Upload
letram
View
230
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
From Robert Kaplan (Accounting) and Michael Porter (Strategy),
HBR, September 2011
Question (Title): “How to Solve the Cost Crisis in Health Care”
Answer: Does not require medical science breakthroughs or new governmental
regulation. It simply requires a new way (TDABC = Time‐Driven Activity‐Based
Costing) to accurately measure costs and compare them to outcomes.
Indeed, accurately measuring costs and outcomes is the single most powerful lever
we have today for transforming the economics of healthcare.
A TDABC budgeting process starts by predicting the volume and types of patients
the provider expects.
The new approach engages physicians, clinical teams, administrative staff and
financial professionals in creating process maps and estimating the resource costs
involved in treating patients over their care cycle.
Introduction:
Goal of Heath care delivery system: Improve the value delivered to patients.
Value = measured in terms of outcome achieved per dollar expended (cost).
Medical outcome: has enjoyed growing attention.
Cost to deliver outcomes: received much less attention ‐ the FOCUS here.
Opportunities to Improve Value:
‐ Eliminate unnecessary process variations and processes that don’t add value.
‐ Improve resource capacity utilization.
‐ Deliver the right processes at the right location.
‐ Match clinical skills to the process.
‐ Speed up cycle time.
‐ Optimize over the full cycle of care.
The Challenge of Health Care Costing:
‐ Heath care today is a highly customized job shop
‐ Any accurate costing system must, at a fundamental level, account for the
total costs of all the resources used by a patient as she or he traverses the
system. That means tracking the sequence of and duration of clinical and
administrative processes used by individual patients – something the
most hospital information systems today are unable to do. (In the future:
RFID etc.)
‐ With good estimates of the typical path an individual patient takes for a
medical condition, providers can use the Time‐Driven Activity‐Base
Costing (TDABC) to assign costs accurately and relatively easily to each
process step along the path.
‐ Requires that providers estimate only two parameters at each process
step: the cost of each resource used in the process and the quantity of
time the patient spends with each resource.
The Cost Measurement Process:
‐ Select the medical condition
‐ Define the care delivery value chain (CDVC), which charts the principal
activities involved in a patient’s care for a medical condition along with
their location.
‐ Develop process maps of each activity in patient care delivery.
‐ Obtain time estimates for each process.
‐ Estimate the cost of supplying patient care resources.
‐ Estimate the capacity of each resource and calculate the capacity cost rate.
‐ Calculate the total cost of patient care.
Reinventing Reimbursement: Abandon the current complex fee‐for‐service
payment schedule. Instead, payors should introduce value‐based reimbursement,
such as bundled payment, that covers the full care cycle and included care for
complications and comorbidities (=several deseases).
From “Managing Business Process Flows”, by Anupindi, Chopra, Deshmukh, Van Mieghem, Zemel (Kellogg, Northwestern)
‐ Job‐shops typically display jumbled work flows with large amounts of
storage and substantial waiting between activities.
‐ Thus, it is more practical to represent a jobshop with a
Network of Resources, instead of
Network of Activities.
On Financial Measures: Though the ultimate judge of process performance,
financial measures are inherently lagging, aggregate, and more results oriented than
action oriented. They also are reported infrequently.
The operations manager, however, needs Operational Measures – more detailed
and more frequent measures that can be controlled and that ultimately have an
impact on financial measures.
Ideally, companies want operational measures to be leading indicators of financial
performance. The three types of financial measures (absolute performance,
performance relative to asset utilization, cash‐flow) would then mirror operational
measures and provide daily support to process management.
Uncharted Territory: Information Technology (e.g. RFID), Statistics, Operations
Research/Management plus Professionals (Physicians, Marketing,…) can jointly
“close the gap” between financial and operational measures.
Research Questions:
‐ Operational Models at the “right” level of resolution (individual transaction)
‐ Imputed / Surrogate for Costs (Profits) or Quality, inferred from the more
easily observable operational measures.
o Tardiness costs via newsvendor o Clinical quality via return‐to‐hospitalization o Waiting costs from Constraint Satisfaction (e.g. 20‐80 rule in call centers)
o Waiting/Abandonment costs? (There is literature on the “Cost of Waiting”)
Conceptual Model:Service Networks = Queueing Networks
8
Service Networks = Queueing Networks • People, waiting for service: teller, repairman, ATM
• Telephone-calls, to be answered: busy, music, info.
• Forms, to be sent, processed, printed; for a partner
• Projects, to be developed, approved, implemented
• Justice, to be made: pre-trial, hearing, retrial
• Ships, for a pilot, berth, unloading crew
• Patients, for an ambulance, emergency room, operation
• Cars, in rush hour, for parking
• Checks, waiting to be processed, cashed
• Queues Scarce Resources, Synchronization Gaps
Costly, but here to stay
– Face-to-face Nets (Chat) (min.)
– Tele-to-tele Nets (Telephone) (sec.)
– Administrative Nets (Letter-to-Letter) (days)
– Fax, e.mail (hours)
– Face-to-ATM, Tele-to-IVR
– Mixed Networks (Contact Centers)
38
15
Stochastic Systems
q
PATIENT FLOW IN HOSPITALS: A DATA-BASEDQUEUEING-SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
By Mor Armony, Avishai Mandelbaum, Yariv Marmor,Yulia Tseytlin, and Galit Yom-Tov
Patient flow in hospitals can be naturally modeled as a queueingnetwork, where patients are the customers, and medical staff, bedsand equipment are the servers. But are there special features of sucha network that sets it apart from prevalent models of queueing net-works? To address this question, we use Exploratory Data Analysis(EDA) to study detailed patient flow data from a large Israeli hospi-tal.
