119
Texas Education Agency Austin, Texas October 2001 Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00 Graduating Seniors

Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

Texas Education Agency Austin, Texas October 2001

Page 1

Results of CollegeAdmissionsTesting in Texasfor 1999-00GraduatingSeniors

Page 2: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

Page 2

Citation. Texas Education Agency. (2001). Results of college admissions testing in Texas for 1999-00 graduating seniors.(Document No. GE02 601 02). Austin, TX: Author.

Abstract. The participation and performance of Texas’ 1999-00 public school graduates on the College Board’s SAT I:Reasoning Test and the ACT, Inc., ACT Assessment was investigated, along with results from other states and thenation. The highest combined number of Texas public school graduates ever—120,077 or 62.2 percent—took eitherthe SAT I or ACT before or during 1999-00. That is, a greater number of Texas graduates than ever before receivedfeedback, via SAT I or ACT examination results, about their academic readiness for college. Performance as measuredby the combined number of tested graduates achieving either SAT I Total scores of 1110-1600 or ACT Compositescores of 24-36—32,747—was highest in 2000. The percentage of SAT I- and ACT-tested graduates scoring withinthese higher ranges on either test was 27.3 percent in 2000—a 2.3 percentage point gain since 1991. African Americans,Hispanics, Whites, males, and females also showed similar trends in overall improvement since 1991. Most encouragingfor all 2000 Texas graduates is that, while the numbers tested increased since 1999, the state’s mean performance heldsteady at 20.3 on the ACT Composite and at 993 for the SAT Total. The percentage of all Texas SAT takers completing20 or more academic course credits continued to increase, as did the percentage of ACT takers completing an ACT-defined core set of academic courses. Thus, the most general suggestion for strengthening SAT I and ACT testperformance overall, or students’ academic readiness for college, is to focus on improving the academic preparation ofall students while also encouraging testing participation.

Keywords. SAT, ACT, college admission, testing, acknowledgment, accountability, high school, scores, research andevaluation, graduate, TASP.

Material in this publication is not copyrighted and may be reproduced. The Texas Education Agency would appreciatecredit for the material used and a copy of the reprint.

Advanced Placement Program®, AP®, SAT®, and PSAT/NMSQT™ are either registered trademarks or trademarks of theCollege Entrance Examination Board in the U.S.A. and/or other countries. Other product and company names mentionedin this report may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

Additional copies of this document may be purchased using the order form in the back of this publication. Additionalinformation about this report may be obtained by contacting the Texas Education Agency Research and EvaluationDivision at (512) 475-3523. The Research and Evaluation website address is http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/.

For information regarding administration, preparation for, and scoring of the SAT examination, contact the CollegeBoard’s Southwestern Regional Office at (512) 891-8400 or http://www.collegeboard.com/.

For information regarding administration, preparation for, and scoring of the ACT Assessment, contact ACT, Inc.,Southwest Region, at (512) 345-1949 or http://www.act.org/.

Page 3: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

i

Results ofCollege Admissions Testing

in Texas for 1999-00Graduating Seniors

DIVISION OF RESEARCH & EVALUATION

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTING AND RESEARCH

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

1701 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-1494OCTOBER 2001

Page 4: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

ii

Page 5: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

iii

PREFACE

Since 1989, the Texas Education Agency has reported selected results of college admissions tests for graduatingseniors. In this 13th annual report, results are presented from the College Board’s SAT I: Reasoning Test(formerly the Scholastic Aptitude Test, or SAT) and the ACT, Inc., (Enhanced) ACT Assessment for 1999-00graduating seniors.

Since the fall of 1990, SAT/SAT I and ACT score data have been included in Texas’ Academic ExcellenceIndicator System (AEIS). The AEIS was mandated in summer 1990 Texas legislation (Senate Bill 1) toestablish a system of school academic performance accountability to local communities and school boardsand to state education and legislative officials. Use of SAT and ACT data in the accountability system foracknowledging high levels of campus and district participation and performance began in 1993-94 andcontinues to date.

Page 6: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report was prepared by the Texas Education Agency’s Research and Evaluation Division in an effort to promoteunderstanding of the college admissions test scores of graduating seniors and to suggest areas for school-level educa-tional attention.

Appreciation is expressed for the capable work done by ACT, Inc., staff (ACT Assessment data) and EducationalTesting Service staff (College Board’s SAT I: Reasoning Test score data) in providing the necessary college admissionstest score data for this report. In addition, staff members in the Austin, Texas, regional offices of both ACT, Inc., andthe College Board have been extremely helpful over the years in facilitating TEA’s access to these test score data.

This report was produced with assistance from Yvonne Liang of the Performance Reporting Division, Department ofAccountability Reporting and Research.

Commissioner of EducationJim Nelson

Office of Finance and AccountabilityRon McMichael

Deputy Commissioner

Department of Accountability Reporting and ResearchCriss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner

Division of Research and EvaluationKaren Dvorak

Director

Project StaffLinda L. HargroveAssistant Director

Angie H. LiuResearch Specialist

Nelson LoponiSystems Analyst

Editorial AssistanceRichard Kallus

Manager

Vicky A. KillgoreInformation Specialist

Page 7: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

v

Preface ............................................................................................................................................................ iiiAcknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................... ivOverview ......................................................................................................................................................... 12000 SAT I and ACT Results in Review ........................................................................................................ 1Interpretative Issues ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Score Scales ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Access to Testing ............................................................................................................................... 4 Specific Uses of Score Results in Texas ........................................................................................... 4 Data Sources ...................................................................................................................................... 7Texas and National Trends .............................................................................................................................. 7

Table 1. 1999-00 Mean SAT I Scores, Percentages Meeting Score Criterion, and Volume Tested by Gender and Ethnic Group for Texas and the Nation ....................................... 8Table 2. 1999-00 Mean ACT Scores, Percentages Meeting Score Criterion, and Volume Tested by Gender and Ethnic Group for Texas and the Nation ....................................... 9

AEIS Indicators of Texas College Admissions Test Results ........................................................................ 10Table 3. Numbers and Percentages of SAT I- and/or ACT-Tested Graduates and Examinees At or Above Criterion Score on Either Test .............................................................. 10

Figure 1. Trends in Percentages of SAT/SAT I- and/or ACT-Tested Graduates ........................... 11Texas and the Other States ............................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 2. Trends in Percentages of SAT/SAT I and/or ACT Examinees At or Above Criterion Score on Either Test ...................................................................................................... 12

Table 4. 2000 State SAT I and ACT Mean Scores and Percentages of All Graduates Tested ...... 13State and District Percentages of SAT I- and ACT-Tested Students ............................................................ 14Districts and Campuses Within Texas ........................................................................................................... 14District, Campus, and Student Characteristics Data ...................................................................................... 15Considerations for Educational Action in the Schools .................................................................................. 15References ..................................................................................................................................................... 17Appendix A ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table A-1. Mean SAT/SAT I Scores by Ethnicity for Texas and the Nation, 1986-87 Through 1999-00 ............................................................................................................ 23 Table A-2. Mean ACT Scores by Ethnicity for Texas and the Nation, 1986-87 Through 1999-00 ............................................................................................................ 24 Table A-3. SAT/SAT I and ACT Examinee Totals and Ethnic Group Percentages for Texas and the Nation, 1986-87 Through 1999-00 ................................................................. 25Appendix B .................................................................................................................................................... 27Notes About Tables in Appendix B ............................................................................................................... 29

Table B-1. 1999-00 Mean SAT I Scores by District and Campus ................................................. 31Table B-2. 1999-00 Mean ACT Scores by District and Campus ................................................... 53Table B-3. 1999-00 College Admissions Testing AEIS Results by District and Campus ............ 76Table B-4. 1999-00 SAT I and ACT Mean Scores, Percentages Tested, and Combined Percentages Scoring At or Above AEIS Criterion by District Categories ................................... 99

Glossary of District Category Descriptions, 1999-00 ................................................................................. 103

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 8: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

vi

Page 9: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

1

OVERVIEW

2000 SAT I AND ACT RESULTS IN REVIEW

Results for 1999-00 graduating seniors are reported from the College Board’s SAT I: Reasoning Test andfrom the ACT, Inc., ACT Assessment. (The SAT I, a revised but comparable test, replaced the originalScholastic Aptitude Test [SAT] effective March 1994.) In this report, Texas statewide, district, and campusresults are displayed along with aggregate results for the nation and other states. Included also are selectedtest score trends and scores among student groups and among selected groupings of Texas regular and non-taxing public school districts as defined by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The report also containsstate, campus, district, and various district grouping summaries of the combined SAT I and ACT results, asdefined within Texas’ Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) (TEA, in press-b). Report purposes areto promote understanding of the diversity existing among tested graduates and to suggest areas for educationalaction in the schools.

A brief review of 2000 SAT I and ACT results is provided to help reinforce the targeting of improvementefforts in areas under the most direct control of schools—that is, student access to educational opportunitiesand testing participation. Beginning with 1995-96 examinees in previous TEA reports, SAT I results havebeen reported on the recentered score scale. Thus, all prior years’ SAT I score results in this report arereported on the recentered score scale. For interpretation purposes, note that comparisons among aggregatescores from any educational entity, state, or group are best made when testing participation rates, studentcharacteristics, and education and policy contexts are similar. Highlights below focus on differences between/among Texas and the nation and other states, Texas school districts, various types of students, and studentswithin schools.

• In 2000, numbers of both SAT I- and ACT-tested graduates were up from the previous year—up 4.6percent for the SAT I and 4.5 percent for the ACT in Texas and up 3.3 and 4.5 percent, respectively, forthe SAT I and the ACT nationally. In Texas, the highest number of graduates ever took one of the twoexaminations; there were 108,919 SAT I-tested graduates and 68,010 ACT-tested graduates.

• The last decade showed some recovery over the previous decade’s decline in both Texas and nationalSAT/SAT I averages, with relatively more improvement in Texas within the last 14 years. On therecentered scale in 2000, this relatively larger 14-year gain in Texas still held true even though Texas’mean SAT I Total score held steady at 993, 26 points below the nation’s mean of 1019. In 1999, Texas at993 was 23 points below the nation at 1016. It is encouraging that the state’s math performance increasedslightly from 499 to 500, while verbal performance slipped by only one point from 494 to 493, as thenumber tested again increased substantially over the past year.

• Texas versus national ACT score trends mirrored SAT/SAT I score trends over the same period. Evenwith state and national gains in the number of ACT examinees, both the 2000 Texas average ACT Com-posite score at 20.3 and the national average at 21.0 remained unchanged from 1999.

Page 10: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

2

• Although SAT I-tested students in Texas had less academic preparation than students nationally, thegap has been closing—percentages completing 20 or more credits improved from 23 percent in 1991 to49 percent (versus 50% nationally) in 2000. While 2000 SAT I- and ACT-tested African American andHispanic students had fewer academic credits than White and Asian American students, the percentage ofTexas SAT I examinees completing physics and calculus courses who are female continued to improve.Texas SAT I-tested males more often than females reported plans for receiving college advanced place-ment or credit in chemistry, computer science, mathematics, and physics. Altogether, the number ofstudents reporting plans for receiving college advanced placement or credit was up across college coursesin general.

• Even with recent growth in numbers and percentages of test takers who are members of ethnic minoritygroups, Texas minority scores on the ACT, except for the ACT English test, have shown some improve-ment since 1991. Although increasing percentages of African American and Hispanic students completedcore academic credits over the past few years, scores of White and Asian American students still tendedto be higher. Except for Hispanics, Texas SAT/SAT I scores across ethnic groups continued improvingmore than scores nationally from 1987-2000.

• A relatively higher percentage of 2000 Texas public school graduates took the SAT I (50.0%) comparedto the ACT (30.8%); altogether, 62.2 percent (up 0.4 percentage point since 1999) took the SAT I and/orthe ACT, based on unduplicated student counts. These percentages were below the highest 2000 statepercentages reported for SAT I-tested graduates in the District of Columbia (89%) and for ACT-testedgraduates in Mississippi (84%).

• Generally consistent with the separate Texas SAT/SAT I and ACT mean score results, the percentageof African American (7.8%) and Hispanic (11.1%) public school students scoring at or above the SAT/SAT I Total score criterion of 1110 or ACT Composite score criterion of 24 has improved by 1.3 percent-age points for African Americans and by 0.8 percentage point for Hispanics since 1991. The percentagesof Native American (26.7%), White (36.4%), and Asian American (42.9%) students scoring at or abovecriterion were still higher than those of other ethnic groups. The percentage meeting criterion was highestfor Whites in 1999-00 but was highest for African Americans and Hispanics in 1994-95. Relative tocriterion, male students still out-performed female students, but the gap between males and females hasnarrowed since 1991.

• In general, states with lower percentages of SAT I-tested seniors tended to show higher state mean SAT Iscores, and vice versa. A similar relationship between state mean ACT scores and percentages of seniorstested was extremely weak. In Texas, the correlation between district average SAT I or ACT scores anddistrict percentage of seniors tested was weak.

• Considering 2000 SAT I and ACT results together for 1,038 public school districts (including charterschools) with graduating seniors or test score data indicated that the vast majority of districts (893)participated in both SAT I and ACT testing; only 54 districts showed no testing participation. A total of944 districts had five or more graduates taking the SAT I and/or ACT.

• Consistent with previous findings, mean SAT I Total and ACT Composite scores tended to go up as thevalues of certain demographic variables rose, including district wealth, student family income, districtpercentage of non-low-income students, district average teacher salary, and district percentage of teacherswith advanced degrees.

Page 11: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

3

• In general, SAT I and ACT average scores also increased as the values of selected educational variableswent up, including district average percentage of students passing all sections of the 1999-00 TexasAssessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) test, prior-year district percentages meeting the SAT I and/orACT criterion score, student letter-grade average, and number of academic courses completed.

The most general suggestion to the educational community for improving students’ SAT I and ACT scores, oracademic preparation for college, is to focus on improving the academic preparation of all students while alsoencouraging testing participation. That is, schools and communities should work on increasing educationalinputs rather than faulting school or student demographics, which are less subject to the direct influence ofschools.

INTERPRETATIVE ISSUES

For individual students, college admissions tests are measures of developed academic abilities that are bestused in conjunction with other measures, such as high school grade point average and courses taken, topredict academic performance in college. When examined over time, aggregate changes in these test scoresmay indicate how well educational institutions are preparing students for college. However, it is alwaysinappropriate to make decisions about individuals, groups of individuals, or educational institutions based onSAT/SAT I or ACT test scores alone. In addition, institutions with smaller numbers of test takers (e.g., under50 or under 100 tested) tend to show greater mean score changes from one year to the next than those withhigher numbers of test takers (ACT, Inc., Research Division, 1998, 2000; College Entrance ExaminationBoard [CEEB], 2000a). Because not all graduating seniors take the SAT I or ACT, comparisons amongeducational entities are best made when the percentages of students tested, student characteristics, and educa-tion and policy contexts are similar (also see CEEB, 1988, and ACT, 2000e). Ultimately, the critical outcomeis increasing student academic preparedness as reflected by increased scores without reducing students’participation in (percentages tested), or access to, the testing.

SCORE SCALES

Verbal and Mathematics scores from the SAT I range from 200 to 800 and sum to the SAT I Total scoreranging from 400 to 1600. All previous years’ SAT/SAT I and 1999-00 SAT I scores in this report arereported on the recentered scale. However, SAT/SAT I results prior to 1995-96 included in previous TEAreports (e.g., TEA, 1997d) are reported on the original scale. Recentering reset the average or midpoint of thescore distributions at approximately 500 on both SAT I Verbal and Mathematics scales. Thus, all current andprior years’ SAT/SAT I scores in this report, because they have been placed on the recentered scale, cannotbe directly compared to scores in reports of results prior to 1995-96, which are on the original scale.Equivalence tables are available from the College Board for converting both individual and average scoresfrom the original to recentered scale, and vice versa.

Since October 1989, the ACT Assessment has consisted of English, Mathematics, Reading, and ScienceReasoning test scores with a standard score range of 1 to 36; the Composite is the average of these fourscores. Note that ACT scores beginning in 1989-90 and ACT scores reported before 1989-90 are notcomparable. Equivalence tables are available from ACT for making score conversions from the original tothe Enhanced ACT scale, and vice versa.

Page 12: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

4

º

ACCESS TO TESTING

Fees and fee waivers. Effective fall 1999 through summer 2000, basic test fees were $23.50 for the SAT I(CEEB, SAT Program, 1999) and $22.00 for the ACT (ACT, 1999a), which included the costs of test regis-tration and sending score reports to various institutions. Effective in fall 2000, the SAT I basic test feeincreased to $24.00 (CEEB, SAT Program, 2000), and the ACT fee rose to $23.00 (ACT, 2000a). Beginningin fall 2001, the basic SAT I test fee will increase to $25.00 (CEEB, SAT Program, 2001b), while the ACTfee will rise to $24.00 (ACT, 2001d). For both the SAT I and the ACT, there is no additional charge for scorereports sent to up to four colleges and scholarship programs.

Test fee waivers from the College Board and ACT for the SAT I and ACT are available to junior and seniorhigh school students based on economic need. Criteria for determining a student’s eligibility include: familyincome; whether the student’s family receives public assistance; whether the student lives in a foster home;and whether the student participates in a program for the economically disadvantaged, such as UpwardBound. For the SAT I, a student may receive a maximum of two fee waivers; one may be used in the junioryear, the other in the senior year. For the ACT, a student may receive only one fee waiver, which may be usedin either the junior or senior year, but only one indicator of economic need has to be met for a student toqualify. However, in many Texas schools and districts, availability of local funding and local criteria deter-mine the extent to which testing fees for additional students and tests may be covered.

Services for students with disabilities. Both the College Board and ACT, Inc., provide special services forstudents with disabilities (ACT, 2001b; CEEB, SAT Program, 2001a). To qualify, a student must have adisability that necessitates testing accommodations, as supported by documentation on file at school(e.g., an individual education plan, a 504 Plan, or a professional evaluation). The student also must be cur-rently receiving special accommodations for school-based tests; however, an exception may be allowed basedon additional documentation provided by an appropriate school staff member or a qualified professional.Texas State Board of Education rules relating to testing accommodations for school-based tests are specifiedin 19 Texas Administrative Code [TAC] §101.3 (1999b).

Various accommodations are available depending on the nature of the disability—for example, a magnifyingdevice, typewriter or computer, Braille device, sign language for verbal instructions, and extra testing time.Depending on the type and extent needed, special testing accommodations are provided through the SATProgram at national test centers or students’ schools (or other ETS-approved sites) (CEEB, SAT Program,2001a). Special testing accommodations for standard or extended time on ACT Assessments can be arrangedat national test centers for certain test dates throughout the year or at students’ schools (ACT, 2001b). Studentscore reports are marked as “Nonstandard Administration” (for extended time only) for the SAT I or as“Special” for the ACT. Neither score report indicates the reason for special testing accommodations.

SPECIFIC USES OF SCORE RESULTS IN TEXAS

Results from SAT/SAT I and ACT college admissions tests are used for a variety of specific purposes inTexas. Some of these uses are specified in Texas statute, while other uses are based on state-level rule orpolicy or the varying policies of the state’s colleges and universities.

College admission requirements and required notifications. Historically, each institution of higher education inTexas has established its own criteria for admissions, as is the case in many states. Consistent with therecommendations of the College Board (CEEB, 1988), most senior, or four-year, colleges and universitieshave taken into consideration some combination of a student’s college admission test scores (SAT I and/orACT) and school achievement record (e.g., courses taken, grade point average, class rank, etc.) (CEEB and

Page 13: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

5

ETS, 1997a). The score standards required for the SAT I and ACT vary significantly, based on the selectivityof the institution, but often are tied inversely to the student’s class rank in high school—that is, the higher theclass rank, the lower the test score required, and vice versa. Other institutions, however, including manyjunior and community colleges, maintain open admission policies under which any person with a high schooldiploma or its equivalent may be accepted.

Beginning with fall 1998 first-time freshman admissions, Texas public higher education institutions wererequired to admit applicants who graduated (within one of the two preceding school years) with a grade pointaverage in the top 10 percent of their class (Texas Education Code [TEC] §§51.801-51.809, 1997). Aftergranting such general admission, Texas higher education institutions may determine whether or not admittedstudents need additional preparation for college-level work or need to participate in a retention program. TheTexas legislation also allows institutions to determine locally whether or not additional automatic admissionswill be adopted—that is, students graduating with grade point averages in the top 25 percent of their classes.Otherwise, for other applicants, institutions shall consider all, any, or a combination of socioeconomicindicators and other factors (e.g., academic record, performance on standardized tests, etc.) specified in Texasstatute in making admission decisions, except for those institutions with open enrollment policies. TexasHigher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) rule (19 TAC §5.9, 2000) further specifies timelines andcriteria for schools and districts to use in determining class rank and when and how higher education institu-tions may limit statutory automatic admissions. Thus, despite Texas legislation, admission policies can stillvary substantially among Texas public and any other higher education institutions.

More recently, the 76th Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 510 (adding TEC §28.026, 1999), whichmandates notification responsibilities for school districts to help ensure that all students are aware of the top10 percent automatic college admission provisions (TEC §51.803, 1999). For example, high schools in eachdistrict are required to display the specifications of TEC §51.803 (1999) in all principals’ and counselors’offices and in each administration building. In addition, districts are responsible for providing detailedexplanations of this statute to all high school counselors and class advisors. Counselors and advisors, in turn,are responsible for explaining the statute’s substance to eligible students. Ultimately, the district must alsoprovide (at the start of the class’s senior year) each eligible senior student with written notice of his or hereligibility, along with a written explanation of the statute’s substance.

Exemption from other testing. In response to public concerns that a growing number of high school graduateslacked the academic skills needed to perform effectively in college, the Texas Legislature in 1987 establisheda system of testing and remediation called the Texas Academic Skills Program (TASP) (TEC §51.306, 1988).Under the program, each student (with certain exceptions) who enters a public institution of higher educationmust take a diagnostic test of basic reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The TASP Test cannot be usedas a condition of admission to the institution, but must be taken before the student completes nine semestercredit hours of coursework. Effective in fall 1998, students must be tested before enrolling in college-levelcourses, except under certain conditions (TEC §51.306, 1997). Colleges and universities are then responsiblefor providing remediation to students who fail any part of the test.

In 1993, the legislature created special exemptions from the TASP Test based on SAT, ACT, and exit-levelTexas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) scores (TEC §51.306, 1994). The 74th Legislature extendedthe TASP exemptions in 1995 by requiring the THECB to lower the target scores used to determine eligibilityfor the exemptions. Effective in fall 1997, to qualify for an exemption based on the ACT, a student mustreceive an ACT Composite score of 23 or higher, with ACT English and Mathematics scores of 19 or higher.For SAT I tests taken in April 1995 or after (recentered score scale), a student must receive an SAT I Totalscore (Verbal + Mathematics) of 1070 or higher, with scores on Verbal and Mathematics sections of 500 orhigher. For SAT/SAT I tests taken before April 1995 (original score scale), the SAT/SAT I Total score must

Page 14: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

6

be 970 or higher, with a Verbal score of 420 or higher and a Mathematics score of 470 or higher. Includingthese exemptions, THECB guidelines for TASP exemptions based on the exit-level TAAS are also specifiedin 19 TAC §5.314 (1999a). Further exemptions from the TASP test were added by the 77th Legislature inHouse Bill 2109 for graduates of Texas public high schools or accredited private high schools with gradepoint averages of 3.5 or higher on a 4.0 or equivalent scale. In addition, these graduates must have completedthe Texas public high school Recommended curriculum or similar curriculum program if graduating fromhigh schools out of state.

Campus- and district-level performance accountability reporting. In 1989, the Texas Legislature created theAcademic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) and directed the State Board of Education (SBOE) to adoptand report a set of campus- and district-level indicators of student performance that included, among others,performance on the SAT and ACT (TEC §21.7531, 1990). The SAT/ACT indicator adopted by the board inNovember 1990 encompasses three measures for reporting test results (SBOE, 1990). The first was thepercentage of graduates who scored at or above the criterion score on either test (24 on the ACT Composite oran SAT I Total score of 1000 on the original scale). Effective with the 1996-97 AEIS report, a redefinedmeasure beginning with the reporting of 1995-96 SAT I and ACT scores was approved by the commissionerof education—that is, the percentage of examinees (rather than graduates) scoring at or above the criterion ofa 24 on the ACT Composite or an SAT I Total score of 1110 on the recentered scale (TEA, 1997c, 2001). Thesecond measure is a participation rate, or the percentage of graduates who took either college admissions test.The third is the average score for each test. For purposes of year-to-year comparisons, this information isreported for the current (most recent year with available data) and previous year when comparable data areavailable.

Since 1994, when the AEIS indicators were first grouped into different categories for accountability purposes,the SAT/ACT indicator has been reported as an “additional” indicator (TEA, 1994b, 2001). Unlike “base”indicators, additional indicators are not used to determine campus or district accountability ratings. They are,however, used to acknowledge high levels of campus or district performance. Any district rated AcademicallyAcceptable or higher and any campus rated Acceptable or higher is eligible for acknowledgment on additionalindicators. Effective with 1996-97 accountability system acknowledgment ratings, only one level of acknowl-edgment, Acknowledged, along with new standards, began to be used (TEA, 1997c). For Acknowledgedcampus or district performance, 70 percent or more of the graduates must take either the ACT or SAT/SAT I,and 50 percent or more of examinees must score at or above the criterion score for either test. Standards mustbe met for each student group (African American, Hispanic, and White) at a campus or district, as well as forall students combined. Previously, campus and district performance was acknowledged at two separateExemplary and Recognized levels; details on standards for these previous two levels can be found in TEAaccountability manuals published before 1997. Further detail on current college admissions indicator defini-tions and acknowledgment standards can be found in TEA’s current accountability manual (TEA, 2001).

School- and district-level awards and recognition. From 1989-90 through 1994-95 and 1997-98 through 1998-99, state appropriations have been made available for monetary awards to campuses with students demonstrat-ing substantial gain in academic performance on indicators such as those in the AEIS. The first set of campusmonetary awards, made in fall 1990 by the Governor’s Educational Excellence Awards Committee (TEC§§34.001-34.009, 1990), was based on SAT and ACT performance indicators, among others, for highschools. (Of course, indicators for non-secondary schools excluded SAT and ACT measures.) Afterwards, theprogram was transferred to TEA as the Texas Successful Schools Award System, or TSSAS (TEC §§34.001-34.009, 1992). During the second year of TSSAS (1992-93), SAT and ACT indicators were once againconsidered along with other AEIS indicators for monetary awards for high school campus performance gain.During the third year of TSSAS (1993-94), campuses received non-monetary TSSAS acknowledgment formeeting AEIS Exemplary and Recognized standards for SAT and ACT indicator performance, which was in

Page 15: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

7

TEXAS AND NATIONAL TRENDS

alignment with additional acknowledgment status given this indicator under the AEIS. Since then, neithermonetary nor non-monetary awards have been made to campuses for SAT and ACT performance underTSSAS. Though TSSAS was retained in statute for the fiscal year (FY) 1996 through FY 1997 biennium(TEC §§39.091-39.096, 1996), no appropriations were made to fund the awards. Recent legislation (TEC§§39.091-39.096, 1997, 1999) continued TSSAS through the previous and current bienniums and restoredfunding for the awards (Riders 54, 47, and 45 of the Appropriations Act, Article III—Education; 75th, 76th,and 77th Legislatures, respectively).

DATA SOURCES

Some data in this report originate from summary reports of state and national test score profiles of public andnon-public high school graduates released annually by the College Board (CEEB, 1999a, 1999b, 2000a,2000b, 2000c, 2000d; CEEB, Southwestern Regional Office, 2000) and by ACT, Inc. (ACT, 1999b, 1999c,2000a, 2000b, 2000c; ACT, Southwest Region, 1999, 2000) in late summer. Texas’ public school student testscore data were provided directly to TEA by the two testing programs. Additional TEA district and campuscharacteristics data were examined in conjunction with the most recent scores from 1999-00 seniors (throughMarch 2000 for the SAT I).

The Texas mean SAT I Total score (sum of Mathematics and Verbal scores) on the recentered scale remainedstable at 993 from 1999 to 2000, while the national mean score went from 1016 to 1019, increasing thedifference between Texas and the nation from 23 to 26 points. During the past 30 years, the maximum differ-ence of 31 points below the national mean (on the original scale) occurred in 1984 and in 1987. Over the sameperiod, the mean ACT Composite score difference between Texas (20.3 in 2000) and the nation (21.0 in2000) was 0.7 point in 2000—only 0.1 point greater than the smallest difference ever in 1993 and 1994 of 0.6point. One reason often given for score differences between Texas and the nation concerns the relativelyhigher proportions of traditionally low-scoring, academically under-prepared examinees in Texas. Repeatedly,findings reported by the two testing programs and researchers have shown the tendency for test scores toincrease as the amount of academic coursework goes up.

In general, Texas SAT/SAT I-tested students have completed fewer academic courses than students nationally(49% versus 50%, respectively, at the 20+ courses level in 2000), but the difference in 2000 was the smallestof the decade. While even at comparable levels of academic preparation, students nationally outscored Texasstudents, the gap was smallest at the highest level of preparation (at the 20+ courses level) and was greatest atthe lowest level of preparation (under the 15 courses level). Despite the fact that the numbers of ACT- andSAT/SAT I-tested students who are Hispanic and African American have risen at greater rates in Texas thanin the nation, ACT Composite scores and almost all SAT/SAT I scores across Texas student ethnic groupsshowed greater improvement overall than scores nationally since 1987. Texas minority student scores on theACT (except for the ACT English test) have continued improving since 1991, and increasing percentages ofminority students have completed core academic coursework, as defined by ACT. Typically, Texas SAT/SATI and ACT score results have shown African American and Hispanic students completing relatively feweracademic courses when compared to White and Asian American students—one possible reason for meanscore discrepancies among ethnic groups.

Page 16: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

8

loohcScilbuPsaxeT

setaudarG

saxeTllA

setaudarG

setatSdetinUllA

setaudarG

scitsitatS labreV htaM latoT labreV htaM latoT labreV htaM latoT

naeMITASspuorGllA 194 994 099 394 005 399 505 415 9101

selameF 984 484 379 194 584 679 405 894 2001

selaM 394 715 0101 694 815 4101 705 335 0401

naciremAnacirfA 624 324 948 724 324 058 434 624 068

rednalsIcificaP/naisA 305 365 6601 405 465 8601 994 565 4601

naciremAnacixeM 744 354 009 054 254 509 354 064 319

naciremAevitaN 394 294 589 294 194 389 284 184 369

cinapsiHrehtO/naciRotreuP 744 054 798 944 154 009 064 364 329

etihW 125 725 8401 325 825 1501 825 035 8501

noiretirCgniteeM055=>% %6.92 %8.23 %7.03 %3.33 %4.53 %9.83

0111=>% %0.82

emuloVdetseT# 615,69 919,801 872,062,1

detseT% %0.05 %0.25 %0.44

College Board reports indicate that the generally higher scores achieved by men relative to women on theSAT/SAT I may relate to the rigor of academic courses they take. Although the proportion of SAT examineescompleting physics and calculus who are female has equaled or exceeded examinees who are male since1998, females remain underrepresented among all examinees completing such courses when compared withtheir percentage in the test-taking population. In 2000, mean Texas ACT Composite scores were 20.4 forwomen and 20.3 for men. Thus, the higher scores achieved by women on the ACT English and Reading testsmore than offset the higher scores obtained by men on the ACT Mathematics and Science Reasoning tests.While mean Texas ACT Composite scores have been virtually the same for males and females since 1991,the Mathematics, English, Reading, and Science Reasoning score differences deserve continued scrutiny. Forfurther detail on some of the 1999-00 Texas versus national SAT I results discussed above, see Table 1; forsimilar 1999-00 ACT results, see Table 2. For specific SAT/SAT I and ACT mean score trends by ethnicity,see Tables A-1 and A-2 in Appendix A; for SAT/SAT I and ACT trends in examinee numbers and percent-ages by ethnicity, see Table A-3.

Data Sources: CEEB; TEA, Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS), actual public school graduate numbers (excludingthose in special education); CEEB (2000a) report of Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE) projections, total graduatenumbers; TEA, Research and Evaluation Division analysis of CEEB data of Texas public school graduates.

*Criterion score percentages based on total test takers rather than on all non-special education graduates, effective with 1995-96 examinees inprevious TEA reports.

Table 11999-00 Mean SAT I Scores, Percentages Meeting Score Criterion,* andVolume Tested by Gender and Ethnic Group for Texas and the Nation

Page 17: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

9

set

audar

GloohcS

cilbuP

saxeT

set

audar

GsaxeTll

Aset

audar

Gset

atS

deti

nUll

A

scit

sitat

Shsil

gnE

hta

Mgni

daeR

ecnei

cS

gni

nosaeR

etisop

moC

hsil

gnE

hta

Mgni

daeR

ecnei

cS

gni

nosaeR

etisop

moC

hsil

gnE

hta

Mgni

daeR

ecnei

cS

gni

nosaeR

etisop

moC

nae

MTCA

sp

uor

Gll

A5.

91

2.0

25.

02

3.0

23.

02

7.9

12.

02

6.0

23.

02

3.0

25.

02

7.0

24.

12

0.1

20.

12

sel

am

eF

0.0

28.

91

8.0

20.

02

3.0

22.

02

9.9

19.

02

1.0

24.

02

9.0

22.

02

5.1

26.

02

9.0

2

sel

aM

8.8

17.

02

1.0

27.

02

2.0

29.

81

7.0

22.

02

7.0

23.

02

0.0

24.

12

2.1

26.

12

2.1

2

nacir

em

An

acirfA

4.6

13.

71

1.7

15.

71

2.7

14.

61

3.7

11.

71

4.7

12.

71

4.6

18.

61

0.7

13.

71

0.7

1

re

dn

alsIcific

aP/

nais

A3.

02

6.3

22.

12

5.1

28.

12

3.0

25.

32

3.1

25.

12

8.1

25.

02

2.3

23.

12

5.1

27.

12

nacir

em

An

acixe

M0.

71

2.8

10.

81

4.8

10.

81

1.7

13.

81

1.8

15.

81

1.8

16.

71

7.8

18.

81

9.8

16.

81

nacir

em

Aevit

aN

8.8

18.

91

8.0

25.

02

1.0

28.

81

7.9

18.

02

5.0

21.

02

0.8

15.

81

4.9

14.

91

0.9

1

cin

apsi

Hr

eht

O8.

71

1.9

19.

81

9.8

18.

81

1.8

11.

91

0.9

10.

91

9.8

17.

81

5.9

19.

91

5.9

15.

91

etih

W1.

12

4.1

21.

22

5.1

27.

12

2.1

24.

12

2.2

25.

12

7.1

23.

12

3.1

22.

22

7.1

28.

12

noir

etirC

gnit

ee

M

42

=>

%%

5.3

2%

4.4

2%

4.0

3%

2.2

2%

0.4

2%

5.4

2%

9.4

2%

2.1

3%

6.2

2%

8.4

2%

6.9

2%

2.9

2%

6.5

3%

3.8

2%

8.9

2

emul

oV

dets

eT

#1

94,

95

01

0,8

68

31,

56

0,1

dets

eT

%%

8.0

3%

0.2

3%

0.8

3

TA

BL

E 2

1999

-00

Mea

n A

CT

Sco

res,

Per

cen

tag

es M

eeti

ng

Sco

re C

rite

rio

n,*

an

d V

olu

me

Tes

ted

by

Gen

der

an

d E

thn

ic G

rou

p f

or

Tex

as a

nd

th

e N

atio

n

Da

ta S

ou

rce

s:

AC

T P

rogr

am; T

EA

, PE

IMS

, act

ual p

ublic

sch

ool g

radu

ate

num

bers

(ex

clud

ing

thos

e in

spe

cial

edu

catio

n); A

CT

(20

00a)

rep

ort o

f WIC

HE

pro

ject

ions

of 2

000

grad

uatin

g se

nior

enro

llmen

ts; T

EA

, Res

earc

h an

d E

valu

atio

n D

ivis

ion,

ana

lysi

s of

AC

T d

ata

of T

exas

pub

lic h

igh

scho

ol g

radu

ates

.

*Crit

erio

n sc

ore

perc

enta

ges

base

d on

tota

l tes

t tak

ers

rath

er th

an o

n al

l non

-spe

cial

edu

catio

n gr

adua

tes,

effe

ctiv

e w

ith 1

995-

96 e

xam

inee

s in

pre

viou

s T

EA

rep

orts

.

Page 18: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

10

AEIS INDICATORS OF TEXAS

COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TEST RESULTS

As mentioned previously, Texas’ Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) includes measures ofcombined but unduplicated percentages of graduating seniors tested and percentages of examinees meetinga specific score criterion on either the SAT I (SAT I Total: at or above 1110) or the ACT (ACT Composite:at or above 24). In other words, even if a student took both tests, each individual’s participation or criterionscore achievement is counted only once in calculating these percentages. Before 1990-91, TEA did notreceive the type of data from the two testing programs that allowed calculation of these values.

Table 3 displays the statewide percentages of SAT I- and/or ACT-tested 1999-00 public school seniors andthe percentages of examinees meeting the criterion score on either test. (Note that Table 1 on page 8 containsthese percentages for the SAT I; Table 2 on page 9, for the ACT.) A greater percentage of females thanmales participated in SAT I and/or ACT testing, and the female participation rate grew more from 1990-91to 1994-95 and subsequently declined less rapidly than the rate for males over the same time periods(see Figure 1). In contrast, a higher percentage of males than females met the criterion for either test from1991 through 2000, but this difference between males and females has decreased over the last 10 years (seeFigure 2 on page 12). This was consistent generally with Texas and national results for the SAT I and ACTseparately. Gaps among ethnic groups were apparent from inspection of the differences in percentagesmeeting or exceeding criterion scores and also were consistent with separate SAT I and ACT results.

Table 3Numbers* and Percentages* of SAT I- and/or ACT-Tested Graduates and Examinees At or

Above Criterion** Score on Either Test (1999-00 Texas Public School Graduates)

Data Sources: TEA, PEIMS, actual public school graduate numbers (excluding those in special education); TEA, Research andEvaluation Division, analysis of CEEB and ACT program data of Texas public high school graduates with percentages fromanalyses also reported in AEIS (TEA, in press-a).

*Group numbers may not add to total for all groups because ethnic group for some students was not included or was not known.

**The AEIS college admissions test criterion scores are an SAT I Total = 1110 and/or an ACT Composite = 24; prior to class of1995-96 scores, the SAT/SAT I Total criterion was 1000. Criterion score percentages are based on total examinees taking one orboth tests rather than on all non-special education graduates, effective with 1995-96 examinees in previous TEA reports.

puorG

*rebmuN

detseT

fo*rebmuN

setaudarG

*tnecreP

detseT

tA*rebmuN

evobAro

**noiretirC

tA*tnecreP

evobAro

**noiretirC

spuorGllA 770,021 349,291 2.26 747,23 3.72

selameF 849,56 134,201 4.46 334,61 9.42selaM 601,45 215,09 8.95 013,61 1.03

naciremAnacirfA 757,31 879,32 4.75 770,1 8.7rednalsIcificaP/naisA 956,5 907,6 3.48 924,2 9.24

cinapsiH 099,72 867,16 3.54 501,3 1.11naciremAevitaN 763 364 3.97 89 7.62

etihW 209,96 520,001 9.96 324,52 4.63

Page 19: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

11

TEXAS AND THE OTHER STATES

Table 4 on page 13 presents results of the SAT I testing program for the 50 states and the District of Colum-bia (DC) for 1999-00 (also see CEEB, 2000a, for mean Verbal and Mathematics scores). Average scores onthe Verbal portion of the test ranged from 484 to 589, and on the Mathematics portion from 482 to 609. Thepercentages of students taking the test ranged from 4 percent in Mississippi, North Dakota, and South Dakotato 89 percent in the District of Colombia. These figures were calculated by the College Board based onestimates of the total number of public and non-public school graduates in each state and in the nation. Thetotal number of 1999-00 Texas graduates who took the test was 108,919; of these, 96,516 were public schoolgraduates—an increase of more than 4,300 tested from the previous year, but a tenth of a percentage pointdecline in the percentage of graduates tested (see Table 1 on page 8).

Table 4 also presents ACT results by state for 1999-00 (also see ACT, 2000b). Mean ACT composite scoresranged from 17.8 in DC to 22.7 in Oregon, while percentages of seniors tested ranged from 3 percent inDelaware to 84 percent in Mississippi. Often, states with low percentages of ACT takers had high percentagesof SAT I takers, and vice versa. Texas had 68,010 ACT-tested graduates; of these, 59,491 were public schoolgraduates—an increase of nearly 4,300 tested from the previous year, along with 0.8 percentage point in-crease in the percentage of graduates tested.

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00

Data Sources: TEA, PEIMS, actual public school graduate numbers; TEA, Research and Evaluation Division, analysis of CEEB and ACT programdata of Texas public high school graduates with percentages from analyses also reported in AEIS (TEA, 1993, 1994a, 1995, 1996, 1997a, 1998a,1999, 2000, in press-a).

Figure 1Trends in Percentages of SAT/SAT I- and/or ACT-Tested Graduates

(1990-91 Through 1999-00 Texas Public School Graduates)

Graduation Year

Percent

69.4

64.1

61.7

58.9

55.9

44.6

All Students

Whites

Females

Males

Hispanics

AfricanAmericans

64.3

62.4

60.3

53.3

47.1

69.3

66.0

63.6

61.1

49.2

56.3

69.4

66.2

64.2

62.0

58.8

49.5

71.0

66.9

64.8

62.6

59.7

49.0

71.2

67.1

64.8

62.3

59.1

49.3

71.1

66.9

64.7

62.4

60.1

48.8

70.6

66.0

63.6

61.0

58.2

46.9

44.5

58.6

59.0

61.8

64.3

68.7 68.969.9

64.4

62.2

59.8

57.4

45.3

Page 20: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00

Figure 2Trends in Percentages of SAT/SAT I and/or ACT Examinees At or Above Criterion* Score

on Either Test (Examinees Indicating Texas Public School Graduation 1990-91 Through 1999-00)

Graduation Year

Data Sources: TEA, Research and Evaluation Division, analysis of CEEB and ACT program data of examinees indicating graduation from aTexas public high school during the years above. Criterion score percentages, previously based on all non-special education graduates in AEIS(TEA, 1993, 1994a, 1995, 1996), were recalculated based on total examinees taking one or both tests to be consistent with the new definition forreporting 1995-96 college admissions data effective since the 1997 AEIS (TEA, 1997b, in press-b).

*Effective beginning with 1995-96 scores, the AEIS college admissions test criterion scores are an SAT I Total = 1110 and/or an ACTComposite = 24; in prior years, the criterion for the SAT/SAT I Total score = 1000, while the ACT Composite criterion has remained the same.

Percent

All Students

Whites

Males

Females

AfricanAmericans

Hispanics

32.2

28.7

25.0

10.3

6.5

21.8

32.6

28.9

25.3

22.3

10.7

6.3

34.7

30.3

26.8

23.7

10.9

7.3

34.9

29.8

26.9

24.3

11.0

7.8

35.8

30.6

27.7

25.3

11.6

8.4

34.6

29.0

26.3

24.1

10.1

6.8

34.6

29.5

26.6

24.2

10.9

7.1

35.6

30.3

27.2

24.6

10.8

7.6 7.8

11.0

24.5

27.2

30.4

35.636.4

30.1

11.1

27.3

24.9

7.8

Page 21: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

13

ITAS TCA

etatSlabreV

naeM

htaM

naeM

latoT

naeM

tnecreP

detseT

etisopmoC

naeM

tnecreP

detseT

amabalA 955 555 4111 9 2.02 86aksalA 915 515 4301 05 3.12 63anozirA 125 325 4401 43 5.12 72

sasnakrA 365 455 7111 6 3.02 37ainrofilaC 794 815 5101 94 4.12 21odaroloC 435 735 1701 23 5.12 46

tucitcennoC 805 905 7101 18 3.12 4erawaleD 205 694 899 66 6.02 3

aibmuloCfotcirtsiD 494 684 089 98 8.71 81adirolF 894 005 899 55 6.02 04aigroeG 884 684 479 46 9.91 81iiawaH 884 915 7001 35 6.12 02

ohadI 045 145 1801 61 4.12 16sionillI 865 685 4511 21 5.12 27anaidnI 894 105 999 06 4.12 02

awoI 985 006 9811 5 0.22 96sasnaK 475 085 4511 9 6.12 77

ykcutneK 845 055 8901 21 1.02 17anaisiuoL 265 855 0211 8 6.91 08

eniaM 405 005 4001 86 9.12 5dnalyraM 705 905 6101 56 7.02 01

sttesuhcassaM 115 315 4201 87 9.12 7nagihciM 755 965 6211 11 3.12 17

atosenniM 185 495 5711 9 0.22 66ippississiM 265 945 1111 4 7.81 48

iruossiM 275 775 9411 8 6.12 96anatnoM 345 645 9801 32 8.12 85aksarbeN 065 175 1311 9 7.12 47

adaveN 015 715 7201 43 5.12 04erihspmaHweN 025 915 9301 27 5.22 6

yesreJweN 894 315 1101 18 7.02 4ocixeMweN 945 345 2901 21 1.02 66

kroYweN 494 605 0001 77 2.22 41aniloraChtroN 294 694 889 46 5.91 31

atokaDhtroN 885 906 7911 4 4.12 08oihO 335 935 2701 62 4.12 16

amohalkO 365 065 3211 8 8.02 17nogerO 725 725 4501 45 7.22 21

ainavlysnneP 894 794 599 07 4.12 8dnalsIedohR 505 005 5001 17 1.12 4

aniloraChtuoS 484 284 669 95 3.91 32atokaDhtuoS 785 885 5711 4 5.12 27

eessenneT 365 355 6111 31 0.02 87saxeT 394 005 399 25 3.02 23

hatU 075 965 9311 5 5.12 96tnomreV 315 805 1201 07 2.22 9

ainigriV 905 005 9001 76 5.02 9notgnihsaW 625 825 4501 25 4.22 81

ainigriVtseW 625 115 7301 91 2.02 06nisnocsiW 485 795 1811 7 2.22 96

gnimoyW 545 545 0901 21 6.12 86lanoitaN 505 415 9101 44 0.12 83

Data Sources: CEEB (2000a) for mean SAT I Verbal and Math scores, used to compute SAT I Total scores, and for percentages of SAT I-testedgraduates; ACT (2000a) for mean ACT Composite scores and percentages of ACT-tested graduates.

Note: Above data include both public and private school graduates. Percentages of SAT I-tested and ACT-tested graduates are based on projected2000 graduating senior enrollments developed by WICHE.

Table 42000 State SAT I and ACT Mean Scores and Percentages of All Graduates* Tested

Page 22: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

14

STATE AND DISTRICT PERCENTAGES OF

SAT I- AND ACT-TESTED STUDENTS

DISTRICTS AND CAMPUSES WITHIN TEXAS

As in previous years, results in Table 4 on page 13 indicate that higher 2000 mean SAT I scores by state(including DC) were associated with lower percentages of graduating seniors taking the test. The samerelationship was still evident but much weaker between ACT mean Composite scores and percentages testedacross states. Reasons often given for this relationship, especially for the SAT I, are that primarily only themost academically able in the state take the test and/or that the majority of the state’s colleges and universi-ties historically prefer or require another admissions examination such as the ACT. In contrast, relatively lowmean SAT I scores and high percentages tested in states such as Texas appear to occur because more studentsof varying academic backgrounds are tested, which lowers averages overall. Regardless of the extent of thisrelationship, the percentage of graduates tested is a critical indicator of access to SAT I or ACT testing andthe availability of external feedback, via test results, about students’ academic readiness for college.

Most importantly, mean score differences among states, districts, and other student groupings also occuralong with differences on other educational and demographic factors in addition to differences in the percent-ages of students tested. This means that considering only the simple relationship between mean scores andthe percentages tested in interpreting and understanding mean score differences is most often insufficient.Thus, mean score comparisons are likely to be most appropriate when the percentages tested, demographics,and education and policy contexts are most similar. For district mean data within Texas, negligible correla-tion existed between SAT I, as well as ACT, mean scores and percentages tested. Statewide, however,districts also varied greatly (and more so than states) in patterns of SAT I versus ACT testing participation,percentages tested, and other educational and demographic factors.

Of the 1,038 public school districts (including 1,598 campuses) with either graduating seniors or test scoredata in 1999-00, 893 districts and 1,136 campuses (including charter schools) had both SAT I and ACT testtakers. There were 64 districts and 78 campuses with ACT-tested students only, 27 districts and 60 campuseswith SAT I-tested students only, and 54 districts and 324 campuses showing neither SAT I nor ACT partici-pation. Of the 984 districts and 1,274 campuses with SAT I and/or ACT participation, 347 districts and 414campuses showed fewer than five graduates meeting the SAT I and/or ACT criterion score, 40 districts and75 campuses had fewer than five graduates taking either test, and 8 districts and 17 campuses had no gradu-ates according to TEA records. SAT I results for each district and campus are shown in Table B-1 in Appen-dix B; ACT results are shown in Table B-2; combined ACT and SAT I results as defined under AEIS are inTable B-3.

Page 23: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

15

DISTRICT, CAMPUS, AND STUDENT

CHARACTERISTICS DATA

CONSIDERATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL

ACTION IN THE SCHOOLS

Results described in the paragraph below are based on summaries of scores grouped by the 25 groupings ofdistricts with similar characteristics shown in Table B-4 in Appendix B. The grouping characteristics aredefined in the Glossary beginning on page 103. Other results described in the paragraph below but not shownin the table concern summaries of scores grouped by student-level characteristics, which were obtained forthe SAT I from the Student Descriptive Questionnaire (SDQ) and for the ACT from the Student ProfileSection and High School Course/Grade Information portions of the Student Information booklet.

Many of the separate mean SAT I Total and ACT Composite score results and the 2000 combined SAT I and/or ACT examinee percentages meeting the score criterion (per AEIS) were consistent with most CollegeBoard and ACT published findings. For instance, increasing district wealth, increasing student family income,or decreasing percentages of low-income students within districts corresponded with rising mean scores fordata from the 1988 through 2000 school years. Other positive relationships and similarities existed betweenthe college admissions score data and the: (a) district average percentage of students passing all sections ofthe 1999-00 TAAS test; (b) district percentages tested and percentages meeting the criterion on prior yearSAT I and/or ACT scores; (c) district average teacher salaries; (d) district average percentage of teachers withadvanced degrees; (e) student self-reported letter-grade average; and (f) student self-reported number ofacademic courses completed. That is, mean scores went up as the values of each of these variables rose.Additional specific score associations have been described in earlier agency publications (see, e.g., TEA,1998b).

A distinction should be made between demographic and educational variables related to test scores. Thisdistinction is important because the education community should focus on the attributes that it can mostdirectly influence. In other words, variables such as family income or parent level of education are not underthe public school’s practical domain of control. Indeed, recent Texas legislation appears to be recognizing theimportance of educational variables in providing support for financially needy college-going students. Forexample, the 76th Texas Legislature created two new grant programs designed to cover Texas college tuitionand required fees, effective in fall 1999. More specifically, the two grant programs target financially needyTexas resident students who have completed the Recommended High School diploma program, or theequivalent, to the extent the applicable courses were offered in their schools. The THECB administers theToward Excellence, Access, and Success (TEXAS) and Teach for Texas grant programs (TEC §§56.301-56.310, 1999). Both the THECB and Texas school districts have substantial notification responsibilitiesconcerning these grants. Most recently, the 77th Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 1596 (which addedTEC §§56.351-56.357) to establish the TEXAS II grant program, which will target financially needy studentswho are attending two-year Texas public higher education institutions, effective in fall 2001.

Page 24: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

16

In adhering to the importance of educational variables mentioned above, a number of approaches are sug-gested for educational action in the schools to improve students’ academic preparation for college. Thesecenter on:

• encouraging all students to take a greater number of academically challenging courses such as AdvancedPlacement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), and other TEA-defined advanced courses, whichcan help fulfill the more difficult public high school diploma requirements of the Recommended orDistinguished Achievement programs;

• increasing the number and diversity of rigorous, challenging courses offered (e.g., ACT, Inc., ResearchDivision, 1999, 2001);

• ensuring that all students are held to consistently high standards; and• encouraging more participation in AP, IB, and pre-college (e.g., the College Board’s PSAT/NMSQT and

the ACT, Inc., PLAN tests) and college admissions testing programs.

Schools must ensure that the courses offered cover genuinely advanced material and are not simply labeled asadvanced courses. For some districts, the most practical option for expanding the array of rigorous courseofferings may depend on technology such as distance learning. Schools and districts must also ensure thatstudents are held to high standards that are consistent over the years through grades that are assigned. Someevidence from the college admissions testing data suggests that student grade point averages have beenincreasing at a relatively greater rate than scores on examinations such as the SAT/SAT I, and that this trendhas been even greater in Texas than nationally (e.g., CEEB, Southwestern Regional Office, 2000).

While about half of the students taking the SAT I in a given year retake the test one or more times at laterdates, student performance on repeat testing can be affected by a number of factors. For example, thoseretaking the test generally have higher initial scores than those who only take the test once. Factors that canrelate to performance on repeated testing include when students are initially tested, the length of time betweentesting, and the score on the initial testing. (For further information concerning SAT I score changes that canbe expected considering these and other factors, see CEEB, Office of Research and Development, 1998; forsimilar information regarding expected ACT score changes, see Andrews & Ziomek, 1998).

Encouraging students to take courses that focus primarily on preparation (coaching) for taking collegeadmissions tests should be carefully considered. Only well-designed and well-executed supplemental coursesfocused on improving test-taking strategies, coupled with instruction that broadly addresses verbal or quanti-tative skills, are recommended for consideration, especially for students from traditionally low-scoringgroups. Smyth’s (1990) study of the effects of SAT coaching, which controlled for differences in students’initial scores and number of tests taken, found the average net gains attributed to coaching to be quite small.The Powers and Rock (1998, cited in CEEB, Office of Research and Development, 1999) study generallyconfirmed these same effects for formal and out-of-school coaching programs on the SAT I, while controllingfor a number of additional differences on descriptive and demographic characteristics between the coachedand uncoached groups. In summary, the educational goal is to better prepare students academically forcollege, not simply to raise college admissions test scores.

Page 25: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

17

REFERENCES

ACT, Inc. (1999a). ACT Assessment FAQ: What does the test cost? [On-line]. Available: www.act.org/aap/FAQ/Cost.html (Date accessed: 6/22/99).

ACT, Inc. (1999b). ACT high school profile report: H S graduating class 1999 national report. Iowa City,IA: Author.

ACT, Inc. (1999c). ACT high school profile report: H S graduating class 1999 state composite for Texas.Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc. (2000a). ACT average Composite scores by state. 2000 ACT-tested graduates [Table]. Iowa City,IA: Author.

ACT, Inc. (2000b). ACT high school profile report: H S graduating class 2000 national report. Iowa City,IA: Author.

ACT, Inc. (2000c). ACT high school profile report: H S graduating class 2000 state composite for Texas.Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc. (2000d). ACT registration. 2000-2001 ACT Assessment fees [On-line]. Available: www.act.org/aap/regist/actfees.html (Date accessed: 8/7/00).

ACT, Inc. (2000e). Cautions on the use of state aggregate ACT scores. Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc. (2001a). ACT registration. 2001-2002 ACT Assessment fees [On-line]. Available: www.act.org/aap/regist/actfees.html (Date accessed: 7/16/01).

ACT, Inc. (2001b). Services for students with disabilities [On-line]. Available: www.act.org/aap/disab/index.html (Date accessed: 7/16/01).

ACT, Inc., Research Division. (1998). How significant are changes in my school’s average ACT Compositescore over time? ACT Information Brief (98-3). Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc., Research Division. (1999). What helps or hinders students’ educational achievement? ACTInformation Brief (99-2). Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc., Research Division. (2000). Monitoring changes in high school average ACT Composite scoresover time. ACT Information Brief (2000-2). Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc., Research Division. (2001). Improving performance on the ACT Assessment. ACT InformationBrief (2001-2). Iowa City, IA: Author.

ACT, Inc., Southwest Region. (1999, August). ACT graduating class of 1999. Texas. Austin, TX: Author.

ACT, Inc., Southwest Region. (2000, August). ACT graduating class of 2000. Texas. Austin, TX: Author.

Page 26: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

18

Andrews, K. M., and Ziomek, R. L. (1998). Score gains on retesting with the ACT Assessment (ReportNumber: 98-7 [050298970]) [Research Abstract]. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.

College Entrance Examination Board. (1988). Guidelines on the uses of College Board test scores andrelated data. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board. (1999a). 1999 college-bound seniors national report: A profile of SATProgram test takers. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board. (1999b). 1999 college-bound seniors Texas report: A profile of SATProgram test takers. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board. (2000a). Profile of the 1.26 million SAT takers in the high school classof 2000 [Media Release for August 29, 2000]. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board. (2000b). 2000 college-bound seniors national report: A profile of SATProgram test takers. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board. (2000c). 2000 college-bound seniors Texas report: A profile of SATProgram test takers. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board. (2000d). 2000 Texas SAT I report. New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board, Office of Research and Development. (1998, September). Scorechange when retaking the SAT I: Reasoning Test. Research Notes (RN-05). New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board, Office of Research and Development. (1999, April). Coaching and theSAT I. Research Notes (RN-06). New York: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board, SAT Program. (1999). Test and service fees [On-line]. Available:www.collegeboard.org/index_this/sat/html/students/fees001.html (Date accessed: 6/22/99).

College Entrance Examination Board, SAT Program. (2000). Test and service fees [On-line]. Available:www.collegeboard.org/sat/html/students/fees001.html (Date accessed: 8/7/00).

College Entrance Examination Board, SAT Program. (2001a). SAT services for students with disabilities[On-line]. Available: www.collegeboard.org/disable/students/html/index000.html(Date accessed: 7/6/01).

College Entrance Examination Board, SAT Program. (2001b). Test and service fees [On-line]. Available:www.collegeboard.org/sat/html/students/fees001.html (Date accessed: 7/16/01).

College Entrance Examination Board, Southwestern Regional Office. (2000, August). Texas EducationAgency executive summary. Austin, TX: Author.

College Entrance Examination Board and Educational Testing Service. (1997a). Admission staff. Handbookfor the SAT Program 1997-98. Princeton, NJ: Authors.

Page 27: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

19

Smyth, F. L. (1990). SAT coaching: What really happens to scores and how we are led to expect more.[Reprinted with permission from the Fall 1990 issue of the Journal of the National Association ofCollege Admission Counselors, located in Alexandria, Virginia.] New York: College EntranceExamination Board.

State Board of Education. (1990, November). Minutes (pp. 17-18). Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.

Texas Administrative Code. (1999a). Title 19, Part I: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Austin,TX: Secretary of State.

Texas Administrative Code. (1999b). Title 19, Part II: Texas Education Agency. Austin, TX: Secretary ofState.

Texas Administrative Code. (2000). Title 19, Part I: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Austin,TX: Secretary of State.

Texas Education Agency. (1993). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1992-93 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1994a). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1993-94 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1994b). Accountability manual: The 1994-95 accountability rating system forTexas public schools and school districts. Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1995). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1994-95 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1996). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1995-96 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1997a). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1996-97 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1997b). Glossary for the Academic Excellence Indicator System 1996-97 report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1997c). 1997 accountability manual: The 1997 accountability rating system forTexas public schools and school districts and blueprint for the 1998-2000 accountability systems.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1997d). Results of college admissions testing in Texas for 1994-95 graduatingseniors (GE7-601-04). Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1998a). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1997-98 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Page 28: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

20

Texas Education Agency. (1998b). Results of college admissions testing in Texas for 1996-97 graduatingseniors (GE8-601-06). Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (1999). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1998-99 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (2000). Academic Excellence Indicator System 1999-00 state performance report.Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (2001). 2001 accountability manual: The 2001 accountability rating system forTexas public schools and school districts and blueprint for the 2002 through 2005 accountabilitysystems. Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (in press-a). Academic Excellence Indicator System 2000-01 state performancereport. Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Agency. (in press-b). Glossary for the Academic Excellence Indicator System 2000-01report. Austin, TX: Author.

Texas Education Code. (1988). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Publishing.

Texas Education Code. (1990). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Publishing.

Texas Education Code. (1992). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Publishing.

Texas Education Code. (1994). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Publishing.

Texas Education Code. (1996). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Publishing.

Texas Education Code. (1997). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Group.

Texas Education Code. (1999). Texas school law bulletin. Austin, TX: West Group..

