Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School Results in 2005
Allison Porch Kristina Phillips-Schwartz
Terry Ryan
October, 2005 For more information, contact: Terry Ryan VP for Ohio Programs and Policy The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation [email protected] 937-227-3368
2
Table of Contents: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….. p. 3State-wide Overview………………………………………………………………… p. 4Snapshot: Cincinnati……………………………………………………………….. p. 8Snapshot: Cleveland……………………………………………………………….. p. 12Snapshot: Columbus……………………………………………………………….. p. 16Snapshot: Dayton……………………………………………………………………. p. 20Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………. p. 24Methodology……………………………………………………………………………. p. 25Appendix A……………………………………………………………………………….
p. 26
Appendix B……………………………………………………………………………… p. 30
3
Introduction
Those who oppose charter schools are quick to compare their performance to
statewide average scores for traditional district-operated public schools. In Ohio, for
example, the “Coalition for Public Education”—a front organization funded by the Ohio
Federation of Teachers and the Ohio Education Association—issued a press release in
August comparing average charter school performance to average district school
performance on state tests administered during 2004-05. Not surprisingly, charter schools
do not compare well on such measures, largely because they are only allowed to operate
in the state’s lowest performing districts (those rated in Academic Emergency or
Academic Watch by the Ohio Department of Education) and for the most part they serve
severely disadvantaged pupils.
This analysis takes Ohio’s 2005 School Report Card data from the Ohio
Department of Education and provides a far more appropriate and valid “apples-to-
apples” comparison, examining charter-school achievement alongside that of district
schools in Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Dayton. This approach yields a more
accurate and balanced comparison—and the results will show fair-minded observers that
the performance of charter pupils in those four cities is notably better than charter
opponents want people to think. The analysis also shows that: 1) improving student
achievement remains a tremendous challenge for both sectors of public schooling in
urban Ohio; 2) state-wide, little of value can be learned from generalizing about charter
school performance because there is such great variation in their academic performance;
and 3) in some cases, charter schools are outperforming similar district schools, and
several of those schools are doing amazing work with Ohio’s neediest children.
4
Overview Comparing Averages
The average performance of Ohio’s charter schools leaves much to be desired, but
so does the average performance of Ohio’s urban school systems where most charter
schools are located. None of the four urban districts examined here met the statewide
achievement average, nor did any of them meet the state’s 75% proficiency goal in any
grade or subject.
To provide a balanced snapshot of the average performance of charter schools, the
following graphs compare them to the average performance of their surrounding district
schools. The measures are 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 8th grade math and reading scores on statewide
tests administered in 2004-05. Charter schools outperformed their districts in some
subjects and grades; in others, the district schools did better. In Cincinnati and Columbus,
districts generally outperformed charters, but in Cleveland performance was split. Dayton
district schools and charter schools performed almost equally in all grades except 8th,
where charters pulled strongly ahead.
Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)
62%
49%
67% 67%
58%53%
60%57%
48%
29%
44%49% 48%
30%
41%44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CincinnatiDistrictSchools
CincinnatiCharterSchools
ClevelandDistrictSchools
ClevelandCharterSchools
ColumbusDistrictSchools
ColumbusCharterSchools
DaytonDistrictSchools
DaytonCharterSchools
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75%
Reading Math
5
Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in
4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
55%
48%
59%55% 55%
34%
49% 50%
43%
30%
53%
38%
50%
34%38% 37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CincinnatiDistrictSchools
CincinnatiCharterSchools
ClevelandDistrictSchools
ClevelandCharterSchools
ColumbusDistrictSchools
ColumbusCharterSchools
DaytonDistrictSchools
DaytonCharterSchools
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75%
Reading Math
Graph III: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
53% 51% 50%
41%
48%
29%
46% 45%44%
33%
41%
35%
42%
21%
35%32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CincinnatiDistrictSchools
CincinnatiCharterSchools
ClevelandDistrictSchools
ClevelandCharterSchools
ColumbusDistrictSchools
ColumbusCharterSchools
DaytonDistrictSchools
DaytonCharterSchools
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75%
Reading Math
6
Graph IV: District-Charter Comparison in
8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
64% 66%
50%
64%
57%
49%45%
56%
37%34%
19%23%
33%
27%
16%
35%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CincinnatiDistrictSchools
CincinnatiCharterSchools
ClevelandDistrictSchools
ClevelandCharterSchools
ColumbusDistrictSchools
ColumbusCharterSchools
DaytonDistrictSchools
DaytonCharterSchools
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75%
Reading Math
7
Looking at Individual Schools
When comparing individual charter schools in these four cities with the average
performance of the four districts combined, we see how little can be learned from
generalizing about charter school performance. The graph below depicts scores of charter
schools in comparison to the combined urban district averages. Each diamond/square on
the graph represents the performance of an individual charter school in relation to the
combined urban district averages. The level of variation emphasizes the wide variation in
individual school performance.
Graph V: Individual Charter School Comparison to District Average in
4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
Random distribution of charter schools in those four cities
* Blue dashed line represents four-city district school average score for 4th grade reading.
* Pink dotted line represents four-city district school average score for 4th grade math.
