Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
- .. ADDENDUM TO THE. 4 1. 6 ;REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
, GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS- -AND AQUIFER INFORMATION
F/ 4 Forthe~ V SWEETWATER URANIUM PROJECT
Sweetwater County, Wyoming
Z tE 7Source Material License~42 SUA-1360
Submitted To:Nuclear ReguLatory Commission
S . _._,_.. _Rockville_ Maryland
Submitted By.Kennsoott Uranium Company
P.O. Box 160a .. n.y•-- toming 82301
_ _ Prepared By.Shepherd Miller, Inc
~ 1600 8pecht Point Drivei1~j,,j Fort Collins Colorado 80625
August 1996
Sweetwater Uranium FacilityKennecott Uranium Company42 Miles NW of RawlinsP.O. Box 1500Rawlins. Wyoming 82301(307) 328-1478 Fax: (307) 324-4925
August 10, 1995 KennecottEnergy
Mr. Joseph J. Holonich, ChiefHigh-Level Waste and Uranium
Recovery Projects Branch, MS-T-7-J-9Division of Waste ManagementOffice of Nuclear Safety and SafeguardsU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555-0001
Dear Mr. Holonich:
Subject: Source Materials License SUA-1350 - Addendum to the Revised EnvironmentalReport - Geologic Cross Sections and Aquifer Information
Enclosed please find a copy of a document entitled 'Addendum to the Revised EnvironmentalReport - Geologic Cross Sections and Aquifer Information". This document was prepared inresponse to comments on Kennecott Uranium Company's August 1994 submittal entitled'Revised Environmental Report, Sweetwater Uranium Project, Sweetwater County, Wyoming",raised by members of your staff in a meeting at your offices in Rockville, Maryland onFebruary 23, 1995, and to Comments 1 and 2 in a letter from Dan Gillen of your office datedMay 3, 1995.
This document has been discussed with Charlotte Abrams of your staff. If you have anyquestions please do not hesitate to contact me.
oSincerely
yours,
scar A. Pau onFacility Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Lcharlotte Abrams 7Licensing Project Manager (2)Director, DRSS, Region IVMichael H. GibsonPat Lorello
Kennecott Uranium Company is Manager of the Green Mountain Mining Venture
Kennecott Energy Company provides marketing and other services on behalf of Cordero Mining Company.
Antelope Coal Company. Spring Creek Coal Company and Kennecott Uranium Company.
ADDENDUM TO THE
SWEETWATER URANIUM PROJECT
REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS AND AQUIFER INFORMATION
Sweetwater County, Wyoming
Source Materials License SUA-1350
Prepared for:
Kennecott Uranium Company
P. 0. Box 1500
Rawlins, Wyoming 82301
Prepared by:
Shepherd Miller, Inc.
1600 Specht Point Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
August 1995
TABLE OF CONTENTSADDENDUM TO THE SWEETWATER ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS AND AQUIFER IN4FORMATION
Executive Summary............................................ 1
1.0 Introduction................................................. 2
2.0 Geologic Cross Sections.......................................... 3
3.0 Aquifer Information............................................ 3
4.0 Ground Water Well Completions.......... ... . . . .. . . . .4
References.................................................. 9
List of Tables
Table 1 Monitor Well Completion Data........ ....................................... 5
Figure 1Figure 2
List of Figures
Geologic Borings LocationsLocation of Geologic Cross Sections
List of Drawings
Drawing 1 Geologic Cross Sections
List of Attachments
Attachment 1 Geophysical Logs
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page i Revision 2August 10, 1995
Executive Summary
A revised Environmental Report for the Sweetwater Uranium Facility was prepared andsubmitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in August 1994. NRC staffreviewed the revised Environmental Report and requested additional information to clarify orexpand the contents of the document in a meeting on February 23, 1995 and in a letter fromDan Gillen, dated May 3, 1995.
