ssoessweni 2.see? MORRISETTE 010

RECEIVEDSEP l i 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

A Report on the Surficial Geology, Bedrock

Geology and Gold Geochemistry of Humus, Till and Bedrock

Lahaie Lake Claim Group

Morrisette Township, District of Timiskaming, Ontario

NTS 32D/5

Gleeson-Rampton Explorations

Box 158

Carp, Ontario

August 1983

l

32085SWeiH 2.5887 MORRISETTE 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. INTRODUCTION......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l

2. LOCATION AND ACCESS...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . l

3. DESCRIPTION OF CLAIMS...................... . ... . . . . . . l

4. PREVIOUS WORK...................... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5. WORK COMPLETED....................................... 4

6. SURFICIAL GEOLOGY AND TILL GEOCHEMISTRY.............. 5

6.1 General Geology.............. .... . ....... . . . . . . 5

6.2 Description of Surficial Materials............. 1

6.3 Till Geochemistry.............................. 11

7. BEDROCK GEOLOGY......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

l. l General Geology...................... .. .. . . . . . . 12

7.2 Geology of the Property........................ 147.2.1 General.................................... 14

l.2.2 Topography and Vegetation.................. 14

7.2.3 Lithology.................................. 15

7.2.4 Structure................ ... . .. .. .... . . . . .. 16

7.2.5 Alteration................................. 17

7.2.6 Economic Geology........................... 18

8. GEOCHEMISTRY......................................... 19

8.1 Field Methods.................................. 19

8.2 Laboratory Methods......................... ... 198.3 Statistics..................................... 20

8.4 Results........................................ 20

9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................... 24

REFERENCES........................................ . . . . 26

CERTIFICATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .

Figure l. Location Map................................. . . 2

Figure 2. Location of Claim Group.................... . . . . 3

Figure 3. General Quaternary Geology..................... 6

Figure 4. Geological Map of Timmins-Kirkland Lake Area....13

Figure 5. Histogram for Au in Humus...................... 21

Figure 6. Cumulative Frequency Curve for Au in Humus..... 22

Table 1. Description of Surficial Geological Map Units... 8

APPENDIX l.Rock Descriptions and Analyses

APPENDIX 2. Geochemical Laboratory ReportsAPPENDIX 3. Technical Data Sheets

Map l - Surficial Geology and Au in Till Values-In Pocket

Map 2-Bedrock Geology and Au in Rock Samples - In Pocket

Map 3 - Geochemical Map of Gold in Humus - In Pocket

1. INTRODUCTION

The claims were staked on the basis of results from

an OGS overburden drillhole, which showed (a) 120ppb Au

in the bedrock and (b) three colours of gold in the basal

till. Systematic detailed bedrock and surficial geological,

mapping was carried out. Till and humus samples were

taken for geochemical gold analysis to determine the extent

of potential gold-bearing rocks within the claim group

and to determine the requirements for follow-up programs.

2. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Lahaie Lake claims are located in the northeast

corner of Morrisette Township, District of Timiskaming,

Ontario (Figure 1). The claims are situated 10 miles

(16km) northeast of the town of Kirkland Lake in NTS map

sheet 32D/5.

They are accessible by a good gravel road (Esker

Lakes Park Road) which runs north from Highway 66, 8 miles

(13km) east of Kirkland Lake. The claims are traversed

by a series of logging roads off of the Esker Lakes Park

Road.

3. DESCRIPTION OF CLAIMS

The property consists of 20 contiguous claims numbered

from 642658 to 642677 inclusive (Figure 2). They are

registered in the Larder Lake Mining Division. The property

was staked between May 3rd and May 6th, 1982 and the claims

were registered on May 12th, 1982.

2.

j l t-ant;

j ' l Claim

LEE , J MAISONVILLE P BERNHARDT MOR!, i

PLAYFAIR COOK BARNET THACKERAY l ELLIOTT

SLACK BENOIT MELBA ! BISLEY j CLIFFORD

BLOCK THREE l 20 l Lahaie

BOMPAS

FIGURE l

LOCATION MAP

lMQNOPRQSE^ , —v' L ^ lu ^ c -A!'- Z!

3.

3 M

-f- 2 M

Figure 2: Location of Lahaie Lake Claim Croup - Morrissette Township

lScale 1";2640'

C

l

4. PREVIOUS WORK

No previous work has been recorded on the property.

The bedrock was mapped by Rupert and Lovell (1970). The

Quaternary geology was mapped by Baker et al (1982) and

a drift thickness map has been produced by Baker (1982).

Airborne electromagnetic and magnetic maps at a scale

of 1:20000 were published in 1979 by the Ontario Geological

Survey (OGS Prelim. Map P2258). As part of the Kirkland

Lake Initiative Program a deep overburden drilling and

geochemical sampling program was carried out by the OGS

in 1980 and 1981 (Routledge et al 1981). One hole (No.

81-19) drilled at the south end of Lahaie Lake contained

three colours of gold and 3% sulphides in basal till atop

bedrock. In addition the bedrock was anomalous in gold

(120ppb). The rock chips have been described as being

intermediate volcanics containing traces of pyrite. On

the basis of this information the Lahaie claim block was

staked.

5. WORK COMPLETED

Between June and September mapping of the bedrock

and surficial geology was carried out over a 400' x 100'

grid. For control purpose a 6800 ft. east-west base line

and a 4600 ft. north-south base line were cut and compass lines were turned off at 400 ft. intervals topofil

was used to measure distance and each station was marked

with flagging. Some 89000 feet of line were thus traversed

and sampled. In addition, to complete the surficial geologic

mapping pits were dug by hand to depths of up to l meter

(deep organics were probed to 1.2 m depths) at 400 ft.

intervals along the lines, more frequently where necessary.

Where shallow till was suspected numerous pits were dug

until a sample was obtained from near the till/bedrock

interface. A total of 21 till samples were obtained.

A humus soil survey and sampling program was also completed

over the grid,807 samples were taken. Generally sites

were not sampled where the peat exceeded l m.

The names and addresses of the field personnel are as follow:

1. Roger Thomas, MSc., P.Eng.; Geologist -linecutting, humus sampling and surficial geology

1172 Castle Hill,Ottawa, Ontario

2. Serge Paradis, M.A., F.G.A.C.; Surficial Geologistlinecutting, humus sampling and surficial geology

10-387 Miller Street, Vanier, Ontario

3. Vern Rampton, PhD., P.Eng.: Surficial Geologistsurficial geology and till sampling

R.R. #1 Carp, Ontario

4. John Adams, B.Se., F.G.A.C.; Geologist -bedrock geology

Osgoode, Ontario

5. Chris Gleeson, PhD., P.Eng.; Geologist-Geochemistbedrock geology and geochemical supervision

R.R. #1 Iroquois, Ontario

6. SURFICIAL GEOLOGY AND TILL GEOCHEMISTRY

6.1 General Geology

The area has been glaciated most recently by a

southeasterly flowing glacier as indicated by striations

(Figure 3, Map l and Baker et al 1982). Thin till was

SCALE i: 50,000

LEGEND

e

5

4

3

SWAMP DEPOSITS: Mud, muck, ptat

GLACIOLACUSTRINE SHALLOW WATER DEPOSITS Sand with minor grovtl

GLACIOLACUSTRINE DEEP WATER DEPOSITS : Clay,lilt

IDE CONTACT DEPOSITS: Sand,gravel

3a ESKERS Sand,gravel IX^y^^)

3c DELTAIC: Sand, minor gravtl

TILL : Stoney, tilty sand till

BEDROCK - Drift complex

la Abundant bedrock expoiuree with thin cover

l b Extensive, but discontinuous drift cover

BEDROCK OUTCROP

GLACIAL STRIATION : Ice movement indicated

FIGURE 3

QUATERNARY GEOLOGY OF LAHAIE LAKE- CLAIM GROUP(III)AFTER: BAKER,c.L.,etai. 1982 : QUATERNARY GEOLOGY OF THE MAGUSI RIVER AREA; ONT. GEOL. SURV. MAP R 2483.

deposited during this glaciation. During deglaciation

eskers and associated sub-aqueous outwash fans were

deposited into a glacial lake fronting the calving glacier.

Commonly, the sandy glaciofluvial deposits grade into

sandy glaciolacustrine deposits. Glaciolacustrine deposits

are more clayey in deeper basins and peripheral to areas

of subaqueous outwash deposition. Tills blanketing bedrock

may have been re-worked in part by wave action during

the lacustrine phase of deglaciation.

During postglacial time, small streams have re-worked

lacustrine deposits to shallow depths along their courses.

Organic materials have accumulated in poorly drained

depressions to form bogs and swamps.

6.2 Description of Surficial Materials

A number of basic surficial map-units were identified

on the Lahaie Lake claim group (Map 1). Their general

description and effect upon the gold content of humus

over gold-bearing bedrock are given in Table 1.

Rock outcrops frequent much of the upland in the

northwest and southwest corners of the claim group; only

isolated outcrops are present in the east-west trending

valley, which occupies the centre of the claim group.

The rocky uplands are blanketed by fine sand of lacustrine

origin - this sand was probably deposited subaqueously

and transported by currents at the edge of a calving glacier,

The exact thickness of the sand is unknown, but estimates

are given in Table 1. Commonly the bedrock is directly in contact with the sand, but freqhently a layer of loose

Unit

Table l Description of Surficial Geologic Map - Units Within Lahaie Lake Claim Group

Material Description Thickness Geomorphology Drainage

8.

Potential Buffering Effect Upon Dispersal of Gold from Underlying

Bedrock

Due to Texture Due to Thickness

OP

OBfsLP

OBml P

AB

fsLP

fsLp

sGM

DB-V

R

DV-B R

Peat and muck; probably over lying fine sand, silt and c lav

Peat and muck over fine sand; silt and clay possible at depth

Peat and muck over silt and clay

Sand and pebbly gravel over fine sand

Fine sand with patches thin organics on surface; silt possible at depth

Fine sand with patches thin organics on surface; silt and clay possible at depth

Sand; fine to medium grained

Commonly fine sand, occasion ally till, re-worked till or broken bedrock over bedrock

Commonly fine sand, occasion ally till, re-worked till or broken bedrock over bedrock

Bedrock with patches of fine sand, till, re-worked till or broken bedrock

Peat-lm minimum; probably 2 to 3m. Fine sand - generally ^m; up to 30m possible

Peat: 0.2-lmFine sand, etc. 1m;up to 30m possible

Peat:< 0.3msilt and clay;^ 1m;up to 30m possible

^m thick; fine sand variable

Mm; variable due to relief on underlying bedrock surface

Mm; generally ^m; up to 30m possible

^m; up to 50m possible

Generally 0.3 to 1m thick, but commonly c.3m or l-5m; maximum unknown

Generally less than 0.5; 0.5 to 8m common; maximum unknown

Generally less than O.5m

Flat; generally bog with ericad and spruce coi'er; string bog rare

Flat; generally bog or alder swamp; few ponds

Flat; generally bog or alder swamp

Floodplain

Gently tomoderatelysloping

Flat

Very Poor High Very High

Verv Poor

Poor

Fair to Poor

Good

Fair

Rolling; forms Excellent occasionally knoll(kane)

Moderately to gently sloping

Generally moderately to steeply sloping

Generally moderately to steeply sloping

Good

Good

Excellent

Moderate

Very High

Low to Moderate

Low to Moderate

Low to Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate toHigh

Moderate to High

Low to High

Low to High

Moderate to High

Moderate to High

Generally Low

Low

Very Low

9.

silty pebbly sandy till or shattered rock is present between

the sand and bedrock. Only on the southern flank of the

southern ridge was compact till noted.

The glaciofluvial sand thickens on the flanks of

the major bedrock ridges. In these areas its surface

is characterized by slopes indicating the influence of

the relief on the underlying bedrock surface. A buried

bedrock ridge is also believed to core the ridge that

marks the central part of the claim group along the base

line (mapped as fsLN- fine sandy lacustrine with nondescript

sloping character). Bedrock outcrops are present near

the west end of this ridge (near L36W onthe BL), but the

eastern end appears to be buried by a subaqueous deltaic

node of the Munro Esker {whose axis is located just east

of the claim group).

