15
Ruthenium Catalysed Oxidations of Organic Compounds By Ernest S. Gore Johnson Matthey Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania Ruthenium and its complexes can be used to catalyse the oxidation, both homogeneous and heterogeneous, of a wide range of organic subs- trates. These include olefins, alkynes, arenes, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, ethers, sulphides, amines, and phosphines. A wide variety of oxidants can be used under mild conditions; conversions and selectivities are usually high, and the catalyst can be easily recovered. Ruthenium can also be used to catalyse the oxidative destruction of pollutants in both gas and liquid phases. The synthetic use of ruthenium tetroxide as an oxidant for organic compounds was first reported in I 95 3 by Djerassi and Engle (I). The scope of ruthenium oxidations was greatly expanded by Berkowitz and Rylander in 1958 (2). All of these early workers used ruthenium tetroxide as a stoichiometric oxidant; however, ruthenium tetroxide is rather inconvenient to use in this way. It is troublesome to prepare, expensive, and its strong oxidising power tends to make it less selective than other oxidants. Caution-ruthenium tetroxide is an extremely powerful and volatile oxidant; it should only be handled in a well ventilated area and when wearing appropriate protective clothing. Thus it is not surprising that work was soon initiated on using ruthenium in catalytic quantities in oxidation reactions. The first such use of ruthenium seems to have been in an obscure publication in 1956 (3). A more readily available report appeared in 1959 (4). The advantages of catalytic ruthenium oxidations over stoichiometric ruthenium tetroxide have proved to be so convincing that today virtually all ruthenium mediated oxidations are perfor- med catalytically. While several reviews (5-9) have been written on ruthenium mediated oxidations, the last one available in the West appeared ten years ago and dealt equally with ruthenium catalysed reactions and stoichiometric ruthenium tetroxide reactions (9). With the emphasis shifting to ruthenium catalysed reac- tions, new reactions have been discovered and conditions have been found which have improved the selectivity and yields of these reactions. Thus it is appropriate to survey the subject again to summarise the state of the art. Experimental Conditions Many different ruthenium catalysts and oxidants have been used. Of these, the most common catalysts are RuCldPPhJ, RuCl,.xH,O, and RuO,.xH,O, and the most common oxidants are HOOAc, NaIO,, O,, and NaOCl. Some catalysdoxidant systems are very selective indeed. For example both RuCl,(PPh,)JPh(IOAc), and RuCl,(PPh),)@- methylmorpholine-N-oxide specifically convert primary alcohols to aldehydes in high yields (10, I I) and RuCl#Ph,)JPhCH=CHCOCH, converts vicinal diols to vicinal diketones (I 2). Conditions for ruthenium catalysed oxida- tions are very mild; usually a few hours or less at room temperature is sufficient. A variety of solvent systems can be used, and depending on the oxidant a wide range of pH’s can be tolerated. Oxidations with oxygen can be carried out at atmospheric pressure. Many ruthenium catalysed reactions have been performed in the H,O-CCl, solvent system. But slow or incomplete reactions are platinum Melds Rev., 1983,27, (3), 111-125 111

Ruthenium Catalysed Oxidations of Organic Compounds

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Ruthenium Catalysed Oxidations of Organic Compounds By Ernest S. Gore Johnson Matthey Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania

Ruthenium and i ts complexes can be used to catalyse the oxidation, both homogeneous and heterogeneous, of a wide range of organic subs- trates. These include olefins, alkynes, arenes, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, ethers, sulphides, amines, and phosphines. A wide variety of oxidants can be used under mild conditions; conversions and selectivities are usually high, and the catalyst can be easily recovered. Ruthenium can also be used to catalyse the oxidative destruction of pollutants in both gas and liquid phases.

The synthetic use of ruthenium tetroxide as an oxidant for organic compounds was first reported in I 95 3 by Djerassi and Engle (I). The scope of ruthenium oxidations was greatly expanded by Berkowitz and Rylander in 1958 (2). All of these early workers used ruthenium tetroxide as a stoichiometric oxidant; however, ruthenium tetroxide is rather inconvenient to use in this way. It is troublesome to prepare, expensive, and its strong oxidising power tends to make it less selective than other oxidants. Caution-ruthenium tetroxide is an extremely powerful and volatile oxidant; it should only be handled in a well ventilated area and when wearing appropriate protective clothing.

