42A07NW2001 2.18132 CARMAN 010

REPORT OF WORK

on the

CARMAN PROJECTCarman Township, ON.

Porcupine Mining Division

for

, f* '

BAND ORE RESOURCES LTD

February 19, 1998 Geoserve Canada Inc. Rodney Barber

42A07NW2001 2.18132 CARMAN

1.0 SUMMARY 010C

Between December 1997 and February 1998, Geoserve Canada Inc performed line

cutting, magnetometer, HLEM and IP surveys on the Carman Property of Band Ore

Resources Inc. These surveys are ongoing, such that a complete report cannot be made

a this time.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.0 5.0 6.0

1 .0 Summary 2.0 Introduction 3.0 1998 Field Work

3.1 Line cutting 3.2 TFM Survey 3.2.1 Procedure 3.2.2 Results 3.3 HLEM Survey 3.3.1 Procedure 3.3.2 Results 3.4 IP Survey 3.4.1 Procedure 3.4.2 Results

Conclusions SL Recommendations Certificate of Qualifications Equipment Specifications

PLANS S. SECTIONS

Plan l Carman PropertyPlan 2 TFM Magnetic SurveyPlan 3 HLEM Survey 440 HzPlan 4 HLEM Survey 1760 HzSections 1:5000 IP Sections

(i)(1)(I)(1)(2) (2) (2) (2) (2)(2)(3) (3)(3)(4)(5)(6)

Pocket

(i)

2.0 INTRODUCTION

During January and February, 1998, Geoserve Canada Inc was asked to perform line

cutting, magnetometer, HLEM and limited IP surveys on the Carman Project of Band

Ore Resources Ltd. This property consists of 356 units contained in 30 unpatented

claims. The property is located in northern Carman and Shaw Townships, ON.,

approximately 25 Ion east-southeast of Timmins, ON.

The work program calls for various geophysical surveys to be completed over much of the

property on three separate line grids, labelled Grid A, Grid B and Grid C. The present

report deals only with Grid A, on the eastern part of the property and Grid B, near the

centre of the property. Work is currently ongoing on the remainder of the property and

will be reported at a later date.

3.0 1998 WORK

3. l Line Cutting

Line cutting to date which is eligible for assessment has been performed on Grids A and

B. Grid A consists of a baseline oriented 1080 Az, four tie lines and 18 cross lines for

a total of 104.3 Ion. Grid B consists of a baseline oriented 0620 , two tie lines and 17

cross lines for a total of 67.2 Ion. Lines were all spaced 200 m apart with the exception

of lines 1000W to 1400W on Grid B, which are 400 m apart. All lines were chained at

25 m intervals.

(1)

3.2 TFM SURVEY

3.2.1 Procedure

The magnetics survey was carried out during February 1998. Crews used GSM-19

magnetometers to take readings on every line at 12.5 m intervals. A similar GSM-19

magnetometer was used to monitor the diurnal variation at 30 second intervals. The raw-

data ranged from 57252 nT to 63527 nT. The background field of 58000 nT was then

subtracted to produce the data shown on Plan 2. A total of 8371 readings were taken

on Grid A, for 104.3 Ion and 5030 readings were taken on Grid B for 62.625 Ion. The

area surveved consists only of LO to L4200E on Grid A and LO to 3600W on Grid B.

3.2.2 Results

Results of the TFM survey are shown on Plan 2. As the data has not yet been contoured,

no conclusions can be drawn at this time.

3.3 HLEM SURVEYS

3.3.1 Procedure

During December 1997, crews from Geoserve Canada Inc completed a horizontal loop

electromagnetic survey on Grid A from LO to L2400E. The remainder of the property

will be surveyed, but this work is ongoing. Crews used the max-min 1-9 transmitter and

receiver to take readings at 440 Hz and 1760 Hz using a 200 m coil separation. A total

of 2216 readings were taken on cross lines at 25 m intervals, for a total of 58 km.

3.3.2 Results

The HLEM survey results are shown on Plans 3 and 4. A very prominent conductor is

located on LO, at 525S, especially on the 1760 Hz survey. This is also present on

L200E. What appears to be the same conductor is also seen on L400E, 550S, to

(2)

L1200E, 450S, then trends south easterly to L2400E, 850S. A series of weak anomalies

closely follows the shoreline of Nighthawk Lake from L1000E to L2400E and are

probably due to cable shortening resulting from a steep carbankment. Data on lines

2000E to 2400 appears very "noisy" especially on the 440 Hz survey. This is due to

interference from the IP survey, which was being run at the same time.

