Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Search for Charginos andNeutralinos with the DØ Detector
Marc Hohlfeld
Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsayon behalf of the DØ Collaboration
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 1/17
Outline
• Introduction
• Tevatron collider and DØ detector
• Signal and background
• Selection criteria
• Results
• Summary and outlook
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 2/17
Introduction
• mSUGRA: five parameters ⇒ m0, m1/2, tan β, µ, A0
• R–parity: R = (−1)3(B−L)+2S ⇒ Conserved ⇒ LSP (neutralino) is stable
R–parity = +1 R–parity = –1 R–parity = –1Particle Symbol Spin Particle Symbol Spin Particle Symbol Spin
Lepton ` 12
Slepton ˜L, ˜
R 0
Neutrino ν 12
Sneutrino ν 0
Quark q 12
Squark qL, qR 0
Gluon g 1 Gluino g 12
Photon γ 1 Photino γ 12
9
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
=
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
;
Z Boson Z 1 Zino Z 12
W Boson W± 1 Wino W± 12
Neutralino χ0i
12
Higgs H0, H± 0 Higgsino H01, H+
212
Chargino χ±
j12
h0, A0 0 H−
1 , H02
12
• LEP limit for the chargino mass: mχ±
1
> 103.5 GeV
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 3/17
Tevatron and Data Taking
• pp collisions at center of mass energy of√
s = 1.96 TeV
PRL 95, 151805 (2005)
Update (2006)
• First DØ Run II Trilepton paper published in 2005 (∫
Ldt ∼ 300 pb−1)
• Now update with 3–4 times more data (∫
Ldt ∼ 1 fb−1)
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 4/17
The DØ Detector
PP
NORTH SOUTH
H−DisksF−DisksSi−Barrels
Superconducting Coil CPSCFT
FPS
Toroid Solenoid
Central PreshowerTracker (CFT)Central Fiber
Detector (CPD)
Scintillators
Tubes (MDT)Mini Drift
Calorimeter
Tracker (SMT)Silicon Micro
Forward Preshower Detector (FPD)
Tubes (PDT)Proportional Drift
• Detector comprises severalsubdetectores
• Vertex– and tracking detector
N Detection of verticesN Measurement of the momentum
of charged particlesN Measurement of the charge
• Calorimeter
N Detection of electrons, photonsand jets
N Measurement of the energyN Indirect detection of neutrinos
using missing transverse energy
• Muon spectrometer
N Detection of muonsN Standalone measurement of
muon momentum
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 5/17
The DØ Detector
PP
NORTH SOUTH
H−DisksF−DisksSi−Barrels
Superconducting Coil CPSCFT
FPS
Toroid Solenoid
Central PreshowerTracker (CFT)Central Fiber
Detector (CPD)
Scintillators
Tubes (MDT)Mini Drift
Calorimeter
Tracker (SMT)Silicon Micro
Forward Preshower Detector (FPD)
Tubes (PDT)Proportional Drift
• Detector comprises severalsubdetectores
• Vertex– and tracking detector
N Detection of verticesN Measurement of the momentum
of charged particlesN Measurement of the charge
• Calorimeter
N Detection of electrons, photonsand jets
N Measurement of the energyN Indirect detection of neutrinos
using missing transverse energy
• Muon spectrometer
N Detection of muonsN Standalone measurement of
muon momentum
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 5/17
The DØ Detector
PP
NORTH SOUTH
H−DisksF−DisksSi−Barrels
Superconducting Coil CPSCFT
FPS
Toroid Solenoid
Central PreshowerTracker (CFT)Central Fiber
Detector (CPD)
Scintillators
Tubes (MDT)Mini Drift
Calorimeter
Tracker (SMT)Silicon Micro
Forward Preshower Detector (FPD)
Tubes (PDT)Proportional Drift
• Detector comprises severalsubdetectores
• Vertex– and tracking detector
N Detection of verticesN Measurement of the momentum
of charged particlesN Measurement of the charge
• Calorimeter
N Detection of electrons, photonsand jets
N Measurement of the energyN Indirect detection of neutrinos
using missing transverse energy