Thus it is not surprising that work was soon initiated on using ruthenium in catalytic quantities in oxidation reactions. The first such use of ruthenium seems to have been in an obscure publication in 1956 (3). A more readily available report appeared in 1959 (4). The advantages of catalytic ruthenium oxidations over stoichiometric ruthenium tetroxide have proved to be so convincing that today virtually all ruthenium mediated oxidations are perfor- med catalytically.

While several reviews (5-9) have been written on ruthenium mediated oxidations, the last one available in the West appeared ten years ago and dealt equally with ruthenium catalysed reactions and stoichiometric

ruthenium tetroxide reactions (9). With the emphasis shifting to ruthenium catalysed reac- tions, new reactions have been discovered and conditions have been found which have improved the selectivity and yields of these reactions. Thus it is appropriate to survey the subject again to summarise the state of the art.

Experimental Conditions Many different ruthenium catalysts and

oxidants have been used. Of these, the most common catalysts are RuCldPPhJ, RuCl,.xH,O, and RuO,.xH,O, and the most common oxidants are HOOAc, NaIO,, O,, and NaOCl. Some catalysdoxidant systems are very selective indeed. For example both RuCl,(PPh,)JPh(IOAc), and RuCl,(PPh),)@- methylmorpholine-N-oxide specifically convert primary alcohols to aldehydes in high yields (10, I I ) and RuCl#Ph,)JPhCH=CHCOCH, converts vicinal diols to vicinal diketones (I 2).

Conditions for ruthenium catalysed oxida- tions are very mild; usually a few hours or less at room temperature is sufficient. A variety of solvent systems can be used, and depending on the oxidant a wide range of pH’s can be tolerated. Oxidations with oxygen can be carried out at atmospheric pressure.

Many ruthenium catalysed reactions have been performed in the H,O-CCl, solvent system. But slow or incomplete reactions are

platinum M e l d s Rev., 1983,27, (3), 111-125 111

occasionally encountered in this system, especially in the presence of carboxylic acids. Recently it has been found that adding CH3CN to the system greatly improves yields and reac- tion times (13, 14). When (Eh~decene was oxidised in HzO-CC1, only 20 per cent conver- sion occurred in 2 hours; but on adding C H F N the reaction was complete in the same period.

Oxidation of Olefins Cleavage of the Double Bond

When the oxidation of an olefin is catalysed by ruthenium in the oxidation state +3 or higher, the usual result is cleavage of the double bond. Ketones are produced if the carbons are fully substituted; otherwise acids, or occasionally, aldehydes are obtained, see Table I. On the other hand, osmium tetroxide when used catalytically converts olefins to aldehydes rather than to acids (21).

Non-Cleavage of the Double Bond Only a few non-cleavage reactions are

known, and these are given in Table 11. The catalyst is usually a +2 ruthenium complex and the products are unpredictable.

Oxidation of Alkynes Terminal alkynes are cleaved to give acids

while internal alkynes yield diketones with no cleavage, see Table 111.

Oxidation of Arenes Ruthenium catalysed oxidations of arenes

can proceed in three ways, see Table IV: Alkyl side chains on the phenyl ring can be con- verted to -COOH (IV-A, B). The phenyl ring can be cleaved from R-Ph to

The phenyl ring can be degraded to form a dicarboxylic acid (IV-E, F , G). In almost all cases where an alkyl side chain is replaced by a carboxyl group, a heterogeneous catalyst was used, for example IV-A, B. This is one of the few cases in which a heterogeneous catalyst is used in ruthenium oxidations. Oxygen is used as the oxidant since at temperatures below 4ooOC it can only oxidise

form R-COOH (IV-C, D).

ruthenium as far as RuO,, which is insoluble. Stronger oxidants such as NaOCl or NaIO, will oxidise ruthenium to the + 7 or +8 oxidation state and these are soluble.

