20
LCV2018 In Wheel Motors and their Value Propositions in the Automotive Industry Dr Richard Ford Vehicle Engineering and Controls Manager 12 th September 2018

Richard Ford - In-Wheel Motors and their value

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

LCV2018

In Wheel Motors and their Value Propositions in the Automotive Industry

Dr Richard FordVehicle Engineering and Controls Manager

12th September 2018

LCV2018 2

Contents

1.2.3.4.

ProteanDrive overviewApproximate cost comparisonValue added by ProteanDriveOverall picture

LCV2018

ProteanDrive overview with demo cars

3

LCV2018

Basic powertrain comparison

4

System Element %age Cost in BMW i3*

Item BMW i3 Quantity* 2x PD18 Quantity

Inverter 47% Inverter Rating 650V/100%A 650V/150%A

Control Electronics 1 2

Mass 100%kg 20%kg

Motor 35% Steel Laminations 100% kg 100% kg

Copper Wire 100% kg 125% kg

RE Magnets 100% kg 240% kg

Housings (mostly Al) 100% kg 169% kg

Gear & Differential 12% Gear & Differential 23 kg None

Half Shafts & CVJ’s

6% Half Shafts & CVJ’s 12 kg None

Other 3kg 10kg

$XXXX

LCV2018

Value added by ProteanDrive technology

1. Mass

2. Efficiency

3. Packaging + design freedom

4. Drivetrain dynamics

5. Looking further ahead

5

LCV2018

Disclaimer

• The financial value attributed to technical functions below are based on a set of assumptions. Different sets of assumptions could be equally valid and might result in significantly different conclusions.

• The actual value is what the customer will pay and will depend on OEM, geographical region, vehicle segment, maturity etc.

• If you believe you can help us with more suitable numbers please get in touch!

6

LCV2018

Mass

7

30kg lighter

Value $100

Value calculation – 30kg becomes 1% reduction in vehicle consumption over NEDC for i3. Could be traded for 1% of battery mass.

LCV2018

Efficiency – measured data 2*PD18 vs i3

8

PD18 less efficient in this area. Lower speed requires higher torque

(current) so more switching and copper losses. Technology improvements (eg.

SiC) will reduce these losses.

PD18 more efficient in this area due to transmission losses of i3. Delta here unlikely to change as

transmission technology very mature

Value $100 - $800

Efficiency gain depends on drivecycle and vehicle. For i3:‐ NEDC 1% improvement‐ USHwy 13% improvement

FCar

vCar

2500N

‐2500N

100kph

Approximate path taken through NEDC for i3.

LCV2018

Maintenance

9

The only moving components in ProteanDrivesystems are the wheel bearing, seal surface and brake pads.Brake pads are consumable but bearing/seal will last for 300000km under normal use.

Value $200 - $1800

LCV2018

Packaging + design freedom – move everything outboard

10

Completely flat and low loadspace, NSEW egress

Four more standing passengers in pod

Value $50-$700

Value $100-$600

‘Traditional’ Skateboard

eMotor + gearbox+ power electronics

occupy space between wheels

Protean Skateboard

eMotor + power electronics in wheel

envelope

LCV2018

Packaging + design freedom – no sideshafts

11

No sideshafts can mean:

• True 90deg steer potential (pure lateral movement possible for parking)

• Suspension vertical range not constrained by CV joints – better lowering (or raising) for easy ingress and loading.

• Common path for braking and accelerating load reaction.‐ Simplified design process, modular design 

easy to replicate.‐ No loads presented on interior of chassis, 

NVH improvement.‐ No complexity due to design for minimised 

torque steer.

No sideshafts

Value $0-$2000

Value $20

Value $20-$500

LCV2018

Drivetrain dynamics improvement

• Smoothness/responsiveness⎼ Demanded torque is applied at wheel. No sideshafts involved which require torque filters or active damping control.⎼ Referred inertia is lower⎼ Zero backlash

12

Value $50 -$500

LCV2018

Individual wheel motor control – Steering response

13

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0

20

40

60

Ste

erA

ngle

(deg

)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2-10

0

10

20

Yaw

Rat

e (d

eg/s

)

BaselineTorque vector

sport

normal

gentry

Nb. Could be manual, or could be automatic eg:‐ Sensitivity with speed‐ Sensitivity with steer angle‐ Different driving characteristic per equipment 

level‐ More sensitive if braking hard?

Same vehicle with Torque vectoring = half steering angle for same yaw rate

Value $0 -$200

LCV2018

Individual Wheel Motor Control – Low speed agility

14

We have demonstrated >10% reduction in turning circle with torque vectoring

Value $20-$200

LCV2018

Drivetrain 2 – Individual wheel torque control

• ABS/TC/ESP⎼ Rapid response (90% of torque demand in 2ms, directly at contact patch) means that ABS/TC/ESP 

systems can all be improved.⎼ Estimates of benefit are around 7‐10%⎼ No other system can achieve this.

15

Value $0 - $600

Ref: Toyota 2010 AVEC

LCV2018

Looking further ahead…

• ProteanDrive has rugged power electronics within the wheel space. We have power and pcb real estate, how could you use this?⎼ Electromechanical brake systems⎼ (corner) Steer by wire actuators⎼ Condition monitoring systems

⎼ Vibration monitoring⎼ Tyre condition monitoring

⎼ V2X data⎼ Street condition mapping⎼ Hazard warning

16

Value $100 - $1500

Value $10 - $380

LCV2018

Overall the picture depends on the vehicle

17

Cheapest EV possible

High perf. C Segment

Luxury SUV Autonomous pod

Efficiency $100 $400 $800 $800

Maintenance $100 $200 $400 $1800

Extra space $0 $100 $500 $1300

No sideshafts $0 $100 $500 $2000

No jerk $0 $200 $500 $200

Improved yaw control $0 $500 $700 $200

ABS/TC/ESP $0 $300 $600 $200

…future $100 $100 $200 $1900

Total Added Value $300 $1900 $4200 $7400

These numbers are for illustration only. We make no

claims as to their validity. Do not make any financial commitment

based on this data!

LCV2018

Summary

• A ProteanDrive IWM solution is more expensive than an equivalent eAxle due to fundamental differences present in the 2*IWM vs 1*central motor configuration.

• An IWM solution offers many advantages at a vehicle level.• The value of these is very vehicle specific.• If these benefits are taken into account then an IWM solution becomes very 

attractive for certain market segments.• The numbers presented have a large degree of uncertainty associated with them 

but are believed to be ‘ballpark’ correct.

• Please come and talk to us on the stand to find out more.

18

LCV2018

Thank youThank you

Dr Richard FordVehicle Engineering and Controls [email protected]+44 1252 741800

LCV2018