23
Today Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs. human language Please write down this url: http://media.animal.discovery.com/fansites/ petstar/videogallery/season3/ep309_winner.html Readings: 1.3,1.4;2.1-2.4

Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Today Rules, Linguistic competence vs.

linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs.

human language Please write down this url: http://media.animal.discovery.com/fansites/ petstar/videogallery/season3/ep309_winner.html

Readings: 1.3,1.4;2.1-2.4

Page 2: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Linguistic competence What we know when we ‘know’ a

language. This knowledge is largely unconscious

Page 3: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

How do we study linguisticcompetence?

By observing aspeaker’s linguistic

performance.

Page 4: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Grammar Descriptive grammar

Describes the rules that govern what peopledo or can say (their “mental grammar”)

Prescriptive grammar Prescribes rules governing what people

should/shouldn’t say

Page 5: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Prescriptive rules“Don’t end a sentence w/

preposition!”“Don’t split infinitives!”“Don’t use double negatives!”

Page 6: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Descriptive rules are linguists’ attempt torepresent your mental grammar.Descriptive rules are natural, followedintuitively, need not be taught

Prescriptive rules are not natural, must belearned by rote (in school)

Page 7: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

language vs. communication

Page 8: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Design features Charles Hockett (1960) Characterize language, distinguish it from

other communication systems If a system lacks even one feature, it is

communication, not language

Page 9: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Design features

Discreteness Arbitrariness Cultural transmission Displacement Interchangeability Productivity

Page 10: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Discreteness Larger, complex messages can be broken

down into smaller, discrete parts

e.g., [pat][tap]

[apt]

pa t

Page 11: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Arbitrariness There is no (necessary) connection

between the form of signal and itsmeaninge.g., ‘whale’ is small word for big animal,

‘microorganism’ is just the reverse

Page 12: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Cultural transmission At least some aspect of communication

system is learned from other users

e.g., child of French-speaking parents will learn French

Page 13: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Displacement Ability to talk about things not present in

space or time

e.g.,

Page 14: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Interchangeability A user can both receive and broadcast

the same signal

e.g., speaker can be listener and vice versa

Page 15: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Productivity Speakers can create infinite number of

novel utterances that others canunderstand

e.g., “Little purple gnomes living in my sock drawersaid, ‘Elvis lives’.”

Elvislives!!

/

Page 16: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Vervet monkeys 3 alarm calls for different predators

‘snake’ ‘eagle’ ‘leopard’http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/media/vervetcalls.html

Young vervets make mistakes

Page 17: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Vervet communication Yes:

Arbitrariness, Cultural transmission,Interchangeability

No: Displacement, Productivity, Discreteness

Page 18: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

‘Einstein’ the parrot At home: Watch the following clip of Einstein

the parrot

http://media.animal.discovery.com/fansites/petstar/videogallery/season3/ep309_winner.html

What design features does he exhibit / fail toexhibit?

Page 19: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Multidimensionality Human language consists of several

levels or dimensions of knowledge used by linguists to separate language

into areas of study not entirely “modular” or discrete (e.g.,

phonetics and phonology inform each other)

Page 20: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Core Subfields Phonology: the study of how speech

sounds pattern and how they areorganized (i.e., the sound system)

e.g., art, *rta (where ‘*’ = ungrammatical)

Page 21: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Core Subfields Morphology: the study of the formation

of words.

e.g., unhappiness un-happy-ness

Page 22: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Core Subfields Syntax: the study of the structure of

sentences.

e.g., She hit the man with a hammer.

Page 23: Rules, Linguistic competence vs. linguistic performance Design features Animal communication vs

Core Subfields Semantics: the study of meaning in

language.

Pragmatics: the study of how linguisticmeaning depends on context.