Upload
israel
View
33
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Safer Medicine Admissions Review Team (SMART). Carl Eagleton and Hannah O’Malley on behalf of the SMART Working Group. The Need… Increasing General Medicine patient volumes. Volume. EC arrival year. The Need… Increasing patient wait times in Emergency Care (EC). LOS (Hours). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Safer Medicine Admissions Review Team (SMART)
Carl Eagleton and Hannah O’Malley
on behalf of the SMART Working Group
The Need… Increasing General Medicine patient volumes
Volu
me
EC arrival year
The Need…Increasing patient wait times in Emergency Care (EC)
LOS
(Hou
rs)
EC arrival year
The Innovation
• Streamline the admission process• Improve patient and medication safety • Meet national Medication Reconciliation (MR)
targets• ThedaCare’s ‘Admission Trio’ mapping the way
‘MAP’ Model of Care
• Team-based admitting pharmacists• Pharmacist at the front of the hospital• Collaborative patient review with admitting
doctor • Medication history and reconciliation in EC• Continuity of care
Adapting the ‘Admissions Team’
• IHI Model for Improvement • TRIO to PAIR = MAP model• 5 week pilot study
Aim
The SMART model (a doctor and pharmacist working together) will be applied to 90% of
triage category 2-5 patients presenting to EC who are referred to GM between the hours of
8am and 10pm, Monday to Friday.
Objectives and MeasuresSafer• Reduce unintended medication errors to zero • Complete MR ≤ 6 hours of GM referralFaster• 80% of patients referred to GM will be seen by SMART within 60
minutes of referral• With 95% seen within 90 minutesPatient-focused• Improve patient experienceSystematic• Improve Medication History documentation to 100%• Reduce length of stay by 0.25 days per patient
Process Improvement – PDSA’sChange Tested Outcome
1 Evening shift PDSAs 1 pharmacist 2 pharmacists 3 pharmacists
2 Shared model of care – tested whether two pharmacists sharing 3 teams provides sufficient cover
PDSA confirmed adequate cover using this model of care. Clinician concern regarding possible fragmented care – to monitor subspecialty cover
3 Alerting staff to unsigned medications chart
Tested green cards inserted into medication charts (Fell out)Stickers on medication chart
Process Improvement - DataElectronic ReportsWith help from statistician a daily report was developed
capturing the # of patients SMARTed versus total # in target group, time to be seen, time to MR, and LOS
Manual Data CollectionManual data collection is needed to record interventions and
contributions by pharmacists – an electronic data collection form is being developed to streamline this process
DashboardA dashboard has been developed to track progress on measures
which are updated weekly or monthly
SMART Collaborative Dashboard – End October 2013
Average time from Gen Med Referral to Gen Med Seen By for SMARTed patients compared with historical baseline
(I chart)
UCL
LCL
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Jul-2
012
Aug
-201
2
Sep
-201
2
Oct
-201
2
Nov
-201
2
Dec
-201
2
Jan-
2013
Feb
-201
3
Mar
-201
3
Apr
-201
3
May
-201
3
Jun-
2013
Jul-2
013
Aug
-201
3
Sep
-201
3
Oct
-201
3
Nov
-201
3
Dec
-201
3
Jan-
2014
Feb
-201
4
Mar
-201
4
Apr
-201
4
May
-201
4
Jun-
2014
Ho
urs
SMARTed patients only
Average Time from Gen Med Referral to Gen Med Seen By for SMARTed Patients(X-bar Chart)
UCL
LCL
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
7/29
/13
8/5/
13
8/12
/13
8/19
/13
8/26
/13
9/2/
13
9/9/
13
9/16
/13
9/23
/13
9/30
/13
10/7
/13
10/1
4/13
10/2
1/13
10/2
8/13
11/4
/13
11/1
1/13
11/1
8/13
Week beginning
Hou
rs Mean = 0.970 (58 mins)
Average time from Gen Med Referral to Medicines Reconciliation (I chart)
UCL
LCL