EDA reveals interesting and significant phenomena, which are notreadily explained by available queueing models, and which raise ques-tions such as: What queueing model best describes the distribution ofthe number of patients in the Emergency Department (ED); and howdo such models accommodate existing throughput degradation dur-ing peak congestion? What time resolutions and operational regimesare relevant for modeling patient length of stay in the Internal Wards(IWs)? While routing patients from the ED to the IWs, how to con-trol delays in concert with fair workload allocation among the wards?Which leads one to ask how to measure this workload: Is it propor-tional to bed occupancy levels? How is it related to patient turnoverrates?
Our research addresses such questions and explores their opera-tional and scientific significance. Moreover, the above questions mostlyaddress medical units unilaterally, but EDA underscores the need forand benefit from a comparative-integrative view: for example, com-paring IWs to the Maternity and Oncology wards, or relating EDbottlenecks to IW physician protocols. All this gives rise to additionalquestions that offer opportunities for further research, in QueueingTheory, its applications and beyond.
CONTENTS
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.1 Anonymous Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51.2 Some Hints to the Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81.3 Data Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2 Summary of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 Emergency Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.1 Empirical findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193.2 What simple queueing model best fits the ED environment? . 24
1imsart-ssy ver. 2011/05/20 file: Patient_flow_main_230811.tex date: August 23, 2011
PATIENT FLOW IN HOSPITALS 5
and significance (practical or statistical).
1.1. Anonymous Hospital. The data we rely on was collected at a largeIsraeli hospital, referred to here as “Anonymous Hospital”. This hospitalconsists of about 1000 beds and 45 medical units, with about 75,000 patientshospitalized annually. The data includes detailed information on patientflow throughout the hospital, over a period of several years (2004-2008). Inparticular, the data allows one to follow the paths of individual patientsthroughout their stay at the hospital, including admission, discharge, andtransfer between hospital units.
Traditionally, hospital studies have focused on individual units, in isola-tion from the rest of the hospital; but this approach ignores interactionsamong units. On the flip side, looking at the hospital as a whole is complexand may lead to a lack of focus. Instead, and although our data encompassesthe entire hospital, we chose to focus on a sub-network that consists of theEmergency Department (ED) and five Internal Wards (IW), denoted by Athrough E; see Figure 1. This subnetwork, referred to as ED+IW, is more
Arrivals EmergencyDepartment
Abandonment
Services
IW A
IW C
IW B
IW D
IW E
Dischargedpatients
Dischargedpatients
InternalDepartment
OtherMedical
Units
53%
13.6%
"JusticeTable"
Blocked at IWs3.5%
69.9%
16.5%
5%
15.7%
1%
23.6%
84.3%
75.4%
245 pat./day
161 pat./day
Fig 1. The ED+IW system as a queueing network
imsart-ssy ver. 2011/05/20 file: Patient_flow_main_230811.tex date: August 23, 2011
PATIENT FLOW IN HOSPITALS 7
90×
90Matrix,Sub-W
ardResolution
InternalMedicine
119
Fig 2. Transition probabilities between hospital wards
imsart-ssy ver. 2011/05/20 file: Patient_flow_main_230811.tex date: August 23, 2011
DataMOCCA DATA MOdel for Call Center Analysis
Volume 5.1 Skills-Based- Routing in US Bank
Mr Pablo Liberman Dr Valery Trofimov
Professor Avishai Mandelbaum
Created: February 2008
Skills Groups Definitions
Grouping Several factors influence the characterization of an agent’s skills-set. Here we explain, via examples, the factors that we have been using. When there are several types of calls served by an agent, one must decide if these types characterize a skill or, alternatively, they are random assignments due perhaps to random circumstances. (For example, an unforeseen increase in load that enforces unqualified agents to serve calls beyond their skill-set.) Our grouping decisions are based on the different services types which the agents take, the percentage of the agent calls from each service type, the percentage of the service type calls that flows to each agent group, the agent skills characteristics over the different months and the number of agent with the same skills characteristics. Grouping Examples, the May 2001 Case On May 2001, 1851 agents worked in the call center within 17 different skills-groups. The largest group in May 2001 is Group 1, consisting of 575 agents. This group consists of all the agents that take mainly Retail service. In Table 2 we see that this group serves 36.26% of the Retails calls, and a very small percentage of others services. This small percentage is negligible because the number of calls is small and the number of agents is large, so it does not influence agents performance. (In Table 1 we see that this fraction is 0.01% of the agents calls). Still, the question arises whether these call types should affect the characterization of these agents’ skills-set. To this end, we observe that, in later months, none of such call-types were served by these agents. Hence, we deduce that the service-types in question are not elements of these agents-skills-set. There are 252 agents who serve mainly Retail group that form Group 2. The difference between this group and Group 1 is that the Group 2 agents take a small number of Premier, Business and Telesales calls, but in these cases we identify predictable patterns of those calls routing (in most of them, we see a small number of these service types calls to each agent on each month of the successive months). The smallest group is Group 38, which is formed by only one agent. This one agent is very important because he or she serves 15.24% of the Subanco calls, and there are no others agents in the call center with the same skills characteristic. Main Service Our Main Service decision is based on only two important parameters: the percentage of the agent calls from each service type and the percentage of the service type calls in each agent group. Examples of Main Services, the May 2001 Case Group 12 is grouping 58 agents, who take 7.24% of the Retails calls; these 7.24% of the Retail calls represent 93.44% of those agents work, therefore the main service of this group is Retail service. Group 31 is grouping 43 agents; 84.15% of their calls are Business calls and 15.62% are Platinum calls but, on the other hand, this group takes 39.5% of the Business calls and 95.51% of the Platinum calls. This is the reason that the main service of this group is Platinum calls.