The effect of the electronegativity of the sub- stituent on the products of the oxidation of naphthalenes can be seen in reactions IV-F and IV-G. An electrondonating substituent favours cleavage of the substituted ring, while an electron-withdrawing substituent favours cleavage of the unsubstituted ring.

Oxidation of Alcohols This is the most common synthetic use of

ruthenium catalysed oxidations. Highly selec- tive conditions are readily available; alcohols can be converted to aldehydes rather than acids and vicinal diols can be readily oxidised to either cleaved or non-cleaved products depend- ing on conditions. In alcohols containing another oxidisable group such as a C=C double bond, a CGC triple bond, an arene, nitrogen or sulphur, the hydroxyl group is oxidised pre- ferentially (Table V). In substrates containing both primary and secondary alcohols the primary alcohol is oxidised preferentially, (see V-H).

Secondary Alcohols These are oxidised cleanly and in good yields

to ketones, see Table VI. Cyclobutanols can be oxidised to cyclobutanones (38) (VI-F) in yields higher than with CrOJoxalic acid (39).

Primary Alcohols Primary alcohols are oxidised either to

aldehydes (Table VII) or to acids (Table VIII). The outcome of the reaction can be highly selective depending on the conditions used. For example: RuClXPPh,), with N- methylmorpholine-N-xide ( I I), O, (33), PhCH=CHCOCH, (40) or Ph(IOAc), (10)

always gives aldehydes. RuCIXPPhJ, with excess PhIO (to), or RuC1, with HOOAc (42) or K&OR (32) always gives acids.

Diols Oxidation of diols can give either cleaved or

non-cleaved products, see Table IX. Stronger

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 112

73 P. i?

f t 5 2 c

F c

W

m

W

h)

21

W

h

v

c

c

W

Tab

le I

Oxi

datio

n of

Ole

fins w

ith C

leav

age o

f the

C =

C B

ond

Subs

trat

e

CH

3(C

H,),

CH

=

CH

(CH

,l,C

OO

H

CH

,(CH

,),C

H

= C

H,

Ph' ph

3Frh

PhC

H =

CH

,

PhC

H =

CH

,

Br + Br

Prod

uct

CH

,(CH

,),C

OO

H+

HO

OC

(CH

,l,C

OO

H

CH

3(C

H,),

CO

OH

HO

OC

(CH

,),,C

OO

H

PhC

OO

H

PhC

HO

f CHO

Br

Br

Cat

alys

t

RuO

,

RuC

I,

RuO

,

RuC

I,

RuO

,

RuO

,"

RuO

,

RuO

,

Oxi

dant

NaO

Cl

Nal

O,

02

NaO

Cl

Nal

O,

0,

Nal

O,

Nal

O,

Yiel

d pe

r cen

t

94

89

94

83

62

92

82

86

Ref

.

"3 p

pm c

obal

t nap

hthe

nate

add

ed

5 F

E

HC

E C

CH

(NH

,)CH

,CH

,CO

OH

c.

W

m

W

h)

21

HO

OC

CH

(NH

,)CH

,CH

,CO

OH

R

uO,

Nal

O,

50

(2

7)

h

v

W

Tab

le II

Oxi

dati

on of

Ole

fins

wit

hout

Cle

avag

e o

Sub

stra

te

A

CH,(C

H,),C

H =

CH,

B

QcH

=

w,

0

C

D

E

OA

c

Sub

stra

te

A

PhC

C

Ph

B

BuC

C

Bu

C

PhC

E C

H

D

‘Bu

ck

CH

Pro

duct

n

40 py+

+0AC

Tab

le I I I

O

xida

tion

of A

lkvn

es

Pro

duct

00

I1

II

PhC

CPh

88

BuC

CB

u +

BuC

CO

H

PhC

OO

H

‘BU

CO

OH

the

C =

C B

ond

Cat

alys

t

Ru C

I ,( PP

h 3) ,

RuCI

,(PPh

,) ,

[Ru(

trpv

) (bip

v)

