School Plan - Amazon Web Services...6th grade math is MC 63% and OR 36%. Analysis of the Target Test Data from 2012/2013 shows the overall average percent correct for 5th grade math

10/1/2014 ACSIP

http://acsip.k12.ar.us/cgi-bin/index.cgi?rm=report_acsip&print=1 1/19

School Plan

BEEBE MIDDLE SCHOOL1201 W. CENTER ST.,BEEBE, AR 72012

Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement Plan

2014-2015

The mission of Beebe Middle School is to empower all students to adapt to a technologically changingsociety, to treat others and themselves with respect, and above all, to value learning.

Grade Span: 5-6 Title I: Not Applicable School Improvement: SI_3

Table of Contents

Priority 1: Mathematics Goal: Beebe Middle School status is Needs Improvement for math for Combined Population and TAGG Population.All students will demonstrate improvement in mathematics in all content areas, specifically multiplication with thestandard algorithm, two-step problem solving, reading/interpreting graphs, solving equations and all Common CoreState Standards. Priority 2: Literacy Goal: Beebe Middle School is designated as ACHIEVING in Literacy. All students will improve literacy skills in theareas of Practical Literary Open Response and in the Writing Multiple Choice.Priority 3: Wellness Goal: All students will demonstrate increased knowledge in healthy lifestyle choices with emphasis in healtheducation and physical activity.Priority 4: English Language Learners Goal: The Beebe Middle School teachers will provide interventions that will help ELL students receive an equitableeducation in relation to other students.

Priority 1: Based on the analysis of student achievement data the area of mathematics has been identified forimprovement.

SupportingData:

1. A review of all of the data relating to the 5th Grade Mathematics Benchmark indicates Algebra isthe weakest strand in the Combined Population MC items for the year 2014. However, theweakest strand in the 3-year average for the MC questions is Data Analysis and Probability(57.8%). The Open Response items for 2014 show an overall increase of 11% in the scores forthe Combined Population. The 3-year averages for the Open Response items continue to showthat Algebra is the strongest strand in the Combined Population (62%) as well as in the SES(57.5%) and the SWD (45.7%). The strongest strand for ELL (66.8%) is Algebra. The 3-yearaverage shows the Geometry strand in Open Response area continues to be our weakest in theCombined Populations as well as the SES, ELL, and the SWD sub-populations. A review of all ofthe data relating to the 6th Grade Mathematics Benchmark indicates Numbers and Operations isthe weakest strand in the Combined Population MC items for the year 2014. However, theweakest strands in the 3-year average for the MC items are Geometry (62.7%), Numbers andOperations (62.4%), and Measurement (62.9%). The Open Response items for 2014 show anoverall increase of 9% from 2013 in the scores for the Combined Population. The 3-yearaverages for the Open Response items show that Algebra is the strongest strand in the CombinedPopulation (58.8%) as well as in the SES (54.1%) and the SWD (47.9%). The strongest strandfor ELL (49.4%) is Geometry. The 3-year average shows the Data Analysis and Probability strandin Open Response continues to be our weakest in the Combined Populations as well as in the SESsub-population. The ELL and SWD sub-populations are weakest in Measurement for the OpenResponse items.

2. Beebe Middle School attendance rate for 2012 - 2013 was 95.7%. Beebe Middle Schoolattendance rate for 2011-2012 was 94.1%. Beebe Middle School attendance rate for 2010-2011was 95.18%.

3.

Goal

Beebe Middle School status is Needs Improvement for math for Combined Population and TAGGPopulation. All students will demonstrate improvement in mathematics in all content areas, specificallymultiplication with the standard algorithm, two-step problem solving, reading/interpreting graphs,solving equations and all Common Core State Standards.

Benchmark

Beebe Middle School Students in the Combined Population and TAGG Population for the 2013-2014 yeardid not meet the Annual Measurable Objective (AMO). For the 2014-2015 school year, students in theCombined Population group will meet the AMO of 88.47%. The TAGG Population will meet AMO of

10/1/2014 ACSIP


83.66%.

Intervention: (A) Ongoing parent involvement will improve student achievement.

Scientific Based Research: This We Believe...Keys to Educating Young Adolescence. National Middle SchoolAssociation, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) Topor, David. Parent Involvement and Student Academic Performance. NIHPublic Access. (2010) Exploring Parental Involvement Strategies Utilized by Middle School Interdisciplinary Teams.School Community Journal. (2013)

Actions PersonResponsible Timeline Resources Source of Funds

STEP 4: A Family night will be held in orderto inform parents about Common CoreState Standards that are continuing to beimplemented in Math/Language Arts thisyear. The school will maintain a web pagethat will be updated on a weekly basis inorder to communicate with parents andstudents about assignments, homework,and upcoming events. Information is alsosent home in a weekly newsletter. Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: Parental EngagementAction Type: Technology Inclusion

BrandyDillin,Principal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffComputersDistrict StaffTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 9: A survey of volunteer options willbe placed in the Informational Packets forparents. The staff is encouraged to use thesurveys to compile a volunteer resourcebook.Action Type: Parental Engagement

Patti Mathis,ParentCoordinator

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffTeachers ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 8: Parenting tips and suggestions onhow to help children be successful inschool, and how parents can contribute tothis success are sent out in the bi-monthlyBadger Link. Action Type: Parental EngagementAction Type: Technology Inclusion


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

ComputersDistrict Staff ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 6: A variety of parenting meetingsare scheduled in the evenings throughoutthe school year covering topics related tothe needs of the community.Action Type: Parental Engagement


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 5: A parent facilitator will helporganize training for staff and parents andact as a liason between parents and theschool.Action Type: Parental Engagement

RebeccaJohnson,ParentInvolvementFacilitator

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 3: As funds are available, materialswill be accessible to parents at the parentcenter, which will be staffed with acoordinator (.17 FTE). This will exceed thestate guidelines for providing support toour parents. A copy machine is rented forreproducing materials for parent use.Action Type: Parental Engagement


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffNSLA(State-281) -EmployeeSalaries:

$4833.33

NSLA(State-281) -EmployeeBenefits:

$1312.50

ACTIONBUDGET: $6145.83

STEP 7: Information encouraging parentsto keep open communication with theschool in resolving any concerns will beplaced in the school's handbook. Action Type: Parental Engagement