• Muon spectrometer
N Detection of muonsN Standalone measurement of
muon momentum
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 5/17
The DØ Detector
PP
NORTH SOUTH
H−DisksF−DisksSi−Barrels
Superconducting Coil CPSCFT
FPS
Toroid Solenoid
Central PreshowerTracker (CFT)Central Fiber
Detector (CPD)
Scintillators
Tubes (MDT)Mini Drift
Calorimeter
Tracker (SMT)Silicon Micro
Forward Preshower Detector (FPD)
Tubes (PDT)Proportional Drift
• Detector comprises severalsubdetectores
• Vertex– and tracking detector
N Detection of verticesN Measurement of the momentum
of charged particlesN Measurement of the charge
• Calorimeter
N Detection of electrons, photonsand jets
N Measurement of the energyN Indirect detection of neutrinos
using missing transverse energy
• Muon spectrometer
N Detection of muonsN Standalone measurement of
muon momentum
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 5/17
Search for Charginos and Neutralinos
• Associated production of charginos andneutralinosN s–channel: via W bosonN t–channel: squark exchangeN Destructive interference
qqqq χ 0
1~χ 0
1~
~W +
Z
W+
l
l+
−
l+
ν
l+
l+
ν
χ~ 01
~ 0χ 1χ~+
χ02
~χ0
2~
χ 01
~
χ+~ χ 01
~
~~l+l+
q
+l
• Decay of charginoN W bosons and lightest neutralino, W decays into lepton and neutrinoN Slepton and lepton, slepton decays into lightest neutralino and lepton
• Decay of neutralinoN Z bosons and lightest neutralino, Z decays into two leptonsN Slepton and neutrino, slepton decays into lightest neutralino and lepton
• Final state consists ofN Three charged leptonsN Two neutralinos (LSP)N One neutrino
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 6/17
Search for Charginos and Neutralinos (2)
• Trilepton channel is the golden mode forchargino/neutralino searchN Signature: three charged leptons plus
missing transverse energy• Challenges
N Leptons have low transverse momentaN Small cross sections: σ×BR < 0.5 pb
(GeV)Tp0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
arb
itra
ry u
nit
s
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1Tp2Tp3Tp
pp
−
−
− ( s = 2 TeV)
10−3
10−2
10−1
1
100 150 200 250m(χ1
±,χ2o) (GeV)
: χ1o
χ2oχ2
o
χ1±χ2
o
χ1+χ1
−
σ
σ
(pp
(pp
χ
χ
1
1
o
o
χ
χ
2
2
o
o
,
,
χ
χ
2
2
o
o
χ
χ
2
2
o
o
,
,
χ
χ
1
1
±
±
χ
χ
2
2
o
o
,
,
χ
χ
1
1
+
+
χ
χ
11
−
−
) ) (pb)(pb)
53 80 105 129
10 • Four different analyses
N Update summer 2006I ee+track:
∫
Ldt ∼ 1.1 fb−1
I like-sign µµ:∫
Ldt ∼ 0.9 fb−1
N PRL 2005I eµ+track:
∫
Ldt ∼ 320 pb−1
I µµ+track:∫
Ldt ∼ 300 pb−1
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 7/17
Signal Monte Carlo
• Three reference points (Les Houches Accord)
Heavy Medium Light
m0 (GeV) 121 98 88m1/2 (GeV) 221 192 182tan β 3 3 3µ > 0 > 0 > 0A0 0 0 0
mχ±
1
(Gev) 150 125 115mχ0
2(GeV) 152 127 118
mχ0
1(GeV) 82 69 63
m˜R
(GeV) 153 129 119
σ×BR (pb) 0.058 0.14 0.22
• Mass of sleptons just above the neutralino masses: m ˜R
& mχ0
2
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 8/17
Backgrounds
• Background components
N Vector boson pair productionI WW =⇒ 2 leptons+E/TI WZ =⇒ 3 leptons+E/TI ZZ =⇒ 2 leptons+E/T or 4 leptons
N Vector boson productionI Z/γ∗ → ee, Z/γ∗ → µµ =⇒ 2 leptonsI Z/γ∗ → ττ =⇒ 2 leptons+E/TI W+jets/photon =⇒ 1 lepton+E/T
N Other componentsI Multijet production =⇒ No isolated leptonsI tt =⇒ 2 leptons+E/TI Υ → ee, Υ → µµ =⇒ 2 leptons
• All backgrounds except QCD from Monte Carlo
N QCD contribution determined from datainverting some of the lepton ID criteria
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
510
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
510
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
-1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
M(e,e) [GeV]
Eve
nts
/ 2.
