58
2017 MACC Annual Environmental Conference College of the Holy Cross Worcester, MA March 4, 2017 Presenters: Dwight R. Dunk, LPD, PWS Epsilon Associates, Inc. Michael Toohill, PWS, CE BSC Group, Inc. Delia Kaye Town of Concord Natural Resources Division Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans

Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

2017 MACC Annual Environmental Conference College of the Holy Cross Worcester, MA March 4, 2017 Presenters: Dwight R. Dunk, LPD, PWS Epsilon Associates, Inc. Michael Toohill, PWS, CE BSC Group, Inc. Delia Kaye Town of Concord Natural Resources Division

Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans

Page 2: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Objectives

Understanding the Science of Wetland Mitigation

Elements of a Mitigation Plan to Write Effective Orders of Conditions

Monitoring and Compliance

Page 3: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Regulations and the Science of Wetland Replication

http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/portals/74/docs/regulatory/Mitigation/2016_New_England_Compensatory_Mitigation_Guidance.pdf http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/water/laws/i-thru-z/replicat.pdf

Page 4: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Replication Under the WPA

Loss vs Alteration Replication vs Restoration Mitigation means rectifying an adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected resource area, or compensating for an adverse impact by enhancing or providing replacement resource areas.

http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/service/regulations/310cmr10a.pdf page 46

Page 5: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Breaking Down the Criteria— 1. Size

What the WPA says (310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)1):

“The surface of the replacement area to be created ("the replacement area") shall be equal to that of the area that will be lost ("the lost area")” i.e. “No Net Loss”

Page 6: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Size

1:1 required by the WPA USACE requirements for restoration or creation

range from 2:1 to 4:1 BUT, the USACE also accepts enhancement or

“in-lieu-of” fees Generally 1.5X provides adequate area to allow

for “edge failure”

Page 7: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Breaking Down the Criteria— 2. GW/SW Elevation and 4. Connectivity

What the WPA says (310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)2):

“The ground water and surface elevation of the replacement area shall be approximately equal to that of the lost area”

And 310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)4:

“The replacement area shall have an unrestricted hydraulic connection to the same water body or waterway associated with the lost area”

Page 8: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Groundwater & Surface Water During design there needs to be definitive evidence of

GW hydrology-Dig a Pit! Take a Boring! In the proposed replication area

On larger projects might want to add piezometers Beware of grading changes and project drainage

altering hydrology

Page 9: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Groundwater & Surface Water Incorporate a stream channel “Break into” the adjacent wetland Obtain spot grades after the rough cut and confirm GW

Page 10: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Breaking Down the Criteria— 3. and 5. Location What the WPA says (310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)3):

“The overall horizontal configuration and location of the replacement area with respect to the bank shall be similar to that of the lost area”

And 310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)5

“The replacement area shall be located within the same general area of the water body or reach of the waterway as the lost area”

Page 11: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria— Location, Location, Location Wetlands are a transition zone between purely upland

and purely aquatic communities, and the edge of the wetland is flagged at “the drier end” of the spectrum

Proximity to adjacent wetland Integrate into adjacent wetland Surface and groundwater connections Criteria 3 is tough to meet for Limited Project Crossings

Page 12: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Breaking Down the Criteria— 6. Revegetation Success Criteria and Erosion Control What the WPA says (310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b)6):

“At least 75% of the surface of the replacement area shall be reestablished with indigenous wetland plant species within two growing seasons, and prior to said vegetative reestablishment any exposed soil in the replacement area shall be temporarily stabilized to prevent erosion in accordance with standard U.S. Soil Conservation Service methods.”

Page 13: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Plants

Natives versus ornamentals (NEWFS natives cultivars)

Grown under proper conditions: anoxic/reduced/acidic conditions

Page 14: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Plants

Planting plans and schedules Planting in “motts”; not necessarily “random”

and not “uniform”

Page 15: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Plants (and Microbes and Animals!) Habitat/forage value of species chosen Microbial community

Page 16: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Soils

Re-using existing wetland soils Stockpiling existing wetland soils Moving/handling wetland soils At least 10% organic Mix: 1 compost:1 sand: 1 loam Beware screened loam!