NickyBenson,AssistantPrincipal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaff ACTION BUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


STEP 2: The school shall enable theformation of a Parent Teacher Associationor organization that will foster parental andcommunity involvement within the school.Additional parental contact will be madethrough parent volunteer meetings asneeded. Action Type: Parental Engagement


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffCommunityLeaders

ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 10: Parent facilitator prepares"Informational Kits" to inform parents withimportant information about their child'sschool. Action Type: EquityAction Type: Parental EngagementAction Type: Program Evaluation

RebeccaJohnson,ParentInvolvementFacilitator

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 In order tomeasure parental involvement, sign-insheets will be used at the parent center,parent-teacher conferences, and at otherparent-student activities. E1.2 The ParentFacilitator will conduct a needs assessmentsurvey at the spring parent teacherconferences to determine how the schoolcan better collaborate and communicatewith parents in meeting the needs of thestudents. E1.3 Parental Involvement Datafor the 2011-2012 school year shows that75% of the parents attended the fallparent teacher conference, and 61% of theparents attended the spring parent teacherconference. Parental Involvement Data forthe 2012 - 2013 school year shows that73% of the parents attended the fallparent teacher conference, and and 57%of the parents attended the spring parentteacher conferences. Parental involvementdata for the 2013/2014 school year showsthat 80% of the parents attended the fallP/T Conference. Data from the spring P/TConference shows that 54% of the parentsattended.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Parental EngagementAction Type: Program Evaluation

RebeccaJohnson,ParentalInvolvementFacitlitator,NickyBenson,Asst.Prinicpal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffOutsideConsultantsTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

Step 11: The Watchdog Dads program willbe incorporated in order to increasepositive parental interaction and supportthroughtout the school year.Action Type: EquityAction Type: Parental Engagement

NickyBenson,Asst.Principal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffCommunityLeadersTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

Total Budget: $6145.83

Intervention: (B) Beebe Middle School teachers collaborate to ensure a cohesive, equitable education for allstudents.

Scientific Based Research: This We Believe...Keys to Educating Young Adolescence. National Middle SchoolAssociation, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) Coil, Carolyn. Differentiated Activities and Assessments Using the CommonCore State Standards. Pieces of Learning. (2011) Collay, Michelle. Teaching is Leading. Educational Leadership.(2013)

Actions PersonResponsible Timeline Resources Source of

Funds

STEP 2: Teachers, administrators and other facultywill collaborate yearly to analyze the results oflocal, state, and national assessments to verify thecurriculum is aligned both vertically andhorizontally.

Brandy Dillin,Principal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffDistrict StaffTeachers

ACTIONBUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Special Education

STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 Instructional alignmentwill be evaluated/reviewed by the principalquarterly through curriculum overview during PLCmeetings. E1.2 Teachers will administer Targettests every six to eight weeks to all mathstudents. THE TARGET TEST DATA WILL BECOMPARED BETWEEN THE TEAMS TO ENSUREEACH STUDENT IS RECEIVING AN EQUITABLE,COHESIVE EDUCATION. Administration will reviewcurriculum each nine weeks through joint mathPLC meetings. E.1.3 Analysis of the Target TestData from 2011/2012 shows the overall averagepercent correct for 5th grade math is MC 65% andOR 50%. The overall average percent correct for6th grade math is MC 63% and OR 36%. Analysisof the Target Test Data from 2012/2013 shows theoverall average percent correct for 5th grade mathis MC 55% and OR 48%. The overall averagepercent correct for 6th grade math is MC 49% andOR 27%. Analysis of the Target Test Data from2013/2014 shows the overall average percentcorrect for 5th grade math is MC 41% and OR35%. The overall average percent correct for 6thgrade math is MC 48% and OR 27%.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Program EvaluationAction Type: Special EducationAction Type: Technology Inclusion

PaulaHeffington,Sp. Ed.,AbbieQuattlebaum,Teacher,MargaretHall, Teacher

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 4: WEEKLY CONTENT AREA MEETINGS WILLBE HELD TO TARGET STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT andcollaborate to ensure vertical and horizontalcurriculum alignment.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: AlignmentAction Type: Collaboration


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffPerformanceAssessmentsTeachers

ACTIONBUDGET: $

Total Budget: $0

Intervention: (C) Beebe Middle School math teachers will provide, implement, and utilize multiple instructionalstrategies to improve student achievement.

Scientific Based Research: Coil, Carolyn. Differentiated Activities and Assessments Using the Common Core StateStandards. Pieces of Learning. (2011) Tate, Marcia. Worksheets Don't Grow Dendrites. Corwin Press. (2010) Tate,Marcia. Mathematics Worksheets Don't Grow Dendrites. Corwin Press (2009) This We Believe...Keys to EducatingYoung Adolescence. National Middle School Association, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) Extending Children'sMathematics: fractions and decimals. by Susan B. Empson and Linda Levi. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH, (2011)

Actions Person Responsible Timeline Resources Source of Funds

STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1Classroom Walk Through(CWT) data will be gatheredto indicate the percentage ofBeebe Middle School Mathteachers using multipleinstructional strategies. E1.2Administrators will documenthigh yield instructionalstrategies observed duringCWT’s. Data will be collectedshowing frequency andcontinuity. Trends and datawill be shared during monthlyfaculty meetings. E1.3 Data

Brandy Dillin, Principal,Nicky Benson, Asst.Principal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


will be gathered andevaluated during bi-weeklysubject area meetings. Datawill be used to determinestudent growth. Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: ProfessionalDevelopmentAction Type: ProgramEvaluationAction Type: TechnologyInclusion

STEP 2: MULTIPLEINSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIESsuch as Differentiation, KaganCooperative LearningActivities, instructionalstrategies with Bloom's higherorder thinking, Marzanno'sHigh Yield InstructionalStrategies, and Marcia Tate'sBrain Compatible Strategieswill be used in all classroomsto promote studentachievement. Lesson planswill indicate these as well asCOMMON CORE STATESTANDARDS, types ofassessments and personalreflections.Action Type: Equity

