Scanned for Far North District Council - fndc.govt.nz · PUAB€. Covd&(* 4,14 00( k HIVE VoqvelelfOCS 01,VE A 'loudg to \ i'103 k *D futti. 85 -tws ovu_ 1& te,Aadal . 6. Description

$Page 1: Scanned for Far North District Council - fndc.govt.nz · PUAB€. Covd&(* 4,14 00( k HIVE Voqvelel*fOCS 01,VE A 'loudg to \* i'103 k *D futti. 85 -tws ovu_ 1& te,Aadal . 6. Description$
*013*

FNDC ADMIN

*ic .t Far North Distrid Council

1 4 MAR 2019 P,,,. 752, m.m.1.

r/* 0440. N,wholotd

14*,31: 0000920029

NnE (09) 401 5200offlce U- Only ..Precheck Number: Fr (09) 401 2137

Application Number: Bnt 0*&11(,1,1,2

NIRE-drdc#•112

APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE CONSENT

(Or Associated Consent Pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991)(lf applying for a Rosource Consent pursuant to Soction 88 of thi RMA, this form can be used to satisfy thi

requirements of Form 9)

Prior to, and during, completion of this applicallon form, please refer to Resource Consent Guidance Notes andSchedule of Fees and Charges - both eva#abb on the Counc#'s web page.

1. Type of Consent being applied for (more than one circle can be ticked):

O Land U8e Subdlvlsion O Discharge

Extension oftime (s.125) Change of conditions (8.127) 0 Change of Consent Notice (s.221(3))0 Consent under National Environmental Standard (e.g. Assessing and Managing Contaminants In Soil)0 Other (please specify)

2. Applicant Details:

Namels: (please writeall names in full) 1netkn \·loe I Eu i ¢*diat (013 liAWPie- note: Applkant must be a person or legal entity. Full name of Indlviduel, Umited Liabllity Company or Trust is required.

Postal Address: fo 60% 13 413Iou, aujol

Post Code: 3 1 10

Phone Numbers: wo*: 01 51% 110 1 Home:

Fax: Email: j,li Strl. bele/544/J°'Gan .co, fil3. Address for Correspondence: Name and address for se,vice andcorrespondence (/fusing an Agent wnTe

their details hen).

Name/s: Jason Hewson [Hewson Planning)

Postal Address: 25 Corbett Road, RDZ, Whaka:.ara, Whangarei 0182

Post Code:

Phone Numbers: Work: 021 2233668 Home:

Fax: [email protected] circle your preferred means of contact, 1,e. whether it be by email or phone, or post

4. Details of Property Ownerh and Occupier/S: Name and Address of the Owner/Occupiers of the land to which this

application relates (where there are multiple owners or occuplers please Ilst on a separate sheet If required)

Name/s: l.lousO Al.0 2-alcin.d

Utitd , lt-* ltd)0,·i 08€Ci -011 4%1194

Properly Address/: 7(,46· 0900ul,N.- f<°lrd,n,Wi MOAaq tr - 0 14 9 41 132Location

Pllv-ate. 601 169,3, ROAL,KAM Cill] , 214 1

5. Application Site Details:Location and/or Property Street Address of the proposed activity:

11 Hongl St, Kalkohe - lot 8 DP 41456 (NA58C/856) - 1110m2

Site Visit Requirements:Is there a locked gate or security system restricting access by Council staff? Yes / No

Is there a dog on the property? Yes / No

Please provide details of any otherentry restrictions that Council staff should be aware of, e.g. health and safety, IA•Oualcaretakees details. This is important to avoid a wasted trip and having to re-arrange a second visit.

PUAB€. Covd&(* 4,14 00( k HIVE Voqvelel*fOCS 01,VE A 'loudgto \* i'103 k *D futti. 85 -tws ovu_ 1& te,Aadal .

6. Description of the Proposal:Please enters brief de®oription of the proposal here. Attach adetalled descripuon of the proposed activity and draWIngs(to a recognized scale, e.g. 1:100) to illustrate your proposal. Please referto Chapter 4 of the DIstrict Plan, and GuidanceNotes, for further (letalle of information requirements.

Subdlvlslon around existing dwellings.

If this Is an application for an Extension of Time (s. 126); Change of Consent Conditions (s.127) or Change orCancellation of Consent Notice conditions (s.221(3)), please quote relevant existing Resource Consents andConsent Notice Identifiers and provide details of the change(s) or extension being sought with reasons forrequesting them.

7. Other Consent required/being applied for under different legislatlon(more than one circle canbe tlcked):

O Building Consent (BC ref #if known ) 0 Regional Council Consent (ref #If known )

O National Environmental Standard consent O Other (please specify)

8. National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contamlnants in Soil toProtect Human Health:

The site and proposal may be subject to the above NES. In order to determine whether regard needs to be had to the NES pleaseanswer the following (further information in regard to this NES is available on the Council's planning web pages):

Is the piece of land currently being used or has it historically ever been yes W no don't knowused for an activity or industry on the Hazardous Industies and ActivitiesLIst (HAIL)

Is the proposed activi4 an advity covered by the NES? (lf the activity Is yes no don't knowany of the activities listed below, then you need to tick the 'yes' circle).

,Subdividing land () Changing 0,e use of a piece of land

O DIsturbIng, removing or sampling soil Removing or replacing a fuel storage system

I j

9. Assessment of Environmental Effects:Evefy app#ce#on fb, resource consent must be accompanied by an Assesament of Envlronmental Effects (AEE). Thfs /1 0requtrwnent of Schedule 4 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and an applloation cen be rejected N an adequate AEE Is notprovided. The Informatlon In an AEE must be specmed In Bumolent detail to satlely the purpose for which it la required. Your AEEmay include addltlonal Informatlon 8uoh as Written Approvals from adjoining property owners, or affected perUes.

Plemie attach your AEE to this application.

10. Billing Details:This Identlfles the permon or entity that wIN be responsible for paying any Invoices or recelvIng any refunds assodated thpro¢-ing this reeourc, corteent Ple- also refer to Council's Fees and Charges Schedule.