Page 29: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

21

APPENDIX A

Page 30: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

22

Page 31: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

23

Table A-1Mean SAT/SAT I* Scores by Ethnicity for Texas and the Nation,

1986-87 Through 1999-00

Data Source: CEEB. Mean Scores are based on both public and private school students.*Scores beginning for the class of 1994-95 are from the SAT I, a revised SAT. Mean scores are on therecentered SAT/SAT I score scale.

llA

seenimaxE

cificaP/naisA

rednalsI

nacirfA

naciremA cinapsiH etihWraeY saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN

erocSlabreVnaeMTAS

0002 394 505 405 994 724 434 054 754 325 825

9991 494 505 705 894 724 434 254 754 225 725

8991 494 505 505 894 624 434 254 654 225 625

7991 494 505 205 694 624 434 254 754 125 625

6991 594 505 305 694 824 434 454 854 125 625

5991 594 405 994 294 724 234 554 754 125 525

4991 984 994 394 984 814 824 944 254 615 025

3991 094 005 594 984 024 924 944 354 615 025

2991 784 005 194 784 714 824 544 254 215 915

1991 884 994 684 584 124 724 844 254 215 815

0991 094 005 284 384 424 824 154 454 315 915

9891 294 405 974 384 224 824 254 754 415 325

8891 494 505 574 284 324 924 254 554 515 225

7891 394 705 664 974 714 824 054 554 415 425

erocShtaMnaeMTAS

0002 005 415 465 565 324 624 454 164 825 035

9991 994 115 365 065 024 224 454 854 525 825

8991 105 215 265 265 424 624 854 064 625 825

7991 105 115 665 065 224 324 954 064 525 625

6991 005 805 465 855 424 224 954 064 325 325

5991 105 605 265 555 624 224 264 064 225 125

4991 005 405 655 355 524 124 464 854 225 915

3991 894 305 755 355 524 124 264 754 815 715

2991 394 105 255 155 814 914 754 654 315 515

1991 194 005 245 845 124 914 654 754 015 315

0991 984 105 735 645 814 914 654 754 605 515

9891 094 205 535 545 914 124 854 954 705 515

8891 094 105 435 145 714 814 754 654 505 415

7891 684 105 235 145 404 114 154 354 205 415

erocSlatoTTAS

0002 399 9101 8601 4601 058 068 409 819 1501 8501

9991 399 6101 0701 8501 748 658 609 519 7401 5501

8991 599 7101 7601 0601 058 068 019 619 8401 4501

7991 599 6101 8601 6501 848 758 119 719 6401 2501

6991 599 3101 7601 4501 258 658 219 819 4401 9401

5991 699 0101 1601 7401 358 458 719 619 3401 6401

4991 989 3001 9401 2401 348 948 319 909 8301 9301

3991 889 3001 2501 2401 548 058 119 019 4301 7301

2991 089 1001 3401 8301 538 748 209 809 5201 4301

1991 979 999 8201 3301 248 648 409 909 2201 1301

0991 979 1001 9101 9201 248 748 609 119 9101 4301

9891 289 6001 4101 8201 148 948 019 919 1201 8301

8891 489 6001 9001 3201 048 748 909 019 0201 6301

7891 979 8001 899 0201 128 938 109 809 6101 8301

Page 32: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

24

Table A-2Mean ACT Scores* by Ethnicity for Texas and the Nation,

1986-87 Through 1999-00

Data Source: ACT Assessment Program. Mean scores are based on both public and private schoolstudents.*Scores beginning with the class of 1990 are for the (Enhanced) ACT, a revised ACT; all scores arereported on the Enhanced ACT score scale. Scores for subject tests by ethnic group were unavailableon the Enhanced ACT score scale prior to 1991.

llA

seenimaxE

cificaP/naisA

rednalsI

nacirfA

naciremA cinapsiH etihWraeY saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN

erocShsilgnETCA0002 7.91 5.02 3.02 5.02 4.61 4.61 2.71 9.71 2.12 3.129991 7.91 5.02 6.02 5.02 5.61 4.61 2.71 9.71 1.12 3.128991 5.91 4.02 4.02 5.02 4.61 4.61 1.71 9.71 9.02 2.127991 4.91 3.02 2.02 4.02 2.61 4.61 0.71 0.81 9.02 2.126991 5.91 3.02 2.02 3.02 4.61 4.61 0.71 9.71 1.12 1.125991 5.91 2.02 1.02 2.02 5.61 4.61 1.71 7.71 0.12 0.124991 7.91 3.02 4.02 4.02 5.61 4.61 2.71 8.71 2.12 0.123991 7.91 3.02 2.02 4.02 7.61 6.61 4.71 0.81 1.12 0.122991 6.91 2.02 6.02 5.02 8.61 6.61 4.71 0.81 0.12 9.021991 7.91 3.02 3.02 6.02 7.61 7.61 5.71 1.81 1.12 0.12

erocShtaMTCA0002 2.02 7.02 5.32 2.32 3.71 8.61 4.81 9.81 4.12 3.129991 2.02 7.02 5.32 1.32 4.71 9.61 4.81 0.91 2.12 3.128991 2.02 8.02 7.32 4.32 2.71 9.61 3.81 0.91 2.12 4.127991 2.02 6.02 9.32 3.32 4.71 9.61 5.81 0.91 1.12 2.126991 9.91 2.02 4.32 9.22 3.71 8.61 3.81 7.81 8.02 8.025991 0.02 2.02 6.32 8.22 5.71 8.61 5.81 6.81 8.02 7.024991 9.91 2.02 3.32 0.32 3.71 8.61 4.81 6.81 8.02 6.023991 9.91 1.02 3.32 0.32 4.71 9.61 5.81 7.81 7.02 5.022991 6.91 0.02 6.32 0.32 2.71 9.61 3.81 7.81 3.02 4.021991 5.91 0.02 1.32 9.22 0.71 8.61 1.81 6.81 2.02 4.02

erocSgnidaeRTCA0002 6.02 4.12 3.12 3.12 1.71 0.71 2.81 1.91 2.22 2.229991 6.02 4.12 4.12 2.12 3.71 1.71 3.81 1.91 0.22 1.228991 6.02 4.12 3.12 3.12 4.71 2.71 1.81 1.91 0.22 1.227991 3.02 3.12 2.12 2.12 9.61 1.71 9.71 0.91 8.12 2.226991 4.02 3.12 3.12 3.12 2.71 1.71 0.81 1.91 9.12 2.225991 3.02 3.12 2.12 3.12 1.71 1.71 0.81 8.81 8.12 1.224991 3.02 2.12 2.12 4.12 0.71 1.71 8.71 9.81 9.12 0.223991 3.02 2.12 9.02 4.12 0.71 0.71 0.81 8.81 8.12 0.222991 1.02 1.12 1.12 2.12 8.61 9.61 7.71 8.81 6.12 9.121991 2.02 2.12 2.12 4.12 0.71 0.71 8.71 9.81 7.12 0.22

erocSgninosaeRecneicSTCA0002 3.02 0.12 5.12 5.12 4.71 3.71 5.81 1.91 5.12 7.129991 4.02 0.12 6.12 3.12 6.71 3.71 5.81 1.91 5.12 7.128991 3.02 1.12 5.12 6.12 5.71 3.71 5.81 1.91 5.12 8.127991 3.02 1.12 6.12 6.12 5.71 4.71 4.81 1.91 4.12 8.126991 3.02 1.12 5.12 5.12 4.71 3.71 4.81 1.91 5.12 8.125991 2.02 0.12 5.12 5.12 5.71 4.71 4.81 0.91 4.12 6.124991 2.02 9.02 3.12 5.12 4.71 4.71 3.81 0.91 3.12 6.123991 2.02 8.02 3.12 4.12 5.71 3.71 3.81 0.91 3.12 4.122991 9.91 7.02 0.12 2.12 3.71 2.71 1.81 8.81 0.12 3.121991 8.91 7.02 9.02 1.12 2.71 2.71 0.81 8.81 9.02 3.12

erocSetisopmoCTCA0002 3.02 0.12 8.12 7.12 2.71 0.71 2.81 9.81 7.12 8.129991 3.02 0.12 9.12 7.12 3.71 1.71 3.81 9.81 6.12 7.128991 3.02 0.12 8.12 8.12 2.71 1.71 2.81 9.81 5.12 7.127991 2.02 0.12 8.12 7.12 1.71 1.71 1.81 9.81 4.12 7.126991 2.02 9.02 8.12 6.12 2.71 0.71 0.81 8.81 5.12 6.125991 1.02 8.02 7.12 6.12 3.71 1.71 1.81 6.81 4.12 5.124991 2.02 8.02 7.12 7.12 2.71 0.71 0.81 7.81 4.12 4.123991 1.02 7.02 5.12 7.12 2.71 1.71 2.81 8.81 3.12 4.122991 9.91 6.02 7.12 6.12 1.71 0.71 0.81 7.81 1.12 3.121991 9.91 6.02 5.12 6.12 1.71 0.71 0.81 7.81 1.12 3.120991 8.91 6.02 2.12 7.12 1.71 0.71 9.71 6.81 0.12 2.129891 8.91 6.02 7.12 9.12 6.61 6.61 7.71 5.81 0.12 3.128891 8.91 8.02 7.12 8.12 5.61 6.61 8.71 6.81 9.02 4.127891 6.91 8.02 3.12 7.12 1.61 5.61 3.71 4.81 7.02 4.12

Page 33: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

25

Table A-3SAT/SAT I and ACT Examinee Totals and Ethnic Group Percentages

for Texas and the Nation, 1986-87 Through 1999-00

Data Sources: CEEB and ACT Assessment Programs. Percentages include both public and private school students.

rebmuNlatoT

seenimaxEfo

naciremAnacirfA

latoTfotnecreP

cinapsiH

latoTfotnecreP

etihW

latoTfotnecreP

raeY saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN saxeT noitaN

ITAS/TAS

0002 919,801 872,062,1 5.01 5.9 3.02 8.7 9.05 5.65

9991 441,401 031,022,1 8.01 8.9 0.02 8.7 5.35 8.85

8991 714,001 977,271,1 6.01 8.9 1.02 7.7 0.55 1.06

7991 430,49 120,721,1 3.01 8.9 2.02 6.7 2.65 6.16

6991 923,98 527,480,1 6.01 8.9 7.91 6.7 6.75 8.26

5991 616,58 399,760,1 2.01 7.9 7.91 5.7 9.75 1.36

4991 369,38 683,050,1 2.01 8.9 6.91 4.7 9.75 0.36

3991 735,28 564,440,1 2.01 9.9 2.91 0.7 9.85 2.46

2991 471,08 131,430,1 5.01 6.9 7.81 7.6 4.06 8.56

1991 649,97 586,230,1 2.01 7.9 0.81 4.6 8.16 5.66

0991 750,87 325,520,1 8.9 2.9 9.61 0.6 2.36 8.76

9891 145,18 322,880,1 1.9 9.8 3.51 3.5 3.56 1.96

8891 701,08 463,431,1 6.8 6.8 6.31 8.4 6.86 7.17

7891 463,57 624,080,1 0.8 1.8 1.31 6.4 3.07 0.37

TCA

0002 010,86 831,560,1 9.01 4.01 6.22 4.5 8.55 5.17

9991 490,56 350,910,1 6.01 2.01 7.12 2.5 9.65 8.17

8991 460,46 930,599 1.01 1.01 4.22 2.5 7.55 1.17

7991 593,85 103,959 5.9 4.9 6.12 0.5 7.35 2.96

6991 244,55 366,429 4.9 5.9 7.12 1.5 5.55 8.07

5991 758,95 963,549 4.9 4.9 0.22 1.5 1.55 8.86

4991 537,65 417,198 5.8 2.9 0.22 0.5 7.55 9.96

3991 511,45 306,578 1.8 2.9 1.22 8.4 0.75 4.17

2991 102,35 712,238 5.8 1.9 9.22 7.4 0.75 6.27

1991 632,05 389,697 4.8 1.9 8.12 4.4 9.75 8.37

0991 740,94 690,718 9.7 7.8 9.02 1.4 9.85 1.47

9891 906,15 171,558 5.7 7.8 9.91 8.3 9.16 3.77

8891 882,64 223,248 7.7 3.8 5.81 4.3 7.36 3.77

7891 121,14 424,777 7.6 9.7 2.81 2.3 1.56 6.87

Page 34: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

26

Page 35: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

27

APPENDIX B

Page 36: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

28

Page 37: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

29

NOTES ABOUT TABLES IN APPENDIX B

RESULTS AND NOTES LISTED IN TABLES

The SAT I results listed for each district and campus in Table B-1 include average SAT I Verbal, Mathemat-ics, and Total scores of 2000 graduating seniors, number of SAT I examinees who were graduating seniors,total number of graduates, percentage of graduates with scores, number and percentage of SAT I-testedexaminees with SAT I Total scores of 1110 or higher, and a “note” column for district- and campus-specificcomments. Similarly, ACT results are listed by district and campus in Table B-2, except that average ACTEnglish, Mathematics, Reading, Science Reasoning, and Composite scores are reported rather than SAT Iscores. Next, Table B-3 shows by district and by campus the number and percentage of SAT I- and/or ACT-tested graduates and of examinees scoring at or above the criterion on either test, a “test note” columnreferencing specific tests, and a “note” column in correspondence with Tables B-1 and B-2. In all threetables, campus results are the same as district results for districts with only one senior high school.

More specifically, SAT I and ACT score data for districts and campuses are not listed in Tables B-1 throughB-3 when the number of graduates with scores is less than five because of the instability of statistics based onsuch low numbers of scores. Campuses with fewer than five students tested are excluded from the tables. A“<5 tested” note is printed for districts with fewer than five students tested. This precaution also helps toensure that single sets of scores cannot be identified or linked with any individual. In addition, districts andcampuses with fewer than five students scoring at or above the criterion were given a “<5 high” comment;when it was possible for these score data to be arithmetically inferred from parallel score data from thedistrict and its other campuses, further masking was employed at intervals of 10 (e.g., “<10 masked,” “<20masked,” “<30 masked,” etc.). Districts and campuses with no graduates tested received a “none tested”note, and those with no TEA-recorded graduates reflect “no grads/TEA,” unless further masking was em-ployed. The test note column in Table B-3 displays “SAT only” or “ACT only” when statistics were based onjust one of the two tests; “neither” indicates neither test was taken by students.

Table B-4 presents results of the two testing programs when the district data (including charter schools) areaggregated into 25 types of groupings of districts with similar characteristics as defined in the Glossary.From these, results start with district enrollment groupings and end with groupings of the district percentageof teachers with an advanced degree. These groupings allow examination, by the various district characteris-tics, of the pattern of district average scores and percentages of students tested for each test separately and forpercentages of SAT I- and/or ACT-tested graduates and percentages of examinees meeting the score criterionon either test, as defined within AEIS (TEA, in press-b).

SOURCES OF DATA FOR TABLES

Overall, data were obtained from the College Board on 104,426 public school graduates in 2000 who partici-pated in the SAT Program’s SAT I: Reasoning Test and/or SAT II: Subject Tests and from the AmericanCollege Testing Program on 59,512 students taking the ACT. District and campus results showed a completeset of SAT I scores for 96,516 graduates and ACT scores for 59,491 graduates. Although the believed effectis small, some amount of inaccuracy may have resulted in using high school codes supplied by the testingprograms to link students’ scores to schools and districts (personal communication with B. Cumberland,Educational Testing Service, November 11, 1997). In another small set of cases, student miscodings of oneof the fields used for student matching may have resulted in more than one set of scores per student (personalcommunication with M. Farmer, ACT, Inc., July 16, 1998). Such discrepancies may have caused slightimprecision in estimating percentages of graduates tested. The actual computation of percentages of gradu-ates tested included the total number of non-special education graduating seniors obtained from TEA datafiles for each district and campus. In Tables B-1 through B-3, when the percentage of graduates tested wasabove 100, it was reset to 100.

Page 38: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

30

Page 39: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

31

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

ANDERSON CAYUGA ISD CAYUGA H S 487 491 978 19 35 54.3 . . < 5 HIGH ELKHART ISD ELKHART H S 513 498 1011 24 54 44.4 8 33.3 FRANKSTON ISD FRANKSTON H S 463 470 933 14 33 42.4 . . < 5 HIGH NECHES ISD NECHES H S 543 560 1103 6 17 35.3 . . < 5 HIGH PALESTINE ISD PALESTINE H S 466 452 918 72 160 45.0 13 18.1 SLOCUM ISD SLOCUM H S . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED WESTWOOD ISD WESTWOOD H S 460 463 923 25 96 26.0 5 20.0 ANDREWS ANDREWS ISD ANDREWS HIGH SCHO 474 472 946 73 191 38.2 11 15.1 ANGELINA CENTRAL 550 525 1075 21 87 24.1 8 38.1 CENTRAL H S 550 525 1075 21 78 26.9 8 38.1 DIBOLL ISD 450 422 872 46 104 44.2 5 10.9 DIBOLL H S 450 422 872 46 102 45.1 5 10.9 HUDSON ISD 499 496 994 41 119 34.5 11 26.8 HUDSON H S 499 496 994 41 117 35.0 11 26.8 HUNTINGTON ISD 475 466 941 44 128 34.4 7 15.9 HUNTINGTON H S 475 466 941 44 79 55.7 7 15.9 LUFKIN ISD 483 476 959 190 366 51.9 43 22.6 LUFKIN H S 483 476 959 190 356 53.4 43 22.6 ZAVALLA ISD . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED ARANSAS ARANSAS COUNTY ROCKPORT-FULTON H 489 483 972 112 235 47.7 26 23.2 ARCHER ARCHER CITY ISD ARCHER CITY H S 515 528 1043 13 34 38.2 5 38.5 HOLLIDAY ISD HOLLIDAY H S 492 485 977 24 66 36.4 5 20.8 MEGARGEL ISD MEGARGEL SCHOOL . . . . 2 . . . NONE TESTED WINDTHORST ISD WINDTHORST H S 460 511 971 12 19 63.2 . . < 5 HIGH ARMSTRONG CLAUDE ISD CLAUDE H S . . . . 27 . . . < 5 TESTED ATASCOSA CHARLOTTE ISD CHARLOTTE H S . . . . 22 . . . NONE TESTED JOURDANTON ISD JOURDANTON H S 533 536 1068 18 . . 5 27.8 NO GRADS/TEA LYTLE ISD LYTLE H S 478 481 959 38 72 52.8 8 21.1 PLEASANTON ISD PLEASANTON H S 483 477 960 44 160 27.5 12 27.3 POTEET ISD POTEET H S 435 472 907 25 68 36.8 . . < 5 HIGH AUSTIN BELLVILLE ISD BELLVILLE H S 487 502 989 81 135 60.0 18 22.2 BRAZOS ISD BRAZOS H S 440 469 909 30 48 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH SEALY ISD SEALY H S 480 489 969 70 127 55.1 18 25.7 BAILEY MULESHOE ISD 516 525 1041 10 85 11.8 . . < 5 HIGH MULESHOE H S 516 525 1041 10 82 12.2 . . < 5 HIGH THREE WAY ISD THREE WAY SCHOOL . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED BANDERA BANDERA ISD 492 489 981 49 130 37.7 6 12.2 BANDERA H S 493 493 985 47 122 38.5 6 12.8 MEDINA ISD MEDINA H S 528 519 1047 20 22 90.9 7 35.0 BASTROP BASTROP ISD 510 517 1027 143 273 52.4 44 30.8 BASTROP H S 511 518 1029 142 256 55.5 44 31.0 ELGIN ISD 475 472 948 52 135 38.5 9 17.3 ELGIN H S 477 474 950 51 104 49.0 9 17.6 SMITHVILLE ISD SMITHVILLE H S 486 437 924 27 75 36.0 5 18.5 BAYLOR SEYMOUR ISD SEYMOUR H S 450 516 966 12 35 34.3 . . < 5 HIGH BEE BEEVILLE ISD 454 451 904 94 234 40.2 13 13.8 A C JONES HIGH SC 454 451 904 94 229 41.0 13 13.8 PETTUS ISD PETTUS H S 483 457 940 20 34 58.8 5 25.0 SKIDMORE-TYNAN SKIDMORE-TYNAN H . . . . 46 . . . NONE TESTED BELL ACADEMY ISD ACADEMY H S 515 532 1047 26 64 40.6 8 30.8 BARTLETT ISD BARTLETT H S 459 455 914 13 30 43.3 . . < 5 HIGH BELTON ISD 505 495 1001 154 430 35.8 46 29.9 BELTON H S 505 495 1001 154 398 38.7 46 29.9 HOLLAND ISD HOLLAND H S 496 484 980 7 32 21.9 . . < 5 HIGH KILLEEN ISD 472 469 941 609 1,187 51.3 96 15.8 ELLISON H S 466 468 934 305 604 50.5 44 14.4 KILLEEN H S 478 471 949 304 553 55.0 52 17.1 KILLEEN-RICHARD KILLEEN-RICHARD M . . . . 27 . . . NONE TESTED ROGERS ISD ROGERS H S 500 482 982 20 44 45.5 5 25.0 SALADO ISD SALADO H S 505 518 1023 53 71 74.6 19 35.8 TEMPLE ISD TEMPLE H S 523 537 1060 211 365 57.8 85 40.3 TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSFORMATIVE CH . . . . 29 . . . NONE TESTED TROY ISD TROY H S 482 472 953 33 66 50.0 5 15.2 BEXAR ALAMO HEIGHTS I ALAMO HEIGHTS H S 555 571 1127 238 286 83.2 133 55.9 BLESSED SACRAME BLESSED SACRAMENT . . . . 25 . . . NONE TESTED BUILDING ALTERN BUILDING ALTER CH . . . . 32 . . . < 5 TESTED EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (SA . . . . 2 . . . NONE TESTED EAST CENTRAL IS EAST CENTRAL H S 466 467 932 211 375 56.3 39 18.5 EDGEWOOD ISD 386 393 780 215 423 50.8 6 2.8

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 40: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

32

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

BEXAR EDGEWOOD ISD KENNEDY HIGH SCHO 394 392 786 117 222 52.7 . . <10 MASKED MEMORIAL H S 378 395 773 97 182 53.3 . . <10 MASKED FT SAM HOUSTON ROBERT G COLE JR- 499 491 990 44 49 89.8 12 27.3 HARLANDALE ISD 408 407 815 258 609 42.4 11 4.3 HARLANDALE H S 403 408 811 122 303 40.3 . . <10 MASKED MCCOLLUM H S 412 406 818 135 266 50.8 . . <10 MASKED JOHN H WOOD CHA JOHN H WOOD CHART . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA JUDSON ISD 498 489 986 436 712 61.2 106 24.3 JUDSON SENIOR H S 498 488 987 433 678 63.9 105 24.2 LACKLAND ISD VIRGINIA ALLRED S 529 521 1050 16 21 76.2 7 43.8 NORTH EAST ISD 508 508 1016 1,701 2,414 70.5 541 31.8 ACADEMY OF CREATI 532 526 1058 5 21 23.8 . . <20 MASKED CHURCHILL H S 531 537 1068 521 532 97.9 218 41.8 INTERNATIONAL SCH 495 474 969 82 95 86.3 . . <20 MASKED LEE H S 501 487 989 214 349 61.3 65 30.4 MAC ARTHUR H S 523 518 1041 351 469 74.8 123 35.0 MADISON H S 489 503 992 351 462 76.0 92 26.2 ROOSEVELT H S 460 459 919 176 315 55.9 27 15.3 NORTHSIDE ISD 497 498 995 1,975 3,276 60.3 552 27.9 BUSINESS CAREERS 489 479 968 124 . . 23 18.5 NO GRADS/TEA HEALTH CAREERS H 555 556 1111 192 218 88.1 98 51.0 HOLMES H S 456 443 899 204 602 33.9 27 13.2 JAY H S 431 432 862 194 450 43.1 15 7.7 MARSHALL H S 517 503 1020 250 383 65.3 83 33.2 SANDRA DAY O’CONN 496 502 998 307 441 69.6 82 26.7 SUNSET H S 509 497 1006 19 66 28.8 5 26.3 TOM CLARK H S 512 532 1044 400 519 77.1 146 36.5 WILLIAM H TAFT H 496 493 989 285 554 51.4 73 25.6 POSITIVE SOLUTI POSITIVE SOLUTION . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED RADIANCE ACADEM RADIANCE ACADEMY . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED RANDOLPH FIELD RANDOLPH H S 520 533 1052 49 67 73.1 19 38.8 SAN ANTONIO ISD 400 397 797 1,294 2,343 55.2 53 4.1 BRACKENRIDGE H S 446 435 881 233 415 56.1 23 9.9 BURBANK H S 376 383 759 187 240 77.9 . . <10 MASKED EDISON H S 388 390 778 149 288 51.7 . . <10 MASKED FOX TECHNICAL H S 410 408 818 67 265 25.3 . . <10 MASKED HIGHLANDS H S 422 406 828 196 354 55.4 16 8.2 HOUSTON H S 361 366 727 133 192 69.3 . . <10 MASKED JEFFERSON H S 397 393 790 208 281 74.0 . . <10 MASKED LANIER H S 374 374 748 120 268 44.8 . . <10 MASKED SOMERSET ISD SOMERSET H S 440 445 885 42 83 50.6 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH SAN ANTON 413 419 832 213 455 46.8 15 7.0 SO SAN ANTONIO H 410 424 834 71 112 63.4 . . <20 MASKED SOUTH SAN ANTONIO 414 417 831 142 323 44.0 . . <20 MASKED SOUTHSIDE ISD SOUTHSIDE H S 435 455 889 41 153 26.8 6 14.6 SOUTHWEST ISD SOUTHWEST H S 423 426 850 164 366 44.8 12 7.3 SOUTHWEST PREPA SOUTHWEST PREPARA . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTED BLANCO BLANCO ISD BLANCO H S 492 523 1015 14 45 31.1 5 35.7 JOHNSON CITY IS LYNDON B JOHNSON 512 497 1009 20 35 57.1 7 35.0 BORDEN BORDEN COUNTY I BORDEN SCHOOL . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED BOSQUE CLIFTON ISD CLIFTON H S 497 514 1011 37 82 45.1 13 35.1 CRANFILLS GAP I CRANFILLS GAP SCH . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED IREDELL ISD IREDELL SCHOOL . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED KOPPERL ISD KOPPERL SCHOOL . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN H S 496 514 1010 14 35 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH MORGAN ISD MORGAN SCHOOL . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED VALLEY MILLS IS VALLEY MILLS H S 501 499 1001 14 32 43.8 . . < 5 HIGH WALNUT SPRINGS WALNUT SPRINGS SC . . . . 6 . . . < 5 TESTED BOWIE DEKALB ISD DEKALB H S . . . . 74 . . . < 5 TESTED EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (TE . . . . 6 . . . NONE TESTED HOOKS ISD HOOKS H S . . . . 69 . . . < 5 TESTED LIBERTY-EYLAU I 414 423 837 7 122 5.7 . . < 5 HIGH LIBERTY-EYLAU H S 392 410 802 6 87 6.9 . . < 5 HIGH MAUD ISD MAUD SCHOOL . . . . 36 . . . < 5 TESTED NEW BOSTON ISD NEW BOSTON H S 524 524 1049 14 87 16.1 5 35.7 PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE H 528 517 1045 45 127 35.4 14 31.1 REDWATER ISD REDWATER H S . . . . 80 . . . < 5 TESTED SIMMS ISD . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED TEXARKANA ISD 510 526 1036 53 275 19.3 19 35.8

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 41: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

33

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

BOWIE TEXARKANA ISD TEXAS H S 510 526 1036 53 267 19.9 19 35.8 BRAZORIA ALVIN ISD 494 502 996 211 485 43.5 58 27.5 ALVIN HIGH SCHOOL 494 502 996 211 431 49.0 58 27.5 ANGLETON ISD ANGLETON H S 495 500 995 153 295 51.9 46 30.1 BRAZOSPORT ISD 511 529 1040 346 712 48.6 117 33.8 BRAZOSPORT H S 455 467 922 62 176 35.2 5 8.1 BRAZOSWOOD H S 523 543 1066 284 534 53.2 112 39.4 COLUMBIA-BRAZOR COLUMBIA H S 502 509 1011 77 185 41.6 24 31.2 DANBURY ISD DANBURY H S 505 535 1040 26 52 50.0 10 38.5 PEARLAND ISD PEARLAND H S 505 519 1024 366 549 66.7 116 31.7 SWEENY ISD SWEENY H S 500 510 1010 50 144 34.7 11 22.0 BRAZOS BRYAN ISD 487 503 990 306 607 50.4 78 25.5 BRYAN H S 487 503 990 306 578 52.9 78 25.5 COLLEGE STATION 549 561 1110 342 469 72.9 164 48.0 A & M CONS H S 549 561 1110 342 462 74.0 164 48.0 BREWSTER ALPINE ISD ALPINE H S 487 464 951 17 67 25.4 . . < 5 HIGH MARATHON ISD MARATHON SCHOOL 414 410 824 5 9 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH TERLINGUA CSD BIG BEND H S 482 488 970 5 13 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH BRISCOE SILVERTON ISD SILVERTON SCHOOL . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED BROOKS BROOKS COUNTY I FALFURRIAS H S 496 465 961 15 90 16.7 6 40.0 BROWN BANGS ISD 484 506 989 20 57 35.1 5 25.0 BANGS H S 484 506 989 20 51 39.2 5 25.0 BLANKET ISD BLANKET H S . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTED BROOKESMITH ISD BROOKESMITH H S 560 484 1044 5 9 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH BROWNWOOD ISD 481 495 977 129 221 58.4 29 22.5 BROWNWOOD H S 485 498 983 126 199 63.3 29 23.0 EARLY ISD EARLY H S 501 509 1010 42 72 58.3 13 31.0 MAY ISD MAY H S 430 412 842 22 23 95.7 . . < 5 HIGH ZEPHYR ISD ZEPHYR H S . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED BURLESON CALDWELL ISD CALDWELL H S 486 491 977 53 108 49.1 9 17.0 SNOOK ISD SNOOK SECONDARY 429 438 868 12 19 63.2 . . < 5 HIGH SOMERVILLE ISD SOMERVILLE H S 418 457 875 15 33 45.5 . . < 5 HIGH BURNET BURNET CONS ISD 491 494 985 59 152 38.8 13 22.0 BURNET H S 491 494 985 59 145 40.7 13 22.0 MARBLE FALLS IS MARBLE FALLS H S 511 496 1007 85 169 50.3 24 28.2 CALDWELL LOCKHART ISD 470 477 947 114 239 47.7 21 18.4 LOCKHART H S 470 477 947 114 226 50.4 21 18.4 LULING ISD LULING H S 443 485 928 33 71 46.5 . . < 5 HIGH PRAIRIE LEA ISD PRAIRIE LEA SCHOO . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED CALHOUN CALHOUN CO ISD 523 521 1044 51 205 24.9 19 37.3 CALHOUN H S 523 521 1044 51 187 27.3 19 37.3 CALLAHAN BAIRD ISD BAIRD H S . . . . 25 . . . < 5 TESTED CLYDE CONS ISD CLYDE H S 482 484 966 22 77 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH CROSS PLAINS IS CROSS PLAINS H S . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED EULA ISD EULA H S 437 480 917 12 34 35.3 . . < 5 HIGH CAMERON BROWNSVILLE ISD 430 440 869 563 1,785 31.5 55 9.8 HANNA H S 471 473 944 146 465 31.4 27 18.5 LOPEZ H S 434 438 872 63 278 22.7 . . < 5 HIGH PACE H S 417 428 845 112 355 31.5 7 6.3 PORTER H S 425 437 862 123 368 33.4 13 10.6 RIVERA H S 393 412 805 119 290 41.0 . . < 5 HIGH EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (BR . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED HARLINGEN CONS 462 466 928 350 758 46.2 58 16.6 HARLINGEN H S 467 463 931 168 389 43.2 29 17.3 HARLINGEN H S - S 458 467 925 180 348 51.7 29 16.1 LA FERIA ISD 457 489 946 11 132 8.3 . . < 5 HIGH LA FERIA H S 457 489 946 11 125 8.8 . . < 5 HIGH LOS FRESNOS CON LOS FRESNOS H S 452 482 934 115 274 42.0 14 12.2 POINT ISABEL IS PORT ISABEL H S 456 456 912 43 105 41.0 . . < 5 HIGH RIO HONDO ISD RIO HONDO H S 425 435 860 55 97 56.7 . . < 5 HIGH SAN BENITO CONS SAN BENITO H S 441 458 899 118 384 30.7 12 10.2 SANTA MARIA ISD SANTA MARIA H S 352 358 710 11 26 42.3 . . < 5 HIGH SANTA ROSA ISD SANTA ROSA H S 373 391 764 29 59 49.2 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH TEXAS ISD 526 530 1056 280 313 89.5 98 35.0 HIGH SCHOOL FOR H 513 510 1023 131 142 92.3 32 24.4 THE SCIENCE ACADE 556 570 1126 108 112 96.4 59 54.6 THE TEACHER ACADE 491 487 978 41 59 69.5 7 17.1 VALLEY HIGH VALLEY HIGH . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTED CAMP PITTSBURG ISD PITTSBURG H S 450 468 918 64 95 67.4 12 18.8

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 42: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

34

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

CARSON GROOM ISD GROOM SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTED PANHANDLE ISD 548 576 1124 5 45 11.1 . . < 5 HIGH PANHANDLE H S 548 576 1124 5 43 11.6 . . < 5 HIGH WHITE DEER ISD WHITE DEER H S . . . . 33 . . . < 5 TESTED CASS ATLANTA ISD ATLANTA H S . . . . 107 . . . < 5 TESTED AVINGER ISD AVINGER H S . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED BLOOMBURG ISD BLOOMBURG H S . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED HUGHES SPRINGS HUGHES SPRINGS HI . . . . 57 . . . < 5 TESTED LINDEN-KILDARE LINDEN-KILDARE H 512 457 968 6 81 7.4 . . < 5 HIGH MCLEOD ISD MCLEOD H S . . . . 23 . . . NONE TESTED QUEEN CITY ISD QUEEN CITY H S 486 463 949 7 79 8.9 . . < 5 HIGH CASTRO DIMMITT ISD DIMMITT H S . . . . 70 . . . NONE TESTED HART ISD HART JR-SR H S . . . . 25 . . . < 5 TESTED NAZARETH ISD NAZARETH SCHOOL . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED CHAMBERS ANAHUAC ISD 467 471 938 28 70 40.0 5 17.9 ANAHUAC H S 467 471 938 28 66 42.4 5 17.9 BARBERS HILL IS 497 506 1002 78 136 57.4 25 32.1 BARBERS HILL H S 497 506 1002 78 135 57.8 25 32.1 EAST CHAMBERS I 440 459 899 37 66 56.1 . . < 5 HIGH EAST CHAMBERS H S 440 459 899 37 64 57.8 . . < 5 HIGH CHEROKEE ALTO ISD ALTO H S 446 435 881 8 44 18.2 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSONVILLE IS 497 486 983 38 228 16.7 10 26.3 JACKSONVILLE H S 497 486 983 38 213 17.8 10 26.3 NEW SUMMERFIELD NEW SUMMERFIELD S . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED RUSK ISD RUSK H S 499 483 982 13 112 11.6 . . < 5 HIGH WELLS ISD WELLS H S 529 484 1013 8 23 34.8 . . < 5 HIGH CHILDRESS CHILDRESS ISD CHILDRESS H S 527 533 1060 7 67 10.4 . . < 5 HIGH CLAY BELLEVUE ISD BELLEVUE SCHOOL 501 530 1031 8 12 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BYERS ISD BYERS SCHOOL . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED HENRIETTA ISD HENRIETTA H S 488 490 978 22 55 40.0 6 27.3 MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY SCHOOL 530 627 1157 7 12 58.3 . . < 5 HIGH PETROLIA ISD PETROLIA H S 480 538 1018 5 27 18.5 . . < 5 HIGH COCHRAN MORTON ISD . . . . 36 . . . < 5 TESTED WHITEFACE CONS 486 487 974 11 29 37.9 . . < 5 HIGH WHITEFACE H S 486 487 974 11 26 42.3 . . < 5 HIGH COKE BRONTE ISD . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED ROBERT LEE ISD 505 485 990 8 28 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH ROBERT LEE H S 505 485 990 8 27 29.6 . . < 5 HIGH COLEMAN COLEMAN ISD 522 532 1054 5 60 8.3 . . < 5 HIGH COLEMAN H S 522 532 1054 5 57 8.8 . . < 5 HIGH NOVICE ISD NOVICE SCHOOL . . . . 3 . . . NONE TESTED PANTHER CREEK C PANTHER CREEK H S . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED SANTA ANNA ISD . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED COLLIN ALLEN ISD ALLEN H S 527 535 1062 418 533 78.4 166 39.7 ANNA ISD ANNA H S . . . . 49 . . . < 5 TESTED BLUE RIDGE ISD BLUE RIDGE H S 526 556 1082 5 31 16.1 . . < 5 HIGH CELINA ISD CELINA H S 503 518 1021 20 47 42.6 5 25.0 COMMUNITY ISD COMMUNITY H S 450 463 914 30 54 55.6 5 16.7 FARMERSVILLE IS FARMERSVILLE H S 510 504 1014 18 50 36.0 7 38.9 FRISCO ISD FRISCO H S 534 530 1064 81 161 50.3 30 37.0 MCKINNEY ISD 533 544 1077 223 409 54.5 96 43.0 MCKINNEY HIGH SCH 531 545 1076 212 369 57.5 90 42.5 THE ACT ACAD AT J 575 533 1108 11 11 100 6 54.5 PLANO ISD 548 574 1122 2,051 2,396 85.6 1,090 53.1 PLANO EAST SR H S 544 566 1110 722 941 76.7 370 51.2 PLANO SR H S 550 578 1128 1,321 1,455 90.8 716 54.2 PRINCETON ISD PRINCETON H S 460 491 951 37 86 43.0 . . < 5 HIGH PROSPER ISD PROSPER H S 492 509 1001 36 58 62.1 12 33.3 WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 500 497 997 123 202 60.9 32 26.0 COLLINGSWORTH SAMNORWOOD ISD SAMNORWOOD SCHOOL . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED WELLINGTON ISD WELLINGTON H S . . . . 34 . . . < 5 TESTED COLORADO COLUMBUS ISD COLUMBUS H S 502 515 1017 68 108 63.0 23 33.8 RICE CONS ISD RICE H S 458 480 938 25 56 44.6 5 20.0 WEIMAR ISD WEIMAR H S 482 483 965 36 56 64.3 6 16.7 COMAL COMAL ISD 506 498 1004 370 573 64.6 103 27.8 CANYON H S 512 519 1031 143 230 62.2 45 31.5 SMITHSON VALLEY H 502 485 987 227 323 70.3 58 25.6 NEW BRAUNFELS I 520 509 1029 196 325 60.3 61 31.1 NEW BRAUNFELS H S 520 509 1029 196 315 62.2 61 31.1

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 43: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

35

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

COMANCHE COMANCHE ISD COMANCHE H S 481 451 932 22 65 33.8 . . < 5 HIGH DE LEON ISD DE LEON H S 441 481 921 20 39 51.3 . . < 5 HIGH GUSTINE ISD GUSTINE SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED SIDNEY ISD SIDNEY SCHOOL 490 522 1012 5 9 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH CONCHO EDEN C I S D EDEN H S 501 530 1031 8 28 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH PAINT ROCK ISD PAINT ROCK SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTED COOKE CALLISBURG ISD CALLISBURG H S 537 528 1065 18 56 32.1 7 38.9 ERA ISD ERA SCHOOL 503 511 1014 14 30 46.7 . . < 5 HIGH GAINESVILLE ISD GAINESVILLE H S 495 493 988 56 125 44.8 17 30.4 LINDSAY ISD LINDSAY H S 548 537 1085 27 31 87.1 12 44.4 MUENSTER ISD MUENSTER H S 526 595 1121 27 28 96.4 15 55.6 VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HS/MS 518 569 1087 15 21 71.4 7 46.7 CORYELL COPPERAS COVE I 506 486 992 194 381 50.9 51 26.3 COPPERAS COVE H S 506 486 992 194 378 51.3 51 26.3 EVANT ISD EVANT H S . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED GATESVILLE ISD GATESVILLE H S 515 499 1014 41 120 34.2 14 34.1 JONESBORO ISD JONESBORO SCHOOL 541 524 1065 8 10 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH OGLESBY ISD OGLESBY SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED COTTLE PADUCAH ISD PADUCAH H S . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED CRANE CRANE ISD CRANE H S 452 471 924 22 55 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH CROCKETT CROCKETT CO CON OZONA H S 461 455 916 46 85 54.1 . . < 5 HIGH CROSBY CROSBYTON ISD . . . . 39 . . . < 5 TESTED LORENZO ISD LORENZO H S 456 462 918 5 13 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH RALLS ISD 520 494 1014 5 35 14.3 . . < 5 HIGH RALLS H S 520 494 1014 5 34 14.7 . . < 5 HIGH CULBERSON CULBERSON COUNT VAN HORN H S 432 477 909 13 45 28.9 . . < 5 HIGH DALLAM DALHART ISD 648 630 1278 6 92 6.5 5 83.3 DALHART H S 648 630 1278 6 90 6.7 5 83.3 TEXLINE ISD TEXLINE SCHOOL . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED DALLAS CARROLLTON-FARM 522 548 1070 622 1,008 61.7 281 45.2 MARY GRIMES CTR 450 464 914 5 77 6.5 . . <100 MASKED NEWMAN SMITH H S 523 559 1082 414 539 76.8 189 45.7 TURNER H S 521 529 1049 202 388 52.1 . . <100 MASKED CEDAR HILL ISD CEDAR HILL H S 505 484 989 197 334 59.0 56 28.4 COPPELL ISD COPPELL H S 532 555 1087 381 451 84.5 178 46.7 DALLAS CAN ACAD . . . . 240 . . . < 5 TESTED DALLAS ISD 433 436 868 2,688 5,430 49.5 328 12.2 A MACEO SMITH H S 359 372 731 55 117 47.0 . . <10 MASKED BOOKER T WASHINGT 514 491 1005 148 162 91.4 41 27.7 BRYAN ADAMS H S 474 484 959 160 318 50.3 27 16.9 DAVID W CARTER H 414 422 836 155 317 48.9 . . <10 MASKED H GRADY SPRUCE H 377 384 761 68 208 32.7 . . <10 MASKED HILLCREST H S 504 489 993 116 216 53.7 33 28.4 JAMES MADISON H S 388 410 797 44 102 43.1 . . <10 MASKED JUSTIN F KIMBALL 380 387 767 103 216 47.7 . . <10 MASKED L G PINKSTON H S 387 397 784 45 116 38.8 . . <10 MASKED LINCOLN H S 367 369 736 151 194 77.8 . . <10 MASKED METROPOLITAN ED C 364 329 693 8 45 17.8 . . <10 MASKED MIDDLE COLLEGE 428 385 813 12 35 34.3 . . <10 MASKED MOISES MOLINA H S 396 427 824 59 258 22.9 . . <10 MASKED NORTH DALLAS H S 383 422 804 74 223 33.2 . . <10 MASKED ROOSEVELT H S 369 355 724 66 115 57.4 . . <10 MASKED SCH OF GOVT,LAW,& 466 437 903 48 55 87.3 . . <10 MASKED SCHOOL FOR THE TA 617 659 1276 28 27 100 26 92.9 SCHOOL OF BUSINES 437 430 867 69 105 65.7 . . <10 MASKED SCHOOL OF EDUCATI 426 409 835 38 43 88.4 . . <10 MASKED SCHOOL OF HEALTH 494 493 987 69 92 75.0 17 24.6 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE 539 561 1099 67 78 85.9 27 40.3 SEAGOVILLE H S 440 438 878 55 129 42.6 . . <10 MASKED SKYLINE H S 447 439 887 381 711 53.6 46 12.1 SOUTH OAK CLIFF H 373 388 760 126 222 56.8 . . <10 MASKED SUNSET H S 404 412 816 71 245 29.0 . . <10 MASKED THOMAS JEFFERSON 381 405 786 74 182 40.7 . . <10 MASKED W H ADAMSON H S 387 386 773 51 164 31.1 . . <10 MASKED W T WHITE H S 479 480 958 163 298 54.7 37 22.7 W W SAMUELL H S 360 380 739 86 173 49.7 . . <10 MASKED WOODROW WILSON H 482 486 968 94 217 43.3 30 31.9 DESOTO ISD DE SOTO H S 513 512 1025 122 299 40.8 40 32.8 DUNCANVILLE ISD 490 482 972 425 673 63.2 100 23.5

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 44: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

36

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DALLAS DUNCANVILLE ISD DUNCANVILLE H S 490 482 972 425 636 66.8 100 23.5 EAGLE ADVANTAGE EAGLE ADVANTAGE S . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (DA . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED GARLAND ISD 502 503 1005 1,259 2,304 54.6 384 30.5 GARLAND H S 566 567 1133 229 370 61.9 135 59.0 LAKEVIEW CENTENNI 487 470 958 104 240 43.3 27 26.0 N GARLAND H S 469 481 950 150 381 39.4 27 18.0 NAAMAN FOREST H S 484 491 976 278 430 64.7 67 24.1 ROWLETT H S 492 491 982 306 497 61.6 70 22.9 S GARLAND H S 500 497 997 191 370 51.6 58 30.4 GRAND PRAIRIE I 484 488 972 367 925 39.7 76 20.7 GRAND PRAIRIE H S 477 479 956 112 387 28.9 18 16.1 SO GRAND PRAIRIE 487 492 979 255 488 52.3 58 22.7 HIGHLAND PARK I 574 579 1154 373 340 100 225 60.3 HIGHLAND PARK H S 574 579 1154 373 339 100 225 60.3 HONORS ACADEMY . . . . 111 . . . NONE TESTED IRVING ISD 508 508 1015 537 1,092 49.2 172 32.0 IRVING H S 501 512 1013 175 366 47.8 60 34.3 MACARTHUR H S 515 501 1016 189 379 49.9 61 32.3 NIMITZ H S 506 511 1017 173 345 50.1 51 29.5 LANCASTER ISD LANCASTER H S 454 434 888 111 210 52.9 16 14.4 MESQUITE ISD 509 521 1030 564 1,530 36.9 193 34.2 MESQUITE H S 506 516 1022 143 522 27.4 47 32.9 NORTH MESQUITE H 507 516 1023 204 418 48.8 70 34.3 RALPH H POTEET H 507 529 1036 179 333 53.8 59 33.0 WEST MESQUITE H S 534 536 1069 37 224 16.5 16 43.2 RENAISSANCE CHA RENAISSANCE CHART 523 534 1057 37 . . 14 37.8 NO GRADS/TEA RICHARDSON ISD 530 547 1077 1,526 1,817 84.0 678 44.4 BERKNER H S 520 551 1071 449 526 85.4 189 42.1 LAKE HIGHLANDS H 524 536 1060 461 527 87.5 200 43.4 PEARCE H S 555 571 1126 336 374 89.8 183 54.5 RICHARDSON H S 524 530 1055 280 388 72.2 106 37.9 RYLIE FAITH FAM RYLIE FAITH FAMIL . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED WILMER-HUTCHINS WILMER-HUTCHINS H 365 355 721 44 130 33.8 . . < 5 HIGH DAWSON DAWSON DAWSON SCHOOL . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED KLONDIKE ISD KLONDIKE H S 580 644 1224 5 13 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH LAMESA ISD LAMESA H S 522 524 1046 16 122 13.1 7 43.8 SANDS ISD SANDS H S . . . . 21 . . . < 5 TESTED DEAF SMITH HEREFORD ISD HEREFORD H S 484 489 973 27 238 11.3 8 29.6 DELTA COOPER ISD COOPER H S 396 470 866 5 55 9.1 . . < 5 HIGH FANNINDEL ISD FANNINDEL H S . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED DENTON AUBREY ISD AUBREY H S 495 501 996 24 52 46.2 5 20.8 DENTON ISD 509 517 1026 384 576 66.7 129 33.6 DENTON H S 513 526 1039 200 245 81.6 79 39.5 RYAN H S 503 508 1011 184 303 60.7 50 27.2 KRUM ISD KRUM H S 488 511 1000 42 59 71.2 15 35.7 LAKE DALLAS ISD LAKE DALLAS H S 496 494 990 90 139 64.7 21 23.3 LEWISVILLE ISD 525 538 1063 1,091 1,807 60.4 433 39.7 LEWISVILLE H S 514 536 1050 322 588 54.8 119 37.0 MARCUS H S 537 539 1076 512 654 78.3 224 43.8 THE COLONY H S 515 536 1051 257 534 48.1 90 35.0 LITTLE ELM ISD LITTLE ELM H S 453 471 925 24 59 40.7 . . < 5 HIGH NORTHWEST ISD 513 516 1029 147 242 60.7 45 30.6 NORTHWEST H S 513 516 1029 147 232 63.4 45 30.6 PILOT POINT ISD PILOT POINT H S 524 535 1059 14 53 26.4 6 42.9 PONDER ISD PONDER H S 478 520 998 15 26 57.7 5 33.3 SANGER ISD 488 482 969 39 151 25.8 8 20.5 SANGER H S 488 482 969 39 126 31.0 8 20.5 UNIVERSITY OF N TEXAS ACADEMY OF 662 712 1373 171 . . 170 99.4 NO GRADS/TEA DEWITT CUERO ISD 522 525 1047 21 113 18.6 8 38.1 CUERO H S 522 525 1047 21 113 18.6 8 38.1 NORDHEIM ISD NORDHEIM SCHOOL . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED YOAKUM ISD YOAKUM H S 531 517 1048 47 110 42.7 15 31.9 YORKTOWN ISD YORKTOWN H S 507 495 1002 26 48 54.2 5 19.2 DICKENS PATTON SPRINGS PATTON SPRINGS SC . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED SPUR ISD SPUR SCHOOL . . . . 21 . . . < 5 TESTED DIMMIT CARRIZO SPRINGS CARRIZO SPRINGS H 436 449 885 56 126 44.4 9 16.1 DONLEY CLARENDON ISD CLARENDON H S . . . . 27 . . . < 5 TESTED HEDLEY ISD HEDLEY SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 45: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

37

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DUVAL BENAVIDES ISD BENAVIDES H S . . . . 32 . . . NONE TESTED FREER ISD FREER H S 392 424 816 5 63 7.9 . . < 5 HIGH SAN DIEGO ISD SAN DIEGO H S 446 438 884 5 81 6.2 . . < 5 HIGH EASTLAND CISCO ISD CISCO H S 580 606 1186 5 42 11.9 . . < 5 HIGH EASTLAND ISD EASTLAND H S 514 508 1022 47 73 64.4 13 27.7 GORMAN ISD GORMAN H S 515 469 984 8 24 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH RANGER ISD RANGER H S . . . . 26 . . . < 5 TESTED RISING STAR ISD RISING STAR H S 479 500 979 8 15 53.3 . . < 5 HIGH ECTOR ECTOR COUNTY IS 501 496 997 404 1,356 29.8 104 25.7 CAREER CTR 410 400 810 5 229 2.2 . . <50 MASKED ODESSA H S 515 517 1032 185 569 32.5 63 34.1 PERMIAN H S 492 481 972 214 514 41.6 . . <50 MASKED EDWARDS NUECES CANYON C NUECES CANYON H S . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED ROCKSPRINGS ISD ROCKSPRINGS H S 420 439 859 14 34 41.2 . . < 5 HIGH EL PASO ANTHONY ANTHONY H S 362 381 743 10 41 24.4 . . < 5 HIGH CANUTILLO ISD 416 408 824 80 193 41.5 5 6.3 CANUTILLO H S 416 408 824 80 191 41.9 5 6.3 CLINT ISD 415 432 847 160 303 52.8 9 5.6 CLINT H S 421 436 857 88 147 59.9 . . <10 MASKED MOUNTAIN VIEW H S 408 427 834 72 132 54.5 . . <10 MASKED EL PASO ISD 473 476 949 1,692 3,043 55.6 317 18.7 ANDRESS H S 457 456 912 190 368 51.6 . . <20 MASKED AUSTIN H S 444 435 879 118 301 39.2 . . <20 MASKED BOWIE H S 400 435 835 83 254 32.7 . . <20 MASKED BURGES H S 455 441 896 151 277 54.5 . . <20 MASKED CORONADO H S 505 505 1010 250 379 66.0 71 28.4 EL PASO H S 457 467 924 118 214 55.1 . . <20 MASKED FRANKLIN H S 512 517 1029 396 554 71.5 124 31.3 IRVIN H S 454 455 909 138 337 40.9 . . <20 MASKED JEFFERSON H S 401 401 803 109 179 60.9 . . <20 MASKED SILVA HEALTH MAGN 505 516 1020 137 152 90.1 37 27.0 FABENS ISD 420 437 857 41 135 30.4 . . < 5 HIGH FABENS H S 420 437 857 41 124 33.1 . . < 5 HIGH PASO DEL NORTE PASO DEL NORTE . . . . 68 . . . NONE TESTED SAN ELIZARIO IS SAN ELIZARIO H S 382 399 781 79 120 65.8 . . < 5 HIGH SOCORRO ISD 437 448 884 576 1,085 53.1 60 10.4 AMERICAS H S 449 459 908 156 299 52.2 20 12.8 MONTWOOD H S 437 452 889 238 408 58.3 20 8.4 SOCORRO H S 426 432 858 182 378 48.1 20 11.0 TORNILLO ISD TORNILLO H S 321 333 654 12 29 41.4 . . < 5 HIGH YSLETA ISD 407 413 820 2,561 2,836 90.3 165 6.4 ACAD OF SCIENCE/T 354 365 719 78 130 60.0 . . <10 MASKED BEL AIR H S 405 402 806 397 429 92.5 23 5.8 CESAR CHAVEZ ACAD 320 339 659 22 28 78.6 . . <10 MASKED DEL VALLE H S 379 396 775 296 390 75.9 . . <10 MASKED EASTWOOD H S 448 460 908 371 434 85.5 44 11.9 J M HANKS H S 442 445 886 567 585 96.9 63 11.1 PARKLAND H S 372 369 741 213 199 100 . . <10 MASKED RIVERSIDE H S 393 405 798 252 258 97.7 . . <10 MASKED TEJAS SCHOOL OF C 341 344 685 20 36 55.6 . . <10 MASKED YSLETA H S 385 393 778 345 343 100 11 3.2 ELLIS AVALON ISD AVALON SCHOOL 449 474 923 7 14 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH ENNIS ISD ENNIS H S 522 514 1036 45 222 20.3 15 33.3 FERRIS ISD FERRIS H S 465 483 948 46 69 66.7 9 19.6 ITALY ISD ITALY H S 476 455 931 8 34 23.5 . . < 5 HIGH MAYPEARL ISD MAYPEARL H S 460 479 939 21 32 65.6 . . < 5 HIGH MIDLOTHIAN ISD MIDLOTHIAN H S 500 511 1011 118 260 45.4 37 31.4 MILFORD ISD MILFORD SCHOOL . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED PALMER ISD PALMER H S 558 540 1098 5 37 13.5 . . < 5 HIGH RED OAK ISD RED OAK H S 494 495 988 102 186 54.8 31 30.4 WAXAHACHIE ISD 491 475 966 174 358 48.6 38 21.8 WAXAHACHIE H S 491 475 966 174 330 52.7 38 21.8 ERATH DUBLIN ISD DUBLIN H S 473 473 946 26 51 51.0 . . < 5 HIGH HUCKABAY ISD HUCKABAY SCHOOL 458 441 899 11 18 61.1 . . < 5 HIGH LINGLEVILLE ISD LINGLEVILLE SCHOO . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED STEPHENVILLE IS STEPHENVILLE H S 496 512 1007 72 193 37.3 20 27.8 FALLS CHILTON ISD CHILTON SCHOOL 436 451 887 9 22 40.9 . . < 5 HIGH MARLIN ISD MARLIN H S 411 406 817 27 67 40.3 . . < 5 HIGH ROSEBUD-LOTT IS ROSEBUD-LOTT H S 581 603 1184 14 61 23.0 11 78.6

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 46: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

38

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

FANNIN BONHAM ISD BONHAM H S 469 476 946 38 98 38.8 10 26.3 DODD CITY ISD DODD CITY SCHOOL . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED ECTOR ISD ECTOR SCHOOL . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED HONEY GROVE ISD HONEY GROVE H S 491 529 1020 11 42 26.2 . . < 5 HIGH LEONARD ISD LEONARD H S . . . . 39 . . . < 5 TESTED SAM RAYBURN ISD RAYBURN H S . . . . 20 . . . < 5 TESTED SAVOY ISD SAVOY H S . . . . 16 . . . NONE TESTED TRENTON ISD TRENTON H S 495 488 983 8 24 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH FAYETTE FAYETTEVILLE IS FAYETTEVILLE H S 471 505 976 17 22 77.3 5 29.4 FLATONIA ISD FLATONIA H S 451 504 956 7 28 25.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA GRANGE ISD LA GRANGE H S 518 521 1039 58 106 54.7 21 36.2 ROUND TOP-CARMI CARMINE H S 506 520 1026 7 10 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH SCHULENBURG ISD SCHULENBURG H S 497 489 987 26 51 51.0 . . < 5 HIGH FISHER ROBY CONS ISD ROBY H S . . . . 20 . . . < 5 TESTED ROTAN ISD ROTAN H S 508 495 1003 6 34 17.6 . . < 5 HIGH FLOYD FLOYDADA ISD 536 590 1126 5 61 8.2 . . < 5 HIGH FLOYDADA H S 536 590 1126 5 56 8.9 . . < 5 HIGH LOCKNEY ISD LOCKNEY H S . . . . 36 . . . < 5 TESTED FOARD CROWELL ISD CROWELL H S . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED FORT BEND FORT BEND ISD 507 535 1043 2,454 3,196 76.8 916 37.3 CLEMENTS H S 552 596 1148 627 646 97.1 351 56.0 DULLES H S 503 539 1042 386 490 78.8 140 36.3 KEMPNER H S 504 536 1040 347 493 70.4 121 34.9 LAWRENCE E ELKINS 490 503 993 409 544 75.2 130 31.8 STEPHEN F AUSTIN 504 530 1034 481 610 78.9 164 34.1 WILLOWRIDGE H S 425 417 843 204 383 53.3 10 4.9 LAMAR CONSOLIDA 501 499 1000 234 691 33.9 67 28.6 B F TERRY H S 494 484 979 122 385 31.7 32 26.2 LAMAR CONS H S 509 518 1026 111 306 36.3 35 31.5 NEEDVILLE ISD NEEDVILLE H S 516 515 1031 37 127 29.1 9 24.3 STAFFORD MSD STAFFORD HIGH SCH 462 489 951 92 137 67.2 14 15.2 FRANKLIN MOUNT VERNON IS MT VERNON H S 493 491 984 9 85 10.6 . . < 5 HIGH FREESTONE FAIRFIELD ISD FAIRFIELD H S 497 508 1004 36 81 44.4 12 33.3 TEAGUE ISD TEAGUE H S 506 493 999 35 66 53.0 12 34.3 WORTHAM ISD WORTHAM H S . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED FRIO DILLEY ISD DILLEY H S . . . . 38 . . . < 5 TESTED PEARSALL ISD 449 478 927 10 126 7.9 . . < 5 HIGH PEARSALL H S 449 478 927 10 124 8.1 . . < 5 HIGH GAINES LOOP ISD LOOP SCHOOL . . . . 13 . . . NONE TESTED SEAGRAVES ISD SEAGRAVES H S . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED SEMINOLE ISD 459 476 935 51 127 40.2 11 21.6 SEMINOLE H S 459 476 935 51 121 42.1 11 21.6 GALVESTON CLEAR CREEK ISD 525 539 1064 1,246 1,547 80.5 498 40.0 CLEAR BROOK H S 500 510 1011 341 419 81.4 . . <100 MASKED CLEAR CREEK H S 509 524 1033 366 473 77.4 123 33.6 CLEAR LAKE H S 552 570 1122 531 618 85.9 277 52.2 CLEAR VIEW ALTER 454 421 875 8 37 21.6 . . <100 MASKED DICKINSON ISD DICKINSON H S 465 473 938 146 274 53.3 30 20.5 FRIENDSWOOD ISD FRIENDSWOOD H S 521 538 1059 271 325 83.4 105 38.7 GALVESTON ISD BALL H S 492 500 991 191 409 46.7 49 25.7 HIGH ISLAND ISD HIGH ISLAND H S 459 471 930 14 29 48.3 . . < 5 HIGH HITCHCOCK ISD HITCHCOCK H S 418 421 839 23 71 32.4 . . < 5 HIGH LA MARQUE ISD LA MARQUE H S 431 423 855 124 237 52.3 12 9.7 SANTA FE ISD SANTA FE H S 478 471 949 104 256 40.6 20 19.2 TEXAS CITY ISD 477 474 951 135 273 49.5 24 17.8 TEXAS CITY H S 477 474 951 135 272 49.6 24 17.8 GARZA POST ISD POST H S 489 491 980 15 41 36.6 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTHLAND ISD SOUTHLAND SCHOOL . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED GILLESPIE FREDERICKSBURG 507 507 1014 121 188 64.4 33 27.3 FREDERICKSBURG H 507 507 1014 121 184 65.8 33 27.3 HARPER ISD HARPER H S 563 560 1123 8 22 36.4 . . < 5 HIGH GLASSCOCK GLASSCOCK COUNT GLASSCOCK COUNTY 500 543 1043 9 21 42.9 . . < 5 HIGH GOLIAD GOLIAD ISD GOLIAD H S 468 468 936 57 81 70.4 6 10.5 GONZALES GONZALES ISD 481 477 957 67 129 51.9 16 23.9 GONZALES H S 481 477 957 67 125 53.6 16 23.9 NIXON-SMILEY CO NIXON-SMILEY H S . . . . 40 . . . < 5 TESTED WAELDER ISD WAELDER H S . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED GRAY LEFORS ISD LEFORS SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED MCLEAN ISD MCLEAN SCHOOL . . . . 17 . . . NONE TESTED

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 47: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

39

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

GRAY PAMPA ISD 507 508 1015 106 218 48.6 29 27.4 PAMPA H S 507 508 1015 106 202 52.5 29 27.4 GRAYSON BELLS ISD BELLS H S 458 509 968 17 36 47.2 . . < 5 HIGH COLLINSVILLE IS COLLINSVILLE H S . . . . 24 . . . < 5 TESTED DENISON ISD 560 560 1120 48 251 19.1 26 54.2 DENISON H S 560 560 1120 48 240 20.0 26 54.2 GUNTER ISD GUNTER H S 528 510 1038 9 41 22.0 . . < 5 HIGH HOWE ISD HOWE H S 545 532 1077 13 70 18.6 6 46.2 POTTSBORO ISD POTTSBORO H S 509 514 1023 21 63 33.3 8 38.1 S AND S CONS IS S AND S CONS H S 473 516 989 14 36 38.9 5 35.7 SHERMAN ISD 527 542 1069 143 324 44.1 56 39.2 SHERMAN HIGH SCHO 527 542 1069 143 298 48.0 56 39.2 TOM BEAN ISD TOM BEAN H S 462 487 949 17 47 36.2 . . < 5 HIGH VAN ALSTYNE ISD VAN ALSTYNE H S 499 511 1010 31 54 57.4 10 32.3 WHITESBORO ISD WHITESBORO H S 488 539 1027 9 92 9.8 . . < 5 HIGH WHITEWRIGHT ISD WHITEWRIGHT H S 524 534 1058 5 34 14.7 . . < 5 HIGH GREGG EAST TEXAS CHAR EAST TEXAS CHARTE . . . . 29 . . . NONE TESTED GLADEWATER ISD GLADEWATER H S 476 486 961 44 116 37.9 9 20.5 KILGORE ISD 521 520 1040 42 222 18.9 14 33.3 KILGORE H S 521 520 1040 42 210 20.0 14 33.3 LONGVIEW ISD 513 525 1037 165 367 45.0 64 38.8 LONGVIEW H S 513 525 1037 165 367 45.0 64 38.8 PINE TREE ISD PINE TREE H S 522 519 1041 160 247 64.8 60 37.5 SABINE ISD SABINE H S 491 526 1016 36 83 43.4 10 27.8 SPRING HILL ISD SPRING HILL H S 508 507 1015 20 96 20.8 7 35.0 WHITE OAK ISD WHITE OAK H S 531 562 1093 15 81 18.5 7 46.7 GRIMES ANDERSON-SHIRO ANDERSON-SHIRO SE 419 414 833 21 33 63.6 . . < 5 HIGH IOLA ISD IOLA H S 424 459 884 14 28 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH NAVASOTA ISD NAVASOTA H S 490 520 1010 45 147 30.6 11 24.4 RICHARDS ISD RICHARDS H S . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED GUADALUPE MARION ISD 476 484 960 44 76 57.9 8 18.2 MARION H S 476 484 960 44 67 65.7 8 18.2 NAVARRO ISD NAVARRO H S 485 473 958 34 50 68.0 5 14.7 SCHERTZ-CIBOLO- 489 501 991 181 390 46.4 36 19.9 SAMUEL CLEMENS H 489 501 991 181 357 50.7 36 19.9 SEGUIN ISD 490 489 979 192 384 50.0 46 24.0 SEGUIN HIGH SCHOO 490 489 979 192 334 57.5 46 24.0 HALE ABERNATHY ISD ABERNATHY H S 448 463 911 16 50 32.0 . . < 5 HIGH COTTON CENTER I COTTON CENTER SCH . . . . 15 . . . NONE TESTED HALE CENTER ISD HALE CENTER H S . . . . 32 . . . < 5 TESTED PETERSBURG ISD . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED PLAINVIEW ISD 488 492 980 98 284 34.5 28 28.6 PLAINVIEW H S 488 492 980 98 275 35.6 28 28.6 HALL LAKEVIEW ISD LAKEVIEW SCHOOL . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA MEMPHIS ISD MEMPHIS H S . . . . 33 . . . < 5 TESTED TURKEY-QUITAQUE VALLEY SCHOOL . . . . 19 . . . < 5 TESTED HAMILTON HAMILTON ISD HAMILTON H S 593 643 1235 11 51 21.6 6 54.5 HICO ISD HICO H S 484 513 996 17 44 38.6 . . < 5 HIGH HANSFORD GRUVER ISD GRUVER H S . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTED SPEARMAN ISD SPEARMAN H S . . . . 48 . . . < 5 TESTED HARDEMAN CHILLICOTHE ISD CHILLICOTHE H S . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED QUANAH ISD QUANAH H S . . . . 50 . . . < 5 TESTED HARDIN HARDIN-JEFFERSO 484 495 978 99 130 76.2 26 26.3 HARDIN-JEFFERSON 484 495 978 99 129 76.7 26 26.3 KOUNTZE ISD KOUNTZE H S 484 475 959 34 60 56.7 . . < 5 HIGH LUMBERTON ISD LUMBERTON H S 476 449 925 137 200 68.5 18 13.1 SILSBEE ISD 472 451 923 84 167 50.3 9 10.7 SILSBEE H S 472 451 923 84 167 50.3 9 10.7 WEST HARDIN COU WEST HARDIN H S 462 460 923 21 43 48.8 . . < 5 HIGH HARRIS ACADEMY OF ACCE ACADEMY OF ACCELE . . . . 15 . . . NONE TESTED ALDINE ISD 429 442 871 892 1,858 48.0 92 10.3 ALDINE H S 414 417 832 225 465 48.4 . . <20 MASKED CARVER H S FOR A 456 444 900 41 60 68.3 . . <20 MASKED CHESTER W NIMITZ 452 463 915 208 379 54.9 31 14.9 EISENHOWER H S 427 451 878 239 495 48.3 28 11.7 MACARTHUR H S 417 437 854 179 406 44.1 . . <20 MASKED ALIEF ISD 457 489 946 1,077 1,553 69.3 221 20.5 ELSIK H S 455 486 941 493 673 73.3 99 20.1 HASTINGS H S 454 489 942 502 761 66.0 97 19.3

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 48: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