Brandy Dillin, Principal Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 5 - Support forhomeless students will includethe purchase of supplies,materials, and othernecessary items to ensureeducational opportunitiessimilar to all other students.The Beebe School District isfortunate to have a supportivecommunity that assistsfamilies in need throughvarious programs, includingthe Community OutreachCenter that provides freeclothing and food; theMinisterial Alliance;community churches; the RiceDepot, which provides food toschools to distribute tostudents when they leaveschool each day; anddonations from communitypatrons that have been set upin a district account. Inaddition, the nearby city ofSearcy has a homelessshelter. The MinisterialAlliance is presently workingto build a homeless shelter inBeebe. District funds will beused to cover most costs, butTitle I funding will be used tosupplement additional needs.Rick Duff, AssistantSuperintendent, is thehomeless liaison who workswith school staff and familiesin identifying students who

Rick Duff, HomelessLiaison

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

Central OfficeCommunityLeaders

ACTION BUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


may qualify as homeless.Administrators, counselors,nurses and secretaries wereprovided information fordetermining homelessness.Because of the communityoutreach programs in theBeebe School District, verylittle money was expendedfrom the Title I set-aside inthe past. Therefore, theamount budgeted this yearwill be $150 per child basedon the number of studentsidentified this past year inNon-Title I schools. Homelessstudents from Non-Title Ischools will receive a higheramount per student aboveTitle I schools so they willreceive comparable servicesas those students in the TitleI schools. Funding forhomeless students will be setaside in the district plan. Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: ParentalEngagement

STEP 6: Most lowsocioeconomic students havelimited access to technologyin their homes. To improvestudent learning throughhands-on technology,students will be able to accessvarious software and on-lineresources in the classroom toreach grade-levelperformance. Chromebooks,along with the relatedtechnology equipment(including mouse, headset,and cart) are available forstudent use in the classroom.Computer labs have beenupdated with 100 newcomputers.Action Type: EquityAction Type: TechnologyInclusion

Scott Embrey,AssistantSuperintendent/FederalCoordinator

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

ComputersTeachers

NSLA(State-281) -CapitalOutlay:

$100000.00

NSLA(State-281) -Materials&Supplies:

$0.00

ACTIONBUDGET: $100000

Total Budget: $100000

Intervention: (D) Beebe Middle School students will receive Response to Intervention to increase studentachievement.

Scientific Based Research: Buffum, Austin; Mattos, Mike; Weber, Chris. Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI,professional learning communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn. (2009) Tiers Without Tears: asystematic approach to implementing RTI in PLC schools by Austin G. Buffum through Sollution Tree. (2009)National Center on Response to Intervention. Essential Components of RTI - A Closer Look at Response toIntervention. Washington, DC; US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Centeron Response to Intervention. (2010) National Center on Response to Intervention. RTI in Middle Schools: TheEssential Components. Washington, DC; US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs,National Center on Response to Intervention. (2013)


STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 Students willwork on individual weaknesses as

PaulaHeffington,

Start:07/01/2014 Administrative

ACTION BUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


identified by each math teacher based onTarget Test, Common Assessments orclass work. Documentation will be kept oneach student’s intervention. E1.2 Datafrom the math Target Test, CommonAssessment or class work will be used asa pre-evaluation. Post evaluation will bedeveloped by the math teachers usingquiz builders from TLI or other availableresources. Analysis of the data from the2012/2013 Target Test, the overallaverage percent correct for 5th grademath is MC 55% and OR 48%. The overallaverage correct for 6th grade math is MC49% and OR 27%. Analysis of the TargetTest Data from 2013/2014 shows theoverall average percent correct for 5thgrade math is MC 41% and OR 35%. Theoverall average percent correct for 6thgrade math is MC 48% and OR 27%. Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Program EvaluationAction Type: Technology Inclusion

Sp. Ed.,AbbieQuattlebaum,Teacher,MargaretHall, Teacher

End:06/30/2015

StaffDistrict StaffPerformanceAssessmentsTeachers

STEP 2: BEFORE SCHOOL TUTORING willbe available to help students meet gradelevel expectations with additional supportand instruction. Parents are informed ofbefore school tutoring opportunities forstudents not meeting the testingstandards and progress will be monitoredthrough parent meetings. Tutoring will beheld daily. Tutoring will be held fromSeptember 2014 through May, 2015.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Parental EngagementAction Type: Special Education


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


NSLA(State-281) -EmployeeSalaries:

$5000.00


$1110.00

ACTIONBUDGET: $6110

STEP 3: Test results from themathematics Arkansas AugmentedBenchmark exams will be analyzed eachyear. Based on the analysis of the newsupporting data the ACSIP plan will berevised annually in order to meet theneeds of students and close achievementgap using AMO.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: Professional DevelopmentAction Type: Program Evaluation


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffCommunityLeadersComputersDistrict StaffPerformanceAssessmentsTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 4: EACH GRADE LEVEL WILLPROVIDE INTERVENTION ACTIVITIES forclosing the achievement gap in areasspecifically identified by math teachers.Enrichment Activities will also beprovided.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: Equity


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffDistrict StaffPerformanceAssessmentsTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

Total Budget: $6110

Intervention: (E) Beebe Middle School faculty will increase student achievement through the utilization ofProfessional Learning Communities.

Scientific Based Research: Marking Your Goals SMART! by Geri L. Parscale, Solution Tree. (2009) Buffum, Austin;

10/1/2014 ACSIP


Mattos, Mike; Weber, Chris. Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI, professional learning communities, and Howto Respond When Kids Don’t Learn. (2009) Tiers Without Tears: a systematic approach to implementing RTI inPLC schools by Austin G. Buffum through Sollution Tree. (2009) 21st Century Skills: Rethinking how studentslearn. by James Bellance, and Ron Brandt. Solution Tree Press. (2010)


STEP 2: Collaboration will take placethrough weekly content meetings. TheFaculty members will review target testresults, discuss RTI, cross curricularconnections and enrichment activities.DATA WILL BE ANALYZED FROM THETLI/TARGET TESTS, COMMONASSESSMENTS AND/OR CLASSROOMWORK TO DETERMINE STRENGTHS ANDWEAKNESSES ACCORDING TO THECOMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: EquityAction Type: Professional Development


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffDistrict StaffOutsideConsultantsTeachers