Name/8: (please write 1 -all names In full) gen,MAA Womu 14 i;de.bal (Nl-) 6¥ltedPostal Address: Po box 134 13

Tau<aaq qPhone Numbers:

post code: 311 QWork:01 :1% 1%01 44+ 1[0 Home:

Fax: Email: jeffl 24 < I€A 93#02/¥UM. CO · 'llFies Information: An Initalment 18* for proces,Ing thls appllcatlon 1, payable mt the time of lodgemint and must accompany your appicallon inordirfor Itto be lodged. Pie- note that If the Inmhont *e ls Ineumolent to ooverthe actual and re-nable costs of work undertak,n to proc-the applicdon you will be required to pay any additional coeti. Involced amounb are payable by the 20'" of the month folowing Invoice date. Youmay also be required b make addllonal payment, If your application requIres notll,caoon.

Declaration concoming Pa,ment of F-: 1/we underitand that the Council may charge me/08 for al cost, actually and reasonably Incurred Inproc-Ing this application. Subject ho my/our rights under Sections 3678 and 358 ofthe RMA, to obJect to any oosts, 11- undertake to pay allandUture procellng costs Incurred by the Counct Without 6nliting the Far North Diatict Counclrs legal rights If any lop• (Including the un of debtcoktion agencles) are nacesaary b recover unpaid proc-Ing coots IAve agree to pay all costs of recovering thoge proce-Ing coots. If thliapplicavon 18 made on behalf of a trust (private or family), a society (Incorporated or unincorporated) or a company In sIgning thig appilcation INaare binding the trust, lociety or company to pay all the above colte 0,1„Ie,a1•,4,4-ab---40WA,0--Maapalle,1

Name: M{BA Wtstiolobk (please print)

(signature of bill payer - mandatory) Date: t<gill-*REF

Important Information:

Privacy Information: Once this application is lodged with the Council It becomes public Information. If there 18sensitive Information In the proposal please advise. The informdon you have provided on this form is required so thatyour application for a consent pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 can be processed under that Act. TheInformation will be stored on a public register and held by the Far North District Council. The details of your applicationmay also be made available to the public on the Council's website, v--·'-lcaovt.nz. These details are collected toinform the general public and community groups about al consents which have been Issued through the Far NorthDistrict Council.

CASA''MII.'

Declaration: The Information I have supplied with this application is tue and complete to the best of my knowledge.

Name: IMM/\ \Nlit\D#Obk (please print)

12=» /02$60/Trt (signature)

Checklist : (please tick If Information Is provided)

Payment (cheques payable to Far North District Council)

A current Certificate of Tltle (Search Copy not more than 6 months old)

4 Copies of any listed encumbrances, easements and/or consent notices relevant tothe applloatlon

4 Applicant/Agent/Property Owner/ Bill Payerdetalls provided

16 Location of property and deecrlptlon of propolal

0 Assessment of Environmental Effects

O Written Approvele / corrempondence from consulted parties

o Reports from technical experts (lf required)

o Copies of other relevant oonsents assoclated with this application

o Location and Site plans (land use) ANC)/OR

4 Location and Scheme Plan (subdlvlslon)

D Elevations / Floor plane

o Topographloal / contour plans

P/ease retbr to Chapter 4 of m. Dis.ict Plan #brdetaits of the information fhaf must be provided with an app#ce#on. Plesse alsorefbr to the RC Check#st ave#able on the Counc#'8 webs/te. Th/s contains more he4*/ hints as to what ##bnndion need. to beshown on p/ana.

Only one copy of an application Is required, but please note for copying and scanning purposes,documentation should be

UNBOUND SINGLE SIDED NO LARGER THAN A3 In SIZE

RECORD OF TITLE

UNDER LAND TRANSFER ACT 2017

FREEHOLD

Guaranteed Search Copy issued under Section 60 of the LandTransfer Act 2017

//SEARek

tit£057//9-R.W. Muii

Registi·tir-Generalof Land

Identifier NA58C/856

Land Registration District North AucklandDate Issued

18 September 1986

Prior Refrrences

NA1116/136

Estate Fee Simple

Area 1110 square metres more or less

Legal Description Lot 8 Deposited Plan 41456

Registered Owners

Housing New Zealand Limited

Interests

Subject to Part IV A Conservation Act 1987

Subject to Section 11 Crown Minerals Act 1991

K50614 Building Line Restriction

Fencing Agreement in Transfer 543999

Transaction Id Guaranteed Search Copy Dated 12/03/19 3:50 pm, Page 1 of 2Client Reference Quickmap Register Only

Identifier NA58C/856

A

41 IO

1/10 ml

0

i,

DP 41450

AONG'

Transaction Id Guaranteed Search Copy Dated 12/03/19 3:50 pm, Page 2 of 2Client Reference Quickmap Register Only

H:*5on PlanninRLEWSON PLANNING 25 Corbett Redd

RD2I I Resource Consent Specialists Whang,trei 082

<4,-03 1

503," 2 I Wate- Mete-lot 1,'

Of)-rr 2 . \" owe.,4 1

f Ex'stinck

tjeck)Y<- Er Sting '1,9793,\ Dwe.hg A.·

'-4...4 *(allt 4,4, f cons:r.£:/c 4'6

0 :NOC Sto•cords)

. ey.629

.er

U N'0'15 60'·57.1'.tea'* c·ler v.=er 'ne

F.'ov• 5.Pol-3_Ot 2;

»hvt: f.Of!Shifited ·CA rNDC Stu,ecrot,i

To The Far North District Council

On Behalf of H NZC

Our Ref 01322_SUB (Hongi Street)

Author Name: Jason Hewson

Signature: * Date: 1/3/19 Subdivision Application

\\

1 Subdivision AroundExisting Dwellings

Review Name:

Signature: Date:

11 Hongi StreetKaikohe

Electronic Download:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1 bvPotOA_2JxlaKB7QJKWxdWPP8ckH_XJ

