Root Cause 0502.pdf

  • Upload
    smoksk8

  • View
    344

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    1/249

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    2/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Introduction

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisThis book was developed to help electric motor techni-

    cians and engineers prevent repeated failures because theroot cause of failure was never determined. There arenumerous reasons for not pursuing the actual cause offailure including:

    A lack of time.

    Failure to understand the total cost.

    A lack of experience.

    A lack of useful facts needed to determine the rootcause.

    The purpose of this book is to address the lack ofexperience in identifying the root cause of motor failures. Byusing a proven methodology combined with extensive listsof known causes of failures, one can identify the actualcause of failure without being an industry expert. In fact,

    Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc.

    1331 Baur Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63132 USA

    314-993-2220 Engineering Fax 314-993-2998 www.easa.com

    The information in this book was carefully prepared and is believed to be correct,

    but EASA makes no warranties respecting it and disclaims any responsibility or liability of any kind

    for any loss or damage as a consequence of anyones use of or reliance upon such information.

    Many of the pictures in this book are of failures thathave occurred where the actual cause was identified.However, in some cases the exact cause was neververified, nonetheless they are included along with theauthors opinion of the most likely cause. In othercases, the pictures are of parts that have not failed, butthe pictures are useful in illustrating how and where thepart could fail.

    It is difficult to segregate each type of failure into nicedistinct categories and to do so would require jumpingback and forth from section to section which wouldcause some amount of discontinuity. Hence, there is acertain amount of overlap and duplication of photos toclarify specific points.

    There is no attempt to single out a particular motormanufacturer or to suggest that one product has moredefects or failures than another. For this reason, wehave not identified the manufacturer of the parts ormotors. In some cases, the failed part is not even anoriginal equipment part. Also, we have made no effortto identify whom may have repaired a particular motor.The intent of this book is not to place blame but to assistin a correct diagnostic procedure that will preventrepetitive failures.

    The authors would like to express our appreciation toall those who have donated pictures for this edition andhope that we will continue to receive more pictures ofunique types of failures to fill the gaps.

    EDITORS NOTE

    when properly used, this material, will polish ones diagnos-tic skills that would qualify one as an industry expert.

    The book is divided into the various components of anelectric motor. In addition to a brief explanation of thefunction of each component and the stresses that act upon

    them, numerous examples of the most common causes offailure are also presented.

    Since it is not always possible to pinpoint the exact causeof failure, some examples are used more than once. Due toa lack of all the necessary facts associated with the applica-tion and history of a given machine, it is only possible toassign the root cause to the most probable scenario.

    A reference section is included at the back of this book forthose wanting to further research root cause failure analy-sis.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    3/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Table of Contents

    Table of ContentsSection

    Root Cause Methodology................................................................................................................................... 1

    Bearing Failures ................................................................................................................................................. 2Winding Failures ................................................................................................................................................ 3

    Shaft Failures ..................................................................................................................................................... 4

    Rotor Failures..................................................................................................................................................... 5

    Mechanical Failures ........................................................................................................................................... 6

    DC Motor Failures .............................................................................................................................................. 7

    Accessory Failures ............................................................................................................................................. 8

    Case Studies ...................................................................................................................................................... 9

    Reference Materials ......................................................................................................................................... 10

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    4/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 1 - 1

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Root Cause Methodology Section 1

    1Root Cause MethodologySection Outline Page

    Introduction to failure surveys ......................................................................................................................... 1-2

    Root cause methodology ................................................................................................................................1-2Summary of motor stresses ............................................................................................................................ 1-3

    Analysis of the motor and system ...................................................................................................................1-4

    Arriving at the correct conclusion ....................................................................................................................1-5

    Basic AC motor nomenclature and common alternatives ............................................................................... 1-6

    Basic DC motor nomenclature and common alternatives ............................................................................... 1-7

    Methodology forms

    Appearance of motor and system............................................................................................................. 1-8

    Application considerations ........................................................................................................................ 1-9

    Maintenance history ...............................................................................................................................1-10

    Motor system and environment checklist ............................................................................................... 1-11

    Stator coil layout for location and identification of fault ........................................................................... 1-12

    Inspection reports ................................................................................................................................... 1-13

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    5/249

    1 - 2 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 1 Root Cause Methodology

    INTRODUCTION TO FAILURE SURVEYSMost failure survey data for electric motors is influenced

    by the particular industry, the geographic location and thecombination of the motors in use. Therefore, specific num-bers may not always be relevant.

    Most failure surveys focus on the component that actuallyfailed but do not address the root cause of that failure. As an

    example, a bearing failure is not the root cause, it is simplythe component that failed. The root cause may be contami-nation, vibration, lack of lubrication, etc.

    The data provided by the Institute of Electrical and Elec-tronics Engineers (IEEE) study shown in Figure 1 is helpfulin that it points to the most likely cause of motor failure byvirtue of which component has failed. It then becomes theresponsibility of those analyzing the failure to search for theroot cause that led to the failure of that particular compo-nent. These percentages may vary for a specific industry orlocation.

    The real challenge lies in reducing the large category ofunknown failures. It is these unknown failures that makeanalyzing the entire motor system so critical.

    Each section of this book provides a detailed list ofpossible root causes of failure for a particular motor compo-nent. And in most cases, an example of that type of failureis also provided.

    ROOT CAUSE METHODOLOGYRoot cause methodology is a step-by-step method for

    examining a failed motor and its system. It focuses on thestresses that acted upon the failed component. By betterunderstanding the stresses that acted upon a failed part, the

    service center is more likely to uncover the root cause of thefailure.

    The five key steps in root cause methodology are:

    Failure mode:The manifestation, form or arrange-ment of the failure (e.g., turn-to-turn, phase-to-phase,etc.).

    Failure pattern:How the failure is configured (e.g.,

    symmetrical or nonsymmetrical). Appearance:A visual examination of the failed part,

    the entire motor and the system in which it operates.Care must be taken to inspect all motor parts fordamage, contamination, moisture, cracks or other signsof stress.

    Application: A close examination of the work per-formed by the motor and the characteristics of thosetypes of loads.

    Maintenance history: An examination of the workperformed to keep the motor and system in properoperating condition.

    In an ideal world, all relevant information pertaining to theapplication, appearance and maintenance history is avail-

    able prior to the actual inspection of the motor or failedcomponent. However, in real life, the methodology usuallyunfolds by first inspecting the failed part, then the motor andfinally acquiring information about the application, appear-ance of the system and the systems maintenance history.This sequence is usually driven by the urgency to return themotor to service as well as the availability of application andhistorical data.

    The good news is, in some cases, the root cause of failureis obvious. Such examples could be:

    A balancing weight comes loose and strikes the winding.

    The winding is saturated with water.

    The bearing lubricant is contaminated.

    However, in a case where the root cause must be known,it is imperative that none of the steps of the methodology beskipped.

    ssertsfoepyT sgniraeB rotatS rotoR tfahS emarF

    lamrehT X X X X X

    /cirtcelEcirtceleid X X X

    lacinahceM X X X X X

    cimanyD X X X X X

    raehS X X X

    /noitarbiVkcohs X X X X X

    laudiseR X X X

    citengamortcelE X X X X

    latnemnorivnE X X X X X

    TABLE 1: MOTOR COMPONENTS/STRESSES

    Bearing 51%*

    Stator winding 16%*(May have been voltage,

    water, overload, etc.)

    External 16%*(Environment, voltageand load will likely

    occur again)

    Shaft/coupling 2%Rotor bar 5%

    Unknown 10%*(No root cause failureanalysis performed)

    * For each component shown, appropriate measures

    to either prevent or predict the failure could greatly

    reduce three-quarters of motor failures.

    FIGURE 1: DISTRIBUTION OF FAILED

    COMPONENTS

    A Survey of Faults ..., IEEE Petro-Chemical Paper

    No. PCIC-94-01, Olav Vaag Thorsen and Magnus Dalva.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    6/249

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    7/249

    1 - 4 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 1 Root Cause Methodology

    Motor

    Power supply

    Power source Utility Co-gen

    Mechanical system

    Mechanical device Pump Fan Compressor Mechanical Transmission drive Machine tool Conveyor belt

    Meter

    Process

    Process requirement Flow Mixing Grinding Handling Conveyance Machining

    Power transmission

    Belting Direct connect Clutch Gears

    Motor controls

    Variable-frequency drive Soft start Wye-Delta Across-the-line Sensors Metering

    Mounting base

    Plate Rails

    C-face P-Base

    Electricity

    Ambient

    Moisture, wind snow, rain Chemical Temperature

    Air flow Vibration Noise

    FIGURE 2: THE TYPICAL MOTOR AND SYSTEM

    stresses exceeds the design capacity, then the life of thesystem may be drastically reduced and catastrophic failure

    could occur.These stresses can be broken down into the following

    groups or classifications:

    Bearing stresses: Thermal, dynamic and static load-ing, vibration and shock, environmental, mechanical,electrical.

    Stator stresses:Thermal, electrical, mechanical andenvironmental.

    Rotor stresses: Thermal, dynamic, mechanical, envi-ronmental, magnetic, residual, miscellaneous.

    Shaft stresses:Dynamic, mechanical, environmen-tal, thermal, residual, electromagnetic.

