Upload
elaine-maxwell
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RHIC Experiment Shielding Working Group Status Report
Minutes and presentations are kept at :
http://www.c-ad.bnl.gov/kinyip/Radiation/RHIC_Shielding.html
Kin Yip
May 14, 2003
p
0.01 FS
5 additional ft of concrete
5 additional ft of concrete
0.2 FF p
1.2FB
5 ft concrete
p
FS
FB
FF
cylindrical tunnel
Fluxes &
shielding
p @ 100 GeV
Sources of the background: PHENIX, STAR and BRAHMS all have evidence to believe that their backgrounds are due to beam scraping at the magnet triplets (Q2 or Q3), rather than beam gas.
PHENIX has not had background problem until the beams are steered into collision.
For BRAHMS, changing the * from 2 to 3 during the d+Au run decreased their backgound by a factor of 10 to 20.
PHOBOS also did not have background problem when the * was set to 3 and their background seems to be strongly correlated to the beam gas pressure increase.
PHENIX and PHOBOS (at least) have seen backgrounds considerably more on the outside of the ring during the deuteron-gold runs.
Simulation aspects:
Tool: MCNPX (newest version 2.5.c)
Sources: protons (100 GeV) scraping the inner radii of Q2/Q3 magnets
Only turned on protons/neutrons at the moment
Major problem (!): MCNPX does NOT have magnetic field.
Plan to learn/use MARS for a more complete/realistic simulation but this probably will take some time …
Gap 3Gap 4
Shield at DX
beam direction
vertical
Shield at D0
beam direction
vertical
Cross-sectional view
platform
The rest of the blocks are shields.
100 cm
Ver
tica
l
(cm
)
Horizontal (cm)
Mesh Tallies in MCNPX (2.5.c) without shielding
beam direction
vertical
One split into halfGap 4
Gap 3
Cross-sectional viewshields closer to the beampipe
65 cm
Platform
What we have done/learnt …
Flux (Gap 3) ~ 0.5-0.6 Flux (Gap 4)
Energy cuts change the absolute fluxes/energy deposition but doesn’t change the ratios
different physics models tried
Source at Q2 ~ source at Q3
For the same length of concrete (5ft), shielding effect :
closer to beampipe > DX > D0 > Q2
Source from Q3
Flux
(cm-2)
Energy Deposition (MeV/g)
Flux
(cm-2)
Energy Deposition (MeV/g)
No shield F E F' E'
DX 0.24 F 0.21 E 0.23 F' 0.21 E'
D0 0.47 F 0.50 E 0.49 F' 0.52 E'
Split 0.18 F 0.15 E 0.17 F' 0.16 E'
Gap 4 (closer to magnets) Gap 3
Conclusion ?
Without magnetic field, we probably can’t really predict for sure how good our shielding will be
Nevertheless, we have some idea where it may be better to put the shielding (eg. closer to the beampipe)
We may go to have a close inspection in the tunnel to see where we could put any kind of shielding at all as close to the beampiple as possible