Page 17: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Breaking Down the Criteria— 7. Consistency with all other Resource Area Performance Standards

What the WPA says (310 CMR 10.55 (4)):

“The replacement area shall be provided in a manner which is consistent with all other General Performance Standards for each resource area in Part III of 310 CMR 10.00. In the exercise of this discretion, the issuing authority shall consider the magnitude of the alteration and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided, the extent to which adverse impacts are minimized, and the extent to which mitigation measures, including replication or restoration, are provided to contribute to the protection of the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, § 40.”

Page 18: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Other Resource Areas Bank Floodplain—replication and compensatory

storage? Riverfront—a “special case”—conversion of

Resource Areas

Page 19: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—”Good” Science

Document hydrology Keep the soil “alive” Pick appropriate species Provide habitat/forage

Page 20: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—”Good” Design

Rough grading “Final” grading Woody structure Hummocks Soil structure Hydraulic connection to adjacent wetland Build in “Phase 1” (minimize soil hold

time)

Page 21: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Using the Criteria—Monitoring Success Keep your eyes on SW and GW Install Monitoring and a Reference Plot Monitor Creation:

• Existing condition of replication are and the adjacent wetland

• Rough grade • Final grade • Plantings

Monitor Progress: • Frequency • Methods, Measures, and Reporting

Page 22: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Replication Design

Dwight Dunk

Page 23: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions Drawings Mitigation Plan (Report or Specifications)

• Grading • Soil • Materials • Plant Palette • Execution • E&S Controls • Wildlife Controls

Schedule / Sequence of Work Construction Specifications (i.e. self-imposed conditions)

Page 24: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Drawings Existing Conditions Grading and E&S Plan (Plan and Cross-Sections)

Planting Plan Details

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions

Page 25: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,
Page 26: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Location Plan - relative to other site features and

fill area

Indicate access to

Replacement Area

Show Limit of Clearing

Page 27: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Cross-Sections

Existing Grade

Proposed Grade

Page 28: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Cross-Section Components

Existing Grade

Proposed Finish Grade

Sub Grade Grade

Page 29: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Planting Details

Planting Schedule-

Common Name, Latin Binomial,

Count, Size, Comments

Page 30: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Erosion and Sedimentation Control Details

Page 31: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions

Mitigation Plan or Specifications Four critical milestones Pre-Construction Planning Site Preparation Construction Grading & Planting

Post –Construction Inspections

Page 32: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions Pre-Construction (Conditions / Specifications)

Mitigation Schedule and Sequence Plan Soil storage protocol (if required) Grading Planting Inspection schedule Identify inspector

Soil Testing Results (manufactured soils) CO2 evolution for organic supplements Percent organic content Soil amendment recommendations from soil laboratory

Page 33: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions

Pre-Construction Planning (Continued) Plant stock Source(s) Common name & Latin binomial needed Wildlife Use (food, nesting, perching, etc.) Quantity Replacements (if needed) On-site storage protocol

Inspect before installed

Page 34: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Scope of Work

Construction Elements

Submittals

Replication Plan: Schedule,

Sequence, Plant stock, Soils Sources, Seeding, Maintenance Monitoring

Page 35: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Manufactured Soil

Specifications

Percent Organic Content

Soluble Salts

pH

Soil Amendment Quality: C:N ratio CO2

evolution Free of

Pathogens

Page 36: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Plant Materials: Source, Condition Size

Page 37: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions

Construction

Grading Plan Provided with NOI Establish sub-grade ~12 inches below finish

grade (inspect or require survey before finish grades established)

Finish grades (inspect or require survey before finish grades established)

Rough surface is good - microtopography

Page 38: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions

Construction Soil conditioning (if required)

Lay out plant stock locations (Stake or mark planting zones)

Install plants per Nurseryman guidelines Irrigation required (tree and shrub saucers filled

twice after installation)

