Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    1/24

    1 | P a g e

    Interim Project Report

    Risk Management in Banking

    Submitted toKaushik Bhattacharya

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    2/24

    2 | P a g e

    A Report on

    Risk Management Practices of

    Three Public Sector Banks

    Bank of Baroda, Punjab National Bank

    &Canara Bank

    By-

    HARSH KUPANIA

    SUMIT VIJ

    SHRESHTA DAS

    PRIYAMWADA

    Submitted on21

    st

    January, 2013

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    3/24

    3 | P a g e

    Table of Contents

    1. Abstract.......................................................................................................42. Introduction to banking sector....................................................................43. Risk Management in Banking Concepts....................................................54. Asset Liability Mismanagement................................................................65. Gap analysis...............................................................................................66. Duration Analysis......................................................................................87. Interest Rate Risk108. Type ofRisk119. Bank of Baroda1410.Canara Bank....1611.Punjab National Bank...............................................................................2012.References24

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    4/24

    4 | P a g e

    Abstract

    This project report is related with the concepts of Risk Management in Banking of three

    public sector banks. The basic methodology is to make a comparison of these three banks to

    analyze the performance of these banks. The comparison is made on the basis of various risk

    management practices that we have mentioned in this report. We have collected the past Ten

    years data of all these PSU banks and compare them on this of their Asset-Liability

    Mismatch, Gap analysis, Interest Rate Risk ant the Duration Gap analysis.

    Introduction

    Financial sector reforms in India have brought about rapid changes in the structure of

    financial markets, more particularly in banks. After initial shocks, the market is now attuned

    to the winds of liberalization and gradually learning the tricks of not only surviving but also

    growing in an environment of volatile as man soon. Banking prior to the 90s and banking

    now present a perfect study of contrast.

    Recently, banks have started to focus on the area ofrisk management as well as asset-

    liability management (ALM). Simply speaking, ALM is an attempt to match the assets and

    liabilities in terms of their maturities and interest rates sensitivities so that the risk arising

    from such mismatchesmainly interest rate risk and liquidity risk- can be contained within

    the desired limit. The objective behind all these measures is to make banks fully prepared to

    face the emerging challenges. It is also common knowledge that the concept of risk in terms

    of its definition, identification, quantification and management as well as the risk of

    managing assets and liabilities, without which all endeavors to manage the net interest margin

    as well as the total balance sheet would remain a non- starter. Because of ALM, Interest rate

    risk management assumes utmost importance. In fact due to very nature of its business, a

    bank should accept interest rate risk not by chance but by choice. And when the bank has to

    take risk as a choice, then it should ensure that the risk taken is firstly manageable and

    secondly it does not get transformed into any other undesirable risk. As stated earlier, the

    focal point in managing any risk will be to understand the nature of the risk. This is especially

    essential for interest rate risk management. Interest Rate Risk is the gain/ loss that arises due

    to sensitivity of the interest income/interest expenditure or values of assets/liabilities to the

    interest rate fluctuations.

    This project study is an endeavor to understand interest rate risk management practices

    followed in banks in India. Banks in fact are using various interest rate risk management

    methods. Traditional and modern methods like maturity gap method, rate adjusted gap

    method, duration analysis, hedging techniques, and simulation and value at risk method are

    being used. So banking in India has come a long way. In fact interest rate risk management

    being part of ALM is being given utmost importance by banks.

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    5/24

    5 | P a g e

    Risk Management in Banking Concepts

    Risk management underscores the fact that the survival of an organization depends heavily

    on its capabilities to anticipate and prepare for the change rather than just waiting for thechange and react to it. The objective of risk management is not to prohibit or prevent risk

    taking activity, but to ensure that the risks are consciously taken with full knowledge, purpose

    and clear understanding so that it can be measured and mitigated. It also prevents an

    institution from suffering unacceptable loss causing an institution to suffer or materially

    damage its competitive position. Functions of risk management should actually be bank

    specific dictated by the size and quality of balance sheet, complexity of functions, technical/

    professional manpower and the status of MIS in place in that bank.

    Risk: the meaning of Risk as per thecomprehensive dictionary is a chance of encountering

    harm or loss, hazard, danger or to expose to a chance of injury or loss. Thus, something

    that has potential to cause harm or loss to one or more planned objectives is called Risk.

    The word risk is derived from an Italian word Risicare which means To Dare. It is an

    expression of danger of an adverse deviation in the actual result from any expected result.

    Banks for International Settlement (BIS) has defined it as- Risk is the threat that an event or

    action will adversely affect an organizations ability to achieve its objectives and successfully

    execute its strategies.

    Risk Management: Risk Management is a planned method of dealing with the potential loss

    or damage. It is an ongoing process of risk appraisal through various methods and tools

    which continuously

    Assess what could go wrong

    Determine which risks are important to deal with

    Implement strategies to deal with those risks

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    6/24

    6 | P a g e

    AssetsLiabilitiesMismatching

    A bank with mismatched assets and liabilities can be badly hurt by unexpected interest

    rate changes. In the 80s, many Savings & Loan associations went bankrupt owing to rates

    increases: since they had borrowed short and lent long, both their income and their net

    worth had become negative.

    Banks use the gap and the duration analyses to respectively evaluate (not necessarily to

    eliminate) their exposure to income and to capital risks.

    Gap analysis

    It estimates the net effect on income of interest rate changes (parallel shifts). Income risk

    is two forged: there is a reinvestment riskwhen assets mature before liabilities (ex. when a

    bank has financed a 6 months T-bill by issuing a 1 year fixed rate CD: when, after 6

    months, it cashes the T-bill, it may be unable to reinvest the proceeds at a profitable rate.