(H ,011

’+

RuC

I, (P

Ph,),

RuC

I,

Oxi

dant

0,

t-BuO

OH

elec

tric

ity

0,

Nal

O,

ield

per

cen

t

30

,52

53

-

27 (

conv

.) at

io 1

:5:3

51,1

2

Cat

alys

t O

xida

nt

NaO

Cl

NaO

Cl

I 70, 1

9 1 (26)

Ruo

z I

RuO

, N

aOC

l 6

6

(26)

I NaO

Cl

I 60

I (26)

Platinum Meto

2 - 5 Q

P

Q

* cn 0 W

0 l-

m sr: m (9

r--

u P

u % z

I 0

V 0 0 I

I 0

& u

I + I 0 0 8 8

' 6 z

I + I 0 0 8 8

0 I

0

I

b 1

b J- 0

U m 0 n

Yatinum Metals Rev., 1983, 27, (3) 115

Tab

le I

V

Oxi

datio

n of

Are

nes

d 0)

I- Q)

(D (D

I- d

In (0

Q) Ic

I

> C 8' -In 0 I-

n

r n n -

N s K

n s K

n n 1

I V +- I V

2,

0 / Q 0 0 I 5 .'t

ON I 0 I

I

I 0,

>c v) L

n

I 0

+- I =N

0 I d I 0

I 0 % I i U m u 0 w LL (1 I

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 116

Tabi

e V

S

elec

tive

Oxi

dati

on o

f A

lcoh

ols

in t

he P

rese

nce

of O

ther

Fun

ctio

nal G

roup

s

W m - hl m - zi

s 1 m s -

I- hl

Lo OD 0) I- Lo W 7 0

m OD b OD

9 4 Y c n

P

0 m

4 Y z

Q a n Q a 2

K

I 0

0 d'

a m u n w LL

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 117

Tab

le V

I

Oxi

dati

on o

f Se

cond

ary

Alc

ohol

s

5 F

I P

hl (O

Ac),

c.

W

m

W

h)

21

W

h

v

Oxi

dant

Nal

O,

HO

OA

c

Phl

O (3

equ

.)

K,S,

O,

KZ

SZ

O8

c

L

oo

Yie

ld p

er c

ent

Ref

.

83

(4

1 I

83

(4

2)

88

(1 0)

97

(32)

86

(32)

Sub

stra

te

A

CH,(C

H,),C

H,OH

0

C

PhCH

,OH

D

E

CH,(C

H,l,C

H,OH

Sub

stra

te CH

,OH

A

B CH

,(CH

,)&H

,OH

C

CH,(C

H,),C

H ,O

H

Tab

le V

II

Oxi

dati

on o

f P

rim

arv

Alc

ohol

s to

Ald

ehyd

es

Pro

duct

CH,(C

H,),C

HO

%CHO

PhC

HO

CH,(C

H,),C

HO

Cat

alys

t

RuCI

,( PP

h,),

RuCI

,(PPh

,),

RuCI

,(PPh

,),

Ru C

I ( P

Ph,) ,

RuCI

,(PPh

,),

Tab

le V

lll

Oxi

dati

on o

f P

rim

ary

Alc

ohol

s to

Aci

ds

Pro

duct

0

CO

OH

Oxi

dant

n

PH

3

3 wN

\o

WN

Lo

3 hC

H=C

HC

OC

H,

Cat

alys

t

RuO

,

RuCI

,

RuCI

,(PPh

3),

RuCI

,

RuCI

,

field

per

cen

t

90

79

90

100

97

Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals

Platinum Metals

Y

c

L

\o

I

t S

ubst

rate

PhC

(CH

,)HC

H(O

H)C

H,O

H

6 OH

OH

O

H

I I

CH

3CH

C

HC

H,

do"