NSLA(State-281) -PurchasedServices:

$11100.00


STEP 1: Evaluation: E1.1 ALL LICENSEDINSTRUCTIONAL STAFF WILL CREATEGOALS ADDRESSING INCREASEDSTUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. E1.2 Eachlicensed instructional staff's goals willinclude strategies and action steps,responsibility, timeline, and evidence ofeffectiveness. E1.3 All licensedinstructional staff will analyze their goalsusing TLI, Common Core State Standardsand/or classroom data. Documentationwill be gathered and discussed during PLCmeetings. E1.4 Since goals vary fromyear to year, the data is not consistentfrom year to year. Evidence ofeffectiveness is discussed during PLCmeetings and documented throughmeeting minutes.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: EquityAction Type: Special Education


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $


Intervention: (F) Beebe Middle School students in the TAGG and Combined Population group who are in theOverall Status of Needs Improvement will receive instructional strategies that concentrate on their areas orweaknesses in order to close the student achievement gap.

Scientific Based Research: Buffman, Austin: Mike Mattos; Chris Weber. Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI,Professional Learning Communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don't Learn. (2009) Buffman, Austin G. TiersWithout Tears: a systematic approach to implementing RTI in PLC schools. Solution Tree. (2009) Coil, Carolyn.Differntiated Activities & Assessments Using the Common Core State Standards. Pieces of Learning. (2011)


Funds

STEP 1: Evaluation: E1.1 Math teachers willadminister a TLI/Target Test every six to eightweeks to students in the TAGG and CombinedPopulation. E1.2 TLI/Target Test data, classroomassessments and classroom work will be collected todetermine areas of weakness that will be the focusof RTI. E1.3 Before school tutoring data will becollected on students who attend before schooltutoring.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: Collaboration


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 2: Teachers will collaborate through weeklyPLC meetings to analyze data gathered fromTLI/Target Test, Common Assessments and/or


Start:07/01/2014End:


ACTIONBUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


classroom work. RTI will be planned to focus onstudents weaknesses in order to close theachievement gap.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: Professional Development

06/30/2015

STEP 3: An outside consultant from the Easter Sealshas been hired for portfolio assessment.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: Professional DevelopmentAction Type: Program Evaluation

JoyceSullivan,LEASupervisor

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

OutsideConsultants ACTION

BUDGET: $

Total Budget: $0

Priority 2: All students will demonstrate improvement in literacy.

SupportingData:

1. Priority Narrative: A review of data from the Fifth Grade Literacy Benchmark over a three yearperiod 2011-2014 indicates the overall weakness still in the areas of Writing Multiple Choice at59.5% and Literary Open Response at 65%. This weakness trend continued across the TAAGgroup as well. A review of data from the Sixth Grade Literacy Benchmark over a three yearperiod 2011-2014 indicates an overall weakness in the areas of Practical Open Response at51.2% and the Writing Multiple Choice at 58.6%. This weakness trend continued across the TAAGgroup as well.

2. Beebe Middle School attendance rate for 2012 - 2013 was 95.7%. Beebe Middle Schoolattendance rate for 2011-2012 was 94.1%. Beebe Middle School attendance rate for 2010-2011was 95.18%.

Goal Beebe Middle School is designated as ACHIEVING in Literacy. All students will improve literacy skills inthe areas of Practical Literary Open Response and in the Writing Multiple Choice.

Benchmark

Beebe Middle School students in both the combined population and TAGG Population for the 2013-2014year met the Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) in literacy. For the 2014-2015 school year, students inthe Combined Population will meet the AMO of 86.64%. The TAGG Population will meet the AMO of79.97%.

Intervention: (A) Beebe Middle School Literacy teachers will collaborate to ensure a cohesive, equitable educationfor all students.

Scientific Based Research: NMSA. This We Believe...Keys to Educating Young Adolescence. National Middle SchoolAssociation, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) Coil, Carolyn. Differentiated Activities and Assessments Using the CommonCore Standards. Pieces of Learning. (2011) Collay, Michelle. Teaching is Leading. Educational Leadership. (2013)


Funds

STEP 2: Teachers, administrators and other facultywill collaborate yearly to analyze the results of local,state and national assessments to verify that thecurriculum is aligned both vertically and horizontally.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: Special Education


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 3: WEEKLY CONTENT AREA MEETINGS WILLBE HELD TO TARGET STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT andcollaborate to ensure vertical and horizontalcurriculum alignment.Action Type: AIP/IRIAction Type: AlignmentAction Type: Collaboration


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 Instructional alignment willbe evaluated/reviewed by the principal. E1.2Teachers will administer Target tests to all LanguageArt students. The Target test data will be analyzedby the administration to ensure each student isreceiving an equitable, cohesive education. E1.3Analysis of the data from the 2011/2012 Target Testshows the overall average percent correct for 5thgrade students is MC 69% and OR is 56%. Theoverall average percent correct for 6th gradestudents on MC is 77% and OR is 82.5%. Analysis ofthe Target Test Data for 2012/2013 shows the

BrandyDillin,Principal,NickyBenson,Asst.Prinicipal,PaulaCourson,Teacher,DorisStillman,

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


overall average percent correct for 5th gradeliteracy is MC 56% and OR 24.2%. The overallaverage percent correct for 6th grade literacy is MC62.5% and OR 55%. Analysis of the Target TestData from 2013/2014 shows the overall averagepercent correct for 5th grade literacy is MC 58.5%and OR 35%. The overall average percent correctfor 6th grade literacy is MC 64% and OR 62%.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Program Evaluation

Teacher

STEP 5: Inclusion teachers and core teachers willcollaborate weekly to plan and implement inclusionof students with IEP's into the regular classroom.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: Special EducationAction Type: Technology Inclusion


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffOutsideConsultantsPerformanceAssessmentsTeachers

ACTIONBUDGET: $

Total Budget: $0

Intervention: (B) Beebe Middle School Literacy teachers will provide/implement/utilize multiple instructionalstrategies to improve student achievement.