3.4 IP SURVEY

3.4.1 Procedure

During January and February 1998, crews from Geoserve Canada Inc conducted a time

domain induced polarization survey on LO on Grid A and L6W on Grid B. More work

was planned, but has been delayed due to instrument failure. Crews used the

Androtex TDR-6 receiver in conjunction with the Androtex STX-10 transmitter to read

n= l to n=6 at 50 m intervals. The survey used a Pole-Dipole array, with the current

electrodes spaced 50 m apart. The surveys totalled 2.65 lcm on Grid A and 0.95 Ion on

Grid B.

3.4.2 Results

The results of the IP survey are shown on the sections located in the back pocket. LOE

shows two areas of higher chargeability, one at 1050S and southerly to the limits of the

survey and one at 300S and northerly to the limits of the survey. Both anomalies show

relatively low absolute values, but are open. Three areas of positive resistivity were also

located, one at 725S to 925S, one at 425S to 525S and another from 100S to the

northerly limits of the survey. The area of relatively low resistivity between 525S

coincides with an HLEM anomaly at the same location. The relatively flat contours on

the southern part of the line suggests either the survey is parallel to the strike of bedrock

formations or that the overburden may be interfering with the current penetration.

(3)

L600W on Grid B shows only a weak chargeability anomaly at 100N to 200N.

Prominent resistivity highs are located from 250N to the southern limits of the survey,

from 900N to 950N and from 1025N to the northern limits of the survey.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Since the surveys are not complete, few conclusions can be drawn at this time. More

complete data and a complete report will be forthcoming when the surveys are complete.

Respectfully Submitted for Approval,

Date

Rodney A Barber

(4)

5.0 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Rodney Alan Barber, residing at 119 Lois Crescent, Timmins, ON., certify that:

1. I hold a B.Se. (Honours) in Geology, obtained from Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON in 1988.

2. I have worked within the mineral exploration and mining industries since 1988, with an emphasis on northeastern Ontario for the last 7 years.

3. This report is the product of the examination of the survey results which accompany this report.

4. I have no direct interest in Band Ore Resources Ltd or the Carman Property.

Date

Rodney A. Barber

(5)

Induced Polarization•Androtex TDR-6; The TDR-6 induced polarization receiver is a highly cost- effective instrument for the detailed measurements of IP effects and apparent resistivity phenomenon. Up to six dipoles can be measured simultaneously, thus increasing production. A wide input voltage range, up to 30V, simplifies surveys over the narrow shallow conductors of large resistivity contrast. Input signal indicators are provided for each dipole. All data are displayed on a 2x16 character display LCD module and any selected parameters con be monitored on a separate analogue meter for noise evaluation during the stacking/averaging. Although the TDR- 6 receiver is automatic it allows full control and communications with the operator at all times during measurements. Since the input signal synchronizes the receiver at each cycle, the transmitter timing stability is not critical and any standard time domain transmitter can be used. Data are stored in the internal memory with a capacity of up to 2700 readings (450 stations). The data format is directly compatible with Geosoft without the necessity of an instrument conversion program. Features Wide input signal range 'Automatic self-potential cancellation Staking/averaging of Vp and M for high measurement accuracy in noisy environments High rejection of power line interference 'Continuity resistance test 'Switch selectable delay and integration time 'Multiwindow chargeability measurements Digital output for data logger 'Six channel input provided 'Compatible with standard time domain transmitters 'Alpha-numeric LCD display 'Audio indicator for automatic SP compensation 'PortableSpecifications'Dipole nl to n6 simultaneously•Input Impedance 10 megohm•Input Voltage (Vp) range:100uV to 30 Volts (automatic),

accuracy:.25%, resolution:lOpV.•Self Potential (SP) range:±2V,accuracy:J.%,Automatic compensation ±1•Chargeability (M) range:SOOmV/V, accuracy:.25 !fc,resolution:.ImV/V•Automatic Stacking 2 to 32 cycles 'Delay Time programmable•Integration Time programmable for each gate (10 gates)•Total Chargeability Time During integration time of all gates•Synchronization Signal programmable from channel l to 6•Filtering power lines:dual notch 60/lSOHz or 50/lSOHz,

