Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LABOR RELATIONS
June 1, 2011
Mr. Cliff GuffeyPresidentAmerican Postal Workers
Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128
Dear Cliff:
Certified Mail Tracking Number:7099 3400 0009 0514 4960
As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) for the Detroit,Michigan area mail processing study.
If you have any questions, please contact Jacqueline Adona at (202) 268-3800.
Sincerely,
Patrick M. DevineActing ManagerContract Administration (APWU)
Enclosure
475 l'ENFANT PLAZA SW
WASHINGTON DC 20260-4100
WWVV.USPS.COM (CA2011-464)
Apr-01-2010: Sep-3D-2010
Type of Distribution Consolidated: OriginatingFacility Name & Type: Detroit P&DC
Street Address: 1401 W Fort StreetCity: Detroit
State: MI50 Facility ZIP Code: 46233
District: DetroitArea: Great Lakes
Finance Number: .iiiiiii•••••••••Current 3D ZIP Code{s):! 481,482
Miles to Gaining Facility: 35.7EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager:! N/ASenior Plant Manager:! Jack Watson
District Manager:! Charles E. Howe
Facility Name & Type: Michigan MetroPlex P&DCStreet Address: 711 N. Glenwood
City: PontiacState: MI
50 Facility ZIP Code: 46340District: Southeast Michigan
Area: Great Lakes
Finance Number:••11111••••••••Current 3D ZIP Code(s):;480, 483
EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: NlASenior Plant Manager: Michael Kotula
District Manager: Charles J. Miller
Approval Date: July 29, 2009Implementation Date: Apr-01-2010
PIR Type: 1st PIRDate Range of Data:
Processing Days per Year: 310Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750
EAS Hours per Year: 1,625Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing!
November 28, 2008New Facility Start-up Costs Update I-------------~
Date & Time this workbook was last saved: 5/16/2011 9:06
Area Vice President:Vice President, Network Operations:
Area AMP Coordinator:NAI Contact:
Jo Ann Feindt
David E. WilliamsNancy SCheonbeckJug S. Bedi
PIR Data Entry Page
Approval Signatures
Losing Facility Name and Type:Facility ZIP Code:Finance Number:
Current SCI" ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
GaInIng Facility Name and Type:Facility ZIP Code:Finance Number:
Current SCI' ZIP Code(s):
Implementation Date:
Date Range of Data:
t.gSft«! FAC/fJTY"
Plant Manager:
Senior Plant Manager:
GAINING FAf}I.J1Y:
Plant Manager;
trc it P&DC~3,4 l2
~82
·P&DCt4112: ·1
83
PIRType:
10
Senior Plant Manager:
District Manager:
Area Vice President:
Executive Summary PIR Type: 1st PIR
Losing Facility Name and Type:Street Address:
City:
State:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Last Saved:
Detroit P&DC1401 W Fort StreetDetroitMI
481,482
Originating
January 0,1900 Date Range of Data: 411/2010 -
Gaining Facility Name and Type: .::M~i~ch:::iglt:a~n.:..:M=et::;ro:::.:P...:I::;ex:...:.-P.:::&=::D~C:.-- _Street Address: 711 N. Glenwood
City: PontiacSlate: ,:::M;:..I _
Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 480, 483
Savings/Costs
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Noo-ProceMing Craft Workhour Savinga (less MalntlTraos)
PCESJEAS Workhour Savings
Transportation Savings
Maintenance Sevings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year SavIngs
StaffingCraft Position Loss
PCESJEAS Position Loss
First-Class MallService Perfonnance (EXFC OIN)
First-Class MallService Perfonnance (EXFC 2 Day)
First-Class MallService Perfonnance (EXFC 3 Day)
Actual Change1st PIR vs Pre AMP
34,135,158
(6,804,329)
7,034,658
5,285,922
(953,239)
38,698,169
(44,111)
38,654,058
571
25
Detroit
0.00
0.00
0.00
Proposed Change1st PIR vs Approved
29,852,939
(6,810,550)
6,851,597
6,129,123
(1,774,305)
34,248,804
114,584
34,363,387
540
23
Metroplex
0.00
0.00
0.00
from Workhour Costs ~ Combined
from other Cun V$ Prop
from Other Curr V$ Prop
from TransportBtion HeRand TranspottBtion PVS
from Maintenance
from Spare Evaluation and Other Costs
from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
from stamng-Craff
from stamng-PCESIEAS
from SefVice Perlonnance & CSM
from SaM"" Parfonnance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
Customer Experience Measurement Q 1Residential at PFC level
Customer Experience Measurement Q 1SmallBusiness at PFC level
92.00%
87.90%
from Service Perlonnance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
PIR Executive Summarypage 3
Calculation References
Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Dam: PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR
Function 1 Wor1<hour Costs 147,874,765 143,592,546 113,739,607Non-Processing Craft Wor1<hour Costs 4,045,696 4,039,476 10,850,026(less Maintenance & Tr&l'l6pOrtation)
PCESIEAS Wor1<hours 19,229,651 19,046,589 12,194,992Transporlation Costs 54,649,473 55,492,674 49,363,551
Maintenance Costs 38,446,607 37,625,541 39,399,846Space Savings
Total Annual SaVings 264,246,192 259,796,827 225,548,023
Total One-Time Costs (158,695) (44,111)
Total First Year Savings 264,246,192 259,638,132 225,503,911
~
Craft Position Total On-Rolls 2,847 2,816 2,276PCESIEAS Position Total On-Rolls 176 174 151
vs1st PIR vs Proposed (Approved)Pre-AMP AMP Approved AMP
Function 1 Wor1<hour Savings 34,135,158 29,852,939 4,282,219 OK $4,282,219Non-Processing Craft VYorkhour Savings (6,804,329) (6,810,550) 6,220 OK $6,220(tess MalnUTrans)
PCESIEAS Wor1<hour Savings 7,034,658 6,851,597 183.062 OK $183,062
Transportation Savings 5,285,922 6,132,328 (846,407) -$646,407
Maintenance Savings (953,239) (1,774,305) 821,066 OK $621,066
Space Savings OK $0
Total Annual Savings 38,698,169 34,252,009 4,446,160 $4,446,160
Total One-Time Costs (44,111) 114,584 (158,695) OK -$158,695
Total First Year Savings 38,654,058 34,366,593 4,287,465 $4,287,465
~Craft Position Loss 571 540 31 OK 31
PCESIEAS Position Loss 25 23 2 OK 2
PIR Executive Summarypage 3
Summary NarrativeLast Saved: May 16, 2011
Losing Facility Name and Type: Detroit P&DCCurrent SCF ZIP Code(s): 481, 482
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Michigan MetroPlex P&DCCurrent SCF ZIP Code(s): 480, 483
Background:
The Great Lakes Area, with the assistance from the Southeast Michigan Performance Cluster, has completed the 1st(6-month) Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Detroit, MI Area Mail Processing (AMP). This 1stl PIR projects afull year savings and determines whether the Postal Service increased efficiency by consolidating originating mailprocessing operations from the Detroit, MI P&DC to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC. The AMP moved originatingletters and flats for the ZIP codes 481-482 to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC without modifications to the operatingplan. The transfer of volumes to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC was completed on January 26,2010.
