11
60 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014 I n its latest commercial for the Cadillac SRX, General Mo- tors shows a bevy of robotic arms happily dancing around the car as part of its summer sales event. Robotics have certainly come a long way from GM’s multibillion dollar at- tempt to go lights-out in the '80s, when robots infamously painted each other and welded doors shut. But while fixed automation is prevalent throughout the global automotive industry, robotics—or flexible automation systems—have actually been a mixed success in this sector, and automakers have shown caution in expanding their role. While robotics are now a given in some areas, such as the once-challenging welding and painting areas, the large, high- volume automotive companies have shown some reluctance ABB’s Integrated Force Control provides this robot with real-time feedback that enables the robot to maintain a constant force between the abrasive wheel and the workpiece. ABB said customers report that robots equipped with such sensors do a better, more consistent job than a man can, owing to the robot’s ability to maintain a tighter tolerance on the force being applied while maintaining proper part dimensions. Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now? With easier programming than ever before, today’s robots leap into the future with new abilities to see, feel and execute different tasks Ed Sinkora Contributing Editor Robotics & Automation

Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

  • Upload
    dotuong

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

60 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

In its latest commercial for the Cadillac SRX, General Mo-

tors shows a bevy of robotic arms happily dancing around

the car as part of its summer sales event. Robotics have

certainly come a long way from GM’s multibillion dollar at-

tempt to go lights-out in the '80s, when robots infamously

painted each other and welded doors shut.

But while fixed automation is prevalent throughout the

global automotive industry, robotics—or flexible automation

systems—have actually been a mixed success in this sector,

and automakers have shown caution in expanding their role.

While robotics are now a given in some areas, such as the

once-challenging welding and painting areas, the large, high-

volume automotive companies have shown some reluctance

ABB’s Integrated Force Control provides this robot with real-time feedback that enables the robot to maintain a constant

force between the abrasive wheel and the workpiece. ABB said customers report that robots equipped with such sensors

do a better, more consistent job than a man can, owing to the robot’s ability to maintain a tighter tolerance on the force

being applied while maintaining proper part dimensions.

Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now? With easier programming than ever before, today’s robots leap into the future with new abilities to see, feel and execute different tasks

Ed SinkoraContributing Editor

Robotics & Automation

Page 2: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

in other areas where robotics companies believe there are

new opportunities given the ease with which one can imple-

ment flexible, collaborative robotics systems. Fact is, robotics

have changed in exactly the areas that caused so much pain

in the past.

Machine Vision Cuts the Cost of Part Pick-Up

The automotive industry is filled with random and semi-

random pick-up tasks: Raw castings that vary slightly in

size. Connecting rods in a heap. Car seats on a conveyer.

The list is endless.

Before, if you wanted a robot to pick up these components,

you either relied on specialized tooling or used a human to ori-

ent each item uniformly. Both approaches are expensive.

“Now,” said FANUC’s David Dechow, staff engineer-Intel-

ligent Robotics/Machine Vision, “your robot can automatically

adjust its pickup move using machine vision. For example, a

robot with machine vision can pick up raw, unfinished con-

necting rods from a bin, in random orientation, for subsequent

machining processes.

NEW hi.aeQ face milling cutter A high-effi ciency tool for counterboring and milling

www.komet.com800-656-6381

Learn more about this and other great ideas.Go to www.komet.com/greatideas

or scan this QR code.

Here’s a great idea for:Milling cast iron

The idea:Providing a quiet, stable, fl exible, and highly-effective milling solution.

Why it’s great:• High number of inserts resulting in quick machining and low cutting forces.

• 8 usable cutting edges per insert for cost-effective production.

• Available with or without internal coolant.

NEW hi.aeQ face milling cutter A high-effi ciency tool for counterboring and milling

September 2014 | ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com 61

FANUC’s iRVision 3D Area Sensor utilizes stereo cameras

and an advanced illumination system that uses binary

coded structured light to create a three-dimensional

scene. The technique does not require moving the sensor

or the parts to analyze the bin contents, which contributes

to its efficiency on the plant floor.