Thick glaciofluvial sand grading into sandy glaciolacustrine

deposits cover the eastern part of the claim group. One

hundred and forty feet of glaciolacustrine and glaciofluvial

sand and gravel were recorded in OGS overburden drillhole

81-19 at the south end of Lahaie Lake. Rare thin sandy

clay beds were noted within the sand and cobbly pebbly

gravel was common within the basal 25 feet of the sequence.

This is considered typical of the area mapped as sGm (sandy

glaciofluvial with rolling surface).

The broad valleys are filled with glaciolacustrine

deposits - the upper portion generally consist of fine

sand, but some silt and clay beds may be present at depth,

especially at the western end of the claim group. Clayey silt was noted at the surface at the very southwest corner

of the claim group, and clay is common in overburden drill

10.

holes to the west of the claim group (Routledge et al

1981). Gravelly beds are common at depth in the glaciolacustrine

sequences, even those characterized by near-surface clay.

The glaciolacustrine sediments are commonly underlain

by 1-2 feet of compact pebbly sandy till. The absolute

thickness of the glaciolacustrine deposits is difficult

to estimate, but all overburden holes drilled in valleys

contained less than 140 feet of lacustrine sediment (Routledgeet al 1981).

Organic deposits are present in poorly drained

depressions. The organics in those characterized by alder

swamp are generally less than l meter thick/ whereas those

characterized by bog are greater than l meter thick.

The map-units have been rated according to their

potential to allow the dispersal of gold from bedrock

to humus at surface (Table 1). Generally silt, clay and

thick organics have been considered as major hinderance

to the dispersal of gold; fine sand has been considered

as a major to negligible hinderance to its dispersal; and coarse sand and gravel have been considered as having

no negative influence on its dispersal. Unconsolidated

thicknesses of l to 2 m are considered to have a negligible

effect upon the movement of gold to the surface vegetation,

whereas thicknesses of 2 to 5 m are considered to have

a potential moderate effect on its movement. As the

thickness of unconsolidated materials increase the potential

hinderance to the dispersal of gold to humus from underlying

bedrock increases. Thus values obtained from humus on

uplands with relatively thin sandy drift are considered

to give a relatively good reflection of gold content in

underlying bedrock, whereas those obtained from areas

11,

blanketed with thick organics and clay silty sediments

may not reflect gold in the underlying bedrock. In areas

covered by sandy sediment the values probably relate to

the underlying bedrock, but may be affected by the thickness

of the sand.

6.3 Till Geochemistry

Till was'only located and sampled where bedrock

was close to the surface. Generally the till was stoney

and sandy with a minor silt component. It was generally

loose and oxidized except near station 8N on L60W where

unoxidized till was exposed in a road scraping. Unoxidized

compact till has also been reported from the base of most

OGS overburden drill holes in the area (Routledge et al

1981). The looseness of the till may be attributed to

a number of possible causes: the till has been modified

by postglacial subaerial weathering and soil forming processes,

the till has been re.-worked by wave action, or the till

is in part englacial or supraglacial ablation till. Postglacial

transport of till must be minimal, even if the till has

been re-worked by wave action; as no major beaches, bars

or wave-cut scarps have developed in the area.

Twenty-one samples of till or modified till were

obtained and the minus 250 mesh portion was analyzed for

Au by the fire assay carbon rod atomic absorption technique.

The distribution and a histogram of the analytical results

are shown on Map 1. Readings of greater than lOppb, the

approximate median of the Lahaie Lake population, on -250

mesh till samples in most areas are considered anomalous.

However, the Lahaie Lake values appear to have a bimodal

distribution with most samples obtained south of the main

12,

east-west trending valley having values above lOppb.

Background in this southern area may be closer to 18 ppb,

the value of the higher peak. Nevertheless, the possibility

exists that all samples above 10 ppb are anomalous and

owe their existence to gold-bearing rock.

The clearly anomalous values above 35ppb are all from samples obtained south or within the main east-west

trending valley within the claim group. The till sampled

was thin and may consist of mainly local material (derived

within 20 m of sample site) or material transported some

distance (eg. 0.1 to 2 km) from the northwest. Values

obtained from humus samples (Map 3) and the nature of

the bedrock (Map 2) indicate that a possible source is

present within the southwest corner of the claim group.

However none of the values from humus samples obtained

adjacent to the highly anomalous till samples are abnormally

high. A more probably source of the gold in the till

is one of the east-west trending anomalous zones defined

by the humus sampling within the east-west trending valley

to the northwest (Map 1).

7. BEDROCK GEOLOGY

7.l General Geology

The area lies within the Blake River Group on the

south side of an east plunging synclinorium (Jensen 1980,

Figure 4). It consists of magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalt,

plus calc-alkalic basalt, andesite, dacite and rhyolite

flows and pyroclastic units. The Blake River Group is

underlain uncomformably by the Kinojevis Group which consists

of magnesium-rich and iron-rich tholeiitic basalt with

tholeiitic andesite, dacite and rhyolite toward its top

(Jensen 1980}.

13.

L. ABITIBI 444 BATHOLITH

4 4

Kirkland *Lanate La kWATABEAG

". \. \ \M

LEGEND

ProterozoicKeeweenawan diabase (not shown)

12 Cobalt Group Archean

Matachewan diabase (not shown) Granitic rocks

11 Granodiorite, monzonite, quartz monzonite,syenite

10 Massive to gneissic quartz diorite, tonalite,trondhjemite

Upper Supergroup9 9a* Timiskaming Group, 9b** Dejtor-

Porcupine Complex8 6a, Bn, Blake River Group, Bc"' Blake

River (Upper Fm,, Tisdale Group)

7 7a, 7b, Kinojevis Group, 7c Klnojevis Group,(Middle Fm., Tisdale Group)

6 6a Larder Lake Group, 6b StoughtonRoquemaure Group, 6c Lower Fm., TisdaleGroup

5 Bc Porcupine Group Lower Supergroups

4 4a Skead Group, 4b Hunter Mine Group, 4cUpper Fm., Deloro Group

3 3a Catherine Group, 3c Middle Fm., DeloroGroup

2 2a Wabewawa Group, 2c Lower Fm, DdoroGroup

1 1 e Pacaud tuffi""

*a refers to Kirkland Lake Area, south limb of synclinorium (Jensen 1978c, 1979)."b refers to Kirkland Lake Area, north limb of synclinorium (Jensen 1976,19786).* * *e refers to Timmins Area (Pyke, 1980)."" (Goodwin, 1965).

Figure 4: Geological map of the Timmins-Kirkland Lake area showing the distribution of volcanic successions f from Jensen(l980)

14.

Dominant fault directions in the area are northwest,

northeast and north-south. Rupert and Lovell (1970) have described

several gold occurrences in the south half of Morrisette Township

associated with northeast and northwest trending silicified

and/or carbonated shear zones. Gold bearing fissure veins containing

quartz and carbonate also have been described associated with

north trending faults in adjoining Bernhardt Township to the

west. Silicified andesite hosts minor amounts of chalcopyrite

mineralization southeast of Morrisette Lake and nearby gold

bearing quartz -carbonate- barite veins occur.

7.2 Geology of the Property

7.2.1 General

All rocks on the property are Precambrian acid

to intermediate volcanics of the Blake River Group, following

is a Table of Formations:

Unit Rock Type

2 - Dacite andesite

IP - Pillowed andesite

l - Andesite

7.2.2 Topography and Vegetation

Maximum relief over the property is about

150 feet. Elevations above mean sea level vary from about 119 O feet

in the northeast part of the claims to 1300 feet in the northwest,

sector. Streams drain westward into Black River; drainage in tn

east-west trending valley in the central part of the claims

is interrupted by beaver dams and ponds. Small lakes (Columbus

Lake and Lahaie Lake) and bogs occupy the east part of the claims

which ife underlain by glaciofluvial deposits associated with

the Munro Esker (see surficial geology section).

15.

Most of the property has been logged and much

of the present growth is secondary scrub made up of moose

maple, alder and young conifers. Pine dominates the

sandy areas in the east sector of the claims where reforestration

has taken place. Mature pines are scattered along the

hilly portion of the west sector of the claims where soils

are thin and sandy. Mixed with the pine are birch and

white spruce. In the wetter, lower portions of the property,

especially in the valleys where beavers have been active,

alders are common.

Rock exposures are confined to the west sector

of the claims.

7.2.3 Lithology

The Lahaie Lake claims are underlain by

Archean volcanic rocks of the Blake River Group. The

formations trend southeasterly and they are steeply dipping

(Map 2).

Medium grey-green pillowed andesites form

two bands, one along the north boundary of the claims

and the other occupies the central portion of the property.

The flows face north and generally the pillows are elliptical.

They trend 145T and they are 2 to 5 feet in length and

l foot to 3 feet wide. Carbonate and quartz-carbonate

amygdules are common. In places traces to minor amounts

of disseminated pyrite occurs and ferromagnesian minerals

(mainly amphibole) may be altered to chlorite. A flow

of massive andesite containing up to 5% carbonate is present

in the southwest corner of the claims

16,

Light grey to grey-green, hard, fine tomedium grained dacitic to andesitic flows are interlayered

with the andesites. Two major bands are present, one

north of the base line and one south of it. They are composed

predominently of plagioclase feldspar with S-10% quartz and ferromagnesium minerals {amphibole, chlorite) and

trace to 11 pyrite. Quartz and/or quartz-carbonate amygdules

are common and in places the dacite-andesite is mottled

by chlorite. Here and there the feldspar becomes coarse

enough to give the rock a porphyritic appearence.

7.2.4 Structure

A northwest trending fault is assumed to

occupy a topographic depression that traverses the western

part of the claims. Blocks of sheared and sericitized

dacite-andesite are present on L52W, 26S. A shear zoneo

striking 095T to 115T and dipping 65 N to vertical occurs in the dacite-andesite at 52W, 21N, shearing has also

been observed to the west on L56W. The zone on L52W is

about 20 feet wide, it is chloritized, it contains quartz

stringers, l to 5% pyrite and about l* calcite. Also

a vertical shear zone, l foot wide, occurs to the south

on L52W, 17S and strikes at 100-llOT to L40W. In the

shear, chlorite is abundant with the formation of minor

sericite on the shear planes, up to 5% pyrite occurs.

Quartz stringers and veins are common in the shear zone

and vicinity. The shear occurs in slightly silicified

dacite-andesite. Smaller easterly trending chloritized

shear zones also have been observed in several places

in dacite-andesite north of the base line. Marked east-west

trending airphoto lineaments also occur in the central valley and these could reflect faults or shear zones.

17.

Rupert and Lovell (1970) suggest that an axis of a large

synclinorium is present in the valley.

Photo lineaments trending southeast probably

mark the locations of other faults on the claim gorup.

A.north trending fault is postulated by Jensen (1982)

to occur just east of the east boundary of the claims

under the Munro esker

Joint sets on the property tend to be steep

and trend northerly.

7.2.5 Alteration

Two major zones of silicification are present

on the property. One occupies the south part of the claims

and trends south of east from L64W across the property

to L28W where it dissappears below the outwash sands of

the Munro esker. For the most part the zone is confined

to dacite-andesite, however at the west end it spills

over onto the pillowed andesite. Another zone of silicification

is present between L56W and L64W north of the base line.

It too is confined irainly to dacite-andesite.

Silicification is characterized by the

presence of quartz veins and stringers as well fractures

and microfractures filled with quartz. On lines 52W and

56W at about 17S some of the quartz has a fine layered

"ribboned" appearence. Conformable silicification also

is present and manifests itself by quartz filled amygdules.

This type of alteration is similar to that described by

Gibson et al (1983) in the Noranda district. They consider

the alteration to be a product of regional geothermal

alteration. The so called rhyolites are in fact silicified

andesites. According to Gibson et al,

18,

"The silicified andesites have acted as an important impermeable cap rock to later ascending ore solutions, thus restricting discharge onto the sea floor to synvolcanic northeast and northwest-trending fractures zones. This silicification is a key indicator of geothermal activity and therefore warrant consideration in exploration".

7.2.6 Economic Geology

The most likely locales for the concentration

of gold on the property are structures (shear zones and

faults) especially within the zones of silicification.