lOOdB, other:Anti-alias, RF and spike rejection.•Internal Test Vp=lV,M=30mV/V 'Ground resistance test O to 200 Kohm•Transmitting Time 1/2,4 and 8 sec pulse duration, ON/OFF.•Digital Display Two line 16 alphanumeric LCD. 'Analogue Meters Six-monitoring input signal and course

resistance testing.•Controls Push button reset, toggle start-stop, rotary

Rs-in-test, rotary (data scroll) display, rotary (data scroll) Dipole, keypad 16 key 4x4.

•Memory Capacity 2700 readings, 450 stations (nl to n6) .•Data Output serial I/O RS-232 (programmable baud rate),

Geosoft compatible output format.•Temperature Range Operating:-30 0 to -f50 0 C,storage -40 0 to +60°C.•Power Supply Four l. 5V D cells.•Dimensions 31x16x29 cm•Weight 6. 5 kg (14.31bs)

(6)

IP MethodThe phenomena of Induced Polarization (IP) was reported as early as 1920 by Schlumberger. The IP survey technique allows a variety of arrays (which all have advantages and disadvantages) and reads two separate elements;(l)The chargeability or IP effect (M) and Apparent Resistivity. The IP technique is useful for detecting sulphide bodies and is also useful as a structural mapping tool. The IP effect is the measurement of the residual voltage in rocks that remains after the interception of a primary voltage. It includes many types of dipolar charge distributions set up by the passage of current through consolidated or unconsolidated rocks. Among the causes are concentration polarization and electrokinetic effects in rocks containing electronic conductors such as metallic sulphides and graphite. The term overvoltage applies to secondary voltages set up by a current in the earth which decays when it is interrupted. These secondary effects are measure by a receiver via potential electrodes. The current flow is actually maintained by charged ions in the solutions. The IP effect is created when this ionic current flow is converted to electronic current flow at the surface of metallic minerals (or some clays, and platy silicates). The IP method is generally used for prospecting low grade ( or disseminated) sulphide ores where metallic particles, sulfides in particular, give an anomalous response. Barren rock (with certain exceptions) gives a low response. In practice, IP is measured in one or two ways; (1) In a pure form, a steady current of some seconds (nominally 2 seconds) is passed and abruptly interrupted. The slowly decaying transient voltage existing in the ground are measured after interruption. This is known as the time domain method. The factor Vs/ Vp is the integrated product for a specified time, and several readings are averaged (suppressing noise and coupling effects). The resultant chargeability, M is essentially an unitless value but it is usually represented in mV/V. The second method entails a comparison of the apparent resistivity using sinusoidal alternating currents of 2 frequencies within the normal range of 0.1 to 10.0 cps. . The factor used to represent the IP effect by this frequency domain method is the percent frequency effect (PFE) and is defined by (R1-R2) /RlxlOO^ where RI and R2 are the apparent resistivities at the low and high frequencies. Use and LimitationsThe effective depth of penetration of any IP survey is a function of the resistivity of the surface layer('s) with respect to the resistivity of the lower layer. All arrays have different effects from this resistivity contrast, some are less affected than others. When the surface layer is 0.01 of the lower layer, the effective penetration is very poor hence the term masking. Masking occurs most often in areas of thick clay cover. The size of the target therefore becomes important when detection is desirous under a conductive surface layer. The frequency domain methods are the most adversely affected by masking as inductive coupling can be much greater than the response.Standard Definitions of ChargeabilityThe IP parameter, chargeability (M) varies with time. For practical reasons the entire decay curve is not sampled. Instead the secondary voltage is sampled one or more times at various intervals. Because the secondary voltage is received at extremely low levels in many prospecting situations, measurements of its amplitude at any given time is extremely susceptible to noise. Therefore, the secondary voltage is usually integrated for a period of time called a gate. Thus, if the noise has a zero mean, the integration will tend to cancel the noise. The Newmount M Factor is a standard time domain IP parameter. The gate delay, of 80 mSeconds (used by the TDR-6) was chosen to allow time for normal electromagnetic effects and capacitive coupling effects between the transmitter and receiver to attenuate so that the secondary voltage consists only of the IP decay voltage.The TDR-6 total integration time of 1580 milliseconds (gate) is divided into ten individual gates. The time-constant of the IP dispersion curve, Cole-Cole dispersion (W H Pelton, 1977), obtained from the ten individual gates (windows) is directly related to the physical size of the metallic particles. This data is available at the clients request since all of the obtained field data is archived (downloaded) to computer.

