48
1 School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School Results in 2005 Allison Porch Kristina Phillips-Schwartz Terry Ryan October, 2005 For more information, contact: Terry Ryan VP for Ohio Programs and Policy The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation [email protected] 937-227-3368

School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

1

School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School Results in 2005

Allison Porch Kristina Phillips-Schwartz

Terry Ryan

October, 2005 For more information, contact: Terry Ryan VP for Ohio Programs and Policy The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation [email protected] 937-227-3368

Page 2: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

2

Table of Contents: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….. p. 3State-wide Overview………………………………………………………………… p. 4Snapshot: Cincinnati……………………………………………………………….. p. 8Snapshot: Cleveland……………………………………………………………….. p. 12Snapshot: Columbus……………………………………………………………….. p. 16Snapshot: Dayton……………………………………………………………………. p. 20Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………. p. 24Methodology……………………………………………………………………………. p. 25Appendix A……………………………………………………………………………….

p. 26

Appendix B……………………………………………………………………………… p. 30

Page 3: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

3

Introduction

Those who oppose charter schools are quick to compare their performance to

statewide average scores for traditional district-operated public schools. In Ohio, for

example, the “Coalition for Public Education”—a front organization funded by the Ohio

Federation of Teachers and the Ohio Education Association—issued a press release in

August comparing average charter school performance to average district school

performance on state tests administered during 2004-05. Not surprisingly, charter schools

do not compare well on such measures, largely because they are only allowed to operate

in the state’s lowest performing districts (those rated in Academic Emergency or

Academic Watch by the Ohio Department of Education) and for the most part they serve

severely disadvantaged pupils.

This analysis takes Ohio’s 2005 School Report Card data from the Ohio

Department of Education and provides a far more appropriate and valid “apples-to-

apples” comparison, examining charter-school achievement alongside that of district

schools in Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Dayton. This approach yields a more

accurate and balanced comparison—and the results will show fair-minded observers that

the performance of charter pupils in those four cities is notably better than charter

opponents want people to think. The analysis also shows that: 1) improving student

achievement remains a tremendous challenge for both sectors of public schooling in

urban Ohio; 2) state-wide, little of value can be learned from generalizing about charter

school performance because there is such great variation in their academic performance;

and 3) in some cases, charter schools are outperforming similar district schools, and

several of those schools are doing amazing work with Ohio’s neediest children.

Page 4: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

4

Overview Comparing Averages

The average performance of Ohio’s charter schools leaves much to be desired, but

so does the average performance of Ohio’s urban school systems where most charter

schools are located. None of the four urban districts examined here met the statewide

achievement average, nor did any of them meet the state’s 75% proficiency goal in any

grade or subject.

To provide a balanced snapshot of the average performance of charter schools, the

following graphs compare them to the average performance of their surrounding district

schools. The measures are 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 8th grade math and reading scores on statewide

tests administered in 2004-05. Charter schools outperformed their districts in some

subjects and grades; in others, the district schools did better. In Cincinnati and Columbus,

districts generally outperformed charters, but in Cleveland performance was split. Dayton

district schools and charter schools performed almost equally in all grades except 8th,

where charters pulled strongly ahead.

Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)

62%

49%

67% 67%

58%53%

60%57%

48%

29%

44%49% 48%

30%

41%44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CincinnatiDistrictSchools

CincinnatiCharterSchools

ClevelandDistrictSchools

ClevelandCharterSchools

ColumbusDistrictSchools

ColumbusCharterSchools

DaytonDistrictSchools

DaytonCharterSchools

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75%

Reading Math

Page 5: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

5

Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in

4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

55%

48%

59%55% 55%

34%

49% 50%

43%

30%

53%

38%

50%

34%38% 37%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CincinnatiDistrictSchools

CincinnatiCharterSchools

ClevelandDistrictSchools

ClevelandCharterSchools

ColumbusDistrictSchools

ColumbusCharterSchools

DaytonDistrictSchools

DaytonCharterSchools

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75%

Reading Math

Graph III: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

53% 51% 50%

41%

48%

29%

46% 45%44%

33%

41%

35%

42%

21%

35%32%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CincinnatiDistrictSchools

CincinnatiCharterSchools

ClevelandDistrictSchools

ClevelandCharterSchools

ColumbusDistrictSchools

ColumbusCharterSchools

DaytonDistrictSchools

DaytonCharterSchools

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75%

Reading Math

Page 6: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

6

Graph IV: District-Charter Comparison in

8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

64% 66%

50%

64%

57%

49%45%

56%

37%34%

19%23%

33%

27%

16%

35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CincinnatiDistrictSchools

CincinnatiCharterSchools

ClevelandDistrictSchools

ClevelandCharterSchools

ColumbusDistrictSchools

ColumbusCharterSchools

DaytonDistrictSchools

DaytonCharterSchools

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75%

Reading Math

Page 7: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

7

Looking at Individual Schools

When comparing individual charter schools in these four cities with the average

performance of the four districts combined, we see how little can be learned from

generalizing about charter school performance. The graph below depicts scores of charter

schools in comparison to the combined urban district averages. Each diamond/square on

the graph represents the performance of an individual charter school in relation to the

combined urban district averages. The level of variation emphasizes the wide variation in

individual school performance.

Graph V: Individual Charter School Comparison to District Average in

4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

Random distribution of charter schools in those four cities

* Blue dashed line represents four-city district school average score for 4th grade reading.

