Upload
doantruc
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
School Data - Contact Information
Please enter your Rising Star leadership team members (Process Manager , Capacity Builder(s) , and Improvement Team Member) contact information.
District Information
District Name: ROCKFORD SD 205 District Address: 501 7Th St
City/State/Zip: Rockford, IL, 61104 1242 RCDT Number: 041012050250000
Superintendent: Dr. Ehren Jarrett Superintendent Email:* [email protected]
District Phone: Ext: 8159663101 District Fax:
School Information
Name: WEST MIDDLE SCHOOL Address: 1900 N ROCKTON AVE
City/State/Zip: ROCKFORD, IL, 61103 4370 RCDTS Number: 041012050251001
Principal: Mike Francis Principal Email*: [email protected]
Phone: Ext: 815966-3200 Fax: 8159663216
Name Rising Star Team Role Phone Email Title/Position
Maceo Rainey School Principal (815) 966-320 [email protected]
Mike Francis School Principal Designee 815-966-3200 [email protected] Principal
Linda Schreiner School Process Manager 8159663200 [email protected] Other
Holly English School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Brad Thornquist School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Cynthia Conley School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Lisa Mellentine School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Diane Roman School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Asiya Laskonis School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
George Cooper School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Richla King School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Lori Beach-Yates School Improvement Team Member 8159663200 [email protected] Teacher
Brian Rasmussen School Improvement Team Member 8159663200 [email protected] Teacher
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 1 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
School Data - Contact Information
Please enter your Rising Star leadership team members (Process Manager , Capacity Builder(s) , and Improvement Team Member) contact information.
District Information
District Name: ROCKFORD SD 205 District Address: 501 7Th St
City/State/Zip: Rockford, IL, 61104 1242 RCDT Number: 041012050250000
Superintendent: Dr. Ehren Jarrett Superintendent Email:* [email protected]
District Phone: Ext: 8159663101 District Fax:
School Information
Name: WEST MIDDLE SCHOOL Address: 1900 N ROCKTON AVE
City/State/Zip: ROCKFORD, IL, 61103 4370 RCDTS Number: 041012050251001
Principal: Mike Francis Principal Email*: [email protected]
Phone: Ext: 815966-3200 Fax: 8159663216
Name Rising Star Team Role Phone Email Title/Position
Maceo Rainey School Principal (815) 966-320 [email protected]
Mike Francis School Principal Designee 815-966-3200 [email protected] Principal
Linda Schreiner School Process Manager 8159663200 [email protected] Other
Holly English School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Brad Thornquist School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Cynthia Conley School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Lisa Mellentine School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Diane Roman School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Asiya Laskonis School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
George Cooper School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Richla King School Improvement Team Member 815-966-3200 [email protected] Teacher
Lori Beach-Yates School Improvement Team Member 8159663200 [email protected] Teacher
Brian Rasmussen School Improvement Team Member 8159663200 [email protected] Teacher
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 2 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
School Data - Report Card Analysis
Summary - What do the School Report Card data tell you about student performance in your school? If appropriate, the school will consider grade-level and subgroup performance.
Analysis - What areas of strength are indicated? What areas of weakness, if any, are indicated by these data? What factors are likely to have contributed to these results? Consider both
external and internal factors to the school that can be influenced or improved by the school.
The school Report Card data tells us that we have several students within the various subgroups that are not meeting or exceeding state benchmarkson the ISAT exam. Our population of Black,
Hispanic, White, and Low-Income students are performing around the 50 percentile range with more interventions that are in place to support student achievement The report card also tells us
that our school is experienceing high volumes of student mobility, which is a serious concern in regards to mobility and continuity with your students and families.
The data also informs us that over half of our teaching staff has less than 4 years of teaching experience inthe classroom. Furthermore, our teaching staff is relatively young and inexperienced
therefore, the teachng staff will require continuous professional development opportuntiies. In addition, our data reflects that we have an increase in the number of students that are living in
poverty.
An area of strength indicated in our school report card shows incremental growth in reading and math for our subgroup of students classified as low-income. There has been close to 5 % growth in
reading and math. Some of the internal factors that I feel contribute to this growth was the implementation of our Professional Learning Communities. Teachers are able to receive instant feedback
on student performance by way of common formative assessments provided to students. The formative assessments are aligned with the common core standards.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 3 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
District Data — Local Assessments
Summary - What do the Local Assessment data tell you about student performance in your school?. If appropriate, the school will consider grade-level and subgroup performance.
Analysis - What areas of strength are indicated? What areas of weakness, if any, are indicated by these data? What factors are likely to have contributed to these results? Consider both
external and internal factors to the school that can be influenced or improved by the school.
The local assessment data indicates that a significant amount of our 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students are not meeting and exceeding State of Illinois academic benchmarks as defined by the ISAT in the
areas of reading and math for 2013. However, recent data also indicates that our school has demonstrated a considerable amount of improvement in reading and math scores over the last year.
Furthermore, the increased test scores in the areas of reading and math is closely connected to the intervention and tutorial services that our school offers tos tudents that are exhbiting high
volumes of academic and social difficulty. Some of the academic interventions include, but not limited to: before school tutoring, afetr school tutoring withthe YMCA, Mandatory Lunch Tutoring during
the instructional day, and after school math enrichment.
In addition, our school has implemented a process of common formative and summative assessments that are designed to supply teachers with immediate feedback on the academic standards that
every student per grade level must master. The common formative assessments are aligned to the common core standards and the data results are intended to be rigorous enough to prepare
students for the upcomiing ISAT in the spring.
An area of strength that has been indicated from our local assessment data highlights the fact that our population of low income students have increased their reading and math proficiency on last
year's ISAT exam. In addition, the increase of student achievement among our low income subgroup of students has been steadily increasing from the past 2 years. An area of weakness that has been
identified is the increase of the student mobility rate fromthe past couple of years. However, much of the mobility related issues are relegated to matters in which our school and District have no
control over.
Possible factors that contribute to the strengths of our school's performance are directly connected to our ability to sustain our leadership. Our Prinicpal has been in place for the past 2 years which
sybolizes continuity and stability. Prior to that, Principal Rainey was the 7th Principal at West Middle School in the past 5-6 year time period. Furthermore, there has been little stability in leadership
at West Middle School over the years. In addition, having the ability to sustain the leadership team has brought continuity and sustainable process and procedures that are beneficial to the academic
success of students and for the managment and organization of the staff. The issue of high mobility rates at West Middle School are closely related to the high volumes of children and families that live
in poverty throughout the Rockford region. Homelessness and unstable living conditions has had a tremendous impact on student mobility.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 4 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis — Leadership
CII7 All staff interactions in all meetings (staff, problem solving, committees, planning, conferences, etc.) and in the instructional setting reflect a "Culture of Candor" and a
climate of trust, respect and collaboration that is focused on norms and adult social and emotional competencies. (2337) CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/5/14: Currently, West staff is required to meet as PLC groups: we no longer meet as whole staff (as the Staff Meetings are
optional).
IA14 The district/school recruits, trains, supports, and places personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
October 22, 2013: Reassessed indicator Professional development is currently being offered regularly at the district level.
Professional development is also offered at the building level on the fourth Thursday of each month in the library. The PLC
Leaders will take a quick head count at the first November PLC Meeting to get an understanding of how many teachers have
taken advantage of the summer/school-year District PD offerings or other educational enrichment opportunities (webinars,
graduate classes, etc.) SIP Team will promote Professional Development opportunities monthly to staff. December 8, 2014
Reassessed Indicator Professional development is currently offered regularly at the district level (optional). Professional
development is now being offered at one of our two PLC meetings related to SMART goals and SMART training. So far this year. PD
has centered on Greatest Area of Need, and color-coded student identification. Scheduled PD sessions are in close reading and
coaching styles.
ID01 A team structure is officially incorporated into the school improvement plan and school governance policy. (1012)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. SS,SD,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Reassessed Indicator: 12/8/2014 The team structure has been officially incorporated into the SIP and school governance
policy. We are in the early phases of incorporating team structures across all areas. The team structure is an integral part of
the school improvement plan. We are working on approppriate governance for all teams. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator.
West's SIP Team consists of representatives from all content areas and electives. The PTO president will be asked to be the
parent representative on the Team. Agendas and minutes are in Rising Start. Minutes are sent
ID02 All teams have written statements of purpose and guidelines for their operation. (1013)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Clarify the Vision for Reform. SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
February 11, 2014:A binder is available for norms and minutes and agendas for each team. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The PLC
teams have set norms and procedures for the school year 2014-2015. This is evidenced by the minutes that each team produces and is
kept in the binder in the front office.
ID06 The principal maintains a file of the agendas, work products, and minutes of all teams. (1017) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Principal keep agendas and minutes for all building meetings in a folder in the office.
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff meets regularly (twice a month or more for an
hour each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement
of individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently the Principal and Leadership Team members meet on a regular basis to monitor student achievement and review
school wide interventions. We will begin meeting biweekly using a predetermined schedule. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. A
meeting schedule is in place. The team meets the 2nd & 4th Tuesday of the month for an hour each meeting. Agendas and
minutes are kept in Rising Star. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The Administrative team meets once a month (principal and
APs)and the Leadership Team meets once a month (principal, administration and team leads).
ID08 The Leadership Team serves as a conduit of communication to the faculty and staff. (1019) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Minutes from SIP meeting are sent to all staff members. The content area representative shares with
their PLC teams. Minutes of meetings are in Rising Star.
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Our school is currently in the early developmental phases of implementing scheduled School Improvement Plan meetings that
will incorporate various forms of school wide data to monitor student achievement. In addition, we are in the arly phases of
using the school wide data to develop school wide targeted interventions for students, who are not meeting academic
benchmarks. The aforementioned developmental processes will also assist in creating and driving professional dvelopment
opportunities for teachers and administration. Currently, we are in the early stages of this development cycle, which will
drive teacher/administrator professional development opportunities. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. The team has just begun
looking at data through PLC meetings. Team agrees on what data needs to be collected, but are still collecting and therefore
have not looked at it to help drive classroom instruction. 12/8/2014 Reassessed indicator The scheduled meeting dates for
the leadership teams have been formalized. The Administrative Team (Principal and assistant principals) meet bi-weekly. The
Leadership Team (Principal, assistant principals, MEL, REL) meet once per month. The SIP team (includes members from
aforementioned teams) meets twice per month. The scheduled meeting time can be found on the published school calendar.
Through our PLC process, the school teams are actively looking at all data to inform instruction toward achieving SMART
goals.
IE06 The principal keeps a focus on instructional improvement and student learning outcomes. (1027) SP,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, Principal has incorporated the use of the Math and Reading Specialist to provide instructional assessment data
that is used to drive interventions and enrichment opportunities for students. Some of the data that the Reading and Math
Specialist are haring with the Principal include, but not limited to: -DEA Testing -Star Testing -SRI Testing October 22, 2013:
Indicator Reassessment Walk-throughs are connected to the Danielson model of evaluation in which principal uses informal
observations and conversations to provide feed-back and support to teachers. Currently, informal observations have been
done at this time. Assistant principals and Principal Rainey have handed out the 'Teacher of the Month' awards to recognize
observed effective teaching practices.
IE07 The principal monitors curriculum and classroom instruction regularly. (1028) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
Currently, the Principal conducts random classroom visits on an informal and formal basis to inspect teaching and learning. In addition,
Principal attends PLC meetings to monitor staff instructional methods and interventions. In addition, the Prinicpal is building an
artifact binder of teacher lead curriculum projects and interventions. October 22, 2013; Indicator reassessed. PlCs visits will continue
and the Principal will continue to build artifact binder.
IE08 The principal spends at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/20/14: Administrators are sharing information as it becomes available to them. Much of their time is spent in student
management and their time working within the classrooms is therefore limited. There is always at least one or more
administrator in the building at all times.
IE09 The principal challenges, supports and monitors the correction of unsound teaching practices based on evidence. (1030) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14; West Middle School administrators follow the Danielson model of evaluation. Teachers submit lesson plans on a
weekly basis so that administrators can follow what is taking place in the classroom.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 5 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CII7 All staff interactions in all meetings (staff, problem solving, committees, planning, conferences, etc.) and in the instructional setting reflect a "Culture of Candor" and a
climate of trust, respect and collaboration that is focused on norms and adult social and emotional competencies. (2337) CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/5/14: Currently, West staff is required to meet as PLC groups: we no longer meet as whole staff (as the Staff Meetings are
optional).
IA14 The district/school recruits, trains, supports, and places personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
October 22, 2013: Reassessed indicator Professional development is currently being offered regularly at the district level.
Professional development is also offered at the building level on the fourth Thursday of each month in the library. The PLC
Leaders will take a quick head count at the first November PLC Meeting to get an understanding of how many teachers have
taken advantage of the summer/school-year District PD offerings or other educational enrichment opportunities (webinars,
graduate classes, etc.) SIP Team will promote Professional Development opportunities monthly to staff. December 8, 2014
Reassessed Indicator Professional development is currently offered regularly at the district level (optional). Professional
development is now being offered at one of our two PLC meetings related to SMART goals and SMART training. So far this year. PD
has centered on Greatest Area of Need, and color-coded student identification. Scheduled PD sessions are in close reading and
coaching styles.
ID01 A team structure is officially incorporated into the school improvement plan and school governance policy. (1012)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. SS,SD,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Reassessed Indicator: 12/8/2014 The team structure has been officially incorporated into the SIP and school governance
policy. We are in the early phases of incorporating team structures across all areas. The team structure is an integral part of
the school improvement plan. We are working on approppriate governance for all teams. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator.
West's SIP Team consists of representatives from all content areas and electives. The PTO president will be asked to be the
parent representative on the Team. Agendas and minutes are in Rising Start. Minutes are sent
ID02 All teams have written statements of purpose and guidelines for their operation. (1013)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Clarify the Vision for Reform. SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
February 11, 2014:A binder is available for norms and minutes and agendas for each team. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The PLC
teams have set norms and procedures for the school year 2014-2015. This is evidenced by the minutes that each team produces and is
kept in the binder in the front office.
ID06 The principal maintains a file of the agendas, work products, and minutes of all teams. (1017) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Principal keep agendas and minutes for all building meetings in a folder in the office.
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff meets regularly (twice a month or more for an
hour each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement
of individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently the Principal and Leadership Team members meet on a regular basis to monitor student achievement and review
school wide interventions. We will begin meeting biweekly using a predetermined schedule. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. A
meeting schedule is in place. The team meets the 2nd & 4th Tuesday of the month for an hour each meeting. Agendas and
minutes are kept in Rising Star. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The Administrative team meets once a month (principal and
APs)and the Leadership Team meets once a month (principal, administration and team leads).
ID08 The Leadership Team serves as a conduit of communication to the faculty and staff. (1019) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Minutes from SIP meeting are sent to all staff members. The content area representative shares with
their PLC teams. Minutes of meetings are in Rising Star.
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Our school is currently in the early developmental phases of implementing scheduled School Improvement Plan meetings that
will incorporate various forms of school wide data to monitor student achievement. In addition, we are in the arly phases of
using the school wide data to develop school wide targeted interventions for students, who are not meeting academic
benchmarks. The aforementioned developmental processes will also assist in creating and driving professional dvelopment
opportunities for teachers and administration. Currently, we are in the early stages of this development cycle, which will
drive teacher/administrator professional development opportunities. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. The team has just begun
looking at data through PLC meetings. Team agrees on what data needs to be collected, but are still collecting and therefore
have not looked at it to help drive classroom instruction. 12/8/2014 Reassessed indicator The scheduled meeting dates for
the leadership teams have been formalized. The Administrative Team (Principal and assistant principals) meet bi-weekly. The
Leadership Team (Principal, assistant principals, MEL, REL) meet once per month. The SIP team (includes members from
aforementioned teams) meets twice per month. The scheduled meeting time can be found on the published school calendar.
Through our PLC process, the school teams are actively looking at all data to inform instruction toward achieving SMART
goals.
IE06 The principal keeps a focus on instructional improvement and student learning outcomes. (1027) SP,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, Principal has incorporated the use of the Math and Reading Specialist to provide instructional assessment data
that is used to drive interventions and enrichment opportunities for students. Some of the data that the Reading and Math
Specialist are haring with the Principal include, but not limited to: -DEA Testing -Star Testing -SRI Testing October 22, 2013:
Indicator Reassessment Walk-throughs are connected to the Danielson model of evaluation in which principal uses informal
observations and conversations to provide feed-back and support to teachers. Currently, informal observations have been
done at this time. Assistant principals and Principal Rainey have handed out the 'Teacher of the Month' awards to recognize
observed effective teaching practices.
IE07 The principal monitors curriculum and classroom instruction regularly. (1028) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
Currently, the Principal conducts random classroom visits on an informal and formal basis to inspect teaching and learning. In addition,
Principal attends PLC meetings to monitor staff instructional methods and interventions. In addition, the Prinicpal is building an
artifact binder of teacher lead curriculum projects and interventions. October 22, 2013; Indicator reassessed. PlCs visits will continue
and the Principal will continue to build artifact binder.
IE08 The principal spends at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/20/14: Administrators are sharing information as it becomes available to them. Much of their time is spent in student
management and their time working within the classrooms is therefore limited. There is always at least one or more
administrator in the building at all times.
IE09 The principal challenges, supports and monitors the correction of unsound teaching practices based on evidence. (1030) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14; West Middle School administrators follow the Danielson model of evaluation. Teachers submit lesson plans on a
weekly basis so that administrators can follow what is taking place in the classroom.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 6 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CII7 All staff interactions in all meetings (staff, problem solving, committees, planning, conferences, etc.) and in the instructional setting reflect a "Culture of Candor" and a
climate of trust, respect and collaboration that is focused on norms and adult social and emotional competencies. (2337) CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/5/14: Currently, West staff is required to meet as PLC groups: we no longer meet as whole staff (as the Staff Meetings are
optional).
