Scudamore/ Skidmore Family Genetics Study Phase III...2-38 generations, and is likely correct. However, further confirmation could be achieved if any or all of the other tested descendents

Relative Genetics

2495 S. West TempleSalt Lake City, UT 84606

Phone: (801) 462-14271-800-956-9362

Scudamore/Skidmore Family

Genetics StudyPhase III

Scudamore/Skidmore Family

Genetics StudyPhase IIIOctober 20, 2006

At A Glance: Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project, Phase IIIIndividuals in a family study who share 26 of 26, or 43 of 43 alleles are considered a unique haplotype, a genetic term for group. Each haplotype is assigned a number. Lineages in a Family Study are designated with a letter and are defined by haplotypes containing 2 or more individuals, and/or haplotypes that share at least 23 of 26, or 38 of 43 alleles. For example, in Skidmore Lineage A there are 10 individuals in 7 haplotypes. Those individuals in bold italic type had 43 markers tested.

Skidmore Lineage A- Earliest Documented Paternal Progenitor: Henry Skidmore, baptized in 1575 in Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire Defined By: Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 1 (A1): 7293, 8104, 23994 Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 2 (A2): 8134 Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 3 (A3): 7558, 7627 Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 4 (A4): 6686 Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 5 (A5): 7789 Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 6 (A6): 7983 Skidmore Lineage A Haplotype 7 (A7): 7292, 68304

Skidmore Lineage B- Earliest Documented Paternal Progenitor: Richard Skydmore of Mayshill, Westerleigh, born about 1480 Defined By: Skidmore Lineage B Haplotype 1 (B1): 6940, 7091, 7290, 7294, 21678, 40475, 41844, Z056842 Skidmore Lineage B Haplotype 2 (B2): 69496 Skidmore Lineage B Haplotype 2 (B3): Z097975

Skidmore Lineage C- Earliest Documented Paternal Progenitor: William Skidmore collier of Kingswinford, born about 1590 Defined By: Skidmore Lineage C Haplotype 1 (C1): 18588, 23755, 29534 Skidmore Lineage C Haplotype 2 (C2): 7480, 12148

Skidmore Lineage D- Earliest Documented Paternal Progenitor: William Scudamore, married in 1708 Defined By: Skidmore Lineage D Haplotype 1 (D1): 40454 Skidmore Lineage D Haplotype 2 (D2): 22920

Skidmore Lineage E- Earliest Documented Paternal Progenitor: John Skydemor, of Dunkerton, alive in 1441 Defined By: Skidmore Lineage E Haplotype 1 (E1): 6646, 16382, 57260 Skidmore Lineage E Haplotype 2 (E2): 35519 Skidmore Lineage E Haplotype 2 (E4): 10508

Page 1

At A Glance: Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project, Phase IIIcont.

Skidmore Lineage F- Defined By: Skidmore Lineage F Haplotype 1 (F1): 70418 Skidmore Lineage F Haplotype 2 (F2): 58854

Skidmore Lineage G- Defined By: Skidmore Lineage G Haplotype 1 (G1): Z097395, 63912, 68685, 68781 Skidmore Lineage G Haplotype 2 (G2): Z097979 Skidmore Lineage G Haplotype 3 (G3): 43557 Skidmore Lineage G Haplotype 4 (G4): 57575 Skidmore Lineage G Haplotype 5 (G5): 62028

Skidmore Lineage H- Defined By: Skidmore Lineage H Haplotype 1 (H1): 8894 Skidmore Lineage H Haplotype 2 (H2): 57918

Skidmore Independent Lineages - 6701, 7291, 20071, 36639, 41512, 41662,

Page 2

20 October 2006

ID: Participant:

6646 Ed Skidmore

6686 Wm. Frank Skidmore

6701 Ian Skidmore

6940 Warren Skidmore

7091 Howard Skidmore

7290 Howard H. Skidmore

Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase III

ID: Participant:

7291 Robert Skidmore

7292 Wade Skidmore

7293 Billy Skidmore

7294 Ellis Dee Skidmore

7480 Ewart Burt Skidmore

7558 Gene Aaron Skidmore

ID: Participant:

7627 James Edgar Skidmore

7789 Eric Skidmore

7983 George Skidmore

8104 Barry Hastings Skidmore

8134 Ron Skidmore

8894 Leonard John Scudamore

Phase I Participants:

