SECONDARY SUITES WHAT WE HEARD - mdfoothills.com Final Summary of... · page 3 of 15 secondary suites what we heard why are we exploring legalization of secondary suites?

Secondary Suites

In the Municipal District of Foothills

WHAT WE HEARD

Summary Report on Public Engagement Regarding Secondary Suites in the MD of Foothills – Spring 2018

Coreena Carr, MCIP, RPP [email protected]

Page 2 of 15

SECONDARY SUITES WHAT WE HEARD

TABLE OF CONTENTS

WHY ARE WE EXPLORING LEGALIZATION OF SECONDARY SUITES? .............................. 3

INITIATING DISCUSSION ON SECONDARY SUITES ............................................................ 4

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT OVERVIEW ..................................................................................... 4

THE QUESTIONNAIRE – WHAT WE ASKED ......................................................................... 5

WHAT WE HEARD ................................................................................................................ 6

Support for Legalization of Secondary Suites in the Municipality .................................. 6

Concerns with Legalizing Secondary Suites in the Municipality ..................................... 7

Different Forms of Secondary Suites ................................................................................ 9

Where in the Municipality are Secondary Suites considered

more or less appropriate? ................................................................................... 10

Benefits and Challenges.................................................................................................. 11

Concerns with Water and Wastewater Servicing for Secondary Suites ....................... 13

Minimizing Impact Secondary Suites May Have on Neighboring Parcels .................... 14

Bringing Secondary Suites into Compliance ............................................................... 15

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? .................................................................................... 15

Page 3 of 15


WHY ARE WE EXPLORING LEGALIZATION OF SECONDARY SUITES?

As they become more commonly understood, the M.D. is receiving an increasing number of

inquiries about Secondary Suites. People are exploring new options for affordable housing,

aging in place, and opportunities to help make living more economical. Secondary Suites are

not a new use nor are they a topic of discussion that is just emerging. Secondary Suites are the

focus of ongoing discussions in many Towns, Cities, and Municipalities including Foothills. We

are one of the only municipalities in Alberta that does not allow for Secondary Suites in some

capacity.

A Secondary Suite is a subordinate dwelling unit

located on a parcel in addition to the principal

dwelling. A Secondary Suite constitutes a self-

contained living accommodation unit comprised of its

own kitchen facilities, sleeping amenities, washroom

facilities and a separate entrance or door which can

be physically closed or locked off from the remainder

of the principal dwelling. They may also be referred

to as secondary dwelling units, mother in law suites,

accessory dwelling units, and garden suites.

Our Land Use Bylaw does not currently allow for this

use; however we acknowledge that Secondary Suites

are being built in the Municipality regardless of the

Land Use Bylaw. Some may be in compliance with all

the necessary Alberta Building/Fire Code

requirements. Others may not. Secondary Suites

that do not meet safety codes, the building code, and

fire codes can be a safety concern and a liability for

property owners.

The Municipality recognizes a need to develop a strategy to move forward with Secondary Suites,

either through legalizing them or commencing stronger enforcement of unpermitted suites.

Page 4 of 15


INITIATING DISCUSSION ON SECONDARY SUITES

January 10, 2018, Council passed a resolution authorizing staff to proceed with a public

engagement process to see if the Municipal District of Foothills residents support legalizing

Secondary Suites in the municipality.

Undertaking a public engagement process for Secondary Suites in the Municipality was initiated

with the following goals in mind:

• Share information on Secondary Suites relative to the Municipality;

• Review water supply and waste water servicing as it pertains to Secondary Suites;

• Explore the benefits and challenges of Secondary Suites;

• Highlight the importance of Secondary Suites meeting the necessary safety, fire, and

building code requirements;

• Obtain feedback from the residents regarding how they feel about Secondary Suites and

what concerns they have with legalizing Secondary Suites in the municipality.

The feedback we received will be used to assist in developing a strategy to move forward and to

implement necessary provisions and policies in the Land Use Bylaw.

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT OVERVIEW

A series of three open houses were held throughout the Municipality to allow the residents

to review information about Secondary Suites and provide their opinion on legalizing this

use in the Municipality. The open houses were held from 4 – 8 PM in the following

locations:

• Monday, March 26, 2018 at Priddis Hall, Priddis Alberta,

• Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at the Council Chambers in the

Administrative Office, High River, Alberta,

• Thursday, March 29, 2018 at Dewinton Hall, Dewinton,

Alberta.

Notification of the open houses was provided municipal wide in the

following manner:

• Advertised in two issues of the Western Wheel;

• Announcement on the Municipal Website;

• Notices posted throughout the municipality;

• Large signs were posted advertising dates of open houses; and

• Information was posted on twitter and face book.

Page 5 of 15


The following information was presented at the open houses through display boards and

handout materials: What is a secondary suite?

• Different forms of Secondary Suites;

• Benefits and challenges of Secondary Suites;

• Important building standards and safety code requirements;

• Water supply and wastewater servicing;

• Frequently asked questions; and

• The process – next steps.

There were several staff members on hand to speak with residents,

answer any questions, and to gather feedback.

All the information provided at the open house was made available on-line, so those residents

who were unable to attend any of the three open houses would still have an opportunity to

review the material and provide their thoughts on Secondary Suites.

A questionnaire was available at the open houses as well as on-line or upon request at the

municipal office, in order to gather important feedback from municipal residents. The on-line

questionnaire remained open until April 15, 2018 to ensure everyone had the opportunity to

respond.

THE QUESTIONNAIRE - WHAT WE ASKED

The questionnaire was designed to obtain resident feedback on the following points:

• Do the residents support legalization of Secondary Suites in the municipality?

• Concerns, benefits and/or challenges you have with Secondary Suites;

• Where this use might be more or less appropriate in the Municipality;

• Parcel sizes that you feel are more or less appropriate for

Secondary Suites;

• Concerns with water supply and waste water servicing for

Secondary Suites;

• Recommended provisions to minimize impact on neighbors;

• Concerns with requirements to bring existing non-permitted suites

into compliance.

https://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://entrevestor.com/images/uploads/Survey_II.png&imgrefurl=http://entrevestor.com/blog/we-need-survey-responses-from-nb&docid=RCKzqRzGdY6fwM&tbnid=AgLlB9QErMyezM:&vet=12ahUKEwjwoeeSx9PaAhVSXK0KHVAbDWU42AQQMyheMF56BAgAEF8..i&w=700&h=700&bih=757&biw=1600&q=SURVEYS QUESTIONNAIRE&ved=2ahUKEwjwoeeSx9PaAhVSXK0KHVAbDWU42AQQMyheMF56BAgAEF8&iact=mrc&uact=8

https://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://entrevestor.com/images/uploads/Survey_II.png&imgrefurl=http://entrevestor.com/blog/we-need-survey-responses-from-nb&docid=RCKzqRzGdY6fwM&tbnid=AgLlB9QErMyezM:&vet=12ahUKEwjwoeeSx9PaAhVSXK0KHVAbDWU42AQQMyheMF56BAgAEF8..i&w=700&h=700&bih=757&biw=1600&q=SURVEYS QUESTIONNAIRE&ved=2ahUKEwjwoeeSx9PaAhVSXK0KHVAbDWU42AQQMyheMF56BAgAEF8&iact=mrc&uact=8

Page 6 of 15


The open houses were reasonably well attended with 88 people registered in attendance. A

total of 128 completed questionnaires were received including the 34 questionnaires that were

completed and left with staff at the open houses.

A copy of the summary including all comments provided is attached for your information.

Why Are We Exploring Legalization Of Secondary Suites?

Based on what we heard at the open houses and the questionnaire results, the residents show

overwhelming support for Secondary Suites so long as they are suitably located, appropriately

sized, and adequate provisions are put in place to ensure they done in a safe manner that has

minimal impact on neighboring properties.

90% of the respondents were supportive of Secondary Suites being accommodated in the

municipality.

90%

10%

Do you think Secondary Suites should be

accommodated in the MD of Foothills?

Yes No

WHAT WE HEARD

Page 7 of 15


The respondents noted support for Secondary Suites in the Municipality for the following

reasons:

Facilitating aging in place;

Making it easier for families to stay together and remain on family owned lands;

To accommodate caregivers for elders, children, or people with disabilities;

As an opportunity for additional income/pooled resources to offset living expenses;

A means to increase the population without increased subdivision;

Providing more affordable housing options;

Providing increased security on site;

Efficient use of services.