12
Table 1 (Groups work description): group code, total number of agents, main service, total number of calls and the percentage of the agent calls from each service type.
Group Code
Total # Agents Main Services Retail Premier Business Platinum Customer
Loans Online
Banking EBO Telesales Subanco Summit Total # Calls
1 575 Retail (1) 99.97 0.01 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 2540752 252 Retail (1) 97.38 0.3 1.67 0 0 0.06 0 0.59 0 0 2058754 17 Retail (1) 69.06 19.62 5.79 0 0 0 0 5.53 0 0 6387 6 94 Retail (1) 98.62 0.25 0.9 0 0 0.01 0 0 0.22 0 86529 9 44 Retail (1) 96.53 0.19 0 0.15 0.01 3.12 0 0 0 0 36369 10 78 EBO (7) 66.99 0.35 0.62 0 0 0 31.93 0.11 0 0 55452 12 58 Retail (1) 93.99 0.17 1.26 0 0 0 0 4.58 0 0 53943 15 43 Retail (1) 98.73 0.14 0.12 0 0 0.01 0 0 1 0 24996 19 89 Premier (2) 0.68 99.29 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 40681 29 64 Business (3) 0.58 0 98.89 0.47 0 0.02 0 0.02 0.02 0 37705 31 43 Platinum (4) 0.23 0 84.15 15.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 33493 33 83 Customer Loans (5) 7.35 0 0 0 92.65 0 0 0 0 0 67803 34 6 Subanco (9) 0.02 0 0 0 68.67 0 0 0 31.31 0 5273 35 178 Online Banking (6) 8.67 0.23 0 0 0 91.1 0 0 0 0 35404 36 129 Telesales (8) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 74765 38 1 Subanco (9) 0 0 38.15 0 0 0.16 0 0 61.69 0 616 45 97 Summit (14) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 111948
Note: Each row sums up 100%.
Table 2 (Calls flow description): main service, group code, total number of agents, the percentage of the service type calls that flows to each agent group, and the number of calls arriving from each service.
Main services Group Code
Total # Agents
Retail Premier Business Platinum Customer Loads
Online Banking EBO Telesales Subanco Summit
Retail (1) 1 575 36.26 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0 0 0.16 0 Retail (1) 2 252 28.62 1.43 4.81 0 0.01 0.38 0.01 1.55 0.32 0 Retail (1) 4 17 0.63 2.92 0.52 0 0 0 0 0.45 0 0 Retail (1) 6 94 12.18 0.5 1.09 0 0 0.02 0 0 7.78 0 Retail (1) 9 44 5.01 0.16 0 0.99 0 3.39 0 0 0 0 EBO (7) 10 78 5.3 0.45 0.48 0.04 0 0 99.99 0.08 0 0 Retail (1) 12 58 7.24 0.21 0.96 0 0 0 0 3.13 0 0 Retail (1) 15 43 3.52 0.08 0.04 0 0 0.01 0 0 9.98 0 Premier (2) 19 89 0.04 93.99 0 0.22 0 0 0 0 0 0 Business (3) 29 64 0.03 0 52.26 3.23 0 0.02 0 0.01 0.28 0 Platinum (4) 31 43 0.01 0 39.5 95.51 0 0 0 0 0 0 Customer Loans (5) 33 83 0.71 0 0 0 94.51 0 0 0 0 0 Subanco (9) 34 6 0 0 0 0 5.45 0 0 0 66.2 0 Online Banking (6) 35 178 0.44 0.19 0 0 0 96.18 0 0 0.04 0 Telesales (8) 36 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94.79 0 0 Subanco (9) 38 1 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 15.24 0 Summit (14) 45 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Total # Calls 700703 43282 72149 35068 71742 36810 55458 78874 7965 111948
Note: Each column sums up 100%.
13
Chart 1
Note: The width of the arrows is proportional to the number of calls for all the arrows that represent more than 5000 calls. The width of all the arrows that represent less than 5000 calls is equal.
14
Chart 2
Note (1): The hold Service Type in each Skill-Group represents the Main-Service. Note (2): The above codes of groups-of-agents-by-skills are part of a list of 48 codes, which we have produced for the whole period of our analysis. In the above chart we describe only the codes relevant to May 2001. The full list appears in the SBR manual, which is under preparation.
15
Chart 3
Note: The width of the arrows is proportional to the number of calls for all the arrows that represent more than 5000 calls. The width of all the arrows that represent less than 5000 calls is equal.
17
Chart 5
Note: The width of the arrows is proportional to the number of calls for all the arrows that represent more than 5000 calls. The width of all the arrows that represent less than 5000 calls is equal.
20
1
Service Engineering
Recitation 4, Part 1: Processing Networks. An Emergency Department Example
The tutorial objective is to teach how to model a queueing network as a “Fork-Join network”.
Join Networks-ForkU
A fork-join network consists of a group of service stations, which serve arriving customers simultaneously and
sequentially according to pre-designed deterministic precedence constraints. More specially, one can think in terms of
"jobs" arriving to the system over time, with each job consisting of various tasks that are to be executed according to
some preceding constraints. The job is completed only after all its tasks have been completed. The distinguishing features
of this model class are the so-called "fork" and "join" constructs. A "fork" occurs whenever several tasks are being
processed simultaneously. In the network model, this is represented by a "splitting" of a task into multiple tasks, which
are then sent simultaneously to their respective servers. A "join" node, on the other hand, corresponds to a task that may
not be initiated until several prerequisite tasks have been completed. Components are joined only if they correspond to
the same job; thus a join is always preceded by a fork. If the last stage of an operation consists of multiple tasks, then
these tasks regroup (join) into a single task before departing the system.
