Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rumi’s poem and Songs of Solomon: Tracing the themes of ‘Spirituality’ and
‘Romanticism’
Shivani A. Damle
Prachi Jain
PG Research Scholars,
CHRIST (Deemed to be) University,
Bangalore, Karnataka,
India.
ABSTRACT
While reading the poems of Rumi, one often wonders at the
depth of the words used by him in a single stanza. Many
people read differently into his works. Some consider it as
love poems, others think of it as a philosophical or spiritual
poem. Similar confusions one might find in the Songs of
Solomon as well. Thus, it can be said that there exists
similarities in the works of these two poets: Rumi and
Solomon; which leads to the question of how these
similarities are portrayed in the works of the two poets and
in which aspects. Thus, this paper aims to find and establish
the similarities between these two poets of different
religions, time-zones and ideologies by conducting a
comparative study of Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi by Rumi
and the Songs of Solomon from the Old Testament and
carrying out a thematic analysis of these works. Through
the literature review and the research conducted, it can be
said that the themes of ‘Spirituality’ and ‘Romanticism’ are
intermingled in the two selected primary texts.
KEYWORDS: Rumi, Songs of Solomon, Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi, Spirituality,
Romanticism
Introduction:
The 21st century world is way more advanced than the ages where the scriptures and
philosophical texts were written and yet they have a tendency to be timeless. Now the
concept of globalization is as inherent in our lives as the word individualism. And therefore,
with the freedom this concept gives, it is possible to study world literatures across the globe.
344
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
This paper deals with a work of the Persian literature and how it is reflected upon in relation
to the hermeneutics of another work in Catholic literature through a comparative study.
Though both the literatures deal heavily with the theme of spirituality, there are other less
known interpretations too that are latent in them. There exists yet another striking point of
contact between these literatures, and that is the style and way in which a few writers have
portrayed their intention. These writers have debunked the idea that spirituality can be taught
only through a didactic medium or only through the rigid structures of religion using jargons
which even the people of the same religion will find it difficult to understand. These writers
have shown, through „romanticism‟, the way of spirituality using simple yet aphoristic
language. Thus, this paper seeks to pave a bridge between the two notions of „romanticism‟
and „Sufism‟ or „spirituality‟; which has been looked upon as two disparate domains in
general by the researchers.
Jalal –ud-din Rumi (1207-1273) wrote the Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi. Now there exists a
dualism where in the text is written by a Sufi saint but about separation and loss of his friend
and mentor, Shams Tabrizi. So this is where the paper functions in realizing that Rumi, while
writing about love, was explaining how to attain the „Eternal soul and being‟; because for
him, the aspect of love and romanticism is no more different from Sufism. Rumi's reference
to God is always deeply personal. Whereas the Song of Solomon from the Old Testament in
the Bible, literally, gives the notion of it being a love song between two lovers; but
figuratively, it actually gives a spiritual analogy between the Church and Christ as the
masculine and feminine.
Therefore, it is apparent that these two afore mentioned texts, though belonging from two
different literatures of the world, do show similarities in a few ideologies, the way of writing
and its portrayal. Of all the articles studied so far, one which compares these two spiritual
texts of dissimilar religion but possessing similar views on spirituality, which is through
345
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
romanticism; were not to be found. This paper tries to address these issues and this will make
a background study for those who aspire to take it up further to compare and contrast other
texts from various religious sects.
Establishing the definitions of the key terms used in the paper is essential. „Romanticism‟, as
is understood in a literature class in general is, as a movement of art and in literature during
the 1700s which was opposed to the classical age before that. But in the research paper, the
term „romanticism‟ is not in relation to the art movement, but is referred as a noun form to
the word „romance‟. „Romance‟ came down from romanz in Old French which very
generically means an intimate relationship shared by two people. Many terms can be
associated with romance, such as attachment, idealized love, that which is pure and beautiful,
a mysterious and exciting feeling, etc. These are the terms that are considered through
analysing the works of Rumi and Solomon.
The term „spirituality‟ is as is known to all, the noun form of spirit and refers to anything that
is not pertaining to the material world, earthly matters and such. It also refers to the
connection between man and God. In the paper, the terms „spiritual‟ and „religious‟ are not
analysed; though these words are used at places in the paper.
Thesis Statement:
A Comparative Study between Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi by Rumi and the Songs of
Solomon: Tracing the Themes of „Spirituality‟ and „Romanticism‟ Intermingled in these
Texts and to Prove the Similarities between these Two Poets through their Representation of
these Themes, through a Thematic Analysis.