Concerns with Legalizing Secondary Suites in the Municipality

Residents expressed the following concerns with legalizing Secondary Suites in the MD:

Ensuring they are approved on appropriately sized parcels;

Size of suites permitted and the number of additional residents allowed per unit;

Concerns with renters and absentee landowners;

Change in character of their area;

Increase in crime, noise and light pollution;

Appearance of properties, especially detached suites or those not in the principal

dwelling;

Increased density/overcrowding in rural area;

Page 8 of 15


Servicing concerns:

Additional stress on water supply;

Ensuring that waste water systems are properly designed and addressed;

The need to meet the higher demand on services;

Providing for adequate schools, fire, recreation services;

Ensuring that suites meet the necessary safety codes and bringing existing suites into

compliance;

Increased traffic in rural areas/hardship on roads;

Parking concerns (primarily in residential communities/cul de sac subdivisions);

Declining community standards;

Increased on-site storage including, but not limited to RV’s, storage containers, vehicles;

Unsightly properties;

Reduced property values;

Increased taxes;

Increased number of dogs

Unnecessary cost being imposed on landowners to bring suites into compliance.

Municipality making process and requirements for legalized Secondary Suites cost

prohibitive;

*Based on comments provided and grouped into common concerns

Page 9 of 15


Different Forms of Secondary Suites

Three forms of Secondary Suites were discussed in this engagement:

1. Secondary Suites within a principal dwelling;

2. Secondary Suites within an accessory building or above a garage;

3. Detached secondary dwelling units.

Many of the respondents expressed no concern with the different forms of

Secondary Suites being legalized in the Municipality.

However, of those that noted they had concerns, 85% were concerned with the detached

secondary dwelling unit. Concerns with this form of secondary suite were with parcel size and

allowance of detached units on smaller parcel sizes, the need to restrict the size of the

secondary unit on sites, ensuring that the units were aesthetically pleasing and complimentary

to the principal dwelling, and overall negative effect they may have on character and quality of

the area.

Concern was expressed with mobile homes being accommodated and the potential for

detached units to be subdivided out at a later date.

Page 10 of 15


Where in the Municipality are Secondary Suites Considered More or Less Appropriate?

Over half of the of respondents that commented on this question stated that they did not feel

there were any particular areas where they would consider Secondary Suites more or less

appropriate in the Municipality.

Residents expressed the most support for Secondary Suites on larger agricultural parcels (29%)

and acreages over 2-acres (51%) in the Municipality.

The parcels most commonly identified as inappropriate for Secondary Suites

in the Municipality were those parcels under 2-acre in size (68%). Parcels in

Hamlets and Heritage Pointe, Greenhaven, Priddis Green style development

were also noted as less favorable for Secondary Suites.

5%

6%

30%

38%

10%

11%

Are there parcel sizes where you would consider Secondary Suites inappropriate?

Parcels Over 21 acres insize/Larger Parcels

Parcels 2 to 21 acres in size

0.8 acres to 1.99-acres

Less than 0.80 acres in size

Within larger hamlet lots(Cayley/Blackie)

Heritage Pointe, Greenhaven,Priddis Greens Style

29%

51%

5%

1%9%

5%

Are there parcel sizes where you would consider Secondary Suites more appropriate?

Parcels Over 21 acres insize/Larger Parcels


0.8 acres to 1.99-acres


Within larger hamlet lots(Cayley/Blackie)

Heritage Pointe,Greenhaven, Priddis GreensStyle

*Percentages on both

charts vary from

attached survey as the

responses here

include both checked

boxes with the addition

of the comments

provided to

accommodate for

questionnaire allowing

only one box to be

checked.

Page 11 of 15


Benefits and Challenges

A number of residents provided their thoughts on both benefits and challenges of Secondary

Suites. At the open houses, visitors were provided with “sticky notes” in order to supply

comments and post them on the display boards. The questionnaire also provided an

opportunity for residents to provide the benefits and challenges that they see with legalizing

Secondary Suites in the municipality.

The most common benefits of Secondary Suites noted by the

respondents were:

Allow families to stay together/stay on property;

Facilitate aging in place allowing seniors to remain in their

own homes;

Provides for extra income;

More affordable housing option;

Allows for pooling of resources;

Added security on site;

Reduces the need to subdivide for family/for income;

Increase the value of your property;

Ability to live in the country when not normally affordable;

Increased community diversity;

Decrease strain on services such as nursing homes and disability supports;

Allow for caregivers on site;

Increased tax base.

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjZpZemotTaAhVSwZ8KHWYvC9oQjRx6BAgAEAU&url=https://www.fountainsseniorliving.com/open-letter-caregivers/&psig=AOvVaw00I45G96_rOziSrzPQiRhk&ust=1524705909872718

Page 12 of 15


Benefits and Challenges Cont’d….

The most common challenges with Secondary Suites noted by the respondents were:

Ability for water co-op/communal water systems to accommodate additional

capacity;

Ensuring waste water systems are upgraded to deal with additional capacity;

Increase in population in the rural areas;

Concern with tenants/renters with no pride of ownership;

Declining property values;

Increased traffic;

More crime;

Increased number of dogs;

Parking concerns in hamlets, cul de sac subdivisions,

smaller communities;

Draw of problems associated with low cost housing;

Resources and staff to enforce rules/compliance;

Demand on services with increased density (policing,

schools, daycare, infrastructure, etc.);

Encouraging landowners to bring existing suites into compliance;

Responding to existing restrictive covenants that restrict to single family dwelling

only;

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiPm5_go9TaAhVJiFQKHTwjCakQjRx6BAgAEAU&url=https://www.cesarsway.com/dog-training/socialization/dog-park-bloopers&psig=AOvVaw0JwUUw7jcVdRlFRuGZ1SyI&ust=1524706299738770

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiQz9eeq9TaAhUlHGMKHRGvAXQQjRx6BAgAEAU&url=https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa010413/&psig=AOvVaw0-VZTL9j9r5mmOsUBm8f7f&ust=1524708290652346

Page 13 of 15


Concerns with Water and Wastewater Servicing for Secondary Suites

Water and wastewater services are always important considerations in the Municipality.

Surprisingly, 60% of the respondents stated they had no concerns with water and wastewater

servicing

Of the comments provided, many felt that appropriate provisions need to be put in place to

ensure that adequate water is available, without any impact to the neighboring properties and

ensuring the wastewater disposal systems are properly designed to handle added capacity.

Also, enforcement of all provisions that are put in place was emphasized.

Concerns were raised with the impact Secondary Suites may have on parcels with communal

water systems/water co-op developments. Others questioned if a secondary suite in a home

really warrants double the annual water requirements and additions to wastewater facilities.

Page 14 of 15


Minimizing Impact Secondary Suites May Have on Neighboring Parcels

The following is a list of issues that residents feel need to be addressed if Secondary Suites are

to be accommodated in the MD:

Size of the suites allowed with respect to parcel sizes;

Number of occupants;

Appearance of properties and character of the area;

View shed;

Storage on site;

Location of detached suites;

Aesthetics/compatibility;

Detached suites should be:

complimentary in appearance;

restricted in size;

appropriately setback from other properties;

only on larger sized parcels/low density areas;

Ownership:

o Provision to allow only family members – no rentals;

o Owner must reside on the land;

Parking restrictions;

No businesses;

Ensuring that services are provided/available (water, wastewater, policing, schools, etc.)

Enforcing existing rules:

Enforcement on number of dogs and confinement on your

property;

Maximum number of vehicles, RV’s, storage on site;

Means to ensure that provisions are enforced;

Page 15 of 15


Bringing Secondary Suites into Compliance

Although approximately one quarter of the respondents noted they have no concerns with a

requirement to bring existing Secondary Suites into compliance, the following

concerns were highlighted:

• Ensure all suites are brought into compliance for safety;

• Give the residents appropriate time to bring existing suites into

compliance;

• Do not make compliance cost prohibitive for existing or new suites;

• Provide incentives /advantages to comply in order to obtain buy-in from

residents;

• Enable people with existing suites to come forward without penalty;

• Ensure that illegal suites are enforced and all provisions/rules upheld;

• Concern with the resources and man power required for enforcement;

• Shut down or fine illegal suites that don’t come into compliance.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

This is the initial stage of exploring whether to permit Secondary Suites in the Municipal District

of Foothills. The feedback we received will inform Council’s decision on whether to allow

Secondary Suites within the Municipal District of Foothills.

This summary report of “What We Heard” from the public engagement on

Secondary Suites is scheduled to go before Council early May 2018 and will be

available for review by residents on the Municipality’s website at

www.mdfoothills.com.

Council will review the report along with suggested draft policy direction based

on “What We Heard” and will direct staff on how to proceed. It is anticipated

that staff will be able to review draft policy direction with the residents to gain

additional feedback as early June 2018.