IA14 The district/school recruits, trains, supports, and places personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
October 22, 2013: Reassessed indicator Professional development is currently being offered regularly at the district level.
Professional development is also offered at the building level on the fourth Thursday of each month in the library. The PLC
Leaders will take a quick head count at the first November PLC Meeting to get an understanding of how many teachers have
taken advantage of the summer/school-year District PD offerings or other educational enrichment opportunities (webinars,
graduate classes, etc.) SIP Team will promote Professional Development opportunities monthly to staff. December 8, 2014
Reassessed Indicator Professional development is currently offered regularly at the district level (optional). Professional
development is now being offered at one of our two PLC meetings related to SMART goals and SMART training. So far this year. PD
has centered on Greatest Area of Need, and color-coded student identification. Scheduled PD sessions are in close reading and
coaching styles.
ID01 A team structure is officially incorporated into the school improvement plan and school governance policy. (1012)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. SS,SD,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Reassessed Indicator: 12/8/2014 The team structure has been officially incorporated into the SIP and school governance
policy. We are in the early phases of incorporating team structures across all areas. The team structure is an integral part of
the school improvement plan. We are working on approppriate governance for all teams. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator.
West's SIP Team consists of representatives from all content areas and electives. The PTO president will be asked to be the
parent representative on the Team. Agendas and minutes are in Rising Start. Minutes are sent
ID02 All teams have written statements of purpose and guidelines for their operation. (1013)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Clarify the Vision for Reform. SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
February 11, 2014:A binder is available for norms and minutes and agendas for each team. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The PLC
teams have set norms and procedures for the school year 2014-2015. This is evidenced by the minutes that each team produces and is
kept in the binder in the front office.
ID06 The principal maintains a file of the agendas, work products, and minutes of all teams. (1017) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Principal keep agendas and minutes for all building meetings in a folder in the office.
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff meets regularly (twice a month or more for an
hour each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement
of individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently the Principal and Leadership Team members meet on a regular basis to monitor student achievement and review
school wide interventions. We will begin meeting biweekly using a predetermined schedule. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. A
meeting schedule is in place. The team meets the 2nd & 4th Tuesday of the month for an hour each meeting. Agendas and
minutes are kept in Rising Star. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The Administrative team meets once a month (principal and
APs)and the Leadership Team meets once a month (principal, administration and team leads).
ID08 The Leadership Team serves as a conduit of communication to the faculty and staff. (1019) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Minutes from SIP meeting are sent to all staff members. The content area representative shares with
their PLC teams. Minutes of meetings are in Rising Star.
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Our school is currently in the early developmental phases of implementing scheduled School Improvement Plan meetings that
will incorporate various forms of school wide data to monitor student achievement. In addition, we are in the arly phases of
using the school wide data to develop school wide targeted interventions for students, who are not meeting academic
benchmarks. The aforementioned developmental processes will also assist in creating and driving professional dvelopment
opportunities for teachers and administration. Currently, we are in the early stages of this development cycle, which will
drive teacher/administrator professional development opportunities. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. The team has just begun
looking at data through PLC meetings. Team agrees on what data needs to be collected, but are still collecting and therefore
have not looked at it to help drive classroom instruction. 12/8/2014 Reassessed indicator The scheduled meeting dates for
the leadership teams have been formalized. The Administrative Team (Principal and assistant principals) meet bi-weekly. The
Leadership Team (Principal, assistant principals, MEL, REL) meet once per month. The SIP team (includes members from
aforementioned teams) meets twice per month. The scheduled meeting time can be found on the published school calendar.
Through our PLC process, the school teams are actively looking at all data to inform instruction toward achieving SMART
goals.
IE06 The principal keeps a focus on instructional improvement and student learning outcomes. (1027) SP,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, Principal has incorporated the use of the Math and Reading Specialist to provide instructional assessment data
that is used to drive interventions and enrichment opportunities for students. Some of the data that the Reading and Math
Specialist are haring with the Principal include, but not limited to: -DEA Testing -Star Testing -SRI Testing October 22, 2013:
Indicator Reassessment Walk-throughs are connected to the Danielson model of evaluation in which principal uses informal
observations and conversations to provide feed-back and support to teachers. Currently, informal observations have been
done at this time. Assistant principals and Principal Rainey have handed out the 'Teacher of the Month' awards to recognize
observed effective teaching practices.
IE07 The principal monitors curriculum and classroom instruction regularly. (1028) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
Currently, the Principal conducts random classroom visits on an informal and formal basis to inspect teaching and learning. In addition,
Principal attends PLC meetings to monitor staff instructional methods and interventions. In addition, the Prinicpal is building an
artifact binder of teacher lead curriculum projects and interventions. October 22, 2013; Indicator reassessed. PlCs visits will continue
and the Principal will continue to build artifact binder.
IE08 The principal spends at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/20/14: Administrators are sharing information as it becomes available to them. Much of their time is spent in student
management and their time working within the classrooms is therefore limited. There is always at least one or more
administrator in the building at all times.
IE09 The principal challenges, supports and monitors the correction of unsound teaching practices based on evidence. (1030) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14; West Middle School administrators follow the Danielson model of evaluation. Teachers submit lesson plans on a
weekly basis so that administrators can follow what is taking place in the classroom.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 7 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CII7 All staff interactions in all meetings (staff, problem solving, committees, planning, conferences, etc.) and in the instructional setting reflect a "Culture of Candor" and a
climate of trust, respect and collaboration that is focused on norms and adult social and emotional competencies. (2337) CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/5/14: Currently, West staff is required to meet as PLC groups: we no longer meet as whole staff (as the Staff Meetings are
optional).
IA14 The district/school recruits, trains, supports, and places personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
October 22, 2013: Reassessed indicator Professional development is currently being offered regularly at the district level.
Professional development is also offered at the building level on the fourth Thursday of each month in the library. The PLC
Leaders will take a quick head count at the first November PLC Meeting to get an understanding of how many teachers have
taken advantage of the summer/school-year District PD offerings or other educational enrichment opportunities (webinars,
graduate classes, etc.) SIP Team will promote Professional Development opportunities monthly to staff. December 8, 2014
Reassessed Indicator Professional development is currently offered regularly at the district level (optional). Professional
development is now being offered at one of our two PLC meetings related to SMART goals and SMART training. So far this year. PD
has centered on Greatest Area of Need, and color-coded student identification. Scheduled PD sessions are in close reading and
coaching styles.
ID01 A team structure is officially incorporated into the school improvement plan and school governance policy. (1012)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. SS,SD,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Reassessed Indicator: 12/8/2014 The team structure has been officially incorporated into the SIP and school governance
policy. We are in the early phases of incorporating team structures across all areas. The team structure is an integral part of
the school improvement plan. We are working on approppriate governance for all teams. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator.
West's SIP Team consists of representatives from all content areas and electives. The PTO president will be asked to be the
parent representative on the Team. Agendas and minutes are in Rising Start. Minutes are sent
ID02 All teams have written statements of purpose and guidelines for their operation. (1013)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Clarify the Vision for Reform. SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
February 11, 2014:A binder is available for norms and minutes and agendas for each team. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The PLC
teams have set norms and procedures for the school year 2014-2015. This is evidenced by the minutes that each team produces and is
kept in the binder in the front office.
ID06 The principal maintains a file of the agendas, work products, and minutes of all teams. (1017) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Principal keep agendas and minutes for all building meetings in a folder in the office.
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff meets regularly (twice a month or more for an
hour each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement
of individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently the Principal and Leadership Team members meet on a regular basis to monitor student achievement and review
school wide interventions. We will begin meeting biweekly using a predetermined schedule. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. A
meeting schedule is in place. The team meets the 2nd & 4th Tuesday of the month for an hour each meeting. Agendas and
minutes are kept in Rising Star. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The Administrative team meets once a month (principal and
APs)and the Leadership Team meets once a month (principal, administration and team leads).
ID08 The Leadership Team serves as a conduit of communication to the faculty and staff. (1019) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Minutes from SIP meeting are sent to all staff members. The content area representative shares with
their PLC teams. Minutes of meetings are in Rising Star.
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Our school is currently in the early developmental phases of implementing scheduled School Improvement Plan meetings that
will incorporate various forms of school wide data to monitor student achievement. In addition, we are in the arly phases of
using the school wide data to develop school wide targeted interventions for students, who are not meeting academic
benchmarks. The aforementioned developmental processes will also assist in creating and driving professional dvelopment
opportunities for teachers and administration. Currently, we are in the early stages of this development cycle, which will
drive teacher/administrator professional development opportunities. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. The team has just begun
looking at data through PLC meetings. Team agrees on what data needs to be collected, but are still collecting and therefore
have not looked at it to help drive classroom instruction. 12/8/2014 Reassessed indicator The scheduled meeting dates for
the leadership teams have been formalized. The Administrative Team (Principal and assistant principals) meet bi-weekly. The
Leadership Team (Principal, assistant principals, MEL, REL) meet once per month. The SIP team (includes members from
aforementioned teams) meets twice per month. The scheduled meeting time can be found on the published school calendar.
Through our PLC process, the school teams are actively looking at all data to inform instruction toward achieving SMART
goals.
IE06 The principal keeps a focus on instructional improvement and student learning outcomes. (1027) SP,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, Principal has incorporated the use of the Math and Reading Specialist to provide instructional assessment data
that is used to drive interventions and enrichment opportunities for students. Some of the data that the Reading and Math
Specialist are haring with the Principal include, but not limited to: -DEA Testing -Star Testing -SRI Testing October 22, 2013:
Indicator Reassessment Walk-throughs are connected to the Danielson model of evaluation in which principal uses informal
observations and conversations to provide feed-back and support to teachers. Currently, informal observations have been
done at this time. Assistant principals and Principal Rainey have handed out the 'Teacher of the Month' awards to recognize
observed effective teaching practices.
IE07 The principal monitors curriculum and classroom instruction regularly. (1028) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
Currently, the Principal conducts random classroom visits on an informal and formal basis to inspect teaching and learning. In addition,
Principal attends PLC meetings to monitor staff instructional methods and interventions. In addition, the Prinicpal is building an
artifact binder of teacher lead curriculum projects and interventions. October 22, 2013; Indicator reassessed. PlCs visits will continue
and the Principal will continue to build artifact binder.
IE08 The principal spends at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/20/14: Administrators are sharing information as it becomes available to them. Much of their time is spent in student
management and their time working within the classrooms is therefore limited. There is always at least one or more
administrator in the building at all times.
IE09 The principal challenges, supports and monitors the correction of unsound teaching practices based on evidence. (1030) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14; West Middle School administrators follow the Danielson model of evaluation. Teachers submit lesson plans on a
weekly basis so that administrators can follow what is taking place in the classroom.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 8 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CII7 All staff interactions in all meetings (staff, problem solving, committees, planning, conferences, etc.) and in the instructional setting reflect a "Culture of Candor" and a
climate of trust, respect and collaboration that is focused on norms and adult social and emotional competencies. (2337) CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/5/14: Currently, West staff is required to meet as PLC groups: we no longer meet as whole staff (as the Staff Meetings are
optional).
IA14 The district/school recruits, trains, supports, and places personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
October 22, 2013: Reassessed indicator Professional development is currently being offered regularly at the district level.
Professional development is also offered at the building level on the fourth Thursday of each month in the library. The PLC
Leaders will take a quick head count at the first November PLC Meeting to get an understanding of how many teachers have
taken advantage of the summer/school-year District PD offerings or other educational enrichment opportunities (webinars,
graduate classes, etc.) SIP Team will promote Professional Development opportunities monthly to staff. December 8, 2014
Reassessed Indicator Professional development is currently offered regularly at the district level (optional). Professional
development is now being offered at one of our two PLC meetings related to SMART goals and SMART training. So far this year. PD
has centered on Greatest Area of Need, and color-coded student identification. Scheduled PD sessions are in close reading and
coaching styles.
ID01 A team structure is officially incorporated into the school improvement plan and school governance policy. (1012)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. SS,SD,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Reassessed Indicator: 12/8/2014 The team structure has been officially incorporated into the SIP and school governance
policy. We are in the early phases of incorporating team structures across all areas. The team structure is an integral part of
the school improvement plan. We are working on approppriate governance for all teams. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator.
West's SIP Team consists of representatives from all content areas and electives. The PTO president will be asked to be the
parent representative on the Team. Agendas and minutes are in Rising Start. Minutes are sent
ID02 All teams have written statements of purpose and guidelines for their operation. (1013)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Clarify the Vision for Reform. SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
February 11, 2014:A binder is available for norms and minutes and agendas for each team. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The PLC
teams have set norms and procedures for the school year 2014-2015. This is evidenced by the minutes that each team produces and is
kept in the binder in the front office.
ID06 The principal maintains a file of the agendas, work products, and minutes of all teams. (1017) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Principal keep agendas and minutes for all building meetings in a folder in the office.
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff meets regularly (twice a month or more for an
hour each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement
of individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently the Principal and Leadership Team members meet on a regular basis to monitor student achievement and review
school wide interventions. We will begin meeting biweekly using a predetermined schedule. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. A
meeting schedule is in place. The team meets the 2nd & 4th Tuesday of the month for an hour each meeting. Agendas and
minutes are kept in Rising Star. Indicator reassessed: 1/26/2015 The Administrative team meets once a month (principal and
APs)and the Leadership Team meets once a month (principal, administration and team leads).
ID08 The Leadership Team serves as a conduit of communication to the faculty and staff. (1019) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Minutes from SIP meeting are sent to all staff members. The content area representative shares with
their PLC teams. Minutes of meetings are in Rising Star.
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Our school is currently in the early developmental phases of implementing scheduled School Improvement Plan meetings that
will incorporate various forms of school wide data to monitor student achievement. In addition, we are in the arly phases of
using the school wide data to develop school wide targeted interventions for students, who are not meeting academic
benchmarks. The aforementioned developmental processes will also assist in creating and driving professional dvelopment
opportunities for teachers and administration. Currently, we are in the early stages of this development cycle, which will
drive teacher/administrator professional development opportunities. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. The team has just begun
looking at data through PLC meetings. Team agrees on what data needs to be collected, but are still collecting and therefore
have not looked at it to help drive classroom instruction. 12/8/2014 Reassessed indicator The scheduled meeting dates for
the leadership teams have been formalized. The Administrative Team (Principal and assistant principals) meet bi-weekly. The
Leadership Team (Principal, assistant principals, MEL, REL) meet once per month. The SIP team (includes members from
aforementioned teams) meets twice per month. The scheduled meeting time can be found on the published school calendar.
Through our PLC process, the school teams are actively looking at all data to inform instruction toward achieving SMART
goals.
IE06 The principal keeps a focus on instructional improvement and student learning outcomes. (1027) SP,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, Principal has incorporated the use of the Math and Reading Specialist to provide instructional assessment data
that is used to drive interventions and enrichment opportunities for students. Some of the data that the Reading and Math
Specialist are haring with the Principal include, but not limited to: -DEA Testing -Star Testing -SRI Testing October 22, 2013:
Indicator Reassessment Walk-throughs are connected to the Danielson model of evaluation in which principal uses informal
observations and conversations to provide feed-back and support to teachers. Currently, informal observations have been
done at this time. Assistant principals and Principal Rainey have handed out the 'Teacher of the Month' awards to recognize
observed effective teaching practices.
IE07 The principal monitors curriculum and classroom instruction regularly. (1028) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
Currently, the Principal conducts random classroom visits on an informal and formal basis to inspect teaching and learning. In addition,
Principal attends PLC meetings to monitor staff instructional methods and interventions. In addition, the Prinicpal is building an
artifact binder of teacher lead curriculum projects and interventions. October 22, 2013; Indicator reassessed. PlCs visits will continue
and the Principal will continue to build artifact binder.
IE08 The principal spends at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/20/14: Administrators are sharing information as it becomes available to them. Much of their time is spent in student
management and their time working within the classrooms is therefore limited. There is always at least one or more
administrator in the building at all times.
IE09 The principal challenges, supports and monitors the correction of unsound teaching practices based on evidence. (1030) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14; West Middle School administrators follow the Danielson model of evaluation. Teachers submit lesson plans on a
weekly basis so that administrators can follow what is taking place in the classroom.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 9 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis — Curriculum
CL17 Professional development for teachers is determined by data (including classroom observations and review of lesson plans) that demonstrate teachers' attention to
academic, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations and standards. (2339) SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- PLC discussions generate ideas for professional development.
IF05 Professional development for teachers includes self-assessment related to indicators of effective teaching and classroom management. (1039) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: The self-assessment reflection occurs in our PLC content area meetings when we address the four curriculum
questions: what do we want them to know?; how do we know when they know it?; how do we address it if they don't know it
(remediation)?; and, what do we do if they do know it (enrichment)?
IF08
Professional development for the whole faculty includes assessment of strengths and areas in need of improvement from classroom observations of indicators of effective
teaching. (1042)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development.
SP,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, we do not a consistent, accurate evaluation tool that assess the teacher strength's / needs for professional
development. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, there have not been any formal building professional development
offered. There is professional development offered from the district. The team recommends that the PLC leaders take
suggestions for professional development from their groups to the administrators. 12/8/2014 Indicator reassessed Optional
professional development is offered through the district on an on-going basis. At the building level, professional development
sessions have been held on SIP days and also on mandatory PLC days. These PD sessions have included: areas of greatest need
(GAN), and, color coded student identification. Other planned PD sessions include: close reading, and coaching styles. This is
a continuing process based on staff needs.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 10 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL17 Professional development for teachers is determined by data (including classroom observations and review of lesson plans) that demonstrate teachers' attention to
academic, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations and standards. (2339) SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- PLC discussions generate ideas for professional development.