    For a more detailed summary of these stresses, seeTable 2.

    ANALYSIS OF THE MOTOR ANDSYSTEM

    Surrounding the motor is a system that consists of thepower supply, mounting, coupling and driven equipment.The environment, including the ambient, acts as an um-brella covering all of the elements of the system. Even the

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    8/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 1 - 5

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Root Cause Methodology Section 1

    end product or process can be considered part of thissystem. (See Figure 2.)

    Many factors affecting the system will also affect themotor and may contribute to the motor failure and vice-versa. Failure to consider each of these elements of thecomplete motor system could lead to an incorrect diagnosisof the root cause of failure. An effective tool for a systemsapproach is to conduct a failure mode effect analysis

    (FMEA) of the complete system. The idea is to determinewhat the possible failure modes are for a component andthen determine how that failure can impact the systemwhere the component resides. This will offer at least someof the possible scenarios that can lead to a motor failure.

    It is important to note that a number of failure mechanismscan lead to the same failed part with a common mode andpattern of failure. As examples, improper voltage, too muchload, blocked ventilation, excessive cycling and excessiveambient can all produce the same type of winding failure. Itis not always possible to correctly identify the problemwithout considering the entire system.

    In many cases, arriving at the correct conclusion is aprocess of elimination driven by the collection of accuratedata and facts associated with the system. At the risk ofstating the obvious, failure to eliminate the root cause willusually assure expensive downtime and repeated motorfailures. A classic example is the repeated replacement offailed bearings without ever trying to assess the root causeof failure.

    ARRIVING AT THE CORRECTCONCLUSION

    When analyzing a motor failure, it is important not toassume facts that may fill in the gaps in information suppliedby the customer.

    The service center often does not know much about themotor application, much less the power supply and/ormaintenance history. The customer dealing with the servicecenter is probably not the person who removed the motorfrom service, and may not be the operator who is familiarwith the motor or its application.

    Incorrect, incomplete or even misleading information isthe common. It may be impossible to draw the correctconclusion from the evidence provided. Never assume apiece of evidence exists just to force the conclusion to fitthe facts.

    When a conclusion is built around erroneous informationmingled with facts, the root cause of failure is seldomcorrect. The result is additional failures or assigning blameto the wrong parties.

    Example:A winding has failed, after a very short run time,with a turn-to-turn failure. The customer might believe thatthe motors short life indicates poor workmanship, whetherthe motor is new or rewound.

    The customer failed to advise (or the service center failedto ask) that the motor was operating on a pulse modulatedwidth (PWM) drive with a 100 (30.5 m) cable run. This wouldhave been a valuable piece of information for the servicecenter and, at the same time, it would have accuratelydescribed the motors power supply.

    Without the knowledge of the PWM drive, the servicecenter forces the conclusion that the motor manufacturermust have damaged the winding, even though there was nosuch evidence. The manufacturer must have damaged it insome not so obvious way.

    The wrong party is assigned responsibility for, and thecost of, repairing the failed motor. More importantly, the

    problem is not fixed and will likely occur again.The location of the failure is critical evidence that may

    explain the real reason for the winding failure. If the turn-to-turn failure is in a coil connected to a line lead, then atransient voltage could be the culprit. The location of thisfailure should alert the service center to find out more aboutthe power supply.

    When a motor is operating from a PWM drive, especiallywith a long cable run [more than 50 (15.25 m)], a turn-to-turn failure in the lead coil is classic indication of high voltagespikes produced by that PWM drive and the long cable run.

    The difference in knowledge will:

    Assign the responsibility and cost of the repair to thecorrect party.

    Give credibility to the service center.

    And most importantly, make sure the root cause of thefailure is identified and corrected.

    RESOURCE MATERIALS

    The following pages provide some useful resources tohelp correctly identify motor failures including basic nomen-clature for horizontal and vertical motors, charts for thecollection of data, and lists of questions useful in analyzinga motor failure.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    9/249

    1 - 6 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 1 Root Cause Methodology

    Bearing carrier

    Bearing holder

    Bearing quill

    Top hatRunner

    Rain bonnet

    Drip cover

    Coupling

    Stand tube

    Oil dam

    Stand pipe

    Air baffle

    Shroud

    Air deflector

    Clearance fit

    Flame path

    Shaft opening

    End bracket

    End bell

    Terminal box

    Outlet boxConduit box

    Junction box

    Keyway

    Shaft

    Foot

    Coils

    Coils

    Windings

    Rotor skew

    Rabbet fit

    Spigot fit

    Fan cover

    Fan shroud

    Bearing cap

    Bearing retainer

    Back cap

    Grease line

    Stator laminations

    Stacked statorCore iron

    Core plate

    Punchings

    Stator laminations

    Stacked stator

    Core iron

    Rotor laminations

    Rotor core

    Rotor laminations

    Rotor core

    Fill pipe

    Drain pipe

    Rotor fan blades

    Rotor fins

    End turns

    Coil extensions

    End ring

    Eye bolt

    Lifting eye

    Stator shroud

    Belly band

    External cooling fan

    Anti-rotation device

    Anti-backlash assembly

    Non-reverse ratchet

    Other key nomenclature items:

    Thrust washer

    Spring washer

    Pre-load washer

    Wave washer

    Oil ring

    Oil slinger

    Sleeve bearing

    Babbitt bearing

    Plain bearing

    Bearing shell

    Shaft

    Boldtextindicates

    terminology used

    in this book.

    BASIC AC MOTOR NOMENCLATURE AND COMMON ALTERNATIVES

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    10/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 1 - 7

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Root Cause Methodology Section 1

    End bracket

    Brush posts

    Brush stud

    Brush arm

    Brush box

    Brush holder

    Commutator

    Interpole

    Commutator coil

    Brush holder yoke

    Brush holder insulator

    Brush holder ring

    Banding

    Glass banding

    Frame Field coil

    Shunt

    Pole iron

    Armature

    Key

    Louvered ventilation covers

    Shaft

    Boldtextindicates

    terminology used

    in this book.

    BASIC DC MOTOR NOMENCLATURE AND COMMON ALTERNATIVES

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    11/249

    1 - 8 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 1 Root Cause Methodology

    METHODOLOGY FORMSAPPEARANCE OF MOTOR AND SYSTEM

    METI SKRAMER

    ?rotomehtnihtiwlairetamngieroffosngiserehterA

    ?segassapnoitalitnevdekcolbfosngiserehterA

    ,noitalusniehtnitneserpgnitaehrevofosngiserehterA ,secafrusdetniap,tnacirbul,sgniraeb,srab,snoitanimal?cte

    lladroceR?debburtfahsrosnoitanimalrotorehtevaH.tcatnocrotatsdnarotorfosnoitacol

    ?esoolsgnicarbliocroslioc,skcitspotehterA

    gniggolcforaelcdnaeerfsegassapgniloocrotorehterA?sirbed

    notisI?eruliafgnidniwehtfonoitacollacisyhpehtsitahW

    ehtfI?dnenoitcennocetisopporodnenoitcennocehthtiweruliafehtsierehw,yllatnozirohdetnuomsirotom

    ?deliafsesahproesahphcihW?kcolcehtottcepserronruttsrifehtnieruliafehtsI?deliafsliocfopuorghcihW

    ?lioctsrif

    ?dednetnisaetarepodnaetatoroteerfsgniraebehterA

    gnitator,rotatsehtnoerutsiomfosngiserehterA?straprehtoynarometsysgniraeb,ylbmessa

    tfahsdnarotorneewtebtnemevomfosngisynaerehterA?snoitanimaldnasrabro

    neeberehtsahrodednetnisametsysnoitacirbulehtsI

    ?noitaroiretedroegakaeltnacirbul

    ?rotordekcolrodellatsafosngisynaerehterA

    ?eruliafehtgnirudgninrutrotorehtsaW

    htiweergatiseoddnanoitatorfonoitceridehtsawtahW?tnemegnarranafeht

    ecnalabsahcus,gnissimstraplacinahcemynaerAynasahro,.cte,sedalbnaf,hteetrotor,stlob,sthgiew

    dluohstahtstrapgnitatorneewtebderruccotcatnoc?ecnaraelcaniatniam

    nevird,ecivedgnilpuocehtfonoitidnocehtsitahW

    ?tnempiuqedetalerrehtodnaesabgnitnuom,tnempiuqe

    ,lanruojtfahs,erobgniraebehtfonoitidnocehtsitahW?spacgniraebdnasyawyek,noisnetxetfahs,slaes

    ?yltcerrocdelpuocdnadengila,detnuomrotomehtsI

    ?lausunurolausutneibmaehtsI

    ?gnikcarcrossenkaewfosngiswohssresirssertsehtoDkaewdekoolrevonetfonasiyawyektfahsdnenevirdehT(

    ).knil

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    12/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 1 - 9

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Root Cause Methodology Section 1

    METHODOLOGY FORMS

    APPLICATION CONSIDERATIONS

    METI SKRAMER

    ?tnempiuqenevirdehtfoscitsiretcarahcdaolehteratahW?eruliaffoemitehttagnidaolehtsawtahW

    ?gnitratsgnirudecneuqesgnitarepoehtsitahW

    ?etasluproelcycdaolehtseoD

    erehtsI?noitarepodnagnitratsgnirudegatlovehtsitahWdecnalabegatlovehtsaW?segatlovtneisnartroflaitnetop

