12
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1

RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1

  • View
    218

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

CSU RocketSat-CConceptual Design Review

Colorado State UniversityIsaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager

10/1/101

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Mission Overview

• There is no way to measure fluid volumes in microgravity without introducing acceleration. Current Techniques are not cost effective and extremely inefficient.

• Our goal is to design a payload capable of accurately measuring tank ullage in a microgravity environment for use in various spacecraft.

• We want to prove that interferometry is a viable option for fluid volume measurement and can be designed to withstand the extreme environmental conditions of launch

2

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Mission Overview: Theory and Concepts

• An optical mass gauging system equipped with a modified Michelson Interferometer was recently developed at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and has shown to be an option to measure liquid volumes with high precision using a small lightweight system.

• For the 2009/2010 RocketSat-C launch a team of CSU students developed a payload that measured tank ullage using a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer system.– The payload was not able to withstand the required environmental

conditions and was unable to gather data during launch.

3

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Mission Overview: Mission Requirements

• Research and develop a reliable system for fluid volume measurement in a microgravity environment.

• Submit a operational payload to Wallops Flight Facility.

• Record ullage volume accurately (within 5%)• Adhere to all requirements stated in the User

Guide.

• Pass all pre-flight reviews and tests.

4

crestock.com

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Mission Overview: Concept of Operations

Schematic of Optical Mass Gauging System

5

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Mission Overview: Expected Results

6

• The gas cell is subjected to a pressure increase due to piston action which creates a phase shift in the light wave.

• This phase shift creates fringes when combined with the reference path beam which is then measured by the photodetector.

• These fringes can then be counted and used for calculation of the tank ullage.

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Design Overview: Functional Block Diagrams

7

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Design Overview: Payload Layout

• We will be using one plate in our design; all components will be mounted on top or bottom of single plate.

• We are still in the preliminary stages of design and have not yet decided on component placement.

8

classymommy.com

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Design Overview: RockSat-C 2011 User’s Guide Compliance

9

• Based on the 2009/2010 CSU design we believe that we will be able to weigh in at or under half of the canister weight allotment of 20±0.2 lbs.

• Our payload will be designed to fill a half canister.

• Our payload will implement the standard 1.SYS.2 activation system.– RBF and G-switch setup

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Design Overview: Shared Can Logistics

10

• We are sharing with Univ. of Minnesota (tentative)

• We plan to communicate via email and periodic phone communication.

• We are still unsure of the structural interface we will use.

• We will not need any environmental ports.

grandpmr.com

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

Management

11

• A schedule is currently being created and has not been finalized.

• Monetary budget has yet to be determined.

• Dr. Azer Yalin and Brian Lee

RockSat-C 2011

CoDR

• Our goal is to design a payload capable of accurately measuring tank ullage in a microgravity environment for use in various spacecraft.

• We are currently building a tabletop setup of our interferometer to test our concept. Once we have obtained accurate and repeatable ullage measurements we will move on to implementation into a physical payload.

Conclusion

12