This addendum to the Environmental Report addresses Comments 1 and 2 of the letter.Other submittals have or will address the remainder of the comments. NRC in Comment 1recommends the provision of a description of aquifer units within the Battle Spring aquifer.NRC in Comment 2 also recommends a description of well completion data for existing sitemonitor wells. This addendum presents geologic cross sections based on geophysical logsprepared during site exploration or in establishing monitor wells. A perched aquifer andupper and lower saturated portions of the Battle Spring Aquifer are identified throughinterpretation of the geologic cross sections. Aquifer information presented in theEnvironmental Report is summarized. A table in this document provides the screenedinterval and notes the unit in which the well is completed.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 1 Revision 2August 10, 1995
1.0 Introduction
The geology of the area surrounding the Sweetwater Uranium Facility has been defined inprevious submittals to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, originally in the 1976Environmental Report by Woodward-Clyde, and subsequently in 1977 and 1981 Dames &Moore reports. The site geology was summarized in the 1994 revised Environmental Reportbased on review of these documents.
The Sweetwater site is situated above the Battle Spring Formation, described in theEnvironmental Report (1994) as a typical deltaic fanglomerate, consisting of intercalated andinterfingered beds of arkosic sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone. The sandstones are fine- tocoarse-grained, slightly clayey, and poorly sorted. Further, the sandstones are lenticular,often bounded by interchannel deposits of siltstone and mudstone. These sandstone lensesare enclosed by finer clastics, which form relatively impermeable barriers to downwardmovement of water. While there is some continuity in the lateral extent of the layers of fineclastics (siltstones and claystones), alluvially deposited sandstone lenses prevent these layersfrom remaining continuous.
Photograph 1 is of the Sweetwater open pit wall displaying approximately 110 feet(vertically) of the Battle Spring Formation. (Note: the dark uneven line a little more thanhalfway down from the ground surface is a bench which collects colluvium and water). Thephotograph reveals the relatively large number and discontinuous nature of thesiltstone/claystone layers. The photograph shows how the lateral extent of the claystone isdisrupted by lenses of lighter colored sandstone.
Photographs 2 and 3 are close-up views of claystone lenses. Photograph 2 is of a wall of thebench located at the south end of the open pit and also displays the discontinuous nature ofthe claystone lenses. Photograph 3, taken in the former ramp to the pit, shows a relativelythick clay lens "pinched out" by a sandstone deposit. Development of geologic crosssections presented herein was based on interpretation driven in part by characteristics evidentin this photographic record of site geology.
This letter report presents geologic detail for the near vicinity of the existing Sweetwatertailings impoundment. The detail derives from a series of exploration drillings, geotechnicalborings, and well borings completed from 1976 to 1987. Based on this data this reportpresents a discussion of site stratigraphy, geologic cross sections, and a description of theground water regime, including a perched aquifer, and upper and lower portions of the BattleSpring Aquifer. This report also summarizes aquifer properties for the Battle Spring Aquifer.Lastly, well completion data for all monitor wells and copies of the geophysical logs of thelogged borings are also presented.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 2 Revision 2August 10, 1995
Photograph 1. Sweetwater Open Pit Wall.
Photograph 2. Claystone Lenses in Bench Wall to the South of the Open Pit.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 3 Revision 2August 10, 1995
Photograph I Single Claystone Lens in Former Ramp to Open Pit.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 4 Revision 2August 10, 1995
2.0 Geologic Cross Sections
Figure 1 shows the location of boreholes near the existing Sweetwater tailings impoundmentand differentiates between exploration borings, geotechnical borings, original tailings monitorwells, water source wells, deep aquifer wells, shallow aquifer wells, and perched aquiferwells. Geophysical data were collected during several of these borings. The geophysicallogging included gamma, spontaneous potential (SP), and resistivity to distinguishstratigraphic layering in the vicinity of the tailings impoundment.
Following review of the locations Of boreholes with geophysical data four cross section lineswere selected to comprise as many of the borings with geophysical data as possible.Geologic cross sections were then created based on interpretation of the geophysical data,cross-referenced to lithologic logs. Drawing 1 presents the interpreted geologic crosssections and also provides a plan view showing the locations of the cross sections relative tothe tailings impoundment and boring locations (this plan view is also presented as Figure 2).Each of the geophysical logs is included in Attachment 1. Lithologic logs were generatedbased on cuttings and are not considered to be as accurate as the geophysical logs.