ModelingU
We model our “fork-join network” using 4 specific flow-charts: activities, resources, activities plus resources, and
information. To draw these 4 flow charts one must list all resources of the network and all activities as well, and then
write which activity is using which resource. Next, one draws the flow charts, using the following “language”:
Chart Legend-FlowU
Often times, reality is too complex to capture with the above “language”. Then one must be creative, hence introduce,
ad hoc, the notation that will tell one’s specific story. (As an example, see page 2 where the “red-dot” is such a special
notation)
resource
decision
resources queue
synchronization queue
Job’s “flow”
“fork”
“join”
) 08/01/2009(
4
Figure 1 - Activity (Flow) Chart
Labs
Treatment
Awaiting
evacuation
Administrative reception
Vital signs & Anamnesis
First
Examination
Imagine:
X-Ray, CT,
Ultrasound
Follow-up
Instruction prior
discharge
Waiting
hospitalized
Administrative discharge
Consultation
Decision
A A A B
B
B
C
C C C
C
Alternative Operation -
Ending point of alternative operation -
C
Figure 67: Activities flow chart in the ED
134
) 08/01/2009(
5
Administrative secretary
Nurse
Labs
Physician
Consultant
CT
X-Ray
Ultrasound
Alternative Operation -
Recourse Queue - Synchronization Queue –
Ending point of alternative operation -
C
Figure 2 - Resource (Flow) Chart
A
A
A
A
A A B
B
B
B
B
C
C D
D
Figure 66: Resources flow chart in the ED
133
Alternative Operation -
Recourse Queue - Synchronization Queue –
Ending point of alternative operation -
C
PhysicianNurse Imaging Lab Other
Follow-up
Instruction Prior to Discharge
Administrative Release
Decision
Labs Treatment
Administrative Reception
Vital signs & Anamnesis
Imaging: X-Ray, CT, Ultrasound
Treatment Consultation
First Examination
AAAA
B
B
B
C
C
C
Figure 7: Activities-Resources flow chart in the ED
13
) 08/01/2009(
6
Ending point of alternative operation -
Figure 3 - Information (Flow) Chart
Backgrounds
Receptions
Family doctor/ Internet/
Community
Clinical Information
Nursing Information
Nurse
Physician
Test tube and results
Labs
Shot result or prognosis
Imagine
Clinical Information
Consult
Collecting ResultNurse
Clinical Information
Coordination with outsources
Nurse / ED Receptions
Figure 68: Information flow chart in the ED
135
8
Part 3: Applications and Results
The data is taken from an ED simulator written in Arena12.
Triage
External X-Ray Multi-
Trauma
Trauma
Customer Types
Departures
Released
Admitted
Arrivals Queue
… and more
33975
4221
2006
2886
2741
361
354697
1111
43
1049
994
319
162
2281
3908
160
504
266
193
122
158
118
7
1
32246
35916
1259
2006
2823
3798
876 352
370
107 491
545
566
127
48
48
2052
47
59
33
307
19
17
390
547
14
3
192
221
20
12
60
282
174
355
1405
169 91
23 1
1022
73
35
112
27
3
119
4
34
243
2935
3908
7
23
17
1
44
71
2
516
267229
266
11
78
8 132
132
172
5
11
41
67
7
17
8
8
118
45
27
13
22
8
135
150
24
1
8
3
3
37
24
16
19
26
67
32
10
3
4
2516
1 11
11
11
8
35
6
7
11
6
4
13
6
3
1
6
13
1
11
2
18
1
7
1
9
33
2 7
2
4
2
6
6
4
3
4
1
1
11
6
1
3
8
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
34
3
1
1
26102
735
4489
1704
2232
2240
53
782 95
10
604
393
24134
105
32
2194
82
1369
1362
33
71
501
22
57
205
757
545
3
208
4
1497
2561
34
254
176
25
82
115
153
2843
3071 560
327
14
1
17
1058
26
18932
15
28
1215
34
46
31 94
2
58
15
49
39
9
94 36
52
5916
70
5
1
8
27
8
4
4
2
10
9
6
1
71
3
5
86
7
5
4
1
1
1
4
21
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
Entry
VRURetail
VRUPremier
VRUBusiness
VRUConsumer Loans
VRUSubanco
VRUSummit
Business LineRetail
Business LinePremier
Business LineBusiness
Business LinePlatinum
Business LineConsumer Loans
Business LineOnline Banking
Business LineEBO
Business LineTelesales
Business LineSubanco
Business LineSummit
AnnouncementRetail
AnnouncementPremier
AnnouncementPlatinum
AnnouncementConsumer Loans
AnnouncementOnline Banking
AnnouncementTelesales
AnnouncementSubanco
MessageRetail
MessagePremier
MessageBusiness
MessagePlatinum
MessageConsumer Loans
MessageTelesales
NonBusiness LineBusiness
NonBusiness LineSubanco
NonBusiness LinePriority Service
NonBusiness Line NonCC ServiceCCO
NonCC ServiceQuick&Reilly
Overnight ClosedRetail
Overnight ClosedConsumer Loans
Overnight ClosedEBO
TrunkRetail
TrunkPremier
TrunkBusiness
TrunkConsumer Loans
TrunkOnline Banking
TrunkEBO