This graph shows that there are some charter schools that have outperformed both
the urban district average and surpassed the statewide goal of 75%. Ohio needs more
schools—district and charter alike—with students performing at such high levels. The
graph also shows that many charter schools performed similarly to district schools
and some scored well below district schools.
The next four chapters will provide a more in-depth analysis of the performance
of charter and district schools in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, and Dayton.
State Target
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75%
4th Grade Reading 4th Grade Math
8
Snapshot: Cincinnati (August 2005) State-wide Tests
Cincinnati graphs I and II compare the performance of Cincinnati-area charter
schools with that of Cincinnati Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores
on statewide tests administered in 2004-05. For this city and the three that follow, only 4th
and 6th grade scores were depicted because those two grades have been the standard
measure in Ohio for the last decade. Graphs for 3rd and 8th grade scores can be found in
Appendix A. The graphs make it clear that, on average, district schools do not meet the
proficiency goal in reading or math and most charter schools also struggle to attain this
goal. Overall, the results show that a wide gap remains between the student achievement
in most of these schools (district and charter alike) and the levels expected by the state
standards.
On the positive side, the graphs also show that some Cincinnati-area charter
schools surpassed the Cincinnati Public Schools average and surpassed (or approached)
the 75% proficiency goal in math, reading or both. For example, in 4th and 6th grade, the
W.E.B. Dubois Academy met or surpassed the 75% proficiency goal in both reading and
math. In addition, while many schools struggle to get their students to meet the 75%
proficiency goal in math, in 4th grade the Cincinnati College Prep School far exceeds it.
Cincinnati Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in
4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
17%
26%
36%
57%60% 62%
88%
50%
91%
46%
55%
28%33%
74%
82%
6%8%10%9%
5%7%
0%
43%
58%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cin
cin
nati
Pu
blic
Sch
ools
Oak T
ree
Mon
tess
ori
AB
Mir
ee
Fu
nd
am
en
tal
Aca
dem
y
Gre
ate
rC
inci
nn
ati
Co
mm
un
ity
Allia
nce
Aca
dem
y o
fC
inci
nn
ati
Inte
rnati
on
al
Co
lleg
e P
rep
Aca
dem
y
East
En
dC
om
mu
nit
yH
eri
tag
e
Cin
cin
nati
Co
lleg
e P
rep
Riv
ers
ide
Aca
dem
y
Mau
d B
ooth
Aca
dem
y
Ph
oen
ixC
om
mu
nit
yLearn
ing
WEB
Du
bois
Aca
dem
y
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
4th Reading 4th Math
9
Cincinnati Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
14%
25%
40%
65% 67%70%
75%
23%
92%
53%
25%
49%
11%12%
18%
44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cin
cinnat
iPu
blic
Sch
ools
AB M
iree
Fundam
enta
lAca
dem
y
Gre
ater
Cin
cinnat
iCom
munity
Ele
men
ata
ry
Alli
ance
Aca
dem
y of
Cin
cinnat
i
Phoen
ixCom
munity
Lear
nin
gCen
ter
Cin
cinnat
iColle
ge
Prep
Riv
ersi
de
Aca
dem
y
WEB D
ubois
Aca
dem
y
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
6th Reading 6th Math
10
School Report Card Ratings
The Ohio Department of Education assigns one of five labels to every public
school, whether district-operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous
Improvement, Academic Watch, or Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare
the school ratings for Cincinnati-area charter schools with Cincinnati district schools
serving elementary and middle school students. Overall, these graphs show that district
schools are outperforming Cincinnati-area charter schools.
Cincinnati Graph III: District School Ratings (2005) Excellent, 2%
Effective, 11%
Continuous Improvement , 36%
Academic Watch, 9%
Academic Emergency, 42%
Cincinnati Graph IV: Charter School Ratings (2005)
Excellent8%
Effective8%
Continuous Improvement
17%
Academic Watch8%
Academic Emergency
59%
11
School Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are
expected to reach the “proficient” level in reading and math by 2013-14. The state has
established annual goals that schools are expected to meet to show that they are making
“adequate yearly progress” toward this goal. Graphs V and VI compare the AYP ratings
for Cincinnati-area charter schools with Cincinnati district schools serving elementary
and middle school students. Overall, these graphs show that a higher percentage of
district schools made AYP in 2004-05 than charter schools.
Cincinnati Graph V: Percentage of District Schools
Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Did Not Meet62%
Met AYP38%
Cincinnati Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Did Not Meet AYP71%
Met AYP29%
12
Snapshot: Cleveland (August 2005) State-wide Tests
Cleveland Graphs I and II compare the performance of Cleveland-area charter
schools with that of Cleveland Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores
on statewide tests administered in 2004-05. The graphs show that, on average, district
schools do not meet the proficiency goal in reading or math and most charter schools
struggle to attain this goal. Overall, the results show that a wide gap remains between the
student achievement in most of these schools (district and charter alike), and the levels
expected by the state.
Some Cleveland-area charter schools, however, are accomplishing remarkable
things. Graph I below shows that in 4th grade, four Cleveland-area charter schools
surpassed the 75% proficiency goal in reading and one surpassed the proficiency goals in
reading and math. Graph II shows that in 6th grade, six of the Cleveland-area charter
schools surpassed the district average in math and three of these schools surpassed the
75% proficiency goal in math.