Some 14 rocks have been analyzed geochemically for Au

and six of them have also been analyzed for Ag, Cu and

Mo. The results for Au are shown on the geological map

and all data is lasted in Appendix 1. The highest gold

values, 4-7ppb, occur in pyrite bearing chloritized shear

zones in dacite-andesite (L52W, 17S; L56W, 25N and 170

feet east of L52W, 26+30N). In addition, the shear zone

in the silicified volcanics on L52W-17S contains anomalous

amounts of Mo (lOppm), a trace of chalcopyrite also occurs

here. Extension eastward some 600 feet of the south

silicification zone would include the gold in rock anomaly

(120ppb) found by the OGS in hole 81-19. They described

their sample as a greenish-grey,fine grained to aphanitic,

slightly foliated intermediate volcanic. It is interesting

to speculate that the zones of silicification on this

property may be the cap rock in a geothermal gold system.

19,

8. GEOCHEMISTRY

8.1 Field Methods

Samples of humus atop the mineral soil were

systematically taken with a mattock at 100 foot intervals

on all lines except those in the beaver flooded areas

and bogs. In addition till samples were obtained from

depths up to 3 feet at suitable sites. A total of 807

hunus samples were taken and till was obtained at 21 sites.

8.2 Laboratory Methods

The humus and till.samples were sent to Bondar

Clegg and Company Limited, Ottawa for sample preparation

and geochemical gold analyses. The samples were dried

and the humus sieved through a 50 mesh screen, the minus

50 mesh material was used for analyses. The till samples

were dried and sieved to -250 mesh prior to analysis.

All samples were analyzed geochemically for gold

using a fire assay procedure on 10 grams of sample followed

by an aqua regia digestion. Determinations for gold were

done on the solution using a carbon-rod atomic absorption

spectrometric technique. Cu, Ag and Mo en some of the

rock samples were done by atomic absorption spectrometry

after a hot HC1 and HNOa digestion.

The geochemical results for the rocks are shown

on the accompanying geology map (Map 2), the till analyses

are plotted on the accompanying Quaternary geology map

{Map 1) and the humus results are plotted and contoured

on Map 3.

20,

8 . 3 Statistics

Histogram and cumulative frequency plots for

Au in humus are shown in Figures 5 and 6. The 50 percentile

(median value) has been taken as the mean and standard

deviation has been calculated by taking the mean of the

difference between the 16th and 84th percentiles on the

normalized curve (ie values geater then 30ppb Au are not

included). Using this approach the mean for Au in humus

on the Lahaie claims is 13ppb with a standard deviation

of 9ppb? values range from l to 117ppb. Contour intervals

of 10, 15, 20, 30 and 40ppb have been used on the geochemical

map (Map 3).

8.4 Results

Geochemical trends for Au in humus tend to be

north of east in the northwest sector, easterly in the

central portion and south of east in the southern sector

of the claims. These trends correspond to the direction

of mapped shear zones and air photo lineaments. There

is little evidence of down ice smearing, so for the most

part, the gold anomalies are thought to represent underlying

bedrock mineralization. However discontinuity of humus

anomalies may be the result of changing overburden conditions

(eg the presence of underlying glacial lacustrine deposits,

bogs etc) and therefore the absence of a humus anomaly

does not necessarily negate the possible presence of gold

mineralization in bedrock.

The anomalous zones are defined by the 20ppb

contour. Areas in excess of 30ppb are significantly anomalous

and warrant additional work.

23

Many of the high Au values are in the south

half of the claims, especially over and in the vicinity

of the zone of silicification in the dacite-andesite unit.

The trend of the humus anomalies is the same as the chloritized,

silicified and pyritized shear zones. The overburden

is relatively thin in the southwest sector of the claims

so prospecting, rock geochemistry and trenching could

be used to evaluate these anomalies.

For the most part the east-west geochemical

anomalies in the central portion of the claims are underlain

by sand and may require deeper probing to evaluate them.

Geologically the area is probably underlain by pillowed

andesite. The presence of quartz veins and quartz filled

amygules near the base line between L36W and L44W indicates

that silicification has taken place. The presence of

gold in the vicinity is further in evidence by an anomalous

till value of 37ppb Au between L40W and L44W. The humus

anomalies coincide, in part, with east-west photo lineaments

(Map 1) which may mark major fault or shear zones in the

valley. These could be important loci for gold mineralization.

The north of east trending anomalies near the

beaver ponds are mostly in overburdened terrain. Since

scattered outcrops are present in the vicinity it is likely

that the overburden is not too thick and in the drier

areas trenching can be done. Geologically the anomalies

are over dacite-andesite and the southwest end of the

anomalies appear related to a zone of silicification in

which east trending and northwest trending fault and/or

shear zones occur.

99.99 99.9 996 995 99 98 95 90 BO 70 60 50 40 50 20 10 03 0.2 O.I 0.05 0.01

90

BO

70

60

SO

40

30

20

* ^^^^ *v

1 1 1 1 l 1

FIGURE 6

CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT FOR Au IN HUMUS- LAHAIE LAKE CLAIM GROUP (Ml)

VX

\^\\

\

^\\

\

\

J3O.Q.

ro to

0.01 005 O.I 0.2 0.5 l 2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY 0Xo

90 95 98 99 99.5 998 99.9 99.99

FIGURE 5

HISTOGRAM FOR Au IN HUMUS - LAHAIE LAKE CLAIM GROUP (III)- 807 SAMPLES

\

i i l i i i i t i i—l——l—l—l—l——l—l—l—l—LJU—l

15 20 29

ppb Au

30 35 40 43

24.

9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Geological mapping of the Lahaie Lake claims has

shown them to be underlain by pillowed andesite and a

dacite-andesite unit. In the west and southwest part

of the property the volcanics have been silicified as

is evidenced by the presence of quartz filled fractures,

quartz veins and replacement of amygdules by quartz.

The silicification is interpreted to be a product of geothermal

alteration and in fact the dacite-andesite unit is probably

an altered andesite or even a basalt. The economic

significance of silicified andesites in the formation

of ore deposits in the Noranda area has recently been

stressed by Gibson et al (1983). The silicified zone

may be the cap rock to later ascending ore solutions so

frequently described in epithermal precious metal deposits.

Southeast and east trending chloritized shear zones have

been mapped in several locations. One of the most persistent

shears extends some 1600 feet from an assumed northwest

trending fault (L52W, 17S). Geochemically the highest

gold values (4-7ppb) are present in sheared dacite-

andesite and one Mo (lOppm) anomaly is associated with

the shear zone at 52W, 17S.

Gold in humus anomalies trend south of east in the

southwest sector of the claims, easterly in the central

portion and north of east in the north sector. These

directions correspond to mapped fault and shear zones.

Some of the highest gold in humus anomalies occur

in the southwest sector of the claims where the terrain

is underlain by silicified dacite-andesite. Easterly

trending gold anomalies in the central portion of the

claims continue to the east boundary of the property and

coincide in part with east trending airphoto lineaments.

25,

Most of these anomalous zones are covered by lacustrine

sands. The north of east trending geochemical anomalies

are north of the base line and appear to overlap with

silicified zones in the dacite-andesite unit.

Au in till samples are anomalous (16-77ppb) in several

places down ice from some of the humus anomalies and it

is suggested that the bedrock sources of the gold in the

till could be reflected by the gold in humus anomalies.

gold

Additional work is required to evaluate further the

this claim group.

Respectfully submitted by,

C.F. Gleeson PhD, P.Eng.

August 31, 1983 . Rampton PhD, P.Eng

26

REFERENCES

Baker, C.L., (1982): Drift thickness of the Magusi River area, Cochrane and Timiskaming Districts; Ontario Geol. Surv., Map P2478.

Baker, C.L., Steele, K.G. and Seaman, A.A. (1982): Quaternary geology of the Magusi River area, Cochrane and Timiskaming Districts,: Ontario Geol. Surv., Map P2483.

Gibson, H.L., Watkinson, D.H., and Comba, C.D.A. (1983):Silicification: Hydrothermal Alteration in an Archean Geothermal System within the Amulet Rhyolite Formation, Noranda Quebec; Econ. Geol. V78, pp954-971.

Jensen, L.S., (1980): Larder Lake Synoptic Mapping Project, District of Cochrane and Timiskaming, p55-60 in Summary of Field Work 1980 by the Ontario Geological Survey, edited by V.G. Milne, O. L. White, R.B. Barlow, J.A. Robertson and A.C. Colvine, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 96, 201 p.

(1982): Precambrian Geology of the Magusi River Area, Cochrane and Timiskaming Districts; OGS Map 2434.

,, Thomson, lan, Thompson, I.S. and Dixon, J.A. (1981): Deep overburden drilling and geochemical sampling in Benoit, Melba, Bisley, Maisonville, Morrisette, Arnold, Grenfell, Lebel, Eby, Otto, Boston and McElroy townships; OGS Open File Report 5356.

Rupert, R.J. and Lovell, H.L., (1970): Geology of Bernhardt and Morrisette Townships: Ontario Department of Mines GR84.

Jensen, L.S.

Routledge, R.E

CERTIFICATE

l Christopher F. Gleeson of the Township of Matilda, Province

of Ontario certify that:

1. I reside at R.R.fl, Iroquois, Ontario (KOE IKO)2. I have worked as a geologist for the last 24 years.

3. I am the President and Principal of C.F. Gleeson and

Associates Ltd., for the last 13 years.

4. I am a graduate of McGill University with a PhD in

Economic Geology-Exploration Geochemistry.

5. I am a Professional Engineer of Ontario.

6. I am a Founding Member of the Association of Exploration

Geochemists, a Member of the Society of Economic Geologists,

a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada, a Member

of the Prospectors and Developers Association and a Member

of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

7. I conducted the geological survey, supervised the

geochemical survey and wrote the portions of the report

dealing with bedrock geology and geochemistry.

Dated at Iroquois, Ontario

This of 1983

CERTIFICATE

I, Vern Rampton, of the Township of West Carleton, Province of Ontario certify that:

1. I reside at R.R. #1, Carp, Ontario (L26,C6, Huntley Ward, West Carleton Township)

2. I have worked as a geologist for the last 14 years.

3. I have been the President and Principal of Terrain Analysis and Mapping Services Ltd. for the last 9 years.

4. I am a graduate of University of Manitoba with aB.Se. Eng. (Geol.) and University of Minnesota with a Ph.D.

5. I am a Professional Engineer of Ontario.

6. I am a member of the Prospectors and DevelopersAssociation and the Geological Association of Canada.

7. I conducted the Surficial Geologic survey and wrote the report concerning the Surficial Geology.

Dated at Carp

This ^7^. day of *~ , 198?

APPENDIX l

ROCK DESCRIPTIONS AND ANALYSES

GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF ROCK SAMPLES FROM LAHAIE LAKE CLAIMS

Sample Number and Location Au Ag Cu Mo Remarks

3M-20 L52W-18+00 S

3M-21 L52W-17+OOS

3M-22 L52W-17+OOS

3M-32 L40W-19+OOS

3M L56W-25+OON (A)

3M L56W-25+OON (B)

3M L52W-26*30N-170'East

3M L52W-21-70N

3M L48W-23+50N

82-9A.N claim line-L48W-25N- 200' W

82-9B " " "

82-10 L36W-3+OON

82-11 W. CI. L; L64W-15N- 450'W

82-12 . B.L-38W

2 *C0.1 42

l 0.1 42

3 ^.1 30

2 <0.1 32

l O.I 42

5 ^.1 44

1

l

l

<5

<5

<5

<5

l Silicified andesite-dacite with qtz. stringers and qtz. amyg.,tr-^ py

10 shear zone in silicified ands.-dcte. chl.,ser., 5% py.

3 silicified (ribboned) ands-dcte. -next to shear zone

1 shear zone in silicified ands.-dcte. 1-51; py./ minor sericite

2 silicified dacite-andesite with chl. spots (51^, l S, CaCpi, l?; pyrite

l like (A)but with 5% pyrite

shear zone in dacite-andesite,ser (5?i),carb (15?;), py d-5%)

dacite-andesite-shear zone with chl.-qtz- py. d-3%)

dacite-ands.calcite amyg. (10%), fractures with py. * chl. mottling-sheared

dacite-ands. with 53; f.g. pyrite

dacite-ands. with 5* f.g. pyrite

andesite with 10% chl.

silicified dacite-andesite

andesite, 20% chl.