TrunkTelesales
TrunkPriority Service
Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
InternalTotal
OutgoingTotal
NormalTermination
NormalTermination
UndeterminedTermination
AbandonedShort
Abandoned
OtherUnhandled
Transfer
Transfer
33975
4221
2006
2886
2741
361
354697
1111
43
1049
994
319
162
2281
3908
160
504
266
193
122
158
118
7
1
32246
35916
1259
2006
2823
3798
876 352
370
107 491
545
566
127
48
48
2052
47
59
33
307
19
17
390
547
14
3
192
221
20
12
60
282
174
355
1405
169 91
23 1
1022
73
35
112
27
3
119
4
34
243
2935
3908
7
23
17
1
44
71
2
516
267229
266
11
78
8 132
132
172
5
11
41
67
7
17
8
8
118
45
27
13
22
8
135
150
24
1
8
3
3
37
24
16
19
26
67
32
10
3
4
2516
1 11
11
11
8
35
6
7
11
6
4
13
6
3
1
6
13
1
11
2
18
1
7
1
9
33
2 7
2
4
2
6
6
4
3
4
1
1
11
6
1
3
8
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
34
3
1
1
26102
735
4489
1704
2232
2240
53
782 95
10
604
393
24134
105
32
2194
82
1369
1362
33
71
501
22
57
205
757
545
3
208
4
1497
2561
34
254
176
25
82
115
153
2843
3071 560
327
14
1
17
1058
26
18932
15
28
1215
34
46
31 94
2
58
15
49
39
9
94 36
52
5916
70
5
1
8
27
8
4
4
2
10
9
6
1
71
3
5
86
7
5
4
1
1
1
4
21
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
Entry
VRURetail
VRUPremier
VRUBusiness
VRUConsumer Loans
VRUSubanco
VRUSummit
Business LineRetail
Business LinePremier
Business LineBusiness
Business LinePlatinum
Business LineConsumer Loans
Business LineOnline Banking
Business LineEBO
Business LineTelesales
Business LineSubanco
Business LineSummit
AnnouncementRetail
AnnouncementPremier
AnnouncementPlatinum
AnnouncementConsumer Loans
AnnouncementOnline Banking
AnnouncementTelesales
AnnouncementSubanco
MessageRetail
MessagePremier
MessageBusiness
MessagePlatinum
MessageConsumer Loans
MessageTelesales
NonBusiness LineBusiness
NonBusiness LineSubanco
NonBusiness LinePriority Service
NonBusiness Line NonCC ServiceCCO
NonCC ServiceQuick&Reilly
Overnight ClosedRetail
Overnight ClosedConsumer Loans
Overnight ClosedEBO
TrunkRetail
TrunkPremier
TrunkBusiness
TrunkConsumer Loans
TrunkOnline Banking
TrunkEBO
TrunkTelesales
TrunkPriority Service
Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
Trunk
InternalTotal
OutgoingTotal
NormalTermination
NormalTermination
UndeterminedTermination
AbandonedShort
Abandoned
OtherUnhandled
Transfer
Transfer
Logged Off
Available (7.36)
Consulting (562.54)
Consulting (208.00)
Consulting (175.42)
General Banking (218.31)
General Banking (136.89)
General Banking (97.22)
Idle (185.11)
Internet Support (313.66)
Internet Support (114.49)
Internet Support (166.50)
Investments (252.68)
Investments (211.41)
Logged In
Logged Off
Long Break (1,384.28)
Managers VIP (227.05)
Managers VIP (149.36)
Medium Break (507.26)
None (209.00)
Paperwork (140.57)
Paperwork (140.62)
Paperwork (140.97)
Paperwork (313.19)
Pension (758.00)
Pension (307.14)
Private Call (27.11)
Sales (177.14)
Sales (329.00)
Securities (278.20)
Securities (532.00)
Shifting (209.71)
Short Break (12.97)
Virtual Branches (195.46)
Virtual Branches (133.67)
Wrap Up (7.46)
Wrap Up (8.71)
Wrap Up (8.11)
Wrap Up (8.03)
ED
Pediatric
Neurology Nephrology Derrmatology
Internal
IntensiveCare
Cardiology
Rheumatology
UrologyOtorhinolaryngology Orthopedics
Surgery
Maternity
Gynecology
Psychiatry Ophthalmology
R
L
D
Out
R
R
R
R
R R
R
RR RR
R
R
R
R
R
L
LL
L
L
L
L
L
L
D
D
D
D
D DD
D
DD
D
D
Out
Out
Out
Out Out
Out
OutOut Out OutOut
Out
Out
115
17
5
43
2
1
1
1
8
6
2
1
1
2
23
3
15
1
7
1
11
1
2
1
6
1
1
1 13
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 3
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
11
1 1
1 11
1
11 11 1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1 1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
11
1
1
1
1
1 1 1 1
1
1
2
1
1
1
6
1
2
1
3
1 1
11
1
3
1
61
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
1
1
1
1
2 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 11
1
11 11 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
23
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1 11
1 1
2 2
1
2
1
1 1 1 11
2
1
1
serveng
lectures
references
predictionmay1809.pdf
homeworks
hw1_amusement_park_mgt.pdf
recitations
hazard_phase_type.pdf
course2011winter
icpr_service_engineering.pdfon_cc_data_frommsom.pdf pivot_table.pdf
thesis_polyna.pdf
proposal_polina.pdf
moss.pdf
files
nurse_proj_psu_tech.pdf
national_cranberry_1.pdf