Mob: 021 2233668 I Email: [email protected]

LEWSON PLANNING H NZCI i Resource Consent Specialists

11 Hongi Street, Kaikohe

Table of Contents

Application and Property Details 3

Executive Summary 4

Site Description 4

Proposal Details 5

Reasons For Consent 6

Section 95 Analysis 7

Public Notification (S95A) 7

Limited Notification (S95B) 8

S95 Analysis (Summary) 9

AEE 10

Section 104 Analysis 12Actual and Potential Effects -12

Adverse Effects 13

Positive Effects 13

Precedent Effects 13

Cumulative Effects 13

Actual and Potential Effects (Summary) 13Relevant Plan Provisions 14

National Environmental Standards 14

Other Regulations 15

National Policy Statements 15

NZ Coastal Policy Statements 15

Regional Policy Statements 15

Plans/ Proposed Plans 15

Any Other Matters 16

Part 2 (RMA) 17

Section 5 (Purpose) 17

Section 6 (Matters of National Significance) 17Section 7 (Other Matters) 18

Section 8 (Treaty of Waitangi) 18

Determination of Applications 18

Section 104 Analysis (Summary) 19

Conclusion 19

Subdivision Application 1Before The Far North District Council

LEWSON PLANNING HNZCi i Resource Consent Specialists


Attachments

1. Certificate of Title

2. Planning Maps

3. Subdivision Plans


12WSON PLANNING HNZCi i Resource Consent Specialists


1. Application and Property Details

Pre-App Info

Our Ref

Applicant

Site Identification

Total Site Area

Noteworthy Interests

Governing Legislation

Zone

Resources

Aerial Photograph of the Site

%,

il-

N/A

01322_SUB

HNZC

11 Hongi Street - Lot 8 DP 41456 (NA58C/856)

1110m2

There are no current interests that will affect the subdivision

RMA/Kaipara District Plan

Map 102 - Far North District Plan

Map 42 - No features indicated

1.:I

r.31

43 ti

4

Subdivision Application 3

Before The Far North District Council

LEWSON PLANNING H NZCi i Resource Consent Specialists


2. Executive Summary

1. Landuse consent was granted in 2018 under 2180510-RMALUC to construct a second dwelling onthe site. This has since been constructed, resulting in a total of 2 dwellings on site.

2. It is now proposed that the site be subdivided around the existing dwellings as per the attachedscheme plan. The subdivision layout matches the existing internal fence layout between theresidential units.

3. Subdivision consent will be required as a discretionary activity.

4. The subdivision proposal will only serve to create cadastral boundaries and legal ownership rightsrelating to each individual dwelling. No physical changes or increase in density is required orprovided for by the subdivision.

5. All infrastructure and services etc have been installed (as shown on the attached plans) andeasements are to be created to cater for these services as part of this proposal.

6. As will be assessed through this application, no affected parties have been identified andneighbours consultation has not been undertaken.

7. As assessed within this application; the proposal is not anticipated to result in any significantadverse effects on the surrounding environment.

8. As assessed within this application; the proposal passes the tests to be processed on anon-notified basis.

9. As assessed within this application; and subject to Council's discretion, the proposal passes thegateway tests to be granted consent.

10. It is anticipated that conditions will be applied around development in accordance with plans andinformation submitted.

3. Site Description

1. Residentially zoned and located off Hongi Street, the site is a 111Om2 piece of land comprised in asingle title.

2. The site contains two HNZC houses, with a new dwelling having been recently constructed besidethe old dwelling (2 dwellings in total). This new dwelling was consented under 2180510-RMALUCand has been generally completed.

3. All infrastructure and services have been provided to the dwellings. Easements are to be createdover services etc as appropriate (see attached subdivision plan).

4. The site itself is essentially fiat. Ground cover is in either paved areas or lawn, with minimalplanting. Proposed Lot 1 in a low post and rail fencing, while proposed Lot 2 is fully fenced withhigh closed pale wooden fencing, providing a high degree of privacy to neighbouring sites.Internally, new fencing has been installed between each of the residential units in a configuration





matching the proposed subdivision layout.

5. The surrounding area comprises the same typical topography, development style and underlyingzone regulations, and the proposed development is considered compatible with the existingenvironment. It is also noted that the density is existing and subdivision will only serve to createseparate titles around this existing development.

4. Proposal Details

1. The intention is to subdivide the site into 2 independent titles. The subdivision layout has beenconfigured around the 2 existing dwellings and matches the recently constructed internal fencing.

2. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 have areas of 503m2net and 607m2netrespectively and comply with the

residential subdivision standards as a discretionary activity.

3. Access is to be provided status quo, with each of the units gaining access directly from theirrespective road frontages.

4. Services are to be provided as per the status quo, as illustrated on the attached plan anddescribed as follows:

Sewer: AS approved under 2180510-RMALUC, the Lot 2 development has connected to anexisting service line, serving and running through proposed Lot 1. This service line connects to thepublic sewer line on Heke Street. Easements have been created to legally accommodate thisarrangement.

Stormwater: Stormwater from Lot 1 discharges directly to kerb side as per the existingarrangement. Stormwater from Lot 2 discharges to a detention tank which discharges to thepublic system as approved under 2180510-RMALUC.

Water/Network Services: These again are to be provided status quo, with each lot gainingconnection via its respective road frontage.

5. Given that the proposed subdivision does not affect existing density, and does not require anyactual physical changes to the site, no affected parties have been identified and no neighboursconsultation has been undertaken.

6. The proposed subdivision layout does not result in development control non-compliances.



LEWSON PLANNING HNZCI i Resource Consent Specialists


5. Reasons For Consent

1. Authorisation is required under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RIVIA) pursuant to thefollowing provisions:

Rule Comment Status

13.7.2.1 The minimum lot sizes are 2,000nf (unsewered) and 300ma DiscretionaryM inimu m Lot (sewered).Sizes

The subject site is sewered and the proposal will result inallotments 503mz to 607%2 (net site area). As such, the proposalcomplies with the subdivision density provisions as adiscretionary activity.