The Detroit P&DC is an owned facility located approximately 36 miles from the Michigan Metroplex P&DC.
Financial Summary:
PIR vs Pre·AMPTotal Annual Savings: $38,698,169Total First Year: $38,654,058
PIR vs Proposed$32,248,804$34,363,387
The vast majority of the savings was due to the unprecedented reduction in mail volume over the last two years.
The consolidation shifted an approximate average daily volume of 1.050,499 originating first handling mail pieces(base period) from the Detroit P&DC to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC. There were service upgrades anddowngrades for Periodicals and Standard Mail. The Southeast Michigan Performance Cluster and Great Lakes Arearealigned transportation, improved operational efficiencies, and made personnel scheduling adjustments to protectservice and ensure cost reduction commitments were met.
Customer Service Considerations:
The Detroit P&DC EXFC First Class Mail Service Performance from TTMS for the AMP impacted ZIP codes is shownbelow:
I After AMP
Fiscal QuarterOvernight
Percenta e
IIQue:tlonResidential Top Sm/Med Bus
Two Box To Two BoxQ1 92% 88%
Q4a 94% 91%
Q8a 94% 90%
Q12a 89% 85%Q16a 67% 54%Q19 86% 84%
PIR Summary Narrative
The Michigan Metroplex P&DC EXFC First Class Mail Service Perfonrnance from TTMS for the AMP impacted ZIPcodes is shown below:
(13) (14) (16) Residential Top Sm/Med BusTwo Box To Two Box
After AMP
Fiscal Quarter
032010
042010
012011
022011
OvernightPercentage
97.04%97.34%
2 DayPercentage
94.84%95.24%
3 DayPercentage
93.10%92.72%
Q1Q4aQ8a
Q12aQ16aQ19
92.0%
93.6%
93.7%
88.9%
88.5%
88.1%
87.9%
91.4%
89.8%
84.6%
53.6%
83.6%
Transportation Changes
The approved Detroit AMP projected an annual transportation cost of $846,407. The initiatives put in placenationwide and the overall consolidation of some routes in both Detroit and Michigan Metroplex show a PIRsavings of $5,285,922. This number is misleading however when you look at the figures that actually applyto the Detroit originating AMP.
In order to improve service between Detroit and the Michigan Metroplex. three collection mail hubs wereadded.
Staffing Impacts:
The approved Detroit AMP proposal identified a net reduction of 31 craft and 2 EAS employee positions due to theconsolidation of some originating operations to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC. Complement data at the end of PQ4,PFY 2010 shows the complement has been reduced by 571 craft employees and 25 EAS employees through attritionand transfers. Local initiatives involving staffing/scheduling study impacts and the retirement incentive in 2009contributed to the larger than expected complement reduction.
The staffing impacts and management-to-craft ratios are summarized below.
PIR Summary Narrative
Detroit, MI P&DCMichigan MetroplexP&DC 1 : 25
MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1
(1 :22 target)
1: 24
1 : 22 1: 30
MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1
(1:22 target)
1 : 19
1: 24
, Craft =FTR+PTR+PTF+Casualsl Craft =F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining
Maintenance Impacts
The AMP projected a net annual savings of $821,066 in Maintenance. This savings was attributed to the DetroitP&DC labor and non-personnel costs associated with no longer maintaining 9 AFCSs, 2 DPRCs, and 2 NEC.
One dual pass rough cull (DPRC), 2 DlOSS heads, and 1 DlOSS machine were moved from the Detroit P&DC to theMichigan Metroplex. In exchange, the Michigan Metroplex sent 2 DBCS heads to Detroit. Due to these proposedchanges the AMP expected to see a savings of $821,066. Instead, a cost is reflected in the worksheets of over $1million dollars.
There are several factors unrelated to the AMP that contribute to the $1 million net cost in Maintenance. The largestmonetary driver was the significant increase in authorized custodian staffing. LDC 38 staffing increased from 38custodians before the AMP (as indicated in the original P0408 data), to 80 after the AMP (as indicated in the PIR dataand supported by the approved and active MS-47 staffing package at the time). The rationale for the increase incustodians was the new Metroplex facility which is more than double the size of the former Royal Oak buildings. Thetransition from the former Royal Oak buildings to the new Metroplex building was after the timeframe of the P0408data but prior to the implementation date of the AMP. Thus the increase in custodian staffing is outside the scope ofthe AMP.
Space Impacts and One TIme Facility Costs:
The AMP projected $158,695 of one time costs. The 1st PIR identifies a one time cost of $44,111 to relocate oneDPRC and other mail processing equipment from Detroit to the Michigan Metroplex.
PIR Summary Narrative
Conclusion
Volume loss at Detroit, MI P&DC and Michigan Metroplex, MI P&DC drove complement reductions through variousefforts including early retirement incentives. The savings associated with this AMP needs to focus on reduction atDetroit, MI P&DC. Comparison of data used during the feasibility study and the 1st PIR indicate a 17.5% reduction inannual TPH volume at the Detroit, MI P&DC. Based on the approved AMP, Detroit, MI P&DC was expected to reducestaffing by 144 craft positions. The difference between the 1st PIR and the proposed for Detroit, MI P&DC was 423craft positions, attributable to volume loss and other local initiatives.
PIR Summary Narrative
.'Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
Last Saved: May 16,2011
PIR Type:Implementation Date:
1st PIR04/01/10
Losing Facility: -::D,...;e.".tr.".o""it_P.".&.".D....:C'-- _District: Detroit.c:....:.""'--'--=--- _
Residential Top ISmIMed BusTwo Box To Two Box
Q1 92% 88%
Q19 86% 84%Q16a 67% 54%
Question#
Fiscal Quarter
Detroit
(7)
Q4a 94% 91%1---.=.c.;~'-----1---::..:.:.:c-'-~~---"-..:.:.:-"--t--:"O':'=---+____::~___;~-------+--...:..c~-_1
_____+----------+-------+__~Q8~a'---+__---94-%----__0_901_1>__Q12a 89% 85%After AMP
Gaining Facility: Michigan MetroPlex P&DCDistrict: Southeast Michigan
(16)(15)(14)(13) Question 'II I# Residential Top I SmIMed Bus
+---------+-----l-----+------+-----1~Bo.ccx_-I_T:-;opJwo Bo~_
Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day 3 Day I__+-'-P::,erc~e;.:n,:,;ta:;;g'-'e_l-C-P-'e;;rcTe"'nita'.;;g"-e=-!_Percentage+ .....~Q'i:1-+--_9::2:::.0c:%=- _._87_.9_%__.