Cleveland Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in
4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
20%
27%
39%44%
48%
64%
74%77%
95%
81%
43%
82%
49%46%43%
59%
81%
44%
27%26%
44%39%39%
19%
0%
70%71%
50%
16%
42%
9%
53%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cleve
land
Pub
lic S
choo
ls
Great
er A
chie
vem
ent C
omm
unity
Acade
my
of C
leve
land
Hope
Acade
my,
Cat
hedr
al C
ampu
s
Hope
Acade
my
Broad
way
Hope
Acade
my,
Cuy
ahog
a Ca
mpu
s
Hope
Acade
my,
Eas
t Cam
pus
Hope
Acade
my,
Nor
thco
ast C
ampu
s
Hope
Cadem
y, Lin
coln
Par
k
Hope
Acade
my,
Cha
pelsid
e Ca
mpu
s
Purita
s Com
mun
ity S
choo
l
Old B
rook
lyn
Mon
tess
ori
Citize
ns' A
cade
my
Was
hing
ton
Park
Com
mun
ity S
choo
l
Parm
a Co
mm
unity
Ele
men
tary
Wes
tpar
k Co
mm
unity
Sch
ool
% o
f st
udents
at
or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
4th Reading 4th Math
13
Cleveland Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in
6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
10%
29%33%
53%
63%
4%
32%
79% 79%
57%
48%
35%
17%
50%
94%
0%
24%
47% 48%
39%
67%
33%
56%57%
18%27%
13%
21%
8%
0%
17%
41%
89%
20%
74%
2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Clev
eland
Pub
lic S
choo
ls
Marcu
s Gar
vey Ac
adem
y
Acad
emy of C
leve
land
Hope Ac
adem
y, C
uyah
oga Ca
mpu
s
Summit
Acad
emy-
Parm
a
Great
er A
chieve
men
t Com
mun
ity
Hope Ac
adem
y, E
ast C
ampu
s
Hope Ca
demy, Linco
ln Par
k
Hope Ac
adem
y, C
athe
dral C
ampu
s
Hope Ac
adem
y, C
hape
lside
Cam
pus
Old B
rook
lyn M
onte
ssor
i
Horiz
on S
cienc
e Ac
adem
y (6
-12)
Horiz
on S
cienc
e Ac
adem
y Clev
elan
d Ju
nior
High
Hope Ac
adem
y Br
oadw
ay
Was
hing
ton
Park
Com
mun
ity S
choo
l
Parm
a Co
mmun
ity E
lemen
tary
Hope Ac
adem
y, N
orth
coas
t Cam
pus
Wes
tpar
k Co
mmun
ity S
choo
l
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requir
em
ent
is
75%
6th Reading 6th Math
14
School Report Card Ratings
The Ohio Department of Education assigns one of five labels to every public
school, whether district-operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous
Improvement, Academic Watch, or Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare
the school ratings for Cleveland-area charter schools and Cleveland district schools
serving elementary and middle school students. On the whole, these graphs show that
Cleveland public schools and Cleveland-area charter schools performed similarly on this
measure.
Cleveland Graph III: District School Ratings (2005)
Excellent, 2%
Effective, 8%
Academic Watch, 6%
Academic Emergency, 37%
Continuous Improvement, 48%
Graph IV: Cleveland-area Charter School Ratings (2005) Excellent
5%
Effective5%
Continuous Improvement
40%
Academic Watch15%
Academic Emergency
35%
15
School Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are to
reach the “proficient” level in reading and math by 2013-14. The state has established
annual objectives that schools are expected to meet to show that they are making
“adequate yearly progress” toward meeting this goal. Graphs V and VI compare the AYP
ratings for Cleveland-area charter schools and Cleveland district schools serving
elementary and middle school students. Overall, both district and Cleveland-area charter
schools performed similarly on this measure.
Cleveland Graph V: Percentage of District Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Met AYP55%
Did Not Meet AYP45%
Cleveland Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Met AYP59%
Did Not Meet AYP41%
16
Snapshot: Columbus (August 2005) State-wide Tests
Columbus Graphs I and II compare the performance of Columbus-area charter
schools with that of Columbus Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores
on statewide tests administered in 2004-05. Few charter schools in the Columbus area
were assigned report cards by the state for the 2005 school year. Many had too few
students to warrant a report card and others had not been open long enough to receive a
state report card. Since, Columbus has many charter schools that are not represented here;
the charts do not reflect the whole story.
The graphs show that, on average, district schools do not meet the proficiency
goal in reading or math and no charter schools have attained this goal. The results show
that a wide gap remains between the student achievement in most of these schools
(district and charter alike) and the levels expected by the state standards.