40

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HARRIS ALIEF ISD KERR H S 484 509 993 82 118 69.5 25 30.5 ALPHONSO CRUTCH ALPHONSO CRUTCH’S . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED AMERICAN ACADEM AMERICAN ACADEMY . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED CALVIN NELMS CH CALVIN NELMS CHAR . . . . 21 . . . NONE TESTED CHANNELVIEW ISD 473 461 934 132 261 50.6 18 13.6 CHANNELVIEW HIGH 473 461 934 132 248 53.2 18 13.6 COMQUEST ACADEM COMQUEST ACADEMY . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED CROSBY ISD CROSBY H S 502 508 1010 76 210 36.2 25 32.9 CYPRESS-FAIRBAN 510 532 1042 2,298 3,216 71.5 835 36.3 CY-FAIR H S 509 521 1031 384 525 73.1 120 31.3 CYPRESS CREEK H S 520 536 1056 485 578 83.9 194 40.0 CYPRESS FALLS H S 503 533 1036 450 574 78.4 155 34.4 CYPRESS SPRINGS H 505 526 1032 241 361 66.8 . . <80 MASKED JERSEY VILLAGE H 494 526 1021 375 589 63.7 128 34.1 LANGHAM CREEK H S 527 552 1079 345 453 76.2 160 46.4 WINDFERN H S 466 495 961 18 135 13.3 . . <80 MASKED DEER PARK ISD 497 512 1010 348 664 52.4 99 28.4 DEER PARK H S 497 512 1010 348 623 55.9 99 28.4 ED WHITE SCHOOL ED WHITE MEMORIAL . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED GALENA PARK ISD 462 474 936 248 892 27.8 46 18.5 GALENA PARK H S 420 451 871 54 286 18.9 . . <50 MASKED NORTH SHORE SR H 474 480 954 194 584 33.2 . . <50 MASKED GEORGE I SANCHE GEORGE I SANCHEZ 390 363 753 18 62 29.0 . . < 5 HIGH GIRLS & BOYS PR GIRLS & BOYS PREP 395 382 777 12 39 30.8 . . < 5 HIGH GOOSE CREEK CIS 470 491 961 353 883 40.0 71 20.1 LEE H S 479 491 970 131 363 36.1 25 19.1 STERLING H S 465 491 956 220 471 46.7 46 20.9 GULF SHORES ACA GULF SHORES ACADE . . . . 67 . . . NONE TESTED HEIGHTS CHARTER HEIGHTS CHARTER S . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED HOUSTON CAN ACA HOUSTON CAN! ACAD . . . . 94 . . . NONE TESTED HOUSTON ISD 463 466 929 3,969 7,086 56.0 848 21.4 AUSTIN H S 387 409 795 131 373 35.1 . . < 5 HIGH BARBARA JORDAN H 397 405 803 115 193 59.6 . . < 5 HIGH BELLAIRE H S 557 581 1138 538 615 87.5 298 55.4 CONTEMPORARY LRN 341 350 691 10 105 9.5 . . < 5 HIGH DAVIS H S 391 418 809 139 265 52.5 . . < 5 HIGH DEBAKEY H S FOR H 575 587 1162 117 114 100 78 66.7 FURR H S 386 396 782 87 189 46.0 . . < 5 HIGH JONES H S 448 422 871 133 169 78.7 19 14.3 KASHMERE H S 382 371 752 64 114 56.1 . . < 5 HIGH LAMAR H S 543 535 1078 420 532 78.9 191 45.5 LAW ENFCMT-CRIM J 476 450 926 141 189 74.6 16 11.3 LEE H S 462 461 923 180 408 44.1 30 16.7 MADISON H S 394 393 787 172 281 61.2 . . < 5 HIGH MIDDLE COLLEGE FO 458 430 888 6 11 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH MILBY H S 424 456 881 215 540 39.8 21 9.8 PERFOR & VIS ARTS 564 544 1109 125 129 96.9 64 51.2 REAGAN H S 428 424 852 114 341 33.4 7 6.1 SAM HOUSTON H S 404 399 803 135 432 31.3 . . < 5 HIGH SCARBOROUGH H S 453 442 895 75 133 56.4 5 6.7 SHARPSTOWN H S 441 452 894 147 249 59.0 15 10.2 STERLING H S 405 394 799 106 227 46.7 . . < 5 HIGH WALTRIP H S 466 452 917 123 221 55.7 25 20.3 WASHINGTON B T H 443 477 920 139 221 62.9 25 18.0 WESTBURY H S 454 458 912 233 359 64.9 32 13.7 WHEATLEY H S 362 366 727 26 91 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH WORTHING H S 384 379 764 157 263 59.7 . . < 5 HIGH YATES H S 402 361 763 114 240 47.5 . . < 5 HIGH HUFFMAN ISD 487 480 967 68 133 51.1 13 19.1 HARGRAVE H S 487 480 967 68 132 51.5 13 19.1 HUMBLE ISD 531 536 1067 1,090 1,428 76.3 445 40.8 HUMBLE H S 496 503 999 371 583 63.6 97 26.1 KINGWOOD H S 549 555 1105 691 796 86.8 341 49.3 QUEST H S 523 499 1022 28 49 57.1 7 25.0 JESSE JACKSON A JESSE JACKSON ACA . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED KATY ISD 529 551 1081 1,253 1,716 73.0 549 43.8 KATY H S 520 534 1054 345 554 62.3 125 36.2 MAYDE CREEK H S 520 546 1066 294 470 62.6 130 44.2 TAYLOR H S 539 564 1102 614 692 88.7 294 47.9

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 49: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

41

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HARRIS KLEIN ISD 512 536 1048 1,432 1,912 74.9 557 38.9 KLEIN FOREST H S 476 511 987 377 598 63.0 102 27.1 KLEIN H S 526 553 1079 635 747 85.0 289 45.5 KLEIN OAK H S 525 532 1057 420 566 74.2 166 39.5 LA PORTE ISD 493 510 1003 163 381 42.8 43 26.4 LA PORTE HIGH SCH 493 510 1003 163 352 46.3 43 26.4 NORTH FOREST IS 393 379 772 179 566 31.6 . . < 5 HIGH FOREST BROOK H S 390 376 766 82 301 27.2 . . < 5 HIGH SMILEY H S 395 382 777 97 264 36.7 . . < 5 HIGH NORTH HOUSTON H NORTH HOUSTON H S . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED PASADENA ISD 475 497 971 692 1,900 36.4 164 23.7 DOBIE H S 479 508 988 234 493 47.5 61 26.1 PASADENA H S 475 508 982 109 409 26.7 27 24.8 RAYBURN H S 485 503 988 172 471 36.5 48 27.9 SOUTH HOUSTON H S 458 469 927 177 496 35.7 28 15.8 PREPARED TABLE PREPARED TABLE . . . . 23 . . . NONE TESTED SHELDON ISD C E KING H S 448 430 878 58 162 35.8 6 10.3 SOUTHWEST HIGH SOUTHWEST HIGH SC 353 364 717 17 67 25.4 . . < 5 HIGH SPRING BRANCH I 528 556 1084 1,100 1,634 67.3 541 49.2 MEMORIAL H S 558 589 1147 407 439 92.7 255 62.7 NORTHBROOK H S 425 457 882 128 315 40.6 18 14.1 SPRING WOODS H S 477 507 985 172 354 48.6 48 27.9 STRATFORD H S 554 576 1130 393 431 91.2 220 56.0 SPRING ISD 505 520 1025 562 1,078 52.1 188 33.5 SPRING H S 508 533 1041 198 457 43.3 70 35.4 WESTFIELD H S 503 514 1017 364 618 58.9 118 32.4 TOMBALL ISD TOMBALL H S 497 513 1010 278 401 69.3 73 26.3 WEST HOUSTON CH WEST HOUSTON CHAR . . . . 7 . . . < 5 TESTED HARRISON ELYSIAN FIELDS ELYSIAN FIELDS H . . . . 68 . . . < 5 TESTED HALLSVILLE ISD HALLSVILLE H S 486 502 988 122 227 53.7 31 25.4 HARLETON ISD HARLETON H S . . . . 36 . . . < 5 TESTED KARNACK ISD KARNACK H S . . . . 14 . . . NONE TESTED MARSHALL ISD 491 486 977 110 324 34.0 26 23.6 MARSHALL H S 491 486 977 110 315 34.9 26 23.6 WASKOM ISD WASKOM H S . . . . 34 . . . < 5 TESTED HARTLEY CHANNING ISD CHANNING SCHOOL . . . . 7 . . . < 5 TESTED HARTLEY ISD HARTLEY SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED HASKELL HASKELL CISD HASKELL H S 552 565 1117 6 47 12.8 . . < 5 HIGH PAINT CREEK ISD PAINT CREEK SCHOO . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED ROCHESTER ISD ROCHESTER SCHOOL . . . . 15 . . . NONE TESTED RULE ISD RULE SCHOOL . . . . 16 . . . NONE TESTED HAYS DRIPPING SPRING DRIPPING SPRINGS 534 542 1076 118 140 84.3 49 41.5 HAYS CONS ISD JACK C HAYS H S 508 511 1019 175 367 47.7 62 35.4 KATHERINE ANNE KATHERINE ANNE PO . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED SAN MARCOS CONS 487 484 972 156 364 42.9 33 21.2 SAN MARCOS H S 487 484 972 156 340 45.9 33 21.2 WIMBERLEY ISD WIMBERLEY H S 517 518 1036 69 109 63.3 24 34.8 HEMPHILL CANADIAN ISD CANADIAN H S . . . . 40 . . . NONE TESTED HENDERSON ATHENS ISD 500 497 997 61 186 32.8 17 27.9 ATHENS H S 500 497 997 61 181 33.7 17 27.9 BROWNSBORO ISD 449 457 905 35 113 31.0 . . < 5 HIGH BROWNSBORO H S 449 457 905 35 108 32.4 . . < 5 HIGH CROSS ROADS ISD 501 481 983 7 37 18.9 . . < 5 HIGH CROSS ROADS H S 501 481 983 7 34 20.6 . . < 5 HIGH EUSTACE ISD EUSTACE H S 489 493 981 16 75 21.3 . . < 5 HIGH LAPOYNOR ISD . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED MALAKOFF ISD MALAKOFF H S 472 458 930 15 64 23.4 . . < 5 HIGH TRINIDAD ISD TRINIDAD SCHOOL . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED HIDALGO DONNA ISD DONNA H S 434 446 880 45 398 11.3 6 13.3 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (PH . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED EDCOUCH-ELSA IS EDCOUCH-ELSA H S 374 396 770 108 271 39.9 . . < 5 HIGH EDINBURG CISD 469 466 935 186 904 20.6 32 17.2 EDINBURG H S 459 459 917 95 481 19.8 12 12.6 EDINBURG NORTH H 480 473 953 91 423 21.5 20 22.0 HIDALGO ISD HIDALGO H S . . . . 139 . . . < 5 TESTED LA JOYA ISD 479 485 965 33 630 5.2 6 18.2 LA JOYA H S 479 485 965 33 599 5.5 6 18.2 LA VILLA ISD LA VILLA H S . . . . 43 . . . < 5 TESTED MCALLEN ISD 473 487 960 560 1,208 46.4 110 19.6

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 50: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

42

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HIDALGO MCALLEN ISD LAMAR ACADEMY 398 418 816 16 89 18.0 . . <30 MASKED MCALLEN H S 475 474 949 157 311 50.5 . . <30 MASKED MCALLEN MEMORIAL 489 509 997 217 401 54.1 57 26.3 ROWE H S 458 479 937 170 382 44.5 . . <30 MASKED MERCEDES ISD 466 470 935 25 233 10.7 5 20.0 MERCEDES H S 466 470 935 25 210 11.9 5 20.0 MID-VALLEY ACAD MID-VALLEY ACADEM . . . . 27 . . . NONE TESTED MISSION CONS IS 446 450 896 211 590 35.8 25 11.8 MISSION H S 446 450 896 211 584 36.1 25 11.8 ONE STOP MULTIS ONE STOP MULTISER . . . . 38 . . . NONE TESTED PHARR-SAN JUAN- 465 493 958 33 1,014 3.3 11 33.3 PSJA H S 521 551 1072 15 294 5.1 . . <10 MASKED PSJA MEMORIAL H S 399 435 834 8 321 2.5 . . <10 MASKED PSJA NORTH H S 443 456 899 9 355 2.5 . . <10 MASKED PROGRESO ISD . . . . 85 . . . < 5 TESTED SENTRY TECHNOLO SENTRY TECHNOLOGY . . . . 99 . . . NONE TESTED SHARYLAND ISD SHARYLAND H S 473 471 944 126 272 46.3 23 18.3 TECHNOLOGY EDUC TECHNOLOGY EDUCAT . . . . 24 . . . NONE TESTED VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW H S . . . . 83 . . . NONE TESTED WESLACO ISD 473 496 969 73 590 12.4 15 20.5 WESLACO H S 471 496 967 72 533 13.5 15 20.8 HILL ABBOTT ISD ABBOTT SCHOOL 521 611 1133 7 20 35.0 . . < 5 HIGH AQUILLA ISD AQUILLA SCHOOL . . . . 4 . . . NONE TESTED BLUM ISD BLUM H S 479 449 928 9 19 47.4 . . < 5 HIGH BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED COVINGTON ISD COVINGTON SCHOOL . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED HILLSBORO ISD HILLSBORO H S 492 475 967 16 71 22.5 . . < 5 HIGH HUBBARD ISD HUBBARD H S 567 567 1133 6 27 22.2 5 83.3 ITASCA ISD ITASCA H S . . . . 19 . . . < 5 TESTED PENELOPE ISD PENELOPE SCHOOL . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED WHITNEY ISD WHITNEY H S 473 454 928 16 66 24.2 . . < 5 HIGH HOCKLEY ANTON ISD . . . . 23 . . . < 5 TESTED LEVELLAND ISD 488 479 967 50 187 26.7 10 20.0 LEVELLAND H S 488 479 967 50 187 26.7 10 20.0 ROPES ISD . . . . 41 . . . < 5 TESTED SMYER ISD SMYER H S 445 419 864 8 16 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH SUNDOWN ISD 468 564 1032 10 38 26.3 . . < 5 HIGH SUNDOWN H S 468 564 1032 10 35 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH WHITHARRAL ISD . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTED HOOD GRANBURY ISD 487 496 983 181 333 54.4 39 21.5 GRANBURY H S 487 496 983 181 313 57.8 39 21.5 LIPAN ISD LIPAN H S 531 464 995 8 21 38.1 . . < 5 HIGH TOLAR ISD TOLAR H S 510 520 1030 6 38 15.8 . . < 5 HIGH HOPKINS COMO-PICKTON CI . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTED CUMBY ISD CUMBY H S . . . . 19 . . . NONE TESTED MILLER GROVE IS MILLER GROVE SCHO . . . . 21 . . . NONE TESTED NORTH HOPKINS I NORTH HOPKINS H S . . . . 21 . . . < 5 TESTED SALTILLO ISD SALTILLO SCHOOL . . . . 19 . . . NONE TESTED SULPHUR BLUFF I SULPHUR BLUFF SCH . . . . 19 . . . NONE TESTED SULPHUR SPRINGS SULPHUR SPRINGS H 493 509 1002 85 201 42.3 24 28.2 HOUSTON CROCKETT ISD CROCKETT H S 467 477 945 33 85 38.8 . . < 5 HIGH GRAPELAND ISD GRAPELAND H S 479 474 953 17 50 34.0 . . < 5 HIGH KENNARD ISD KENNARD H S . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED LATEXO ISD LATEXO H S 438 426 864 16 28 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH LOVELADY ISD LOVELADY H S 450 450 900 21 29 72.4 . . < 5 HIGH HOWARD BIG SPRING ISD BIG SPRING H S 541 535 1075 13 220 5.9 7 53.8 COAHOMA ISD COAHOMA H S . . . . 62 . . . < 5 TESTED FORSAN ISD FORSAN H S . . . . 44 . . . < 5 TESTED HUDSPETH DELL CITY ISD DELL CITY SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED FT HANCOCK ISD FORT HANCOCK SCHO . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED SIERRA BLANCA I SIERRA BLANCA SCH . . . . 6 . . . NONE TESTED HUNT BLAND ISD BLAND H S 470 493 963 8 19 42.1 . . < 5 HIGH BOLES ISD 440 409 849 15 27 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH BOLES ISD HIGH SC 440 409 849 15 25 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH CADDO MILLS ISD CADDO MILLS H S 487 477 964 20 36 55.6 5 25.0 CAMPBELL ISD CAMPBELL H S . . . . 16 . . . NONE TESTED CELESTE ISD CELESTE H S 501 503 1004 11 29 37.9 . . < 5 HIGH COMMERCE ISD COMMERCE H S 513 529 1042 33 102 32.4 8 24.2 GREENVILLE ISD 495 485 980 126 230 54.8 33 26.2

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 51: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

43

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HUNT GREENVILLE ISD GREENVILLE H S 492 485 978 123 224 54.9 32 26.0 LONE OAK ISD LONE OAK H S 476 429 905 17 28 60.7 . . < 5 HIGH QUINLAN ISD FORD H S 461 469 930 29 110 26.4 5 17.2 WOLFE CITY ISD WOLFE CITY H S . . . . 20 . . . NONE TESTED HUTCHINSON BORGER ISD 511 533 1044 52 206 25.2 18 34.6 BORGER H S 511 533 1044 52 204 25.5 18 34.6 PLEMONS-STINNET 504 467 971 7 53 13.2 . . < 5 HIGH WEST TEXAS H S 504 467 971 7 52 13.5 . . < 5 HIGH SANFORD ISD . . . . 73 . . . < 5 TESTED IRION IRION CO ISD 492 528 1021 13 25 52.0 6 46.2 IRION H S 492 528 1021 13 24 54.2 6 46.2 JACK BRYSON ISD BRYSON SCHOOL 394 436 830 13 20 65.0 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSBORO ISD 500 497 997 22 53 41.5 5 22.7 JACKSBORO H S 500 497 997 22 51 43.1 5 22.7 PERRIN-WHITT CO PERRIN H S 494 484 979 7 17 41.2 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSON EDNA ISD 543 552 1095 18 78 23.1 8 44.4 EDNA H S 543 552 1095 18 74 24.3 8 44.4 GANADO ISD GANADO H S 455 476 932 19 41 46.3 . . < 5 HIGH INDUSTRIAL ISD INDUSTRIAL H S 514 535 1049 31 70 44.3 12 38.7 JASPER BROOKELAND ISD BROOKELAND H S . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED BUNA ISD BUNA H S 457 436 892 57 84 67.9 5 8.8 EVADALE ISD EVADALE H S 402 411 813 22 31 71.0 . . < 5 HIGH JASPER ISD JASPER H S 491 473 964 79 178 44.4 14 17.7 KIRBYVILLE CISD KIRBYVILLE H S 485 489 974 10 96 10.4 . . < 5 HIGH JEFF DAVIS FT DAVIS ISD 496 446 943 11 23 47.8 . . < 5 HIGH FT DAVIS H S 496 446 943 11 23 47.8 . . < 5 HIGH VALENTINE ISD VALENTINE SCHOOL . . . . 4 . . . < 5 TESTED JEFFERSON BEAUMONT ISD 482 472 955 421 1,002 42.0 99 23.5 CENTRAL SENIOR H 406 418 824 141 314 44.9 7 5.0 WEST BROOK SR H S 521 500 1020 280 408 68.6 92 32.9 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (BE . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED HAMSHIRE-FANNET HAMSHIRE-FANNETT 468 475 944 91 130 70.0 12 13.2 NEDERLAND ISD NEDERLAND H S 501 501 1003 209 300 69.7 51 24.4 PORT ARTHUR ISD 428 424 852 186 470 39.6 15 8.1 AUSTIN H S 426 435 861 28 68 41.2 . . <20 MASKED JEFFERSON H S 437 441 877 80 236 33.9 . . <20 MASKED LINCOLN H S 419 403 822 78 166 47.0 . . <20 MASKED PORT NECHES-GRO PORT NECHES-GROVE 482 490 972 229 373 61.4 59 25.8 SABINE PASS ISD SABINE PASS SCHOO 410 424 834 11 11 100 . . < 5 HIGH JIM HOGG JIM HOGG COUNTY HEBBRONVILLE H S 421 444 865 12 62 19.4 . . < 5 HIGH JIM WELLS ALICE ISD ALICE H S 508 510 1018 33 312 10.6 11 33.3 BEN BOLT-PALITO BEN BOLT-PAL BLAN . . . . 42 . . . < 5 TESTED ORANGE GROVE IS ORANGE GROVE H S . . . . 76 . . . < 5 TESTED PREMONT ISD PREMONT H S 428 421 849 16 50 32.0 . . < 5 HIGH JOHNSON ALVARADO ISD ALVARADO H S 456 452 908 133 166 80.1 20 15.0 BURLESON ISD 505 504 1009 198 335 59.1 56 28.3 BURLESON H S 505 504 1009 198 322 61.5 56 28.3 CLEBURNE ISD 495 499 993 153 310 49.4 47 30.7 CLEBURNE H S 495 499 993 153 284 53.9 47 30.7 GODLEY ISD GODLEY H S 480 442 922 26 61 42.6 5 19.2 GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW H S 509 531 1040 24 55 43.6 7 29.2 JOSHUA ISD 471 483 955 91 222 41.0 18 19.8 JOSHUA H S 470 482 952 90 205 43.9 17 18.9 KEENE ISD 457 448 905 19 33 57.6 . . < 5 HIGH KEENE H S 457 448 905 19 31 61.3 . . < 5 HIGH RIO VISTA ISD RIO VISTA H S 482 473 956 29 42 69.0 . . < 5 HIGH VENUS ISD VENUS H S 444 518 962 12 46 26.1 . . < 5 HIGH JONES ANSON ISD ANSON H S 498 508 1006 15 41 36.6 . . < 5 HIGH HAMLIN ISD HAMLIN H S . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED HAWLEY ISD HAWLEY H S . . . . 39 . . . NONE TESTED LUEDERS-AVOCA I LUEDERS-AVOCA H S . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED STAMFORD ISD 546 590 1136 5 43 11.6 . . < 5 HIGH STAMFORD JR-SR H 546 590 1136 5 38 13.2 . . < 5 HIGH KARNES FALLS CITY ISD FALLS CITY H S 458 454 913 12 21 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH KARNES CITY ISD KARNES CITY H S 510 515 1024 22 60 36.7 8 36.4 KENEDY ISD 460 464 924 22 68 32.4 5 22.7 KENEDY HIGH SCHO 460 464 924 22 60 36.7 5 22.7 RUNGE ISD RUNGE H S . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED KAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD 498 501 999 47 102 46.1 13 27.7

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 52: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

44

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

KAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD CRANDALL H S 498 501 999 47 85 55.3 13 27.7 FORNEY ISD FORNEY H S 484 493 978 65 133 48.9 16 24.6 KAUFMAN ISD KAUFMAN H S 465 438 903 74 152 48.7 12 16.2 KEMP ISD KEMP HIGH SCHOOL 511 507 1018 19 73 26.0 . . < 5 HIGH MABANK ISD MABANK H S 473 467 940 49 140 35.0 8 16.3 SCURRY-ROSSER I SCURRY-ROSSER H S 501 513 1014 15 43 34.9 . . < 5 HIGH TERRELL ISD TERRELL H S 487 470 957 66 178 37.1 12 18.2 KENDALL BOERNE ISD BOERNE H S 514 506 1020 240 300 80.0 66 27.5 COMFORT ISD COMFORT H S 512 460 971 25 45 55.6 5 20.0 KENT JAYTON-GIRARD I JAYTON SCHOOLS . . . . 14 . . . NONE TESTED KERR CENTER POINT IS CENTER POINT H S 447 433 880 18 26 69.2 . . < 5 HIGH INGRAM ISD INGRAM-TOM MOORE 485 480 965 51 88 58.0 12 23.5 KERRVILLE ISD 527 531 1058 157 257 61.1 64 40.8 TIVY H S 528 532 1059 156 239 65.3 64 41.0 KIMBLE JUNCTION ISD JUNCTION H S 437 458 895 26 37 70.3 . . < 5 HIGH KING GUTHRIE CSD GUTHRIE SCHOOL . . . . 4 . . . < 5 TESTED KINNEY BRACKETT ISD 523 493 1015 12 44 27.3 5 41.7 BRACKETT H S 523 493 1015 12 40 30.0 5 41.7 KLEBERG KINGSVILLE ISD 460 446 906 114 306 37.3 14 12.3 H M KING HIGH SCH 460 446 906 114 277 41.2 14 12.3 RIVIERA ISD KAUFER H S 464 473 937 36 48 75.0 6 16.7 SANTA GERTRUDIS ACADEMY H S 482 484 965 13 34 38.2 . . < 5 HIGH KNOX BENJAMIN ISD BENJAMIN SCHOOL . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED GOREE ISD GOREE SCHOOL . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED KNOX CITY-O’BRI KNOX CITY H S . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED MUNDAY ISD MUNDAY H S . . . . 33 . . . < 5 TESTED LA SALLE COTULLA ISD . . . . 60 . . . < 5 TESTED LAMAR CHISUM ISD CHISUM H S . . . . 50 . . . < 5 TESTED NORTH LAMAR ISD NORTH LAMAR H S 512 493 1004 52 173 30.1 12 23.1 PARIS ISD 524 524 1048 57 159 35.8 21 36.8 PARIS H S 524 524 1048 57 153 37.3 21 36.8 PRAIRILAND ISD PRAIRILAND H S . . . . 61 . . . < 5 TESTED ROXTON ISD ROXTON H S . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED LAMB AMHERST ISD AMHERST SCHOOL . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED LITTLEFIELD ISD LITTLEFIELD H S 439 414 853 7 92 7.6 . . < 5 HIGH OLTON ISD 529 536 1065 16 39 41.0 5 31.3 OLTON H S 529 536 1065 16 36 44.4 5 31.3 SPADE ISD SPADE SCHOOL . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED SPRINGLAKE-EART SPRINGLAKE-EARTH . . . . 27 . . . < 5 TESTED SUDAN ISD . . . . 21 . . . NONE TESTED LAMPASAS CEDAR RIDGE CHA CEDAR RIDGE CHART . . . . 3 . . . < 5 TESTED LAMPASAS ISD 502 498 1000 93 187 49.7 26 28.0 LAMPASAS H S 502 498 1000 93 176 52.8 26 28.0 LOMETA ISD LOMETA SCHOOL 424 448 871 8 15 53.3 . . < 5 HIGH LAVACA HALLETTSVILLE I HALLETTSVILLE H S 478 500 979 36 91 39.6 7 19.4 MOULTON ISD MOULTON H S 470 508 978 25 28 89.3 6 24.0 SHINER ISD SHINER H S 485 519 1003 22 31 71.0 7 31.8 LEE DIME BOX ISD DIME BOX SCHOOL 448 520 968 5 . . . . NO GRADS/TEA GIDDINGS ISD 475 492 967 55 143 38.5 10 18.2 GIDDINGS H S 475 492 967 55 138 39.9 10 18.2 LEXINGTON ISD LEXINGTON H S 471 499 969 34 62 54.8 9 26.5 LEON BUFFALO ISD BUFFALO H S 447 468 915 22 47 46.8 . . < 5 HIGH CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE JR-SR 435 432 866 42 56 75.0 . . < 5 HIGH LEON ISD LEON H S 503 513 1016 14 42 33.3 5 35.7 NORMANGEE ISD NORMANGEE H S 460 444 904 21 31 67.7 . . < 5 HIGH OAKWOOD ISD OAKWOOD H S 458 464 922 5 16 31.3 . . < 5 HIGH LIBERTY CLEVELAND ISD CLEVELAND H S 462 461 923 38 120 31.7 10 26.3 DAYTON ISD 459 460 919 181 218 83.0 24 13.3 DAYTON H S 459 460 919 181 212 85.4 24 13.3 HARDIN ISD HARDIN H S 479 464 943 35 68 51.5 . . < 5 HIGH HULL-DAISETTA I 411 427 838 10 29 34.5 . . < 5 HIGH HULL-DAISETTA H S 411 427 838 10 28 35.7 . . < 5 HIGH LIBERTY ISD 496 500 996 60 131 45.8 16 26.7 LIBERTY H S 496 500 996 60 130 46.2 16 26.7 TARKINGTON ISD TARKINGTON H S 457 468 925 42 81 51.9 5 11.9 LIMESTONE COOLIDGE ISD COOLIDGE H S 415 405 820 6 11 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH GROESBECK ISD 463 486 949 27 90 30.0 . . < 5 HIGH GROESBECK H S 463 486 949 27 83 32.5 . . < 5 HIGH MEXIA ISD 462 492 954 19 96 19.8 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 53: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

45

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

LIMESTONE MEXIA ISD MEXIA H S 462 492 954 19 95 20.0 . . < 5 HIGH LIPSCOMB BOOKER ISD BOOKER JH/H S . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED FOLLETT ISD FOLLETT SCHOOL . . . . 17 . . . NONE TESTED HIGGINS ISD HIGGINS SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED LIVE OAK GEORGE WEST ISD GEORGE WEST H S 497 523 1020 11 71 15.5 . . < 5 HIGH THREE RIVERS IS THREE RIVERS H S 488 532 1020 6 49 12.2 . . < 5 HIGH LLANO LLANO ISD LLANO H S 485 495 980 48 72 66.7 11 22.9 LUBBOCK EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (LU . . . . 3 . . . NONE TESTED FRENSHIP ISD 502 488 991 95 261 36.4 25 26.3 FRENSHIP H S 502 488 991 95 217 43.8 25 26.3 IDALOU ISD IDALOU H S 486 471 958 14 53 26.4 . . < 5 HIGH LUBBOCK ISD 515 516 1031 799 1,648 48.5 286 35.8 CORONADO H S 504 508 1012 274 490 55.9 81 29.6 ESTACADO H S 434 437 871 44 194 22.7 6 13.6 LUBBOCK H S 552 549 1101 257 498 51.6 131 51.0 MONTEREY H S 502 502 1004 224 403 55.6 68 30.4 LUBBOCK-COOPER COOPER H S 464 491 955 19 103 18.4 . . < 5 HIGH LUBBOCK-RICHARD LUBBOCK-RICHARD M . . . . 28 . . . NONE TESTED NEW DEAL ISD NEW DEAL H S 481 481 962 19 45 42.2 . . < 5 HIGH ROOSEVELT ISD ROOSEVELT H S 476 501 978 14 57 24.6 . . < 5 HIGH SHALLOWATER ISD SHALLOWATER H S 480 509 989 28 70 40.0 5 17.9 SLATON ISD SLATON H S 463 462 924 16 67 23.9 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH PLAINS SOUTH PLAINS . . . . 27 . . . NONE TESTED TEXAS TECH UNIV TEXAS TECH H S 627 563 1189 20 . . 15 75.0 NO GRADS/TEA LYNN NEW HOME ISD NEW HOME SCHOOL . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED O’DONNELL ISD O’DONNELL H S . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTED TAHOKA ISD TAHOKA H S 550 536 1086 7 42 16.7 . . < 5 HIGH WILSON ISD WILSON SCHOOL 414 441 856 7 14 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH MADISON MADISONVILLE CO MADISONVILLE HIGH 458 474 932 49 85 57.6 7 14.3 NORTH ZULCH ISD NORTH ZULCH H S 431 428 858 12 22 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH MARION JEFFERSON ISD JEFFERSON H S 568 522 1090 5 70 7.1 . . < 5 HIGH MARTIN GRADY ISD GRADY SCHOOL 517 528 1045 6 14 42.9 . . < 5 HIGH STANTON ISD STANTON H S 480 482 962 27 46 58.7 . . < 5 HIGH MASON MASON ISD MASON H S 473 462 935 22 40 55.0 . . < 5 HIGH MATAGORDA BAY CITY ISD BAY CITY H S 475 504 979 135 228 59.2 30 22.2 PALACIOS ISD PALACIOS H S 454 471 925 47 92 51.1 6 12.8 TIDEHAVEN ISD TIDEHAVEN H S 436 474 909 14 55 25.5 . . < 5 HIGH VAN VLECK ISD VAN VLECK H S 431 465 896 25 63 39.7 . . < 5 HIGH MAVERICK EAGLE PASS ISD 429 443 872 295 559 52.8 19 6.4 EAGLE PASS H S 429 443 872 295 . . 19 6.4 NO GRADS/TEA MCCULLOCH BRADY ISD BRADY H S 530 498 1028 8 68 11.8 . . < 5 HIGH LOHN ISD LOHN SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED ROCHELLE ISD ROCHELLE SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED MCLENNAN AXTELL ISD 535 506 1042 11 49 22.4 5 45.5 AXTELL H S 535 506 1042 11 43 25.6 5 45.5 BOSQUEVILLE ISD BOSQUEVILLE SCHOO . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED BRUCEVILLE-EDDY 525 533 1058 6 60 10.0 . . < 5 HIGH BRUCEVILLE-EDDY H 525 533 1058 6 58 10.3 . . < 5 HIGH CHINA SPRING IS 475 485 960 57 116 49.1 9 15.8 CHINA SPRING H S 475 485 960 57 114 50.0 9 15.8 CONNALLY ISD 506 501 1008 54 130 41.5 17 31.5 CONNALLY H S 506 501 1008 54 125 43.2 17 31.5 CRAWFORD ISD CRAWFORD H S 530 532 1062 30 40 75.0 16 53.3 LA VEGA ISD 450 445 895 20 81 24.7 . . < 5 HIGH LA VEGA H S 450 445 895 20 80 25.0 . . < 5 HIGH LORENA ISD 505 528 1033 53 88 60.2 15 28.3 LORENA H S 505 528 1033 53 87 60.9 15 28.3 MART ISD 482 459 941 12 56 21.4 . . < 5 HIGH MART H S 482 459 941 12 53 22.6 . . < 5 HIGH MCGREGOR ISD MCGREGOR H S 482 522 1004 21 56 37.5 5 23.8 MIDWAY ISD 529 534 1063 191 347 55.0 76 39.8 MIDWAY H S 529 534 1063 191 344 55.5 76 39.8 MOODY ISD MOODY H S . . . . 32 . . . < 5 TESTED RIESEL ISD RIESEL SCHOOL 567 503 1070 7 29 24.1 . . < 5 HIGH ROBINSON ISD ROBINSON H S 476 474 950 58 116 50.0 7 12.1 WACO ISD 452 445 897 169 482 35.1 28 16.6 UNIVERSITY H S 396 408 804 22 161 13.7 . . <30 MASKED WACO H S 460 451 911 147 311 47.3 . . <30 MASKED WEST ISD 489 490 978 75 152 49.3 14 18.7

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 54: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

46

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

MCLENNAN WEST ISD WEST H S 489 490 978 75 146 51.4 14 18.7 MCMULLEN MCMULLEN COUNTY MCMULLEN COUNTY . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED MEDINA D’HANIS ISD D’HANIS SCHOOL 454 543 998 12 18 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH DEVINE ISD DEVINE HIGH SCHOO 455 463 917 51 105 48.6 7 13.7 HONDO ISD HONDO H S 542 550 1092 12 87 13.8 6 50.0 MEDINA VALLEY I 488 483 971 95 195 48.7 21 22.1 MEDINA VALLEY H S 488 483 971 95 179 53.1 21 22.1 NATALIA ISD NATALIA H S 442 456 898 11 37 29.7 . . < 5 HIGH MENARD MENARD ISD MENARD H S . . . . 26 . . . < 5 TESTED MIDLAND EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (MI . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED GREENWOOD ISD GREENWOOD H S 436 449 885 107 106 100 13 12.1 MIDLAND ISD 517 526 1044 622 1,242 50.1 215 34.6 LEE H S 511 527 1038 327 639 51.2 113 34.6 MIDLAND H S 525 525 1051 295 535 55.1 102 34.6 MIDLAND-RICHARD MIDLAND-RICHARD M . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED MILAM BUCKHOLTS ISD BUCKHOLTS SCHOOL . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED CAMERON ISD YOE H S 475 480 955 36 85 42.4 8 22.2 MILANO ISD MILANO H S . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED ROCKDALE ISD ROCKDALE H S 463 476 939 60 93 64.5 14 23.3 THORNDALE ISD THORNDALE H S 488 486 974 27 35 77.1 5 18.5 MILLS GOLDTHWAITE ISD GOLDTHWAITE HIGH 515 493 1008 14 33 42.4 . . < 5 HIGH MULLIN ISD MULLIN SCHOOL . . . . 6 . . . NONE TESTED PRIDDY ISD PRIDDY SCHOOL . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED STAR ISD STAR SCHOOL . . . . 4 . . . NONE TESTED MITCHELL COLORADO ISD COLORADO H S . . . . 66 . . . < 5 TESTED LORAINE ISD LORAINE SCHOOL . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED WESTBROOK ISD WESTBROOK SCHOOL . . . . 15 . . . NONE TESTED MONTAGUE BOWIE ISD BOWIE H S 508 525 1033 37 84 44.0 10 27.0 FORESTBURG ISD FORESTBURG SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED GOLD BURG ISD GOLD BURG H S . . . . 7 . . . < 5 TESTED NOCONA ISD NOCONA H S . . . . 49 . . . < 5 TESTED PRAIRIE VALLEY PRAIRIE VALLEY H . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED SAINT JO ISD SAINT JO H S 490 540 1030 5 20 25.0 . . < 5 HIGH MONTGOMERY CONROE ISD 524 535 1059 1,170 1,682 69.6 476 40.7 CANEY CREEK H S 473 485 958 102 207 49.3 22 21.6 CONROE H S 507 505 1012 196 342 57.3 56 28.6 OAK RIDGE H S 519 534 1053 188 285 66.0 72 38.3 THE WOODLANDS H S 538 551 1089 684 813 84.1 326 47.7 MAGNOLIA ISD MAGNOLIA H S 508 503 1011 133 263 50.6 35 26.3 MONTGOMERY ISD MONTGOMERY H S 487 490 977 127 196 64.8 32 25.2 NEW CANEY ISD NEW CANEY H S 483 471 954 92 219 42.0 17 18.5 SPLENDORA ISD SPLENDORA H S 432 454 885 37 99 37.4 . . < 5 HIGH WILLIS ISD WILLIS H S 492 503 995 114 223 51.1 25 21.9 MOORE DUMAS ISD 523 520 1042 20 190 10.5 6 30.0 DUMAS H S 523 520 1042 20 181 11.0 6 30.0 SUNRAY ISD . . . . 30 . . . NONE TESTED MORRIS DAINGERFIELD-LO DAINGERFIELD H S 462 471 933 39 94 41.5 5 12.8 PEWITT ISD PEWITT H S . . . . 46 . . . < 5 TESTED MOTLEY MOTLEY COUNTY I MOTLEY COUNTY SCH . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED NACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGHTS CENTRAL HEIGHTS H 565 525 1090 11 34 32.4 5 45.5 CHIRENO ISD CHIRENO H S . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED CUSHING ISD CUSHING SCHOOL 543 509 1051 7 26 26.9 . . < 5 HIGH DOUGLASS ISD DOUGLASS SCHOOL 472 498 970 6 15 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH GARRISON ISD GARRISON H S 433 476 909 8 34 23.5 . . < 5 HIGH MARTINSVILLE IS MARTINSVILLE SCHO 451 428 879 8 11 72.7 . . < 5 HIGH NACOGDOCHES ISD 507 525 1033 157 380 41.3 61 38.9 NACOGDOCHES H S 507 525 1033 157 373 42.1 61 38.9 WODEN ISD WODEN H S 554 569 1123 8 40 20.0 . . < 5 HIGH NAVARRO BLOOMING GROVE BLOOMING GROVE H 511 590 1101 7 36 19.4 . . < 5 HIGH CORSICANA ISD 494 484 978 96 252 38.1 24 25.0 CORSICANA H IGH S 494 484 978 96 239 40.2 24 25.0 DAWSON ISD DAWSON H S 437 457 894 23 31 74.2 . . < 5 HIGH FROST ISD FROST H S . . . . 17 . . . NONE TESTED KERENS ISD KERENS SCHOOL 451 464 915 22 37 59.5 . . < 5 HIGH MILDRED ISD MILDRED H S . . . . 32 . . . < 5 TESTED RICE ISD RICE H S 461 470 931 15 29 51.7 . . < 5 HIGH NEWTON BURKEVILLE ISD BURKEVILLE JR-SR . . . . 26 . . . < 5 TESTED DEWEYVILLE ISD DEWEYVILLE H S 447 460 907 22 40 55.0 . . < 5 HIGH NEWTON ISD NEWTON H S 463 449 911 27 77 35.1 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 55: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

47

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

NOLAN BLACKWELL CONS BLACKWELL SCHOOL . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED HIGHLAND ISD HIGHLAND SCHOOL . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED ROSCOE ISD ROSCOE H S 507 491 998 10 29 34.5 . . < 5 HIGH SWEETWATER ISD 503 554 1056 17 143 11.9 7 41.2 SWEETWATER H S 503 554 1056 17 135 12.6 7 41.2 NUECES ACAD-TRANSITION . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED AGUA DULCE ISD AGUA DULCE H S 486 487 973 19 35 54.3 . . < 5 HIGH BANQUETE ISD BANQUETE H S 492 492 983 12 39 30.8 5 41.7 BISHOP CONS ISD BISHOP H S 478 483 961 28 67 41.8 . . < 5 HIGH CALALLEN ISD CALALLEN H S 488 495 984 214 343 62.4 44 20.6 COASTAL BEND YO COASTAL BEND YOUT . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED CORPUS CHRISTI 491 488 979 943 1,923 49.0 229 24.3 CARROLL H S 504 504 1008 287 460 62.4 83 28.9 KING H S 506 504 1010 212 344 61.6 64 30.2 MILLER HIGH SCHOO 422 428 850 105 280 37.5 . . <20 MASKED MOODY H S 450 451 901 142 337 42.1 . . <20 MASKED RAY H S 525 506 1031 196 426 46.0 64 32.7 CORPUS CHRISTI- CORPUS CHRISTI-RI . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED FLOUR BLUFF ISD 510 505 1015 146 235 62.1 43 29.5 FLOUR BLUFF H S 510 505 1015 146 223 65.5 43 29.5 PORT ARANSAS IS PORT ARANSAS H S 560 557 1118 21 41 51.2 11 52.4 ROBSTOWN ISD 459 477 936 18 203 8.9 . . < 5 HIGH ROBSTOWN H S 459 477 936 18 190 9.5 . . < 5 HIGH TULOSO-MIDWAY I 496 490 985 45 211 21.3 11 24.4 TULOSO-MIDWAY H S 496 490 985 45 196 23.0 11 24.4 WEST OSO ISD WEST OSO H S 428 398 826 24 67 35.8 . . < 5 HIGH OCHILTREE PERRYTON ISD PERRYTON H S 521 539 1060 10 100 10.0 . . < 5 HIGH OLDHAM ADRIAN ISD ADRIAN SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED BOYS RANCH ISD BOYS RANCH H S . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED VEGA ISD VEGA H S . . . . 23 . . . < 5 TESTED ORANGE BRIDGE CITY ISD BRIDGE CITY H S 475 469 944 114 168 67.9 18 15.8 LITTLE CYPRESS- LIT CYPR-MRCEVILL 484 495 979 154 244 63.1 32 20.8 ORANGEFIELD ISD ORANGEFIELD H S 475 511 986 66 91 72.5 16 24.2 VIDOR ISD 472 460 932 159 265 60.0 20 12.6 VIDOR H S 472 460 933 157 250 62.8 20 12.7 WEST ORANGE-COV 475 463 938 95 186 51.1 17 17.9 WEST ORANGE-STARK 475 463 938 95 177 53.7 17 17.9 PALO PINTO GORDON ISD GORDON SCHOOL 518 453 971 11 19 57.9 . . < 5 HIGH GRAFORD ISD GRAFORD H S 477 459 936 14 23 60.9 . . < 5 HIGH MINERAL WELLS I 488 480 968 71 164 43.3 10 14.1 MINERAL WELL H S 488 480 968 71 161 44.1 10 14.1 SANTO ISD SANTO HIGH SCHOOL 484 488 972 5 18 27.8 . . < 5 HIGH STRAWN ISD STRAWN SCHOOL . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED PANOLA BECKVILLE ISD BECKVILLE JR-SR H . . . . 34 . . . NONE TESTED CARTHAGE ISD CARTHAGE H S 537 506 1044 28 187 15.0 7 25.0 GARY ISD GARY SCHOOL . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED PARKER ALEDO ISD ALEDO H S 529 527 1056 123 186 66.1 45 36.6 BROCK ISD BROCK H S 453 455 909 15 31 48.4 . . < 5 HIGH MILLSAP ISD MILLSAP H S 470 462 932 24 31 77.4 . . < 5 HIGH PEASTER ISD PEASTER H S 506 527 1033 32 50 64.0 8 25.0 POOLVILLE ISD POOLVILLE H S 497 494 991 7 14 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH SPRINGTOWN ISD 492 486 978 48 164 29.3 9 18.8 SPRINGTOWN H S 491 483 974 43 146 29.5 . . <10 MASKED YALE 498 518 1016 5 18 27.8 . . <10 MASKED WEATHERFORD ISD WEATHERFORD H S 536 539 1075 100 285 35.1 41 41.0 PARMER BOVINA ISD BOVINA H S . . . . 16 . . . NONE TESTED FARWELL ISD FARWELL H S 576 556 1131 7 37 18.9 . . < 5 HIGH FRIONA ISD FRIONA H S . . . . 70 . . . < 5 TESTED LAZBUDDIE ISD LAZBUDDIE SCHOOL . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED PECOS BUENA VISTA ISD BUENA VISTA SCHOO . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED FT STOCKTON ISD 474 480 954 48 171 28.1 14 29.2 FORT STOCKTON H S 474 480 954 48 164 29.3 14 29.2 IRAAN-SHEFFIELD 480 482 962 6 34 17.6 . . < 5 HIGH IRAAN H S 480 482 962 6 32 18.8 . . < 5 HIGH POLK BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY SCHOOL 409 433 842 19 33 57.6 . . < 5 HIGH CORRIGAN-CAMDEN CORRIGAN-CAMDEN H 442 437 879 47 73 64.4 . . < 5 HIGH GOODRICH ISD GOODRICH H S 408 410 818 5 13 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH LEGGETT ISD LEGGETT H S . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED LIVINGSTON ISD LIVINGSTON H S 484 484 968 112 178 62.9 27 24.1

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 56: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

48

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

POTTER AMARILLO ISD 526 528 1054 523 1,420 36.8 202 38.6 AMARILLO H S 550 546 1096 284 478 59.4 133 46.8 CAPROCK H S 517 508 1025 40 251 15.9 12 30.0 PALO DURO H S 450 505 955 33 299 11.0 5 15.2 TASCOSA H S 503 508 1011 166 362 45.9 52 31.3 HIGHLAND PARK I HIGHLAND PARK H S 519 427 946 7 47 14.9 . . < 5 HIGH RIVER ROAD ISD RIVER ROAD HIGH S 459 462 921 12 90 13.3 . . < 5 HIGH PRESIDIO MARFA ISD MARFA H S 425 419 845 15 33 45.5 . . < 5 HIGH PRESIDIO ISD PRESIDIO H S 423 430 853 10 59 16.9 . . < 5 HIGH RAINS RAINS ISD 504 505 1009 16 80 20.0 . . < 5 HIGH RAINS H S 504 505 1009 16 77 20.8 . . < 5 HIGH RANDALL CANYON ISD 532 544 1076 142 418 34.0 68 47.9 CANYON H S 530 537 1066 61 177 34.5 25 41.0 RANDALL H S 534 550 1084 81 241 33.6 43 53.1 REAGAN REAGAN COUNTY I REAGAN COUNTY H S 467 470 937 27 68 39.7 . . < 5 HIGH REAL LEAKEY ISD LEAKEY SCHOOL 479 509 987 14 20 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH RED RIVER AVERY ISD AVERY H S . . . . 18 . . . NONE TESTED CLARKSVILLE ISD CLARKSVILLE H S 462 449 911 9 58 15.5 . . < 5 HIGH DETROIT ISD DETROIT H S 482 450 932 5 28 17.9 . . < 5 HIGH RIVERCREST ISD RIVERCREST H S 475 483 958 6 49 12.2 . . < 5 HIGH REEVES BALMORHEA ISD BALMORHEA SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED PECOS-BARSTOW-T PECOS H S 431 416 847 65 151 43.0 5 7.7 REFUGIO AUSTWELL-TIVOLI AUSTWELL-TIVOLI H . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED REFUGIO ISD REFUGIO HIGH SCHO 459 487 946 13 58 22.4 . . < 5 HIGH WOODSBORO ISD WOODSBORO H S . . . . 44 . . . < 5 TESTED ROBERTS MIAMI ISD MIAMI SCHOOL . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED ROBERTSON BREMOND ISD BREMOND H S 398 429 827 24 26 92.3 . . < 5 HIGH CALVERT ISD CALVERT H S . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED FRANKLIN ISD FRANKLIN H S 476 472 948 44 58 75.9 7 15.9 HEARNE ISD HEARNE H S 392 403 795 20 59 33.9 . . < 5 HIGH ROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISD 515 532 1048 213 374 57.0 75 35.2 ROCKWALL H S 515 532 1048 213 361 59.0 75 35.2 ROYSE CITY ISD ROYSE CITY H S 455 484 939 48 81 59.3 8 16.7 RUNNELS BALLINGER ISD 525 595 1120 8 65 12.3 . . < 5 HIGH BALLINGER H S 525 595 1120 8 62 12.9 . . < 5 HIGH MILES ISD . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED WINTERS ISD . . . . 43 . . . < 5 TESTED RUSK CARLISLE ISD CARLISLE SCHOOL . . . . 23 . . . < 5 TESTED HENDERSON ISD HENDERSON H S 514 512 1025 30 212 14.2 8 26.7 LANEVILLE ISD LANEVILLE SCHOOL . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED LEVERETTS CHAPE LEVERETTS CHAPEL . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED MOUNT ENTERPRIS MT ENTERPRISE H S . . . . 25 . . . < 5 TESTED OVERTON ISD OVERTON H S 520 525 1045 8 23 34.8 . . < 5 HIGH TATUM ISD TATUM H S 488 543 1032 6 76 7.9 . . < 5 HIGH WEST RUSK ISD WEST RUSK H S 538 562 1100 5 34 14.7 . . < 5 HIGH SABINE HEMPHILL ISD HEMPHILL H S 465 444 910 30 50 60.0 5 16.7 WEST SABINE ISD WEST SABINE H S 404 426 829 19 30 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH SAN AUGUSTINE BROADDUS ISD BROADDUS H S 502 470 972 6 19 31.6 . . < 5 HIGH SAN AUGUSTINE I 497 492 989 14 76 18.4 . . < 5 HIGH SAN AUGUSTINE H S 497 492 989 14 73 19.2 . . < 5 HIGH SAN JACINTO COLDSPRING-OAKH COLDSPRING-OAKHUR 504 474 978 35 69 50.7 5 14.3 SHEPHERD ISD SHEPHERD H S 436 453 889 36 81 44.4 . . < 5 HIGH SAN PATRICIO ARANSAS PASS IS ARANSAS PASS HIGH 456 443 898 27 79 34.2 5 18.5 GREGORY-PORTLAN GREGORY-PORTLAND 492 524 1016 171 237 72.2 55 32.2 INGLESIDE ISD INGLESIDE H S 490 530 1020 38 103 36.9 10 26.3 MATHIS ISD MATHIS H S 488 500 988 24 102 23.5 . . < 5 HIGH ODEM-EDROY ISD ODEM H S 441 455 896 35 73 47.9 . . < 5 HIGH SINTON ISD SINTON H S 460 450 911 37 99 37.4 5 13.5 TAFT ISD TAFT H S 466 484 950 5 70 7.1 . . < 5 HIGH SAN SABA CHEROKEE ISD CHEROKEE H S . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED RICHLAND SPRING RICHLAND SPRINGS 536 532 1068 5 11 45.5 . . < 5 HIGH SAN SABA ISD SAN SABA H S 511 548 1059 8 41 19.5 . . < 5 HIGH SCHLEICHER SCHLEICHER ISD ELDORADO H S . . . . 40 . . . < 5 TESTED SCURRY HERMLEIGH ISD HERMLEIGH SCHOOL . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED IRA ISD IRA SCHOOL . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTED SNYDER ISD 571 581 1152 17 197 8.6 10 58.8 SNYDER H S 571 581 1152 17 193 8.8 10 58.8 SHACKELFORD ALBANY ISD ALBANY JR-SR H S 459 491 950 27 27 100 6 22.2 MORAN ISD MORAN SCHOOL 408 404 811 8 4 100 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 57: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

49

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

SHELBY CENTER ISD CENTER H S 522 525 1047 31 102 30.4 12 38.7 JOAQUIN ISD JOAQUIN H S . . . . 23 . . . NONE TESTED SHELBYVILLE ISD SHELBYVILLE SCHOO . . . . 36 . . . NONE TESTED TENAHA ISD TENAHA H S . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED TIMPSON ISD TIMPSON H S . . . . 27 . . . < 5 TESTED SHERMAN STRATFORD ISD STRATFORD H S . . . . 43 . . . < 5 TESTED TEXHOMA ISD TEXHOMA EL . . . . 13 . . . NONE TESTED SMITH ARP ISD ARP H S 510 503 1013 12 49 24.5 5 41.7 BULLARD ISD 488 490 978 31 69 44.9 8 25.8 BULLARD H S 488 490 978 31 54 57.4 8 25.8 CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 460 441 901 73 151 48.3 12 16.4 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (TY . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED LINDALE ISD LINDALE H S 498 517 1015 71 172 41.3 21 29.6 TROUP ISD TROUP H S 502 544 1046 5 33 15.2 . . < 5 HIGH TYLER ISD 507 508 1016 376 763 49.3 129 34.3 JOHN TYLER H S 478 470 948 88 294 29.9 21 23.9 LEE H S 516 520 1037 288 431 66.8 108 37.5 WHITEHOUSE ISD WHITEHOUSE H S 517 524 1042 126 236 53.4 47 37.3 WINONA ISD WINONA H S . . . . 41 . . . < 5 TESTED SOMERVELL GLEN ROSE ISD 527 535 1061 47 81 58.0 17 36.2 GLEN ROSE H S 527 535 1061 47 77 61.0 17 36.2 STARR RIO GRANDE CITY 437 433 871 74 341 21.7 5 6.8 RIO GRANDE CITY H 437 433 871 74 333 22.2 5 6.8 ROMA ISD 466 488 953 9 276 3.3 . . < 5 HIGH ROMA H S 466 488 953 9 275 3.3 . . < 5 HIGH SAN ISIDRO ISD SAN ISIDRO H S . . . . 21 . . . < 5 TESTED STEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE IS 465 463 927 50 100 50.0 8 16.0 BRECKENRIDGE H S 465 463 927 50 96 52.1 8 16.0 STERLING STERLING CITY I STERLING CITY H S . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTED STONEWALL ASPERMONT ISD ASPERMONT H S . . . . 26 . . . < 5 TESTED SUTTON SONORA ISD SONORA H S 551 604 1156 7 60 11.7 5 71.4 SWISHER HAPPY ISD HAPPY H S . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED KRESS ISD KRESS H S . . . . 24 . . . < 5 TESTED TULIA ISD TULIA H S 493 523 1016 14 75 18.7 . . < 5 HIGH TARRANT ARLINGTON ISD 516 522 1038 1,589 2,593 61.3 570 35.9 ARLINGTON H S 521 527 1048 330 475 69.5 121 36.7 BOWIE H S 507 505 1012 284 472 60.2 95 33.5 LAMAR H S 528 530 1058 302 435 69.4 119 39.4 MARTIN H S 532 544 1076 490 713 68.7 206 42.0 SAM HOUSTON H S 458 469 927 175 419 41.8 . . <30 MASKED VENTURE ALTER H S 446 465 911 8 77 10.4 . . <30 MASKED AZLE ISD AZLE H S 499 485 984 124 262 47.3 27 21.8 BIRDVILLE ISD 504 518 1022 476 1,033 46.1 156 32.8 HALTOM H S 501 511 1012 190 471 40.3 61 32.1 RICHLAND H S 507 522 1029 286 508 56.3 95 33.2 CARROLL ISD CARROLL H S 531 555 1087 330 351 94.0 144 43.6 CASTLEBERRY ISD 462 459 921 75 168 44.6 10 13.3 CASTLEBERRY H S 462 459 921 75 151 49.7 10 13.3 CROWLEY ISD 498 499 997 297 456 65.1 74 24.9 CROWLEY H S 515 508 1023 184 272 67.6 52 28.3 NORTH CROWLEY H S 471 484 955 113 184 61.4 22 19.5 EAGLE MT-SAGINA 492 491 983 170 349 48.7 37 21.8 BOSWELL H S 492 491 983 170 322 52.8 37 21.8 ERATH EXCELS AC ERATH EXCELS ACAD . . . . 16 . . . NONE TESTED EVERMAN ISD EVERMAN H S 452 455 907 69 105 65.7 10 14.5 FORT WORTH ISD 471 473 944 1,519 3,049 49.8 342 22.5 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS 498 498 996 175 252 69.4 47 26.9 CARTER-RIVERSIDE 420 470 890 55 119 46.2 . . <10 MASKED CTR FOR NEW LIVES 387 403 790 7 40 17.5 . . <10 MASKED DIAMOND HILL-JARV 389 432 821 36 132 27.3 . . <10 MASKED DUNBAR H S 492 508 1001 110 211 52.1 39 35.5 EASTERN HILLS H S 444 442 886 87 239 36.4 . . <10 MASKED NORTH SIDE H S 446 450 896 106 249 42.6 12 11.3 O D WYATT H S 405 395 800 98 249 39.4 . . <10 MASKED PASCHAL H S 531 525 1056 297 518 57.3 121 40.7 POLYTECHNIC H S 389 411 800 82 142 57.7 . . <10 MASKED SOUTHWEST H S 501 491 992 222 334 66.5 69 31.1 TRIMBLE TECHNICAL 394 390 785 79 238 33.2 . . <10 MASKED WESTERN HILLS H S 468 466 934 165 271 60.9 24 14.5

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 58: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

50

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TARRANT GRAPEVINE-COLLE 529 536 1065 622 792 78.5 252 40.5 COLLEYVILLE HERIT 530 535 1064 329 397 82.9 137 41.6 GRAPEVINE H S 529 537 1066 293 375 78.1 115 39.2 HURST-EULESS-BE 513 521 1033 654 1,196 54.7 204 31.2 BELL H S 523 523 1047 306 556 55.0 104 34.0 TRINITY H S 503 518 1022 348 588 59.2 100 28.7 KELLER ISD 520 526 1046 506 816 62.0 182 36.0 FOSSIL RIDGE H S 505 503 1008 246 412 59.7 64 26.0 KELLER H S 533 548 1082 259 400 64.8 117 45.2 KENNEDALE ISD KENNEDALE H S 485 491 976 67 121 55.4 12 17.9 LAKE WORTH ISD 504 440 944 16 83 19.3 . . < 5 HIGH LAKE WORTH H S 504 440 944 16 79 20.3 . . < 5 HIGH MANSFIELD ISD 521 526 1047 348 681 51.1 127 36.5 MANSFIELD H S 521 526 1047 348 643 54.1 127 36.5 MASONIC HOME IS MASONIC HOME HIGH 383 433 816 7 7 100 . . < 5 HIGH THERESA B LEE A THERESA B LEE ACA . . . . 35 . . . NONE TESTED TREETOPS SCHOOL TREETOPS SCHOOL I . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA WHITE SETTLEMEN 488 512 1000 92 212 43.4 24 26.1 BREWER H S 488 512 1000 92 210 43.8 24 26.1 TAYLOR ABILENE ISD 496 490 986 483 911 53.0 117 24.2 ABILENE H S 508 497 1005 249 482 51.7 74 29.7 COOPER H S 484 482 965 234 385 60.8 43 18.4 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (AB . . . . 6 . . . NONE TESTED JIM NED CONS IS JIM NED H S 473 496 968 18 63 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH MERKEL ISD MERKEL H S 456 462 918 13 68 19.1 . . < 5 HIGH TRENT ISD . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 512 524 1036 92 168 54.8 24 26.1 TERRELL TERRELL COUNTY SANDERSON H S . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED TERRY BROWNFIELD ISD BROWNFIELD H S 488 468 956 41 124 33.1 8 19.5 MEADOW ISD MEADOW SCHOOL 394 434 828 5 20 25.0 . . < 5 HIGH WELLMAN-UNION C WELLMAN-UNION SCH . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED THROCKMORTON THROCKMORTON IS THROCKMORTON H S . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED WOODSON ISD WOODSON SCHOOL . . . . 6 . . . < 5 TESTED TITUS CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 496 498 993 9 34 26.5 . . < 5 HIGH MOUNT PLEASANT 480 484 964 62 199 31.2 11 17.7 MT PLEASANT H S 480 484 964 62 191 32.5 11 17.7 TOM GREEN CHRISTOVAL ISD CHRISTOVAL H S . . . . 23 . . . < 5 TESTED GRAPE CREEK ISD 493 477 969 24 55 43.6 6 25.0 GRAPE CREEK H S 493 477 969 24 54 44.4 6 25.0 SAN ANGELO ISD 499 506 1004 421 873 48.2 130 30.9 CENTRAL H S 503 513 1016 355 659 53.9 116 32.7 LAKE VIEW H S 480 465 945 63 195 32.3 14 22.2 VERIBEST ISD . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED WALL ISD 528 538 1067 6 55 10.9 . . < 5 HIGH WALL H S 528 538 1067 6 53 11.3 . . < 5 HIGH WATER VALLEY IS 478 489 967 10 27 37.0 . . < 5 HIGH WATER VALLEY H S 478 489 967 10 25 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH TRAVIS AMERICAN YOUTH AMERICAN YOUTH WO . . . . 26 . . . < 5 TESTED AUSTIN ISD 522 529 1051 1,873 3,146 59.5 773 41.3 ANDERSON H S 545 570 1114 292 340 85.9 155 53.1 AUSTIN H S 570 576 1147 267 349 76.5 160 59.9 BOWIE H S 526 533 1059 449 597 75.2 187 41.6 CROCKETT H S 478 465 943 166 343 48.4 26 15.7 GONZALO GARZA IND 437 361 799 7 94 7.4 . . <20 MASKED JOHNSON H S 535 567 1101 175 228 76.8 93 53.1 JOHNSTON H S 560 521 1081 73 195 37.4 38 52.1 LANIER H S 451 468 919 107 281 38.1 . . <20 MASKED MCCALLUM H S 544 534 1078 178 293 60.8 86 48.3 REAGAN H S 405 438 843 64 175 36.6 . . <20 MASKED TRAVIS H S 439 438 877 95 248 38.3 . . <20 MASKED DEL VALLE ISD 461 455 916 70 261 26.8 14 20.0 DEL VALLE H S 461 455 916 70 224 31.3 14 20.0 EANES ISD WESTLAKE H S 574 601 1174 463 488 94.9 308 66.5 LAGO VISTA ISD LAGO VISTA H S 527 534 1061 21 44 47.7 9 42.9 LAKE TRAVIS ISD LAKE TRAVIS H S 544 547 1092 167 196 85.2 69 41.3 MANOR ISD 465 451 916 43 86 50.0 7 16.3 MANOR H S 465 451 916 43 81 53.1 7 16.3 PFLUGERVILLE IS 490 514 1004 459 630 72.9 125 27.2 JOHN B CONNALLY H 486 511 998 220 281 78.3 65 29.5

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 59: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