032010 97.04% 94.84% . 93.10% -- Q4a 93.6% 91.4%042010 97.34% --95.24% -t----;;9;;;2"".7;;2;,;OIi'o:..-+--;;Q8~a:.....-+---:::93.7% 89.8%
----+-'-----'-'--'-"--+-'-------j--'-=-"--'---+---;;2';;;=--+-- .:'---t--'-'-'--:..:.....--j1-_-:0::1-:2.~01'_:1--_!_-----_-.-_+------+--_--.-.+-_:Q~12"'a=--+__ 8_8.9.1!.....__. 84_.6_%__
Q16a 66.5% 53.6%Q19 86.1% 83.6%
F-1 After AMP'i
(13) Notes: _
.. Customer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement In 2010 Data reflects most recentty quarter
Q 1 Overall Satisfaction (OveraH Experience)
Q4a Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)08a Satisfaction with Sending (Experience with tending)012a Satisfaction with most m.quently visrted PO (Experience with most frequently visrted PO)Q 16a Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact 'Nith USPS)
019 Likely 10 recommend the USPS
PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
PIRT
ype>;
+..l_;::st:::P-=~R':"P;iOR-::",","",,==.;-:""""'==od=""'''''''''P''
...-01
0/0
10
012T012~D1'5Tci15D1'5Tci15017T0170187018020i02002170210227022029702'90i8702'B""030703004010<
40
060I
000~06fT007070
I070rn
iTi4
12
5/1
25~~
1427"461dU2i58i"208
2i597209"21072102'11i"211212T2122
13
/21
3~225i225229i229~231'72312
35
/23
5261726127'1i2'7127278922B'fT28129'1i291
292i"89'2du~
44
1/8
11
4<42/«2
49
1'0
49
1~5
54
/55
4
~56
3/5
63
56
4/5
64~6O
fT6076i2i"6"12~62'07620~6TiT677
81
1/8
11
du
81'2"i812891T891
a92789idU~9
62
/89
2d
u002T002
033J
033~044/~"
IC
om
bin
ed
Fa
cilities
I
Typ
eo
fDistrib
utio
nC
on
ao
Jktate
d:
Originating
Wo
rkho
urC
osts
·Com
binedF
acllitle
sL
utse-i;
May
16,2011
Date
Ran
ge
ofD
ata:A
pr..o
1.2
01
0to
.....,..,.,.11'
hlP
IR$6
67
97
.$0$0
$1
07
73
2.
$0$1.970,071
1.203.988$15,288
18.382$0$0$0$
4,4
38
,09
2$321,011
$454,""7
~$0
nos$
17
92
658$2.898.407$6,678.205
52<$20.228$41.316$
81
36
24,006,852
$14366-31$1.550.561
$102.009$364,272
$1.95-4,568$4,532.088$19<
47350$3.522.768
$7
17
&45
$3.076$1.378,220
$711.556$634.550
$1.301$0
~$0
!£$0
$246,120$131,673
$299.239
$80,860
$429,490$0i828':414$479.863
$2.836.197$22
456$~1.630
$8
19
91
0$0$0$891.289
$6
60
0$30.168$0$0
$0
$897.525$l.090.a...O
PIR
'No
rkho
ur
Costs
-C
ombined
FacUlties
.'
('
0....-
.........0
45
/04
50
46
/04
60
47
/a..70737"0730747074075i075083T083084i084087i087009T089090
10
90
091i09109270920937093084i0840
95
/09
5096T096"fi9fT0970
98
10
98~"1OOTi'OO"i03Ti03"i107T1O'11171111
12
/11
21"15i115TI'671161
17
/11
71207120121T121128T128i'327"1321'34Tf341
35
/13
5'i'36T1361
37
/13
7~1
39
/13
9143/1~3
~14
5/1
45~"W
TW
15OT15O16Oi"16O1687168169716917OT17O"ffi717818O
Ti8O185T1"a5186i186200
12
00
23872382397239263726326<
/26
<2667266267T26f273TV
328372832
84
12
84
28372832'957'2952
96
/29
6~3
25
/32
5~/340
3517351405/0405"4437443444'7«4~4
46
/44
6'44i7«8481i""481m
7493585i58561'976'19~n
61
77
6i13T
ii381T
Ii148
15
/81
58167i1'6893'78938
9-4
/89
4
'''PIR
$<J~$173.318$
0$
13
22
80
$1
20
)23
$1
27
46
9$
16
8,8
86
$94,758$3,902
.Blli
$5988
$171792
$1
08
62
3$138.542
~$5
79
4$596
821$
1,3
90
$7,876.828$1.617.310
$4
66
$151,614$86,572514,921$27,271~$896.382~
$3
97
06
24
$1,311.331$3.528$14,~2
$487,155$
33
95
43
$3
45
33
9$884
99
0$
1,9
84
$4
57
78
2$255
$1
25
07
5$339,048$308.053$160,167$812,754
$24,219$
70
44
7
~$235$
0S2
916$11-i,600
$0
'35
$7,347$315,273
$16.268$<J$
0
!£$0
$1£12$
48
6353$
0$0$0$
0$
0$<J$
0$0
$0$552,0490
$6
059,728$<J$76,827$
0$0$0$0
$5
,69
29
87
$462.918
PIR
Wo
rkho
urC
osts
-C
om
bin
ed
FacW
ties
{11
0""
..........'895"i'i95896
Jageiif7897i98789i699i89991"8i91i~93O
i93O9637963~9
65
/96
5~J0
35
11091
12
411261127Ti30T1'311232i2337"E4/2515/2
74
/28
2/2
92
/29
4m
4T
m/3
32
/33
4/3
36
/«1
14
61
du
14
82
146-4/4
60
1<S
4'-494IS
Ol
ISO
'1515515881793
n
h.P
IR
$7.254$396127$0~~$1
11
78
69
0$3,351.862
i2."81529
$1-45$0$8
281$41,31-4
~$1.347.367$618.033$337.865
~$0
$5.387$
63
21
9$33.430
$796$0$6,<403
$5
1'
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
$2
68
8$279.722
$1,283,712$0$58<
4Hl
$0$
09.167
Slu
na
$70,755
PIR
'Workhour
Costs
-C
ombined
Faclltties
$113,7»."7
10
...]0-1)%
,..PIR
13:
riAL
40<
riAL
16,')';;'
'''PIR
12411
stP
IRw
fl'rop
oM
d
2"""
No:C
a$cN
oC
ak:
.........A
nn...._
(1,1S0,330}
~3{},&%
,..PIR
\Ul
1at~YaPtopooa.d
oo£o0" o'0'00" o'0'0'0 o'0'0
1.802
),755,,"1
.........A
nn
aalWo
rtho
lIrs
2,S6i,S
17,U1
12
6%
m,0
7t,1
33
1s
tptR
(11'1at",Ya~
(VI
NO
TE
S'
~1til!ll!}'"~_@"'lt'.l!