    ?sesahpneewteb

    otetareleccaotrotomehtrofekattiseodgnolwoH?deepsgnitarepo

    sihtnodeliaftnempiuqerosrotomrehtoynaevaH

    ?noitacilppa

    ?gninnuryllufsseccuserasrotomrehtoynamwoH

    ?ecivresnineebrotomehtsahgnolwoH

    ?gnitarepoelihwrognitratsnoliafrotomehtdiD

    rolaunamasihtsI?detratsrotomehtsinetfowoH,atled-eyw,gnidniw-trapatisI?noitarepocitamotua

    dohtemenil-eht-ssorcaro)DFV(evirdycneuqerfelbairav?gnitratsfo

    ?dedivorpsinoitcetorpfoepyttahW

    ehtdeppirtrodevomertahW rotom ?enilehtmorf

    ehtsierehW rotom lamronehteratahwdnadetacolsawtahW?setarepotihcihwnisnoitidnoclatnemnorivne

    ehtnehwekiltnemnorivneeht rotom ?deliaf

    ehtdnuoraerutarepmettneibmaehtsawtahW rotom ta?riafonoitalucricerynaerehtsaW?eruliafehtfoemiteht

    ?etauqedariagniloocfoegnahcxeehtsI

    evirdycneuqerfelbairavaybdeilppusrewopehtsIehtneewtebnurelbacehtfoecnatsidehtsitahW?)DFV(

    ?rotomehtdnaDFV

    gnitnuomdnagnilpuocehtebircseduoydluowwoH?daolnevirdehtrofdohtem

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    13/249

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    14/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 1 - 11

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Root Cause Methodology Section 1

    MOTOR SYSTEM AND ENVIRONMENT CHECKLIST

    SINEWAVE POWER

    Across-the-line starting Controlled start

    Voltage RMS current Reduced voltage

    Vab _______ IA ______________

    Part-windingV

    ac_______ I

    B______________ Wye-delta

    Vbc

    _______ IC

    ______________ Soft start

    _______

    % unbalanced

    NON-SINEWAVE POWER

    Type of drive Known transients

    Pulse width modulated Lightning

    Other _______________ Switching

    Other __________

    Cable run length ________

    Recorded incidents OtherTrips Power factor correction

    Failed starts Surge capacitors

    Known harmonics Lightning arrestors

    Other ______________ Reactors

    Voltage variations

    POWER SUPPLY INFORMATION

    V

    Time

    VMax

    = _______

    d

    d

    v

    t

    = ________

    V

    Time

    High

    Low

    ENCLOSURE AND ENVIRONMENT

    Location of motor

    Outdoors Confined space

    Indoors Other ___________________

    Examine ambient Recent events

    High temperature Rain

    Low temperature Flood

    Moisture conditions Spills

    Altitude, coastal or mining Lightning

    Other _______________ Other __________

    List possible contaminants

    __________________________________________

    __________________________________________

    Abovegrade

    Belowgrade

    At grade

    Ground level

    MOUNTING AND COUPLING

    Equipment type Description

    Pump Centrifugal

    Reciprocating

    Submersible

    Blower/Fan _________________________

    _________________________Compressor Reciprocating

    Rotary screw type

    Material handling _________________________

    (Conveyor, _________________________

    crusher, etc.) _________________________

    Starting requirements

    Inertia Torque

    Low Constant

    Medium Variable

    High Constant horsepower

    Other______________

    Starting cycle

    Acceleration ____________________

    Frequency/on-off time ____________________

    Loading conditions

    Light High

    Medium Overload

    APPLICATION INFORMATION

    Direct coupled

    Integral cantilever

    Solid shaft, coupled lower endHollow shaft, coupled top end

    Wall mountedCeiling mountedOther

    Integral but foot mounted

    Common shaft

    Overhung load

    BeltsSprocketOther

    Risetime

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    15/249

    1 - 12 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 1 Root Cause Methodology

    12:00

    6:00

    3:009:00

    12:00

    6:00

    3:009:00

    Drive end Opposite drive end

    The leads are F1 mounted

    F2 mounted

    The connection is on the drive end (DE)opposite drive end (ODE)

    How many leads are there? _____

    How are the leads marked? _____

    Mark the location of failure(s) above. Identify on which end of the motor

    the failure occured and it's position on the clock.

    Identify which coil in the group failed, and relationship to the lead coil.

    Is there core damage?YesNo

    How many slots are affected? __________

    Length of damaged area? _____________

    If so, how extensive is the damage?

    Is there grease, water or dirt on the windings?

    Number of: Poles _____

    Slots _____

    Coils per group _____

    Circuits _____

    Connection Wye Delta

    STATOR COIL LAYOUT FOR LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF FAULT

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    16/249

    Root Cause Methodology Sect

    1 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure Analysis

    AS FOUND REPORT

    OPPOSITE

    DRIVE END

    (ODE) MAG. CTR.

    DRIVE END

    (DE)3:00

    12:00

    9:00

    6:00

    3:00

    12:00

    9:00

    6:00

    Disassembled By:Mechanical Readings:

    Electrical Readings:Reassembled By:

    Tested By:

    CUST:P.O. #:JOB #:DATE:

    OVERALL LENGTH

    NORMAL THICKNESS

    INSIDE DIAMETER

    OUTSIDE DIAMETER

    WINDING FLAPS

    FRAME CLEARANCE

    WINDING PITCH

    NUMBER OF LEAD WIRES

    SIZE OF LEAD WIRE

    SIZE OF MAGNET WIRE

    TYPE OF MAGNET WIRE

    NUMBER OF TURNS PER COIL

    NUMBER OF COILS PER POLE

    NUMBER OF SLOTS

    CONDITION OF CONNECTION LEADS

    INITIAL 12:00

    3:00

    6:00

    9:00

    FINAL 12:00

    3:00

    6:00

    9:00

    IB OB

    AIR GAP(AS VIEWED FROM COUPLING END)

    DRIVE END

    OPP. DRIVE END

    MEASUREMENTS

    BRG. HOUSING I.D.

    BRG. O.D.

    CLEARANCE

    BRG I.D.

    JOURNAL O.D.

    CLEARANCE

    MFG.

    IB OB

    BEARINGS

    SHAFT

    TIR INITIAL

    FINAL

    STRAIGHTENING METHOD

    NOT APPLICABLE

    PEENING

    HEATING

    BENDING

    LOCATION OF BEND

    (DISTANCE FROM IB END)

    JOURNAL RECONDITION

    NOT RECONDITIONED

    CHROME PLATE DEPOSITION THICKNESS

    DRIVE END

    OPPOSITE DRIVE END

    END FLOAT

    ENTER

    VALUES

    MECHANICAL REPAIR

    COND. BEFORE REPAIR

    DISASSEMBLY

    MANUFACTURER

    SERIAL NO.

    HORSE POWER

    VOLTAGE

    PHASES

    NO LOAD CURRENT 1ST PHASE

    2ND PHASE

    3RD PHASE

    SERVICE FACTOR

    NEMA TYPE

    RPM

    BEARING TYPE

    FULL LOAD AMPS

    MOTOR INFORMATION

    TEST

    YES NO COUPLING OR PULLEY ATTATCHED TO MOTOR ON ARRIVAL?

    DELTA COIL CONNECTION WYE COIL CONNECTION

    YES NO CONNECTION BOX ATTATCHED TO MOTOR ON ARRIVAL?

    1009080

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    1098

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    1 MIN 30 SEC1 MIN 45 SEC

    2 MIN 0 SEC

    3 MIN4 MIN

    5 MIN

    0 SEC15 SEC

    30 SEC

    45 SEC1 MIN 0 SEC

    1 MIN 15 SEC

    6 MIN7 MIN

    8 MIN

    9 MIN10 MIN

    NO LOAD SPEED (RPM)

    INSULATION RESISTANCE

    TEST VOLTS

    MINUTES INTO TEST

    RESISTANCE : VALUE @ 10 MIN:

    RESISTANCE : VALUE @ 1 MIN:

    RESISTANCE(MEGAHOMS)

    INSULATION RESISTANCE DURING TEST (IF REQUIRED)

    POLORIZATION INDEX =

    MAJOR REPAIR ITEMS

    INSPECT/CLEAN

    REWIND

    RESTACK ROTOR

    BEARING REPLACEMENT

    JOURNAL SURFACE RECONDITION

    SHAFT STRAIGHTENED

    SHAFT REPLACED

    HOUSING LINE BORED

    ROTOR BALANCED

    PAINTED

    OTHER

    1. BEARING DE ODE

    GOOD CONDITION

    CHATTER

    FROZEN TO SHAFT

    SCORED/WIPED

    OTHER

    2. LUBRICATION

    INBOARD NORMAL VARNISHED

    OUTBOARD NORMAL VARNISHED

    3. ROTOR

    GOOD CONDITION ARCED/FUSED AREAS

    DISCOLORED/HOT SPOTS ROTOR FAN CRACKED

    CRACKED ROTOR BARS RUBBED TO STATOR

    OTHER

    4. SHAFT

    GOOD CONDITION DIAM @ SLEEVE BEARING

    BENT RUN OUT / TIR

    JOURNAL SURFACE DAMAGED

    OTHER

    5. STATOR

    GOOD CONDITION ARCED/FUSED AREAS

    DISCOLORED/HOT SPOTS BENT LAMINATIONS

    RUBBED/WARPED/WORN LOOSENESS

    OTHER

    6. FLAME PATH BUSHING

    GOOD CONDITION I.D.

