71
School-wide Behavior Supports in High Schools: What Works! And What Does Not! Dr. Hank Bohanon Loyola University of Chicago Center for School Evaluation, Intervention, and Training [email protected] http://www.luc.edu/cseit

School-wide Behavior Supports in High Schools: What Works! And What Does Not! Dr. Hank Bohanon Loyola University of Chicago Center for School Evaluation,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

School-wide Behavior Supports in High Schools:

What Works!And What Does Not!

Dr. Hank BohanonLoyola University of Chicago

Center for School Evaluation, Intervention, and Training

[email protected]://www.luc.edu/cseit

Welcome

• Greetings and Key Elements– Lessons Learned– Principles, and Systems, Practices, Data– Remembering the Adults

• Charge and benediction

Powerpoint

• Participants will have a better idea of the what may work (and what certainly does not work) in high school schoolwide behavior support implementation

Outline

• What seems to work

– Lesson’s learned from the field (Ready, Get Set, Go)

– Principles, Systems, Practices, Data

– Supporting Adult Behavior

Thank you!• Maryland PBIS Leadership Team• Virginia Department of Education• George Mason University• Maryland PBIS• Sheppard Pratt Health System • Johns Hopkins University• Chicago Public Schools• IL-PBIS• University of Kansas• Loyola University and CSEIT

Thank you

• Staff and Leadership of CPS Schools

• Research Team from Loyola

– Dr. Pamela Fenning – [email protected]– Contact about policy and group level supports– See article

– Journal of School Violence (2004), Vol. 3, (1)

Colleagues

• Gina Bartucci [email protected]

• Alissa Briggs [email protected]

• Dr. Pamela Fenning, [email protected]

• Kira Hicks [email protected]

• Lisa [email protected]

• Lauren McArdle [email protected]

• Jennifer [email protected]

• Dr. Diane Morrison [email protected]

• Steve Ramano (IL-PBIS)[email protected]

• Jennifer Rose [email protected]

• Dr. Lynda Stone [email protected]

• Stacey Weber [email protected]

• “Systematic Analysis and Model Development for High School Positive Behavior Support” Institute for Education Science, U.S. Department of Education, Submitted with the University of Oregon. Awarded 2007.

• “Character Education: Application of Positive Behavior Supports” to U.S. Department of Education, Safe and Drug Free Schools. Awarded 2007.

Thank you!

Who do we have in the room?

• Years of PBS implementation

• Roles

Presentations• Brad Engel, Assistant

Principal– Kent Island High School– Queen Anne’s County,

Maryland• Adam Sheinhorn,

Administrator– North County High School– Anne Arundel County,

Maryland• Bruce Butler, Principal

Teresa FennessyMarla FullertonFrances Walker, PBS Coach– South Lakes High School– Fairfax County, Virginia

• Aaron Engley, AdministratorCarrie Jones, PBS CoachGarrett Hubbard

West Potomac High SchoolFairfax County,

Virginia

• Panel Discussion

What you will hear next…

• Description of schools

• Key components (e.g., buy-in)

• Examples of teaching, acknowledging, and policies (redirection)

• Implementation data

• Outcome data

Ready (Lesson’s Learned)

• Take time to build foundation– Identify priorities

• Share priority perceptions and organized outcome data

– Link approach with local need• Link to top three priorities (school improvement)

– Address philosophy of staff• Behavior• Discipline

Question

• What are at least three things you can do to supports students from diverse backgrounds in your schools?

Task Force, 2006

• Help African-American males…transition from high school to college

• In areas of high need, provide…mental health services needed to support greater academic achievement.

• Increase and improve in-school, supervised suspension programs focused on academic development and behavioral counseling.

(Task Force on the Education of Maryland’s African-American Males, 2006)

Task Force, 2006

• Futures planning

• Wraparound

• Schoolwide behavior and academic support

(Task Force on the Education of Maryland’s African-American Males, 2006)

Big Ideas: Get Set!

What IDEA says about PBS

• Consider if Impedes

• School-wide

• General education

• Incidental benefit

• Service not a place

• School-improvement

• FBA/BIP

Principles

• Behavior• Reinforcement• Punishment• Setting events• Discipline• Shaping

Principles

• Behavior = Purposive & Communitive

• Reinforcement = Add or take away something, behavior goes up

• Punishment = You do something behavior does not occur again

• Setting events = before behavior• Discipline = to teach• Shaping = baby steps

Punishment• Punishment stops a behavior• Alone, it has some major side effects

- Increases escape/avoidance- Encourages “sneaky” behaviors- Generates desire for revenge- Makes behavior harder to change- Does not teach- You can’t find a big enough hammer- It works both ways- It makes us filter (e.g., He’s always mean

to me!)