IF05 Professional development for teachers includes self-assessment related to indicators of effective teaching and classroom management. (1039) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: The self-assessment reflection occurs in our PLC content area meetings when we address the four curriculum
questions: what do we want them to know?; how do we know when they know it?; how do we address it if they don't know it
(remediation)?; and, what do we do if they do know it (enrichment)?
IF08
Professional development for the whole faculty includes assessment of strengths and areas in need of improvement from classroom observations of indicators of effective
teaching. (1042)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development.
SP,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, we do not a consistent, accurate evaluation tool that assess the teacher strength's / needs for professional
development. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, there have not been any formal building professional development
offered. There is professional development offered from the district. The team recommends that the PLC leaders take
suggestions for professional development from their groups to the administrators. 12/8/2014 Indicator reassessed Optional
professional development is offered through the district on an on-going basis. At the building level, professional development
sessions have been held on SIP days and also on mandatory PLC days. These PD sessions have included: areas of greatest need
(GAN), and, color coded student identification. Other planned PD sessions include: close reading, and coaching styles. This is
a continuing process based on staff needs.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 11 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis – Instruction
IIA01 Instructional Teams develop standards-aligned units of instruction for each subject and grade level. (1045) SC,SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, instructional teams have have developed standards that are aligned to various units of instruction for each grade
level and course content area. This has been completed by way of working in PLC's to create common formative assessments.
The PLC teams are in the early stages of development which leaves room for improvement over time. 11/12/2013 Indicator
Assessed Teachers are directed by curriculum guides. When necessary, teachers provide appropriate adaptations for
students.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 12 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis — Assessment
IIC01 Units of instruction include specific learning activities aligned to objectives. (1083) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Teachers follow distict guidelines. Supplemental materials are used in Reading and Math. The evidence
used consist of lesson plans, Sip Day activities, professional development days and administrative evaluations.
IIC03 Materials for standards-aligned learning activities are well-organized, labeled, and stored for convenient use by teachers. (1085) SC,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 4/8/2014: Curriculum maps are available. Each subject area has either a MEL, REL or curriculum AP. Differentiated reading
materials are available.
IIIA01 All teachers are guided by a document that aligns standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment. (1063) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: Teachers are using District provided teacher guides and texts as well as, using supplemental materials.
Teachers use common core standards and PLC's to stay aligned within their content areas. The evidence used to assess this indicator
are lesson plans and PLC minutes.
IIIA02 All teachers develop weekly lesson plans based on aligned units of instruction. (1064) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
5/6/14: Teachers turn in weekly lesson plans. There is a scope and sequence for all areas of instruction. PLCs discuss progress toward
achieving instructional goals and objectives.
IIIA06 All teachers test frequently using a variety of evaluation methods and maintain a record of the results. (1068) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Teachers are recieving support and professional development to incorporate various evaluation methods as well as recording
and maintaining the various data. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Teachers follow the assessment calendar. Formal and
informal assessments are conducted on an ongoing basis. Grades are kept in the district's gradebook.
IIIA07
All teachers differentiate assignments (individualize instruction) in response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other methods of assessment.
(1069)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SP,RTI,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Indicator Reassessed There is a planned, whole-staff professional development(January 22, 2015) led by the REL for
close-reading and color-coded writing. This and other professional development opportunities are included to address the
differentiated instruction indicator. Our school must improve upon our ability to have teachers differentiate assignments in
response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other forms of assessments. This is usually accomplished through
conducting common formative assessments. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Some teachers are differentiating assignments.The
team suggests that professional development be offered at the building level to provide guidance and direction in this area.
IIIA35 Students are engaged and on task. (1161) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, student engagement is not at a level that correlates to high volumes of teaching and learning. Furthermore,
assessment data concludes that high percentage of our students require some sort of Tier I or Tier 2 academic intervention.
Teachers are recieving on-going professional development and training to promote engaging students within the classroom.
11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Positive studentengagement is improving. The team suggests that professional development
be offered to increase authentic engagement. The team also suggests that the staff is provided opportunities to exchange
best practices.
IIIC12 All teachers engage all students (e.g., encourage silent students to participate). (1109) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
During the teaching and learning phase, it is required through the Danielson Framework that teachers in our building actively
engage students in the learning process. Furtehrmore, it is expected that all students are engaged in learning in all classes.
11/12/2013 Indicator assessed Positive student engagement has increased. A variety of teaching modalities are being used.
TL1 All teachers demonstrate in their lesson plans the content knowledge necessary to challenge and motivate students to high levels of learning. (2332) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Teachers submit lesson plans weekly for administrative review. Teachers are evaluated by administrators based on
the Danielson model.
TL2
All teachers establish in their lesson plans and explicitly define to students high and realistic academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations for their
learning so that they know what is needed for them to achieve at proficient levels. (2331)
Title I Expectations: Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary schoolwide programs.
CL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Lesson plans are being monitored by administration to make certain that all aspects of each student's academic,
physical, social , emotional, and behavioral expectations are being met. Review of lesson plan format was presented at the
November staff meeting and at the December PAC meeting. February 11, 2014: Expectations are posted in classrooms. PBIS
posters are visible in classrooms and throughout the school. The school vision is also posted in classrooms. The first 15
minutes of the 1st hour (the advisory period) is used to focus on school-wide expectations.
TL9 All teachers incorporate the use of technology in their classrooms when it enhances instruction and builds 21st Century Learning Skills. (2335) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Every classrooms have a SMART Board, a laptop, and a computer for daily use. All teachers have access to Discovery
Education, online databases, iPADs, and the computer labs.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 13 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIC01 Units of instruction include specific learning activities aligned to objectives. (1083) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Teachers follow distict guidelines. Supplemental materials are used in Reading and Math. The evidence
used consist of lesson plans, Sip Day activities, professional development days and administrative evaluations.
IIC03 Materials for standards-aligned learning activities are well-organized, labeled, and stored for convenient use by teachers. (1085) SC,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 4/8/2014: Curriculum maps are available. Each subject area has either a MEL, REL or curriculum AP. Differentiated reading
materials are available.
IIIA01 All teachers are guided by a document that aligns standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment. (1063) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: Teachers are using District provided teacher guides and texts as well as, using supplemental materials.
Teachers use common core standards and PLC's to stay aligned within their content areas. The evidence used to assess this indicator
are lesson plans and PLC minutes.
IIIA02 All teachers develop weekly lesson plans based on aligned units of instruction. (1064) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
5/6/14: Teachers turn in weekly lesson plans. There is a scope and sequence for all areas of instruction. PLCs discuss progress toward
achieving instructional goals and objectives.
IIIA06 All teachers test frequently using a variety of evaluation methods and maintain a record of the results. (1068) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Teachers are recieving support and professional development to incorporate various evaluation methods as well as recording
and maintaining the various data. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Teachers follow the assessment calendar. Formal and
informal assessments are conducted on an ongoing basis. Grades are kept in the district's gradebook.
IIIA07
All teachers differentiate assignments (individualize instruction) in response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other methods of assessment.
(1069)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SP,RTI,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Indicator Reassessed There is a planned, whole-staff professional development(January 22, 2015) led by the REL for
close-reading and color-coded writing. This and other professional development opportunities are included to address the
differentiated instruction indicator. Our school must improve upon our ability to have teachers differentiate assignments in
response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other forms of assessments. This is usually accomplished through
conducting common formative assessments. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Some teachers are differentiating assignments.The
team suggests that professional development be offered at the building level to provide guidance and direction in this area.
IIIA35 Students are engaged and on task. (1161) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, student engagement is not at a level that correlates to high volumes of teaching and learning. Furthermore,
assessment data concludes that high percentage of our students require some sort of Tier I or Tier 2 academic intervention.
Teachers are recieving on-going professional development and training to promote engaging students within the classroom.
11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Positive studentengagement is improving. The team suggests that professional development
be offered to increase authentic engagement. The team also suggests that the staff is provided opportunities to exchange
best practices.
IIIC12 All teachers engage all students (e.g., encourage silent students to participate). (1109) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
During the teaching and learning phase, it is required through the Danielson Framework that teachers in our building actively
engage students in the learning process. Furtehrmore, it is expected that all students are engaged in learning in all classes.
11/12/2013 Indicator assessed Positive student engagement has increased. A variety of teaching modalities are being used.
TL1 All teachers demonstrate in their lesson plans the content knowledge necessary to challenge and motivate students to high levels of learning. (2332) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Teachers submit lesson plans weekly for administrative review. Teachers are evaluated by administrators based on
the Danielson model.
TL2
All teachers establish in their lesson plans and explicitly define to students high and realistic academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations for their
learning so that they know what is needed for them to achieve at proficient levels. (2331)
Title I Expectations: Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary schoolwide programs.
CL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Lesson plans are being monitored by administration to make certain that all aspects of each student's academic,
physical, social , emotional, and behavioral expectations are being met. Review of lesson plan format was presented at the
November staff meeting and at the December PAC meeting. February 11, 2014: Expectations are posted in classrooms. PBIS
posters are visible in classrooms and throughout the school. The school vision is also posted in classrooms. The first 15
minutes of the 1st hour (the advisory period) is used to focus on school-wide expectations.
TL9 All teachers incorporate the use of technology in their classrooms when it enhances instruction and builds 21st Century Learning Skills. (2335) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Every classrooms have a SMART Board, a laptop, and a computer for daily use. All teachers have access to Discovery
Education, online databases, iPADs, and the computer labs.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 14 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIC01 Units of instruction include specific learning activities aligned to objectives. (1083) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Teachers follow distict guidelines. Supplemental materials are used in Reading and Math. The evidence
used consist of lesson plans, Sip Day activities, professional development days and administrative evaluations.
IIC03 Materials for standards-aligned learning activities are well-organized, labeled, and stored for convenient use by teachers. (1085) SC,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 4/8/2014: Curriculum maps are available. Each subject area has either a MEL, REL or curriculum AP. Differentiated reading
materials are available.
IIIA01 All teachers are guided by a document that aligns standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment. (1063) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: Teachers are using District provided teacher guides and texts as well as, using supplemental materials.
Teachers use common core standards and PLC's to stay aligned within their content areas. The evidence used to assess this indicator
are lesson plans and PLC minutes.
IIIA02 All teachers develop weekly lesson plans based on aligned units of instruction. (1064) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
5/6/14: Teachers turn in weekly lesson plans. There is a scope and sequence for all areas of instruction. PLCs discuss progress toward
achieving instructional goals and objectives.
IIIA06 All teachers test frequently using a variety of evaluation methods and maintain a record of the results. (1068) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Teachers are recieving support and professional development to incorporate various evaluation methods as well as recording
and maintaining the various data. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Teachers follow the assessment calendar. Formal and
informal assessments are conducted on an ongoing basis. Grades are kept in the district's gradebook.
IIIA07
All teachers differentiate assignments (individualize instruction) in response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other methods of assessment.
(1069)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SP,RTI,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Indicator Reassessed There is a planned, whole-staff professional development(January 22, 2015) led by the REL for
close-reading and color-coded writing. This and other professional development opportunities are included to address the
differentiated instruction indicator. Our school must improve upon our ability to have teachers differentiate assignments in
response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other forms of assessments. This is usually accomplished through
conducting common formative assessments. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Some teachers are differentiating assignments.The
team suggests that professional development be offered at the building level to provide guidance and direction in this area.
IIIA35 Students are engaged and on task. (1161) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, student engagement is not at a level that correlates to high volumes of teaching and learning. Furthermore,
assessment data concludes that high percentage of our students require some sort of Tier I or Tier 2 academic intervention.
Teachers are recieving on-going professional development and training to promote engaging students within the classroom.
11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Positive studentengagement is improving. The team suggests that professional development
be offered to increase authentic engagement. The team also suggests that the staff is provided opportunities to exchange
best practices.
IIIC12 All teachers engage all students (e.g., encourage silent students to participate). (1109) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
During the teaching and learning phase, it is required through the Danielson Framework that teachers in our building actively
engage students in the learning process. Furtehrmore, it is expected that all students are engaged in learning in all classes.
11/12/2013 Indicator assessed Positive student engagement has increased. A variety of teaching modalities are being used.
TL1 All teachers demonstrate in their lesson plans the content knowledge necessary to challenge and motivate students to high levels of learning. (2332) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Teachers submit lesson plans weekly for administrative review. Teachers are evaluated by administrators based on
the Danielson model.
TL2
All teachers establish in their lesson plans and explicitly define to students high and realistic academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations for their
learning so that they know what is needed for them to achieve at proficient levels. (2331)
Title I Expectations: Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary schoolwide programs.
CL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Lesson plans are being monitored by administration to make certain that all aspects of each student's academic,
physical, social , emotional, and behavioral expectations are being met. Review of lesson plan format was presented at the
November staff meeting and at the December PAC meeting. February 11, 2014: Expectations are posted in classrooms. PBIS
posters are visible in classrooms and throughout the school. The school vision is also posted in classrooms. The first 15
minutes of the 1st hour (the advisory period) is used to focus on school-wide expectations.
TL9 All teachers incorporate the use of technology in their classrooms when it enhances instruction and builds 21st Century Learning Skills. (2335) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Every classrooms have a SMART Board, a laptop, and a computer for daily use. All teachers have access to Discovery
Education, online databases, iPADs, and the computer labs.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 15 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIC01 Units of instruction include specific learning activities aligned to objectives. (1083) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Teachers follow distict guidelines. Supplemental materials are used in Reading and Math. The evidence
used consist of lesson plans, Sip Day activities, professional development days and administrative evaluations.
IIC03 Materials for standards-aligned learning activities are well-organized, labeled, and stored for convenient use by teachers. (1085) SC,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 4/8/2014: Curriculum maps are available. Each subject area has either a MEL, REL or curriculum AP. Differentiated reading
materials are available.
IIIA01 All teachers are guided by a document that aligns standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment. (1063) SC,SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: Teachers are using District provided teacher guides and texts as well as, using supplemental materials.
Teachers use common core standards and PLC's to stay aligned within their content areas. The evidence used to assess this indicator
are lesson plans and PLC minutes.
IIIA02 All teachers develop weekly lesson plans based on aligned units of instruction. (1064) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
5/6/14: Teachers turn in weekly lesson plans. There is a scope and sequence for all areas of instruction. PLCs discuss progress toward
achieving instructional goals and objectives.
IIIA06 All teachers test frequently using a variety of evaluation methods and maintain a record of the results. (1068) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Teachers are recieving support and professional development to incorporate various evaluation methods as well as recording
and maintaining the various data. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Teachers follow the assessment calendar. Formal and
informal assessments are conducted on an ongoing basis. Grades are kept in the district's gradebook.
IIIA07
All teachers differentiate assignments (individualize instruction) in response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other methods of assessment.
(1069)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SP,RTI,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes in
current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Indicator Reassessed There is a planned, whole-staff professional development(January 22, 2015) led by the REL for
close-reading and color-coded writing. This and other professional development opportunities are included to address the
differentiated instruction indicator. Our school must improve upon our ability to have teachers differentiate assignments in
response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other forms of assessments. This is usually accomplished through
conducting common formative assessments. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Some teachers are differentiating assignments.The
team suggests that professional development be offered at the building level to provide guidance and direction in this area.
IIIA35 Students are engaged and on task. (1161) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, student engagement is not at a level that correlates to high volumes of teaching and learning. Furthermore,
assessment data concludes that high percentage of our students require some sort of Tier I or Tier 2 academic intervention.
Teachers are recieving on-going professional development and training to promote engaging students within the classroom.
11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Positive studentengagement is improving. The team suggests that professional development
be offered to increase authentic engagement. The team also suggests that the staff is provided opportunities to exchange
best practices.
IIIC12 All teachers engage all students (e.g., encourage silent students to participate). (1109) SP,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
During the teaching and learning phase, it is required through the Danielson Framework that teachers in our building actively
engage students in the learning process. Furtehrmore, it is expected that all students are engaged in learning in all classes.
11/12/2013 Indicator assessed Positive student engagement has increased. A variety of teaching modalities are being used.
TL1 All teachers demonstrate in their lesson plans the content knowledge necessary to challenge and motivate students to high levels of learning. (2332) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Teachers submit lesson plans weekly for administrative review. Teachers are evaluated by administrators based on
the Danielson model.
TL2
All teachers establish in their lesson plans and explicitly define to students high and realistic academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations for their
learning so that they know what is needed for them to achieve at proficient levels. (2331)
Title I Expectations: Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary schoolwide programs.
CL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Lesson plans are being monitored by administration to make certain that all aspects of each student's academic,
physical, social , emotional, and behavioral expectations are being met. Review of lesson plan format was presented at the
November staff meeting and at the December PAC meeting. February 11, 2014: Expectations are posted in classrooms. PBIS
posters are visible in classrooms and throughout the school. The school vision is also posted in classrooms. The first 15
minutes of the 1st hour (the advisory period) is used to focus on school-wide expectations.
TL9 All teachers incorporate the use of technology in their classrooms when it enhances instruction and builds 21st Century Learning Skills. (2335) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Every classrooms have a SMART Board, a laptop, and a computer for daily use. All teachers have access to Discovery
Education, online databases, iPADs, and the computer labs.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 16 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis – Professional Development
IIB01 Units of instruction include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. (1048) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Staff struggles with the time constraints due to the large number of testing (SRI, DEA, PARCC, ISAT, STAR, CFA,
CWA,DBQs, etc.)
IIB03 Unit pre-test and post-test results are reviewed by the Instructional Team. (1050) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Review of the results are done within the PLCs.