ID: Participant:

10508 Lee Skidmore

12148 David. M. Skidmore

16382 Tim Skidmore

18588 James Skidmore

20071 Alan Skidmore

21678 Frank G. Skidmore

Phase II Participants:

ID: Participant:

22920 Gavin Skidmore

23755 Richard Charles Skidmore

23994 Charles Skidmore

29534 Robert Skidmore

35519 Peter Charles Scudamore

36639 Ernest Roy Skidmore

ID: Participant:

40454 Andrew Skidmore

40475 Dennis Skidmore

41512 Matthew Scudamore

41662 Lamoin Edward Skidmore

41844 Brian Skidmore

Phase III Participants:

43557 Mark Skidmore

57260 John A. Skidmore

57575 Dr. Dwight V. Skidmore

57918 John Robert Skidmore

58854 Dr. Peter Skidmore

62028 John Steven Edgar

ID: Participant: ID: Participant:

63912 Walter R. Skidmore

68304 Robert M. Skidmore

68685 Jack Skidmore

68781 John Skidmore

69496 Michael George Skidmore

70418 Dr. John F. Skidmore

ID: Participant:

Z056842 Bill Skidmore

Z097395 Milus Skidmore

Z097975 Robert Emerson Skidmore

Z097979 James Tennessee Burke

Page 3

Relative Genetics

Page 4

Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase III

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage A, The Rickmansworth Line: After Phase II testing, Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage A was defined by ten individuals in seven haplotypes. Phase III testing added one individual, 68304, Robert M. Skidmore, for whom no genealogy was submitted. However, he is a 43/43 match with 7292 who defines Skidmore Lineage A7. As was described in the Phase II report, the earliest genealogical point that the DYS442 mutation that defines lineage A7 could have occurred would have been between Nathaniel Skidmore of Morgan Co., AL, born in 1842, and his father, Captain William Skidmore of Madison County, KY, born in 1799. Therefore, the genetic evidence strongly asserts that 68304, like 7292, is a descendent of Nathaniel Skidmore (b. 1842).

Objectives of the Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project, Phase III:The objectives of this study are to further elucidate the genealogies of various Skidmore individuals to determine if common ancestry can be established.

Summary of Phase III Findings:With the 16 additional individuals participating in the Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase III, there were eight main lineages identified (Figure 1a, 1b, and and Appendixes A1-A3). A discussion of each Lineage follows. Hereafter in the text, those who had 43 markers tested will be in italic type.

Summary of Phase II Findings:Of the 35 individuals participating in the Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase II, there were five main lineages identified, and seven independent lineages.

Note: Some analyses in this report are based on genetic data that were not generated by Relative Genetics. Relative Genetics cannot verify the accuracy of those data.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage B, The Westerleigh line: In the Phase II report, Skidmore Lineage B was defined by seven individuals in one haplotype. Phase III testing has identified three new individuals who are also part of Skidmore Lineage B (Figure 1a). The first participant Z056842, Bill Skidmore, who was tested by another laboratory, shares descendency with 7091 and 41844 in Timothy Skidmore of Suffolk Co., LI, born in 1760, a tenth generation descendent of Richard Skydmore (b. abt. 1480). The genetic data confirm his connection to this line as he is part of Skidmore Lineage B1. The second new participant is 69496, Michael George Skidmore, who shares descendency with 6940, 7294, and 40475 in Joseph Skidmore of Little York, DE, born in 1706, an eighth generation descendent of Richard Skydmore (b. abt. 1480). 69496 forms a new genetic lineage, Skidmore Lineage B2 as he has a different value at DYS635 than the others in Lineage B. Though the MRCA would place the common ancestor for 69496 and the other descendents of Joseph Skidmore (b. 1706) at 13 generations, their stated relationship of 6-7 generations is within the 95% Confidence interval of 2-38 generations, and is likely correct. However, further confirmation could be achieved if any or all of the other tested descendents of Joseph (b. 1706), namely 6940, 7294, or 40475 upgraded to 43 markers. If there was only one mismatch after testing 43 markers, then the MRCA would be 8 generations, which would directly correlate with the current genealogical data. The third new participant is Z097975, Robert Emmerson Skidmore who was tested by another laboratory, and claims shared descendency with 6940, 7294, 40475, and 69496 in Joseph Skidmore