346
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Literature Review:
Through all the articles reviewed so far, there is a similar thread that runs through all of them,
which is that the work written by Rumi, Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi, was trying to make the
readers understand something that is very elated from the normal teachings about love. It
talks about how through the path of love, the „Beloved‟ or the God could be attained.
Similarly, in the article reviewed about the Song of Solomon, the article points out to a poem
or verses which are no more than a love song that king Solomon composes for a girl he loves;
but there exists a deeper meaning to it that just being a lyrical love song because it is involved
in a religious text, the Bible, where there might not be place for a common lover‟s songs.
Thus, the reason is established behind its inclusion in the Bible that because there exists an
allegorical meaning to it also. The interpretation is described verse by verse in Matthew
Henry‟s paraphrase to the Song of Solomon, which says that the song actually talks about the
love between Christ as a masculine entity and the Church as a feminine one.
Though the research papers support the claim of achieving spirituality through romanticism
of various forms, they only support the individual poets at a time. Thus, the research paper to
be published based on this literature review and other articles to be read further about the
topic, intends to cater to the comparative studies from the point of „spirituality and Sufism‟
through „romanticism‟ of the two texts only, which are the Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi and the
Song of Solomon from the Old Testament of the Bible, since this particular research has not
been found so far.
The given example is the first one to deal with the thematic analysis from Rumi‟s poetry:
I once had a thousand desires
but in my one desire to know you
all else melts away. (Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi)
347
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
In the quote, Rumi is addressing Shams of Tabriz, his friend and mentor, by saying that Rumi
himself had a thousand worldly desires, such as maintaining the decorum of the society as his
father would have done. But when he met Shams, he started to let go of such ephemeral
positions in society that ultimately have no value in an individual‟s life. Though this quote
seems to be love poetry at a glance, research has enabled the readers to read out other
interpretations as well for the works of Rumi. Another interpretation too is as evident as the
first one is. The fact that Shams came into Rumi‟s life as a mentor, plays a vital role. It was
Shams who had guided the Sufi poet Rumi into the path of God. And the quote might as well
be read as; those trivial desires all melted away, once Rumi was bestowed with the
knowledge of God and was kindled with a desire to know Him.
Panjwani in her research paper titled „Rumi and Donne, Comparative Reflections‟ reiterates
this observation and adds by saying that for Rumi, love was everything; right from being
religion to madness, from universal intellect to a creative force. For Rumi, love is the source
of Divinity and Beyond.
Thus, we see that for Rumi, love becomes „God and beyond‟.
Similarly, in the Songs of Solomon, through the description of the girl and Christ, we can see
that it talks about spiritual aspects through the love poem.
He: Your neck is like the tower of David,
built with courses of stone (Song 4)
The poem continues with the praise and He (Christ) says to the girl that she is beautiful and is
flawless. Even though Songs of Solomon is a song of praise between two lovers, as is evident
through the selected quote; there has to be a reason as to why such a text is placed in the
Bible. Here comes in another interpretation which draws parallels between the love of
Solomon and the girl with the love between Christ and the Church. Even the usage of words
such as „tower‟, built with stone‟ depicts some of the aspects of a church as is seen in the
348
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
quote. Thus, this love song becomes the relation between the two pairs; Solomon and his
beloved as well as Christ and the Church.
There are many interpretations on how there are links found between Christ and the Church
through the Songs of Solomon. Quinn in his paper, states similarly that the Shepherd or the
Groom is made in the figure, or image of Jesus, whereas the girl from Shulam, the Shulamite
maiden is made in the image of the Church. He goes on to say that the relation between
Solomon and the girl in the song is as strong as the relation between Christ and Church. In a
figurative sense, this also means that the relation is eternal as is Jesus and as well-built as the
foundation of the Church. This also signifies that in spite of the obstacles that come in the
lives of Solomon and the girl from Shulam, they both stand sturdy against them all, just like
the image in which they are built.
Through these examples, it can be seen that the two different texts; in terms of authors of
different religions and time, had both used allegorical and parable like literary devices to
portray their true and latent intentions. Thus, through comparison of the two selected
examples, it becomes evident that both the poets have used the path of romanticism to attain
spirituality. Thus, it proves the claim that both the poets, in spite of belonging to two different
religions; had similar ideology in terms of their belief that romanticism was the way in which
one could reach spirituality.
