Upload
gerodi
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
University of Newcastle Centre for Space Physics http://plasma.newcastle.edu.au/plasma. T wo-dimensional C ross-phase G radient Techniques - H igh-latitude Pc5 ULF M agnetometer D ata. S. T. Ables B. J. Fraser Centre for Space Physics School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
TTwo-dimensional wo-dimensional CCross-phase ross-phase GGradient radient Techniques - Techniques - HHigh-latitude Pc5 ULF igh-latitude Pc5 ULF
MMagnetometer agnetometer DDataata
S. T. AblesB. J. Fraser
Centre for Space PhysicsSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences
The University of Newcastle AUSTRALIA
University of NewcastleUniversity of NewcastleCentre for Space PhysicsCentre for Space Physics
http://plasma.newcastle.edu.au/plasma
The “Davis Square”The “Davis Square”
Magnetometer Array(Summer operation2002, 2003, 2004)
N (CGM)
Cusp location~75o MLat
Pc5 ULF wavesPc5 ULF waves
7 8-250-200-150-100
-500
50100150200250300350400450 7 8
-450-400-350-300-250-200-150-100
-500
50100150200
UT [Hour]
Y
X
16 January 2003 DAV ZHS VYV RIK
dH/dt
dD/dt
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22UT [Hour]
DAV-ZHS Cross-phase
Freq
uenc
y [m
Hz]
-90 0 90[Degrees]
Azimuthal pairs of stations were used to produce Cross-phase spectrograms
There are both diurnal and frequency variations in cross-phase
Δ
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22UT [Hour]
VYV-RIK Cross-phase
Freq
uenc
y [m
Hz]
-90 0 90[Degrees]
Cross-phase spectrogramsfor each azimuthally spaced pair of stations have clear differences.
Particularly 2 hours each side of Local magnetic noon
Δ
IMF control of field line topology – Bz EffectIMF control of field line topology – Bz Effect
-10
0
10
Bz [n
T]
-5
0
5
By [n
T]-500
-400
-300
Vx G
SM
[km
s-1
]
0
0.5
1
Np [c
m-3
]
0
10
20
|B| [
nT]
06:00 07:12 08:24 09:36 10:48 12:000
2
4x 10
11
[W
]
Time
4 6 8 10 12 14 16-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
505 (2 - 5 mHz)
[deg
rees
]
UT [Hour]
16 January 2003
DAV-ZHS VYV-RIK
The The ФФ5 index: 5 index: Phase Phase difference between 2 azimuthally difference between 2 azimuthally
spaced stationsspaced stations
Closed field lines
IMF control of field line topology – Bz~0IMF control of field line topology – Bz~0
4 6 8 10 12 14 16
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
5 (2 - 5 mHz)
24 January 2003
[deg
rees
]
DAV-ZHS VYV-RIK
UT [Hour]
-10
0
10
Bz [n
T]
-10
0
10
By [n
T]-800
-600
-400
Vx G
SM
[km
s-1
]
2
4
6N
p [cm
-3]
0
10
20
|B| [
nT]
06:00 07:12 08:24 09:36 10:48 12:000
5
10x 10
11
[W
]
Time
Closed field linesAnti-sunward azimuthal motion
IMF control of field line topology – Bz NegativeIMF control of field line topology – Bz Negative
4 6 8 10 12 14 16-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
405 (2 - 5 mHz)
25 January 2003
[deg
rees
]
UT [Hour]
DAV-ZHS VYV-RIK
-10
0
10
Bz [n
T]
-10
0
10
By [n
T]-900
-800
-700
-600
Vx G
SM
[km
s-1
]
0
2
4N
p [cm
-3]
0
10
20
|B| [
nT]
06:00 07:12 08:24 09:36 10:48 12:000
5
10x 10
11
[W
]
Time
Open field linesconvective motion
IMF control of field line topology – Bz VariableIMF control of field line topology – Bz Variable
-10
0
10
Bz [n
T]
-10
0
10
By [n
T]
-500
-400
-300
Vx GSM [k
m s
-1]
0
5
10N
p [c
m-3
]
0
10
20
|B| [nT
]
06:00 07:12 08:24 09:36 10:48 12:000
5x 10
11
[W
]
Time
4 6 8 10 12 14 16
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
15 January 2003
5 (2 - 5 mHz)
[deg
rees
]
UT [Hour]
DAV-ZHS VYV-RIK
Mixed - 0pen-closed field lines