Relative Genetics

Page 5


Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage C, The Kingswinford Line: Skidmore Lineage C does not have any changes from the Phase II report.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage D: Skidmore Lineage D does not have any changes from the Phase II report.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage E: In the Phase II report, Skidmore Lineage E was defined by five individuals in four haplotypes. After one upgrade, one addition, and two deletions, Phase III testing shows five individuals in three haplotypes. The new participant is 57260, John A. Skidmore, a descendent of Arthur Skydmore of Eyam, Derbyshire, born before 1629. And, as was suggested in Phase II, 6646 upgraded to 43 markers. The 43 marker profiles of 6646 and 57260 likely represent the DNA profile of the common ancestor for Skidmore Lineage E. 6701, Ian Skidmore who had previously claimed descendency from William Skidmore collier of Kingswinford born about 1590, the common paternal progenitor of Skidmore Lineage C, was named Skidmore Lineage E3 in the Phase II report. As was suggested, he upgraded to 43 markers. Previously, 6701 had three differences from Skidmore Lineage E1, but after upgrading he had 11 differences, thus moving him out of Lineage E and into the independent lineages. This upgrade has also effected Skidmore Lineage E4, 10508, Lee Skidmore, descendent of Mary Skidmore. In Phase II it was reported "Lineages E3 and E4 share a mutation at DYS390, indicating that they likely share common ancestry with each other before they share a common ancestor with the rest of Lineage E (Figure 3d, Figure 5). However, because 10508 and 6701 share only 23 of 26 alleles, their common ancestor is estimated at 28 generations with a 95% Confidence Interval of 9 to 65 generations. Therefore, the connection of these two lineages to each other and to the rest of Skidmore Lineage E is tentative. The Phase II report did not mention that they also had a shared mutation at DYS392, though they still share only 23 of 26 markers. It is imperative that 10508 upgrade to 43 markers to determine if he has shared ancestry with 6701, with the rest of Lineage E, or neither, as the genetic data at this point are unclear.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage B, cont.:of Little York, DE, born in 1706, an eighth generation descendent of Richard Skydmore (b. abt. 1480). Z097975 forms a new genetic lineage, Skidmore Lineage B3 as he has different values at DYS442 and DYS464c than 69496. 66496 is the only participant in Lineage B who had more than 26 markers tested. These two individuals have a total of 32 tested markers in common, and they share 30 of those 32 markers. The MRCA value is 16 generations with a 95% Confidence Interval of 5 to 42 generations, which does not correspond to the current genealogical findings of 6-7 generations. Because only two individuals have been tested at DYS442 and DYS464c, the ancestral type, or the profile of the common ancestor, cannot be determined. Therefore, the upgrades suggested in the previous paragraph are highly recommended in order to reconcile the relationship of Z097975 to 69496 as well as to the rest of the group.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage F:Skidmore Lineage F was created by two new individuals 70418, Dr. John F. Skidmore, and 58854, Dr. Peter Skidmore who shared 25 of 26 alleles. They have a calculated MRCA of 13 generations with a 95% Confidence Interval of 2 to 38 generations. It is recommended that 58854 upgrade to 43 markers so that a more detailed comparison can be made to 70418 who has already been tested at 43 markers. This will give further insight into the relationship of these two individuals.

Relative Genetics

Page 6


Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage G: Skidmore Lineage G was created by eight new individuals. Lineage G1 is defined by Z097935,

Skidmore Lineage G Common Ancestor 3

MRCA 20 generations

Lineage G1

DYS19


MRCA 3-8 generations



Lineage G3 Lineage G4

DYS389II

DYS439 (14) DYS439 (13)

Lineage G2 Lineage G5

DYS385b DYS390

DYS439 (13)

Figure 3a: Skidmore Lineage G when the DYS389II mutation is shared.


