Review of Suffering-Test of Theological Method

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Review of Suffering-Test of Theological Method

    1/3

    BOOK REVIEWS 171

    SUFFERING: A TEST

    OF THEOLOGICAL METHOD

    ARTHUR C.MCGILL

    Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1982.Pages 130. pb.

    This book made hardly a stir when it was first published in 1968. Thomas

    Altizer, Harvey Cox, and4'religionless Christianity" where the vogue in that

    annus terribilis.Now that the necro-theologies have gone the way of all fads,

    Westminster Press has reissued the late Arthur McGill's exemplary essay, together with a foreword by Paul Ramsey and WilliamF.May. Though modest

    in tone and slender in size, McGill's treatise shows how theology is done in

    the grand manner. He takes what is surely the most vexing modern prob

    lemthe reality of violent sufferingand subjects it to vigorous analysis by

    way of the Christian theological tradition.

    The essential, indeed the rending modern problem, McGill contends, is

    the fear that an awful destruction will fall upon us unawares. Physical dis

    ease,mental illness, political terror, mechanical calamity, total warall the

    complaints of modern life seem to threaten us with a dread unexpectedness,

    even an occult improbability. To the surprise of many, we have been madeonce again to confront what Scripture calls the demonic. Evil is not merely

    the perversity that originates in humanity. It is also the abusive transnatural

    power that entangles and subjects us to its own terrible energy of violation.

    What kind of God, we must ask, will not or cannot obstruct these de

    monic forces that beset us all around? In answering so troubling a question,

    McGill makes no attempt at theodicy. Christian faith in the good God does

    not need to be defended so much as clarified and proclaimed. To deal with

    our modern perplexity over the demonic, McGill resorts ingeniously to the

    ancient controversy between Arius and Athanasius. The real issue betweenthem, he shows, was the nature of God's own trinitarian lifenot only what

    God does toward us, but what he is inhimself.For Arius, God is pure tran

    scendence, the Absolute who is wholly self-contained, independent, and in

    communicable. For Athanasius, by contrast, the decisive mark of God's

    divinity is the charity whereby he gives all things to the Son, who in turn yields

    all glory back to the Father.

    To say that God is the power of surrender and self-giving love is also to

    make a radical claim about the nature of evil. As the parody and ape of God,

    the demonic rules by dominationby the desire to subordinate and subjugate

    everything to its own selfish will. Its fundamental assumption is that we have

    identity and security in the things we possess as uniquely and solely our own.

  • 8/13/2019 Review of Suffering-Test of Theological Method

    2/3

    172 PERSPECTIVESINRELIGIOUSSTUDIES

    casion for demonic power to invade ourlives.Because it can deprive us of

    what we think to be the source of our fundamental identity, it has the strength

    tokill.

    Sin is never, in this reading of evil,a choice between the good and the

    bad. A merely ethical approach to our condition isitselfa demonic delusion.

    Our basic lifedecision lies between two kinds of power that we must ac-

    knowledge as having sway over us, and that we must worship as the final

    Reality oftheuniverse: the power ofdominationorthepower ofredemption.

    We liveand we die, in New Testament terms, "according to the king who

    holds [us] and the kingdom to which [we] belong" (92). The great Scriptural

    adjurations are not for us to do good, therefore, but tolove the selfgivingGodrevealed in Jesus.

    McGillunderstands thelifeand death of Jesus as one continuous act of

    dispossession. His crucifixion exposes violentpossessivenessin all of its fu-

    tility and vapidity. The who rules by coercive domination has been

    metand conquered in the Jesus who yields up his own identity as the world

    understands it: Heseeksnot topossessbut to surrenderhimself,offering his

    life in adoration to God and in service to hisfellows.His resurrection abol-

    ishes the satanic pretense by showing that demonic control and destruction

    are not the ultimate facts of life.This risen Lord enables Christians to confront demonic violence not in

    despairing fear, McGill concludes, but in sorrow andjoy. In sorrow, because

    ourown livesand the world itself remain largely enthralled by the ungodly

    power. Yet finally in joy, because of our unyielding confidence that the world

    is ruled by the God of Jesus Christ. Such assurance is the only true grounds

    for living an unselfish life, and thus for answering the problem ofevilexis

    tentially aswellas theoretically. Compared to most books that attempt either

    tovindicate or indict God for the world's violent suffering, McGill's modest

    workwillendure. It ought to become a standard text in courses on the prob-

    lem ofevil.

    RALPHC.WOOD

    WAKEFORESTUNIVERSITY

    WINSTONSALEMNC

    BEYONDNIHILISM

    NIETZSCHEWITHOUTMASKS

    OFELIASCHUTTEChicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

    Pages 233. $22.00.

    P f S h tt h d d t hil hi i i h b k

  • 8/13/2019 Review of Suffering-Test of Theological Method

    3/3

    Copyright and Use:

    Asan ATLAS user, you may print, download, or send articles for individual use

    according to fair use as defined by U.S. and international copyright law and as

    otherwise authorized under your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement.

    No content may be copied or emailed to multiple sites or publicly posted without the

    copyright holder(s)' express written permission. Any use, decompiling,

    reproduction, or distribution of this journal in excess of fair use provisions may be a

    violation of copyright law.

    This journal is made available to you through the ATLAS collection with permission

    from the copyright holder(s). The copyright holder for an entire issue of a journal

    typically is the journal owner, who also may own the copyright in each article. However,

    for certain articles, the author of the article may maintain the copyright in the article.

    Please contact the copyright holder(s) to request permission to use an article or specific

    work for any use not covered by the fair use provisions of the copyright laws or covered

    by your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement. For information regarding the

    copyright holder(s), please refer to the copyright information in the journal, if available,

    or contact ATLA to request contact information for the copyright holder(s).

    About ATLAS:

    The ATLA Serials (ATLAS) collection contains electronic versions of previously

    published religion and theology journals reproduced with permission. The ATLAS

    collection is owned and managed by the American Theological Library Association

    (ATLA) and received initial funding from Lilly Endowment Inc.

    The design and final form of this electronic document is the property of the American

    Theological Library Association.