Conclusion: The overall Activity Status is Discretionary





6. Section 95 Analysis

Public Notification (S95A)

1. Under Section 95A(1) a consent authority must follow the steps set out in this section, in theorder given, to determine whether to publicly notify an application for a resource consent.

2. As assessed below, the proposal passes the tests under S95A of the RMA to be processed withoutPublic Notification.

Step 1: Mandatory Public Notification In Certain Circumstances(lf the answer is yes, publicly notify the application, and if the answer is no, go to step 2).

Assessment

The applicant has requested that the application be publicly notified. No

Public notification is required under section 95C No

The application is made jointly with an application to exchange recreation reserve Noland under section 15AA of the Reserves Act 1977.

Conclusion: Public notification is not required under Step 1.

Step 2: Public Notification Precluded In Certain Circumstances(lf the answer is yes, go to step 4 (step 3 does not apply) and if the answer is no, go to step 3).

Assessment

The application is for a resource consent for 1 or more activities, and each activity Nois subject to a rule or national environmental standard that precludes publicnotification:

The application is for a resource consent for 1 or more of the following, but no Yesother, activities:

1. a controlled activity:

11. a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity, but only if the activity isa subdivision of land or a residential activity:

111. a restricted discretionary, discretionary, or non-complying activity, butonly if the activity is a boundary activity:

IV. a prescribed activity (see section 36OH(1)(a)(i)).

Conclusion: The answer to the above criteria is 'Yes'. Analysis of Step 3 is therefore not required.

Step 4: Public Notification In Special Circumstances(lf the answeris yes, publicly notify the application, andifno, determinelimited notification),

Assessment

Determine whether special circumstances exist in relation to the application that Nowarrant the application being publicly notified.

Conclusion: Public Notification is not required under Step 4.



LEWSON PLANNING HNZC0 1 Resource Consent Specialists


Limited Notification (S95B)

1. Under S95B(1) a consent authority must follow the steps set out in this section, in the ordergiven, to determine whether to give limited notification of an application for a resource consent,if the application is not publicly notified under section 95A.

2. Public notification of the proposal under 95A is not required. As such, an analysis of S95B isrequired;

3. AS assessed below, the proposal passes the S95B tests to be processed without LimitedNotification.

Step 1: Certain Affected Groups And Affected Persons Must Be Notified Assessment

(Limited Notification of the application is required to any affected person or group identified underbelow).

Affected protected customary rights groups No

Affected customary marine title groups (in the case of an application for a Noresource consent for an accommodated activity).

Whether the proposed activity is on or adjacent to, or may affect, land that is the Nosubject of a statutory acknowledgement made in accordance with an Actspecified in Schedule 11.

Whether the person to whom the statutory acknowledgement is made is an Noaffected person under section 95E.

Conclusion: Limited notification is not required under Step 1.

Step 2: Limited Notification Precluded In Certain Circumstances(lf the answer is yes, go to step 4 (step 3 does not apply) and if the answer is no, go to step 3).

Assessment

The application is for a resource consent for 1 or more activities, and each activity Nois subject to a rule or national environmental standard that precludes limitednotification.

The application is for a resource consent for either or both of the following, but no Noother, activities:

1. a controlled activity that requires consent under a district plan (other thana subdivision of land):

Il. a prescribed activity (see section 360H (1)(a)(ii)).

Conclusion: The answer to the above criteria is 'no'. Step 3 analysis is required.

Step 3: Certain Other Affected Persons Must Be Notified Assessment

(Limited Notification of the application is required to any affected person or group identified underbelow).

In the case of a boundary activity, an owner of an allotment with an infringed Noboundary.



LEWSON PLANNING H NZC i Resource Consent Specialists


In the case of any activity prescribed under section 360H(1)(b), a prescribed Noperson in respect of the proposed activity.

In the case of any other activity, determine whether a person is an affected person Noin accordance with section 95E. (Refer AEE)

Conclusion: Limited Notification is not required under Step 3.

Step 4: Further Notification In Special Circumstances(lf the answer is yes, notify those persons; and if the answer is no, do not notify anyone else).

Assessment

Determine whether special circumstances exist in relation to the application that Nowarrant notification of the application to any other persons not alreadydetermined to be eligible for limited notification under this section (excludingpersons assessed under section 95E as not being affected persons)

Conclusion: Limited notification under Step 4 is not required.

S95 Analysis (Summary)

1. As assessed through the S95 A&B assessments above, the proposal meets tests under S95A andS95B to be processed on a non-notified basis.




7. AEE

1. An assessment of effects is provided for Council's consideration, As assessed below, the proposedactivity is not anticipated to result in any significant degree of adverse effect on the surroundingenvironment.

Permitted Baseline

There are no permitted baseline comparisons relevant to the proposed activity.

Existing Environment

The surrounding area comprises the same typical topography, development style and underlyingzone regulations. While the residential density expressed across the site is slightly more intensivethan current surrounding development, is in general agreement with the applied zone intentionsand is not considered incompatible with the existing environment. Regardless, the density isexisting and subdivision will only serve to create separate titles around this existing development.

Neighbours Approvals

No affected parties have been identified and no consultation has been undertaken.

Ecological Values Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

The site is located in the center of an existing highly developed residential area and is not in closeproximity to any sensitive ecological features. Further, the proposed subdivision will not result inany physical changes.

There appears to be no reason to consider that the proposal will result in any discernible adverseeffects on ecological values.

Landform Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

The site is located in the center of an existing highly developed residential area and is not in closeproximity to any sensitive identified landscape features. Further, the proposed subdivision will notresult in any physical changes.

There appears to be no reason to consider that the proposal will result in any discernible adverseeffects on landscape values.

Runoff Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

The proposed subdivision will not result in any physical changes and compliance with impervioussurfaces is maintained on a lot by lot basis.

