Upload
agnes-lawson
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Role of Twitter in formation of political agendain various socio-political contexts:
the cases of discussions on migrants in Russia and Germany
Saint PetersburgState University
Svetlana Bodrunova, PhD, Anna Litvinenko, PhD
School of Journalism and Mass Communications St. Petersburg State University
Theoretical premises1. Hybridization of media systems (Chadwick 2011, 2013):
- Tech-based growth of the web segment of media systems brings in new societal and political cleavages
- Difference in hybridization patterns depends most upon national socio-political conditions (Adam&Pfetsch 2011)
2. Media-constructed public sphere:
- Media as ‘junctions’ of the public sphere => mediatization?
3. Network(ed) communication theory:
- Formation of closed-up communicative milieus (‘echo chambers’)
- The idea of ‘spill-overs’ (online to offline, traditional/new media)
Saint PetersburgState University
Twitter as a communicative milieu: optimism vs. pessimism
• Twitter as the milieu of platform-limited horizontal communication with a big news alerts potential (Mancini&Mazzoni 2013, Vaccari et al. 2013)
• Twitter as a de-politicized space for gaming, dating, and chats (Fuchs 2014: Chapter 8)
• Can Twitter be a ‘crossroads of opinion’ in the online public sphere?
Saint PetersburgState University
Russia in 21st century is a fundamentally fragmented society (Zubarevich 2011, 2013): «Four Russias» Bodrunova, Litvinenko 2013: formation of the public counter-sphere in Russia of 2008-2012 Germany, in these terms, has developed a more solid society, with the differences between Eastern and Western part gradually
diminishing in many terms; the only striking similarity is huge urban migrant population from the southern direction still under-represented in the media content. Germany has a large number of citizens with migrant background and big diasporas, e.g. Turkish- and Russian-speaking communities which, in terms of media use, often differ from national average indicators (Sauer 2010)
Saint PetersburgState University
Public Sphere in Russia and in Germany
Project «Political agendasin hybrid media systems»
• Research team: Svetlana Bodrunova, Dmitry Gavra, Anna Litvinenko, Alena Savizkaya, Anna Smolyarova, Alexandr Yakunin
• Research upon structural and framing features of Twitter discussions in Russia and Germany
• Roles of media accounts in discussions upon polarizing issues- overall mediatization- linkages between media and non-media accounts (the ‘crossroads’
issue)• A case of social polarization: anti-migrant bashings in Biryulyovo
district of Moscow in October 2013
• A ‘calm’ period in Russia and in Germany (March 2014)
Saint PetersburgState University
Mixed methodology
1.Web crawling based on pre-selected hashtags2.Frame analysis based on coding of tweets3.Descriptive statistics 4.Discourse analysis (including semantic groups
of lexicon and their interpretation)
Saint PetersburgState University
Time-series graphs
Saint PetersburgState University
Saint PetersburgState University
STRUCTURE OF THE DISCUSSION:results of web crawling
Saint PetersburgState University
Web graph:Russia,
BiryulyovoBiryulyovo
- political actors- media- ordinary users- fake/spam
Web-graph:
Germany- Political actors- Media- Ordinary users- NGOs
Web-graph: Russia
- Political actors- Media- Ordinary users- Nationalist users- Official accounts- NGOs- Spin-doctoring(!)
Saint PetersburgState University
FEATURES OF THE DISCOURSE
15% of tweeets put blame on someone
Just ONE tweet of 673 tells ‘it is the whole society to be blamed’
10% contain nationalist speech
11% contain hate speech
Saint PetersburgState University
Features of the discourse: discussion topics
Saint PetersburgState University
Features of the discourse: Tweeters’ mood
Saint PetersburgState University
Features of the discourse: Tweeters’ mood
Polarization of the public sphere on Twitter
Saint PetersburgState University
Saint PetersburgState University
Features of the discourse: origins of discussants
Saint PetersburgState University
Features of the discourse: who is to be blamed?
15% = 100 tweets
Semantic analysis:First 600 stems from the word dataset
Saint PetersburgState University
Saint PetersburgState University
MEDIATIZATION OF THE DISCUSSION
Saint PetersburgState University
Mediatization of the discussion: media dominate in N of tweets
- mediatization really high: «breaking news», «news», «novosti», «they say that…», «RIA», «media», «Lifenews», «RT»- national-level political actors: Putin, ‘United Russia’ party, Navalny, Public Chamber - scarce aspect thinking: introduction of visas, football- other issues: LGBT; corruption.
Some results in hashtagging
Saint PetersburgState University
‘Discussion triggers’
• mediatization: both real and fake! • media of various Russian public spheres
• nationalists outperform migrants • the role of Public Chamber
Saint PetersburgState University
Positions of media in the discussion
Saint PetersburgState University
Tweeted media content vs. involved media content
N = 677 tweets
Saint PetersburgState University
Twitter in Russia shows a bigger potential for becoming a real "crossroads of opinions", in contrast to the Russian Facebook where anti-governmental discourse predominates, as well as to Vkontakte where political debate is much less noticeable and is encapsulated in closed-up communities. BUT under-representation of migrant community in Twitter obstacles this.
In Russian Twitter, hybrid pro-elite media dominate represented by lifenews_ru, izvestia_ru, pravda.ru, RT_russia, onlinekpru etc., although the anti-mainstreem media are also among influencers (GraniTweet, SvobodaRadio, MaloverjanBBC, ru_rbc).
In general, the case study supported hypothesis about the different role of Twitter in different socio-political contexts.
Conclusion
Saint PetersburgState University
Thank you for your attention!