    WEAR OUT OF ROUND/TIR

    SCORING JOURNAL CLEARANCE

    7. SUSPECTED CAUSE OF FAILURE, COMMENTS, SUGG.

    SLEEVE

    ANTIFRICTION

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    17/249

    Section 1 Root Cause Methodology

    1 - 14 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502

    Root Cause Failure Analysi

    AS RELEASED REPORT

    OPPOSITE

    DRIVE END

    (ODE) MAG. CTR.

    DRIVE END

    (DE)3:00

    12:00

    9:00

    6:00

    3:00

    12:00

    9:00

    6:00

    Disassembled By:Mechanical Readings:

    Electrical Readings:Reassembled By:

    Tested By:

    CUST:P.O. #:JOB #:DATE:

    OVERALL LENGTH

    NORMAL THICKNESS

    INSIDE DIAMETER

    OUTSIDE DIAMETER

    WINDING FLAPS

    FRAME CLEARANCE

    WINDING PITCH

    NUMBER OF LEAD WIRES

    SIZE OF LEAD WIRE

    SIZE OF MAGNET WIRE

    TYPE OF MAGNET WIRE

    NUMBER OF TURNS PER COIL

    NUMBER OF COILS PER POLE

    NUMBER OF SLOTS

    CONDITION OF CONNECTION LEADS

    INITIAL 12:00

    3:00

    6:00

    9:00

    FINAL 12:00

    3:00

    6:00

    9:00

    IB OB

    AIR GAP(AS VIEWED FROM COUPLING END)

    DRIVE END

    OPP. DRIVE END

    MEASUREMENTS

    BRG. HOUSING I.D.

    BRG. O.D.

    CLEARANCE

    BRG I.D.

    JOURNAL O.D.

    CLEARANCE

    MFG.

    IB OB

    BEARINGS

    SHAFT

    TIR INITIAL

    FINAL

    STRAIGHTENING METHOD

    NOT APPLICABLE

    PEENING

    HEATING

    BENDING

    LOCATION OF BEND

    (DISTANCE FROM IB END)

    JOURNAL RECONDITION

    NOT RECONDITIONED

    CHROME PLATE DEPOSITION THICKNESS

    DRIVE END

    OPPOSITE DRIVE END

    END FLOAT

    ENTER

    VALUES

    MECHANICAL REPAIR

    COND. AFTER REPAIR

    ASSEMBLY

    MANUFACTURER

    SERIAL NO.

    HORSE POWER

    VOLTAGE

    PHASES

    NO LOAD CURRENT 1ST PHASE

    2ND PHASE

    3RD PHASE

    SERVICE FACTOR

    NEMA TYPE

    RPM

    BEARING TYPE

    FULL LOAD AMPS

    MOTOR INFORMATION

    TEST

    YES NO COUPLING OR PULLEY ATTATCHED TO MOTOR ON ARRIVAL?

    DELTA COIL CONNECTION WYE COIL CONNECTION

    YES NO CONNECTION BOX ATTATCHED TO MOTOR ON ARRIVAL?

    1009080

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    1098

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    1 MIN 30 SEC1 MIN 45 SEC

    2 MIN 0 SEC

    3 MIN4 MIN

    5 MIN

    0 SEC15 SEC

    30 SEC

    45 SEC1 MIN 0 SEC

    1 MIN 15 SEC

    6 MIN7 MIN

    8 MIN

    9 MIN10 MIN

    NO LOAD SPEED (RPM)

    INSULATION RESISTANCE

    TEST VOLTS

    MINUTES INTO TEST

    RESISTANCE : VALUE @ 10 MIN:

    RESISTANCE : VALUE @ 1 MIN:

    RESISTANCE(MEGAHOMS)

    INSULATION RESISTANCE DURING TEST (IF REQUIRED)

    POLORIZATION INDEX =

    MAJOR REPAIR ITEMS

    INSPECT/CLEAN

    REWIND

    RESTACK ROTOR

    BEARING REPLACEMENT

    JOURNAL SURFACE RECONDITION

    SHAFT STRAIGHTENED

    SHAFT REPLACED

    HOUSING LINE BORED

    ROTOR BALANCED

    PAINTED

    OTHER

    1. BEARING DE ODE

    GOOD CONDITION

    CHATTER

    FROZEN TO SHAFT

    SCORED/WIPED

    OTHER

    2. LUBRICATION

    INBOARD NORMAL VARNISHED

    OUTBOARD NORMAL VARNISHED

    3. ROTOR

    GOOD CONDITION ARCED/FUSED AREAS

    DISCOLORED/HOT SPOTS ROTOR FAN CRACKED

    CRACKED ROTOR BARS RUBBED TO STATOR

    OTHER

    4. SHAFT

    GOOD CONDITION DIAM @ SLEEVE BEARING

    BENT RUN OUT / TIR

    JOURNAL SURFACE DAMAGED

    OTHER

    5. STATOR

    GOOD CONDITION ARCED/FUSED AREAS

    DISCOLORED/HOT SPOTS BENT LAMINATIONS

    RUBBED/WARPED/WORN LOOSENESS

    OTHER

    6. FLAME PATH BUSHING

    GOOD CONDITION I.D.

    WEAR OUT OF ROUND/TIR

    SCORING JOURNAL CLEARANCE

    7. SUSPECTED CAUSE OF FAILURE, COMMENTS, SUGG.

    SLEEVE

    ANTIFRICTION

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    18/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 1

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    2Bearing FailuresSection Outline Page

    Determining bearing life .................................................................................................................................. 2-2

    The fatigue process and stresses that act upon rolling element bearings ...................................................... 2-2Methodology for analyzing rolling element bearing failures ...................................................................... 2-4

    Tips for interpreting bearing failures .........................................................................................................2-4

    Lubrication ................................................................................................................................................ 2-5

    Thermal stress ........................................................................................................................................2-10

    Dynamic and static loading stress .......................................................................................................... 2-13

    Vibration and shock stress ..................................................................................................................... 2-15

    Environmental stress ..............................................................................................................................2-17

    Mechanical stress ................................................................................................................................... 2-19

    Electrical stress ...................................................................................................................................... 2-21

    Vertical motor bearing systems: Special cases ...................................................................................... 2-24

    Introduction to sleeve bearing failures .......................................................................................................... 2-29

    Methodology for analyzing sleeve bearing failures .................................................................................2-30

    Thermal stress ........................................................................................................................................2-31

    Babbitt grade .................................................................................................................................... 2-32

    Some common causes of failure ......................................................................................................2-32

    Dynamic and static loading stress .......................................................................................................... 2-35

    Environmental stress ..............................................................................................................................2-37

    Mechanical stress ................................................................................................................................... 2-39

    Vibration and shock stress ..................................................................................................................... 2-41Electrical stress ...................................................................................................................................... 2-42

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    19/249

    2 - 2 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    DETERMINING BEARING LIFEBearing life is a function of rotational speed, dynamic

    load, lubricant quality, impact loading and bearing size. Theprediction of rating fatigue life, commonly referred to as L

    10

    life is based on the assumption that the ultimate cause offailure is material fatigue. Excessive heat, lack of lubricant,or excessive loads simply accelerate the fatigue process.The L

    10

    life is the estimated time for 10% of a large popula-tion to fail. If L

    10is one year, then L

    50(the point at which half

    the bearings will have failed) is 5 times that or 5 years. Thismeans that for an application with a L

    10life of 1 year, 10%

    of the bearings may fail within that first year, and that one-half the bearings may fail after 5 years.

    The life for ball bearings is approximately inversely pro-portional to the load cubed and inversely proportional to thespeed. These relationships are only valid within certainconstraints relating to the bearing size, design, lubrication,temperature, load and speed. Bearings are subject to speedlimitations that are affected by the size and material of thebearing, as well as the lubricant. Oil lubrication increasesbearing speed limits by at least 10 to 15%.

    L10

    = (C/P)p

    When rpm is constant, L10h

    can be derived:

    L10h

    = 1,000,000/60n (C/P)p

    Where: L10

    is basic rating life, millions of revolutions

    p = 3 for ball bearings

    p = 10/3 for roller bearings

    C = Bearing dynamic load rating

    P = Equivalent bearing load

    n = Rotational speed, rpm

    The bearing industry has long used this formula to predictbearing life. The L

    10bearing life gives satisfactory assur-

    ance of bearing life for the purpose of selecting theappropriate bearing for each application.

    In the real world, manufacturers try to reduce costs byusing the smallest bearing that will give satisfactory perfor-mance. Sometimes motors are built with smaller bearingsthan are prudent. End users apply motors for applications(and in environments) for which they were not intended. Inaddition, maintenance personnel do not always lubricatebearings on schedule. The repair industry has to contendwith each of these realities.