Staff will then draft Land Use Bylaw amendments for Secondary Suites giving

consideration to the additional feedback that was provided on the proposed policy direction. A

public hearing will be held to provide an opportunity for the public to further comment on the Land

Use Bylaw amendments.

90.24% 111

9.76% 12

Q1 A Secondary Suite is a subordinate dwelling unit located on a parcelin addition to the principal dwelling, which constitutes a self-containedliving accommodation comprised of its own kitchen facilities, sleeping

amenities, washroom facilities and a separate entrance or door which canbe physically closed or locked off from the remainder of the principal

dwelling. Do you think Secondary Suites should be accommodated in theMunicipal District of Foothills?

Answered: 123 Skipped: 1

TOTAL 123

# WHY OR WHY NOT? DATE

1 There are many residents who need an adjacent suite for family, caregivers, or extra income.Having some regulation for safety and quality seems desirable to ensure the suites are neither"eyesores" nor contrary to overalll planning goals.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 1. It will allow young people to come and live in our area. 2. It will allow children to stay out in thecountry once they get married 3. It will allow elderly to stay in the country with their children 4. Itwill benefit the family unit 5. More people, means more eyes and less crime 6. It will increaseeconomic activity in the country. 7. It will increase property value.

4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 Great for big families 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 Yes, because many residents would like to have guest suites or suites available to support familymembers that require additional support. e.g. ill parents

4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 Retirement income to keep older residents to be able to afford and stay in home Flexibility forchildren to live on property with parents

4/15/2018 11:32 PM

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

Yes

No

1 / 48

Secondary Suites

6 We live in a community where we have a Home Owners Association and the bylaws andcovenants specifically refers to single-family dwellings country residential. In-law suites utilizedONLY for that purpose i.e. accommodating a mother / father would be acceptable but they shouldnot be permitted to be converted or transformed into a “rental Unit” for income. The concerns ofthe immediate residences / neighbours must be taken into account and have a priority. Approval ofsecondary suites should not be left in the hands of MD Staff. The MD’s main concern isencouraging situations where they can increase taxes as will occur when they approve asecondary suite. The rental income from secondary suites or Air B&B’s (one is just a step to thenext) are beneficial only to the family renting out the unit. The establishment of “rental units” is awell recognized detriment to the community as a whole – why else do residents rally to opposetheir development whenever they are presented in a challengeable manner. There has been awater shortage in Southern Alberta for some years now and it is not expected to get any better.Our community has a Community Water System and cannot accommodate the additionalrequirements necessitated by Secondary Suites.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

7 Residential parking can be a challenge at the best of times and now having 2-3 or more familiesliving in a house triples that parking problem

4/14/2018 7:56 PM

8 Yes, allows for aging family members to be close to their loved ones 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

9 With an aging population this allows children of aging parents to keep an eye on them, while stillgiving both parties space.

4/13/2018 7:57 PM

10 decline in property values, not aligned with current LUB, cons are far more detrimental than thepros.

4/13/2018 4:47 PM

11 The secondary suite can be used for employees or family. 4/13/2018 8:54 AM

12 Excellent idea for family members or possibly employees 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

13 decline in property values, crime, taxation for properties, fire hazards, increase in Municipal staff. 4/13/2018 3:00 AM

14 I think it would help aging parents stay in their home longer if their child's family was able to livewith them

4/12/2018 6:49 PM

15 This is a great way to accommodate more residents without further subdividing. 4/12/2018 6:09 PM

16 Streets are too crowded already no place to park 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

17 Land owner should have reasonable autonomy to use their land as they see fit. Units alreadyexisting should be subject to inspection and be brought up to code as required.

4/12/2018 4:05 PM

18 i think they should be but they should have guidelines and restrictions to make sure safety for allinvolved are followed.

4/12/2018 2:46 PM

19 We live on an acreage for the serene quiet and elbow room. This will bring increased traffic andgreater noise pollution and probably crime. We currently do not have enough policing now. Mostlikely add to more unappealing possessions to look at. Cause us to feel overcrowded. Increasedlight pollution and more dogs barking. Loss of property value to our property by being beside oneof these.

4/12/2018 1:52 PM

20 Only on large parcels of land more than 10 acres. May lower the value for existing propertyowners. If allowed should only be for relatives not for rent or financial profits. If residents are beingturned into suites they should have their land redesignation changed and be taxed commercial.There will be many who jump on this, and feel not enough information has been reviewed for thedetrimental effects of secondary suites.

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

21 Makes it easier to look after our aging parents when they can be so close to where we already live. 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

22 It's a source of income for the property owner, and if it's privately owned residential land, thehomeowner should be allowed to build what they want!

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

23 Aging parents and adult children of landlords should be able to live on the family property 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

24 With the abundance of land available, and a growing population, this would be beneficial both tothe landowners who would receive additional rent, security (someone being present when they areaway) and other benefits.

4/11/2018 10:42 AM

25 If a person has land that is 3 or more acres it can easily accommodate a garage type carriagesuite or full basement suite. There is more than enough land and it assists the homeowners paythere mortgage as well as a tenant or older family member who cannot pay the higher costs of rentof a full acreage.

4/11/2018 8:08 AM

2 / 48

Secondary Suites

26 To have the option for adult kids and parents to live close 4/10/2018 6:15 PM

27 Multiple benefits for investors and families. 4/10/2018 4:31 PM

28 There are too many presently that are existing and non-compliant. There is also opportunity MDwide to undertake these in a positive way for families with aging parents and classic above-garagecarriage houses can be a nice addition to the landscape.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

29 Security Help pay bills help old people stay in MD 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

30 Very reluctantly yes as I sense from the scope of The Calgary Metropolitan Regional Board &quick timeline categories noted leading to Drafting bylaws this will go ahead anyway. Possibly It islikely partially tax based driven as well?? I do see some benefits of secondary suites where it cantruly help some families and aging land owners remain and many people will hopefully berespectful of neighbours when doing a suite etc. But feel this should certainly not go ahead withoutMD having restrictions in place for controlling tenants and holding owners responsible forinfractions. Getting a little personal, given my 24 years of exposure to numerous acreages from arealtor perspective as well as being a small acreage owner in a cul de sac development andhaving seen firsthand the many infractions of the bylaws relative to community standards bylaws Ihave to be honest I am concerned that this initiative will eventually open the gates for much morepotential negative activities. E.g. Increase in people on a parcel, increase in traffic & number ofvehicles, number of parked RV’s and storage units, more noise, less visual privacy for existingacreages in sight of each other etc. I therefore strongly feel that if this goes ahead separatedetached secondary suites be not allowed on smaller acreages (2 to 6 ish acres in size e.g.) forsure. Very strict parameters be set regarding the number of extra residents that can dwell in asecondary suite, limited parking on a property and of RV’s and storage containers etc. Andsecondary suite owners be made aware of all community standard bylaws in the approval process.Dollars will motivate more people to do this strictly for monetary gain and lose sight of what affect itmay do to a close neighbour next door. Another concern is how the MD will monitor tenantcompliance given there is not ample manpower to even police current community standards.Strongly recommend if this goes ahead that owners on properties where secondary suites areconstructed be made aware that as part of the approval documentation that they are responsible toensure tenants are made aware of MD property community standards by laws and that they abideby these bylaws with the owners responsible for infringements and they ensure tenants abide bythem to minimize visual, noise bylaws. Consider people moving from a larger house or apartmentto rent a secondary suite. There is a very good chance they will want to bring their belongings withthem such as RV’s, extra vehicles, furniture that may not fit in the smaller units and may requestlandowner to store in storage units on the property etc. We and the majority of acreage ownersmoved to the country to obtain privacy, quiet space and enjoyment of our surroundings. Allowingsecondary suites will certainly in many cases impinge on these situations going forward,especially detached units. Human nature is that renters to not treat their spaces or surroundingsthe same as owners!! I realize progress is imminent but I don’t believe this change should beundertaken without placing strict rules on the process to ensure neighbours are protected as muchas possible and there is periodic policing.

4/10/2018 8:42 AM

31 There is a need and they if addressed the md could make bylaws to address any concerns. 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

32 To help keep families together. Care of the elderly Additional care for young children 4/9/2018 8:44 PM

33 Whole range of benefits - density increases tax revenue for the MD, senior (parent) care or abilityfor seniors to live with help of family - less need for government care facilities.

4/9/2018 8:36 PM

34 If inspected and done properly, a secondary suite can add value to a property. With an agingpopulation a lot of people would like to have their aging parents live with them.

4/9/2018 8:32 PM

35 Absolutely - to make living out here somewhat affordable, allow in-home seniors care options, andallow the community to grow without adding building density.