dO

H

OH

OH

I

I

CH

3CH

CH

CH

,

I S

ubst

rate

a CH

,(CH

,),CHO

PhC

HO

CI

C

D

Tab

le I

X

Oxi

dati

on of

Dio

ls

Pro

duct

PhC

(CH

,) H

CO

OH

HO

OC

(CH,

),CO

OH

CH,C

HO

00

00

1111

CH,C

CCH,

Cat

alvs

t

RuCI

,

RuCI

,

RuCI

,

RuCI

,

RuCI

, (P

Ph,),

RuCI

, (P

Ph,),

Tab

le X

O

xida

tion

of A

ldeh

ydes

and

Ket

ones

P

rodu

ct

CH

,(CH

,),COO

H

PhC

OO

H

CI

@-C

OO

H

HO

OC

(CH

,),C

OO

H

+ HO

OC(

CH,),

COO

H

+ HO

OC(

CH,),

COO

H

Oxi

dant

Nal

O,

NaO

Cl

H,Oz

H2O

z

'hC

H=C

HC

OC

H3

'hC

H=C

HC

OC

H,

Cat

alys

t O

xida

nt

RuCI

, (P

Ph,),

RuCI

, (P

Ph,),

RuCI

,

RuCI

, N

aOC

l

field

Der

cen

i

92

90

88

-

85

70

fiel

d pe

r cen

t 88

96

99

3,5

6,2

8

-

Ref

.

Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals Platinum Metals

Platinum Metals

Platinum Metals

Platinum Metals

c C m n 6

c

- r J m c

- I

2 2 1 -

N O L D N

P f f P P 0 f

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i i z m m m m m z z z z

t

0 i

o s a

o I u 0

3= u, A

N I

I V

+

0

c)

I

I u

a m u

0 I u 0 t

+

11 I V 0

$ n

0

YI LL

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 120

Tab

le X

I O

xida

tion

of

Acv

clic

Eth

ers

ri al a

P 9 P 4 P

0 0 0 0 0 i z z z z m m

Q a Q a Q a Q a Q LT

I 0 0

I N 0

u, I 0 0 I u N

I V

0

u

I

0 - 70 0 0

4 m u D W

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 121

Tabl

a X

I1

Oxi

dati

on o

f C

yclic

Eth

ers

0 m

B a

B a

N

0 % m

0

m

+

cnN

I

I V

O= V,

LAooQoac I I I I I 0=3 o=v

Om o=v

I I V V

I& 0 v1, V

Q D I o=v

I V

LJ I 0" WCI I V

0 I o=v,

LL V

II z I

Om

o=v o=v I V

a m o n u U (1 I -

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 122

Tab

le X

lll

Oxi

dati

on o

f Su

lphi

des a

nd A

min

es

oxidants cleave the diol, generally giving acids (IX-A, B), although under carefully controlled conditions aldehydes can be obtained as the major product (IX-C, D). The use of RuClXPPhJ, and PhCH=CHCOCH, selectively produces non-cleaved diketones from diols (IX-E, F).

Carbohydrates Ruthenium catalyses the oxidation of

hydroxyl groups in carbohydrates, secondary hydroxyl groups being converted into carbonyls and primary groups to acids. For example L- sorbose is converted to a mixture of erythrose and glycolic acid (44) and sugar, I, is converted to its keto sugar, 11, in 100 per cent yield (45).

I I1

The yields are usually better when ruthenium is used than when CrO, is used (9).

Oxidation of Aldehydes and Ketones

Aldehydes are readily oxidised to carboxylic acids, see Table X. There has been little published work on the oxidation of ketones. In one paper dealing with kinetics the authors reported that ketones were converted to diketones (46), for example:

CH,COCH&H, + CH,COCOCH,

However in this case a ten fold excess of subs- trate was used. Diketones are cleaved to give a mixture of acids (X-D).

Oxidation of Ethers Acyclic Ethers

Primary methyl ethers, RCH,OCH,, are oxidised to methyl esters, RCOOCH,, in excellent yields, (XI-A, B). Secondary methyl ethers, RR'CHOCH,, on the other hand undergo cleavage to give ketones, RCORI (XI- C, D). Benzyl ethers, PhCH,OR, undergo oxidation of the benzyl group to give esters,

PhCOOR, in fair to good yields (XI-E, F). Oxidation of unsymmetric ethers, RORI where one of the substituents is not aromatic, gives unpredictable results with either R or R1 being oxidised in roughly equal proportions.