PIR
VVorkhourCosts
~C
ombined
Facltitles
Wo
rkho
ur
Co
sts
·Lo
sing
Facility
1..-.Sa
nd
:M
ay16.2011
PlRT
ype":.:~~st'i:-,:~Rc;P1"'R'-:ooIumns==7:"~"'''''''''"''=='d'''''''=F=''''PIR.
$0
$0
$6.600
$654$0 $0$
60
9,2
7.
$302.517$3.556
$0
~10.~
$599.305 $0~29
.•90
$80.860
$75,276
$68.540
$12.775$0
$0 $0$
1.6
7.
$0
$0$0$10
$0
$41.316
$0$0
$0
$2.108
$20,228$13.315
$0$0$0
$0$0 $0
$1.734 $0$38.661
$1
6M
06
$107.108
$694.465
$185.195
$578.905
$1.920.923
$2.268.682
$1.792.856$2.844.915$3.103.844
,.htp
tR
&ep-30--2010
toA
p!'-ol-2G
l0D
at.R
ang
e01
Data:
!...Fu
nctio
n4
LO$lng
Faclllty;~De=tro-"II-"P,-,&=;DC,-,,-_
Type
of
Distribution
Con
aolidated
:O
Mginating
(1)
PIRW
orkhourC
osts·
Losing
1lJlI
t16A
nn
UA
lWo
rtho
ur
CO
$tJ
$219,866$(l$0
$62,128$27,53$
0$61
$988~
$0390
$704$81
$2,117$1,718
$26,071$4$0
$1,025,23777.992
$275,144$23,782
$309,828
htP
fR$30,168~$0$
0$897,525$380.107$0
~$509
$742.595$750.588$0$102,918$173,318
$0$132,177$
12
0.n
3$127,469$168,886
$94,758$3,902$3,414$5,988
$171,792$108,623$138.542
$1,642$5,794
$594,555$1,390
$6,522,386$1,616,699
$488$151,614
$1,927$2,961
$27,271$186,642$896.382
$490$1,869,334
$611,377$3,528
$14,642$467,155$339,543$345,339$684,990
$1,984$457,782
$255$125,075$339,048$308,053$160.167$711,123$24,219$70,447
$4,881$235$
0$2,916
$114,600$0$135
$7,~7
$3
15
27
3$270$
0$0$0$
0$192
$465,949$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
PJRW
orkhourC
osts-
Losing
11
htP
fR
$0$0$
«7
.80
8$2(1.(81$0
$36.239$0$0$0$0$1.!>ol9.608
$98,058$725ol
$388.902$0$1.119.(99
$8.105$5.385,108
821.828$32.(81$86,529
$1
(5$0$8281
PIRW
or1d1ourCo
sts·Losing
,.1s
tPtR
~
13
1StP
fR
NoC
llIeN
oCllIe
NoC
llIeN
oC
No
CllIe
No
CllIe
No
Cllle
No
CllIe
No
Cllle
NQe.tc
NOCOk
No
Cllle
NoC
llleIN
oC
llleN
oC
llle
NoC
llle'N
QC
;iC
NoC
llIeN
oC
llleN
oCllIe
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
NoC
llIeN
oC
al.
NoC
llIe'N
oC
llleN
oCllIe
NoC
llIeN
oCllIe
No
CllIe
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
C¥
c'N
oC
al.
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
NoC
llIeN
oC
llleN
oC
llleN
oC
llle
No
Cllle
No
Cale
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
CllIe
No
Cllle
NoC
llIeN
oC
llleN
oC
llleN
oCllIe
No
ca
kN
oC
llleN
oC
llleN
oCllIe
NoC
llIeN
oCllIe
No
Cllle
No
CllIe
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
NoC
llIeN
oC
llle
No
C8lc
No
Calc
NoC
llIe
NoC
llIe
No
Cllle
No
Cllle
No
Calc
NoC
llIe
No
Cllle
NoC
llIe
No
NoC
llIe
NoC
llIe
NoC
llIe
~
"0
","
,au..
~I
htP
lR
00"0"0"0"0"0"0"000000"000"0"0000000000000000"00000~00000"00000000"0000000000000"000000000000"00
1atPlR
~1atP
iR~
"MIU
IFH
PV
okfmt,
(')
PIR
Wor1<:hourC
osts~
Losing
$159,747,001
-2j,3~~
I~16,1&0,,.61
(26.1at'""'-....P
ropou
d
&)
I'10
Pfo
po
ud
Ifa
tPeR
Annll&
lWon:hour
COIlt&
.
========================================================;_~~~?E~if
(1.,.
1213
AnnualW
orkhoursA
nnualP
roductlvttv
Pn
>p
ou
db
tptR
--,.tp
tR
No
CloI<
2,021
(24.1d~
...~
(7......'531)11642.lM
ll444
-17.5%~n,:nf,
21.9%
PIR
World1our
Co
sts·Losing
PIRT
ypo':.;!u.iC.t=:-c~,-,Rp'"'R,"""""""",==-'-~-C"",=uo7",.....,7""---'F"m7PIR.
(1)
Gaining
Facility:
Michigan
/,IatroPia.