Page 3: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

“Or it could be as far down the line as picking up a seat to be

placed in a car for final assembly. The ability to do something like

picking up a seat and knowing exactly where it is in space to cor-

rect for gripping errors, and positioning errors prior to gripping, is

a big plus that lets you make the incoming part flow more flexible

and less fixed. We’ll see more and more applications that require

the ability to pick up and place randomly oriented parts and that

will only be accomplished with vision enabled robots.”

Tougher challenges like bin picking or handling a car seat

require advanced 3D sensing, which has “really come to the

forefront in the last few years,” according to Dechow. “FANUC

offers two types of 3D scanning. One is a laser-line-based

3D sensor. The other is a very high-end scanning sensor that

produces a full 3D point cloud of a group of objects that might

be in a bin or lying on a table. It gives the robot 3D real-world

locations to pick the part in.

“The position we take is that we live in a 3D world and the

robot operates in 3D space. So we’re working hard to make

the robot not just mechanically capable, but also visually

capable, in that 3D space.”

FANUC feels so strongly about this that every robot

they ship now is “capable of vision with both 2D and 3D

guidance, and even inspection, right out of the box.” That

doesn’t mean every robot has a camera on it, or needs to.

But in Dechow’s view, every robot needs to be visually capa-

ble, because changes to a factory’s production requirements

will often require robots to be reassigned to applications that

require the capability.

Some Robots Prefer to Feel Their Way

Machine vision isn’t the only way to give a robot flexibil-

ity in part pickup and placement. New advances in tactile

sensing also give robots the ability to adjust their motions in

real time. For example, ABB’s new Integrated Force Control

technology makes it possible to robotically assemble parts

with tight tolerances without requiring highly accurate and

expensive fixtures.

According to ABB’s North American

manager of technology and support,

Nick Hunt, such a “force-controlled

robot” can apply search patterns—while

using feedback from the force sen-

sor—to find the correct position. Like

machine vision, this cuts the cost of

tooling and reduces the risk of assembly

failures or damaged parts.

“It’s a Cartesian soft-servo, a kind of software spring.

Allowing the robot to comply in a certain plane or direction allows the process to dictate position, instead of the other way around.”

ABB’s Integrated Force Control also

can be used to improve robotic machin-

ing applications such as grinding, pol-

ishing, deburring and deflashing. One

package feature allows a robot to grind,

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

3054-4088-ME_0914-4.56x4.88-2C.eps 1 7/16/2014 10:04:39 AM

62 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

Robotics & Automation

See us at Booth #E-5413

Page 4: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

polish or buff parts while maintaining a constant

force between the tool and the work piece.

Another feature enables a robot to deburr or

deflash part-lines and surfaces of parts at a

controlled speed, slowing down when encoun-

tering excessive burrs or casting flash.

More Economical Approaches

to Flexible Part Placement

Force/torque sensors and machine

vision are not always the most cost-effective

solution, however.

Hunt points to two approaches that might

provide the necessary flexibility at lower cost.

The first uses what ABB calls “SoftMove.”

Hunt explains that even in applications in

which you’re using a highly repeatable robot to place parts in

a predictable spot, a nonsensing robot relies on the accu-

racy of the robot end-of-arm tooling and other fixtures. But

specifying tooling with tight tolerances can get expensive in

both machining and engineering costs,

and subject to wear in any case.

“So,” asked Hunt, “why not just

guide the robot into position using a

tapered pin and hole and ease the

tooling tolerances a bit? That’s what

‘SoftMove’ was initially designed for.

It’s a Cartesian soft-servo, a kind of

software spring. Allowing the robot to

comply in a certain plane or direction

allows the process to dictate position,

instead of the other way around—not

perfect for all applications but more

than you might think.”

“The robot is in all actuality one really big sensor

working in reverse. We simply exploit that attribute.”

Hunt said some situations allow a

second “software solution” to the prob-

lem. “Let’s say we need to align a robot

to the plane of some large assembly

sitting out there in a fixture, or perhaps

64 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

Robotics & Automation

An ABB Force Sensor on a robot’s “wrist.”