5 G
eV
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Data ee→Z
tautau→Z e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b WW 2l + 2nuWZ 3l + nuZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCDSUSY
[GeV]T EE
ven
ts /
1 G
eV -1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 9/17
Selection Strategy
1. Dilepton+track analysis
N Require two reconstructed leptons (either e or µ)N Require significant E/T to account for escaping neutralinos/neutrinosN Require one additional isolated high quality track
I Higher efficiency than reconstructed third leptonI Efficient for e, µ and τ
• For some parameter points the third lepton has very low pT
• Dilepton+track analysis becomes inefficient
2. Likesign dilepton analysis
N Require two reconstructed leptons of the same chargeN Require significant E/T to account for escaping neutralinos/neutrinosN No requirement for a third object
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 10/17
ee + ` Selection
• Preselection
N Two good reconstructed electronsI pT > 12 GeV and pT > 8 GeV
• Anti–Z/γ∗ → ee cuts
N Small invariant massI 18 GeV < mee < 60 GeV
N Not back–to–backI ∆φee < 2.9
• Anti–tt cut
N Reject events with large jet activityI Sum of all jet momenta < 80 GeV
• Third isolated track
N Transverse momentum p`T > 4 GeV
I Isolated in tracker and calorimeter
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
Transverse momentum [GeV]E
ven
ts /
1 G
eV -1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 11/17
ee + ` Selection (2)
• E/T related cuts
N E/T > 22 GeVN Transverse mass mT =
√
pT · E/T · (1 − ∆Φ(e, E/T )) > 20 GeVN Significance of E/T > 8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
) [GeV]2
, Mtr1
min(Mtr
Eve
nts
/ 1
GeV -1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
)TESig(
Eve
nts
-1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
• E/T and track
N Product of E/T and track pT
I E/T × pT > 220 GeV2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
[GeV ^2]l3
TMET X p
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
^2
-1DØ RunII Preliminary, 1.1 fb
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 12/17
ee + ` Selection (2)
• E/T related cuts
N E/T > 22 GeVN Transverse mass mT =
√
pT · E/T · (1 − ∆Φ(e, E/T )) > 20 GeVN Significance of E/T > 8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
) [GeV]2
, Mtr1
min(Mtr
Eve
nts
/ 1
GeV -1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
)TESig(
Eve
nts
-1DØ RunII Preliminary 1.1 fb
• E/T and track
N Product of E/T and track pT
I E/T × pT > 220 GeV2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
Data
ee→Z
tautau→Z
e nu →W
ee→Y
tt 2l 2b
WW 2l + 2nu
WZ 3l + nu
ZZ 4l or 2l + 2nu
QCD
SUSY
[GeV ^2]l3
TMET X p
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
^2
-1DØ RunII Preliminary, 1.1 fb
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 12/17
Likesign µµ Selection
• Preselection
N Two good muons of same chargeI pT > 5 GeV for both muons
N Not back–to–backI ∆φµµ < 2.9
• Anti–Z/γ∗ → µµ cuts
N Small invariant mass for OS pairsI 25 GeV < mµµ < 65 GeV
• Tightened pT cuts
N pT > 13 GeV and pT > 8 GeV
)2 (GeV/c±µ±µm0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2ev
ents
/ 1
GeV
/c
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
)2 (GeV/c±µ±µm0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2ev
ents
/ 1
GeV
/c
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
-1D0 Run II preliminary, 0.9 fbsignal
WZWWZZ
νµ→W
incl→tt+Xνµ→bW+b+Xµµ→bZ+b
-τ+τ→Z-µ+µ→Z
-µ+µ→1sΥQCDdata
)2 (GeV/c-µ+µm0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2ev
ents
/ 1
GeV
/c-210
-110
1
10
210
310
)2 (GeV/c-µ+µm0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2ev
ents
/ 1
GeV
/c-210
-110
1
10
210
310-1D0 Run II preliminary, 0.9 fb
signal
WZWWZZ
νµ→W
incl→tt+Xνµ→bW+b+Xµµ→bZ+b
-τ+τ→Z-µ+µ→Z
-µ+µ→1sΥQCDdata
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 13/17
Likesign µµ Selection (2)
• E/T related cuts
N 15 GeV < mT < 65 GeVN E/T > 10 GeVN Significance of E/T > 12N E/T × pT of trailing muon > 160 GeV2
)2,next to leading muon) (GeV/cTE(Tm0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
