Upload
others
View
31
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
School Improvement
Plan
2015-2016
SCHOOL: Holly Ridge Elementary
The following items should make up the Data Portfolio (to be kept on file at the school): o Subgroup Component Report and Principal’s Report Card for the last three years.
o Summary of Findings of Survey Data and all source documents. (Teachers, Parents, Students, and Principal) May be completed
online. If Parent sample size is inadequate, there must be Parent Focus Group(s).
o Summary of Findings of Interview Data and all source documents. (Principal, Counselor, and Teachers) (Not Optional for
Schools in School Improvement)
o Summary of Findings of Focus Group Data and all source documents. (Teachers, Students, and Parents) (Not Optional for
Schools in School Improvement)
o Copy of the Data Triangulation Form
o Comprehensive Needs Assessment: Final Report
o DRA or DIBELS Reports
o Data Analysis Template (Trend Data history, Discipline/Behavior history, etc.)
o Data Notebook (for schools participating in School Analysis Model-SAM 2000 or LANA online)
o Cognitive Summary Data (iLEAP, LEAP/GEE, ACT, PSAT, etc.)
o Citation from monitoring of Federal Programs – if applicable (e.g., Special Education and corresponding Corrective Action
Plans)
I have read and understand that the above information will be kept on file at the school. _________________________________ ____________________________ Principal’s Signature Date
SIP COMMITTEE
SCHOOL: Holly Ridge Elementary
FOR SCHOOL YEAR: 2015-2016
NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE REPRESENTING (Indicate Parent, Community, Teacher, Staff, Leadership)
QUARTERLY DATE(S) attended for Development, Revisions, and
Evaluation of SIP
Gloria Gallman Principal
Mildred Davis Principal -Intern
Amanda Morgan SPED Teacher/Teacher Leader
Nancy Cogburn ELA/SS Teacher
Vicki Russell Math Teacher/ Teacher Leader
Monita Windham ELA Teacher
Barbara Adcock Kindergarten Teacher
Angela Clack Parent
Jessica DiGiovanni Parent
Angelia Simmons Community Leader- Delta Parties/ Ricky Graham Farms
This page must be turned in at the end of the school year to Ken Newsom with parent signatures for documentation.
SUMMARY REPORT OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
DIBELS Instructional Recommendation *
Year Grade Level # Students
Assessed
At Risk
(Intensive Intervention Needed)
At Some Risk (Strategic
Intervention Needed)
Benchmark (Low Risk
Of Reading Failure)
# Students Percent # Students Percent # Students Percent
Fall 2012 Kindergarten 27 16 59 3 11 8 30
_____ First Grade 36 17 47 3 8 16 44
_____ Second Grade 31 16 52 9 29 6 19
_____ Third Grade 27 4 15 5 19 18 67
Spring 2013 Kindergarten 30 18 60 6 20 6 20
_____ First Grade 26 14 54 6 23 6 23
_____ Second Grade 34 12 35 8 24 14 41
_____ Third Grade 29 19 66 3 10 7 24
Fall 2013 Kindergarten 23 12 52 4 17 7 30
_____ First Grade 28 20 71 5 18 3 11
_____ Second Grade 23 12 52 3 13 8 35
_____ Third Grade 31 15 48 4 13 12 39
Spring 2014 Kindergarten 22 10 45 3 14 9 41
_____ First Grade 24 12 50 5 21 7 29
_____ Second Grade 20 9 45 4 20 7 35
_____ Third Grade # # % # % # %
Fall 2014
Kindergarten 18 10 56 4 22 4 22
_____ First Grade 28 16 57 7 25 5 18
_____ Second Grade 25 9 36 3 12 13 52
_____ Third Grade 24 12 50 4 17 8 33
Spring 2015 Kindergarten 17 4 24 6 35 7 41
_____ First Grade 26 16 62 2 8 8 31
_____ Second Grade 28 16 57 7 25 5 18
_____ Third Grade 24 9 38 3 13 12 50
School Index Indicator Data
grade/subject 2011-2012 proficiency
2012-2013 proficiency
2013-2014 proficiency
2014-2015 proficiency growth/loss 2014-2015
3rd grade
ELA 30% 21% 48%
math 78% 31% 56%
science 74% 52% 60% 52% - 8%
social studies 78% 28% 48% 52% + 4%
4th grade
ELA 69% 55% 36%
math 62% 48% 32%
science 65% 52% 46% 42% -4%
social studies 55% 58% 50% 45% -5%
5th grade
ELA 79% 83% 61%
math 79% 91% 57%
science 83% 83% 70% 48% -22%
social studies 80% 78% 70% 52% -18%
6th grade
ELA 63% 67% 61%
math 85% 90% 87%
science 70% 73% 70% 74% +4%
social studies 59% 53% 70% 55% -15%
7th grade
ELA 66% 57% 76%
math 97% 91% 81%
science 72% 83% 76% 68% -8%
social studies 46% 61% 67% 52% -18%
8th grade
ELA 79% 69% 81%
math 89% 90% 67%
science 78% 83% 71% 56% -13%
social studies 73% 66% 62% 56% -6%
Score Distributions and Proficiency Rates 2015 grade/subject Advanced
(150) Mastery (125)
Basic (100)
App Basic (0)
Unsat (0)
% prof
3rd grade
ELA
math
science 0 4 8 6 5 52%
social studies 0 2 10 6 5 52%
4th grade
ELA
math
science 2 3 11 12 10 42%
social studies 0 1 16 8 13 45%
5th grade
ELA
math
science 0 4 10 7 8 48%
social studies 0 4 11 5 9 52%
6th grade
ELA
math
science 0 5 18 5 3 74%
social studies 0 7 10 10 4 55%
7th grade
ELA
math
science 1 3 13 7 1 68%
social studies 0 2 11 7 5 52%
8th grade
ELA
math
science 0 4 6 5 3 56%
social studies 0 2 8 3 5 56%
DATA COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY REPORT For Title I Schools: ELA and Math by subgroups should be primary when considering weaknesses that will lead to the goals in the SIP.
