65
Risk management A management perspective mercredi 28 avril 2010

Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Summary of the principal issues of risk management

Citation preview

Page 1: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk managementA management perspective

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 2: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Plan

What is risk ?

Risk Governance

Risk management

Risk and culture

Risk taxonomy

Risk Metrics

Wrap-up

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 3: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

IntroductionWhat is risk ?

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 4: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

A definition of risk

Pb(event) x impact

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 5: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk has two meanings

In English, Risk is an umbrella term, with two varieties:

opportunity which is a risk with positive effects

threat which is a risk with negative effects

Hillson(2001)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 6: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk is not uncertainty

Risk refers to situations where the decision-maker can assign mathematical probabilities to the randomness which he is faced with.

Uncertainty refers to situations when this randomness "cannot" be expressed in terms of specific mathematical probabilities.

Knight, Frank H. (1921)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 7: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk and uncertainty

The terms risk and uncertainty have become interchangeable, and one can often be found in the description of the other.

Beck(1986)

Risk and uncertainty will be defined and used accordingly as separate issues of the same complex phenomena, that of hazard management.

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 8: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk is formal

Risk can be considered as a systematic way of dealing with hazards.

If it is assumed that there is uncertainty associated with any prediction of a hazard occurring, then there is only uncertainty because there is only ever a prediction of the likely occurrence.

Beck(1986)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 9: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Uncertainty is not risk

By uncertain knowledge, (...) I do not mean merely to distinguish what is known for certain from what is only probable.

uncertainty is present when there is no scientific basis on which to form any calculable probability whatever.

We simply do not know.

Keynes(1937)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 10: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk and probability

The very assignment of numerical probabilities - even if subjective - implies that it represents choice under "risk"

These probabilities are merely expressions of what is ultimately amorphous belief and thus may seem more like "uncertainty".

Savage(1954)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 11: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk is about outcomes

Risk is the probability that an event will occur.

In epidemiology, it is most often used to express the probability that a particular outcome will occur following a particular exposure.

Last JM, (2001)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 12: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

What is the problem ?

Risk is an old concept, classically measured as a product of outcome, usually negative, and a measure of uncertainty, such as probability, balancing bad, but unlikely, outcomes with less bad but more frequent ones.

The problems arise in defining

what one means by an outcome and

how one assesses the probabilities.

Hudson(2003)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 13: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

time 0

Util

ity Risk

management RISK

Risk Management

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 14: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

A more complete definition

R! (E,A,!) "

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 15: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

E : element at risk

Element (asset, process, system, etc.) or group of elements that have an expected utility (u) for a given period of time (Δt) in a finite space (s)

A : Hazard (real, foreseeable or perceived)

Event or sequence of events resulting from the exploitation of a vulnerability (ψ) of an element at risk (E) which can cause a dammage (δ) which results in a reduction of the expected utility (u) for a given period of time (Δt) in a finite space (s)

ψ : vulnerability

Fragility (relative) of an element at risk (E) to a hazard (A)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 16: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

θ : resilience

Capacity of an element at risk (E) to overcome a hazard (A) by minimizing damages (δ) or by using adversity as a catalyst for improvement. It is linked to organisational maturity

δ: damage (real, foreseen or perceived)

Reduction of the expected utility (u) of an element at risk (E) by a hazard (A)

t : time

s: space

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 17: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

The risk triangle

Hazard or thre at

Vuln

e rab

i l it y

Damage or impact

Risk(E,t,s)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 18: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk governanceA management perspective

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 20: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Governance structure

Executive

Strategic

Tactical

Operational

Corporate directors

Professionals

Governance comitee

Management comitee

supports

directs

manages

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 21: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 22: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Role of the Board of directors

Management Stockholders Employees

Board of directors

Lenders SuppliersOther

stakeholders

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 23: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Roles and responsibilities

Mission statement and values

Sets culture and normative framework

Arbitrage

Exercises authority

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 24: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Subsidiarity

Responsability for actions must be alloted to the smallest possible entity that can resolve it

Decision making as close as possible to the end-user or customer

Act locally: responsabilize the actors

Empower local competencies and decentralize

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 25: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk governanceBasic ethical principles