Note: Au in pp.j all other values in ppm - anomalous values underlined

APPENDIX 2

GEOCHEMICAL Au ANALYSES FOR HUMUS,TILL AND ROCKS

Bomfcv-Ora t Company Ud.16* Belfast Road Ottawa, Ontario CanadaKlGOZS Phone: (613) 237-3110 Telex: 053-4455

Geoct Lab!

REPORT: 013-1456FROM: DR. c,F, SLEESONDATE: IQ-AUG-SZ PROJECT; MORB

SoBHITTEB Wl S. THOMAS

LOWER.-*f ,r.*~ f. f) f l/** M Y T-f"T-"r\f T f^V ' f M T ^j?,jis tLtntnT r-siiL ilL-N nfu:

J r*Dtli r r i?

t— ^., , f, r-L:hOi ** r- * f. fvni t i*- * '-jj^'f *" T V*^"*-- c, *- '.-i i Of t ?w1rLt i ir i

HUfiL'S OilVt

REPORT COPIES TO: C, F, GLEESON V, RAMPTON

INVOICE TO: C, F,

REMARKS J s^ MEANS LESS THAN

764 Bdflrt toad Oam, Ontario

Phone: (413)237-31 10 Tdcx: 053-4455

Geod Lab

2118 IB •18

•. s^i^f^^^p^if^w^;

3H-MB-20+OOS

884

.^S:**.^^gmm'.?4,.' . :

.^l*ii'.W- i-t s .3MB^l|t3ia,iaaii^ """".^/^ •^;^.:^^4^tS^yK

^j^i-SrvS&J.jggSl**- v--. ••-:: -' ;i;. : : '^W i;!:*S*iSi'*;i *';!S**?:;*' ll--' "'/ : - "V*.-

v':' 1 '^:. ; ;H"'^' •-•.••- : i

10

j 3M-U8-21+OON i 3M-W-22IOON

l 3M-UB-24400N j 3M-yB-25tOON

397

16

3M-BL-6+OOW 3H-BL-7iOOtf 3H-BL-8WOM

45

191514

3H-HB-2IOOS

SH-KB-S+OOS

oi? 20 35 14

3H-BL-11+OOW

3H-BL-13IOOH 3H-8L-14WW 3M-BL-15WOW

2238

1315

l 3IHB-8TOOS l 3H-HB-9TOOS

616402621

3M-BL-161M"3H-BL-17+OOH3K-BL-MOOH3M-BL-19+OOW3M-BL-20tOOfe'

1439333030

3H-HB-1HOOS 3H-1/B-12WOS 3H-HB-13tQQS

3H-MB-15+OOS

20 li 37 20 12

3M-BL-22WOH 3M-BL-23tOOW

II"

22 21a

t__

__

i

y? w*C

i* f^

c. g

i-I —

' CM

C

M

O"*-

tra

—

~- ac

i-o m

m

3 ra ra

r*o

o o

o

o J3 o

o

-t- -t- -t- -*-

CM r-o **- viif~i u-i at m

i i

l i

ix, m 3* m

S M

M

M

.;M

CO

C

O

CO

O

en en o)

i jro

hi

' i ac

ac ^c

i: j

;r-) ro

ro

i-'i

r^, ii3*r iJtCro

•fXi CJ-*

: i i

TT

s\x

-x. x -x.

--*"-\ O

el*

c^

O

O

\ O

c-^

t^t tt

Oi ,^,

-t. -^

,f, -*-.

u-i

r j f)

f

u-i!

l l

l l

l;ca

en ea

o o

i .j .j

-j .j

—i

! L

'

' '

'm

m

S

?o M

-se.O

O

H

- C

Oi ea

-se. oO

O

O -t;

-*~ 5

JO^ *-t

t t

o o

i -J

-J

-J

—J

—4

L.,...,,.

764 Betfan ROM) Ottawa, Ontario Canada KIOOZ3 Phone: (613) 237-3110 Tefcx: 053-4455

Geodic Lab B

REPORT; 013-1456 TB8Tl.-.-

W!ll*iifii'"'.':*J--'ii\3fti"

Au

l 3M-4H-4+OOS 3H-4H-5fOOS 3H-4y-6i00S

.SMH-8W0S.

3H-4U-9+QOS

2018

3H-3U-8IOOS

715201217

18s^m,VV'CSiii*.**- ,' •••*j*v,.'

3K-41K7iOOS

108

1518

3M-4i(-22f003 3H-4W-23400S

3H-3H-8+OOK3M-3*-9TOON

1713 IS

3H-3W-2+00S 3M-8U-3+OOS 3H-8U-4tOOS 3H-8y-5IOOS

n24185

3H-8U-24WOS

13 li 261824

3M-4U-24t0053M-4M-25tOOS3M-4B-26tOOS3H-4W-27IOOS3H-4y-28IOOS3F8~w~-Tlo"cF '"""3M-8W-2+OON3M-8y-3tOON3H-8y-4400N3H-8K-5WON

li19li1914

2323181314

3M-8U-26WOS3H-8U-27I0QS3JJ-8H-2WOOS3M-12H-ltOON3H-121i-2iOON

3U-12H-3+OOM3H-12y-4iOON3N-12y-5iOON3H-12H-6WOH3H-12y-7T0QN

""""""""I2

131647

.13

1012292916

3M-12U-9IOON 3H-12U-1400S3K-12W-2IOOS

.3M-12H-4WOS 3H-12U-5TOOS 3fi-12b'-6IOOS 3H-12W-7t003

17

1615

Bomhr-OtH t Compul) Md.764 Belfast Road Ottawa, Ontario Canada KIGOZ5 Phonet (613) 237-3110 Telex: 053-4455

: REPORT; 013-1456 j i PROJECT; HQRRi'lS^^ELEMENT ' "ftu~"SrtTAu""~ '~~~~~"~"'"~"""~^s"~~~liiiin!E"~rLpEiiT Au" wt/Au

j NUMBER UNITS PPB S* : ?:pttEK WITS PPB st

"ItH^^oos T? " -.-—- iH^Sioos ir"3H-i2H-10-rOOS 16 3M-20W-2SfOOS 4~r\i t m i j i i n -i - - ••l/^AM'}'"^''"1 J: 311-12^-11tiuij 7 ijn-iOii-2cit^yB t3,^-12^-12+003 2 3M'20a-27IOOS E3fi-i2B-13WOS E 3M-20H-28+OOS 173ii^2iH^oos~" """~To"""""""'"" "" ----—•--- -- ~""- ----"--- "af^HHwwi' "" •22-——- -3M-12W-20+OOS 13 3H-24M-2tOON 373H-12K-2HOOS 3 3M-24W-3+OON 103H-128-22+MS 10 3H-24tfr440ftH 123H-12H-23+OOS 22 3H-28W-HOON 13'W\3f^mT~~' """2? ~~'~"""™" •--••"•-••-•••-••-"--~—~~~-~~-^^^.yi^~~--~^-"-~~~--3M-12W-25+OOS 24 3M-23y-3tOON 113M-12W-26W03 16 3M-28U-4+OON 123H-12y-27fOOS 25 3H-28U-5+OON 203M-12y-28tOOS 5 3H-32Mrl*OOH ' 23

.,.....,^.™.,,,,.^..,-..........,.....,^....^ .........,...,™.^.. .-^.....^p,^^ , ^.,..,,....,..,....m

24 3M-32U-3+OON 153H-I6U-3+OON 24 3M-32S-4tOON 93H-16B-4tOON 26 3H-32K-5+OON ISSH-iiy-ifDOS 20 3H-32y-6IOON 27

:: !i-i6w-3t003 12 3H--3ots-lTOON 153H-16*-4TOOS l- 3H-36y-2tOON S

13 l 1':

3M-36U-19tOONIS 25

BoMhr-Cktt * Compai764 Belfast Road

^^ Otuwa. Ontario••t- CaiudaKIGOZ5^V Phone:(613)237-3110

Telex: 053^455

ntFORT! 01 3- i 456

SAHPLE ELEHEKTNUMBER UNITS

3M-36W-20tOON3fi-36af-21rOON3M-36H-22+OCH3M-36H-23+00N3H-40K-HOON

3K-40ii-2iOON3M-40H-3IOOH3M-40IM400N3H-40B-5+OON3H-40W-6+OON

3M-4QK-7IOQN3M-40W-8IOON3M-40W-9tOON3H-4WI-10WON3M-40H-11WON

f 3H-40U-12"fOON3H-40y-13-i'OON3M-40U-14'fOOH3H-40W-15IOON3H-40B-16WOK

S-^S'isS^. 3H-4o!-S;S

3H-40ti-21iOOH

Oi i ^ y te j.iiT 'j(.' i i j ?i "* 4 O si "* z 3 T 0 v t 3fi-40B-24IOON

: 3H-44ti-!tOOfi3K-44B-2WOK

^li'^S!

^-^H

i 3M-44(8-llTOOisi 3H-44i^-12tOON

fLtd. ^SliMS,mffinana^a^a^a^aK'/ '' " .' . /-'

Au wt/AuPPB 36

2717•i')1728

2329211210

142325lo9

15242117:'

?i

y

-•'

2014

4

i

;10

7

Si^aBSSS^alf^'M'BS^PS^^^^^SiiiSAkHHItl^E. ... .j^v ^^^.^..rf.^^^ t -,,,-.-,,,, — .....^ ....,, .,,^

. ' j PROJECT!

NOTES SAMPLE ELEHENTNUHBER UNITS

3H-44!M3fOOK3i1-44w-14iOON3i'--44s-15TOON3^-44ii-16i-OOIi3H-44W~17IOON

JH-441H8+OON3H-44U-i9fOOH3H-44W-20IOOH3M-44H-2HOON3K-44U-22WON

3S-44W-23+OON3K-44U-24+OON3H-44y-25tOON3i'i-48W-lfOON3M-4BU-2tMN

3H-48H-3+OON3K-48W-4400H3H-48y-5tOON3H-4Sa-6fOON3H-4BH-7WOH

3H-43M-OTOON

3-i'i-43i*-iirOON;;-;-'!Cw-:^-v,:'!

I^E'iSiS3(^-43w-l6TOOi'42?i-43iK7TOG,N

JSrS-

w! i *iOW 4J w T v V i

3ri-52*-lrvON3M-52b-2fOON

sanp^Bi.jjjBjB| Geochi^^H Lab I

MORR FA3E 5

Au wt/AuPPB S*

19141515?

IV5

2310

6

12Id3

1510 .

2337

439

j. i

-j j^ :

- ;

li

- 1-

iO2411

BoMfar-Oea 4 Compuiy Ud.

Ottawa, Ontario Canada K 1C OZ5 Phone:(613)237-3110 Tetex: 053-4455

REPORT; vi 3-14 j DSAMPLE ELEMENT NUMBER UNITS

3H-52ii-5tQON

3M-52w-7fOON

3H-52U-KHOON 3H-52H-1H00N 3H-52y-12tOON 3M-52IH3I00N 3fi-52U-14iOON

3H-52y-15WOK 3M-52W-16+OON 3H-521H7*G0N 3M-52H-18+00N

f 3M-52U-2WOON 3H-52W-2HOON

i 3M-S2IH22+OOH j 3K-52H-23+OON ; 3H-52U-24IOCN

1||H^^BJHHIHHIIHI^HBIIHH

| j FRO JtC i ; HDRf:

Au wt/Au NOTES SAMPLE ELEHENT Au Mt/Au PPB 3d. NUMBER * illtS PPB ft

25 3H-56y-25*OQK 15 5 3H-56U-26WON 13

15 8

14

24 10

4 6

10

12 13

li18

20 1822 12

Geochei Lab Ri

r. * r.r-TMUi 0

3H-52H-25tCOf{

••7 i.- c ' ' 4 n t n -. 1 1jrrjois-7TUv'ii

3H-56U-12WON

3H-56li-14TOON

: 3H-56W-22IOOH

19

l —.

lBoate-CkM * Compuiy Ud.TMBdfolRoid

Phone: Tdex:05

Geochemical Lab Report

i UHKRORDER aEHEKT DETECTION LIHIT EXTRACTION

01 Cu02 Ho-*J3——ftr~

1 PPK l PPK

HN03-HCL HOT EXTR HN03-HCL HOT EXTR

HETKOB

Atoiic AbsorptionAtosic Absorption

-frrgftres'i/CarbonRo'J

SIZE FRACTION SAMPLE TYPE

-200-200

-2W-

ROCKS

^•U'M *~ f'f'fr,} r- IT * f\l1fi3Hflrlt Fr.LrMr.AuuNs

CRUSHfPULVERIZE -200

v,

l REHARKSK MEANS LESS THAN

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

P

l

BMfcfOtu * Compmy U*.764 BeHaU Road Ottawa, Ontario CanaoaKIGOZ5 Phone:(613)237-3110 Tdex: 053-4455

Geocl Lab

REPORT; 013-1323

DNITS ? FPK PPH

["PROJECfi" PAGE l

3M-L56W-25N1B) 3H-L56U-25N(H)

4442

L.......,.,

l amtmi O|| * Company Lid.764 Bdf ut Howl Ottawa, Onurio

Phone: (613) 237-31 10 Tetex: 053-4453

Geocb Lab!

