Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Experimental
NIH MH064498; NRSA GM007507 (UW-Madison NTP)
Transfer of working memory training observed in contralateral delay activityBornali Kundu, David W. Sutterer, Stephen M. Emrich, Bradley R. Postle
Neuroscience Training Program, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin - [email protected]
Does intensive training on a working memory task transfer to behavioral and neural markers of
STM capacity?
IInnttrrooduducctiontion
Experimental designExperimental design
Training on working memory tasks improves performance on the task itself and results in changes in fMRI and DTI-based measures, whose effects local-ize to fronto-parietal brain regions - implicated in working memory and short-term memory (STM) performance (Olesen et al., 2004; Dahlin et al., 2008; Takeuchi et al., 2010).
Location STM taskLocation STM task
Experimental: Adaptive dual n-back Experimental: Adaptive dual n-back (n=15; based on Jaeggi et al., 2008; using Brain Work-shop http://brainworkshop.sourceforge.net/)
Psychometric Measures:Psychometric Measures:1. STM capacity (K value) derived from color-in-location STM task. 2. Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices score (RAPM; Raven, 1990)3. Operation Span score (OPAN; Turner & Engle, 1989)4. Stroop task performance (Stroop, 1935)5. Search efficiency from visual search task (Wolfe, 1994)
EEG measures:EEG measures:EEG recorded with a 256-channel EEG amplifier (Electrical Geodesic, Inc., Eugene, Oregon), sampled at 500 Hz and referenced to Cz. Electrode impedances were set below 50 kOhm. Offline, data were downsampled to 250 Hz, and re-referenced to average of both mastoid electrodes. Trials rejected based on eye movement artifacts. For search data, only target-absent trials used. Baseline taken over 100 ms prestimulus. CDA and CSA amplitudes determined from average over 300-800 ms window post-stimulus.
DelayCue
200 ms
400 ms200 ms Probe
2000 ms
ITI
3750 ms
Training
Pre-trainingcognitive
battery
Post-trainingcognitive
battery
100 ms 950 ms 2000 ms200 ms
DelayMemory
Array ProbeCue
Cue
200 ms
SearchArray
3000 ms
Color-in-Location STM taskColor-in-Location STM task
Visual Search taskVisual Search task
Training
Pre-trainingcognitive
battery
Post-trainingcognitive
battery
Control: Adaptive visuospatial Tetris Control: Adaptive visuospatial Tetris (n=15 ; http://www.gosu.pl/tetris/); no overt memory demands
1 hr/day, 5 days/wk, 5 weeks
ResultsResultsTrainingTraining
Working memory training transferred to STMWorking memory training transferred to STM. No significant training transfer to complex span (OSPAN), fluid intelligence (RAPM), interference control (Stroop task), or behavioral search effi-ciency (derived from visual search task).
Mea
n N
Lev
el (z
)
AverageTrainingGain
Experimental Task (dual n-back) Performance
Day of Training0 5 10 15 20 25−4
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
3
fit y = A*x Sum
Tot
al T
etris
Sco
re (z
)
Control Task (Tetris) Performance
Day of Training0 5 10 15 20 25−2
−1
0
1
2
3
4
fit y=p1+p2*x
K
POSTPRE
ExptControl1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
-b
Pre-Post Psychometric MeasuresPre-Post Psychometric Measures
−2
−1
0
1
2
Pre-training K
Ch
ang
e in
CD
A (µ
V)
1 2 3
Cha
nge
in K
(z)
Gain (z)−2 −1 0 1 2−2
−1
0
1
2
Change in CDA (z)
Cha
nge
in C
SA (z
)
P7/8P7/8
−1 0 1
−1
0
1
42
% A
ccur
acy
Pretraining ExptPosttraining ExptPretraining ControlPosttraining Control
Memory Load
0.65
0.75
0.85
Both groups improved with training. Learning on n-back task well fit by power law (mean adj R =0.81). Control group performance did not fit well to
power function (mean adj R =0.49), and thus was fit to a linear function (mean adj R =0.75).
2
2
2
ExperimentalControl
ExperimentalControl
Change in CDA amplitude correlatedwith pre-training K across groups
Change in K correlated with training gain for Experimental group
STM capacity (K) improved with training for Experimental group
VSTM performance improved withtraining for Experimental but not
Control group
r(5)=0.85, P<0.05
5
0
−5
5
0
−5
−200 0 200 400 600 0 200 400 600800 800
Contralateral Search Activity (CSA) for Target-Absent Trials
ms
PRE POST
Parallel far trans-fer of training to the CSA (derived from visual search, with no overt memory component) F(1,12)=4.84, P<0.05.
2
0
−2
Pre-trainingPost-training
ms
Pre-trainingPost-training
2
0
−2
−200 0 200 400 600 800
Con
trol
(µV)
Expe
rimen
tal
(µV)
Working memory training-related change in CDA correlated with training-related change in CSA
These findings suggest that transfer of working memory training effects may be strongest for tasks that engage the
same underlying neural networks.
P3P5
P7P4
P6P8
EXPT
CO
NTR
OL
CONTRAIPSICONTRACONTRA
PRE POST
0 200 400 600 800 0 200 400 600 800
3
0
−3
3
0
−3
Contralateral Delay Activity (CDA) for Load 4
Volta
ge (µ
V)Vo
ltage
(µV)
Pre-Post Event-Related Potential MeasuresPre-Post Event-Related Potential Measures
Pre-training
LOAD4LOAD2
0 200 400 600 8002
0
−2
ms
Post-training
2
0
−2
0 200 400 600 800ms
Neural marker of STM capacity (the CDA; Vogel and Machizawa, 2004), derived from color-in-location STM task, decreased with train-ing F(1,18)=6.92, P<0.05.
P3P5
P7P4
P6P8
2
ms
EXPT
CO
NTR
OL
Volta
ge (µ
V)Vo
ltage
(µV)
EXPT
CO
NTR
OL
Volta
ge (µ
V)Vo
ltage
(µV)
r(6)=0.36; n.s.
r(12)=0.65, P<0.05r(13)=0.30; n.s.
-0.4
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
Ch
ang
e in
co
ntr
rala
tera
l w
ave
amp
(mic
roVo
lts)
ControlExperimental
WM training reduced contralateral differencewaveform amplitude (Load 4 versus 2)
for Experimental, not Control group
0
F(1,18)=2.78, P=0.11