4/9/2018 8:30 PM

36 For aging families to stay in their homes. Having on site accommodations for caregivers. Keepfamilies together and the elderly at home.

4/9/2018 8:24 PM

37 Allowing secondary suites can help families stay together, pool resources to live in today's risingcosts to live. Acreages especially are able to provide a space for families to share their lives witheach other. May God bless us and help us to take care of each other.

4/9/2018 8:21 PM

38 Efficient use of resources, companionship for elderly, extra income. 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

39 Havnig large lots should be able to be shared by more than a single family within reason. Whywould it matter to anyone else other than direct neighbours to what a person does on their ownproperty, as long as they are not breaking laws.

4/9/2018 1:50 PM

3 / 48

Secondary Suites

40 Especially in the high density areas. Allows for elders to remain at home longer by providing someassisted living. Nanny/mother in law suite.

4/9/2018 1:43 PM

41 Wholeheartedly. As an example, we are a couple age 80 and 85 who have lived in this MD foryears. We now wish to live with family - two of our children live in the MD and would take us in andcare for us in a family system, including many grandchildren. Under present rules they can't. this isa ridiculous situation.

4/9/2018 1:38 PM

42 For all the reasons listed on the information boards. 4/9/2018 1:30 PM

43 With appropriate regulations it demonstrates the progressive attitudes of the MD. 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

44 For aging parents and security reasons 4/9/2018 1:23 PM

45 Our area (Rusticana Estates) has 15 - 20 acres parcels. Lots of room for additional dwellings. 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

46 Have space particularly on acreages - less footprint. 4/9/2018 1:16 PM

47 As the population ages people should be able to stay in homes which were made for more than acouple. Suites provide a method to do that.

4/9/2018 1:14 PM

48 Low cost way to increase population density without subdivision. 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

49 Many already exist and need to be up to code. People like us, who want to age in place and needsomeone close. young people starting out that can't afford to by anything. People who live awaypart of the year and need someone in the house for security. People who need additional incomein retirement.

4/9/2018 1:03 PM

50 beneficial to families, economically and socially - keep aging parents with children or other helpers 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

51 Only in a care giving capacity, limited to 5 or more acres, no rentals, no mobile homes 4/9/2018 12:54 PM

52 Caregiver, caretaker, family 4/9/2018 12:48 PM

53 families taking care of elderly relatives 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

54 believe it would greatly improve security of rural residences. Would serve as an aging populationwho want to remain in the rural setting.

4/9/2018 12:41 PM

55 Aging community - changing lifestyles - families living together. 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

56 I would like to build a secondary suite for the income stream to help me afford to live in Priddis. Itwill also enable options for lower cost living for people who want to live out here but can't afford tobuy, as there are not a lot of rental options.

4/9/2018 12:36 PM

57 On our acreage it will enable one of our kids family to stay there and hopefully afford to buy orplace when we are no longer able to stay there. After that, a secondary suite would give them theoption of generating income to finance staying there.

4/9/2018 12:20 PM

58 This would allow one of our kids/grand-kids to have a separate home in our large country house.They can keep animals and enjoy country living where they would not be able to afford to buy theirown property. Our house is far to large for only 2 people and we can use the help with upkeep of itand our property.

4/9/2018 12:08 PM

59 Extended family accommodation, rental income, low-income housing help. If an acreage has thespace why not permit different ways to use your property

4/7/2018 10:11 AM

60 To help keep families in the community, in their "homestead" longer keeping the sense ofcommunity that long term families and neighbors give to a community off set the cost of rural livingfor younger families trying to keep/live the rural lifestyle.

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

61 I work with the aging and disable population. What is currently available to those individuals ispublicly funded disability services or nursing homes. If a disable individual could stay with familypast 18 in their own suite, or an aging parent can live with their children's family. This is a HUGEstep in the right direction.

4/6/2018 9:15 PM

62 Allows ability for multi-generations to sty on property longer. Provides potential added income andsecurity at residences, allows seniors to stay in home longer, second suitecaregivers/family/nurses. Potential for nanny suites. Snow bird residences 1/2 year.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

63 It would be good for seniors to stay in their lovely homes; it could allow young families the ability tolive, and raise their children, in the country.

4/6/2018 6:57 PM

4 / 48

Secondary Suites

64 Non compliance to all the rules - septic being a very big one (Who is going to upgrade theirsystem?

4/6/2018 6:51 PM

65 Living in a rural area is as expensive as it is rewarding. Having a secondary income or allowingother family memebers to live with you but still have some separation is important

4/6/2018 3:42 PM

66 To encourage ageing-in-place and safety of seniors by having family or other support closeby. 4/6/2018 11:48 AM

67 It just makes sense. After all, why has it taken so long since the MD hates Urban Sprawl. It'stotally unreasonable the amount of work and costs in subdividing, so it should be allowed.

4/6/2018 9:51 AM

68 The extra income is nice. It would be nice to have the ability for parents to live with their childrenwhen they are older, or to be able to care for grand children.

4/6/2018 8:57 AM

69 It creates an opportunity for a continued family relationship/development within the Foothills wheregenerational families can continue to live together and support each other.

4/6/2018 8:24 AM

70 To serve the need to age in place, support aging parents, support special needs adults 4/5/2018 4:30 PM

71 It will destroy our lifestyle 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

72 The MD is a diverse area with residential dwellings ranging from extremely low density in the caseof farms to very high density in the case of subdivisions or within towns Existing homes were builtand zoned as single family dwellings. Infrastructure was designed and provided assuming xnumber of people and autos. Residents that purchased their homes had specific expectations andtypically spent more $ to acquire a home in an area that didn't have multifamily homes and orrentals. Secondary suites is equivalent to building multifamily dwellings and even worse is creatingrental accommodation in at least the secondary suite and possibly in the main home if the owner isalready renting out the main home. Secondary suites will change the dynamics of a communityand to the negative introducing lower income families, renters who don't want the responsibilitiesof owning a home and don't look after their property. Secondary suites will drive down the value ofboth the home with a secondary suite and surrounding homes. Take a look at Victoria BC wherethey have a high number of both legal and illegal secondary suites. The streets are packed withparked cars

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

73 Allows for generational occupancy. Avoids unnecessary subdivision 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

74 with an aging population it is becoming increasingly beneficial for parents to live with adult childrenor vice versa while each retains so independence.

4/4/2018 5:25 PM

75 I think it will enhance rural safety. It will also allow families to help one another. 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

76 To provide ability for families to age in place and provide for disabilities 4/4/2018 2:52 PM

77 They could be allowed but there are many factors involved. The most important one being is howthe MD will regulate them and enforce rules and regulations that are in place. We are dealing witha temporary dwelling on a neighbouring piece of property that is existing outside of the rules for it'sexistance. with repeated calls to the MD it is still there and the MD is not willing to enforce it's ownruling. If this is going to be the case then the MD should not go forward with allowing the suites ifthey cannot and will not enforce their own rules.

4/4/2018 2:12 PM

78 1. for added security 2. To help aging folks stay on their property longer 4/4/2018 12:10 PM

79 It would be taxing to the enviorment 4/4/2018 11:36 AM

80 Time for the MD to join the 21st century and start being a little more progressive instead of soregressive in their thinking. As you mentioned, they are going to be built and used anyway, youcannot stop them nor can you patrol it, so why not generate some economic activity and use it toincrease tax base. Nothing gained by what is going on now. I don't see or agree with any of the socalled challenges in your presentation, only fear of the unknown for the backwards MD.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

81 Many families are looking for alternative ways to live and to help each other. It’s especially good forseniors. As long as there are rules in place to take care of safety, parking, noise etc. Suites couldbe very advantageous for families in the md.

4/2/2018 4:30 PM

82 As long as it is in keeping with the standards of the neighbourhood. 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

83 accessible, affordable living spaces for people who cannot afford to purchase 3/31/2018 10:34 AM

84 Primarily to facilitate multi/inter generational living. Aging in place increases likelihood of happierhealthier aging.

3/30/2018 1:10 PM

5 / 48

Secondary Suites

85 As the rural population ages residents may not want to go back to an urban centre. Throughdiscussions with our children we would like to trade places. Our children would live in our houseand we would build a smaller bungalow adjacent to the main house with disabledaccommodations. Ramps, wider doors, etc.

3/28/2018 4:37 PM

86 Allows for increased income to families who can offer suites. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

87 It would help the elderly to "age in place" and to provide accommodation for a caregiver on anacreage. Both parties can also maintain their privacy.