[REPORT: 113-1223FROM W*' SUBHITTED BY? RAHPTON

REPORT COPIES TO! C, F, iSLEESON V, RAHPW

INVOICE TO! C* F, GLEESON

REMARKS l t MEANS LESS THAN

j LOUERi ORDER ELEHENT DETECTION LIH1T EXTRACTION HETKOD SIZE FRACTION SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE PF1 .

l 01 A3 il PPM HN03-HCL HOT EXTR Atomic Absorption PREPARED PULP A3 RECEIVED; NO

764BdfutR(Md Otttw*. Ontario CuiMfaKIGOZ5 Phone: (613) 237-3110 Trie*: 053-4455

Lab

REPORT! 113-1323

SAHPLE ELEMENT NUMBER J UNITS 'i

[PROJECff

i3fi-L56ii-25N(B} j3H-L56U-25N(A)

s'0,1 -K l2-

<

.VwiteOtB * Compny Ltd.764 Bdfut Rend Ottawa, Ontario CanadaKIGOZS Phone: (613)237-3110 Tdex: 053-4455

Lab

REPORTI 013-1322

3RBER ELEMENT DETECtlOH LIMIT EXTRACTION

H-& :to ; :.^i "Sfi^w-. *: ; ; AQUA RE6IA:

HETH00 SIZE FRACTION SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE Pfl

FireAssaa/CerbonRod -250 TILL OTHER SAMPLE PR*|

Ci F, a.EESON

^ .-"vOF 2 PPB MAS BEEN SUBTRACTED

,u',',,-,

f

^

5: g:

g;o-

o

C.4

"o

i"

l l

t l*1

\

V

BmteOiB A Conpm; Ltd.764 BdfM Raid OOm, Ontario QuMdnKIOOZ5 Phone: (613) 237-3110 Tdw:053-44JJ

Geo La:

RH.EPT DETECTION LIMIT EXTRACTION

01 Ao!;v ? ) i f^B AQUA RE6IA

HEIHOB SIZE FRACTION SAMPLE TYPE SAHPLE 1

-250 TILL SEM -230

BoMtarCka A Compwy LM.764 Betfut Raid Otuwm,Onurio Cwd*KlOOZ5 Phone: ((13) 237-3110 Tefcx: 053-4455

Geochi Lab E

REPORT} 113-1234 PROJECT; MORS PAGE i

SH13JK0-100S 7' 373*

19-

3M-L64W-1360SM3-t64IJ-800NH3-U4H-12QON

42-1683

If-"22 /-I

]

*amt* Otg t Cannon Ut.764Bdf*ttRo*d Own, Ontario CuudiKlOOZ5 Phone:(613)237-3110 Tefcx: 053-4455

Geocl Lab

REPORT; 013-1237

LOWER ORDER ELEMENT DETECTION LIHIT EXTRACTION

01 Cu l PPM HHOWMfXfR02 Ho

SIZE FRACTION SAMPLE TYPE

-200 ROCKS-200

SAHPi

CRUSH fPULVE!

vwv: :^itf ftjfiipfflN ::*F ' - ;.:.'/-" ~-^, l ^m^^Km^::^

iiifltifis

t!

ml

II*

764 BdfM Roed OavM, Onurio

Phone: (4U)U7-3110 T*ta:05M*SJ

.. . ;^ Lab]

Bondv-Ckn * Company Ud.764 BelfaH Road Ottawa, Ontario CanadaKlGQZS Phone: (61 J) 237-3110 Tefcx: 053-4455

[REPORT; Oi3:2oo2 "" •-"-"~-~- '~ ~ j , ^.—-.......^ —-~r- ~~j^~~~~~

i.-^i^g^[0i^^^^^^^ji^^^^^ ' --j LOKER '^ ~~ •DRBER ELEOT DEJECTION LIMIT EXTRMCTION MfiOB ::;: ;--

l O i fcu l f'PB Hulift RE8IA ; ' .FircAsssw/Csrtwnfi'o'J -200

'lAfiKSt. \ HEAK3 LESB THAfs j , Ali STA^Anli - 83 FPE,

•-BLftNii -2*0 rf B*

f "^

l l

in** On t Company Ud.764BdfiMRMd Oum.Onnrio

Phone:

Geochemical Lab Report

t REPORT? 013-1240 L:i t-' •- , :

: -:fv;y - .. : . loyER ^ -:ORDER ELEHENT DETECTION LIMIT EXTRACTION

01 Au l PPB AQUA RE6IA

FRACTION SAMPLE TYfE SAfifLE FREF'AKATI:.

SEIVE -50

l

BMdwOtfl A ConpM? Lid.764MfMtRo*d Ottawa, Oittrio CMwttKICOa Phont: (613) 237-3110 Tetex:05J-*455

Geoct Lab?

REPORT? 013-1240

20 3M-64U-24-K)OS 3

2

3H-64H-23+00S

3H-&W1..40QS

PROJECT! HORR PAGE

SAHPIE iJHBER

wt/Au

3M-64H-16N 3H-64H-17N 3M-64y-18K 3M-64W-19N 3H-64H-20N

1616

659

3M-64U-21N

JL5

16

L.

3M-64tf-mOOS 3M-64U-9IOOS

3K-64H-4MOS

3?H4N-3ii5S

3H-64U-HOOS3H-64B-1)!3M-64B-2N

815

it7

i(5

i?

3H-64W-3N3M-64H-7N

15 l? 17

'- ^7- ; '-'^^V; -^Pv '^i; 3H-60W-20S

3M-60y-i2S 3H-60I*'-11S

191424

3K-64ii-8*CQS3M-64S-7IOOS3H-64i)-6iOOS3H-64y-5IOOS

6i?4

3M-60ii-l?S3M-60*-iSS3^-60^-1 7S3H-60U-io3

312322

.-V

7

A* 5

23 2024

1536

OttAWftt Ontario Cmd*KlGOZ5 Phone: (413) 237-3110 Tefcx:05W45S

Lab]

REPORT} OIH240 ";fAGE -t- --'. - -' '--'r

•: :?i." v^V-s1 ::-

3M-&H-5S 3H-50MS 3^5211-288 3H-52S-27S

24.-*'

19

3H-56U-25S 3H-56U-24S 3H-56H-23S

3 20

l38 2r

3H-56U-22S 3H-56y-21S 3H-56H-20S

205423

642

3H-52HIS 3^-S2W-iOS3M-52H-9S 3H-52W-8S 3H-52U-7S

""""3IF52IF5S""

3H-52IMS 3H-52U-3S 3M-52W-2S

26l 5•a5

133

136

3H-56K-14S 3H-56W-13S

21161344?

3M-48W-283 3H-48a-27S 3M-48W-2dS 3H-48W-25S

37

1113

3H-56B-12S 3H-56W-11S

•. .-'.'•"Vr." i '''- - ' ' '

• -"•.V'"-'^/-;.'', 1 " 1!.*.,1;.."- -v 1 -- 1^" 1''.' .- '- ' ' ' - - - : :' -i

3

u' J.;;.. 17 - . ',;-:

r , 3H-48U-24S . , ^ 3H-48y-23S

rv ".\ ,, : .• : ; : . ; .:.4,'V... :-,;;v-. •.; 3M-48S-22S;:: ..,;

:-:^-syj:;; :lfeaiii^^t--12

.: 11 ' -- - . ;

••'fe^^P^-' •'•'';- : 18:^

BMMfcr-OtB * CowpMy Ud.764MfMtRo*d Otttwt, Ontario CmxkKIOOZ5 Phone:(613)237-3110 Tdex: 053-4455

REPORT! 013-1240

3]M8H9S 3H-48W-18S 3H-48U-17S 3H-4W-J63 3H-4W-15S

819

77

PROJECT: MORE PAGE

SAMPLE H|HENT illTS

Au wt/Au PPB **

3H-44K-7S 3H-44W-6S 3M-44y-53

3H-44W-3S

158

1898

3H-44U-17S 3M-44W-16S

15

.

201217

3H-40W-24S-

3M-40H-22S

3K-40U-1733M-40B-16S

3M-40B-53

3M-40B-1S 3M-36W-28S

23

292420

15201514

3M-44W-27S3M-44W-26S3H-44M-25S3M-44y-2433H-44W-23S

3H-44H-22S3K-44ii-21S3M-44H-20S3H-44M-19S3H-44H-18S

188

281312

23 .10

-t .f : : ' '

103?

3H-40*-15S3K-40s-14S3W-40a-13S3ii-40y-12S3M-4G*"11S

3H-40W-10S .3H-40B-9S3H-40K-8S

; 3H-40U-7S3M-40y-6S

0

141113

i;

4386

24

c^13 IB

t

3H-441H2S3K-44U-11S3H-44U-10S3H-44II-983H-44H-8S

•'..i16

639 19

A Can*** Ltd.

Ottawa, Onurio

Phon* (413)237-3110 Tde*:OJ3-445J

L REPORT: 013-1240 PROJECTS

3H-36W-20S 3H-38H9S,

"•'•'-If:138

2518

3M-32U-7S 3M-32K-6S

1212

52220

i-

3H-28H7S

'••••' - !:^**!***?8il^^

16 :

27

^32!^ ;3H-32W-27S3H-32H-26S

3N-32K-25S3M-32B-24S3M-32W-23S3M-32U-22S3H-32a-21S

-:\-.::- li . " ' ' ' •"' . '^15 . "

3211

29i?12 , ' . . . ,; .', ,:7 V' -'' '.: ' ' ' ' :''- 1 -.*'' ,v' : '' ' . "- ' '" ' - ''; ;" :, '

6 . '.'' ,. . . . : .-, . : /::,- 5 , ,-

^n-^BWrl/b3H-281H6S3H-28W-15S3M-28W-14S

3H-28W-13S3H-28H2S•3H"28iHiS-3H-28SHOS3M-28W-9S

19234517

~1T

1211728

8

3H-32M-20S 3M-32B-19S3M-32y-18S 3H-32U-17S 3H-32W-16S

3H-32K-15S 3K-32IM43

2024232014

i i2288

1H-2SU-8S " 3H-28U-7S 3tt-28W-6S 3M-28W-5S 3H-2WMS

liRiSFsir3H-28W-2S 3M-2W-1S 3H-24M-28S

14251833

20

1731

•ndar Oru * Cornf** Ud.764 Mf M Road Ottawa. Ontario CanadaKIGOZ5 Phone: (413) 237-3110 Tdex: 053-4455

Lab

REPORT! 013-1240

3N-24U-2683H-24U-25S3H-24H-24S3H-24U-23S3H-24U-18S

.J^-MSP^g^:";;

' ' * ' TJM"* 0 A U i* "t *^C 1 ': ' . : wfl i*W i&W' : ' ' '' "'

^j|sSto. : fe;

;lllfiij/'. . ''' y '-- : MI* '"'i*'**'*" fM i" l ' ' :\-M'.''V ^||^XI||U**AH ,' ii;'.' 1 T'-' - '•, :^i,-r.,' '^v'-'';^-\,s ,-.. .' ,- . ''' •1 ..' 1 ^ 1 .-' 1 : - '' .