    Please note that it is not unusual for a bank to finance a 5-years floating rate loan by

    issuing a 3-years fixed rate bond: also in this case it is exposed to a reinvestment risk).

    There is also a refinancing riskwhen liabilities mature before assets (ex. when a bank has

    financed a 1 year fixed rate asset by issuing a 6 months CD: when the liability will mature,

    the bank has to refinance its position by issuing another 6 months CD. But, if interest rates

    have increased, the bank will have to pay a higher rate).

    For the Gap analysis all items, on both sides of the balance sheet, are classified into twocategories: rate-sensitive andfixed-rate (non-sensitive).

    ASSETS LIABILITIES

    Rate-sensitive: RSA

    (variable-rate loans and bonds; bills

    and short-term securities) 40

    Rate-sensitive:RSL

    (variable-rate deposits; short-term or

    variable-rate securities) 30

    Fixed-rate: NSA

    (fixed-rate loans; fixed-rate long-term

    bonds; reserves) 60

    Fixed-rate: NSL

    (fixed-rate loans; fixed-rate long-term

    bonds; net worth) 70

    Gap = RSARSL = 4030 = 10 million

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    7/24

    7 | P a g e

    The (annual) income will change by the size of the gap multiplied by the size of theinterest rates change: if the rates increase by 2% (200 basis points), the annual income will

    increase by: 2%(10 million) = 200,000 euro.

    GAP>0 The bank is asset sensitive: it benefits from interest rate increases and suffersfrom decreases.

    GAP

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    8/24

    8 | P a g e

    Duration analysis

    Estimates the effect on the banks net worth (capital gains and losses) of an interest rate

    change (parallel shifts).

    ASSETS LIABILITIES

    Rate-sensitive 40 Rate-sensitive 30

    Fixed-rate Fixed-rate

    *Reserves 10

    *Zero coupon 5 years (83 mln, market

    value at 6%) 62

    *Zero coupon 20 years (233 mln, market

    value at 8%) 50 *Net worth 8

    Total 100 Total 100

    After a 200 bp increase in interest rates, we have:ASSETS LIABILITIES

    Rate-sensitive 40 Rate-sensitive 30

    Fixed-rate Fixed-rate

    *Reserves 10

    *Zero coupon 5 years (83 mln,

    market value at 8%) 56,46

    *Zero coupon 20 years (233 mln, market

    value at 10%) 34,64 *Net worth -1,82

    Total 84,64 Total 84,64

    The bank is bankrupt, notwithstanding its advantage of 0.2 mln in interest income. The cause

    is a very large mismatching between assets and liabilities duration:

    DA Assets average duration 0 40 100 0 10 100 20 50 100 10/ / /

    DL

    Liabilities average duration 0 30 92 5 62 92 3 4/ / .

    DG Duration gap D

    L

    AD

    A L10

    92

    1003 4 6 87. .

    1st approximation:Duration gap

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    9/24

    9 | P a g e

    NW DL

    AD A i D A i

    A L G1

    For an increase of 200 bp, DG gives an estimation of NW1 = 13.74mln: a poor

    approximation since the actual fall is 9.82 mln.

    2nd approximation: Modified duration gap

    NWD

    i

    L

    A

    D

    iA i MD A iA

    A

    L

    L

    G21 1

    ForMDG = 6.30, we have: NW2= 12.6 mln.

    3rd

    approximation: Modified duration gap and convexity gap

    NW MD A i CL

    AC A i

    A A L3

    21

    2

    MD A i C A iG G 1

    2

    2

    with: C CA 50

    100

    20 10% 180 04. ; C CL 62

    92

    5 8% 17 93. , we have: NW3=

    9.45 mln: a not too bad approximation.

    Of course, all the approximations are better for smaller changes in interest rates. For i=0.01, we obtain: NW1 = 6.87, NW2= 6.30, NW3 = 5.51 as against an actual fall of

    5.61 mln.

    A positive DG is an implicit bet that interest rates will fall; a negative one that they willrise. To obtainDG = 0, in order to cover much of the capital risk, the bank can:

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    10/24

    10 | P a g e

    Interest Rate Risk

    Interest rate risk is the largest market risk in the banking book. A bank's interest rate risk

    reflects the extent to which its financial condition is affected by changes in market interest

    rates. There are two different ways of thinking about such effects when analysing banks'

    exposure to interest rate risk: the net interest income risk measure and the investment riskmeasure.

    The income risk measure is employed to assess the impact of a change in overall interest rate

    level to the net interest income from the banking book, whereas the investment risk measure

    is employed to assess changes in the market value of the trading portfolio (on and off balance

    sheet items available for sale) in response to interest rate changes.

    Various economic forces affect the level and direction of interest rates in the economy.

    Interest rates typically climb when the economy is growing, and fall during economic

    downturns.

    Similarly, rising inflation leads to rising interest rates (although at some point, higher rates

    themselves become contributors to higher inflation), and moderating inflation leads to lowerinterest rates. Inflation is one of the most influential forces on interest rates.

    Management of interest rate and currency risks by banks

    Banks are essentially in the business of managing risks. In particular, they are required to

    handle interest rate mismatches as well as currency mismatches in their capacity as

    authorized dealers and market-makers in the currency market.. The Reserve Bank has also

    assigned responsibility on banks for ensuring suitability and appropriateness while

    transacting derivative instruments with the corporates and also ensuring that the corporates

    have appropriate risk management framework... Absence of proper oversight over corporates

    business particularly their currency and interest rate risks has come to the fore now when we

    have witnessed a number of cases of corporates seeking restructuring/CDR, many of whom

    have got into difficulties due to foreign exchange related losses and excessive leverage,

    restructuring/defaults of overseas ECB/Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCB)

    obligations, loss to the overseas branches of Indian banks who have subscribed Credit Linked

    Notes (CLNs) under the FCCB issues past.