Scientific Based Research: NMSA. This We Believe...Keys to Educating Young Adolescence. National Middle SchoolAssociation, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) Pitler, Howard; Dean, Ceri; Hubbell, Elizabeth; Stone, B.J. ClassroomInstruction That Works. ASCD. (2012) Coil, Carolyn. Differentiated Activiites and Assessments Using the CommonCore Standards. Pieces of Learning. (2011) Tate, Marcia. Worksheets Don't Grow Dendrites. Corwin. (2010)


STEP 1: Evaluation: E1.1 Throughclassroom observations, data will begathered to indicate the percentage ofBeebe Middle School Language Artsteachers using multiple instructionalstrategies. Administrators willdocument observable high yieldinstructional strategies. Data will beshared with the faculty. E1.2 Targettests will be administered throughoutthe year. E1.3 Analysis of the datafrom the 2011/2012 Target Test showsthe overall average percent correct for5th grade students is MC 69% and ORis 56%. The overall average percentcorrect for 6th grade students on MC is77% and OR is 82.5%. Analysis of thedata from the 2012/2013 Target Testshows the overall average percentcorrect for 5th grade students is MC56% and OR is 24.2%. The overallaverage percent correct for 6th gradestudents on MC is 62.5% and OR is55%. Analysis of the Target Test Datafrom 2013/2014 shows the overallaverage percent correct for 5th gradestudents is MC 58.5% and OR 35%.The overall average percent correct for6th grade students is MC 64% and OR62%.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Professional DevelopmentAction Type: Program Evaluation

Brandy Dillin,Principal, NickyBenson, Asst.Principal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 2: Multiple Instructionalstrategies such as cross-curricular

Brandy Dillin,Principal, Paula

Start:07/01/2014 Administrative

10/1/2014 ACSIP


connections, reading across content,activities with high level Bloomstrategies, Marcia Tate's BrainCompatible strategies, and Marzano'sHigh Yield Instructional Strategies willbe used in all classrooms to promotestudent achievement. Lesson plans willindicate these as well as the CommonCore State Standards, types ofassessments, and the integration oftechnology.Action Type: EquityAction Type: Special EducationAction Type: Technology Inclusion

Courson,Teacher,

End:06/30/2015

StaffTeachers

ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 4: Local and state funds will becoordinated to improve instruction andincrease student achievement inliteracy with the purchase of materials,supplies, and equipment. Local andstate categorical funding will addressstate mandates, to enhance theinstructional program, withoutsuperseding state funding.Action Type: Equity

Rick Duff,FederalProgramsDirector

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $

STEP 3: One teacher (1.0 FTE's) PaulaCourson, is employed to reduceclassroom sizes in grade 6. Theteacher/student ratio in grade 6 beforethe additional teacher was 1:25, andafter adding a teacher the ratio is1:23.

Scott Embry,Asst.Superintendentof Curriculum

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

TeachersNSLA(State-281) -EmployeeSalaries:

$48250.00


$12350.00



Intervention: (C) Beebe Middle School students will receive Response to Intervention to increase studentachievement.

Scientific Based Research: Buffum, Austin; Mattos, Mike; Weber, Chris. Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI,professional learning communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn. (2009) Tiers Without Tears: asystematic approach to implementing RTI in PLC schools by Austin G. Buffum through Solution Tree. (2009)National Center on Response to Intervention. Essential Components of RTI - A Closer Look at Response toIntervention. Washington, DC; US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Centeron Response to Intervention. (2010) National Center on Response to Intervention. RTI in Middle Schools: TheEssential Components. Washington, DC; US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs,National Center on Response to Intervention. (2013)


Funds

STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 Students will work onindividual weaknesses as identified by each month'sLanguage Arts Target Test, classroom assessmentsand Benchmark scores. E.1.2 Data from theLanguage Arts Target Test, classroom assessmentsand Benchmark scores will be used as a pre-evaluation. E1.3 Analysis of the data from the2011/2012 Target Test shows the overall averagepercent correct for 5th grade students is MC 69%and OR is 56%. The overall average percent correctfor 6th grade students on MC is 77% and OR is82.5%. Analysis of the data from the 2012-2013Target Test shows an overall average percentcorrect for 5th grade literacy is MC 56% and OR24.2%. The overall average percent correct for 6th

BrandyDillin,Principal,PaulaCourson,Teacher

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


grade literacy is MC 62.5% and OR 55%. Analysis ofthe data from the 2013/2014 Target Test shows theoverall average percent correct for 5th gradestudents is MC 58.5% and OR is 35%. The overallaverage percent correct for 6th grade students onMC is 64% and OR is 62%.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Program Evaluation

STEP 3: Test results from the Arkansas AugmentedBenchmark Literacy exams will be analyzed eachyear. Based on the analysis of the new supportingdata the ACSIP plan will be revised annually in orderto meet or exceed the Annual Measurable Objective(AMO). Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: Professional DevelopmentAction Type: Program Evaluation


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 4: Using data from the Target Test,Benchmark scores and classroom assessments, eachliteracy subject team will provide interventionactivities for increasing student achievement inareas specifically identified by literacy teachers.Intervention Activities will occur during RTI. Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Special EducationAction Type: Technology Inclusion


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

Total Budget: $0

Intervention: (D) Beebe Middle School faculty will increase student achievement through the utilization ofProfessional Learning Communities.

Scientific Based Research: Marking Your Goals SMART! by Geri L. Parscale, Solution Tree. (2009) 21st CenturySkills: Rethinking how students learn. by James Bellance, and Ron Brandt. Solution Tree Press. (2010)


Funds

STEP 2: Collaboration will take place through PLCmeetings. Licensed instructional staff will reviewCommon Core State Standards, learning andteaching strategies,common assessments, Targettest results, RTI, enrichment activities, and cross-curricular connections.Action Type: AlignmentAction Type: CollaborationAction Type: Special Education


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 1: Evaluation: E1.1 ALL LICENSEDINSTRUCTIONAL STAFF WILL CREATE GOALSADDRESSING INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.E1.2 Each licensed instructional staff's goals willinclude strategies and action steps, responsibility,timeline, and evidence of effectiveness. E1.3 Alllicensed instructional staff will analyze their goalsusing Target Test Data, Common Core StateStandards and/or classroom data. Documentationwill be gathered and discussed during PLC meetings.E1.4 Since goals vary from year to year, the data isnot consistent from year to year. Evidence ofeffectiveness is discussed during PLC meetings anddocumented through meeting minutes.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Program Evaluation


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

Total Budget: $0

Priority 3: Beebe Middle School will provide support in making healthy lifestyle choices by implementing systems toincrease education for students in the areas of healthy eating and physical activity.