3/27/2018 11:39 AM

88 To enable older people to age in place or to stay on a family farm. 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

89 Safety, security and piece of mind for the aging population 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

90 this would allow for aging in place for older persons if family members were close by to offer help ifneeded.

3/26/2018 10:13 AM

91 Secondary Suites are already a reality in the MD. Allowing a process to ensure these suites aresafe allow homeowners in the MD to comply with municipal bylaws and address any potentialconcerns from the community. Aging in place is a large concern and allowing safe, legal suites willensure that older residents can stay in their homes longer. In our case, allowing family members tolive close in order to provide support and care to aging parents.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

92 This type of land use allows families to host a nanny, help with aging or partially retired parents, ora separate living quarters for farm hands, etc. Far more upside than down.

3/26/2018 7:22 AM

93 First, as our population ages, secondary suites will allow families to accommodate the day to daycare and housing of their parents in a way that provides both families with autonomy and privacyfor as long as possible. Decreasing the pressure on our over-populated long term care facilities,which are a huge drain on our healthcare system. They will also allow for families to bring theirparents into their space, without there being any overlap of their personal areas. This will givefamilies with young children the opportunity for their grandparents to act as supplementarycaregivers, thereby easing the pressure on families, and assisting parents of their need to return towork. Secondly, as a rental income for families. Many many people want to live outside of thecity/towns, but are unable to currently, and possibly forever will be unable to afford the costsassociated with how expensive homes are. Having a rental suite ready and available will allow twofamilies to enjoy a dream living situation, without it being a major change to the local area - suchas subdivisions, apartment buildings or lower income housing would change a neighbourhood. Iam completely for secondary suites in the MD of Foothills.

3/25/2018 10:31 PM

94 Housing affordability and flexibility 3/25/2018 9:55 PM

95 It allows elderly parents to live with us. 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

96 necessary for extended families and caregivers for elderly landowners 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

6 / 48

Secondary Suites

Q2 What concerns do you have with allowing this use in the MunicipalDistrict of Foothills? Please explain.


# RESPONSES DATE

1 It appears there are many already, and these have not become a disturbance to the peacefulenjoyment of others in the M.D.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 None 4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 None 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 The size of the dwelling and number of permanent occupants, use of secondary dwelling for rentalpurposes.

4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 None at this point 4/16/2018 6:25 AM

6 No concern , great idea Common in many other cities 4/15/2018 11:32 PM

7 Possibly a concern for traffic in smaller subdivisions, crowded cul-de-sacs, very small towns.Should work well in rural subdivisions

4/15/2018 10:27 PM

8 I believe the MD’s main interest is developing additional tax base. Our community bylaws andcovenants specifically identify single-family country residential dwellings, secondary suites areconsidered counter productive to a community of “single family dwellings”. We purchased ourproperty and built our home in accordance to the Association bylaws and covenants some of whichcaused us difficulty and additional expense which we complied with so as not to be a detriment toour neighbours and community. As noted previously our community water system does not havesufficient resources to accommodate Secondary suites.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

9 Parking and water 4/14/2018 7:56 PM

10 Only concern would be relations with adjacent neighbours if they are not in agreement with thischange.

4/14/2018 10:49 AM

11 How many secondary units are allowed 4/13/2018 8:50 PM

12 As long as water and septic are done properly and buildings are to code and fit the landscape thatthey are in none.

4/13/2018 7:57 PM

13 Disposal of sewage effulent, water, fire, commercial for profit landlords, who will create moreproblems with the planning process, and enforcement.

4/13/2018 4:47 PM

14 I don’t have any real concerns, except with safety. If current code is used in the building ofsecondary suites, this should not be an issue

4/13/2018 8:54 AM

15 None 4/13/2018 8:53 AM

16 Someone putting up a poor structure, old mobile home, etc. Unsightly. 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

17 Lack of parking in residential neighbourhoods is contracted as it is. 4/13/2018 7:19 AM

18 No concerns 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

19 None 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

20 potential strain on water resources, increased traffic 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

21 No concerns. 4/12/2018 6:09 PM

22 None it is about time. 4/12/2018 4:17 PM

23 Unsafe dwellings if not done at minimal to code, some smaller properties becoming overburdened, potential increase in crime and/or trespassing

4/12/2018 4:05 PM

24 safety and understanding how many occupants are there in case of emergencies. 4/12/2018 2:46 PM

25 Same as #1 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

7 / 48

Secondary Suites

26 Fire, roads, more and more dogs chasing livestock. An increase in suites would equal more andmore staff and bylaw to monitor and with the increase in rural crime we feel our tax dollars would bebetter spent on more RCMP officers. Secondary suites should be only allowed on LARGE parcelsand only for immediate family, otherwise we will create slum land lords with declining propertyvalues/ There is already so much apuse of the planning bylaws allowing secondary suites will opena huge mess,

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

27 It will probably be expensive which it already is super expensive to live in Okotoks already. Andthere isn't a lot of parking.

4/12/2018 11:59 AM

28 None 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

29 The MD or Government using it as a tax or cash grab 4/12/2018 8:47 AM

30 Increase in property taxes 4/12/2018 8:38 AM

31 Property value decrease due to shabby secondary units. Secondary suites should be controlled tomatch the quality of the primary building.

4/12/2018 8:31 AM

32 I don't have any concerns. I think we are behind the times on this matter. 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

33 The MD would want to ensure that all landowners are following the guidelines set out forsecondary suites. The added responsibility on the MD would be for schooling of children, so theproperty taxes for landowners who have secondary suites would need to be accommodated.Roads and policing probably would not be heavily impacted as the costs are already born by alllandowners and having additional people on the property would impact these in a negligiblemanner probably.

4/11/2018 10:42 AM

34 None 4/11/2018 8:08 AM

35 Appearance of secondary units- no mobile homes or shacks 4/10/2018 6:15 PM

36 None 4/10/2018 4:31 PM

37 None 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

38 These should not be permitted on a stand-along basis. There are too many abandoned and awfulaccessory buildings across the MD. The should be limited to in dwellings or above garage.Opening it up to barns or accessory buildings is a no! Some limited public arenas could supportsecondary suites within the building for staff only. Hamlets need higher standards of evaluation forsecondary suites because parking is an issue in these communities - Look for "on driveway"dedicated stalls.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

39 None really Parking on private property only 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

8 / 48

Secondary Suites

40 Very reluctantly yes as I sense from the scope of The Calgary Metropolitan Regional Board &quick timeline categories noted leading to Drafting bylaws this will go ahead anyway. Possibly It islikely partially tax based driven as well?? I do see some benefits of secondary suites where it cantruly help some families and aging land owners remain and many people will hopefully berespectful of neighbours when doing a suite etc. But feel this should certainly not go ahead withoutMD having restrictions in place for controlling tenants and holding owners responsible forinfractions. Getting a little personal, given my 24 years of exposure to numerous acreages from arealtor perspective as well as being a small acreage owner in a cul de sac development andhaving seen firsthand the many infractions of the bylaws relative to community standards bylaws Ihave to be honest I am concerned that this initiative will eventually open the gates for much morepotential negative activities. E.g. Increase in people on a parcel, increase in traffic & number ofvehicles, number of parked RV’s and storage units, more noise, less visual privacy for existingacreages in sight of each other etc. I therefore strongly feel that if this goes ahead separatedetached secondary suites be not allowed on smaller acreages (2 to 6 ish acres in size e.g.) forsure. Very strict parameters be set regarding the number of extra residents that can dwell in asecondary suite, limited parking on a property and of RV’s and storage containers etc. Andsecondary suite owners be made aware of all community standard bylaws in the approval process.Dollars will motivate more people to do this strictly for monetary gain and lose sight of what affect itmay do to a close neighbour next door. Another concern is how the MD will monitor tenantcompliance given there is not ample manpower to even police current community standards.Strongly recommend if this goes ahead that owners on properties where secondary suites areconstructed be made aware that as part of the approval documentation that they are responsible toensure tenants are made aware of MD property community standards by laws and that they abideby these bylaws with the owners responsible for infringements and they ensure tenants abide bythem to minimize visual, noise bylaws. Consider people moving from a larger house or apartmentto rent a secondary suite. There is a very good chance they will want to bring their belongings withthem such as RV’s, extra vehicles, furniture that may not fit in the smaller units and may requestlandowner to store in storage units on the property etc. We and the majority of acreage ownersmoved to the country to obtain privacy, quiet space and enjoyment of our surroundings. Allowingsecondary suites will certainly in many cases impinge on these situations going forward,especially detached units. Human nature is that renters to not treat their spaces or surroundingsthe same as owners!! I realize progress is imminent but I don’t believe this change should beundertaken without placing strict rules on the process to ensure neighbours are protected as muchas possible and there is periodic policing.

