Upload
lelien
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SEP I 2 1985
far u*.*n Ot***
.»vw^* M •©8*Jfo
1;. IK
V 1
1 ^
1**1* .^...Cir-C-:v./j J f j t f •
*«f*. ti** ftfe ^m^-mtm^ WON*
e
Swp* r ' i i l * ' "-< f ;. i« ft ,.'
V-.tn,. ^ rv j i
t i l Chmm\I t« ' «r «-•:>! 2V1-.W. » p . t«** f f ind" nitt« copies
th* attached •'•".:'«<: al format is»tv tu4 «.re *o
,". :'"r , c«t«*:fK «on« . f t ***r pu&Uc i n f ormat ion
••' • VJ.'''- * ,, ; #
' ' * •• • Champ i*« b*« vi r i « M , . "••,!*.-« * t i ? i i i « * j . ^ v , . ^ . r „ , * V • '* ; J ' - ; " ^ ' present t i m a a d
fvf t h i s (Man ' f l l . • . l " f r * * t } i V « P ? r e c M t « 4 i f a p v r o w i
a p p r o v e d n l U t w p*.r™,.( hv tha t M « aa
«-» t » , . , t e < * > * p n a n « aura»#r 1.7J1> 654-2552.
YiMirs wery t r u l y ,
CHAMPLtf* PETROLRiJM COMPANY
^T. « . Car ter , I r . JRC/ABS
At t.achQent<»
Mr. David MaLdoojdrt Minnrals Mandg<>ment S*>fyic» Campus Box i ' f l
Corpus C h r i s t i State s 'niversUy Corpus C h r i s t i , TPXHS 7P<»J2
PLAN OF EXPLORATION
BLOCKS A-185, A-191 and A~l<>4
HIGH ISLAND EAST ADDITION
OCS-G 6209, 6211. and 6212
CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM COMPANY
FOUR ALI.KN CENTER
SUITE 1500
HOUSTON, TEXAS 7 7002
AUGUST 27. 1985
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Designated Company Contact I
Proposed Type and Sequence of A c t i v i t i e s and Approximate
Locat ions or the Exploratory W e l l s . . I I
S t r u c t u r e H.«p H I
Shallow D r i l l i n g Hazards And
ArcheoloR i ca I As sessment tV
D e s c r i p t i o n of D r i l l i n g Vessel V
L i s t o f D r i l l i n g Mud Addi t ives VI
O i l S p i l l Contingency Plan V l l Pro jec ted A i r Emissions V I I I Onshore Support Rase F a c i l i t y . IX
Guarantee Statement. . . . . . X
NOTE: Enclosed in the Plan of Exploration are CONT IPENTTAL papers. These papers have heen stamped CONF1 DENTIAL and are deleted from the copies heing submitted for Public Information.
PROPOSED TYPE AND SEQUENCE OF ACTIVITIES
AND APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF THE EXPLORATORY WELLS
Champ I i n Petroleum Companv was awarded the High Is land East Add i t ion
Blocks A-1 ft 5, A-193 .in A-194 OCS-0 6209, 6211 and 6212 leases in the OCS
Western Gulf o f Mexico 01] and Gas Lease Of fer ine held in August, 1984.
Seismic work has been performed over the block and r e s u l t s are addresser!
i n the Shallow D r i l l i n g Hazards Assessment section of t h i s Plan.