Correlations between borings were also based on an understanding of the general site geologyand a review of the geologic record available in observation of the pit wall, as shown inPhotographs 1 through 3. Initially, it appeared that many of the units were correlative acrossthe site based on the geophysical/lithologic logs. However, a review of photographs of thepit walls indicated that the fine-grained layers (silt/clay) are discontinuous across the lengthof the pit wall. In some cases, silt/clay layers are cut and removed by sand-filled, sub-gradestream channels. In these instances, the silt/clay lenses resume at the same elevation after adistance of approximately 50 feet. The interpretation that the fine layers are discontinuouswas used to construct the cross sections as much as possible. The cross sections verifyprevious observations that the Battle Spring Formation in the site vicinity is composed ofinterfingered layers of sandstone and silt- or claystone.
3.0 Aquifer Information
The Battle Spring Aquifer is located immediately beneath the Sweetwater tailingsimpoundment, at a depth of approximately 100 feet. As described above, the Battle SpringFormation is composed of discontinuous layers of alluvial sandstones and finer clastics(siltstone and claystone). As stated in the Environmental Report (1994), the sandstone unitsof the Battle Spring Formation behave as a multiple leaky confined aquifer system, with thedrawdown in each aquifer in response to pumping being more or less independent of the headin the overlying or underlying aquifers. This behavior results from the fairly discontinuouslayers of clay materials, which inhibit vertical movement of water.
Therefore, on a localized basis, a number of separated water-storing units exist within theBattle Spring Aquifer. Additionally, the presence of claystone layers above the Battle SpringAquifer allows seepage to be perched in certain locations.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 5 Revision 2August 10, 1995
1/ i 000
\\ CRE-1870 N
/ CRE-1871 0
RE-WONE
151 000
'V ~ -~ - TMW41 *
CRE-1874E~.~
'a
/ II I
1~~ia!
I I
K'
I - I
0
SRE-108 IN
00
CIO
I CRE-1877
00
00
04C'
DH-17N
890
WCRE4066
CRE4064-a 7 82D 24A30CRE4068
80 AS' 209
780 BSA C-1873 A 7 9 GR31 87+74 A %75 GE17
A 21A AA23 A741A77 30A
20. 22f A14
.~~2fL ___ \34A 3
RE-107 ~ 3 8 CRE4047RE--CY7036 - T
DO.4
370 M3
\ja.
W-6 -
530 CRE-187U
490
TMW-2~
N CRE4041 P5 ~D~4
_____ EGRE-i869-6675--.
-44 ~ ~ ~ w1.......
147,000 +
d.,
484D47
+b 133DM4+
~1'
-a
/V-
146,000 +
. RE-108 l
//
DM2~
-p- ....÷
./-- -- • :-• - - -- -I - .P...
DM1 Tmw-e* DH-3 0
* PERCHED AQUIFER WELLS
* SHALLOW AQUIFER WELLS
0 WATER SOURCE WELLS
M GEOTECHNICAL BORINGS
0 EXPLORATION BORINGS
* ORIGINAL TAILINGS MONITORING WELLS
0 DEEP AQUIFER WELLS (8,24,47)
ALL MONITORING WELLS HAVE A TMW PREFIX (TYP.)PI - PS: BORINGS FROM 1976 DAMES & MOORE STUDYDM1 - DM5: PRELIMINARY BORINGS FROM 1976 DAMES & MOORE STUDY
SCALE IN FEET
I1000 I0 02000
PAPSHIEPIF [ILLER_
FIGURE 1GEOLOGIC BORINGS
LOCATIONS
Date: JULY 1995ProIect: 06-442,File: WELLS-2
p -. 9-
CR
A'//
It I ' lit 1
't 11f, vqo
.......... . / 0.....,0
E-1876 A
.. .i .........o.
0/ " , ,'.. ... .. .
i...,.....
y o .o o
. ..,,..• RE-lO0 O o
(N.,,
£, 6,00
C.4W)
0
V .1 4
B/'
,f .....