51

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TRAVIS PFLUGERVILLE IS PFLUGERVILLE H S 493 516 1009 239 331 72.2 60 25.1 TEXAS SCH FOR T TEXAS SCHOOL FOR . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA UNIVERSITY CHAR HILL COUNTRY . . . . 2 . . . NONE TESTED TRINITY APPLE SPRINGS I APPLE SPRINGS H S 475 464 939 8 10 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE H S . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED GROVETON ISD GROVETON J H-H S 452 455 907 22 40 55.0 . . < 5 HIGH TRINITY ISD TRINITY H S 463 508 972 18 56 32.1 . . < 5 HIGH TYLER CHESTER ISD CHESTER H S 417 428 845 6 11 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH COLMESNEIL ISD COLMESNEIL H S 447 439 886 15 36 41.7 . . < 5 HIGH SPURGER ISD SPURGER H S . . . . 28 . . . < 5 TESTED WARREN ISD WARREN H S 464 450 914 44 72 61.1 . . < 5 HIGH WOODVILLE ISD WOODVILLE H S 487 487 974 45 66 68.2 9 20.0 UPSHUR BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY H S 479 528 1006 8 38 21.1 . . < 5 HIGH GILMER ISD GILMER H S 491 530 1020 32 124 25.8 12 37.5 HARMONY ISD HARMONY H S 458 471 929 8 57 14.0 . . < 5 HIGH NEW DIANA ISD NEW DIANA H S 505 474 979 33 68 48.5 6 18.2 ORE CITY ISD ORE CITY HIGH SCH 495 552 1047 6 47 12.8 . . < 5 HIGH UNION GROVE ISD UNION GROVE H S 469 495 964 10 41 24.4 . . < 5 HIGH UNION HILL ISD UNION HILL H S 456 462 918 11 17 64.7 . . < 5 HIGH UPTON MCCAMEY ISD MCCAMEY H S 499 491 990 15 47 31.9 . . < 5 HIGH RANKIN ISD RANKIN H S 592 622 1214 5 21 23.8 . . < 5 HIGH UVALDE GABRIEL TAFOLLA GABRIEL TAFOLLA C . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED KNIPPA ISD KNIPPA SCHOOL . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED SABINAL ISD SABINAL H S . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED UTOPIA ISD UTOPIA SCHOOL . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED UVALDE CONS ISD 479 496 976 102 257 39.7 24 23.5 UVALDE H S 479 496 976 102 240 42.5 24 23.5 VAL VERDE COMSTOCK ISD COMSTOCK SCHOOL 440 511 951 9 11 81.8 . . < 5 HIGH EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (DE . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED SAN FELIPE-DEL DEL RIO H S 453 471 924 199 486 40.9 39 19.6 VAN ZANDT CANTON ISD CANTON H S 500 489 989 47 94 50.0 10 21.3 EDGEWOOD ISD EDGEWOOD H S 487 486 973 19 55 34.5 . . < 5 HIGH FRUITVALE ISD FRUITVALE H S . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED GRAND SALINE IS GRAND SALINE H S 484 469 953 30 51 58.8 . . < 5 HIGH MARTINS MILL IS MARTINS MILL H S . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED VAN ISD VAN H S 516 487 1003 50 98 51.0 15 30.0 WILLS POINT ISD WILLS POINT H S 492 484 976 60 147 40.8 11 18.3 VICTORIA BLOOMINGTON ISD BLOOMINGTON H S 427 454 881 18 46 39.1 . . < 5 HIGH VICTORIA ISD 491 501 991 307 839 36.6 77 25.1 STROMAN H S 451 473 925 72 316 22.8 11 15.3 VICTORIA H S 503 509 1012 235 492 47.8 66 28.1 WALKER HUNTSVILLE ISD 492 503 995 166 359 46.2 44 26.5 HUNTSVILLE H S 492 503 995 166 346 48.0 44 26.5 NEW WAVERLY ISD NEW WAVERLY H S 450 436 886 26 44 59.1 . . < 5 HIGH WALLER HEMPSTEAD ISD HEMPSTEAD H S 458 484 942 20 46 43.5 . . < 5 HIGH ROYAL ISD ROYAL H S 541 544 1085 8 57 14.0 . . < 5 HIGH WALLER ISD WALLER H S 461 464 925 48 182 26.4 6 12.5 WARD GRANDFALLS-ROYA GRANDFALLS-ROYALT . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED MONAHANS-WICKET 608 600 1208 6 126 4.8 . . < 5 HIGH MONAHANS H S 608 600 1208 6 118 5.1 . . < 5 HIGH WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD 511 504 1015 136 265 51.3 40 29.4 BRENHAM HIGH SCHO 511 504 1015 136 259 52.5 40 29.4 BURTON ISD BURTON H S 497 491 989 7 14 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH WEBB EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (LA . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED GATEWAY (STUDEN GATEWAY (STUDENT . . . . 25 . . . NONE TESTED LAREDO ISD 427 432 860 257 1,003 25.6 12 4.7 DR LEO CIGARROA H 438 457 895 57 254 22.4 . . <10 MASKED MARTIN H S 406 407 813 103 381 27.0 . . <10 MASKED NIXON H S 444 445 888 97 368 26.4 . . <10 MASKED UNITED ISD 447 451 898 387 1,115 34.7 44 11.4 JOHN B ALEXANDER 468 475 943 194 411 47.2 36 18.6 UNITED H S 435 428 864 101 278 36.3 . . <10 MASKED UNITED SOUTH H S 417 424 841 92 426 21.6 . . <10 MASKED WEBB CONS ISD BRUNI H S 341 378 719 10 17 58.8 . . < 5 HIGH WHARTON BOLING ISD BOLING H S 523 526 1049 16 61 26.2 5 31.3 EAST BERNARD IS EAST BERNARD H S 488 497 985 50 62 80.6 15 30.0 EL CAMPO ISD EL CAMPO H S 457 470 927 100 208 48.1 16 16.0 LOUISE ISD LOUISE H S 447 472 918 6 35 17.1 . . < 5 HIGH WHARTON ISD WHARTON H S 558 564 1122 17 132 12.9 9 52.9

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 60: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

52

TABLE B-1 1999-00 MEAN SAT I SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS VERBAL MATH TOTAL # OF GRADS GRADS EXNEES EXNEES NAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=1110 >=1110 ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

WHEELER ALLISON ISD ALLISON SCHOOL . . . . 7 . . . < 5 TESTED FORT ELLIOTT CO FORT ELLIOTT SCHO . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED SHAMROCK ISD SHAMROCK H S . . . . 31 . . . NONE TESTED WHEELER ISD WHEELER SCHOOL . . . . 27 . . . < 5 TESTED WICHITA BRIGHT IDEAS CH BRIGHT IDEAS CHAR . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED BURKBURNETT ISD 509 514 1023 70 201 34.8 16 22.9 BURKBURNETT H S 509 514 1023 70 191 36.6 16 22.9 ELECTRA ISD ELECTRA H S . . . . 55 . . . < 5 TESTED IOWA PARK CONS IOWA PARK H S 485 483 968 39 135 28.9 9 23.1 WICHITA FALLS I 505 517 1022 466 832 56.0 143 30.7 HIRSCHI HS 469 489 957 70 179 39.1 16 22.9 RIDER H S 519 532 1051 260 369 70.5 88 33.8 WICHITA FALLS H S 498 503 1000 136 253 53.8 39 28.7 WILBARGER HARROLD ISD HARROLD SCHOOL . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE SCHOOL . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED VERNON ISD VERNON H S 634 616 1250 8 137 5.8 5 62.5 WILLACY LYFORD CISD LYFORD H S 456 455 910 22 100 22.0 . . < 5 HIGH RAYMONDVILLE IS RAYMONDVILLE H S 429 455 884 54 126 42.9 . . < 5 HIGH SAN PERLITA ISD SAN PERLITA H S 484 478 961 8 30 26.7 . . < 5 HIGH WILLIAMSON FLORENCE ISD FLORENCE H S 486 448 934 32 53 60.4 6 18.8 GEORGETOWN ISD 524 532 1056 305 418 73.0 115 37.7 GEORGETOWN H S 525 533 1057 303 401 75.6 115 38.0 GRANGER ISD GRANGER SCHOOL 493 496 989 10 20 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH HUTTO ISD HUTTO H S 470 512 983 37 66 56.1 8 21.6 JARRELL ISD JARRELL H S 483 469 953 12 34 35.3 . . < 5 HIGH LEANDER ISD 518 532 1050 356 552 64.5 125 35.1 LEANDER H S 518 532 1050 356 551 64.6 125 35.1 LIBERTY HILL IS LIBERTY HILL H S 489 509 998 38 70 54.3 6 15.8 ROUND ROCK ISD 533 545 1078 1,251 1,597 78.3 542 43.3 MCNEIL H S 524 534 1058 348 428 81.3 132 37.9 ROUND ROCK H S 515 524 1039 469 630 74.4 160 34.1 WESTWOOD H S 560 577 1136 434 492 88.2 250 57.6 TAYLOR ISD TAYLOR H S 471 486 957 78 149 52.3 14 17.9 THRALL ISD THRALL H S 454 480 934 25 35 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH WILSON FLORESVILLE ISD FLORESVILLE H S 499 525 1024 50 152 32.9 15 30.0 LA VERNIA ISD LA VERNIA HIGH SC 496 510 1006 72 97 74.2 19 26.4 POTH ISD POTH H S 470 503 973 24 48 50.0 6 25.0 STOCKDALE ISD STOCKDALE H S 448 456 904 17 52 32.7 . . < 5 HIGH WINKLER KERMIT ISD KERMIT H S 526 544 1070 10 73 13.7 . . < 5 HIGH WINK-LOVING ISD WINK H S . . . . 30 . . . < 5 TESTED WISE ALVORD ISD ALVORD H S 522 505 1026 11 24 45.8 . . < 5 HIGH BOYD ISD BOYD H S 481 505 986 43 72 59.7 6 14.0 BRIDGEPORT ISD 493 518 1011 40 127 31.5 14 35.0 BRIDGEPORT H S 493 518 1011 40 120 33.3 14 35.0 CHICO ISD CHICO HIGH SCHOOL 463 455 918 24 35 68.6 . . < 5 HIGH DECATUR ISD 488 506 994 59 156 37.8 17 28.8 DECATUR H S 488 506 994 59 144 41.0 17 28.8 PARADISE ISD 496 522 1018 13 48 27.1 . . < 5 HIGH PARADISE H S 496 522 1018 13 42 31.0 . . < 5 HIGH SLIDELL ISD SLIDELL H S 458 504 962 5 18 27.8 . . < 5 HIGH WOOD ALBA-GOLDEN ISD . . . . 36 . . . < 5 TESTED HAWKINS ISD 504 491 995 21 50 42.0 5 23.8 HAWKINS H S 504 491 995 21 47 44.7 5 23.8 MINEOLA ISD MINEOLA H S 505 539 1044 12 64 18.8 . . < 5 HIGH QUITMAN ISD 488 482 970 37 84 44.0 10 27.0 QUITMAN H S 488 482 970 37 81 45.7 10 27.0 WINNSBORO ISD WINNSBORO H S 501 492 993 20 79 25.3 5 25.0 YANTIS ISD YANTIS SCHOOL . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTED YOAKUM DENVER CITY ISD DENVER CITY H S 483 491 974 11 101 10.9 . . < 5 HIGH PLAINS ISD PLAINS H S . . . . 38 . . . < 5 TESTED YOUNG GRAHAM ISD 480 477 958 65 140 46.4 10 15.4 GRAHAM H S 480 477 958 65 135 48.1 10 15.4 NEWCASTLE ISD NEWCASTLE H S 475 494 969 8 20 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH OLNEY ISD OLNEY H S 495 481 975 28 46 60.9 . . < 5 HIGH ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY I ZAPATA H S 435 510 945 22 148 14.9 . . < 5 HIGH ZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY IS CRYSTAL CITY H S . . . . 85 . . . < 5 TESTED LA PRYOR ISD LA PRYOR H S 326 359 685 22 42 52.4 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 61: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

53

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

ANDERSON CAYUGA ISD CAYUGA H S 21.6 21.9 22.4 21.2 21.9 18 35 51.4 5 27.8 ELKHART ISD ELKHART H S 21.7 21.3 22.2 21.3 21.8 24 54 44.4 7 29.2 FRANKSTON ISD FRANKSTON H S 21.4 20.0 20.2 20.4 20.8 5 33 15.2 . . < 5 HIGH NECHES ISD . . . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED PALESTINE ISD PALESTINE H S 18.0 18.5 20.3 19.6 19.3 26 160 16.3 . . < 5 HIGH SLOCUM ISD SLOCUM H S 17.6 20.4 22.6 21.2 20.6 5 22 22.7 . . < 5 HIGH WESTWOOD ISD WESTWOOD H S 18.0 18.3 19.4 18.5 18.7 11 96 11.5 . . < 5 HIGHANDREWS ANDREWS ISD ANDREWS HIGH SC 20.0 19.8 21.1 20.2 20.4 59 191 30.9 10 16.9ANGELINA CENTRAL 21.5 18.3 23.3 20.5 21.0 20 87 23.0 5 25.0 CENTRAL H S 21.5 18.3 23.3 20.5 21.0 20 78 25.6 5 25.0 DIBOLL ISD 19.0 17.8 19.9 19.5 19.2 50 104 48.1 8 16.0 DIBOLL H S 19.0 17.8 19.9 19.5 19.2 50 102 49.0 8 16.0 HUDSON ISD 20.3 19.4 20.8 20.7 20.4 41 119 34.5 9 22.0 HUDSON H S 20.3 19.4 20.8 20.7 20.4 41 117 35.0 9 22.0 HUNTINGTON IS 17.9 18.9 21.7 20.1 19.9 9 128 7.0 . . < 5 HIGH HUNTINGTON H S 17.9 18.9 21.7 20.1 19.9 9 79 11.4 . . < 5 HIGH LUFKIN ISD 17.2 17.6 18.1 17.7 17.8 61 366 16.7 7 11.5 LUFKIN H S 17.2 17.6 18.1 17.7 17.8 61 356 17.1 7 11.5 ZAVALLA ISD . . . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTEDARANSAS ARANSAS COUNT ROCKPORT-FULTON 19.3 19.3 19.5 20.4 19.8 52 235 22.1 9 17.3ARCHER ARCHER CITY I ARCHER CITY H S 20.9 21.3 21.6 20.6 21.2 17 34 50.0 5 29.4 HOLLIDAY ISD HOLLIDAY H S 20.9 20.0 21.7 21.2 21.1 43 66 65.2 10 23.3 MEGARGEL ISD . . . . . . 2 . . . < 5 TESTED WINDTHORST IS WINDTHORST H S 21.0 22.4 21.3 20.1 21.4 14 19 73.7 . . < 5 HIGHARMSTRONG CLAUDE ISD CLAUDE H S 20.0 22.3 22.5 20.3 21.4 15 27 55.6 . . < 5 HIGHATASCOSA CHARLOTTE ISD CHARLOTTE H S 16.0 16.8 16.0 17.8 16.8 12 22 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH JOURDANTON IS JOURDANTON H S 19.6 18.5 20.4 20.4 19.9 43 . . 12 27.9 NO GRADS/TEA LYTLE ISD LYTLE H S 17.0 18.9 17.9 19.1 18.3 15 72 20.8 . . < 5 HIGH PLEASANTON IS PLEASANTON H S 18.1 18.7 19.5 19.7 19.2 95 160 59.4 15 15.8 POTEET ISD POTEET H S 18.7 18.5 19.2 18.5 18.8 11 68 16.2 . . < 5 HIGHAUSTIN BELLVILLE ISD BELLVILLE H S 20.5 19.8 20.4 20.8 20.5 28 135 20.7 8 28.6 BRAZOS ISD BRAZOS H S 17.8 17.5 18.2 18.7 18.2 12 48 25.0 . . < 5 HIGH SEALY ISD SEALY H S 18.3 18.3 18.9 19.3 18.8 36 127 28.3 5 13.9BAILEY MULESHOE ISD 20.0 20.1 20.5 20.9 20.5 71 85 83.5 16 22.5 MULESHOE H S 20.0 20.1 20.5 20.9 20.5 71 82 86.6 16 22.5 THREE WAY ISD THREE WAY SCHOO 17.8 20.2 18.3 18.7 18.8 9 11 81.8 . . < 5 HIGHBANDERA BANDERA ISD 20.4 19.6 21.7 21.2 20.9 52 130 40.0 8 15.4 BANDERA H S 20.4 19.6 21.7 21.2 20.9 52 122 42.6 8 15.4 MEDINA ISD MEDINA H S 20.5 21.8 21.5 21.1 21.4 8 22 36.4 . . < 5 HIGHBASTROP BASTROP ISD 19.4 20.3 20.4 20.4 20.2 59 273 21.6 13 22.0 BASTROP H S 19.4 20.3 20.4 20.4 20.2 59 256 23.0 13 22.0 ELGIN ISD 19.1 18.9 20.5 20.5 19.8 11 135 8.1 . . < 5 HIGH ELGIN H S 19.1 18.9 20.5 20.5 19.8 11 104 10.6 . . < 5 HIGH SMITHVILLE IS SMITHVILLE H S 19.2 17.8 20.5 19.5 19.3 42 75 56.0 9 21.4BAYLOR SEYMOUR ISD SEYMOUR H S 19.8 21.8 20.5 20.6 20.8 25 35 71.4 5 20.0BEE BEEVILLE ISD 18.1 18.1 19.0 19.1 18.7 63 234 26.9 10 15.9 A C JONES HIGH 18.1 18.1 19.0 19.1 18.7 63 229 27.5 10 15.9 PETTUS ISD PETTUS H S 19.3 19.0 21.9 22.0 20.7 7 34 20.6 . . < 5 HIGH SKIDMORE-TYNA SKIDMORE-TYNAN 19.4 19.4 18.6 20.3 19.6 17 46 37.0 . . < 5 HIGHBELL ACADEMY ISD ACADEMY H S 22.5 21.8 22.7 23.0 22.5 33 64 51.6 13 39.4 BARTLETT ISD BARTLETT H S 17.5 18.7 19.3 20.3 18.9 15 30 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH BELTON ISD 19.3 19.2 20.2 19.5 19.7 313 430 72.8 68 21.7 BELTON H S 19.3 19.2 20.2 19.5 19.7 313 398 78.6 68 21.7 HOLLAND ISD HOLLAND H S 21.5 19.9 24.2 21.5 21.9 11 32 34.4 . . < 5 HIGH KILLEEN ISD 19.3 19.3 20.5 20.1 19.9 291 1,187 24.5 57 19.6 ELLISON H S 19.0 19.2 20.5 19.9 19.8 179 604 29.6 34 19.0 KILLEEN H S 19.7 19.4 20.6 20.4 20.1 112 553 20.3 23 20.5 KILLEEN-RICHA KILLEEN-RICHARD . . . . . . 27 . . . NONE TESTED ROGERS ISD ROGERS H S 22.0 19.1 20.3 20.4 20.6 14 44 31.8 . . < 5 HIGH SALADO ISD SALADO H S 18.7 19.5 20.8 19.8 19.9 19 71 26.8 . . < 5 HIGH TEMPLE ISD TEMPLE H S 20.6 22.0 22.0 21.1 21.6 123 365 33.7 41 33.3 TRANSFORMATIV TRANSFORMATIVE . . . . . . 29 . . . NONE TESTED TROY ISD TROY H S 20.0 19.7 20.3 20.3 20.2 44 66 66.7 10 22.7BEXAR ALAMO HEIGHTS ALAMO HEIGHTS H 22.0 22.0 22.8 22.0 22.4 86 286 30.1 36 41.9 BLESSED SACRA BLESSED SACRAME . . . . . . 25 . . . NONE TESTED BUILDING ALTE BUILDING ALTER . . . . . . 32 . . . NONE TESTED EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 2 . . . NONE TESTED EAST CENTRAL EAST CENTRAL H 18.6 18.8 19.5 19.7 19.3 147 375 39.2 25 17.0

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 62: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

54

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

BEXAR EDGEWOOD ISD 15.0 16.6 15.5 17.1 16.2 85 423 20.1 . . < 5 HIGH KENNEDY HIGH SC 15.6 17.1 16.3 18.1 16.9 48 222 21.6 . . < 5 HIGH MEMORIAL H S 14.1 15.9 14.5 15.7 15.1 35 182 19.2 . . < 5 HIGH FT SAM HOUSTO ROBERT G COLE J 19.8 20.7 22.6 20.6 21.0 24 49 49.0 9 37.5 HARLANDALE IS 15.5 17.1 16.7 17.5 16.8 140 609 23.0 6 4.3 HARLANDALE H S 15.0 16.9 16.3 17.1 16.5 90 303 29.7 . . <10 MASKED MCCOLLUM H S 16.5 17.3 17.3 18.1 17.5 50 266 18.8 . . <10 MASKED JOHN H WOOD C JOHN H WOOD CHA . . . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA JUDSON ISD 19.3 19.5 20.5 20.5 20.1 230 712 32.3 58 25.2 JUDSON SENIOR H 19.3 19.5 20.5 20.5 20.1 230 678 33.9 58 25.2 LACKLAND ISD VIRGINIA ALLRED 20.6 22.2 23.1 22.8 22.5 17 21 81.0 6 35.3 NORTH EAST IS 20.2 21.0 21.5 20.9 21.0 663 2,414 27.5 190 28.7 CHURCHILL H S 21.3 21.7 22.4 21.7 21.9 168 532 31.6 55 32.7 INTERNATIONAL S 19.9 19.6 22.2 20.0 20.6 45 95 47.4 9 20.0 LEE H S 19.9 20.3 21.0 20.7 20.5 64 349 18.3 17 26.6 MAC ARTHUR H S 20.6 21.2 22.3 21.2 21.4 108 469 23.0 35 32.4 MADISON H S 19.6 21.5 20.7 20.7 20.7 155 462 33.5 43 27.7 REAGAN H S 21.7 22.4 22.8 21.4 22.2 40 162 24.7 15 37.5 ROOSEVELT H S 18.4 19.4 19.3 19.8 19.3 83 315 26.3 16 19.3 NORTHSIDE ISD 20.6 21.0 21.5 21.0 21.1 897 3,276 27.4 262 29.2 BUSINESS CAREER 19.8 19.7 21.2 19.8 20.3 64 . . 10 15.6 NO GRADS/TEA COMMUNICATIONS 23.3 22.6 24.7 22.2 23.3 31 . . 18 58.1 NO GRADS/TEA HEALTH CAREERS 23.0 23.1 24.1 22.6 23.3 111 218 50.9 45 40.5 HOLMES H S 18.2 18.5 19.2 18.5 18.8 78 602 13.0 12 15.4 JAY H S 17.9 18.5 18.6 19.2 18.7 89 450 19.8 9 10.1 MARSHALL H S 20.6 20.4 21.3 21.2 21.0 89 383 23.2 25 28.1 SANDRA DAY O’CO 20.5 20.9 21.6 21.4 21.3 154 441 34.9 44 28.6 TOM CLARK H S 21.4 22.8 21.9 21.5 22.0 167 519 32.2 61 36.5 WILLIAM H TAFT 20.2 20.7 21.5 21.1 21.0 111 554 20.0 37 33.3 POSITIVE SOLU POSITIVE SOLUTI . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED RADIANCE ACAD RADIANCE ACADEM . . . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED RANDOLPH FIEL RANDOLPH H S 21.5 22.1 23.2 21.7 22.2 26 67 38.8 8 30.8 SAN ANTONIO I 15.7 17.1 16.9 17.3 16.9 794 2,343 33.9 49 6.2 BRACKENRIDGE H 18.2 19.3 19.6 18.9 19.1 161 415 38.8 26 16.1 BURBANK H S 14.4 16.3 15.7 16.8 15.9 152 240 63.3 . . <10 MASKED EDISON H S 16.4 16.9 17.2 17.8 17.2 65 288 22.6 . . <10 MASKED FOX TECHNICAL H 14.6 16.7 16.3 16.6 16.2 58 265 21.9 . . <10 MASKED HIGHLANDS H S 16.4 17.3 17.6 18.4 17.6 122 354 34.5 12 9.8 HOUSTON H S 13.5 15.8 14.2 14.8 14.7 78 192 40.6 . . <10 MASKED JEFFERSON H S 15.7 16.9 17.1 16.9 16.8 75 281 26.7 . . <10 MASKED LANIER H S 14.7 15.8 15.7 16.8 15.9 82 268 30.6 . . <10 MASKED SOMERSET ISD SOMERSET H S 18.1 19.0 20.6 20.1 19.4 14 83 16.9 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH SAN ANT 15.3 16.5 16.3 16.8 16.4 161 455 35.4 . . < 5 HIGH SO SAN ANTONIO 15.9 16.9 16.3 17.1 16.7 55 112 49.1 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH SAN ANTON 15.0 16.3 16.3 16.6 16.2 106 323 32.8 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTHSIDE ISD SOUTHSIDE H S 16.3 18.2 18.3 18.7 18.0 56 153 36.6 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTHWEST ISD SOUTHWEST H S 19.4 19.4 19.7 19.9 19.7 54 366 14.8 9 16.7 SOUTHWEST PRE . . . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTEDBLANCO BLANCO ISD BLANCO H S 19.0 19.2 20.3 20.0 19.7 43 45 95.6 7 16.3 JOHNSON CITY LYNDON B JOHNSO 18.1 19.6 19.9 20.2 19.5 13 35 37.1 . . < 5 HIGHBORDEN BORDEN COUNTY BORDEN SCHOOL 21.6 20.2 22.1 21.1 21.3 23 22 100 7 30.4BOSQUE CLIFTON ISD CLIFTON H S 19.9 19.8 19.7 19.9 20.0 43 82 52.4 8 18.6 CRANFILLS GAP . . . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED IREDELL ISD . . . . . . 8 . . . < 5 TESTED KOPPERL ISD KOPPERL SCHOOL 15.4 20.0 17.7 19.3 18.4 7 13 53.8 . . < 5 HIGH MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN H S 19.6 19.5 21.7 19.9 20.2 22 35 62.9 . . < 5 HIGH MORGAN ISD . . . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED VALLEY MILLS VALLEY MILLS H 22.4 21.7 23.6 23.2 22.8 9 32 28.1 . . < 5 HIGH WALNUT SPRING WALNUT SPRINGS 14.8 18.0 16.2 20.4 17.6 5 6 83.3 . . < 5 HIGHBOWIE DEKALB ISD DEKALB H S 18.6 17.1 18.3 18.3 18.2 60 74 81.1 7 11.7 EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 6 . . . NONE TESTED HOOKS ISD HOOKS H S 19.1 18.5 19.2 19.5 19.2 51 69 73.9 5 9.8 LIBERTY-EYLAU 17.9 17.8 18.6 18.7 18.4 79 122 64.8 8 10.1 LIBERTY-EYLAU H 17.8 17.8 18.5 18.6 18.3 76 87 87.4 7 9.2 MAUD ISD MAUD SCHOOL 16.9 17.0 17.9 18.0 17.6 30 36 83.3 . . < 5 HIGH NEW BOSTON IS NEW BOSTON H S 20.5 19.3 21.1 19.8 20.3 70 87 80.5 16 22.9 PLEASANT GROV PLEASANT GROVE 22.2 20.9 23.0 21.9 22.1 106 127 83.5 36 34.0 REDWATER ISD REDWATER H S 21.8 20.0 22.3 20.8 21.3 67 80 83.8 22 32.8

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 63: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

55

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

BOWIE SIMMS ISD 19.0 17.6 20.4 19.2 19.1 17 22 77.3 . . < 5 HIGH JAMES BOWIE H S 19.0 17.6 20.4 19.2 19.1 17 19 89.5 . . < 5 HIGH TEXARKANA ISD 20.4 19.7 19.4 19.9 20.0 193 275 70.2 45 23.3 TEXAS H S 20.4 19.7 19.4 19.9 20.0 193 267 72.3 45 23.3BRAZORIA ALVIN ISD 20.0 19.9 21.3 20.9 20.7 73 485 15.1 18 24.7 ALVIN HIGH SCHO 20.0 19.9 21.3 20.9 20.7 73 431 16.9 18 24.7 ANGLETON ISD ANGLETON H S 19.1 20.0 19.3 19.5 19.6 32 295 10.8 7 21.9 BRAZOSPORT IS 20.8 22.2 21.8 21.5 21.7 124 712 17.4 42 33.9 BRAZOSPORT H S 17.2 19.1 17.1 18.1 18.1 17 176 9.7 . . <50 MASKED BRAZOSWOOD H S 21.3 22.7 22.5 22.1 22.3 107 534 20.0 . . <50 MASKED COLUMBIA-BRAZ COLUMBIA H S 22.0 21.0 21.7 21.4 21.6 68 185 36.8 25 36.8 DANBURY ISD DANBURY H S 23.3 23.4 22.0 23.3 23.0 7 52 13.5 . . < 5 HIGH PEARLAND ISD PEARLAND H S 20.3 21.1 21.4 21.5 21.2 137 549 25.0 39 28.5 SWEENY ISD SWEENY H S 21.0 21.6 22.6 22.3 22.0 57 144 39.6 22 38.6BRAZOS BRYAN ISD 18.7 20.4 20.0 20.2 19.9 137 607 22.6 29 21.2 BRYAN H S 18.7 20.4 20.0 20.2 19.9 137 578 23.7 29 21.2 COLLEGE STATI 22.2 23.6 22.9 22.7 23.0 132 469 28.1 55 41.7 A & M CONS H S 22.2 23.6 22.9 22.7 23.0 132 462 28.6 55 41.7BREWSTER ALPINE ISD ALPINE H S 18.8 19.3 19.7 19.8 19.5 40 67 59.7 5 12.5 MARATHON ISD MARATHON SCHOOL . . . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED TERLINGUA CSD BIG BEND H S . . . . . . 13 . . . NONE TESTEDBRISCOE SILVERTON ISD SILVERTON SCHOO 19.0 19.7 21.4 20.5 20.2 14 16 87.5 . . < 5 HIGHBROOKS BROOKS COUNTY FALFURRIAS H S 17.8 17.4 18.6 18.7 18.2 39 90 43.3 5 12.8BROWN BANGS ISD 20.6 20.5 20.7 20.2 20.6 35 57 61.4 7 20.0 BANGS H S 20.6 20.5 20.7 20.2 20.6 35 51 68.6 7 20.0 BLANKET ISD BLANKET H S 19.4 21.3 21.8 20.3 20.9 12 12 100 . . < 5 HIGH BROOKESMITH I BROOKESMITH H S 15.3 18.0 17.3 17.3 17.2 6 9 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BROWNWOOD ISD 20.4 22.1 21.5 21.1 21.4 64 221 29.0 20 31.3 BROWNWOOD H S 20.4 22.1 21.5 21.1 21.4 64 199 32.2 20 31.3 EARLY ISD EARLY H S 21.5 20.2 22.1 21.1 21.4 37 72 51.4 11 29.7 MAY ISD MAY H S 19.6 19.8 20.1 21.1 20.3 12 23 52.2 . . < 5 HIGH ZEPHYR ISD ZEPHYR H S 16.1 17.9 18.2 18.8 17.9 17 15 100 . . < 5 HIGHBURLESON CALDWELL ISD CALDWELL H S 18.8 18.9 20.1 19.5 19.4 21 108 19.4 . . < 5 HIGH SNOOK ISD SNOOK SECONDARY . . . . . . 19 . . . NONE TESTED SOMERVILLE IS . . . . . . 33 . . . < 5 TESTEDBURNET BURNET CONS I 18.6 20.1 20.3 19.5 19.7 36 152 23.7 8 22.2 BURNET H S 18.6 20.1 20.3 19.5 19.7 36 145 24.8 8 22.2 MARBLE FALLS MARBLE FALLS H 20.6 19.8 22.2 20.6 20.9 92 169 54.4 23 25.0CALDWELL LOCKHART ISD 18.7 19.4 19.8 20.0 19.6 91 239 38.1 16 17.6 LOCKHART H S 18.7 19.4 19.8 20.0 19.6 91 226 40.3 16 17.6 LULING ISD LULING H S 16.5 19.3 17.7 18.4 18.2 29 71 40.8 . . < 5 HIGH PRAIRIE LEA I . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTEDCALHOUN CALHOUN CO IS 20.4 19.0 21.1 20.4 20.4 48 205 23.4 12 25.0 CALHOUN H S 20.4 19.0 21.1 20.4 20.4 48 187 25.7 12 25.0CALLAHAN BAIRD ISD BAIRD H S 22.1 19.7 22.3 21.1 21.4 23 25 92.0 5 21.7 CLYDE CONS IS CLYDE H S 20.9 20.0 21.1 21.2 20.9 47 77 61.0 10 21.3 CROSS PLAINS CROSS PLAINS H 19.2 18.9 19.7 20.3 19.6 18 30 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH EULA ISD EULA H S 19.9 20.4 19.8 20.6 20.3 18 34 52.9 . . < 5 HIGHCAMERON BROWNSVILLE I 18.4 19.4 19.3 19.4 19.3 167 1,785 9.4 32 19.2 HANNA H S 20.4 20.9 21.8 21.1 21.2 63 465 13.5 22 34.9 LOPEZ H S 17.2 18.3 18.4 18.6 18.2 18 278 6.5 . . < 5 HIGH PACE H S 18.3 18.8 18.6 18.6 18.8 14 355 3.9 . . < 5 HIGH PORTER H S 17.7 18.7 18.7 19.2 18.7 35 368 9.5 . . < 5 HIGH RIVERA H S 16.3 18.0 16.1 17.5 17.1 37 290 12.8 . . < 5 HIGH EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED HARLINGEN CON 17.9 19.2 19.1 19.1 19.0 182 758 24.0 32 17.6 HARLINGEN H S 18.1 19.3 19.1 18.8 19.0 80 389 20.6 14 17.5 HARLINGEN H S - 17.8 19.2 19.0 19.4 19.0 101 348 29.0 18 17.8 LA FERIA ISD 17.4 18.4 17.7 18.2 18.0 61 132 46.2 . . < 5 HIGH LA FERIA H S 17.4 18.4 17.7 18.2 18.0 61 125 48.8 . . < 5 HIGH LOS FRESNOS C LOS FRESNOS H S 18.9 20.1 18.4 19.4 19.3 33 274 12.0 6 18.2 POINT ISABEL PORT ISABEL H S 19.1 19.6 19.0 18.7 19.3 12 105 11.4 . . < 5 HIGH RIO HONDO ISD RIO HONDO H S 16.7 18.2 17.4 17.5 17.5 60 97 61.9 6 10.0 SAN BENITO CO SAN BENITO H S 18.4 19.8 19.2 19.8 19.4 30 384 7.8 6 20.0 SANTA MARIA I SANTA MARIA H S 15.8 16.8 17.4 18.6 17.4 5 26 19.2 . . < 5 HIGH SANTA ROSA IS SANTA ROSA H S 16.6 17.1 16.8 17.4 17.1 19 59 32.2 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH TEXAS I 21.7 22.4 23.0 21.7 22.4 207 313 66.1 85 41.1 HIGH SCHOOL FOR 21.4 22.5 23.1 21.6 22.3 101 142 71.1 39 38.6

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 64: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

56

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

CAMERON SOUTH TEXAS I THE SCIENCE ACA 22.8 23.5 24.0 22.6 23.3 71 112 63.4 39 54.9 THE TEACHER ACA 20.5 20.0 20.8 20.1 20.7 35 59 59.3 7 20.0 VALLEY HIGH VALLEY HIGH . . . . . . 12 . . . NONE TESTEDCAMP PITTSBURG ISD PITTSBURG H S 20.0 21.3 20.2 21.8 20.9 22 95 23.2 7 31.8CARSON GROOM ISD GROOM SCHOOL 19.9 20.1 19.3 20.4 20.0 12 12 100 . . < 5 HIGH PANHANDLE ISD 21.4 21.9 22.1 21.0 21.7 28 45 62.2 9 32.1 PANHANDLE H S 21.4 21.9 22.1 21.0 21.7 28 43 65.1 9 32.1 WHITE DEER IS WHITE DEER H S 20.2 20.7 20.5 21.0 20.7 27 33 81.8 6 22.2CASS ATLANTA ISD ATLANTA H S 20.4 19.9 20.4 20.1 20.3 99 107 92.5 24 24.2 AVINGER ISD AVINGER H S 14.1 17.6 14.3 18.1 16.1 7 5 100 . . < 5 HIGH BLOOMBURG ISD BLOOMBURG H S 18.1 17.8 17.0 18.4 17.9 8 11 72.7 . . < 5 HIGH HUGHES SPRING HUGHES SPRINGS 18.0 17.8 19.3 19.5 18.8 53 57 93.0 6 11.3 LINDEN-KILDAR LINDEN-KILDARE 20.1 18.5 19.6 19.6 19.6 50 81 61.7 12 24.0 MCLEOD ISD MCLEOD H S 24.2 24.2 24.4 22.4 24.1 10 23 43.5 5 50.0 QUEEN CITY IS QUEEN CITY H S 17.5 18.0 18.2 18.5 18.1 55 79 69.6 7 12.7CASTRO DIMMITT ISD DIMMITT H S 18.3 18.1 20.5 19.6 19.2 43 70 61.4 5 11.6 HART ISD HART JR-SR H S 19.6 18.3 19.6 19.3 19.3 16 25 64.0 . . < 5 HIGH NAZARETH ISD NAZARETH SCHOOL 23.3 22.6 22.2 22.1 22.9 17 18 94.4 6 35.3CHAMBERS ANAHUAC ISD 18.9 18.8 20.1 20.5 19.7 12 70 17.1 . . < 5 HIGH ANAHUAC H S 18.9 18.8 20.1 20.5 19.7 12 66 18.2 . . < 5 HIGH BARBERS HILL 19.3 21.6 20.4 20.7 20.6 39 136 28.7 14 35.9 BARBERS HILL H 19.3 21.6 20.4 20.7 20.6 39 135 28.9 14 35.9 EAST CHAMBERS 15.8 18.4 16.1 18.4 17.3 17 66 25.8 . . < 5 HIGH EAST CHAMBERS H 15.8 18.4 16.1 18.4 17.3 17 64 26.6 . . < 5 HIGHCHEROKEE ALTO ISD ALTO H S 18.5 18.6 19.4 20.1 19.3 16 44 36.4 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSONVILLE 18.7 18.4 19.4 19.2 19.1 108 228 47.4 16 14.8 JACKSONVILLE H 18.7 18.4 19.4 19.2 19.1 108 213 50.7 16 14.8 NEW SUMMERFIE NEW SUMMERFIELD 18.5 16.7 18.7 17.7 17.8 6 22 27.3 . . < 5 HIGH RUSK ISD RUSK H S 20.1 19.8 20.3 20.1 20.2 49 112 43.8 8 16.3 WELLS ISD WELLS H S 22.0 17.8 20.9 18.7 19.9 14 23 60.9 . . < 5 HIGHCHILDRESS CHILDRESS ISD CHILDRESS H S 19.3 19.7 20.8 20.3 20.2 48 67 71.6 10 20.8CLAY BELLEVUE ISD BELLEVUE SCHOOL 22.0 23.4 24.1 21.1 22.7 7 12 58.3 . . < 5 HIGH BYERS ISD BYERS SCHOOL 21.7 18.5 22.3 21.7 21.2 6 9 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH HENRIETTA ISD HENRIETTA H S 20.8 19.8 21.7 21.7 21.1 35 55 63.6 9 25.7 MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY SCHOOL 21.2 23.3 22.6 22.6 22.5 11 12 91.7 . . < 5 HIGH PETROLIA ISD PETROLIA H S 18.4 18.4 19.5 19.0 18.8 13 27 48.1 . . < 5 HIGHCOCHRAN MORTON ISD 18.8 18.2 22.0 19.8 19.8 13 36 36.1 . . < 5 HIGH MORTON H S 18.8 18.2 22.0 19.8 19.8 13 21 61.9 . . < 5 HIGH WHITEFACE CON 20.8 20.2 21.6 19.9 20.8 24 29 82.8 7 29.2 WHITEFACE H S 20.8 20.2 21.6 19.9 20.8 24 26 92.3 7 29.2COKE BRONTE ISD 21.3 22.8 24.2 22.9 22.9 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BRONTE H S 21.3 22.8 24.2 22.9 22.9 10 14 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH ROBERT LEE IS 20.0 21.3 21.7 21.2 21.2 20 28 71.4 5 25.0 ROBERT LEE H S 20.0 21.3 21.7 21.2 21.2 20 27 74.1 5 25.0COLEMAN COLEMAN ISD 19.6 19.5 19.7 20.1 19.8 45 60 75.0 7 15.6 COLEMAN H S 19.6 19.5 19.7 20.1 19.8 45 57 78.9 7 15.6 NOVICE ISD NOVICE SCHOOL . . . . . . 3 . . . NONE TESTED PANTHER CREEK PANTHER CREEK H 22.8 19.3 24.2 21.5 22.0 6 9 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH SANTA ANNA IS . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTEDCOLLIN ALLEN ISD ALLEN H S 22.1 22.9 23.4 22.6 22.9 175 533 32.8 74 42.3 ANNA ISD ANNA H S 17.9 17.8 19.2 18.3 18.4 13 49 26.5 . . < 5 HIGH BLUE RIDGE IS . . . . . . 31 . . . < 5 TESTED CELINA ISD CELINA H S 19.6 19.7 18.8 20.5 19.6 16 47 34.0 . . < 5 HIGH COMMUNITY ISD COMMUNITY H S 18.4 19.1 17.4 19.0 18.6 9 54 16.7 . . < 5 HIGH FARMERSVILLE FARMERSVILLE H 17.7 17.3 17.7 17.1 17.6 12 50 24.0 . . < 5 HIGH FRISCO ISD FRISCO H S 20.0 20.4 21.4 21.1 20.8 77 161 47.8 19 24.7 MCKINNEY ISD 21.0 21.1 22.3 21.6 21.6 196 409 47.9 56 28.6 MCKINNEY HIGH S 21.0 21.2 22.3 21.6 21.6 191 369 51.8 . . <70 MASKED THE ACT ACAD AT 19.0 19.0 22.4 21.2 20.4 5 11 45.5 . . <70 MASKED PLANO ISD 22.7 24.2 23.9 23.5 23.7 974 2,396 40.7 496 50.9 PLANO EAST SR H 22.4 24.3 23.8 23.4 23.6 308 941 32.7 155 50.3 PLANO SR H S 22.8 24.2 24.0 23.6 23.8 666 1,455 45.8 341 51.2 PRINCETON ISD PRINCETON H S 17.8 18.3 18.5 19.5 18.7 6 86 7.0 . . < 5 HIGH PROSPER ISD PROSPER H S 21.2 21.1 20.9 21.0 21.2 27 58 46.6 8 29.6 WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 20.5 20.6 22.3 21.5 21.3 96 202 47.5 30 31.3COLLINGSWOR SAMNORWOOD IS SAMNORWOOD SCHO 18.0 20.3 20.0 19.5 19.5 6 7 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH WELLINGTON IS WELLINGTON H S 18.4 20.0 19.5 19.8 19.6 22 34 64.7 . . < 5 HIGHCOLORADO COLUMBUS ISD COLUMBUS H S 21.6 22.1 23.6 21.6 22.4 17 108 15.7 8 47.1

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 65: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

57

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

COLORADO RICE CONS ISD RICE H S 18.9 20.0 18.9 20.1 19.6 31 56 55.4 5 16.1 WEIMAR ISD WEIMAR H S 19.9 22.2 20.7 21.7 21.2 19 56 33.9 . . < 5 HIGHCOMAL COMAL ISD 20.7 20.9 21.7 21.3 21.2 228 573 39.8 59 25.9 CANYON H S 20.7 21.1 21.2 21.0 21.1 115 230 50.0 26 22.6 SMITHSON VALLEY 20.6 20.8 22.3 21.7 21.5 110 323 34.1 33 30.0 NEW BRAUNFELS 20.5 20.4 21.6 21.0 21.0 124 325 38.2 28 22.6 NEW BRAUNFELS H 20.5 20.4 21.6 21.0 21.0 124 315 39.4 28 22.6COMANCHE COMANCHE ISD COMANCHE H S 19.6 18.8 19.6 19.9 19.7 37 65 56.9 5 13.5 DE LEON ISD DE LEON H S 18.3 20.6 18.1 18.0 18.9 8 39 20.5 . . < 5 HIGH GUSTINE ISD . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED SIDNEY ISD SIDNEY SCHOOL 16.6 19.0 17.6 19.2 18.2 5 9 55.6 . . < 5 HIGHCONCHO EDEN C I S D EDEN H S 20.1 20.3 20.2 20.3 20.3 23 28 82.1 6 26.1 PAINT ROCK IS PAINT ROCK SCHO 17.9 19.7 19.4 18.4 19.0 7 12 58.3 . . < 5 HIGHCOOKE CALLISBURG IS CALLISBURG H S 22.4 22.8 22.9 23.9 23.2 17 56 30.4 7 41.2 ERA ISD ERA SCHOOL 22.2 21.2 22.0 21.1 21.8 17 30 56.7 5 29.4 GAINESVILLE I GAINESVILLE H S 19.7 19.8 21.3 20.1 20.4 38 125 30.4 11 28.9 LINDSAY ISD LINDSAY H S 22.7 21.5 21.5 21.7 21.9 11 31 35.5 . . < 5 HIGH MUENSTER ISD MUENSTER H S 23.1 24.9 24.9 23.9 24.3 15 28 53.6 10 66.7 VALLEY VIEW I . . . . . . 21 . . . < 5 TESTEDCORYELL COPPERAS COVE 20.6 21.0 22.9 21.3 21.6 76 381 19.9 25 32.9 COPPERAS COVE H 20.6 21.0 22.9 21.3 21.6 76 378 20.1 25 32.9 EVANT ISD EVANT H S 25.0 21.0 22.8 22.3 22.9 10 16 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH GATESVILLE IS GATESVILLE H S 20.8 20.3 22.8 21.5 21.5 54 120 45.0 17 31.5 JONESBORO ISD . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED OGLESBY ISD . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTEDCOTTLE PADUCAH ISD PADUCAH H S 20.1 18.6 20.3 20.2 19.9 16 17 94.1 5 31.3CRANE CRANE ISD CRANE H S 18.2 20.1 19.7 20.5 19.8 33 55 60.0 6 18.2CROCKETT CROCKETT CO C OZONA H S 19.0 19.8 20.6 19.9 19.9 18 85 21.2 . . < 5 HIGHCROSBY CROSBYTON ISD 18.1 19.2 19.3 20.2 19.3 25 39 64.1 5 20.0 CROSBYTON H S 18.1 19.2 19.3 20.2 19.3 25 32 78.1 5 20.0 LORENZO ISD . . . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED RALLS ISD 20.0 20.1 20.4 20.4 20.4 10 35 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH RALLS H S 20.0 20.1 20.4 20.4 20.4 10 34 29.4 . . < 5 HIGHCULBERSON CULBERSON COU VAN HORN H S 16.0 18.9 16.4 17.4 17.2 10 45 22.2 . . < 5 HIGHDALLAM DALHART ISD 19.4 20.3 21.1 20.1 20.4 68 92 73.9 16 23.5 DALHART H S 19.4 20.3 21.1 20.1 20.4 68 90 75.6 16 23.5 TEXLINE ISD TEXLINE SCHOOL 21.9 22.2 20.6 20.4 21.5 10 8 100 . . < 5 HIGHDALLAS CARROLLTON-FA 20.5 22.0 21.2 21.0 21.3 212 1,008 21.0 64 30.2 NEWMAN SMITH H 20.6 22.7 21.1 21.0 21.5 123 539 22.8 38 30.9 TURNER H S 20.5 21.3 21.4 20.9 21.2 85 388 21.9 26 30.6 CEDAR HILL IS CEDAR HILL H S 20.6 20.3 21.6 20.8 20.9 151 334 45.2 46 30.5 COPPELL ISD COPPELL H S 21.7 23.2 23.1 22.7 22.8 152 451 33.7 69 45.4 DALLAS CAN AC . . . . . . 240 . . . < 5 TESTED DALLAS ISD 17.1 17.6 17.5 17.8 17.6 850 5,430 15.7 90 10.6 A MACEO SMITH H 13.7 15.4 13.5 16.2 14.8 19 117 16.2 . . < 5 HIGH BOOKER T WASHIN 21.7 20.7 21.8 20.7 21.3 64 162 39.5 20 31.3 BRYAN ADAMS H S 19.1 19.9 19.9 19.7 19.8 33 318 10.4 7 21.2 DAVID W CARTER 16.3 17.1 15.9 17.1 16.7 80 317 25.2 . . < 5 HIGH H GRADY SPRUCE 13.9 16.1 15.4 15.6 15.3 21 208 10.1 . . < 5 HIGH HILLCREST H S 20.0 20.2 20.9 19.7 20.3 35 216 16.2 11 31.4 JAMES MADISON H 14.7 17.1 13.7 16.0 15.5 18 102 17.6 . . < 5 HIGH JUSTIN F KIMBAL 12.3 14.8 14.6 16.1 14.6 32 216 14.8 . . < 5 HIGH L G PINKSTON H 17.6 15.3 16.6 17.0 16.6 7 116 6.0 . . < 5 HIGH LINCOLN H S 15.1 15.3 14.8 15.3 15.2 124 194 63.9 . . < 5 HIGH ROOSEVELT H S 12.2 14.5 13.5 14.5 13.9 15 115 13.0 . . < 5 HIGH SCH OF GOVT,LAW 19.5 18.6 21.1 19.3 19.8 20 55 36.4 . . < 5 HIGH SCHOOL OF BUSIN 17.8 18.5 19.1 17.8 18.5 30 105 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH SCHOOL OF EDUCA 18.4 15.7 19.4 17.4 17.7 7 43 16.3 . . < 5 HIGH SCHOOL OF HEALT 19.7 18.6 20.0 19.7 19.6 29 92 31.5 5 17.2 SCHOOL OF SCIEN 21.1 22.7 22.9 21.4 22.2 23 78 29.5 7 30.4 SEAGOVILLE H S 18.6 18.2 19.9 19.6 19.3 25 129 19.4 . . < 5 HIGH SKYLINE H S 16.9 17.2 16.7 17.7 17.2 80 711 11.3 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH OAK CLIFF 15.4 16.0 15.4 16.5 16.0 40 222 18.0 . . < 5 HIGH SUNSET H S 16.5 16.3 17.7 17.7 17.3 19 245 7.8 . . < 5 HIGH THOMAS JEFFERSO 14.5 17.0 15.0 17.2 16.1 13 182 7.1 . . < 5 HIGH W H ADAMSON H S 13.6 16.6 16.9 18.0 16.4 7 164 4.3 . . < 5 HIGH W T WHITE H S 18.5 19.3 19.4 19.2 19.2 76 298 25.5 13 17.1 W W SAMUELL H S 14.9 16.4 16.1 16.4 16.1 11 173 6.4 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 66: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

58

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DALLAS DALLAS ISD WOODROW WILSON 18.9 19.9 18.5 19.7 19.3 15 217 6.9 . . < 5 HIGH DESOTO ISD DE SOTO H S 20.4 19.7 20.9 20.2 20.4 196 299 65.6 55 28.1 DUNCANVILLE I 19.6 20.1 21.3 20.6 20.5 305 673 45.3 79 25.9 DUNCANVILLE H S 19.6 20.1 21.3 20.6 20.5 305 636 48.0 79 25.9 EAGLE ADVANTA EAGLE ADVANTAGE . . . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED GARLAND ISD 20.3 20.6 21.0 20.9 20.8 481 2,304 20.9 137 28.5 GARLAND H S 24.4 24.6 24.9 24.9 24.8 90 370 24.3 58 64.4 LAKEVIEW CENTEN 18.3 17.4 19.0 19.4 18.7 32 240 13.3 5 15.6 N GARLAND H S 17.8 18.3 19.3 19.7 18.9 40 381 10.5 6 15.0 NAAMAN FOREST H 19.5 19.8 20.6 20.4 20.2 93 430 21.6 21 22.6 ROWLETT H S 20.3 20.7 20.8 20.6 20.7 114 497 22.9 30 26.3 S GARLAND H S 19.1 19.6 19.7 19.4 19.5 112 370 30.3 17 15.2 GRAND PRAIRIE 18.7 19.6 19.7 19.7 19.5 207 925 22.4 31 15.0 GRAND PRAIRIE H 18.3 18.9 19.0 19.5 19.0 92 387 23.8 10 10.9 SO GRAND PRAIRI 19.0 20.1 20.2 19.8 19.9 115 488 23.6 21 18.3 HIGHLAND PARK 24.0 25.0 25.0 23.8 24.6 182 340 53.5 106 58.2 HIGHLAND PARK H 24.0 25.0 25.0 23.8 24.6 182 339 53.7 106 58.2 HONORS ACADEM . . . . . . 111 . . . NONE TESTED IRVING ISD 19.3 19.3 20.6 19.9 19.8 211 1,092 19.3 41 19.4 IRVING H S 19.9 19.9 21.2 20.6 20.5 81 366 22.1 18 22.2 MACARTHUR H S 18.5 17.9 19.3 19.2 18.8 68 379 17.9 11 16.2 NIMITZ H S 19.4 20.0 21.1 19.9 20.2 62 345 18.0 12 19.4 LANCASTER ISD LANCASTER H S 18.0 18.1 18.6 19.1 18.6 65 210 31.0 8 12.3 MESQUITE ISD 19.0 19.6 20.2 19.8 19.7 562 1,530 36.7 100 17.8 MESQUITE H S 19.0 19.3 20.2 19.8 19.7 256 522 49.0 43 16.8 NORTH MESQUITE 19.8 20.6 21.3 20.7 20.7 106 418 25.4 . . <30 MASKED RALPH H POTEET 19.2 20.0 19.9 19.8 19.9 150 333 45.0 . . <30 MASKED WEST MESQUITE H 16.9 17.3 18.2 17.6 17.7 49 224 21.9 . . <30 MASKED RENAISSANCE C RENAISSANCE CHA 22.4 21.6 23.3 21.4 22.3 10 . . . . NO GRADS/TEA RICHARDSON IS 21.9 23.2 22.8 22.2 22.6 835 1,817 46.0 336 40.2 BERKNER H S 21.8 23.7 23.0 22.5 22.8 272 526 51.7 111 40.8 LAKE HIGHLANDS 21.6 23.0 22.4 21.8 22.3 274 527 52.0 106 38.7 PEARCE H S 23.0 23.4 23.2 22.7 23.2 171 374 45.7 74 43.3 RICHARDSON H S 21.4 22.3 22.7 21.7 22.1 118 388 30.4 45 38.1 RYLIE FAITH F RYLIE FAITH FAM . . . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED WILMER-HUTCHI WILMER-HUTCHINS 14.5 14.7 13.2 15.1 14.6 10 130 7.7 . . < 5 HIGHDAWSON DAWSON DAWSON SCHOOL 23.8 22.0 22.0 20.7 22.3 6 7 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH KLONDIKE ISD KLONDIKE H S 26.1 26.6 23.7 23.3 25.1 10 13 76.9 6 60.0 LAMESA ISD LAMESA H S 19.5 20.2 20.6 20.3 20.3 68 122 55.7 14 20.6 SANDS ISD SANDS H S 18.8 20.1 20.5 20.1 19.9 13 21 61.9 . . < 5 HIGHDEAF SMITH HEREFORD ISD HEREFORD H S 18.8 18.8 19.7 19.9 19.3 82 238 34.5 14 17.1DELTA COOPER ISD COOPER H S 17.8 18.3 18.2 19.0 18.4 34 55 61.8 . . < 5 HIGH FANNINDEL ISD FANNINDEL H S 14.3 17.5 15.8 16.9 16.3 8 13 61.5 . . < 5 HIGHDENTON AUBREY ISD AUBREY H S 18.7 19.2 19.6 20.2 19.6 9 52 17.3 . . < 5 HIGH DENTON ISD 20.3 20.8 21.7 20.8 21.0 154 576 26.7 46 29.9 DENTON H S 21.4 22.1 22.5 21.8 22.1 77 245 31.4 30 39.0 RYAN H S 19.3 19.5 20.9 19.9 20.0 76 303 25.1 16 21.1 KRUM ISD KRUM H S 22.8 24.3 25.6 24.4 24.3 12 59 20.3 6 50.0 LAKE DALLAS I LAKE DALLAS H S 18.1 19.2 19.8 20.9 19.7 18 139 12.9 . . < 5 HIGH LEWISVILLE IS 20.4 21.4 21.9 21.2 21.3 1,187 1,807 65.7 354 29.8 LEWISVILLE H S 19.5 21.1 21.2 20.8 20.8 408 588 69.4 114 27.9 MARCUS H S 21.7 21.9 23.0 21.8 22.2 453 654 69.3 159 35.1 THE COLONY H S 19.7 21.1 21.3 20.8 20.8 326 534 61.0 81 24.8 LITTLE ELM IS LITTLE ELM H S 17.8 18.5 19.4 17.7 18.5 15 59 25.4 . . < 5 HIGH NORTHWEST ISD 21.3 21.1 22.0 21.3 21.6 79 242 32.6 22 27.8 NORTHWEST H S 21.3 21.1 22.0 21.3 21.6 79 232 34.1 22 27.8 PILOT POINT I PILOT POINT H S 22.6 20.9 23.5 21.6 22.3 30 53 56.6 11 36.7 PONDER ISD PONDER H S 19.0 21.7 19.6 20.6 20.5 10 26 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH SANGER ISD 21.8 19.7 23.0 20.9 21.5 43 151 28.5 16 37.2 SANGER H S 21.8 19.7 23.0 20.9 21.5 43 126 34.1 16 37.2 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ACADEMY O 29.0 30.7 30.9 28.1 29.7 16 . . 16 100 NO GRADS/TEADEWITT CUERO ISD 19.5 20.6 19.0 19.7 19.8 53 113 46.9 13 24.5 CUERO H S 19.5 20.6 19.0 19.7 19.8 53 113 46.9 13 24.5 NORDHEIM ISD NORDHEIM SCHOOL . . . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED YOAKUM ISD YOAKUM H S 19.7 19.9 20.4 19.9 20.0 48 110 43.6 9 18.8 YORKTOWN ISD YORKTOWN H S 16.3 19.0 17.0 18.4 17.7 9 48 18.8 . . < 5 HIGHDICKENS PATTON SPRING PATTON SPRINGS 18.2 18.3 17.2 18.0 18.0 6 5 100 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 67: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

59

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DICKENS SPUR ISD SPUR SCHOOL 21.3 19.0 19.3 20.6 20.2 11 21 52.4 . . < 5 HIGHDIMMIT CARRIZO SPRIN CARRIZO SPRINGS 16.0 16.6 16.8 16.9 16.7 48 126 38.1 . . < 5 HIGHDONLEY CLARENDON ISD CLARENDON H S 20.6 19.3 20.9 20.0 20.4 19 27 70.4 6 31.6 HEDLEY ISD HEDLEY SCHOOL 21.7 22.5 22.8 20.9 22.2 10 10 100 . . < 5 HIGHDUVAL BENAVIDES ISD BENAVIDES H S 17.2 16.7 17.0 16.9 17.1 29 32 90.6 . . < 5 HIGH FREER ISD FREER H S 17.4 18.6 18.3 17.6 18.1 43 63 68.3 5 11.6 SAN DIEGO ISD SAN DIEGO H S 15.3 16.3 15.5 17.5 16.2 39 81 48.1 . . < 5 HIGHEASTLAND CISCO ISD CISCO H S 20.2 22.1 22.1 21.1 21.5 23 42 54.8 7 30.4 EASTLAND ISD EASTLAND H S 20.1 20.4 20.8 19.5 20.3 35 73 47.9 . . < 5 HIGH GORMAN ISD GORMAN H S 19.5 19.1 21.9 19.8 20.3 18 24 75.0 5 27.8 RANGER ISD RANGER H S 17.1 18.6 16.5 17.9 17.6 21 26 80.8 . . < 5 HIGH RISING STAR I RISING STAR H S 19.0 19.3 19.6 20.0 19.6 12 15 80.0 . . < 5 HIGHECTOR ECTOR COUNTY 20.5 21.3 22.3 21.6 21.5 162 1,356 11.9 51 31.5 CAREER CTR 13.7 16.9 14.9 16.7 15.8 10 229 4.4 . . < 5 HIGH ODESSA H S 21.4 23.0 23.3 22.4 22.6 72 569 12.7 31 43.1 PERMIAN H S 20.6 20.4 22.2 21.5 21.3 80 514 15.6 20 25.0EDWARDS NUECES CANYON NUECES CANYON H 21.0 17.7 19.7 18.1 19.2 12 18 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH ROCKSPRINGS I ROCKSPRINGS H S 16.1 17.9 16.8 17.9 17.3 16 34 47.1 . . < 5 HIGHEL PASO ANTHONY ANTHONY H S 15.6 17.2 16.8 18.7 17.2 28 41 68.3 . . < 5 HIGH CANUTILLO ISD 15.6 17.2 17.5 18.3 17.2 95 193 49.2 . . < 5 HIGH CANUTILLO H S 15.6 17.2 17.5 18.3 17.2 95 191 49.7 . . < 5 HIGH CLINT ISD 18.8 19.7 19.6 19.8 19.6 33 303 10.9 . . < 5 HIGH CLINT H S 19.0 20.0 19.5 19.6 19.7 20 147 13.6 . . < 5 HIGH MOUNTAIN VIEW H 18.3 19.3 19.8 20.1 19.4 13 132 9.8 . . < 5 HIGH EL PASO ISD 19.7 21.2 21.2 20.8 20.8 559 3,043 18.4 146 26.1 ANDRESS H S 19.7 20.2 20.4 20.1 20.2 65 368 17.7 13 20.0 AUSTIN H S 17.1 18.9 18.4 18.3 18.4 47 301 15.6 . . < 5 HIGH BOWIE H S 14.6 18.1 16.4 17.8 16.8 33 254 13.0 . . < 5 HIGH BURGES H S 18.0 19.6 19.7 18.7 19.0 23 277 8.3 . . < 5 HIGH CORONADO H S 20.5 21.7 21.8 21.7 21.5 72 379 19.0 24 33.3 EL PASO H S 20.3 19.7 22.0 20.2 20.6 18 214 8.4 . . < 5 HIGH FRANKLIN H S 21.2 22.4 22.4 22.0 22.1 180 554 32.5 61 33.9 IRVIN H S 19.0 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.5 25 337 7.4 6 24.0 JEFFERSON H S 15.5 19.1 16.0 18.6 17.4 11 179 6.1 . . < 5 HIGH SILVA HEALTH MA 20.4 22.6 23.1 21.6 22.1 85 152 55.9 28 32.9 FABENS ISD 15.8 19.2 17.0 17.7 17.6 45 135 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH FABENS H S 15.8 19.2 17.0 17.7 17.6 45 124 36.3 . . < 5 HIGH PASO DEL NORT PASO DEL NORTE . . . . . . 68 . . . NONE TESTED SAN ELIZARIO SAN ELIZARIO H 14.9 17.4 16.7 17.3 16.7 42 120 35.0 . . < 5 HIGH SOCORRO ISD 18.7 19.7 19.4 19.7 19.5 150 1,085 13.8 25 16.7 AMERICAS H S 19.1 19.4 19.2 19.9 19.5 75 299 25.1 14 18.7 MONTWOOD H S 19.4 21.1 20.4 20.0 20.3 38 408 9.3 . . <10 MASKED SOCORRO H S 17.1 18.7 18.5 19.2 18.5 37 378 9.8 . . <10 MASKED TORNILLO ISD TORNILLO H S 14.8 14.8 14.7 16.2 15.3 12 29 41.4 . . < 5 HIGH YSLETA ISD 19.0 20.0 20.0 19.7 19.8 282 2,836 9.9 63 22.3 BEL AIR H S 20.4 20.5 20.8 20.1 20.5 50 429 11.7 11 22.0 DEL VALLE H S 18.2 18.5 17.8 18.3 18.3 26 390 6.7 . . < 5 HIGH EASTWOOD H S 19.3 21.1 21.2 20.7 20.6 66 434 15.2 18 27.3 J M HANKS H S 21.2 21.4 22.1 21.1 21.5 53 585 9.1 19 35.8 PARKLAND H S 16.5 17.6 18.4 18.9 17.9 23 199 11.6 . . < 5 HIGH RIVERSIDE H S 16.3 18.2 17.1 17.7 17.5 34 258 13.2 . . < 5 HIGH YSLETA H S 17.6 19.1 19.4 18.9 18.9 30 343 8.7 5 16.7ELLIS AVALON ISD . . . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED ENNIS ISD ENNIS H S 19.6 19.0 19.9 20.2 19.8 154 222 69.4 24 15.6 FERRIS ISD FERRIS H S 17.7 21.6 19.3 19.3 19.6 9 69 13.0 . . < 5 HIGH ITALY ISD ITALY H S 19.2 18.8 20.2 19.6 19.6 17 34 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH MAYPEARL ISD MAYPEARL H S 20.0 21.1 20.9 20.1 20.6 14 32 43.8 . . < 5 HIGH MIDLOTHIAN IS MIDLOTHIAN H S 20.7 21.2 22.3 21.3 21.6 163 260 62.7 51 31.3 MILFORD ISD . . . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED PALMER ISD PALMER H S 17.6 19.5 17.7 19.6 18.8 13 37 35.1 . . < 5 HIGH RED OAK ISD RED OAK H S 18.9 20.2 20.5 19.9 20.0 119 186 64.0 28 23.5 WAXAHACHIE IS 20.0 19.0 20.8 20.3 20.1 130 358 36.3 25 19.2 WAXAHACHIE H S 20.0 19.0 20.8 20.3 20.1 130 330 39.4 25 19.2ERATH DUBLIN ISD . . . . . . 51 . . . < 5 TESTED HUCKABAY ISD HUCKABAY SCHOOL 18.5 17.9 17.2 17.8 18.0 11 18 61.1 . . < 5 HIGH LINGLEVILLE I LINGLEVILLE SCH 19.4 17.7 18.3 18.9 18.7 7 10 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH STEPHENVILLE STEPHENVILLE H 19.7 20.6 21.3 20.6 20.6 138 193 71.5 32 23.2FALLS CHILTON ISD CHILTON SCHOOL 18.3 20.7 16.9 18.9 18.7 7 22 31.8 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 68: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