Cyclic Ethers Only carbons next to the ether linkage are

oxidised. If both carbons are secondary, the products are mainly lactones with some car- boxylic acids depending on the sensitivity of the lactone to hydrolysis (XII-A, B). If one carbon is secondary and the other tertiary the secondary carbon is oxidised preferentially giving a lactone (XII-C, D). Some hydrolysis to keto acids can occur. If both carbons are tertiary, cleavage to diketones occurs (XII-E).

Ethers are a class of compounds for which the yields and selectivities differ significantly when they are oxidised catalytically or stoichiometrically with ruthenium tetroxide. For example, tetrahydrofuran oxidised stoichiometrically with ruthenium tetroxide gives only y-butyrolactone in 65 to IOO per cent yield (2,47) but when oxidised catalytically with RuO, and NaIO, (47) the products are y- butyrolactone, 40 per cent, and succinic acid, 5 per cent.

Oxidation of Sulphides and Amines

Sulphides are usually oxidised to a mixture of sulphoxides and sulphones (XIII-A, B), but in at least one case a sulphone was obtained exclusively (XIII-C).

Linear primary amines are oxidised to nitriles with some hydrolysis to the amide (XIII- D, E). Cyclic amines are oxidised to either lactams (XIII-F, G) or imides (XIII-H, I). The yields range from poor to good. As with ethers, only the carbon adjacent to the heteroatom is oxidised and secondary carbons are oxidised preferentially to tertiary carbons.

Oxidation of Steroids Steroids generally undergo the same reac-

tions that have already been discussed- oxidative cleavage of C=C double bonds to

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, (3) 123

acids (4, 53), degradation of aromatic rings (54), suggested (56) for removing sulphur containing and oxidation of secondary alcohols to ketones impurities from various petroleum fractions. ( 1 0 , I I ) . Thus sulphur (500 ppm) in an n-paraffin frac-

It is interesting that cholesterol, which has tion was reduced to less than 50 ppm in 4 hours both a secondary hydroxyl group and a C=C by treatment with RdNaOCl at 2oOC. double bond, does not undergo any reaction Ruthenium has also been suggested (57,58) (10, XI). for the removal of ammonia from waste water

An atypical reaction which some steroids by treating the waste at elevated temperatures undergo is simultaneous oxidation of a tertiary with oxygen and a supported ruthenium CH group to a tertiary alcohol, and a secondary catalyst. Chlorophenols and highly toxic CH, ~ to a ketone (54): ~ polychlorodibenzodioxins effectively destroyed were shown by ruthen- to be

ium catalysed oxidations (59). Finally ruthenium has been

demonstrated to remove pollu- tants in the gas phase. Thus 5500 ppm vinyl chloride in air Ac 0 AcO

- - 0

Pollution Control via Ruthenium Catalysed Oxidations

Wet scrubbing with KMnO, is used com- mercially to control air pollution. However with some pollutants, notably thiophenes, the reac- tions are too slow to be useful. It has been demonstrated (5 5 ) that oxidation of thiophenes with RdNaOCl is more than IOO times faster than with KMnO,. This means that residence times are within the range that wet scrubbing of airborne thiophenes and other sulphur con- taining pollutants is practicable.

Ruthenium catalysed oxidations have been

was reduced to 2 ppm by pass- ing the gas over a 0.5 per cent ruthenium on alumina catalyst at a temperature of 376OC (60).

Conclusion Ruthenium and its complexes are extremely

versatile oxidation catalysts. They will catalyse the oxidation of virtually any oxidisable organic functional group and, by choosing the appropriate conditions, the oxidations can be made to proceed in high yield and selectivity even in the presence of other oxidisable groups. Thus they offer a useful alternative to the more classical oxidation reagents.