    Banks enter into derivative contracts for the purpose of hedging their own risks. They also

    play an important role as market makers in the derivatives markets to enable their customers

    to hedge their risks. Client trades are typically covered on a back-to-back basis by banks in

    the inter-bank market, implying that the banks are hedged as far as market risks on clientrelated transactions are concerned but they continue to hold on to the credit risks arising from

    the exposure to their clients. Banks also carry a significant amount of interest rate risk in their

    investment portfolio due to holding of the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) bonds and non-

    SLR securities. Managing risks in the investment portfolio, thus, acquires additional

    significance in an environment of increased volatility of interest rates notwithstanding the

    HTM dispensation available to banks up to certain limits. Typically, banks have been using a

    combination of duration targets and duration gap analysis for managing risks arising out of

    movements in interest rates. A series of stress tests are being conducted periodically by the

    Reserve Bank on the impact of interest rate shocks on the banking and trading books of

    banks. The results have been presented in the Financial Stability Reports (FSR) published by

    the Reserve Bank of India.

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    11/24

    11 | P a g e

    Type of Risk

    When we use the term Risk, we all mean financial risk or unexpected financial loss. If we

    consider risk in terms of probability or occur frequently, we measure risk on a scale, with

    certainty of occurrence at one end and certainty of non-occurrence at the other end. Risk is

    the greatest phenomena where the probability of occurrence or non-occurrence is equal. As

    per the Reserve Bank of India guidelines issued in Oct. 1999, there are three major types of

    risks encountered by the banks and these are Credit Risk, Market Risk & Operational Risk.

    Further after eliciting views of banks on the draft guidelines on Credit Risk Management and

    market risk management, the RBI has issued the final guidelines and advised some of the

    large PSU banks to implement so as to gauge the impact. Risk is the potentiality that both the

    expected and unexpected events may have an adverse impact on the banks capital or its

    earnings.

    The expected loss is to be borne by the borrower and hence is taken care of by adequately

    pricing the products through risk premium and reserves created out of the earnings. It is the

    amount expected to be lost due to changes in credit quality resulting in default.

    Where as, the unexpected loss on account of the individual exposure and the whole portfolio

    is entirely borne by the bank itself and hence care should be taken. Thus, the expected losses

    are covered by reserves/provisions and the unexpected losses require capital allocation.

    LIQUIDITY RISKLiquidity risk is the current and prospective risk to earnings or capital arising from a banks

    inability to meet its obligations when they become due without incurring unacceptable

    losses.Liquidity risk includes the inability to manage unplanned decreases or changes in

    funding sources. Liquidity risk also arises from the failure to recognize or address changes in

    market conditions that affect the ability to liquidate assets quickly and with minimal loss invalue.

    CREDIT RISKIn the context of Basel II, the risk that the obligor (borrower or counterparty) in respect of a

    particular asset will default in full or in part on the obligation to the bank in relation to the

    asset is termed as Credit Risk.

    Credit Risk is defined as-The risk of loss arising from outright default due to inability orunwillingness of the customer or counter party to meet commitments in relation to lending,

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    12/24

    12 | P a g e

    trading, hedging, settlement and other financial transaction of the customer or counter party

    to meet commitments.

    Credit Risk is also defined, as the potential that a borrower or counter party will fail to meets

    its obligations in accordance in agreed terms.

    MARKET RISKIt is defined as the possibility of loss caused by changes in the market variables such as

    interest rate, foreign exchange rate, equity price and commodity price. It is the risk of losses

    in, various balance sheet positions arising from movements in market prices.

    RBI has defined market risk as the possibility of loss to a bank caused by changes in themarket rates/ prices. RBI Guidance Note focus on the management of liquidity Risk and

    Market Risk, further categorized into interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, commodity

    price risk and equity price risk.

    Market risk includes the risk of the degree of volatility of market prices of bonds, securities,

    equities, commodities, foreign exchange rate etc., which will change daily profit and loss

    over time; its the risk of unexpected changes in prices or rates. It also addresses the issues of

    Banks ability to meets its obligation as and when due, in other words, liquidity risk.

    OPERATIONAL RISKOperational risk is the risk associated with the operations of an organization. It is defined as

    risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal process, people and systems or from

    external events.

    It includes legal risk. It excludes strategic and reputational risks, as the same are not

    quantifiable.

    Operational risk includes the risk of loss arising from fraud, system failures, trading error andmany other internal organizational risks as well as risk due to external events such as fire,

    flood etc. the losses due to operation risk can be direct as well as indirect. Direct loss means

    the financial losses resulting directly from an incident or an event. E.g. forgery, fraud etc.

    indirect loss means the loss incurred due to the impact of an incident.

    REGULATORY RISKThe owned funds alone are managed by an entity, it is natural that very few regulatorsoperate and supervise them. However, as banks accept deposit from public obviously better

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    13/24

    13 | P a g e

    governance is expected from them. This entails multiplicity of regulatory controls. Many

    Banks, having already gone for public issue, have a greater responsibility and accountability

    in this regard. As banks deal with public funds and money, they are subject to various

    regulations. The various regulators include Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities Exchange

    Board of India (SEBI), Department of Company Affairs (DCA), etc. More over, banks shouldensure compliance of the applicable provisions of The Banking Regulation Act, The

    Companies Act, etc. Thus all the banks run the risk of multiple regulatory-risks which

    inhibits free growth of business as focus on compliance of too many regulations leave little

    energy scope and time for developing new business. Banks should learn the art of playing

    their business activities within the regulatory controls.

