SB 540 Task Force Briefing

Establishing a Statewide Facility Database & Regional Comparative Analysis Softwareat the Dept of Education

January 21, 2013

By Joe Rodriguez, Hillsboro School District Superintendent (Retired)

Purpose of Statewide Database

SB 540. Section 4

SB 540 Required Data

SB 540 Task Force Indentified Mandate-Based Funding Priorities

•All-Day Kindergarten

•Physical Education (PE)

•Science

•Technology

•Early Childhood Education

What Districts Want From Database

State of the Schools AtlasRegional Comparative Analysis Tool

Data Types for Peer Reviewed Standards & Formulas

Industry Condition Analysis

FCI Data Used for Atlas Pilot Districts

Based on Density, Energy and National O & M standards

• Basic Data – School ID #, Name, Enrollment (2010-11), Enrollment Projections (2012–22), Free & Reduced Lunch %

• Planning re: Density – Average Square Foot (SF) per Student; Resulting Density Factor

• Building Condition – Operations & Maintenance per SF, Age (Technology rating = construction <10 yrs); Seismic Rating, Energy Usage Indicator (EUI)

• Performance – Attendance, Mobility, Reading (Yrs 4, 8, 10); Math (Yrs 4, 8, 10)

Data Comparative Analysis Rating Examples (1 = Good; 5 = Not So Good; * = No known public Dbase)

Security Analysis: Data Needed• Secure perimeter

• Single, controlled access

• Sight lines

• Alarms -- types (panic, silent, fire, etc)

• Lockdown system

• Monitors, cameras and surveillance

• Training & protocols in place

Energy Efficiency Analysis

Note: Energy Efficiency (note: 1/3 of the state has not benefited from SB 1149 funds for the past 10 years

•Energy Usage Intensity -- Electricity, gas, etc., plus building age, type of school, region (i.e. climate), SF, enrollment, O & M/SF

•Return on Investment (ROI) -- Current EUI, recommended efficiency measures, their cost, the measure savings and over what time period.  1 = High ROI , 5 = Low ROI.

Impact on LearningNote: Several of these topics can be funded with energy efficiency funds; applicable data points found in that section.

Additional data points for –

• Lighting – Light fixtures & day-lighting

• Air Quality – HVAC rating (i.e. age, commissioning, etc),

• Noise – Noise rating (dBA)

• Technology – WiFi, broadband/speed, piping capacity

Funding: Comparative Analysis Examples

Comparative Analysis from Data & Ratings

Publicly Available Databases• DOGAMI – 2007 Level 1 seismic survey data (25%

updated by districts)

• Municipal Market Access – capital bond data*

• Oregon Department of Education – basic school identification numbers, location etc.

• Oregon Department of Energy – SB 1149 and non-1149 energy data by building

• Oregon State Treasury – capital bond data*

• Technology – Engineering & Technology Industry Council (ETIC)

Other Available D-Bases

Conclusion

•Equity – Overriding issue for any State funding allocation model

•Requires – statewide data plus comparative analysis capabilities

•Both exist and are ready for use as launching pad by ODE and the Task Force (and through contract with government agency)