Upload
chibale
View
31
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
SAT Referral Process. 08/12/14. Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson , & Deno, 2007). Tier I : Universal screening and progress monitoring: All students, Tier II: Standardized interventions delivered in an efficient manner (small groups) : 15% to 20% of students at any time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
SAT Referral Process08/12/14
Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson, & Deno, 2007)
Tier I: Universal screening and progress monitoring: All students,
Tier II: Standardized interventions delivered in an efficient manner (small groups) : 15% to 20% of students at any time
Tier III: Individualized interventions developed through in-depth problem analysis: 5% of students at any time
Process Main Points• Three main roles (System Manager, Facilitator, and Consultant)• Consultation before and after meeting• Use a consistent form
Team Members• Referring teacher• Another general education teacher• Special education teacher• School psychologist• Others as needed (another teacher, Title I teacher, SLP, counselor,
social worker, nurse, etc.)• Principal?
Team Roles• Number of members • 5 – 8 (Rosenfield, 1996)• 7 or fewer (Zins, 1988)
• Systems Manager - Organizes meeting & monitors status• Problem-solving Facilitator• Consultant
Consultation• Within 2 to 5 days of referral• Behaviorally define problem• Prioritize• Observe kid/baseline data
• Conduct meeting within 2 weeks• 10 to 15 minutes
• Meet within 2 weeks of conference• discuss the teacher’s understanding• assess implementation integrity• problem solve previously unforeseen difficulties with the intervention
Grade-Level Team Meeting - Progress
•Who is making sufficient progress?• Should we discontinue and write a transition
plan?•Who is not making sufficient progress?• Should we make a change within the tier?• Should we change tiers?• Is there anyone new that we should talk
about?
Tier 2 Problem Solving• Check student’s attendance – Does the student attend school
regularly• Observe the student – Are behavioral difficulties interfering
with the interventions?• Incentivize the intervention – Is the student sufficiently
motivated? • Examine intervention fidelity – Is the intervention occurring as
it should?• Compare skill and GOM data – Are students not generalizing
(skill data are going up but GOM are not)• Examine the accuracy within skill and GOM data – Are the students receiving a
proficiency intervention when they should be focusing on acquisition?