DII-
APPROXIMATE LIMITS,OF PERCHED AQUIFER
/17
C•
7' "'
+.°-•'i •i/1 .. • • ......... f c¸,
,t. r r i ", •. , ,.i ,• .•, , .. it- - ,,,i ,-. • ..... - - "•.5"" :; -. ; %...';:
CRE4Oi... ....... 665 8
37Q %\CRE-1874&xs5 6
.4/4;
701
..*--* ...... t ... hW-
N9boJ I
* U '5m*ao4
14-; , I0/0533 '\ )
D t~
I4'. as2 0CE e,870
74E46 CR-173o
tiI
210~ 3078c.-7........300 /
3J44
'4,
V 2 V
/DMoi 37
Nt 0,-
/ /
7
'V
"'V
>,* N,
,"/j
*/---
//.
.2
I.
7 k-
DlITM oTMW-60 DH-3
NOTES:ALL WELLS HAVE A TMW PREFIX (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)TMW- 1 TO 89: TAILINGS MONITOR WELLSP1 - P6: BORINGS FROM 1976 DAMES & MOORE STUDYDM1 - DM5: PRELIMINARY BORINGS FROM 1976 DAMES & MOORE STUDYRE: EXPLORATION HOLESCRE: EXPLORATION HOLESPWW-1 & 2 WATER WELLSDH: EXPLORATION HOLES
SCALE IN FEET
I1000 0 22000
0MAPSHýý NULLER
FIGURE 2LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC
CROSSECTIONS
Date: AUG. 1995
Project: 06-442
File: WELLS-3
As documented in the Environmental Report (1994), an incursion from the tailingsimpoundment occurred in 1984, allowing tailings fluid to seep into the ground adjacent to theimpoundment. In the vicinity of the tailings impoundment, two claystone layers create threelocalized water-storing units. Each of the three units is identified where appropriate on thecross sections on Drawing 1. The first, located to the north and west of the impoundment, isa perched aquifer. This perched layer is situated above a fairly continuous claystone layerlocated approximately 50 to 70 feet below the ground surface. The approximate areal extentof the perched aquifer is estimated as shown in Figure 2 (also the plan view map on Drawing1). As of September 1989 available fluid present in the perched aquifer had been pumpedout and returned to the tailings impoundment. Therefore, the perched aquifer is no longersaturated.
The other two localized aquifer units are within saturated sands of the Battle Spring Aquifer,separated by another fairly continuous claystone layer approximately 150 to 200 feet belowthe ground surface (see Drawing 1). The upper saturated sand of the Battle Spring Aquiferis approximately 50 feet thick. The lower saturated sand of the aquifer exists below 150 feetfrom the ground surface. Water quality sampling of three wells completed within the lowersaturated sand, TMW's 8, 24 and 47, shows it to be unaffected by seepage from the cell,indicating that flow from the upper to lower saturated sands is retarded by the claystonelayer. These three wells have been completed at depths of approximately 200 to 240 feet, asstated in the 1994 Environmental Report.
The current (April 1995) piezometric surface for the saturated portion of the Battle SpringAquifer is shown in blue on the cross sections in Drawing 1. Additionally, the perimeter ofthe tailings impoundment, the approximate tailings surface, and the current tailings fluid level(6,621 feet above mean sea level) are depicted on Drawing 1.
The average horizontal conductivity of the Battle Spring Aquifer, as stated in theEnvironmental Report (1994), is probably on the order of 1 x 102- ft/min and verticalconductivity probably on the order of 1 x 10- ft/min. Potable water wells, Drake-i, PWW-1and PWW-2, have been drilled in the Battle Spring Aquifer to provide water to the site.Water quality in these wells is good, with water quality data provided in the 1994Environmental Report. Pumpback wells, as part of the ground water Corrective ActionProgram, have historically pumped at annualized average rates of up to 11 gpm.