Columbus Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in
4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
0%
19%
42%
50%
58%
17%
10%
26%
36%
25%
55%50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ColumbusPublic
Schools
MilleniumCommunity
School
WC CupeCommunity
School
InternationalAcademies of
Columbus
Granville T.Woods
CommunitySchool
MontessoriRenaissanceExperience
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
4th Reading 4th Math
17
Columbus Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
5%
25%
57%
10% 10%
44%48%
42%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Columbus PublicSchools
InternationalAcademies of
Columbus
WC CupeCommunity School
Horizon ScienceAcademy
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
abov
e pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
6th Reading 6th Math
18
School Report Card Ratings
The state assigns one of five labels to every public school, whether district
operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous Improvement, Academic Watch, or
Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare the school ratings for Columbus-area
charter schools and Columbus district schools serving elementary and middle school
students. The graphs show that, on the whole, Columbus-area district schools are
outperforming Columbus-area charter schools.
Columbus Graph III: District School Ratings (2005)
Excellent, 3%
Effective, 8%
Academic Watch, 25%
Academic Emergency, 39%
Continuous Improvement, 26%
Columbus Graph IV: Charter School Ratings (2005) Excellent
0% Effective20%
Continuous Improvement
20%
Academic Watch0%
Academic Emergency
60%
19
School Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are to
reach the “proficient” level in reading and mathematics by 2013-14. The state has
established annual objectives that schools are expected to meet to show that they are
making “adequate yearly progress” toward meeting this goal. Graphs V and VI compare
the AYP ratings for Columbus-area charter schools and Columbus district schools
serving elementary and middle school students. Overall, these graphs show that a much
higher percentage of Columbus-area charter schools made AYP in 2004-05 than district
schools.
Columbus Graph V: Percentage of District Schools
Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Met AYP28%
Did Not Meet AYP72%
Columbus Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Did Not Meet33%
Met AYP67%
20
Snapshot: Dayton, Ohio (August 2005)
State-wide Tests
Dayton Graphs I and II compare the performance of Dayton-area charter schools
with that of the Dayton Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores on
statewide tests administered in 2004-05. The graphs show that, on average, district
schools did not meet the proficiency goals in reading or math and most charter schools
struggle to attain this goal. Overall, the results show that a wide gap remains between the
student achievement in most of these schools (district and charter alike) and the levels
expected by state standards.
The graphs below show that many of Dayton’s charter schools outperformed the
district average. For example, in 4th grade math and reading, six charter schools
outperformed the district average. In 6th grade reading, 5 charters outperformed the
district average.
Dayton Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in
4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
49%
35%
23%
59%
46% 47%
57% 59%64%
48%
31%35%
62%
25%
88%
53%
41%
15%
23%
73%
62%
45%
20%
50%55%
8%
0%
38%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Dayton Public
Schools
Academ
y of D
ayton
City D
ay
Colin Powell
Leaders
hip Aca
demy
Dayton A
cadem
y, The
Dayton View
Aca
demy
East E
nd Community
School
North D
ayton Sch
ool of S
cience
Pathway
School o
f Disc
overy
Richard
Alle
n Prepara
tory
Richard
Alle
n II
Richard
Alle
n Aca
demy
Trotw
ood Fitnes
s & Prep
WOW Community
School%
of s
tude
nts
at o
r abo
ve p
rofic
ient
- st
ate
requ
irem
ent i
s 75
%
Reading Math
21
Dayton Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
46%
15%
27% 29%
58%
48%
26%
36%
53%48%
60%65%
44% 42%
35%
27%
56%55%
25%
69%
10%
19%20%
38%
30%
4%0%0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Dayton Public
Schools
Academ
y of D
ayton
City D
ay
Colin Powell
Leaders
hip Aca
demy
Dayton A
cadem
y, The
Dayton View
Aca
demy
North D
ayton Sch
ool of S
cience
Omega S
chool o
f Exc
ellen
ce
Pathway
School o
f Disc
overy
Richard
Alle
n Prepara
tory
Richard
Alle
n II
Richard
Alle
n Aca
demy
Trotw
ood Fitnes
s & Prep
WOW Community
School%
of s
tude
nts
at o
r abo
ve p
rofic
ient
- st
ate
requ
irem
ent i
s 75
%
Reading Math
22
School Report Card Ratings
The state assigns one of five labels to every public school, whether district-
operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous Improvement, Academic Watch, or
Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare the school ratings for Dayton charter
schools and Dayton district schools serving elementary and middle school students.
Overall, the graphs show that Dayton district schools out-performed the Dayton-area
charter schools on this measure. The bad news here is that Dayton does not have a public
elementary school – district or charter – that is rated Effective or Excellent.
Dayton Graph III: District School Ratings (2005) Excellent, 0%
Effective, 4%
Continuous Improvement , 43%
Academic Watch, 4%
Academic Emergency, 50%
Dayton Graph IV: Charter School Ratings (2005)
23
Excellent, 0%Effective, 0%
Continuous Improvement, 25%
Academic Watch, 6%
Academic Emergency, 69%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are to
reach the “proficient” level in reading and mathematics by 2013-14. The state has
established annual objectives that schools are expected to meet to show that they are
making “adequate yearly progress” toward meeting this goal. Graphs V and VI compare
the AYP ratings for Dayton charter schools and Dayton district schools serving
elementary and middle school students. The graphs show that a higher percentage of
district schools made AYP in 2004-05 than charter schools.
