17
Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Ring Country Comparison

Moving from

Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Page 2: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Regional Emphasis of ICP 2004

• The ICP2004 is organised on Regional lines: Africa, Latin America and Carribean, West Asia, Asia and the Pacific, CIS, OECD/Eurostat.

• The regional comparisons are at the core of ICP2004 Global comparison.

• How will the regions be linked to produce a Global Comparison?

Page 3: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Bridge Countries

Region A

Region CRegion B

Page 4: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Ring Method: Multilateral

• A group of about 15 countries from all regions will be selected as Ring Countries.

• A separate PPP comparison will be made

among these Ring Countries in exactly the same way as the regional comparisons.

• The Ring Country comparison will provide link co-efficients to align the regions in order to obtain the Global comparison.

Page 5: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

West Asia

Africa

CIS

Asia and the Pacific

Latin America and Carribean

OECDEurostat

Ring Countries

Page 6: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Product List for Multilateral Ring Method

• The Ring coordinators review the rgional lists and establish a « Ring Country List » including products from all regions.

• This means that Ring Countries will be asked to price products from other regional lists.

Page 7: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Ring Method: Closed Loop

• In each Region, two countries undertake a bilateral comparison with countries from two other different Regions

• Because the ring is a Closed Loop, there are alternative paths to compare countries from different Regions

• Initially these alternative paths will give different results for comparisons of countries in different Regions

• The alternative routes will be reconciled by reviewing the bilateral comparisons and, eventually, by an averaging process (EKS)

Page 8: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

B

A

F E

D

C

Page 9: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

B

A

F E

D

C

Page 10: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

B

A

F E

D

C

Page 11: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

B

A

F E

D

C

Page 12: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

B

A

F

E

D

C

Page 13: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Product List for Closed Loop Ring Method

• The Ring Countries in each Region identify a Ring Country in another Region as their partner

• The two partners exchange product lists and agree to price additional products from their partner’s list

Page 14: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Outstanding Questions

• Multilateral Ring or Closed Loop Ring?

• Fixity– Will the relative positions established by the

Regional Comparisons be preserved for the Global Comparison?

• Ring Countries

Page 15: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Ring Countries?

Region Technical Advisory Group

Global Office Exeutive Board

Latin America Mexico,Chile,Costa Rica

Chile, Ecuador, Brazil, Mexico,Chile, Ecuador, Brazil

Africa South Africa, Senegal, Tunis

South Africa, Senegal, Tunis

South Africa, Senegal, Tunis

Asia Pakistan, Singapore, (India, Thailand, Malaysia)

Mazlaysia, Thailand, Philippines

Philippines, Malaysia, Viet Nam (Singapore if they wish)

West Asia Jordan, Oman, Egypt Jordan, Oman Jordan, Oman

CIS Russia, Ukraine Russia, Kazakstan Russia, Kazakstan

OECD/Eurostat US, UK, Japan, Slovenia, (Austrralia, Estonia)

US, UK, Slovenia, (Austrralia, Estonia)

US, UK, Japan, Slovenia

Page 16: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Oman

CIS

Kazakstan

Russia

Korea

OECDAustralia

France

SpainTunisia

Algeria

Asia

Africa

South Africa

West Asia

Jordan

ECLAC

Brazil

Argentina

Thailand

India

Pakistan

Page 17: Ring Country Comparison Moving from Regional Comparisons to the Global Comparison

Workplan

• TAG Review and recommend Process

Prepare Criteria to select countries • Executive Board Approve• Ring Coordinator review country preliminary

list of representative products• Determine countries with best match• Joint meeting countries, regional coords

agree on ring price list by pair• Collect ring prices with regional prices