* Pink dotted line represents four-city district school average score for 4th grade math.

This graph shows that there are some charter schools that have outperformed both

the urban district average and surpassed the statewide goal of 75%. Ohio needs more

schools—district and charter alike—with students performing at such high levels. The

graph also shows that many charter schools performed similarly to district schools

and some scored well below district schools.

The next four chapters will provide a more in-depth analysis of the performance

of charter and district schools in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, and Dayton.

State Target

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75%

4th Grade Reading 4th Grade Math

Page 8: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

8

Snapshot: Cincinnati (August 2005) State-wide Tests

Cincinnati graphs I and II compare the performance of Cincinnati-area charter

schools with that of Cincinnati Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores

on statewide tests administered in 2004-05. For this city and the three that follow, only 4th

and 6th grade scores were depicted because those two grades have been the standard

measure in Ohio for the last decade. Graphs for 3rd and 8th grade scores can be found in

Appendix A. The graphs make it clear that, on average, district schools do not meet the

proficiency goal in reading or math and most charter schools also struggle to attain this

goal. Overall, the results show that a wide gap remains between the student achievement

in most of these schools (district and charter alike) and the levels expected by the state

standards.

On the positive side, the graphs also show that some Cincinnati-area charter

schools surpassed the Cincinnati Public Schools average and surpassed (or approached)

the 75% proficiency goal in math, reading or both. For example, in 4th and 6th grade, the

W.E.B. Dubois Academy met or surpassed the 75% proficiency goal in both reading and

math. In addition, while many schools struggle to get their students to meet the 75%

proficiency goal in math, in 4th grade the Cincinnati College Prep School far exceeds it.

Cincinnati Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in

4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

17%

26%

36%

57%60% 62%

88%

50%

91%

46%

55%

28%33%

74%

82%

6%8%10%9%

5%7%

0%

43%

58%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cin

cin

nati

Pu

blic

Sch

ools

Oak T

ree

Mon

tess

ori

AB

Mir

ee

Fu

nd

am

en

tal

Aca

dem

y

Gre

ate

rC

inci

nn

ati

Co

mm

un

ity

Allia

nce

Aca

dem

y o

fC

inci

nn

ati

Inte

rnati

on

al

Co

lleg

e P

rep

Aca

dem

y

East

En

dC

om

mu

nit

yH

eri

tag

e

Cin

cin

nati

Co

lleg

e P

rep

Riv

ers

ide

Aca

dem

y

Mau

d B

ooth

Aca

dem

y

Ph

oen

ixC

om

mu

nit

yLearn

ing

WEB

Du

bois

Aca

dem

y

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

4th Reading 4th Math

Page 9: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

9

Cincinnati Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

14%

25%

40%

65% 67%70%

75%

23%

92%

53%

25%

49%

11%12%

18%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cin

cinnat

iPu

blic

Sch

ools

AB M

iree

Fundam

enta

lAca

dem

y

Gre

ater

Cin

cinnat

iCom

munity

Ele

men

ata

ry

Alli

ance

Aca

dem

y of

Cin

cinnat

i

Phoen

ixCom

munity

Lear

nin

gCen

ter

Cin

cinnat

iColle

ge

Prep

Riv

ersi

de

Aca

dem

y

WEB D

ubois

Aca

dem

y

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

6th Reading 6th Math

Page 10: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

10

School Report Card Ratings

The Ohio Department of Education assigns one of five labels to every public

school, whether district-operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous

Improvement, Academic Watch, or Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare

the school ratings for Cincinnati-area charter schools with Cincinnati district schools

serving elementary and middle school students. Overall, these graphs show that district

schools are outperforming Cincinnati-area charter schools.

Cincinnati Graph III: District School Ratings (2005) Excellent, 2%

Effective, 11%

Continuous Improvement , 36%

Academic Watch, 9%

Academic Emergency, 42%

Cincinnati Graph IV: Charter School Ratings (2005)

Excellent8%

Effective8%

Continuous Improvement

17%

Academic Watch8%

Academic Emergency

59%

Page 11: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

11

School Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are

expected to reach the “proficient” level in reading and math by 2013-14. The state has

established annual goals that schools are expected to meet to show that they are making

“adequate yearly progress” toward this goal. Graphs V and VI compare the AYP ratings

for Cincinnati-area charter schools with Cincinnati district schools serving elementary

and middle school students. Overall, these graphs show that a higher percentage of

district schools made AYP in 2004-05 than charter schools.

Cincinnati Graph V: Percentage of District Schools

Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Did Not Meet62%

Met AYP38%

Cincinnati Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Did Not Meet AYP71%

Met AYP29%

Page 12: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

12

Snapshot: Cleveland (August 2005) State-wide Tests

Cleveland Graphs I and II compare the performance of Cleveland-area charter

schools with that of Cleveland Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores

on statewide tests administered in 2004-05. The graphs show that, on average, district

schools do not meet the proficiency goal in reading or math and most charter schools

struggle to attain this goal. Overall, the results show that a wide gap remains between the

student achievement in most of these schools (district and charter alike), and the levels

expected by the state.

Some Cleveland-area charter schools, however, are accomplishing remarkable

things. Graph I below shows that in 4th grade, four Cleveland-area charter schools

surpassed the 75% proficiency goal in reading and one surpassed the proficiency goals in

reading and math. Graph II shows that in 6th grade, six of the Cleveland-area charter

schools surpassed the district average in math and three of these schools surpassed the

75% proficiency goal in math.