4/10/2018 8:42 AM

41 I don't have any concerns 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

42 Too many people in a house. Numbers of vehicles could be a problem in more densely populatedareas.

4/9/2018 8:44 PM

43 As long as sensible requirements are in place, I have no concerns. 4/9/2018 8:36 PM

44 None. In is already happening. If legalized the MD can make sure these unites are built to code. 4/9/2018 8:32 PM

45 That is would be a tax grab. 4/9/2018 8:30 PM

46 We need controls on size and numbers per land/site. 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

47 Knowledge and education , people need easy access to the information so they can make goodinformed decisions. It's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission, so make a great flow ofinformation, communication and education so that more people seek permission over forgiveness.

4/9/2018 8:21 PM

48 Dogs, irresponsible behavior 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

49 None. What people do on their own land with property they own should be their own business. TheMD has already mandated enough rules as it is and many rules aren't followed as most are simpleminded cash grabs.

4/9/2018 1:50 PM

50 None - Assume the MD will outline the guidelines. 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

51 I'm sure appropriate bylaws would deal with concerns. 4/9/2018 1:38 PM

52 Water supply, wastewater, safety standards 4/9/2018 1:30 PM

53 The community not understanding the issue fully. Tax revenue being unable to compensate for thehigher demand on services.

4/9/2018 1:27 PM

54 Young people will rent the suites and crime such as shooting, stealing, drugs, etc might increase. 4/9/2018 1:23 PM

55 None 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

9 / 48

Secondary Suites

56 None... I trust the MD will proceed in a logical manner. 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

57 No concerns in the areas where the properties all consist of large acreages - small increases inpopulation wont overwhelm infrastructures.

4/9/2018 1:09 PM

58 Absentee land lords - tenants have no ties to neighbors. Too many out buildings - lots lookcluttered. More load on MD resources - garbage, schools, fire, etc.

4/9/2018 1:03 PM

59 rentals could present problems, parking, and traffic 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

60 more schools needed, more traffic on roads, more dogs barking, noise level, limit suite size to1000 sq. ft.

4/9/2018 12:54 PM

61 Over crowding, more traffic, more taxes, no rentals, no trailers 4/9/2018 12:48 PM

62 Too much traffic, noise complaints, problems with septic and wells. 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

63 absolutely non 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

64 None 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

65 So long as there are appropriate fair guidelines for secondary suites, and they are not allowed on1-2 acre parcels (unless a basement suite). Then I have no other concerns.

4/9/2018 12:36 PM

66 Concern of increased density in areas where the neighbors do not support it. Not concerned withsecondary suites within existing structures but am concerned about new additional structures.

4/9/2018 12:28 PM

67 That the suites are developed according to building and safety codes. 4/9/2018 12:20 PM

68 Perhaps in congested subdivision there may be concerns about more traffic or to heavy usage ofwater/waste water problems. Having a suite in acreages would not have the same concerns.

4/9/2018 12:08 PM

69 None 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

70 no concerns 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

71 My only concern would be multiple suites (3+) on one small parcel. 4/7/2018 10:11 AM

72 Enforcing the legal requirements that need to be met, these requirements are not being met nowand allowing secondary suites wold give the grounds for enforcement.

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

73 Cost. Septic tanks, wells, waste water services all cost. Why is this necessary for smallerresidences who have simply added on unit? Where as some of the huge homes that have beenbuilt but are "single dwellings" require more (ie. have 5+ bedrooms, en suite in every other room,the kitchen is the size of my house, swimming pools, water fountains, hot tubs, etc.) Somediscretion will be imperative.

4/6/2018 9:15 PM

74 Only concern is once supported then needs to be monitored because some sort of expectations toensure that they are being done safely and appropriately to lower the concern if causing heavytaxation on emergency services and safety. Must be to code and monitored. Potential increase intraffic.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

75 Too many dogs; Absentee owners (owners should need to live on the property. 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

76 Traffic noise septic water wells more noise liability owners leaving for 2 months with nosupervision SECURITY

4/6/2018 6:51 PM

77 I would like to see a maximum amount of people and/or vehicles. The smaller the property thefewer people should be aloud. Also I am nervous that people would abuse this and park severaltrailers on a single property.

4/6/2018 3:42 PM

78 No impromptu trailer parks or rooming houses. 4/6/2018 11:48 AM

79 No concerns at all. However, I'm sure the M.D. will be benefitting from it more than the ownerotherwise they wouldn't even consider it.

4/6/2018 9:51 AM

80 I think there needs to be guidelines set as far as what would be allowed on a property. Forexample, I don't think it would be appropriate to allow a second house on a small acreage (around3 acres) but allowing a basement suite would be reasonable.

4/6/2018 8:57 AM

10 / 48

Secondary Suites

81 Number of people and units living on smaller acreage parcels. Maintaining the rural / acreage feeland quality of life. Ensuring that additional buildings are not unsightly and unkempt. Some concernaround detached units and the amount of space. E.g. perhaps detached unit of less than 1000sq ftis allowed, but anything larger requires a minimum of 10 acres. This would allow for detached tinyhomes on smaller acreage units. However, anything smaller than say 5 acres doesn’t allow formultiple detached dwellings. Consider the space for vehicles, RV vehicles etc. That typicallyaccompany people on acreages.

4/5/2018 4:30 PM

82 Increased traffic, dust on my property 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

83 The question is who wants or is asking for secondary suites. The MD before it starts consideringthis should enforce the existing bylaws and get rid of existing illegal secondary suites. If someonewants to live in the MD and wants to purchase a single family home but can't afford the mortgageor maintenance cost they should look elsewhere.

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

84 Only issue I see is in hamlets 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

85 traffic, wildlife disturbance, loss of agricultural land. water and wastewater management 4/5/2018 12:26 AM

86 None 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

87 I think to have two residences that each look like a house on a smaller parcel would detract fromthe appearance but if it is designed to look like a single residence or a loft on top of garage ormaybe a loft in a barn that would be a good solution. The size of a detached secondary suiteshould be limited to the size and design permitted for secondary structures for that particularparcel.

4/4/2018 5:25 PM

88 unapproved secondary suites are not a good idea 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

89 As long as suites are compliant with building and safety codes and are aesthetically pleasing Iwould have no concerns

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

90 Lack of ability to monitor, control and enforce it's own requirements. 4/4/2018 2:12 PM

91 The only issue that I see is adding more administration and cost to the MD. (overhead costs andcontrol)

4/4/2018 12:10 PM

92 My concerns with enough drinkable water, and the management of wastewater.My other concernis with the in crease of crime and the policing of the areas.

4/4/2018 11:36 AM

93 None whatsoever, you have listed all the benefits, and I agree with all of them, you have listed allthe so called challenges and other than fear of progress, I don't see any challenges really.Farmers and ranchers don't want subdivision and they don't want secondary suites or anyonerenting out their own basement of their house, this thinking and fear has ruled the MD for years,while acreage owners pay the vast majority of tax, time for a rethinking in the backward thinkingMD.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

94 None 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

95 none 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

96 There are folks who will be able to supply others with an alternative to moving out of the area andthose who can also benefit from the extra income, help and additional security on the property.

3/31/2018 12:32 PM

97 more free-running dogs; traffic problems (do renters have the same sense of safety and dustcontrol when travelling on a gravel road?)

3/31/2018 10:34 AM

98 Architectural controls is important to maintain the features of acreage living. Recognizing andallowing these developed suites should keep homeowners accountable for following buildingguidelines and codes.

3/30/2018 1:10 PM

99 None, provided clear guidelines are developed 3/30/2018 1:08 PM

100 We live in a group of acreages and the adjacent acreage owners may not agree 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

101 None. I think its a great idea. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

102 Where space is limited. 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

103 No logical concerns. 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

104 not sure -- maybe size of property -- shouldn't happen on anything smaller than 10 acres?? if rural 3/26/2018 7:47 PM

105 none 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

11 / 48

Secondary Suites

106 none 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

107 Increased traffic, strain on water table and care of property when renters are solely responsible forupkeep.

3/26/2018 11:00 AM

108 no concerns. 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

109 My only concern would be with process. This should be an Administrative process (like adevelopment or building permit). Letting Council decide every secondary suite application (likewas the case in Calgary until recently) takes up unnecessary time and places an undue burden onapplicants. Most concerns people have are not actually applicable to the decision (e.g. worriesabout who is renting). Though parking may be a concern in hamlets, this will not be a concern inmore rural areas.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

110 I have no concerns with this allowance as long as it is limited to one additional living space. 3/26/2018 7:22 AM

111 None. For the number of people who will actually be able to accomplish this, I can’t se it being alarge scale enough issue that it would be concerning. Have other areas done this? What are theirissues they’ve run into? I just see no downside to allowing secondary suites.