MRCA 20 generations

Lineage G1

DYS19





Lineage G3Lineage G4

DYS389II

DYS439 (14)

DYS439 (13)

Lineage G2Lineage G5

DYS385bDYS390DYS389II

Milus Skidmore, 63912, Walter R. Skidmore, 68685, Jack Skidmore, and 68781, John Skidmore, who are all descendents of different sons of John Skidmore of Lee County, VA, born in 1792. Lineage G2 is defined by Z097979, James Tennessee Burke, who differs from G1 at DYS19 and DYS385b. Lineage G3 is defined by 43557, Mark Skidmore, who differs from Lineage G1 at DYS19, DYS389II, and DYS439 where he has a value of 14. Lineage G4 is defined by 57575, Dr. Dwight V. Skidmore who differs from Lineage G1 at DYS19, DYS389II, and DYS439 where his value is 13. Lineage G5 is defined by 62028, John Steven Edgar, who believed he shared common ancestry with G1's Z097935 in James M. Skidmore of Harlan County, KY born in 1855, but his three differences from G1 show that it is highly unlikely that this assumption is correct. From the current genetic information we cannot verify the genetic profile of the lineage common ancestor, Skidmore Lineage G Common Ancestor 3. It is likely that a DYS19 mutation occurred before the common ancestor of the Lineage G1 participants, refer to Skidmore Lineage G Common Ancestor 1, in Figure 3. Because there are two mutually exclusive shared mutations at DYS389II and DYS439, for Lineages G3 and G4, there are two genetic alternatives as to how the other individuals in this lineage are related. (Figure 3a) First, if the DYS389II mutation is truly shared by Lineage G3 and Lineage G4, then they would share a common ancestor in Skidmore Lineage G common Ancestor 2 before sharing common ancestry with the rest of the group. This would mean that the DYS439 (13) value shared by Lineage G4 and G5 would have happened independently on each of the G4 and G5 lines. (Figure 3b) Conversely, if the DYS439 (13) value is the result of shared ancestry, then Lineages G4 and G5 share a common ancestor in Skidmore Lineage G Common Ancestor 2, and it is the DYS389II mutation that occurred independently. To determine which scenario is more likely, more known cousins of Z097979, 43557, 57575, and 62028 should be tested. It is also recommended that Z097979, 43557, and 57575 upgrade to 43 markers in order to better define their relationship with Lineage G1 as their current MRCA is between 13 and 20 generations.

Figure 3b: Skidmore Lineage G when the DYSDYS439 mutation is shared.

Relative Genetics

Page 7


The undersigned have reviewed the above results and do hereby verify that they are accurate according to the information provided by the participants.

_______________________________Diahan L. SouthardMolecular Genealogist

_______________________________Lars MouritsenDirector of Laboratory Operations

The Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project, Phase III was able to address the requested objectives by using genetic testing techniques to assess the probability of relationships. If you have any questions regarding the information in this report, please contact your project coordinator, or contact Diahan Southard at [email protected], or at (801) 462-1431.

Conclusion:

Scudamore/Skidmore Independent Lineages: 6701, 7291, 8894, 20071, 36639, 41512, and 41662 form unique Skidmore Lineages as each has a profile distinct from anyone else in the study (Figure 2).

What Next?Following are the recommendations made in the text to further your genetic genealogy pursuits. Besides these specific recommendations, you can always extend your knowledge of the relationships of individuals by conducting traditional genealogical research or by testing more individuals, both those with, and without known genealogical connections to current participants.

-p. 4 Lineage B upgrade 6940, 7294, and/or 40475

-p. 5 Lineage E Upgrade 10508

-p. 5 Lineage F Upgrade 58854

-p. 6 Lineage G Test more known cousins of Z097979, 43557, 57575, and 62028

-p. 6 Lineage G Upgrade Z097979, 43557, and 57575 to 43 markers

-p. 7 Lineage H Upgrade 8894 to 43 markers

Scudamore/Skidmore Independent Lineage H: Skidmore Lineage H is defined 8894, who was previously an independent lineage, and newcomer 57918, a descendent of Edward Skidmore of Farfax Co., VA. 8894 and 57918 share 24 of 26 markers giving them an MRCA of 20 generations with a 95% Confidence Interval of 5 to 52 generations. It is highly recommended that 8894 upgrade to 43 markers in order to narrow the time better define the relationship of these two individuals.

Skidmore Lineage A:

Page 8 Relative Genetics Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase III

Figure 1a- Haplocation: This diagram shows how subgroups in a family project are connected. To find out how genetically related two individuals are, count how many mutations, represented by boxes, separate the two individuals. The fewer boxes separating two individuals, the more closely they are related. See the text for more information. Continued in Figure 1b.