Cleveland Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in

4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

20%

27%

39%44%

48%

64%

74%77%

95%

81%

43%

82%

49%46%43%

59%

81%

44%

27%26%

44%39%39%

19%

0%

70%71%

50%

16%

42%

9%

53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cleve

land

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Great

er A

chie

vem

ent C

omm

unity

Acade

my

of C

leve

land

Hope

Acade

my,

Cat

hedr

al C

ampu

s

Hope

Acade

my

Broad

way

Hope

Acade

my,

Cuy

ahog

a Ca

mpu

s

Hope

Acade

my,

Eas

t Cam

pus

Hope

Acade

my,

Nor

thco

ast C

ampu

s

Hope

Cadem

y, Lin

coln

Par

k

Hope

Acade

my,

Cha

pelsid

e Ca

mpu

s

Purita

s Com

mun

ity S

choo

l

Old B

rook

lyn

Mon

tess

ori

Citize

ns' A

cade

my

Was

hing

ton

Park

Com

mun

ity S

choo

l

Parm

a Co

mm

unity

Ele

men

tary

Wes

tpar

k Co

mm

unity

Sch

ool

% o

f st

udents

at

or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

4th Reading 4th Math

Page 13: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

13

Cleveland Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in

6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

10%

29%33%

53%

63%

4%

32%

79% 79%

57%

48%

35%

17%

50%

94%

0%

24%

47% 48%

39%

67%

33%

56%57%

18%27%

13%

21%

8%

0%

17%

41%

89%

20%

74%

2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Clev

eland

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Marcu

s Gar

vey Ac

adem

y

Acad

emy of C

leve

land

Hope Ac

adem

y, C

uyah

oga Ca

mpu

s

Summit

Acad

emy-

Parm

a

Great

er A

chieve

men

t Com

mun

ity

Hope Ac

adem

y, E

ast C

ampu

s

Hope Ca

demy, Linco

ln Par

k

Hope Ac

adem

y, C

athe

dral C

ampu

s

Hope Ac

adem

y, C

hape

lside

Cam

pus

Old B

rook

lyn M

onte

ssor

i

Horiz

on S

cienc

e Ac

adem

y (6

-12)

Horiz

on S

cienc

e Ac

adem

y Clev

elan

d Ju

nior

High

Hope Ac

adem

y Br

oadw

ay

Was

hing

ton

Park

Com

mun

ity S

choo

l

Parm

a Co

mmun

ity E

lemen

tary

Hope Ac

adem

y, N

orth

coas

t Cam

pus

Wes

tpar

k Co

mmun

ity S

choo

l

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requir

em

ent

is

75%

6th Reading 6th Math

Page 14: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

14

School Report Card Ratings

The Ohio Department of Education assigns one of five labels to every public

school, whether district-operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous

Improvement, Academic Watch, or Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare

the school ratings for Cleveland-area charter schools and Cleveland district schools

serving elementary and middle school students. On the whole, these graphs show that

Cleveland public schools and Cleveland-area charter schools performed similarly on this

measure.

Cleveland Graph III: District School Ratings (2005)

Excellent, 2%

Effective, 8%

Academic Watch, 6%

Academic Emergency, 37%

Continuous Improvement, 48%

Graph IV: Cleveland-area Charter School Ratings (2005) Excellent

5%

Effective5%

Continuous Improvement

40%

Academic Watch15%

Academic Emergency

35%

Page 15: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

15

School Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are to

reach the “proficient” level in reading and math by 2013-14. The state has established

annual objectives that schools are expected to meet to show that they are making

“adequate yearly progress” toward meeting this goal. Graphs V and VI compare the AYP

ratings for Cleveland-area charter schools and Cleveland district schools serving

elementary and middle school students. Overall, both district and Cleveland-area charter

schools performed similarly on this measure.

Cleveland Graph V: Percentage of District Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Met AYP55%

Did Not Meet AYP45%

Cleveland Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Met AYP59%

Did Not Meet AYP41%

Page 16: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

16

Snapshot: Columbus (August 2005) State-wide Tests

Columbus Graphs I and II compare the performance of Columbus-area charter

schools with that of Columbus Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores

on statewide tests administered in 2004-05. Few charter schools in the Columbus area

were assigned report cards by the state for the 2005 school year. Many had too few

students to warrant a report card and others had not been open long enough to receive a

state report card. Since, Columbus has many charter schools that are not represented here;

the charts do not reflect the whole story.

The graphs show that, on average, district schools do not meet the proficiency

goal in reading or math and no charter schools have attained this goal. The results show

that a wide gap remains between the student achievement in most of these schools

(district and charter alike) and the levels expected by the state standards.

Columbus Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in

4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

0%

19%

42%

50%

58%

17%

10%

26%

36%

25%

55%50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ColumbusPublic

Schools

MilleniumCommunity

School

WC CupeCommunity

School

InternationalAcademies of

Columbus

Granville T.Woods

CommunitySchool

MontessoriRenaissanceExperience

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

4th Reading 4th Math

Page 17: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

17

Columbus Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

5%

25%

57%

10% 10%

44%48%

42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Columbus PublicSchools

InternationalAcademies of

Columbus

WC CupeCommunity School

Horizon ScienceAcademy

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

abov

e pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

6th Reading 6th Math

Page 18: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

18

School Report Card Ratings

The state assigns one of five labels to every public school, whether district

operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous Improvement, Academic Watch, or

Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare the school ratings for Columbus-area

charter schools and Columbus district schools serving elementary and middle school

students. The graphs show that, on the whole, Columbus-area district schools are

outperforming Columbus-area charter schools.