•'' ; --- 3H-24y-4s'.: -v;:.::. : /;.;-,3M-24U-3S

l 3H-24H-2S3H-24H-1S3M-201MS3H-20W-2S3M-20*-3S

f 3H-20H-4S3M-20W-5S3H-20M-6S3K-20M-7S

.

3H-20H-10S

3H-2Gw-'.2331-20*- i 3S

3fi-20w-i4S3K-20*-15S3K-BL-60^wJSM-BL-il'? f33H-BL-435U)

| PROJECT! MORS PAC-E-

^t;.^;AU;,^|^^ii.^ ^u Kt/Au .

"' ' ' •'••" ' " " "" "" '

23 . ' . '. " • : :v'"^;"-^^; :.^'3ll-BL-638iV 9.31 .;v:;.::r , ; ..;.:.^: v; - 3M-BL-64iv 25

19 3H-BL-6JSu^ 17. ' 12 ' ' : '•' : ' :'-- v^'v''-''^: :v^';v :/- 'SH^BL-^ ; du ;i 13 ti"*

8 i 3M-8L-6^ ^ 13 ^^^ T*^*-J"*'

SSJ^c'r-S^S-,. ^. - :'v'"' ..i^-" :-..'-' -* i.jl1 ~. . --\, vV' ' -. " J- -!"-^r '-' '-'•-.'•:',' V 8' - ' --!^' 'V ;, i-.-*' ••;-.-~'f; *;-,.;T

.A'.: '/' •3y- a'Si'..'-. •: : .^'/?: '

.-'.' : .:'' .1'.' ' ; " ' V.'- - '

•'. 4. :' ' ": :'', ,,15. ; -, ;

^'-••i: !'-*1-;f •'.'-:'- •..•••.:: -i-,.: f-: V.-V- '1..-?!^,'.';,*)-.'.: x,;.i ;-;^-':?'-;:il'"'?:;; -..iffcfe^^fei''^!^^.'©;^-

:. ' 7

14

182713232"'

1121•-j ri. W'

1?

i 1*

r

-,:'

i -iid

516

APPENDIX 3

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Bedrock Geology; Surficial Geology; Till and Humus GeochemistryTownship or Ar™ Morrisette __JLClaim HnlHerfs) ' V.N. Rampton

R.R. #1, Carp, Ontario KOA 1LO_______I~ITio .Terrain Analysis 5 Survey Company C.F. Gleeson 5 Assoc.; Mapping fift-ry^r-ac

Anthnrnf Kppm-t C.F.Gleeson, R.R.#1 Iroquois, Ont. KO.ff 1KO Address of AnthnrV.N. Rampton. R.R.#1. Carp. Ont. KOA 1LQ Covering Dates of Survey 11 Apr. 85 to Aug. 2. 1985______

(linecutting to office) 16Total Miles of Line Cut.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for firstsurvey.

Surficial Geo. ENTER 20 days for eachadditional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric——

DAYS per claim

Till Geochemistry -Other—. ——— LBedrock

Geological—Geochemical.

40

20

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer.

DATE:

.Electromagnetic.(enter days per

S Radio

SIGNATURE7 Authof ofReport or Agent

S

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications r!/ O O 0 C*

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

"""""(prefix)'

642658(number)

* tttinfffffft i

642668•••••****O*t*

642674

642675

642676

TOTAL CLAIMS

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval ——— Profile scale ————

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing ————-J

Contour interval.

U

l O

Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

ELECTROMAGNETKC"jl c^lfignratinn

fVijl separation

AccuracyMethod: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In line Frequency

(specify V.L.F. station)

CD Parallel line

Parameters measured.

O

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

zoH < Nkvf

Instrument ————————— Method D Time DomainParameters — On time .

- Off time— Delay time ——-— Integration time

O Frequency Domain _ Frequency _____ Range --—————.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

~rSELF POTENTIALInstrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ——-—————^^—^—-——————---™-———^-—-—.—--.—————-

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels) —^^^—^^^^^—————————————————.^^^^———^^

Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector-^———-—^———-—.-.—————^—^——-—————-———..^^————

Overburden ___________________________________________—(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey_____.—^-—————.——^———^— Instrument —^——————.——-^—.————^^^—Accuracy-—-—-———-———————————————.——.—.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)—— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy——————————^————

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used.——--—————————.^—-—————-————.....—.—.

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude.————————-———-—————————————Line SparingMiles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

IShirrihers nf rlaims frnm whirh samples tflken.

Tntal Niimripr nf Sample* 9-rocks; 21-ti,ll; 807-HiTypp nf Samplp

(Nature of Material) Average Samplp Weight Rocks-lkf: Till-lkgr ?

Method of Collection""™5 -300? wet

Rock-hand; Till-shovel; Humus-MattockSnil Hnri,nn SampleH Rock . Till-C. HUHIUS-A

Horizon Development.Sample Depth Rock-Surf ace : Till-3-lm;Terrain Hilly

nonage neveinpmpnt Generally good, but fewpoor areas

FflirmtH Range of Overburden Thickness

average - 2m, Range-nil-30m

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

M*"sh si?,e of fraction nsp^ for analysis

Rock - Crush, pulverize - 200Till - sieve - 250Humus - Dry, sieve - 50

General ,. ,

- PROCEDURE RECORD ^k

20 claims

jmus ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: . percent D

Cu,Ag,Mo p.p. m. CET Au p. P- b. Ei

(Q)), Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, (gj) @) As.-(circle) -,

Others . **U

FiplH Analysis (. t"fte)

Evtrartion MethnH ,

Analytical MethnH

Field Laboratory AnalysisMn. ( tpets)

Extrartion Method -,...Analytical MpthnH

Rpflgppts ^^SeH llinii

Cnmme.rrial Laboratory ^ 83 7 -AU tectsj

Name nf T.ahnratnfy BOttdar-Clegg

Kvtra.ction MpthnH pirp -Assay-Aqua lR*xg^

Analytical Method -Carbon -rnrf AAspectroscopy

Rpagents TIspH

General — — - —————————————————————Only 6 rocks tested for Ag,Cu,MoExtract - Hot Lefort aquia regiaAnalysis - AA spectroscopy

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

o

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

32DeSSW8l11 2.5887 MORRISETTE 900

1984 01 18 Your File: Our File :

2522.5807

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

RE: Geological ft Geochemical Surveys ft Data for Assayingon Mining Claims L 642658 et al In the Township of

_______________Morrisette-———————-———The Geological fi Geochemlcal Surveys and Data for Assaying assessnent work credits as listed have been approved as of the above date. A re-assessment of the report and naps, after the Issue of the Notice of Intent dated December 21, 1983, has allotted full credit for the Geological and the Surficial Geological and Till Geochemical Survey.Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.Yours very truly

J.R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380R. P1chette:sccc: V.N. Rampton

R.R. fi Carp, Ontario KOA 1LO

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

weociiernicai ana expnditures;

Mining Act

Note: — uniy days credits calculated in the

S S ^ /~ Do not Uie thaded areas below.

Bedrock Geology; Surficial Geology; Till and Humus Geochera.Township or Area

Morrisette_____Prospector's Licence No.

V.N. ton A45116Address

R. R. #1, Carp, Ontario KOA 1LOsurvey company Terrain Analysis and C.F. Gleeson 6 Assoc.; Mapping Services Ltd.

Date of Survey (from fit to)11 i 4 83 l 2 8 83Day | Mo. | Yr. | Bay | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

16Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technicel report)

C.F. Gleeson, R.R.#1, Iroquois, Ont. KOE 1KO; V.N. Rampton, R.R.#1, Carp, Ont. KOA 1LOCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

•^sC ESr'f: '2(-

MINING LAN,.Airborne Credits TII.

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- RadiometricSurficial Geo. 5 Ti51*r Geochem

EftBlPtfe* c.Uu**Geochemical ~

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- OtriSr'"*^

(J^ica,

Geochemical

^ ^CCT/O/v

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

4020

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Geochemical AnalysisPerformed on Claim(s)

As per list in opposite column

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

S 5880.26 15Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

DateS

Holder or AatVrt (Signatu/4)

Certification Vejnfying*Xepferf of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List ip numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

• ;

" T

,/, - . jm '* - '** ' -

./;::d ' 1. 1 *,''? ^

Number

642658

642659

642660

642661

642662

642663

642664

642665

642666

642667

642668

642669

642670

642671 .

642672

642673 i

642674

^642675

642676

642677

Expend. Days Cr.

20

20

20

16

16

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

1. 1

i

Mining ClaimPrefix

f .'J; T ^ i

-•JX~

'•.'•'•i''•\

i

LA

AM -""

7|8|9

/^f

Number

Q

IDKr. LAiMININQ QIV ———

? g g m |

oCp^rflfflMocr\ 'ssp1fly r

I0lfl|12|tti2i3p( v^-\wt]f

Expend. Days Cr.

E

PWPM

! r).G

Total number of mining claims covered by this 20 report of work.

For Office Use Only fTotal Ree

Data Ra 7/1983Data Approved as Rfeoori•dad

Mining Recorder

Branch Director '

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the fact* set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed tame during and/or after its completion and the annexed report Is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

, Box 158, Carp. Ontario KOA ILflstaCertlfledf j J Cerrffljn*hy (SI)g^y/fa ^^

® v, r.s'jyoi Technical Across Natural R'-.nuTcer Work Credits

Gniano ^^

1ient p"2T,07C**'* tM,r.it,g HtcorO*''i H*|mrl ol

1983 12 ?1 !wo.kU\ L ^ i

Recorded Hone, ^ Nj RAMpTON

TownsrnporA,.. MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Type ol survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysics!

Fl^rnm.jn.tir . , ni d*yi

Inriuod polarization . riayt

Oth*r rlnyi

Section 77 (1G) fei "Mining CI i Inn AtiMMd" column

Hpnlngir*! rUyt

17.0 Gflochpnrc"' ri*v

Man days Q Airborne C

Special provision ED Ground E

Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claim* AeMesed

L 642658 to 672 inclusive 642675 to 677 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

t

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claim!

B not sutficiintly cov*r*d by tht jurvey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

L 642673 642674

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits If necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded oneach claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60: tB28 (83/6) '

Ministry of Technical Assessment Work Credits

OntarioDate

1984 01 18

2.5807Mining Recorder's Report of Wor^o. 252

Recorded Holder V.N. RAMPTON

Township or Area MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

E-leetrnmagnfltin days

Magnatnmetar days

Radiomatrir riays

Induced pnlari7afinn riaysSurficial Geological S

nthar Till Geochemical 20 riaVs

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

40

Man days d Airborne d

Special provision Q Ground [3

|~1 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

L 642658 to 677 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims ,

l _ l not sufficiently covered by the survey l — l Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 60; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

/l^~^v '-••^^\-)L\ \Gcnn\CR\ Assess 1 W 1 f J-Miira; yy J prr OU rce. Work CreditsUrvan.j ^e^

ment P"l 2.5807

Del* Winino Hfcoroxr'i HtpoM o*

1983 12 21 Wo ' k^ 2b2

Recorded Holder

\.H. RAMPTONTownship or Ares

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Type o) survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Ufjnntomat.r dayi

Rpriinmf trip . riayi

Inrinrcri pnlariiation dftyi

Oth*r rtiiyf

Section 77 (18) S** "Mining Clalmt Aimitd" column

fipnlngiral dayi

Rnnrhemiral diyt

Man days CD Airborne CD

Special provision LJ Ground GD

Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Clelme Aweeeed

S5,880.26 spent on geochemical analysis of samples from mining claims L 642658 to L 642677 inclusive

393 days credit are allowed which may be recorded in accordance with Section 76(6) of the Mining Act.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technics! data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits If necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:

B2B (83/6)

Tffi*R4IN ^N^LYSISand /MAPPING SERVICES LTDLConsultants in Earth Sciences and Engineering

V. N. Rampton, PH.D., p.Eng.R. D. Thomas, M.Sc., P.Eng.Serge Paradis, M.A., F.G.A.C. RECEIVED

i "rid Management Branch^H?:.^! j L ATE

Box 158, Carp, Ontario KOA1LO {613)836-2594

D

Mr. George J. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Re: MNR Files 2.5807/252

AiJ DI984

January 1983

f *— ~

JAN l l 1984

MINING u,.^ v ^nr*^

Dear Mr. Koleszar:

I received notice of intent for what I believe is a reduced rate of assessment work credits on claims in Morrisette Township. We believe that these reductions are not just and that our original filing should not be changed. Please let me explain,

(D Claims L64259; 642664, 642667 and 642672 have had their special provisions geological and line cutting credits reduced by \ to 20 days and their special provisions sur ficial geological plus till geochemical credits reduced by \ to 10 days. No reason is given, but from looking at our report I would presume it is because of the small size of these claims and the fact that this has led to fewer traverse lines than average crossing these claims. However, the total claim group was systematically traversed at 400 foot inter vals and some of the larger claims have more than average number of traverse lines crossing them (yet we have not received extra credits for these claims). The total area of our claim group - 6750 ft by 5300 ft - approximately 821 acres - is close to what 20 claims should theoretically be - 800 acres - and the claims should be considered as a total group (in spite of the obvious problem with the size of individual claims during the original staking). In summary we believe our level of effort and our technical reports concerning the total claim group warrent full special provisional credits per claim. Otherwise we will end up with*difficult fractions within our claim group.

