8
SAT Referral Process 08/12/14

SAT Referral Process

  • Upload
    chibale

  • View
    31

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SAT Referral Process. 08/12/14. Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson , & Deno, 2007). Tier I : Universal screening and progress monitoring: All students, Tier II: Standardized interventions delivered in an efficient manner (small groups) : 15% to 20% of students at any time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SAT Referral Process

SAT Referral Process08/12/14

Page 2: SAT Referral Process

Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson, & Deno, 2007)

Tier I: Universal screening and progress monitoring: All students,

Tier II: Standardized interventions delivered in an efficient manner (small groups) : 15% to 20% of students at any time

Tier III: Individualized interventions developed through in-depth problem analysis: 5% of students at any time

Page 3: SAT Referral Process

Process Main Points• Three main roles (System Manager, Facilitator, and Consultant)• Consultation before and after meeting• Use a consistent form

Page 4: SAT Referral Process

Team Members• Referring teacher• Another general education teacher• Special education teacher• School psychologist• Others as needed (another teacher, Title I teacher, SLP, counselor,

social worker, nurse, etc.)• Principal?

Page 5: SAT Referral Process

Team Roles• Number of members • 5 – 8 (Rosenfield, 1996)• 7 or fewer (Zins, 1988)

• Systems Manager - Organizes meeting & monitors status• Problem-solving Facilitator• Consultant

Page 6: SAT Referral Process

Consultation• Within 2 to 5 days of referral• Behaviorally define problem• Prioritize• Observe kid/baseline data

• Conduct meeting within 2 weeks• 10 to 15 minutes

• Meet within 2 weeks of conference• discuss the teacher’s understanding• assess implementation integrity• problem solve previously unforeseen difficulties with the intervention

Page 7: SAT Referral Process

Grade-Level Team Meeting - Progress

•Who is making sufficient progress?• Should we discontinue and write a transition

plan?•Who is not making sufficient progress?• Should we make a change within the tier?• Should we change tiers?• Is there anyone new that we should talk

about?

Page 8: SAT Referral Process

Tier 2 Problem Solving• Check student’s attendance – Does the student attend school

regularly• Observe the student – Are behavioral difficulties interfering

with the interventions?• Incentivize the intervention – Is the student sufficiently

motivated? • Examine intervention fidelity – Is the intervention occurring as

it should?• Compare skill and GOM data – Are students not generalizing

(skill data are going up but GOM are not)• Examine the accuracy within skill and GOM data – Are the students receiving a

proficiency intervention when they should be focusing on acquisition?