Columbus Graph III: District School Ratings (2005)

Excellent, 3%

Effective, 8%

Academic Watch, 25%

Academic Emergency, 39%

Continuous Improvement, 26%

Columbus Graph IV: Charter School Ratings (2005) Excellent

0% Effective20%

Continuous Improvement

20%

Academic Watch0%

Academic Emergency

60%

Page 19: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

19

School Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are to

reach the “proficient” level in reading and mathematics by 2013-14. The state has

established annual objectives that schools are expected to meet to show that they are

making “adequate yearly progress” toward meeting this goal. Graphs V and VI compare

the AYP ratings for Columbus-area charter schools and Columbus district schools

serving elementary and middle school students. Overall, these graphs show that a much

higher percentage of Columbus-area charter schools made AYP in 2004-05 than district

schools.

Columbus Graph V: Percentage of District Schools

Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Met AYP28%

Did Not Meet AYP72%

Columbus Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Did Not Meet33%

Met AYP67%

Page 20: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

20

Snapshot: Dayton, Ohio (August 2005)

State-wide Tests

Dayton Graphs I and II compare the performance of Dayton-area charter schools

with that of the Dayton Public Schools. The measures are 4th and 6th grade scores on

statewide tests administered in 2004-05. The graphs show that, on average, district

schools did not meet the proficiency goals in reading or math and most charter schools

struggle to attain this goal. Overall, the results show that a wide gap remains between the

student achievement in most of these schools (district and charter alike) and the levels

expected by state standards.

The graphs below show that many of Dayton’s charter schools outperformed the

district average. For example, in 4th grade math and reading, six charter schools

outperformed the district average. In 6th grade reading, 5 charters outperformed the

district average.

Dayton Graph I: District-Charter Comparison in

4th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

49%

35%

23%

59%

46% 47%

57% 59%64%

48%

31%35%

62%

25%

88%

53%

41%

15%

23%

73%

62%

45%

20%

50%55%

8%

0%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Dayton Public

Schools

Academ

y of D

ayton

City D

ay

Colin Powell

Leaders

hip Aca

demy

Dayton A

cadem

y, The

Dayton View

Aca

demy

East E

nd Community

School

North D

ayton Sch

ool of S

cience

Pathway

School o

f Disc

overy

Richard

Alle

n Prepara

tory

Richard

Alle

n II

Richard

Alle

n Aca

demy

Trotw

ood Fitnes

s & Prep

WOW Community

School%

of s

tude

nts

at o

r abo

ve p

rofic

ient

- st

ate

requ

irem

ent i

s 75

%

Reading Math

Page 21: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

21

Dayton Graph II: District-Charter Comparison in 6th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

46%

15%

27% 29%

58%

48%

26%

36%

53%48%

60%65%

44% 42%

35%

27%

56%55%

25%

69%

10%

19%20%

38%

30%

4%0%0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Dayton Public

Schools

Academ

y of D

ayton

City D

ay

Colin Powell

Leaders

hip Aca

demy

Dayton A

cadem

y, The

Dayton View

Aca

demy

North D

ayton Sch

ool of S

cience

Omega S

chool o

f Exc

ellen

ce

Pathway

School o

f Disc

overy

Richard

Alle

n Prepara

tory

Richard

Alle

n II

Richard

Alle

n Aca

demy

Trotw

ood Fitnes

s & Prep

WOW Community

School%

of s

tude

nts

at o

r abo

ve p

rofic

ient

- st

ate

requ

irem

ent i

s 75

%

Reading Math

Page 22: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

22

School Report Card Ratings

The state assigns one of five labels to every public school, whether district-

operated or charter: Excellent, Effective, Continuous Improvement, Academic Watch, or

Academic Emergency. Graphs III and IV compare the school ratings for Dayton charter

schools and Dayton district schools serving elementary and middle school students.

Overall, the graphs show that Dayton district schools out-performed the Dayton-area

charter schools on this measure. The bad news here is that Dayton does not have a public

elementary school – district or charter – that is rated Effective or Excellent.

Dayton Graph III: District School Ratings (2005) Excellent, 0%

Effective, 4%

Continuous Improvement , 43%

Academic Watch, 4%

Academic Emergency, 50%

Dayton Graph IV: Charter School Ratings (2005)

Page 23: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

23

Excellent, 0%Effective, 0%

Continuous Improvement, 25%

Academic Watch, 6%

Academic Emergency, 69%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

According to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), all students are to

reach the “proficient” level in reading and mathematics by 2013-14. The state has

established annual objectives that schools are expected to meet to show that they are

making “adequate yearly progress” toward meeting this goal. Graphs V and VI compare

the AYP ratings for Dayton charter schools and Dayton district schools serving

elementary and middle school students. The graphs show that a higher percentage of

district schools made AYP in 2004-05 than charter schools.

Dayton Graph V: Percentage of District Schools

Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Met50%

Did Not Meet50%

Dayton Graph VI: Percentage of Charter Schools Making Adequate Yearly Progress (2005)

Page 24: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

24

Met25%

Did Not Meet75%

Conclusion Ohio’s charter schools are not performing as poorly as critics would have you

believe. There are many high performing charter schools throughout the state. There is,

however, tremendous room for improvement for them, as well as for district-run public

schools in urban Ohio. School leaders must look toward the successes of high performing

schools in whatever sector they can be found and should replicate those results

throughout the state.