    ENVIRONMENTAL RISKAs the years roll the technological advancement takes place, expectation of the customers

    change and enlarges. With the economic liberalization and globalization, more national and

    international players are operating the financial markets, particularly in the banking field.

    This provides the platform for environmental change and exposure of the bank to the

    environmental risk. Thus, unless the banks improve their delivery channels, reach customers,

    innovate their products that are service oriented; they are exposed to the environmental risk.

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    14/24

    14 | P a g e

    Bank of Baroda

    Bank of Baroda is the highest profit-making public sector undertaking (PSU) bank in India

    and the second largest PSU bank in terms of number of total business in India. Based

    in Vadodara, India, it is the country's first largest public sector lender in terms of annual

    profit. BoB is ranked 715 on Forbes Global 2000 list. BoB has total assets in excess of Rs.

    3.58 lakh crores, or Rs. 3,583 billion, a network of 4007 branches (out of which 3914

    branches are in India) and offices, and over 2000 ATMs. It plans to open 400 new branches

    in the coming years. It offers a wide range of banking products and financial services to

    corporate and retail customers through its delivery channels and through its specialized

    subsidiaries and affiliates in the areas of investment banking, credit cards and asset

    management. Its total global business was Rs. 7,003.30 billion as of 30 Sep 2012. Its

    headquarter is in Vadodara and corporate headquarter is in BandraKurla Complex Mumbai.

    HERE IS THE CALCULTION OF RSA, RSL,GAP, GAP RTIO, CUMMULATIVEGAP & NET WORTH OF BOB FROM MARCH 2003 TO MARCH 2012.

    Industry :Banks -

    Public Sector

    (Rs in Crs)

    Year

    Mar

    12

    Mar

    11

    Mar

    10

    Mar

    09

    Mar

    08

    Mar

    07

    Mar

    06

    Mar

    05

    Mar

    04

    Mar

    03

    SOURCES OF

    FUNDS :

    Capital

    412.3

    8

    392.

    81

    365.5

    3

    365.5

    3

    365.

    53

    365.5

    3

    365.5

    3

    294.5

    3

    294.5

    3

    294.3

    4

    Reserves Total

    28,10

    3.92

    21,4

    33.7

    6

    15,34

    9.06

    12,95

    9.17

    10,9

    93.0

    1

    8,512

    .03

    7,743

    .31

    5,556

    .54

    4,997

    .72

    4,188

    .18

    Equity Share

    Warrants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Equity

    Application Money 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Minority Interest 91.18

    72.9

    1 59.42 46.43

    36.2

    9 31.82 24.61 41.76 35.97 31.58

    Deposits392,615.95

    311,

    603.25

    245,951.15

    196,608.44

    155,

    295.08

    128,107.41

    96,051.01

    83,405.12

    74,646.54

    67,668.69

    Borrowings

    23,59

    8.06

    22,3

    78.3

    3

    13,40

    4.27

    12,77

    6.67

    3,96

    2.17

    1,171

    .15

    5,048

    .87

    1,924

    .54

    1,289

    .35

    949.0

    1

    Other Liabilities &

    Provisions

    12,59

    0.52

    10,3

    32.7

    1

    9,147

    .34

    8,820

    .48

    12,8

    84.1

    3

    8,725

    .49

    7,446

    .64

    6,178

    .15

    6,259

    .17

    5,229

    .30

    Policy Holders

    Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    TOTAL LIABILITIES

    444,8

    21.49

    355,

    881.

    275,1

    29.43

    222,7

    56.24

    170,

    652.

    138,1

    87.94

    109,2

    33.33

    91,22

    2.49

    81,26

    4.11

    73,13

    1.80

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadodarahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakhhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croreshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadodarahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandra_Kurla_Complexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumbaihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumbaihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandra_Kurla_Complexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadodarahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croreshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakhhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Global_2000http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadodara
  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    15/24

    15 | P a g e

    06 08

    APPLICATION OF

    FUNDS :

    Cash & Balances

    with RBI

    22,26

    8.35

    20,3

    94.4

    2

    14,07

    6.07

    10,90

    1.21

    9,61

    7.34

    6,569

    .79

    3,470

    .96

    2,777

    .11

    3,121

    .19

    3,567

    .25Balances with

    Banks & money at

    Call

    43,54

    2.00

    31,0

    29.3

    1

    22,49

    3.41

    14,30

    1.41

    13,5

    52.7

    7

    12,40

    5.72

    10,47

    1.33

    6,839

    .90

    4,397

    .37

    3,538

    .50

    Investments

    86,69

    7.00

    74,1

    54.4

    2

    63,16

    3.27

    53,62

    6.58

    44,6

    57.7

    6

    35,67

    7.00

    35,64

    5.17

    38,02

    3.35

    38,80

    4.41

    30,72

    5.70

    Advances

    292,0

    77.14

    232,

    085.

    11

    177,7

    11.90

    145,5

    59.50

    108,

    578.

