21
Ring Beam Experiment Mike Syphers FNAL A0 Photoinjector Review 2008 Aug 18

Ring Beam Experiment - Fermilabbeamdocs.fnal.gov/AD/DocDB/0031/003195/001/SyphersA0PI.pdf · A Possible Scenario Use photoinjector with masked laser, say, to produce “ring” on

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Ring Beam Experiment

Mike SyphersFNAL

A0 Photoinjector Review 2008 Aug 18

MotivationHas been examined...

- flat-beam transformation

- trans-long transformation

Using another suggestion of Derbenev, can we ...

- make the flat beam smaller in the bigger dimension?

- ameliorate space charge effects by making a ring at the cathode?

A Possible ScenarioUse photoinjector with masked laser, say, to produce “ring” on the cathode to mitigate space charge

pass through the flat beam transformer

- this produces “no emittance” in one plane, and a “ring” in the phase space of the other d.o.f.

inject into “new device” to reduce the larger dimension

perform x-z exchange if desired

... could give much flexibility to a facility

S.C. Force within a ringassume uniform density

make ring of ave. radius a0, thickness da, with same area as circle of radius a (<a0); i.e., choose:

space charge force at radius a of smaller circle is

s.c. force at radius a0+da/2 of the “ring” is

So, might expect a reduction by factor...

2!a0da = !a2

Fring

Fcircle=

2da

a= 2

da

a0

a0

a=

a2

a20

a0

a=

a

a0a

a0

x

y

F ! e2!

2"2#0

r2 " b2

r, b < r < b + da

F ! e2!

2"2#0· 2da

F ! e2!

2"2#0a

Flat Beam x-form of a “ring”

!X0 =

!

""#

x0

0y0

0

$

%%& =

!

""#

r0 cos "0

0r0 sin "0

0

$

%%& !Xs =

!

""#

1 0 0 00 1 !k 00 0 1 0k 0 0 1

$

%%& !X0 =

!

""#

x0

!k y0

y0

k x0

$

%%& .

!Xf = R!1McR !Xs R =!

22

·

!

""#

1 0 "1 00 1 0 "11 0 1 00 1 0 1

$

%%& , Mc =

!

""#

1 0 0 00 1 0 00 0 0 !0

0 0 "1/!0 0

$

%%&

!Xf =

!

""#

x0 ! y0

k(x0 + y0)00

$

%%& =

!

""#

r0(cos "0 ! sin "0)kr0(cos "0 + sin "0)

00

$

%%& =

!

""#

rc cos "c

krc sin "c

00

$

%%& .

Initial Conditions: Exiting solenoid field:

Through a skew quad channel:

Final result:

Flat Beam x-form of a “ring”

!X0 =

!

""#

x0

0y0

0

$

%%& =

!

""#

r0 cos "0

0r0 sin "0

0

$

%%& !Xs =

!

""#

1 0 0 00 1 !k 00 0 1 0k 0 0 1

$

%%& !X0 =

!

""#

x0

!k y0

y0

k x0

$

%%& .

!Xf = R!1McR !Xs R =!

22

·

!

""#

1 0 "1 00 1 0 "11 0 1 00 1 0 1

$

%%& , Mc =

!

""#

1 0 0 00 1 0 00 0 0 !0

0 0 "1/!0 0

$

%%&

!Xf =

!

""#

x0 ! y0

k(x0 + y0)00

$

%%& =

!

""#

r0(cos "0 ! sin "0)kr0(cos "0 + sin "0)

00

$

%%& =

!

""#

rc cos "c

krc sin "c

00

$

%%& .

Initial Conditions: Exiting solenoid field:

Through a skew quad channel:

Final result:

Turn “ring” into “bunch”Derbenev noted the process in NIM-A 441 (2000) 221-233.

Akin to adiabatic capture in synchrotron RF systems (h=1)

Assume a focusing channel or ring, with a repeat period of length

L that has phase advance near, but just below, 2π;

- Use octupole fields within the channel to give an amplitude dependent tune shift; adjust octupole to produce phase advance

of exactly 2π at an amplitude of a0 (which will be the radius of the initial ring distribution in phase space).

- Then, introduce a gradually increasing dipole field at the end of each repeat period (could be distributed, w/ proper phasing)

Parameterizationsmall amplitude phase advance of channel: 2π - ∆φ

phase shift with amplitude due to octupole field...

- do not want octupole field to contribute to ∆a; only ∆ψ; then, yields ∆a = 0

- define , then

dipole kick:

total kick (depicting ramped field):

resulting Hamiltonian:

!8 ! (B!!!/6)0 a30L/(B!)

(See details in Edwards/Syphers note)

!!8 =34

"#0

L

#0"8

a30

(a2 ! a20)

!2 ! B0L/(B!)

!B8 =!

B!!!(s)6

"x3 =

!!0

!

"3 !B!!!