3/25/2018 10:31 PM

112 None 3/25/2018 9:55 PM

113 None 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

114 Emergency awareness of when a dwelling has a secondary dwelling and maintaining the Propertyvalues.

3/25/2018 9:46 PM

115 none 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

116 Water is always a concern 3/24/2018 4:34 AM

12 / 48

Secondary Suites

37.50% 15

45.00% 18

85.00% 34

Q3 Secondary Suites may take several different forms: A suite within inprincipal dwelling - a secondary dwelling unit located within the basement

or interior space of the principal dwelling unit with separate cooking,sleeping and bathroom facilities, A dwelling unit within accessory buildingor above a garage - a secondary dwelling unit located above a garage or

within an accessory building located on the same lot as the principaldwelling. A detached secondary dwelling unit - a detached dwelling unitlocated on the same lot as the principal dwelling. Do you have concerns

with any of the three forms of Secondary Dwelling Unit?Answered: 40 Skipped: 84

Total Respondents: 40

# PLEASE EXPLAIN: DATE

1 Safety and quality are the main concerns. High winds and snowfall can endanger residents of sub-standard mobile or fixed homes.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 No concerns with any of the forms. All should be allowed. 4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 No 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 No 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 No 4/16/2018 6:25 AM

6 None 4/15/2018 11:32 PM

7 Not with one or two - only problem for 3rd would be if there was not enough space for anotherdwelling.

4/15/2018 10:27 PM

8 We have objections to all three forms / any form of secondary suite. 4/15/2018 11:31 AM

9 No concerns with any of these formats. 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

Secondary DwellingUnit within inprincipal dwelling

Secondary DwellingUnit within Accessorybuilding or abovegarage

Detached secondarydwelling unit

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%


Secondary Dwelling Unit within in principal dwelling

Secondary Dwelling Unit within Accessory building or above garage

Detached secondary dwelling unit

13 / 48

Secondary Suites

10 I think they are all fine 4/13/2018 8:50 PM

11 Yes 4/13/2018 4:47 PM

12 I don’t have any concerns with either type. I think each resident is able to decide which type ofsecondary suite/dwelling suits them best

4/13/2018 8:54 AM

13 None 4/13/2018 8:53 AM

14 No concerns. All are acceptable and dependant upon each individual needs. 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

15 should only be allowed for parcels of land over 20 acres. Adding more people to existing smalldevelopments will only stress the septic systems which were designed for 1 household not 2households. Decline of existing water table. Will they be taxed as commercial developments ???Will family only be allowed....Our current bylaws and land uses will need to be revamped entirely toallow for these. Fire is a real concern especially with the dry years we have experienced in thepast. Road safety, more people equals more crime, more stray animals (dogs) loose. Hire moreRCMP for the MD rather than secondary suites.

4/13/2018 3:00 AM

16 No concerns 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

17 Not if it is for family 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

18 No concerns, all are viable options 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

19 Signal family dwelling means just that! 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

20 None at all 4/12/2018 4:17 PM

21 no assuming permitted 4/12/2018 4:05 PM

22 no 4/12/2018 3:10 PM

23 Same reasoning as number 1. 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

24 Fire hazard, septic problems, water well problems, with increase in people on the well, septic.Crime, dogs, traffic on roads, create slums in our beautiful MD of Foothills.

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

25 No concerns 4/12/2018 11:59 AM

26 No I do not have any concerns 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

27 Suite Safety - Especially above garage - There must be policies in place so that buildings are up tocode - have proper ventilation and to protect the tenant and homeowners.

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

28 There will need to be regulations for detached units and which areas hey are permitted and notpermitted.

4/12/2018 8:38 AM

29 See previous comment. I support secondary suites wholly but would like to see some controls toprevent junkie or shabby thrown together secondary suites.

4/12/2018 8:31 AM

30 None 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

31 No concerns with any of them. 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

32 The abundance of land makes any of these not a concern. 4/11/2018 10:42 AM

33 No concerns whatsoever. 4/11/2018 8:08 AM

34 None 4/10/2018 6:15 PM

35 No 4/10/2018 4:31 PM

36 No 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

37 This housing form will be hard to police/enforce in the rural areas and should only be allowedwhere there is a water co-op and parcels greater than 1 acres and less then 3-acres. should notbe allowed anywhere else in the MD.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

38 They all depend on the main property 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

39 Biggest concern with detached secondary dwelling and some with the units above accessorybuildings as that may also be abused with all the space for someone to bring their “stuff” to theproperty. Landowners may charge high renters and renters may double up to pay rents thus morepeople on site.

4/10/2018 8:42 AM

40 No I don't have any concerns other than making them to code 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

14 / 48

Secondary Suites

41 this might cause concerns for neighbors as it could affect their ability to sell their house. ie.blocking views of the mountains.

4/9/2018 8:44 PM

42 Depending on the specific site any of the above may be suitable. eg. on an acreage a separatedetached dwelling may be safer and easier to accommodate.

4/9/2018 8:36 PM

43 No concerns 4/9/2018 8:32 PM

44 No concerns. These are already addressed in existing bylaws. (ie. max buildings allowed). 4/9/2018 8:30 PM

45 None 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

46 No concerns apart from inspection to confirm suites are safe. 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

47 No 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

48 A secondary dwelling unit may bring more traffic than a landlord may have been told, howeverproperly done, having multiple properties on a very large parcel should be fine.

4/9/2018 1:50 PM

49 No issues. Obviously setbacks from property lines adhered to. 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

50 No concerns. Ad detached dwelling provides more privacy. We would love to live in a "grannyhouse" on our children's property.

4/9/2018 1:38 PM

51 No specific concerns other than previously stated general ones 4/9/2018 1:30 PM

52 None as long as the appropriate definition can be determined 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

53 Privacy 4/9/2018 1:23 PM

54 No concerns 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

55 No 4/9/2018 1:16 PM

56 No 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

57 No concerns as long as they are built according to building codes. 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

58 If there are also more out buildings it could lead to too many buildings and clutter. 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

59 No 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

60 No concerns 4/9/2018 12:54 PM

61 Separate dwellings are not needed unless the purpose is to make an income. Family help wouldusually take plan in main dwelling.

4/9/2018 12:46 PM

62 No concerns 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

63 None 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

64 Will existing rules on number of accessory building be relaxed/changed. 4/9/2018 12:28 PM

65 The size of the property should be large enough to accommodate the extra building foot print. 4/9/2018 12:20 PM

66 No 4/9/2018 12:08 PM

67 None 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

68 assurance that a manufactured home is classified as a secondary suite. 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

69 Not really unless it appears to be two whole large houses on one small property (which hasrecently been built in my neighbourhood!). Somehow this bothers me.

4/7/2018 10:11 AM

70 Nope, unless someone tries to subdivide on the basis of the second detached unit. 4/6/2018 9:15 PM

71 I have no concerns as long as all types are within MD code and compliant, and done to maintain"the look" of the MD of Foothills and are safe. ex. above garage "fumes" proper ventilation systemsand maintained and tested to compliance.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

72 No concerns 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

73 See Previous 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

74 Although I think there should be a exemption for "tiny homes" or living quarters like that, I wouldlike to avoid having 2 full size house on smaller acreages.

4/6/2018 3:42 PM

15 / 48

Secondary Suites

75 Secondary dwelling unit on under 40 acres is portable and permitted only as family/support toresident of primary dwelling.

4/6/2018 11:48 AM

76 No concerns. I'm sure the M.D. will complicate it enough. 4/6/2018 9:51 AM

77 I only have concerns if people expect to be able to build two homes on a small parcel of land (lessthan 3 acres) or if people think its reasonable to have 10 trailers on their 20 acre parcel. Thereneeds to be a reasonable limit to the amount of dwellings and type of dwellings on different sizesof parcels.

4/6/2018 8:57 AM

78 As I mentioned in my comment above, detached secondary dwellings need to have squarefootage and acreage requirements. E.g. up to 1000 sq ft. On 5+ acres. Above 1000 sq ft on 10+acres. As with all secondary suites, I think there needs to be consideration taken into account thenumber of vehicles, RVs, motorcycles etc. That are parked on the property as well. Beaccommodating while maintaining the feel of a rural acreage community

4/5/2018 4:30 PM

79 The neighbours have had had tenants and they have been a problem for everybody. They hadthem just to pay the mortgage.