Page 5: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

being held by a robot or robots. Let’s say we need to weld

another part onto this larger assembly but it landed a little

cockeyed in the fixture. All we have to do is poke a robot-held

tapered pin into three GDT (geometric dimensioning and toler-

ancing) holes on that part and we’ve

established a complete frame including

translation and rotation.”

A Ford Motor Co. subassembly

supplier gave them just such a case,

locating the position and Z rotation of

a large assembly. ABB programed the

robot to go through the frame, and

stop when the part touched the frame

without damaging it. (The ability to pro-

grammatically alter the force applied

to a part for location purposes is a very

important aspect of SoftMove accord-

ing to Hunt.) As one edge of the robot

plate rested on the part the rest of the

plate would come down on the part,

establishing the skew of the plane. The

robot would then slide across the plane

until it hit the corner. So the system

had now determined the location of

the part in X-Y-Z coordinates, including

its orientation—the POSE. They had

everything they needed to successfully

weld parts onto the frame, all done with

software. This software-only method

for aligning a part frame is possible

because, as Hunt puts it, “The robot

is in all actuality one really big sensor

working in reverse. We simply exploit

that attribute.”

Working Virtually Hand-in-Hand

with Your Robot

Collaborative robots, which work in

proximity to humans without guards,

are a hot topic today. Yet there is

skittishness about the idea and few

installations in the top tier auto sec-

tor. That might soon change. KUKA

Systems just introduced a lightweight

robot specifically to serve as an auto

worker’s “third hand,” relieving him of awkward, uncom-

fortable jobs like inserting rubber plugs into a vehicle body

or screw fastening, even within the confined space of a

vehicle’s interior.

ICON Technologies • 11600 Adie Road • St. Louis, MO 63043 • p 314.432.4644 • f 314.692.5166 • icon.hydromat.com

The Ultimate in Productivity and Flexibility

Versatile System For Increased Production

Engineered For Maximum Output In A Small Footprint

Rapid Tool Changes At All Stations

icon.hydromat.com

Mill/Turn Center

See It At IMTS 2014. Making It’s First Trade Show Appearance, Introducing The New

ME HPI Hydromat-ICON 6-150 IMTS.indd 1 7/9/2014 10:55:13 AMSeptember 2014 | ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com 67

Robotics & Automation

Page 6: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

KUKA calls the lightweight robot LBR

iiwa. (LBR for “Leichtbauroboter,” German

for lightweight robot, and “iiwa” for “intel-

ligent industrial work assistant.”)

With seven axes, it’s based on the human

arm and features high-performance collision

detection and integrated joint torque sensors

in all axes, so it can handle delicate joining

processes. It’s on a mobile platform called

the KUKA flexFELLOW, so an operator would

place the system near the programmed job

and execute the operation while he goes on to

other nearby jobs.

Let’s say the job is inserting rubber

plugs into the holes in a car body’s wheel

well. If the operator didn’t place the plat-

form in exactly the position expected by the

program, the robot is able to calibrate the

68 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

Robotics & Automation

KUKA’s new LBR iiwa lightweight robot works right next to humans to take

over uncomfortable, cramped jobs like plugging holes in a wheel well.

Specialized torque sensing automatically adjusts for variations in robot

placement and keeps the human safe.

See us at Booth #N-7538

Page 7: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

exact position and adjust its movements to find the holes by

touching the workpiece and “feeling” the resistance with its

torque sensors. Combining several points yields a complete

“picture,” enabling the program to run. Vision sensing is

not required.

Laser Application Specialistswww.gtschmidt.com

800-323-1332See us at IMTS - BOOTH N-6159 70 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

Robotics & Automation

ABB’s RobotStudio can program and optimize a robot’s

moves on a PC even from an office, including machine

tending (top) or detailed cutting operations (bottom).

Because RobotStudio includes the Cognex program suite

and tools it can even set up a machine vision system.

Page 8: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

It’s a compact system, but KUKA said it’s the first and

only lightweight robot with a payload capacity of over 22 lb

(10 kg). It’s available with payload capacities of 15 and 31 lb

(7 and 14 kg). 