IIB04 Teachers differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051) RTI,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 3/11/2014-Currently addressing the interventions for lower performing students, while understanding that differentiating
instruction is a requirement for ALL students in ALL classes.
IID02 The school tests each student at least 3 times each year to determine progress toward standards-based objectives. (1054) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 5/20/14- The following tests are given: DEA, SRI, ISAT, STAR, CFA, CWA, DBQs.
IID03 Teachers receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. (1055) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Some test come back in a timely manner, such as DEA and SRI, but state testing results usually appear the following
year.
IID04 The school maintains a central database that includes each student’s test scores, placement information, demographic information, attendance, behavior indicators,
and other variables useful to teachers. (1116) SS,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-9-13 Reassessed Indicator E-school and Performance Plus are used as the data base for collecting student test scores, placement
information, IEP's, demographic information, and attendance. In addition, Guidacen Counselors keep secured file cabinets with
importnt student academic and social data.
IID06 Yearly learning goals are set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
We have not formally set yearly learning goals. We currently have various opportunties for staff to review academic data to
make instructional decisions. However, the data could be more cohesive and have a central idea as to where staff members
can recieve data from. In addition, we are in the early phases of assigning a point person for distributing data to staff
members. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Providing students with reading interventions that will increase reading proficiency.
This comes from data that many of our students are reading below grade level. 5th grade ISAT, 6th,7th & 8th grade DEA, SRI
and teacher observation are used. Student progress monitoring scores from Read 180, tutoring, SOAR, Caught, and AMP are
the building's evidence. This indicator is at full implementation as of 10-8-13.
IID07 The Leadership Team monitors school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The leadership Team is not yet fluidly monitoring school-level student learning data. Our Professional Learning Community
initiatives are a work in progress and our staff and administration have gone through several training sessions intended to
assist with the implementation phase. Utilizing data continues to be an area of support that is needed. Furthermore, it is
important that we develop a needs assessment for all PLC leaders as well as, communicating the role of the Professional
Development Liason to West Middle School staff members. In addition, we are in the process of creating a schedule of Tier 1
and Tier 2 meetings in which a structured process for analyzing data will be created. 10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: We are
continuing with the goals that we set from the previous school year.
IID08 Instructional Teams review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the Student Services Department are meeting to discuss social and emotional support for students on a case by
case basis. The Student Support Team are developing intervention strategies to progress monitor the students that are not
demonstrating academic success. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, PLCs are reviewing student learning data.
However, due to the high number of students in need of social and emotional support, there is a strain on the current
personnel.
IID09 Instructional Teams use student learning data to plan instruction. (1060) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
All testing done throughout the year (DEA, SRI, STAR, CFA,CWA, DBQs, etc.) provide the basis for planning student placement and
instruction, and is reviewed and updated through the year. 5/20/14: All testing done throughout the year provides the basis for
planning student placement and instruction, and is revised and updated through the year.
IID10 Instructional Teams use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. (1061) RTI,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently doing a good job of identifying students in need of additional help, but there is concern that more is
needed to be done for those students needing enhancements and enrichments. As for behavior, both positive and negative
behaviors are addressed through the appropriate systems.
IID11
Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of
intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives).
(1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Student services and building administration are using various data points (data dashboard, grades, attendence,
behavior)for intervention supports and possible Tier III referral. Tier II support evidence: lunch-time tutoring, YMCA
program (am and PM)to begin 1/2015, February 11, 2014: Performance test scores are looked at, along with teacher input to
determine intervention needs. Student status is discussed within PLCs and with REL and MEL. Mandatory lunch tutoring is in
place for students with failing grades. Initial reading placements are re-evaluated at semester for moving students (REL,
MEL, PLC , teachers, Mrs. Jackson). Leveled literature circles are used based on student readability levels. Rubrics are used
for student projects. Formative and summative assessment are in place to gauge student understanding
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 17 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIB01 Units of instruction include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. (1048) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Staff struggles with the time constraints due to the large number of testing (SRI, DEA, PARCC, ISAT, STAR, CFA,
CWA,DBQs, etc.)
IIB03 Unit pre-test and post-test results are reviewed by the Instructional Team. (1050) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Review of the results are done within the PLCs.
IIB04 Teachers differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051) RTI,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 3/11/2014-Currently addressing the interventions for lower performing students, while understanding that differentiating
instruction is a requirement for ALL students in ALL classes.
IID02 The school tests each student at least 3 times each year to determine progress toward standards-based objectives. (1054) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 5/20/14- The following tests are given: DEA, SRI, ISAT, STAR, CFA, CWA, DBQs.
IID03 Teachers receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. (1055) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Some test come back in a timely manner, such as DEA and SRI, but state testing results usually appear the following
year.
IID04 The school maintains a central database that includes each student’s test scores, placement information, demographic information, attendance, behavior indicators,
and other variables useful to teachers. (1116) SS,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-9-13 Reassessed Indicator E-school and Performance Plus are used as the data base for collecting student test scores, placement
information, IEP's, demographic information, and attendance. In addition, Guidacen Counselors keep secured file cabinets with
importnt student academic and social data.
IID06 Yearly learning goals are set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
We have not formally set yearly learning goals. We currently have various opportunties for staff to review academic data to
make instructional decisions. However, the data could be more cohesive and have a central idea as to where staff members
can recieve data from. In addition, we are in the early phases of assigning a point person for distributing data to staff
members. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Providing students with reading interventions that will increase reading proficiency.
This comes from data that many of our students are reading below grade level. 5th grade ISAT, 6th,7th & 8th grade DEA, SRI
and teacher observation are used. Student progress monitoring scores from Read 180, tutoring, SOAR, Caught, and AMP are
the building's evidence. This indicator is at full implementation as of 10-8-13.
IID07 The Leadership Team monitors school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The leadership Team is not yet fluidly monitoring school-level student learning data. Our Professional Learning Community
initiatives are a work in progress and our staff and administration have gone through several training sessions intended to
assist with the implementation phase. Utilizing data continues to be an area of support that is needed. Furthermore, it is
important that we develop a needs assessment for all PLC leaders as well as, communicating the role of the Professional
Development Liason to West Middle School staff members. In addition, we are in the process of creating a schedule of Tier 1
and Tier 2 meetings in which a structured process for analyzing data will be created. 10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: We are
continuing with the goals that we set from the previous school year.
IID08 Instructional Teams review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the Student Services Department are meeting to discuss social and emotional support for students on a case by
case basis. The Student Support Team are developing intervention strategies to progress monitor the students that are not
demonstrating academic success. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, PLCs are reviewing student learning data.
However, due to the high number of students in need of social and emotional support, there is a strain on the current
personnel.
IID09 Instructional Teams use student learning data to plan instruction. (1060) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
All testing done throughout the year (DEA, SRI, STAR, CFA,CWA, DBQs, etc.) provide the basis for planning student placement and
instruction, and is reviewed and updated through the year. 5/20/14: All testing done throughout the year provides the basis for
planning student placement and instruction, and is revised and updated through the year.
IID10 Instructional Teams use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. (1061) RTI,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently doing a good job of identifying students in need of additional help, but there is concern that more is
needed to be done for those students needing enhancements and enrichments. As for behavior, both positive and negative
behaviors are addressed through the appropriate systems.
IID11
Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of
intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives).
(1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Student services and building administration are using various data points (data dashboard, grades, attendence,
behavior)for intervention supports and possible Tier III referral. Tier II support evidence: lunch-time tutoring, YMCA
program (am and PM)to begin 1/2015, February 11, 2014: Performance test scores are looked at, along with teacher input to
determine intervention needs. Student status is discussed within PLCs and with REL and MEL. Mandatory lunch tutoring is in
place for students with failing grades. Initial reading placements are re-evaluated at semester for moving students (REL,
MEL, PLC , teachers, Mrs. Jackson). Leveled literature circles are used based on student readability levels. Rubrics are used
for student projects. Formative and summative assessment are in place to gauge student understanding
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 18 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIB01 Units of instruction include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. (1048) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Staff struggles with the time constraints due to the large number of testing (SRI, DEA, PARCC, ISAT, STAR, CFA,
CWA,DBQs, etc.)
IIB03 Unit pre-test and post-test results are reviewed by the Instructional Team. (1050) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Review of the results are done within the PLCs.
IIB04 Teachers differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051) RTI,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 3/11/2014-Currently addressing the interventions for lower performing students, while understanding that differentiating
instruction is a requirement for ALL students in ALL classes.
IID02 The school tests each student at least 3 times each year to determine progress toward standards-based objectives. (1054) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 5/20/14- The following tests are given: DEA, SRI, ISAT, STAR, CFA, CWA, DBQs.
IID03 Teachers receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. (1055) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Some test come back in a timely manner, such as DEA and SRI, but state testing results usually appear the following
year.
IID04 The school maintains a central database that includes each student’s test scores, placement information, demographic information, attendance, behavior indicators,
and other variables useful to teachers. (1116) SS,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-9-13 Reassessed Indicator E-school and Performance Plus are used as the data base for collecting student test scores, placement
information, IEP's, demographic information, and attendance. In addition, Guidacen Counselors keep secured file cabinets with
importnt student academic and social data.
IID06 Yearly learning goals are set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
We have not formally set yearly learning goals. We currently have various opportunties for staff to review academic data to
make instructional decisions. However, the data could be more cohesive and have a central idea as to where staff members
can recieve data from. In addition, we are in the early phases of assigning a point person for distributing data to staff
members. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Providing students with reading interventions that will increase reading proficiency.
This comes from data that many of our students are reading below grade level. 5th grade ISAT, 6th,7th & 8th grade DEA, SRI
and teacher observation are used. Student progress monitoring scores from Read 180, tutoring, SOAR, Caught, and AMP are
the building's evidence. This indicator is at full implementation as of 10-8-13.
IID07 The Leadership Team monitors school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The leadership Team is not yet fluidly monitoring school-level student learning data. Our Professional Learning Community
initiatives are a work in progress and our staff and administration have gone through several training sessions intended to
assist with the implementation phase. Utilizing data continues to be an area of support that is needed. Furthermore, it is
important that we develop a needs assessment for all PLC leaders as well as, communicating the role of the Professional
Development Liason to West Middle School staff members. In addition, we are in the process of creating a schedule of Tier 1
and Tier 2 meetings in which a structured process for analyzing data will be created. 10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: We are
continuing with the goals that we set from the previous school year.
IID08 Instructional Teams review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the Student Services Department are meeting to discuss social and emotional support for students on a case by
case basis. The Student Support Team are developing intervention strategies to progress monitor the students that are not
demonstrating academic success. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, PLCs are reviewing student learning data.
However, due to the high number of students in need of social and emotional support, there is a strain on the current
personnel.
IID09 Instructional Teams use student learning data to plan instruction. (1060) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
All testing done throughout the year (DEA, SRI, STAR, CFA,CWA, DBQs, etc.) provide the basis for planning student placement and
instruction, and is reviewed and updated through the year. 5/20/14: All testing done throughout the year provides the basis for
planning student placement and instruction, and is revised and updated through the year.
IID10 Instructional Teams use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. (1061) RTI,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently doing a good job of identifying students in need of additional help, but there is concern that more is
needed to be done for those students needing enhancements and enrichments. As for behavior, both positive and negative
behaviors are addressed through the appropriate systems.
IID11
Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of
intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives).
(1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Student services and building administration are using various data points (data dashboard, grades, attendence,
behavior)for intervention supports and possible Tier III referral. Tier II support evidence: lunch-time tutoring, YMCA
program (am and PM)to begin 1/2015, February 11, 2014: Performance test scores are looked at, along with teacher input to
determine intervention needs. Student status is discussed within PLCs and with REL and MEL. Mandatory lunch tutoring is in
place for students with failing grades. Initial reading placements are re-evaluated at semester for moving students (REL,
MEL, PLC , teachers, Mrs. Jackson). Leveled literature circles are used based on student readability levels. Rubrics are used
for student projects. Formative and summative assessment are in place to gauge student understanding
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 19 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIB01 Units of instruction include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. (1048) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Staff struggles with the time constraints due to the large number of testing (SRI, DEA, PARCC, ISAT, STAR, CFA,
CWA,DBQs, etc.)
IIB03 Unit pre-test and post-test results are reviewed by the Instructional Team. (1050) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Review of the results are done within the PLCs.
IIB04 Teachers differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051) RTI,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 3/11/2014-Currently addressing the interventions for lower performing students, while understanding that differentiating
instruction is a requirement for ALL students in ALL classes.
IID02 The school tests each student at least 3 times each year to determine progress toward standards-based objectives. (1054) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 5/20/14- The following tests are given: DEA, SRI, ISAT, STAR, CFA, CWA, DBQs.
IID03 Teachers receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. (1055) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Some test come back in a timely manner, such as DEA and SRI, but state testing results usually appear the following
year.
IID04 The school maintains a central database that includes each student’s test scores, placement information, demographic information, attendance, behavior indicators,
and other variables useful to teachers. (1116) SS,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-9-13 Reassessed Indicator E-school and Performance Plus are used as the data base for collecting student test scores, placement
information, IEP's, demographic information, and attendance. In addition, Guidacen Counselors keep secured file cabinets with
importnt student academic and social data.
IID06 Yearly learning goals are set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
We have not formally set yearly learning goals. We currently have various opportunties for staff to review academic data to
make instructional decisions. However, the data could be more cohesive and have a central idea as to where staff members
can recieve data from. In addition, we are in the early phases of assigning a point person for distributing data to staff
members. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Providing students with reading interventions that will increase reading proficiency.
This comes from data that many of our students are reading below grade level. 5th grade ISAT, 6th,7th & 8th grade DEA, SRI
and teacher observation are used. Student progress monitoring scores from Read 180, tutoring, SOAR, Caught, and AMP are
the building's evidence. This indicator is at full implementation as of 10-8-13.
IID07 The Leadership Team monitors school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The leadership Team is not yet fluidly monitoring school-level student learning data. Our Professional Learning Community
initiatives are a work in progress and our staff and administration have gone through several training sessions intended to
assist with the implementation phase. Utilizing data continues to be an area of support that is needed. Furthermore, it is
important that we develop a needs assessment for all PLC leaders as well as, communicating the role of the Professional
Development Liason to West Middle School staff members. In addition, we are in the process of creating a schedule of Tier 1
and Tier 2 meetings in which a structured process for analyzing data will be created. 10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: We are
continuing with the goals that we set from the previous school year.
IID08 Instructional Teams review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the Student Services Department are meeting to discuss social and emotional support for students on a case by
case basis. The Student Support Team are developing intervention strategies to progress monitor the students that are not
demonstrating academic success. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, PLCs are reviewing student learning data.
However, due to the high number of students in need of social and emotional support, there is a strain on the current
personnel.
IID09 Instructional Teams use student learning data to plan instruction. (1060) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
All testing done throughout the year (DEA, SRI, STAR, CFA,CWA, DBQs, etc.) provide the basis for planning student placement and
instruction, and is reviewed and updated through the year. 5/20/14: All testing done throughout the year provides the basis for
planning student placement and instruction, and is revised and updated through the year.
IID10 Instructional Teams use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. (1061) RTI,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently doing a good job of identifying students in need of additional help, but there is concern that more is
needed to be done for those students needing enhancements and enrichments. As for behavior, both positive and negative
behaviors are addressed through the appropriate systems.
IID11
Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of
intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives).
(1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Student services and building administration are using various data points (data dashboard, grades, attendence,
behavior)for intervention supports and possible Tier III referral. Tier II support evidence: lunch-time tutoring, YMCA
program (am and PM)to begin 1/2015, February 11, 2014: Performance test scores are looked at, along with teacher input to
determine intervention needs. Student status is discussed within PLCs and with REL and MEL. Mandatory lunch tutoring is in
place for students with failing grades. Initial reading placements are re-evaluated at semester for moving students (REL,
MEL, PLC , teachers, Mrs. Jackson). Leveled literature circles are used based on student readability levels. Rubrics are used
for student projects. Formative and summative assessment are in place to gauge student understanding
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 20 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIB01 Units of instruction include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. (1048) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Staff struggles with the time constraints due to the large number of testing (SRI, DEA, PARCC, ISAT, STAR, CFA,
CWA,DBQs, etc.)
IIB03 Unit pre-test and post-test results are reviewed by the Instructional Team. (1050) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Review of the results are done within the PLCs.
IIB04 Teachers differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051) RTI,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 3/11/2014-Currently addressing the interventions for lower performing students, while understanding that differentiating
instruction is a requirement for ALL students in ALL classes.
IID02 The school tests each student at least 3 times each year to determine progress toward standards-based objectives. (1054) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented: 5/20/14- The following tests are given: DEA, SRI, ISAT, STAR, CFA, CWA, DBQs.
IID03 Teachers receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. (1055) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Some test come back in a timely manner, such as DEA and SRI, but state testing results usually appear the following
year.
IID04 The school maintains a central database that includes each student’s test scores, placement information, demographic information, attendance, behavior indicators,
and other variables useful to teachers. (1116) SS,ELL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10-9-13 Reassessed Indicator E-school and Performance Plus are used as the data base for collecting student test scores, placement
information, IEP's, demographic information, and attendance. In addition, Guidacen Counselors keep secured file cabinets with
importnt student academic and social data.
IID06 Yearly learning goals are set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
We have not formally set yearly learning goals. We currently have various opportunties for staff to review academic data to
make instructional decisions. However, the data could be more cohesive and have a central idea as to where staff members
can recieve data from. In addition, we are in the early phases of assigning a point person for distributing data to staff
members. 10-8-13 Reassessed indicator. Providing students with reading interventions that will increase reading proficiency.