    97

    85,55

    8.04

    61,48

    3.12

    44,47

    7.15

    36,53

    3.59

    36,17

    4.08

    Fixed Assets

    2,428

    .19

    2,38

    3.20

    2,369

    .39

    2,559

    .63

    2,67

    4.64

    1,343

    .60

    1,216

    .59

    905.3

    7

    852.3

    9

    737.4

    5

    Other Assets

    10,39

    9.33

    6,16

    7.31

    4,462

    .73

    4,628

    .39

    4,45

    4.73

    5,359

    .28

    4,392

    .80

    4,377

    .76

    3,814

    .33

    3,618

    .12

    Miscellaneous

    Expenditure not

    written off 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    TOTAL ASSETS

    457,4

    12.01

    366,

    213.

    77

    284,2

    76.77

    231,5

    76.72

    183,

    536.

    21

    146,9

    13.43

    116,6

    79.97

    97,40

    0.64

    87,52

    3.28

    78,36

    1.10

    Contingent

    Liability

    153,1

    54.99

    127,

    562.

    36

    88,22

    1.17

    73,73

    0.71

    82,5

    95.2

    7

    61,65

    4.29

    39,34

    6.12

    36,95

    4.03

    30,49

    3.92

    24,55

    1.53

    Bills for

    collection

    22,86

    2.48

    18,9

    86.6

    8

    18,26

    7.18

    14,04

    7.39

    8,36

    0.15

    6,883

    .55

    6,096

    .96

    6,340

    .39

    5,014

    .96

    4,245

    .77

    RSA

    444,5

    84.49

    357,

    663.

    26

    277,4

    44.65

    224,3

    88.70

    176,

    406.

    84

    140,2

    10.55

    111,0

    70.58

    92,11

    7.51

    82,85

    6.56

    74,00

    5.53

    RSL416,3

    05.19

    334,

    054.

    49

    259,4

    14.84

    209,4

    31.54

    159,

    293.

    54

    129,3

    10.38

    101,1

    24.49

    85,37

    1.42

    75,97

    1.86

    68,64

    9.28

    GAP (RSA - RSL)28,27

    9.30

    23,6

    08.7

    7

    18,02

    9.81

    14,95

    7.16

    17,1

    13.3

    0

    10,90

    0.17

    9,946

    .09

    6,746

    .09

    6,884

    .70

    5,356

    .25

    CUMMULATIVEGAP

    28,279.30

    51,8

    88.07

    69,917.88

    84,875.04

    101,

    988.34

    112,888.51

    122,834.60

    129,580.69

    136,465.39

    141,821.64

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    16/24

    16 | P a g e

    GAP RATO

    (RSA/RSL)

    1.067

    9292

    52

    1.07

    0673

    41

    1.069

    5018

    45

    1.071

    4178

    96

    1.10

    7432

    48

    1.084

    2946

    25

    1.098

    3549

    09

    1.079

    0204

    73

    1.090

    6217

    12

    1.078

    0233

    97

    NET WORTH

    (TOTAL ASSETS -

    TOTAL LIABLITIES)

    12,59

    0.52

    10,3

    32.7

    1

    9,147

    .34

    8,820

    .48

    12,8

    84.1

    3

    8,725

    .49

    7,446

    .64

    6,178

    .15

    6,259

    .17

    5,229

    .30

    Canara Bank

    Widely known for customer centricity, Canara Bank was founded by

    ShriAmmembalSubbaRaoPai, a great visionary and philanthropist, in July 1906, at

    Mangalore, then a small port town in Karnataka. The Bank has gone through the various

    phases of its growth trajectory over hundred years of its existence. In June 2006, the Bank

    completed a century of operation in the Indian banking industry. Today, Canara Bank

    occupies a premier position in the comity of Indian banks. With an unbroken record of profits

    since its inception, Canara Bank has several firsts to its credit. These include:

    Launching of Inter-City ATM Network Obtaining ISO Certification for a Branch Articulation of Good Banking Banks Citizen Charter Commissioning of Exclusive Mahila Banking Branch Launching of Exclusive Subsidiary for IT Consultancy Issuing credit card for farmers Providing Agricultural Consultancy Services

    Over the years, the Bank has been scaling up its market position to emerge as a major'Financial Conglomerate' with as many as nine subsidiaries/sponsored institutions/joint

    ventures in India and abroad. As at September 2012, the Bank has further expanded its

    domestic presence, with 3650 branches spread across all geographical segments. Keeping

    customer convenience at the forefront, the Bank provides a wide array of alternative delivery

    channels that include 3184 ATMs, covering 1182 centres. Several IT initiatives have been

    undertaken during the year, which include Funds Transfer through Interbank Mobile Payment

    Services (IMPS) in ATMs, ASBA facility to net banking users, E-filing of tax returns and

    facility for viewing details of tax deducted at source, Terminal at 223 branches for customers

    to use net banking, SMS/e-mail alerts for all transactions done through ATM, net banking,

    POS, mobile banking, online payments irrespective of amounts, online loan applications and

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    17/24

    17 | P a g e

    tracking facility, generation of automatic pass sheets through e-mail and automatic renewal of

    term deposits. Under Government business, the Bank has implemented internet based

    application for UGC Maulana Azad National Fellowship Scheme, Web portal for National

    Scheme for Girl Child Secondary Education, Electronic Accounting Systems of e-Receipts-

    Customs (EASeR-C) for collection of customs duty and e-payment of commercial taxesmodule for UP, Karnataka, Delhi and Tamil Nadu.