P&D
C
Typo
ofD
istributionC
onaolktotad:O
figinating
Wo
rkho
urC
osts
·Ga
inin
gF
acility
lfl;tS
ave<!:M
ay
16
,2011
Fu
nction
1
""10iii:O
i......iii:O
i$5&
.37
Date
Ran
ge
ofD
ata.:A
IW-.4
1-t0
10
toh
p-3
0-2
01
0"11ltF'tR
$667,974$0
$0$1,077,324$0$1,970,071
$625,083$15.288$18,382$
0$
0$0$4,401,430
$319.278
$2
£9
.2n
$1.482$0
$0$0$53,(91
$3,574,561$416,210$0$0
$81,362$3.288,740$0$0
$508$288,415$
0$
2,=
,$4
6$1,107.797$1.254,086
$23,380$2,422
$1,378$711,556$621,775
$1,301$0$0$0$0$0$80.714$63,033
$223,963$0$0$0$229,109
$69,397$915.273
$18,900$39,313
$210,636$0
$0
$584,182$0
$0
PIR
Wor1dlour
Co
sts~
Gaining
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0$0 $0
$0 $0 $0$0 $0
$0$0
$0$0
$0 $0 $0$0 $0 $0
$0$0 $0
$0
$0$0$0
$0$0$0
$0$0 $0 $0 $0$0$0$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0 $0$0$0 $0 $0
~$0
$0$0~$0$
0$0
645
$404
$612
$155
$103
$2.267
$15,998
$71.960
$101,631
$705.9504$
0
$624,070
$710,733$0
$2,101
$1,354,442
..1IJtPlR
$0
$0$01
$0
$0
$0 $(I$0
$207
~$856,932
,1.$30,792$1,415,017
$1,767,534
(II
PIR
Workhour
Costs
-G
aining
(1)
aaaaa
NoCOlON
oCelc
NoC
eIcN
oCNo
CeIc
NoC
eIcN
oCeIc
NoC
eIcN
ocNo
CeIc
NoC
eIcN
oC"'"
NoC
eIcNo
CeIc
NoC
eIcN
oCeIc
NoC
elcNo
CeIc
NoC
elcN
oCelc
NoNoC
elc
NoC
'"
,.1
1tP
fR
$(I
$1()ol,SlI2
$5,81824S$0$40,588$(I
$0$0$0
$3,7.(3,379$364,920$(I
$7
22
4$a$0$0
$5,793.583$53a,a34$0$
0$
0$
0$
0$41.314$34,151
$1,347,367$
61
M3
3$337,865
$7.S78$0$5,387
$6
32
19
$33.43a$
0$796$0
$6,4a3$514$
a$0$0$
a$0$0
$2,688$
27
9,m
$1283,712$0$584,147$(I
$0$9,167
$1
62
,n8
$70.755
PIR'II'or1<hourC
osts-
Gaining
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000000000000000000000000 00
IH-H-H-H-H++++++++++++++++f-+-f-+-H-H-I-HI-H-H-H-H++++++++++++++++++f-+-f-+-H-I-HI-HI-H-H-H++-I!~ 1
~ ~ 8-1 l~
,.1s
tPiR
PIR
Workhour
Costs
-G
aining
11
·lL7
%
\.$11,618(079)
htP
iR
P....,t
H.P
/.10.8%
p....,t
(50£.517)
1,2
h.
·28.1'Y~
htp
tR
{lM
.1t3
}
e18.G4/.
,.
1,71&,&
14
- An
nu
alWo
rtho
urs
(12)1.tP
W'.'n
PT
.AM
P\1.t~
..
Pn
lpo
Qd
-20.7%
(1,G
K,7t1
,....)
~9.8%
1atPIR
:
1,1
8!,2
b,3
7&
- Aftnual
F"HPV~IfM
(27)N
OT
ES
:======================================_
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
li.:~~$:~'ftW#ifT.~~j
PIR
Workhour
Co
ots·G
aining
Other Workhour Move Analysis
Totals $7.648.310 $3.011,.0439
PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities
252,615 2-4lU17
"'08lw CnIr o,.(\lIM~ P>g to 'T_-Po-I!'_r..T l<lT,....pvlltab
-....- lI>~lllb...or
161= 7,e..I6,310 8,01 L439
$0
,$0
"oT"'"
........oooo
oTOl:alA
"= =-=_ ($I
$0
$0$0
$0
PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities
Staffing· PCES/EASLast Saved; May 16. 2011
PIR Type: '" PIR
FI~'
37
17
13
84
-1e.S%
,.ptA VI' PropOMd
-20.8%P.rtw'lt
(2l_ ........PCES-01 1
EAS-25 1
EAS-25 IEAS-25 1
EAS-24 2
EAS-23 2EAS-23 1
EAS-22 2EAS-22 IEAS-21 1
EAS-21 2EAS-20 •EAS-20 0
EAS-20 •EAS-20 1EAS-19 0EAS-19
EAS-19 1EAS-19 3EAS-19 0EAS-19 1EAS-18 1
EAS-18 3EAS-17 ,EAS-17 ••EAS-17 "EAS-17 •EAS-17 7
EAS-16 1EA$-15 0
EAS-12 I
101
30 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
27 SUPV MAINTENANCE PLANNING/ASSETS
26 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
28 SUPVTRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS
25 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
24 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
23 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
31 SECRETARY (FLO)
Totlla
29 NElV'.URKS SPECIALIST
19 MaR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
18 MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ANAlYST
16 INDUSTRIAl ENGINEER (FLO)
17 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIAUST
15 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIAlIST
14 MGR MAlNTENANCE PlANNING/ASSETS
13 MGR MAtNTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT
12 MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ANAlYST
10 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPT
11 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FIE
9 OPERATK>NS INDUSTRiAL ENGINEER (FIE
8 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
7 MGR TRANSPORTATtONlNETV\QRKS
6 MaR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
4 SR MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
5 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
3 MGR MAINTENANCE
1 SR PLANT MANAGER (1)
2 MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT
Position Tille
22 NET\I",.tORKS SPECIAliST
In
PCESIEAS Positions
21 MGR PVS OPERATIONS
20 MaR FIELD MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
27
11
125)PlR
&7
1STl'Jftnp'......
37
o
10
73
(24)-On-Rollo
Vwfanuos Total On-RoAI(33) (3.()
Finance'
EAS-25
EAS-21
EAS-20
EAS-22
EAS-21
EAS-24
EAS·22
EAS-20
EAS-20
EAS·20
EAS-19
EAS-17
EA$-12
PCE5-01
EAS-17
EAS-16
EAS-17
EAS-15
22 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
13 INDUSTRIAL ENGlNEER (FLO)
26 NETW:lRKS SPECIALIST
15 MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ANAlYST
o
11 MGR TRANSPORTATIONINETWORKS
25 SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS
10 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPT
12 OPERATlONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
9 MaR OlSTR1BUTION OPERATIONS
17 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT
8 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAl ENGINEER (FIE
16 MaR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
6 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FIE
7 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
21 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
5 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
20 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECiALIST
IJlGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
19 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
MaR IN-PlANT SUPPORT
18 MGR MAINTENANCE PlANNINO/ASSETS
SR PlANT MANAGER (2)
(1i)
Position Tille
PCESIEAS Positions
14 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST
27 ASSOCIATE SUPERVlSOR--QIST OPS
28 SECRETARY (FLO)
24 SUPV MAINTENANCE PLANNING/ASSETS
23 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPORT
Gaining Facility: MIchigan MotroPlex P&DC
Data Extnl~tkJn 0..: 101141Z010
r"-"-;~;;;~-;;~~-":::~;;:-:,::-"r"-:::~:,r;'::----l/ Position LOSS; 25 j 23 IL._;_.._.._..._..._..._.._.......-or_... .._ .._ .._ ..._ .. ..._ ... ..