10/1/2014 ACSIP


SupportingData:

1. Body Mass Index Data 2013/2014 School Year: The baseline data from the 2012/2013 BMI assessment was used to compare withthe 2013/2014 BMI assessment to determine if the goal of a 1% decrease inobesity was met. The 2012/2013 overall BMI results for Beebe Middle Schoolshow approximately 47.5% of all children measured where identified as obese.Evaluated data shows that the obesity level in BMS children decreased by 10.5%. BMS failed to exceeded the goal of a 1% decrease by 0.9%.

Priority Narrative:In addressing our goal of a healthier student population, an increase inhealthy lifestyle choices through participation in health education andphysical activity will continue to be implemented.

The results from the 2013-2014 Body Mass Index (BMI) data for Beebe MiddleSchool reflects that male overweight and at risk students is 56.6% and femalestudents at risk or overweight is 38.1% for a combined 47.4% overweight/obeserate. Evaluated data shows that the obesity level in BMS students decreased by0.1% during the 2013-2014 school year. In order to decrease obesity, theWellness Committee will continue to support interventions that were developed. The interventions are: Beebe Middle School students will participate in twofitness tests a year; an increase in health education, two healthy food optionsfor lunch and, in addition, an increase in communication with parentsconcerning appropriate clothing for participation in physical education. Thedesired result from the implementation of our plan is a 1% decrease in BodyMass Index (BMI) by the end of the 2014-2015 school year.

Body Mass Index Data 2012-2013 School Year:The baseline data from the 2011-2012 BMI assessment was used to compare withthe 2012-2013 BMI assessment to determine if the goal of 1% decrease in obesitywas met. The results from the 2011-2012 Body Mass Index (BMI) data for BeebeMiddle School reflects that male overweight and at risk students is 48% andfemale students at risk or overweight is 47.5% for a combined 47.7%overweight/obese rate. Evaluated data shows that the obesity level in BMSstudents decreased by 0.2% during the 2011-2012 school year.

Body Mass Index Data 2011-2012 School Year:The baseline data from the 2010-2011 BMI assessment was used to compare withthe 2011-2012 BMI assessment to determine if the goal of 1% decrease in obesitywas met. The 2011-2012 overall BMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 47.7% of all children measured were identified as obese. Evaluated data show that the obesity level in BMS increased by 11%. BMS missedthe goal of a 1% decrease by 12%.

2. School Health Index SY 2013-2014:The School Health Index indicates that Module 1 (Health and Safety Policies andEnvironment) contains areas of concerns. The area of concern in Module 1indicated a lack of staff development on HIV, STD, and Pregnancy policies orlaws. The rest of the modules had scores of 3 out of 3.

School Health Index SY 2012-2013:The School Health Index indicates that Module 2 and Module 3 contained areas ofconcern dealing with lack of grading in activity classes. (Health Education,Physical Education and Other Physical Activity ) Module 8 (CommunityInvolvement) contained areas of concern involving a need for better family andcommunity involvement in the school. The rest of the modules had scores of 3out of 3.

School Health Index SY 2011-2012:The School Health Index indicates that Module 3 (Physical Education and OtherPhysical Activity) and Module 4 (Nutrition Services) contain areas of concern. The area of concern in Module 3 indicated a need for more vigorous activitiesin Physical Education. The area of concern in Module 4 indicated a need formore fruits and vegetables in the school lunches. The rest of the modules hadscores of 3 out of 3.

3. Beebe Middle School Student Eligibility for Free, Reduced, and Paid Meals are:

10/1/2014 ACSIP


2013-201443.28% Free7.14% Reduced49.58% Paid 2012 - 201343.6% Free9.7% Reduced46.7% Paid

2011-201250.1% Free9.9% Reduced50.1% Paid

4. White County Unemployment Rate is:2012 8.0%2011 8.8%2010 8.4%

5. White County Population Poverty Rate is:

2012 19.4%2011 18.0%2010 16.5%

Goal All students will demonstrate increased knowledge in healthy lifestyle choices with emphasis in healtheducation and physical activity.

Benchmark The overall BMI will decrease by 1% during the 2013-2014 school year.

Intervention: (A) Beebe Middle School students will be provided with a broad curriculum in physical education ineffort to increase participation.

Scientific Based Research: \The Obesity Epidemic and Arkansas Students. U.S. Dept. of Health and HumanServices. CDC. (2009) www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth This We Believe...Keys to Educating Young Adolescence.National Middle School Association, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. www.iom.edu/fitnessmeasures. (2012)


Funds

STEP 5: Beebe Middle School will provide between90 and 270 minutes of weekly physical education,physical fitness and intramurals over the schoolyear. Action Type: EquityAction Type: Wellness


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 4: Beebe Middle School will promoteopportunities to interact with family members andcommunity organizations by using the school phonemessenger system to deliver information to parents.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: Parental EngagementAction Type: Wellness


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 Beebe Middle SchoolPhysical Education programs will offer 24 differentactivities to encourage student participation. E1.2Principals will conduct periodic CWT’s and evaluatelesson plans to see if a variety of activities are beingimplemented for the 5th and 6th grade students inphysical education classes. Results will be sharedimmediately with the physical education teacher.E1.3 The School Health Index and BMI are beingconducted annually to evaluate the school’s progress