    Not just in commercial banking, the Bank has also carved a distinctive mark, in various

    corporate social responsibilities, namely, serving national priorities, promoting rural

    development, enhancing rural self-employment through several training institutes and

    spearheading financial inclusion objective. Promoting an inclusive growth strategy, which

    has been formed as the basic plank of national policy agenda today, is in fact deeply rooted in

    the Bank's founding principles. "A good bank is not only the financial heart of the

    community, but also one with an obligation of helping in every possible manner to

    improve the economic conditions of the common people". These insightful words of our

    founder continue to resonate even today in serving the society with a purpose. The growth

    story of Canara Bank in its first century was due, among others, to the continued patronage of

    its valued customers, stakeholders, committed staff and uncanny leadership ability

    demonstrated by its leaders at the helm of affairs. We strongly believe that the next century is

    going to be equally rewarding and eventful not only in service of the nation but also in

    helping the Bank emerge as a "Global Bank with Best Practices". This justifiable belief is

    founded on strong fundamentals, customer centricity, enlightened leadership and a family

    like work culture.

    HERE IS THE CALCULTION OF RSA, RSL,GAP, GAP RTIO, CUMMULATIVE

    GAP & NET WORTH OF CANARA BANK FROM MARCH 2003 TO MARCH 2012.

    Industry :Banks - Public Sector

    (Rs in Crs)

    Year

    Mar

    12

    Mar

    11

    Mar

    10

    Mar

    09

    Mar

    08

    Mar

    07

    Mar

    06

    Mar

    05

    Mar

    04

    Mar

    03

    SOURCES OF FUNDS

    Capital 443 443 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410

    ReservesTotal 22600 19959 14612 12171 10310 10445

    7164.6

    6075.5

    5274.2

    4054.1

    EquityShare

    Warrants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Equity App

    Money 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Minority

    Interest

    161.4

    8

    149.1

    6

    136.3

    7

    181.5

    7

    159.0

    4 30.87 27.2 22.96

    190.5

    2

    161.1

    9

    Deposits

    3268

    94.04

    2932

    57.91

    2345

    17.77

    1867

    56.47

    1537

    28.7

    1423

    76.43

    1167

    76.68

    9673

    7.76

    8640

    5.88

    7214

    2.05

    Borrowings 15614 142958473.

    8 139652777.

    81724.

    6545.8

    4512.0

    62152.

    7 785.7

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    18/24

    18 | P a g e

    Other

    Liabilities &

    Provisions 13690 11361

    8691.

    3

    6968.

    1 13536 11696

    8963.

    8

    7455.

    3

    6782.

    1

    5918.

    9

    Policy

    Holders

    Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    TOTAL

    LIABILITIES

    3657

    13.34

    3281

    04.23

    2581

    50.3

    2134

    84.34

    1673

    85.49

    1549

    87.07

    1249

    24.34

    1037

    58.23

    9443

    3.23

    7755

    3.03

    APPLICATION OF

    FUNDS :

    Cash &

    Balances

    with RBI 17813 22032 15733 10047 13365

    9095.

    3

    7914.

    3

    4984.

    5 6891

    5607.

    6

    Balances

    with Banks &

    money at

    Call 10434

    8739.

    5

    3990.

    3

    6680.

    1

    4758.

    7

    7291.

    3

    4891.

    7

    3641.

    3

    5062.

    3

    1814.

    8

    Investment

    s

    10649

    7 86499 71120 58425 49598 45293 37013 38038 35922 30536

    Advances

    2327

    28.74

    2114

    48.51

    1694

    63.86

    1383

    60.53

    1076

    17.09

    9889

    4.93

    8002

    5.7

    6092

    7.56

    4887

    0.83

    4075

    1.91

    Fixed

    Assets 2888

    2884.

    5

    2931.

    6

    2998.

    3

    2941.

    5

    2876.

    2

    704.7

    6

    693.2

    6

    699.6

    4

    679.6

    7

    Other

    Assets

    9043.

    5

    7860.

    7

    3602.

    8

    3941.

    1

    2641.

    5

    3232.

    4

    3339.

    1

    2928.

    9

    3769.

    9

    4081.

    9

    MisExp notwritten off 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    TOTAL

    ASSETS

    3794

    03.55

    3394

    64.82

    2668

    41.6

    2204

    52.45

    1809

    21.38

    1666

    82.96

    1338

    88.09

    1112

    13.56

    1012

    15.29

    8347

    1.97

    Contingent

    Liability

    1900

    56.81

    1296

    54.29

    1243

    44.55

    1518

    12.07

    1089

    13.42

    6194

    3.56

    5527

    3.61

    5796

    6.19

    5280

    6.28

    5154

    5.22

    Bills for

    collection 12497 11193

    7491.

    6 10522 11137

    6206.

    2

    4422.

    6

    3961.

    5

    3711.

    1

    3320.

    4

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    19/24

    19 | P a g e

    RSA

    36747

    2

    32872

    0

    26030

    7

    21351

    3

    17533

    8

    16057

    4

    12984

    4

    10759

    1 96746 78710

    RSL34267

    030770

    224312

    820090

    315666

    614413

    211735

    0 97273 88749 73089

    GAP (RSA -

    RSL) 24802 21018 17179 12610 18673 16443 12494 10319

    7996.

    7

    5621.

    5

    CUMMULAT

    IVE GAP 24802 45820 62999 75609 94282

    11072

    4

    12321

    9

    13353

    7

    14153

    4

    14715

    6

    GAP RATO

    (RSA/RSL)

    1.072

    4

    1.068

    3

    1.070

    7

    1.062

    8

    1.119

    2

    1.114

    1

    1.106

    5

    1.106

    1

    1.090

    1

    1.076

    9

    NET WORTH

    (TOTAL

    ASSETS -

    TOTAL

    LIABLITIES) 13690 11361

    8691.

    3

    6968.

    1 13536 11696

    8963.