I

2

3

4 5 6

7

8

9

10

References C. Djerassi and R. Engle, 3. Am. Chem. Soc., 11 K. B. Sharpless, K. Akashi and K. Oshima, 1953, 757 3838 L. M. Berkowitz and P. N. Rylander, 3. Am. 12 S. L. Regen and G. M. Whitesides,J. Org. Chem.,

R. Pappo and A. Becker, Isr. Res. Counc. Bull., 13 P. H. J. Carlsen, T. Katsuki, V. S. Martin and K. 19569 5A, 300 B. Sharpless,3. Org. Chem., I 981,46, ( 1 9 ) ~ 3936 S.SarrlandY.Yan~3.7.0rg.Chern.,1959,~4,2018 14 P. H. J. Carlsen and K. B. Sharpless, personal

communication PN;Rylander, EngeIhard Tech. Bull., 1969,9,135 1 5 T. A. Foglia, P. A. Barr, A. J. Malloy and M. J.

“Oxidation” Vol. I , ed. R. L. Augustine, Marcel Costanzo, 3. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1977, 54, (I I), Dekker, New York, I 969 870A

Tetrahedron Lett., 1976, (29), 2503

Chem. SOC., 1958,80,6682. 1972,377 (1 I), 1832

T. Yamanaka, Kagaku Kogvo, 1979, 30, (6), 619; Chem. Abstr., 1979,91, I 12953 T. Yamanaka, Kagaku Kogyo, 1979,30, (7), 747; Chem. Abstr., 1979,91, 199460 D. G. Lee and M. van den Engh in “Oxidation in Organic Chemistry”, Part B, ed. W. S. Trahanovsky, Academic Press, New York, 1973 P. Miiller and J. Godoy, Tetrahedron Lett., I 98 I , 22, (251,2361

16 K. Kawamoto and T. Yoshioka, European Parent

17 K. A. Keblys and M. Dubeck, U.S. Patent

I 8 W.-D. SchrGer and W. Friedrichsen; Liebigs Ann.

19 Mitsubishi Petrochemical Co., LtG., ’ fapawe Purenr, 80,087,739; 1980; C‘lrem. Abstr., 1981,

Appl. 21, 118; 1981

134099649; I 968

C h . , 197891978, (91, 1648

94, 103012

Platinum Metals Rev. , 1983,27, (3) 124

effectively destroyed by ruthen-

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29 30

3’

32

33

34

35

36

37

K. H. Holm, D. G. Lee and L. Skattebgjl, Acta Chem. Scand., 1978, Bjz, (9), 693 M. Schroder, Chem. Rev., 1980,80, (2), 187 M. E. Pudel, L. G. Privalova, Z. K. Maizus, L. V. Revenko, M. L. Khidekel and I. V. Kalechits, Neftekhimiya, 1973, 13,64 J. 0. Turner and J. E. Lyons, German Patent

B. A. Moyer, M. S. Thompson and T. J. Meyer, J . Am. Chem. SOC., 1980,1oz, (7), 2310 S. Cenini, A. Fusi and F. Porta, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 1978, 108, (3-4), 109 H. Gopal and A. J. Gordon, Tetrahedron Lett.,

M. J. Jung, B. W. Metcalf, B. Lippert and P. Casara, Biochem., (Washington), 1978, 17, (I 3), 2628 D. C. Cronauer and L. G. Baumgard, US. Patent

S. N. Massie, U.S. Patent 3,775,472; 1973 D. E. Applequist and J. W. Wheeler, Tetrahedron

U. A. Spitzer and D. G. Lee, J. Org. Chem., I 974,

M. Schrijder and W. P. Griffith, 3. Chem. SOC., Chem. Commun., 1979, (I), 58 M. Matsumoto and S. Ito, 3. Chem. SOC., Chem. Commun., I 98 I, (I 7), 907 R. S. Givens and D. R. Rademacher, 3. Med.