This comes from data that many of our students are reading below grade level. 5th grade ISAT, 6th,7th & 8th grade DEA, SRI
and teacher observation are used. Student progress monitoring scores from Read 180, tutoring, SOAR, Caught, and AMP are
the building's evidence. This indicator is at full implementation as of 10-8-13.
IID07 The Leadership Team monitors school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 9 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The leadership Team is not yet fluidly monitoring school-level student learning data. Our Professional Learning Community
initiatives are a work in progress and our staff and administration have gone through several training sessions intended to
assist with the implementation phase. Utilizing data continues to be an area of support that is needed. Furthermore, it is
important that we develop a needs assessment for all PLC leaders as well as, communicating the role of the Professional
Development Liason to West Middle School staff members. In addition, we are in the process of creating a schedule of Tier 1
and Tier 2 meetings in which a structured process for analyzing data will be created. 10/9/13 Reassessed Indicator: We are
continuing with the goals that we set from the previous school year.
IID08 Instructional Teams review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the Student Services Department are meeting to discuss social and emotional support for students on a case by
case basis. The Student Support Team are developing intervention strategies to progress monitor the students that are not
demonstrating academic success. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed Currently, PLCs are reviewing student learning data.
However, due to the high number of students in need of social and emotional support, there is a strain on the current
personnel.
IID09 Instructional Teams use student learning data to plan instruction. (1060) SC,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
All testing done throughout the year (DEA, SRI, STAR, CFA,CWA, DBQs, etc.) provide the basis for planning student placement and
instruction, and is reviewed and updated through the year. 5/20/14: All testing done throughout the year provides the basis for
planning student placement and instruction, and is revised and updated through the year.
IID10 Instructional Teams use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. (1061) RTI,CL
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently doing a good job of identifying students in need of additional help, but there is concern that more is
needed to be done for those students needing enhancements and enrichments. As for behavior, both positive and negative
behaviors are addressed through the appropriate systems.
IID11
Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of
intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives).
(1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Student services and building administration are using various data points (data dashboard, grades, attendence,
behavior)for intervention supports and possible Tier III referral. Tier II support evidence: lunch-time tutoring, YMCA
program (am and PM)to begin 1/2015, February 11, 2014: Performance test scores are looked at, along with teacher input to
determine intervention needs. Student status is discussed within PLCs and with REL and MEL. Mandatory lunch tutoring is in
place for students with failing grades. Initial reading placements are re-evaluated at semester for moving students (REL,
MEL, PLC , teachers, Mrs. Jackson). Leveled literature circles are used based on student readability levels. Rubrics are used
for student projects. Formative and summative assessment are in place to gauge student understanding
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 21 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis – Community and Family
CL6 School Leadership and primary caregivers engage in regular communication to provide mutual supports and guidance between home and school for all aspects of student
learning. (2341) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Progress reports, report cards, district website, auto-dialer calls, quarterly newsletters are all communication
vehicles from school to home. Administrators make calls home to students' families.
IIIB06 All teachers systematically report to primary caregivers the student’s mastery of specific standards-based objectives. (1097)
Title I Expectations: The plan must articulate strategies to increase parental involvement. SC,SP,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
12/17/2014 Additionally: Honor Roll Recognition for students and parents in regards to academic performance; through performance-
based presentations (plays, dance, etc.) parental involvement is encouraged; 8th grade promotion ceremony. February 11, 2014:
Teachers systematically report to primary caregivers the student's mastery of specific standards-based objective in the following way: *
phone calls * parent teacher conferences * progress reports * school/parent compact * parent portal * newsletter * parent bulletin board *
availability of pamphlets (informational, social service, school- oriented, etc.) in the office and the library * assignment notebooks *
report cards
IVA03 The school's Compact outlines the responsibilities/expectations of teachers, primary caregivers, and students. (1113) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the school's compact and expectations has been addressed with students and parents during back to school
orientations, student-parent conferences, and reinstatement meetings. In addiiton, the school's compact can been found
within the student planner for the 2012-2013 school year. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed The school compact will be mailed
homeand posted on the parent portal. The school's ROBO caller will be utilized to inform parents.
IVD01 The school's Compact is annually distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students. (1114) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 1 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The school's compact has been distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students has been
executed. However, the school looks for various opportunities to continue the ongoing conversation with parents and
community members in regards to expectations. 11/20/2013 The school compact will be mailed home and posted on the
Parent Portal. The school's ROBO caller will be utilized to inform parents. parents are given the form, but may not follow
through.
IVD02 The "ongoing conversation" between school personnel and primary caregivers is candid, supportive, and flows in both directions. (1115) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the ongoing conversation with school officials is a intricate part of the day to day operations for our school.
Parents are frequently called upon to collaborate with school officials to engage upon the problem solving process. Our goal is
to discover new ways to engage more primary caregivers in bilateral conversations. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed
Continue as stated above.
IVD03 The school regularly and clearly communicates with primary caregivers about its expectations of them and the importance of the "curriculum of the home." (1155) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The school is undergoing continuous efforts to engage the community and primary caregivers of school wide rules and
expectations for partnerships with caregivers through the various school wide events that our school sponsors. Howevr,
issues concerning the home curriculum must be addressed and analyzed in a more detailed fashion. 11/12/2013 Indicator
Assessed Family engagement and communication: -Doughnuts with dads -IEP Meetings -Phone calls home -Recognition nights -
Literacy Nights -Quarterly Newsletters -Parent teacher conferences -Open House -PTO
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 22 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL6 School Leadership and primary caregivers engage in regular communication to provide mutual supports and guidance between home and school for all aspects of student
learning. (2341) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Progress reports, report cards, district website, auto-dialer calls, quarterly newsletters are all communication
vehicles from school to home. Administrators make calls home to students' families.
IIIB06 All teachers systematically report to primary caregivers the student’s mastery of specific standards-based objectives. (1097)
Title I Expectations: The plan must articulate strategies to increase parental involvement. SC,SP,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
12/17/2014 Additionally: Honor Roll Recognition for students and parents in regards to academic performance; through performance-
based presentations (plays, dance, etc.) parental involvement is encouraged; 8th grade promotion ceremony. February 11, 2014:
Teachers systematically report to primary caregivers the student's mastery of specific standards-based objective in the following way: *
phone calls * parent teacher conferences * progress reports * school/parent compact * parent portal * newsletter * parent bulletin board *
availability of pamphlets (informational, social service, school- oriented, etc.) in the office and the library * assignment notebooks *
report cards
IVA03 The school's Compact outlines the responsibilities/expectations of teachers, primary caregivers, and students. (1113) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the school's compact and expectations has been addressed with students and parents during back to school
orientations, student-parent conferences, and reinstatement meetings. In addiiton, the school's compact can been found
within the student planner for the 2012-2013 school year. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed The school compact will be mailed
homeand posted on the parent portal. The school's ROBO caller will be utilized to inform parents.
IVD01 The school's Compact is annually distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students. (1114) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 1 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The school's compact has been distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students has been
executed. However, the school looks for various opportunities to continue the ongoing conversation with parents and
community members in regards to expectations. 11/20/2013 The school compact will be mailed home and posted on the
Parent Portal. The school's ROBO caller will be utilized to inform parents. parents are given the form, but may not follow
through.
IVD02 The "ongoing conversation" between school personnel and primary caregivers is candid, supportive, and flows in both directions. (1115) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the ongoing conversation with school officials is a intricate part of the day to day operations for our school.
Parents are frequently called upon to collaborate with school officials to engage upon the problem solving process. Our goal is
to discover new ways to engage more primary caregivers in bilateral conversations. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed
Continue as stated above.
IVD03 The school regularly and clearly communicates with primary caregivers about its expectations of them and the importance of the "curriculum of the home." (1155) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The school is undergoing continuous efforts to engage the community and primary caregivers of school wide rules and
expectations for partnerships with caregivers through the various school wide events that our school sponsors. Howevr,
issues concerning the home curriculum must be addressed and analyzed in a more detailed fashion. 11/12/2013 Indicator
Assessed Family engagement and communication: -Doughnuts with dads -IEP Meetings -Phone calls home -Recognition nights -
Literacy Nights -Quarterly Newsletters -Parent teacher conferences -Open House -PTO
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 23 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL6 School Leadership and primary caregivers engage in regular communication to provide mutual supports and guidance between home and school for all aspects of student
learning. (2341) SC
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/20/14- Progress reports, report cards, district website, auto-dialer calls, quarterly newsletters are all communication
vehicles from school to home. Administrators make calls home to students' families.
IIIB06 All teachers systematically report to primary caregivers the student’s mastery of specific standards-based objectives. (1097)
Title I Expectations: The plan must articulate strategies to increase parental involvement. SC,SP,ELL,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
12/17/2014 Additionally: Honor Roll Recognition for students and parents in regards to academic performance; through performance-
based presentations (plays, dance, etc.) parental involvement is encouraged; 8th grade promotion ceremony. February 11, 2014:
Teachers systematically report to primary caregivers the student's mastery of specific standards-based objective in the following way: *
phone calls * parent teacher conferences * progress reports * school/parent compact * parent portal * newsletter * parent bulletin board *
availability of pamphlets (informational, social service, school- oriented, etc.) in the office and the library * assignment notebooks *
report cards
IVA03 The school's Compact outlines the responsibilities/expectations of teachers, primary caregivers, and students. (1113) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the school's compact and expectations has been addressed with students and parents during back to school
orientations, student-parent conferences, and reinstatement meetings. In addiiton, the school's compact can been found
within the student planner for the 2012-2013 school year. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed The school compact will be mailed
homeand posted on the parent portal. The school's ROBO caller will be utilized to inform parents.
IVD01 The school's Compact is annually distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students. (1114) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 1 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The school's compact has been distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students has been
executed. However, the school looks for various opportunities to continue the ongoing conversation with parents and
community members in regards to expectations. 11/20/2013 The school compact will be mailed home and posted on the
Parent Portal. The school's ROBO caller will be utilized to inform parents. parents are given the form, but may not follow
through.
IVD02 The "ongoing conversation" between school personnel and primary caregivers is candid, supportive, and flows in both directions. (1115) SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
Currently, the ongoing conversation with school officials is a intricate part of the day to day operations for our school.
Parents are frequently called upon to collaborate with school officials to engage upon the problem solving process. Our goal is
to discover new ways to engage more primary caregivers in bilateral conversations. 11/12/2013 Indicator Assessed
Continue as stated above.
IVD03 The school regularly and clearly communicates with primary caregivers about its expectations of them and the importance of the "curriculum of the home." (1155) SC,SP
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 3 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
The school is undergoing continuous efforts to engage the community and primary caregivers of school wide rules and
expectations for partnerships with caregivers through the various school wide events that our school sponsors. Howevr,
issues concerning the home curriculum must be addressed and analyzed in a more detailed fashion. 11/12/2013 Indicator
Assessed Family engagement and communication: -Doughnuts with dads -IEP Meetings -Phone calls home -Recognition nights -
Literacy Nights -Quarterly Newsletters -Parent teacher conferences -Open House -PTO
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 24 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Indicator Analysis — Conditions for Learning
CL1
The school's Learning Support System includes academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral programming based on school-wide, targeted group and individualized
needs. (2343)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
RTI,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Staff is working with student support personnel to provide a wide-range of assistance. Staff was presented a list
of support service personnel at last staff meeting (12/14), and there are plans to introduce support staff to teachers.
Rockford Health Systems has been added as an additional community partner. February 11, 2014: The school coordinates local
services and programs in the following ways: *RTI tiers *Winnebago County Health Department * Clergy - boys groups at each
grade level * Adults academy * YMCA * Rockford Ice Hogs
CL10 The school culture promotes and supports the academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral skill development and engagement of students . (2351)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The following is currently provided: Best of West; Honor Roll Rec Nights; Principal's Scholar; all athletic games; ISAT
Rec Night; student-based clubs and organizations; only NJHS; CAPA; YMCA; counselors, etc.
CL11 The school culture promotes and supports the physical, social, emotional, and behavioral health of all school personnel. (2352)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The Sunshine team provides social and emotional support through flowers, lunches and treats. Benefits provides
counseling, health clubs, legal advice, and access to behavioral health.
CL12 All school personnel work effectively and equitably with racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. (2353)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Professional development is provided for us to work effectively and equitably with our student population. PBIS is
used to help all students become better citizens.
CL2
School Leadership identifies and allocates/reallocates resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Beginning 1/2015, AM and PM tutoring will be offered through coordination of our community partner, the YMCA.
Qualifying students will be identified by Data Dashboard, counselor recommendation, and discipline data. Students and
families have been informed of the retention component at West: social promotion has ended. February 12, 2014: School
leadership identifies and allocates resources in the following ways: Ongoing coordination and discussions with PLCs,
Leadership Team, SIP Team, support staff (Social Worker, librarian, REL, MEL, counselors, etc.),paraprofessionals, Title I
tutors, PBIS team, parents and guardians,community input.
CL3 School Leadership monitors and evaluates the implementation of Learning Supports' programming through an on-going data collection system. (2345) SD,RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently monitoring students with the following: check-in, check-out sheets, mandatory parent conferences,
student goal sheets, monthly house meetings As for academic moitoring: assessments; pyramid of intervention (five
students); Performance Plus; student climate dashboard
CL4 All school personnel actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: School personnel are given feedback during evaluations and opportunities for growth are provided through
professional development. Illinois 5 Essential Survey also provides school climate feedback. The ROE also sponsored a school
climate survey.
CL5 School Leadership actively models and fosters a positive school environment where staff members feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow professionally.
(2347)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Administration recognizes "Staff Member of the Month." Opportunities for professional development are shared via
email. Building Committee and Principal's Advisory Council are available for staff concerns.
CL7 The environment of the school (physical, social, emotional, and behavioral) is safe, welcoming, and conducive to learning. (2348) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed indicator: Students are also recieving social emotional support from members of the Student Support Team
(Psychologist, Nurse, Social Worker, Police Liasion and Speech Pathologist). Teachers and administrators greet students in the hallway
and on campus upon student arrival to campus. In addition, there is a collaboration between West Middle School and Rockford Health
Sytems to supply physical support. Our school wide PBIS initiatives are currently in place. (PBIS House Meetings, Warror Bucks, End of
Year Celebrations).
CL8 The school culture supports teachers in practicing effective and responsive instruction to meet individual student needs. (2349) RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014-The PLC meetings allow the teachers to reflect and examine on instruction. The PLCs also offer an opportunity to
share classroom management strategies, as well. SIP days,Institute Days, modeling and assistance by MEL and REL help
support teachers. Other opportunities that need to be encouraged are: using planning periods to observe other classrooms.
CL9
All teachers invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-
teaching opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels
of student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 2 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Co -teaching classrooms continue. Our REL and MELs continue to support teachers and student instruction by
daily working within the classrooms. On-going professional development helps teachers be aware of supports available to
them. February 11, 2014: Co-taught classrooms currently exist. PLC meetings have been developed and are meeting
regularly. PBIS has grown and is now breaking into smaller groups. Recognition nights are in place.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 25 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL1
The school's Learning Support System includes academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral programming based on school-wide, targeted group and individualized
needs. (2343)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
RTI,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Staff is working with student support personnel to provide a wide-range of assistance. Staff was presented a list
of support service personnel at last staff meeting (12/14), and there are plans to introduce support staff to teachers.
Rockford Health Systems has been added as an additional community partner. February 11, 2014: The school coordinates local
services and programs in the following ways: *RTI tiers *Winnebago County Health Department * Clergy - boys groups at each
grade level * Adults academy * YMCA * Rockford Ice Hogs
CL10 The school culture promotes and supports the academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral skill development and engagement of students . (2351)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The following is currently provided: Best of West; Honor Roll Rec Nights; Principal's Scholar; all athletic games; ISAT
Rec Night; student-based clubs and organizations; only NJHS; CAPA; YMCA; counselors, etc.
CL11 The school culture promotes and supports the physical, social, emotional, and behavioral health of all school personnel. (2352)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The Sunshine team provides social and emotional support through flowers, lunches and treats. Benefits provides
counseling, health clubs, legal advice, and access to behavioral health.
CL12 All school personnel work effectively and equitably with racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. (2353)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Professional development is provided for us to work effectively and equitably with our student population. PBIS is
used to help all students become better citizens.
CL2
School Leadership identifies and allocates/reallocates resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Beginning 1/2015, AM and PM tutoring will be offered through coordination of our community partner, the YMCA.
Qualifying students will be identified by Data Dashboard, counselor recommendation, and discipline data. Students and
families have been informed of the retention component at West: social promotion has ended. February 12, 2014: School
leadership identifies and allocates resources in the following ways: Ongoing coordination and discussions with PLCs,
Leadership Team, SIP Team, support staff (Social Worker, librarian, REL, MEL, counselors, etc.),paraprofessionals, Title I
tutors, PBIS team, parents and guardians,community input.
CL3 School Leadership monitors and evaluates the implementation of Learning Supports' programming through an on-going data collection system. (2345) SD,RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently monitoring students with the following: check-in, check-out sheets, mandatory parent conferences,
student goal sheets, monthly house meetings As for academic moitoring: assessments; pyramid of intervention (five
students); Performance Plus; student climate dashboard
CL4 All school personnel actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: School personnel are given feedback during evaluations and opportunities for growth are provided through
professional development. Illinois 5 Essential Survey also provides school climate feedback. The ROE also sponsored a school
climate survey.
CL5 School Leadership actively models and fosters a positive school environment where staff members feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow professionally.
(2347)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Administration recognizes "Staff Member of the Month." Opportunities for professional development are shared via
email. Building Committee and Principal's Advisory Council are available for staff concerns.