    8

    7455.

    3

    6782.

    1

    5918.

    9

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    20/24

    20 | P a g e

    Punjab National Bank

    With over 72 million satisfied customers and 5937 domestic branches, PNB has continued to

    retain its leadership position amongst the nationalized banks. The Bank enjoys strong

    fundamentals, large franchise value and good brand image. Over the years PNB has remained

    fully committed to its guiding principles of sound and prudent banking irrespective of

    conditions. Bank has been earning many laurels and accolades in recognition to its service

    towards doing good to society, technology usage and on its overall performance. Some of the

    major awards won by the Bank are the Best Bank Award, Most Socially Responsive

    Bank by Business World-PwC, Most Productive Public Sector Bank, Golden Peacock

    Awards by Institute of Directors, etc. Besides, the Bank is ranked 26th amongst FE 500

    Indias Finest Companies, 26th amongst the Top 500 India's Largest Corporations by

    Fortune 500 India. The Banker ranked PNB on 186th position in 2011, improving from 257thposition a year before. PNB ranked 668th amongst 2000 Global Giants as per the Forbes and

    170th in 2012 improving from 195th in 2011 in Top 500 Most Valuable Banking Brands by

    Brand Finance Banking 500. India Inc Top 100 Most Powerful CEOs for the year 2012, Shri

    K.R. Kamath, CMD, PNB, adjudged Most Powerful amongst the Nationalised Banks in

    India, with overall rank at 50 by Economic Times. Bank has also been ranked 26th amongst

    India Top Companies as per ET 500 and 25th amongst the Top 50 most valuable corporate

    brand by Brand Finance-ET.

    Bank has been a frontrunner in the industry so far as the initiatives for Financial Inclusion is

    concerned. With its policy of inclusive growth and the mission Banking for Unbanked, it isa matter of pride for the Bank that it has been able to cover all its 4588 villages allotted under

    the Swabhiman Campaign of Government of India through Business Correspondents.

    Further, the Bank has also adopted 118 villages across country. Under FI plan, the Bank has

    engaged Technical Service Providers (TSPs) and the corporate Business Correspondents

    (BCs) for providing banking services in villages using ICT based BC model. The village

    level BC agents are using Hand Held Terminals/ POS machines & smartcards. Bank has

    extensively used technology to reach out to those which have remained away from formal

    banking set up.

    The Bank is offering all the technology enabled services to its customers ranging from

    Mobile Banking, Call Centre, Internet Banking, on line booking of rail tickets, payment of

    utilities bills, booking of airline tickets to SMS alerts and Mobile Banking services to keep

    them updated about their financial transactions at all time. Towards developing a cost

    effective alternative channels of delivery, the Bank with more than 6050 ATMs has the

    largest ATM network amongst Nationalized Banks. ATM Network of the Bank provides

    other value added services such as Funds Transfer, Bill Payments and mobile registration for

    generation of SMS alerts; Direct Tax Payment, request for stop payment of cheques, etc. are

    also provided to the cardholders.

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    21/24

    21 | P a g e

    Backed by strong domestic performance, the Bank has its global aspirations as well. Bank has

    expanded its footprint into 10 countries. Bank also has 4 overseas branches in Hong Kong,

    Dubai & Afghanistan and an Offshore Banking Unit (OBU) Branch in SEEPZ, Mumbai.

    Bank has one wholly owned overseas Banking subsidiary, PNB International Ltd. (UK) along

    with other two overseas subsidiaries are Druk PNB Bank Ltd, Bhutan and PNBKazakhstan besides Representative Office in Sydney, Australia, Dubai, Almaty, China &

    Norway. Bank is planning to set up its second wholly owned subsidiary in Canada. Bank is

    also looking to upgrade its Representative Offices at Norway, China and Australia to full-

    fledged branches. Bank is also exploring possibilities for presence in Maldives, South Africa,

    Bangladesh, Myanmar, Pakistan, Singapore and Brazil.

    HERE IS THE CALCULTION OF RSA, RSL,GAP, GAP RTIO, CUMMULATIVE

    GAP & NET WORTH OF PNB FROM MARCH 2003 TO MARCH 2012.

    (Rs inCrs)

    Year

    Mar

    12

    Mar

    11

    Mar

    10

    Mar

    09

    Mar

    08

    Mar

    07

    Mar

    06

    Mar

    05

    Mar

    04

    Mar

    03

    SOUR

    CES OF

    FUNDS

    :

    Capita

    l 339.18 316.81 315.3 315.3 315.3 315.3 315.3 315.3 265.3 265.3

    Reser

    vesTotal

    28,864.66

    22,297.85

    18,387.44

    15,244.92

    12,756.54

    10,736.67

    9,588.03

    8,261.57

    5,191.83

    4,128.48

    Equity

    Share

    Warra

    nts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Equit

    y

    Applica

    tion

    Money 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Minority 331.42 301.29 227.06 139.94 136.87 131.3 127.16 122.67

    144.92

    123.86

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    22/24

    22 | P a g e

    Interes

    t

    Depos

    its

    384,40

    8.22

    316,23

    1.93

    251,45

    7.66

    210,65

    9.17

    166,91

    7.02

    139,94

    4.07

    119,75

    2.01

    103,20

    3.69

    88,07

    3.38

    75,95

    1.73

    Borro

    wings

    42,645

    .42

    34,638

    .50

    22,762

    .94

    17,136

    .14

    8,646.

    18

    4,711.

    11

    8,973.

    08

    3,973.