Blanton Lineage B:

DYS460

YCAIIa

7293 8104

23994

DYS439 DYS390

8134

729268304

A7

Each circle with a number represents a participant.

#

X6 Each square designates the specific lineage of the individuals with the letter defining the lineage and the number defining the haplotype in that lineage.Green denotes a single mutation, the site of the mutation is noted in black.

54612 Those individuals with bold italic type had 43 markers analyzed.

A1

DYS449

7558 7627A3

A2

6686

DYS393

7789

7983

A4

A5

A6

DYS442

6940, 7091, 7290, 7294, 21678,

40475, 41844,Z056842

B1

Skidmore Lineage B:

18588 23755 29534C1

7480 12148

C2

DYS19

Skidmore Lineage C:

40454

D1

22920

D2

DYS447

Skidmore Lineage D:

6646 1638257260

E1

35519

E2

GGAAT1B07

Skidmore Lineage E:

Skidmore Independent Lineages:

6701, 7291, 8894, 10508, 20071, 36639, 41512, 41662

69496

B2

DYS635 Z0-97975

B3

DYS442 DYS464c

70418

F1

58854

F2

DYS389I

Skidmore Lineage F:

10508

E4

DYS390 DYS460 DYS392

Page 9 Relative Genetics Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase III

Figure 1b- Haplocation: This diagram shows how subgroups in a family project are connected. To find out how genetically related two individuals are, count how many mutations, represented by boxes, separate the two individuals. The fewer boxes separating two individuals, the more closely they are related. See the text for more information.

Blanton Lineage B:

DYS460

YCAIIa

729268304

A7

Each circle with a number represents a participant.

#

X6 Each square designates the specific lineage of the individuals with the letter defining the lineage and the number defining the haplotype in that lineage.Green denotes a single mutation, the site of the mutation is noted in black.


DYS449

7558 7627A3

A27789

7983

A5

A6

DYS442

Skidmore Independent Lineages:

6701, 7291, 8894, 20071, 36639, 41512, 41662

70418

F1

58854

F2

DYS389I

Skidmore Lineage F:

Skidmore Lineage G:

8894

H1

57918

H2

DYS391 DYS439

Skidmore Lineage H:

Other colors denote a mutation that is shared between two individuals not in the same haplotype.

63912, 68685, 68781,

Z097935

DYS385b DYS19

G1

Z0-97979

DYS390

DYS439 (13)

DYS389II

62028

5757543557DYS439 (14) DYS439 (13)

G2

G3 G4

G5

Figure 2a: The genetic genealogy of Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage A according to information provided by the Project Coordinator, William Frank Skidmore and the genetic data. Genetic Genealogy continued in Figure 2b.

8134

7294

Henry SkidmoreRickmansworth,

Hertfordshirebapt. 1575

Rickmansworthaft. 1636

John Skidmore

Rickmansworthcirca 1600

Abraham Skidmore

Rickmansworth1773

Joseph Skidmore

Rickmansworth1773

Joseph SkidmoreRickmansworth

1816

Thomas Emmott Skidmore

8104

Sussex Co., DEd. 1774

Henry Skidmore

Sussex Co., DECapt. Henry Skidmore

circa 1750

Sussex Co., DESgt. Thomas Skidmore

circa 1750Sussex Co., DE

circa 1750

John Skidmore

Madison Co., KYCapt. William Skidmore

1799

Morgan Co. AL1842

Nathaniel SkidmoreMorgan Co. AL

1842

Richard Skidmore

7292 7293

North Carolina1780

Thomas Skidmore

Gaston Co., NC1808

William SkidmoreLincoln Co., NC

1817

Clayton Skidmore

7558

Franklin Co., TN1839

Andrew SkidmoreTennessee

1836

James Skidmore

7627

6686

Houston Co., TX1869

John Skidmore

7789

DYS439

DYS393

DYS460

7983

Relative Genetics Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase III Page 10

A7 A1

A4

A3 A3

A5 A6

A2

A1

B1

DYS390

23994

North Carolina1796

Joseph Cullen Skidmore

A1

YCAIIa

DYS449

DYS442

68304

A7

Each square with a number represents a participant.

X6 Each orange square designates the specific lineage of the individuals with the letter defining the lineage and the number defining the haplotype in that lineage.

Green denotes a single mutation, the site of the mutation is noted in black.