Fourteen (14) explora tory we l l s are planned to test the geologic features
in the b l o c k s . Proposed surface loca t ions , d r i l l i n g , completion t ime, and
true v e r t i c a l depth (TVDI are as f o l l o w s :
Ori11i ng ami
We 11 No. Proposed Locat ion Completion Time TVD
M. I . BLOCK A-l 1
A 5400' FSL and 1 700' FWL 200 Davs 20,000'
B 5400' FSL and 5700' FWL 200 Davs 20,000'
C 2700* FSL and 2600' FWL 200 Days 20,000'
D 2 7 00* FSL and 6000' FWL 200 Days 20,000'
E 100' FSL and 8000' FWL 200 Davs 20,000'
M. I . BLOCK A-12
F 5 SOO' FSL and 1400' FFL 200 Days 20,000'
G 2400' FSL and 1000' FEL 200 Days 20,000"
II 2800' FSL and 7200' FEL 200 Davs 20,000'
I 1600' FSL •Hid 800' FEL 200 Days 20,000'
J 100* FSL and 2600' FEL 200 Days 20,000'
M, I . BLOCK A-14
K 2600' FNL and 6500' FWL 200 Davs 20,000'
I. 2600' FNL and 2600" FWL 200 Da v s 20,000'
M. 1. BLOCK A- 1 5
M 1000' FNL and 7500' FWL 200 Days 20,000'
N 1500' FNL and 5500' FWL 200 Da y s 20,000'
A l l w e l l s w i l l be d r i l l e d as S t ra igh t holes.
Onshore support >pe*«tions should commence approximately seven (7) days
prior to d r i l i n g operations. Pending approval of the app l icab le Federal
Permits, i t ant ic ipated that the f i r s t wel l w i l l be spudded on or about
October \ t >, 198S, with explora tory operations on the block completed w i t h i n
the year o f 1987.
MUSTANG ISLAND AREA
I
/ 7
-r - i
"•Veil
—.
•*' '
V l C i N t T t M A P
1 hereOy certify i*ar tne obc*e •ri foseJ '0C0'iO"i ere correct
fabv/t 0 El iii tf«g \o 4007
•e C. ,v i ••.«.- mt £c-«v t •• • i f f . I i f f I f 1 0 ) ' , ; u ' ' / . » . : / •
Af y, . f • 4 «.a 1 .••) M *i K °t * *• 4 **• >• i: '•<'"
;>,CC?,OM •«• H ' s " 4 ,' '* f t it «.» ' . . 1 B 1 » 15 ii
• : * 4 . • .'»- * /.. • k*l >»," SB 1 ' SBS
6 . .wt'/ 1 •• M J C ' « .• ''• ft Hi • • " • ' i g c « a
> , SvSi , f *"i « 4 ' « : - '•'•»* • • J! > > ? *,•••»,••>; l l «c• ua i
•!•*.»• • » » . * « , ? • • » . '
^ MUX. • ! ' . ».- • 4 1 .>• •• • i i i 4 <
• • • •• :\ *• . J V M i • 4 "» t; l T » i / 0', *) " l •"» 0 * Obt
j ? >.-> • • > 4 1 t •. ! 5 . " » 4 . « • • > i i i s - .
- f 11 %* 6 •. •-' • 4 V / ' * 7 * S i * •>i' i t i » • '•>
• • *0 ' • ' ". it 1 . 4 f ' 4 » • 1 » * " i r
101 » S«. j>. 64 ' P*(J 7 .>. 4 ^ 4 »t* •.» i? k i •. H ;,««>.". * 4 1 H I a :* !.*S f i ' !4 ^6 ."If. H «.. . .% i \ . , 4 4 * 4 H i/V4 ~t • ' W -ft *. ' f
- * , SI , H S H
e H W P LIN PF !ROLEUM
. -> S A M.A I?, A 14, A ; 5
Vu 5 TANG 13 L AN ( t H
OFFSHORE TEXAS
• • •
SHALLOW DRTLUNC HAZARDS
VI'STANi'. ISLAND
HLOCKS A-11, A-13, A-l̂ > and A-15
CFFSHr,-" TEXAS
A surv-v ol po t en t i a l L iz i r i s as prepared and in er -. «.• ..-ii by
Hom Of t »*• - • • Survey*, Houston, Texas. The data was ibtain;< w t h a
' :«i i r i • sensor w • ph R»»sol ut i on «ph • «i • i ! survey over 'he »'nt i re tour
block area. The survey inc lude! a Suhbotrow P r o f i l e , .» > •• System,
Side *>can Ron*r, ' ' r ec i s ion Ec*"- •<nder m i a Marine Pro:. Magnetometer.
S -v work commenced >n I ::<•• . • ) , 1985, ind was complete 1 on July h ,
]M Water lepth in rh- hl.-.cks wanes from I 90 feet to 2'V f e e t .