CL7 The environment of the school (physical, social, emotional, and behavioral) is safe, welcoming, and conducive to learning. (2348) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed indicator: Students are also recieving social emotional support from members of the Student Support Team
(Psychologist, Nurse, Social Worker, Police Liasion and Speech Pathologist). Teachers and administrators greet students in the hallway
and on campus upon student arrival to campus. In addition, there is a collaboration between West Middle School and Rockford Health
Sytems to supply physical support. Our school wide PBIS initiatives are currently in place. (PBIS House Meetings, Warror Bucks, End of
Year Celebrations).
CL8 The school culture supports teachers in practicing effective and responsive instruction to meet individual student needs. (2349) RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014-The PLC meetings allow the teachers to reflect and examine on instruction. The PLCs also offer an opportunity to
share classroom management strategies, as well. SIP days,Institute Days, modeling and assistance by MEL and REL help
support teachers. Other opportunities that need to be encouraged are: using planning periods to observe other classrooms.
CL9
All teachers invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-
teaching opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels
of student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 2 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Co -teaching classrooms continue. Our REL and MELs continue to support teachers and student instruction by
daily working within the classrooms. On-going professional development helps teachers be aware of supports available to
them. February 11, 2014: Co-taught classrooms currently exist. PLC meetings have been developed and are meeting
regularly. PBIS has grown and is now breaking into smaller groups. Recognition nights are in place.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 26 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL1
The school's Learning Support System includes academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral programming based on school-wide, targeted group and individualized
needs. (2343)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
RTI,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Staff is working with student support personnel to provide a wide-range of assistance. Staff was presented a list
of support service personnel at last staff meeting (12/14), and there are plans to introduce support staff to teachers.
Rockford Health Systems has been added as an additional community partner. February 11, 2014: The school coordinates local
services and programs in the following ways: *RTI tiers *Winnebago County Health Department * Clergy - boys groups at each
grade level * Adults academy * YMCA * Rockford Ice Hogs
CL10 The school culture promotes and supports the academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral skill development and engagement of students . (2351)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The following is currently provided: Best of West; Honor Roll Rec Nights; Principal's Scholar; all athletic games; ISAT
Rec Night; student-based clubs and organizations; only NJHS; CAPA; YMCA; counselors, etc.
CL11 The school culture promotes and supports the physical, social, emotional, and behavioral health of all school personnel. (2352)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The Sunshine team provides social and emotional support through flowers, lunches and treats. Benefits provides
counseling, health clubs, legal advice, and access to behavioral health.
CL12 All school personnel work effectively and equitably with racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. (2353)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Professional development is provided for us to work effectively and equitably with our student population. PBIS is
used to help all students become better citizens.
CL2
School Leadership identifies and allocates/reallocates resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Beginning 1/2015, AM and PM tutoring will be offered through coordination of our community partner, the YMCA.
Qualifying students will be identified by Data Dashboard, counselor recommendation, and discipline data. Students and
families have been informed of the retention component at West: social promotion has ended. February 12, 2014: School
leadership identifies and allocates resources in the following ways: Ongoing coordination and discussions with PLCs,
Leadership Team, SIP Team, support staff (Social Worker, librarian, REL, MEL, counselors, etc.),paraprofessionals, Title I
tutors, PBIS team, parents and guardians,community input.
CL3 School Leadership monitors and evaluates the implementation of Learning Supports' programming through an on-going data collection system. (2345) SD,RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently monitoring students with the following: check-in, check-out sheets, mandatory parent conferences,
student goal sheets, monthly house meetings As for academic moitoring: assessments; pyramid of intervention (five
students); Performance Plus; student climate dashboard
CL4 All school personnel actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: School personnel are given feedback during evaluations and opportunities for growth are provided through
professional development. Illinois 5 Essential Survey also provides school climate feedback. The ROE also sponsored a school
climate survey.
CL5 School Leadership actively models and fosters a positive school environment where staff members feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow professionally.
(2347)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Administration recognizes "Staff Member of the Month." Opportunities for professional development are shared via
email. Building Committee and Principal's Advisory Council are available for staff concerns.
CL7 The environment of the school (physical, social, emotional, and behavioral) is safe, welcoming, and conducive to learning. (2348) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed indicator: Students are also recieving social emotional support from members of the Student Support Team
(Psychologist, Nurse, Social Worker, Police Liasion and Speech Pathologist). Teachers and administrators greet students in the hallway
and on campus upon student arrival to campus. In addition, there is a collaboration between West Middle School and Rockford Health
Sytems to supply physical support. Our school wide PBIS initiatives are currently in place. (PBIS House Meetings, Warror Bucks, End of
Year Celebrations).
CL8 The school culture supports teachers in practicing effective and responsive instruction to meet individual student needs. (2349) RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014-The PLC meetings allow the teachers to reflect and examine on instruction. The PLCs also offer an opportunity to
share classroom management strategies, as well. SIP days,Institute Days, modeling and assistance by MEL and REL help
support teachers. Other opportunities that need to be encouraged are: using planning periods to observe other classrooms.
CL9
All teachers invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-
teaching opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels
of student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 2 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Co -teaching classrooms continue. Our REL and MELs continue to support teachers and student instruction by
daily working within the classrooms. On-going professional development helps teachers be aware of supports available to
them. February 11, 2014: Co-taught classrooms currently exist. PLC meetings have been developed and are meeting
regularly. PBIS has grown and is now breaking into smaller groups. Recognition nights are in place.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 27 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL1
The school's Learning Support System includes academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral programming based on school-wide, targeted group and individualized
needs. (2343)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
RTI,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Staff is working with student support personnel to provide a wide-range of assistance. Staff was presented a list
of support service personnel at last staff meeting (12/14), and there are plans to introduce support staff to teachers.
Rockford Health Systems has been added as an additional community partner. February 11, 2014: The school coordinates local
services and programs in the following ways: *RTI tiers *Winnebago County Health Department * Clergy - boys groups at each
grade level * Adults academy * YMCA * Rockford Ice Hogs
CL10 The school culture promotes and supports the academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral skill development and engagement of students . (2351)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The following is currently provided: Best of West; Honor Roll Rec Nights; Principal's Scholar; all athletic games; ISAT
Rec Night; student-based clubs and organizations; only NJHS; CAPA; YMCA; counselors, etc.
CL11 The school culture promotes and supports the physical, social, emotional, and behavioral health of all school personnel. (2352)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The Sunshine team provides social and emotional support through flowers, lunches and treats. Benefits provides
counseling, health clubs, legal advice, and access to behavioral health.
CL12 All school personnel work effectively and equitably with racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. (2353)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Professional development is provided for us to work effectively and equitably with our student population. PBIS is
used to help all students become better citizens.
CL2
School Leadership identifies and allocates/reallocates resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Beginning 1/2015, AM and PM tutoring will be offered through coordination of our community partner, the YMCA.
Qualifying students will be identified by Data Dashboard, counselor recommendation, and discipline data. Students and
families have been informed of the retention component at West: social promotion has ended. February 12, 2014: School
leadership identifies and allocates resources in the following ways: Ongoing coordination and discussions with PLCs,
Leadership Team, SIP Team, support staff (Social Worker, librarian, REL, MEL, counselors, etc.),paraprofessionals, Title I
tutors, PBIS team, parents and guardians,community input.
CL3 School Leadership monitors and evaluates the implementation of Learning Supports' programming through an on-going data collection system. (2345) SD,RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently monitoring students with the following: check-in, check-out sheets, mandatory parent conferences,
student goal sheets, monthly house meetings As for academic moitoring: assessments; pyramid of intervention (five
students); Performance Plus; student climate dashboard
CL4 All school personnel actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: School personnel are given feedback during evaluations and opportunities for growth are provided through
professional development. Illinois 5 Essential Survey also provides school climate feedback. The ROE also sponsored a school
climate survey.
CL5 School Leadership actively models and fosters a positive school environment where staff members feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow professionally.
(2347)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Administration recognizes "Staff Member of the Month." Opportunities for professional development are shared via
email. Building Committee and Principal's Advisory Council are available for staff concerns.
CL7 The environment of the school (physical, social, emotional, and behavioral) is safe, welcoming, and conducive to learning. (2348) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed indicator: Students are also recieving social emotional support from members of the Student Support Team
(Psychologist, Nurse, Social Worker, Police Liasion and Speech Pathologist). Teachers and administrators greet students in the hallway
and on campus upon student arrival to campus. In addition, there is a collaboration between West Middle School and Rockford Health
Sytems to supply physical support. Our school wide PBIS initiatives are currently in place. (PBIS House Meetings, Warror Bucks, End of
Year Celebrations).
CL8 The school culture supports teachers in practicing effective and responsive instruction to meet individual student needs. (2349) RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014-The PLC meetings allow the teachers to reflect and examine on instruction. The PLCs also offer an opportunity to
share classroom management strategies, as well. SIP days,Institute Days, modeling and assistance by MEL and REL help
support teachers. Other opportunities that need to be encouraged are: using planning periods to observe other classrooms.
CL9
All teachers invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-
teaching opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels
of student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 2 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Co -teaching classrooms continue. Our REL and MELs continue to support teachers and student instruction by
daily working within the classrooms. On-going professional development helps teachers be aware of supports available to
them. February 11, 2014: Co-taught classrooms currently exist. PLC meetings have been developed and are meeting
regularly. PBIS has grown and is now breaking into smaller groups. Recognition nights are in place.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 28 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL1
The school's Learning Support System includes academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral programming based on school-wide, targeted group and individualized
needs. (2343)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
RTI,SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 3 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Staff is working with student support personnel to provide a wide-range of assistance. Staff was presented a list
of support service personnel at last staff meeting (12/14), and there are plans to introduce support staff to teachers.
Rockford Health Systems has been added as an additional community partner. February 11, 2014: The school coordinates local
services and programs in the following ways: *RTI tiers *Winnebago County Health Department * Clergy - boys groups at each
grade level * Adults academy * YMCA * Rockford Ice Hogs
CL10 The school culture promotes and supports the academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral skill development and engagement of students . (2351)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The following is currently provided: Best of West; Honor Roll Rec Nights; Principal's Scholar; all athletic games; ISAT
Rec Night; student-based clubs and organizations; only NJHS; CAPA; YMCA; counselors, etc.
CL11 The school culture promotes and supports the physical, social, emotional, and behavioral health of all school personnel. (2352)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: The Sunshine team provides social and emotional support through flowers, lunches and treats. Benefits provides
counseling, health clubs, legal advice, and access to behavioral health.
CL12 All school personnel work effectively and equitably with racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. (2353)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Professional development is provided for us to work effectively and equitably with our student population. PBIS is
used to help all students become better citizens.
CL2
School Leadership identifies and allocates/reallocates resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming
needs are met.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 4 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Beginning 1/2015, AM and PM tutoring will be offered through coordination of our community partner, the YMCA.
Qualifying students will be identified by Data Dashboard, counselor recommendation, and discipline data. Students and
families have been informed of the retention component at West: social promotion has ended. February 12, 2014: School
leadership identifies and allocates resources in the following ways: Ongoing coordination and discussions with PLCs,
Leadership Team, SIP Team, support staff (Social Worker, librarian, REL, MEL, counselors, etc.),paraprofessionals, Title I
tutors, PBIS team, parents and guardians,community input.
CL3 School Leadership monitors and evaluates the implementation of Learning Supports' programming through an on-going data collection system. (2345) SD,RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014- Currently monitoring students with the following: check-in, check-out sheets, mandatory parent conferences,
student goal sheets, monthly house meetings As for academic moitoring: assessments; pyramid of intervention (five
students); Performance Plus; student climate dashboard
CL4 All school personnel actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
5/6/14: School personnel are given feedback during evaluations and opportunities for growth are provided through
professional development. Illinois 5 Essential Survey also provides school climate feedback. The ROE also sponsored a school
climate survey.
CL5 School Leadership actively models and fosters a positive school environment where staff members feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow professionally.
(2347)
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation: 5/6/14: Administration recognizes "Staff Member of the Month." Opportunities for professional development are shared via
email. Building Committee and Principal's Advisory Council are available for staff concerns.
CL7 The environment of the school (physical, social, emotional, and behavioral) is safe, welcoming, and conducive to learning. (2348) SS
Level of Development or Implementation for this
Indicator. Full Implementation
Evidence that this indicator has been fully and
effectively implemented:
10/9/13 Reassessed indicator: Students are also recieving social emotional support from members of the Student Support Team
(Psychologist, Nurse, Social Worker, Police Liasion and Speech Pathologist). Teachers and administrators greet students in the hallway
and on campus upon student arrival to campus. In addition, there is a collaboration between West Middle School and Rockford Health
Sytems to supply physical support. Our school wide PBIS initiatives are currently in place. (PBIS House Meetings, Warror Bucks, End of
Year Celebrations).
CL8 The school culture supports teachers in practicing effective and responsive instruction to meet individual student needs. (2349) RTI
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 6 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 3 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 2 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
3/11/2014-The PLC meetings allow the teachers to reflect and examine on instruction. The PLCs also offer an opportunity to
share classroom management strategies, as well. SIP days,Institute Days, modeling and assistance by MEL and REL help
support teachers. Other opportunities that need to be encouraged are: using planning periods to observe other classrooms.
CL9
All teachers invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-
teaching opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels
of student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development or Implementation for this Indicator. Partial Development/Implementation
Index: 2 (Priority Score x Opportunity Score)
Priority Score: 2 (3 - highest, 2 - medium, 1 - lowest)
Opportunity Score: 1 (3 - relatively easy to address, 2 - accomplished within current policy and budget conditions, 1 - requires changes
in current policy and budget conditions)
Current level of development or implementation:
12/17/2014 Co -teaching classrooms continue. Our REL and MELs continue to support teachers and student instruction by
daily working within the classrooms. On-going professional development helps teachers be aware of supports available to
them. February 11, 2014: Co-taught classrooms currently exist. PLC meetings have been developed and are meeting
regularly. PBIS has grown and is now breaking into smaller groups. Recognition nights are in place. West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 29 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Leadership
CII7 All staff interactions in all meetings (staff, problem solving, committees, planning, conferences, etc.) and in the instructional setting will reflect a "Culture of Candor" and a
climate of trust, respect and collaboration that will be focused on norms and adult social and emotional competencies. (2337) CL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IA14 The district/school will recruit, train, support, and place personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Activities through the 2015 calendar year addressing the RTTT3 Expectations.
Year 1 - Through June 30, 2012 [District Scope of Work Activities]
Year 2 - July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 [District Scope of Work Activities]
Year 3 - July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 [District Scope of Work Activities]
5 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 30 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IA14 The district/school will recruit, train, support, and place personnel to competently address the problems of schools in need of improvement. (1130)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development. ELL,SP,HQT,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Activities through the 2015 calendar year addressing the RTTT3 Expectations.
Year 1 - Through June 30, 2012 [District Scope of Work Activities]
Year 2 - July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 [District Scope of Work Activities]
Year 3 - July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 [District Scope of Work Activities]
5 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
ID01 A team structure will be officially incorporated into the school improvement plan and school governance policy. (1012)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment. SS,SD,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff will meet regularly (twice a month or more for an hour
each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of
individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 31 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
ID07
A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional staff will meet regularly (twice a month or more for an hour
each meeting). (1018)
Title I Expectations: Include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of
individual students and the overall instructional program.
SS,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team will regularly look at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and use that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Mike Francis
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
The Leadership Team will have bi-weekly meetings schedule through the end of the year. The Leadership Team will
consist of the Principal, Assistant Principals, and Curriculum Heads. All meetings will have an agenda,
minutes, schedule, and action items. Information obtained will be communicated through line-item agenda items at
staff meetings, emails, and SIP Days. The data derived will be analyzed to drive instruction, professional
development, and school wide improvement.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 08/31/2015
4 Tasks
1
Bi-monthly Leadership Team meetings will be held to review the Dashboard Data: attendance and referrals. Leadership meetings will also review district assessments as they occur.
Assigned to School Leadership Team Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 1000
2
Data gathered from these meetings will be presented to teachers monthly via staff meetings, the PLCs and a monthly email to staff.
Assigned to School Leadership Team Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
The gathered Leadership Team data will be used to inform and drive professional development for staff.
Assigned to Administration Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 32 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
ID10
The school’s Leadership Team will regularly look at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and use that data to make decisions about school
improvement and professional development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Mike Francis
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
The Leadership Team will have bi-weekly meetings schedule through the end of the year. The Leadership Team will
consist of the Principal, Assistant Principals, and Curriculum Heads. All meetings will have an agenda,
minutes, schedule, and action items. Information obtained will be communicated through line-item agenda items at
staff meetings, emails, and SIP Days. The data derived will be analyzed to drive instruction, professional
development, and school wide improvement.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 08/31/2015
4 Tasks
1
Bi-monthly Leadership Team meetings will be held to review the Dashboard Data: attendance and referrals. Leadership meetings will also review district assessments as they occur.
Assigned to School Leadership Team Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 1000
2
Data gathered from these meetings will be presented to teachers monthly via staff meetings, the PLCs and a monthly email to staff.
Assigned to School Leadership Team Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
The gathered Leadership Team data will be used to inform and drive professional development for staff.
Assigned to Administration Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IE06 The principal will keep a focus on instructional improvement and student learning outcomes. (1027) SP,SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IE08 The principal will spend at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 33 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IE08 The principal will spend at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. (1029) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IE09 The principal will challenge and monitor unsound teaching practices and support the correction of them. (1030) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 34 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Professional Development
CL17 Professional development for teachers will be determined by data (including classroom observations and review of lesson plans) that demonstrate teachers' attention to
academic, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations and standards. (2339) SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IF05 Professional development for teachers will include self-assessment related to indicators of effective teaching and classroom management. (1039) SC,CL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 35 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IF08
Professional development for the whole faculty will include assessment of strengths and areas in need of improvement from classroom observations of indicators of effective
teaching. (1042)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development.