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Jul-
20
13
Au
g-2
01
3
Se
p-2
01
3
Oct
-20
13
No
v-2
01
3
De
c-2
01
3
Jan
-20
14
Fe
b-2
01
4
Ma
r-2
01
4
Ap
r-2
01
4
Ma
y-2
01
4
Jun
-20
14
Ho
urs
General Medicine eMedication Reconciliation Forms Completed on Admission (P Chart)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Week beginning
SMART starts
Average LOS for Inpatients who were SMARTed compared with historical averages (I chart)
UCL
LCL
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Jul-1
2
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
13
Feb-
13
Mar
-13
Apr
-13
May
-13
Jun-
13
Jul-1
3
Aug
-13
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
Nov
-13
Dec
-13
Jan-
14
Feb-
14
Mar
-14
Apr
-14
May
-14
Jun-
14
Day
s
SMARTed patients only
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percent of Patients Presenting to EC Between 8am and 10pm Mon-Fri who were SMARTed each week
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
7/2
9/1
3
8/5
/13
8/1
2/1
3
8/1
9/1
3
8/2
6/1
3
9/2
/13
9/9
/13
9/1
6/1
3
9/2
3/1
3
9/3
0/1
3
10
/7/1
3
10
/14
/13
10
/21
/13
10
/28
/13
11
/4/1
3
11
/11
/13
11
/18
/13
11
/25
/13
12
/2/1
3
12
/9/1
3
12
/16
/13
12
/23
/13
12
/30
/13
Week beginning
P harmacy staff absences
Additional teams rolled out
1
Percent of Patients Presenting to EC Between 8am and 10pm Mon-Fri who were SMARTed each week
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
7/2
9/1
3
8/5
/13
8/1
2/1
3
8/1
9/1
3
8/2
6/1
3
9/2
/13
9/9
/13
9/1
6/1
3
9/2
3/1
3
9/3
0/1
3
10
/7/1
3
10
/14
/13
10
/21
/13
10
/28
/13
11
/4/1
3
11
/11
/13
11
/18
/13
11
/25
/13
12
/2/1
3
12
/9/1
3
12
/16
/13
12
/23
/13
12
/30
/13
Week beginning
P harmacy staff absences
Additional teams rolled out
Percent of patients seen increasing as SMART tests new combinations and
rolls out new teams
Safety Data• Clinical input by pharmacist occurs sooner and is proactive rather than
reactive• More convenient communication and collaboration allowing errors to
be prevented or rectified faster• 747 patients seen by SMART since August 2013• 302 contributions recorded and 65 interventions• Examples:
“Patient had run out of epoetin injections and didn't know to continue them. Hb = 80g/L (anaemic), recommended to prescriber to restart”“HbA1c 79mmol/mol advised increase glipizide dose”“Citalopram 10mg charted but patient normally on escitalopram 10mg. Medication corrected.”
Key SuccessesImproved working relationship between pharmacists,
doctors and nursing staffRolling out eight general medical teams with the shared
model of care covering 8am-10pmSignificant reduction in time to MR from >2 days to <6
hours and increased # of patients receiving MREarlier contribution by pharmacist has led to fewer
medication errors Winning medication safety and innovation award and
best paper award at NZHPA
Buy In• Various stakeholders including pharmacy, nursing, medical staff and allied
health union
• Meetings held with Key EC nursing staff and presentations at EC nursing handovers
• Presentations at medical RMO/SMO handovers to educate doctors about SMART
• Email and poster communications
• Weekly SMART updates at Medical Pharmacist meetings
• SMART themed week involving all clinical pharmacists aimed to educate, engage and identify potential issues
Challenges• Several measures require multiple methods of data collection• Quality of historical data such as number and type of
interventions and contributions has not been reliable – needed to investigate more reliable ways of collecting
• Risk of medicines charted by pharmacist being administered before being signed
• Changing work hours of pharmacists – ensuring issues identified and addressed is important
SMART Staff Feedback
SMART Staff Feedback
THE SMART PHARMACISTS