It’s Getting Much Easier

to Set Up a Robot

Robots can be a challenge to set

up, as the early horror stories at GM

attest. FANUC’s Dechow is a 30-year

veteran of machine vision and a strong

proponent of the technology, but even

he admits that vision systems have a

well-deserved reputation for being dif-

ficult to implement, until now. Not only

are vision systems better integrated and

easier to set up, they aid in setting up

the robot itself.

Dechow said, “Before, an operator

had to position the robot’s vision system

over a calibration grid and then, often

with complex moves, get the robot

to touch off on the grid, or otherwise

measure and correlate the grid to

world space and then share that space

information with the camera. Then the

camera would have to take a picture of

the grid, all through a step-by-step pro-

cess dependent on the operator. With

FANUC’s automated calibration, the

operator only needs to get the robot to

the right spot and command it to do the

operation. The robot itself then shows

the calibration grid or the calibration

article to the camera and automatically

performs a calibration with respect to

the camera.

“Even more exciting, for fairly simple

tasks we’re introducing a no-calibration

capability within the FANUC guidance

suite. In these cases the robot will

automatically discover its real-world

relationship with the object using the

vision camera without using any calibra-

tion grid or operator intervention. It will

calibrate itself relative to a target part automatically and know

the real-world relationship of that part and where it has to be

guided to pick that part up—even for parts in random orienta-

tion without fixed tooling.”

COOL CUTTING | PRECISE PROFILE | HIGH SPEED

RESHAPING THE WORLDOF PRECISION GRINDING

REVOLUTIONARY BOND TECHNOLOGY

NEW GENERATION, PATENT-PENDING BOND SCIENCE.

For more information, visit us www.nortonindustrial.com/vitrium3-videos.aspxor email us at [email protected].

AUTOMOTIVE ENERGYGEAR BEARINGAEROSPACE

© 2014 Saint-Gobain.

VISIT US AT IMTS #N-7051

September 2014 | ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com 71

See us at Booth #N-7051

Page 9: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

Wouldn’t You Rather

Set Up in Your Office?

Easing the burden of calibration is

one thing, but it still leaves the bigger

task of programming the robot. Trying

to program, or just debug a program,

on the shop floor ties up the space, the

robot, the fixtures, maybe a camera,

and more. ABB’s RobotStudio lets you

program a robot and vision system at

your desk. Nick Hunt explains: “Robot-

Studio gives you full 3D simulation of

the robot and its moves. You can import

your solid file into RobotStudio and it

can recommend the optimum path

without interference, then generate that

path, complete with the actual accelera-

tion and deceleration for very accurate

cycle time.

“We also worked closely with Cog-

nex,” Hunt says, “one of the industry

leaders in machine vision, to incorpo-

rate their program suite and tools into

RobotStudio. You sit in your office with

the same machine vision camera you’re

going to use, an actual part or a photo-

graph of the part, and software. Then

you teach the vision system and debug

or improve your application almost as

if you were out on the floor. The robot

you’re watching on your RobotStudio

screen moves in exactly the same way

with exactly the same cycle time as

what you’ll see on the shop floor. You’re

working in a virtual world, producing a

program you can run in the real one.

“The only thing you’re not certain of

is how well calibrated the real world is to

what you have in your simulation pack-

age. Once back out on the floor, if you

calibrate properly, you’re going to get

pretty much what you developed in your

simulation. The time savings are huge.”

Oddly, Hunt adds that many people

don’t take advantage of this, preferring

72 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

Robotics & Automation

Page 10: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

to take their new toys out on the floor to do the setup there.

That’s a waste that management should be keen to eliminate.

Different Machine Vision Integration

Philosophies Yield Different Benefits

Engineers face a basic question in

fielding any complex product: Which

subsystems should you design and

build yourself and which should you

source externally and integrate? FANUC

elected to field their own machine vision

product, which they call iRVision. FA-

NUC’s Dechow said, “IRVision cameras

connect directly to the FANUC control-

ler. There is no third-party computing

device or external processing going on.”