I imp 1 i n ' s ReoloBint lias reviewed f \ " Hazard Survey r e s u l t s ,
'one l us i ons conci ruing i n d i v i d u a l we! i i . . . - ir<' summarised in the
attached l e t t e r and ind i i t - 1 rhat t"-« <<*.>•,• sed wel l s i ' e s iave been
toim.l ncceptaMe,
(
E chomplin
August 20 , 1985
Minerals Management Serv*'-. I b e r i a ' f l f f i c e Bu i ldmq 3301 Nor th "'useway Bo.jl^vard Metar ie , Lou is iana 700' '
RE: H a z a r d C u l t u r a l Survey Mustanq Is 'and Ar^a Blocks A - l 1, A - !? , ft-14, A- ;• O f f sho re . Texas
boot 'emen:
A h iqh r e s o l u t i o n leyphysiea' survey was c o ^ ' j r t e d over the above r a ) * i olocks f o r purposes le^t^mf nf no the safety of d r ' I M n a s ' t - i s an ' .u< resource ovaluat HI.
Analysis of tues* data show no ind icat v. ' of J r i l U n q hazards, sr n w e e ' r . or subme qed pre-, . tor!- : s i t es at th- d r ' H s i t e s 1 i s ted be'ow:
RLOCK A- 1 i ai r)-v BLOO BLOCK A-15 V
»8
• Ml
»:
Dw -on Exp lo ra t i on (ieoo!*ys»cis* Eas*-rn D i v i s i on /O f f sho re
DCR:it*
RESCRIPTTON OF DRILLING RIG
*H. d r i l l i n g r i g Which w i l l h , u ed to d r i l l the we l l s in Mustang
U i , r , . oc.s - 11. A-12, A - U and A-15 w i l l he . i . i l - r to the Western
^ t . u v a modern c a - t i U v e r iacx-up r i g designed f o r 250' water
depths . I t is oq-upp.-.: wi th a l l r e t i r e d safe ty and p o l l u t i , cont • o l
equipment. An equipment l i s t and s p e c i f i c a t i o n .Hetchea are included.
V s s r r r n cneanU, Inc. o f f i c e s are Seated at 515 s. uth Post OaK Road,
Houston, Texas.
Western Triton IV Cantilever jack-up for 250 ft. water depth
t
- »
!
1
— & -
•f-
^ I ^
- > -
I
— ^ — — fc*— ^ — *o
I i I I i ^ 8* * I i
—#—^—^—*-
— — ^ — — ^ -! ( - J I I
i l l [ ! I _ —^SL_ ^ — ^ — 4* a
-J^—^sjft—jf£—^—jjt— jfi—Jp a s i I i I
_ ^ > — ^ ^ — ^ w
- jr^— 4? 2 1 ! 1
1
- . ^ 5 ^ — > > 4? *
f— J stance Sttw o ' * P(#t 'omi -o t Rotary 4
>»iance * * i a* •
A
<fv«.Qnt 3 ai'Ov*ao<« comOmad - 0 0 * 4 \
A
/
\ 1 j \ v—
weSTCRM TWTON IV
HBBH HRHH PHI
Western Triton IV Cantilever jack-up for 250 ft. water depth
\
24":Jack Ho u i e L
30 A i r Gao *
2c 1' Total
water Cectrt
P e n e f a t i o n *76'
H ' - O " (one bay) recommended safe minimum he igh t ot leg above j ack i ng u n i t .
- r gap is dependent on hur r icane and n o n - h u m care seasor d i noted m Operat ing Manual.
OU. SPILL CONTINGENCY PLAN
Champ i .n has an approved O i l S p i l l Contingency Plan or ' : le w i t h
th* Miner; Is Management Service in M e r a i r i e , Louisiana. The Plan
ic l.-.des ( I ) not i f i c a t i o n procedures and i 1 i s t ing i f contact agencies
and personnel, (Z) response procedures f.tr s p i l l s of various s izes , (3)
a l i s t i n g of equipment, 1 4.) r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the operator personnel,
(55 t r a i n i n g procedures, and (f>) pre-- n t a t i v e measures to minimize
s p i l l s ar i po l l - i t ion .