There appears to be no reason to consider that the proposal will result in any discernible adverseeffects with regard to runoff.

Capacity of Public Systems Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

The proposal will not generate additional demand on public systems



UEWSON PLANNING HNZCI i Resource Consent Specialists


Land Stability Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

The proposed subdivision will not result in any physical changes.

There appears to be no reason to consider that the proposal will result in any discernible adverseeffects with regard to land stability.

Flooding Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

It is not anticipated that the proposal will in any way affect, nor be affected by flood risk.

Visual Character and Views Assessed Degree of Effect: Nil

The proposed subdivision will not alter residential densities across the site, nor result in anyphysical changes.

There appears to be no reason to consider that the proposal will result in any discernible adverseeffects with regard to character and views..

Amenity Values Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

The RMA defines amenity values as follows; "'Amenity values" means those natural or physicalqualities and characteristics of an area that contribute to people's appreciation of itspleasantness, aesthetic coherence, and cultural and recreaticnal attributes:'

Although amenity values deal with intangible issues, these issues arise through changes totangible aspects of the surrounding environment. The proposed activity is not anticipated toresult in any effects that would compromise the surrounding areas capacity to contribute topeople's appreciation of its pleasantness, aesthetic coherence, and cultural and recreationalattributes.

Natural Heritage Features Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

There appears no reason to believe that the proposed activity will result in adverse effects onnatural heritage features.

Man Made Heritage Features Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

There appears no reason to believe that the proposed activity will result in adverse effects onman made heritage features.

Cultural Values Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

There appears no reason to believe that the proposed activity will result in adverse effects oncultural values.

Pollutants/Nuisance Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

There appears no reason to believe that the proposed activity will result in unacceptable levels ofpollutants or noise. The proposal will only result in one additional allotment/household unit.

Reverse Sensitivity Assessed Degree of Effect: NIL

There are no other specific activities occurring in the area that would generate potentials for




reverse sensitivity issues.

Traffic Assessed Degree of Effect: N IL

The proposal will not generate any additional traffic movements and does not in any way alter theway in which traffic enters/exits the ite or is in any other way managed.

Summary

As assessed above, it is not expected that the proposed subdivision will result in any significantadverse effects on the surrounding environment.

8. Section 104 Analysis

1. Section 104 of the Act sets out mandatory matters for consideration, being;

a. any actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity; and

b. any measure proposed or agreed to by the applicant for the purpose of ensuring positiveeffects on the environment to offset or compensate for any adverse effects on theenvironment that will or may result from allowing the activity; and

c. any relevant provisions of-

i. a national environmental standard:

ii. other regulations:

iii. a national policy statement:iv. a New Zealand coastal policy statement:

v. a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement:vi. a plan or proposed plan; and

d. any other matter the consent authority considers relevant and reasonably necessary todetermine the application.

An analysis of the proposal against these matters has been undertaken for Council'sconsideration, as follows;

Actual and Potential Effects

1. Conducting an analysis of actual and potential effects aims to encompass all effects that will, andmay occur as a result of Council granting consent to an activity. Such effects may be viewed asbeing either;

• Adverse Effects

• Positive Effects

• Precedent Effects

• Cumulative Effects



.



These aspects are discussed within as follows;

Adverse Effects

1. As assessed through the AEE, it is anticipated that adverse effects associated with the proposedactivity will be Nil.

Positive Effects

1. Under Section 104 (1) (ab) of the Act Council should also consider the positive effects of theproposal. In this respect, the granting of consent to the proposed activity will have the followingbenefits:

• The proposal will allow the applicant to manage resources in the desired manner, thusallowing them to enjoy the property in which they have invested.

• The proposal will provide job opportunities to consultants and contractors, as well asassociated retail companies.

• Enhancing the social, cultural and economic wellbeing of individuals by utilising resourcesin a mannerthat avoids adverse effect on the environment enhances the wellbeing of thecommunity of which they are a part.

2. As illustrated through the assessments carried out within this application, it is anticipated that theabove benefits can be achieved with without significant adverse effect on the surroundingenvironment.

Precedent Effects

1. The proposal provides for a level of development that is generally consistent with District Planprovisions. There appears no reason to consider that the proposal will result in the setting of anyundesirable precedents.

Cumulative Effects

1. There appears no reason to consider that the proposal will result in adverse cumulative effects.

Actual and Potential Effects (Summary)

1. Through preceding sections of this application, adverse, positive and potential adverse effectsassociated with the proposal have been analysed. Overall, effects as they relate to the applicants,the surrounding environment, the wider community, and administration of the Djstrict Plan havebeen assessed, with the results tabled below. Overall, it is anticipated that the proposed activitywill result in a net positive effect.

Area of Effect Adverse Effects Positive Effects Potential Effects Total

Applicant: Nil Positive Nil PositiveSurrounding Nil Nil Nil NilEnvironment

Wider Nil Positive Nil Positive

Community

RMA Nil Nil Nil NilAdministration



LEWSON PLANNING HNZCI 1 Resource Consent Specialists


Relevant Plan Provisions

1. Section 104(1) (b) of the Act requires consideration of any relevant plan provisions, including; anyrelevant provisions of-

i. a national environmental standard:

ii. other regulations:iii. a national policy statement:

iv. a New Zealand coastal policy statement:

v. a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement:vi. a plan or proposed plan;

2. An analysis of these matters is provided as follows;

National Environmental Standards

1. The National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to ProtectHuman Health) Regulations 2011 is addressed as follows;

5 NESCS

The Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and ManagingContaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 (NESCS);

a. apply when a person wants to do an activity described in any of subclauses 5(2) to 5(6)on a piece of land described in subclauses 5(7) or 5(8):

b. do not apply when a person wants to do an activity described in any of subclauses 5(2) to5(6) on a piece of land described in subclause 5(9).

