Upload
buzz
View
34
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to pairs in pp collisions at 1.96 TeV (CDF). Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835. MSSM Higgs. How do particles have mass? SM Higgs mechanism Problems with SM Higgs may be solved in MSSM Five Higgs in MSSM: 2 charged, 3 neutral - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to pairs in pp
collisions at 1.96 TeV (CDF)
Jessica LeonardOct. 23, 2006
Physics 835
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 2
MSSM Higgs How do particles have mass?
SM Higgs mechanism Problems with SM Higgs may be solved in MSSM
Five Higgs in MSSM: 2 charged, 3 neutral This paper deals with neutrals ():
1 CP-odd: A 2 CP-even: h (lighter), H (heavier)
MSSM parameters: mA
tan = vu/vd, where vu, vd are vev’s of neutral Higgs that couple to up- and down-type fermions
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 3
MSSM Higgs For large tan b, one CP-even Higgs has
similar mass, couplings to A Dominant production mechanisms:
Gluon fusion bb fusion
Dominant decay modes for A, mass-degenerate CP-even state: -> bb (~90%) -> (~10%)
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 4
The search at CDF Tevatron: CM energy 1.96 TeV Data collected at CDF II between 2002-04 Integrated luminosity 310 pb-1
-> for 90 < mA < 250 GeV/c2
One -> lepton + neutrinos (e, ) Other -> hadrons + neutrino (had)
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 5
CDF detector
=-ln(tan(/2))
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 6
Event selection For the -> search, each event must contain a
lepton candidate (e or ) and hadrons consistent with a decay.
Pre-select with a “lepton plus track” condition Lepton and track must both point into central cal. Must have azimuthal separation of > 10o
e/ determination: Electrons only deposit energy in EM calorimeter Muons seen in muon chambers outside cal.
Momentum of neutrinos: missing transverse energy
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 7
Event selection Hadron reconstruction
Energy from decays are deposited in a small, contiguous region
Four-momentum of this jet determined from tracks of charged particles and energies of 0’s within “signal cone”
Particles in a ring outside the signal cone must have very low transverse energy (< 1 GeV total). This isolation cuts out quark and gluon jets.
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 8
Event selection Hadron reconstruction
The jets must have 1 or 3 tracks (charged particles), and sum of charges 1
Invariant mass must be < 1.8 GeV/c2 ( = m) Require (Ecl/Psig
trk)(0.95-f)>0.1 to reject electrons Ecl: value of energy deposit in the calorimeter f: ratio of electromagnetic to hadronic energy Psig
trk: scalar sum of track momenta in signal cone
Require ETcl > 15 GeV to reject muons
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 9
Event selection Hadron reconstruction efficiency:
38% at pThad = 15 GeV/c
46% at pThad > 25 GeV/c
Probability of misidentifying quark or gluon jet 1.5% at ET
jet = 20 GeV 0.1% at ET
jet = 100 GeV
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 10
Monte Carlo Simulation Event generation: PYTHIA, with CTEQ5L
PDFs Tau decays: TAUOLA package Detector response: GEANT-based model
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 11
Backgrounds Dominant background: Z/* -> Second-highest: “fake” ’s (misidentified
quark or gluon jets) from processes like di-jet, multi-jet, W+jets, +jets
Third: Z/* -> ll, WW, WZ, ZZ, tt Background contributions determined by
Monte Carlo
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 12
Eliminating backgrounds Cut out low-energy multi-jet backgrounds
Each e/ candidate must pass pT threshold of 10 GeV/c
Each had candidate must pass pT threshold of 15 GeV/c, must also have opposite charge
Require |pTl|+|pT
had|+|ETmiss| > 50 GeV
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 13
Eliminating backgrounds Cut out W+jets backgrounds
Define: p
vis = (pl + phad) p
ETmiss = ETmiss
Require pETmiss > 0.6p
vis - 10 GeV/c Removes ~85% W+jets events, keeps ~95% of signal
Cut out Z -> ll decays with misidentified lepton: reject events with lepton + 1-prong had invariant mass within 10 GeV/c2 of Z mass
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 14
Signal Acceptance For mA = 90 GeV/c2, combined acceptance
for ehad and had channels is 0.8% For mA = 250 GeV/c2, combined acceptance
is 2.0%
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 15
Uncertainties Systematic uncertainties for particle ID
efficiency: had 3.5%, e 1.3%, 4.6% Uncertainties in trigger efficiency: ehad 2.1%,
had 1.4% Jet -> misidentification 20% (3% bg. overall) Uncertainty in signal acceptance
Due to event-level cuts < 2% Due to PDFs: 5.7%
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 16
Expected events from SM Number of expected standard model events
passing all cuts: 4965(stat)28(sys)25(lumi)for a range of 438 to 554 events
Breakdown: 405 from Z/* -> 75 from jet -> misidentification 16 from all remaining background sources
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 17
Data 487 observed events Reconstructed the mass (mvis) for each event:
invariant mass of visible tau decay products and ET
miss
NOTE: This is incorrect! Binned the data to compare with background
and hypothetical Higgs data No signal evidence observed for mA = 90
through 250 GeV/c2
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 18
Example plot: mA = 140 GeV/c2
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 19
Exclusion limits
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 20
Excluded regions Plotted excluded regions in parameter space
for four situations mh
max vs. no-mixing > 0 and < 0
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 21
Excluded regions
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard 22
Conclusions LEP excluded mA < 93 GeV/c2, higher mA for
small tan This search also excluded regions of higher
tan Results similar to those of D0