AcknowledgmentSystems

AdministrativeSupports

EngagingSchools

Instructing Behavior

GroupSupports

DataTeams Individuals

• Representative• Top 3 goal• Use data• Have mission• Meet regularly

• Identify concerns• Prioritize• Simple questions• Useful presentation

• Address skill deficits• Function-based• Multiple students

• Data driven• Team based• Comprehensive

• Knows the team• Attends training• Anticipates needs• Plans meetings• Liaison between team and staff

• Ask questions• Identify concerns• Build on strengths• Pacing

• Clear responses for + and – behavior• Encourage, discourage and monitor behavior• Prompt and reward staff

• Across settings• Examples/ non-examples• Re-teaching• Pre-teaching• Prompting

Structure of

Prevention

Key Features of Prevention

• Pro-activity

• Data-based decision-making; and

• Problem-solving orientation

(Horner, 2000; Lewis & Sugai, 1999; Sugai, et al., 2000; Weigle, 1997).

Key Prevention Strategies

• Multiple approaches to changing behavior:

Changing systems

Alteringenvironments

Teaching skills

Improvingquality of life

Systems, Practices &

Data: Go!

PROPORTIONS WHO RESPOND TO A CONTINUM OF SUPPORTS

Students who respond to intensive academic behavior support

Students who respond to less intensive academic behavior support

Students who would respond to effective core academic and behavior curriculum

National Standard

Schoolwide support

Group Support

1

1-7%

5-15%

80-90%

Individual Support

OSEP-PBS

Blueprint for Prevention

UniversalInstruction

GroupInstruction

Individual Supports

How do you Teach What is Expected in your

Home/School?

ImplicitlyIndirectly

Explicitly Directly

We are always teaching!

Examples of Universal Supports

Effective core curriculumModifying academic curriculum

(Universal Learning Design)Academic screening Improving classroom management Embedding social skills instruction

Modified from Online Academy – Access 2002

Building Level Systems

• Administrative Commitment

• Staff Commitment/Priority

• Team

• Self-Assessment

• Data system

Schoolwide Supports

• Identify expectations of the setting

• Evaluate implementation and evaluation of core curriculum

• Develop team/plan/support

• Directly teach expectations

• Consistent consequences

• Acknowledgement• Collect data

– Process, academics and behavior

• Communicate with staff

• On-going evaluation

Key Elements

• Systems– Administrative Commitments, Representative

Teams, Audit of practices, Priority

• Practices– Based on evidence

• Data– Process and impact

• What and with whom?

Systems/Data

• System - SET Information– Overall Score approximately 80%– Teaching @ 70%– Acknowledgment @ 50%

• Impact data– School has access to discipline and

attendance data

Practice

• To address tardies (high school) – names of students from class were put into a drawing. Four students’ names were drawn at random weekly, if the student did not have a tardy they could choose a prize.

Report from School

• Teachers were not able to sustain, teachers did not remember to conduct drawings.

• We can use department chairs to provide reminders and support to staff (System)

Can it be done?

CSEIT Research Team 2008

Teaching Expectations

Examples• Staff orientation

meetings• Assemblies• Lesson plans for

homerooms• Posters• Booster weeks

Key Elements• Rationale• Negative

examples• Positive examples• Practice

Teaching• Identify areas of need• Develop plans and post• Lesson

- Identify expectation- Rationale- Non-example/example- Practice/Feedback (Set limits and pre-teach

stop prompt)- Evaluation

• Booster Sessions as necessary

Acknowledgement

• Frequent (Daily)

• Intermediate (Weekly/Monthly)

• Large (Quarterly/Bi-Annually)

• Includes staff and students

Acknowledging Students and Staff

Examples• Buzzy Bucks/School Store• Monthly raffles for students

teachers, and support staff• Best Homeroom Challenge• Gold and Silver ID cards• Honors Dinner• Birthday Cards• School-Wide Celebrations

Key Elements• Variety of reinforcers• Specific/Immediate• Training• Rationale• Developmentally

appropriate• Don’t forget the big

people

Buzzy Buck

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

DIVISIONS: Freshman div. 132 Mr. W

Sophomore div. 040 Mr. J & Ms. M Junior div. 903 P

Senior div. 816 Mr. W

YOU WERE ONE OF THE TOP DIVISIONS OF YOUR CLASS WITH THE LEAST NUMBER OF LOANER SHIRTS CHECKED

OUT FOR THE MONTHS OF November and December!