(Allow runbenI c.med~tQtheEx~~)
PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS
Staffing· CraftLast Saved: May 16, 2011
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Craft Positions
Function 1 - ClerkFunction 4 - ClerkFunction 1 - Mail HandlerFunction 4 - Mail HandlerFunction 3A - Vehicle ServiceFunction 38 - MaintenanceFunctions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehabflNCOther Functions
Total
Data Extraction Date: 10/14/10
Craft Positions
Function 1 - ClerkFunction 1 - Mail HandlerFunction 3A - Vehicle ServiceFunction 38 - MaintenanceFunctions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehabflNCOther Functions
Total
Data Extraction Date: 10/14/10
,,----,--------~-------------1I ~ I ~ I
! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ! 1st PIR vs Proposed !Total Craft Position Loss=L_._.~~~._._.l._._.~_:<:.._._j
(Above numbers are earned fOlWard to the Ex&Cutive Summary)
ChangeAnalysis
PositionsPercent
Variances Total On-Rolls(21) (22)
Change 1st PIR va 1st PIR vaAnalysis Pre AMP Proposed
Positions 117
Percent -9.8%
PIR Staffing - Craft
"
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-P
VS
LastS
aved:M
ay
16,2011
-to
-S
ep-30-2010
PIR
Typ
e:
1stPIR
Date
Range
ofData:
Apr-Q
1-2010
$0
(10)V
arianceP
IRvs
ProD
osed
$0
(9)V
arianceP
IRvs
Pre
AM
P
32
386,884
(8)
PIR
$328,851
$120,697, __
,'_v,$1,563,228
($1,118,107)
$1,683,925T
ota
lWo
rkho
ur
Co
stsLD
C34
(765,766)
LDC
31(6
17
,67
9,7
64
)
TotalV
ehiclesLeased
To
talLease
Co
sts
PV
SW
orkh
ou
rC
osts
PV
SL
ea
ses
$11,171 $0
(5)V
arianceP
IRvs
ProD
osed
$0
(4)V
arianceP
IRvs
Pre
AM
P
$0
(3)
PIR
$351,795
$7,739,703
$8,091,498
o o 75 30 1715
156
340,624
(2)
$843,587
2,721,247
10,932,002
$11,272,686
Lo
sing
Facillty:.D.e.tr.o.it.P
.&.D
.C••••r
_F
ina
nce
Nu
mb
er:
TotalLease
Costs
TotalV
ehiclesLeased
PV
SLeases
(11)T
ota
lPIR
vsP
reA
MP
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-PV
SS
avin
gs:
($3,320,319)(T
his
nu
mb
er
ad
de
dto
the
Executive
Su
mm
ary
(12)T
ota
lPIR
vsP
rop
ose
dT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-P
VS
Sa
ving
s:($3,334,412)
(Th
isn
um
be
ra
dd
ed
toth
eE
xecutiveS
um
ma
ry)
(13)N
ote
s:_
PIR
Transportation
-P
VS
Tran
spo
rtation
-H
eR
LastSaved:
May
16,2011
losin
gFacility:_D
_e_tr_o_it_P_&_D_C
_
Typ
eo
fD
istribu
tion
Co
nso
lida
ted
:O
rigin
atin
g
Da
taE
xtractio
nD
ate
:
PIR
Typ
e:
1stP
IR
CT
for
Ou
tbo
un
dD
ock:
$0
$0
$3
8,7
96
.00
$117,901
$200,861
$3
70
,28
2
$0
$2
87
,57
5
$414,881
$5
6,9
37
$223,491
$1
82
,62
8
$2
20
,10
4
$1
79
,86
3
$3
47
,25
9
$5
4,6
41
.00
$1
,25
4,4
87
$1
,02
6,5
66
$2
,43
0,2
57
$1
83
,77
1.0
0
$2
34
,00
0.0
0
$2
32
,16
0.0
0
$2
63
,11
9.0
0
$3
62
,53
2.0
0
$1
03
,00
2.0
0
(7)
1stP
IRA
nn
ua
lC
ost
$1
,10
8,2
81
.00
(6)(4)
(3)
prOp()S
ed.>••••.\
1stP
IRA
nn
ua
lMile
ag
eA
nn
ua
lM
ilea
ge
48
16
5
48171
48
1L
4
481L1
48
13
3
48
16
2
48
13
2
48
17
5
48
2B
O
48
1A
A
48
13
0
48
20
0
48
11
9
48
1L
2
48161
48
2A
O
48
20
0
48
13
5
48
16
3
(1)
48
1B
K
48111
48
11
0
48
1A
O
Route
#
48131(A
)
48
13
4(A
)
48
11
2(A
+B
)
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Losing
486LO
48
1N
EW
$1
,41
0,0
20
$4
6,0
75
$1,336,620.00
$0
.00
PIR
Transportation
HeR
-Losing
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/Ol
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
5,989,1725,627,200
$11,789,204$1.97
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/OI
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
$0.00
$0.00
48110consolidated
into48130
481N
EW
addedto
4816248132
consolidated48321
on7/1/0S
Va
rian
ces
To
talA
nn
ua
lCo
sts
Ch
an
ge
An
alysis
Do
llars
Pe
rcen
t
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Losing
Tran
spo
rtation
-H
eR
LastS
aved:M
ay
16,2011
21:25
1:4
0
(9)
PIR
Type:
Orig
ina
ting
CE
Tfo
rOG
P:
CT
for
Ou
tbo
un
dD
ock:
i
o1
PIR
An
nu
alC
ost
(7)
CE
Tfo
rIn
bo
un
dD
ock:---
CE
Tfo
rC
an
cella
tion
s:
Ga
inin
gF
acility:
Michigan
MetroP
lexP
&D
C
Typeo
fDistribution
Consolidated:
Orig
ina
ting
Data
Extraction
Date:
_.t
480L1
48
0B
K
480A8
480A6
480A5
480LO
48039
48071
48067
48066
48014
48010
48035
48018
48037
(1)
48030
48012
48033
48
0A
G
48
0A
Q
Route
#
480M1
480MO
480L7(B
)
480L7(A
)
480L9
48072(B
)
48065(B
)
48065(A
)
48072(A
)
48036(A
)
48036(B
)
48
0E
UR
eplacedby
HC
R4
80
M5
;been
eliminated
andw
as
enterrredin
theA
I480L6
PIR
Transportation
HC
R-
Gaining
48
0M
3
48
0M
4
48
0M
R
01
11
3
46028
48
11
9
60811
01
0K
E
070L1
150YO
(A)
150YO
(8)
171LO
20
7F
E
303SE
38
12
0
#R
EF
!
#R
EF
!
607NO
640M1
680PO
75
1A
E
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Gaining
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
lO!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#D
IV/O
!._
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
#DIV
/O!