With regard to the clauses referenced above, the proposed activity is assessed as follows;

NESCS Activity Tests(lf the answer to any of the test below is yes, then the activity is regulated under the NESCS),

Assessment

An activity is removing or replacing a fuel storage system from the piece of land. No

An activity is samplingthe soil of the piece of land. No

An activity is disturbing the soil of the piece of land. No

An activity is subdividing land. Yes

An activity is changing the use of the piece of land. No

Conclusion: The proposed activity is regulated under the NESCS.

NESCS Land Tests

(If the answer to any of the test below is yes, then the activity is regulated under the NESCS).Assessment

An activity or industry described in the HAIL is being undertaken on it. No

An activity or industry described in the HAIL has been undertaken on it. No




It is more likely than not that an activity or industry described in the HAIL is Nobeing or has been undertaken on it.

Conclusion: The piece of land is not regulated underthe NECSC.

NESCS Land Test (Exception) Assessment

These regulations do not apply to a piece of land described in subclause (7) or No(8) about which a detailed site investigation exists that demonstrates that anycontaminants in or on the piece of land are at, or below, backgroundconcentrations.

Conclusion: The exception does not apply as no DSI has been provided.

In conclusion, as the piece of land is not regulated under the NESCS, the proposal requires nofurther consideration under this legislation.

2. No other National Environmental Standards are considered specifically relevant to this proposal.

Other Regulations

1. There are no other relevant regulations that affect the proposal.

National Policy Statements

1. It is not anticipated that the proposed activity will require any specific consideration regardingNational Policy Statements.

NZ Coastal Policy Statements

1. NZ Coastal Policy Statements are not considered relevant in relation to this proposal.

Regional Policy Statements

1. It is not anticipated that the proposed activity will require any specific consideration regardingRegional Policy Statements.

Plans / Proposed Plans

District Plans:

1. Relevant District Plan infringements have already been addressed as part of this application.

2. Relevant District plan Assessment Criteria and Objectives and Policies are assessed below;

3. As assessed, the proposal is not anticipated to result in any significant degree of adverse effectwith regard to the matters raised through relevant District plan Assessment Criteria,

4. As assessed, the proposal is considered compatible with the values expressed through relevantObjectives and Policies.


UEWSON PLANNING HNZCI i Resource Consent Specialists


Assessment Criteria: 13.10.1 Allotment Sizes And Dimensions

(a) Whether the allotment is of sufficient area and dimensions to provide for the intendedpurpose or land use, having regard to the relevant zone standards and any District wide rulesfor land uses.

The proposed allotments comply with relevant shape factor dimensions and allotment areasand all allotments contain existing dwellings, so demonstrate that they can accommodateresidential development having regard to the relevant zone standards and any District widerules for land uses.

(b) Whether the proposed allotment sizes and dimensions are sufficient for operational andmaintenance requirements.

The allotments follow existing fences which delineate between the separate existing residentialunits. These have been configured to FNDC and HNZC standards for residential housing and areanticipated to provide for the above values.

(c) The relationship of the proposed allotments and their compatibility with the pattern of theadjoining subdivision and land use activities, and access arrangements.

The proposed subdivision layout mimics the existing fence delineated residential areas aroundthe existing dwellings and the proposed subdivision will not result in any discernible effect interms of the sites physical attributes.

(d) Whether the cumulative and long term implications of proposed subdivisions aresustainable in terms of preservation of the rural and coastal environments.

The proposed subdivision is around existing dwellings and is not expected to result in anycumulative and long term implications. Further, the subdivision is located within a residentialzone and is not anticipated to result in any adverse effects whatsoever in relation topreservation of the rural and coastal environments.

Objectives and Policies:

As has previously been repeated, the proposed subdivision is around existing consented and establishedresidential development and will not result in any physical changes. Having reviewed the objectives andpolicies under Sections 13.3 and 13.4 of the District Plan, it is not considered that the proposal is in anyway contrary to these values. No further assessment of objectives and policies is considered necessary.

Regional Plans:

1. Specific consideration of the Regional Plan is not considered necessary in this case.

Any Other Matters

1. It is not anticipated that any other matters will be relevant in consideration of the proposedactivity.




Part 2 (RMA)

1. The consideration of resource consents is subject to Part Il of the Act. An analysis of the proposalagainst the provisions of Part 11 of the Act has been undertaken for Council's consideration asfollows;

Section 5 (Purpose)

1. Section 5 of the RMA states;

'(1) the purpose Of this Act is to promote the sustainable management Of natural and physicalresources.

(2) In this Act, sustainable management means managing the use, development, and protectionof natural and physical resources in a way, or at a rate, which enables people and communities toprovide for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing and for their health and safety while-

• Sustaining the potential of natural and physical resources (excluding minerals) to meet thereasonably foreseeable needs of future generations; and

• Safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of air, water, soil, and ecosystems; and• Avoiding, remedying, or mitigating any adverse effects Of activities on the environment.'

2. Overall, with regard to the AEE, the proposal is not anticipated to generate any significant adverseeffects on the environment. The proposal is however, anticipated to result in positive benefits.Subject to the design constraints set out within this application, the proposed activity isanticipated to generate positive benefits without adverse consequence. Therefore, the granting ofconsent would be in accordance with Section 5 of the Act, which allows for people andcommunities to provide for their social, economic and cultural wellbeing while maintaining thevalues expressed.

Section 6 (Matters of National Significance)

1. Section 6 of the RMA States;

'In achieving the purpose Of this Act, all persons exercising functions and powers under it, inrelation to managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources,shall recognise and provide for the following matters of national importance:

a. The preservation of the natural character of the coastal environment (including the

coastal marine area), wetlands, and lakes and rivers and their margins, and the protectionof them from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development:

b. The protection Of outstanding natural features and landscapes from inappropriatesubdivision, use, and development:

c. The protection of areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitats ofindigenous fauna:

d. The maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along the coastal marine area,lakes, and rivers:

e. The relationship of Maori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands,water, sites, waahi tapu, and other taonga.

f· The protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development.g. The protection Of recognised customary activities.'

2. It is not anticipated that the proposed activity will in any way result in adverse effects in relationto those matters addressed through Section 6 of the RMA.