60

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

FALLS MARLIN ISD MARLIN H S 19.2 18.7 19.4 19.0 19.2 22 67 32.8 . . < 5 HIGH ROSEBUD-LOTT ROSEBUD-LOTT H 21.0 22.1 21.8 22.3 22.0 40 61 65.6 13 32.5FANNIN BONHAM ISD BONHAM H S 18.9 18.9 18.6 19.5 19.2 38 98 38.8 5 13.2 DODD CITY ISD DODD CITY SCHOO 18.8 18.5 18.1 19.3 18.8 8 11 72.7 . . < 5 HIGH ECTOR ISD . . . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTED HONEY GROVE I HONEY GROVE H S 22.3 21.0 22.5 20.5 21.7 33 42 78.6 14 42.4 LEONARD ISD LEONARD H S 18.6 18.1 19.7 20.0 19.2 22 39 56.4 . . < 5 HIGH SAM RAYBURN I RAYBURN H S 18.3 19.3 17.9 20.3 19.0 12 20 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH SAVOY ISD SAVOY H S 22.8 21.4 21.2 22.6 22.0 5 16 31.3 . . < 5 HIGH TRENTON ISD TRENTON H S 20.9 20.2 20.9 21.3 20.9 14 24 58.3 . . < 5 HIGHFAYETTE FAYETTEVILLE FAYETTEVILLE H 21.3 21.9 23.4 21.0 22.1 7 22 31.8 . . < 5 HIGH FLATONIA ISD FLATONIA H S 19.5 19.8 19.9 20.9 20.0 21 28 75.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA GRANGE ISD LA GRANGE H S 23.8 21.6 21.9 21.0 22.1 9 106 8.5 . . < 5 HIGH ROUND TOP-CAR . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED SCHULENBURG I SCHULENBURG H S 18.2 19.8 19.9 19.2 19.5 13 51 25.5 . . < 5 HIGHFISHER ROBY CONS ISD ROBY H S 20.3 19.3 21.6 20.0 20.3 12 20 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH ROTAN ISD ROTAN H S 20.1 20.8 20.5 20.6 20.7 33 34 97.1 5 15.2FLOYD FLOYDADA ISD 19.6 21.4 21.9 21.0 21.1 39 61 63.9 12 30.8 FLOYDADA H S 19.6 21.4 21.9 21.0 21.1 39 56 69.6 12 30.8 LOCKNEY ISD LOCKNEY H S 19.2 19.7 19.2 20.2 19.7 31 36 86.1 . . < 5 HIGHFOARD CROWELL ISD . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTEDFORT BEND FORT BEND ISD 19.9 21.6 21.1 20.7 20.9 793 3,196 24.8 233 29.4 CLEMENTS H S 22.1 24.2 23.2 22.7 23.2 196 646 30.3 92 46.9 DULLES H S 20.3 21.9 21.3 20.6 21.2 91 490 18.6 27 29.7 KEMPNER H S 19.4 21.6 20.9 20.7 20.7 67 493 13.6 17 25.4 LAWRENCE E ELKI 20.0 21.4 21.1 20.7 20.9 162 544 29.8 47 29.0 STEPHEN F AUSTI 19.6 21.1 20.9 20.2 20.5 181 610 29.7 45 24.9 WILLOWRIDGE H S 16.1 17.3 17.2 17.7 17.2 96 383 25.1 5 5.2 LAMAR CONSOLI 19.3 19.9 20.2 20.2 20.0 309 691 44.7 74 23.9 B F TERRY H S 18.9 19.5 19.8 20.0 19.7 191 385 49.6 37 19.4 LAMAR CONS H S 20.0 20.6 20.9 20.5 20.6 118 306 38.6 37 31.4 NEEDVILLE ISD NEEDVILLE H S 20.7 19.7 21.9 21.3 21.0 70 127 55.1 21 30.0 STAFFORD MSD STAFFORD HIGH S 18.3 20.0 18.2 19.1 19.1 36 137 26.3 5 13.9FRANKLIN MOUNT VERNON MT VERNON H S 21.0 19.2 20.8 20.7 20.5 52 85 61.2 10 19.2FREESTONE FAIRFIELD ISD FAIRFIELD H S 19.8 22.0 20.9 20.4 20.8 36 81 44.4 11 30.6 TEAGUE ISD TEAGUE H S 20.3 19.9 21.1 20.5 20.7 15 66 22.7 . . < 5 HIGH WORTHAM ISD WORTHAM H S 16.3 17.9 18.7 18.1 17.9 16 16 100 . . < 5 HIGHFRIO DILLEY ISD DILLEY H S 19.8 19.7 20.2 20.4 20.2 24 38 63.2 5 20.8 PEARSALL ISD 16.3 17.8 17.3 18.1 17.5 70 126 55.6 7 10.0 PEARSALL H S 16.3 17.8 17.3 18.1 17.5 70 124 56.5 7 10.0GAINES LOOP ISD LOOP SCHOOL 19.9 18.1 19.0 18.5 19.1 10 13 76.9 . . < 5 HIGH SEAGRAVES ISD SEAGRAVES H S 17.5 19.6 18.5 19.7 18.9 19 30 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH SEMINOLE ISD 19.1 19.0 19.4 19.7 19.4 36 127 28.3 5 13.9 SEMINOLE H S 19.1 19.0 19.4 19.7 19.4 36 121 29.8 5 13.9GALVESTON CLEAR CREEK I 21.6 22.5 22.8 22.2 22.4 368 1,547 23.8 150 40.8 CLEAR BROOK H S 20.5 21.7 21.7 21.6 21.5 98 419 23.4 32 32.7 CLEAR CREEK H S 21.2 21.9 22.8 22.2 22.2 109 473 23.0 47 43.1 CLEAR LAKE H S 22.6 23.5 23.7 22.6 23.2 158 618 25.6 71 44.9 DICKINSON ISD DICKINSON H S 16.8 18.2 16.6 18.3 17.7 23 274 8.4 . . < 5 HIGH FRIENDSWOOD I FRIENDSWOOD H S 21.8 22.3 22.7 22.0 22.3 106 325 32.6 38 35.8 GALVESTON ISD BALL H S 19.5 20.7 20.7 19.6 20.2 96 409 23.5 27 28.1 HIGH ISLAND I . . . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTED HITCHCOCK ISD HITCHCOCK H S 15.4 15.4 18.4 18.4 17.0 5 71 7.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA MARQUE ISD LA MARQUE H S 15.5 16.6 16.3 16.9 16.5 61 237 25.7 . . < 5 HIGH SANTA FE ISD SANTA FE H S 18.5 18.9 19.5 19.8 19.3 16 256 6.3 . . < 5 HIGH TEXAS CITY IS 17.4 17.4 18.2 18.5 18.0 32 273 11.7 . . < 5 HIGH TEXAS CITY H S 17.4 17.4 18.2 18.5 18.0 32 272 11.8 . . < 5 HIGHGARZA POST ISD POST H S 22.0 21.0 24.8 23.6 23.0 8 41 19.5 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTHLAND ISD . . . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTEDGILLESPIE FREDERICKSBUR 21.2 20.4 22.1 21.1 21.3 55 188 29.3 12 21.8 FREDERICKSBURG 21.2 20.4 22.1 21.1 21.3 55 184 29.9 12 21.8 HARPER ISD HARPER H S 21.5 20.3 21.9 22.1 21.7 16 22 72.7 5 31.3GLASSCOCK GLASSCOCK COU GLASSCOCK COUNT 22.4 23.4 22.4 22.5 22.8 11 21 52.4 5 45.5GOLIAD GOLIAD ISD GOLIAD H S 17.1 17.3 17.2 18.9 17.9 19 81 23.5 . . < 5 HIGHGONZALES GONZALES ISD 19.4 20.2 20.1 20.1 20.0 74 129 57.4 18 24.3 GONZALES H S 19.4 20.2 20.1 20.1 20.0 74 125 59.2 18 24.3 NIXON-SMILEY NIXON-SMILEY H 20.1 20.5 21.4 19.5 20.6 18 40 45.0 . . < 5 HIGH WAELDER ISD WAELDER H S 12.7 15.9 15.5 15.8 15.1 11 18 61.1 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 69: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

61

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

GRAY LEFORS ISD . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED MCLEAN ISD MCLEAN SCHOOL 18.6 16.3 17.2 18.1 17.6 15 17 88.2 . . < 5 HIGH PAMPA ISD 21.4 20.4 22.2 21.8 21.6 106 218 48.6 30 28.3 PAMPA H S 21.4 20.4 22.2 21.8 21.6 106 202 52.5 30 28.3GRAYSON BELLS ISD BELLS H S 17.9 19.1 18.6 20.3 19.0 18 36 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH COLLINSVILLE COLLINSVILLE H 21.0 20.3 21.9 21.1 21.2 21 24 87.5 9 42.9 DENISON ISD 21.4 21.5 22.3 21.7 21.8 95 251 37.8 36 37.9 DENISON H S 21.4 21.5 22.3 21.7 21.8 95 240 39.6 36 37.9 GUNTER ISD GUNTER H S 21.9 20.7 22.6 22.1 22.0 21 41 51.2 9 42.9 HOWE ISD HOWE H S 21.5 20.4 22.1 20.8 21.3 41 70 58.6 13 31.7 POTTSBORO ISD POTTSBORO H S 22.0 21.5 22.2 21.9 22.1 34 63 54.0 12 35.3 S AND S CONS S AND S CONS H 21.4 20.6 20.2 20.5 21.0 17 36 47.2 . . < 5 HIGH SHERMAN ISD 20.0 20.6 20.6 20.4 20.5 70 324 21.6 16 22.9 SHERMAN HIGH SC 20.0 20.6 20.6 20.4 20.5 70 298 23.5 16 22.9 TOM BEAN ISD TOM BEAN H S 20.4 19.8 20.4 20.6 20.4 16 47 34.0 . . < 5 HIGH VAN ALSTYNE I VAN ALSTYNE H S 20.2 22.7 21.2 21.5 21.7 6 54 11.1 . . < 5 HIGH WHITESBORO IS WHITESBORO H S 21.3 20.2 21.0 20.7 20.9 54 92 58.7 16 29.6 WHITEWRIGHT I . . . . . . 34 . . . < 5 TESTEDGREGG EAST TEXAS CH EAST TEXAS CHAR . . . . . . 29 . . . NONE TESTED GLADEWATER IS GLADEWATER H S 20.2 19.7 20.7 20.2 20.4 33 116 28.4 7 21.2 KILGORE ISD 20.1 19.5 21.0 20.6 20.5 71 222 32.0 17 23.9 KILGORE H S 20.1 19.5 21.0 20.6 20.5 71 210 33.8 17 23.9 LONGVIEW ISD 18.9 20.3 20.5 19.9 20.0 120 367 32.7 33 27.5 LONGVIEW H S 18.9 20.3 20.5 19.9 20.0 120 367 32.7 33 27.5 PINE TREE ISD PINE TREE H S 21.6 21.0 22.7 21.5 21.9 103 247 41.7 38 36.9 SABINE ISD SABINE H S 19.9 22.8 21.3 21.7 21.5 25 83 30.1 6 24.0 SPRING HILL I SPRING HILL H S 20.5 20.0 21.6 20.9 20.9 82 96 85.4 22 26.8 WHITE OAK ISD WHITE OAK H S 22.4 22.9 23.5 22.8 22.9 48 81 59.3 24 50.0GRIMES ANDERSON-SHIR ANDERSON-SHIRO . . . . . . 33 . . . NONE TESTED IOLA ISD . . . . . . 28 . . . < 5 TESTED NAVASOTA ISD NAVASOTA H S 19.4 20.3 20.1 20.1 20.1 36 147 24.5 9 25.0 RICHARDS ISD . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTEDGUADALUPE MARION ISD 20.5 21.0 22.0 21.5 21.4 17 76 22.4 5 29.4 MARION H S 20.5 21.0 22.0 21.5 21.4 17 67 25.4 5 29.4 NAVARRO ISD NAVARRO H S 19.1 18.3 19.6 18.9 19.1 16 50 32.0 . . < 5 HIGH SCHERTZ-CIBOL 20.5 20.9 21.4 21.1 21.1 164 390 42.1 46 28.0 SAMUEL CLEMENS 20.5 20.9 21.4 21.1 21.1 164 357 45.9 46 28.0 SEGUIN ISD 20.1 19.8 20.8 20.2 20.4 87 384 22.7 20 23.0 SEGUIN HIGH SCH 20.1 19.8 20.8 20.2 20.4 87 334 26.0 20 23.0HALE ABERNATHY ISD ABERNATHY H S 19.2 19.6 19.7 19.4 19.6 39 50 78.0 8 20.5 COTTON CENTER COTTON CENTER S 19.0 18.1 18.9 20.0 19.3 8 15 53.3 . . < 5 HIGH HALE CENTER I HALE CENTER H S 21.4 19.0 22.3 20.6 20.9 16 32 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH PETERSBURG IS 15.7 19.0 17.1 18.1 17.7 15 17 88.2 . . < 5 HIGH PETERSBURG H S 15.7 19.0 17.1 18.1 17.7 15 14 100 . . < 5 HIGH PLAINVIEW ISD 20.1 20.2 21.0 20.3 20.5 99 284 34.9 28 28.3 PLAINVIEW H S 20.1 20.2 21.0 20.3 20.5 99 275 36.0 28 28.3HALL MEMPHIS ISD MEMPHIS H S 17.5 18.3 18.0 18.7 18.2 23 33 69.7 . . < 5 HIGH TURKEY-QUITAQ VALLEY SCHOOL 20.4 19.2 21.0 22.0 20.7 12 19 63.2 . . < 5 HIGHHAMILTON HAMILTON ISD HAMILTON H S 21.4 22.1 22.3 21.8 22.1 52 51 100 15 28.8 HICO ISD HICO H S 18.3 20.5 19.6 20.3 19.8 20 44 45.5 . . < 5 HIGHHANSFORD GRUVER ISD GRUVER H S 20.5 21.4 21.0 20.6 20.9 32 29 100 11 34.4 SPEARMAN ISD SPEARMAN H S 22.6 21.3 22.1 22.6 22.2 32 48 66.7 16 50.0HARDEMAN CHILLICOTHE I . . . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED QUANAH ISD QUANAH H S 19.3 18.3 20.0 19.5 19.4 44 50 88.0 9 20.5HARDIN HARDIN-JEFFER 19.6 21.0 21.1 19.8 20.5 20 130 15.4 5 25.0 HARDIN-JEFFERSO 19.6 21.0 21.1 19.8 20.5 20 129 15.5 5 25.0 KOUNTZE ISD . . . . . . 60 . . . < 5 TESTED LUMBERTON ISD LUMBERTON H S 21.9 19.9 21.0 21.0 21.0 24 200 12.0 7 29.2 SILSBEE ISD 19.1 19.9 19.6 20.0 19.8 21 167 12.6 . . < 5 HIGH SILSBEE H S 19.1 19.9 19.6 20.0 19.8 21 167 12.6 . . < 5 HIGH WEST HARDIN C WEST HARDIN H S 18.5 16.8 19.5 18.9 18.6 16 43 37.2 . . < 5 HIGHHARRIS ACADEMY OF AC ACADEMY OF ACCE . . . . . . 15 . . . NONE TESTED ALDINE ISD 16.3 17.8 17.3 17.7 17.4 371 1,858 20.0 34 9.2 ALDINE H S 14.7 16.5 15.8 16.8 16.1 99 465 21.3 . . <10 MASKED CHESTER W NIMIT 17.4 18.4 18.3 18.4 18.2 94 379 24.8 12 12.8 EISENHOWER H S 16.5 17.7 17.4 17.8 17.5 115 495 23.2 11 9.6 MACARTHUR H S 16.5 18.6 17.7 17.8 17.8 60 406 14.8 . . <10 MASKED ALIEF ISD 18.3 20.2 19.4 19.6 19.5 350 1,553 22.5 71 20.3

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 70: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

62

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HARRIS ALIEF ISD ELSIK H S 17.9 20.0 19.4 19.3 19.3 135 673 20.1 24 17.8 HASTINGS H S 18.0 20.1 18.5 19.4 19.1 163 761 21.4 31 19.0 KERR H S 20.1 20.8 21.9 21.0 21.0 52 118 44.1 16 30.8 ALPHONSO CRUT ALPHONSO CRUTCH . . . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED AMERICAN ACAD AMERICAN ACADEM . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED CALVIN NELMS CALVIN NELMS CH . . . . . . 21 . . . NONE TESTED CHANNELVIEW I 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.4 19.5 28 261 10.7 5 17.9 CHANNELVIEW HIG 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.4 19.5 28 248 11.3 5 17.9 COMQUEST ACAD COMQUEST ACADEM . . . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED CROSBY ISD CROSBY H S 18.2 19.0 19.2 18.6 18.8 107 210 51.0 16 15.0 CYPRESS-FAIRB 20.4 22.0 21.7 21.5 21.6 1,023 3,216 31.8 313 30.6 CY-FAIR H S 20.5 21.8 21.9 21.7 21.7 243 525 46.3 71 29.2 CYPRESS CREEK H 21.1 22.6 21.8 21.6 21.9 196 578 33.9 64 32.7 CYPRESS FALLS H 21.3 23.5 22.1 22.3 22.5 195 574 34.0 74 37.9 CYPRESS SPRINGS 19.4 21.5 20.2 20.7 20.5 88 361 24.4 . . <30 MASKED JERSEY VILLAGE 18.6 20.4 20.6 20.2 20.1 145 589 24.6 32 22.1 LANGHAM CREEK H 21.3 22.3 23.4 22.1 22.4 136 453 30.0 52 38.2 WINDFERN H S 16.5 17.3 19.0 18.8 18.0 20 135 14.8 . . <30 MASKED DEER PARK ISD 19.2 21.0 20.5 20.5 20.4 72 664 10.8 15 20.8 DEER PARK H S 19.2 21.0 20.5 20.5 20.4 72 623 11.6 15 20.8 ED WHITE SCHO ED WHITE MEMORI . . . . . . 9 . . . NONE TESTED GALENA PARK I 17.7 18.1 18.8 18.7 18.5 245 892 27.5 32 13.1 GALENA PARK H S 16.4 17.1 17.4 17.8 17.4 72 286 25.2 5 6.9 NORTH SHORE SR 18.3 18.5 19.4 19.1 18.9 173 584 29.6 27 15.6 GEORGE I SANC GEORGE I SANCHE 14.6 15.6 17.0 15.4 15.9 7 62 11.3 . . < 5 HIGH GIRLS & BOYS GIRLS & BOYS PR 14.5 15.3 13.8 13.7 14.3 6 39 15.4 . . < 5 HIGH GOOSE CREEK C 20.0 20.7 20.3 20.3 20.4 124 883 14.0 38 30.6 LEE H S 20.8 20.9 20.3 20.4 20.8 29 363 8.0 12 41.4 STERLING H S 19.7 20.6 20.3 20.3 20.3 95 471 20.2 26 27.4 GULF SHORES A GULF SHORES ACA . . . . . . 67 . . . NONE TESTED HEIGHTS CHART HEIGHTS CHARTER . . . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED HOUSTON CAN A HOUSTON CAN! AC . . . . . . 94 . . . NONE TESTED HOUSTON ISD 18.3 19.1 19.0 19.0 19.0 1,115 7,086 15.7 211 18.9 AUSTIN H S 14.2 17.5 15.5 16.5 16.0 26 373 7.0 . . < 5 HIGH BARBARA JORDAN 16.4 15.8 16.0 16.5 16.3 46 193 23.8 . . < 5 HIGH BELLAIRE H S 21.9 23.1 22.8 21.7 22.5 116 615 18.9 45 38.8 CONTEMPORARY LR 11.0 13.6 11.9 14.6 13.0 8 105 7.6 . . < 5 HIGH DAVIS H S 15.3 17.3 15.8 17.4 16.5 11 265 4.2 . . < 5 HIGH DEBAKEY H S FOR 23.7 25.0 24.4 23.0 24.1 83 114 72.8 45 54.2 FURR H S 15.9 16.3 16.7 18.0 16.7 15 189 7.9 . . < 5 HIGH JONES H S 18.1 18.8 18.6 18.7 18.7 30 169 17.8 . . < 5 HIGH KASHMERE H S 15.1 15.7 15.6 16.1 15.8 35 114 30.7 . . < 5 HIGH LAMAR H S 21.9 21.8 22.6 21.6 22.1 118 532 22.2 48 40.7 LAW ENFCMT-CRIM 19.6 18.5 20.9 19.5 19.7 41 189 21.7 6 14.6 LEE H S 18.0 18.6 20.1 20.1 19.3 31 408 7.6 9 29.0 MADISON H S 15.6 16.7 16.1 17.7 16.6 36 281 12.8 . . < 5 HIGH MILBY H S 16.2 19.4 18.2 18.6 18.2 46 540 8.5 10 21.7 PERFOR & VIS AR 23.1 21.6 22.3 20.1 21.9 19 129 14.7 5 26.3 REAGAN H S 16.7 17.6 17.4 17.9 17.5 28 341 8.2 . . < 5 HIGH SAM HOUSTON H S 14.1 16.7 15.8 17.3 16.1 43 432 10.0 . . < 5 HIGH SCARBOROUGH H S 17.3 18.1 18.2 18.1 18.0 50 133 37.6 . . < 5 HIGH SHARPSTOWN H S 17.4 18.3 17.3 17.7 17.8 43 249 17.3 6 14.0 STERLING H S 16.7 16.2 17.8 16.9 17.1 29 227 12.8 . . < 5 HIGH WALTRIP H S 17.4 18.1 18.1 18.6 18.2 52 221 23.5 . . < 5 HIGH WASHINGTON B T 16.8 19.3 17.7 18.7 18.3 40 221 18.1 . . < 5 HIGH WESTBURY H S 17.9 18.2 18.8 18.6 18.5 75 359 20.9 10 13.3 WHEATLEY H S 14.4 15.5 14.8 14.8 14.9 15 91 16.5 . . < 5 HIGH WORTHING H S 14.8 15.9 15.1 15.8 15.5 34 263 12.9 . . < 5 HIGH YATES H S 15.8 15.6 15.6 16.5 16.0 45 240 18.8 . . < 5 HIGH HUFFMAN ISD 20.8 21.2 22.4 21.1 21.4 16 133 12.0 5 31.3 HARGRAVE H S 20.8 21.2 22.4 21.1 21.4 16 132 12.1 5 31.3 HUMBLE ISD 21.1 22.2 22.3 22.0 22.0 375 1,428 26.3 132 35.2 HUMBLE H S 19.8 20.9 21.1 21.0 20.8 171 583 29.3 43 25.1 KINGWOOD H S 22.2 23.3 23.3 22.7 23.0 201 796 25.3 88 43.8 JESSE JACKSON JESSE JACKSON A . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED KATY ISD 22.0 23.2 22.9 22.5 22.8 853 1,716 49.7 345 40.4 KATY H S 21.6 22.8 22.5 22.3 22.4 313 554 56.5 112 35.8 MAYDE CREEK H S 20.7 21.8 21.8 21.2 21.5 160 470 34.0 51 31.9

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 71: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

63

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HARRIS KATY ISD TAYLOR H S 22.8 24.2 23.6 23.1 23.6 380 692 54.9 182 47.9 KLEIN ISD 21.1 22.6 22.4 21.7 22.1 645 1,912 33.7 249 38.6 KLEIN FOREST H 18.2 20.4 19.2 19.8 19.6 173 598 28.9 29 16.8 KLEIN H S 22.1 23.7 23.7 22.5 23.1 332 747 44.4 160 48.2 KLEIN OAK H S 22.1 22.8 23.4 22.0 22.7 140 566 24.7 60 42.9 LA PORTE ISD 19.5 20.8 20.5 19.8 20.3 71 381 18.6 17 23.9 LA PORTE HIGH S 19.5 20.8 20.5 19.8 20.3 71 352 20.2 17 23.9 NORTH FOREST 15.5 15.6 16.1 16.5 16.1 83 566 14.7 . . < 5 HIGH FOREST BROOK H 15.2 15.8 16.4 16.5 16.2 31 301 10.3 . . < 5 HIGH SMILEY H S 15.7 15.5 16.0 16.5 16.1 52 264 19.7 . . < 5 HIGH NORTH HOUSTON NORTH HOUSTON H . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED PASADENA ISD 19.1 20.0 19.7 20.0 19.8 258 1,900 13.6 57 22.1 DOBIE H S 18.5 19.8 18.9 19.5 19.3 70 493 14.2 . . <20 MASKED PASADENA H S 19.7 21.2 19.5 20.3 20.3 33 409 8.1 . . <20 MASKED RAYBURN H S 19.5 20.2 20.1 20.5 20.1 129 471 27.4 32 24.8 SOUTH HOUSTON H 18.3 18.2 19.8 18.7 18.9 26 496 5.2 . . <20 MASKED PREPARED TABL PREPARED TABLE . . . . . . 23 . . . NONE TESTED SHELDON ISD C E KING H S 16.4 17.5 17.8 17.5 17.5 37 162 22.8 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTHWEST HIG SOUTHWEST HIGH . . . . . . 67 . . . NONE TESTED SPRING BRANCH 22.1 23.4 23.2 22.3 22.9 418 1,634 25.6 175 41.9 MEMORIAL H S 23.4 25.0 24.5 23.3 24.2 179 439 40.8 96 53.6 NORTHBROOK H S 18.4 19.8 18.9 19.1 19.1 27 315 8.6 . . <20 MASKED SPRING WOODS H 20.2 22.0 20.8 21.0 21.2 63 354 17.8 . . <20 MASKED STRATFORD H S 22.1 22.8 23.4 22.3 22.8 149 431 34.6 59 39.6 SPRING ISD 20.2 21.4 21.7 21.1 21.2 355 1,078 32.9 107 30.1 SPRING H S 20.2 21.2 22.1 21.3 21.3 165 457 36.1 50 30.3 WESTFIELD H S 20.1 21.7 21.4 21.0 21.2 190 618 30.7 57 30.0 TOMBALL ISD TOMBALL H S 20.7 21.4 21.6 21.5 21.4 131 401 32.7 40 30.5 WEST HOUSTON WEST HOUSTON CH . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTEDHARRISON ELYSIAN FIELD ELYSIAN FIELDS 19.2 18.8 19.5 19.5 19.4 65 68 95.6 11 16.9 HALLSVILLE IS HALLSVILLE H S 19.9 21.3 20.6 20.3 20.6 75 227 33.0 20 26.7 HARLETON ISD HARLETON H S 19.3 18.1 19.6 19.5 19.1 27 36 75.0 . . < 5 HIGH KARNACK ISD KARNACK H S 16.4 16.5 16.6 18.0 16.9 13 14 92.9 . . < 5 HIGH MARSHALL ISD 18.7 19.1 19.7 19.7 19.5 182 324 56.2 36 19.8 MARSHALL H S 18.7 19.1 19.7 19.7 19.5 182 315 57.8 36 19.8 WASKOM ISD WASKOM H S 18.0 19.0 18.7 18.6 18.7 23 34 67.6 . . < 5 HIGHHARTLEY CHANNING ISD CHANNING SCHOOL 20.7 18.7 22.2 19.5 20.5 6 7 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH HARTLEY ISD HARTLEY SCHOOL 17.1 17.6 18.6 19.2 18.2 14 12 100 . . < 5 HIGHHASKELL HASKELL CISD HASKELL H S 20.3 21.1 19.8 20.6 20.6 29 47 61.7 8 27.6 PAINT CREEK I PAINT CREEK SCH 18.4 18.4 16.9 17.4 17.9 7 16 43.8 . . < 5 HIGH ROCHESTER ISD ROCHESTER SCHOO 16.0 16.6 15.5 18.2 16.6 17 15 100 . . < 5 HIGH RULE ISD RULE SCHOOL 19.5 20.5 19.5 19.4 19.8 11 16 68.8 . . < 5 HIGHHAYS DRIPPING SPRI DRIPPING SPRING 21.4 22.0 23.2 22.4 22.4 69 140 49.3 27 39.1 HAYS CONS ISD JACK C HAYS H S 18.8 18.9 19.8 20.0 19.5 114 367 31.1 22 19.3 KATHERINE ANN KATHERINE ANNE . . . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED SAN MARCOS CO 18.5 19.0 20.4 19.4 19.4 90 364 24.7 12 13.3 SAN MARCOS H S 18.6 19.0 20.4 19.5 19.5 89 340 26.2 12 13.5 WIMBERLEY ISD WIMBERLEY H S 20.1 19.2 21.6 20.4 20.5 40 109 36.7 6 15.0HEMPHILL CANADIAN ISD CANADIAN H S 19.5 21.4 20.6 21.9 21.1 43 40 100 9 20.9HENDERSON ATHENS ISD 19.8 19.5 20.3 20.2 20.1 38 186 20.4 10 26.3 ATHENS H S 19.8 19.5 20.3 20.2 20.1 38 181 21.0 10 26.3 BROWNSBORO IS 19.8 18.4 20.0 20.4 19.8 18 113 15.9 . . < 5 HIGH BROWNSBORO H S 19.8 18.4 20.0 20.4 19.8 18 108 16.7 . . < 5 HIGH CROSS ROADS I 22.1 18.0 21.6 19.5 20.5 11 37 29.7 . . < 5 HIGH CROSS ROADS H S 22.1 18.0 21.6 19.5 20.5 11 34 32.4 . . < 5 HIGH EUSTACE ISD EUSTACE H S 18.0 18.8 20.8 18.8 19.2 5 75 6.7 . . < 5 HIGH LAPOYNOR ISD 18.2 15.8 18.5 18.0 17.7 17 30 56.7 . . < 5 HIGH LAPOYNOR H S 18.2 15.8 18.5 18.0 17.7 17 27 63.0 . . < 5 HIGH MALAKOFF ISD MALAKOFF H S 17.3 17.1 19.5 18.5 18.3 32 64 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH TRINIDAD ISD TRINIDAD SCHOOL 17.5 17.5 20.5 19.7 18.8 6 16 37.5 . . < 5 HIGHHIDALGO DONNA ISD DONNA H S 15.2 16.6 16.1 17.3 16.4 214 398 53.8 12 5.6 EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED EDCOUCH-ELSA EDCOUCH-ELSA H 14.3 16.2 15.5 16.5 15.7 139 271 51.3 . . < 5 HIGH EDINBURG CISD 15.8 17.7 16.8 17.6 17.1 628 904 69.5 43 6.8 EDINBURG H S 15.7 17.5 16.4 17.4 16.9 332 481 69.0 20 6.0 EDINBURG NORTH 15.9 17.9 17.3 17.9 17.4 296 423 70.0 23 7.8 HIDALGO ISD HIDALGO H S 13.3 16.6 14.5 16.4 15.3 75 139 54.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA JOYA ISD 15.5 16.8 16.7 17.7 16.8 295 630 46.8 19 6.4

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 72: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

64

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HIDALGO LA JOYA ISD LA JOYA H S 15.5 16.8 16.7 17.7 16.8 295 599 49.2 19 6.4 LA VILLA ISD LA VILLA H S 18.4 18.3 18.2 19.7 18.8 18 43 41.9 . . < 5 HIGH MCALLEN ISD 17.7 19.5 18.7 18.9 18.8 536 1,208 44.4 70 13.1 LAMAR ACADEMY 15.2 15.7 14.9 16.0 15.6 22 89 24.7 . . <20 MASKED MCALLEN H S 17.9 18.8 18.5 18.8 18.6 140 311 45.0 . . <20 MASKED MCALLEN MEMORIA 18.2 20.2 19.4 19.6 19.5 173 401 43.1 30 17.3 ROWE H S 17.4 19.6 18.7 18.8 18.8 201 382 52.6 26 12.9 MERCEDES ISD 16.9 17.2 17.1 18.2 17.4 103 233 44.2 6 5.8 MERCEDES H S 16.9 17.2 17.1 18.2 17.4 103 210 49.0 6 5.8 MID-VALLEY AC MID-VALLEY ACAD . . . . . . 27 . . . NONE TESTED MISSION CONS 16.5 18.0 17.7 18.1 17.7 265 590 44.9 23 8.7 MISSION H S 16.5 18.0 17.7 18.1 17.7 265 584 45.4 23 8.7 ONE STOP MULT ONE STOP MULTIS . . . . . . 38 . . . NONE TESTED PHARR-SAN JUA 16.2 17.3 16.8 17.8 17.2 563 1,014 55.5 32 5.7 PSJA CENTRAL H 13.5 15.7 15.7 16.0 15.3 18 23 78.3 . . <10 MASKED PSJA H S 16.7 17.6 17.0 18.1 17.5 198 294 67.3 15 7.6 PSJA MEMORIAL H 16.1 17.4 16.8 17.5 17.1 174 321 54.2 . . <10 MASKED PSJA NORTH H S 16.2 17.4 16.9 17.9 17.2 162 355 45.6 . . <10 MASKED TEENAGE PARENT 13.8 14.9 15.2 17.9 15.6 11 21 52.4 . . <10 MASKED PROGRESO ISD 16.0 17.6 17.0 17.6 17.2 36 85 42.4 . . < 5 HIGH PROGRESO H S 16.0 17.6 17.0 17.6 17.2 36 82 43.9 . . < 5 HIGH SENTRY TECHNO SENTRY TECHNOLO . . . . . . 99 . . . NONE TESTED SHARYLAND ISD SHARYLAND H S 16.7 18.7 17.8 18.3 18.0 157 272 57.7 13 8.3 TECHNOLOGY ED TECHNOLOGY EDUC . . . . . . 24 . . . NONE TESTED VALLEY VIEW I VALLEY VIEW H S 16.6 16.7 15.8 15.9 16.4 71 83 85.5 . . < 5 HIGH WESLACO ISD 16.9 18.7 18.1 18.5 18.2 302 590 51.2 26 8.6 SOUTH PALM GARD 14.4 15.4 14.4 17.8 15.6 5 57 8.8 . . <30 MASKED WESLACO H S 16.9 18.7 18.1 18.5 18.2 297 533 55.7 . . <30 MASKEDHILL ABBOTT ISD ABBOTT SCHOOL 21.4 20.8 20.5 20.1 20.8 18 20 90.0 5 27.8 AQUILLA ISD AQUILLA SCHOOL . . . . . . 4 . . . NONE TESTED BLUM ISD BLUM H S 18.7 18.5 22.5 20.0 20.0 6 19 31.6 . . < 5 HIGH BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL 20.5 22.2 19.2 20.8 20.8 13 16 81.3 . . < 5 HIGH COVINGTON ISD . . . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTED HILLSBORO ISD HILLSBORO H S 17.5 17.4 19.1 20.0 18.7 14 71 19.7 . . < 5 HIGH HUBBARD ISD HUBBARD H S 20.7 22.7 22.4 21.9 22.1 15 27 55.6 6 40.0 ITASCA ISD . . . . . . 19 . . . < 5 TESTED PENELOPE ISD . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED WHITNEY ISD WHITNEY H S 18.0 18.6 20.0 19.1 19.1 26 66 39.4 . . < 5 HIGHHOCKLEY ANTON ISD 14.7 18.1 14.9 18.6 16.7 7 23 30.4 . . < 5 HIGH ANTON H S 14.7 18.1 14.9 18.6 16.7 7 21 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH LEVELLAND ISD 20.1 20.0 20.8 20.8 20.6 79 187 42.2 15 19.0 LEVELLAND H S 20.1 20.0 20.8 20.8 20.6 79 187 42.2 15 19.0 ROPES ISD 20.5 21.2 19.3 20.7 20.5 10 41 24.4 . . < 5 HIGH ROPES SCHOOL 20.5 21.2 19.3 20.7 20.5 10 29 34.5 . . < 5 HIGH SMYER ISD SMYER H S 17.6 17.7 19.2 18.2 18.4 18 16 100 . . < 5 HIGH SUNDOWN ISD 21.3 24.3 20.4 21.6 22.0 16 38 42.1 . . < 5 HIGH SUNDOWN H S 21.3 24.3 20.4 21.6 22.0 16 35 45.7 . . < 5 HIGH WHITHARRAL IS . . . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTEDHOOD GRANBURY ISD 20.1 21.1 21.2 21.2 21.0 152 333 45.6 39 25.7 GRANBURY H S 20.1 21.2 21.2 21.3 21.0 151 313 48.2 39 25.8 LIPAN ISD LIPAN H S 23.8 21.6 26.6 21.2 23.4 5 21 23.8 . . < 5 HIGH TOLAR ISD TOLAR H S 18.6 18.5 19.9 19.9 19.3 24 38 63.2 . . < 5 HIGHHOPKINS COMO-PICKTON 18.6 19.1 17.8 19.6 18.8 14 29 48.3 . . < 5 HIGH COMO-PICKTON SC 18.6 19.1 17.8 19.6 18.8 14 26 53.8 . . < 5 HIGH CUMBY ISD CUMBY H S 21.5 17.6 21.4 21.2 20.6 12 19 63.2 . . < 5 HIGH MILLER GROVE MILLER GROVE SC 18.1 19.1 17.8 20.0 19.0 8 21 38.1 . . < 5 HIGH NORTH HOPKINS NORTH HOPKINS H 20.3 18.0 20.4 19.6 19.7 14 21 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH SALTILLO ISD SALTILLO SCHOOL 19.0 17.6 19.2 17.5 18.6 11 19 57.9 . . < 5 HIGH SULPHUR BLUFF SULPHUR BLUFF S 21.9 19.8 21.4 21.0 21.2 10 19 52.6 . . < 5 HIGH SULPHUR SPRIN SULPHUR SPRINGS 20.7 20.4 21.6 21.2 21.1 100 201 49.8 29 29.0HOUSTON CROCKETT ISD CROCKETT H S 18.5 19.1 20.1 19.7 19.4 19 85 22.4 . . < 5 HIGH GRAPELAND ISD GRAPELAND H S 18.1 19.2 19.2 20.0 19.3 21 50 42.0 . . < 5 HIGH KENNARD ISD KENNARD H S 17.6 16.4 18.6 17.0 17.6 5 13 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH LATEXO ISD LATEXO H S 21.8 18.6 20.8 21.2 20.8 5 28 17.9 . . < 5 HIGH LOVELADY ISD LOVELADY H S 18.4 17.8 17.6 16.8 17.8 5 29 17.2 . . < 5 HIGHHOWARD BIG SPRING IS BIG SPRING H S 21.0 20.3 23.1 21.1 21.5 70 220 31.8 20 28.6 COAHOMA ISD COAHOMA H S 19.4 19.7 21.1 20.9 20.5 42 62 67.7 9 21.4 FORSAN ISD FORSAN H S 20.5 21.1 21.2 20.5 21.0 26 44 59.1 6 23.1

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 73: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

65

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HUDSPETH DELL CITY ISD DELL CITY SCHOO 17.6 16.3 18.4 17.3 17.5 11 12 91.7 . . < 5 HIGH FT HANCOCK IS FORT HANCOCK SC 17.6 16.4 18.0 21.0 18.4 5 22 22.7 . . < 5 HIGH SIERRA BLANCA . . . . . . 6 . . . < 5 TESTEDHUNT BLAND ISD . . . . . . 19 . . . < 5 TESTED BOLES ISD 17.3 16.7 19.0 18.8 18.1 16 27 59.3 . . < 5 HIGH BOLES ISD HIGH 17.3 16.7 19.0 18.8 18.1 16 25 64.0 . . < 5 HIGH CADDO MILLS I CADDO MILLS H S 17.9 18.6 19.9 18.9 19.0 14 36 38.9 . . < 5 HIGH CAMPBELL ISD CAMPBELL H S 18.2 19.1 18.2 19.7 19.0 9 16 56.3 . . < 5 HIGH CELESTE ISD CELESTE H S 19.5 19.0 20.0 19.7 19.5 13 29 44.8 . . < 5 HIGH COMMERCE ISD COMMERCE H S 18.2 19.0 19.1 19.5 19.1 73 102 71.6 14 19.2 GREENVILLE IS 20.2 20.1 21.4 20.4 20.6 82 230 35.7 28 34.1 GREENVILLE H S 20.3 20.2 21.4 20.4 20.7 81 224 36.2 28 34.6 LONE OAK ISD LONE OAK H S 18.8 18.4 17.9 20.6 19.1 14 28 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH QUINLAN ISD FORD H S 19.0 18.1 20.2 20.2 19.5 25 110 22.7 6 24.0 WOLFE CITY IS WOLFE CITY H S 19.9 17.8 17.9 19.0 18.8 8 20 40.0 . . < 5 HIGHHUTCHINSON BORGER ISD 21.8 21.7 21.8 21.5 21.8 106 206 51.5 32 30.2 BORGER H S 21.8 21.7 21.8 21.5 21.8 106 204 52.0 32 30.2 PLEMONS-STINN 18.9 20.7 20.5 21.4 20.5 37 53 69.8 8 21.6 WEST TEXAS H S 18.9 20.7 20.5 21.4 20.5 37 52 71.2 8 21.6 SANFORD ISD 19.2 18.9 20.9 20.5 20.0 49 73 67.1 10 20.4 SANFORD-FRITCH 19.2 18.9 20.9 20.5 20.0 49 71 69.0 10 20.4IRION IRION CO ISD 21.5 21.8 22.7 22.5 22.3 13 25 52.0 5 38.5 IRION H S 21.5 21.8 22.7 22.5 22.3 13 24 54.2 5 38.5JACK BRYSON ISD . . . . . . 20 . . . < 5 TESTED JACKSBORO ISD 20.7 18.2 21.3 19.5 20.1 15 53 28.3 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSBORO H S 20.7 18.2 21.3 19.5 20.1 15 51 29.4 . . < 5 HIGH PERRIN-WHITT PERRIN H S 17.4 19.1 17.4 18.3 18.1 7 17 41.2 . . < 5 HIGHJACKSON EDNA ISD 19.6 19.5 19.4 20.1 19.8 60 78 76.9 12 20.0 EDNA H S 19.6 19.5 19.4 20.1 19.8 60 74 81.1 12 20.0 GANADO ISD GANADO H S 20.1 22.1 19.7 21.7 21.0 19 41 46.3 5 26.3 INDUSTRIAL IS INDUSTRIAL H S 21.9 21.8 22.8 23.1 22.5 33 70 47.1 10 30.3JASPER BROOKELAND IS BROOKELAND H S 16.0 17.6 16.6 18.0 17.1 9 17 52.9 . . < 5 HIGH BUNA ISD . . . . . . 84 . . . < 5 TESTED EVADALE ISD . . . . . . 31 . . . < 5 TESTED JASPER ISD JASPER H S 19.2 18.9 20.0 19.7 19.6 95 178 53.4 20 21.1 KIRBYVILLE CI KIRBYVILLE H S 18.6 18.1 19.2 18.9 18.8 57 96 59.4 6 10.5JEFF DAVIS FT DAVIS ISD 20.1 16.6 21.0 20.6 19.4 9 23 39.1 . . < 5 HIGH FT DAVIS H S 20.1 16.6 21.0 20.6 19.4 9 23 39.1 . . < 5 HIGH VALENTINE ISD . . . . . . 4 . . . < 5 TESTEDJEFFERSON BEAUMONT ISD 18.9 19.3 19.5 19.0 19.3 122 1,002 12.2 22 18.0 CENTRAL SENIOR 16.7 17.5 18.0 18.0 17.7 16 314 5.1 . . <10 MASKED OZEN H S 17.7 17.6 17.9 17.9 17.9 48 243 19.8 . . <10 MASKED WEST BROOK SR H 20.6 21.3 21.1 20.3 21.0 58 408 14.2 15 25.9 EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED HAMSHIRE-FANN HAMSHIRE-FANNET 20.7 21.0 21.8 21.8 21.5 10 130 7.7 . . < 5 HIGH NEDERLAND ISD NEDERLAND H S 21.8 20.7 23.2 21.3 21.9 47 300 15.7 15 31.9 PORT ARTHUR I 16.3 17.0 16.7 17.4 17.0 35 470 7.4 . . < 5 HIGH JEFFERSON H S 19.0 17.6 18.4 18.9 18.5 11 236 4.7 . . < 5 HIGH LINCOLN H S 15.6 17.0 16.3 17.3 16.8 20 166 12.0 . . < 5 HIGH PORT NECHES-G PORT NECHES-GRO 21.5 22.7 21.4 22.3 22.1 44 373 11.8 18 40.9 SABINE PASS I SABINE PASS SCH . . . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTEDJIM HOGG JIM HOGG COUN HEBBRONVILLE H 15.5 17.1 17.0 18.1 17.1 31 62 50.0 . . < 5 HIGHJIM WELLS ALICE ISD ALICE H S 16.8 17.5 17.5 17.9 17.6 220 312 70.5 20 9.1 BEN BOLT-PALI BEN BOLT-PAL BL 16.0 17.3 16.8 18.2 17.2 32 42 76.2 . . < 5 HIGH ORANGE GROVE ORANGE GROVE H 20.4 18.9 21.6 19.8 20.3 54 76 71.1 10 18.5 PREMONT ISD PREMONT H S 17.2 17.0 18.7 18.0 17.8 26 50 52.0 . . < 5 HIGHJOHNSON ALVARADO ISD ALVARADO H S 20.1 20.0 19.7 19.8 19.9 23 166 13.9 6 26.1 BURLESON ISD 20.9 20.8 21.5 21.5 21.3 75 335 22.4 26 34.7 BURLESON H S 20.9 20.8 21.5 21.5 21.3 75 322 23.3 26 34.7 CLEBURNE ISD 20.1 20.7 20.5 20.8 20.6 77 310 24.8 18 23.4 CLEBURNE H S 20.1 20.7 20.6 20.8 20.7 76 284 26.8 18 23.7 GODLEY ISD GODLEY H S 18.9 18.4 21.1 20.5 19.9 31 61 50.8 6 19.4 GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW H S 22.8 22.5 22.4 21.4 22.4 25 55 45.5 10 40.0 JOSHUA ISD 20.4 19.7 20.9 20.7 20.5 55 222 24.8 11 20.0 JOSHUA H S 20.4 19.7 20.9 20.7 20.5 55 205 26.8 11 20.0 KEENE ISD . . . . . . 33 . . . NONE TESTED RIO VISTA ISD RIO VISTA H S 17.1 17.3 19.0 20.9 18.6 8 42 19.0 . . < 5 HIGH VENUS ISD VENUS H S 17.4 17.9 18.2 18.4 18.2 18 46 39.1 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 74: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

66

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

JONES ANSON ISD ANSON H S 20.3 19.6 21.1 21.0 20.6 20 41 48.8 . . < 5 HIGH HAMLIN ISD HAMLIN H S 18.8 19.3 19.5 19.5 19.4 20 30 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH HAWLEY ISD HAWLEY H S 20.7 19.0 21.4 20.6 20.5 29 39 74.4 9 31.0 LUEDERS-AVOCA LUEDERS-AVOCA H 20.2 23.2 23.8 21.6 22.4 5 9 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH STAMFORD ISD 19.4 20.0 19.8 20.5 20.1 24 43 55.8 5 20.8 STAMFORD JR-SR 19.4 20.0 19.8 20.5 20.1 24 38 63.2 5 20.8KARNES FALLS CITY IS FALLS CITY H S 20.4 17.7 18.9 19.7 19.3 18 21 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH KARNES CITY I KARNES CITY H S 20.4 19.7 19.1 20.1 19.9 34 60 56.7 9 26.5 KENEDY ISD 18.2 18.8 18.8 18.9 18.7 22 68 32.4 . . < 5 HIGH KENEDY HIGH SC 18.2 18.8 18.8 18.9 18.7 22 60 36.7 . . < 5 HIGH RUNGE ISD RUNGE H S 17.9 19.2 18.9 18.1 18.6 9 12 75.0 . . < 5 HIGHKAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD 22.1 21.3 21.8 21.2 21.7 33 102 32.4 11 33.3 CRANDALL H S 22.1 21.3 21.8 21.2 21.7 33 85 38.8 11 33.3 FORNEY ISD FORNEY H S 20.6 20.6 21.2 20.6 20.9 83 133 62.4 20 24.1 KAUFMAN ISD KAUFMAN H S 19.4 20.2 20.8 20.5 20.3 39 152 25.7 9 23.1 KEMP ISD KEMP HIGH SCHOO 20.4 18.8 22.1 19.3 20.3 21 73 28.8 . . < 5 HIGH MABANK ISD MABANK H S 20.4 20.2 20.4 20.9 20.5 26 140 18.6 . . < 5 HIGH SCURRY-ROSSER SCURRY-ROSSER H 21.5 20.0 20.1 20.8 20.6 8 43 18.6 . . < 5 HIGH TERRELL ISD TERRELL H S 17.1 17.6 17.2 17.8 17.5 51 178 28.7 6 11.8KENDALL BOERNE ISD BOERNE H S 21.0 21.1 22.3 21.5 21.6 113 300 37.7 34 30.1 COMFORT ISD COMFORT H S 17.3 17.7 19.6 20.1 19.0 10 45 22.2 . . < 5 HIGHKENT JAYTON-GIRARD JAYTON SCHOOLS 21.6 20.4 19.5 20.7 20.6 10 14 71.4 . . < 5 HIGHKERR CENTER POINT CENTER POINT H 19.1 17.7 19.1 19.1 18.8 12 26 46.2 . . < 5 HIGH INGRAM ISD INGRAM-TOM MOOR 18.4 19.5 20.4 19.6 19.5 37 88 42.0 7 18.9 KERRVILLE ISD 21.4 21.9 21.9 21.7 21.8 111 257 43.2 42 37.8 TIVY H S 21.4 22.0 22.0 21.8 21.9 109 239 45.6 42 38.5KIMBLE JUNCTION ISD JUNCTION H S 18.8 18.6 20.0 19.4 19.3 8 37 21.6 . . < 5 HIGHKING GUTHRIE CSD . . . . . . 4 . . . < 5 TESTEDKINNEY BRACKETT ISD 20.1 18.7 21.4 20.9 20.4 25 44 56.8 6 24.0 BRACKETT H S 20.1 18.7 21.4 20.9 20.4 25 40 62.5 6 24.0KLEBERG KINGSVILLE IS 18.4 17.6 19.0 18.9 18.6 148 306 48.4 17 11.5 H M KING HIGH S 18.6 17.7 19.2 19.0 18.7 143 277 51.6 . . <20 MASKED K E Y S ACADEMY 12.2 14.8 12.8 15.4 14.0 5 25 20.0 . . <20 MASKED RIVIERA ISD KAUFER H S 18.7 19.9 20.7 19.9 19.9 32 48 66.7 9 28.1 SANTA GERTRUD ACADEMY H S 18.0 17.3 20.2 19.2 18.8 26 34 76.5 . . < 5 HIGHKNOX BENJAMIN ISD BENJAMIN SCHOOL 21.2 20.5 21.0 18.8 20.7 6 7 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH GOREE ISD GOREE SCHOOL 16.3 18.4 17.1 20.1 18.1 7 7 100 . . < 5 HIGH KNOX CITY-O’B KNOX CITY H S 21.3 20.7 21.1 20.9 21.1 7 18 38.9 . . < 5 HIGH MUNDAY ISD MUNDAY H S 18.8 18.9 18.4 19.1 18.9 29 33 87.9 . . < 5 HIGHLA SALLE COTULLA ISD 16.3 17.0 17.8 17.5 17.3 38 60 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH COTULLA H S 16.3 17.0 17.8 17.5 17.3 38 57 66.7 . . < 5 HIGHLAMAR CHISUM ISD CHISUM H S 16.8 17.7 17.4 17.7 17.6 43 50 86.0 . . < 5 HIGH NORTH LAMAR I NORTH LAMAR H S 20.9 20.1 22.0 22.0 21.4 41 173 23.7 12 29.3 PARIS ISD 18.6 19.3 19.6 19.5 19.3 52 159 32.7 12 23.1 PARIS H S 18.6 19.3 19.6 19.5 19.3 52 153 34.0 12 23.1 PRAIRILAND IS PRAIRILAND H S 20.2 19.1 21.9 21.6 20.8 19 61 31.1 . . < 5 HIGH ROXTON ISD . . . . . . 15 . . . < 5 TESTEDLAMB AMHERST ISD AMHERST SCHOOL 19.2 19.8 19.3 19.2 19.3 6 9 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH LITTLEFIELD I LITTLEFIELD H S 17.4 18.4 18.4 19.4 18.5 54 92 58.7 7 13.0 OLTON ISD 21.3 23.2 22.3 22.4 22.3 18 39 46.2 . . < 5 HIGH OLTON H S 21.3 23.2 22.3 22.4 22.3 18 36 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH SPADE ISD . . . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED SPRINGLAKE-EA SPRINGLAKE-EART 20.6 21.7 20.9 21.3 21.3 19 27 70.4 5 26.3 SUDAN ISD 19.7 20.1 19.0 19.2 19.7 22 21 100 . . < 5 HIGH SUDAN H S 19.7 20.1 19.0 19.2 19.7 22 19 100 . . < 5 HIGHLAMPASAS CEDAR RIDGE C CEDAR RIDGE CHA . . . . . . 3 . . . NONE TESTED LAMPASAS ISD 20.5 20.6 21.8 21.5 21.2 64 187 34.2 21 32.8 LAMPASAS H S 20.5 20.6 21.8 21.5 21.2 64 176 36.4 21 32.8 LOMETA ISD LOMETA SCHOOL 18.0 17.9 18.6 18.6 18.5 8 15 53.3 . . < 5 HIGHLAVACA HALLETTSVILLE HALLETTSVILLE H 19.4 19.1 18.9 19.5 19.3 29 91 31.9 . . < 5 HIGH MOULTON ISD MOULTON H S 22.6 22.4 20.7 21.4 22.1 9 28 32.1 . . < 5 HIGH SHINER ISD SHINER H S 21.2 21.7 19.8 20.3 20.9 22 31 71.0 6 27.3LEE DIME BOX ISD DIME BOX SCHOOL . . . . . . . . . . NO GRADS/TEA GIDDINGS ISD 19.6 20.3 20.1 20.4 20.2 52 143 36.4 9 17.3 GIDDINGS H S 19.6 20.3 20.1 20.4 20.2 52 138 37.7 9 17.3 LEXINGTON ISD LEXINGTON H S 23.2 20.3 23.6 22.6 22.4 9 62 14.5 6 66.7LEON BUFFALO ISD BUFFALO H S 21.0 23.6 18.6 21.2 21.2 5 47 10.6 . . < 5 HIGH CENTERVILLE I . . . . . . 56 . . . < 5 TESTED

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 75: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

67

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

LEON LEON ISD LEON H S 22.3 18.9 22.0 20.3 20.8 11 42 26.2 . . < 5 HIGH NORMANGEE ISD NORMANGEE H S . . . . . . 31 . . . NONE TESTED OAKWOOD ISD . . . . . . 16 . . . < 5 TESTEDLIBERTY CLEVELAND ISD CLEVELAND H S 18.7 18.8 19.1 18.2 18.9 26 120 21.7 6 23.1 DAYTON ISD 20.1 21.1 21.4 20.9 21.0 31 218 14.2 8 25.8 DAYTON H S 20.1 21.1 21.4 20.9 21.0 31 212 14.6 8 25.8 HARDIN ISD HARDIN H S 18.9 19.5 19.6 17.3 19.0 8 68 11.8 . . < 5 HIGH HULL-DAISETTA . . . . . . 29 . . . < 5 TESTED LIBERTY ISD 18.6 20.4 21.6 20.9 20.6 14 131 10.7 . . < 5 HIGH LIBERTY H S 18.6 20.4 21.6 20.9 20.6 14 130 10.8 . . < 5 HIGH TARKINGTON IS TARKINGTON H S 21.7 20.6 21.7 20.4 21.1 7 81 8.6 . . < 5 HIGHLIMESTONE COOLIDGE ISD . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED GROESBECK ISD 18.3 19.2 18.7 19.4 19.0 44 90 48.9 . . < 5 HIGH GROESBECK H S 18.3 19.2 18.7 19.4 19.0 44 83 53.0 . . < 5 HIGH MEXIA ISD 19.7 20.2 20.8 19.4 20.2 58 96 60.4 10 17.2 MEXIA H S 19.7 20.2 20.8 19.4 20.2 58 95 61.1 10 17.2LIPSCOMB BOOKER ISD BOOKER JH/H S 20.3 20.9 21.2 21.1 20.9 17 18 94.4 5 29.4 FOLLETT ISD FOLLETT SCHOOL 20.8 20.8 23.2 21.8 21.7 13 17 76.5 5 38.5 HIGGINS ISD HIGGINS SCHOOL 19.0 19.5 19.3 20.6 19.7 11 10 100 . . < 5 HIGHLIVE OAK GEORGE WEST I GEORGE WEST H S 19.9 20.3 20.5 20.1 20.2 39 71 54.9 9 23.1 THREE RIVERS THREE RIVERS H 20.1 20.6 21.1 20.3 20.7 18 49 36.7 5 27.8LLANO LLANO ISD LLANO H S 19.6 20.6 20.5 21.0 20.4 23 72 31.9 6 26.1LUBBOCK EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 3 . . . NONE TESTED FRENSHIP ISD 20.5 20.1 22.0 21.6 21.2 83 261 31.8 18 21.7 FRENSHIP H S 20.5 20.1 22.0 21.6 21.2 83 217 38.2 18 21.7 IDALOU ISD IDALOU H S 20.5 19.1 21.4 20.4 20.5 36 53 67.9 8 22.2 LUBBOCK ISD 20.6 21.1 21.5 20.8 21.1 451 1,648 27.4 139 30.8 CORONADO H S 20.8 21.3 21.6 20.9 21.2 157 490 32.0 45 28.7 ESTACADO H S 16.0 17.9 17.1 17.6 17.2 41 194 21.1 5 12.2 LUBBOCK H S 21.8 22.3 23.0 21.6 22.3 144 498 28.9 59 41.0 MONTEREY H S 20.3 20.6 21.0 20.7 20.8 109 403 27.0 30 27.5 LUBBOCK-COOPE COOPER H S 20.0 20.5 20.7 20.8 20.7 53 103 51.5 11 20.8 LUBBOCK-RICHA LUBBOCK-RICHARD . . . . . . 28 . . . NONE TESTED NEW DEAL ISD NEW DEAL H S 18.0 19.1 18.5 19.1 18.8 20 45 44.4 . . < 5 HIGH ROOSEVELT ISD ROOSEVELT H S 19.7 19.1 18.9 19.5 19.5 17 57 29.8 . . < 5 HIGH SHALLOWATER I SHALLOWATER H S 20.2 20.6 20.9 21.2 20.9 30 70 42.9 9 30.0 SLATON ISD SLATON H S 18.1 18.4 20.3 19.5 19.2 34 67 50.7 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH PLAINS SOUTH PLAINS . . . . . . 27 . . . NONE TESTEDLYNN NEW HOME ISD . . . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED O’DONNELL ISD O’DONNELL H S 17.5 19.3 18.1 18.0 18.2 11 29 37.9 . . < 5 HIGH TAHOKA ISD TAHOKA H S 18.8 19.0 20.0 19.3 19.4 44 42 100 7 15.9 WILSON ISD WILSON SCHOOL 15.9 18.0 17.8 18.6 17.6 8 14 57.1 . . < 5 HIGHMADISON MADISONVILLE MADISONVILLE HI 19.2 18.7 18.7 19.3 19.1 45 85 52.9 5 11.1 NORTH ZULCH I . . . . . . 22 . . . < 5 TESTEDMARION JEFFERSON ISD JEFFERSON H S 19.3 19.8 20.8 19.6 20.0 37 70 52.9 8 21.6MARTIN GRADY ISD GRADY SCHOOL 25.7 23.0 24.5 23.3 24.2 6 14 42.9 . . < 5 HIGH STANTON ISD STANTON H S 19.4 20.4 19.6 19.3 20.0 7 46 15.2 . . < 5 HIGHMASON MASON ISD MASON H S 18.7 19.0 20.1 20.0 19.6 22 40 55.0 5 22.7MATAGORDA BAY CITY ISD BAY CITY H S 21.5 23.8 22.2 23.5 22.9 31 228 13.6 12 38.7 PALACIOS ISD PALACIOS H S 17.8 19.5 18.0 18.7 18.7 40 92 43.5 5 12.5 TIDEHAVEN ISD TIDEHAVEN H S 18.6 19.4 18.3 19.5 19.0 28 55 50.9 . . < 5 HIGH VAN VLECK ISD VAN VLECK H S 18.0 20.2 18.3 19.5 19.1 20 63 31.7 . . < 5 HIGHMAVERICK EAGLE PASS IS 16.9 19.8 18.0 19.2 18.6 42 559 7.5 . . < 5 HIGH EAGLE PASS H S 16.9 19.8 18.0 19.2 18.6 42 . . . . NO GRADS/TEAMCCULLOCH BRADY ISD BRADY H S 20.7 20.1 21.5 20.7 20.8 43 68 63.2 9 20.9 LOHN ISD LOHN SCHOOL 21.4 20.4 20.2 21.8 21.0 5 10 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH ROCHELLE ISD ROCHELLE SCHOOL 16.3 18.3 16.7 17.7 17.4 12 12 100 . . < 5 HIGHMCLENNAN AXTELL ISD 20.7 19.3 21.6 20.9 20.8 16 49 32.7 . . < 5 HIGH AXTELL H S 20.7 19.3 21.6 20.9 20.8 16 43 37.2 . . < 5 HIGH BOSQUEVILLE I BOSQUEVILLE SCH 22.9 21.9 20.8 21.7 22.0 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BRUCEVILLE-ED 18.8 19.4 17.8 19.9 19.1 31 60 51.7 5 16.1 BRUCEVILLE-EDDY 18.8 19.4 17.8 19.9 19.1 31 58 53.4 5 16.1 CHINA SPRING 19.5 19.2 20.0 20.0 19.8 40 116 34.5 7 17.5 CHINA SPRING H 19.5 19.2 20.0 20.0 19.8 40 114 35.1 7 17.5 CONNALLY ISD 20.4 19.9 22.6 21.2 21.2 43 130 33.1 14 32.6 CONNALLY H S 20.4 19.9 22.6 21.2 21.2 43 125 34.4 14 32.6 CRAWFORD ISD CRAWFORD H S 25.0 25.6 23.9 24.3 24.8 11 40 27.5 8 72.7 LA VEGA ISD 18.3 17.5 18.6 18.7 18.4 26 81 32.1 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 76: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