Airphoto interpretation 9 Maps of Surficitf Materials * Geologic Reports # Stratigraphic Studies * Granular Resource Locations and Evaluations * RouteSelection^ and f valuations 9 Permafrost Studies * Environmental Assessments * Terrain Sensitivity Assessments 9 Engineering Properties of Surficial Materials

Drift Prospecting # Hydrogeology * Modern Geologic Process Analysis 9 Development Plans

(2) Claims L642673 and L642674 have had their credits under the geochemical survey completely disallowed with the result that the remaining claims within the group (642658 to 672 and 642675 to 642677) end up with reduced credits. The reason given is that these claims were not sufficiently covered by the survey. The geochemical survey involved sampling of humus and analysis for gold. We believe that in bogs where the peat is excessively thick the results from surface organics are not reliable. Thus, we tended to not sample and analyze organics where we determined them to be thicker than 3 feet. Thus in claims L642673 and L642674 where the peat is thicker than 3 feet we did not retain samples. However, in other claims where samples had more meaning we obtained extra samples. I believe that because we assessed the complete claim group and obtained meaning ful samples with an average number of samples exceeding the minimum required that we should receive full credits over the complete claim group. Or at least over all claims other than L642673 and L642674.

In our original filing we filed our expenditure credit days not anticipating that we would not receive special provi sions as claimed. If upon reviewing our claims, you still decide that some reduction is necessary, we would like the option if possible, of reassigning to different claims our expenditure credit days.

Yours truly,

Copy to:

V.N. Rampton, Ph.D., P.Eng

E.F. Anderson, Director, Land Management BranchG.H. Ferguson, Mining and Lands CommissionerC.F. Gleeson, C.F. Gleeson S Associates Ltd.

Airphoto Interpretation * Mops of Surficial Materials * Geologic Reports * Stratigraphic Studies 9 Granular Resource Locations and Evaluations t RouteSelections and evaluations * Permafrost Studies * Environmental Assessments * Terrain Sensitivity Assessments * engineering Properties of Surficial Materials

Drift Prospecting * Hydrogeology * Modern Geologic Process Analysis * Development Plans

1984 01 12 Your File: Our File:

2522.5807

Mr. George J. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

RE: Geological and Geochemical Surveys and Data for Assaying on Mining Claims L 642658 et al 1n the Township of Morrisette

The Geological and Geochemical Surveys and Data for Assaying assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated December 21, 1983 have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly.

J.R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1H3 Phone:(416)965-1380

M.E. Anderson:me

cc: Y.N. Rampton R.R.I1Carp, Ontario KOA lLO

cc: Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, Ontario

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining ft Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

/r^\ Minisuyot lecnnicai Astessi[\yi Natural lif , . .u \SJ R|^ources Work CreditOntario ^B

tiem w*2.5807

Bate Mining Recorder'1 Report of

1983 12 21 Wprk *0' 252

Recorded Holder

V.N. RAMPTONTownship or Area

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Typt of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Ma(jn*tom*t*i' day*

RfHinm*trir days

Inriiicari polarization ...,,,, . dayi

nthur riayt

Section 77 (10) *t* "Mining Clllmt Atieued" column

Geological dayi

finnrhemical riay*

Man days G Airborne Q

Special provision ED Qround B

l~~l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

CD Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

S5,880.26 spent en geochemical analysis of samples from mining claims L 642658 to L 642677 inclusive

393 days credit are allowed which may be recorded in accordance with Section 76(6) of the Mining Act.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

CD not sufficiently covered by the survey CD Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Qeophysical — 80; Qeological—40; Qeochemlcal — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

© Ministry of Technical Assessi Natural ,.. , . Jfm Resources Work Credits

Ontario^t^k^^^

nant ?ii* 2.5807

KM* Mining Recorder'1 Report of1983 12 21 Work *0- 252

Recorded HolderV.N. RAMPTON

Township or AreaMORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Typt of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

GeophysicalFli^troinfgn.tjr dcyi

R*rliom.Tnr riays

ftth. rSurficial Geological 4 20 riJ,y,Till Geochemical

Section 77 (19) St* "Mining Clelms Assessed" column

fipnlngiral dayi

fionrhfinvral rtayt

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision 03 Qround OS

H Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claim AstMMd

L 642658 642660 to 663 inclusive 642665-66 642668 to 671 inclusive 642673 to 677 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claimi

10 DAYS CREDITED

L 642659 642664 642667 642672

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently cov*r*d by th* survey [J Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

/iZrv Mimsuyot Technical Astessi * a u)ruarces Work credits

nant "H*2.5807

bet* Mining Recorder'* Rtport of 1983 12 21 Wofk No- 252

Recorded Holder y^ ^p^

Township or Area MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of AMitsmtnt days credit per claim

Geophysical

Fl*rtrnm*gn*tie dayt

MaB"*tOrn"tpr , dayt

flaHinmatric , . days

Oth*r days

Section 77 (10) S** "Mining Clilmt AtlMiad" column

fienlngical dayt

17.0fiBnrhcmiral riayt

Man days G Airborne Q

Special provision ED Ground Q

JTI Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Anewed

L 642658 to 672 inclusive 642675 to 677 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

H not iufficiently covtrid by tht survey {-l Insufficient technical data filed

L 642673 642674

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical—80; Geological—40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

© Ministry of Technical Assessi Natural , lf , ^ ... Resources Work Credit*

Ontario J^

"•"! Fi " 2.5807^1983 12 21 Kl,Weordft?fportof

Recorded Holder V.N. RAMPTON

Township or Area MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Magnetometer , , days

Rartinmatric. . ,. ...... .days

Inriiipurl polarization days

Oth.r days

Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Claims Anetied" column

40fipnlngira| riayt

Renrhemiral dayi

Man days D Airborne CI

Special provision I—I Ground 0

tx3 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims AtMSMd

L 642658 642660 to 663 inclusive 642665 - 666 642668 to 671 inclusive 642673 to 677 inclusive

Special credits under tection 77 (16) for the following mining claims

20 DAYS CREDITED

L 642659 642664 642667 642672

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by tha survey l — l Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

ntario

1983 12 21

YourJile: 252

Our file: 2.5807

Mr. George J. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

Anderson fetor

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

M.E. Anderson:mc

Ends:

cc: V.N. Rampton R.R.#1Carp, Ontario KOA l LO

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

B45

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1983 12 21

2.5807/252

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 /82/5.1

Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural Report HBi|flK6S

Ontario V Approval

File

J?. S So 7

13/33.Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

o: Geology - Expenditures "itr-si L r*iComments

Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsData. S ^ T/t rf li/ W Signatu

|{ To: Geochemistry *"7)^-

Approved l l Wish to see again with corrections

l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1983 09 20

252

2.5807

Mr. George J. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for Geological and Geochemical Surveys and Data for Assaying submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on mining claims L 642658 et al In the Township of Morrisette.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

A. Barr:me

cc: V.N. Rampton R.R.I1Carp, Ontario KOA 1LO

cc: C.F. Gleeson R.R.I1Iroquois, Ontario KOE 1KO

Financial Breakdown - Geochemical Analysis

Lahaie Lake Claims

Report No. (See Appendix)

013-1456

parts of013-2002

113-1236

013-1322

013-1240

013-1323

013-1323

013-1237

Material

442 Humus

3 Rock

14 Till

7 Till

365 Humus

2 Rock

2 Rock

4 Rock

Total

Date

Aug. 10

Aug. 15

June 30

June 30

July 12

July 5

July 7

June 21

Invoice No.

103118

103204

102591

102593

102727

102669

102684

102522

Amount

3099.53

23.59

86.25

43.14

2559.57

20.57

3.23

44.38

S5880.26

: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

103118

August 10* 1983

tPort Not

ftv: ','

442 Analyse* of Ooid* ; "ft 'ifcWv. i'.Jfis *j--, .. . i.1

t 6*50

13X Contract Discount d Subtotal

Pr*par0tion ,442 8*iBPl*v of SKIVE ~50

SubtotalLet* t 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Invoice Total

at 1.75

2873*002873*00430*952442*05

773,50 773.30 116*02 657*48

2442*05

657,48

*3099*53

THISI3APROFESSIONM

fijai

BONDAR-GLEGGSf COMPANY LTD.BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

DR. C.F* GLEESON DR. C.F. GLEESON 764 BELFAST ROADf OTTAWA* ONTARIO* K10 025

Invoice: 103204

Date: August IS* 1983

Report No! 013-2002

Project:-2/1 *

MOR Rn

9 Analuse* of Ooid *t 6*50 58.50Subtotal 58.50Lets! 15Z Contract Discount 8.77Discounted Subtotal 49.73

SaitMe Preparation9 Samples of CRUSHfPULVERIZE -200 at 2.75 24.75

Subtotal 24.75 Less? 152 Contract Discount 3.71 Discounted Subtotal 21.04

Invoice Total

49.73

21.04

170.77

- - -' -) ij

- -'i :: ;-AO OTr^.V/A, OJ^URIp KJG 02g

UD,

3L — ~*

z.*, n-uTHIS IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ACCOUNTS DUE WHEN RENDERED

l-if-rtf'.iS-

INDAR-CLEGG Si COMPANY LTD.764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

DR. C*F, GLEESONC* F, GLEESONR* R. 41LAKESHORE DRIVEIROQUOIS, ONTARIO KOE 1KO

Invoice:

Date:

102591

June 30* 1983

Retort No: 113-1236

ProJecM MORR J'•3* /sf l i—C.

20 Analyses of Gold el A,50 130.00Subtotal " 130,00Less! 153J Contract Discount 19,50Discounted Subtotal 110.50 110,50

Preparation"O Samplt-s of SEIVE -230 st 0,75

SubtotalLesfel 152 Contract I'i s count Discounted Subtotal

11 w o i '.'e ('o t A !

15,00 15*00

f 123 ,1'J

a* 2

l D AU6 28 1983

THIS IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE i DUE WHEN RENDERED

BCDNCDAR COMPANY LTD.764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

DR. C,F. GLEESONC. F, GLEESONR. R. *1LAKESHORE DRIVEIROQUOIS, ONTARIO KOE 1KO

InvoiceJ 102593

Datei June 30* 1983

Report No! 013-1322T "f

ProJectJf MORR '

Z ^

29 Analyses of Gold st 6.50 188,50Subtotal 188,50Less: 15X Contract Discount. 28.27Discounted Subtotal 160,23 160,23

Sample Preparation29 Samples of OTHER SAMPLE PREP l at 0.75 21,75

Subtotal 21,75Less! IS.% Contract Discourvt ' 3,26Discounted S-jbtottl 18,49 19.49

Invoice To t-i. f 1?B, 72

S". S"?

/-f

l D Aufi 2 B 198a w.