Section 7 (Other Matters)


'In achieving the purpose Of this Act, all persons exercising functions and powers under it, inrelation to managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources,shall have particular regard to-

a. Kaitiakitanga:

b. The ethic of stewardship:

c. The efficient use and development Of natural and physical resources:d. the efficiency of the end use of energy:

e. The maintenance and enhancement of amenity values:

f. Intrinsic values Of ecosystems:

g. [Repealed]

h. Maintenance and enhancement of the quality of the environment:i. Any finite characteristics of natural and physical resources:

j. The protection of the habitat of trout and salmon:

k. the effects of climate change:

1. the benefits to be derived from the use and development of renewable energy.'

2. The proposed activity is not anticipated to contravene, contradict, or otherwise compromise anyof the above listed values. Overall, the proposed activity is not anticipated to contradict thevalues maintained through Section 7 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

Section 8 (Treaty of Waitangi)


'In achieving the purpose Of this Act, all persons exercising functions and powers under it, inrelation to managing the use, development, and protection Of natural and physical resources,shall take into account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi).'

2. The proposal does not have any implications in terms of the Treaty of Waitangi.

Determination of Applications

104B Determination Of Applications For Discretionary Or Non-complying Activities

After considering an application for a resource consent for a discretionary activity ornon-complying activity, a consent authority-

a. may grant or refuse the application; and

b. if it grants the application, may impose conditions under section 108.


.



Section 104 Analysis (Summary)

1. The proposal is anticipated to result in Nil adverse effects, but rather, is anticipated to result in anumber of positive effects.

2. On balance, the proposal is anticipated to result in a net positive effect.

3. The proposal is not expected to result in any undesirable precedent effects.

4. The proposal is not expected to result in any significant cumulative effects.

5. The proposal is not regulated under the NESCS and no other National Environmental Standardsare considered to require specific address as part of this proposal.

6. No national Policy Statements are considered to require specific address as part of this proposal.7. NZ Coastal Policy Statements are not considered relevant to this proposal.

8. No Regional Policy Statements are considered to require specific address under this proposal.

9. The proposal is not expected to result in any adverse effects with regard to relevant assessmentcriteria.

10. The proposal is compatible with the Objectives and Policies of the District Plan.

11. No specific address of the Regional Plan is considered necessary.

12. The proposed activity must be considered as a discretionary activity activity under the DistrictPlan.

13. The proposal is considered to be consistent with Part 2 of the RMA.

14. Given the above, the proposal passes the gateway tests to be granted approval under the RMA.

9. Conclusion

1. The proposal relates to subdivision of the site as detailed through this application.

2. Consent is required in relation to subdivision of the site, non-compliance with the 14mx14m shapefactor, and setbacks as a discretionary activity.

3. The proposal passes the S95 tests to be processed on a non-notified basis.

4. The proposal passes the tests under S104 (subject to Council's discretion) to be granted consent.

5. It is hereby requested that council grant consent to the proposed activity as detailed within thisapplication.

6. Subject to grant of consent, it is anticipated that conditions of consent will be imposed in generalaccordance with the information contained within this application.


EN ·180 ft

Kaikohe North

102

Scalel :10000

Date: 21/04/2017

Document Name: DP_Zone102_PC

Zone

i Commercialr--3 A'· Industfial

Lakes and Rivers

491....

tpu»t.u 46*34

4 3%42:.i :4 V,· €·· t»?094

64444/A©»49:1 L»9*

7.44* &4**1 - A..... f.9...%*4-

69£:Ril

Minerals

Recrealional Activities

Resk-

Rural Living

Rural Product}on

'M / 7: RoadDeignations

1-1.ele£itnan rrontago

4 -Ar-r·etfff·t*'rt'?d#Mis##aer/.4 i Gern,•leryI .sto,1. SIte

-Mahona Andlne

ll. ---lopfx,et,*Il#*Neappe#mer'Onet

Hgh Voltage Power Pole

¥ Notabte Tree

..ir - ·Distfic: Boundary

L

- - ·Heritage Precinct

1 Raibely

: Map Index

34 , iNC

4 IN , € ./ -DE< '% ' ' ' ,/3k-2 <51 \ \7 'rt ,4iA·----1 V \ 20- . i

: *1 122>05 .3 :-3-- R\>«fr/-Jl j ./ 49*I, 1 <FIc ron ...0.«

r 443*23ii.%..flf< %914'€ \.: 1 '-·'34<-4 r.0,0, 991 -92%A 1

MAS 0, 4Off0

Mt107

ME107

ME107

41

1\, Far North District Plan - Zone Map250 500

Metres

N0 125

ANote:

Roads cafry the sarne zoning as the Ilpernl land

N the boundary between mies follows a road.

Ole zone boundary $ located on the centel,meof the formed road, of whate Unformed,

ecent/ne & thelegal road

Disdmmer.

Consderable care has been taken to avoid /rurs and

omissions. and h late# into,malion has been Included

In these District p"aps.

However even w,0, the greatest "e inaccuracies mayoccur Ind thefefore the Fy North Distnct Councii cannot

accept any responsibility for such emn and omissions.

\ V

0#

ouN}*

3I

13

0

0

Z

$ NSID

ID

fMC/™4-YRD

<1 3l

N

PUA RD

801 Crown Cop¥wright R-ve4.11424 OCPB OioRN Uk 43

1

g-3

47

M'N·34 --

ru 1

RD

f

1

Resource

- CE] Outstanding Landscape

r Outstanding LandscapeFeature

M Outstanding NaturalFeature

6 Sib of CulturalSignificance to Maori

r-1-

<R>T-\ i

4U4 1 9 9 /1 34 35 +

/\ 1\ I 40 41 42

t. /-1

/7109 /.A\

5 EX V A

46 47

Map Index

Map 41

DISCLAIMER

0 3 Km

i Far North District Plan - Resource Maps A1 2

Scale 1:50,000

Consklerable cate has blentaken lo avoicl errors an{10//Ins, and

fle West ink,rmation has been included in these Dstrict Plan,naps.