Be Appropriate and be in uniform; was our school wide goal for November and December!

Thank you for your dedication to making this a

PARR-FECT and APPROPRIATE school!

We will be having a large Pizza party for you this Thursday January 17th at 11:00am!

In the social room following finals students MUST have their ID’s on to gain entrance to the party!

Gold and Silver ID Cards

Birthday Cards and Pencils

Policies

• Clear on office v.s. class– Classroom management

• Communicated with staff– Teach, post, remind

• Support what you train/expect

Teacher-Managed

• Excessive talking• Tardy: Inform Parents• Off Task• Drinks/Food/Headphones (as

posted)• Missing Homework• Not Prepared for Class• Inappropriate Language• Dishonesty• PDA• Hallway Disruption• Passing Notes• Cheating/Plagiarism

Office-Managed

• Attendance & Tardy• Insubordination• Fighting• Vandalism• Verbal/Physical Intimidation• Weapons• Gang Representation• Cutting Class/School/Teacher Detention• Theft• Drug Violations• Directed Profanity• Arson• Harassment (including sexual)• Controlled Substances• Threats• Security Threat/Breach• Repeated/Severe Offenses• Dress Code Violations• Hallway Disruption – Non Compliance

IL Public School

W h a t i s a l l o f t h i s t a r d y b u s i n e s s ?

Definition of ON TIME:

Student is 100% through the threshold of the classroom before the second bell rings.

INAPPR OPR IATE entrance to class:

Appropriate way to enter the classroom:

Redirecting

• Equip teachers to handle minors

• Hallway issues

• Saving face

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%

100.00%

Per

cen

tag

e

2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

Year

Proportion of Students With Office Discipline Referrals

6 + Referrals to Office 21.00% 16.00% 13.13%

2 to 5 Referrals to Office 33.00% 25.00% 23.47%

0-1 Referrals to Office 46.00% 59.00% 63.40%

2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

(02-03 compared to 03-04 X2 = 53.199, df = 2, p = .000)

(03-04 compared to 04-05 X2 = 6.324, df = 2, p = .042)

School 2 School-wide Evaluation of PBS 2005-2008

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

SET Category

Perc

en

tag

e o

f Im

ple

men

tati

on

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

0.665531

0.558752

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

pe

r d

ay

pe

r m

on

th p

er

10

0 s

tud

en

ts p

er

av

era

ge

da

ily

en

roll

me

nt

2005-2006 2006-2007

Year

Office Referrals by Year

17.9%

decrease

School 1 Office Referrals By Month By Year

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Per

Day

Per

Mon

th P

er 1

00 S

tude

nts

Per

Ave

rage

Dai

ly E

nrol

lmen

t

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

September October November December Jan uary February March April May June

Months

Houston County H.S. SET Results

0102030405060708090

100

SWPBS Feature

Per

cent

in P

lace Fall 2003

Winter 2004

Fall 2005

Accessed 3-7-06 = http://web.utk.edu/~swpbs/schools/data/hchs/HCHS%20SET%209%2028%2005.doc

Supporting Adult Behavior

ICEPS Project, 2008http://www.luc.edu/cseit

CSEIT Research Team

Effective Meetings

• Scheduling and

communication • Creation and use of

an agenda • Meeting begin and

end on-time • Keeping the

meeting on track

• Action plan/delegating

tasks

• Meeting Participation

• Dissemination of meeting notes

Shaping

• Do not train what you cannot support– Teaching components– Rationale– Resources– Modeling– Practice– Feedback (Coaching)

Coaching

• Do you give time?• Do you use evidence-based approaches?• Do coaches get the professional development

they need?• Is the coaching relationship protected?• Do coaches and administration work together?• Are they the right people?• Are the coaches effective?

Knight, 2008

Punch Line

• Invest in local capacity

• Tie into greater mission

• Ask before you tell

• Do not train what you cannot support

• Remember your humanity

Final Thoughts

• Ask before you tell

• Do not train what you cannot support

• Remember your humanity– Make things work together

Share with the group

• Great article on professional development

• http://www.ku-crl.org/archives/pd/partnership.html

• High Schools and PBS– http://www.pbis.org/highschool.htm

• Tennessee Examples– http://web.utk.edu/~swpbs/examples.htm

Share with the group

• Scaling Up– http://sisep.fmhi.usf.edu/

• PBS Evaluation from the University of Oregon– https://www.pbseval.org/