BrandyDillin,Principal,NickyBenson,Asst.Principal,TamaraWood,Teacher,

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


in reducing BMI scores. The data from the 2012-2013 assessment was used to compare with the2013-2014 BMI assessment to determine if a 1%decrease in obesity was met. The 2012-2013 overallBMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 47.4% of all children measured wereidentified as obese. The 2012-2013 overall BMIresults for Beebe Middle School show approximately47.5% of all children measured were identified asobese. Evaluated data shows that the obesity levelin BMS students decreased by 0.1%. Our goal of 1%reduction was not met. BMI data from the 2013-2014 school year will be compared with 2014-2015BMI data to determine if the goal of a 1% decreasein obesity has been met. The data from the 2011-2012 assessment was used to compare with the2012-2013 BMI assessment to determine if a 1%decrease in obesity was met. The 2011-2012 overallBMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 47.7% of all children measured wereidentified as obese. The 2012-2013 overall BMIresults for Beebe Middle School show approximately47.5% of all children measured were identified asobese. Evaluated data shows that the obesity levelin BMS students decreased by 0.2%. Our goal of 1%reduction was not met. BMI data from the 2012-2013 school year will be compared with 2013-2014BMI data to determine if the goal of a 1% decreasein obesity has been met. The data from 2010-2011BMI assessment was used to compare with the2011-2012 BMI assessment to determine if a 1%decrease in obesity was met. The 2010-2011 overallBMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 36.7% of all children measured wereidentified as obese. The 2011-2012 overall BMIresults for Beebe Middle School show approximately47.7% of all children measured were identified asobese. Evaluated data shows that the obesity levelin BMS students increased by 11%. Our goal of a1% decrease in obesity was not met. BMI data fromthe 2011-2012 school year will be compared with2012-2013 to determine if the goal of a 1%decrease in obesity has been met.Action Type: EquityAction Type: Program EvaluationAction Type: Wellness

SharonChaloupka,Nurse

STEP 3: All students will be evaluated with fitnesstests two times per year. Students will participateonce a week in physical fitness classes.Action Type: EquityAction Type: Program EvaluationAction Type: Wellness

TamaraWood,Teacherand NickyBenson,AssistantPrincipal

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 2: Beebe Middle School will supportcommunity activities which enrich student healthsuch as basketball, football, softball, soccer, andcheerleading by providing use of facilities andproviding information on such activities to ourstudents.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: Wellness


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTIONBUDGET: $

Total Budget: $0

Intervention: (B) In effort to promote a healthy lifestyle, Beebe Middle School will provide health education forstudents.

Scientific Based Research: The Obesity Epidemic and Arkansas Students. U.S. Dept. of Health and HumanServices, CDC. (2009) www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth This We Believe...Keys to Educating Young Adolescence.

10/1/2014 ACSIP


National Middle School Association, Westerville, Ohio. (2010) School and Childcare Providers. Centers for DiseaseControl and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/asthma/schools.html (2013)


Funds

STEP 3: Beebe Middle School students are given twohealthy food options for lunch.Action Type: EquityAction Type: Wellness

JackiePerry, FoodServicesDirector

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 4: Beebe Middle School students willparticipate in health education curriculum. Action Type: EquityAction Type: Technology InclusionAction Type: Wellness


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffComputersTeachers

ACTIONBUDGET: $

STEP 2: Beebe Middle School faculty will be providedwith inservice covering various aspects of asthmaand staff development on unintentional injuries,violence, and suicide.Action Type: Professional DevelopmentAction Type: Wellness

SharonChaloupka,Nurse

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffTeachers ACTION

BUDGET: $

STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 The physical education staffat Beebe Middle School will implement healtheducation into their curriculum. Classroom WalkThrough (CWT) data, lesson plan monitoring, andopen response assessments will be used to insurethe implementation of health education in thecurriculum. E1.2 There will be a sign-in sheet at theasthma/unintentional injuries, violence and suicide,HIV, STD and Pregnancies professional developmenttraining. E1.3 The School Health Index and BMI arebeing conducted annually to evaluate the school’sprogress in reducing BMI scores. The data from the2012-2013 assessment was used to compare withthe 2013-2014 BMI assessment to determine if a1% decrease in obesity was met. The 2012-2013overall BMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 47.4% of all children measured wereidentified as obese. The 2012-2013 overall BMIresults for Beebe Middle School show approximately47.5% of all children measured were identified asobese. Evaluated data shows that the obesity levelin BMS students decreased by 0.1%. Our goal of 1%reduction was not met. BMI data from the 2013-2014 school year will be compared with 2014-2015BMI data to determine if the goal of a 1% decreasein obesity has been met. The data from the 2011-2012 assessment was used to compare with the2012-2013 BMI assessment to determine if a 1%decrease in obesity was met. The 2011-2012 overallBMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 47.7% of all children measured wereidentified as obese. The 2012-2013 overall BMIresults for Beebe Middle School show approximately47.5% of all children measured were identified asobese. Evaluated data shows that the obesity levelin BMS students decreased by 0.2%. Our goal of 1%reduction was not met. BMI data from the 2012-2013 school year will be compared with 2013-2014BMI data to determine if the goal of a 1% decreasein obesity has been met. The data from 2010-2011BMI assessment was used to compare with the2011-2012 BMI assessment to determine if a 1%decrease in obesity was met. The 2010-2011 overallBMI results for Beebe Middle School showapproximately 36.7% of all children measured wereidentified as obese. The 2011-2012 overall BMI

NickyBenson,Asst.Principal,TamaraWood,Teacher,SharonChaloupka,Nurse,RebeccaJohnson,Counselor

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

AdministrativeStaffCommunityLeadersTeachers

ACTIONBUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


results for Beebe Middle School show approximately47.7% of all children measured were identified asobese. Evaluated data shows that the obesity levelin BMS students increased by 11%. Our goal of a1% decrease in obesity was not met. BMI data fromthe 2011-2012 school year will be compared with2012-2013 to determine if the goal of a 1%decrease in obesity has been met.Action Type: EquityAction Type: Program EvaluationAction Type: Wellness

Total Budget: $0

Priority 4: Beebe Middle School will provide support to ensure ELL students receive interventions to provideequitable learning opportunities.

SupportingData:

1. Priority Narrative for Literacy: Beebe Middle School has an ELL population of three. All three ELLstudents were tested in the spring using the Arkansas Augmented Benchmark Standardized Test.All three students (100%) scored either Advanced or Proficient in Literacy.

2. Priority Narrative for Math: Beebe Middle School has an ELL population of three. All three ELLstudents were tested in the spring using the Arkansas Augmented Benchmark Standardized Test.All three students (100%) scored either Advanced or Proficient in Math.

Goal The Beebe Middle School teachers will provide interventions that will help ELL students receive anequitable education in relation to other students.

Benchmark The number of Beebe Middle School students reaching the Advanced or Fully Proficient Level on theELDA assessment in Reading and Comprehension for all ELL students will be 75% by 2013-2014.