Part Ia: Rank-order the identified areas of strength (3-5) from the student performance (cognitive data), behavior, attendance, dropout
data, and/or graduation index and indicate the supporting data sources:
STRENGTHS (100 characters per box) DATA SOURCE/INSTRUMENT (100 characters per box)
1. 6th,7th, and 8th grade Science and Social Studies scores are greater than 50% proficient
2015 iLEAP/LEAP School Roster Reports
2. 3rd Grade DIBELS 50% at Benchmark 2015 Spring DIBELS Report
3. 6th and 7th grade math scores are above 80% proficient; 8th grade ELA scores are above 80% proficient
2014 % proficient report
Part IIa. List the contributing factors from the cognitive, attitudinal/perceptual, behavioral, and archival data of the identified
strengths:
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THE STRENGTHS
(100 characters per box) DATA SOURCE/INSTRUMENT (100 characters per box)
1. Technology Availability LANA – ISQ, ISFG, SFG, PQ, PFG, AQ, 3rd Grade DIBELS 50% at
Benchmark.
2. Faculty Collaboration LANA – FNA, ISI, ISFG, PFG, AI, MATH Whole School 71.8% Proficient
2014 Proficiency Report.
3. PROMOTE POSITIVE LEARNING CLIMATE
LANA – FNA, ISQ, SQ, PQ, AQ, COA, No significant gap between whole
school and Economically Disadvantaged students across all content
areas.
DATA COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY REPORT
Part Ib: Rank-order the identified areas of weakness (3-5) from the student performance (cognitive data), behavior, attendance, dropout data, and/or
graduation index and indicate the supporting data sources:
WEAKNESSES (100 characters per box) DATA SOURCE/INSTRUMENT (100 characters per box)
1. 3rd and 4th grade ELA scores below 50% proficient 2014 % proficient report
2. 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade scores in Science and Social Studies below 50% proficient.
2015 iLEAP/LEAP Roster Reports
3. K – 2nd Grade DIBELS below 50 % proficient. DIBELS Report Spring 2015
Part IIb. List the contributing factors from the cognitive, attitudinal/perceptual, behavioral, and archival data of the identified weaknesses:
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THE WEAKNESSES
(100 characters per box) DATA SOURCE/INSTRUMENT (100 characters per box)
1. INSTRUCTIONAL TIME COA, ISI, ISFG, SFG, PQ, CONTEXTUAL, ARCHIVAL ELA Whole School
58% Proficient
2. DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION COA, COS, ISI, ISFG, PFG, 2nd Grade DIBELS 82% at risk or some risk, 3rd
Grade Math 31% and ELA 21% PROFICIENT TrendData 2013
3. CONSEQUENCE INCONSISTENCY (SWPB) COA, FNA, ISI, ISFG, SQ, SFG, PQ
The identified weaknesses will lead to the goals. The contributing factors of the weaknesses will lead to the strategies.
Richland Parish School Improvement Plan STRATEGIES: Data Driven Decision Making & RTI
School and Teacher Colaboration FOCUS AREAS: Curriculum and Assessment;
SCHOOL : Holly Ridge Elementary YEAR : 2015-2016
SUMMATIVE Evaluations will include comparison of state test results & SPS factors including DIBELS, LEAP, iLEAP, EOC, GEE, ITBS, dropout rates and
graduation index
Activity (include PD, implementation, & follow-up
steps)
Timeframe Person(s) responsible &
Person(s) involved
Funding source & amount
Procedure for documenting/evaluating/
Student outcomes
Teacher leaders will participate in ELA and Math state standard training.
June 4 - 5, 2015 And throughout 2015-2016 school year
Teacher Leaders District Support Team
Title II (travel, hotel)
Sign-in sheets Feedback
Teacher Leaders will redeliver information from state standard training.