The following example is specifically looking at the imagery of flame and light as used in the
two texts. There are instances when Shams and Christ are looked upon as a/the source of light
in Rumi‟s and other people‟s lives.
From your majestic bright face
The flame lighting my place (Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi 4)
349
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
The stanza is addressed to Shams. Rumi implies that Shams‟ presence in his life is like a
flame that lightens every corners of the dark room. It implies that it is an enlightening
experience to have Shams in his otherwise dull or ignorant life.
The same stanza here can be interpreted as addressed to God. It could be said that the divine
presence brings light in ones‟ life. Many have viewed God as their guiding „light‟ in their
lives. The ancient people used to believe the same about God. Peter Enns is a senior member
of biblical studies at BioLogos Foundation. He has observed in the article, Science vs. The
Bible, that the meaning as given in the Genesis is that which talks about the God of Israel,
who is so powerful that He doesn‟t need a sun, moon or the stars to light up the day. His own
light is sufficient to light up the entire cosmos. This again may be considered as a source that
also claims that God is light, and that everything around Him seems bright because of His
presence.
In Rumi‟s poetry, Shams is always portrayed as a guide, who is there to spread Allah‟s love
towards the mankind. „Shams‟ stands for the “Sun” in Arabic, literally; thus, Shams was a
sun in the true sense, as well as in the referential sense. Rumi as well, looked at Shams as
though he was the Light of the Sun personified, who was there to guide him (Rumi) to follow
the right path and to dispel the darkness of his heart, mind, body and soul.
These statements prove that God can be said to be synonymous to light just like Rumi finds
Shams‟ presence to be filled with light.
...fair as the moon, bright as the sun,
majestic as the stars in procession... (Song 6:10)
Here, the Church, or the bride is being addressed to as being fair as the moon, which
ultimately borrows its light from the sun, which can be represented as Christ or being
synonymous to Him.
350
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Matthew Henry provides extensive commentaries on the theological works and is referred to
through the entire paper as well for commentaries on Songs of Solomon. He gives another
perspective for the chosen couplet above. He says that even though the moon is fair, it still
has its own eclipses and spots. Even though the moon does shine, but that is a borrowed light
from the Sun and shines only when it is dark. Sun here, refers to Christ again and he says that
when the moon will be „perfected in the glory‟ and reach a stature as high as that of the
Sun/Christ and is finally ready to receive the Christ; then the moon-like Church, will be
embraced and clothed by the Sun, which is Christ.
Thus, it is evident through the elucidated examples, that both the poets view God as light in
their lives, one that brings hope and brightness into ones‟ life. Their belief about thinking
God to be synonymous to light proves that their notions about their respective Gods are
similar to each others‟, in spite of their different religious beliefs, and this too they prove
through intermingled themes of romanticism and spirituality. The stanzas appear as though
they are love poems, but their intention must have been to convey the path that ultimately
leads to God.
In such revealing nights I swoon
The night when beloved is in our midst
A night as revealing as a hundred high noon.
(Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi 6)
In this stanza, the focus is on spending as much time with the „beloved‟ as possible. In the
poem, Rumi has addressed this to Shams but the intention is that the more time they spend
together, the more „revealing‟ gets the night; which means gaining more insight into the
Eternal, getting enlightened by the master about the Almighty. The last line of the stanza
351
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
again refers to this one night being „revealing‟ with spiritually filled talks and discussions.
For Rumi, this one night was equal to the hundred „high noon‟ that he could have spent with
others; because the spiritual knowledge that Shams had, Rumi found that even a hundred
days spent with a scholar would not have matched and sufficed.
Smolovits in his article titled „Rumi Poet of the Heart‟, writes about the time Rumi and
Shams used to spend together alone. He says that while they were thus secluded from the
world, they would engage in sohbet which means „mystical conversations‟. Another Rumi
scholar and a translator of his works, Andrew Harvey, says that Rumi‟s heart and his whole
being was transformed massively; which was actually a result of the transmission of
knowledge and enlightenment from Shams to Rumi, during these secluded hours spent
together. He also gives a reason stating why Shams was so eager to transfer his knowledge to
Rumi. He tells that Shams had come to know that very little time was left with him and that
for some reason or the other, he would be separated from Rumi.
In the many biographies on Rumi, one said that Shams was in search of an apprentice whose
spirit was already rekindled by the divine touch and was just in need of someone to direct
him on to the right path. Thus, when Shams found Rumi, he would always try to engage him
in such spiritual talks so that the revelations that Shams felt himself responsible for, to
transmit to Rumi, would be strongly ingrained in him, before their time together gets spent
up. Also, in Sufism, it is considered the duty and responsibility of the pir or the spiritual
master to pass on the knowledge to his spiritual disciple.
