30
Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2 007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo PHYSICS is FUN LATTICE is FUN [1] Lattice QCD basics [2] Nuclear force on the lattice ( dense QCD) [3] In-medium hadrons on the lattice ( hot QCD) [4] Summary I II

Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

  • Upload
    misu

  • View
    32

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PHYSICS is FUN. LATTICE is FUN. [1] Lattice QCD basics [2] Nuclear force on the lattice (  dense QCD) [3] In-medium hadrons on the lattice (  hot QCD) [4] Summary. I. II. Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

PHYSICS is FUN   LATTICE is FUN  

[1] Lattice QCD basics   [2] Nuclear force on the lattice ( dense QCD)

[3] In-medium hadrons on the lattice ( hot QCD)

[4] Summary

I

II

Page 2: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Why lattice ?

• well defined QM (finite a and L) • gauge invariant • fully non-perturbative

• hadron mass, coupling, form factor etc • scattering (phase shift, potential etc) • hot plasma  

What one can do

• cold plasma • far from equilibrium system

What one cannot do (at present) quarks q(n) on the sites gluons U(n)

on the links

Lattice QCD Basics

Page 3: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

QCD partition function QCD partition function

1/T

a

L

• Zero temperature : 1/T ~ L• Finite temperature : 1/T << L

quenched QCD : det F=1 (exploratory studies)full QCD : det F≠1 (precision studies)

n n+

n++ n+

Wilson gauge action

plaquette

link variable

Page 4: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Important limits and theory-guidesImportant limits and theory-guides

L-1 0 (thermodynamics limit) : finite size scalinga 0 (continuum limit) : asymptotic freedomm 0 (chiral limit) : chiral pert. theory

L-1

a

m

Improved actions: asqtad,   p4, stout, clover … different way of reducing the discretization error

Fermions: staggered, Wilson, Domain-wall, Overlap

different way of handling chiral symmetry

Modern algorithms: RHMC, DDHMC … techniques to make the simulations fast and reliable

Simulation techniquesSimulation techniques

Page 5: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

76315 0.05

Example of improvement:

Number of floating-point operationsTo collect 100 config. on 2LxL3 lattice with DDHMC algorithm:

1 year = 3 x 107 sec

HNCDDHMC

Del debbio, Giusti, Luscher, Petronzio, Tantalo, hep-lat/0610059

Page 6: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

To collect 1000 indep. gauge conf.on 243x40, a=0.08 fm lattice (T=0)

Clark, hep-lat/0610048.

Page 7: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

QCD Cluster @ FNAL PACS-CS @ Tsukuba

QCDOC @ RBRC-ColumbiaApeNEXT @ Rome

BlueGene/L @ KEK

Page 8: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

time

space

r

     M ∞

E0 = 2M + V(r)Heavy quark potential

time

space

  M = finite

E0 = ground state mass Meson mass

Typical measurement of mass : QQ pair Typical measurement of mass : QQ pair

Page 9: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Examples in quenched QCDExamples in quenched QCD

R

0.5 fm 1.0 fm

Linear confining string

Bali, Phys. Rep. 343 (’01) 1

Charmoniums

CP-PACS, Phys. Rev. D65 (’02) 094508

2S+1LJ

Page 10: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Examples in full QCDExamples in full QCD

string breaking

Nf= 2, Wilson sea-quarks, 243x40a= 0.083 fm, L= 2 fm, mp/mr= 0.704

SESAM Coll., Phys.Rev.D71 (2005) 114513

1fm0.5fm 1.5fm

[ V

(r)

- 2m

HL ]

a

Charmoniums

MILC Coll., PoS (LAT2005) 203 [hep-lat/0510072]

Nf= 2+1, staggered sea-quarks, 163x48, 203x64, 283x96a = 0.18, 0.12, 0.086 fm, L= 2.8, 2.4, 2.4 fm

spin ave. 1S energy

Page 11: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

• light hadron spectroscopy • heavy hadron spectroscopy• exotic hadrons• various “charges”• form factors• weak matrix elements• etc

Many applications

One of the latest developments

The nuclear force

Ishii, Aoki & Hatsuda,hep-lat/0611096 (to appear in Phys. Rev. Lett.)

Page 12: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Nuclear Force

• Why the nuclear force important now?• How to extract the nuclear force from QCD ?

H. Yukawa, “On the Interaction of Elementary Particles, I”, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan (1935)

H. Bethe, “What holds the Nucleus Together?”, Scientific American (1953)

F. Wilczek, “Hard-core revelations”, Nature (2007)

Nuclear forcenucleus

Page 13: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Modern Nuclear Force from NN scatt. dataModern Nuclear Force from NN scatt. data

One-pion exchange by Yukawa (1935)

repulsivecore

Repulsive core by Jastrow (1950,1951)

...

Multi-pions & heavy mesons

Page 14: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Machleidt and Entem, nucl-th/0503025

High precision NN potentialsHigh precision NN potentials

Page 15: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

2. Maximum mass of neutron stars  

CAS A remnant

Nuclear force

Nuclear repulsive coreNuclear repulsive core

Origin of RC is not known ….