Dayton Graph V: Percentage of District Schools
Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
Met50%
Did Not Meet50%
Dayton Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)
24
Met25%
Did Not Meet75%
Conclusion Ohio’s charter schools are not performing as poorly as critics would have you
believe. There are many high performing charter schools throughout the state. There is,
however, tremendous room for improvement for them, as well as for district-run public
schools in urban Ohio. School leaders must look toward the successes of high performing
schools in whatever sector they can be found and should replicate those results
throughout the state.
Improving the academic performance of Ohio’s neediest children in charter
schools is no small feat. The current level of funding that charter schools receive will not
help them overcome the challenges ahead. As reported in Charter School Funding:
Inequity’s Next Frontier, Ohio’s charter schools are among the worst-funded in the
United States, and they get no facility dollars. Charter schools receive 31% less funding
per student than district schools, despite the fact that all are public schools. That
translates into $2,564 less per pupil! The expectations for district and charter schools are
the same, yet charter schools are expected to produce equal or superior results with much
less funding.
25
Methodology
• All data were compiled from Ohio State Report Cards, which can be found at http://ilrc.ode.state.oh.us/schools/Comm_School_list.asp
• All graphs reflect every school with a report card and data available in that subject and grade for school year 2004-5. Some charter schools did not have data reported. There are multiple reasons for this: the school opened or closed this year, it didn’t report data, it has fewer than 30 students, it serves grades not included in our analyses, etc.
• High schools were removed from all statistics. The data analyzed here are for schools serving grades K-8 or portions thereof.
• Electronic schools were removed from data used for analysis.
26
Appendix A
Cincinnati Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)
6%
18%
36%
48% 50%54%
58%
76%
33%
98%
72%
62%
23%
48%
15%
66%
56%
42%
22%
28%24%
21%
0%
9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%Cin
cinnat
iPu
blic
Sch
ools
AB M
iree
Fundam
enta
lAca
dem
y
Oak
Tre
eM
onte
ssori
Alli
ance
Aca
dem
y of
Cin
cinnat
iEas
t End
Com
munity
Her
itag
eIn
tern
atio
nal
Colle
ge
Prep
Aca
dem
y
Mau
d B
ooth
Aca
dem
y
Gre
ater
Cin
cinnat
iCom
munity
Riv
ersi
de
Aca
dem
y
Phoen
ixCom
munity
Lear
nin
g
WEB D
ubois
Aca
dem
y
Cin
cinnat
iColle
ge
Prep
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
3rd Reading 3rd Math
Cincinnati Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in
8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
31%
56% 56%
66%
88%
18%
96%
64%
58%
37%
7%
19%16%
88%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cin
cinnat
iPu
blic
Sch
ools
Gre
ater
Cin
cinnat
iCom
munity
Ele
men
ata
ry
Riv
ersi
de
Aca
dem
y
AB M
iree
Fundam
enta
lAca
dem
y
Phoen
ixCom
munity
Lear
nin
gCen
ter
WEB D
ubois
Aca
dem
y
Cin
cinnat
iColle
ge
Prep
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
8th Reading 8th Math
27
Cleveland Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)
17%20%
42%45%
49%
58%
80% 82% 84%
91% 91%
76%75%67%
93%100%
73%
77%
63% 61%
94%
53%
69%
61%
20%
75%
50%
42%47%
35%
18%
7%8%
44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Clev
elan
d Pub
lic S
choo
ls
Acade
my
of C
leve
land
Great
er A
chie
vem
ent C
omm
unity
Hope
Acade
my,
Cat
hedr
al C
ampu
s
Hope
Acade
my,
Cuy
ahog
a Ca
mpu
s
Hope
Acade
my,
Cha
pelsid
e Cam
pus
Purita
s Com
mun
ity S
choo
l
Hope
Cadem
y, L
inco
ln P
ark
Was
hing
ton
Park
Comm
unity
Sch
ool
Hope
Acade
my,
Nor
thco
ast C
ampu
s
Hope
Acade
my,
Eas
t Cam
pus
Old
Bro
okly
n Mon
tess
ori
Parm
a Com
mun
ity E
lem
enta
ry
Hope
Acade
my
Broad
way
Wes
tpar
k Com
mun
ity S
choo
l
Citiz
ens' A
cade
my
Inte
rgen
erat
iona
l Sch
ool
This graph reflects all Cleveland-area charter schools with data for this grade in 2004-05.