Champ I i : : ' s membership in Clean Gulf Associates w i l l make ava i lab le
the Assoc i at t o n ' » o i l s p i l l cleamij. equipment *long 'he Texas and
Louisiana Culf Coast. A f u l l inventory ' f equipment ir . reined at
CCA >iper.it ine basses in Oalvest m and Roc V. port , Texas. «*pei. lent upon
weather condit ions ind 1 -at ion of S » i ? s , t h i s equ ip 1 ' .an be at the
d r i l l s i t e locat ion approximately '•«' ~ . 1 •• s t r <m i tockror t , >xa» w i t h i n 8
hours from the 11 m<> i r a i l is i n i t i a t e d .
Clean Culf Associates has 5 types ot "qmpment < I > fast response
open-sea skimmer. ' high volume vpen—«ea - * immer, (3) shallow water
skinnier, ( 4 ' •• iramuni i t ion . -juipmenr and beach cleanup system, and (5)
boat spray system.
ShouM the i r services be required, Peterson Maritime Services, Inc .
ran provide idd iv iona l men, equipment, >nd mater ia l s to handle bot
m i j o r and mi:: .r •» p i I i * .
PKOJECTEP AIR EMISSIONS
MUSTANG ISLAND BLOCK A-11 , A-12. A-IA and A-15
The e x p l o r a t i o n plan for Wustang Island Blocks A - l I , A-12. A-14 and A-15 w i l l consis t of d r i l l i n g , completion and/or abandonment opera t ions . Champlin an t i c ipa t e s the pro jec t w i l t last about 2800 days t o t a l whi le d r i l l i n g four teen (14) *e1U. Each wel l w i l l be d r i l l e d to an average depth of 20,000 feet for 1 t o t a l d r i l l i n g footage of 280,000 f e e t . The projec ted a i r emissions for the projec* are as f o l l o w s :
Major Source - Engines . ' t f s h o r e i
Emissions* Tons per Project
NiK
259.00
CO VOC
if. ?0. 7 2
:sp
!« .508
SO 2
1" 220
*Cale . i la t i - i , s HasU: T o f t horsepower requirement is based on 60 h p h r / f t . from Table k - i , " A t f r i ^ t U m i s s i o n s from Offshore U l and Gas Development m<: P . r«r« i o n " , Ei-A No. ^ W ' - 0 / 6 , J « l * W T , Enri - -miss ion rates are b,*ed m emission f a c e r s >m Tab e 3 . 3 . 3 - 1 , "Compilat ion o f Air Pol l . r * f l Kmission f a r r or a", Third e d i t i o n , EPA Report AP-42. Auisuct 1977.
M i nor Source*/, " f t shnr«- I
1. Mel i i - nf ers use J to Chi* ipera* L ' " U t r i p s dur ing the p r o ? e f t , based on dav.
x.fieeted to -a i k e 2800 round ^ximately 1 : >und c r i p per
Workboats and ,-, cr-vboats mav w,? -0,000 , a U * M of f u e l dur ing the p r o t e c t , ban"! on us i n * approximate! y l,5OT gal lons per day.
I n c i n e r t o r a are expected ro Huf,, cons >t oaper wastes dur ing the p r o j e c t , based on burning a p p r o x i m a t e 20f nounds of waste per dav.
•'•'X
He! i c o p i ' i r s Boats ' n c i n e r i t o r
178.00 ?.')«
1 54. o.o L i . no
per Project
. 728 70.00 l i .00
. 35 6 " i . 00
4.00
SO,
.25: 37.8 0.07
rOTALS $78.* rn 3.1* 84.73 68. 25 38. 1
\
Projected Air Emissions
Page 2
• C a l c u l a t i o n B a s i s : H e l i c o p t e r e m i s s i o n s based on T a b l e 3 . 2 . 1 - 3 ; b o a t s on T a b l e 3 . 2 . 3 . - 1 ; and i n c i n e r a t o r or, 2 . 1 - 1 o f " C o m p i l a t i o n o f A i r P o l l u t a n ' Emis s ion F a c t o r " , T h i r l E d i t i o n , r.PA Repor t A P - 4 2 , August 1977 . a b l e 3,2.3—1 g i v e s no TSP o m i s s i o n f a c t o r f o r b o a t s , so the TSP r a t e was approx ima ted by assuming t h a t boat TSP " q u a I t o 90* o f boat VOC w h i c h i s the r a t i o between TSP/VOG f o r I se i e n g i n e s Ln T a b l e 1 . 3 . 3 - 1 ,
T o t a l A l l Sources ' O t ' . s h o r e )
NOv CO VOC TSP SO
6 - 1 94 260.0 105.4 ' 55.