68

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

MCLENNAN LA VEGA ISD LA VEGA H S 18.3 17.5 18.6 18.7 18.4 26 80 32.5 . . < 5 HIGH LORENA ISD 20.7 22.3 22.1 22.0 21.8 35 88 39.8 15 42.9 LORENA H S 20.7 22.3 22.1 22.0 21.8 35 87 40.2 15 42.9 MART ISD 19.3 19.4 20.6 19.3 19.8 26 56 46.4 6 23.1 MART H S 19.3 19.4 20.6 19.3 19.8 26 53 49.1 6 23.1 MCGREGOR ISD MCGREGOR H S 18.0 19.9 18.4 18.9 18.9 16 56 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH MIDWAY ISD 22.1 21.7 23.0 22.0 22.3 138 347 39.8 55 39.9 MIDWAY H S 22.1 21.7 23.0 22.0 22.3 138 344 40.1 55 39.9 MOODY ISD MOODY H S 20.8 18.9 19.5 20.4 19.9 15 32 46.9 . . < 5 HIGH RIESEL ISD RIESEL SCHOOL 17.6 19.2 20.7 19.5 19.5 15 29 51.7 . . < 5 HIGH ROBINSON ISD ROBINSON H S 18.9 19.3 18.8 19.5 19.2 43 116 37.1 6 14.0 WACO ISD 16.7 17.4 17.6 16.9 17.3 87 482 18.0 7 8.0 UNIVERSITY H S 15.3 16.7 16.1 16.3 16.2 23 161 14.3 . . <10 MASKED WACO H S 17.2 17.7 18.1 17.1 17.7 64 311 20.6 . . <10 MASKED WEST ISD 22.0 21.5 21.9 22.7 22.1 31 152 20.4 9 29.0 WEST H S 22.0 21.5 21.9 22.7 22.1 31 146 21.2 9 29.0MCMULLEN MCMULLEN COUN MCMULLEN COUNTY 19.6 17.2 18.0 19.4 18.4 5 10 50.0 . . < 5 HIGHMEDINA D’HANIS ISD D’HANIS SCHOOL 19.0 24.2 19.1 22.0 21.1 10 18 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH DEVINE ISD DEVINE HIGH SCH 19.4 20.9 21.0 20.5 20.5 30 105 28.6 7 23.3 HONDO ISD HONDO H S 21.2 20.5 23.0 21.3 21.6 49 87 56.3 17 34.7 MEDINA VALLEY 20.5 20.6 21.0 20.7 20.9 60 195 30.8 15 25.0 MEDINA VALLEY H 20.5 20.6 21.0 20.7 20.9 60 179 33.5 15 25.0 NATALIA ISD NATALIA H S 16.4 16.0 16.4 17.2 16.6 5 37 13.5 . . < 5 HIGHMENARD MENARD ISD MENARD H S 20.8 18.9 21.9 21.2 20.9 21 26 80.8 5 23.8MIDLAND EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED GREENWOOD ISD GREENWOOD H S 21.1 22.3 20.8 22.3 21.7 22 106 20.8 7 31.8 MIDLAND ISD 20.9 22.1 22.3 21.9 21.9 253 1,242 20.4 89 35.2 LEE H S 20.9 21.9 22.1 21.9 21.8 155 639 24.3 54 34.8 MIDLAND H S 21.1 22.3 22.6 22.0 22.1 97 535 18.1 35 36.1 MIDLAND-RICHA MIDLAND-RICHARD . . . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTEDMILAM BUCKHOLTS ISD . . . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED CAMERON ISD YOE H S 19.2 20.2 20.5 20.9 20.3 21 85 24.7 8 38.1 MILANO ISD MILANO H S 18.6 20.7 19.0 19.7 19.6 15 22 68.2 6 40.0 ROCKDALE ISD ROCKDALE H S 19.4 20.1 20.9 21.9 20.7 15 93 16.1 . . < 5 HIGH THORNDALE ISD . . . . . . 35 . . . < 5 TESTEDMILLS GOLDTHWAITE I GOLDTHWAITE HIG 21.5 20.8 19.8 22.0 21.1 20 33 60.6 . . < 5 HIGH MULLIN ISD . . . . . . 6 . . . < 5 TESTED PRIDDY ISD . . . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED STAR ISD . . . . . . 4 . . . < 5 TESTEDMITCHELL COLORADO ISD COLORADO H S 18.7 18.8 18.9 19.3 19.0 47 66 71.2 5 10.6 LORAINE ISD . . . . . . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED WESTBROOK ISD WESTBROOK SCHOO 18.1 17.7 19.0 19.1 18.7 7 15 46.7 . . < 5 HIGHMONTAGUE BOWIE ISD BOWIE H S 20.1 18.9 22.0 20.4 20.4 19 84 22.6 . . < 5 HIGH FORESTBURG IS FORESTBURG SCHO . . . . . . 10 . . . NONE TESTED GOLD BURG ISD GOLD BURG H S . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED NOCONA ISD NOCONA H S 18.9 17.9 18.8 18.7 18.8 34 49 69.4 . . < 5 HIGH PRAIRIE VALLE . . . . . . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED SAINT JO ISD SAINT JO H S 19.5 21.9 18.4 22.0 20.6 8 20 40.0 . . < 5 HIGHMONTGOMERY CONROE ISD 21.8 22.8 22.7 21.9 22.4 548 1,682 32.6 227 41.4 CANEY CREEK H S 19.8 21.1 20.5 20.5 20.5 45 207 21.7 14 31.1 CONROE H S 20.2 20.0 20.6 20.1 20.4 80 342 23.4 19 23.8 OAK RIDGE H S 21.8 22.8 23.0 21.5 22.4 54 285 18.9 23 42.6 THE WOODLANDS H 22.3 23.6 23.4 22.6 23.1 368 813 45.3 171 46.5 MAGNOLIA ISD MAGNOLIA H S 20.2 20.2 21.8 20.6 20.9 54 263 20.5 14 25.9 MONTGOMERY IS MONTGOMERY H S 20.1 19.4 19.7 20.0 19.9 41 196 20.9 9 22.0 NEW CANEY ISD NEW CANEY H S 20.5 19.6 22.1 21.2 21.0 37 219 16.9 9 24.3 SPLENDORA ISD SPLENDORA H S 18.8 20.6 19.0 20.2 19.8 5 99 5.1 . . < 5 HIGH WILLIS ISD WILLIS H S 19.0 19.7 20.0 20.1 19.8 62 223 27.8 11 17.7MOORE DUMAS ISD 19.3 19.1 20.5 20.7 20.1 85 190 44.7 22 25.9 DUMAS H S 19.3 19.1 20.5 20.7 20.1 85 181 47.0 22 25.9 SUNRAY ISD 19.1 19.1 21.4 20.4 20.2 19 30 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH SUNRAY H S 19.1 19.1 21.4 20.4 20.2 19 29 65.5 . . < 5 HIGHMORRIS DAINGERFIELD- DAINGERFIELD H 18.7 18.9 20.3 19.4 19.4 29 94 30.9 6 20.7 PEWITT ISD PEWITT H S 18.8 19.2 20.3 20.1 19.8 37 46 80.4 8 21.6MOTLEY MOTLEY COUNTY MOTLEY COUNTY S 18.3 18.4 19.9 19.7 19.2 16 16 100 . . < 5 HIGHNACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGH . . . . . . 34 . . . < 5 TESTED CHIRENO ISD CHIRENO H S 21.0 21.0 21.8 18.7 20.7 6 22 27.3 . . < 5 HIGH CUSHING ISD CUSHING SCHOOL 20.3 18.0 21.0 19.5 19.8 20 26 76.9 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 77: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

69

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

NACOGDOCHES DOUGLASS ISD DOUGLASS SCHOOL 18.0 21.7 19.6 20.1 20.1 7 15 46.7 . . < 5 HIGH GARRISON ISD GARRISON H S 17.0 19.3 18.5 18.9 18.6 27 34 79.4 5 18.5 MARTINSVILLE . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED NACOGDOCHES I 18.9 19.8 19.4 19.6 19.6 103 380 27.1 21 20.4 NACOGDOCHES H S 18.9 19.8 19.4 19.6 19.6 103 373 27.6 21 20.4 WODEN ISD WODEN H S 20.5 19.7 20.5 20.5 20.4 31 40 77.5 6 19.4NAVARRO BLOOMING GROV BLOOMING GROVE 19.2 20.3 20.3 20.7 20.2 32 36 88.9 7 21.9 CORSICANA ISD 20.7 19.8 22.6 20.7 21.1 35 252 13.9 11 31.4 CORSICANA H IGH 20.7 19.8 22.6 20.7 21.1 35 239 14.6 11 31.4 DAWSON ISD DAWSON H S 20.4 20.2 20.6 20.4 20.4 5 31 16.1 . . < 5 HIGH FROST ISD FROST H S 17.5 18.5 16.8 18.6 18.0 13 17 76.5 . . < 5 HIGH KERENS ISD KERENS SCHOOL 21.0 20.1 21.1 20.4 20.7 7 37 18.9 . . < 5 HIGH MILDRED ISD MILDRED H S 20.9 20.5 21.7 20.0 20.9 18 32 56.3 . . < 5 HIGH RICE ISD RICE H S . . . . . . 29 . . . NONE TESTEDNEWTON BURKEVILLE IS BURKEVILLE JR-S 21.6 18.7 22.6 20.9 21.0 7 26 26.9 . . < 5 HIGH DEWEYVILLE IS DEWEYVILLE H S 20.6 20.9 19.6 21.1 20.6 8 40 20.0 . . < 5 HIGH NEWTON ISD NEWTON H S 20.3 19.2 20.4 19.2 19.9 29 77 37.7 8 27.6NOLAN BLACKWELL CON BLACKWELL SCHOO 18.2 18.2 19.2 19.4 18.9 11 14 78.6 . . < 5 HIGH HIGHLAND ISD . . . . . . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED ROSCOE ISD ROSCOE H S 19.6 19.0 20.8 20.7 20.2 23 29 79.3 5 21.7 SWEETWATER IS 20.0 21.6 21.6 20.9 21.2 81 143 56.6 25 30.9 SWEETWATER H S 20.0 21.6 21.6 20.9 21.2 81 135 60.0 25 30.9NUECES ACAD-TRANSITI . . . . . . 7 . . . NONE TESTED AGUA DULCE IS AGUA DULCE H S 21.7 19.3 20.8 20.4 20.6 18 35 51.4 . . < 5 HIGH BANQUETE ISD BANQUETE H S 16.6 17.4 17.7 18.4 17.6 41 39 100 . . < 5 HIGH BISHOP CONS I BISHOP H S 18.7 19.2 19.2 19.3 19.1 38 67 56.7 7 18.4 CALALLEN ISD CALALLEN H S 20.0 20.9 21.1 21.1 20.9 203 343 59.2 51 25.1 COASTAL BEND COASTAL BEND YO . . . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED CORPUS CHRIST 19.2 19.2 19.8 19.6 19.6 595 1,923 30.9 109 18.3 CARROLL H S 20.2 20.8 20.7 20.5 20.6 147 460 32.0 36 24.5 KING H S 20.6 19.8 20.7 20.3 20.5 98 344 28.5 26 26.5 MILLER HIGH SCH 16.8 17.2 17.4 18.1 17.5 74 280 26.4 . . <20 MASKED MOODY H S 17.7 18.4 18.5 18.7 18.4 95 337 28.2 . . <20 MASKED RAY H S 19.5 18.9 20.3 19.5 19.7 181 426 42.5 33 18.2 CORPUS CHRISTI- . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED FLOUR BLUFF I 20.3 20.8 22.2 21.1 21.3 59 235 25.1 17 28.8 FLOUR BLUFF H S 20.3 20.8 22.2 21.1 21.3 59 223 26.5 17 28.8 PORT ARANSAS PORT ARANSAS H 21.0 20.7 21.6 20.9 21.1 22 41 53.7 6 27.3 ROBSTOWN ISD 15.8 16.9 16.4 17.1 16.7 137 203 67.5 . . < 5 HIGH ALTER LRN CTR 12.0 14.2 12.3 13.2 12.8 6 13 46.2 . . < 5 HIGH ROBSTOWN H S 15.9 17.0 16.6 17.2 16.8 131 190 68.9 . . < 5 HIGH TULOSO-MIDWAY 20.9 20.1 21.1 21.2 21.0 116 211 55.0 34 29.3 TULOSO-MIDWAY H 20.9 20.1 21.1 21.2 21.0 116 196 59.2 34 29.3 WEST OSO ISD WEST OSO H S 16.4 16.6 17.4 17.7 17.2 22 67 32.8 . . < 5 HIGHOCHILTREE PERRYTON ISD PERRYTON H S 20.4 20.3 21.4 20.8 20.8 73 100 73.0 20 27.4OLDHAM ADRIAN ISD . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED BOYS RANCH IS BOYS RANCH H S 17.3 17.0 18.7 19.1 18.1 31 30 100 . . < 5 HIGH VEGA ISD VEGA H S 20.9 22.7 21.5 20.8 21.5 19 23 82.6 7 36.8ORANGE BRIDGE CITY I BRIDGE CITY H S 20.3 19.8 20.8 19.5 20.3 39 168 23.2 7 17.9 LITTLE CYPRES LIT CYPR-MRCEVI 21.7 20.8 21.0 21.5 21.4 49 244 20.1 12 24.5 ORANGEFIELD I ORANGEFIELD H S 20.0 23.3 20.8 20.5 21.1 20 91 22.0 . . < 5 HIGH VIDOR ISD 18.2 19.0 19.5 20.4 19.4 10 265 3.8 . . < 5 HIGH VIDOR H S 18.2 19.0 19.5 20.4 19.4 10 250 4.0 . . < 5 HIGH WEST ORANGE-C 17.5 18.0 17.4 17.6 17.6 10 186 5.4 . . < 5 HIGH WEST ORANGE-STA 17.5 18.0 17.4 17.6 17.6 10 177 5.6 . . < 5 HIGHPALO PINTO GORDON ISD GORDON SCHOOL 20.6 18.4 22.8 21.2 20.9 18 19 94.7 . . < 5 HIGH GRAFORD ISD . . . . . . 23 . . . < 5 TESTED MINERAL WELLS 18.8 19.1 19.6 20.6 19.5 12 164 7.3 . . < 5 HIGH MINERAL WELL H 18.8 19.1 19.6 20.6 19.5 12 161 7.5 . . < 5 HIGH SANTO ISD SANTO HIGH SCHO 18.2 19.8 18.7 20.1 19.2 10 18 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH STRAWN ISD STRAWN SCHOOL 19.9 21.6 21.1 20.8 20.8 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGHPANOLA BECKVILLE ISD BECKVILLE JR-SR 19.6 19.5 19.7 19.9 19.7 21 34 61.8 . . < 5 HIGH CARTHAGE ISD CARTHAGE H S 21.6 20.2 21.5 20.9 21.2 98 187 52.4 24 24.5 GARY ISD GARY SCHOOL 16.8 16.4 18.3 19.1 17.6 8 18 44.4 . . < 5 HIGHPARKER ALEDO ISD ALEDO H S 22.3 22.2 23.5 23.0 22.8 82 186 44.1 35 42.7 BROCK ISD BROCK H S 20.4 19.2 20.4 21.0 20.2 5 31 16.1 . . < 5 HIGH MILLSAP ISD . . . . . . 31 . . . < 5 TESTED PEASTER ISD PEASTER H S 22.4 23.1 24.2 22.4 23.2 18 50 36.0 10 55.6

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 78: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

70

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

PARKER POOLVILLE ISD POOLVILLE H S . . . . . . 14 . . . NONE TESTED SPRINGTOWN IS 18.7 18.8 21.6 21.6 20.3 18 164 11.0 . . < 5 HIGH SPRINGTOWN H S 18.7 18.8 21.6 21.6 20.3 18 146 12.3 . . < 5 HIGH WEATHERFORD I WEATHERFORD H S 20.5 21.3 22.7 21.5 21.7 125 285 43.9 37 29.6PARMER BOVINA ISD BOVINA H S 14.4 17.6 16.5 18.4 16.9 16 16 100 . . < 5 HIGH FARWELL ISD FARWELL H S 21.7 21.0 21.7 21.4 21.6 29 37 78.4 7 24.1 FRIONA ISD FRIONA H S 18.8 19.5 19.7 20.1 19.7 59 70 84.3 9 15.3 LAZBUDDIE ISD LAZBUDDIE SCHOO 19.5 20.0 19.4 19.7 19.7 19 16 100 . . < 5 HIGHPECOS BUENA VISTA I BUENA VISTA SCH 19.7 17.6 20.7 19.9 19.4 7 13 53.8 . . < 5 HIGH FT STOCKTON I 18.7 20.6 20.4 20.6 20.2 30 171 17.5 7 23.3 FORT STOCKTON H 18.7 20.6 20.4 20.6 20.2 30 164 18.3 7 23.3 IRAAN-SHEFFIE 19.5 20.3 21.4 20.5 20.5 22 34 64.7 6 27.3 IRAAN H S 19.5 20.3 21.4 20.5 20.5 22 32 68.8 6 27.3POLK BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY SCHOO 17.6 19.4 19.6 18.7 18.9 7 33 21.2 . . < 5 HIGH CORRIGAN-CAMD CORRIGAN-CAMDEN 16.1 19.3 17.9 18.6 18.0 10 73 13.7 . . < 5 HIGH GOODRICH ISD GOODRICH H S . . . . . . 13 . . . NONE TESTED LEGGETT ISD . . . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED LIVINGSTON IS LIVINGSTON H S 19.5 19.8 21.0 20.5 20.4 24 178 13.5 . . < 5 HIGHPOTTER AMARILLO ISD 19.9 21.1 21.2 21.1 20.9 374 1,420 26.3 119 31.8 AMARILLO H S 22.5 22.9 23.9 22.8 23.1 160 478 33.5 78 48.8 CAPROCK H S 17.5 19.4 19.1 19.8 19.1 62 251 24.7 9 14.5 PALO DURO H S 16.3 19.1 17.7 18.8 18.1 79 299 26.4 11 13.9 TASCOSA H S 19.8 21.0 20.9 20.9 20.7 73 362 20.2 21 28.8 HIGHLAND PARK HIGHLAND PARK H 17.3 16.8 17.8 18.6 17.8 32 47 68.1 . . < 5 HIGH RIVER ROAD IS RIVER ROAD HIGH 17.8 17.9 19.4 19.9 18.9 50 90 55.6 . . < 5 HIGHPRESIDIO MARFA ISD MARFA H S 18.1 18.9 18.1 19.7 18.9 15 33 45.5 . . < 5 HIGH PRESIDIO ISD PRESIDIO H S 14.1 16.7 15.6 17.1 16.0 35 59 59.3 . . < 5 HIGHRAINS RAINS ISD 19.6 19.6 20.2 20.5 20.1 52 80 65.0 12 23.1 RAINS H S 19.6 19.6 20.2 20.5 20.1 52 77 67.5 12 23.1RANDALL CANYON ISD 21.7 21.5 22.5 22.4 22.1 232 418 55.5 78 33.6 CANYON H S 21.7 21.5 22.8 22.6 22.3 133 177 75.1 46 34.6 RANDALL H S 21.6 21.6 22.0 22.1 21.9 99 241 41.1 32 32.3REAGAN REAGAN COUNTY REAGAN COUNTY H 17.9 19.7 19.5 20.0 19.4 38 68 55.9 8 21.1REAL LEAKEY ISD LEAKEY SCHOOL 18.3 19.6 20.1 20.7 19.8 15 20 75.0 . . < 5 HIGHRED RIVER AVERY ISD AVERY H S 19.8 20.0 18.4 19.7 19.6 9 18 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH CLARKSVILLE I CLARKSVILLE H S 17.2 18.2 18.4 18.8 18.2 30 58 51.7 . . < 5 HIGH DETROIT ISD DETROIT H S 18.3 17.2 18.8 17.8 18.1 13 28 46.4 . . < 5 HIGH RIVERCREST IS RIVERCREST H S 19.2 18.6 20.1 19.7 19.6 38 49 77.6 7 18.4REEVES BALMORHEA ISD . . . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED PECOS-BARSTOW . . . . . . 151 . . . < 5 TESTEDREFUGIO AUSTWELL-TIVO AUSTWELL-TIVOLI 21.9 20.2 21.1 21.6 21.3 10 12 83.3 . . < 5 HIGH REFUGIO ISD REFUGIO HIGH SC 19.1 20.1 19.4 19.2 19.6 34 58 58.6 6 17.6 WOODSBORO ISD WOODSBORO H S 17.4 17.5 17.9 18.8 18.0 39 44 88.6 . . < 5 HIGHROBERTS MIAMI ISD MIAMI SCHOOL 20.5 19.4 21.9 20.4 20.7 13 15 86.7 . . < 5 HIGHROBERTSON BREMOND ISD BREMOND H S 16.8 19.0 14.8 17.1 17.0 9 26 34.6 . . < 5 HIGH CALVERT ISD . . . . . . 17 . . . < 5 TESTED FRANKLIN ISD FRANKLIN H S 20.1 20.2 21.4 21.0 20.8 14 58 24.1 6 42.9 HEARNE ISD HEARNE H S 14.6 14.8 15.0 15.7 15.1 10 59 16.9 . . < 5 HIGHROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISD 21.2 21.7 22.8 21.7 22.0 146 374 39.0 48 32.9 ROCKWALL H S 21.2 21.7 22.8 21.7 22.0 146 361 40.4 48 32.9 ROYSE CITY IS ROYSE CITY H S 19.6 20.7 20.8 20.5 20.6 38 81 46.9 9 23.7RUNNELS BALLINGER ISD 21.6 21.3 22.2 21.1 21.6 50 65 76.9 18 36.0 BALLINGER H S 21.6 21.3 22.2 21.1 21.6 50 62 80.6 18 36.0 MILES ISD 17.8 19.1 20.3 20.8 19.6 9 14 64.3 . . < 5 HIGH MILES H S 17.8 19.1 20.3 20.8 19.6 9 13 69.2 . . < 5 HIGH WINTERS ISD 21.1 19.9 22.7 21.0 21.3 22 43 51.2 6 27.3 WINTERS H S 21.1 19.9 22.7 21.0 21.3 22 32 68.8 6 27.3RUSK CARLISLE ISD CARLISLE SCHOOL 20.6 18.8 20.8 21.3 20.5 12 23 52.2 . . < 5 HIGH HENDERSON ISD HENDERSON H S 19.8 19.5 20.1 20.1 20.0 139 212 65.6 29 20.9 LANEVILLE ISD LANEVILLE SCHOO . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED LEVERETTS CHA LEVERETTS CHAPE . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED MOUNT ENTERPR MT ENTERPRISE H 22.9 21.9 20.7 22.4 22.1 15 25 60.0 6 40.0 OVERTON ISD OVERTON H S 19.7 20.3 19.5 20.0 20.0 11 23 47.8 . . < 5 HIGH TATUM ISD TATUM H S 18.8 18.5 19.8 20.0 19.5 41 76 53.9 7 17.1 WEST RUSK ISD WEST RUSK H S 20.4 20.1 22.9 21.2 21.3 21 34 61.8 9 42.9SABINE HEMPHILL ISD HEMPHILL H S 19.5 17.9 20.4 19.9 19.6 14 50 28.0 . . < 5 HIGH WEST SABINE I WEST SABINE H S 17.1 17.0 17.3 16.4 17.0 8 30 26.7 . . < 5 HIGHSAN AUGUSTI BROADDUS ISD BROADDUS H S 20.1 17.1 21.7 18.5 19.5 15 19 78.9 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 79: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

71

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

SAN AUGUSTI SAN AUGUSTINE 17.5 17.6 17.0 17.6 17.6 29 76 38.2 . . < 5 HIGH SAN AUGUSTINE H 17.5 17.6 17.0 17.6 17.6 29 73 39.7 . . < 5 HIGHSAN JACINTO COLDSPRING-OA COLDSPRING-OAKH 20.6 20.2 21.5 20.1 20.7 10 69 14.5 . . < 5 HIGH SHEPHERD ISD SHEPHERD H S 21.3 22.7 22.0 21.7 22.1 7 81 8.6 . . < 5 HIGHSAN PATRICI ARANSAS PASS ARANSAS PASS HI 16.3 18.2 18.3 19.3 18.1 42 79 53.2 . . < 5 HIGH GREGORY-PORTL GREGORY-PORTLAN 19.2 20.5 20.4 20.4 20.2 93 237 39.2 23 24.7 INGLESIDE ISD INGLESIDE H S 19.9 21.2 20.0 20.4 20.5 26 103 25.2 5 19.2 MATHIS ISD MATHIS H S 16.1 17.9 17.6 17.5 17.4 61 102 59.8 6 9.8 ODEM-EDROY IS ODEM H S 18.3 18.3 19.2 18.7 18.7 32 73 43.8 . . < 5 HIGH SINTON ISD SINTON H S 19.4 19.1 19.9 20.3 19.8 56 99 56.6 12 21.4 TAFT ISD TAFT H S 16.8 18.0 18.2 18.0 18.0 40 70 57.1 . . < 5 HIGHSAN SABA CHEROKEE ISD CHEROKEE H S 19.0 18.4 19.0 18.4 18.8 5 8 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH RICHLAND SPRI RICHLAND SPRING 18.1 19.1 20.1 20.1 19.6 7 11 63.6 . . < 5 HIGH SAN SABA ISD SAN SABA H S 20.8 21.4 21.9 20.9 21.4 23 41 56.1 8 34.8SCHLEICHER SCHLEICHER IS ELDORADO H S 19.2 20.1 19.6 19.9 19.8 38 40 95.0 9 23.7SCURRY HERMLEIGH ISD . . . . . . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED IRA ISD IRA SCHOOL 21.3 21.6 19.7 20.6 20.8 12 12 100 . . < 5 HIGH SNYDER ISD 21.0 20.2 21.3 20.3 20.8 115 197 58.4 32 27.8 SNYDER H S 21.0 20.2 21.3 20.3 20.8 115 193 59.6 32 27.8SHACKELFORD ALBANY ISD ALBANY JR-SR H 22.3 22.3 23.2 22.8 22.8 9 27 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH MORAN ISD . . . . . . 4 . . . < 5 TESTEDSHELBY CENTER ISD CENTER H S 19.7 20.1 20.7 20.3 20.4 72 102 70.6 16 22.2 JOAQUIN ISD JOAQUIN H S 18.5 18.3 18.8 18.7 18.6 14 23 60.9 . . < 5 HIGH SHELBYVILLE I SHELBYVILLE SCH 17.7 18.1 20.1 19.9 19.2 14 36 38.9 . . < 5 HIGH TENAHA ISD TENAHA H S 19.0 18.0 18.8 19.4 19.0 5 17 29.4 . . < 5 HIGH TIMPSON ISD TIMPSON H S 19.8 18.8 19.6 20.0 19.6 18 27 66.7 . . < 5 HIGHSHERMAN STRATFORD ISD STRATFORD H S 21.0 21.6 21.1 20.8 21.3 38 43 88.4 13 34.2 TEXHOMA ISD TEXHOMA EL . . . . . . 13 . . . NONE TESTEDSMITH ARP ISD ARP H S 17.9 18.0 18.3 18.8 18.4 21 49 42.9 . . < 5 HIGH BULLARD ISD 19.9 20.7 20.2 20.2 20.4 16 69 23.2 . . < 5 HIGH BULLARD H S 19.9 20.7 20.2 20.2 20.4 16 54 29.6 . . < 5 HIGH CHAPEL HILL I CHAPEL HILL H S 19.9 19.6 19.5 19.4 19.7 37 151 24.5 7 18.9 EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED LINDALE ISD LINDALE H S 20.3 21.5 22.1 21.1 21.4 56 172 32.6 14 25.0 TROUP ISD TROUP H S 18.9 20.6 20.1 21.5 20.5 8 33 24.2 . . < 5 HIGH TYLER ISD 19.7 20.0 20.7 19.8 20.2 230 763 30.1 58 25.2 JOHN TYLER H S 18.2 18.1 18.6 18.3 18.5 106 294 36.1 17 16.0 LEE H S 21.1 21.7 22.5 21.2 21.8 124 431 28.8 41 33.1 WHITEHOUSE IS WHITEHOUSE H S 22.0 22.4 23.2 21.7 22.5 30 236 12.7 11 36.7 WINONA ISD WINONA H S 20.1 18.8 19.2 19.2 19.4 26 41 63.4 5 19.2SOMERVELL GLEN ROSE ISD 25.1 25.3 25.4 23.3 25.0 22 81 27.2 13 59.1 GLEN ROSE H S 25.1 25.3 25.4 23.3 25.0 22 77 28.6 13 59.1STARR RIO GRANDE CI 15.3 16.4 16.3 17.1 16.4 234 341 68.6 13 5.6 RIO GRANDE CITY 15.3 16.4 16.3 17.1 16.4 234 333 70.3 13 5.6 ROMA ISD 16.0 17.4 16.9 17.4 17.1 148 276 53.6 8 5.4 ROMA H S 16.0 17.4 16.9 17.4 17.1 148 275 53.8 8 5.4 SAN ISIDRO IS SAN ISIDRO H S 15.3 16.1 15.3 16.6 16.0 19 21 90.5 . . < 5 HIGHSTEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE 21.5 22.3 22.3 22.7 22.3 24 100 24.0 8 33.3 BRECKENRIDGE H 21.5 22.3 22.3 22.7 22.3 24 96 25.0 8 33.3STERLING STERLING CITY STERLING CITY H 19.8 18.8 20.2 19.3 19.6 20 22 90.9 5 25.0STONEWALL ASPERMONT ISD ASPERMONT H S 20.4 18.2 21.5 20.5 20.1 21 26 80.8 5 23.8SUTTON SONORA ISD SONORA H S 18.9 20.7 19.2 19.9 19.8 43 60 71.7 11 25.6SWISHER HAPPY ISD HAPPY H S 19.8 21.3 20.7 21.7 21.1 9 15 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH KRESS ISD KRESS H S 18.7 19.0 21.6 22.4 20.4 9 24 37.5 . . < 5 HIGH TULIA ISD TULIA H S 20.3 19.6 19.5 20.6 20.0 30 75 40.0 . . < 5 HIGHTARRANT ARLINGTON ISD 20.8 21.7 22.4 21.5 21.7 557 2,593 21.5 183 32.9 ARLINGTON H S 22.1 23.0 23.4 22.5 22.9 141 475 29.7 62 44.0 BOWIE H S 19.6 20.5 21.3 20.8 20.7 93 472 19.7 20 21.5 LAMAR H S 20.0 21.2 21.6 21.2 21.1 88 435 20.2 29 33.0 MARTIN H S 21.5 22.7 23.2 22.0 22.4 172 713 24.1 62 36.0 SAM HOUSTON H S 18.5 18.8 20.3 19.2 19.3 62 419 14.8 10 16.1 AZLE ISD AZLE H S 21.1 19.8 21.9 21.0 21.1 76 262 29.0 22 28.9 BIRDVILLE ISD 20.5 19.7 21.6 20.8 20.8 231 1,033 22.4 57 24.7 HALTOM H S 19.3 18.6 20.3 19.9 19.6 84 471 17.8 13 15.5 RICHLAND H S 21.2 20.4 22.4 21.4 21.4 147 508 28.9 44 29.9 CARROLL ISD CARROLL H S 22.5 24.1 24.0 23.4 23.6 210 351 59.8 106 50.5 CASTLEBERRY I 18.9 18.7 19.2 20.3 19.4 33 168 19.6 5 15.2 CASTLEBERRY H S 18.9 18.7 19.2 20.3 19.4 33 151 21.9 5 15.2

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 80: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

72

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TARRANT CROWLEY ISD 19.7 20.3 20.7 20.4 20.4 149 456 32.7 44 29.5 CROWLEY H S 21.1 20.9 22.2 21.1 21.4 83 272 30.5 30 36.1 NORTH CROWLEY H 18.0 19.5 18.9 19.5 19.1 66 184 35.9 14 21.2 EAGLE MT-SAGI 21.2 19.9 21.2 20.9 21.0 42 349 12.0 11 26.2 BOSWELL H S 21.2 19.9 21.2 20.9 21.0 42 322 13.0 11 26.2 ERATH EXCELS ERATH EXCELS AC . . . . . . 16 . . . NONE TESTED EVERMAN ISD EVERMAN H S 17.4 17.4 17.5 17.8 17.7 25 105 23.8 . . < 5 HIGH FORT WORTH IS 18.6 19.5 19.8 19.6 19.5 473 3,049 15.5 99 20.9 ARLINGTON HEIGH 19.7 20.0 21.3 20.7 20.5 58 252 23.0 15 25.9 CARTER-RIVERSID 20.7 21.6 23.6 21.9 22.0 14 119 11.8 . . <10 MASKED DIAMOND HILL-JA 14.7 17.2 16.3 17.4 16.4 9 132 6.8 . . <10 MASKED DUNBAR H S 18.0 19.7 18.5 19.8 19.1 24 211 11.4 . . <10 MASKED EASTERN HILLS H 16.3 16.6 18.0 17.6 17.3 60 239 25.1 . . <10 MASKED NORTH SIDE H S 18.0 20.7 20.2 19.8 19.8 24 249 9.6 . . <10 MASKED O D WYATT H S 16.5 16.6 16.4 16.4 16.6 34 249 13.7 . . <10 MASKED PASCHAL H S 19.3 20.1 20.8 19.9 20.1 51 518 9.8 13 25.5 POLYTECHNIC H S 16.3 20.9 16.5 18.9 18.3 15 142 10.6 . . <10 MASKED SOUTHWEST H S 20.3 20.9 21.6 20.7 21.0 95 334 28.4 31 32.6 TRIMBLE TECHNIC 16.7 17.3 17.2 17.5 17.4 23 238 9.7 . . <10 MASKED WESTERN HILLS H 19.8 20.1 20.7 20.8 20.5 66 271 24.4 15 22.7 GRAPEVINE-COL 20.7 21.6 22.4 21.6 21.7 194 792 24.5 67 34.5 COLLEYVILLE HER 20.7 21.5 22.3 21.6 21.7 126 397 31.7 46 36.5 GRAPEVINE H S 20.6 21.6 22.6 21.5 21.7 68 375 18.1 21 30.9 HURST-EULESS- 20.8 21.7 22.0 21.2 21.5 325 1,196 27.2 112 34.5 BELL H S 21.5 21.8 22.4 21.6 21.9 150 556 27.0 52 34.7 TRINITY H S 20.3 21.6 21.6 20.9 21.2 175 588 29.8 60 34.3 KELLER ISD 20.5 21.2 21.6 21.2 21.3 225 816 27.6 70 31.1 FOSSIL RIDGE H 20.3 21.5 21.9 21.0 21.3 85 412 20.6 23 27.1 KELLER H S 20.5 21.1 21.4 21.2 21.2 139 400 34.8 46 33.1 KENNEDALE ISD KENNEDALE H S 19.0 19.6 20.6 19.6 19.8 20 121 16.5 . . < 5 HIGH LAKE WORTH IS 16.3 16.4 19.3 18.3 17.7 15 83 18.1 . . < 5 HIGH LAKE WORTH H S 16.3 16.4 19.3 18.3 17.7 15 79 19.0 . . < 5 HIGH MANSFIELD ISD 21.5 22.0 23.0 22.4 22.3 175 681 25.7 71 40.6 MANSFIELD H S 21.5 22.0 23.0 22.4 22.3 175 643 27.2 71 40.6 MASONIC HOME . . . . . . 7 . . . < 5 TESTED THERESA B LEE THERESA B LEE A . . . . . . 35 . . . NONE TESTED WHITE SETTLEM 19.1 21.1 20.2 20.7 20.4 59 212 27.8 13 22.0 BREWER H S 19.1 21.1 20.2 20.7 20.4 59 210 28.1 13 22.0TAYLOR ABILENE ISD 20.1 20.2 21.4 20.7 20.7 283 911 31.1 66 23.3 ABILENE H S 20.1 20.1 21.3 20.5 20.6 166 482 34.4 39 23.5 COOPER H S 20.0 20.4 21.7 20.9 20.9 117 385 30.4 27 23.1 EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 6 . . . NONE TESTED JIM NED CONS JIM NED H S 19.0 19.7 19.5 20.3 19.8 44 63 69.8 7 15.9 MERKEL ISD MERKEL H S 20.7 18.9 21.2 19.9 20.3 37 68 54.4 11 29.7 TRENT ISD 21.5 22.0 22.5 22.5 22.3 6 10 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH TRENT SCHOOL 21.5 22.0 22.5 22.5 22.3 6 10 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 21.2 21.6 22.2 21.9 21.9 102 168 60.7 28 27.5TERRELL TERRELL COUNT SANDERSON H S 21.0 20.2 23.1 21.3 21.7 9 11 81.8 . . < 5 HIGHTERRY BROWNFIELD IS BROWNFIELD H S 19.8 18.9 21.2 20.7 20.3 62 124 50.0 14 22.6 MEADOW ISD MEADOW SCHOOL 16.4 17.6 18.3 19.3 18.1 7 20 35.0 . . < 5 HIGH WELLMAN-UNION . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTEDTHROCKMORTO THROCKMORTON THROCKMORTON H 19.3 19.9 18.9 20.1 19.7 14 17 82.4 . . < 5 HIGH WOODSON ISD . . . . . . 6 . . . < 5 TESTEDTITUS CHAPEL HILL I CHAPEL HILL H S 18.0 19.1 17.5 19.4 18.6 8 34 23.5 . . < 5 HIGH MOUNT PLEASAN 18.4 20.0 19.2 19.7 19.5 58 199 29.1 7 12.1 MT PLEASANT H S 18.4 20.0 19.2 19.7 19.5 58 191 30.4 7 12.1TOM GREEN CHRISTOVAL IS CHRISTOVAL H S 19.1 19.4 19.9 20.4 19.9 17 23 73.9 . . < 5 HIGH GRAPE CREEK I 21.3 20.4 21.1 20.8 20.9 21 55 38.2 5 23.8 GRAPE CREEK H S 21.3 20.4 21.1 20.8 20.9 21 54 38.9 5 23.8 SAN ANGELO IS 20.3 20.9 21.5 20.8 21.0 350 873 40.1 107 30.6 CENTRAL H S 21.0 21.4 22.1 21.2 21.6 272 659 41.3 93 34.2 LAKE VIEW H S 18.1 19.1 19.4 19.3 19.2 77 195 39.5 14 18.2 VERIBEST ISD 18.5 19.2 19.4 20.9 19.6 13 16 81.3 . . < 5 HIGH VERIBEST H S 18.5 19.2 19.4 20.9 19.6 13 16 81.3 . . < 5 HIGH WALL ISD 20.8 21.3 20.7 21.1 21.0 39 55 70.9 14 35.9 WALL H S 20.8 21.3 20.7 21.1 21.0 39 53 73.6 14 35.9 WATER VALLEY 20.1 20.4 22.4 21.8 21.3 13 27 48.1 . . < 5 HIGH WATER VALLEY H 20.1 20.4 22.4 21.8 21.3 13 25 52.0 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 81: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

73

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TRAVIS AMERICAN YOUT AMERICAN YOUTH . . . . . . 26 . . . NONE TESTED AUSTIN ISD 19.6 20.3 21.0 20.2 20.4 539 3,146 17.1 124 23.0 ANDERSON H S 20.8 22.1 22.0 21.2 21.7 61 340 17.9 17 27.9 AUSTIN H S 19.8 21.2 21.5 20.6 20.9 57 349 16.3 16 28.1 BOWIE H S 20.7 21.3 21.9 21.1 21.3 117 597 19.6 31 26.5 CROCKETT H S 19.6 19.2 21.2 20.3 20.2 67 343 19.5 14 20.9 JOHNSON H S 19.8 21.3 21.1 21.0 20.9 49 228 21.5 16 32.7 JOHNSTON H S 21.7 21.9 23.7 22.4 22.4 9 195 4.6 . . < 5 HIGH LANIER H S 18.0 18.2 19.4 18.1 18.5 31 281 11.0 . . < 5 HIGH MCCALLUM H S 21.5 20.7 22.8 20.9 21.6 63 293 21.5 21 33.3 REAGAN H S 14.9 16.5 16.5 16.4 16.3 32 175 18.3 . . < 5 HIGH TRAVIS H S 16.5 17.7 18.1 18.2 17.7 53 248 21.4 . . < 5 HIGH DEL VALLE ISD 17.9 18.4 18.7 18.9 18.6 36 261 13.8 7 19.4 DEL VALLE H S 17.9 18.4 18.7 18.9 18.6 36 224 16.1 7 19.4 EANES ISD WESTLAKE H S 23.7 25.3 25.1 24.3 24.7 193 488 39.5 112 58.0 LAGO VISTA IS LAGO VISTA H S 21.3 21.6 22.4 20.9 21.7 19 44 43.2 7 36.8 LAKE TRAVIS I LAKE TRAVIS H S 21.8 22.1 21.9 22.5 22.2 31 196 15.8 12 38.7 MANOR ISD 19.2 19.1 20.6 20.1 20.0 34 86 39.5 6 17.6 MANOR H S 19.2 19.1 20.6 20.1 20.0 34 81 42.0 6 17.6 PFLUGERVILLE 19.7 21.0 20.3 20.4 20.5 170 630 27.0 34 20.0 JOHN B CONNALLY 20.1 20.9 20.8 20.6 20.7 96 281 34.2 21 21.9 PFLUGERVILLE H 19.1 21.1 19.7 20.1 20.2 74 331 22.4 13 17.6 UNIVERSITY CH HILL COUNTRY . . . . . . 2 . . . NONE TESTEDTRINITY APPLE SPRINGS . . . . . . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED CENTERVILLE I . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED GROVETON ISD . . . . . . 40 . . . < 5 TESTED TRINITY ISD TRINITY H S 16.0 18.9 17.1 17.9 17.4 26 56 46.4 . . < 5 HIGHTYLER CHESTER ISD . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED COLMESNEIL IS COLMESNEIL H S 18.8 18.8 20.0 19.7 19.4 21 36 58.3 . . < 5 HIGH SPURGER ISD SPURGER H S 21.4 20.0 19.0 19.3 20.0 12 28 42.9 . . < 5 HIGH WARREN ISD WARREN H S 18.9 19.6 20.9 19.6 19.9 7 72 9.7 . . < 5 HIGH WOODVILLE ISD WOODVILLE H S 17.3 18.9 17.7 18.5 18.3 12 66 18.2 . . < 5 HIGHUPSHUR BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY H S 20.1 21.4 20.4 21.0 20.8 21 38 55.3 7 33.3 GILMER ISD GILMER H S 18.3 20.6 19.2 19.7 19.6 45 124 36.3 11 24.4 HARMONY ISD HARMONY H S 19.4 20.0 20.8 21.0 20.4 40 57 70.2 11 27.5 NEW DIANA ISD NEW DIANA H S 21.3 19.9 21.2 21.3 21.0 32 68 47.1 9 28.1 ORE CITY ISD ORE CITY HIGH S 19.9 19.7 20.2 20.8 20.2 30 47 63.8 6 20.0 UNION GROVE I UNION GROVE H S 20.3 19.0 20.7 19.8 20.2 13 41 31.7 . . < 5 HIGH UNION HILL IS UNION HILL H S 20.0 18.0 21.2 20.6 20.1 9 17 52.9 . . < 5 HIGHUPTON MCCAMEY ISD MCCAMEY H S 19.7 18.6 22.1 18.9 19.9 20 47 42.6 5 25.0 RANKIN ISD RANKIN H S 21.8 21.7 22.3 21.3 21.8 19 21 90.5 8 42.1UVALDE GABRIEL TAFOL GABRIEL TAFOLLA . . . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED KNIPPA ISD KNIPPA SCHOOL 22.6 21.9 23.3 22.3 22.7 12 15 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH SABINAL ISD SABINAL H S 17.0 18.6 17.9 17.8 18.0 12 30 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH UTOPIA ISD UTOPIA SCHOOL 19.3 19.1 21.2 20.4 20.0 12 11 100 . . < 5 HIGH UVALDE CONS I 19.4 20.1 20.2 19.6 19.9 39 257 15.2 9 23.1 UVALDE H S 19.4 20.1 20.2 19.6 19.9 39 240 16.3 9 23.1VAL VERDE COMSTOCK ISD COMSTOCK SCHOOL . . . . . . 11 . . . NONE TESTED EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 1 . . . NONE TESTED SAN FELIPE-DE DEL RIO H S 16.8 18.7 18.5 18.3 18.2 116 486 23.9 17 14.7VAN ZANDT CANTON ISD CANTON H S 21.2 19.8 21.6 20.4 20.8 31 94 33.0 9 29.0 EDGEWOOD ISD EDGEWOOD H S 20.6 20.4 21.8 21.8 21.2 17 55 30.9 6 35.3 FRUITVALE ISD . . . . . . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED GRAND SALINE GRAND SALINE H 20.1 19.4 21.8 20.7 20.6 19 51 37.3 5 26.3 MARTINS MILL MARTINS MILL H 21.7 20.3 23.8 21.5 21.9 15 18 83.3 6 40.0 VAN ISD VAN H S 21.3 21.6 21.7 20.4 21.4 7 98 7.1 . . < 5 HIGH WILLS POINT I WILLS POINT H S 22.1 20.0 22.5 22.0 21.8 33 147 22.4 9 27.3VICTORIA BLOOMINGTON I BLOOMINGTON H S 17.1 18.3 17.8 18.6 18.1 14 46 30.4 . . < 5 HIGH VICTORIA ISD 19.3 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.2 151 839 18.0 37 24.5 STROMAN H S 17.7 19.4 19.3 19.6 19.1 39 316 12.3 5 12.8 VICTORIA H S 19.8 20.5 20.6 20.6 20.5 112 492 22.8 32 28.6WALKER HUNTSVILLE IS 18.5 19.4 19.8 19.8 19.5 100 359 27.9 23 23.0 HUNTSVILLE H S 18.5 19.4 19.8 19.8 19.5 100 346 28.9 23 23.0 NEW WAVERLY I NEW WAVERLY H S 20.2 20.1 19.4 20.3 20.1 18 44 40.9 . . < 5 HIGHWALLER HEMPSTEAD ISD HEMPSTEAD H S 17.5 20.0 17.9 18.0 18.5 26 46 56.5 . . < 5 HIGH ROYAL ISD ROYAL H S 18.7 19.5 19.4 19.4 19.4 41 57 71.9 9 22.0 WALLER ISD WALLER H S 17.5 18.2 18.3 18.6 18.3 78 182 42.9 11 14.1WARD GRANDFALLS-RO GRANDFALLS-ROYA 14.2 16.2 14.3 17.0 15.7 6 13 46.2 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 82: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

74

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

WARD MONAHANS-WICK 19.2 19.6 20.7 19.9 20.0 91 126 72.2 16 17.6 MONAHANS H S 19.2 19.6 20.7 19.9 20.0 91 118 77.1 16 17.6WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD 19.6 19.7 21.7 20.0 20.4 27 265 10.2 . . < 5 HIGH BRENHAM HIGH SC 19.6 19.7 21.7 20.0 20.4 27 259 10.4 . . < 5 HIGH BURTON ISD BURTON H S . . . . . . 14 . . . NONE TESTEDWEBB EAGLE PROJECT EAGLE PROJECT ( . . . . . . 8 . . . NONE TESTED GATEWAY (STUD GATEWAY (STUDEN . . . . . . 25 . . . NONE TESTED LAREDO ISD 16.2 18.0 17.8 17.6 17.6 133 1,003 13.3 8 6.0 DR LEO CIGARROA 17.6 19.2 19.7 18.5 18.9 39 254 15.4 . . < 5 HIGH MARTIN H S 14.6 17.1 16.2 16.8 16.3 56 381 14.7 . . < 5 HIGH NIXON H S 17.2 18.1 18.4 17.7 18.1 38 368 10.3 . . < 5 HIGH UNITED ISD 16.0 17.5 17.2 17.6 17.2 418 1,115 37.5 32 7.7 JOHN B ALEXANDE 17.5 18.3 18.9 18.7 18.5 172 411 41.8 . . <30 MASKED UNITED H S 16.5 17.8 17.2 18.0 17.5 100 278 36.0 . . <30 MASKED UNITED SOUTH H 14.0 16.3 15.1 16.0 15.5 146 426 34.3 . . <30 MASKED WEBB CONS ISD BRUNI H S 15.2 16.8 15.2 16.0 15.8 6 17 35.3 . . < 5 HIGHWHARTON BOLING ISD BOLING H S 19.7 19.3 18.9 19.0 19.4 31 61 50.8 . . < 5 HIGH EAST BERNARD EAST BERNARD H 18.3 19.0 20.7 21.4 20.2 10 62 16.1 . . < 5 HIGH EL CAMPO ISD EL CAMPO H S 20.9 19.9 20.0 20.5 20.5 26 208 12.5 5 19.2 LOUISE ISD LOUISE H S 20.0 18.7 19.5 19.9 19.7 14 35 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH WHARTON ISD WHARTON H S 19.1 20.0 19.4 19.7 19.7 72 132 54.5 14 19.4WHEELER ALLISON ISD ALLISON SCHOOL 21.3 23.0 21.0 21.5 22.0 6 7 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH FORT ELLIOTT FORT ELLIOTT SC 19.9 19.4 20.4 20.0 20.0 8 8 100 . . < 5 HIGH SHAMROCK ISD SHAMROCK H S 19.8 19.5 20.2 19.0 19.7 30 31 96.8 5 16.7 WHEELER ISD WHEELER SCHOOL 19.7 19.1 19.4 19.7 19.7 27 27 100 5 18.5WICHITA BRIGHT IDEAS BRIGHT IDEAS CH . . . . . . 5 . . . NONE TESTED BURKBURNETT I 20.7 21.0 21.6 21.6 21.3 120 201 59.7 36 30.0 BURKBURNETT H S 20.7 21.0 21.6 21.6 21.3 120 191 62.8 36 30.0 ELECTRA ISD ELECTRA H S 20.0 18.7 21.3 20.5 20.3 29 55 52.7 8 27.6 IOWA PARK CON IOWA PARK H S 20.5 19.8 20.9 20.3 20.5 64 135 47.4 18 28.1 WICHITA FALLS 20.3 20.9 21.2 21.0 21.0 227 832 27.3 66 29.1 HIRSCHI HS 17.8 19.4 18.5 18.9 18.8 53 179 29.6 8 15.1 RIDER H S 21.9 22.4 23.3 22.4 22.6 106 369 28.7 49 46.2 WICHITA FALLS H 19.8 19.7 20.0 20.3 20.1 67 253 26.5 9 13.4WILBARGER HARROLD ISD . . . . . . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE SCHOO 23.4 21.0 22.4 20.9 22.0 7 10 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH VERNON ISD VERNON H S 21.0 20.0 21.3 20.7 20.9 88 137 64.2 19 21.6WILLACY LYFORD CISD LYFORD H S 15.7 17.0 16.5 17.1 16.7 62 100 62.0 . . < 5 HIGH RAYMONDVILLE RAYMONDVILLE H 17.4 17.9 18.3 18.5 18.1 32 126 25.4 . . < 5 HIGH SAN PERLITA I SAN PERLITA H S 15.9 18.0 16.8 18.1 17.3 19 30 63.3 . . < 5 HIGHWILLIAMSON FLORENCE ISD FLORENCE H S 19.4 18.9 22.4 20.1 20.5 29 53 54.7 8 27.6 GEORGETOWN IS 20.3 21.4 21.8 21.1 21.2 127 418 30.4 30 23.6 GEORGETOWN H S 20.3 21.4 21.8 21.1 21.3 124 401 30.9 30 24.2 GRANGER ISD GRANGER SCHOOL 18.8 18.3 19.1 18.5 18.9 8 20 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH HUTTO ISD HUTTO H S 20.1 21.0 20.5 20.8 20.7 32 66 48.5 7 21.9 JARRELL ISD JARRELL H S 20.9 19.2 22.9 20.4 20.9 16 34 47.1 . . < 5 HIGH LEANDER ISD 21.4 22.7 23.0 23.5 22.7 86 552 15.6 38 44.2 LEANDER H S 21.4 22.7 23.0 23.5 22.7 86 551 15.6 38 44.2 LIBERTY HILL LIBERTY HILL H 19.6 19.9 20.8 19.7 20.0 20 70 28.6 . . < 5 HIGH ROUND ROCK IS 22.2 23.4 23.4 22.8 23.1 639 1,597 40.0 301 47.1 MCNEIL H S 21.0 22.4 22.6 22.2 22.2 127 428 29.7 55 43.3 ROUND ROCK H S 20.9 22.1 22.4 21.8 22.0 261 630 41.4 88 33.7 WESTWOOD H S 24.0 25.3 24.9 24.0 24.7 251 492 51.0 158 62.9 TAYLOR ISD TAYLOR H S 18.5 19.7 19.5 19.0 19.3 32 149 21.5 6 18.8 THRALL ISD . . . . . . 35 . . . < 5 TESTEDWILSON FLORESVILLE I FLORESVILLE H S 19.0 20.2 19.0 19.5 19.6 88 152 57.9 14 15.9 LA VERNIA ISD LA VERNIA HIGH 19.9 19.1 19.1 20.4 19.8 18 97 18.6 . . < 5 HIGH POTH ISD POTH H S 18.0 20.2 18.9 20.0 19.4 22 48 45.8 5 22.7 STOCKDALE ISD STOCKDALE H S 18.7 17.8 18.0 19.1 18.4 25 52 48.1 . . < 5 HIGHWINKLER KERMIT ISD KERMIT H S 20.6 20.7 20.9 20.5 20.8 35 73 47.9 10 28.6 WINK-LOVING I WINK H S 18.4 17.4 19.4 18.7 18.5 22 30 73.3 . . < 5 HIGHWISE ALVORD ISD ALVORD H S 21.9 20.6 23.7 22.1 22.2 16 24 66.7 7 43.8 BOYD ISD BOYD H S 19.3 21.3 20.9 21.5 20.8 24 72 33.3 5 20.8 BRIDGEPORT IS 18.6 20.5 19.3 20.3 19.9 49 127 38.6 8 16.3 BRIDGEPORT H S 18.6 20.5 19.3 20.3 19.9 49 120 40.8 8 16.3 CHICO ISD CHICO HIGH SCHO 18.2 18.6 18.6 20.2 18.9 11 35 31.4 . . < 5 HIGH DECATUR ISD 20.9 20.7 22.0 20.7 21.2 63 156 40.4 18 28.6 DECATUR H S 20.9 20.7 22.0 20.7 21.2 63 144 43.8 18 28.6

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 83: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

75

TABLE B-2 1999-00 MEAN ACT SCORES BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN # OF PCT OF # OF PCT OFCOUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS ENG. MATH READ. SCI R COMP. # OF GRADS GRADS XNEES XNEESNAME NAME NAME SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE XNEES —TEA TESTED >=24 >=24 ****NOTE****——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

WISE PARADISE ISD 17.8 20.0 19.7 19.7 19.4 26 48 54.2 . . < 5 HIGH PARADISE H S 17.8 20.0 19.7 19.7 19.4 26 42 61.9 . . < 5 HIGH SLIDELL ISD . . . . . . 18 . . . < 5 TESTEDWOOD ALBA-GOLDEN I 22.0 18.2 22.7 22.0 21.3 12 36 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH ALBA-GOLDEN H S 22.0 18.2 22.7 22.0 21.3 12 32 37.5 . . < 5 HIGH HAWKINS ISD 21.0 22.0 20.2 19.6 20.8 5 50 10.0 . . < 5 HIGH HAWKINS H S 21.0 22.0 20.2 19.6 20.8 5 47 10.6 . . < 5 HIGH MINEOLA ISD MINEOLA H S 18.1 19.1 19.0 19.0 19.0 22 64 34.4 . . < 5 HIGH QUITMAN ISD 20.9 19.8 23.2 22.6 21.8 10 84 11.9 . . < 5 HIGH QUITMAN H S 20.9 19.8 23.2 22.6 21.8 10 81 12.3 . . < 5 HIGH WINNSBORO ISD WINNSBORO H S 19.8 19.7 20.8 20.6 20.3 45 79 57.0 9 20.0 YANTIS ISD YANTIS SCHOOL 15.0 18.0 15.6 16.4 16.4 8 18 44.4 . . < 5 HIGHYOAKUM DENVER CITY I DENVER CITY H S 18.3 19.4 19.3 19.4 19.2 44 101 43.6 6 13.6 PLAINS ISD PLAINS H S 20.6 21.8 21.2 20.6 21.1 30 38 78.9 9 30.0YOUNG GRAHAM ISD 20.4 19.6 20.6 20.6 20.4 47 140 33.6 8 17.0 GRAHAM H S 20.4 19.6 20.6 20.6 20.4 47 135 34.8 8 17.0 NEWCASTLE ISD NEWCASTLE H S 19.3 21.7 22.1 21.6 21.4 7 20 35.0 . . < 5 HIGH OLNEY ISD OLNEY H S 20.9 19.5 21.1 20.4 20.6 35 46 76.1 10 28.6ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY ZAPATA H S 16.7 18.0 17.5 18.1 17.7 36 148 24.3 . . < 5 HIGHZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY CRYSTAL CITY H 14.1 16.3 16.0 17.1 16.0 52 85 61.2 . . < 5 HIGH LA PRYOR ISD LA PRYOR H S . . . . . . 42 . . . NONE TESTED

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 84: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

76

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

ANDERSON CAYUGA ISD CAYUGA H S 22 35 62.9 5 22.7 ELKHART ISD ELKHART H S 29 54 53.7 9 31.0 FRANKSTON ISD FRANKSTON H S 14 33 42.4 . . < 5 HIGH NECHES ISD NECHES H S 8 17 47.1 . . < 5 HIGH PALESTINE ISD PALESTINE H S 76 160 47.5 14 18.4 SLOCUM ISD SLOCUM H S 9 22 40.9 . . < 5 HIGH WESTWOOD ISD WESTWOOD H S 30 96 31.3 5 16.7 ANDREWS ANDREWS ISD ANDREWS HIGH SCHO 98 191 51.3 19 19.4 ANGELINA CENTRAL 34 87 39.1 10 29.4 CENTRAL H S 34 78 43.6 10 29.4 DIBOLL ISD 68 104 65.4 9 13.2 DIBOLL H S 68 102 66.7 9 13.2 HUDSON ISD 64 119 53.8 16 25.0 HUDSON H S 64 117 54.7 16 25.0 HUNTINGTON ISD 45 128 35.2 6 13.3 HUNTINGTON H S 45 79 57.0 6 13.3 LUFKIN ISD 215 366 58.7 44 20.5 LUFKIN H S 215 356 60.4 44 20.5 ZAVALLA ISD 5 14 35.7 . . < 5 HIGH ZAVALLA H S 5 12 41.7 . . < 5 HIGH ARANSAS ARANSAS COUNTY ROCKPORT-FULTON H 126 235 53.6 31 24.6 ARCHER ARCHER CITY ISD ARCHER CITY H S 21 34 61.8 7 33.3 HOLLIDAY ISD HOLLIDAY H S 46 66 69.7 11 23.9 MEGARGEL ISD . 2 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED WINDTHORST ISD WINDTHORST H S 16 19 84.2 . . < 5 HIGH ARMSTRONG CLAUDE ISD CLAUDE H S 15 27 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH ATASCOSA CHARLOTTE ISD CHARLOTTE H S 12 22 54.5 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH JOURDANTON ISD JOURDANTON H S 47 . . 14 29.8 NO GRADS/TEA LYTLE ISD LYTLE H S 43 72 59.7 8 18.6 PLEASANTON ISD PLEASANTON H S 99 160 61.9 18 18.2 POTEET ISD POTEET H S 30 68 44.1 5 16.7 AUSTIN BELLVILLE ISD BELLVILLE H S 85 135 63.0 23 27.1 BRAZOS ISD BRAZOS H S 33 48 68.8 . . < 5 HIGH SEALY ISD SEALY H S 82 127 64.6 22 26.8 BAILEY MULESHOE ISD 71 85 83.5 16 22.5 MULESHOE H S 71 82 86.6 16 22.5 THREE WAY ISD THREE WAY SCHOOL 9 11 81.8 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH BANDERA BANDERA ISD 72 130 55.4 12 16.7 BANDERA H S 70 122 57.4 12 17.1 MEDINA ISD MEDINA H S 21 22 95.5 7 33.3 BASTROP BASTROP ISD 159 273 58.2 51 32.1 BASTROP H S 158 256 61.7 51 32.3 ELGIN ISD 56 135 41.5 9 16.1 ELGIN H S 55 104 52.9 9 16.4 SMITHVILLE ISD SMITHVILLE H S 50 75 66.7 10 20.0 BAYLOR SEYMOUR ISD SEYMOUR H S 26 35 74.3 6 23.1 BEE BEEVILLE ISD 125 234 53.4 20 16.0 A C JONES HIGH SC 125 229 54.6 20 16.0 PETTUS ISD PETTUS H S 21 34 61.8 5 23.8 SKIDMORE-TYNAN SKIDMORE-TYNAN H 17 46 37.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH BELL ACADEMY ISD ACADEMY H S 41 64 64.1 14 34.1 BARTLETT ISD BARTLETT H S 16 30 53.3 . . < 5 HIGH BELTON ISD 323 430 75.1 76 23.5 BELTON H S 323 398 81.2 76 23.5 HOLLAND ISD HOLLAND H S 14 32 43.8 . . < 5 HIGH KILLEEN ISD 681 1,187 57.4 124 18.2 ELLISON H S 350 604 57.9 62 17.7 KILLEEN H S 331 553 59.9 62 18.7 KILLEEN-RICHARD KILLEEN-RICHARD M . 27 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED ROGERS ISD ROGERS H S 24 44 54.5 6 25.0 SALADO ISD SALADO H S 59 71 83.1 19 32.2 TEMPLE ISD TEMPLE H S 248 365 67.9 95 38.3 TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSFORMATIVE CH . 29 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED TROY ISD TROY H S 49 66 74.2 11 22.4 BEXAR ALAMO HEIGHTS I ALAMO HEIGHTS H S 250 286 87.4 140 56.0 BLESSED SACRAME BLESSED SACRAMENT . 25 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED BUILDING ALTERN . 32 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (SA . 2 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED EAST CENTRAL IS EAST CENTRAL H S 251 375 66.9 46 18.3

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 85: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

77

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

BEXAR EDGEWOOD ISD 227 423 53.7 6 2.6 KENNEDY HIGH SCHO 124 222 55.9 . . <10 MASKED MEMORIAL H S 101 182 55.5 . . <10 MASKED FT SAM HOUSTON ROBERT G COLE JR- 47 49 95.9 15 31.9 HARLANDALE ISD 296 609 48.6 13 4.4 HARLANDALE H S 149 303 49.2 . . <10 MASKED MCCOLLUM H S 146 266 54.9 . . <10 MASKED JUDSON ISD 485 712 68.1 133 27.4 JUDSON SENIOR H S 482 678 71.1 132 27.4 LACKLAND ISD VIRGINIA ALLRED S 19 21 90.5 8 42.1 NORTH EAST ISD 1,830 2,414 75.8 608 33.2 ACADEMY OF CREATI 5 21 23.8 . . SAT ONLY <20 MASKED CHURCHILL H S 537 532 100 231 43.0 INTERNATIONAL SCH 85 95 89.5 . . <20 MASKED LEE H S 224 349 64.2 67 29.9 MAC ARTHUR H S 368 469 78.5 136 37.0 MADISON H S 379 462 82.0 106 28.0 REAGAN H S 40 162 24.7 . . ACT ONLY <20 MASKED ROOSEVELT H S 191 315 60.6 35 18.3 NORTHSIDE ISD 2,154 3,276 65.8 633 29.4 BUSINESS CAREERS 133 . . 26 19.5 NO GRADS/TEA COMMUNICATIONS AR 30 . . 17 56.7 ACT ONLY NO GRADS/TEA HEALTH CAREERS H 203 218 93.1 107 52.7 HOLMES H S 217 602 36.0 29 13.4 JAY H S 214 450 47.6 18 8.4 MARSHALL H S 264 383 68.9 88 33.3 SANDRA DAY O’CONN 334 441 75.7 99 29.6 SUNSET H S 19 66 28.8 5 26.3 TOM CLARK H S 426 519 82.1 159 37.3 WILLIAM H TAFT H 314 554 56.7 85 27.1 POSITIVE SOLUTI POSITIVE SOLUTION . 7 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED RADIANCE ACADEM RADIANCE ACADEMY . 1 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED RANDOLPH FIELD RANDOLPH H S 53 67 79.1 23 43.4 SAN ANTONIO ISD 1,416 2,343 60.4 77 5.4 BRACKENRIDGE H S 254 415 61.2 36 14.2 BURBANK H S 200 240 83.3 . . < 5 HIGH EDISON H S 160 288 55.6 5 3.1 FOX TECHNICAL H S 93 265 35.1 . . < 5 HIGH HIGHLANDS H S 216 354 61.0 21 9.7 HOUSTON H S 139 192 72.4 . . < 5 HIGH JEFFERSON H S 214 281 76.2 6 2.8 LANIER H S 138 268 51.5 . . < 5 HIGH SOMERSET ISD SOMERSET H S 44 83 53.0 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH SAN ANTON 256 455 56.3 15 5.9 SO SAN ANTONIO H 82 112 73.2 . . <20 MASKED SOUTH SAN ANTONIO 174 323 53.9 . . <20 MASKED SOUTHSIDE ISD SOUTHSIDE H S 66 153 43.1 8 12.1 SOUTHWEST ISD SOUTHWEST H S 169 366 46.2 15 8.9 SOUTHWEST PREPA SOUTHWEST PREPARA 5 29 17.2 . . < 5 HIGH BLANCO BLANCO ISD BLANCO H S 42 45 93.3 7 16.7 JOHNSON CITY IS LYNDON B JOHNSON 24 35 68.6 7 29.2 BORDEN BORDEN COUNTY I BORDEN SCHOOL 24 22 100 8 33.3 BOSQUE CLIFTON ISD CLIFTON H S 59 82 72.0 14 23.7 CRANFILLS GAP I . 5 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED IREDELL ISD IREDELL SCHOOL 5 8 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH KOPPERL ISD KOPPERL SCHOOL 8 13 61.5 . . < 5 HIGH MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN H S 25 35 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH MORGAN ISD . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED VALLEY MILLS IS VALLEY MILLS H S 18 32 56.3 6 33.3 WALNUT SPRINGS WALNUT SPRINGS SC 6 6 100 . . < 5 HIGH BOWIE DEKALB ISD DEKALB H S 59 74 79.7 7 11.9 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (TE . 6 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED HOOKS ISD HOOKS H S 49 69 71.0 6 12.2 LIBERTY-EYLAU I 81 122 66.4 8 9.9 LIBERTY-EYLAU H S 77 87 88.5 7 9.1 MAUD ISD MAUD SCHOOL 30 36 83.3 . . < 5 HIGH NEW BOSTON ISD NEW BOSTON H S 70 87 80.5 17 24.3 PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE H 104 127 81.9 38 36.5 REDWATER ISD REDWATER H S 64 80 80.0 21 32.8