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
3rd Reading 3rd Math
Cleveland Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in
8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
44% 44% 45% 46%
56%59%
63%
82% 83% 83%
91%
36%
50%
71%
11%
19%
6%2%
9%
0%
22%
7%
41%
71%
36%36%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cle
vela
nd
Pu
blic
Sch
oo
ls
Gre
ate
rA
chie
vem
en
tC
om
mu
nit
y
Ho
pe
Aca
dem
y,
East
Ho
pe
Aca
dem
y,
Cath
ed
ral
Marc
us
Garv
ey
Aca
dem
y
Ho
pe
Aca
dem
y,
Ch
ap
els
ide
Ho
pe
Aca
dem
y,
Cu
yah
og
a
Ho
pe
Aca
dem
y,
No
rth
coast
Ho
pe
Aca
dem
yB
road
way
Parm
aC
om
mu
nit
yE
lem
en
tary
Ho
rizo
nS
cien
ceA
cad
em
y (
6-
12
) H
ori
zon
Sci
en
ceA
cad
em
yC
levela
nd
Old
Bro
okly
nM
on
tess
ori
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
8th Reading 8th Math
28
Columbus Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)
58%
50%
84%
45%
36%
49%48%
38%
72%
35%
0%3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ColumbusPublic
Schools
Granville T.Woods
CommunitySchool
GreatWesternAcademy
InternationalAcademies of
Columbus
MilleniumCommunity
School
WC CupeCommunity
School
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
3rd Reading 3rd Math
Columbus Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in
8th Grade Math and Reading ( 2005)
57%
29%
74%
43%
33%
0%
38%
43%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Columbus PublicSchools
CrittentonCommunity School
Horizon ScienceAcademy
InternationalAcademies of
Columbus
% o
f st
uden
ts a
t or
above
pro
fici
ent
- st
ate
requirem
ent
is
75%
8th Reading 8th Math
29
Dayton Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)
60%
40%
29%
68%
36%
45%
61% 59%
95% 95%
76%
63%70%
43%
76%76%
87%
41%48%
36%40%
63%
21%
6%4%
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Dayton Public
Schools
City D
ay
Colin Powell
Leaders
hip Aca
demy
Dayton A
cadem
y, The
East E
nd Community
School
Moraine C
ommunity
North D
ayton Sch
ool of S
cience
Pathway
School o
f Disc
overy
Richard
Alle
n Prepara
tory
Richard
Alle
n II
Richard
Alle
n Aca
demy
Trotw
ood Fitnes
s & Prep
WOW Community
School:N
L
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75% Reading Math
Dayton Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in
8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)
31%
69%
55%
42%
65%
52%
91%
0%
52%
37%
0%
39%
52%
24%
100% 96%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Colin PowellLeadership
Acad
DaytonAcademy,
The
Dayton ViewAcademy
MoraineCommunity
School
OmegaSchool OfExcellence
Richard AllenAcademy
Richard AllenAcademy II
Richard AllenPreparatory
Thi h fl t ll D t h t h l d t f thi d i 2004 05
% o
f stu
dent
s at
or a
bove
pro
ficie
nt -
stat
e re
quire
men
t is
75%
Reading Math
30
Appendix B Cincinnati Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
A.B. Miree Fundamental Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Alliance Academy of Cincinnati K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Cincinnati College Preparatory Academy K-8
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
East End Comm Heritage School K-12 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Greater Cincinnati Community K-8 Academic Watch Academic Emergency ↑
Harmony Community School 6-12 Effective Academic Emergency ↑
International College Preparatory Academy K-7
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Maud Booth Academy K-5 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Oak Tree Montessori K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Orion Academy K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Phoenix Community Learning Ctr K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Riverside Academy K-8 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
W.E.B. Dubois 1-8 Excellent Effective ↑ Cincinnati Table II: District School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
School For Creat & Perf Arts High School 4-12 Effective Effective ↔ Lafayette Bloom Back On Track Middle School 6-8
Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Clark Montessori High School 7-12 Effective Excellent ↓
Dater High School 7-12 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Jacobs High School 7-12 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Shroder Paideia High School 7-12 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Walnut Hills High School 7-12 Excellent Excellent ↔
Schiel Prim Schl Arts Enrchmnt Elementary School K-3
Continuous Improvement Excellent ↓
Carthage Paideia Academy Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
College Hill Elementary School K-6 Continuous Continuous ↔
31
Improvement Improvement
Covedale Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔
Dater Montessori Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Eastwood Paideia Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Fairview Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔ Kilgour Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔
Linwood Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
North Avondale Montessori Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔ Sands Montessori Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Silverton Paideia Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Winton Montessori Elementary School K-6 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Woodford Paideia Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Academy for Multilingual Immersion Studies K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Academy Of World Languages Elementary School K-8
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Bond Hill Academy Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Bramble Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Burton Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Carson Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Central Fairmount Elementary School K-8
Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Chase Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Cheviot Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Clifton Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Frederick Douglass Elementary School K-8
Academic Emergency *
Gamble Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Hartwell Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Hays/Porter/Washburn Elementary School K-8
Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Heberle Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Hoffman Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Hyde Park Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
John P Parker Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Kirby Road Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
32
Losantiville Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Mckinley Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Midway Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Millvale Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Mt. Airy Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Mt. Washington Elementary School K-8 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
North Fairmount Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Oyler Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Parham Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Pleasant Hill Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Pleasant Ridge Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Quebec Heights Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Roberts Paideia Academy K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Rockdale Academy Elementary School K-8
Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Roselawn Condon Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Rothenberg Preparatory Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Sayler Park Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Schwab Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
South Avondale Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Washington Park Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Westwood Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Whittier Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
William H Taft Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Winton Hills Academy Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Douglass Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement *
Project Succeed Program 4 - 9 Academic Emergency * Vine Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency * Windsor Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency *
33
Cleveland Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
Academy of Cleveland K-6 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔ Apex Academy K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Citizens Academy K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Greater Achievement Community School K-8 Academic Emergency Not rated * Greater Heights Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Not rated * Hope Academy Broadway Campus K-12 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔ Hope Academy Cathedral Campus K-12
Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Hope Academy Chapelside Campus K-12 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Hope Academy Cuyahoga Campus K-7 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Hope Academy East Campus K-12 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔ Hope Academy Lincoln Park K-8 Academic Watch Academic Watch ↔ Hope Academy Northwest Campus K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated * Hope Northcoast Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Horizon Science Acad 6-12 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Intergenerational School, The K-4 Excellent Excellent ↔ Life Skills Center of Metro Cleveland 9-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Life Skills Ctr Of Cleveland 9-12 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Life Skills Ctr Of Lake Erie 9-12,UNG Academic Emergency Not rated *
Marcus Garvey Academy 6-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Old Brooklyn Montessori School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Virtual Schoolhouse, Inc. K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated * Westpark Community-Cleveland K-6 Effective Effective ↔ Wilson Military Academy K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Cleveland Table II: District School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