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 26: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Due diligence

Organisations need to demonstrate that they are being diligent

They need to be able to demonstrate that they have in place formal processes to ensure that risks are known and managed

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 27: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Precaution

When there is the possibility, event if unlikely, that hazards may cause grave or irreversible dammages, the absence of absolute scientific certitude can not become a pretext to avoid taking actions to prevent the degredation of the situation

Contrary to rational theory, precausion justifies taking decisions in cases of incomplete information to avoid irreversable damages. It justifies non optimal solutions that may satisfy all parties (minimum regrets)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 28: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Continuous improvementDeming’s wheell approachRecurrence feedback loopsEvolution of solutions aligned withthe availability of ressources

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 29: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Evaluation

Must determine, a priori:ObjectivesFollow-up parametersControl and corrective action plansA space for all stakeholders to review information

Finality:Create mecanisms that allow the conversion of data into usefull planning information

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 30: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk ManagementFormal processes

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 31: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

IPMa process

Identify risks

Prioritize

Mobiize ressources

Audit

IPMamercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 32: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Qualitative or Quantitative ?

In the absence of solid historical data, all data is subjective.

Sources of historical data:

Past events, hazards and incidents in the organization

Data from similar organizations

Regulatory bodies

Gartner group, IDC, Forester Research and litterature

Standards (ITU, ISO, IEEE)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 33: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Scenario based risk mgmt

Using scenarios is the most ‘human sensitive’ approach to risk management

it’s simpler to get people to tell you a story

What if ...

Then ...

This would result in ...

But, we could do ... to prevent it or to reduce it’s impacts.

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 34: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Incidents are central

Using past incidents is a key to risk management

Quantitative data finds it’s source in historical data

It is a chance to improve

individuals has to feel that they can, and must, report incidents

Management has to support this

A risk registry, or journal, serves this purpose

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 35: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

IPM process

Identify

Hazards

Vulnerabilities

Damages

Prioritize

Mobilize ressources

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 36: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Cognitive processesThe cognitive operations of individual decision makers involved on decisions about risk are (in order) :

Identify the scenarios to consider

Predict the consequences for each scenario and estimate their likelyhood

Identify the variables susceptible to influence utility and ajust them to account for the context

Evaluate the probabilities to assign to contexts that have been retained

Apply a decisional strategy

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 37: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Transferrisk

Avoidrisk

Acceptrisk

Mitigaterisk

D a m a g e s

Likelihood

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 38: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Transferrisk Avoid

risk

Acceptrisk Mitigate

risk

D a m a g e s

Likelihood

Tolerate risks

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 39: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Biaises that may affect decision makers

Errors in reasoning

Cognitive dissonances

Heuristics

Cultural variations

Limitis of vigilance

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 40: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Methodologies

Several are available

All have their limitations

Choice of variables

Scientificity

Validity (internal and external)

Must consider maturity

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 41: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk Management FrameworkAn integrated risk framework allows organisation to integrate all the organisational, regulatory and scientific requirements in a cyclical approach (continuous improvement).

Should include:

Business processes

Standard Operating Procedures

A governance model

Risk awareness, education & training programs

Workflow management tool (software)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 42: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Change management

Implementing a RMF is a Change management problem

five (5) stages of change

Denial

Resistance

Decompensation

Resignation

Integration

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 43: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

How to facilitate change ?

Education, training

Setting normative factors

Rationalization

Consensus

Other (dictatorship, coersion,esoteric)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 44: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk and cultureRisk, culture, perception and subjectivity

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 45: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk, culture and perception

According to one cultural theory, people choose what to fear as a way to defend their way of life.

The theory hypothesizes that adherents of a hierarchical culture will approve of technology, provided it is certified as safe by their experts.

Competitive individualists will view risk as opportunity and, hence, be optimistic about technology.

And egalitarians will view technology as part of the apparatus by which corporate capitalism maintains inequalities that harm society and the natural environment. Widavsky (2002)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 46: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Difficulty to assess risk

Risk is not always easy to assess, since the probability of occurrence and the consequence of occurrence are usually not directly measurable parameters and must be estimated by statistical or other procedures.