    Rolling element bearings

    Thermal stress.................................................... 2-10

    Dynamic and static loading stress ...................... 2-14

    Vibration and shock stress ................................ 2-15

    Environmental stress .......................................... 2-17

    Mechanical stress............................................... 2-19

    Electrical stress .................................................. 2-23

    PHOTOGRAPHS OF BEARING FAILURES

    Sleeve bearings

    Thermal stress.................................................... 2-33

    Dynamic and static loading stress ...................... 2-36

    Environmental stress .......................................... 2-38

    Mechanical stress............................................... 2-40

    Vibration and shock stress ................................. 2-41

    Electrical stress .................................................. 2-42

    The mode of bearing failure is fatigue, which may begreatly accelerated by the factors listed later in this section.

    THE FATIGUE PROCESS ANDSTRESSES THAT ACT UPON ROLLINGELEMENT BEARINGS

    Microscopic subsurface fractures of metal due to cyclicloading stress, producing thin layers of surface separa-tion, which flake off (spalling).

    Some increase in noise and vibration will occur.

    A change in critical dimension occurs.

    Noise, vibration, friction, heat and wear accompaniedby more advanced spalling. It is no longer safe orprudent to operate the machine.

    The final step is advanced spalling, usually followed bycatastrophic failure. (See Figure 1.)

    The above 5 steps outline the failure process; the rate atwhich that process occurs depends on the variables in theL

    10formula, but can be further influenced by several external

    factors. The majority of bearing failures can be attributed to

    a variety of stresses that can be grouped as follows:Thermal stress

    Friction.

    Lubricant.

    Ambient.

    Dynamic and static loading stress

    Radial.

    Axial.

    Preload.

    Vibration and shock stress

    Rotor.

    Driven equipment.

    System.Environmental stress

    Condensation.

    Foreign material.

    Excessive ambient.

    Poor ventilation.

    Mechanical stress

    Loss of clearance.

    Misalignment.

    Shaft fit out of tolerance.

    Housing fit out of tolerance.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    20/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 3

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    Electrical currents

    Rotor dissymmetry.

    Electrostatic coupling.

    Static charges.

    Variable frequency drives.

    Since more than half of electric motor failures start asbearing failures (Figure 2), it is important to correctly analyze

    the failure to determine the root cause to prevent futurefailures. Because severe thermal failures also destroy thelubricant, evaluation of the bearing independent of thesystem is difficult (Figure 3).

    FIGURE 1: THE FATIGUE PROCESS

    Bearing 51%*

    Stator winding 16%*(May have been voltage,

    water, overload, etc.)

    External 16%*(Environment, voltage

    and load will likelyoccur again)

    Shaft/coupling 2%Rotor bar 5%

    Unknown 10%*(No root cause failureanalysis performed)

    * For each component shown, appropriate measures

    to either prevent or predict the failure could greatly

    reduce three-quarters of motor failures.

    FIGURE 2: DISTRIBUTION OF FAILEDCOMPONENTS

    A Survey of Faults ..., IEEE Petro-Chemical Paper No.

    PCIC-94-01, Olav Vaag Thorsen and Magnus Dalva.

    FIGURE 3: LUBRICANT DESTROYEDBY THERMAL STRESS

    These photographs show the progression of a fatiguefailure, from microscopic fractures, through spalling, tocatastrophic failure. How quickly this happens de-pends on speed, time, temperature, load, vibration andlubricant.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    21/249

    2 - 4 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYZING

    ROLLING ELEMENT BEARINGFAILURESThere are five key areas which should be considered and

    related to one another in order to accurately diagnose theroot cause of rolling element bearing failures. They are:

    Failure mode.

    Failure pattern.

    Appearance.

    Application.

    Maintenance history.

    FAILURE MODES

    Failure modes can be grouped into twelve categories,

    which are usually the result of combined stresses acting onthe bearing to the point of damage or failure. This isarbitrarily referred to as the failure mode.

    Fatigue.

    Fretting.

    Smearing.

    Skidding.

    Scoring.

    Abrasive or abnormal wear.

    Corrosion.

    Lubrication failure.

    True or false brinelling.

    Electric pitting or fluting.

    Cracks.

    Seizures.

    These modes do not represent the cause of the bearingproblem; instead they are the result or way that the problemis manifested.

    FAILURE PATTERNS

    Closely associated with the failure mode, yet different, isthe failure pattern. Each bearing failure has associated withit a certain pattern which can be grouped into some combi-nation of the following categories.

    Temperature levels (discoloration).

    Noise levels.

    Vibration levels.

    Lubrication quality.

    Condition of mounting fits.

    Internal clearances.

    Contamination.

    Mechanical or electrical damage.

    Load paths and patterns (alignment).

    TIPS FORINTERPRETING BEARINGFAILURES

    In order to correctly interpret a bearing failure, it ishelpful to mark the position of each bearing as it isremoved. When axial thrust is a factor, the direction ofthrust may point to a coupling problem or an internalpreload condition. A practical method is to use a diegrinder or engraver to identify which side of each bearingis toward the rotor before the bearings are removed.Dissect the bearing using a die grinder rather than atorch, which heats and destroys evidence.

    The wear pattern on the raceways offers importantevidence. Axial displacement (thrusting) is indicated bya ball path that is offset to opposite sides of the inner andouter races. Misalignment is indicated by a ball path thatangles from one side of the outer race to the other. Adisplaced (cocked) inner race is indicated by a widerpath on the inner race. Internal misalignment (indicatedby the angled ball path) often results from a cockedbearing bracket, or a bearing housing that has beenbored and sleeved improperly.

    In the case of thrust bearings, indications of internalmisalignment are important because misalignment willdrastically shorten bearing load capacity and life.

    Some bearing failures, especially sleeve bearing fail-ures, can only be interpreted in conjunction with thelubricant. When possible, preserve a sample of thelubricant for analysis. In the case of rolling elementbearings, the appearance of the lubricant can be criti-cally important.

    If a bearing is to be sent out for outside expertise, donot clean the bearing first! Sandwich bags are great forpackaging a bearing with its lubricant before shipping.

    Above, the side of the bearing toward the rotor has beenmarked prior to dissection. Below, a dissected ball bear-ing.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    22/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 5

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    APPEARANCE CONSIDERATIONS

    When coupled with the mode and pattern of failure, themotor, bearing and load appearance usually give a clue asto the possible cause of failure. The following checklist willbe useful in the evaluation.

    Are there signs of contamination in the area of thebearings? Any recent welding?

    Are there signs of excessive temperature anywhere inthe motor or driven equipment?

    What is the quality of the bearing lubricant?

    Are there signs of moisture or rust?

    What is the condition of the coupling device used toconnect the motor and the load?

    What levels of noise or vibration were present prior tofailure?

    Are there any missing parts on the rotating member?

    What is the condition of the bearing bore, shaft journal,seals, shaft extension and bearing cap?

    What was the direction of rotation? Was there anoverhung load or any axial thrust? Are they supported

    by the bearing wear patterns? Does the outer or inner face show signs of fretting?

    Is the motor mounted, aligned and coupled correctly?

    Do not destroy the failed bearing until it has been properlyinspected. It is also important to save a sample of thebearing lubricant.

    APPLICATION CONSIDERATIONS

    Usually it is difficult to reconstruct the actual operatingconditions at the time of failure. However, a knowledge ofthe general operating conditions will be helpful. The follow-ing items should be considered:

    What are the load characteristics of the driven equip-

    ment and the loading at time of failure? Does the load cycle or pulsate?

    How many other units are successfully operating?

    How often is the unit started?

    What type of bearing protection is provided?

    Where is the unit located and what are the normalenvironmental conditions?

    Is the motor enclosure adequate for the application?

    What were the environmental conditions at time offailure?

    Is the mounting base correct for proper support to themotor?

    Is the belting or method of connection to the load

    correct for the application?

    MAINTENANCE HISTORY

    An understanding of the past performance of the motorcan give a good indication as to the cause of the problem.Again a checklist may be helpful.

    How long has the motor been in service?

    Have any other motor failures been recorded and whatwas the nature of the failures?

    What failures of the driven equipment have occurred?Was any welding done in the area?

    When was the last time any service or maintenancewas performed?

    What operating levels (temperature, vibration, noise,etc.) were observed prior to the failure? What trippedthe motor off the line?

    What comments were received from the equipmentoperator regarding the failure or past failures?

    How long was the unit in storage or sitting idle prior tostarting?

    What were the storage conditions?

    How often is the unit started? Were there shutdowns?

    Were the lubrication procedures correct?

    Have any changes been made to surrounding equip-ment?

    What procedures were used in adjusting belt tensions?

    Are the pulleys positioned on the shaft correctly and asclose to the motor bearing as possible?

    LUBRICATIONBecause lubrication is inseparable from many bearing

    failures, there is lubrication information distributed through-out the bearing failure section. This portion of the sectionfocuses specifically on lubrication issues, to facilitate its useas a reference.

    The role of lubricant is to reduce friction between therolling or sliding parts, dissipate heat generated by thebearings and protect the surface finish of the bearing partsfrom corrosion. To a lesser extent, lubrication excludesforeign contamination by displacement.

    Lubrication normally means either grease or oil, each ofwhich can be delivered by several different methods.