2ev
ents
/ 1
GeV
/c
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
)2,next to leading muon) (GeV/cTE(Tm0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
2ev
ents
/ 1
GeV
/c
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
-1D0 Run II preliminary, 0.9 fbsignal
WZWWZZ
νµ→W
incl→tt+Xνµ→bW+b+Xµµ→bZ+b
-τ+τ→Z-µ+µ→Z
-µ+µ→1sΥQCDdata
)1/2) (GeVTESig(0 5 10 15 20 25 30
1/2
even
ts /
1 G
eV
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
)1/2) (GeVTESig(0 5 10 15 20 25 30
1/2
even
ts /
1 G
eV
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
-1D0 Run II preliminary, 0.9 fbsignal
WZWWZZ
νµ→W
incl→tt+Xνµ→bW+b+Xµµ→bZ+b
-τ+τ→Z-µ+µ→Z
-µ+µ→1sΥQCDdata
/c)2 (GeVT
next to leading p× TE0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
/c2ev
ents
/ 10
GeV
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
/c)2 (GeVT
next to leading p× TE0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
/c2ev
ents
/ 10
GeV
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410-1D0 Run II preliminary, 0.9 fb
signal
WZWWZZ
νµ→W
incl→tt+Xνµ→bW+b+Xµµ→bZ+b
-τ+τ→Z-µ+µ→Z
-µ+µ→1sΥQCDdata
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 14/17
Final Event Numbers
• ee + ` selectionN Expected: 0.76 ± 0.67 events Observed: 0 eventsN Signal expectations: 1.69 ± 0.01 – 4.73 ± 0.02 eventsN Dominant background: Diboson production, Z/γ∗ → ττ
• Likesign µµ selection
N Expected: 1.1 ± 0.4 events Observed: 1 eventN Signal expectations: 0.61 ± 0.01 – 3.76 ± 0.15 eventsN Dominant background: Diboson production, Z/γ∗ → µµ
• eµ + ` selectionN Expected: 0.31 ± 0.15 events Observed: 0 eventsN Signal expectations: 0.70 ± 0.03 – 2.45 ± 0.09 eventsN Dominant background: Diboson production
• µµ + ` selectionN Expected: 1.75 ± 0.57 events Observed: 1 eventsN Signal expectations: 0.47 ± 0.02 – 1.94 ± 0.08 eventsN Dominant background: QCD, Z/γ production
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 15/17
Current Result
• Three reference scenariosN "3l–max": Maximize leptonic BR of chargino and neutralino ⇒ mχ0
2≈ m˜
N "Large–m0": Decays via W/Z bosons dominant ⇒ Small leptonic BRN "Heavy–squarks": Relax scalar mass unification
⇒ Increased production cross section
Chargino Mass (GeV)100 110 120 130 140 150 160
BR
(3l)
(p
b)
×) 20 χ∼1± χ∼ (σ
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
)20
χ∼)>M(l~); M(10
χ∼2M(≈)20
χ∼M(≈)1±
χ∼M(
>0, no slepton mixingµ=3, βtan
-1DØ Run II Preliminary, 0.3-1.1 fb
LEP
3l-max
heavy-squarks
0large-m
Observed LimitExpected Limit
Chargino Mass (GeV)100 110 120 130 140 150 160
BR
(3l)
(p
b)
×) 20 χ∼1± χ∼ (σ
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
• Mass limit for "3l–max" scenario
N mχ±
1
> 140 GeV
• Mass limit from PRL
N mχ±
1
> 116 GeV
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 16/17
Conclusion and Outlook
• Summary
N New search for charginos and neutralinos with 1 fb−1 of DØ dataN No evidence for signalN Chargino mass limit of 140 GeV in scenario with enhanced leptonic BR
• Outlook
N Still room for lot of improvementN Update µµ + ` and eµ + ` channelsN Include final states involving τ ’s
Chargino Mass (GeV)100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
BR
(3l)
(p
b)
×) 20 χ∼1± χ∼ (σ
-210
-110
3l+X→ 02χ∼
±1χ∼Search for
)20
χ∼)>M(l~); M(10
χ∼2M(≈)20
χ∼M(≈)1±
χ∼M(
>0, no slepton mixingµ=3, βtan
LE
P
3l-max
0
large-m
-11.0 fb
-12.0 fb
-14.0 fb
-18.0 fb
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 17/17
Conclusion and Outlook
• Summary
N New search for charginos and neutralinos with 1 fb−1 of DØ dataN No evidence for signalN Chargino mass limit of 140 GeV in scenario with enhanced leptonic BR
• Outlook
N Still room for lot of improvementN Update µµ + ` and eµ + ` channelsN Include final states involving τ ’s
Chargino Mass (GeV)100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
BR
(3l)
(p
b)
×) 20 χ∼1± χ∼ (σ
-210
-110
3l+X→ 02χ∼
±1χ∼Search for
)20
χ∼)>M(l~); M(10
χ∼2M(≈)20
χ∼M(≈)1±
χ∼M(
>0, no slepton mixingµ=3, βtan
LE
P
3l-max
0
large-m
-11.0 fb
-12.0 fb
-14.0 fb
-18.0 fb
SUSY 2006, 06/13/2006 Marc Hohlfeld – p. 17/17