She: Come, my beloved, let us go to the countryside,
let us spend the night in the villages (Song 7:11)
352
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Here, the lover is eager to spend time with her beloved. This constitutes the romantic aspect
of the poem, whereas the connotated meaning is that the bride or the Church, the believing
soul, is eager to spend time with her „beloved‟ Christ. Here too the underlying meaning is to
depict the eagerness of a devotee to spend time with the master.
Henry in his commentaries on the Songs of Solomon, also holds a similar view. He explains
the spiritual aspect of the love couplet. He explains that the girl is eager to spend the night
with her Beloved because she earnestly desires a communion with Christ, her Beloved. She
eagerly wants to spend time with her Beloved, to receive consul, comfort, instruction and also
wants to spell her grievances to Him, without any interruptions from the world; which here
establishes a two dimensional world: one that is the material world, and the other that is in the
presence of Christ, a spiritual world.
Another aspect to be observed in the couplet, says Henry, is her desire to stay longer in the
company of her Beloved. Through this, he alludes to the blessed Paul, who in a similar
manner desired more and more the company and knowledge of Christ.
Through these examples, it can be observed that both the poets have written about a lover
desiring more time with his/her beloved, who crave the other‟s presence and this becomes the
surface level meaning. Through this, Rumi and the Shulamite girl, both try to portray their
eagerness to be closer to God, be it through talking with one‟s mentor, or be it with being in
the presence of Christ Himself. Thus, it can be seen that through romanticism, these poets are
talking about spirituality.
The next comparison between the two poets consists of their usage of the symbol of wine in
their poetries.
What is cup-bearer and wine, if not divine
In the kitchen of heart we can wine and dine
353
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
The whole town can smell such aromatic sign.
(Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi 21)
Here, the cup-bearer becomes Rumi himself and the wine is Shams and Rumi says that this
union of the cup-bearer and the wine is a divine union. Here, he clearly establishes that he is
not writing about the material and worldly love but of a divine kind of love; thereby
establishing the inter-woven nature of his poetries between romanticism and divinity. The
next lines represent that „wine‟ or a symbol for the love of God will be served which will be
beneficial for the whole town as its aroma will spread around. Usually in Ghazal Poetries,
wine is seen as a symbol of the „Love of God‟ personified. Thus, here as well, it can clearly
be seen that Rumi is trying to portray Shams in a light that makes him the one who is there to
spread the love of God, not just to Rumi, but to the whole town as well.
She: May the wine go straight to my beloved,
flowing gently over lips and teeth. (Song 7:9)
In this stanza, Solomon deals with the symbol of wine, just the way Rumi did in the previous
example. The previous lines of the song are conveying how Solomon is adoring the
Shulamite girl and compares her breasts to that of a cluster of grapes, he says that the
fragrance of her breath is like apples and that her mouth tastes as the best wine. To which the
girl willingly offers herself to Solomon.
Here, the allegorical sense is stated clearly by Henry, that Christ is pleased by the words that
are flowing as sweetly as wine from the girl‟s mouth about spiritual taste. This also
symbolizes the communion with God and how sweet that communion is. Thus, wine is the
354
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
medium through which God‟s love is gained by the Shulamite maiden, and is also an image
of the communion with God.
Therefore, wine becomes a symbol of divinity, because it is portrayed as a medium to spread
the love and knowledge of God, so that the people can gain Christ.
Through this reference, the interpretations become clear as to how wine is used as a symbol
to achieve the „spiritual taste‟. Thus, it can be said that both the poets have used wine in a
semi-erotic and romantic way as a symbol which ultimately is shown as a path to divinity or
spirituality.
O Pride of Tabriz...
...where can I find a better friend?
(Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi 28)
Shams of Tabriz was a Pir, a guide and a mentor for Rumi and he addresses Shams as his
very close friend as well. This can even be a verse which similarly addresses God because
Rumi uses personal names for Him as well, such as the „Beloved‟. In the Ghazal poetry also,
there is a mention that the beloved, yar (a friend), is generally used to indicate and refer to
God.