    GREASE LUBRICATION

    Grease is oil suspended in a base so that the oil isavailable to lubricate the bearing as needed. Grease lubri-cation is almost exclusively for ball and roller bearings.

    When a bearing housing is designed for grease lubrica-tion, a cavity is provided within the bracket to hold a quantityof grease. Some designs incorporate metering plates andsimilar methods to regulate the flow of grease to the bearing.An inner bearing retainer (or cap) is often provided to retainthe grease and exclude contamination. In many cases, theretainer also is used to establish endplay.

    Lubrication can be affected by temperature, environmen-tal conditions, dynamic bearing load, and speed. Lubrication

    selection can affect vibration levels, bearing temperatureand longevity.

    Grease selection should consider the above variables.The best grease for an open pit copper mine in the desert[130oF (54C) ambient] is probably not the best grease touse in the arctic [-50oF (-45C) ambient]. The same is truefor dry climates (5% humidity) versus coastal regions (98%humidity). Additional concerns include contamination of thelubricant. Contamination, high temperature and friction re-duce the effectiveness of lubricants.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    23/249

    2 - 6 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    Present research is making it possible to predict bearinglife more accurately. The use of Elasto-Hydrodynamic Lu-brication theory (EHL), introduced in the 1960s, for calculatingfilm thickness and pressure profiles, has been the key tomany investigations and the base for understanding failuremodes. Since the early 1970s, lubrication and film thicknesshave been recognized as significant factors in the lifeequation. The ABMA Standard 9/ANSI B3.15, and ISO 281

    standards were modified in 1972 and 1977 respectively, toinclude this effect by the addition of the a2 (material) and a3(operating conditions) life adjustment factors.

    Typical factors used are shown in Figure 4. The latestefforts have been in the area of particle contamination andlubricant cleanliness. These new studies are tending toreshape the life prediction equations. According to onebearing manufacturer, the true nature of the failure modemechanism was hidden and not understood until recently

    for the following reasons: The high loads used to accelerate testing resulted in

    insufficient time for wear to manifest itself.

    Surface initiated cracks, from particle indentation,

    FIGURE 4: LIFE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR

    VS. VISCOSITY RATIO

    FIGURE 6: GREASE TEMPERATUREPROPERTIES

    TEMPERATURE VS. OXIDATION LIFE

    FIGURE 5: LIFE ADJUSTMENT FACTORVS. CONTAMINATION-LOAD

    which penetrated into deeper areas of high stressand culminated in flaking, could not be distinguishedfrom flaking caused by cracks formed below thesurface.

    Based on these latest studies, bearing life theory hasbeen further refined to use a family of curves to establish anadjustment factor to the unmodified life. Of primary impor-tance is the !factor used to correct for contamination. An

    accurate assessment of the!factor requires an analysis ona computer with accurate knowledge of the application.Figure 5 is typical of the curves used to determine the lifeadjustment factor for contamination. These refinements,along with similar actions taken by other manufacturers, canonly lead to a more precise determination of bearing life. Inaddition to new life prediction theories, new lubricants andlubrication methods are being devised which will extend theoperating life. Synthetic greases are capable of extendinggrease life significantly as indicated by the oxidation char-acteristics shown in Figure 6. Although grease life is afunction of more than just oxidation life, it is a good indicatorof the type of gain that can be made using synthetic grease.

    Synthetic greases can be formulated with a lower sensi-tivity to temperature variations, and therefore, have a largeruseful temperature range and the potential for lower losses.

    The question frequently asked about greases, deals withthe compatibility of them if mixed during the relubricationprocess. Table 1 is a guideline to assist in this process. If indoubt, do not mix without checking with the lubricant manu-facturer.

    Lubrication arrangements for grease-lubricated bear-ings, shown in Figure 7, vary among manufacturers and

    designs. Grease viscosity, motor mounting position, andbearing enclosure impact the effectiveness of the lubrica-tion porting. For example, the grease-through design shownin Example C does not work well with a double-shieldedbearing.

    While some margin exists, a good rule of thumb forbearing temperature is 80-90-100, where 80o C is theoperating temperature, 90 o C is the alarm setting, and100o C is the shutdown limit. For higher temperatures,synthetic lubricants (oil or grease) are available. In general,

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    24/249

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    25/249

    2 - 8 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    tion. When a high ambient condition exists, or when it isdesirable to lower bearing temperatures, a forced lubrica-tion system is used.

    Most sleeve bearings require 2 to 3 gallons per minute(1.5 to 2 liters per minute) for adequate lubrication. Tocontrol the volume of oil through a forced lubrication system,the inlet is pressurized and oil forced through a small orifice(or metering plate). System pressure is 10 to 15 psi, and

    orifice sizes are typically around 0.030 (0.8 mm) to providethe desired flow rate. To test the flow rate, use a bucket tomeasure the oil exiting the bearing for one timed minute.One common cause of apparent oil leaks is a missingorifice. This occurs because the orifice is installed in themotor piping, and can get lost when the motor plumbing isdisconnected.

    Table 3 provides some clues based on the appearance ofthe oil.

    LUBRICATION PRECAUTIONS All motor housings, shafts, seals and relubrication paths

    must be kept thoroughly clean throughout the motor's life.

    Avoid any dirt, moisture, chips or foreign matter contami-nating the grease.

    Identify the temperature range for the application andselect a grease that will perform satisfactorily.

    Over greasing may cause elevated bearing and/or wind-ing temperatures which can lead to premature failures.Be sure to properly purge excess grease.

    When regreasing, be sure that the new grease is compat-ible with the existing grease and that it has the desiredperformance characteristics.

    Synthetic grease may not be as suitable as petroleumgreases for high-speed applications. Some applicationsmay require an extreme pressure (EP) grease.

    Some common greases are not suitable for motorapplications. If they are too soft, whipping can occur. Iftoo stiff; noise and poor bleeding characteristics canoccur.

    Do not try to lubricate sealed bearings.

    preventing corrosion during long idle periods. Bearingslubricated by oil mist should have seals or bearing isolatorsto contain the oil. Recovery methods vary from drip cups topassing the exiting vapor through a reclassifier. A reclassifierreconsolidates the oil droplets.

    Oil mist has drawbacks, each of which is difficult to detectuntil the motor has been dismantled. First, oil mist is a vaporthat can exit the bearing chamber and cause other prob-

    lems. Environmental contamination may result when thevapor recovery system fails. Oil chemically attacks someinsulation materialsespecially lead wire insulation.

    Oil selection is affected by the application, temperature,environment and bearing design. Aside from the obviousfactors already listed, oil viscosity can affect vibration levelsof sleeve bearing machines by altering the stiffness of theshaft-bearing interface. As a rule-of-thumb, the closer theratio of bearing length to bearing diameter is to 1, the moreimportant oil viscosity is likely to be.

    FORCED LUBRICATION

    Forced lubrication systems are added to reduce bearing

    temperature (Figure 8). In effect, the forced lubricationsystem simply increases the size of the oil reservoir. Therole of the oil reservoir is to ensure a steady supply of oil tolubricate the bearings, but also to cool the oil by recircula-

    FIGURE 8: SLEEVE BEARING MOTOREQUIPPED WITH A FORCED LUBRICATION

    SYSTEM

    The piping is part of a forced lubrication system used toreduce bearing temperatures.

    ecnaraeppA

    evahyamtahW

    deneppah

    .ttibbabdetlem,lionaelCretfadeddasawliO

    .deliafgniraeb

    .ecnaraeppaykliM .lioehtniretaW

    .yddumsraeppaliO .lioninoitanimatnoC

    .sgnidniwdekaos-liO

    laeshtnirybalevissecxEootlevellio,ecnaraelc

    gniraebdezirusserp,hgih-decrofrorebmahc

    ootemulovnoitacirbul.hgih

    TABLE 3: APPEARANCE OF OIL

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    26/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 9

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    OVERLUBRICATION

    Thin grease used in this roller bearing migrated past theinner bearing cap. A lip seal would prevent this byretaining the grease.

    Grease quiets a noisy bearing. This bearing was noisy forquite some time.

    Overgreasing a noisy bearing treats the symptom ratherthan the cause. The result may cause other problems,most notably an increase in winding temperature.

    The upper bearing carrier, bolted inside the end bracket,has too much clearance to the shaft. Gravity, grease anddirt are not a good combination.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    27/249

    2 - 10 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    noitidnocgnirotinoM erutarepmeT

    lamroN )C08(F071

    mralA )C09(F091

    nwodtuhS )C001(F012

    TABLE 4: BEARING MONITORING

    TEMPERATURES

    Add 30C when synthetic lubricants are used, however,synthetic grease is often not suitable for high-speedapplications.

    THERMAL STRESSA rolling element bearing should operate at temperatures

    not in excess of 100C. The rule of thumb, 80-90-100,refers to an operating temperature of 80C (170F), analarm temperature of 90 C (190 F) and a shutdowntemperature of 100C (210F). (Note: 30C may be addedfor synthetic lubricants, however, synthetic grease is oftennot suitable for high-speed applications.) (See Table 4.) Forsealed bearings, the rpm rating is significantly lower than foropen bearings.

    At temperatures above 100 C (130 C for syntheticlubricants), thermal expansion of the component parts mayreduce the internal clearance, resulting in premature failureof the bearing. In addition, lubricant breakdown will result inhigher bearing temperatures and bearing failure.