Improving the academic performance of Ohio’s neediest children in charter

schools is no small feat. The current level of funding that charter schools receive will not

help them overcome the challenges ahead. As reported in Charter School Funding:

Inequity’s Next Frontier, Ohio’s charter schools are among the worst-funded in the

United States, and they get no facility dollars. Charter schools receive 31% less funding

per student than district schools, despite the fact that all are public schools. That

translates into $2,564 less per pupil! The expectations for district and charter schools are

the same, yet charter schools are expected to produce equal or superior results with much

less funding.

Page 25: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

25

Methodology

• All data were compiled from Ohio State Report Cards, which can be found at http://ilrc.ode.state.oh.us/schools/Comm_School_list.asp

• All graphs reflect every school with a report card and data available in that subject and grade for school year 2004-5. Some charter schools did not have data reported. There are multiple reasons for this: the school opened or closed this year, it didn’t report data, it has fewer than 30 students, it serves grades not included in our analyses, etc.

• High schools were removed from all statistics. The data analyzed here are for schools serving grades K-8 or portions thereof.

• Electronic schools were removed from data used for analysis.

Page 26: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

26

Appendix A

Cincinnati Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)

6%

18%

36%

48% 50%54%

58%

76%

33%

98%

72%

62%

23%

48%

15%

66%

56%

42%

22%

28%24%

21%

0%

9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Cin

cinnat

iPu

blic

Sch

ools

AB M

iree

Fundam

enta

lAca

dem

y

Oak

Tre

eM

onte

ssori

Alli

ance

Aca

dem

y of

Cin

cinnat

iEas

t End

Com

munity

Her

itag

eIn

tern

atio

nal

Colle

ge

Prep

Aca

dem

y

Mau

d B

ooth

Aca

dem

y

Gre

ater

Cin

cinnat

iCom

munity

Riv

ersi

de

Aca

dem

y

Phoen

ixCom

munity

Lear

nin

g

WEB D

ubois

Aca

dem

y

Cin

cinnat

iColle

ge

Prep

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

3rd Reading 3rd Math

Cincinnati Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in

8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

31%

56% 56%

66%

88%

18%

96%

64%

58%

37%

7%

19%16%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cin

cinnat

iPu

blic

Sch

ools

Gre

ater

Cin

cinnat

iCom

munity

Ele

men

ata

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Aca

dem

y

AB M

iree

Fundam

enta

lAca

dem

y

Phoen

ixCom

munity

Lear

nin

gCen

ter

WEB D

ubois

Aca

dem

y

Cin

cinnat

iColle

ge

Prep

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

8th Reading 8th Math

Page 27: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

27

Cleveland Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)

17%20%

42%45%

49%

58%

80% 82% 84%

91% 91%

76%75%67%

93%100%

73%

77%

63% 61%

94%

53%

69%

61%

20%

75%

50%

42%47%

35%

18%

7%8%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Clev

elan

d Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Acade

my

of C

leve

land

Great

er A

chie

vem

ent C

omm

unity

Hope

Acade

my,

Cat

hedr

al C

ampu

s

Hope

Acade

my,

Cuy

ahog

a Ca

mpu

s

Hope

Acade

my,

Cha

pelsid

e Cam

pus

Purita

s Com

mun

ity S

choo

l

Hope

Cadem

y, L

inco

ln P

ark

Was

hing

ton

Park

Comm

unity

Sch

ool

Hope

Acade

my,

Nor

thco

ast C

ampu

s

Hope

Acade

my,

Eas

t Cam

pus

Old

Bro

okly

n Mon

tess

ori

Parm

a Com

mun

ity E

lem

enta

ry

Hope

Acade

my

Broad

way

Wes

tpar

k Com

mun

ity S

choo

l

Citiz

ens' A

cade

my

Inte

rgen

erat

iona

l Sch

ool

This graph reflects all Cleveland-area charter schools with data for this grade in 2004-05.

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

3rd Reading 3rd Math

Cleveland Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in

8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

44% 44% 45% 46%

56%59%

63%

82% 83% 83%

91%

36%

50%

71%

11%

19%

6%2%

9%

0%

22%

7%

41%

71%

36%36%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cle

vela

nd

Pu

blic

Sch

oo

ls

Gre

ate

rA

chie

vem

en

tC

om

mu

nit

y

Ho

pe

Aca

dem

y,

East

Ho

pe

Aca

dem

y,

Cath

ed

ral

Marc

us

Garv

ey

Aca

dem

y

Ho

pe

Aca

dem

y,

Ch

ap

els

ide

Ho

pe

Aca

dem

y,

Cu

yah

og

a

Ho

pe

Aca

dem

y,

No

rth

coast

Ho

pe

Aca

dem

yB

road

way

Parm

aC

om

mu

nit

yE

lem

en

tary

Ho

rizo

nS

cien

ceA

cad

em

y (

6-

12

) H

ori

zon

Sci

en

ceA

cad

em

yC

levela

nd

Old

Bro

okly

nM

on

tess

ori

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

8th Reading 8th Math

Page 28: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

28

Columbus Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)

58%

50%

84%

45%

36%

49%48%

38%

72%

35%

0%3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ColumbusPublic

Schools

Granville T.Woods

CommunitySchool

GreatWesternAcademy

InternationalAcademies of

Columbus

MilleniumCommunity

School

WC CupeCommunity

School

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

3rd Reading 3rd Math

Columbus Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in

8th Grade Math and Reading ( 2005)