Page 39: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Execution

Plant Installation

Specifications

Page 40: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Specifications for: Digging plant

pits, Installing plants, Backfilling, Pruning, & Irrigation

Inspection Protocols: Methodology Defined

locations Frequency Season

Page 41: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Elements of a Mitigation Plan & Writing Effective Orders of Conditions

Post - Construction Construction completion inspection

End of growing season 1 inspection

End of growing season 2 inspection

Page 42: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Inspections: Initial (at Time of

planting) Intermediate (end of

first growing season) Final (end of second

growing season)

Inspection Reports

Page 43: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Define “Success” 75% cover in two growing seasons (per

310 CMR 10.55)

Page 44: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Writing Effective Orders of Conditions for Wetland Replication

Delia Kaye

Page 45: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance How to condition your project for

successful mitigation Milestones How to determine if successful

mitigation has been achieved

Page 46: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance Specify conditions for wetland mitigation Per approved plan and specs (use specs to develop conditions) Include condition that OOC and approved NOI plans onsite

Page 47: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance Require an Environmental Monitor a qualified professional with a minimum of 5 years

experience in wetland delineation, replication design, monitoring, and construction oversight, and erosion and sedimentation control

EM resume is provided at least two weeks prior to construction for Commission/Agent approval

EM shall be independent of the Contractor with the ability to stop work if needed

EM to immediately contact the Commission in the event that there is a wetlands violation and the Contractor must take immediate steps to address the violation

Page 48: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance EM contact info provided to the

Commission for 24/7 contact Pre-construction visit with the Engineer,

Contractor, Conservation Commission/Agent, and EM

Contractor to provide construction schedule to Commission/Agent at or before site visit

Page 49: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance EM shall oversee all aspects of work related to wetland replication construction and monitoring

Wetland reflagging Erosion control installation When wetland replication area is excavated When soils are brought into the replication area Rough grade Final grade Before and when wetland plants are installed Monitoring

Page 50: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance In OOC, require wetland replication occur during the first growing season of permit issuance

Increases chances that wetland replication will occur

Provides opportunity for evaluation during life of the permit

Provides opportunity to assess and address invasive species encroachment

Page 51: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance Include condition for monitoring reports

Twice per year, through the life of the permit • at the beginning and end of the growing

season, with recommendations to address any problems

First report should include information on wetland construction and planting, with dates, forms, narrative, plan, and photos

Subsequent reports should document hydrology, hydric soils, plant success, recommendations for corrections – same format

Final report should document compliance with OOC, WPA, and Bylaw

Page 52: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,
Page 53: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Monitoring & Compliance Concord Wetland Replication Area Observation Plot Locations (Approximate)

Observation Plot #1

Observation Plot #2

“High Point” Observation Plot

(From 2015 LEC Monitoring Report)

Page 54: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Monitoring and Compliance

Soil Profile at Concord Observation Plot 2 (from 2015 and 2016 LEC Reports)

Page 55: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Monitoring and Compliance

Concord Observation Plot 2 (from 2015 LEC Report)

5-20-15 11-4-2015

Page 56: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Monitoring and Compliance

Concord Observation Plot 2 (from 2016 LEC Report)

6-10-16 10-13-16

Page 57: Reviewing Wetland Mitigation Plans...and the significance of the project site to the interests identified in M.G.L. c. 131, 40, the extent to which adverse impacts can be avoided,

Effective Orders of Conditions for Monitoring & Compliance

Certificate of Compliance A written statement by a P.E. or P.L.S registered in the

Commonwealth of MA that the Project has been developed in accordance with all terms and conditions of the OOC. Any existing deviations from the OOC and approved plans must be noted

As-built plans prepared by a P.E. or P.L.S. registered in the Commonwealth of MA showing the wetland replication area, with representative cross sections

A written report from a qualified wetlands professional that the wetland replication area has been constructed in accordance with the permit and the WPA (and Bylaw, if applicable)

Critical to ensure that correct replication area has been provided, and that 75% coverage has been achieved