Intervention: (A) English Language Learners (ELL) students will be assessed and receive balanced academic andlanguage instruction.

Scientific Based Research: Response To Intervention in Reading for English Language Learners. RTI ActionNetwork. English Language Learners. Research Center. (Sept., 2009) http://www.edweek.org/rc/issues/english-language-learners Research Hones Focus on ELL's. by Deborah Viadero. Education Week. (Jan., 2009)www.edweek.org/go/qc09 Fenner, Diane. New Multimeida Project: ELLs and their TEachers in Poughkeepsie, NYCommon Core Classrooms. http://blog.colorincolorado.org (2014)


STEP 3: The school counselor and secretarywill identify new ELL students duringregistration and the Home Language Surveywill be completed. The Language AcquisitionSkills (LAS) will be given to the studentswithin the first two weeks of enrollment. Action Type: EquityAction Type: Parental Engagement

RebeccaJohnson,Counselor.DonnaChambers,Secretary

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


STEP 2: Students will receive instructionalsupport from an ESL instructor (.20 FTE)through classroom integration, and throughindirect services. Action Type: EquityAction Type: Technology Inclusion

Rick Duff,Director ofStudentServices

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015

District StaffTeachers

ELL(State-276) -EmployeeSalaries:

$3791.67

ELL(State-276) -EmployeeBenefits:

$1154.16

ACTIONBUDGET: $4945.83

STEP 4: One teacher has completed the ESLtraining and is licensed through the StateBoard of Education. The teacher will providesupport and direction to other teachersworking with ELL students.

DorisStillman,Teacher

Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $

10/1/2014 ACSIP


Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Parental EngagementSTEP 5: Parents of ELL students willparticipate in the identification of studentsfor the program and will be a part of theteam decision-making process. Duringmeetings, parents will be informed of theirchild's performance, accommodations fortesting, etc. Written communication toparents will be in the appropriate languageso they can understand. An interpreter isavailable to serve as a liason between theschool and parents.Action Type: CollaborationAction Type: EquityAction Type: Parental Engagement


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


STEP 1: Evaluation E1.1 The ELDAAssessment is given in the spring eachschool year. The performance of studentson this literacy-based test will provide datato determine the ELL program success. E1.2All ELL students in the ELL Program will beassessed in April by the school counselor.Results will be available in the summer andreviewed for student progress. E1.3Comparison of the 2012-2013 scores to the2011-2012 scores show that 75%maintained a level 4, another 25%increased from a level 3 to level 4 and therewere no decreases. Data collected in 2013-2014 will be compared to data collected in2012-2013 to determine student growth. Action Type: Program Evaluation


Start:07/01/2014End:06/30/2015


ACTION BUDGET: $

Total Budget: $4945.83

Planning Team

Classification Name Position CommitteeClassroom Teacher Allgood, Toni Science Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Belew, Johnny Math Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Bledsoe, Teresa Language Arts Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Bramlett, Joyce Science Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Brumfield, Lydia Gifted and Talented Teacher Math/Literacy

Classroom Teacher Courson, Paula Literacy Facilitator Literacy

Classroom Teacher Crow, Terrian Language Arts Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Davis, Brian East Lab Facilitator Parental Involvement/ELL/ Wellness

Classroom Teacher Davis, Lindsey Math Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Davis, Shauna Art Teacher Parent Involvement/Wellness/ELL

Classroom Teacher Dodge, David Language Arts & Math Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Hall, Margaret Math Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Heffington, Paula Resource Teacher Math/Special Education

Classroom Teacher Hollis, Monica Resource Teacher Literacy/Special Education

Classroom Teacher Howard, Fran Science Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Jewell, Ken Science Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Kidder, Cathy Library Media Specialist Literacy

Classroom Teacher Leamons, Sarah Language Arts Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Money, Larry Language Arts Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Moore, Remona Special Education Self-ContainedTeacher Special Education/ELL/Parental Involvement

10/1/2014 ACSIP


Classroom Teacher Pasley, Dana Social Studies Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Quattlebaum,Abby Math Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Redman, Michelle Resource Teacher Literacy/Special Education

Classroom Teacher Sawatsky,Patrick Math Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Simpson, Melanie Music Teacher Parent Involvement/Wellness/ELL

Classroom Teacher Stillman, Doris Language Arts Teacher Literacy/ELL

Classroom Teacher Thomas, Amy Music Teacher Parental Involvement/Wellness/ELL

Classroom Teacher Underwood,Stephen Social Studies Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Vaden, Gail Social Studies Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Whitehead,Dianna Science Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Wood, Tamara Physical Education Teacher Parental Involvement/Wellness/ELL

Classroom Teacher Woodard, Sarah Social Studies Teacher Literacy

District-Level Professional Embrey, Scott Assistant Superintendent Math/Literacy

District-Level Professional Perry, Jackie Food Services Director Wellness

District-Level Professional Shook, Belinda Superintendent Math/Literacy/Wellness

Non-Classroom ProfessionalStaff Allen, LuAnne Computer Lab Facilitator Literacy/ Math

Non-Classroom ProfessionalStaff

Chaloupka,Sharon Nurse Wellness


Chambers,Donna Secretary ELL/Math/ Literacy/Parental Involvement

Non-Classroom ProfessionalStaff Collier, Dennis Instructional Aide Special Education

Non-Classroom ProfessionalStaff Crisco, Debbie Math Specialist Math

Non-Classroom ProfessionalStaff Damron, Lisa Computer Lab Facilitator Math/Literacy

Non-Classroom ProfessionalStaff Ferry, Carrie Resource Aide Special Education


Johnson,Rebecca Counselor Parental Involvement/ELL/Wellness

Parent Brand, Misty Parent Math

Parent Davidson, Mykila Parent Literacy

Parent Griffin, Keith Parent Parental Involvement

Parent Rudd, Judith Parent Math

Principal Benson, Nicky Assistant Principal Math/Wellness/Literacy/Sp. Ed./ParentalInvolvement

Principal Dillin, Brandy Principal ELL/Literacy/Wellness/Math/SpecialEducation

Documents

School Plan - Amazon Web Services...6th grade math is MC 63% and OR 36%. Analysis of the Target Test Data from 2012/2013 shows the overall average percent correct for 5th grade math