57%

29%

74%

43%

33%

0%

38%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Columbus PublicSchools

CrittentonCommunity School

Horizon ScienceAcademy

InternationalAcademies of

Columbus

% o

f st

uden

ts a

t or

above

pro

fici

ent

- st

ate

requirem

ent

is

75%

8th Reading 8th Math

Page 29: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

29

Dayton Graph A: District-Charter Comparison in 3rd Grade Math and Reading (2005)

60%

40%

29%

68%

36%

45%

61% 59%

95% 95%

76%

63%70%

43%

76%76%

87%

41%48%

36%40%

63%

21%

6%4%

41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Dayton Public

Schools

City D

ay

Colin Powell

Leaders

hip Aca

demy

Dayton A

cadem

y, The

East E

nd Community

School

Moraine C

ommunity

North D

ayton Sch

ool of S

cience

Pathway

School o

f Disc

overy

Richard

Alle

n Prepara

tory

Richard

Alle

n II

Richard

Alle

n Aca

demy

Trotw

ood Fitnes

s & Prep

WOW Community

School:N

L

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75% Reading Math

Dayton Graph B: District-Charter Comparison in

8th Grade Math and Reading (2005)

31%

69%

55%

42%

65%

52%

91%

0%

52%

37%

0%

39%

52%

24%

100% 96%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Colin PowellLeadership

Acad

DaytonAcademy,

The

Dayton ViewAcademy

MoraineCommunity

School

OmegaSchool OfExcellence

Richard AllenAcademy

Richard AllenAcademy II

Richard AllenPreparatory

Thi h fl t ll D t h t h l d t f thi d i 2004 05

% o

f stu

dent

s at

or a

bove

pro

ficie

nt -

stat

e re

quire

men

t is

75%

Reading Math

Page 30: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

30

Appendix B Cincinnati Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

A.B. Miree Fundamental Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Alliance Academy of Cincinnati K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Cincinnati College Preparatory Academy K-8

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

East End Comm Heritage School K-12 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Greater Cincinnati Community K-8 Academic Watch Academic Emergency ↑

Harmony Community School 6-12 Effective Academic Emergency ↑

International College Preparatory Academy K-7

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Maud Booth Academy K-5 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Oak Tree Montessori K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Orion Academy K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Phoenix Community Learning Ctr K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Riverside Academy K-8 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

W.E.B. Dubois 1-8 Excellent Effective ↑ Cincinnati Table II: District School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

School For Creat & Perf Arts High School 4-12 Effective Effective ↔ Lafayette Bloom Back On Track Middle School 6-8

Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Clark Montessori High School 7-12 Effective Excellent ↓

Dater High School 7-12 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Jacobs High School 7-12 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Shroder Paideia High School 7-12 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Walnut Hills High School 7-12 Excellent Excellent ↔

Schiel Prim Schl Arts Enrchmnt Elementary School K-3

Continuous Improvement Excellent ↓

Carthage Paideia Academy Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

College Hill Elementary School K-6 Continuous Continuous ↔

Page 31: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

31

Improvement Improvement

Covedale Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔

Dater Montessori Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Eastwood Paideia Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Fairview Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔ Kilgour Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔

Linwood Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

North Avondale Montessori Elementary School K-6 Effective Effective ↔ Sands Montessori Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Silverton Paideia Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Winton Montessori Elementary School K-6 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Woodford Paideia Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Academy for Multilingual Immersion Studies K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Academy Of World Languages Elementary School K-8

Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Bond Hill Academy Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Bramble Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Burton Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Carson Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Central Fairmount Elementary School K-8

Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Chase Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Cheviot Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Clifton Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Frederick Douglass Elementary School K-8

Academic Emergency *

Gamble Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Hartwell Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Hays/Porter/Washburn Elementary School K-8

Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Heberle Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Hoffman Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Hyde Park Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

John P Parker Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Kirby Road Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Page 32: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

32

Losantiville Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Mckinley Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Midway Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Millvale Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Mt. Airy Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Mt. Washington Elementary School K-8 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

North Fairmount Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Oyler Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Parham Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Pleasant Hill Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Pleasant Ridge Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Quebec Heights Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Roberts Paideia Academy K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Rockdale Academy Elementary School K-8

Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Roselawn Condon Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Rothenberg Preparatory Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Sayler Park Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Schwab Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

South Avondale Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Washington Park Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Westwood Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Whittier Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

William H Taft Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Winton Hills Academy Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Douglass Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement *

Project Succeed Program 4 - 9 Academic Emergency * Vine Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency * Windsor Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency *

Page 33: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

33

Cleveland Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

Academy of Cleveland K-6 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔ Apex Academy K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Citizens Academy K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Greater Achievement Community School K-8 Academic Emergency Not rated * Greater Heights Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Not rated * Hope Academy Broadway Campus K-12 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔ Hope Academy Cathedral Campus K-12

Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Hope Academy Chapelside Campus K-12 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Hope Academy Cuyahoga Campus K-7 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Hope Academy East Campus K-12 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔ Hope Academy Lincoln Park K-8 Academic Watch Academic Watch ↔ Hope Academy Northwest Campus K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated * Hope Northcoast Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Horizon Science Acad 6-12 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Intergenerational School, The K-4 Excellent Excellent ↔ Life Skills Center of Metro Cleveland 9-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Life Skills Ctr Of Cleveland 9-12 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Life Skills Ctr Of Lake Erie 9-12,UNG Academic Emergency Not rated *