SP,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Mike Francis
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Administration input: Classroom observations by the principal and/or assistant principals are
conducted and analyzed by the School Leadership Team to identify strengths and areas of need
for improvement across the staff, which are used to plan school-wide staff development.
Anonymous data collected from regular walkthroughs is used to further drive professional
development. Staff input: A professional needs assessment survey, given twice per year, will
determine staff perceived areas of need.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 08/31/2015
4 Tasks
1
Investigate and develop a form that will allow compilation of domain component evaluation score trends across the building.
Assigned to Administration Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 04/15/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Investigate and develop a tally sheet for building walkthroughs.
Assigned to Administration Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 04/15/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Investigate and develop a professional development needs survey to be completed by staff to assess perceived gaps in professional development.
Assigned to Linda Schreiner Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 03/25/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Data compiled from the domain component evaluation scores, the walkthrough tallies, and the staff needs assessment will be used to determine the initial 2015-2016 professional
development offerings in this building.
Assigned to School Leadership Team Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 36 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IF08
Professional development for the whole faculty will include assessment of strengths and areas in need of improvement from classroom observations of indicators of effective
teaching. (1042)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and provide ongoing professional development.
SP,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Mike Francis
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Administration input: Classroom observations by the principal and/or assistant principals are
conducted and analyzed by the School Leadership Team to identify strengths and areas of need
for improvement across the staff, which are used to plan school-wide staff development.
Anonymous data collected from regular walkthroughs is used to further drive professional
development. Staff input: A professional needs assessment survey, given twice per year, will
determine staff perceived areas of need.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 08/31/2015
4 Tasks
1
Investigate and develop a form that will allow compilation of domain component evaluation score trends across the building.
Assigned to Administration Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 04/15/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Investigate and develop a tally sheet for building walkthroughs.
Assigned to Administration Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 04/15/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Investigate and develop a professional development needs survey to be completed by staff to assess perceived gaps in professional development.
Assigned to Linda Schreiner Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 03/25/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Data compiled from the domain component evaluation scores, the walkthrough tallies, and the staff needs assessment will be used to determine the initial 2015-2016 professional
development offerings in this building.
Assigned to School Leadership Team Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 37 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Aligned Instruction-Curriculum
IIA01 Instructional Teams will develop standards-aligned units of instruction for each subject and grade level. (1045) SC,SP,ELL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 38 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Instruction
IIC03 Materials for standards-aligned learning activities will be well-organized, labeled, and stored for convenient use by teachers. (1085) SC,ELL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IIIA06 All teachers will test frequently using a variety of evaluation methods and maintain a record of the results. (1068) SP,ELL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 39 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIIA07 All teachers will differentiate assignments (individualize instruction) in response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other methods of assessment. (1069)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty. SP,RTI,ELL,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IIIA35 Students will be engaged and on task. (1161) SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Maceo Rainey
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Students will be on task and engaged in the follow manner:
*variety of groupings
*questioning
*all risk taker
*reciprocal taching
*peer sharing
*stating and understanding objective of the lesson
*student led lessons and discussions
*peer tutoring
*differentiated lessons to met all needs
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/06/2014
4 Tasks
1
Teachers will post, relay, and review the day's objective.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 11/26/2013 End Date 12/20/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Mr. Rainey will present/model a culturally relevant lesson at the December 12th optional staff meeting.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 11/26/2013 End Date 12/12/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 40 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIIA35 Students will be engaged and on task. (1161) SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Maceo Rainey
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Students will be on task and engaged in the follow manner:
*variety of groupings
*questioning
*all risk taker
*reciprocal taching
*peer sharing
*stating and understanding objective of the lesson
*student led lessons and discussions
*peer tutoring
*differentiated lessons to met all needs
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/06/2014
4 Tasks
1
Teachers will post, relay, and review the day's objective.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 11/26/2013 End Date 12/20/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Mr. Rainey will present/model a culturally relevant lesson at the December 12th optional staff meeting.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 11/26/2013 End Date 12/12/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IIIC12 All teachers will engage all students (e.g., encourage silent students to participate). (1109) SP,ELL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Lori Beach-Yates
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District: Teachers will provide differentiated instruction and materials to ensure that all students are engaged and on task.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/05/2015
4 Tasks
1
1. The PLCs will discuss and reflect on ELL students' struggles with language and its impact on learning and understanding. This discussion will be reflected in the PLCs minutes.
Assigned to Lori Beach-Yates Start Date 05/01/2014 End Date 05/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 41 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
TL1 All teachers will demonstrate in their lesson plans the content knowledge necessary to challenge and motivate students to high levels of learning. (2332) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
TL2
All teachers will establish in their lesson plans and will explicitly define to students high and realistic academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral expectations for their
learning so that they know what is needed for them to achieve at proficient levels. (2331)
Title I Expectations: Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary schoolwide programs.
CL,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 42 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
TL9 All teachers will incorporate the use of technology in their classrooms when it enhances instruction and builds 21st Century Learning Skills. (2335) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 43 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Assessment
IIB01 Units of instruction will include pre-/post-tests to assess student mastery of standards-based objectives. (1048) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IIB03 Unit pre-test and post-test results will be reviewed by the Instructional Team. (1050) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 44 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IIB04 Teachers will differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051) RTI,ELL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Maceo Rainey
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District: Delete this task
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 04/08/2014
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IID03 Teachers will receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. (1055) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IID06 Yearly learning goals will be set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Current information will be collected, analyzed and a flow chart completed. Entire West staff will have been made
aware of the flow chart information. The leadership Team will use that data to establish and communicate yearly
learning goals.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 03/01/2013
4 Tasks
1
A cohesive leadership team will be formed with defined roles.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 10/19/2012 End Date 03/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 1000
2
Clarify/define what data is necessary to set yearly learning goals.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Prioritized data will be analyzed and shared with staff.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
The Leadership team and associated roles will be communicated to the rest of the school.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
The yearly determined goals will become recurring agenda items at PLC meetings and monthly Staff Meeting.
Assigned to Start Date 08/01/2013 End Date 06/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6
PLC's will create steps or intervention plans in line with yearly goals.
Assigned to Start Date 08/01/2013 End Date 06/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 45 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IID06 Yearly learning goals will be set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Current information will be collected, analyzed and a flow chart completed. Entire West staff will have been made
aware of the flow chart information. The leadership Team will use that data to establish and communicate yearly
learning goals.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 03/01/2013
4 Tasks
1
A cohesive leadership team will be formed with defined roles.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 10/19/2012 End Date 03/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 1000
2
Clarify/define what data is necessary to set yearly learning goals.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Prioritized data will be analyzed and shared with staff.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
The Leadership team and associated roles will be communicated to the rest of the school.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
The yearly determined goals will become recurring agenda items at PLC meetings and monthly Staff Meeting.
Assigned to Start Date 08/01/2013 End Date 06/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6
PLC's will create steps or intervention plans in line with yearly goals.
Assigned to Start Date 08/01/2013 End Date 06/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 46 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IID06 Yearly learning goals will be set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. (1057) SS,SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Current information will be collected, analyzed and a flow chart completed. Entire West staff will have been made
aware of the flow chart information. The leadership Team will use that data to establish and communicate yearly
learning goals.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 03/01/2013
4 Tasks
1
A cohesive leadership team will be formed with defined roles.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 10/19/2012 End Date 03/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 1000
2
Clarify/define what data is necessary to set yearly learning goals.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Prioritized data will be analyzed and shared with staff.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
The Leadership team and associated roles will be communicated to the rest of the school.
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
The yearly determined goals will become recurring agenda items at PLC meetings and monthly Staff Meeting.
Assigned to Start Date 08/01/2013 End Date 06/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6
PLC's will create steps or intervention plans in line with yearly goals.
Assigned to Start Date 08/01/2013 End Date 06/01/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IID07 The Leadership Team will monitor school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District: The West Leadership Team will monitor chosen data and use that data to provide support and direction to PLC
leaders. School level learning data will be efficiently reviewed using an organized structure.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 04/03/2013
4 Tasks
1
Set structured time to meet for 1 hour/week for all PLC’s
Assigned to Start Date 11/02/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 500 0 0 0 0 0 500
2
Ensure that all members of the Tier 1 Team have access to necessary data
Assigned to Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Set a schedule for Tier 1 meetings through end of the school year.
Assigned to Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Establish a structured process for Tier 2 Meetings
Assigned to Lori Beach-Yates Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
Releveant student level data will be selected for review by the Leadership Team
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/16/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 47 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IID07 The Leadership Team will monitor school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District: The West Leadership Team will monitor chosen data and use that data to provide support and direction to PLC
leaders. School level learning data will be efficiently reviewed using an organized structure.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 04/03/2013
4 Tasks
1
Set structured time to meet for 1 hour/week for all PLC’s
Assigned to Start Date 11/02/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 500 0 0 0 0 0 500
2
Ensure that all members of the Tier 1 Team have access to necessary data
Assigned to Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Set a schedule for Tier 1 meetings through end of the school year.
Assigned to Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Establish a structured process for Tier 2 Meetings
Assigned to Lori Beach-Yates Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 08/01/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
Releveant student level data will be selected for review by the Leadership Team
Assigned to Maceo Rainey Start Date 12/11/2012 End Date 04/16/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IID08 Instructional Teams will review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 48 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IID08 Instructional Teams will review student learning data (academic, physical, social, emotional, behavioral) to assess and make decisions about curriculum and instructional
strategies. (1059) SC,SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IID10 Instructional Teams will use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. (1061) RTI,CL
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Maceo Rainey
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
1. All students involved in literature circles, reading books at their success level, and completing projects based
activities
2. Increase in district-wide student assessments
3. Instruction will be based on data from the assessments and teacher reflection on results
4. Reduction in number of students receiving Tier II services
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/12/2015
4 Tasks
1
1.Have each PLC develop 3 project based learning activities to share with the school community. This task will be presented and initially discussed at the March 20, 2014 PLC
meeting.
Assigned to Start Date 03/11/2014 End Date 05/15/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Each teacher will submit an enhancement activity that they are using in their classroom for their top performing students. This will be submitted to the PLC leader by April 11, 2014.
Assigned to Start Date 03/20/2014 End Date 04/11/2014 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 49 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IID11
Instructional Teams will review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of
intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives). (1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Mike Francis
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Students will be provided with the opportunity to receive extra help via before school and after school tutoring.
Students will also be assigned (per results of data) to lunch tutoring. Students will be placed in the appropriate
reading and math intervention classes (using data and district placement guidelines).
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/05/2015
4 Tasks
1
The Instructional Teams (content PLCs) will quarterly review the results of unit pre-/post tests to determine placements or exiting of a reading intervention program and/or math
foundation class.
Assigned to PLC Content Leader Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
The Instructional Teams (content PLCs) will monthly review the results of pre-/post tests to determine tutoring needs.
Assigned to PLC Content Leader Start Date 03/23/2015 End Date 06/05/2015 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 50 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Periodic Assessment
CL6 School Leadership and primary caregivers will engage in regular communication to provide mutual supports and guidance between home and school for all aspects of student
learning. (2341) SC
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IVA03 The school's Compact will outline the responsibilities/expectations of teachers, primary caregivers, and students. (1113) SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 51 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IVD01 The school's Compact will be annually distributed to teachers, school personnel, primary caregivers, and students. (1114) SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IVD02 The "ongoing conversation" between school personnel and primary caregivers will be candid, supportive, and flow in both directions. (1115) SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
IVD03 The school will regularly and clearly communicate with primary caregivers about its expectations of them and the importance of the "curriculum of the home." (1155) SC,SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Maceo Rainey
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Parents will be informed about school and everyday events by the school. Parents access Parent Portal regularly for
relevant student data. Parents are communicating back to the school with concerns, updated addresses and phone
numbers.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/06/2014
4 Tasks
1
Find out the capabilities of the Parent Portal and talk with Chris Taskey about particulars.
Assigned to Asiya Laskonis Start Date 11/26/2013 End Date 12/20/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 52 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
IVD03 The school will regularly and clearly communicate with primary caregivers about its expectations of them and the importance of the "curriculum of the home." (1155) SC,SP
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to Maceo Rainey
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
Parents will be informed about school and everyday events by the school. Parents access Parent Portal regularly for
relevant student data. Parents are communicating back to the school with concerns, updated addresses and phone
numbers.
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality: 06/06/2014
4 Tasks
1
Find out the capabilities of the Parent Portal and talk with Chris Taskey about particulars.
Assigned to Asiya Laskonis Start Date 11/26/2013 End Date 12/20/2013 Timeline
Budget & Funding Sources($)
District Title I Title II-D Title III State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 53 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Create Plan — Community and Family Engagement
CL1
The school's Learning Support System will include academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral programming based on school-wide, targeted group and individualized
needs. (2343)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming needs are
met.
RTI,SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL10 The school culture will promote and support the academic, physical, social, emotional, and behavioral skill development and engagement of students . (2351)
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 54 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL11 The school culture will promote and support the physical, social, emotional, and behavioral health of all school personnel. (2352)
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL12 All school personnel will work effectively and equitably with racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students. (2353)
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL2
School Leadership will identify and allocate/reallocate resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming needs are
met.
SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 55 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL2
School Leadership will identify and allocate/reallocate resources needed for Learning Supports' implementation. (2344)
Title I Expectations: The school coordinates and integrates Federal, State and local services and programs as much as possible to ensure the schoolwide programming needs are
met.
SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL3 School Leadership will monitor and evaluate the implementation of Learning Supports' programming through an on-going data collection system. (2345) SD,RTI
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL4 All school personnel will actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 56 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL4 All school personnel will actively model and foster a positive school environment where students feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow cognitively. (2346)
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL5 School Leadership will actively model and foster a positive school environment where staff members feel valued and are challenged to be engaged and grow professionally. (2347)
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL8 The school culture will support teachers in practicing effective and responsive instruction to meet individual student needs. (2349) RTI
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
CL9
All teachers will invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-teaching
opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels of
student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 57 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
CL9
All teachers will invite valid and reliable Learning Supports identified by their school leadership into their classrooms including but not limited to programs/strategies, co-teaching
opportunities, and consultation. (2350)
Title I Expectations: Identify and implement Schoolwide Reform Strategies that provide opportunities for all children to meet the State's proficient and advanced levels of
student academic achievement.
SW
Level of Development Partial Development/Implementation
1 Assigned to
2 How it will look when fully implemented in the District:
3 Date by which the description above will be a reality:
4 Tasks
There are no tasks created for this Objective
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 58 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Action Plan - Monitoring Process
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
ID10 The school’s Leadership Team will regularly look at school performance data and aggregated classroom
observation data and use that data to make decisions about school improvement and professional
development needs. (1021)
Title I Expectations: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment - Creating the School Profile.
SS,SW Mike Francis 08/31/2015 3 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 Bi-monthly Leadership Team meetings will be held to review the
Dashboard Data: attendance and referrals. Leadership meetings will
also review district assessments as they occur.
The meeting schedule has been created and dispersed to appropriate
personnel
School Leadership Team
2 Data gathered from these meetings will be presented to teachers
monthly via staff meetings, the PLCs and a monthly email to staff.
Completition date has been changed due to Leadership Team not
being able to meet
School Leadership Team
3 The gathered Leadership Team data will be used to inform and drive
professional development for staff.
Completition date has been changed due to Leadership Team not
being able to meet
Administration
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IF08 Professional development for the whole faculty will include assessment of strengths and areas in need of
improvement from classroom observations of indicators of effective teaching. (1042)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and
provide ongoing professional development.
SP,SW Mike Francis 08/31/2015 4 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 Investigate and develop a form that will allow compilation of domain
component evaluation score trends across the building.
Administration
2 Investigate and develop a tally sheet for building walkthroughs. Administration
3 Investigate and develop a professional development needs survey to
be completed by staff to assess perceived gaps in professional
development.
Linda Schreiner
4 Data compiled from the domain component evaluation scores, the
walkthrough tallies, and the staff needs assessment will be used to
determine the initial 2015-2016 professional development offerings in
this building.
School Leadership Team
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 59 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IF08 Professional development for the whole faculty will include assessment of strengths and areas in need of
improvement from classroom observations of indicators of effective teaching. (1042)
Title I Expectations: A schoolwide program must ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers and
provide ongoing professional development.
SP,SW Mike Francis 08/31/2015 4 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 Investigate and develop a form that will allow compilation of domain
component evaluation score trends across the building.
Administration
2 Investigate and develop a tally sheet for building walkthroughs. Administration
3 Investigate and develop a professional development needs survey to
be completed by staff to assess perceived gaps in professional
development.
Linda Schreiner
4 Data compiled from the domain component evaluation scores, the
walkthrough tallies, and the staff needs assessment will be used to
determine the initial 2015-2016 professional development offerings in
this building.
School Leadership Team
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IIB04 Teachers will differentiate instruction based on assessment results to provide support for some students
and enhanced learning opportunities for others. (1051)
RTI,ELL Maceo Rainey 04/08/2014 0
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
There are no tasks created for this Objective
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IID06 Yearly learning goals will be set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data.
(1057)
SS,SD 03/01/2013 6 16.67%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 A cohesive leadership team will be formed with defined roles. Completition date has been changed due to Leadership Team not
being able to meet
Maceo Rainey 05/01/2013
2 Clarify/define what data is necessary to set yearly learning goals. Maceo Rainey
3 Prioritized data will be analyzed and shared with staff. Maceo Rainey
4 The Leadership team and associated roles will be communicated to
the rest of the school.
Maceo Rainey
5 The yearly determined goals will become recurring agenda items at
PLC meetings and monthly Staff Meeting.