(7)

6.0 Equipment Specifications SL Survey Theory 6.1.0 Apex MaxMin 1-9 Description•The MaxMin I ground Horizontal Loop ElectroMagnetic (HLEM) systems are designed for mineral St water exploration and for geoengineering applications. They expand the highly popular MaxMin II and III EM system concepts. The frequency range (in Hz) is extended to seven octaves from four. The ranges and numbers of coil separations are increased and new operating modes are added. The receiver can also be used independently for measurements with power line sources. The advanced spheric and powerline noise rejection is further improved, resulting in faster and more accurate surveys, particularly at large coil separations. Several receivers may be operated along a single reference scale. Mating plug in data acquisition computer is available for use with MaxMin I for automatic digital acquisition and processing. The computer specifications are in separate data sheets.6.1.2 Specifications•Frequencies 110, 220, 440, 880, 1760, 3520, 7040, 14080 Hz plus 50/60HZ powerline frequency (receiver only).•Modes MAX1: HL mode, Tx &RX coil planes horizontal and coplanar.

MAX2: V coplanar loop mode, Tx fit Rx coil planes V fit coplanar MAX3: V coaxial loop mode, Tx S. Rx coil planes V S. coaxial MINI: P loop mode l ( Tx coil plane H & Rx coil plane V. MIN2: P loop mode 2 (Tx coil plane V 6k. Rx coil plane H.

•Coil Separation 12.5,25,50,75,100,125,150,200,300,400 meters standard. 10,20,40,60,80,100,120,160,200,240,320 m, internal option

50,100,200,300,400,500,600,800,1000,1200,1600ft internal opt -Parameters IP and Qcomponents ofthe secondary magnetic field, in 96 Measure of primary (Tx) fid. Fid amplitude and/or tilt of PL fid. •Readouts

Analog direct readouts on edgewise panel meters for IP, Q and tilt, and for 50/60HZ amplitude.Additional digital readouts when using the DAC, for which interfacing and controls areprovided for plug-in.•Range of Analog IP and Q scales; O ±2096, O ±2-96, O Readouts ±10096, switch activated. Analogue tilt scale O ±7596 grade (digital IP &QO ±102.496).•Readability Analogue IP and QO.05% to 0.596, analogue tilt 196 grade (digital IP S. QO.1%).•Repeatability ±0.0596 to ± 196 normally, depending on frequency, coil spacing &L conditions.•Signal Powerline comb filter, continuous spherics noise dipping, Filtering autoadjusting time constants and other filtering.•Warning Lights Rx signal and reference warning lights to indicate potential errors.•Survey Depth From surface down to 1.5 times coil separation used.•Transmitter 110Hz:220atm 220Hz:215atm 440Hz: 210atm 880Hz: 200atm

Dipole moments 1760Hz: 160atm 3520Hz: SOatm 7040Hz:40atm 14080Hz: 20atm -Reference Cable Lightweight unshielded 4/2 conductor teflon cable for maximum temperature range and for minimum friction.•Intercom Voice communication link via reference cable.•Rx Power Supply Four standard 9V batt (O.SAh, alk). Life 30 hrs continuous duty, less in cold weather. Rechargeable batt optional.•Tx Power Supply Rechargeable sealed gel type lead acid 12V-13Ahr batt (4x 6V-6ViAh) in canvas belt. Opt 12V-8Ahr light duty belt pack.•TxBattery For 110-120/220-240VAC, 50/60/400 Hz and 12-15VDC supply Charger operation, automatic float charge mode, three charge status indicator lights. Output 14.4V-1.25A nominal.•Operating Temp -40"C to H-60"C•Rx weight 8 kg Tx weight 16 kg with standard batt. IP^n-Phase/Q^Quadrature/^ Horizontal/ V^ Vertical/PL= Powerline