4.0 Ground Water Well Completions
Monitor wells around the tailings impoundment have been completed in each of the threelocalized aquifer units discussed above (perched aquifer and upper and lower saturated sandsof the Battle Spring Aquifer). Table 1 summarizes for each well the zone in which it wascompleted and the depth of the screened interval. Additionally, Figure 1 displays thelocations of each of these monitor wells and denotes the zone of completion by symbol. Thecompletion zones are also shown on the cross sections in Drawing 1 with widened lines overthe vertical boring line.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 6 Revision 2August 10, 1995
Table 1. Monitor Well Completion DataWell Number Completion Screen Interval
(TMW-) Zone (Feet from ground surface)
1 Aquifer 160 - 260, 280 - 300
2 Aquifer 135 - 295, 295 - 300
3 Aquifer 100 - 267
4 Aquifer 100 - 267
5 Aquifer 100 - 267
6 Aquifer 100 - 267
8 Deep Aquifer 220 - 240
15 Aquifer 78 - 128
16 Aquifer 120- 145
17 Aquifer 100- 150
18 Aquifer 96- 146
19 Perched 20 - 38
20 Perched 39 - 59
21 Perched 33 - 53
22 Perched 28 - 48
23 Perched 15 - 44.5
24 Deep Aquifer 215 - 235
29 Aquifer 100- 150
30 Perched 18.5 - 38.5
31 Aquifer 99.5 - 149.5
34 Perched 24.7 - 35.7
35 Aquifer 97- 147
36 Aquifer 96- 146
37 Aquifer 88.5- 138.5
44 Aquifer 85 - 135
45 Aquifer 85 - 135
47 Deep Aquifer 197 - 217
48 Aquifer 100- 150
49 Aquifer 100- 150
50 Aquifer 100- 150
51 Aquifer 110 - 160
52 Aquifer 100- 150
53 Aquifer 100- 150
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 7 Revision 2August 10, 1995
Table 1. Continued
Well Number Completion Screen Interval(TMW-) Zone j (Feet from ground surface)
54 Perched 49 - 75
55 Perched 43.5 - 58.5
56 Aquifer 87- 137
57 Aquifer 87 - 137
58 Aquifer 87 - 137
59 Aquifer 90- 138
61 Aquifer 100- 150
62 Aquifer 100- 150
63 Aquifer 110 - 130
64 Aquifer 97 -147
65 Perched 54.7 - 77.7
66 Perched 58 - 68
67 Perched 54 - 72
68 Perched 76 - 91
69 Aquifer 100- 150
70 Aquifer 100- 150
71 Aquifer 100- 150
74 Perched 42.5 - 62.5
75 Aquifer 97 - 147
76 Perched 46 - 76
77 Perched 15.5 - 30.5
78 Aquifer 99- 149
79 Perched 48 - 60
80 Perched 57 - 82
81 Perched 37.5-47.5
82 Aquifer 100- 150
83 Perched 40 -65
84 Aquifer 97 - 147
85 Perched 50 - 90
86 Perched 71.5 - 89.5
87 Perched 64 - 88
88 Perched 62.5 - 85.5
89 Aquifer 100- 150
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 8 Revision 2August 10, 1995
REFERENCES
Dames & Moore, 1977. "Revised Final Report on Design of Tailings Retention Basin,Sweetwater Uranium Project, Sweetwater County, Wyoming," prepared for MineralsExploration Company.
Dames & Moore, 1982. "Report of Engineering Design Study, Tailings Disposal System,Sweetwater Uranium Project Near Rawlins, Wyoming," prepared for MineralsExploration Company.
Shepherd Miller, Inc., 1994. "Revised Environmental Report, Sweetwater Uranium Project,Sweetwater County, Wyoming," prepared for Kennecott Uranium Company.
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1976. "Environmental Report, Sweetwater Uranium Project,Sweetwater County, Wyoming," prepared for Minerals Exploration Company.