    63

    2,689

    .81

    1,733

    .90Other

    Liabiliti

    es &

    Provisi

    ons

    13,884

    .97

    12,526

    .26

    10,444

    .32

    10,116

    .95

    14,972

    .55

    10,392

    .35

    9,654.

    96

    12,254

    .81

    8,362

    .50

    5,964

    .77

    Policy

    Holder

    s Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Othe

    rs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    TOTAL

    LIABILI

    TIES

    456,58

    8.90

    373,78

    6.38

    293,15

    0.40

    243,49

    5.47

    188,77

    1.91

    155,83

    8.45

    138,75

    5.58

    115,87

    6.86

    96,36

    5.24

    82,20

    3.27

    APPLIC

    ATION

    OF

    FUNDS :Cash &

    Balances

    with RBI

    18,50

    7.64

    23,79

    1.19

    18,33

    4.78

    17,05

    9.55

    15,25

    9.14

    12,37

    2.51

    23,39

    4.96

    9,460.

    76

    6,742.

    93

    6,569

    .01

    Balances

    with

    Banks &

    money at

    Call

    11,61

    2.25

    6,300.

    11

    5,915.

    91

    4,965.

    60

    3,968.

    53

    3,505.

    57

    1,587.

    24

    1,750.

    75

    2,090.

    77

    1,528

    .78

    Investm

    ents

    125,7

    46.34

    96,91

    1.28

    79,25

    3.88

    65,39

    1.68

    55,88

    3.28

    47,07

    5.87

    42,85

    1.13

    51,68

    2.60

    43,58

    5.72

    35,08

    9.04

    Advances

    301,346.52

    247,746.58

    191,110.85

    158,453.42

    121,571.05

    97,873.46

    75,409.29

    61,094.47

    47,862.28

    40,798.13

    Fixed

    Assets

    3,217.

    14

    3,150.

    48

    2,531.

    41

    2,622.

    19

    2,538.

    64

    1,228.

    14

    1,249.

    12

    974.7

    3

    910.7

    2

    902.5

    1

    Other

    Assets

    10,04

    3.98

    8,413.

    00

    6,447.

    89

    5,119.

    98

    4,523.

    82

    4,175.

    25

    3,918.

    80

    3,168.

    36

    3,535.

    32

    3,280

    .57

    Miscell

    aneous

    Expendit

    ure not

    written

    off 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    23/24

    23 | P a g e

    TOTAL

    ASSETS

    470,4

    73.87

    386,3

    12.64

    303,5

    94.72

    253,6

    12.42

    203,7

    44.46

    166,2

    30.80

    148,4

    10.54

    128,1

    31.67

    104,7

    27.74

    88,16

    8.04

    Conting

    ent

    Liability

    212,4

    21.74

    127,6

    11.31

    92,78

    9.21

    110,4

    72.81

    104,1

    76.34

    66,76

    1.36

    53,03

    9.75

    43,04

    0.88

    32,23

    0.11

    23,58

    8.81

    Bills forcollectio

    n

    16,32

    2.79

    11,98

    1.55

    9,529.

    79

    7,567.

    10

    7,106.

    59

    7,942.

    25

    5,704.

    17

    4,046.

    07

    4,813.

    08

    3,334

    .76

    RSA

    457,2

    12.75

    374,7

    49.16

    294,6

    15.42

    245,8

    70.25

    196,6

    82.00

    160,8

    27.41

    143,2

    42.62

    123,9

    88.58

    100,2

    81.70

    83,98

    4.96

    RSL

    427,3

    85.06

    351,1

    71.72

    274,4

    47.66

    227,9

    35.25

    175,7

    00.07

    144,7

    86.48

    128,8

    52.25

    107,2

    99.99

    90,90

    8.11

    77,80

    9.49

    GAP

    (RSA-

    RSL)

    29,82

    7.69

    23,57

    7.44

    20,16

    7.76

    17,93

    5.00

    20,98

    1.93

    16,04

    0.93

    14,39

    0.37

    16,68

    8.59

    9,373.

    59

    6,175.

    47

    Gap

    ratio

    1.069

    7911

    1.067

    1393

    1.073

    4849

    1.078

    6846

    1.119

    419

    1.110

    7902

    1.111

    6812

    1.155

    5321

    1.103

    1106

    1.079

    3665

    Cummu

    lative

    gap

    29,82

    7.69

    53,40

    5.13

    73,57

    2.89

    91,50

    7.89

    112,4

    89.82

    128,5

    30.75

    142,9

    21.12

    159,6

    09.71

    168,9

    83.30

    175,1

    58.77

    Net

    Worth

    (Total

    assets -

    Total

    Liabiliti

    es)

    13,88

    4.97

    12,52

    6.26

    10,44

    4.32

    10,11

    6.95

    14,97

    2.55

    10,39

    2.35

    9,654.

    96

    12,25

    4.81

    8,362.

    50

    5,964.

    77

  • 7/29/2019 Risk Management Practices of Three Public Sector Banks

    24/24

    References

    Websites:

    www.bankofbaroda.com

    www.wikipedia.com

    www.capitaline.in/

    www.bseindia.com

    www.moneycontrol.com

    http://in.finance.yahoo.com/

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/

    http://www.bankofbaroda.com/http://www.capitaline.in/http://www.capitaline.in/http://www.bseindia.com/http://www.bseindia.com/http://www.moneycontrol.com/http://www.moneycontrol.com/http://in.finance.yahoo.com/http://in.finance.yahoo.com/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/http://in.finance.yahoo.com/http://www.moneycontrol.com/http://www.bseindia.com/http://www.capitaline.in/http://www.bankofbaroda.com/