21
The DOJ Settlement Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor [email protected] Its Implications for Housing

Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

The DOJ Settlement

Robert Bernstein, PhDCourt [email protected]

Its Implications for Housing

Page 2: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

Some context.

2

Page 3: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

3

Institutionalized SegregationInstitutionalized Segregation

Page 4: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

4

Page 5: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

5

The "Cottage for Colored Women" (Maryland Hospital for the Insane c. 1906)

Page 6: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

6

The Back WardThe Back Ward.

Page 7: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

7

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

1950

1960

1975

1985

1995

2005

Deinstitutionalization

Page 8: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

8

Levels of Care

Page 9: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

The Nursing Home.The Nursing Home.9

Page 10: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

10The Group Home.The Group Home.

Page 11: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

Over-Representation ofPeople with Serious Mental Illness

11General Population Homeless Population

0%

10%

20%

30%

Page 12: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

12

The ADAThe ADA

“…individuals with disabilities are a discrete and insular minority …

subjected to a history of purposeful unequal treatment, and relegated to a position of political

powerlessness in our society… resulting from stereotypic

assumptions not truly indicative of the individual ability of such

individuals to participate in, and contribute to, society; … the

Nation’s proper goals regarding individuals with disabilities are to

assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living,

and economic self-sufficiency …”

Page 13: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

13

The Olmstead Decision

“Institutional placement of persons who can handle

and benefit from community settings

perpetuates unwarranted assumptions that persons

so isolated are incapable or unworthy of participating in

community life.”

“Unjustified isolation, we hold, is properly regarded as discrimination based on disability..”

Page 14: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

14

Understanding de-segregation• Separate is Unequal• More than Proximity to the Mainstream• Contact with the Broader Community• Meaningful Opportunity

• Separate is Unequal• More than Proximity to the Mainstream• Contact with the Broader Community• Meaningful Opportunity

Page 15: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

15

The housing services will ensure that people with SPMI can live like the rest of Delawareans, in their own homes, including leased apartments, or living with their family.

Page 16: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

16

An Ordinary Life:

Stable housing. Owning something.

Page 17: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

17

The Assessment Process

Page 18: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

18

Move Services, Not People.

Page 19: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

19

Reasonable Accommodations: Leveling the Playing Field

Page 20: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

QuantifyingIntegration:

The “20-2” Rule?

Page 21: Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor Robert.del@verizon.net

21

Retooling for Integrated Housing