# Each bold square designates a new participant.

#Legend for Figures 2a-2e:

Other colors denote a mutation that is shared between two lineages that are not in the same haplotype.


The Most Recent Common Ancestor figures refer to the likely generation individuals within a lineage converge in a common ancestor

William SkidmoreClay, Co., KY

1790

72946940

Andrew Skidmore

1750Pendleton Co.

40475

Srgt. Edward Skidmore

1737Kent Co., DE

Joseph SkidmoreVirginia

1774

Capt. John Skidmore

1736Kent Co., DE

69496

Figure 2b: The genetic genealogy of Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage B according to information provided by the Project Coordinator, William Frank Skidmore and the genetic data. Genetic Genealogy continued in Figure 2c.

William ScudemoreKingswinford

1595

7480


B1

7091

Mayshill, WesterleighRichard Skydmore

abt. 1480

Mayshill, WesterleighJohn Skydmore

1510

Mayshill, WesterleighRichard Skidmore

1580

Thomas Skidmore

1605

21678

Richard Skidmore

b. by 1710

Mayshill, Westerleigh

Thomas Skidmore

1627Westerleigh, Gloucestershire

John Skidmore

1660Huntington, Long Island

Thomas Skidmore III

1650Queens Co., Long Island

7290

John Skidmore

1643Cambridge, MA

Joseph Skidmore

1706Little York, DE

B1

B1B1

B1

B1

41844

Timothy Skidmore

1760Suffolk Co., LI

Timothy Skidmore

1805Suffolk Co., LI

David Skidmore

1810Suffolk Co., LI

B1

Z056842

Nathaniel Skidmore

1788Orange Co., NY

B1

Thomas SkidmoreWashington Co., MD

d. 1807

Z097975

B3

DYS464c

DYS442

B2

DYS635

Figure 2c: The genetic genealogy of Scudamore/Skidmore Lineages C and D according to information provided by the Project Coordinator, William Frank Skidmore and the genetic data. No changes have been made in these lineages since Phase II. Genetic Genealogy continued in Figure 2d.

7294

Sussex Co., DECapt. Henry Skidmore

circa 1750

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage C:


B1

DYS394

29534

AmblcoteWilliam of

1625

AmblecoteIsaiah collier of

1665

12148

collier of KingswinfordWilliam Skidmore

KingswinfordFrancis Skidmore

bapt. 1632

KingswinfordJohn Skidmore

bapt. 1681

abt. 1590

7480

m. Ann GloverFrancis Skidmore

Kingswinford 1676

18588

23755C2

C2C1

C1

C1

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage D:

40454

William Scudamore

m. 1708

Frampton CotterellDaniel Scudamore

chr. 1711/12

Daniel Scudamore

m. 1772

22920

Daniel Scudamore

1718

BristolWilliam Scudamore

1738

m. Eleanor HayansWilliam Scudamore

1763

Skidmore Lineage DCommon Ancestor

DYS447

D1

D2

Figure 2d: The genetic genealogy of Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage E according to information provided by the Project Coordinator, William Frank Skidmore and the genetic data. The green boxes indicate the earliest genealogical point where the mutation identifying the lineage could have occurred according to the present genetic data. The site of the mutation is noted in black. Genetic Genealogy continued in figure 2e.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage E:

Relative Genetics Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project Phase II Page 13

GGAAT1B07

16382

Cumberland Co., Nova ScotiaWilliam Skidmore

1753

Parrsboro, Nova ScotiaWilliam Skidmore Jr.

bapt. 1803

William Henry Skidmore

1828

Eyam, DerbyshireRobert Skidmore

bapt. 1737

Sheffield CathedralGeorge Skidmore

bapt. 1769

6646

Charles Beet Skidmore

1804

E1 E1

Mary Skidmore

William Washington Skidmore

1836

Sidney Jeremiah Skidmore

1857

10508

35519

DunkertonJohn Skydemor

alive in 1441

Juror on 23Robert Skydmor

October 1486

Twinhoe in WellowRichard Skydmore

abt 1502

6701

E3

E4

E2

Skidmore Lineage ECommon Ancestor 2

DYS390

DYS437, DYS442, DYS446, DYS456, DYS458, DYS459a, DYS463, DYS464, Y-GATA-A10

DYS460

collier of KingswinfordWilliam Skidmore

abt. 1590

X

Eyam, DerbyshireArthur Skydmore

d. bfr 1629

Wardlaw, DerbyshireArthur Skydmore

Eyam, DerbyshireArthur Skydmore

d. 1693/4

57260

E1

This individual upgraded to 43 markers and was subsequently removed from this lineage and placed in the independent lineages. See the text for further details.