Graham Billy in his article named „Friends with God‟ says that God had actually created
humans so that they could be His friends. He traces this saying back to the time when Adam
and Eve were created. He believes that this divine plan of humans being friends with God had
its origin in the Love of God. But he remarks that this friendship was a different kind of
friendship because usually, we choose friends who belong to the same class with similar
ideologies. Therefore, he says that God and Adam were unequal in such terms. He says that
God was the one who created this universe and Adam was one of His creations; God was
355
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
infinite and Adam was finite; God was self-sufficient, whereas Adam was the one who
depended on Him. In spite of all such vast differences, Graham notes that God still wanted to
be friends with Adam and Eve.
It is noteworthy, just as the way Graham says that God was independent and man was
dependent on Him, Rumi was also dependent on Shams and in a way, Shams was his creator
and Rumi was the creation. This also bears resemblance with the mentor – disciple kind of relationship which
Shams and Rumi had for each other.
Similarly, in the Song of Songs, a corresponding treatment is seen where the maiden is addressing to her beloved.
This is my beloved, this is my friend,
daughters of Jerusalem. (Song 5:16)
It can be observed that the maiden is time and again referring to Christ as „my/mine‟. As per
the gospel-covenant, mine stands for „mine in every sense and way possible‟. Mine also
means that she needs Him for her soul to be pure. It also means that by stating Christ as mine,
she has surrendered herself entirely to Him.
According to Henry, those who believe God to be their friend, are the ones who truly receive
His Grace and those who love Him, He in turn loves them immensely.
Here too, the Church, the lover, the Bride and Believer calls Christ her „beloved and friend‟,
both personal and subjective addresses.
Thus, it can be seen that both the poets consider God as their „Beloved‟ and „Friend‟, which
draws similarities between both of them, yet again. They both have a personal approach to
God, as opposed to the Objective approach to keeping God on a high pedestal and fearing
Him instead. It is noteworthy that even in Old Testament, such a personal and subjective
356
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
label is given to God, although notions of God were different in those times as opposed to the
New Testament, where there are more frequent usage of personal attributes for God.
After all such comparisons made between the two works of romance and spirituality, there
are a few differences as well that were noted.
Love, beauty, grace, goodness, passion
Fear not, fear not, enter this realm of the Wise
(Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi 17)
Along with talking about „love‟ and „spirituality‟, Rumi also talks about being Wise, about
gaining the knowledge and enlightenment about God.
This aspect of a call to be wise is not to be seen in the Songs of Solomon, at least in the text
per say. Through the entire set of poems, it is observed that there is just praises for the lover
and the Beloved; Christ and the Church.
This observation leads to the dissimilarities portrayed in the two selected texts, thus it goes
against the thesis statement which tries to portray the similarities between the two poets of
different religions and even though this paper focuses on just the two aspects of
„romanticism‟ and „spirituality‟, the aspect of „wisdom‟ is relative to both the themes, but is
only dealt by Rumi and is not present in the Songs of Solomon.
But, the major themes that the paper focuses on are the themes of „romanticism‟ and
„spirituality‟ and there are many relative terms that fall under these umbrella terms. Though
the Songs do not look at the aspect of Wisdom literally, it talks about it at a hermeneutics
level. And also it looks at the rest of the aspects of spirituality which are mentioned in the
above given example. The Songs does talk about beauty, grace, passion and other such
aspects related to God-believer relationship.
357
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Thus, it is reasonable to say that even though differences exist in both the texts, and thus,
between both the poets; it can be seen as an exception to the norm which is not that
significant either because only the relative themes are different; the major themes that are
dealt with for this paper, are treated in a similar manner by both the poets, thus, reiterating the
fact that both the poets have used the themes of „romanticism‟ and „spirituality‟ intermingled
in their works.
Conclusion:
After the research is conducted, it can be said that dealing with the allegorical style, both the
poets have used to convey their intentions, not having chosen the direct path to express
themselves. Both of them consider God to be synonymous with light, here as well their
association with God matches. Both the poems show instances of the desire to spend more
and more time with and in company of God, thus, the desires are similar that they both want
to spend time with their „Beloved‟. The treatment of wine as a symbol to denote a path to
God and having a personal relation with the divine also shows the way the poets have treated
God very subjectively. For them, God is like a friend. All these depictions in the two texts
point to the similarities between the two poets that too confining to their treatment of the two
themes of „romanticism‟ and „spirituality‟, as there are many aspects to look at these themes,
and these are just a few among those many representations of „love‟ and God.
This research paper only looks at the treatment of the themes of „romanticism‟ and
„spirituality‟ intertwined in the texts. But there are many ways in which texts can be
interpreted. In case of these two texts, the portrayal of women is also a part that can be well
researched into, as both the texts do have female characters. In the same way, any two texts
of these two religions can be compared to show similarities or dissimilarities within them.