    Bearing temperature is affected by the temperature of thesurroundings (air, windings, rotor), as well as by the lubri-cant (type, quantity, viscosity and condition), the bearingitself (internal clearance, open/shielded/sealed,) and load

    (dynamic load, direction of load, speed and impact cycling).The bearing should be sized appropriately for all of theseconditions, but in the real world not all equipment is createdequal. Understanding the root cause may lead to sugges-tions to modify a unit to make it more suitable, or evenreplace it.

    THERMAL STRESS

    Symptoms of overheating are discoloration of the races,balls and cages from straw to blue. Temperatures inexcess of 400F (205C) can anneal the race and ballmaterials. The resulting loss in hardness reduces thebearing capacity, causing early failure.

    Courtesy of The Barden Corporation

    Heat discoloration indicates the inner race reached700F (370C). Possible causes include loss of fit to theshaft, lubricant failure or improper installation. Localizeddiscoloration may indicate that a torch was used to heatthe inner race.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    28/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 11

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    THERMAL STRESS

    Lubricant failure will lead to excessive wear, overheatingand subsequent bearing failure.

    Courtesy of The Barden Corporation

    This motor failure started as a failed bearing. The burntpaint shows the extreme heat created by this failure. Thebearing failure resulted in damage to the rotor as well asthe stator.

    Diligence and protection mean the difference betweenminor damage and this type of failure.

    The temperature of this bearing exceeded the droppingpoint of the grease. This is the temperature at which oilseparatesor drops outfrom the grease base. Thisbearing failure led to the bent shaft.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    29/249

    2 - 12 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    THERMAL STRESS

    By the time this bearing failed, the shaft temperatureexceeded 900F (480C).

    This bearing shows signs of heat discoloration. It wasoverheated prior to installation.

    In this case, the heat source was a stalled rotor. Heatmigrated from the rotor through the shaft to the bearing.Different greases have different dropping points (thetemperature at which oil separates from the greasebase).

    The additional air shroud on the drive end deflects airacross the drive end bearing housing. If removed by anend user or previous repairer, the drive end bearingtemperature will increase.

    Loss of lubrication damaged this spherical roller bearing.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    30/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 13

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    DYNAMIC AND STATIC LOADINGSTRESS

    Load characteristics of the bearing in its unique applica-tion include radial load and/or thrust load. Radial load mayresult from a belted application (Figures 9 and 10), misalign-ment or other factors not immediately apparent. Thrustloads may be external or internal in source. A vertical

    application supporting a pump may require a thrust bearingcapable of handling substantial thrust loads. An identicalmotor might be designed with different bearings for high-,medium- or low-thrust applications. Thrust load may alsoresult from internal preloading of the motor. Prior machinework such as a shaft replacement, missing gaskets orswapped bearing caps (when both bearings are the samesize) can also cause this condition.

    For vertically-mounted machines, axial thrust load of thenon-thrust bearing may result from improper assembly.Thermal expansion of the shaft during service may movethe axial load from the thrust bearing to the non-thrustbearing. This is also true of axially-loaded horizontal ma-chines. It is worth noting that there are end users who install

    horizontal motors in nonstandard positions (Figure 11),reducing the effectiveness of the lubrication paths. If some-thing about the evidence doesnt seem to fit, it may indicatean unusual mounting condition. Look for an answer that fitsALL the evidence.

    Axial loading may also result from improper alignment ifthe coupling preloads the locating bearing; for examplewhen a rigid coupling is used, if the installer pries thecoupling halves apart (or draws them together using thecoupling bolts) after the motor base is secured.

    FIGURE 9: RESULTS OF EXTREMEOVERHUNG LOAD ON A BELTED

    APPLICATION

    FIGURE 10: BELTED APPLICATION

    Pulley diameter and number of belts can affect radialloads. See alignment material in Section 6.

    FIGURE 11: HORIZONTAL MOTOR MOUNTED

    VERTICALLY

    An end user may save money by purchasing a hori-zontal C-face motor instead of a vertical. However,this may reduce the effectiveness of lubrication paths.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    31/249

    2 - 14 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    DYNAMIC AND STATIC LOADING STRESS

    These shafts show signs of a classic case of excess radialload on a ball bearing.

    This application requires a roller bearing for the drive end.The pulley should be installed as close to the bracket aspossible. Worn belt grooves increase belt slip and maycause the operator to overtighten the belts and overloadthe bearing.

    This bearing stopped rotating, but the undersized shaftdid not. A heavy radial load caused this unique failurepattern.

    Severe spalling caused by excessive load. This spallingis part of the natural failure process as a bearing reachesthe end of its life.

    Courtesy of The Barden Corporation

    Heavy shock loads can cause unusual fractures of theouter race and/or balls.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    32/249

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    33/249

    2 - 16 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    VIBRATION AND SHOCK STRESS

    A split outer race (circumferentially) is caused by highshock impact. This unusual failure is more common inapplications such as a crusher or hammer mill.

    The bearing of this motor was damaged by vibrationcaused by a damaged cooling fan.

    Rotational shock load caused this coupling to fracture.Most service centers do not receive the coupling with themotor, so evaluating a bearing failure without all theevidence can be tough. The coupling can provide valu-able information.

    Heavy axial loading or axial impact can chip the outer raceshoulder of a roller bearing.

    Courtesy of Koyo

    Excessive load may cause bearing cage failure.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    34/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 17

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSLubricants are produced with varying degrees of mois-

    ture resistance. It is up to the end user to select the mostappropriate lubricant for the application. Condensation maycause rust on the surface of the bearing and internal motorparts. Corrosion on the bearing raceways or rolling ele-ments will work quickly to further damage the bearingsurface.

    Foreign material may include liquid or vapor that attacksthe bearing surface or the lubricant. Examples include nitricor hydrochloric acid, which can flash-rust a bearing whenthe vapor is present, even in small quantities. Foreignmaterial also includes grease incompatibility. SeeTable 1 (Page 2-7) for specifics, but the results of mixingincompatible greases vary. Some combinations result in asoupy liquid while others harden into a solid mass thatresembles plastic.

    Excessive ambient temperature is not restricted to the air

    surrounding the motor. An exposed steam line near one endof a motor may elevate temperatures on that end only.Radiant heat sources may be a considerable distance from

    the machine and still raise bracket temperaturewithout affect-ing air temperature. A motor operating within a confinedspace (e.g., compressor) may be subject to recirculation asthe temperature of the cooling air is raised each time it

    passes through the motor. The smaller the "T, the lesseffective the cooling medium becomes. ("T is the tempera-ture difference, in this case between the air in and air out.)

    In the case of restricted ventilation, the temperature of thewindings and rotor increases. The shaft functions partly as a

    heat sink to conduct heat away from the rotor. That, in turn,increases the bearing and lubricant temperature. Buildup ofcontamination (dirt, pulp, product) on the exterior of the motor

    insulates the bearing, trapping heat.

    ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS

    Grease was flushed from this bearing. Water, steam orsolvents are often the cause of this type of damage.

    The lubricant was washed out of the bearing. Rust isevident.

    The irregular striped discoloration was caused whencontamination was pressed in the roller path.

    Corrosion caused the initial damage to this roller bearing.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    35/249

    2 - 18 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS

    Dust and other fine dry contaminants absorb oil andthicken the grease base.

    Grease compatibility problems may result from mixingincompatible greases, or from ingress of other contami-nants. Dry powders may absorb the oil causing thegrease to thicken.

    Restricted ventilation may increase winding and/or rotortemperatures. Heat transfers to the bearing housing andelevates the bearing temperature.

    Dirt in the roller path imbeds in the raceway, decreasingbearing life.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    36/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 19

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    MECHANICAL STRESSBearing failures can also result from a variety of mechani-

    cal causes, either internal or external in origin. Contaminationand/or corrosion may reduce the clearance between theshaft and end bracket resulting in heat-generating friction.

    Misalignment of the motor and driven equipment in-creases the dynamic load on the bearing. Improper

    manufacturing or repair procedures may result in a loss ofinternal bearing clearance. A shaft fit that is too large, or abearing housing that is too small, results in a tighter fit andreduces internal clearance of the bearing. Too loose a fitmay permit the bearing to slip on the shaft (or in thehousing), generating more heat.

    In specific cases, use of the wrong bearing for theapplication can lead to the same failures. Vibrator (shaker-screen) motors are designed with loose shaft fits and tighthousing fits. They require the use of C4 internal clearancebearings. Some dragline motors utilize higher interferencefits between the shaft and bearing (m6 rather than k5), butmay also adjust the bearing housing fit to preserve thebearings internal clearance.

    Crushers are often fitted with spherical roller bearings ontapered journals. The distance the bearing is advanced ontothe tapered journal controls the internal clearance of thebearing. Once the bearing is removed, it is too late to checkthe internal clearance.

    MECHANICAL STRESS

    Discoloration and scoring is the result of the outer raceslipping in the bearing housing.

    Courtesy of The Barden Corporation

    Heavy ball path wear indicates a tight fit.