(8)

6.1.3 HLEM Theory•The MaxMin I is a frequency domain, horizontal loop electromagnetic (HLEM) system, based on measuring tl\e response of conductors to a transmitted, time varying electromagnetic field. The transmitted, or primary EM field is a sinusoidally varying field at any of the eight varying frequencies. This field induces an electromotive force (emf), or voltage, in any conductor through which the field passes (defined by Faraday's Eaw). The emf causes a secondary current to flow in the conductor in turn generating a secondary electromagnetic field. This changing secondary field induces an emf in the receiver coil (by Faraday's Eaw) at the same frequency, but which differs from the primary field in magnitude and phase. The difference in phase (phase angle) is a function of the conductance of the conductor(s), both the target and the overburden, and host rock. The magnitude of the secondary field is dependant on the conductance, dimension, depth, geometry as well as on the interference from the overburden and host rock. The two parameters, phase angle and magnitude are measured by measuring the strength of the secondary field in two components; the real field, In-phase with the primary field, and the imaginary field, Quadrature or 90 0 out-of-phase from the primary field. The magnitude and phase angle of the response is also a function of the frequency of the primary field. A higher frequency field generates a stronger response to weaker conductors. A low frequency tends to pass through weak conductors and penetrate to a deeper depth. The lower frequency also tends to energize the full thickness of a conductor, and give better measure of it's true conductivity-thickness " a " , in mho's per meter. For these reasons, two or more frequencies are usually used. A lower frequency for better penetration and a higher frequency for stronger response to weaker conductors. The transmitted primary field also creates an emf in the receiver coil, which is much stronger than that of the secondary and must be corrected for by the receiver. This is done by electronically creating an emf in the receiver, whose magnitude is determined by the distance between the transmitter and receiver. The phase is derived from the receiver via an interconnecting cable.6.1.4 MethodThe MaxMin I is a two-man continuously portable EM system. Designed to measure both the vertical and horizontal In-Phase (IP) and Quadrature (QP) components of the anomalous field from electrically conductive zones. The plane of the Transmitter (Tx) was kept parallel to the mean slope between the TX and Receiver (Rx) at all times. This ensures a horizontal loop system measuring perpendicular to the anomalous targets. The grid being surveyed should also be secant chained in order to keep a constant separation (between Tx and Rx) to eliminate anomalous response derived from cable loss over rough terrain. Crews attempted to keep a constant separation for a qualitative survey. Three frequencies; 440Hz, 1760Hz, and 3520Hz were selected to resolve complex conductors if/when encountered. The 200 meter coil spacing, chosen to detect possible deep conductors also ensures a more consistent survey overall (a large spread gives better penetration over areas of conductive layers, eg. day). The crews read the cross-lines only to cut the geology at a perpendicular angle for better cross-over response.

(9)

6.0 GEM Systems Advanced Magnetometers GSM-19 V 4.0GEM Systems Inc52 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 14Richmond Hill, Ontario Phone; (905) 764- 8008Canada, L4B-1L9 Fax ; (905) 764- 9329

6.2.1 Instrument Description•The sensor is a dual coil type designed to reduce noise and improve gradient tolerance. The coils are electrostatically shielded and contain a proton rich liquid in a pyrex bottle, which also acts as an RF resonator.•The sensor cable is coaxial, typically RG-58/U, up to 100m long.•The staff is made of strong aluminum tubing sections. This construction allows for a selection of sensor elevations above the ground during surveys. For best precision the full staff length should be used. Recommended sensor separation in gradiometer mode is one staff section, although two or three section separations are sometimes used for maximum sensitivity.•The console contains all the electronic circuitry. It has a sixteen key keyboard, a 4x20 character alphanumeric display, and sensor and power input/ output connectors. The keyboard also serves as an ON-OFF switch.•The power input/output connector also serves as a RS232 input/output and optionally as analog output and contact closure triggering input.•The keyboard front panel, and connectors are sealed (can operate under rainy conditions)•The charger has two levels of charging, full and trickle, switching automatically from one to another. Input is normally 110V 50/60HZ. Optionally, 12V DC can be provided.•The all-metal housing of the console guarantees excellent EM protection.

