Rubric for Quiz on Superlative, 2s 2012 English Phonetics

7/31/2019 Rubric for Quiz on Superlative, 2s 2012 English Phonetics

1/1

POINTS

ASPECTS

OVERALL ORAL

PRONUNCIATION

Overall production of english

language, consonant & vowelsounds, is perfectly executed and if

pronunciation mistakes appear in

the s's speech they don't hamper

communication; there is very little, if

none, effort from the other person

to understand s's speech.


language is generally well-executed

and with a few pronunciation

mistakes in the s's speech; sucherrors, though, don't affect

communication so much; there is

some effort from the other person

to understand s's speech, but speech

is generally well interpreted by

interlocutors even if there is no

effort to make out s's oral

performance.


language is somewhat inefficiently

executed and with major presence

of mistakes in the s's speech; such

errors affect communication in a

way that it takes some effort from

the other to make out s's speech.


language is very badly executed and

with lots of pronunciation mistakes

in the s's speech; such errors affect

communication so much that

interlocutors must exercise a lot of

effort to understand s's speech.

Overall production of english language is

not executed at all; communication does

not take place since s's speech is

severely affected by pronunciation

mistakes. Even if interlocutors make a

lot of effort to understand s's speech, it

turns out to be hardly productive. Or it

might be the case that student(s) do not

present anything at all. Student(s) do not

respond to teacher's and peers'

questions.

ENGLISH

LANGUAGE

FLUENCY &

INTONATION

Overall performance of english

language fluency & intonation is

executed with a very high level of

attainment. There might be few

minor discrepancies related to

fluency but such do not seem to

affect the main communicative

message entailed in the sketch.



executed with a generally well level

of attainment. There is a few minor

mistakes and discrepancies related

to fluency but such do not affect the

main communicative message

entailed in the sketch majorly.



executed with a low and mediocre

level of attainment. There are some

errors and discrepancies related to

fluency and such affect the main

communicative message entailed in

the sketch.



executed with a very low and

mediocrily high level of attainment.

There are so many errors and

discrepancies related to fluency that

they do affect the main

communicative message entailed in

the sketch.

Overall production of english language

fluency & intonation is not executed at

all; message entailed in sketch is so

severely affected by such lack of control

of fluency and intonation. There is also

no level of fluency and no level of

intonation achieved at all in the

student's performance.

LEVEL OF

SYNCHRONICITY

BETWEEN SPEECH

AND MAJOR

ACTIONS

There is the maximum level of

synchronicity (95-100%) between

the students' speech and the actions

indicated in the sketch. All

innuendos of language

communication have been efficiently

covered, particularly the sense of

irony and humour implicitly

incorporated in the sketch.

There is a satisfactory level of

coherence between the students'

suggested location for prominence

and the actual oral realization of

such proposal in this test (70-89%).

There are some discrepancies in the

location of such prominences that it

takes some effort from the teacher

to detect prominent syllables.

Groups are pronounced satisfactorily

well, though there are some

discrepancies in terms of the

separation of such units.

There is an inefficienty level of





There are lots of discrepancies in the

location of such prominences that it

takes a lot of effort from the teacher

to detect prominent syllables.

Groups are pronounced inefficiently

for there are lots of discrepancies in

terms of the separation of such

units.

There is a very bad level of





There are too many discrepancies in

the location of such prominences

that, even if teacher makes a lot of

effort to detect prominent syllables,

message is still unclear. Groups are

pronounced ia very bad way for

there are too many discrepancies in

terms of the separation of such

units.

There is no level of coherence between

the students' suggested location for

prominence and the actual oral

realization of such proposal in this test

(0-19%). There is no prominence

detected that speech sounds rather flat

and with lots of fluency flaws. Student

does not produce anything related to

the objectives of such test, or s/he is

absent without an officially justified

note. Fluency, therefore, has not been

able to be assessed.

NOTE: THE ADMINISTRATION OF THIS QUIZ WILL FULFILL TE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1) PAIRS ARE SUPPOSED TO PRESENT ON THE DAY

ASSIGNED, 2) MAXIMUM GRADE ATTAIN INDIVIDUALLY WILL BE 3,5 I F THE OTHER PAIR DOES NOT SHOW UP, & AND IN GROUP ASSESSMENT, THE

GRADE WILL BE 1,0 SINCE SYNCHRONICITY CAN NOT OBSERVED.

0

ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY: SUPRASEGMENTS, II SEMESTER OF 2012

RUBRIC FOR "SUPERLATIVE" QUIZ: SPEECH & ACTING OUT

4 3 2 1

Documents

Rubric for Quiz on Superlative, 2s 2012 English Phonetics