He credits this “seamless integration”

with iRVision’s ease of use, its unique

ability to perform automated calibration,

and its particularly efficient and accu-

rate high-end functions like 3D sens-

ing, “because the vision system always

knows where the robot is and the robot

always knows what the vision system is

seeing in near real-time.”

“We’re not a vision company. We’re a robot company. We’re

a motion control company. That’s what we do well.”

ABB took the opposite tack. As Hunt

puts it, “We’re not a vision company.

We’re a robot company. We’re a motion

control company. That’s what we do

well. We get the robot TCP [tool center

point] from point A to point B as quickly

as possible with minimum path devia-

tion and a lot of engineering tools to play

with to execute logic along the way, or to

interrupt it or even subscribe to sensor

and other variable data. We don’t want

to spend a lot of time developing vision

algorithms. We don’t need to. There are many companies who

specialize in doing that and they do it quite well. We’ll use

what they have and know that we are using the best vision

technology industry has to offer.”

Machine Tool Gage & Fixtures Makers Automotive Aerospace Glass Energy Medical Electronics

Earning the maximum ROI from your In-process Gaging investment starts withmatching exactly the right gage to yourmachine application and production requirements. That’swhy Marposs developed the mostcomprehensive lineof in-process gages.From versatile single-finger OD and ID heads forhigh productiongrinding, to flexible, wide-range absolutegages for grinding families of shafts up to 1,500mm diameter while eliminating parasitic downtime for changeovers.Helping you choose the best gaging solution and backing it up with total global support are some of the things we do to help keep your uptime up.

MARPOSS MAKES SENSE.Visit us at www.marposs.com/MakesSense

RELIABLE CHOICES

Marposs Reliable ad island 1/2 ME

September 2014 | ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com 73

See us at Booth #E-5519 & #N-7433

Page 11: Robots in the Auto Plant: What are They up to Now?

This focus on motion control yields faster robots, based

on ABB’s frequent benchmark testing. For example, tests of

their IRB2600 robot have shown 25% shorter cycle times over

comparable competitor models and typical improvement is

10% shorter cycle time right out of the box. Their patented

motion control algorithm is “as secret as the formula for Coca-

Cola,” but Hunt reveals one trick is to constantly maximize ac-

celeration of the critical joint versus just maximizing speed of

the dominant joint. (Remember: acceleration is a vector, while

speed is a theoretical scalar.) Hunt said the latter “method

alone without a real-time kinematic model will waste torque

and consume more power with no added benefit,” whereas

ABB’s robots often use less power to move the same load.

However, since there is no standard protocol for communi-

cating between robots and sensors, ABB and other companies

who take their approach must develop interfaces. In some

cases, they can build upon what has been delivered to offer

fully integrated, turnkey solutions. ABB offers such a package in

partnership with Cognex, called Integrated Vision. They estimate

that a user saves about 25% of the usual setup time by not hav-

ing to develop the vision system communication drivers. ME

OMP400—Optical transmission strain gauge probe.More details at renishaw.com/omp400

• Lower contact forces for less stylus bend and pre-travel

• Excellent 3D performance

• CMM-level accuracy

• Excels in the harshest machine conditions

Learn more: Renishaw.com/RMP600

Renishaw’s strain gauge technology offers an unrivaled opportunity to control the variables of process control for small to medium-size machining centers. Reap the benefi ts of automated job set-up, reduced scrap and lower fi xture costs. The unique frequency-hopping feature of the RMP600 maintains radio transmission and control, even in the “noisiest” environments.

RENGAGE™ strain gauge technology—for the most accurate probes in the world.

the infi nite possibilities of process control

cmyk

pms

black

Renishaw Inc Hoffman Estates, IL www.renishaw.com

See us atBOOTH #E5510

OMP400-2ME 7-13.indd 1 6/10/14 7:07 PM

74 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | September 2014

Robotics & Automation

ABBPh: 800-435-7365

Web site: www.abb.us/robotics

CognexPh: 855-426-4639

Web site: www.cognex.com

FANUC RoboticsPh: 248-377-7000

Web site: www.fanucrobotics.com

KUKA SystemsPh: 586-795-2000

Web site: www.kuka-systems.com

Want More Information?