Adlai Stevenson Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Albert B Hart School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
34
Alexander Hamilton Middle School 6-8
Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Alfred A Benesch Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Almira Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Andrew J Rickoff Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Anton Grdina Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Artemus Ward Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Audubon Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Benjamin Franklin Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Bolton Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Brooklawn Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Effective ↓
Buckeye-Woodland Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Buhrer Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Captain Arthur Roth Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Carl & Louis Stokes Central Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Carl F Shuler Middle School 6-9 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Case Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Charles A Mooney Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Charles Dickens Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Charles H Lake Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Charles W Eliot Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Childrens Aid Society Not Rated *
Clara E Westropp Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Clark Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Cleveland Christian Home Inc. Not Rated *
Cleveland School Of The Arts High School 6-12 Effective Effective ↔
35
Collinwood High School 6-12 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Corlett Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Cranwood Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Daniel E Morgan Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Denison Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Dike Montessori Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Douglas Macarthur Year Round Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Early Childhood Development K-3 Continuous Improvement *
East Clark Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Emile B Desauze Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Empire Computech Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Euclid Park Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Forest Hill Parkway Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Franklin D Roosevelt Middle School 6-8
Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Fullerton Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Garfield Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Garrett Morgan Schl Of Science Middle School 6-9
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
George Washington Carver Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Giddings Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Gracemount Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
H Barbara Booker Montessori Elementary School K-8 Effective Effective ↔
Hannah Gibbons Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Harry E Davis Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Harvey Rice Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
36
Henry W Longfellow Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Iowa-Maple Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Jesse Owens Academy (Clc) High School 4-12 Academic Emergency Not Rated *
John D Rockefeller Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
John W Raper Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Jones Home Of Children's Serv. Not Rated (No tested grades) *
Joseph F Landis Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Joseph M Gallagher Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Kenneth W Clement Foreign Lang Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Kentucky Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Louis Agassiz Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Louis Pasteur Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Louisa May Alcott Elementary School K-6 Excellent Excellent ↔
Luis Munoz Marin Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Margaret Spellacy Middle School 6-9 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Marion C Seltzer Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Marion-Sterling Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Martin Luther King Jr High School 6-12 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Mary B Martin Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Mary M Bethune Elementary School K-7
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
McKinley Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Michael R. White Elementary K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Miles Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Miles Park Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
37
Moses Cleveland Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Mound Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Mount Auburn Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Nathan Hale Middle School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Newton D Baker School Of Arts Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement Excellent ↓
Oliver H Perry Elementary School K-5 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Option Complex HS 6-12 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Orchard School Of Science Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Patrick Henry Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Paul L Dunbar Elementary School K-5 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Paul Revere Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Riverside Swing Space Elementary School K-8 Effective
Continuous Improvement ↑
Robert Fulton Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Robert H Jamison Computech Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Robinson G Jones Foreign Lang Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Scranton Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Stephen E Howe Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔
Sunbeam Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Thomas Jefferson Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Tremont Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Union Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑
Valley View Elementary School K-5 Excellent Effective ↑
Wade Park Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Walton Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
38
Watterson-Lake Elementary School K-5 Effective Effective ↔
Waverly Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Whitney Young Middle School 6-10 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Wilbur Wright Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
William C Bryant Elementary School K-5 Effective Effective ↔
William R Harper Elementary School K-5
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Willow Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓
Willson Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Woodland Hills Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
39
Columbus Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
A+ Arts Academy 6-8 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Arts & College Preparatory Academy 9-10 Effective Not rated *
Columbus Arts & Technology Academy K,1,2,3,5 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Columbus Humanities, Arts and Technology Academy K-5
Continuous Improvement Not rated *
Columbus Preparatory Academy K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Electronic Classroom Of Tomorrow K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *
FCI Academy 9-11 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Graham School, The 9-12 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Great Western Academy K-3 Effective Not rated *
Horizon Science Acad Columbus 5-12 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
International Acad Of Columbus K-7 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Millennium Community K-6 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
The Harte School - Columbus 6 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Virtual Community School Of Ohio K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Vision Into Action Academy 9-12,UNG Academic Emergency Not rated *
W C Cupe Community School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Columbus Table II: District School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grade Span 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
Africentric Program At Mohawk Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Alexander Graham Bell Not Rated *
Alpine Elementary School K-5,P Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Alum Crest Not Rated *
Arlington Park Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Arts Impact (Aims) Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Avalon Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
40
Avondale Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Barrett Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Beatty Park@Eastgate Elementary School K-12
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Beck Urban Academy Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Beery Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Berwick Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Binns Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Brentnell Alternative Elementary School K-5
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency ↑
Broadleigh Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Buckeye Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Burroughs Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Cassady Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Cedarwood Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Champion Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Clarfield Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Clearbrook K-12 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Clinton Elementary School K-5,P Excellent Effective ↑
Clinton Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Colerain K-12 Excellent Effective ↑
Columbus Africentric Secondary Junior High School 6-11
Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Columbus Spanish Immersion Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Como Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Cranbrook Elementary School K-5,P Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Crestview Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Dana Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
41
Deshler Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Academic Emergency ↑
Devonshire Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Dominion Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Douglas Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Duxberry Park Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Eakin Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
East Columbus Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
East Linden Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
East Pilgrim Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency *
Eastgate Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement *
Easthaven Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Eastmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Ecole Kenwood Alternative Elementary School K-8
Continuous Improvement Effective ↓
Fair Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Fairmoor Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Fairwood Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Fifth Avenue Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Forest Park Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Fort Hayes Career Center Not Rated *
Franklin Alternative Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Franklinton Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement *
Gables Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔
Georgian Heights Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Gladstone Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Hamilton Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
42
Heyl Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Highland Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Hilltonia Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Hubbard Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency *
Hudson Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement *
Huy Road Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Indian Springs Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔
Indianola Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Effective Excellent ↓
Indianola Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Innis Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
I-Pass Not Rated *
Johnson Park Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Kent Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Koebel Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Leawood Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Liberty Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Lincoln Park Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Lindbergh Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Linden Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Linden Park Alternative Elementary School K-5
Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Linmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Literature Based Alternative @ Hubbard Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Watch *
Livingston Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Academic Emergency ↑
Main Street Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
43
Maize Road Elementary School K-5,P Effective Continuous Improvement ↑
Maybury Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Mcguffey Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Medary Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Medina Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Mifflin Alternative Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Moler Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Monroe Alternative Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
North Education Center Academic Watch *
North Linden Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Northeast Career Center Not Rated *
Northtowne Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Northwest Career Center Not Rated *
Oakland Park Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔
Oakmont Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch
Academic Emergency ↑
Ohio Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Olde Orchard Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Parkmoor Urban Academy Elementary School K-5,P
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Pilgrim Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement *
Reeb Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Ridgeview Middle School 6-8 Effective Effective ↔
Salem Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Scioto Trail Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Scottwood Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Second Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Shady Lane Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
44
Sherwood Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Siebert Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
South Mifflin Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Southeast Career Center Not Rated *
Southmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Southwood Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Starling Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Stewart Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔
Stockbridge Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Sullivant @ Franklinton Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Trevitt Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Academic Emergency ↑
Valley Forge Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Valleyview Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Wedgewood Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch Academic Watch ↔
Weinland Park @ Hudson Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Welcome Center @ Mifflin M.S. K-12 Continuous Improvement Not Rated *
Welcome Center @ North H.S. Continuous Improvement *
Welcome Center At Southeast Cc Not Rated *
West Broad Street Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
West Mound Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Westgate Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Westmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Windsor Alternative Elementary School K-5,P
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Winterset Elementary School K-5,P Excellent Excellent ↔
Woodcrest Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
45
Woodward Park Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
Yorktown Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
46
Dayton Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
Academy of Dayton K-9 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
City Day K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Colin Powell Leadership Academy K-8
Academic Emergency Not rated *
Dayton Academy, The K-8 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Dayton View Academy K-8 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
East End Community School K-4 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Emerson Academy of Dayton K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *
Moraine Community School K-11 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
North Dayton School of Science K-8
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Omega School of Excellence 5-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
Pathway School of Discovery K-6 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓
Rhea Academy K-10 NA Continuous Improvement *
Richard Allen Academy K-12 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Richard Allen II K-8 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Richard Allen Preparatory K-8 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Trotwood Fitness & Prep K-7 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
WOW Community School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Dayton Table II: District School Ratings Over Time
Building Name Grade Span 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating
1-Year Trend
Allen Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Belle Haven Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Charles L Loos Elementary School K-6
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Cornell Heights Elementary School K-7
Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Eastmont Park Elementary School K-6 Academic Watch
Continuous Improvement ↓
47
Edison Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
F G Carlson Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Fairview Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Fairview Middle School 7-8 Continuous Improvement Not Rated *
Franklin Montessori Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Gorman Not Rated *
Grace A Greene Academy @ Longfellow Center
Academic Emergency *
Hickorydale Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Horace Mann Montessori Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Jefferson Montessori I Elementary School 1-8
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Jefferson Montessori Prim Ii Elementary School K-5 Not Rated *
Kemp Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Kiser Middle School 7-8 Academic Emergency Not Rated *
Lincoln Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Longfellow Center D,H,1-12 Not Rated (No tested grades) *
Louise Troy Elementary School K-3 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓
McNary Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency
Academic Emergency ↔
Meadowdale Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Miami Chapel Elementary School 4-6
Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑
Nettie Lee Roth Middle School @ Gardendale 8
Academic Emergency Not Rated *
Orville Wright Elementary School K-6
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement ↓
Patterson/Kennedy Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Stivers School For The Arts High School 7-12 Effective Excellent ↓
Valerie Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement ↔
Van Cleve @ McGuffey Elementary School K-6
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
48
Webster Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency ↑
Wilbur Wright Middle School 7-8 Academic Emergency Not Rated *