6.2.2 Instrument SpecificationsResolution 0.01 nT, magnetic field and gradientAccuracy 0.20 nT over operating rangeRange 20,000 to 120,000 nT automatic tuning, requiring initial setupGradient Tolerance over 10,000 nT/mOperating Interval 3 seconds minimum, faster optional. Reading initiated from keyboard, externaltrigger, or carriage return via RS-232Input/Output 6 pin weatherproof connectorsPower Requirements 12V, 200mA peak, 30mA standby, 300mA peak with GradiometerPower Source Internal 12V, 1.9Ah sealed lead-acid battery standard, external source optional.Battery Charger Input; 110/ 220VAC, 50/60HZ and/or 12VDC

Output; 12V dual level charging Operating Ranges Temperatures; -40 0 C to H-60 0 C

Battery Voltages; 10.0 V min to 15.0V maxHumidity; up to 9096 relative, non condensing

Storage Temperature -50"C to -l-65"C Dimensions Console; 223 X 69 X 240 cm

Sensor Staff; 4 x 450mm sectionsSensor; 170 x 71 mm diameterWeight; Console 2.1Kg Staff 0.9Kg Sensors; I.iKg

(10)

Magnetic Survey6.2.3 Theory; e

The magnetic method is based on measuring alteration in the shape and magnitude of the earth's naturally occurring magnetic field caused by changes in the magnetization of the rocks in the earth. These changes in magnetization are due mainly to the presence of the magnetic minerals, of which the most common is magnetite, and to a lesser extent ilmenite, pyrrhotite, and some less common minerals. Magnetic anomalies in the earth's filed are caused by changes in two types of magnetization; (l) Induced, caused by the magnetic field being altered and enhanced by increases in the magnetic susceptibility of the rocks, which is a function of the concentration of the magnetic minerals. (2) Remanent magnetism is independent of the earth's magnetic field, and is the permanent magnetization of the magnetic particles (magnetite, etc..) in the rocks. This is created when these particles orient themselves parallel to the ambient field when cooling. This magnetization may not be in the same direction as the present earth's field, due to changes in the orientation of the rock or the field. The unit of measurement (variations in intensity) is commonly known as the Gamma which is equivalent to the nanotesla (n T).

6.3.4 Method;

The magnetometer, GSM-19 with an Overhauser sensor measures the Total Magnetic Field (TFM) perpendicular to the earth's field (horizontal position in the polar region). The unit has no moving parts, produces an absolute and relatively high resolution measurement of the field and displays the measurement on a digital lighted display and is recorded (to memory). Initially, the tuning of the instrument should agree with the nominal value of the magnetic field for each particular area. The Overhauser procession magnetometer collected the data with a 0.2 nanoTesla accuracy. The operator read each and every line at a 12.5 m interval with the sensor attached to the top of three (56cm) aluminum tubing sections. The readings were corrected for changes in the earth's magnetic field (diurnal drift) with a similar GSM-19 magnetometer, > ^ase station < < which automatically read and stored the readings at every 30 seconds. The data from both units was then downloaded to PC and base corrected values were computed.

(H)

s - * Ministry ofOntario aa Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land

Mining Act, Subsection 66(2) and 66(3), R.S.0.1090

Transaction Number (office use)

Assessment Files Research Imaging

Personal Information collected on tni* form Is obtained under the authority of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, this Infbrmatlon Is a public record. This Information win be used to review the assesment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to a Provincial Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 3rd Finnr cm p.mo~, i .u.

Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recoi - Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holders) (Attach a list if necessary)

42A07NW2001 2.18132 CARMAN 900

Name

Address ,

y /f- /) ill5 l " -W I.* C /V tVji^,',-, .-j Z-iTtf

^ A :Ll*rJ^ ^ i/

7V,,^o r^,/-. M b tt SL5Name '

Address

2. Type

.Client Number

Telephone Number(70 r; 3 c-

7?