6

"

0

x3

!2 · b, where 0 < b < 1

H = k!3!816 (r2 ! 1)2 !!2br cos !

"

k ! !"0L

"0a0

r ! a/a0

Resulting Hamiltonianfixed Points at ψ = 0 (stable), ψ = π (unstable)

for full “b”, island at r ~ 1 (i.e., a~a0) of width:

island “tune”:

- must be sufficiently small, compared with unity, for adiabatic process

w = 2!

83

!2!8

"1/2

!s !!

332!2 k2!2!8b

"1/2

Expected Phase Spaceuse as input parameters:

- given L, determine β0

- scale dimensions w/ a0

- choose ∆φ, w

- from which:

-2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4

-2

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

!8 = 4La03!"2

0"!

!2 = 332!8w2

x/a0

!0x!/a0

Expected Phase Spaceuse as input parameters:

- given L, determine β0

- scale dimensions w/ a0

- choose ∆φ, w

- from which:

-2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4

-2

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

!8 = 4La03!"2

0"!

!2 = 332!8w2

x/a0

!0x!/a0

w

Expected Phase Spaceuse as input parameters:

- given L, determine β0

- scale dimensions w/ a0

- choose ∆φ, w

- from which:

-2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4

-2

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

!8 = 4La03!"2

0"!

!2 = 332!8w2

x/a0

!0x!/a0

w

Expected Phase Spaceuse as input parameters:

- given L, determine β0

- scale dimensions w/ a0

- choose ∆φ, w

- from which:

-2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4

-2

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

!8 = 4La03!"2

0"!

!2 = 332!8w2

x/a0

!0x!/a0

w

A Device?How would one make a device?

- FODO channel -- how long?

• communications from others who have looked at this -- "process takes long time"

- use FODO ring? -- how big?

- try weak focus ring?

• easiest to quickly examine...

Numerical Simulationassume weak focusing, circumference L

- tune = √(1-n); as an example, choose n such that tune

= 15/16, ∆φ = 2π/16

take u = x/a0, v = β0 x’/a0 ; choose w = 0.5

divide ring into m sections, at the center of which an octupole kick is received:

- ∆v = -3/8 ∆φ/m u3

after m sections, s = L and dipole kick is provided:

- ∆v = 1/4 ∆φ w2 b, 0<b<1 (ramped dipole)

Result

adiabatically ramp the dipole

-2 -1 0 1 2

-2-1

01

2

u

vrev= 0

-2 -1 0 1 2

-2-1

01

2

u

v

rev= 10000

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

revolution number

dip

ole

pro

file

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

revolution number

u_

rms (

red

), v

_rm

s (

bla

ck)

initialdistribution

“final”distribution

rms of distribution

position (red)angle (black)

Animation

Parameters of presumed ring:

L = 2 mB0 = 0.314 T

ν = Δφ/2π = 15/16

β0 = 0.34 mpc = 30 MeVa0 = 4 mm

w = 0.5

Θ8 = 12.3 mr

Θ2 = 0.289 mrB2L = 0.03 T-mm

u = x/a0

v = β0 x’/a0

Animation

Parameters of presumed ring:

L = 2 mB0 = 0.314 T

ν = Δφ/2π = 15/16

β0 = 0.34 mpc = 30 MeVa0 = 4 mm

w = 0.5

Θ8 = 12.3 mr

Θ2 = 0.289 mrB2L = 0.03 T-mm

u = x/a0

v = β0 x’/a0

Animation

Parameters of presumed ring:

L = 2 mB0 = 0.314 T

ν = Δφ/2π = 15/16

β0 = 0.34 mpc = 30 MeVa0 = 4 mm

w = 0.5

Θ8 = 12.3 mr

Θ2 = 0.289 mrB2L = 0.03 T-mm

u = x/a0

v = β0 x’/a0

-2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4

-2

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

RemarksType of device

- if channel, very very long

- if ring, worry about bunch lengthening (isochronous ring?), chromatic effects, etc.

Possible Further Studies

- distribute dipole field along channel/ring

- how far from adiabaticity can be tolerated?

With Liouville in mind, only makes sense if a “ring beam” off the cathode helps with space charge effects

RemarksCould make nice student project; “too large” (?) for one student, if large-scale ring or channel is involved; could be enough work for several students

- needs further thought -- can be scaled down?

References

[1] Ya. S. Derbenev, “Advanced optical concepts for electron cooling”, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. A 441 (2000) 221-233. See the discussion beginning at thebottom of page 226.

[2] D. A. Edwards, M. J. Syphers, “Introduction to the Physics of High EnergyAccelerators”, J. Wiley and Sons, 1993. The material used here begins onpage 116 of this textbook.

[3] Private communications from R. Brinkmann, K. Flottmann, S. Nagaitsev

[4] D.A. Edwards, M.J. Syphers, “Comments on an Experiment on TransverseCoalescing,” unpublished.