H. Tomioka, K. Takai, K. Oshima and H. Nozaki, Tetrahedron Lett., I 98 I, zz, (I 7), I 605 S. Wolfe, S. K. Hasan and J. R. Campbell, Chem. Commun., 1970, (21), 1420 H. Gopal, T. Adams and R. M. Moriarty,

2,231,678; I973

‘971,(3’)1294’

3,865370; 197

Lett., 1977, (39)s 34’1

39, (161,2468

Chem.9 I9747 17, (41, 457

40 Y. Sasson and J. Blum, Tetrahedron Lett., 1971,

41 A. I. Dalton, Jr., H. J. Doran and R. D. H. Murray, U.S. Parent 4,225,694; 1980

42 M. N. Sheng, U.S. Patent 3,997,578; I 976 43 Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd., Japaness

Patent, 80, 102, 528; 1980; Chem. Abstr., 1981,

44 K. N. Reddy, V. Devi and P. K. Saiprakash, Nail. Acad. Sci. Lett., (India), 1981, 4, (7), 297; Chem. Abst., 1982,96, 85864

45 G. Descotes, J. P. Praly and D. Sinou, J. Mol. Catal., I 979,6, (6),42 I

46 P. S. Radhakrishnamurti and D. K. Mahapatro, Ind.J. Chem., 1979, I ~ A , (I), 53

47 A. B. Smith, I11 and R. M. Scarborough, Jr., Synth. Comm., 1980, 10, (3), 205

48 I. V. Howell, M. A. Ledlie and R. C. Pitkethly, British Patent 1,404,s I 3; I 975

49 M. A. Ledlie and I. V. Howell, Tetrahedron Lett., 1976, (101,785

50 R. Tang, S. E. Diamond, N. Neary and F. Mares, J . Chem. SOC., Chem. Commun., 1978, (13), 562

51 N. Tangari and V. Tortorella, J. Chem. SOC., Chem. Commun., 1975, (3), 71

52 J. C. Sheehan and R. W. Tulis, 3. Org. Chem., 19743 3% (1 51,2264

53 D. M. Piatak, H. B. Bhat and E. Caspi, J. Org.

54 D. M. Piatak and 0. Ekundayo, Steroids, 1973,

55 D. C. Ayres and C. M. Scott, Enuiron. Sci.

56 V. Cariati and V. Viani, British Patent 1,549,363;

57 N. Okada, Y. Nakanishi and Y. Harada, German

(241,2167

94, 46774

Chem., 1969~34, (11, I 12

219 475

Technol., 1979, 13, (I I), 1 3 8 3

‘979

Patent 2,735,892; 1978 Tetrahedron, 1972, 28, (16), 4259

1967, (47h 4729

60,20

58 Osaka Gas Co., Ltd.,Japanese Patent 80,086,854;

59 D.C.Ayres, Plarinum Metals Rev., I 98 I ,25,(4), I 60 60 K. Yang, J. F. Scamehorn, J. D. Reedy and R. C.

38 J. A. Caputo and R. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Lett.,

39 M. Krumpolc and J. Rocek, Org. Synth., 1981,

1980, Chem- Abstr.3 19809 939 244898

Lindberg, German Patent 2,640,906; I 977

Platinum Group Metals in Organic Synthesis Modern Synthetic Methods, Volume 3,1983-Transition Metals in Organic Synthesis EDITED BY R. SCHEFFOLD, Salle and Sauerlander, and John Wiley & Sons, 440 pages.

To provide chemists with an easy access to important and rapidly developing areas of syn- thetic organic chemistry triennial seminars on modern synthetic methods are held at Interlaken, sponsored and organised by The Association of Swiss Chemists. The May 1983 conference was devoted to the transition metals, and the above named volume of contributions is being co-produced by Salle and Sauerlander, with distribution rights in Austria, Germany and Switzerland (sfr./DM 48), and by John Wiley & Sons for the rest of the world.

The platinum group metals are featured in two of the five sections, these being “Principles of Transition Metals Chemistry” by Professor J. K. Stille and “Group VIII Metals in Organic Synthesis” by Professor L. S. Hegedus, both of Colorado State University. The contributions are well supported by references and this most useful book will undoubtedly fulfil its main purpose of serving as a guide for chemists interested in the application of transition metal chemistry to organic synthesis, in addition to aiding participants at the May conference.

Platinum Metals Rev., 1983,27, ( 3 ) 125