$1.87$1.76
$1,777,421)1($2,235.520
$188,181)1($559,190
(13)I
(14)1
stP1Rvs
1stP1R
vsP
reA
MP
Pro
po
sed
Sum
mary
HC
RL
osin
g&
Gaining
Lo
sing
Ga
inin
go (12)
1stP1R
vsP
rop
osed
-2,235,520
Pre
$28,658,385
Variances
TotalA
nn
ua
lCo
sts
Dollars
Pe
rcen
t
Ch
an
ge
An
alysis
16,290,380I14,097,705
To
tals
48014consolidated
into48039
on7/1/0S
48033consolidated
into48012
on7/1/0S
48036consolidated
into48018
on7/1109
01113term
inatedservice
runningon
010H5
sine8/1/09
(13)T
ota
l1stP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PT
ran
spo
rtatio
n-H
CR
Sa
ving
s:(from
losingand
gainingfacilities)
($1,965,602)
51,734,75452,563,862
$47,350,775(14)
To
tal1
stP
IRvs
Pro
po
sed
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
-HC
RS
avin
gs:
(fromlosing
andgaining
facilities)($2,794,710)
(15)T
ota
l1stP
IRvs
Pre
AM
PT
ran
spo
rtatio
n(P
VS
&H
CR
):($5,285,922)
(16)T
ota
l1stP
IRvs
Pro
po
sed
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
(PV
S&
HC
R):
(This
nu
mb
er
carriedforw
ardto
theE
xecutiveS
um
ma
ry)($6,129,123)
PIR
Transportation
He
R-
Gaining
Main
tenan
ceLastS
aved:M
ay
16,2011
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:D
etroitP&
DC
Date
Range
ofD
ata:
Ga
inin
gF
acility:
PIR
Typ
e":..:.1s::.;:t..;.P..:.IR
_
Ap
r-Q1
-20
10
:S
ep-3G-2010
Michigan
MetroP
lexP
&D
C
3,276,0111$15,327,380
1$768,836
o
780,9871$
$$14,422,8161$1
3,888,751
3,386,7701$
(8)(9)
(10)V
aria
nce
151V
aria
nce
1511
stPIR
PIR10
Pre
PIR
loC
osts
AM
PP
red
7,546,382$
341,497$
(175,325)
1,571,094$
235,872$
235,872
4,808,3371$
2,399,552$
2,399,552
740,812$
13,244$
13,244
1,384,576$
651,664$
646,571
16,051,200$
3,641,829$
3,119,915
Wo
rkho
ur
Activity
01
$o
22,076,3221$119,961,8761$
(2)(3)
(4)(5)
Va
rian
ce151
Va
rian
ce151
Proposed
151PlR
PIR
loP
IRlo
Costs
Co
stsP
reAM
PP
roed
EM
ailPro
cessin
g$
10,241,721$
7,688,873$
(3,695,182)$
(2,552,848)E
qUipm
ent
EB
uild
ing
Eq
uip
me
nt
$180::(lJl.~t!~I'l$1
1,954,5991$1
1,584,3931$1(370,206)
$1(370,206)
LD
C3
8B
Uild
ing
Se
rvices
5,~,0951$1
4,303,8111$1
(1,152,962)$1
(1,049,284)lllliIL
DC
38
(Custodial
CJoanlng)
EM
ain
ten
an
ce
Op
era
tion
s$11jjllf:':I.(!~i:I$1
1,038,127\$1802,941
1$\{305,136)
$1(235,187)1l1li1
LD
C3
9S
UppO
rt"/",,,
"',,
EM
ain
ten
an
ce$ri0~rr~~~I$b
212,7691$1254,4781$1
33,140$1
41,709T
rain
ing
!!Ii'/,;)#
::';)<,<
V);)
~im("LNtiiG:!11itf:;1t;:;t0lli';,'l
18,800,3111$114,634,4961$1
(5,490,347)$1
(4,165,815)
(11)1
stPIR
vsP
reA
Mp
·M
ain
ten
an
ceS
aVings:
(12)1
stPIR
vsP
rop
ose
d·M
ain
ten
an
ceS
aVings:
$953,239
$1,774,305(T
hesenum
berscarried
forward
tothe
Executive
Su
mm
ary)
(These
numbers
carriedforw
ardto
theE
xecutiveS
um
ma
ry)
(13)N
ote
s:-=====================================
'"DataIn
PIR
colurm.s
is.annualiZad
forFirst:P
IR.
r:%tJl'l~lii"~~1'
PIR
Maintenance
Distrib
utio
nC
ha
ng
es
LastSaved:
May
16,2011
PIR
Typ
e:
1stPIR
Date
Range
of
Data:
Apr-01-2010
-to
--S
ep-30-2010
Lo
sing
Fa
cility
:_D_e_tr_oi_t_P&_D_C
_
Typ
eo
fD
istribu
tion
Co
nso
lida
ted
:O
riginating
Pla
cea
..x..n
extto
the
DM
Mla
be
ling
Iist(s)re
vised
as
resu
ltofth
ea
pp
rove
dA
MP
.Id
en
tifyth
ed
ate
ofth
eP
osta
lBu
lletin
tha
tco
nta
ine
dD
MM
lab
elin
glis
tre
vision
s.
Wa
sth
eS
ervice
Sta
nd
ard
Dire
ctory
up
da
ted
for
the
ap
pro
ved
AM
P?