X

This dotted line indicates a questionable link

MRCA 8 generations

DYS392

Figure 2e: The genetic genealogy of Scudamore/Skidmore Lineages F, G and H according to information provided by the Project Coordinator, William Frank Skidmore and the genetic data.


Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage F:

Skidmore Lineage F Common Ancestor 1

DYS389I


It cannot be determined from the current genetic data if the DYS389I mutation occurred on the line of F1 or F2.

70418

F1

58814

F2

m. Susannah BlackmoreHenry Skidmore

John Skidmore

1792Lee Co., VA

68685

G1

Henry Skidmore

1819Lee Co., VA

Leander Skidmore

1826Lee Co., VA

63912

G1

DYS19

Abraham Skidmore

1829Lee Co., VA

James M. Skidmore

1855Harlan Co., KY

Z097395

G1

62028

G5

DYS390

DYS439

68781

G1

John Skidmore Jr.

1834Harlan Co., KY

Partial Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage G*:

X

*This diagram includes all who submitted genealogical information, all participants are represented in Figure 3 in the text.

Edward SkidmoreFairfax Co., VA

Jesse Skidmore

1790Virginia

57918

H2

Skidmore Lineage H Common Ancestor 1

MRCA 12 generationsDYS391

DYS439

8894

H1

It cannot be determined from the current genetic data if the DYS391 and DYS439 mutations occurred on the line of H1 or H2.

Scudamore/Skidmore Lineage H:

Relative Genetics Scudamore/Skidmore Family Genetics Project, Phase IIIPage 15

Skidmore Lineage A: 11 individuals in 7 haplotypes

Appendix A1: A list of all the participants in Skidmore Lineages A and B. Those in bold type had 43 markers tested. The column "Differs From Modal At" indicates the mutation(s) that individual carries from the first haplotype in that lineage; likewise the "Match %" column lists the percentage matched to that first haplotype. The "Haplogroup" column indicates the inferred large ancestral grouping each individual is likely to belong to based on the current genetic data. To find out more about haplogroups and see the individual genetic profiles for all individuals, please login to your family website at www.relativegenetics.com.

New Participant Change in self

Skidmore Lineage B: 10 individuals in 3 haplotypes

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At Match% HaplogroupBill Skidmore Z056842 B1 New - 100% G

Warren Skidmore T006940 B1 No - 100% GHoward Skidmore T007091 B1 No - 100% G

Howard H. Skidmore T007290 B1 No - 100% GEllis Skidmore T007294 B1 No - 100% G

Frank G. Skidmore T021678 B1 No - 100% GDennis Skidmore T040475 B1 No - 100% GBrian Skidmore T041844 B1 No - 100% G

Michael George Skidmore T069496 B2 New DYS635 96.20% GRobert Emerson Skidmore (FTDNA) Z097975 B3 New DYS442, DYS464c 93.80% G

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At Match% HaplogroupBilly Skidmore T007293 A1 No - 100% R1b

Barry Hastings Skidmore T008104 A1 No - 100% R1bCharles Skidmore T023994 A1 No - 100% R1b

Ron Skidmore T008134 A2 No DYS460 96.20% R1bGene Aaron Skidmore T007558 A3 No DYS439 96.20% R1bJames Edgar Skidmore T007627 A3 No DYS439 96.20% R1b

Wm F Skidmore T006686 A4 No DYS439, DYS390 92.30% R1bEric Skidmore T007789 A5 No DYS393, DYS439 92.30% R1b

George Skidmore T007983 A6 No DYS439, YCAIIa, DYS449 88.46% R1bRobert M. Skidmore T068304 A7 New DYS442 96.20% R1b

Wade Skidmore T007292 A7 No DYS442 96.20% R1b


Skidmore Lineage C: 5 individuals in 2 haplotypes

Appendix A2: A list of all the participants in Skidmore Lineages C, D, E and F. Those in bold type had 43 makers tested. The column "Differs From Modal At" indicates the mutation(s) that individual carries from the first haplotype in that lineage; likewise the "Match %" column lists the percentage matched to that first haplotype. The "Haplogroup" column indicates the inferred large ancestral grouping each individual is likely to belong to based on the current genetic data. To find out more about haplogroups and see the individual genetic profiles for all individuals, please login to your family website at www.relativegenetics.com.