Kennecott Uranium Company SUA-1350Addendum to Revised Environmental Report - Submitted to NRC
Page 9 Revision 2August 10, 1995
ATTACHMENT 1
GEOPHYSICAL LOGS
ATTACHMENT 1
GEOPHYSICAL LOGS
CRE-18766664.90
-RESISTIVITY
SCALE IN FEET
500
575 I0 150
SHEPHERD MILLERWCOCAF•AT"D
CRE- 1876GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995Project: 06-442
File: CRE1876C
RE-559
6655.00
GAMMA-
SP-
497
SCALE IN FEET
E
75 1500
SHEPHERD MILLER3NOOWAArl
RE-559GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995Project: 06-442
File: RE559C
GAMMA
SPRESISTIVITY
THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
300
050 I0 100
SHEPHERD MILLERvowOATEDl
TMW-1GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442
File: TMW1C_5
TMW-16
RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
mmmmmýý mmmmmmý550 I0
I1O00
S-EmPHER MILLERiHGG-AT
TMW-16GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442
File: TMW16C-5
TMW-18
0 - ELEV 6654.35
147
- RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
050 I0 100
SHEPHERD MILLERNC!T
TMW-18GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 0$-442
File: TMW18C_5
TMW-61
1
SP
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
I
50I0 100
50 0
I SHEPHERD MILLERwmoap. 1m-
TMW-61GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995Project: 06-442
File: TMW61C
TMW-50
151
-RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
I50 I0 100
__
SHEIPHE MILLERIrO~Ac AVo"m
TMW-50GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442
File: TMW50C-5
TMW-51
0 - ELEV 6645.75
GAMMA-
SP-RESISTIVITY
THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
170
SCALE IN FEET
pmwmmmimýý I550 I0
I100
SHEPHERD MILLERm0001"A"
TMW-51GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995
Projecf: 06-442
File: TMW51C-5I
TMW-2
GAMMA-
RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
300
SCALE IN FEET
50 0 100
150 I0I1 O0
CRE-1877
GAMMA-
6670.00
ý- RESISTIVITY
SCALE IN FEET
I I75 0 I150
TMW-89
GAMMA-
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
550 i0I100
SHEPHERD MILLER
TMW-89GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442File: TMW89C
TMW-24
RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
50 0 100
150 I0 II 00
CRE-1873
10 - ELEV 6659.60
SP
SCALE IN FEET
75 0I150
TMW-17
.RESISTIVITY
,,-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
50I0
1IOU
I
SIIIEPIH MILrLER I
TMW-17GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442File: TMW1 7C-5
11
RE-107
RESISTIVITY
SCALE IN FEET
I75 0 150
r
SHEPHERD MILLERuNc01PAUOAPIA
RE-107GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995Project: 06-442
File: RE107Ch
TMW-47
-RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
230
500 1c•0
SHEPHERD MILLER
TMW-47GEOPHYSICAL LOG
D1fe: AUG. 1995
Proiect: 06-442
File: TMW47C 5
DM-4
.GAMMA-
SCALE IN FEET
I50 I0 100
SHEPHERD MILLER
DM-4GEOPHYSICAL LOG I Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442File: 4C
RE-108
- RESISTIVITY
SCALE IN FEET
I0II15075
SHEPHERD MILLER
RE-108GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995
Project: 06-442File: RE108C
Pww-1
GAMMA,
SP-RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
=6?%Wm6pý 11150775 I0
SHE•PIHRD MILLER
PWW- 1GEOPHYSICAL LOG
] Date: JUNE 1995Project: 06-442
File: PWW1C
PWW-2
GAMý
RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
6ýmmmmmý :ý .1I F-
75 0II150
TMW-62
GAMI - RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEETi -.-,.- I
50I0
I100
I
SHEPHERD MILLER
TMW-62GEOPHYSICAL LOG
1 ate: JUNE 1995Project: 06-442
File: TMW62C_5I
TMW-8
GAMMA-
RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
I50 I0 I1 O0
SHEPHRD MLLER
TMW-8GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995
Project: 06-442
File: TMW8C_5
CRE-4047
6663.00
GAMMA-
115
SCALE IN FEET
50 0I 100
SHEPHERD MILLERosOOc*"rTU=I
CRE-4047GEOPHYSICAL LOG
D1te: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442
File: CRE4047C
TMW-53
-RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
160
SCALE IN FEET
I50 i0 100
SHEPHERD MILLER
TMW-53GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: AUG. 1995
Project: 06-442
File: TMW53C5
TMW-49
--RESISTIVITY
-THICK LINE DENOTESWELL COMPLETION ZONES
SCALE IN FEET
0550 I0 10
SHEPES O-GP C AAT UD E
TMW-49GEOPHYSICAL LOG
Date: JUNE 1995
Project: 06-442
File: TMW49C_5
DH-4
0' - ELEV 6636.00
RESISTIVITY
SCALE IN FEET
I050 1O00
SHEPH ERD M IL LEDH-4
GEOPHYSICAL LOG
D1te: JUNE 1995
Proiject: 06-442
File: DH_4C