(3)Y
es
(1)D
MM
LOO
1D
MM
L011
DM
MLO
O2
XD
MM
L201
DM
MLO
O3
DM
ML601
DM
MLO
O4
DM
ML
60
2
DM
MLO
O5
DM
ML
60
3
DM
MLO
O6
DM
ML
60
4
DM
MLO
O7
DM
ML
60
5
DM
MLO
O8
DM
ML
60
6
DM
MLO
O9
DM
ML
60
7
DM
ML
01
0D
MM
L801
(2)22282
(04/08/10)
(4)D
rop
Sh
ipm
en
tsfo
rD
estin
atio
nE
ntry
Disco
un
ts
FA
ST
Ap
po
intm
en
tSu
mm
ary
Re
po
rtN
AS
SF
acility
Na
me
To
tal
No
-Sh
ow
La
teA
rrival
0e
nC
lose
dU
nsch
dM
on
thL
osin
gI
GaininQ
Fa
cilitvC
od
eS
chd
Co
un
t%
Co
un
t%
Co
un
t%
Co
un
t%
Co
un
t
Aug-10
LosingF
acility481
Detroit
P&
DC
43095
22.09%118
27.44%43
10.00%292
67.91%5
Sep-O
OLosing
Facility
482D
etroitP
&D
C496
12926.01%
15531.25%
00.00%
36773.99%
9
Aug-10
Gaining
Facility
480M
ichiganM
etroolexP
&D
C515
98
19.03%195
37.86%43
8.35%374
72.62%45
Sep-10
Gaining
Facility
48
0M
ichiganM
etroolexP
&D
C559
12522.36%
21839.00%
00.00%
43477.64%
58
(5)N
ote
s:=========
PIR
Distribution
Changes
(9)
($17,700)
($19,362)
Variance
InC
osts
$1,113
$2,775
$3,888
(8)PIR
RelocationC
osts
Ca
rried
to
Space
Evaluation
an
dO
the
rCosts
(7)P
roposedR
elocationC
osts
o o o o o 2 oo oo o 9 6 o o2o o oo 355
48 17
(6)
Apr-01-2010
-to
-S
ep-30-2010
1stP
IR
(10)N
ote
s:
MP
EIn
vento
ryLast
Saved:
May
16,2011
Data
Extra
ction
Da
te:
PIR
Typ
e:
1stP
IRD
ate
Ra
ng
eo
fDa
ta:
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:D
etroitP
&D
CG
ain
ing
Fa
cility:M
ichiganM
etroPlex
P&
DC
(2)(3)
(5)
1stP
IRE
au
im
en
tE
ui
me
nt
AF
CS
00
AF
CS
AF
SM
1004
6A
FS
M1
00
AF
SM
-Ai
00
AF
SM
-Ai
AF
SM
AT
HS
00
AF
SM
AT
HS
AF
SM
-AT
HS
/Ai
00
AF
SM
-AT
HS
/Ai
AP
PS
00
AP
PS
ClO
SS
23
ClO
SS
CS
BC
S0
0C
SB
CS
DB
CS
54
45D
BC
S
DB
CS
-OS
S0
0D
BC
S-O
SS
DIO
SS
43
DIO
SS
FS
S0
0F
SS
SP
BS
22
SP
BS
UF
SM
10
UF
SM
FCI
MIC
RO
MA
RK
00
FC
IM
ICR
OM
AR
K
RO
BO
TG
AN
TR
Y0
0R
OB
OT
GA
NT
RY
HS
TS
IH
SU
S0
0H
ST
SI
HS
US
LCT
SI
LCU
S2
2LC
TS
ILC
US
LIPS
00
LIPS
MLO
CR
-ISS
00
MLO
CR
-ISS
MP
BC
S-O
SS
00
MP
BC
S-o
SS
TA
BB
ER
00
TA
BB
ER
PO
WE
RE
DP
OW
ER
ED
IND
US
TR
IAL
5554
IND
US
TR
IAL
57E
QU
IPM
EN
TE
QU
IPM
EN
T
0
PIR
MP
EInventory
.4C
usto
me
rS
ervice
Issue
sL
ast
Sa
ved
:M
ay
16
.2
01
1
Lo
sing
Fa
cility:..:D:.:e;::tr.::.ol:.:.t.:...P.:::&::D.::.C_
5..oigltZIP
Code:
48233D
ataE
xtractio
nD
ate:-=0
-=7
''''0:.:6
''"=1
":'"0------
Sot.
PIR
n.-FrL
Sat.
PIR
Mon.
~Fri.
Sot.
1,0
85
1.0
85
PIR
1,0
85
1,0
85
Mo
n.-F
ri.
16
4
86
9
70
5
93
.9%
92
.4%
--t
6.B
usin
ess
(Bu
lk)M
ailAcce
pta
nce
Hours
PIR
PIR
Sta
riend
Sta
rtend
6:amM
idnightlO
am8pm
6:amM
idnIgI>tlO
am8pm
6:amM
idnlgl1tlO
am8pm
6:amM
idnlght10am
8pm
6:amM
idnightlO
amB
pm
6:amM
idnlgl1t!'W
t0nly
Mo
n.-F
ri.
P1'opo$ed
6:amI
MidnIght
6:amI
MidnIght
6:amI
MidnIght
Um
IM
IdnIght
6:amI
MidnIght
Sta
rtIEnd
6:amM
idnIght
Sat.
23
3
63
6
0-8
69
----'J"-_._-
._..---.--"--'1
.I
0
~~--P
ercent
%C
arriersreturning
be
fore
5p.m
.
5.R
etailUn
itInsid
eL
osin
gF
acility
(WIndow
Service
Tim
es)
2.H
ow
ma
ny
colle
ction
boxesare
curre
ntly
rlA!l:.ln
na
tAl"l
fnr
"In
ral
I'fAllv
iDru
U?
_
4.D
eliveryP
erformance
Re
po
rt
3.H
ow
ma
ny
"loca
lde
livery"
boxesw
ererem
ovedas
are
sulto
fAM
P?
1.C
olle
ction
PointsN
um
be
rpickedup
before1
p.m.
Nu
mb
er
pickedup
be
twe
en
1-5p.m
.
Nu
mb
er
pickedup
afte
r5p.m
.
Ta
laiN
um
be
ro
fCollection
Points
7.
Can
cuatomers
obtaina
localp
ostm
ark
Inaccordance
with
applicablepolicies
inthe
Po
smlO
pe
ruJo
ns
Ma
nu
al?
Yes
8.N
otes:Ga
inin
gF
aclllty:
Michigan
MetroP
lexP
&D
C
9.W
ha
tpo
stma
rkIs
prin
ted
onco
llectio
nm
ail?
Me
trop
lex
MI480
~..1".~<"""'(e'-
."'IIt'''..~
;,:'f'''A~~,,;;a··~···f'$.ft
~l&~1\.~~~i.
PIR
Cu
stom
er
Service
Issues
· ,..
Space Evaluation and Other CostsLast Saved: May 16, 2011
Losing Facility: -=D:.::e""tr.:::o'-'-it..:..P.:::&""D:.::C"-- _ Date: _
1, Affected FacilityFacility Name: Detroit P&DC
Street Address: .:;1'740~1;:.:W~F~0:::rtf':S~t:::re:-:e7t----------------------
City, State ZIP: DetroitMI48233
2. One-Time Costs M4ti4M.Enter anyone-time costs: $0
Mpt.j.j.jj,li'$158,695 $44,111
(These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)
3. Savings Information
Space Savings ($):_---:$0:;:..__ $0 $0(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain. The P0408 indicated the plan for utilizing the space was "to be determined".
As of 10/01/10 the Bamey loose collection mail system remains In place. Plans for utilizing the space are stili being determined.
The AFCS and DPRC have been removed. This space is utilized for additional BMEU staging.
5. Notes:
Employee Relocation Costs
Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs(from MPE Inventory)
Fadlity Costs(/rom above)
Total One-Time Costs
$0 $0 $0
$40,950 $3,888 ($37,062)
$117,745 $40,223 ($77,522)
$158,695 $44,111 ($114,584)(Variance carried fOfWSrd to
Executive &mmtJry)
$25.71
$27.39
$33.34
$155.40
(10)
P1RCost per 1,000
Images
(S)(5)(5)
P1RCost per 1,000
Images
(4)
Losing Facility:-=D:..:e:..:;trc::0c:..:it...:.P..:&:.:D:..;C"--________ ?aining Facility: Michigan MetroPlex P&DC
YTD Range of Report: Apr-01-2010: Sep-30-2010
(1)
Product
PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs