Upload
anshul-aggarwal
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Sample Proposal Writing
1/3
SAMPLE PROPOSAL WRITING
Date :December 17, 2013
To:Satish Maharaj, Chief Engineer
From:Badrinath Rao, Technician
Subject: Replacement of Present 1-ph Ventilation Motor with a New 3-ph Induction
Motor
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this proposal is to apprise you of the limitation of the present
ventilation system, and to inform you about the benefits of replacing the current
motor. In this report, I first give you a quick gist of the proposal then discuss in detail
the following:
problems relating to the present system A proposed solution to the problem Cost Time Benefits
GIST OF THE PROPOSAL
The problem in the ventilation system was noticed during a routine inspection. I
noticed the following problems with the present system:
1. Insufficient flow of air at the southern end of plant2. Current motor uses too much electricity
These two problems create both unsafe and an inefficient system. However,fortunately, the solution is quite simple and inexpensive. To correct the problem the
present 1-ph motor in the system must be removed and replaced with a new 3-ph
induction motor. This new motor will not only correct the problems of the present
system, it will also yield the following benefits:
1. Increased life span
8/12/2019 Sample Proposal Writing
2/3
2. Decreased use of power3.Ability to expand, and4. Minimal installation time
PROBLEMS
Inadequate airflow The main problem with the present system is that it is unable
to generate enough airflow to the southern end of the plant. During my inspection, I
took many different measurements of airflow throughout the plant using an airflow
meter. I observed that the southern end is receiving only 1,700 cubic yards of
ventilation per hour. General standards require that 2,000 cubic yards must be
replaced every hour. If this situation is not rectified, we may be jeopardizing the well-
being of our staff, not to mention a possible penalty from the government. After
closer investigation of the ventilation system, I identified that the only thing wrong
with the system is the motor driving the fan. The motor is badly worn out and
therefore it is unable to generate the necessary flow.
High Energy Consumption The problem with the present system is its
uncommonly high power consumption. I notice this high power consumption while
taking measurements on the present motor with a digital VOM meter. With these
measurements, I calculated that the motor is running at only half its peak efficiency.
An average 3-ph induction motor runs at approximately 90% peak efficiency. Over a
year, the company loses about Rs. 47000 from the inefficiency of the present motor.
SOLUTIONS
If a 3-ph induction motor were installed in place of a 1-ph motor, it would increase
airflow by almost 20%. I calculated this by using the torque and speed features of a 3-
ph motor. This would boost the airflow to the southern end of the plant from 1,700
cubic yards to over 2,000 cubic yards per hour well within the General standards
An average new 3-ph motor can run up to 90% efficiency. An average 1-ph motor of
the same horsepower could achieve only 80% at best. The more efficient a device, the
less costly it is to run.
8/12/2019 Sample Proposal Writing
3/3
COST/BUDGET
The overall cost of replacing and installing the new motor should not exceed Rs.2500.
The motor and control together cost Rs. 1300. The wiring would have to be
undertaken by a qualified electrician. The overall labour cost should not exceed Rs.
350. Approximately Rs. 150 will go towards new motor mountings, brackets and the
wire.
TIME
From start to finish, replacement should not take more than 3 hours. It will take
hour to remove the old 1-ph motor, and no more than an hour to install the 3-ph
motor. Clean up work and initial start up of the system takes about 1 and hours.
BENEFITS
Increased lifespan- If a 3-ph induction motor were installed into the ventilation
system, it would provide much longer life than an equivalent 1-ph motor. A 3-ph
motor will last much longer than a 1-ph motor doing the same task. The reason for
this is the simplicity of operation of a 3-ph motor.
Decreased use of powerPower factor is not a clear term used in the description of
any inductive device, including motors. Power factor, if left unattended, alters the
electricity we receive. Although both 1-ph and 3-ph have some power factors
associated with them, a 3-ph motor has fewer. In other words, a 3-ph motor will
reduce the amount we are charged for electrical power.
Ability to expandanother of a 3-ph motor is the expandability we would have in
our ventilation system. With the increase in airflow, we could easily add other
addiction to the ventilation system, with more ease.
CONCLUSION
We must not let this problem continue. A 3-ph motor is the ventilation will best suit
our requirements both for the present and for the future.