hw9par_sol_2012w.pdf
syllabus8.pdfexams
statanalysis.pdf
agent-heterogeneity-brown-book-final.pdf
1_1_qed_lecture_introduction_2011w.pdf
course2004
retail.pdf hall_6.pdf
jasa_callcenter.pdf dantzig.pdf
bacceli.pdf
avishai-class-april-2003.ppt
hw7_2011w_par_sol_part2.pdf
ibmrambam technion srii presentation final.ppt
dimensioning.pdf
palmannoyance.pdf
yair_sergurywaitingtimeanalysis.pdf
nejmsb1002320.pdf
qed_qs_scientific_generic_caschina.pdf
web_summary13_2011s.pdf
4callcenters_coverpage.pdf
documentation.pdf rec9part2.pdf
web_summary9_2010w.pdf
qed_qs_scientific_wharton_stat_seminar.pdf
l2_measurements_class_2009s.pdf
ccreview.pdfvdesign_ecompanion.pdf
wharton_lecture_avi_printout.pdflarson_atoa.pdf
proposal_michael.pdf
stanford_seminar_avi_printout.pdf
solver_guide.pdf
fitz.pdf
rec10_part2.pdf rec5.pdf
paxson.pdf
connect_to_see_terminal.pdf
project_ug_simulationinterface.pdf revenue_manage.pdf
hw7_2009s_forecast.xls
syllabus2.pdf
infocom04.pdf
hall_transportation.pdf
whitt_handout_chapter1.pdf
fromprojecttoprocess.pdf
nytimes.2007-06-23.pdf ds_pert_lec1.pdf syllabus6.pdf hw9_2011w.pdf hw7_2011w.pdf
mmng_constraint_supp_or.pdf
awam-april_2011.pdfwhitt_scaling_slides.pdfmmng_seminar.pdf
syllabus4.pdf
syllabus12_2012w.pdf
syllabus5.pdf
mm1_strong_apprximations.pdf seestat_tutorial.ppt
kaplan_porter_2011-9_how-to-solve-the-cost-crisis-in-health-care_hbr.pdf
rec9_part2.pdf
callcenterdata
bocaraton.ps
gccreport 20-04-07 uk version.pdf hall_manpower_planning.pdf
bi18.pdf
syllabus12.pdf fluidview_2010w_short_version.pdf hw7_2009s_par_sol_part2.pdf
moed_b_2007w_solution.pdf
newell.pdf
rec11.pdf
moedb_2009w.pdf
rec3.pdf
hw10_par_sol_2011s.pdf
thirdlevel support ijtm1_cs.pdf
hw4_full.pdf
moedb_2010s_sol.pdf
chandra.pdf
gurvich_seminar.pdf
ed_sinreich_marmor.ppt regimes_supplement.pdf
web_summary10_2011s.pdf hw6par_sol_2009s.xls
exam_2005s_sol.pdf
servicefull.pdf
witor09_empirical_adventures_sep2009.pdf
web_summary12_2011s.pdf
heb_summary_yulia.pdf
hw9par_sol_2011s.pdf
seminar_yulia_9_2.pdf
bpr_2003.pdf staffing_italian_us_2011w.xlsdesignofqueues.pdf thepsychologyofwaitinglines.pdf
erlangabc.pdf
studentsevaluations.pdf hw8_2011s.pdf
hw9_2012w.pdf
edie.pdf
syllabus9.pdf
ds_pert_lec2.pdf
zohar_seminar.ppt
hist-normal.pdf
vandergraft.pdf
rec13.pdf
desighn_ivr.pdf
cohen_aircraft_failures.pdf
sbr.pdf
nano.pdf
hw2_2011w.pdf seminar_presentation_boaz_estimatinger load.ppt
project_ug_meirav.pdf see_report_output_june_2011.pdf
see_report_2010.pdf
470
228
5
101
8 4 3
30
53
44 35
6 33
7334 3
4
4
321
3
314 93
3
4 43
19
4
3 3
5
48 34
64
3 3 4
14
7 3
5 4
3
6
7
335 3 33 3
58 4 3
53
44 35 7334 3
4
3
3
5
14 93
3
4 43
4
3
5
48 34
64
3 3 45 4
3
6 335 3 33 3
serveng
lectures
hall_flows_hospitals_chapter1text.pdf
references
4callcenterscourse2004 homeworks
icpr_service_engineering.pdf keycorp.pdf
files
revenue_manage.pdfhw1_amusement_park_mgt.pdf
recitations
setup.exe
garnett.pdf abandon02.pdf erlang_a.pdf ccbib.pdf
us7_cc_avi.pdf
jasa_callcenter.pdfsbr.pdf
hazard_phase_type.pdf
mazeget_noa_yul.pptexams technion-call-center-report-sept-2004.pdfbrandt.pdf statanalysis.pdfmjp_into_erlang_a.pdf loch.pdf sbr_stolyar.pdf
callcenterdata
larson_atoa.pdf sivanthesisfinal.pdf columbia05.pdf crmis.pptfluid_systems.rar
januarytxt.zip
sbr_wharton_ccforum_short_may03.pdf predictingwaitingtime.pdf avishaicourse_munichor.ppt vdesign_pub.pdf hierarchical_modelling_chen_mandelbaum_part1.pdf
solver_guide.pdf
datamocca_february_2008_cc_forum_lecture.ppt seminar_presentation_galit.pptintro_to_serveng_teaching_note.pdf
pivot_table.pdf
project_ug_simulationinterface.pdf
course2010winter
ed_simulation_modeling_supp.pdf avim_cv.pdfdantzig.pdf yariv_phd.pdf
rec10_part2.pdf
fr6.pdfnejmsb1002320.pdf
hebrew_syllabus_2011s.pdf
patientflow main.pdf
hw9_2012w.pdf
avim_cv_18_12_2011.pdf
470
228
5
101
8 4 3
30
53
44 35
6 33
7334 3
4
4
321
3
314 93
3
4 43
19
4
3 3
5
48 34
64
3 3 4
14
7 3
5 4
3
6
7
335 3 33 3
58 4 3
53
44 35 7334 3
4
3
3
5
14 93
3
4 43
4
3
5
48 34
64
3 3 45 4
3
6 335 3 33 3
serveng
lectures
hall_flows_hospitals_chapter1text.pdf
references
4callcenterscourse2004 homeworks
icpr_service_engineering.pdf keycorp.pdf
files
revenue_manage.pdfhw1_amusement_park_mgt.pdf
recitations
setup.exe
garnett.pdf abandon02.pdf erlang_a.pdf ccbib.pdf
us7_cc_avi.pdf
jasa_callcenter.pdfsbr.pdf
hazard_phase_type.pdf
