Risks and Issues

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

r4ter

Citation preview

OpenIDType
Martin Goernitz: Martin Goernitz:Risk - Potential for Critical PathIssue - Critical Path ItemShort DescriptionDateOwnerResolution StatusImpact AreaSeverity
Martin Goernitz: Martin Goernitz:Low - will cost only a few days on the timeline, caught by reserves in the plan, no image impact (stakeholders will not notice)

Medium - Minor risk to deadlines or stakeholders will notice, but it will not land on us

High - deadlins will be missed, impacts more than a few application, blame will land on usProbability
Martin Goernitz: Martin Goernitz:Low - the risk will only manifest under special circumstances (75-99%, in most cases)

Issues do not have a probability as the risk has already manifested or is sure to manifest in the futureMitigation Approach

3RiskRequest for two Small VMs required to host web servers for CAPE still pendingIn ProgressCAPEHighHighRequest has been made. Delivery date still unkown5RiskNew To-Be Server delays for TFS and TSOrders Track, date is now pushed to July 30.The new delivery date eliminates the cushion that was in schedule. If date goes past July 30 then missing Oct 1 becomes possibility14-JulOsbert LassbergOpenTFS and TSOrdersMediumMediumServers are delivered, access still pending6RiskData and application transfer/migration to the target environment, which will be of significant size is undefined. If the process ends up taking significant time, tracks will have to plan for this or risk their timeline15-JulTony DangIn ProgressTimeline all tracksMediumLowHalliburton is working with HP on finding a solution. Will have to assess impact to tracks upon receiving it7IssueRVCS - 2 source servers, 1 target server16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressF&CLowObtain more information from business owner, he stated the reason for 2 servers is load balancing8IssueProtheus application is in Portuguese16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressF&CMediumNone, unless English documentation is provided9IssueProtheus - Wipro needs to obatin an access key to enable application and acess to Brazilian governement16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressF&CLowObtain further information from Hal for requiring licenses10RiskRVCS - Highly depentant on Hyperion16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressF&CHighCynthia to contact Hyperion to obtain changes required from migration and discuss cut over plan approach11RiskF&C - Master data extraction logic is expected to built by Wipro16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressF&CHighObtain a clear understanding on what data needs to be extracted. Hal needs to provide clear extraction logic.12IssueData only applications' target environment16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressAll data only applicationsLowHal needs to provide target environment 13RiskLearning Management System - Dependencies on other out of scope applications16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressHCMMediumHal to decided if other applications will be included in Wipro's scope14RiskClone applications will need a cut over plan16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressAll tracks - Clone AppsHighHal to decided on dates for each individual application15IssueLimited data on Norway applications16-JulCynthiaIn ProgressNorway AppsMediumWipro team has set up meetings and calls with the Norway team to have a better understanding of the applications16RiskCurrently access to production servers is being denied. While access to stage and QA servers might be sufficent to investigate the appliations, access to production is mandatory for cloning (to ensure correct integration endpoints) and data extraction (to ensure up to date production data)21-JulMartin GoernitzIn ProgressAll tracks, timeline & qualityMediumHighEnsure access to Prod servers is provided; alternatively, request waiver from HAL for any discrepancies in data sourced from non-prod servers, manual reconstruction of integration. 17RiskCloning servers to the HP DC might not be possible due to missing root access to the Hypervisor. It is unclear how the cloning images are to be deployed to the HP environment, as the availability of sized servers with OS & DB points can't be used to deploy clones21-JulMartin GoernitzIn ProgressCustom Apps tracks timelineHighMediumGreenfield option as alternative, though this would kill the timeline. Need to figure out what HALs approach to cloning is.18RiskNo administrative access to servers in the VPC container after 30 days.27-JulHPUnknownAny servers not in the Custom containerHighHighDon't put any servers in the VPC container that cannot run their applications as a service. Move any servers that require an interactive login to the Custom container.19RiskNo early servers for the Custom container27-JulHPUnknownAny track that expected to get servers early that are going to be in the Custom containerHighHighDon't need servers early or move them to the Standard VPC container if administrative access is not needed.20RiskWe are combining applications on servers in the To-Be that are currrently NOT co-located in the As-Is at HAL. Compatibility is unknown; LOE for potential issues is unknown.30-JulOsbert LassbergOpenAll tracksHighHighNone. We will simply have to install the applications and work through any and all issues on a server by server basis. 21222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140

ClosedType
Martin Goernitz: Martin Goernitz:Risk - Potential for Critical PathIssue - Critical Path ItemShort DescriptionDateOwnerResolution StatusImpact AreaSeverity
Martin Goernitz: Martin Goernitz:Low - will cost only a few days on the timeline, caught by reserves in the plan, no image impact (stakeholders will not notice)

Medium - Minor risk to deadlines or stakeholders will notice, but it will not land on us

High - deadlins will be missed, impacts more than a few application, blame will land on usProbability
Martin Goernitz: Martin Goernitz:Low - the risk will only manifest under special circumstances (75-99%, in most cases)

Issues do not have a probability as the risk has already manifested or is sure to manifest in the futureMitigation Approach

RiskProjects will have to pass Halliburton Security and Architecture Reviews (Conditional initially). If not passed, migration will be delayed. This is responsibility of the project manager, but track leads/resources might be pulled in.17-JunMartin GoernitzClosedTimeline F&C, HCM, OTC, Real Time, (CAPE)MediumMediumSCM has already passed both reviews, CAPE is in progress for Security. Review guidance is availableRiskAccording to Os there will be no NAS and what constitutes a fileshare in the target environment is still under discussion, meaning we will not be able to store any Data Only extracts.8-JulTony DangClosedAll Tracks Data Only DeliverablesMediumMediumStorage options are available, request using VPC Server template via TonyRiskApplications (Norway Apps) need Oracle 9g and 10g which is currently out of standard for the HP environment. If this cannot be provided migration would have to wait until September when Halliburton plans to migrate these applications to 11g30-JunMartin GoernitzClosedSCM/HSE track timeline (also relevant for Accenture)MediumHighNorway apps will migrate post upgrade to 11 g