E m i s s i o n Fxempt ioo D e t e r m i n a t i o n
F x p l o r j t i o n o p - r a t i o n s i n Must inn ' s i a r e Located . p p r o x i m a t e 1 v W r i l e
The o n s h o r e support base f o r the pr 1 s 1 ami , v " / i s i p p r >x; mat e 1 v '0 m i l e s • l i s t a n c e of 16 m i l e s f rom the neares t l e v e l s a re is f o l l o w :
•i.i B l o c k s A - l I , A - 1 2 , A-14 and u f rom t ' i e L I V S C S I onshore a r e a , o- t wi i be l o c a t e d &L Harbor : . <n t h - M o c k . Rased on a
I a n - ' f a l l , t ne e m i s s i o n e x e m p t i o n
3.67 0,63 r,.-,s o f CO « 1,'tOOO - < 1.400) ' 1A1 = 17 ,069 .26 c o n e ' y e a r Ton ; o f N O x , V0C, TSP, . - 13. 3D = 51.11 ( 361 • 1198,8 t o n s / y e a r
The exempt i »n l e v e l s i r e abov* the e s t i m a t e d a c t u a l " m i s s i o n s f o r t h e p r o j e c t , so i t can be conc luded the p r o j e c t w i l ! have an i n s i g n i f i c a n t impact on the s i r q u a l i t v i n the p r o j e c t i r»-a .
Onshore Sonrees
I t can be r e a s o n a b l y assumed tha t -HI r emi s s ions f r o m o n s h o r e o p e r a t i o n s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h the p r « j e t shou-d be a p p r o x i m a t e l y the same as the m i n o r o f f shot • e n i s s t o n a , so i t in be c o n c l u d e d t h a t the onshore •• ons a l s o shou ld have an i n s i g n i f i c a n t impact on t h e a i r q u a l i t y i n
t h e a r e a .
DESCRIPTION OF ONSHORE SI'PPORT BASF. FACILITY
Support f a c i l i t i e s tor dt i l l i n g operations in Mustang Is land Blocks
A—11, A-12 , A-14 and A -1 *> w i l l Se located at the Magcobar f a c i l i t y at
Harbor I s l a n d , Texas. Magcobat has complete s t r v i c e f a c i l i t i e s
i n c l u d i n g dockage, he l i cop te r landing s i t * , bulk and sack mud add i t ive
storage and loading f a c i l i t i e s , and l i q u i d mud mixing and storage
f a c i l i t i e s . A communications and dispatching base is established and
w i l l be manned 24 ho • i c»>r dav.
*1
r.l!AHANT-.:' T̂ATFMF.NT
In che conduct of the proposed exploratory d r i l l i n g a c t i v i t i e s in
Mustang Island Blocks \->. 1, A-12. A-14 snd A-15, ChampIin Petroleum
Company guarantees the f o l l o w i n g :
l i The best avai lahte and satest technologies w i l l be u t i l i z e d
throughout the p r o j e c t . This includes meeting a l l appl icable
requirements for equipment tvpes, general p ro jec t layout , safe ty
system;?, and equipment and monitoring svstems.
2. A l l >pe rat ions - - t i l be covered by the MMS approved o i l s p i l l
contingency pi an.
: . Al 1 applicable f e d e r a l , state ind lo. i ! requirement s regarding
-miss ion and witer | u a l i t v ind l i s barge for the proposed
a c t i v i t i*»i, i s well M any r i - : erm-it condi t ions w i l l be complied