''^s&iA&vM

THIS IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ACCOUNTS DUE \

^.••;..te*S' ' '

BBNDAR-eLEee-SrCOMRANY LTD.BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA. ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

DR. C.F. GLEESON C* F. GLEESONR* R* fi LAKESHORE DRIVE IROQUOIS* ONTARIO KOE 1KO

Invoice! 102727

Date: July 12, 1983

Report Not 013-1240

Project: HORRf

Analyses of Gold at 6.50 SubtotalLess: 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

1.75Preparation

461 Samples of SEIVE -50 3t SubtotalLess: 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Invoice Total

2996.502996.50

449.472547.03

806.75806,75121.01685.74

2547.03

685,74

13232.77

COMPANY LTD,

/,4 BELFAST ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO

OZ5

l

THIS IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ACCOUNTS DUE WHEN RENDERED

.y.'&iir J . l 'S:; l : v: - • ;i^lmte^:4--r——

>y/

784 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO. K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

OR* C. F. 8LEE80N C. F. OLEE8QN; '

LAKESHORE DRIVEIROQUOIS, ONTARIO KOE 1KO

Invoice: 102669

Date* July Ofit 1983

Report Nor 013-1323

4 Analyses of4 Analyse* of Holwbdenu*

SubtotalLacst 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

4 Analyses of Gold SubtotalLess! 152 Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Sample Preparation4 Samples of CRUSH*PULVERIZE -200

SubtotalLess! 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Invoice Total

at 1.90at 0,95

ount

at 6.50

ount

at 2,75

ount

7.603.8011.40t. 719.69

26.0026 * 003,90

22.10

11,0011,001.659,35

9.69

22,10

9.35

141.14

THIS IS A l' K e**;i ta..-vv^^WMf.-

COMPANY LTD.BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1Q OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

DR. C.F, GLEESON C* F. GLEESONR* R* nLAKESHORE DRIVE R ' * IROQUOIS* ONTARIO KOE 1KO

Invoice; 102684

Date! July 07* 1983

R*fort Not 113-1323

•v

l

4 Analyses of Silver at 1.90 SubtotalLe**! 1SX Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Invoice Total

7,60 7.60 1*14 6.46 6.46

16.46

THIS IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ACCOUNTS DUE WHEN RENDERED- '-'---

BONDAR-CLE G G S C D M PA N Y LT D.64 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1Q OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110 TELEX: 053-4455

OR. C*F. GLEESON C* F* OLEE80N** R. fi.LAKESHORE DRIVEIROQUOIS* ONTARIO KOE 1KO

Invoice} 102522

Date! June 211 1983

Report Not 013-1237

Project? HORR

7 Analyses of Silver7 Analyses of Copper7 Analyses of Molybdenum

SubtotalLess! 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

7 Analyses of Gold SubtotalLess! 152 Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Sample Preparation7 Samples of CRUSHrPULvERIZE -200

SubtotalLess! 15X Contract Discount Discounted Subtotal

Invoice Total

J

-64 B*-.i:^.S7 l^CAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO.

OZ5

at 1.90at 0,95at 0.95

•ount

at 6.50

:ount

at 2,75

ount

13.306.656,65

26,603.99

22.61

45.5045.506,82

38,68

19,2519,252,8816,37

22,61

33,68

16,37

177,66

~ffa*k

THIS IS A PROF ACCOUNTS!

JIONAL SERVICE

o

:D H

LU

UJ O)

O

t7

Bisley Twp.(M. 328)

1643247 l 643246

|642 7B l [642680)542579

7.4062;7I406 .-., ^ ^. . j. .L L

547/119 1547118-v

642650 642^51"J l0742 V 0 0 Y- *'"-- li rBi \ CP) r----.-v:--n^-^^*/ IT.04..-U '"K

C ib6C!64 43S0355-~, :———

544771 5/44758544757 544754

5447531 544750 , 544779 , 544776

|L i L 'l i L , L

i -5447 51 544752

V, 47217 1546432

\ J. J- NEWMAN l

Lebel Twp.(M.359)

C\Jro

CL h-

o

THF TOWNSHIPar

MORRISETTEDISTRICT OF

TIMISKAMING

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE; 1-INCH 40 CHAiNS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLEDPATENTED S.R.O.

C.S.

©LocLO,

M.R.O. S.R.O.

C,e

NOTES

400' SURFACE RIGHTS RESERVATION ALONG THE SHORES OF ALL LAKES AND RIVERS.

Areas withdrawn from slaking under Section 43 of the Mining Act (R. s o 19/0 ). Order NO. File Date Disposition

*\) tJR W. 20/7*! 160^05

•5JJNRW56 50 60705

5/3/79

3/l/BO

S R S M R

M RO.

S j r fac e nchts on mining claim L 10772 * e 11 p o ra ri l y withdrawn File 45155.

Mining claims opined thus ... l are subjeci ID rights and pnvncjes granTed by Mining Court Order April l, 1946 File 19697.

PLAN NO.

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

320855*8111 2.5807 MORRISETTE soo

LAHAIE LAKE CLAIM GROUP(III)PART OF NTS 32 D/5

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

MAP 3

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

MORRISETTE

TOWNSHIP

ARNOLD

TOWNSHIPGOLD IN HUMUS

WB L64W L 60W L 56W L 52W

COLUMBUS

LAKE

-I5N

-25 S

WB L 64W L 60W L44W L40W L36W L 32W L 28W L24W L20W LI6W LI2W

— —— _ TRAIL

— . — - — STREAM

W-/ BRIDGE

N——f BEAVER DAM

L 8W

CLAIM LINE

L4W LO

CLAIM POST t Located during survey, not located)

CLAIM NUMBER

SEE MAP 2 -BEDROCK GEOLOGY FOR GEOLOGICAL AND DRILL DATA and MAP l SURFICIAL GEOLOGY FOR CHARACTER OF OVERBURDEN

-38

30

A

B

P

S

T

M

LEGEND

ppb Au

CONTOUR INTERVAL10, 15. 20. 30, 40 ppb Au

NO SAMPLE

VEGETATION

ALDER SWAMP

BIRCH

PINE

SPRUCE

TAMARACK

MIXED: BIRCH, MAPLE, POPLAR, FIR, SPRUCE, TAMARACK,ALDER

VEGETATION BOUNDARYO

astronomic

O 50 100 200 metres

O 50 100 200 300 400 500 fe*t

SURVEY DATE: JUNE-SEPT 1983

HOLDER OF PROPERTY!

V. RAMPTON

SIGNATURE

c. F. GLEESONeio

m S a.E 8-1 Om*- 7 O

O

6 -

5 -

O 3UJ(Tli- 2

HtSTOGRAM FOR Au- 250 M ESH OF TILL SAMPLES

TOTAL SAMPLES 21

MEDIAN -^ lOppb

MORRISETTE

TOWNSHIP

ARNOLD

TOWNSHIP

WB

l10

L64W

i15 20

r25 30ppb Au

35 40l

45

5577

50

L 60W L 56WL 52W

L 48W L 44WL 40W L 28W L24W L 20W L I6W L I2W L 8W

L 4W LO

COLUMBUS

LAKE

20 N

-15 N

Y OGS-03D8I - 19 l.Us l

-15 S

-25 S

WB L64W L 60 L 24W L20W LI6W LI2W

330055*0111 S.5SC7 MORRISETTE

— — — —— TRAIL

— . ——. — STREAM

^—' BRIDGE

V——t BEAVER DAM

L 8W

CLAIM LINE

L4W LO

l, D CLAIM POST (Located during survey, not located)

;'-'..::.:' : : ; : ' y -;" CLAIM NUMBER

SS0SEE MAP 3 -GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY GOLD IN HUMUS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF BOG, SWAMP AND VEGETATION

LAHAIE LAKE CLAIM GROUP(III)PART OF NTS 32 D/5

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

MAP l

SURFICIAL GEOLOGY AND

TILL GEOCHEMISTRYLEGEND

ORGANIC DEPOSITS (Greoterthan LO m thick), BOG

ORGANIC BLANKET ( .2 to LO m thick) OVER FINE SANDY LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS (Greater than l.O m thick)

ORGANIC BLANKET (.2 to l.Om thick) OVER SILTY LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS (Greater than LO m thick)

SANDY AND SANDY PEBBLY GRAVELLY ALLUVIUM

FINE SANDY LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS (Greater than l O m thick) SLOPING SURFACE PARTIALLY REFLECTING UNDERLYING BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY

FINE SANDY LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS (Greater than I.Omthick)

GLACIOFLUVIAL SAND(Greater than I.Omthick); ROLLING TO HUMMOCKY SURFACE

BLANKET (and veneer) OF GLACIAL DRIFT INCLUDING MAINLY LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS AND TILL (Generally between . 3 to LOm thick; frequently greater than l ,0m thick )

VENEER ( and blanket ) OF, GLACIAL DRIFT INCLUDING MAINLY LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS AND TILL ( Generally less than 0.5m thick) OVER BEDROCK

BEDROCK, FEW PATCHES THIN DRIFT

SYMBOLSISOLATED BEDROCK OUTCROP

GLACIAL STRIAE

MELTWATER CHANNEL

—— GEOLOGIC CONTACT (defined, approximate)

LI NE AT IONS ( photo , topographic t

.20

l .Its

fs

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WITH THICKNESS IN METRES TO BASE OF TEST PIT

ppb Au IN — 250 MESH OF TILL SAMPLE

MATERIALSFINE SAND AND SILT

FINE SAND

GRAVEL, GENERALLY PEBBLY SANDY GRAVEL

SILT

ORGANIC

SAND ; GENERALLY MEDIUM TO COARSE-GRAINED

TILL-, GENERALLY SILTY PEBBLY SANDY TILL

BEDROCK

ri

astronomic

O 50 100 200 metres

GEOLOGY BY S. PARADIS R. THOMAS V. RAMPTON

O 5O 100 200 300 400 500 feet

SURVEY DATE: JUNE-SEPT (983HOLDER OF PROPERTY!

V. RAMPTON

SIGNATU

TERRAIN ANAL' PING SERVICES LTD.

LAHAIE LAKE CLAIM GROUP(III)PART OF NTS 32 D/5

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP

MAP 2

MORRISETTE

TOWNSHIP

ARNOLD

TOWNSHIP

BEDROCK GEOLOGY

L64W

COLUMBUS

LAKE

20 N -

WB L64W L 60W L56W L52W L48W L44W L 40 W L36W L 32W L 28W

320855*8111 2.5807 MORRISETTEt

230

LI6W

— — __-. TRAIL

— - -,- - — STREAM

BRIDGE

BEAVER DAM

LI2W L8W L4W

• * CLAIM LINE

LO

CLAIM POST (Located during survey, not located )

•••'..•.'•.'.•'•t-'. .-' ,. CLAIM NUMBER

SEE MAPI- SURFICIAL GEOLOGY FOR CHARACTER OF OVERBURDEN andMAP 3 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY -GOLD IN HUMUS FOR DETAILS OF VEGETATION

5 N

- ION

5 N

L SOW j 56W\ L 3&W L 52W

L 28W L24W

ANDS\ ~ ^y\ DCTE-Ai ^O - to- l *r rr-A DCTE~ - ^K^ - P y* corb, v: * XI.\ANDS

"TV^^VrJ" V^ chl., qtz,

' x\ t qti.,corb.

SWAMP

\

DCTE-ANDS(P)qtz . in fracture chl.

qtz. string* •s S S carb, in fracture

DCTE-ANDS jf tltlcifted with l/ qrz. itrlngen B /T .

-205

25S

40 q.v.

^w

ANOS.(P)

ANDS.

DCTE.

qlz. omyg

chl .

PV

cp .

carb.

A

IT

LEGEND

DACITE-ANDESITE

PILLOWED ANDESITE

ANDESITE

ZONES OF SILICIFICATION

PILLOWS- STRIKE AND DIRECTION OF TOPS

QUARTZ VEIN AND STRINGER- STRIKE AND DIP

SHEAR ZONE'AND DIP

ASSUMED FAULT (vertical)

FRACTURE l dipping,vertica!)

GLACIAL STRIAE

AREA OF OUTCROP

ASSUMED GEOLOGICAL CONTACT

PILLOWED ANDESITE

ANDESITE

DACITE

QUARTZ AS VEIN OR FILLING FRACTURES

QUARTZ AMYGDULES

CHLORITE

SERICITE

PYRITE

CHALCOPYRITE

CALCITE

BOULDER

Au ( ppb) IN ROCK SAMPLE

fi

astronomic

O 50 IOO 200 metres

GEOLOGY BY J. ADAMS and C F. GLEESON

O 50 100 20O 300 4OO 500 feet

SURVEY DATE: JUNE-SEPT. 1983HOLDER OF PROPERTY:

V. RAMPTON