6 PLC's will create steps or intervention plans in line with yearly goals.
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 60 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IID06 Yearly learning goals will be set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data.
(1057)
SS,SD 03/01/2013 6 16.67%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 A cohesive leadership team will be formed with defined roles. Completition date has been changed due to Leadership Team not
being able to meet
Maceo Rainey 05/01/2013
2 Clarify/define what data is necessary to set yearly learning goals. Maceo Rainey
3 Prioritized data will be analyzed and shared with staff. Maceo Rainey
4 The Leadership team and associated roles will be communicated to
the rest of the school.
Maceo Rainey
5 The yearly determined goals will become recurring agenda items at
PLC meetings and monthly Staff Meeting.
6 PLC's will create steps or intervention plans in line with yearly goals.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IID07 The Leadership Team will monitor school-level student learning data. (1058) SC,SS,SD 04/03/2013 5 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 Set structured time to meet for 1 hour/week for all PLC’s
2 Ensure that all members of the Tier 1 Team have access to necessary
data
3 Set a schedule for Tier 1 meetings through end of the school year.
4 Establish a structured process for Tier 2 Meetings Lori Beach-Yates
5 Releveant student level data will be selected for review by the
Leadership Team
Maceo Rainey
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 61 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IID10 Instructional Teams will use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or
enhancement. (1061)
RTI,CL Maceo Rainey 06/12/2015 2 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 1.Have each PLC develop 3 project based learning activities to share
with the school community. This task will be presented and initially
discussed at the March 20, 2014 PLC meeting.
2 Each teacher will submit an enhancement activity that they are
using in their classroom for their top performing students. This will
be submitted to the PLC leader by April 11, 2014.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IID11 Instructional Teams will review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum
and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of intervention (both students in need of tutoring
or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of
objectives). (1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW Mike Francis 06/05/2015 2 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 The Instructional Teams (content PLCs) will quarterly review the
results of unit pre-/post tests to determine placements or exiting of
a reading intervention program and/or math foundation class.
PLC Content Leader
2 The Instructional Teams (content PLCs) will monthly review the
results of pre-/post tests to determine tutoring needs.
PLC Content Leader
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 62 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IID11 Instructional Teams will review the results of unit pre-/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum
and instructional plans and to "red flag" students in need of intervention (both students in need of tutoring
or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of
objectives). (1062)
Title I Expectations: Effective, timely additional assistance provided to students experiencing difficulty.
SW Mike Francis 06/05/2015 2 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 The Instructional Teams (content PLCs) will quarterly review the
results of unit pre-/post tests to determine placements or exiting of
a reading intervention program and/or math foundation class.
PLC Content Leader
2 The Instructional Teams (content PLCs) will monthly review the
results of pre-/post tests to determine tutoring needs.
PLC Content Leader
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IIIA35 Students will be engaged and on task. (1161) SP Maceo Rainey 06/06/2014 2 50%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 Teachers will post, relay, and review the day's objective. Maceo Rainey
2 Mr. Rainey will present/model a culturally relevant lesson at the
December 12th optional staff meeting.
Mr. Rainey presented the lesson at the Institute Day on January 17,
2014.
Maceo Rainey 01/17/2014
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IIIC12 All teachers will engage all students (e.g., encourage silent students to participate). (1109) SP,ELL Lori Beach-Yates 06/05/2015 1 0%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 1. The PLCs will discuss and reflect on ELL students' struggles with
language and its impact on learning and understanding. This
discussion will be reflected in the PLCs minutes.
Lori Beach-Yates
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 63 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Tasks
Key
CodeObjectives
Indicator
TypeAssigned to Target date Tasks
% Tasks
Completed
Objective
Status
IVD03 The school will regularly and clearly communicate with primary caregivers about its expectations of them
and the importance of the "curriculum of the home." (1155)
SC,SP Maceo Rainey 06/06/2014 1 100%
Task ID Task Description Comments Assigned to Completed
1 Find out the capabilities of the Parent Portal and talk with Chris
Taskey about particulars.
Ms. Laskonis spoke with Chris Taskey on December 20, 2013. Mr.
Taskey said he will look into West's access to the parent portal and
get back to West.
Asiya Laskonis 12/20/2013
Report Card Data Overview
Percent (%) of Students Meeting and Exceeding State Standards - ISAT/PSAE
ACCESS Results
IAA Results
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Reading - ISAT Results
SubGroups 45 40.3 43.8 49.3 30.4 30.5
White 64.2 53.9 58.7 63.9 38 38.8
Black 33.8 34.5 39.6 46.2 21.8 18
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 58.2 64.8 63.5 - 40.6
Asian 54.5 0 - 13 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 58.8 -
Two or More Races 78.6 28.6 - - 33.3 50
LEP 14.3 11.4 33.3 10.8 - -
Students with Disabilities 14.1 6.6 11.5 17.5 3.9 3.4
Low Income 43.3 39.1 43.1 48.6 29.2 28.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 39.1 -
Mathematics - ISAT Results
SubGroups 44.4 48.9 50.2 50.1 25.2 28.4
White 66.7 70.9 66.3 68.6 36.8 38.8
Black 34.2 41 45.9 47.1 14.4 16.1
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 71.2 67.9 49.2 - 38.3
Asian 28 26.3 22.2 21.7 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 52.9 -
Two or More Races 28.6 46.2 - - 26.3 38.9
LEP 18.4 25.8 43.1 19.4 - -
Students with Disabilities 13.3 9.2 19.5 24 4 6.1
Low Income 42 47.8 49.2 49.2 23.8 27
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 25 -
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade K
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 1
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 2
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 3
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 4
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 5
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 6
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 7
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 8
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 9
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 10
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 11
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade12
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 64 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Report Card Data Overview
Percent (%) of Students Meeting and Exceeding State Standards - ISAT/PSAE
ACCESS Results
IAA Results
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Reading - ISAT Results
SubGroups 45 40.3 43.8 49.3 30.4 30.5
White 64.2 53.9 58.7 63.9 38 38.8
Black 33.8 34.5 39.6 46.2 21.8 18
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 58.2 64.8 63.5 - 40.6
Asian 54.5 0 - 13 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 58.8 -
Two or More Races 78.6 28.6 - - 33.3 50
LEP 14.3 11.4 33.3 10.8 - -
Students with Disabilities 14.1 6.6 11.5 17.5 3.9 3.4
Low Income 43.3 39.1 43.1 48.6 29.2 28.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 39.1 -
Mathematics - ISAT Results
SubGroups 44.4 48.9 50.2 50.1 25.2 28.4
White 66.7 70.9 66.3 68.6 36.8 38.8
Black 34.2 41 45.9 47.1 14.4 16.1
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 71.2 67.9 49.2 - 38.3
Asian 28 26.3 22.2 21.7 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 52.9 -
Two or More Races 28.6 46.2 - - 26.3 38.9
LEP 18.4 25.8 43.1 19.4 - -
Students with Disabilities 13.3 9.2 19.5 24 4 6.1
Low Income 42 47.8 49.2 49.2 23.8 27
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 25 -
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade K
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 1
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 2
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 3
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 4
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 5
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 6
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 7
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 8
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 9
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 10
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 11
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade12
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 65 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Report Card Data Overview
Percent (%) of Students Meeting and Exceeding State Standards - ISAT/PSAE
ACCESS Results
IAA Results
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Reading - ISAT Results
SubGroups 45 40.3 43.8 49.3 30.4 30.5
White 64.2 53.9 58.7 63.9 38 38.8
Black 33.8 34.5 39.6 46.2 21.8 18
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 58.2 64.8 63.5 - 40.6
Asian 54.5 0 - 13 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 58.8 -
Two or More Races 78.6 28.6 - - 33.3 50
LEP 14.3 11.4 33.3 10.8 - -
Students with Disabilities 14.1 6.6 11.5 17.5 3.9 3.4
Low Income 43.3 39.1 43.1 48.6 29.2 28.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 39.1 -
Mathematics - ISAT Results
SubGroups 44.4 48.9 50.2 50.1 25.2 28.4
White 66.7 70.9 66.3 68.6 36.8 38.8
Black 34.2 41 45.9 47.1 14.4 16.1
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 71.2 67.9 49.2 - 38.3
Asian 28 26.3 22.2 21.7 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 52.9 -
Two or More Races 28.6 46.2 - - 26.3 38.9
LEP 18.4 25.8 43.1 19.4 - -
Students with Disabilities 13.3 9.2 19.5 24 4 6.1
Low Income 42 47.8 49.2 49.2 23.8 27
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 25 -
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade K
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 1
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 2
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 3
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 4
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 5
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 6
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 7
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 8
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 9
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 10
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade 11
No students tested for ACCESS in Grade12
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 66 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Assessment Data Reading
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Grade 6
SubGroups 38.8 41.1 47.8 49.4 33.9 33.3
White 57.9 65.7 61.1 58.7 37.5 46.8
Black 30.6 33.6 44.9 45.7 25.2 18.8
Hispanic/Latino 77.8 55 64.7 63.6 - 40.4
Asian - - - 13.6 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 58.8 -
Two or More Races - 28.6 - - - 44.4
LEP 0 - 30 11.1 - -
Students with Disabilities 5.6 5 7.4 16 0 2
Low Income 38.6 39.9 47.1 49.8 32.9 30.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - - -
Grade 7
SubGroups 44.2 32.1 37.6 44.4 29.9 29.9
White 61.9 33.3 59.4 62.7 40.8 38.5
Black 35.4 27.6 32.1 39.3 20.5 17.5
Hispanic/Latino 63.6 63.6 56.2 61.9 - 34.8
Asian - 0 - 9.1 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races - - - - - -
LEP - 5.9 17.6 11.8 - -
Students with Disabilities 11.5 3 13 16 6.7 3.3
Low Income 41.3 31.2 37 42.6 28.3 28.4
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 45.5 -
Grade 8
SubGroups 53.2 47.5 45.6 54.6 27.3 27.5
White 72.1 57.5 54.2 74.4 35.8 30
Black 36.3 42.4 41.1 54.4 20.4 17.5
Hispanic/Latino 77.8 56 71.4 65 - 50
Asian 54.5 - - 16 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races 78.6 - - - 33.3 62.5
LEP 33.3 16.7 50 9.4 - -
Students with Disabilities 26.7 13 14.3 22.7 3.4 5.4
Low Income 51.2 46 44.8 53.6 26.4 26.9
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 33.3 -
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 67 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Assessment Data Reading
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Grade 6
SubGroups 38.8 41.1 47.8 49.4 33.9 33.3
White 57.9 65.7 61.1 58.7 37.5 46.8
Black 30.6 33.6 44.9 45.7 25.2 18.8
Hispanic/Latino 77.8 55 64.7 63.6 - 40.4
Asian - - - 13.6 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 58.8 -
Two or More Races - 28.6 - - - 44.4
LEP 0 - 30 11.1 - -
Students with Disabilities 5.6 5 7.4 16 0 2
Low Income 38.6 39.9 47.1 49.8 32.9 30.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - - -
Grade 7
SubGroups 44.2 32.1 37.6 44.4 29.9 29.9
White 61.9 33.3 59.4 62.7 40.8 38.5
Black 35.4 27.6 32.1 39.3 20.5 17.5
Hispanic/Latino 63.6 63.6 56.2 61.9 - 34.8
Asian - 0 - 9.1 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races - - - - - -
LEP - 5.9 17.6 11.8 - -
Students with Disabilities 11.5 3 13 16 6.7 3.3
Low Income 41.3 31.2 37 42.6 28.3 28.4
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 45.5 -
Grade 8
SubGroups 53.2 47.5 45.6 54.6 27.3 27.5
White 72.1 57.5 54.2 74.4 35.8 30
Black 36.3 42.4 41.1 54.4 20.4 17.5
Hispanic/Latino 77.8 56 71.4 65 - 50
Asian 54.5 - - 16 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races 78.6 - - - 33.3 62.5
LEP 33.3 16.7 50 9.4 - -
Students with Disabilities 26.7 13 14.3 22.7 3.4 5.4
Low Income 51.2 46 44.8 53.6 26.4 26.9
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 33.3 -
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 68 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Assessment Data Mathematics
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Grade 6
SubGroups 44.4 53.4 50.8 53.8 34.8 32.9
White 61.5 72.2 63.9 69.3 44.4 45.6
Black 36.6 48.7 48.3 48.4 23.1 21.5
Hispanic/Latino 88.9 73.7 82.4 59.1 - 40.4
Asian 14.3 - 7.7 22.7 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 52.9 -
Two or More Races - 46.2 - - - 34.2
LEP 9.1 16.7 39.3 18.5 - -
Students with Disabilities 11.4 5 18.5 24 0 4
Low Income 42.5 52.7 50.5 53.7 32.6 30.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - - -
Grade 7
SubGroups 49 48 51.7 48.4 22.5 26.1
White 70.5 66.7 71.9 72.5 34.1 35.9
Black 41.3 40.3 47.7 44.1 10 12.2
Hispanic/Latino 63.6 77.3 60 42.9 - 37.8
Asian - 26.3 16.7 27.3 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races - - - - - -
LEP 7.7 37 28.6 26.5 - -
Students with Disabilities 11.5 12.1 18.2 29.2 6.7 0
Low Income 46.1 47.4 50.9 45.8 21.8 24.2
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 33.3 -
Grade 8
SubGroups 39.4 45.5 48.1 46.9 18.1 24.9
White 67.4 72.5 62.5 62.8 27.9 34.3
Black 22 34.2 41.9 48.5 11.9 13.4
Hispanic/Latino 66.7 64 61.9 45 - 35.5
Asian 45.5 - 45.5 16 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races 28.6 - - - 26.3 50
LEP 42.9 19 60.9 12.5 - -
Students with Disabilities 17.2 8.7 21.4 18.2 3.7 14.3
Low Income 36.7 43.5 46.3 47 16.9 24.9
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 16.7 -
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 69 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Assessment Data Mathematics
% Meets+Exceeds Trends (These are school level results. Subgroups with fewer than 10 students will not be reported.)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Grade 6
SubGroups 44.4 53.4 50.8 53.8 34.8 32.9
White 61.5 72.2 63.9 69.3 44.4 45.6
Black 36.6 48.7 48.3 48.4 23.1 21.5
Hispanic/Latino 88.9 73.7 82.4 59.1 - 40.4
Asian 14.3 - 7.7 22.7 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - 52.9 -
Two or More Races - 46.2 - - - 34.2
LEP 9.1 16.7 39.3 18.5 - -
Students with Disabilities 11.4 5 18.5 24 0 4
Low Income 42.5 52.7 50.5 53.7 32.6 30.8
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - - -
Grade 7
SubGroups 49 48 51.7 48.4 22.5 26.1
White 70.5 66.7 71.9 72.5 34.1 35.9
Black 41.3 40.3 47.7 44.1 10 12.2
Hispanic/Latino 63.6 77.3 60 42.9 - 37.8
Asian - 26.3 16.7 27.3 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races - - - - - -
LEP 7.7 37 28.6 26.5 - -
Students with Disabilities 11.5 12.1 18.2 29.2 6.7 0
Low Income 46.1 47.4 50.9 45.8 21.8 24.2
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 33.3 -
Grade 8
SubGroups 39.4 45.5 48.1 46.9 18.1 24.9
White 67.4 72.5 62.5 62.8 27.9 34.3
Black 22 34.2 41.9 48.5 11.9 13.4
Hispanic/Latino 66.7 64 61.9 45 - 35.5
Asian 45.5 - 45.5 16 - -
American Indian or Alaska Native - - - - - -
Two or More Races 28.6 - - - 26.3 50
LEP 42.9 19 60.9 12.5 - -
Students with Disabilities 17.2 8.7 21.4 18.2 3.7 14.3
Low Income 36.7 43.5 46.3 47 16.9 24.9
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander - - - - 16.7 -
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 70 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
School Information
Note: Hyphens in the table indicate that data is not relevant for your plan.
District Information
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Attendance Rate (%) 92.5 91.1 89.6 89.4 90.0 91.7 89.4 93.1
Truancy Rate (%) 5.5 6.1 5.7 7.2 31.0 2.1 7.7 5.2
Mobility Rate (%) 10.4 28.5 13.6 15.2 44.7 24.1 19.2 22.3
HS Graduation Rate, if applicable (%) - - - - - - - -
HS Dropout Rate, if applicable (%) - - - - - - - -
School Population (#) 829 995 629 647 575 684 786 874
Low Income (%) 57.7 66.3 91.6 91.5 95.7 93.9 92.1 89.4
Limited English Proficient(LEP)(%) 7.6 7.5 7.8 8.8 10.1 12.0 2.3 1.4
Students with Disabilities (%) - - - 14.7 16.7 16.2 17.4 18.0
White, non-Hispanic (%) 43.4 35.3 21.0 18.7 16.5 24.3 27.7 29.7
Black, non-Hispanic (%) 37.5 44.2 59.6 60.1 64.0 51.3 49.1 44.9
Hispanic (%) 8.6 9.5 9.1 10.0 10.1 11.4 15.3 16.2
Asian (%) 7.0 6.0 4.9 5.9 6.3 8.8 1.4 1.0
American Indian (%) 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2
Two or More Races (%) 3.3 4.7 4.8 4.9 2.6 4.2 6.4 7.9
Native Hawiian/Pacific Islander (%) - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 71 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Student Race/Ethnicity
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 72 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Educational Environment
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 73 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Educational Environment
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 74 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Educational Environment
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 75 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Enrollment Trends
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 76 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Enrollment Trends
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 77 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Educator Data
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 78 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Educator Data
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 79 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Educator Data
West Middle School
4/29/2015 11:47:53 AM School Continuous Improvement Plan Page 80 of 81
© 2015 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University, with support from the Illinois State Board of Education.