August 11 or 12, 2015 and ongoing
Teacher Leaders District Support Team ,Teachers, Paras, Principals Math Coach, and Instructional Facilitator
GF/Title I/Title II Sign-in sheets Agenda
Evaluations conducted by District Support Team
Implement state standards throughout the school year
August 13, 2015 and ongoing through May 2016
Teachers GF Title I Technology, materials and supplies $6,733
Walk- around forms completed by teacher leaders, principals, & supervisors indicating Common Core Standards; fidelity checks conducted by principals and supervisors
Lesson plans turned in weekly
to principals
Student progress from pre-tests, benchmarking, and post-tests; six weeks grades; improvement on state assessments
CCSS follow-up through PLCs
Bi-monthly Teacher leaders Principals District Support Team
Title II
PLC logs checked monthly by principals
Walk around forms completed by principals and supervisors
Phonics Instruction PD August 31-Sept. 2, 2015
Supervisors K-5 Teachers & elem. principals
Title II $15000.00
Sign in sheets Feedback
Implementation of phonics strategies
August 13, 2015 and ongoing
Principals K-5 teachers
Lesson plans checked weekly by principals for phonics activities
Student progress from running records, DIBELS scores, and reading scores
Phonics follow-up through PLCs Monthly Supervisors
PLC logs checked monthly by principals
Walk around forms completed monthly by principals & supervisors.
DIBELS scores analyzed for needs & improvements
Paraprofessional will assist with K Daily K & 1st Grade Title I Lesson plans
and 1st Grade teachers with struggling students. Para will assist teacher with centers and RTI.
August 2015-May 2016
Teacher Principal Prinicpal Intern
Salary $30,039
Walk-around forms DIBELS scores analyzed for progress
Reading Interventionist will work with small groups of targeted students to provide remediation for reading deficiencies.
4 days a week August 2015-May 2016
Reading Interventionist Principal Principal Intern
Title I $28,974
DIBELS scores for progress and improvement Student RTI folders
Teachers meet bimonthly to collaborate. Meetings shall include a minimum of the following: sharing student work, reviewing assessments and assessment guide, discussion of common core, planning and implementation of text-based writing, effective classroom management, time-on-task, and improving rigor in the classroom.
Bimonthly September 2015-April 2016
Teachers and paras Instructional Facilitators Data Coach Principals
PLC logs checked monthly by principals
Implementation of strategies discussed during collaborative meetings
Daily September 2015-May 2016
Teachers and paras Lesson plans Walk around forms completed monthly by principals and supervisors
Student progress from pre-tests, benchmarking, and post-tests; six weeks grades; improvement on state assessments
Odyssey Ware, BrainPop, Discovery Ed, and Ren Learning
Ongoing August 2015 –
Teachers Title I - $8,177
Summary reports available through CAI programs
programs will be used by teachers and students to differentiate instruction.
May 2016
Principal and Principal Intern will provide an overview (rewards and consequences of actions) of the School Wide Positive Behavior Plan.
August 2015 Principal Principal Intern
Sign-in sheets Agenda Copy of SWPB Plan
Principal, Principal Intern, Instructional Facilitator will provide monitoring and written feedback to teachers in the implementation of the plan by completing walk around forms.
Ongoing August 2015-May 2016
Principal Principal Intern Supervisors Instructional Facilitator/Math Coach/Data Coach
Walk around forms completed monthly by principals and supervisors
Teachers will establish and monthly review individual classroom behavior plans, follow the guidelines of the school behavior plan daily, and use the JPAM system to assist with documentation. (SWPB team monthly meetings)
Monthly August 2015-May 2016
Teachers JPAMS reports Classroom behavior plans Meeting logs from SWPB team Improved student behavior
Students with good behavior and without office referrals will be rewarded with privileges/prizes/ and certificates each six weeks. Teachers will provide, written or verbal, positive feedback to parents of each student every six weeks.
Each six weeks August 2015-May 2016
Teachers Principal Principal Intern
Copy of parent log kept by teacher
Students with good behavior for May2016 Teachers Copy of Weekly behavior logs
the year as defined by the following: less than 5 MIRS, no office referrals or no more than one bus referral will participate in PBIS Fun Day or a Field Trip in May
Principal Principal Intern
turned ito office. JPAMS report.
The Principal Intern will work an additional month to ensure test scores are analyzed
August 2015 June 2016
Principal Intern Mildred Davis
Title I $6,612
Test analysis forms
Teachers will collaborate with one another to develop a classroom schedule that protects and makes optimum use of instructional minutes.
Aug.11-12, 2015
Teachers Schedule submitted to principal
*Each school must add all Title I funded activities that correlate with identified weaknesses from LANA and attach the
parent action plan.
Blue Signature Pages for Holly Ridge Elementary School
2015-2016
Should be signed in August 2013 by all faculty members
and sent to Christy Hendrix by Sept. 11, 2015.
I have read and understand my role in the school improvement process.
I agree to implement the strategies and activities in the school improvement plan.
Name (printed) Signature Position
Principal’s Signature________________________ Date______________________