Fax Number

Client Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

of work performed: Check (*0 and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)

Physical: drilling stripping, trenching and associated assays D Rehabilitation

Work Type

^M-VCI-.. ft'tVj. . tt,-..-. ^*, -^J':-. H-LE-M. If -.-.L. /.y,'

DatecWork From To ^ -. -) Porformed DayfTf | Month f 'Z. l Yew /-(''i J D*y/^! Mw5T j Year /' y '-f ^

Global Portioning System Data (if avatobte) Township/Arae / - "~T t r- til i, K-tn ; i":, .u/i y i

MorG-PtonNumbtr , ^ -1

^ " *t C 1 0

Office UseCommodity

Total S Value of ^ ^Work Claimed ? ^.^.^.^B^^

NTS Reference0

Mining Division ~~P 4 rv\ trfiuiA' r\ \ \ l \ f C'^*- f?'~ ''^ ^Resident Geologist -T - !District //' /;^ ^ci *. 'j

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name

( -v.. Jv.-vxc. f '..-.. t L-.Address , . -, .

•' ~i h^ic^ s f W , ./A /..-,-. t ,/!,, iName 7

Address

Name

Address

Telephone Number

Fax Number ,, f/OOi )^ -^L/Y

Telephone Number

Fax Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

4. Certification by Recorl, ___ yC ̂ r./-//? ̂ O

nt, do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in

(Print Nairn)

this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.Signature of Recorded

Agent's Address Telephone Number

Date

Fax Number

0241 (03*7)

RECEIVEDFEB 20 1998

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT ______ OFFIQF

FEB 19

M.C. EXPLORATION INC 7852358938 P. 84

x*4rtc to b* recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned lo claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining

r where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link must accompany this' X ~- '

'Mining Claim Number. OrH wofM WVA oonc 9t\ oWwr dM0iDw mHnotand, thowlntNe

oolunin the locBdoo number Indicated on me cMm (nep.

eg

9

g

i

2

3

4

S

6

7

t

1

10

11

12

13

14

ts

TB7827

1234567

1234S68

11112.71IZI12.18I2.ll2.ft

ILlJ2-#i1 2.137. f 2.1? f3?J(3/2./I2J71-LtlT.fSIZ.l33(,X/za^vo J12JL,1 V oCi^Zm/V12.2-VfS^yi. 2.8^5?

Column Totals

,. &/CHA&1)

Mumper of Ctatn

16 ne

12

2

fa

' /fc

/t

(k

f 4Rf k

- t t.lij

(SIfIS

' IO

ft

Velu* of work

eMm or other nwwiQ nnd.

txjas0

t 8.892

5i\L7459r^SJinitt/007

0703V2.^75"

00

^?o5o'JW

7(62S"0f0

72.^IT/5VV

VeJueolwvik

cWffl.

N/A

J24.000

* 4.000

5COO

fi ^flL)

S-600

fi V0 3D VO 0

fc *f DO

6 SoOCi foo5600fi 000

fe ooo

2^q 0 4

^ ^i/O"?

Value of work intoned to other mtnlrio cMrriv*

S24.000

0

0

Ik

(y JV

3f 05Z5VC.

l/ U

72HS

BwCVelueor worktoetoietilbuled eteMuredate

S2.S2S

0

V4.892

0 y/ix O t .. .,... , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible uruter

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 8/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim

where the work was done. x-,/y_____y

Signetur"55T

6. li

~t~rins for cutting back credits that ara not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check (O in the boxes below to show how you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

a 1 . Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as Indicated.

tsf 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration, or

P 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not Indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use Only—^-—————.————-—Received Stomp

1 (OMIT)

RECEIVEDAPR C 2 12S3 ^

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT QrrtCr ,

Deemed Approved Od*

D*te Approved

Date Notification Sent

Tot* Vilus at Credit Approved

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Slgneture)

ftPR 02 '98 1 1:39 7052358038 PflGE.04

M. C. tXHLURtn l ON INC ("0523518038 P. 05

.Irk to b* recorded and distributed. Work can only b* assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining .tfhere work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous Pnk must accompany this

X* U)rffa &VJ*' Mining CUkn Nurnber. Or If

work wee done on other eagfete ntinaig land, ahuw In Ihl*

column tie location number Mealed on Hw cajkn map

g

eg

g

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

S

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TB7B27

1234587

1234SS6

\?2 S^dO

\jL-2-Si o l

Column Totelt

Number of CKkn Unite. For othermining lend, Bel hectere*

16 hi

12

2

/6-

ICV

?^

parfennaol on Ml dakn or ether mMrvhmd.

S28,t2S

0

S 8,882

SC2?