mazeget_noa_yul.pptexams technion-call-center-report-sept-2004.pdfbrandt.pdf statanalysis.pdfmjp_into_erlang_a.pdf loch.pdf sbr_stolyar.pdf
callcenterdata
larson_atoa.pdf sivanthesisfinal.pdf columbia05.pdf crmis.pptfluid_systems.rar
januarytxt.zip
sbr_wharton_ccforum_short_may03.pdf predictingwaitingtime.pdf avishaicourse_munichor.ppt vdesign_pub.pdf hierarchical_modelling_chen_mandelbaum_part1.pdf
solver_guide.pdf
datamocca_february_2008_cc_forum_lecture.ppt seminar_presentation_galit.pptintro_to_serveng_teaching_note.pdf
pivot_table.pdf
project_ug_simulationinterface.pdf
course2010winter
ed_simulation_modeling_supp.pdf avim_cv.pdfdantzig.pdf yariv_phd.pdf
rec10_part2.pdf
fr6.pdfnejmsb1002320.pdf
hebrew_syllabus_2011s.pdf
patientflow main.pdf
hw9_2012w.pdf
avim_cv_18_12_2011.pdf
8 AM - 9 AM
55888
1113 43320 160505194 7
36512 23633845 3792
845 103
120
314
3314
155
43
13
4
34
594 140
547
191
16
10 60 303
6
73
432
242
3052 3908
7
23
12
60
472131 202
19
8
9
150
14 46 10
8
78
30924
873
20863633 3536
562
867
40
260
294
8
78
20
666
198 35148
29
213
3005
6
3671
11
19 356
126
10
46
4
12
3
Entry
Entry Entry Entry Entry EntryEntry Entry
VRU
Retail Premier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBOTelesales Subanco Summit
VRU
Retail PremierBusiness PlatinumConsumer LoansEBO Telesales SummitOut
VRU
Retail
C
A
C
CC C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
AA
A
A AA A A
A
A
OutOut Out Out OutOut OutOut Out
Out OutOut
Daily(Deposit)
OrderCheckbooks
Identification
ChangePassword
Agent
Fax
Query Transfer
Securities
StockMarket
PerformOperation
Credit
Error
43123
234
270
1352
35315
3900
7895
830
68
65
273
1063
231
768
133
1032
897
40
49
54
21
71
30
165
53
114
29
16
35
10
9
12
107
6
5
21
8
26091
4115
12317
962
1039
147
42
18
28
114
14
72
20
Philadelphia NYC
Boston
C
A
CC
A
A
8742
1418611712
488
7311804
1618 171426
10126
254
14688
125
9254
193
8742
1418611712
488
731
1804
1618 171426
10126
254
14688
125
9254
193
54
2
3315
335615
3
1
1
7
2
4
3
1
1
1
2
6
2
26
1
2
2
3
2
9
1
1
1
3
3
52
1
1
2 3
22
1
2
2
2 1
2
1
1
3
1
11
18
1
3
1 12
1
3
1 2
1
3
2
4
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
13
1
1
1 1
1
2
7
3 2813
5
18
32
1
10
14
23
3
5
1
Logged Off
Allocate For Call (0.39)Allocate For Call (1.29)Allocate For Call (0.67)
Available (4.15)
Completed (0.29)
Completed (1.00)
Consult (148.43)
Consult (94.50)
Dial (38.67)
Disconnect (50.19)
Disconnect (47.50)
Disconnected (39.00)
Disconnected (52.00)
Held (21.00)
Held (144.33)
Hold (127.00)
Idle (69.87)
Inbound Call (160.47)
Logged In
Logged Off Long Break (1,225.50)
Make Agent Dialer (43.82)
Make Call (192.00)
Make Call (53.67)
Medium Break (273.50)
Other Party Disconnected (2.33)
Other Party Disconnected (54.00)
Paperwork (140.57)
Paperwork (77.48)
Paperwork (37.00)
Paperwork (97.20)
Private Call (31.90)
Ready (61.17)
Ready (16.00)
Ready (2.00)
Reschedule (0.31)
Retrieve (34.00)
Retrieved (67.50)
Retrieved (108.33)
Short Break (6.29)
Transfer Done (39.24)Transfer Done (41.19)
Wrap Up (7.03)
Wrap Up (5.53)
Wrap Up (2.50)
Wrap Up (14.53)
44 15
3
1 11233
1
2 1
42
2
14
9
1
11
3
1 1
1
1
2
12
1
1
2
11 18
1
3
1 1 21 3
12
1
3
2
2
2
1
33
7
18 32
1
10
14 23
3
5
1
Logged Off
Available (4.15)
General Banking (190.48)
General Banking (297.50)
General Banking (61.25)
Idle (69.87)
Investments (184.00) Investments (125.00)
Logged In
Logged Off Long Break (1,225.50)
Managers VIP (119.08)
Medium Break (273.50)
None (209.00)
Paperwork (140.57) Paperwork (77.48)
Paperwork (37.00)
Paperwork (97.20)
Private Call (31.90)
Sales (176.09)
Short Break (6.29)
Wrap Up (7.03) Wrap Up (5.53)
Wrap Up (2.50)
Wrap Up (14.53)
2 11 12
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
2
1
2
2 1
1
1
4
1
2
2
2
2 2
Logged Off
Available (4.50)
General Banking (93.50) General Banking (19.00)
Idle (23.00)
Investments (184.00) Investments (125.00)Managers VIP (129.50)
Medium Break (154.00)
Paperwork (340.50)
Paperwork (103.50) Paperwork (53.00)Idle
Idle (9.00)
Sales (125.50)
Short Break (10.00)
Wrap Up (11.00)
Wrap Up (3.50) Wrap Up (5.50)
Private Prepaid
PrivatePrivate VIP Private Customer RetentionBusiness Business VIP Business Customer Retention
Language 2 Prepaid Language 2 Prepaid Low PriorityLanguage 2 PrivateLanguage 3 Internet Surfing Internet
Overseas
1 24 5 810 11 12 1315161718 20 21 24 25
2104
2208 26264592 445 3411432049 1484 8734785 4658 411 444480 43 847 181 974