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 86: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

78

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

BOWIE SIMMS ISD 16 22 72.7 . . < 5 HIGH JAMES BOWIE H S 16 19 84.2 . . < 5 HIGH TEXARKANA ISD 194 275 70.5 47 24.2 TEXAS H S 194 267 72.7 47 24.2 BRAZORIA ALVIN ISD 236 485 48.7 65 27.5 ALVIN HIGH SCHOOL 236 431 54.8 65 27.5 ANGLETON ISD ANGLETON H S 163 295 55.3 48 29.4 BRAZOSPORT ISD 369 712 51.8 129 35.0 BRAZOSPORT H S 67 176 38.1 6 9.0 BRAZOSWOOD H S 302 534 56.6 123 40.7 COLUMBIA-BRAZOR COLUMBIA H S 101 185 54.6 33 32.7 DANBURY ISD DANBURY H S 26 52 50.0 11 42.3 PEARLAND ISD PEARLAND H S 394 549 71.8 130 33.0 SWEENY ISD SWEENY H S 76 144 52.8 25 32.9 BRAZOS BRYAN ISD 339 607 55.8 94 27.7 BRYAN H S 339 578 58.7 94 27.7 COLLEGE STATION 358 469 76.3 177 49.4 A & M CONS H S 358 462 77.5 177 49.4 BREWSTER ALPINE ISD ALPINE H S 40 67 59.7 5 12.5 MARATHON ISD MARATHON SCHOOL 5 9 55.6 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH TERLINGUA CSD . 13 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED BRISCOE SILVERTON ISD SILVERTON SCHOOL 14 16 87.5 . . < 5 HIGH BROOKS BROOKS COUNTY I FALFURRIAS H S 43 90 47.8 7 16.3 BROWN BANGS ISD 35 57 61.4 8 22.9 BANGS H S 35 51 68.6 8 22.9 BLANKET ISD BLANKET H S 12 12 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH BROOKESMITH ISD BROOKESMITH H S 9 9 100 . . < 5 HIGH BROWNWOOD ISD 136 221 61.5 35 25.7 BROWNWOOD H S 133 199 66.8 35 26.3 EARLY ISD EARLY H S 54 72 75.0 18 33.3 MAY ISD MAY H S 23 23 100 . . < 5 HIGH ZEPHYR ISD ZEPHYR H S 17 15 100 . . < 5 HIGH BURLESON CALDWELL ISD CALDWELL H S 59 108 54.6 10 16.9 SNOOK ISD SNOOK SECONDARY 12 19 63.2 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH SOMERVILLE ISD SOMERVILLE H S 16 33 48.5 . . < 5 HIGH BURNET BURNET CONS ISD 76 152 50.0 16 21.1 BURNET H S 76 145 52.4 16 21.1 MARBLE FALLS IS MARBLE FALLS H S 116 169 68.6 34 29.3 CALDWELL LOCKHART ISD 140 239 58.6 27 19.3 LOCKHART H S 140 226 61.9 27 19.3 LULING ISD LULING H S 48 71 67.6 6 12.5 PRAIRIE LEA ISD PRAIRIE LEA SCHOO 5 10 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH CALHOUN CALHOUN CO ISD 81 205 39.5 27 33.3 CALHOUN H S 81 187 43.3 27 33.3 CALLAHAN BAIRD ISD BAIRD H S 23 25 92.0 5 21.7 CLYDE CONS ISD CLYDE H S 53 77 68.8 10 18.9 CROSS PLAINS IS CROSS PLAINS H S 18 30 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH EULA ISD EULA H S 20 34 58.8 . . < 5 HIGH CAMERON BROWNSVILLE ISD 591 1,785 33.1 67 11.3 HANNA H S 157 465 33.8 33 21.0 LOPEZ H S 70 278 25.2 5 7.1 PACE H S 113 355 31.8 8 7.1 PORTER H S 128 368 34.8 15 11.7 RIVERA H S 123 290 42.4 6 4.9 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (BR . 7 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED HARLINGEN CONS 414 758 54.6 67 16.2 HARLINGEN H S 200 389 51.4 33 16.5 HARLINGEN H S - S 211 348 60.6 34 16.1 LA FERIA ISD 62 132 47.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA FERIA H S 62 125 49.6 . . < 5 HIGH LOS FRESNOS CON LOS FRESNOS H S 120 274 43.8 15 12.5 POINT ISABEL IS PORT ISABEL H S 47 105 44.8 5 10.6 RIO HONDO ISD RIO HONDO H S 67 97 69.1 7 10.4 SAN BENITO CONS SAN BENITO H S 132 384 34.4 13 9.8 SANTA MARIA ISD SANTA MARIA H S 15 26 57.7 . . < 5 HIGH SANTA ROSA ISD SANTA ROSA H S 32 59 54.2 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH TEXAS ISD 313 313 100 131 41.9 HIGH SCHOOL FOR H 138 142 97.2 49 35.5 THE SCIENCE ACADE 119 112 100 69 58.0

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 87: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

79

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

CAMERON SOUTH TEXAS ISD THE TEACHER ACADE 56 59 94.9 13 23.2 VALLEY HIGH VALLEY HIGH . 12 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED CAMP PITTSBURG ISD PITTSBURG H S 65 95 68.4 13 20.0 CARSON GROOM ISD GROOM SCHOOL 12 12 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH PANHANDLE ISD 28 45 62.2 10 35.7 PANHANDLE H S 28 43 65.1 10 35.7 WHITE DEER ISD WHITE DEER H S 27 33 81.8 6 22.2 CASS ATLANTA ISD ATLANTA H S 96 107 89.7 23 24.0 AVINGER ISD AVINGER H S 6 5 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH BLOOMBURG ISD BLOOMBURG H S 8 11 72.7 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH HUGHES SPRINGS HUGHES SPRINGS HI 51 57 89.5 5 9.8 LINDEN-KILDARE LINDEN-KILDARE H 46 81 56.8 10 21.7 MCLEOD ISD MCLEOD H S 8 23 34.8 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH QUEEN CITY ISD QUEEN CITY H S 55 79 69.6 7 12.7 CASTRO DIMMITT ISD DIMMITT H S 43 70 61.4 5 11.6 ACT ONLY HART ISD HART JR-SR H S 14 25 56.0 . . < 5 HIGH NAZARETH ISD NAZARETH SCHOOL 17 18 94.4 6 35.3 CHAMBERS ANAHUAC ISD 30 70 42.9 5 16.7 ANAHUAC H S 30 66 45.5 5 16.7 BARBERS HILL IS 83 136 61.0 29 34.9 BARBERS HILL H S 83 135 61.5 29 34.9 EAST CHAMBERS I 43 66 65.2 . . < 5 HIGH EAST CHAMBERS H S 43 64 67.2 . . < 5 HIGH CHEROKEE ALTO ISD ALTO H S 20 44 45.5 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSONVILLE IS 122 228 53.5 23 18.9 JACKSONVILLE H S 122 213 57.3 23 18.9 NEW SUMMERFIELD NEW SUMMERFIELD S 7 22 31.8 . . < 5 HIGH RUSK ISD RUSK H S 51 112 45.5 10 19.6 WELLS ISD WELLS H S 16 23 69.6 . . < 5 HIGH CHILDRESS CHILDRESS ISD CHILDRESS H S 46 67 68.7 8 17.4 CLAY BELLEVUE ISD BELLEVUE SCHOOL 8 12 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BYERS ISD BYERS SCHOOL 7 9 77.8 . . < 5 HIGH HENRIETTA ISD HENRIETTA H S 40 55 72.7 10 25.0 MIDWAY ISD MIDWAY SCHOOL 12 12 100 . . < 5 HIGH PETROLIA ISD PETROLIA H S 15 27 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH COCHRAN MORTON ISD 13 36 36.1 . . < 5 HIGH MORTON H S 13 21 61.9 . . < 5 HIGH WHITEFACE CONS 25 29 86.2 7 28.0 WHITEFACE H S 25 26 96.2 7 28.0 COKE BRONTE ISD 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BRONTE H S 10 14 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH ROBERT LEE ISD 23 28 82.1 6 26.1 ROBERT LEE H S 23 27 85.2 6 26.1 COLEMAN COLEMAN ISD 46 60 76.7 7 15.2 COLEMAN H S 46 57 80.7 7 15.2 NOVICE ISD NOVICE SCHOOL . 3 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED PANTHER CREEK C PANTHER CREEK H S 7 9 77.8 . . < 5 HIGH SANTA ANNA ISD . 11 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED COLLIN ALLEN ISD ALLEN H S 457 533 85.7 190 41.6 ANNA ISD ANNA H S 13 49 26.5 . . < 5 HIGH BLUE RIDGE ISD BLUE RIDGE H S 5 31 16.1 . . < 5 HIGH CELINA ISD CELINA H S 28 47 59.6 6 21.4 COMMUNITY ISD COMMUNITY H S 32 54 59.3 6 18.8 FARMERSVILLE IS FARMERSVILLE H S 24 50 48.0 7 29.2 FRISCO ISD FRISCO H S 114 161 70.8 39 34.2 MCKINNEY ISD 293 409 71.6 116 39.6 MCKINNEY HIGH SCH 281 369 76.2 109 38.8 THE ACT ACAD AT J 12 11 100 7 58.3 PLANO ISD 2,151 2,396 89.8 1,199 55.7 PLANO EAST SR H S 754 941 80.1 392 52.0 PLANO SR H S 1,393 1,455 95.7 805 57.8 PRINCETON ISD PRINCETON H S 42 86 48.8 . . < 5 HIGH PROSPER ISD PROSPER H S 40 58 69.0 15 37.5 WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 137 202 67.8 41 29.9 COLLINGSWORTH SAMNORWOOD ISD SAMNORWOOD SCHOOL 5 7 71.4 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH WELLINGTON ISD WELLINGTON H S 22 34 64.7 . . < 5 HIGH COLORADO COLUMBUS ISD COLUMBUS H S 70 108 64.8 24 34.3 RICE CONS ISD RICE H S 39 56 69.6 6 15.4 WEIMAR ISD WEIMAR H S 39 56 69.6 7 17.9

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 88: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

80

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

COMAL COMAL ISD 432 573 75.4 127 29.4 CANYON H S 173 230 75.2 56 32.4 SMITHSON VALLEY H 256 323 79.3 71 27.7 NEW BRAUNFELS I 225 325 69.2 70 31.1 NEW BRAUNFELS H S 225 315 71.4 70 31.1 COMANCHE COMANCHE ISD COMANCHE H S 41 65 63.1 6 14.6 DE LEON ISD DE LEON H S 24 39 61.5 . . < 5 HIGH GUSTINE ISD . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED SIDNEY ISD SIDNEY SCHOOL 7 9 77.8 . . < 5 HIGH CONCHO EDEN C I S D EDEN H S 24 28 85.7 7 29.2 PAINT ROCK ISD PAINT ROCK SCHOOL 7 12 58.3 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH COOKE CALLISBURG ISD CALLISBURG H S 27 56 48.2 10 37.0 ERA ISD ERA SCHOOL 23 30 76.7 6 26.1 GAINESVILLE ISD GAINESVILLE H S 69 125 55.2 20 29.0 LINDSAY ISD LINDSAY H S 30 31 96.8 13 43.3 MUENSTER ISD MUENSTER H S 29 28 100 17 58.6 VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW HS/MS 16 21 76.2 8 50.0 CORYELL COPPERAS COVE I 210 381 55.1 59 28.1 COPPERAS COVE H S 210 378 55.6 59 28.1 EVANT ISD EVANT H S 10 16 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH GATESVILLE ISD GATESVILLE H S 68 120 56.7 22 32.4 JONESBORO ISD JONESBORO SCHOOL 8 10 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH OGLESBY ISD . 10 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED COTTLE PADUCAH ISD PADUCAH H S 15 17 88.2 5 33.3 CRANE CRANE ISD CRANE H S 39 55 70.9 7 17.9 CROCKETT CROCKETT CO CON OZONA H S 50 85 58.8 5 10.0 CROSBY CROSBYTON ISD 25 39 64.1 5 20.0 CROSBYTON H S 25 32 78.1 5 20.0 LORENZO ISD LORENZO H S 6 13 46.2 . . < 5 HIGH RALLS ISD 12 35 34.3 . . < 5 HIGH RALLS H S 12 34 35.3 . . < 5 HIGH CULBERSON CULBERSON COUNT VAN HORN H S 16 45 35.6 . . < 5 HIGH DALLAM DALHART ISD 65 92 70.7 16 24.6 DALHART H S 65 90 72.2 16 24.6 TEXLINE ISD TEXLINE SCHOOL 10 8 100 . . < 5 HIGH DALLAS CARROLLTON-FARM 658 1,008 65.3 301 45.7 MARY GRIMES CTR 8 77 10.4 . . <110 MASKED NEWMAN SMITH H S 432 539 80.1 200 46.3 TURNER H S 217 388 55.9 . . <110 MASKED CEDAR HILL ISD CEDAR HILL H S 237 334 71.0 73 30.8 COPPELL ISD COPPELL H S 417 451 92.5 200 48.0 DALLAS CAN ACAD 5 240 2.1 . . < 5 HIGH DALLAS CAN! ACADE 5 107 4.7 . . < 5 HIGH DALLAS ISD 2,839 5,430 52.3 357 12.6 A MACEO SMITH H S 61 117 52.1 . . < 5 HIGH BOOKER T WASHINGT 152 162 93.8 45 29.6 BRYAN ADAMS H S 166 318 52.2 31 18.7 DAVID W CARTER H 166 317 52.4 11 6.6 H GRADY SPRUCE H 73 208 35.1 . . < 5 HIGH HILLCREST H S 124 216 57.4 36 29.0 JAMES MADISON H S 45 102 44.1 . . < 5 HIGH JUSTIN F KIMBALL 114 216 52.8 . . < 5 HIGH L G PINKSTON H S 47 116 40.5 . . < 5 HIGH LINCOLN H S 172 194 88.7 . . < 5 HIGH METROPOLITAN ED C 8 45 17.8 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH MIDDLE COLLEGE 12 35 34.3 . . < 5 HIGH MOISES MOLINA H S 59 258 22.9 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH NORTH DALLAS H S 75 223 33.6 . . < 5 HIGH ROOSEVELT H S 66 115 57.4 . . < 5 HIGH SCH OF GOVT,LAW,& 47 55 85.5 6 12.8 SCHOOL FOR THE TA 28 27 100 27 96.4 SCHOOL OF BUSINES 74 105 70.5 7 9.5 SCHOOL OF EDUCATI 39 43 90.7 . . < 5 HIGH SCHOOL OF HEALTH 74 92 80.4 18 24.3 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE 70 78 89.7 28 40.0 SEAGOVILLE H S 66 129 51.2 7 10.6 SKYLINE H S 391 711 55.0 47 12.0 SOUTH OAK CLIFF H 134 222 60.4 . . < 5 HIGH SUNSET H S 77 245 31.4 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 89: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

81

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DALLAS DALLAS ISD THOMAS JEFFERSON 77 182 42.3 . . < 5 HIGH W H ADAMSON H S 51 164 31.1 . . < 5 HIGH W T WHITE H S 184 298 61.7 42 22.8 W W SAMUELL H S 89 173 51.4 . . < 5 HIGH WOODROW WILSON H 94 217 43.3 29 30.9 DESOTO ISD DE SOTO H S 243 299 81.3 77 31.7 DUNCANVILLE ISD 484 673 71.9 132 27.3 DUNCANVILLE H S 484 636 76.1 132 27.3 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (DA . 1 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED GARLAND ISD 1,360 2,304 59.0 422 31.0 GARLAND H S 239 370 64.6 145 60.7 LAKEVIEW CENTENNI 111 240 46.3 26 23.4 N GARLAND H S 158 381 41.5 30 19.0 NAAMAN FOREST H S 298 430 69.3 77 25.8 ROWLETT H S 326 497 65.6 81 24.8 S GARLAND H S 227 370 61.4 63 27.8 GRAND PRAIRIE I 436 925 47.1 90 20.6 GRAND PRAIRIE H S 148 387 38.2 23 15.5 SO GRAND PRAIRIE 288 488 59.0 67 23.3 HIGHLAND PARK I 383 340 100 239 62.4 HIGHLAND PARK H S 383 339 100 239 62.4 HONORS ACADEMY . 111 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED IRVING ISD 622 1,092 57.0 187 30.1 IRVING H S 204 366 55.7 64 31.4 MACARTHUR H S 228 379 60.2 68 29.8 NIMITZ H S 190 345 55.1 55 28.9 LANCASTER ISD LANCASTER H S 125 210 59.5 16 12.8 MESQUITE ISD 870 1,530 56.9 242 27.8 MESQUITE H S 304 522 58.2 71 23.4 NORTH MESQUITE H 236 418 56.5 79 33.5 RALPH H POTEET H 249 333 74.8 75 30.1 WEST MESQUITE H S 79 224 35.3 16 20.3 RENAISSANCE CHA RENAISSANCE CHART 39 . . 14 35.9 NO GRADS/TEA RICHARDSON ISD 1,626 1,817 89.5 746 45.9 BERKNER H S 482 526 91.6 210 43.6 LAKE HIGHLANDS H 482 527 91.5 212 44.0 PEARCE H S 360 374 96.3 202 56.1 RICHARDSON H S 302 388 77.8 122 40.4 RYLIE FAITH FAM . 5 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED WILMER-HUTCHINS WILMER-HUTCHINS H 48 130 36.9 . . < 5 HIGH DAWSON DAWSON DAWSON SCHOOL 6 7 85.7 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH KLONDIKE ISD KLONDIKE H S 10 13 76.9 7 70.0 LAMESA ISD LAMESA H S 68 122 55.7 15 22.1 SANDS ISD SANDS H S 13 21 61.9 . . < 5 HIGH DEAF SMITH HEREFORD ISD HEREFORD H S 91 238 38.2 16 17.6 DELTA COOPER ISD COOPER H S 35 55 63.6 . . < 5 HIGH FANNINDEL ISD FANNINDEL H S 8 13 61.5 . . < 5 HIGH DENTON AUBREY ISD AUBREY H S 29 52 55.8 5 17.2 DENTON ISD 421 576 73.1 144 34.2 DENTON H S 210 245 85.7 83 39.5 RYAN H S 210 303 69.3 61 29.0 KRUM ISD KRUM H S 46 59 78.0 16 34.8 LAKE DALLAS ISD LAKE DALLAS H S 96 139 69.1 22 22.9 LEWISVILLE ISD 1,517 1,807 84.0 561 37.0 LEWISVILLE H S 495 588 84.2 165 33.3 MARCUS H S 627 654 95.9 274 43.7 THE COLONY H S 395 534 74.0 122 30.9 LITTLE ELM ISD LITTLE ELM H S 29 59 49.2 . . < 5 HIGH NORTHWEST ISD 160 242 66.1 48 30.0 NORTHWEST H S 160 232 69.0 48 30.0 PILOT POINT ISD PILOT POINT H S 34 53 64.2 12 35.3 PONDER ISD PONDER H S 17 26 65.4 6 35.3 SANGER ISD 58 151 38.4 20 34.5 SANGER H S 58 126 46.0 20 34.5 UNIVERSITY OF N TEXAS ACADEMY OF 171 . . 171 100 NO GRADS/TEA DEWITT CUERO ISD CUERO H S 60 113 53.1 17 28.3 NORDHEIM ISD NORDHEIM SCHOOL . 5 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED YOAKUM ISD YOAKUM H S 72 110 65.5 19 26.4 YORKTOWN ISD YORKTOWN H S 27 48 56.3 5 18.5

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 90: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

82

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

DICKENS PATTON SPRINGS PATTON SPRINGS SC 6 5 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SPUR ISD SPUR SCHOOL 12 21 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH DIMMIT CARRIZO SPRINGS CARRIZO SPRINGS H 77 126 61.1 10 13.0 DONLEY CLARENDON ISD CLARENDON H S 19 27 70.4 6 31.6 HEDLEY ISD HEDLEY SCHOOL 9 10 90.0 . . < 5 HIGH DUVAL BENAVIDES ISD BENAVIDES H S 29 32 90.6 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH FREER ISD FREER H S 43 63 68.3 5 11.6 SAN DIEGO ISD SAN DIEGO H S 39 81 48.1 . . < 5 HIGH EASTLAND CISCO ISD CISCO H S 23 42 54.8 7 30.4 EASTLAND ISD EASTLAND H S 55 73 75.3 14 25.5 GORMAN ISD GORMAN H S 18 24 75.0 5 27.8 RANGER ISD RANGER H S 22 26 84.6 . . < 5 HIGH RISING STAR ISD RISING STAR H S 13 15 86.7 . . < 5 HIGH ECTOR ECTOR COUNTY IS 453 1,356 33.4 121 26.7 CAREER CTR 14 229 6.1 . . <60 MASKED ODESSA H S 204 569 35.9 71 34.8 PERMIAN H S 235 514 45.7 . . <60 MASKED EDWARDS NUECES CANYON C NUECES CANYON H S 13 18 72.2 . . < 5 HIGH ROCKSPRINGS ISD ROCKSPRINGS H S 20 34 58.8 . . < 5 HIGH EL PASO ANTHONY ANTHONY H S 31 41 75.6 . . < 5 HIGH CANUTILLO ISD 118 193 61.1 6 5.1 CANUTILLO H S 118 191 61.8 6 5.1 CLINT ISD 169 303 55.8 9 5.3 CLINT H S 91 147 61.9 . . <10 MASKED MOUNTAIN VIEW H S 78 132 59.1 . . <10 MASKED EL PASO ISD 1,786 3,043 58.7 375 21.0 ANDRESS H S 205 368 55.7 25 12.2 AUSTIN H S 132 301 43.9 . . <20 MASKED BOWIE H S 89 254 35.0 . . <20 MASKED BURGES H S 156 277 56.3 . . <20 MASKED CORONADO H S 263 379 69.4 81 30.8 EL PASO H S 118 214 55.1 . . <20 MASKED FRANKLIN H S 425 554 76.7 151 35.5 IRVIN H S 140 337 41.5 . . <20 MASKED JEFFERSON H S 111 179 62.0 . . <20 MASKED SILVA HEALTH MAGN 145 152 95.4 45 31.0 FABENS ISD 59 135 43.7 . . < 5 HIGH FABENS H S 59 124 47.6 . . < 5 HIGH PASO DEL NORTE PASO DEL NORTE . 68 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED SAN ELIZARIO IS SAN ELIZARIO H S 91 120 75.8 6 6.6 SOCORRO ISD 622 1,085 57.3 71 11.4 AMERICAS H S 186 299 62.2 26 14.0 MONTWOOD H S 244 408 59.8 24 9.8 SOCORRO H S 192 378 50.8 21 10.9 TORNILLO ISD TORNILLO H S 21 29 72.4 . . < 5 HIGH YSLETA ISD 2,579 2,836 90.9 186 7.2 ACAD OF SCIENCE/T 78 130 60.0 . . SAT ONLY <10 MASKED BEL AIR H S 397 429 92.5 25 6.3 CESAR CHAVEZ ACAD 22 28 78.6 . . SAT ONLY <10 MASKED DEL VALLE H S 300 390 76.9 10 3.3 EASTWOOD H S 375 434 86.4 51 13.6 J M HANKS H S 572 585 97.8 70 12.2 PARKLAND H S 215 199 100 . . <10 MASKED RIVERSIDE H S 257 258 99.6 10 3.9 TEJAS SCHOOL OF C 20 36 55.6 . . SAT ONLY <10 MASKED YSLETA H S 343 343 100 13 3.8 ELLIS AVALON ISD AVALON SCHOOL 9 14 64.3 . . < 5 HIGH ENNIS ISD ENNIS H S 161 222 72.5 28 17.4 FERRIS ISD FERRIS H S 48 69 69.6 10 20.8 ITALY ISD ITALY H S 21 34 61.8 . . < 5 HIGH MAYPEARL ISD MAYPEARL H S 23 32 71.9 5 21.7 MIDLOTHIAN ISD MIDLOTHIAN H S 189 260 72.7 64 33.9 MILFORD ISD . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED PALMER ISD PALMER H S 14 37 37.8 . . < 5 HIGH RED OAK ISD RED OAK H S 156 186 83.9 42 26.9 WAXAHACHIE ISD 210 358 58.7 48 22.9 WAXAHACHIE H S 210 330 63.6 48 22.9 ERATH DUBLIN ISD DUBLIN H S 26 51 51.0 . . < 5 HIGH HUCKABAY ISD HUCKABAY SCHOOL 13 18 72.2 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 91: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

83

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

ERATH LINGLEVILLE ISD LINGLEVILLE SCHOO 7 10 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH STEPHENVILLE IS STEPHENVILLE H S 164 193 85.0 42 25.6 FALLS CHILTON ISD CHILTON SCHOOL 11 22 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH MARLIN ISD MARLIN H S 37 67 55.2 . . < 5 HIGH ROSEBUD-LOTT IS ROSEBUD-LOTT H S 41 61 67.2 16 39.0 FANNIN BONHAM ISD BONHAM H S 54 98 55.1 10 18.5 DODD CITY ISD DODD CITY SCHOOL 8 11 72.7 . . < 5 HIGH ECTOR ISD ECTOR SCHOOL 5 15 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH HONEY GROVE ISD HONEY GROVE H S 35 42 83.3 14 40.0 LEONARD ISD LEONARD H S 24 39 61.5 . . < 5 HIGH SAM RAYBURN ISD RAYBURN H S 12 20 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH SAVOY ISD SAVOY H S 5 16 31.3 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH TRENTON ISD TRENTON H S 13 24 54.2 . . < 5 HIGH FAYETTE FAYETTEVILLE IS FAYETTEVILLE H S 19 22 86.4 6 31.6 FLATONIA ISD FLATONIA H S 21 28 75.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA GRANGE ISD LA GRANGE H S 61 106 57.5 22 36.1 ROUND TOP-CARMI CARMINE H S 7 10 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH SCHULENBURG ISD SCHULENBURG H S 31 51 60.8 5 16.1 FISHER ROBY CONS ISD ROBY H S 12 20 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH ROTAN ISD ROTAN H S 32 34 94.1 5 15.6 FLOYD FLOYDADA ISD 39 61 63.9 12 30.8 FLOYDADA H S 39 56 69.6 12 30.8 LOCKNEY ISD LOCKNEY H S 31 36 86.1 . . < 5 HIGH FOARD CROWELL ISD . 10 . . . < 5 TESTED FORT BEND FORT BEND ISD 2,584 3,196 80.9 979 37.9 CLEMENTS H S 644 646 99.7 374 58.1 DULLES H S 398 490 81.2 145 36.4 KEMPNER H S 357 493 72.4 128 35.9 LAWRENCE E ELKINS 436 544 80.1 139 31.9 STEPHEN F AUSTIN 516 610 84.6 181 35.1 WILLOWRIDGE H S 233 383 60.8 12 5.2 LAMAR CONSOLIDA 387 691 56.0 95 24.5 B F TERRY H S 223 385 57.9 46 20.6 LAMAR CONS H S 163 306 53.3 49 30.1 NEEDVILLE ISD NEEDVILLE H S 88 127 69.3 27 30.7 STAFFORD MSD STAFFORD HIGH SCH 103 137 75.2 15 14.6 FRANKLIN MOUNT VERNON IS MT VERNON H S 51 85 60.0 10 19.6 FREESTONE FAIRFIELD ISD FAIRFIELD H S 47 81 58.0 15 31.9 TEAGUE ISD TEAGUE H S 41 66 62.1 12 29.3 WORTHAM ISD WORTHAM H S 16 16 100 . . < 5 HIGH FRIO DILLEY ISD DILLEY H S 23 38 60.5 5 21.7 PEARSALL ISD 73 126 57.9 7 9.6 PEARSALL H S 73 124 58.9 7 9.6 GAINES LOOP ISD LOOP SCHOOL 10 13 76.9 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SEAGRAVES ISD SEAGRAVES H S 19 30 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH SEMINOLE ISD 58 127 45.7 11 19.0 SEMINOLE H S 58 121 47.9 11 19.0 GALVESTON CLEAR CREEK ISD 1,301 1,547 84.1 539 41.4 CLEAR BROOK H S 349 419 83.3 . . <110 MASKED CLEAR CREEK H S 390 473 82.5 140 35.9 CLEAR LAKE H S 553 618 89.5 294 53.2 CLEAR VIEW ALTER 9 37 24.3 . . <110 MASKED DICKINSON ISD DICKINSON H S 150 274 54.7 30 20.0 FRIENDSWOOD ISD FRIENDSWOOD H S 287 325 88.3 117 40.8 GALVESTON ISD BALL H S 218 409 53.3 57 26.1 HIGH ISLAND ISD HIGH ISLAND H S 14 29 48.3 . . < 5 HIGH HITCHCOCK ISD HITCHCOCK H S 24 71 33.8 . . < 5 HIGH LA MARQUE ISD LA MARQUE H S 146 237 61.6 14 9.6 SANTA FE ISD SANTA FE H S 110 256 43.0 20 18.2 TEXAS CITY ISD 144 273 52.7 24 16.7 TEXAS CITY H S 144 272 52.9 24 16.7 GARZA POST ISD POST H S 17 41 41.5 5 29.4 SOUTHLAND ISD . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED GILLESPIE FREDERICKSBURG 124 188 66.0 35 28.2 FREDERICKSBURG H 124 184 67.4 35 28.2 HARPER ISD HARPER H S 17 22 77.3 5 29.4 GLASSCOCK GLASSCOCK COUNT GLASSCOCK COUNTY 12 21 57.1 6 50.0 GOLIAD GOLIAD ISD GOLIAD H S 67 81 82.7 8 11.9 GONZALES GONZALES ISD 86 129 66.7 20 23.3

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 92: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

84

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

GONZALES GONZALES ISD GONZALES H S 86 125 68.8 20 23.3 NIXON-SMILEY CO NIXON-SMILEY H S 17 40 42.5 . . < 5 HIGH WAELDER ISD WAELDER H S 11 18 61.1 . . < 5 HIGH GRAY LEFORS ISD . 10 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED MCLEAN ISD MCLEAN SCHOOL 15 17 88.2 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH PAMPA ISD 136 218 62.4 40 29.4 PAMPA H S 136 202 67.3 40 29.4 GRAYSON BELLS ISD BELLS H S 23 36 63.9 . . < 5 HIGH COLLINSVILLE IS COLLINSVILLE H S 21 24 87.5 9 42.9 DENISON ISD 109 251 43.4 46 42.2 DENISON H S 109 240 45.4 46 42.2 GUNTER ISD GUNTER H S 22 41 53.7 10 45.5 HOWE ISD HOWE H S 44 70 62.9 15 34.1 POTTSBORO ISD POTTSBORO H S 39 63 61.9 16 41.0 S AND S CONS IS S AND S CONS H S 23 36 63.9 6 26.1 SHERMAN ISD 168 324 51.9 61 36.3 SHERMAN HIGH SCHO 168 298 56.4 61 36.3 TOM BEAN ISD TOM BEAN H S 26 47 55.3 . . < 5 HIGH VAN ALSTYNE ISD VAN ALSTYNE H S 31 54 57.4 10 32.3 WHITESBORO ISD WHITESBORO H S 55 92 59.8 16 29.1 WHITEWRIGHT ISD WHITEWRIGHT H S 7 34 20.6 . . < 5 HIGH GREGG EAST TEXAS CHAR EAST TEXAS CHARTE . 29 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED GLADEWATER ISD GLADEWATER H S 56 116 48.3 12 21.4 KILGORE ISD 89 222 40.1 26 29.2 KILGORE H S 89 210 42.4 26 29.2 LONGVIEW ISD LONGVIEW H S 223 367 60.8 79 35.4 PINE TREE ISD PINE TREE H S 190 247 76.9 75 39.5 SABINE ISD SABINE H S 41 83 49.4 11 26.8 SPRING HILL ISD SPRING HILL H S 80 96 83.3 23 28.8 WHITE OAK ISD WHITE OAK H S 49 81 60.5 24 49.0 GRIMES ANDERSON-SHIRO ANDERSON-SHIRO SE 20 33 60.6 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH IOLA ISD IOLA H S 17 28 60.7 . . < 5 HIGH NAVASOTA ISD NAVASOTA H S 64 147 43.5 14 21.9 RICHARDS ISD RICHARDS H S 5 11 45.5 . . < 5 HIGH GUADALUPE MARION ISD 45 76 59.2 12 26.7 MARION H S 45 67 67.2 12 26.7 NAVARRO ISD NAVARRO H S 38 50 76.0 5 13.2 SCHERTZ-CIBOLO- 240 390 61.5 60 25.0 SAMUEL CLEMENS H 240 357 67.2 60 25.0 SEGUIN ISD 217 384 56.5 54 24.9 SEGUIN HIGH SCHOO 217 334 65.0 54 24.9 HALE ABERNATHY ISD ABERNATHY H S 43 50 86.0 8 18.6 COTTON CENTER I COTTON CENTER SCH 8 15 53.3 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH HALE CENTER ISD HALE CENTER H S 16 32 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH PETERSBURG ISD 15 17 88.2 . . < 5 HIGH PETERSBURG H S 15 14 100 . . < 5 HIGH PLAINVIEW ISD 135 284 47.5 39 28.9 PLAINVIEW H S 135 275 49.1 39 28.9 HALL LAKEVIEW ISD LAKEVIEW SCHOOL . . . . . SAT ONLY NO GRADS/TEA MEMPHIS ISD MEMPHIS H S 23 33 69.7 . . < 5 HIGH TURKEY-QUITAQUE VALLEY SCHOOL 14 19 73.7 . . < 5 HIGH HAMILTON HAMILTON ISD HAMILTON H S 52 51 100 15 28.8 HICO ISD HICO H S 25 44 56.8 5 20.0 HANSFORD GRUVER ISD GRUVER H S 33 29 100 12 36.4 SPEARMAN ISD SPEARMAN H S 33 48 68.8 16 48.5 HARDEMAN CHILLICOTHE ISD CHILLICOTHE H S 5 12 41.7 . . < 5 HIGH QUANAH ISD QUANAH H S 41 50 82.0 8 19.5 HARDIN HARDIN-JEFFERSO 101 130 77.7 28 27.7 HARDIN-JEFFERSON 101 129 78.3 28 27.7 KOUNTZE ISD KOUNTZE H S 35 60 58.3 . . < 5 HIGH LUMBERTON ISD LUMBERTON H S 140 200 70.0 21 15.0 SILSBEE ISD SILSBEE H S 88 167 52.7 12 13.6 WEST HARDIN COU WEST HARDIN H S 26 43 60.5 . . < 5 HIGH HARRIS ACADEMY OF ACCE ACADEMY OF ACCELE . 15 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED ALDINE ISD 999 1,858 53.8 104 10.4 ALDINE H S 264 465 56.8 . . <20 MASKED CARVER H S FOR A 42 60 70.0 . . <20 MASKED CHESTER W NIMITZ 236 379 62.3 35 14.8 EISENHOWER H S 264 495 53.3 31 11.7

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 93: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

85

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HARRIS ALDINE ISD MACARTHUR H S 193 406 47.5 . . <20 MASKED ALIEF ISD 1,143 1,553 73.6 236 20.6 ELSIK H S 515 673 76.5 106 20.6 HASTINGS H S 534 761 70.2 102 19.1 KERR H S 94 118 79.7 28 29.8 ALPHONSO CRUTCH ALPHONSO CRUTCH’S . 10 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED AMERICAN ACADEM AMERICAN ACADEMY . 7 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED CALVIN NELMS CH CALVIN NELMS CHAR . 21 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED CHANNELVIEW ISD 135 261 51.7 21 15.6 CHANNELVIEW HIGH 135 248 54.4 21 15.6 COMQUEST ACADEM COMQUEST ACADEMY . 9 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED CROSBY ISD CROSBY H S 137 210 65.2 31 22.6 CYPRESS-FAIRBAN 2,464 3,216 76.6 918 37.3 CY-FAIR H S 420 525 80.0 147 35.0 CYPRESS CREEK H S 502 578 86.9 205 40.8 CYPRESS FALLS H S 463 574 80.7 172 37.1 CYPRESS SPRINGS H 259 361 71.7 . . <90 MASKED JERSEY VILLAGE H 413 589 70.1 139 33.7 LANGHAM CREEK H S 374 453 82.6 173 46.3 WINDFERN H S 33 135 24.4 . . <90 MASKED DEER PARK ISD 360 664 54.2 107 29.7 DEER PARK H S 360 623 57.8 107 29.7 ED WHITE SCHOOL ED WHITE MEMORIAL . 9 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED GALENA PARK ISD 386 892 43.3 64 16.6 GALENA PARK H S 99 286 34.6 8 8.1 NORTH SHORE SR H 287 584 49.1 56 19.5 GEORGE I SANCHE GEORGE I SANCHEZ 20 62 32.3 . . < 5 HIGH GIRLS & BOYS PR GIRLS & BOYS PREP 14 39 35.9 . . < 5 HIGH GOOSE CREEK CIS 373 883 42.2 85 22.8 LEE H S 134 363 36.9 29 21.6 STERLING H S 238 471 50.5 56 23.5 GULF SHORES ACA GULF SHORES ACADE . 67 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED HEIGHTS CHARTER HEIGHTS CHARTER S . 10 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED HOUSTON CAN ACA HOUSTON CAN! ACAD . 94 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED HOUSTON ISD 4,179 7,086 59.0 908 21.7 AUSTIN H S 136 373 36.5 5 3.7 BARBARA JORDAN H 126 193 65.3 . . < 5 HIGH BELLAIRE H S 549 615 89.3 305 55.6 CONTEMPORARY LRN 15 105 14.3 . . < 5 HIGH DAVIS H S 139 265 52.5 . . < 5 HIGH DEBAKEY H S FOR H 121 114 100 85 70.2 FURR H S 87 189 46.0 . . < 5 HIGH JONES H S 135 169 79.9 19 14.1 KASHMERE H S 76 114 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH LAMAR H S 438 532 82.3 203 46.3 LAW ENFCMT-CRIM J 144 189 76.2 20 13.9 LEE H S 188 408 46.1 35 18.6 MADISON H S 176 281 62.6 . . < 5 HIGH MIDDLE COLLEGE FO 6 11 54.5 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH MILBY H S 223 540 41.3 23 10.3 PERFOR & VIS ARTS 124 129 96.1 65 52.4 REAGAN H S 120 341 35.2 9 7.5 SAM HOUSTON H S 157 432 36.3 . . < 5 HIGH SCARBOROUGH H S 88 133 66.2 6 6.8 SHARPSTOWN H S 162 249 65.1 19 11.7 STERLING H S 113 227 49.8 . . < 5 HIGH WALTRIP H S 138 221 62.4 25 18.1 WASHINGTON B T H 145 221 65.6 27 18.6 WESTBURY H S 245 359 68.2 37 15.1 WHEATLEY H S 35 91 38.5 . . < 5 HIGH WORTHING H S 161 263 61.2 . . < 5 HIGH YATES H S 125 240 52.1 . . < 5 HIGH HUFFMAN ISD 71 133 53.4 15 21.1 HARGRAVE H S 71 132 53.8 15 21.1 HUMBLE ISD 1,145 1,428 80.2 482 42.1 HUMBLE H S 399 583 68.4 109 27.3 KINGWOOD H S 716 796 89.9 365 51.0 QUEST H S 30 49 61.2 8 26.7 JESSE JACKSON A JESSE JACKSON ACA . 7 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 94: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

86

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HARRIS KATY ISD 1,405 1,716 81.9 646 46.0 KATY H S 424 554 76.5 165 38.9 MAYDE CREEK H S 326 470 69.4 140 42.9 TAYLOR H S 655 692 94.7 341 52.1 KLEIN ISD 1,537 1,912 80.4 629 40.9 KLEIN FOREST H S 419 598 70.1 111 26.5 KLEIN H S 680 747 91.0 337 49.6 KLEIN OAK H S 438 566 77.4 181 41.3 LA PORTE ISD 177 381 46.5 47 26.6 LA PORTE HIGH SCH 177 352 50.3 47 26.6 NORTH FOREST IS 207 566 36.6 . . < 5 HIGH FOREST BROOK H S 92 301 30.6 . . < 5 HIGH SMILEY H S 115 264 43.6 . . < 5 HIGH NORTH HOUSTON H NORTH HOUSTON H S . 8 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED PASADENA ISD 758 1,900 39.9 183 24.1 DOBIE H S 251 493 50.9 63 25.1 PASADENA H S 117 409 28.6 30 25.6 RAYBURN H S 210 471 44.6 60 28.6 SOUTH HOUSTON H S 180 496 36.3 30 16.7 PREPARED TABLE PREPARED TABLE . 23 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED SHELDON ISD C E KING H S 73 162 45.1 8 11.0 SOUTHWEST HIGH SOUTHWEST HIGH SC 17 67 25.4 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH SPRING BRANCH I 1,146 1,634 70.1 572 49.9 MEMORIAL H S 426 439 97.0 271 63.6 NORTHBROOK H S 134 315 42.5 20 14.9 SPRING WOODS H S 182 354 51.4 52 28.6 STRATFORD H S 404 431 93.7 229 56.7 SPRING ISD 671 1,078 62.2 230 34.3 SPRING H S 262 457 57.3 90 34.4 WESTFIELD H S 409 618 66.2 140 34.2 TOMBALL ISD TOMBALL H S 303 401 75.6 90 29.7 WEST HOUSTON CH . 7 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED HARRISON ELYSIAN FIELDS ELYSIAN FIELDS H 61 68 89.7 12 19.7 HALLSVILLE ISD HALLSVILLE H S 150 227 66.1 39 26.0 HARLETON ISD HARLETON H S 26 36 72.2 . . < 5 HIGH KARNACK ISD KARNACK H S 13 14 92.9 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH MARSHALL ISD 207 324 63.9 43 20.8 MARSHALL H S 207 315 65.7 43 20.8 WASKOM ISD WASKOM H S 23 34 67.6 . . < 5 HIGH HARTLEY CHANNING ISD CHANNING SCHOOL 5 7 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH HARTLEY ISD HARTLEY SCHOOL 13 12 100 . . < 5 HIGH HASKELL HASKELL CISD HASKELL H S 29 47 61.7 8 27.6 PAINT CREEK ISD PAINT CREEK SCHOO 8 16 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH ROCHESTER ISD ROCHESTER SCHOOL 16 15 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH RULE ISD RULE SCHOOL 11 16 68.8 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH HAYS DRIPPING SPRING DRIPPING SPRINGS 136 140 97.1 61 44.9 HAYS CONS ISD JACK C HAYS H S 221 367 60.2 73 33.0 KATHERINE ANNE KATHERINE ANNE PO . 11 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED SAN MARCOS CONS 183 364 50.3 41 22.4 SAN MARCOS H S 182 340 53.5 41 22.5 WIMBERLEY ISD WIMBERLEY H S 83 109 76.1 28 33.7 HEMPHILL CANADIAN ISD CANADIAN H S 42 40 100 9 21.4 ACT ONLY HENDERSON ATHENS ISD 74 186 39.8 24 32.4 ATHENS H S 74 181 40.9 24 32.4 BROWNSBORO ISD 44 113 38.9 8 18.2 BROWNSBORO H S 44 108 40.7 8 18.2 CROSS ROADS ISD 11 37 29.7 . . < 5 HIGH CROSS ROADS H S 11 34 32.4 . . < 5 HIGH EUSTACE ISD EUSTACE H S 19 75 25.3 . . < 5 HIGH LAPOYNOR ISD 19 30 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH LAPOYNOR H S 19 27 70.4 . . < 5 HIGH MALAKOFF ISD MALAKOFF H S 36 64 56.3 . . < 5 HIGH TRINIDAD ISD TRINIDAD SCHOOL 6 16 37.5 . . < 5 HIGH HIDALGO DONNA ISD DONNA H S 216 398 54.3 13 6.0 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (PH . 10 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED EDCOUCH-ELSA IS EDCOUCH-ELSA H S 182 271 67.2 5 2.7 EDINBURG CISD 654 904 72.3 54 8.3 EDINBURG H S 340 481 70.7 22 6.5 EDINBURG NORTH H 314 423 74.2 32 10.2

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 95: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

87

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HIDALGO HIDALGO ISD HIDALGO H S 75 139 54.0 . . < 5 HIGH LA JOYA ISD 297 630 47.1 21 7.1 LA JOYA H S 297 599 49.6 21 7.1 LA VILLA ISD LA VILLA H S 18 43 41.9 . . < 5 HIGH MCALLEN ISD 768 1,208 63.6 131 17.1 LAMAR ACADEMY 32 89 36.0 . . <30 MASKED MCALLEN H S 201 311 64.6 . . <30 MASKED MCALLEN MEMORIAL 277 401 69.1 67 24.2 ROWE H S 258 382 67.5 37 14.3 MERCEDES ISD 111 233 47.6 8 7.2 MERCEDES H S 111 210 52.9 8 7.2 MID-VALLEY ACAD MID-VALLEY ACADEM . 27 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED MISSION CONS IS 323 590 54.7 31 9.6 MISSION H S 323 584 55.3 31 9.6 ONE STOP MULTIS ONE STOP MULTISER . 38 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED PHARR-SAN JUAN- 567 1,014 55.9 33 5.8 PSJA CENTRAL H S 18 23 78.3 . . ACT ONLY <10 MASKED PSJA H S 199 294 67.7 16 8.0 PSJA MEMORIAL H S 175 321 54.5 . . <10 MASKED PSJA NORTH H S 163 355 45.9 . . <10 MASKED TEENAGE PARENT PR 12 21 57.1 . . <10 MASKED PROGRESO ISD 36 85 42.4 . . < 5 HIGH PROGRESO H S 36 82 43.9 . . < 5 HIGH SENTRY TECHNOLO SENTRY TECHNOLOGY . 99 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED SHARYLAND ISD SHARYLAND H S 207 272 76.1 31 15.0 TECHNOLOGY EDUC TECHNOLOGY EDUCAT . 24 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW H S 70 83 84.3 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH WESLACO ISD 312 590 52.9 31 9.9 SOUTH PALM GARDEN 6 57 10.5 . . <40 MASKED WESLACO H S 306 533 57.4 . . <40 MASKED HILL ABBOTT ISD ABBOTT SCHOOL 19 20 95.0 5 26.3 AQUILLA ISD AQUILLA SCHOOL . 4 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED BLUM ISD BLUM H S 9 19 47.4 . . < 5 HIGH BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL 13 16 81.3 . . < 5 HIGH COVINGTON ISD COVINGTON SCHOOL 5 16 31.3 . . < 5 HIGH HILLSBORO ISD HILLSBORO H S 26 71 36.6 5 19.2 HUBBARD ISD HUBBARD H S 17 27 63.0 8 47.1 ITASCA ISD ITASCA H S 5 19 26.3 . . < 5 HIGH PENELOPE ISD . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED WHITNEY ISD WHITNEY H S 31 66 47.0 6 19.4 HOCKLEY ANTON ISD 10 23 43.5 . . < 5 HIGH ANTON H S 10 21 47.6 . . < 5 HIGH LEVELLAND ISD LEVELLAND H S 90 187 48.1 17 18.9 ROPES ISD 12 41 29.3 . . < 5 HIGH ROPES SCHOOL 12 29 41.4 . . < 5 HIGH SMYER ISD SMYER H S 18 16 100 . . < 5 HIGH SUNDOWN ISD 20 38 52.6 . . < 5 HIGH SUNDOWN H S 20 35 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH WHITHARRAL ISD . 12 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED HOOD GRANBURY ISD 223 333 67.0 54 24.2 GRANBURY H S 222 313 70.9 54 24.3 LIPAN ISD LIPAN H S 8 21 38.1 . . < 5 HIGH TOLAR ISD TOLAR H S 24 38 63.2 . . < 5 HIGH HOPKINS COMO-PICKTON CI 15 29 51.7 . . < 5 HIGH COMO-PICKTON SCHO 15 26 57.7 . . < 5 HIGH CUMBY ISD CUMBY H S 11 19 57.9 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH MILLER GROVE IS MILLER GROVE SCHO 8 21 38.1 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH NORTH HOPKINS I NORTH HOPKINS H S 14 21 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH SALTILLO ISD SALTILLO SCHOOL 10 19 52.6 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SULPHUR BLUFF I SULPHUR BLUFF SCH 10 19 52.6 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SULPHUR SPRINGS SULPHUR SPRINGS H 132 201 65.7 37 28.0 HOUSTON CROCKETT ISD CROCKETT H S 43 85 50.6 6 14.0 GRAPELAND ISD GRAPELAND H S 26 50 52.0 . . < 5 HIGH KENNARD ISD KENNARD H S 7 13 53.8 . . < 5 HIGH LATEXO ISD LATEXO H S 16 28 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH LOVELADY ISD LOVELADY H S 21 29 72.4 . . < 5 HIGH HOWARD BIG SPRING ISD BIG SPRING H S 73 220 33.2 22 30.1 COAHOMA ISD COAHOMA H S 41 62 66.1 9 22.0 FORSAN ISD FORSAN H S 26 44 59.1 6 23.1

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 96: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

88

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HUDSPETH DELL CITY ISD DELL CITY SCHOOL 11 12 91.7 . . < 5 HIGH FT HANCOCK ISD FORT HANCOCK SCHO 5 22 22.7 . . < 5 HIGH SIERRA BLANCA I . 6 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED HUNT BLAND ISD BLAND H S 9 19 47.4 . . < 5 HIGH BOLES ISD 20 27 74.1 . . < 5 HIGH BOLES ISD HIGH SC 20 25 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH CADDO MILLS ISD CADDO MILLS H S 25 36 69.4 5 20.0 CAMPBELL ISD CAMPBELL H S 9 16 56.3 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH CELESTE ISD CELESTE H S 22 29 75.9 6 27.3 COMMERCE ISD COMMERCE H S 81 102 79.4 18 22.2 GREENVILLE ISD 147 230 63.9 40 27.2 GREENVILLE H S 144 224 64.3 39 27.1 LONE OAK ISD LONE OAK H S 20 28 71.4 5 25.0 QUINLAN ISD FORD H S 45 110 40.9 10 22.2 WOLFE CITY ISD WOLFE CITY H S 8 20 40.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH HUTCHINSON BORGER ISD 120 206 58.3 37 30.8 BORGER H S 120 204 58.8 37 30.8 PLEMONS-STINNET 36 53 67.9 7 19.4 WEST TEXAS H S 36 52 69.2 7 19.4 SANFORD ISD 50 73 68.5 11 22.0 SANFORD-FRITCH H 50 71 70.4 11 22.0 IRION IRION CO ISD 17 25 68.0 7 41.2 IRION H S 17 24 70.8 7 41.2 JACK BRYSON ISD BRYSON SCHOOL 13 20 65.0 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSBORO ISD 28 53 52.8 7 25.0 JACKSBORO H S 28 51 54.9 7 25.0 PERRIN-WHITT CO PERRIN H S 10 17 58.8 . . < 5 HIGH JACKSON EDNA ISD 65 78 83.3 15 23.1 EDNA H S 65 74 87.8 15 23.1 GANADO ISD GANADO H S 24 41 58.5 5 20.8 INDUSTRIAL ISD INDUSTRIAL H S 43 70 61.4 14 32.6 JASPER BROOKELAND ISD BROOKELAND H S 10 17 58.8 . . < 5 HIGH BUNA ISD BUNA H S 57 84 67.9 7 12.3 EVADALE ISD EVADALE H S 22 31 71.0 . . < 5 HIGH JASPER ISD JASPER H S 120 178 67.4 24 20.0 KIRBYVILLE CISD KIRBYVILLE H S 58 96 60.4 7 12.1 JEFF DAVIS FT DAVIS ISD FT DAVIS H S 16 23 69.6 . . < 5 HIGH VALENTINE ISD . 4 . . . < 5 TESTED JEFFERSON BEAUMONT ISD 483 1,002 48.2 110 22.8 CENTRAL SENIOR H 144 314 45.9 8 5.6 OZEN H S 48 243 19.8 6 12.5 ACT ONLY WEST BROOK SR H S 291 408 71.3 96 33.0 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (BE . 8 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED HAMSHIRE-FANNET HAMSHIRE-FANNETT 92 130 70.8 14 15.2 NEDERLAND ISD NEDERLAND H S 222 300 74.0 54 24.3 PORT ARTHUR ISD 192 470 40.9 16 8.3 AUSTIN H S 28 68 41.2 . . <20 MASKED JEFFERSON H S 82 236 34.7 . . <20 MASKED LINCOLN H S 82 166 49.4 . . <20 MASKED PORT NECHES-GRO PORT NECHES-GROVE 234 373 62.7 63 26.9 SABINE PASS ISD SABINE PASS SCHOO 11 11 100 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH JIM HOGG JIM HOGG COUNTY HEBBRONVILLE H S 37 62 59.7 . . < 5 HIGH JIM WELLS ALICE ISD ALICE H S 218 312 69.9 23 10.6 BEN BOLT-PALITO BEN BOLT-PAL BLAN 32 42 76.2 . . < 5 HIGH ORANGE GROVE IS ORANGE GROVE H S 54 76 71.1 10 18.5 PREMONT ISD PREMONT H S 33 50 66.0 . . < 5 HIGH JOHNSON ALVARADO ISD ALVARADO H S 137 166 82.5 21 15.3 BURLESON ISD 208 335 62.1 65 31.3 BURLESON H S 208 322 64.6 65 31.3 CLEBURNE ISD 167 310 53.9 50 29.9 CLEBURNE H S 166 284 58.5 50 30.1 GODLEY ISD GODLEY H S 34 61 55.7 8 23.5 GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW H S 31 55 56.4 11 35.5 JOSHUA ISD 108 222 48.6 21 19.4 JOSHUA H S 107 205 52.2 20 18.7 KEENE ISD 19 33 57.6 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH KEENE H S 19 31 61.3 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH RIO VISTA ISD RIO VISTA H S 30 42 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH VENUS ISD VENUS H S 25 46 54.3 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 97: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

89

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

JONES ANSON ISD ANSON H S 24 41 58.5 5 20.8 HAMLIN ISD HAMLIN H S 20 30 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH HAWLEY ISD HAWLEY H S 29 39 74.4 9 31.0 ACT ONLY LUEDERS-AVOCA I LUEDERS-AVOCA H S 5 9 55.6 . . < 5 HIGH STAMFORD ISD 26 43 60.5 6 23.1 STAMFORD JR-SR H 26 38 68.4 6 23.1 KARNES FALLS CITY ISD FALLS CITY H S 19 21 90.5 . . < 5 HIGH KARNES CITY ISD KARNES CITY H S 39 60 65.0 12 30.8 KENEDY ISD 32 68 47.1 6 18.8 KENEDY HIGH SCHO 32 60 53.3 6 18.8 RUNGE ISD RUNGE H S 9 12 75.0 . . < 5 HIGH KAUFMAN CRANDALL ISD 51 102 50.0 16 31.4 CRANDALL H S 51 85 60.0 16 31.4 FORNEY ISD FORNEY H S 99 133 74.4 24 24.2 KAUFMAN ISD KAUFMAN H S 80 152 52.6 14 17.5 KEMP ISD KEMP HIGH SCHOOL 32 73 43.8 5 15.6 MABANK ISD MABANK H S 58 140 41.4 9 15.5 SCURRY-ROSSER I SCURRY-ROSSER H S 18 43 41.9 . . < 5 HIGH TERRELL ISD TERRELL H S 87 178 48.9 14 16.1 KENDALL BOERNE ISD BOERNE H S 255 300 85.0 81 31.8 COMFORT ISD COMFORT H S 28 45 62.2 5 17.9 KENT JAYTON-GIRARD I JAYTON SCHOOLS 10 14 71.4 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH KERR CENTER POINT IS CENTER POINT H S 20 26 76.9 . . < 5 HIGH INGRAM ISD INGRAM-TOM MOORE 58 88 65.9 13 22.4 KERRVILLE ISD 180 257 70.0 71 39.4 TIVY H S 177 239 74.1 71 40.1 KIMBLE JUNCTION ISD JUNCTION H S 26 37 70.3 5 19.2 KING GUTHRIE CSD GUTHRIE SCHOOL 6 4 . . . < 5 HIGH KINNEY BRACKETT ISD 26 44 59.1 6 23.1 BRACKETT H S 26 40 65.0 6 23.1 KLEBERG KINGSVILLE ISD 190 306 62.1 25 13.2 H M KING HIGH SCH 185 277 66.8 . . <30 MASKED K E Y S ACADEMY 5 25 20.0 . . ACT ONLY <30 MASKED RIVIERA ISD KAUFER H S 40 48 83.3 10 25.0 SANTA GERTRUDIS ACADEMY H S 26 34 76.5 . . < 5 HIGH KNOX BENJAMIN ISD BENJAMIN SCHOOL 6 7 85.7 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH GOREE ISD GOREE SCHOOL 7 7 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH KNOX CITY-O’BRI KNOX CITY H S 7 18 38.9 . . < 5 HIGH MUNDAY ISD MUNDAY H S 30 33 90.9 . . < 5 HIGH LA SALLE COTULLA ISD 38 60 63.3 . . < 5 HIGH COTULLA H S 38 57 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH LAMAR CHISUM ISD CHISUM H S 43 50 86.0 . . < 5 HIGH NORTH LAMAR ISD NORTH LAMAR H S 74 173 42.8 20 27.0 PARIS ISD 83 159 52.2 25 30.1 PARIS H S 83 153 54.2 25 30.1 PRAIRILAND ISD PRAIRILAND H S 19 61 31.1 . . < 5 HIGH ROXTON ISD ROXTON H S 5 15 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH LAMB AMHERST ISD AMHERST SCHOOL 6 9 66.7 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH LITTLEFIELD ISD LITTLEFIELD H S 57 92 62.0 7 12.3 OLTON ISD 21 39 53.8 6 28.6 OLTON H S 21 36 58.3 6 28.6 SPADE ISD . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED SPRINGLAKE-EART SPRINGLAKE-EARTH 19 27 70.4 5 26.3 SUDAN ISD 22 21 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SUDAN H S 22 19 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH LAMPASAS CEDAR RIDGE CHA . 3 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED LAMPASAS ISD 111 187 59.4 34 30.6 LAMPASAS H S 111 176 63.1 34 30.6 LOMETA ISD LOMETA SCHOOL 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH LAVACA HALLETTSVILLE I HALLETTSVILLE H S 49 91 53.8 10 20.4 MOULTON ISD MOULTON H S 26 28 92.9 7 26.9 SHINER ISD SHINER H S 28 31 90.3 7 25.0 LEE DIME BOX ISD DIME BOX SCHOOL 5 . . . . NO GRADS/TEA GIDDINGS ISD 74 143 51.7 11 14.9 GIDDINGS H S 74 138 53.6 11 14.9 LEXINGTON ISD LEXINGTON H S 37 62 59.7 12 32.4 LEON BUFFALO ISD BUFFALO H S 22 47 46.8 . . < 5 HIGH CENTERVILLE ISD CENTERVILLE JR-SR 42 56 75.0 . . < 5 HIGH LEON ISD LEON H S 17 42 40.5 6 35.3

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 98: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

90

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

LEON NORMANGEE ISD NORMANGEE H S 21 31 67.7 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH OAKWOOD ISD OAKWOOD H S 7 16 43.8 . . < 5 HIGH LIBERTY CLEVELAND ISD CLEVELAND H S 51 120 42.5 12 23.5 DAYTON ISD 183 218 83.9 27 14.8 DAYTON H S 183 212 86.3 27 14.8 HARDIN ISD HARDIN H S 36 68 52.9 . . < 5 HIGH HULL-DAISETTA I 13 29 44.8 . . < 5 HIGH HULL-DAISETTA H S 13 28 46.4 . . < 5 HIGH LIBERTY ISD 63 131 48.1 17 27.0 LIBERTY H S 63 130 48.5 17 27.0 TARKINGTON ISD TARKINGTON H S 42 81 51.9 5 11.9 LIMESTONE COOLIDGE ISD COOLIDGE H S 6 11 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH GROESBECK ISD 53 90 58.9 7 13.2 GROESBECK H S 53 83 63.9 7 13.2 MEXIA ISD 62 96 64.6 11 17.7 MEXIA H S 62 95 65.3 11 17.7 LIPSCOMB BOOKER ISD BOOKER JH/H S 16 18 88.9 5 31.3 FOLLETT ISD FOLLETT SCHOOL 13 17 76.5 5 38.5 ACT ONLY HIGGINS ISD HIGGINS SCHOOL 10 10 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH LIVE OAK GEORGE WEST ISD GEORGE WEST H S 43 71 60.6 10 23.3 THREE RIVERS IS THREE RIVERS H S 21 49 42.9 7 33.3 LLANO LLANO ISD LLANO H S 56 72 77.8 14 25.0 LUBBOCK EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (LU . 3 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED FRENSHIP ISD 132 261 50.6 31 23.5 FRENSHIP H S 132 217 60.8 31 23.5 IDALOU ISD IDALOU H S 37 53 69.8 9 24.3 LUBBOCK ISD 913 1,648 55.4 326 35.7 CORONADO H S 303 490 61.8 96 31.7 ESTACADO H S 64 194 33.0 8 12.5 LUBBOCK H S 294 498 59.0 144 49.0 MONTEREY H S 252 403 62.5 78 31.0 LUBBOCK-COOPER COOPER H S 56 103 54.4 12 21.4 LUBBOCK-RICHARD LUBBOCK-RICHARD M . 28 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED NEW DEAL ISD NEW DEAL H S 30 45 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH ROOSEVELT ISD ROOSEVELT H S 24 57 42.1 . . < 5 HIGH SHALLOWATER ISD SHALLOWATER H S 41 70 58.6 10 24.4 SLATON ISD SLATON H S 36 67 53.7 . . < 5 HIGH SOUTH PLAINS SOUTH PLAINS . 27 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED TEXAS TECH UNIV TEXAS TECH H S 20 . . 15 75.0 SAT ONLY NO GRADS/TEA LYNN NEW HOME ISD . 9 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED O’DONNELL ISD O’DONNELL H S 11 29 37.9 . . < 5 HIGH TAHOKA ISD TAHOKA H S 43 42 100 7 16.3 WILSON ISD WILSON SCHOOL 10 14 71.4 . . < 5 HIGH MADISON MADISONVILLE CO MADISONVILLE HIGH 59 85 69.4 9 15.3 NORTH ZULCH ISD NORTH ZULCH H S 12 22 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH MARION JEFFERSON ISD JEFFERSON H S 37 70 52.9 8 21.6 MARTIN GRADY ISD GRADY SCHOOL 8 14 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH STANTON ISD STANTON H S 30 46 65.2 . . < 5 HIGH MASON MASON ISD MASON H S 33 40 82.5 6 18.2 MATAGORDA BAY CITY ISD BAY CITY H S 139 228 61.0 34 24.5 PALACIOS ISD PALACIOS H S 57 92 62.0 10 17.5 TIDEHAVEN ISD TIDEHAVEN H S 31 55 56.4 . . < 5 HIGH VAN VLECK ISD VAN VLECK H S 33 63 52.4 . . < 5 HIGH MAVERICK EAGLE PASS ISD 298 559 53.3 21 7.0 EAGLE PASS H S 298 . . 21 7.0 NO GRADS/TEA MCCULLOCH BRADY ISD BRADY H S 43 68 63.2 10 23.3 LOHN ISD LOHN SCHOOL 5 10 50.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH ROCHELLE ISD ROCHELLE SCHOOL 12 12 100 . . < 5 HIGH MCLENNAN AXTELL ISD 19 49 38.8 5 26.3 AXTELL H S 19 43 44.2 5 26.3 BOSQUEVILLE ISD BOSQUEVILLE SCHOO 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH BRUCEVILLE-EDDY 31 60 51.7 5 16.1 BRUCEVILLE-EDDY H 31 58 53.4 5 16.1 CHINA SPRING IS 81 116 69.8 14 17.3 CHINA SPRING H S 81 114 71.1 14 17.3 CONNALLY ISD 62 130 47.7 21 33.9 CONNALLY H S 62 125 49.6 21 33.9 CRAWFORD ISD CRAWFORD H S 31 40 77.5 17 54.8 LA VEGA ISD 36 81 44.4 5 13.9