However. even with the greatest care inacculacis may occur andtherefole the Far Norlh Distict Council cannot accepl any responsibility

tr such enors and omissions.

44

25.47%Lot 1

503mQ \9

X

)1 F Lot 2\45660712

Lot 7 DP 41 \ \3

'477®rr X \ \ /

P Tank. g

k\

Existingk *\\Jxoio Deck j \\4 \ 6/ n C. l i li 19 I

\ \118 '\ Y Existing \&92 %\\1 Dwelling j L / \ 10

n .\

i\\ -3

See Diagram A

9/

, il JEX \ '\

5 /1

V //

CU

-2 .9,41 \

\

Proposed Subdivision

4-\ 4 / \ X Newlg constructed VC1 \ tto FNDS Standards)

Diagram A

Existing development approved under:

• 2180510-RMALUC

BC298-9852 .

t

€

\0

61

Off

/

1 1

\

' Eprf \/0

1 U Newly Constructed90 r

. Power Supply

Water Meter and

1 [Lot 2)

Newly constructed VS (to FNDC Standa-ds)

00,

t

t

f

1(A)\

\6,\U

\ 6\1\ \?\Proposed Easements

#

l

Shown Purpos

l (A) Sewer

(B) Sewer

e Servient Dominant

Lot 1 hereon Lot 2 hereon \/e106

Existing Site Lot 2 hereon Lot 1 hereon Scale 1:35*3

Existing Site/Proposed Subdivision

LEWSON PLANNING Proposed Subdivision Date: 27/2/1911 Hongi Street - Lot 8 DP 41456 (NA58C/856)1 1 Resource Consent Specialists Ref.· O 22/1Drawn For: HNZC -Scale 1:300@A3I ,

Notes Page: 1 of 3

C Dimensions are approximate, h

N 41 1

Jason Hewson: [email protected] I 021 2233668

.

Lot !

.

\ 6/321" O I Water MeterNLot 1)

Lot 2

607m2 -111 4\ 6 Exis:ing \\ 1/ 1 1\ \ r \A \\

i « Dwe I l ing \Deck , /

6

Existing \©> 4 1,\14\ 5%\DweHing 4

1€\

il i 110 <

. 1 , //4////>A , 1

/1,0 0 9

1 4 -%0 · 11

ff INewlg constructed VC. ftc FNDS Standards)

:.

: 1, 9%€00/

11 /\ \ 1 1

0 Newlg Constructed1 -Water Meter and

lPower Supplg *f

410 \ , (Lot 2) l% I.49 . .1

Newlg constructed VE j . i(to FNDO Standards) -2 0/

In ' .:<ir////7j

- Proposed Subdivision (Details) Notes Page: 2

LEWSON PLANNING ' Proposed Subdivision Date: 27/2/19Dimensions are approximate

\

11 Hongi Street - Lot 8 DP 41456 (NA58*856) . Services based on recent as-builts0 0 Resource Consent Specialists , . 4Ref: 01322/1

1 1Drawn For: HNZC Scale 1: 200@A3,


f%

3 5< 1 <.f -3

Lot,

%Lot 1 1

0 -h W

Lot 1 Op 4 1 456 7 \ OP 41450- 4. Lot 1 :,

®

Lot 1 06

503m2\

Lot 1 6

50802

1 - 1/1 1 \\

K Lot 2

607m2 A1r \ ExistingDwell:ng

q Deck j

1 \ Lot 2

9 \I 601m2

< Deck \

Existin*x\,DwellIng

0\

i

\ \ ,<..Existing \\1 Owe lung 3 ,

1 \ Existing 2 1f

Dwelling 3 -1 41 //V /1 \ ,Ott/

1 1 \ Building Coverage r =<=Fpe'vious Surfaces%\

91+, _ot 1 : 36.55%Lot 1: 16.96%

\ _ot 2: 85.17%Lot 2: 12.37%

\ 93,02\. \ t . 0€00% /. 4 0, \ ) .4.19 . 0

1 j4-0gel# % 1 /\ 00" 1 1 \ 90 f

.// 1\

b, / - 1AN A-" ik /

\ /9 i 11? .'' ,

632 ,;

1 OP e + 1 09 <Lot - 1 i Lo:

1 1Lot 1 Lo: 1 9503m2 it - 11 503m2

Lot 2

607m2 11 \\

¢ Peck j

/ 1

Lot 2

Existing 4 \ 607m2 Ll triDwelling 1 11-- f \ 1<Deck \

/

\. q Existing \

j \ Owelling \ 1 \

\ 112 j\

1 1

f' 42

Existing #,

Dwelling \

9 1

40 \ /

f

\1/ffl///

96<\/0

f. 1/ Loridecaping 4Lot 1 : Be.34%

Lot 2: 74.36%

001 /// -h -

\

1

\4, '.1.7

Existing Dwelling

f

\

\

/

V

. 690 \1///..A\

er

lf Setbacks

00,

/4///J

Proposed Subdivision (Details)

LEWSON PLANNING Proposed Subdivision

11 Hongi Street - Lot 8 DP 41456 (NA58C/856) -

1 0 Resource Consent SpecialistsDrawn For: HNZCI J

Notes Page: 3 of 3

Dimensions are approximateDate: 27/2/19 · R

\

Ref: 01322/1

Scale 1:400@A3


Documents

Scanned for Far North District Council - fndc.govt.nz · PUAB€. Covd&(* 4,14 00( k HIVE Voqvelel*fOCS 01,VE A 'loudg to \* i'103 k *D futti. 85 -tws ovu_ 1& te,Aadal . 6. Description

Scanned for Far North District Council - fndc.govt.nz · PUAB€. Covd&(* 4,14 00( k HIVE VoqvelelfOCS 01,VE A 'loudg to \ i'103 k *D futti. 85 -tws ovu_ 1& te,Aadal . 6. Description