Skidmore Lineage D: 2 individuals in 2 haplotypesName Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At* Match% Haplogroup

Andrew Skidmore T040454 D1 No 96.20% I1cGavin Skidmore T022920 D2 No 96.20% I1c

DYS447

Skidmore Lineage E: 5 individuals in 3 haplotypes*

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At* Match% HaplogroupDr. John F. Skidmore T070418 F1 New 96.20% R1bDr. Peter Skidmore T058854 F2 New 96.20% R1b

DYS389I

Skidmore Lineage F: 2 individuals in 2 haplotypes

*In Phase II this lineage had one additional individual that was moved to the independent lineages, see Figure 2d for further explanation

*Modal cannot be identified when there are only two individuals in a lineage, the locus shown is the point at which these two individuals differ


New Participant Change in self Effected by another's change

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At Match% HaplogroupJames Skidmore T018588 C1 No - 100% I1c

Richard Charles Skidmore T023755 C1 No - 100% I1cRobert Skidmore T029534 C1 No - 100% I1c

Ewart Burt Skidmore T007480 C2 No DYS19 96.20% I1cDavid. M. Skidmore T012148 C2 No DYS19 96.20% I1c

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II* Differs From Modal At Match% HaplogroupDr. Ed Skidmore T006646 E1 Upgrade - 100% R1b

John A. Skidmore T057260 E1 New - 100% R1bTim Skidmore T016382 E1 No - 100% R1b

Peter Charles Scudamore T035519 E2 No GGAAT1B07 96.20% R1bLee Skidmore T010508 E4 Yes DYS390. DYS392, DYS460 88.40% R1b


Skidmore Lineage G: 8 individuals in 5 haplotypes

Appendix A3: A list of all the participants in Skidmore Lineages G and H and the Independent Lineages. Those in bold type had 43 markers tested. The column "Differs From Modal At" indicates the mutation(s) that individual carries from the first haplotype in that lineage; likewise the "Match %" column lists the percentage matched to that first haplotype. The "Haplogroup" column indicates the inferred large ancestral grouping each individual is likely to belong to based on the current genetic data. To find out more about haplogroups and see the individual genetic profiles for all individuals, please login to your family website at www.relativegenetics.com.

New Participant Change in self

Skidmore Lineage H: 2 individuals in 2 haplotypes

There are 7 Independent Skidmore Lineages


Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At* Match% HaplogroupMilus Skidmore (FTDNA) Z097395 G1 New - 100% I1a

Walter R. Skidmore T063912 G1 New - 100.00% I1aJack Skidmore T068685 G1 New - 100.00% I1aJohn Skidmore T068781 G1 New - 100.00% I1a

James Tennessee Burke (FTDNA) Z097979 G2 New DYS19, DYS385b 83.40% I1aMark Skidmore T043557 G3 New DYS19, DYS389II, DYS439 75.00% I1a

Dr. Dwight V. Skidmore T057575 G4 New DYS19, DYS389II, DYS439 75.00% I1aJohn Steven Edgar T062028 G5 New DYS19, DYS390, DYS439 75.00% I1a

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At* Match% HaplogroupLeonard John Scudamore T008894 H1 Yes, was IND 95.40% I1a

John Robert Skidmore T057918 H2 New 95.40% I1aDYS391, DYS439

Name Case Number Lineage Lineage Changes since Phase II Differs From Modal At* Match% HaplogroupIan Skidmore T006701 IND Yes, was E3 N/A < 70% R1b

Robert Herman Skidmore T007291 IND N/A < 70% R1bAlan Skidmore T020071 IND N/A < 70% R1b

Ernest Roy Skidmore T036639 IND N/A < 70% E3bMatthew Scudamore T041512 IND N/A < 70% R1b

Lamoin Edward Skidmore T041662 IND N/A < 70% R1b

Documents

Scudamore/ Skidmore Family Genetics Study Phase III...2-38 generations, and is likely correct. However, further confirmation could be achieved if any or all of the other tested descendents