1253823 843343 1390109630 4454 1240792 3793 49 735
1433 193
1 24 5 810 11 12 1315161718 20 21 24 25
2104
2208 26264592 445 3411432049 1484 8734785 4658 411 444480 43 847 181 974
1253823 843343 1390109630 4454 1240792 3793 49 735
1433 193
8 AM - 9 AM
Entry
EntryEntry Entry Entry EntryEntry Entry
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBOTelesalesSubanco Summit
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBO Telesales SummitOut
VRU
Retail
C
A
C
C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
AA
A
AA AAA
A
A
OutOutOut Out OutOutOut OutOut
Out OutOut
8 AM - 9 AM
Entry
EntryEntry Entry Entry EntryEntry Entry
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBOTelesalesSubanco Summit
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBO Telesales SummitOut
VRU
Retail
C
A
C
C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
AA
A
AA AAA
A
A
OutOutOut Out OutOutOut OutOut
Out OutOut
9 AM - 10 AM
Entry
EntryEntry Entry Entry EntryEntry Entry
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBOTelesalesSubanco Summit
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBO Telesales SummitOut
VRU
Retail Business
C
A
C
C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
AA
A
AA AAA
A
A
OutOut Out OutOutOut OutOut
Out OutOut
10 AM - 11 AM
Entry
EntryEntry Entry Entry EntryEntry Entry
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBOTelesalesSubanco Summit
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBO Telesales SummitOut
VRU
Retail Business
C
A
C
C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
AA
A
AA AAA
A
A
OutOutOut Out OutOutOut OutOut
Out OutOut
11 AM - 12 PM
Entry
EntryEntry Entry Entry EntryEntry Entry
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBOTelesalesSubanco Summit
VRU
RetailPremier Business PlatinumConsumer Loans EBO Telesales SummitOut
VRU
Retail Business
C
A
C
C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
AA
A
AA AAA
A
A
OutOutOut Out OutOutOut OutOut
Out OutOut
Conceptual Model:Bank Branch = Queueing Network
23
Teller
Entrance
Tourism
Xerox
Manager
Teller
Entrance
Tourism
Xerox
Manager
Bottleneck!
16
Bank Branch: A Queuing Network
Bank: A Queuing Network
Transition Frequencies Between Units in The Private and Business Sections:
Private Banking Business
To Unit Bankers Authorized Compens - Tellers Tellers Overdrafts Authorized Full Exit
From Unit Personal - ations Personal Service
Bankers 1% 1% 4% 4% 0% 0% 0% 90%
Private Authorized Personal 12% 5% 4% 6% 0% 0% 0% 73%
Banking Compensations 7% 4% 18% 6% 0% 0% 1% 64%
Tellers 6% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 90%
Tellers 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 94%
Services Overdrafts 2% 0% 1% 1% 19% 5% 8% 64%
Authorized Personal 2% 1% 0% 1% 11% 5% 11% 69%
Full Service 1% 0% 0% 0% 8% 1% 2% 88%
Entrance 13% 0% 3% 10% 58% 2% 0% 14% 0%
Legend: 0%-5% 5%-10% 10%-15% >15%
Dominant Paths - Business:
Unit Station 1 Station 2 Total Parameter Tourism Teller Dominant Path
Service Time 12.7 4.8 17.5 Waiting Time 8.2 6.9 15.1
Total Time 20.9 11.7 32.6
Service Index 0.61 0.41 0.53
Dominant Paths - Private:
Unit Station 1 Station 2 Total Parameter Banker Teller Dominant Path
Service Time 12.1 3.9 16.0 Waiting Time 6.5 5.7 12.2
Total Time 18.6 9.6 28.2
Service Index 0.65 0.40 0.56
Service Index = % time being served
17
Mapping the Offered Load (Bank Branch)
Mapping Offered Load (Branch of a Bank)
Business
Services
Private
Banking
Banking
Services
Department
Time Tourism Teller Teller Teller Comprehensive
8:30 – 9:00
9:00 – 9:30
9:30 – 10:00
10:00 – 10:30
10:30 – 11:00
11:00 – 11:30
11:30 – 12:00
12:00 – 12:30
Break
16:00 – 16:30
16:30 – 17:00
17:00 – 17:30
17:30 – 18:00
Legend:
Not Busy
Busy
Very Busy
Note: What can / should be done at 11:00 ? Conclusion: Models are not always necessary but measurements are !
18
Conceptual Model: The Justice Network, orThe Production of Justice
“Production” Of Justice
Queue
Mile Stone
Activity
Appeal
Proceedings
Closure
Prepare AllocateOpen File
Avg. sojourn time ≈ in months / years
Processing time ≈ in mins / hours / days
Phase Transition
Phase
24
Conceptual Model: Burger King Bottlenecks
Bottleneck Analysis: Short – Run ApproximationsTime – State Dependent Q-Net
3 Minimal:Drive-thruCounterKitchen
Add:#4 Kitchen#5 Help
Drive -thru
20
22