But, it is intimately related to

1. Nuclear saturation  

  3. Ignition of Type II supernovae

Page 16: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Z=0

N=Z

ρ(fm-3)

ρ0

= 0.16 fm-3

3ρ0 5ρ0

Akmal, Pandharipande & Ravenhall, PRC58 (’98)

State-of-the-art nuclear EoS

E/A

(M

eV)

Nuclear Equation of State Nuclear Equation of State

Page 17: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Mass-Radius relation of neutron star

in Akmal-Pandharipande-Ravenhall EoS

Mass-Radius relation of neutron star

in Akmal-Pandharipande-Ravenhall EoS

PSR1913+16 Neutron starbinary

Vela-X1Cyg-X2 X-ray binaries

J0751+1807 Neutron star- WD binary

EXO0748-676(X-ray bursts)

(ρmax ~ 6ρ0)

Page 18: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

How to extract (bare) NN force in QCD ? How to extract (bare) NN force in QCD ?

• unrealistic• fundamental difficulty

(i) Born-Oppenheimer potential r

Takahashi, Doi & Suganuma, hep-lat/0601006

(ii) NN “wave function” NN potentialIshii, Aoki & Hatsuda, hep-lat/0611096

similar in spirit with phenomenological potentials (phase shift data NN potential)

Page 19: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Equal time BS amplitude (r) Equal time BS amplitude (r)

Nucleon interpolating field:

Equal time BS amplitude:

Probability amplitude to find nucleonic three-quark cluster at point x      and another nucleonic three-quark cluster at point y

cf: for π-πscattering,Lin, Martinelli, Sachradja & Testa, NP B169 (2001)CP-PACS Coll, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005)

+x

y

Page 20: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Local potential:

Non-local potential:

• asymptotic form of (r) (= the phase shift) determined by elastic pole interpolating operator independent

• inelastic contribution: interpolating operator dependent exponentially localized in space magnitude suppressed by Ep/Eth

LS equation :Ishii, Aoki & Hatsuda, hep-lat/0611096             + paper in preparation  

Page 21: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

time

space

r

     M ∞

E0 = 2M + V(r)Heavy quark potential

time

space

  M = finite

E0 = ground state mass Meson mass

Typical measurement of mass : QQ pair Typical measurement of mass : QQ pair

Page 22: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Measurement of (r) (s-wave) Measurement of (r) (s-wave)

time

space

x

y

J y

J y

+ all possible combinations

NN potential:

Page 23: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

a =

0.1

37 f

m

L = 4.4 fm

BlueGen

e/L @ KEK

Simulation details Simulation details

• 324 lattice• Quenched QCD• Plaquette gauge action• Wilson fermion• Periodic (Dirichlet) B.C. for spatial (temporal) direction

m(GeV) 0.37 0.53 0.73 0.99

Nconf 1093 1900 1000 1000

as of today

m = 0.89 GeV

mN= 1.34 GeV

m = 0.84 GeV

mN= 1.18 GeV

Page 24: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

BS amplitude (r) for m=0.53 GeVBS amplitude (r) for m=0.53 GeV 2s+1LJ

Ishii, Aoki & Hatsuda, hep-lat/0611096

Page 25: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Yukawa tailmid-rangeattraction

repulsive core

1S0 channel

3S1 channel

NN central potential Vc(r) for m=0.53 GeV NN central potential Vc(r) for m=0.53 GeV 2s+1LJ

Ishii, Aoki & Hatsuda, hep-lat/0611096

Page 26: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

1S0 channel

3S1 channel

NN central potential Vc(r) for m=0.53 GeV NN central potential Vc(r) for m=0.53 GeV 2s+1LJ

Ishii, Aoki & Hatsuda, hep-lat/0611096

Page 27: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Pion exchange Pion exchange

attraction for 1S0 & 3S1

+

ghost exchange (quenched artifact)ghost exchange (quenched artifact)

attraction for 1S0

repulsion for 3S1

Beane & Savage, PLB535 (2002)

Page 28: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Quark mass dependence (preliminary) Quark mass dependence (preliminary)

Ishii, Aoki & Hatsuda, in preparation

Page 29: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

Remarks Remarks

4. Hyperons ? to be announced in two weeks (INPC2007)

3. Different Interpolating operators ? same phase shift but different V(r) at short distances

1. NN scattering length: fragile object in NN case

Luscher’s formula:

Luscher, CMP 105 (1986), NPB 354 (1991)

But situation is not that simple as “first Born” tells:

Born

2. Tensor force ? coupled channel 3S1-3D1

Page 30: Second Berkeley School on Collective Dynamics, May 21-25, 2007 Tetsuo Hatsuda, Univ. Tokyo

     N

  

  

Z

LQCD 

GFMCAMD

MCSM

Nuclear chart

Nuclear force : bridge between one and many Nuclear force : bridge between one and many