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 99: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

91

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

MCLENNAN LA VEGA ISD LA VEGA H S 36 80 45.0 5 13.9 LORENA ISD 56 88 63.6 19 33.9 LORENA H S 56 87 64.4 19 33.9 MART ISD 28 56 50.0 6 21.4 MART H S 28 53 52.8 6 21.4 MCGREGOR ISD MCGREGOR H S 30 56 53.6 6 20.0 MIDWAY ISD 234 347 67.4 98 41.9 MIDWAY H S 234 344 68.0 98 41.9 MOODY ISD MOODY H S 15 32 46.9 . . < 5 HIGH RIESEL ISD RIESEL SCHOOL 17 29 58.6 5 29.4 ROBINSON ISD ROBINSON H S 73 116 62.9 11 15.1 WACO ISD 199 482 41.3 28 14.1 UNIVERSITY H S 35 161 21.7 . . <30 MASKED WACO H S 164 311 52.7 . . <30 MASKED WEST ISD 76 152 50.0 16 21.1 WEST H S 76 146 52.1 16 21.1 MCMULLEN MCMULLEN COUNTY MCMULLEN COUNTY 5 10 50.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH MEDINA D’HANIS ISD D’HANIS SCHOOL 14 18 77.8 . . < 5 HIGH DEVINE ISD DEVINE HIGH SCHOO 54 105 51.4 10 18.5 HONDO ISD HONDO H S 49 87 56.3 18 36.7 MEDINA VALLEY I 111 195 56.9 27 24.3 MEDINA VALLEY H S 111 179 62.0 27 24.3 NATALIA ISD NATALIA H S 13 37 35.1 . . < 5 HIGH MENARD MENARD ISD MENARD H S 21 26 80.8 5 23.8 MIDLAND EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (MI . 5 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED GREENWOOD ISD GREENWOOD H S 109 106 100 17 15.6 MIDLAND ISD 667 1,242 53.7 235 35.2 LEE H S 356 639 55.7 127 35.7 MIDLAND H S 310 535 57.9 108 34.8 MIDLAND-RICHARD MIDLAND-RICHARD M . 1 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED MILAM BUCKHOLTS ISD . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED CAMERON ISD YOE H S 41 85 48.2 10 24.4 MILANO ISD MILANO H S 16 22 72.7 6 37.5 ROCKDALE ISD ROCKDALE H S 62 93 66.7 14 22.6 THORNDALE ISD THORNDALE H S 27 35 77.1 6 22.2 MILLS GOLDTHWAITE ISD GOLDTHWAITE HIGH 23 33 69.7 5 21.7 MULLIN ISD . 6 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED PRIDDY ISD . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED STAR ISD . 4 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED MITCHELL COLORADO ISD COLORADO H S 45 66 68.2 5 11.1 LORAINE ISD . 13 . . . < 5 TESTED WESTBROOK ISD WESTBROOK SCHOOL 7 15 46.7 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH MONTAGUE BOWIE ISD BOWIE H S 48 84 57.1 12 25.0 FORESTBURG ISD . 10 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED GOLD BURG ISD . 7 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED NOCONA ISD NOCONA H S 34 49 69.4 . . < 5 HIGH PRAIRIE VALLEY . 5 . . . < 5 TESTED SAINT JO ISD SAINT JO H S 8 20 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH MONTGOMERY CONROE ISD 1,258 1,682 74.8 533 42.4 CANEY CREEK H S 114 207 55.1 28 24.6 CONROE H S 227 342 66.4 64 28.2 OAK RIDGE H S 193 285 67.7 79 40.9 THE WOODLANDS H S 723 813 88.9 362 50.1 MAGNOLIA ISD MAGNOLIA H S 147 263 55.9 41 27.9 MONTGOMERY ISD MONTGOMERY H S 136 196 69.4 35 25.7 NEW CANEY ISD NEW CANEY H S 101 219 46.1 20 19.8 SPLENDORA ISD SPLENDORA H S 38 99 38.4 . . < 5 HIGH WILLIS ISD WILLIS H S 140 223 62.8 32 22.9 MOORE DUMAS ISD 87 190 45.8 22 25.3 DUMAS H S 87 181 48.1 22 25.3 SUNRAY ISD 19 30 63.3 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SUNRAY H S 19 29 65.5 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH MORRIS DAINGERFIELD-LO DAINGERFIELD H S 51 94 54.3 9 17.6 PEWITT ISD PEWITT H S 37 46 80.4 8 21.6 MOTLEY MOTLEY COUNTY I MOTLEY COUNTY SCH 16 16 100 . . < 5 HIGH NACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGHTS CENTRAL HEIGHTS H 14 34 41.2 5 35.7 CHIRENO ISD CHIRENO H S 8 22 36.4 . . < 5 HIGH CUSHING ISD CUSHING SCHOOL 20 26 76.9 5 25.0 DOUGLASS ISD DOUGLASS SCHOOL 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 100: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

92

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

NACOGDOCHES GARRISON ISD GARRISON H S 29 34 85.3 5 17.2 MARTINSVILLE IS MARTINSVILLE SCHO 10 11 90.9 . . < 5 HIGH NACOGDOCHES ISD 200 380 52.6 69 34.5 NACOGDOCHES H S 200 373 53.6 69 34.5 WODEN ISD WODEN H S 32 40 80.0 7 21.9 NAVARRO BLOOMING GROVE BLOOMING GROVE H 32 36 88.9 8 25.0 CORSICANA ISD 110 252 43.7 29 26.4 CORSICANA H IGH S 110 239 46.0 29 26.4 DAWSON ISD DAWSON H S 23 31 74.2 . . < 5 HIGH FROST ISD FROST H S 13 17 76.5 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH KERENS ISD KERENS SCHOOL 23 37 62.2 . . < 5 HIGH MILDRED ISD MILDRED H S 18 32 56.3 . . < 5 HIGH RICE ISD RICE H S 15 29 51.7 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH NEWTON BURKEVILLE ISD BURKEVILLE JR-SR 8 26 30.8 . . < 5 HIGH DEWEYVILLE ISD DEWEYVILLE H S 23 40 57.5 . . < 5 HIGH NEWTON ISD NEWTON H S 40 77 51.9 8 20.0 NOLAN BLACKWELL CONS BLACKWELL SCHOOL 11 14 78.6 . . < 5 HIGH HIGHLAND ISD . 9 . . . < 5 TESTED ROSCOE ISD ROSCOE H S 22 29 75.9 5 22.7 SWEETWATER ISD 83 143 58.0 26 31.3 SWEETWATER H S 83 135 61.5 26 31.3 NUECES ACADEMY OF TRAN . 7 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED AGUA DULCE ISD AGUA DULCE H S 24 35 68.6 6 25.0 BANQUETE ISD BANQUETE H S 42 39 100 6 14.3 BISHOP CONS ISD BISHOP H S 49 67 73.1 9 18.4 CALALLEN ISD CALALLEN H S 281 343 81.9 73 26.0 COASTAL BEND YO COASTAL BEND YOUT . 1 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED CORPUS CHRISTI 1,128 1,923 58.7 271 24.0 CARROLL H S 319 460 69.3 90 28.2 KING H S 245 344 71.2 78 31.8 MILLER HIGH SCHOO 128 280 45.7 6 4.7 MOODY H S 169 337 50.1 19 11.2 RAY H S 266 426 62.4 78 29.3 CORPUS CHRISTI- CORPUS CHRISTI-RI . 8 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED FLOUR BLUFF ISD 157 235 66.8 50 31.8 FLOUR BLUFF H S 157 223 70.4 50 31.8 PORT ARANSAS IS PORT ARANSAS H S 30 41 73.2 13 43.3 ROBSTOWN ISD 139 203 68.5 . . < 5 HIGH ALTER LRN CTR 6 13 46.2 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH ROBSTOWN H S 133 190 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH TULOSO-MIDWAY I 121 211 57.3 35 28.9 TULOSO-MIDWAY H S 121 196 61.7 35 28.9 WEST OSO ISD WEST OSO H S 35 67 52.2 . . < 5 HIGH OCHILTREE PERRYTON ISD PERRYTON H S 73 100 73.0 20 27.4 OLDHAM ADRIAN ISD . 10 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED BOYS RANCH ISD BOYS RANCH H S 31 30 100 . . < 5 HIGH VEGA ISD VEGA H S 19 23 82.6 7 36.8 ORANGE BRIDGE CITY ISD BRIDGE CITY H S 123 168 73.2 21 17.1 LITTLE CYPRESS- LIT CYPR-MRCEVILL 160 244 65.6 37 23.1 ORANGEFIELD ISD ORANGEFIELD H S 74 91 81.3 16 21.6 VIDOR ISD 161 265 60.8 20 12.4 VIDOR H S 159 250 63.6 20 12.6 WEST ORANGE-COV 96 186 51.6 18 18.8 WEST ORANGE-STARK 96 177 54.2 18 18.8 PALO PINTO GORDON ISD GORDON SCHOOL 18 19 94.7 . . < 5 HIGH GRAFORD ISD GRAFORD H S 14 23 60.9 . . < 5 HIGH MINERAL WELLS I 72 164 43.9 10 13.9 MINERAL WELL H S 72 161 44.7 10 13.9 SANTO ISD SANTO HIGH SCHOOL 12 18 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH STRAWN ISD STRAWN SCHOOL 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH PANOLA BECKVILLE ISD BECKVILLE JR-SR H 21 34 61.8 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH CARTHAGE ISD CARTHAGE H S 106 187 56.7 27 25.5 GARY ISD GARY SCHOOL 9 18 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH PARKER ALEDO ISD ALEDO H S 131 186 70.4 56 42.7 BROCK ISD BROCK H S 16 31 51.6 . . < 5 HIGH MILLSAP ISD MILLSAP H S 23 31 74.2 . . < 5 HIGH PEASTER ISD PEASTER H S 34 50 68.0 12 35.3 POOLVILLE ISD POOLVILLE H S 7 14 50.0 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH SPRINGTOWN ISD 55 164 33.5 12 21.8

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 101: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

93

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

PARKER SPRINGTOWN ISD SPRINGTOWN H S 52 146 35.6 11 21.2 WEATHERFORD ISD WEATHERFORD H S 163 285 57.2 58 35.6 PARMER BOVINA ISD BOVINA H S 16 16 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH FARWELL ISD FARWELL H S 29 37 78.4 7 24.1 FRIONA ISD FRIONA H S 57 70 81.4 9 15.8 LAZBUDDIE ISD LAZBUDDIE SCHOOL 17 16 100 . . < 5 HIGH PECOS BUENA VISTA ISD BUENA VISTA SCHOO 7 13 53.8 . . < 5 HIGH FT STOCKTON ISD 57 171 33.3 16 28.1 FORT STOCKTON H S 57 164 34.8 16 28.1 IRAAN-SHEFFIELD 23 34 67.6 7 30.4 IRAAN H S 23 32 71.9 7 30.4 POLK BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY SCHOOL 20 33 60.6 . . < 5 HIGH CORRIGAN-CAMDEN CORRIGAN-CAMDEN H 50 73 68.5 . . < 5 HIGH GOODRICH ISD GOODRICH H S 5 13 38.5 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH LEGGETT ISD . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED LIVINGSTON ISD LIVINGSTON H S 113 178 63.5 27 23.9 POTTER AMARILLO ISD 691 1,420 48.7 250 36.2 AMARILLO H S 331 478 69.2 162 48.9 CAPROCK H S 78 251 31.1 13 16.7 PALO DURO H S 97 299 32.4 14 14.4 TASCOSA H S 185 362 51.1 61 33.0 HIGHLAND PARK I HIGHLAND PARK H S 33 47 70.2 . . < 5 HIGH RIVER ROAD ISD RIVER ROAD HIGH S 54 90 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH PRESIDIO MARFA ISD MARFA H S 20 33 60.6 . . < 5 HIGH PRESIDIO ISD PRESIDIO H S 40 59 67.8 . . < 5 HIGH RAINS RAINS ISD 55 80 68.8 12 21.8 RAINS H S 55 77 71.4 12 21.8 RANDALL CANYON ISD 276 418 66.0 107 38.8 CANYON H S 144 177 81.4 51 35.4 RANDALL H S 132 241 54.8 56 42.4 REAGAN REAGAN COUNTY I REAGAN COUNTY H S 48 68 70.6 9 18.8 REAL LEAKEY ISD LEAKEY SCHOOL 19 20 95.0 . . < 5 HIGH RED RIVER AVERY ISD AVERY H S 9 18 50.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH CLARKSVILLE ISD CLARKSVILLE H S 31 58 53.4 . . < 5 HIGH DETROIT ISD DETROIT H S 13 28 46.4 . . < 5 HIGH RIVERCREST ISD RIVERCREST H S 38 49 77.6 7 18.4 REEVES BALMORHEA ISD . 12 . . . < 5 TESTED PECOS-BARSTOW-T PECOS H S 64 151 42.4 5 7.8 REFUGIO AUSTWELL-TIVOLI AUSTWELL-TIVOLI H 11 12 91.7 . . < 5 HIGH REFUGIO ISD REFUGIO HIGH SCHO 38 58 65.5 7 18.4 WOODSBORO ISD WOODSBORO H S 39 44 88.6 . . < 5 HIGH ROBERTS MIAMI ISD MIAMI SCHOOL 13 15 86.7 . . < 5 HIGH ROBERTSON BREMOND ISD BREMOND H S 25 26 96.2 . . < 5 HIGH CALVERT ISD CALVERT H S 5 17 29.4 . . < 5 HIGH FRANKLIN ISD FRANKLIN H S 46 58 79.3 10 21.7 HEARNE ISD HEARNE H S 26 59 44.1 . . < 5 HIGH ROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISD 259 374 69.3 94 36.3 ROCKWALL H S 259 361 71.7 94 36.3 ROYSE CITY ISD ROYSE CITY H S 57 81 70.4 13 22.8 RUNNELS BALLINGER ISD 49 65 75.4 18 36.7 BALLINGER H S 49 62 79.0 18 36.7 MILES ISD 9 14 64.3 . . < 5 HIGH MILES H S 9 13 69.2 . . < 5 HIGH WINTERS ISD 22 43 51.2 7 31.8 WINTERS H S 22 32 68.8 7 31.8 RUSK CARLISLE ISD CARLISLE SCHOOL 12 23 52.2 . . < 5 HIGH HENDERSON ISD HENDERSON H S 139 212 65.6 30 21.6 LANEVILLE ISD . 8 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED LEVERETTS CHAPE . 8 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED MOUNT ENTERPRIS MT ENTERPRISE H S 15 25 60.0 6 40.0 OVERTON ISD OVERTON H S 13 23 56.5 . . < 5 HIGH TATUM ISD TATUM H S 43 76 56.6 8 18.6 WEST RUSK ISD WEST RUSK H S 22 34 64.7 9 40.9 SABINE HEMPHILL ISD HEMPHILL H S 32 50 64.0 5 15.6 WEST SABINE ISD WEST SABINE H S 23 30 76.7 . . < 5 HIGH SAN AUGUSTINE BROADDUS ISD BROADDUS H S 15 19 78.9 . . < 5 HIGH SAN AUGUSTINE I 34 76 44.7 5 14.7 SAN AUGUSTINE H S 34 73 46.6 5 14.7 SAN JACINTO COLDSPRING-OAKH COLDSPRING-OAKHUR 36 69 52.2 6 16.7

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 102: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

94

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

SAN JACINTO SHEPHERD ISD SHEPHERD H S 37 81 45.7 . . < 5 HIGH SAN PATRICIO ARANSAS PASS IS ARANSAS PASS HIGH 49 79 62.0 5 10.2 GREGORY-PORTLAN GREGORY-PORTLAND 197 237 83.1 65 33.0 INGLESIDE ISD INGLESIDE H S 43 103 41.7 11 25.6 MATHIS ISD MATHIS H S 66 102 64.7 8 12.1 ODEM-EDROY ISD ODEM H S 46 73 63.0 6 13.0 SINTON ISD SINTON H S 62 99 62.6 13 21.0 TAFT ISD TAFT H S 41 70 58.6 . . < 5 HIGH SAN SABA CHEROKEE ISD CHEROKEE H S 5 8 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH RICHLAND SPRING RICHLAND SPRINGS 9 11 81.8 . . < 5 HIGH SAN SABA ISD SAN SABA H S 23 41 56.1 9 39.1 SCHLEICHER SCHLEICHER ISD ELDORADO H S 37 40 92.5 8 21.6 SCURRY HERMLEIGH ISD . 14 . . . < 5 TESTED IRA ISD IRA SCHOOL 12 12 100 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SNYDER ISD 118 197 59.9 35 29.7 SNYDER H S 118 193 61.1 35 29.7 SHACKELFORD ALBANY ISD ALBANY JR-SR H S 27 27 100 7 25.9 MORAN ISD MORAN SCHOOL 8 4 . . . < 5 HIGH SHELBY CENTER ISD CENTER H S 82 102 80.4 23 28.0 JOAQUIN ISD JOAQUIN H S 14 23 60.9 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH SHELBYVILLE ISD SHELBYVILLE SCHOO 14 36 38.9 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH TENAHA ISD TENAHA H S 5 17 29.4 . . < 5 HIGH TIMPSON ISD TIMPSON H S 18 27 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH SHERMAN STRATFORD ISD STRATFORD H S 37 43 86.0 13 35.1 TEXHOMA ISD TEXHOMA EL . 13 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED SMITH ARP ISD ARP H S 27 49 55.1 6 22.2 BULLARD ISD 35 69 50.7 10 28.6 BULLARD H S 35 54 64.8 10 28.6 CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 79 151 52.3 14 17.7 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (TY . 8 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED LINDALE ISD LINDALE H S 85 172 49.4 30 35.3 TROUP ISD TROUP H S 10 33 30.3 . . < 5 HIGH TYLER ISD 463 763 60.7 146 31.5 JOHN TYLER H S 149 294 50.7 27 18.1 LEE H S 314 431 72.9 119 37.9 WHITEHOUSE ISD WHITEHOUSE H S 129 236 54.7 49 38.0 WINONA ISD WINONA H S 28 41 68.3 6 21.4 SOMERVELL GLEN ROSE ISD 48 81 59.3 18 37.5 GLEN ROSE H S 48 77 62.3 18 37.5 STARR RIO GRANDE CITY 244 341 71.6 14 5.7 RIO GRANDE CITY H 244 333 73.3 14 5.7 ROMA ISD 149 276 54.0 8 5.4 ROMA H S 149 275 54.2 8 5.4 SAN ISIDRO ISD SAN ISIDRO H S 18 21 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH STEPHENS BRECKENRIDGE IS 57 100 57.0 10 17.5 BRECKENRIDGE H S 57 96 59.4 10 17.5 STERLING STERLING CITY I STERLING CITY H S 20 22 90.9 5 25.0 STONEWALL ASPERMONT ISD ASPERMONT H S 21 26 80.8 5 23.8 SUTTON SONORA ISD SONORA H S 43 60 71.7 11 25.6 SWISHER HAPPY ISD HAPPY H S 10 15 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH KRESS ISD KRESS H S 9 24 37.5 . . < 5 HIGH TULIA ISD TULIA H S 36 75 48.0 . . < 5 HIGH TARRANT ARLINGTON ISD 1,676 2,593 64.6 622 37.1 ARLINGTON H S 352 475 74.1 139 39.5 BOWIE H S 304 472 64.4 101 33.2 LAMAR H S 315 435 72.4 128 40.6 MARTIN H S 500 713 70.1 220 44.0 SAM HOUSTON H S 197 419 47.0 . . <40 MASKED VENTURE ALTER H S 8 77 10.4 . . <40 MASKED AZLE ISD AZLE H S 145 262 55.3 33 22.8 BIRDVILLE ISD 566 1,033 54.8 182 32.2 HALTOM H S 235 471 49.9 70 29.8 RICHLAND H S 331 508 65.2 112 33.8 CARROLL ISD CARROLL H S 343 351 97.7 171 49.9 CASTLEBERRY ISD 81 168 48.2 12 14.8 CASTLEBERRY H S 81 151 53.6 12 14.8 CROWLEY ISD 328 456 71.9 96 29.3 CROWLEY H S 197 272 72.4 68 34.5 NORTH CROWLEY H S 131 184 71.2 28 21.4

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 103: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

95

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TARRANT EAGLE MT-SAGINA 178 349 51.0 41 23.0 BOSWELL H S 178 322 55.3 41 23.0 ERATH EXCELS AC ERATH EXCELS ACAD . 16 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED EVERMAN ISD EVERMAN H S 82 105 78.1 10 12.2 FORT WORTH ISD 1,596 3,049 52.3 367 23.0 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS 182 252 72.2 51 28.0 CARTER-RIVERSIDE 55 119 46.2 . . <10 MASKED CTR FOR NEW LIVES 7 40 17.5 . . SAT ONLY <10 MASKED DIAMOND HILL-JARV 36 132 27.3 . . <10 MASKED DUNBAR H S 113 211 53.6 40 35.4 EASTERN HILLS H S 110 239 46.0 10 9.1 NORTH SIDE H S 110 249 44.2 14 12.7 O D WYATT H S 106 249 42.6 . . <10 MASKED PASCHAL H S 299 518 57.7 123 41.1 POLYTECHNIC H S 82 142 57.7 . . <10 MASKED SOUTHWEST H S 235 334 70.4 76 32.3 TRIMBLE TECHNICAL 85 238 35.7 . . <10 MASKED WESTERN HILLS H S 176 271 64.9 29 16.5 GRAPEVINE-COLLE 649 792 81.9 271 41.8 COLLEYVILLE HERIT 347 397 87.4 151 43.5 GRAPEVINE H S 302 375 80.5 120 39.7 HURST-EULESS-BE 709 1,196 59.3 239 33.7 BELL H S 334 556 60.1 118 35.3 TRINITY H S 375 588 63.8 121 32.3 KELLER ISD 558 816 68.4 199 35.7 FOSSIL RIDGE H S 257 412 62.4 72 28.0 KELLER H S 299 400 74.8 125 41.8 KENNEDALE ISD KENNEDALE H S 68 121 56.2 14 20.6 LAKE WORTH ISD 27 83 32.5 . . < 5 HIGH LAKE WORTH H S 27 79 34.2 . . < 5 HIGH MANSFIELD ISD 387 681 56.8 147 38.0 MANSFIELD H S 387 643 60.2 147 38.0 MASONIC HOME IS MASONIC HOME HIGH 7 7 100 . . < 5 HIGH THERESA B LEE A THERESA B LEE ACA . 35 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED TREETOPS SCHOOL TREETOPS SCHOOL I . . . . . SAT ONLY NO GRADS/TEA WHITE SETTLEMEN 105 212 49.5 26 24.8 BREWER H S 105 210 50.0 26 24.8 TAYLOR ABILENE ISD 565 911 62.0 146 25.8 ABILENE H S 300 482 62.2 89 29.7 COOPER H S 265 385 68.8 57 21.5 EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (AB . 6 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED JIM NED CONS IS JIM NED H S 49 63 77.8 9 18.4 MERKEL ISD MERKEL H S 39 68 57.4 11 28.2 TRENT ISD TRENT SCHOOL 6 10 60.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH WYLIE ISD WYLIE H S 134 168 79.8 39 29.1 TERRELL TERRELL COUNTY SANDERSON H S 9 11 81.8 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH TERRY BROWNFIELD ISD BROWNFIELD H S 63 124 50.8 15 23.8 MEADOW ISD MEADOW SCHOOL 10 20 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH WELLMAN-UNION C WELLMAN-UNION SCH 6 10 60.0 . . < 5 HIGH THROCKMORTON THROCKMORTON IS THROCKMORTON H S 14 17 82.4 . . < 5 HIGH WOODSON ISD . 6 . . . < 5 TESTED TITUS CHAPEL HILL ISD CHAPEL HILL H S 13 34 38.2 . . < 5 HIGH MOUNT PLEASANT 92 199 46.2 13 14.1 MT PLEASANT H S 92 191 48.2 13 14.1 TOM GREEN CHRISTOVAL ISD CHRISTOVAL H S 17 23 73.9 . . < 5 HIGH GRAPE CREEK ISD 32 55 58.2 6 18.8 GRAPE CREEK H S 32 54 59.3 6 18.8 SAN ANGELO ISD 534 873 61.2 164 30.7 CENTRAL H S 428 659 64.9 144 33.6 LAKE VIEW H S 103 195 52.8 20 19.4 VERIBEST ISD VERIBEST H S 14 16 87.5 . . < 5 HIGH WALL ISD 40 55 72.7 14 35.0 WALL H S 40 53 75.5 14 35.0 WATER VALLEY IS 16 27 59.3 . . < 5 HIGH WATER VALLEY H S 16 25 64.0 . . < 5 HIGH TRAVIS AMERICAN YOUTH . 26 . . . SAT ONLY < 5 TESTED AUSTIN ISD 1,963 3,146 62.4 808 41.2 ANDERSON H S 297 340 87.4 159 53.5 AUSTIN H S 280 349 80.2 165 58.9

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 104: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

96

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TRAVIS AUSTIN ISD BOWIE H S 468 597 78.4 193 41.2 CROCKETT H S 177 343 51.6 34 19.2 GONZALO GARZA IND 7 94 7.4 . . SAT ONLY <20 MASKED JOHNSON H S 177 228 77.6 94 53.1 JOHNSTON H S 77 195 39.5 40 51.9 LANIER H S 115 281 40.9 . . <20 MASKED MCCALLUM H S 189 293 64.5 92 48.7 REAGAN H S 68 175 38.9 . . <20 MASKED TRAVIS H S 108 248 43.5 . . <20 MASKED DEL VALLE ISD 78 261 29.9 15 19.2 DEL VALLE H S 78 224 34.8 15 19.2 EANES ISD WESTLAKE H S 473 488 96.9 320 67.7 LAGO VISTA ISD LAGO VISTA H S 28 44 63.6 12 42.9 LAKE TRAVIS ISD LAKE TRAVIS H S 170 196 86.7 71 41.8 MANOR ISD 55 86 64.0 11 20.0 MANOR H S 55 81 67.9 11 20.0 PFLUGERVILLE IS 482 630 76.5 134 27.8 JOHN B CONNALLY H 234 281 83.3 70 29.9 PFLUGERVILLE H S 248 331 74.9 64 25.8 TEXAS SCH FOR T TEXAS SCHOOL FOR . . . . . SAT ONLY NO GRADS/TEA UNIVERSITY CHAR HILL COUNTRY . 2 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED TRINITY APPLE SPRINGS I APPLE SPRINGS H S 10 10 100 . . < 5 HIGH CENTERVILLE ISD . 11 . . . ACT ONLY < 5 TESTED GROVETON ISD GROVETON J H-H S 22 40 55.0 . . < 5 HIGH TRINITY ISD TRINITY H S 32 56 57.1 . . < 5 HIGH TYLER CHESTER ISD CHESTER H S 6 11 54.5 . . < 5 HIGH COLMESNEIL ISD COLMESNEIL H S 24 36 66.7 . . < 5 HIGH SPURGER ISD SPURGER H S 15 28 53.6 . . < 5 HIGH WARREN ISD WARREN H S 45 72 62.5 . . < 5 HIGH WOODVILLE ISD WOODVILLE H S 50 66 75.8 10 20.0 UPSHUR BIG SANDY ISD BIG SANDY H S 23 38 60.5 7 30.4 GILMER ISD GILMER H S 61 124 49.2 16 26.2 HARMONY ISD HARMONY H S 41 57 71.9 11 26.8 NEW DIANA ISD NEW DIANA H S 46 68 67.6 9 19.6 ORE CITY ISD ORE CITY HIGH SCH 31 47 66.0 6 19.4 UNION GROVE ISD UNION GROVE H S 19 41 46.3 . . < 5 HIGH UNION HILL ISD UNION HILL H S 15 17 88.2 . . < 5 HIGH UPTON MCCAMEY ISD MCCAMEY H S 26 47 55.3 6 23.1 RANKIN ISD RANKIN H S 19 21 90.5 8 42.1 UVALDE GABRIEL TAFOLLA GABRIEL TAFOLLA C . 1 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED KNIPPA ISD KNIPPA SCHOOL 12 15 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH SABINAL ISD SABINAL H S 12 30 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH UTOPIA ISD UTOPIA SCHOOL 12 11 100 . . < 5 HIGH UVALDE CONS ISD 112 257 43.6 25 22.3 UVALDE H S 112 240 46.7 25 22.3 VAL VERDE COMSTOCK ISD COMSTOCK SCHOOL 9 11 81.8 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (DE . 1 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED SAN FELIPE-DEL DEL RIO H S 256 486 52.7 41 16.0 VAN ZANDT CANTON ISD CANTON H S 57 94 60.6 14 24.6 EDGEWOOD ISD EDGEWOOD H S 23 55 41.8 8 34.8 FRUITVALE ISD FRUITVALE H S 6 12 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH GRAND SALINE IS GRAND SALINE H S 35 51 68.6 5 14.3 MARTINS MILL IS MARTINS MILL H S 16 18 88.9 6 37.5 VAN ISD VAN H S 50 98 51.0 16 32.0 WILLS POINT ISD WILLS POINT H S 72 147 49.0 16 22.2 VICTORIA BLOOMINGTON ISD BLOOMINGTON H S 19 46 41.3 . . < 5 HIGH VICTORIA ISD 354 839 42.2 91 25.7 STROMAN H S 90 316 28.5 13 14.4 VICTORIA H S 264 492 53.7 78 29.5 WALKER HUNTSVILLE ISD 214 359 59.6 53 24.8 HUNTSVILLE H S 214 346 61.8 53 24.8 NEW WAVERLY ISD NEW WAVERLY H S 29 44 65.9 . . < 5 HIGH WALLER HEMPSTEAD ISD HEMPSTEAD H S 30 46 65.2 7 23.3 ROYAL ISD ROYAL H S 40 57 70.2 9 22.5 WALLER ISD WALLER H S 99 182 54.4 13 13.1 WARD GRANDFALLS-ROYA GRANDFALLS-ROYALT 8 13 61.5 . . < 5 HIGH MONAHANS-WICKET 90 126 71.4 17 18.9 MONAHANS H S 90 118 76.3 17 18.9 WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD 144 265 54.3 41 28.5

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 105: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

97

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

WASHINGTON BRENHAM ISD BRENHAM HIGH SCHO 144 259 55.6 41 28.5 BURTON ISD BURTON H S 7 14 50.0 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH WEBB EAGLE PROJECT ( EAGLE PROJECT (LA . 8 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED GATEWAY (STUDEN GATEWAY (STUDENT . 25 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED LAREDO ISD 299 1,003 29.8 15 5.0 DR LEO CIGARROA H 66 254 26.0 . . <10 MASKED MARTIN H S 119 381 31.2 . . <10 MASKED NIXON H S 114 368 31.0 . . <10 MASKED UNITED ISD 614 1,115 55.1 59 9.6 JOHN B ALEXANDER 282 411 68.6 49 17.4 UNITED H S 152 278 54.7 . . <10 MASKED UNITED SOUTH H S 180 426 42.3 . . <10 MASKED WEBB CONS ISD BRUNI H S 11 17 64.7 . . < 5 HIGH WHARTON BOLING ISD BOLING H S 38 61 62.3 7 18.4 EAST BERNARD IS EAST BERNARD H S 52 62 83.9 16 30.8 EL CAMPO ISD EL CAMPO H S 115 208 55.3 19 16.5 LOUISE ISD LOUISE H S 14 35 40.0 . . < 5 HIGH WHARTON ISD WHARTON H S 77 132 58.3 16 20.8 WHEELER ALLISON ISD ALLISON SCHOOL 7 7 100 . . < 5 HIGH FORT ELLIOTT CO FORT ELLIOTT SCHO 8 8 100 . . < 5 HIGH SHAMROCK ISD SHAMROCK H S 28 31 90.3 5 17.9 ACT ONLY WHEELER ISD WHEELER SCHOOL 26 27 96.3 5 19.2 WICHITA BRIGHT IDEAS CH BRIGHT IDEAS CHAR . 5 . . . NEITHER NONE TESTED BURKBURNETT ISD 136 201 67.7 41 30.1 BURKBURNETT H S 136 191 71.2 41 30.1 ELECTRA ISD ELECTRA H S 29 55 52.7 8 27.6 IOWA PARK CONS IOWA PARK H S 74 135 54.8 22 29.7 WICHITA FALLS I 529 832 63.6 165 31.2 HIRSCHI HS 88 179 49.2 18 20.5 RIDER H S 285 369 77.2 104 36.5 WICHITA FALLS H S 155 253 61.3 43 27.7 WILBARGER HARROLD ISD . 11 . . . < 5 TESTED NORTHSIDE ISD NORTHSIDE SCHOOL 7 10 70.0 . . ACT ONLY < 5 HIGH VERNON ISD VERNON H S 86 137 62.8 19 22.1 WILLACY LYFORD CISD LYFORD H S 63 100 63.0 . . < 5 HIGH RAYMONDVILLE IS RAYMONDVILLE H S 66 126 52.4 . . < 5 HIGH SAN PERLITA ISD SAN PERLITA H S 24 30 80.0 . . < 5 HIGH WILLIAMSON FLORENCE ISD FLORENCE H S 43 53 81.1 12 27.9 GEORGETOWN ISD 332 418 79.4 124 37.3 CHIP RICHARTE H S 5 17 29.4 . . <130 MASKED GEORGETOWN H S 327 401 81.5 . . <130 MASKED GRANGER ISD GRANGER SCHOOL 14 20 70.0 . . < 5 HIGH HUTTO ISD HUTTO H S 45 66 68.2 11 24.4 JARRELL ISD JARRELL H S 18 34 52.9 . . < 5 HIGH LEANDER ISD 371 552 67.2 138 37.2 LEANDER H S 371 551 67.3 138 37.2 LIBERTY HILL IS LIBERTY HILL H S 45 70 64.3 8 17.8 ROUND ROCK ISD 1,292 1,597 80.9 606 46.9 MCNEIL H S 357 428 83.4 153 42.9 ROUND ROCK H S 489 630 77.6 185 37.8 WESTWOOD H S 446 492 90.7 268 60.1 TAYLOR ISD TAYLOR H S 82 149 55.0 17 20.7 THRALL ISD THRALL H S 26 35 74.3 . . < 5 HIGH WILSON FLORESVILLE ISD FLORESVILLE H S 101 152 66.4 22 21.8 LA VERNIA ISD LA VERNIA HIGH SC 76 97 78.4 19 25.0 POTH ISD POTH H S 28 48 58.3 6 21.4 STOCKDALE ISD STOCKDALE H S 26 52 50.0 . . < 5 HIGH WINKLER KERMIT ISD KERMIT H S 33 73 45.2 11 33.3 WINK-LOVING ISD WINK H S 22 30 73.3 . . < 5 HIGH WISE ALVORD ISD ALVORD H S 16 24 66.7 7 43.8 BOYD ISD BOYD H S 48 72 66.7 7 14.6 BRIDGEPORT ISD 66 127 52.0 19 28.8 BRIDGEPORT H S 66 120 55.0 19 28.8 CHICO ISD CHICO HIGH SCHOOL 30 35 85.7 . . < 5 HIGH DECATUR ISD 78 156 50.0 22 28.2 DECATUR H S 78 144 54.2 22 28.2 PARADISE ISD 30 48 62.5 5 16.7 PARADISE H S 30 42 71.4 5 16.7 SLIDELL ISD SLIDELL H S 6 18 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 106: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

98

TABLE B-3 1999-00 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TESTING AEIS RESULTS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS

# OF PCT OF # OF PCT OF COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS # OF GRADS GRADS EXAMNEES EXAMNEES NAME NAME NAME XNEES —TEA TESTED >=CRITRN >=CRITRN TEST NOTE ****NOTE**** ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

WOOD ALBA-GOLDEN ISD 12 36 33.3 . . < 5 HIGH ALBA-GOLDEN H S 12 32 37.5 . . < 5 HIGH HAWKINS ISD 22 50 44.0 7 31.8 HAWKINS H S 22 47 46.8 7 31.8 MINEOLA ISD MINEOLA H S 26 64 40.6 . . < 5 HIGH QUITMAN ISD 38 84 45.2 12 31.6 QUITMAN H S 38 81 46.9 12 31.6 WINNSBORO ISD WINNSBORO H S 49 79 62.0 9 18.4 YANTIS ISD YANTIS SCHOOL 8 18 44.4 . . < 5 HIGH YOAKUM DENVER CITY ISD DENVER CITY H S 47 101 46.5 8 17.0 PLAINS ISD PLAINS H S 29 38 76.3 8 27.6 YOUNG GRAHAM ISD 76 140 54.3 14 18.4 GRAHAM H S 76 135 56.3 14 18.4 NEWCASTLE ISD NEWCASTLE H S 9 20 45.0 . . < 5 HIGH OLNEY ISD OLNEY H S 39 46 84.8 11 28.2 ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY I ZAPATA H S 49 148 33.1 . . < 5 HIGH ZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY IS CRYSTAL CITY H S 52 85 61.2 . . < 5 HIGH LA PRYOR ISD LA PRYOR H S 22 42 52.4 . . SAT ONLY < 5 HIGH

NOTE: ONLY CAMPUSES WITH 5 OR MORE GRADUATES OR TEST TAKERS ARE LISTED UNDER DISTRICTS. SOME CAMPUS DATA ARE MASKED (SEE PAGE 29).

Page 107: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

99

TABLE B-4 1999-00 SAT I AND ACT MEAN SCORES, PERCENTAGES TESTED, AND COMBINED PERCENTAGES SCORING AT OR ABOVE AEIS CRITERION BY DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS

PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PCT GRADS PCT EXAMINEES NBR MEAN SAT SAT-TESTED MEAN ACT ACT-TESTED SAT- &/OR AT OR OVER DIST CATEGORY TOTAL GRADUATES COMPOSITE GRADUATES ACT-TESTED CRITERION

ENROLLMENT GROUPINGS

11 50,000 AND OVER 962 58.2 19.8 20.8 61.9 26.0 24 25,000 TO 49,999 1011 61.4 21.4 28.8 68.1 33.4 47 10,000 TO 24,999 993 46.7 19.6 28.7 58.0 26.0 66 5,000 TO 9,999 1016 51.9 20.7 31.8 63.5 30.6 85 3,000 TO 4,999 979 45.0 20.0 35.2 61.1 24.2 130 1,600 TO 2,999 970 39.5 20.0 36.5 58.3 22.1 119 1,000 TO 1,599 975 32.6 19.8 46.7 62.1 20.6 220 500 TO 999 971 31.1 20.0 46.7 61.7 21.2 333 UNDER 500 942 22.2 19.8 44.4 55.1 18.2

DISTRICT TYPE

10 MAJOR URBAN 935 59.2 19.6 19.1 62.5 22.4 62 MAJOR SUBURBAN 1024 61.4 21.1 29.1 68.0 34.5 38 OTHER CENTRAL CITY 1013 45.6 20.2 30.8 57.8 29.4 93 OTHER CC SUBURBAN 978 44.9 19.8 32.7 60.0 23.7 75 INDEPENDENT TOWN 982 41.5 20.1 33.5 57.6 23.8 77 NON-METRO FAST GROWING 990 51.9 20.6 38.9 66.8 26.4 268 NON-METRO STABLE 968 34.5 19.8 42.5 60.3 20.4 350 RURAL 961 28.1 19.8 52.6 65.9 19.4 62 CHARTERS 880 6.8 18.4 1.8 7.4 13.4

WEALTH (MEDIAN=$147,206)

98 UNDER $74,944 872 27.9 17.8 33.4 49.9 9.2 102 $74,944 TO $93,423 898 49.6 19.3 30.3 65.4 14.6 102 $93,424 TO $109,253 945 37.7 19.7 39.7 59.5 18.7 99 $109,254 TO $127,327 927 41.9 19.6 38.8 59.9 19.5 101 $127,328 TO $147,205 958 44.3 19.5 27.3 55.9 20.7 98 $147,206 TO $168,080 993 47.5 20.3 29.2 59.1 27.4 98 $168,081 TO $197,906 1015 54.6 20.9 30.5 64.6 31.2 95 $197,907 TO $260,873 1011 58.3 20.9 29.9 67.5 31.8 93 $260,874 TO $407,769 1015 57.5 21.1 29.2 65.5 33.4 81 OVER $407,769 1076 64.6 22.0 33.7 74.6 43.2 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

WEALTH (ST AVG=$200,250)

703 UNDER $200,250 962 44.7 19.7 31.6 59.3 22.2 264 OVER $200,250 1023 59.2 21.2 29.9 67.8 34.4 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

WEALTH BY EQUAL PUPILS PER GROUP

38 UNDER $55,908 849 27.9 17.2 36.4 50.9 6.6 85 $55,908 TO < $80,372 918 30.0 18.7 31.9 51.2 13.9 73 $80,372 TO < $92,405 888 53.4 19.3 28.3 67.5 13.9 118 $92,405 TO < $110,939 904 41.1 19.2 38.3 59.5 16.1 89 $110,939 TO < $127,437 975 38.8 20.2 35.2 56.4 23.3 22 $127,437 TO < $130,896 937 45.9 19.2 22.2 53.8 18.2 66 $130,896 TO < $145,500 974 45.0 19.8 32.2 60.5 22.7 46 $145,500 TO < $154,504 988 39.7 20.0 33.3 55.7 24.7 50 $154,504 TO < $165,403 1005 52.9 20.5 31.5 64.2 29.2 39 $165,403 TO < $174,843 1001 55.3 20.6 25.7 63.7 30.0 31 $174,843 TO < $184,118 1026 55.2 21.0 32.1 65.1 33.0 53 $184,118 TO < $203,766 995 49.8 20.7 32.0 61.8 27.5 24 $203,766 TO < $215,907 1043 64.8 21.6 36.9 73.9 37.4 51 $215,907 TO < $249,888 1027 53.1 20.8 30.8 65.1 32.1 4 $249,888 TO < $253,135 956 59.3 19.8 19.6 63.4 25.3 33 $253,135 TO < $285,488 1050 62.1 21.6 38.7 74.1 37.2 14 $285,488 TO < $295,269 948 52.8 19.8 19.8 57.0 24.4 49 $295,269 TO < $402,617 1041 57.6 21.3 30.1 66.3 36.8 65 $402,617 TO < $825,089 1077 64.7 22.1 31.7 73.1 43.7 17 $825,089 AND OVER 942 36.7 20.4 53.6 72.5 22.0 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

TOTAL TAX EFFORT (ST AVG=$1.5107)

225 UNDER $1.3555 963 35.6 20.0 35.8 56.1 20.7 247 $1.3555 TO UNDER $1.4505 937 46.8 19.8 28.5 60.4 20.5 242 $1.4505 TO UNDER $1.5229 967 44.5 19.8 28.7 57.3 23.2 253 $1.5229 AND OVER 1017 56.5 20.6 32.2 66.7 31.9 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

M&O EFF. TAX EFFORT (ST AVG=$1.3579)

229 UNDER $1.2839 967 45.7 19.9 28.9 58.4 23.3 251 $1.2839 TO $1.3661 1012 51.8 20.7 33.5 64.8 30.0 248 $1.3662 TO $1.4400 997 55.5 20.7 29.1 64.8 29.8 239 $1.4401 AND OVER 956 41.8 19.2 33.4 58.8 21.0 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

1,038 STATE TOTAL 990 50.0 20.3 30.8 62.2 27.3

Page 108: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

100

TABLE B-4 1999-00 SAT I AND ACT MEAN SCORES, PERCENTAGES TESTED, AND COMBINED PERCENTAGES SCORING AT OR ABOVE AEIS CRITERION BY DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS

PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PCT GRADS PCT EXAMINEES NBR MEAN SAT SAT-TESTED MEAN ACT ACT-TESTED SAT- &/OR AT OR OVER DIST CATEGORY TOTAL GRADUATES COMPOSITE GRADUATES ACT-TESTED CRITERION

HIGHEST PROPERTY VALUE CATEGORY

364 RESIDENTIAL 999 54.3 20.5 30.2 64.6 29.1 309 LAND 964 31.6 19.8 45.3 61.3 19.2 86 OIL AND GAS 954 26.3 20.0 46.8 59.0 20.8 208 BUSINESS 958 44.0 19.6 28.9 56.9 22.8 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

SMALL/SPARSE ADJSTMNT (ST AVG=25.2%)

212 NO SMALL/SPARSE ADJUSTMENT 994 54.7 20.4 26.7 62.4 29.3 222 UNDER 9.0% 973 42.1 20.0 35.9 59.8 22.6 219 9.0% TO UNDER 27.3% 972 33.6 19.8 46.2 62.5 20.6 213 27.3% TO UNDER 35.9% 961 30.8 19.9 50.6 65.6 19.4 169 35.9% AND OVER 962 24.0 20.1 58.9 68.8 21.5

CEI LEVEL (MEDIAN=1.06)

103 UNDER 1.04 954 15.6 20.0 28.3 35.4 20.5 231 1.04 TO UNDER 1.06 984 30.0 20.2 48.8 62.3 21.6 246 1.06 TO UNDER 1.08 987 38.3 20.3 41.6 61.8 24.7 246 1.08 TO 1.11 1006 48.1 20.4 34.0 62.5 28.4 209 1.11 AND OVER 986 54.0 20.2 27.4 62.6 27.6

OPERATING COST/PUPIL (ST AVG=$5,668)

185 UNDER $5,280 1002 49.4 20.6 27.4 59.6 28.7 224 $5,280 TO $5,733 986 52.7 20.4 29.4 62.8 27.3 224 $5,734 TO $6,287 967 47.1 19.6 31.2 61.1 23.7 207 $6,288 TO $7,253 1026 50.7 20.6 39.0 67.8 32.2 195 OVER $7,253 988 32.5 20.2 52.5 66.3 23.5

ESC REGION

44 I EDINBURG 915 27.7 17.7 38.3 51.9 10.8 38 II CORPUS CHRISTI 972 39.8 19.1 43.3 62.8 20.6 33 III VICTORIA 983 40.2 19.9 31.7 56.1 22.6 67 IV HOUSTON 1001 58.6 20.7 23.8 64.1 31.1 31 V BEAUMONT 945 53.0 19.9 15.9 58.8 18.8 53 VI HUNTSVILLE 1004 57.0 20.9 24.4 63.1 29.8 95 VII KILGORE 995 34.5 20.1 36.8 55.9 25.5 42 VIII MT PLEASANT 990 19.9 19.8 57.3 63.7 20.5 39 IX WICHITA FALLS 1009 39.4 20.6 43.9 63.2 26.3 82 X RICHARDSON 1012 55.3 21.0 31.0 64.4 33.1 72 XI FORT WORTH 1015 55.4 21.2 29.3 63.3 31.8 75 XII WACO 984 42.7 20.4 35.6 58.4 24.8 56 XIII AUSTIN 1039 61.0 21.2 28.9 67.6 36.3 44 XIV ABILENE 991 35.3 20.5 49.0 65.4 23.7 43 XV SAN ANGELO 976 39.1 20.4 45.1 64.1 24.6 57 XVI AMARILLO 1049 23.3 20.6 50.5 60.1 28.1 62 XVII LUBBOCK 1006 32.4 20.4 41.4 56.1 26.3 34 XVIII MIDLAND 993 35.5 20.7 25.2 48.1 25.9 13 XIX EL PASO 869 66.0 19.7 16.0 69.6 12.0 55 XX SAN ANTONIO 946 55.9 19.5 30.5 64.0 22.5

TAAS: PCT PASSING ALL TESTS TAKEN

3 NO STUDENTS TESTED 925 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 165 UNDER 71.4% 915 44.1 18.3 21.3 52.0 17.7 218 71.4% TO UNDER 80.3% 969 43.7 19.5 30.3 57.3 22.6 220 80.3% TO UNDER 84.8% 981 50.0 20.2 29.9 62.2 25.7 224 84.8% TO UNDER 89.4% 1025 55.6 21.0 33.9 68.2 32.2 205 89.4% AND OVER 1058 61.1 21.7 42.9 76.4 38.3

SAT/ACT: PCT TAKING

360 0% TO UNDER 55% 937 37.2 19.1 24.3 48.7 18.4 361 55% TO UNDER 70% 973 50.0 20.0 30.7 62.3 24.9 268 70% AND OVER 1045 65.9 21.4 39.3 78.7 36.8 46 NO GRADUATES 833 12.1 19.7 9.2 18.6 11.4

SAT/ACT: PCT AT OR ABOVE CRITERION

83 NONE MET CRITERION 862 27.2 18.0 34.9 51.3 9.2 105 UNDER 10% 843 38.5 17.5 31.9 57.4 7.8 286 10% TO UNDER 20% 928 41.9 19.2 28.6 55.6 17.0 377 20% TO UNDER 35% 989 48.0 20.4 30.0 60.0 26.8 124 35% AND OVER 1065 68.3 22.0 34.3 76.1 41.8 60 NO TEST TAKERS 863 4.0 18.6 1.8 5.6 8.8

1,038 STATE TOTAL 990 50.0 20.3 30.8 62.2 27.3

Page 109: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

101

TABLE B-4 1999-00 SAT I AND ACT MEAN SCORES, PERCENTAGES TESTED, AND COMBINED PERCENTAGES SCORING AT OR ABOVE AEIS CRITERION BY DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS

PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PCT GRADS PCT EXAMINEES NBR MEAN SAT SAT-TESTED MEAN ACT ACT-TESTED SAT- &/OR AT OR OVER DIST CATEGORY TOTAL GRADUATES COMPOSITE GRADUATES ACT-TESTED CRITERION

DENSITY (ST AVG=14.62 PUPILS/SQ MI)

445 FEWER THAN 5 965 29.3 19.8 50.1 63.8 19.8 287 5 TO FEWER THAN 20 970 38.3 19.9 37.2 58.7 21.6 129 20 TO FEWER THAN 100 1001 46.1 20.2 31.0 58.5 27.2 106 100 AND OVER 991 57.6 20.5 26.6 64.5 29.5 68 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1010 25.0 21.5 16.7 29.0 33.7

PUPIL CHG:98/99-99/00 (ST AVG=1.19%)

542 DECLINING PUPILS 953 43.7 19.8 29.2 57.2 22.1 237 0% TO UNDER 3% 1002 52.9 20.4 30.3 63.5 29.6 151 3% TO UNDER 6% 1022 56.8 20.5 35.3 69.9 31.3 65 6% TO UNDER 10% 1016 58.2 21.3 33.9 67.9 32.0 40 10% AND OVER 1028 50.8 20.8 31.0 63.4 31.4

PCT AFRICAN AM PUPILS (ST AVG=14.4%)

601 UNDER 5% 965 44.5 19.8 35.0 62.0 22.1 140 5% TO UNDER 10% 1037 57.0 21.4 33.1 67.0 35.3 138 10% TO UNDER 20% 997 50.1 20.2 27.9 59.8 28.9 77 20% TO UNDER 30% 1023 55.0 20.7 31.8 66.4 32.4 48 30% TO UNDER 50% 926 50.2 19.1 21.0 56.5 19.8 31 50% AND OVER 913 37.2 18.9 23.2 49.4 18.3

PCT HISPANIC PUPILS (ST AVG=39.6%)

167 UNDER 5% 1015 45.0 20.8 40.3 66.7 28.7 158 5% TO UNDER 10% 1038 55.0 21.3 34.1 68.0 34.5 207 10% TO UNDER 20% 1030 58.5 21.2 34.8 69.3 34.2 125 20% TO UNDER 30% 1008 52.3 20.6 29.3 62.5 29.8 166 30% TO UNDER 50% 998 48.4 20.3 27.6 58.9 28.6 212 50% AND OVER 908 42.9 18.6 27.8 56.1 15.5

PCT MINORITY PUPILS (ST AVG=56.9%)

35 UNDER 5% 1027 60.1 21.9 34.7 73.0 32.7 106 5% TO UNDER 10% 996 45.1 21.2 36.6 63.3 26.9 188 10% TO UNDER 20% 1022 52.8 21.2 35.1 67.0 31.3 150 20% TO UNDER 30% 1049 58.7 21.4 38.6 72.1 36.6 217 30% TO UNDER 50% 1021 52.3 20.8 32.8 65.0 31.3 339 50% AND OVER 950 46.6 19.3 27.0 57.6 21.7

PCT ECON DISADV (ST AVG=48.98%)

89 UNDER 20% 1064 71.0 22.2 36.4 78.6 41.5 114 20% TO UNDER 30% 1021 55.8 21.0 31.7 66.9 31.9 162 30% TO UNDER 40% 1015 53.4 21.0 32.4 64.8 31.3 427 40% TO UNDER 60% 991 44.1 20.2 31.4 58.4 26.2 175 60% TO UNDER 80% 903 46.4 18.8 22.8 56.2 15.9 68 80% AND OVER 845 30.4 17.1 34.8 51.2 6.5

AVG. TEACHER EXPER (ST AVG=11.9 YRS)

192 UNDER 10.0 YEARS 978 44.2 19.5 30.1 57.8 23.6 275 10.0 TO UNDER 11.9 YEARS 1002 56.0 20.6 31.5 66.5 29.7 283 11.9 TO UNDER 13.5 YEARS 984 48.7 20.2 26.7 58.7 26.7 285 13.5 YEARS AND OVER 973 42.7 20.1 39.9 63.4 24.3

AVG. TEACHER SALARY (ST AVG=$37,382)

194 UNDER $33,830 885 44.2 19.6 25.7 59.0 14.4 282 $33,830 TO UNDER $35,516 979 39.5 20.0 36.7 59.0 22.9 280 $35,516 TO UNDER $36,977 990 44.8 20.2 34.2 60.7 25.7 279 $36,977 AND OVER 998 54.5 20.4 28.8 63.6 29.6

PCT MINORITY TCHRS (ST AVG=26.1%)

486 UNDER 5% 1012 45.6 20.9 38.9 64.9 28.6 214 5% TO UNDER 10% 1044 57.1 21.3 36.5 69.8 35.7 150 10% TO UNDER 20% 1011 51.0 20.5 28.9 61.1 30.4 44 20% TO UNDER 30% 989 53.0 20.2 26.5 61.3 27.0 35 30% TO UNDER 50% 967 47.7 19.4 21.4 54.2 25.3 106 50% AND OVER 881 44.2 17.8 25.8 56.3 12.1

% TCHRS W ADV DEGREE (ST AVG=24.7%)

232 UNDER 12.2% 951 26.8 19.3 45.1 57.7 17.4 274 12.2% TO UNDER 18.5% 953 37.2 19.3 34.8 56.1 18.3 274 18.5% TO UNDER 25.1% 974 50.5 20.4 28.5 61.2 24.9 255 25.1% AND OVER 1009 56.6 20.7 29.4 65.4 32.2

1,038 STATE TOTAL 990 50.0 20.3 30.8 62.2 27.3

Page 110: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

102

Page 111: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

103

GLOSSARY OF DISTRICT

CATEGORY DESCRIPTIONS, 1999-00

Page 112: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

104

Page 113: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

105

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

GLOSSARY OF DISTRICT CATEGORY DESCRIPTIONS, 1999-00(IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE IN TABLE B-4)

ENROLLMENT GROUPINGS

A nine-category grouping based on the total number of students enrolled by district as of the Public EducationInformation Management System (PEIMS) fall collection date (late October of each year). Enrollmentexcludes students who are served but not enrolled by districts.

DISTRICT TYPE

Classification of school districts based on factors such as size, growth rates, and proximity to urban areas islisted below. Charter school districts form a separate category.

Major Urban. The state’s largest metropolitan districts serving the Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Fort Worth,Austin, and El Paso areas.

Major Suburban. Other districts in and around the major urban areas.

Other Central City. Major districts in other large Texas cities.

Other Central City Suburban. Other districts in and around the other large, but not major, Texas cities.

Independent Town. Largest districts in counties with populations of 25,000 to 100,000, or the number ofstudents enrolled is greater than 75 percent of the largest district.

Non-Metro: Fast Growing. Districts not fitting in any of the above categories but exhibiting a five-year growthrate of at least 20 percent with at least 300 students enrolled.

Non-Metro: Stable. Districts not fitting any of the above categories but with an enrollment exceeding the statemedian.

Rural. Districts not fitting any of the above categories; districts either with an enrollment between 300 and thestate median and a growth rate less than 20 percent, or with an enrollment less than 300.

Charter School Districts. The open-enrollment school districts chartered by the State Board of Education.Charter schools operate in facilities of commercial or nonprofit entities or a school district.

PROPERTY WEALTH

Total taxable property value divided by enrollment, which indicates district ability to raise local funds on aper pupil basis. The property value used is total taxable value for the last completed calendar year as deter-mined by the Comptroller’s Property Tax Division (CPTD). The total number of students is for the 1999-00school year. The first wealth grouping shows 10 categories; the second simply shows districts above andbelow state average wealth; the third is a 20-category grouping, with each category representing about fivepercent of the state’s students. The special statutory and charter school districts without taxable propertywealth form a separate category in all three wealth groupings.

Page 114: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

106

TOTAL TAX EFFORT

A four-category tax effort grouping of districts defined by the total effective tax rate, which was determinedby dividing the last completed calendar year’s total levy amount by that year’s CPTD total taxable propertyvalue. Rates are expressed per $100 of taxable value. A fifth category is reserved for the six special statutoryand charter school districts without property tax levies.

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS (M&O) EFFECTIVE TAX EFFORT

A four-category tax effort grouping of districts showing the M&O effective tax rate, which was determined bydividing the last completed calendar year’s M&O levy amount by that year’s CPTD total taxable propertyvalue. The M&O rates shown include money generated by districts for equalizing wealth. A fifth category isreserved for the special statutory and charter school districts without property tax levies.

HIGHEST PROPERTY VALUE CATEGORY

A four-category CPTD classification based on property use. A district is placed into the category that repre-sents its greatest total property value. A fifth category is reserved for the special statutory and charter schooldistricts without taxable property wealth.

Residential. Single-family, multi-family, and residential inventory.

Land. Vacant lots and rural real (taxable).

Oil and Gas. Oil, gas, and minerals.

Business. Commercial and industrial real property, commercial and industrial personal property, and utilities.

SMALL/SPARSE ADJUSTMENT

A four-category grouping of districts based on the small/sparse adjustment amount as a percentage of the totaladjusted basic allotment amount. The small/sparse percentage represents the extent to which state funding isadjusted to compensate for small and/or sparsely populated districts. A fifth category is reserved for districtsreceiving no small/sparse adjustment.

COST OF EDUCATION INDEX (CEI) LEVEL

A five-category grouping of districts based on the CEI level. It reflects geographic variations in costs andprices outside district control. The current index, which has a minimum value of 1.0 and maximum of 1.2,was implemented in 1991-92.

OPERATING COST PER PUPIL

A five-category grouping of districts based on operating cost per student. Operating costs are the sum of allexpenditures budgeted for the operation of the district for all funds. The operating expenditures are a subset ofthe total expenditures; they do not include debt service, capital outlay, or ancillary services expenditures. Perstudent amounts are the school year expenditures divided by enrollment. The source for budgeted expendi-tures is the fall PEIMS submission.

Page 115: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

107

EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER (ESC) REGION

The state is divided into 20 geographic regions, each served by an ESC. This category reflects the ESC regionfrom which the district receives services, not the geographically assigned ESC region. For the vast majorityof districts, these are the same.

TAAS: PERCENTAGE PASSING ALL TESTS TAKEN

A five-category grouping of districts based on the percentage of students passing the 2000 Texas Assessmentof Academic Skills (TAAS). For Grades 3-8 and 10, the total number of students passing all sections of theEnglish or Spanish versions of the TAAS taken is expressed as a percentage of the total number of studentstaking one or more tests. This percentage excludes students taking Grade 8 science and social studies testsand includes only those students in the district in October of the school year, which is the percentage used foraccountability purposes. A sixth category is reserved for districts not administering the test.

SAT I / ACT: PERCENTAGE TAKING

A three-category grouping based on the percentage of graduates taking the SAT I and/or the ACT Assessmentin the previous year. A fourth category is reserved for districts that had no graduates.

SAT I / ACT: PERCENTAGE SCORING AT OR ABOVE CRITERION

A five-category grouping based on the percentage of examinees who scored at or above the criterion (1110 onSAT I Total and/or 24 on ACT Composite) on the SAT I and/or ACT in the previous year. The numbermeeting the criterion is divided by the number of examinees. A sixth category is reserved for districts that hadno examinees.

DENSITY

A four-category grouping based on density, or the number of students enrolled per square mile. Districtsquare miles were determined through a joint effort by the State Property Tax Board (SPTB, now the CPTD),the Texas Education Agency, and the Texas Water Commission (TWC). Maps provided by districts to theSPTB were digitized by TWC to determine acreage. A fifth category is reserved for the special statutory andcharter school districts without available mileage information.

PUPIL CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR

A five-category grouping based on the growth or decline in district student population over a one-year period.Districts with declining enrollment represent one category, while the remaining categories show one-yeargrowth rates ranging from “0% to 3%” to “10% and over.”

PERCENTAGE AFRICAN AMERICAN, HISPANIC, AND MINORITY PUPILS

Three six-category groupings based on the ethnic composition of district student populations, as reported inPEIMS. Minority percentage is calculated as the sum of all non-White populations expressed as a percentageof the total. Non-White populations include American Indian or Alaskan Native; Asian or Pacific Islander;African American, not of Hispanic origin; and Hispanic.

Page 116: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

108

PERCENTAGE ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED PUPILS

A six-category grouping based on the percentage of students enrolled in the district who are classified aseconomically disadvantaged in PEIMS as follows:

a) eligible for free or reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch and Child Nutrition Program;b) from a family with annual income at/below the federal poverty line;c) eligible for Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) or other public assistance;d) recipient of a Pell Grant or comparable state, need-based, financial assistance program; ore) eligible for programs assisted under Title II of the Job Training Partnership Act.

AVERAGE TEACHER EXPERIENCE

A four-category grouping based on average years of teacher experience. This average is computed by takingthe total years of professional experience for each district teacher, multiplying by each teacher’s full-time-equivalent (FTE) count, summing these products for the whole district, and dividing by the total teacher FTEcount.

AVERAGE TEACHER SALARY

A four-category grouping based on average district teacher salary. This average is computed as the total salaryof teachers divided by the total teacher FTE count. Total salary amount does not include any other supple-ment.

PERCENTAGE MINORITY TEACHERS

A six-category grouping based on the minority composition of district teaching populations. Minority percent-age is calculated by summing all non-White teacher FTEs and dividing by the total teacher FTEs.

PERCENTAGE TEACHERS WITH ADVANCED DEGREES

A four-category grouping based on the district percentage of teachers with advanced degrees. This percentageis computed as the FTE count of teachers with a master’s or doctoral degree divided by the total teacher FTEcount.

Page 117: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

109

Purchaser Name _______________________________________________________ Date ________________

Send to (name, if different) __________________________________________________________________

Address __________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

City _______________________________________________________State _________ Zip_____________

PUBLICATION ORDER FORM

To place an order for a publication, fill out information below and make check or money order payable to:Texas Education Agency

Price includes postage, handling, and state tax.

FOR PUBLICATION INQUIRIES AND PURCHASE ORDERS,* SEND TO:

Texas Education AgencyPublications Distribution1701 North Congress AvenueAustin, Texas 78701-1494

*Purchase orders are accepted only from Texas educational institutions and government agencies.

IF YOU ARE MAILING A CHECK OR MONEY ORDER, REMIT THIS FORM WITH PAYMENT TO:

Texas Education AgencyPublications DistributionP. O. Box 13817Austin, Texas 78711-3817

Make check or money order payable to: Texas Education Agency

Publication Price TotalNumber Title of Publication Quantity Per Copy Price

GE02 601 02 Results of College Admissions Testing in Texasfor 1999-00 Graduating Seniors ________ $14.50 ________

To place an order for a publication, fill out information below and make check or money order payable to:Texas Education Agency

Price includes postage and handling.

Publication Price TotalNumber Title of Publication Quantity Per Copy Price

GE02 601 02 Results of College Admissions Testing in Texasfor 1999-00 Graduating Seniors ________ $13.00 ________

For Tax Exempt Orders Only

Page 118: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

110

Page 119: Results of College Admissions Testing in Texas for 1999-00

Page 2

Texas Education Agency

Austin, Texas 78701-1494

October 2001GE02 601 02