    Courtesy of The Barden Corporation

    This drive end bearing was forced over the bearing lockwasher after the inner race spun and got hot enough toforge. A heavy axial preload from the load caused thefailure.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    37/249

    2 - 20 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    MECHANICAL STRESS

    Loss of fit damaged this bearing. The inner race spun on the shaft, generating heat. Thermal breakdown of the lubricantfollowed causing the rolling elements to seize and forge to the inner race, which expanded it further.

    Loss of fit (left) may follow a bearing failure or it may result from corrosion, product contaminants or insufficient clearance.A motor in a corrosive atmosphere, operating infrequently, is susceptible to this mode of failure. The combination of analuminum bracket and steel shaft can be vulnerable. Resulting friction could cause the shaft to seize, or friction-generatedheat could weaken the shaft (right).

    Severe vibration literally forged the inner race of this bearing once the race temperature reached 1200F (650C).

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    38/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 21

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    FIGURE 12: SHORTED LAMINATIONS

    This severe damage resulted from a bearing failure thatprogressed.

    ELECTRICAL STRESSCurrent discharge from voltage passing through the bear-

    ings can damage them. These shaft voltages have longbeen associated with medium and large electric machines;however, the increased used of variable frequency drives(VFDs) has since resulted in shaft voltages in much smallermotors.

    In standard machines, any break from uniformity in therotor or stator can cause shaft voltages. Shorted lamina-tions (Figure 12), gaps in the stator laminations (as occurwith large machines built with segmented laminations),variations in air gap or spacing for f ields or interpoles in a DCmachine; all can result in shaft voltages in rotating equip-ment. Shaft voltages may also result from static electricdischarge from the driven equipment or process. Oneexample is a large continuous paper roll, where staticelectricity can build up and discharge through the bearings.

    Indications of shaft voltages are fluting when rpm issteady, or frosting when speed varies continuously. In somecases, the appearance of the balls offers the best clue.Instead of a highly-polished finish, the rolling elements may

    have a dull appearance.The rule of thumb for voltage limits is 100 mV for ball

    bearings and 200 mV for sleeve bearings. Variable fre-quency drives can result in shaft voltages as high as 20 to25 volts. Because of capacitive coupling between the rotorand stator, both bearings must be electrically isolated. Thestandard method of insulating only one bearing will notprotect bearings in a machine operated from a VFD.

    FIGURE 13: METHODS OF PROTECTING AGAINST SHAFT CURRENTS

    METHODS OF PROTECTION

    Before pulse width modulated (PWM) inverters, shaft-riding brushes were used or the opposite drive end bearingwas insulated. Insulating the bearing was the preferredmethod. This breaks the circuit and interrupts the flow ofvoltage. (See Figure 13.) A good analogy is a light switch:When the switch is turned off, the light goes off because theswitch breaks the circuit.

    The grounding brush provides a parallel path to the

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    39/249

    2 - 22 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    When insulating a bearing housing, the repairer must

    also insulate the face of the bearing cap. The bearing

    cap could come into contact with the face of the

    bearing, bypassing any insulation on the bearing

    housing.

    FIGURE 15: PRECAUTION WHEN INSULATINGBEARING CAPS

    FIGURE 14: INSULATING WITH CERAMIC

    SPRAY

    Ceramic or aluminum oxide spray is one method ofinsulating. Above, an opposite drive end bearing jour-nal, and below, vertical motor bearing carriers, all ofwhich have been insulated with ceramic spray.

    bearing, diverting some of the current from the bearing tothe brush. Voltage follows the path of least resistance, so ifthe brush is highly conductive and has good contact with theshaft, most of the voltage will flow through the brush. But asthe shaft oxidizes or as dirt builds up on the shaft, theresistance through the brush/shaft connection increases.The bearing becomes the path of least resistance and moreof the voltage flows through the bearing.

    A partial list of better preventive measures includes:

    Install ground brushes on both ends.

    Insulate both bearing housings.

    Insulate both shaft journals.

    Use ceramic (insulated) bearings.

    Use bearings with ceramic balls.

    Install in-line filters between the motor and VFD toreduce the problem.

    Improve grounding of the motor and drive.

    If a motor is critical, a short-term corrective action is todecrease the switching frequency of the drive to less than5 kHz. That may permit the motor to operate until anotheroption can be implemented.

    Grounding brushes still have all the problems mentionedpreviously, but are utilized by some manufacturers. For verylarge machines, a copper toothbrush style brush is avail-able. In most cases, the brush is constructed like a

    conventional carbon brush, but with a high silver content toincrease conductivity.

    Grounding brushes should be located as close as practi-cal to the bearing. The longer the supporting bracket, thehigher the resistance of the bracket/brush/shaft path.

    Ceramic spray can applied to the shaft journal, and mustbe precision-ground to size (Figure 14). Ceramic chipseasily, so handling requires care. Because the layer ofceramic is relatively thin, care should be taken when balanc-ing a shaft with ceramic-coated journals. The rotor weightshould not be placed on the journals, for balancing orinspection, because the point-loading is likely to break theceramic loose from the shaft. The damage often does notshow up until the motor is in service, at which time theceramic fractures, leaving the bearing with a loose shaft fit.

    A thermal spray aluminum oxide may be used for sleevebearing exteriors. Aluminum oxide is the same materialused for emery cloth and abrasive grinding wheels. With thealuminum oxide bearing shell, vibration can eventuallycause the bearing housing to wear due to the abrasiveaction. The higher the vibration, the more likely this is tooccur. Aluminum oxide coatings can also be compromisedby moisture and corrosion.

    Insulating the bearing housings requires that other parts(like bearing caps) not bypass the insulation. When abearing exhibits evidence of shaft currents, and the housingis insulated, verify the integrity of the insulation with that endof the motor assembled. (See Figure 15.)

    Space-age epoxy putties (Devcon, Belzona) also can beused, but caution should be exercised to avoid exceedingthe load capacity of these materials.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    40/249

    Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502) 2 - 23

    Root Cause Failure Analysis Bearing Failures Section 2

    ELECTRICAL STRESS

    Fluting due to shaft currents on both a roller bearing,above, and a ball bearing, below.

    When rotational speed varies, the shaft currents maycause a dull, frosted appearance instead of fluting.

    The spacing of the fluting marks depends on rpm, diam-eter, radial load and magnitude of the shaft voltage.

    Fluting only occurred on the non-loaded roller path be-cause the arcing occurred only at the gap between the

    rollers and the race. A good analogy is the points in anolder automobile ignition system.

    The arcing on this ball was caused by welding done nearthe motor.

  • 8/10/2019 Root Cause 0502.pdf

    41/249

    2 - 24 Copyright 2002, Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (Version 502CI-502)

    Root Cause Failure AnalysisSection 2 Bearing Failures

    VERTICAL MOTOR BEARINGSYSTEMS: SPECIAL CASES

    There are several features unique to vertical motors.Those features are grouped together here for the conve-nience of those inspecting vertical machines. Because avertical motor is often coupled to a pump, the motor may berequired to support the weight and thrust load of the pump

    as well as the weight of the rotor. With pump designsranging from low- to medium- to high-thrust, the upperbearing arrangement of seemingly identical vertical motorscan vary tremendously according to the bearing size, quan-tity and direction of thrust. (See Figure 16.)

    When an end user changes the pump without matchingthe thrust load requirement to the thrust load capacity of themotor, or when an aftermarket spare motor is purchased,there is potential for misapplication.

    The service center may not be aware of all the circum-stances surrounding a bearing failure. A key considerationis the length of time in service with the same pump and thrustload for the motor. Recent installation, pump work or otherchanges are cause for further investigation.

    The following checklist will help focus the inspection onprobable causes:

    Has the pump been recently replaced or serviced?

    Was any base or foundation work done?

    Has the motor been coupled to the same pump? Has itbeen moved recently?

    Has there been a change in the material being pumped?

    Are there records of vibration levels and/or current?

    Is there on-line monitoring equipment for vibration/current? Are the records available?

    Has there been any recent maintenance to the motor orpump?

    Is the pump or motor part of a redundant system? If so,

    are some units run continuously or is the startingsequence alternated?

    Have maintenance personnel recently checked thealignment or vibration?

    Following is a list of possible misapplications for verticalmachines:

    Mismatch of thrust needs.

    - High-thrust bearings coupled to a low-thrust pump.

    - Low-thrust bearings coupled to a high-thrust pump.

    - Lack of upthrust capability on a pump with occa-sional upthrust.

    Bearing arrangement has been changed for occa-sional upthrust, but no clamping ring/thrust shoulder isprovided. The bearing orientations are correct, but theupthrust bearing cannot function because there isnothing to thrust against. (See the top illustration inFigure 16.)

    Bearing thrust capacity has been changed by adding orremoving a bearing without changing lubrication provi-sions. If a thrust bearing is removed from a2-thrust-bearing arrangement, the lower bearing shouldbe removed, with a spacer (Figure 17) used beneaththe remaining bearing. A clue is to compare the oil level

    COUPLING

    ADJUSTING NUT

    LOCK WASHER

    BEARING HOLDER

    RATCHET CAP

    SHAFT

    THRUST BEARING

    TOP BEARINGLOCK WASHER

    TOP BEARINGLOCK NUT

    TOP BRACKET

    TOPBEARING CAP

    O - RING

    TOP BEARINGCAP BOLT

    BEARINGHOLDER

    OIL DAM

    BEARING HO