5736

5 /O 765^

VeHMofwoni applied lo WecWfTV

N/A

*24,000

S 4,000

f)

n

0

VehMOIwofk aulgned to otherirtnJnj clelnia.

S24.000

0

0

JfeZT*5( 1L

11676?

tobedaoftuud tt* future date

12.825

0

44.892

XtCHtitfd

ir

, do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible underprM Ft* New)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 8/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim

where the work was done.

Date

8. Instructions for cutting back credit* that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed In this declaration may be cut back. Please check (O in the boxes below to show how you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

Q 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as Indicated.

B^aTCredits are to be cut back starting whh the claims listed last, working backwards; or

O 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or

D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use Only _________ ___Received Stamp

RECEIVEDAPR 02 1838 ^y1

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICF

Oomed Approved Date

Od* Approved

Date Notifloallen Sent

Total Velue of Cradk Approved

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)

flPR 02 '98 11=40 7052359038 PPGE.05

M.C. EXPLORATION INC 7052358058 P. 03

Ontario MnbwyotNortnemC

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Mumver (oWee uee)

Pereon*! Information collected on IN* form le obtained under Ine euthorty or auMecOon e (l) of In* MMtement woik Regulation 6/98 Under eectKm 8 of irm Mining Ad Mi Information Is a public record. This WarmaUon wu be UMd to review trie nieument work and correspond wth In* mining land holder Ouetttoru evoiX Ihb oolliclion ehnoW be directed to l Provkwdl Mining Recofdef. MMeliy of Northern Development ind Mine*. 3rd Floor, 933 Rimeey Lake Road. Sudbury. Ontario. P36 685

Work Type

L lf\e e u.fffJiM —

t\A Q y" i 6t**ojfvi'' r /^KVPw

ItffiM inM*yIP 4 LH/ V* x./

'

Unite of workDepending on ttw type of work, M Vie number of houra/dey* worked, metres or drilling, kitomettM or grid In*, number of tempta, etc.

/f&.^T/i 6.^2-5

, 5-/.0

5"AyJ

f

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

K^i/osr flSt pASijiiBnIII

Transportation Costs

Food and Lodging Costs ' -

Coit Per Unit of work

y^v/4*,^ ILO/L*f ft'/A-*tftoo/J^

l

4 ISOff

- *

Total Value of Assessment Work

ToUl Coct

V7M7/^ J5GItitWg 000

i /Too

;

ZZtDl

V

Calculations of Filing Discounts:

1. Work Tiled within two years of performance is claimed at 10034 of the above Total Value of Assessment Work2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 50"A of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x OSO Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:Work older than S years is not eligible for credit.A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement or costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/darificalion. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying costs:

_______ ______________, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may reasonablyfpfoua prirtf fafl mm*)

be determined and the costs were Incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on the accompanying

Declaration of Work form as.(r*ewd*f hofdv, •g**, or tut* aontftnf tar Hw *flh

l am authorized to make this certificalion.

031210*17) RECEIVERAPR 0 2 1SS3 \\

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICF

PPR 02 '98 11=38 7052359038 PflGE.03

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Mlnlstere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

May 7, 1998

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD. 141 ADELAIDE ST. W. SUITE 1703 TORONTO, ONTARIO M5H-3L5

OntarioGeoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888)415-9846 Fax: (705) 670-5881

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .18132

W9860.00125Status

Deemed Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at benetest@epo.gov.on.ca or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 12198

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .18132

Date Correspondence Sent: May 07, 1998 AssessonSteve Beneteau

Transaction First Claim Number NumberW9860.00125 1213277

Section:14 Geophysical IP 14 Geophysical EM 14 Geophysical MAG

Township(s) l Area(s)CARMAN

StatusDeemed Approval

Approval DateMay 05,1998

Correspondence to:Resident Geologist South Porcupine, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Richard DaigleSOUTH PORCUPINE, ONTARIO, CANADA

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD. TORONTO, ONTARIO

LARRY NOEL GERVAIS TIMMINS, ONTARIO

DENIS J. MERCIER TIMMINS, Ontario

GHISLAIN ALBERT GERVAIS TIMMINS, Ontario

ISAAC ALEXANDER NEIL MAC SCHUMACHER, Ontario

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 12198