Marcus Garvey Academy 6-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Old Brooklyn Montessori School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Virtual Schoolhouse, Inc. K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated * Westpark Community-Cleveland K-6 Effective Effective ↔ Wilson Military Academy K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Cleveland Table II: District School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

Adlai Stevenson Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Albert B Hart School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Page 34: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

34

Alexander Hamilton Middle School 6-8

Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Alfred A Benesch Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Almira Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Andrew J Rickoff Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Anton Grdina Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Artemus Ward Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Audubon Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Benjamin Franklin Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Bolton Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Brooklawn Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Effective ↓

Buckeye-Woodland Elementary School K-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Buhrer Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Captain Arthur Roth Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Carl & Louis Stokes Central Academy K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Carl F Shuler Middle School 6-9 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Case Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Charles A Mooney Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Charles Dickens Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Charles H Lake Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Charles W Eliot Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Childrens Aid Society Not Rated *

Clara E Westropp Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Clark Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Cleveland Christian Home Inc. Not Rated *

Cleveland School Of The Arts High School 6-12 Effective Effective ↔

Page 35: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

35

Collinwood High School 6-12 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Corlett Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Cranwood Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Daniel E Morgan Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Denison Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Dike Montessori Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Douglas Macarthur Year Round Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Early Childhood Development K-3 Continuous Improvement *

East Clark Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Emile B Desauze Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Empire Computech Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Euclid Park Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Forest Hill Parkway Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Franklin D Roosevelt Middle School 6-8

Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Fullerton Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Garfield Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Garrett Morgan Schl Of Science Middle School 6-9

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

George Washington Carver Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Giddings Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Gracemount Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

H Barbara Booker Montessori Elementary School K-8 Effective Effective ↔

Hannah Gibbons Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Harry E Davis Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Harvey Rice Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Page 36: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

36

Henry W Longfellow Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Iowa-Maple Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Jesse Owens Academy (Clc) High School 4-12 Academic Emergency Not Rated *

John D Rockefeller Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

John W Raper Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Jones Home Of Children's Serv. Not Rated (No tested grades) *

Joseph F Landis Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Joseph M Gallagher Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Kenneth W Clement Foreign Lang Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Kentucky Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Louis Agassiz Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Louis Pasteur Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Louisa May Alcott Elementary School K-6 Excellent Excellent ↔

Luis Munoz Marin Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Margaret Spellacy Middle School 6-9 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Marion C Seltzer Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Marion-Sterling Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Martin Luther King Jr High School 6-12 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Mary B Martin Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Mary M Bethune Elementary School K-7

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

McKinley Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Michael R. White Elementary K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Miles Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Miles Park Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Page 37: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

37

Moses Cleveland Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Mound Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Mount Auburn Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Nathan Hale Middle School K-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Newton D Baker School Of Arts Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement Excellent ↓

Oliver H Perry Elementary School K-5 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Option Complex HS 6-12 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Orchard School Of Science Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Patrick Henry Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Paul L Dunbar Elementary School K-5 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Paul Revere Elementary School K-8 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Riverside Swing Space Elementary School K-8 Effective

Continuous Improvement ↑

Robert Fulton Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Robert H Jamison Computech Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Robinson G Jones Foreign Lang Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Scranton Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Stephen E Howe Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Academic Emergency ↔

Sunbeam Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Thomas Jefferson Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Tremont Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Union Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency ↑

Valley View Elementary School K-5 Excellent Effective ↑

Wade Park Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Walton Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Page 38: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

38

Watterson-Lake Elementary School K-5 Effective Effective ↔

Waverly Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Whitney Young Middle School 6-10 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Wilbur Wright Elementary School K-8 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

William C Bryant Elementary School K-5 Effective Effective ↔

William R Harper Elementary School K-5

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Willow Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency Continuous Improvement ↓

Willson Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Woodland Hills Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Page 39: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

39

Columbus Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

A+ Arts Academy 6-8 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Arts & College Preparatory Academy 9-10 Effective Not rated *

Columbus Arts & Technology Academy K,1,2,3,5 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Columbus Humanities, Arts and Technology Academy K-5

Continuous Improvement Not rated *

Columbus Preparatory Academy K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Electronic Classroom Of Tomorrow K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *

FCI Academy 9-11 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Graham School, The 9-12 Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Great Western Academy K-3 Effective Not rated *

Horizon Science Acad Columbus 5-12 Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

International Acad Of Columbus K-7 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Millennium Community K-6 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

The Harte School - Columbus 6 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Virtual Community School Of Ohio K-12 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Vision Into Action Academy 9-12,UNG Academic Emergency Not rated *

W C Cupe Community School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Columbus Table II: District School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grade Span 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

Africentric Program At Mohawk Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Alexander Graham Bell Not Rated *

Alpine Elementary School K-5,P Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Alum Crest Not Rated *

Arlington Park Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Arts Impact (Aims) Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Avalon Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Page 40: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

40

Avondale Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Barrett Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Beatty Park@Eastgate Elementary School K-12

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Beck Urban Academy Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Beery Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Berwick Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Binns Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Brentnell Alternative Elementary School K-5

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency ↑

Broadleigh Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Buckeye Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Burroughs Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Cassady Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Cedarwood Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Champion Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Clarfield Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Clearbrook K-12 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Clinton Elementary School K-5,P Excellent Effective ↑

Clinton Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Colerain K-12 Excellent Effective ↑

Columbus Africentric Secondary Junior High School 6-11

Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Columbus Spanish Immersion Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Como Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Cranbrook Elementary School K-5,P Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Crestview Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Dana Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Page 41: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