Risk constitutes a lack of knowledge of future events. Typically, future events (or outcomes) that are favorable are called opportunities, whereas unfavorable events are called risks. Another element of risk is its cause.

Kerzner, H. (2003)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 47: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk tolerance

Risk tolerance looks at acceptable/unacceptable deviations from what is expected.

In financial investments, The extent to wish an investor is willing to accept more risk in exchange for the possibility of a higher return.

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 48: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk appetite

Where do we feel we should allocate our limited time and resources to minimise risk exposures?

What level of risk exposure requires immediate action?

What level of risk requires a formal response strategy to mitigate the potentially material impact?

What events have occurred in the past, and at what level were they managed?

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 49: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Predictable outcomesMany activities undertaken by organizations do not have predictable outcomes

One can’t predict the return from a new project, for example.

Occurrence of these types of events can only be described in terms of a range of possible outcomes and the likelihood or probability of each outcome.

The lack of predictability of outcomes is referred to as risk.

The concept of risk does not imply all possible outcomes are adverse, only that the precise probabilities of the outcomes are unknown.

Lewis(2003)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 50: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Distribution of outcomes

According to classical decision theory, risk is generally understood to be the distribution of possible outcomes, their likelihood, and their subjective values.

In project management, this definition can be applied to time, cost, performance, and many other influential factors in any project that impact these three concerns.

March and Shapira (1987) in Kwak(2005)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 51: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Reference points

The reference points that people use to evaluate risky prospects affect risk-taking.

In this respect, risk tolerance is a subjective notion in the absence of clear and uniform communication and tools for risk analysis.

Kahneman and Taversky (1979) and Taversky and Kahneman (1992) in Kwak(2005)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 52: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk taxonomyCategories of organisational risks

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 53: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk categories

There is an infinite number of categories of risk

Depends on :

organisational culture

legislation

many other factors

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 54: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk Taxonomy

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 55: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

What is needed ?

For each incident identified, information needs to be collected about :

direct monetary losses caused by the incident

Annualized (or aligned on budgetary strategy)

indirect losses (reputation damage or lost business)

with an estimate of the monetary losses resulting from these indirect losses.

Blakley, B., McDermott, E., Geer, D.(2001)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 56: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk register

Dates: As the register is a living document, it is important to record the date that risks are identified or modified. Optional dates to include are the target and completion dates.

Description of the Risk: A phrase that describes the risk.

Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 57: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk register

Risk type (business, project, stage): Classification of the risk, business risks relate to delivery of achieved benefits, project risks relate to the management of the project such as timeframes and resources, stage risks are risks associated with a specific stage plan.

Likelihood of Occurrence: Provides an assessment on how likely it is that this risk will occur. Examples of classifications are: L-Low (<30%), M-Medium (31-70%), H-High (>70%).

Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 58: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk register

Severity of effect: Provides an assessment of the impact that the occurrence of this risk would have on the project.

Counter Measures: Action to be taken to prevent, reduce or transfer the risk. This may include production of contingency plans.

Owner: Individual responsible for the ensuring this risk is appropriately managed and counter measures are undertaken.

Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 59: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk register

Status: Indicates whether this is a current risk or if risk can no longer arise and impact the project. Example classifications are: C-current or E-ended.

Other columns such as quantitative value can also be added if appropriate.

Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 60: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Risk metricsA management perspective

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 61: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

The use of metrics

From the governanced based risk management perspective:

Risk assessment

Continuous improvement

Evaluation

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 62: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Identifying variables

Metrics are about measurement

Attributing values to variables

Values depend on measurement scales

There are rules on how to use measurement scales

nominal, ordinal, interval, proportional

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 63: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Example of measurement scales

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 64: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

Scientificity and reliability

Scientific data must meet certain criterias

trust, repeatable, verifyable

We must be able to justify the choices we make

in data and in manipulation (formulas)

mercredi 28 avril 2010

Page 65: Risk Mgmt V1 0c

[email protected]

Montreal, Quebec, Canada:+1(514)824-6302Philadelphia, PA, USA:+1(215)543-6352

Paris, France: +33.(0)9.77.19.63.02

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/itriskmgrBlog: http://crhoma.org/blogue

http://www.leger.ca

mercredi 28 avril 2010