Click here to load reader
Upload
justin-york
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SCAD CouncilJuly 22, 2009
Draft Executive Order:Uniform Tariff Treatment of
Shipmentsfrom PEZA Zones and Freeports
Background
Draft EO seeks to amend EO 293, s.2003
To cover other Free Trade Agreements (e.g. ASEAN-China, ASEAN Japan, ASEAN-Korea, ASEAN-India)
To provide for uniform tariff treatment for goods ‘imported’ from PEZA zones and Freeports
EO 293 covered only the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA)
2
Tariff Environment
Present average tariff rate is roughly 7%
Free Trade Agreements provide for even lower rates
Tariff rates for Raw Materials and Semi-finished Goods are LOWER than rates for Finished Goods
Different Tariff Environment for PEZA zones as against Freeports
3
PEZA Tariff Treatment
For goods manufactured in PEZA zones and sold in the domestic market
Duty rate of RAW MATERIALS is applied on the Value of the Raw Materials
The effective tariff rate used is LOWER than the rate for Finished Goods
Value of local processing is not ‘taxed’
4
Clark-Subic Tariff Treatment
For goods manufactured in Clark and Subic Freeports and sold in the domestic market
Duty rate of FINISHED GOODS is applied on the Value of the Raw Materials
The effective tariff rate used is HIGHER than the rate for Raw Materials
Value of local processing is not ‘taxed’
NOTE: PEZA tariff treatment is however applied in the case of YOKOHAMA (a Clark locator) and Texas Instrument (a PEZA locator)
5
Conclusion
Goods manufactured in Clark and Subic Freeports and sold in the domestic market are ‘taxed’ higher than goods coming from PEZA zones
Subic and Clark locators are at a disadvantage (except for Yokohama) compared to PEZA locators
Subic and Clark goods are more ‘expensive’ (because of higher duty rates) than PEZA goods
Draft EO will provide for harmonized tariff treatment for locators of both PEZA zones and Freeports
6
Thank You
7