41

Deshler Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Academic Emergency ↑

Devonshire Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Dominion Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Douglas Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Duxberry Park Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Eakin Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

East Columbus Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

East Linden Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

East Pilgrim Elementary School K-5 Academic Emergency *

Eastgate Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement *

Easthaven Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Eastmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Ecole Kenwood Alternative Elementary School K-8

Continuous Improvement Effective ↓

Fair Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Fairmoor Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Fairwood Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Fifth Avenue Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Forest Park Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Fort Hayes Career Center Not Rated *

Franklin Alternative Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Franklinton Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement *

Gables Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔

Georgian Heights Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Gladstone Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Hamilton Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Page 42: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

42

Heyl Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Highland Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Hilltonia Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Hubbard Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency *

Hudson Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement *

Huy Road Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Indian Springs Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔

Indianola Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Effective Excellent ↓

Indianola Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Innis Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

I-Pass Not Rated *

Johnson Park Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Kent Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Koebel Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Leawood Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Liberty Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Lincoln Park Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Lindbergh Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Linden Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Linden Park Alternative Elementary School K-5

Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Linmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Literature Based Alternative @ Hubbard Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Watch *

Livingston Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Academic Emergency ↑

Main Street Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Page 43: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

43

Maize Road Elementary School K-5,P Effective Continuous Improvement ↑

Maybury Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Mcguffey Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Medary Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Medina Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Mifflin Alternative Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Moler Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Monroe Alternative Middle School 6-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

North Education Center Academic Watch *

North Linden Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Northeast Career Center Not Rated *

Northtowne Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Northwest Career Center Not Rated *

Oakland Park Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔

Oakmont Elementary School K-5 Academic Watch

Academic Emergency ↑

Ohio Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Olde Orchard Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Parkmoor Urban Academy Elementary School K-5,P

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Pilgrim Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement *

Reeb Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Ridgeview Middle School 6-8 Effective Effective ↔

Salem Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Scioto Trail Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Scottwood Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Second Avenue Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Shady Lane Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Page 44: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

44

Sherwood Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Siebert Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

South Mifflin Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Southeast Career Center Not Rated *

Southmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Southwood Elementary School K-5,P Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Starling Middle School 6-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Stewart Alternative Elementary School K-5,P Effective Effective ↔

Stockbridge Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Sullivant @ Franklinton Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Trevitt Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Academic Emergency ↑

Valley Forge Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Valleyview Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Wedgewood Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch Academic Watch ↔

Weinland Park @ Hudson Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Welcome Center @ Mifflin M.S. K-12 Continuous Improvement Not Rated *

Welcome Center @ North H.S. Continuous Improvement *

Welcome Center At Southeast Cc Not Rated *

West Broad Street Elementary School K-5,P Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

West Mound Elementary School K-5 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Westgate Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Westmoor Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Windsor Alternative Elementary School K-5,P

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Winterset Elementary School K-5,P Excellent Excellent ↔

Woodcrest Elementary School K-5,P Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Page 45: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

45

Woodward Park Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Yorktown Middle School 6-8 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Page 46: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

46

Dayton Table I: Charter School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grades Served 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

Academy of Dayton K-9 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

City Day K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Colin Powell Leadership Academy K-8

Academic Emergency Not rated *

Dayton Academy, The K-8 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Dayton View Academy K-8 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

East End Community School K-4 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Emerson Academy of Dayton K-5 Academic Emergency Not rated *

Moraine Community School K-11 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

North Dayton School of Science K-8

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Omega School of Excellence 5-8 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

Pathway School of Discovery K-6 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement ↓

Rhea Academy K-10 NA Continuous Improvement *

Richard Allen Academy K-12 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Richard Allen II K-8 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Richard Allen Preparatory K-8 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Trotwood Fitness & Prep K-7 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

WOW Community School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Dayton Table II: District School Ratings Over Time

Building Name Grade Span 2004-05 Rating 2003-04 Rating

1-Year Trend

Allen Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Belle Haven Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Charles L Loos Elementary School K-6

Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Cornell Heights Elementary School K-7

Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Eastmont Park Elementary School K-6 Academic Watch

Continuous Improvement ↓

Page 47: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

47

Edison Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

F G Carlson Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Fairview Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Fairview Middle School 7-8 Continuous Improvement Not Rated *

Franklin Montessori Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Gorman Not Rated *

Grace A Greene Academy @ Longfellow Center

Academic Emergency *

Hickorydale Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Horace Mann Montessori Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Jefferson Montessori I Elementary School 1-8

Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Jefferson Montessori Prim Ii Elementary School K-5 Not Rated *

Kemp Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Kiser Middle School 7-8 Academic Emergency Not Rated *

Lincoln Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Longfellow Center D,H,1-12 Not Rated (No tested grades) *

Louise Troy Elementary School K-3 Academic Emergency Academic Watch ↓

McNary Elementary School K-6 Academic Emergency

Academic Emergency ↔

Meadowdale Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Miami Chapel Elementary School 4-6

Continuous Improvement Academic Watch ↑

Nettie Lee Roth Middle School @ Gardendale 8

Academic Emergency Not Rated *

Orville Wright Elementary School K-6

Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement ↓

Patterson/Kennedy Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Stivers School For The Arts High School 7-12 Effective Excellent ↓

Valerie Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement ↔

Van Cleve @ McGuffey Elementary School K-6

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Page 48: School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Citiesedex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/... · School Performance in Ohio’s Inner Cities: Comparing Charter and District School

48

Webster Elementary School K-6 Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency ↑

Wilbur Wright Middle School 7-8 Academic Emergency Not Rated *