358
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
In conclusion, it could be clearly stated that the two primary texts; Diwan-e-Shams-e-Tabrizi
by Jalal –ud-din Rumi and the Songs of Solomon from the Old Testament have shown
similarities in the treatment of their writing styles, similar ideas on God and ideologies in
association with the themes of „romanticism‟ and „spirituality‟.
REFERENCES:
‘Flame’ in the Bible. Knowing-Jesus.com
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/words/Flame
“The Unfailing Love Expressed in the Song of Solomon?”. Jehovah‟s Witnesses, January
2015
https://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20150115/unfailing-love-song-of-
solomon/
Ahmadi, Zahra. “„Love‟ in Mawlana Jalaluddin Mohammad Balkhi‟s (Rumi) Works”.
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, vol. 36, 1-6
file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/New%20folder/Sufism/Love_In_Mawlana_Jalaluddin_
Mohammad_Bal%20(1).pdf
Athanasios, Sideris. “Mevlana Celaleddin Rumi”. Encyclopedia of the Hellenic World, Asia
Minor
file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/New%20folder/Sufism/Mevlana_Celaleddin_Rumi_or_l
ove_as_theos.pdf
Dauzat, Albert; Jean Dubois, Henri Mitterand (1964), “romance”, in Nouveau dictionnaire
étymologique (in French), Paris: Librairie Larousse
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/romance#English
For the definition of „spirituality‟:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirituality
359
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Ghazal Poetry. Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project. Accessed on 1 March 2019.
https://www.al-islam.org/wine-love-mystical-poetry-imam-khomeini/ghazal-
poetry#wine-love
Graham, Billy. “Friends with God”. Faith Gateway. 21 February, 2018
https://www.faithgateway.com/friends-with-god/#.XHnSCtQzbIU
Green, Lauren. “Science vs. the Bible: Reconciling Genesis and the Big Bang.” Fox News, 2 June, 2010
https://www.foxnews.com/science/science-vs-the-bible-reconciling-genesis-and-thebig-
bang
Henry, Matthew. “MATTHEW HENRY'S COMMENTARY”. Bible Gateway, New
International Version, Accessed on: 1 March, 2019
https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/matthew-henry/Song-of-Solomon
Kaya, Cinar.”Rumi from the viewpoint of Spiritual Psychology and Counseling”. Spiritual
Psychology and Counseling, vol.1, Feb. 2016, 9-25, JSTOR
file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/New%20folder/Sufism/Rumi_from_the_Viewpoint_of_S
piritual_Psy.pdf
Omer, Spahic. “Sufism is not Mysticism”. Academia.edu
http://aboutislam.net/spirituality/authentic-sufism-sufism-is-not-mysticism/
Ozdemir, Ibrahim. “Creative love, nature and Mevlana Jalal-al-Din-Rumi”. Academia.edu,
Turkish Daily News, Dec. 14,2005
file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/New%20folder/Sufism/Creative_Love_and_Rumi.pdf
Panjwani, Zohra. “Rumi and Donne, Comparative reflections: Love, Sensibility and
Divinity”. Academia.edu
file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/Sufism_The_Way_of_the_Lover._Rumi_and_Do.pdf
360
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020
Qamber, Akhtar. “Rumi: mystsic extraordinary”. India International Centre Quarterly,
vol.28, no. 4, 152-163, JSTOR
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23005736?read-
now=1&refreqid=excelsior%3Ad4c49179b1ed68a32860fb3537897b03&seq=1#page_s
can_tab_contents
Shams’ first encounter with Rumi. Shams Tabrizi-Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shams_Tabrizi
Smolovits, Laz. “Rumi Poet of the Heart.” Islami City. 16 October, 2008
https://www.islamicity.org/3374/rumi-poet-of-the-heart/
Spanbock, Grace. “Rumi: In Love and Unity”. Writersalon Apr. 21, 2016
http://www.writersalon.com/literary_criticism/rumi-in-love-and-unity
Tasa, Tugay. “The Sufi Metaphysical thought in relation to Al- Muhasibi and Ibn-Arabi”.
Academia.edu
file:///C:/Users/USER/Desktop/New%20folder/Sufism/The_Su_fi_Metaphysical_Thou
ght_in_Relati.pdf
Contact Details:-
Shivani A. Damle: [email protected]
Prachi Jain: [email protected]
361
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2020