4/5/2018 2:37 PM

80 The same concern for all forms. Areas already developed as single family homes should remainas built. That is why most purchasers bought their home. They didn't want to live in a multifamilyarea or area with renters. Secondary suites should be illegal. If the MD feels there is a shortage ofrental accommodation encourage builders in new subdivisions to include more apartments orduplexes. People buying single family homes in these subdivisions know upfront the type ofcommunity they are buying into and can decide if that is the lifestyle they want. Do not change thecommunity lifestyle after the fact by allowing secondary suites.

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

81 There should be a size limit 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

82 No concerns I think acreage owners should be able to build these suites above accessorybuildings etc as they come in handy for family members to live on the property too

4/5/2018 7:49 AM

83 loss of agricultural land, 4/5/2018 12:26 AM

84 No concerns 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

85 If it looks like a second house on a smaller parcel it would affect the appearance of the housingdensity of a neighborhood.

4/4/2018 5:25 PM

86 no problem with any of the three types 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

87 As long as there were standards set to ensure that the detached dwelling units wherecomplimentary to the rest of the property and did not constitute a full sized second residence onparcels under 80 acres, then I would have no concern.

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

88 How do you regulate the size, access, safety, codes and number of people living on andaccessing a secondary suite.

4/4/2018 2:12 PM

89 Absolutely no concern with any of the options. People should have more control over their ownproperty. We are becoming a far too Socialist community, province and country.

4/4/2018 12:10 PM

90 None whatsoever as stated above. 4/3/2018 12:55 PM

91 No - just that detached dwellings have a similar look to principal residences 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

92 no concerns 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

93 No concerns as long as they meet the codes for safety. 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

94 size and aesthetics could be a problem if the secondary dwelling is TOO BIG on a relatively smallparcel. Want to avoid 2 monster houses on the same parcel or multiple LARGE buildings on sameparcel with visibly high density.

3/31/2018 10:34 AM

95 Size in relation to property and to principal dwelling. 3/30/2018 1:10 PM

96 See above 3/30/2018 1:08 PM

97 The size of the building to be built -what would be allowed 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

98 None. I think its a great idea. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

99 No concern with any of the above 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

100 No concerns 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

16 / 48

Secondary Suites

101 A detached secondary dwelling will lead to more construction, blocking of views, etc. I support theother two options but feel the MD should seriously consider making it a requirement that the ownershould be physically living on the property in one of the suites. This will ensure proper upkeep andpride of ownership will be maintained. This will also allow better supervision on the property toprevent 'trouble renters'.

3/26/2018 11:00 AM

102 no concerns. 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

103 No concerns. Allowing all three options gives homeowners the flexibility. This is particularlyrelevant in the MD, which has many types of development and land use. These options may bemore applicable for different types or sizes of lots. For example, a large agriculturally zoned parcelwith a primary residence could accommodate any one of these types of dwelling units withminimum impact.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

104 No concerns. 3/26/2018 7:22 AM

105 None. Legalizing them will ensure that people are protected from illegally and possibly incorrectlyconstructed dwellings.

3/25/2018 10:31 PM

106 None 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

107 I think they should all be accepted 3/25/2018 9:46 PM

108 No concerns, landowners should have the choice 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

109 None 3/24/2018 4:34 AM

17 / 48

Secondary Suites

Q4 Are there certain areas of the Municipality where you would considerthis use more appropriate? Please explain.


# RESPONSES DATE

1 No. However, in towns or hamlets there is more concern for parking, noise, fire safety, and otherconsiderations because of close co-location.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 No. 4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 Every body should have the option 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 No 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 No 4/16/2018 6:25 AM

6 Allow all over 4/15/2018 11:32 PM

7 Especially rural acreages, farms 4/15/2018 10:27 PM

8 A community that agrees to allow secondary suites and residents are fully aware of therequirements and drawback of allowing a neighbour to develop and rent out a suite. A communitythat has sufficient parking to ensure the street is not congested with rental suite vehicles. Acommunity that has access to sufficient potable water and waste water facilities.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

9 Outside of town 4/14/2018 7:56 PM

10 No, whether it's a 3 or 4 acre property or 20 acre property, we fully support secondary suites. 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

11 No 4/13/2018 8:50 PM

12 Land with 2+ acres is great for this 4/13/2018 7:57 PM

13 Longview, Cayley, Blackie, Aldersyde, small villages that have a service base 4/13/2018 4:47 PM

14 No. All areas would be appropriate. 4/13/2018 8:54 AM

15 It should be allowed on all land over 2 acres 4/13/2018 8:53 AM

16 All areas that are not high density housing would be acceptable. 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

17 Rural locations. 4/13/2018 7:19 AM

18 Only on large parcels of land, for the immediate family, taxed commercially. 4/13/2018 3:00 AM

19 No 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

20 Any place for family 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

21 I think it would be more appropriate near urban communities 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

22 Out of town 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

23 ???? 2 acres and up; country residential zoned 4/12/2018 3:10 PM

24 i think more appropriate places would be on larger acreages, further away from townsites 4/12/2018 2:46 PM

25 Maybe in towns, hamlets, cities. they have the infrastructure for this. 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

26 Only on large holdings, and or taxed commerially. We have an aprox. 1000 sq. foot home on ourroad who has 3 tenants and neighbors have just given up dealing with the land owner, the bylawofficers, and the planning dept. One or two move out then another moves in every 3 - 5 months.Over the past two years we have tried to get the MD to address his Home Occupation and hisrentals, on his property. Everyone is tired of addressing and talking to the MD planning and bylawstaff when nothing is every accomplished. If the MD can not address this situation, how can theyexpand?

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

27 Closer to schools and downtown. Or in bigger properties so the houses aren't closer together thanthey already are

4/12/2018 11:59 AM

18 / 48

Secondary Suites

28 No 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

29 Rural villages or hamlets where homes for rent may be harder to come by EI: Cayley, Longviewetc.

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

30 No 4/12/2018 8:38 AM

31 No 4/12/2018 8:31 AM

32 Anywhere 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

33 No 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

34 All areas would be appropriate. 4/11/2018 10:42 AM

35 Acreages of 3 acres or more and within the town of High River that has a full sized lot. 4/11/2018 8:08 AM

36 Quality of structure less of a concern in remote areas. In highly developed areas (Norris COulee)-sturctures should meet architectural controls.

4/10/2018 6:15 PM

37 On acreages. 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

38 No, but the process should be a discretionary Development Permit in all districts, with higherparking requirements in Hamlets. Agricultural Districts should also be discretionary of this isperceived as a permitted use it will be abused.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

39 No should be available for the entire MD. 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

40 More appropriate on larger land parcels where neighbours are not close and won’t be visuallyimpacted. Certainly not on cluster developments such as cul de sacs etc. E.g. I live on a cul desac of 7 acreages. Even if say 3 or 4 people developed detached suites I can assure you there willbe visual impacts, more noise, more visitors, dogs etc. that will affect our privacy and quiteenjoyment. People start with good intentions but we all know that many tenants don’t view propertyas owners.

4/10/2018 8:42 AM

41 No 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

42 In acreages where there is more room for expanded accommodation and extra cars. 4/9/2018 8:44 PM

43 No 4/9/2018 8:36 PM

44 No 4/9/2018 8:32 PM

45 For space reasons only,perhaps woutside the actual Hamlets. Anyone with an acreage has plentyof room for parking, etc. and should be allowed to do it. (Perhaps the Hamlet should be able tovote for themselves, since they may be different than an area with large acreages).

4/9/2018 8:30 PM

46 No 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

47 With today's rising cost, people should be able to make a secondary suite! Canada in general hasmore than enough space per person. Ex. Calgary 1 million ish people anywhere else way morepeople per land space.

4/9/2018 8:21 PM

48 should work in all areas, especially modern subdivision like Heritage Pointe 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

49 Closer to Calgary on paved roads. Anything 3-4 acres in size and above. 4/9/2018 1:50 PM

50 High Density Areas 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

51 Everywhere, fair for everyone. 4/9/2018 1:38 PM

52 Counter-intuitively in the more rural areas there is less impact on a 1+ acre lot than in an area withhigher density.

4/9/2018 1:27 PM

53 In town of Okotoks 4/9/2018 1:23 PM

54 Larger Acreage Areas 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

55 Larger acreages 4/9/2018 1:16 PM

56 Not really 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

57 Any rural, low density areas 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

58 Larger parcels 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

59 No 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

19 / 48

Secondary Suites

60 5 or more acre limit 4/9/2018 12:54 PM

61 High Density Areas 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

62 No 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

63 no 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

64 In larger subdivision - greater than 5-acre parcels - also close to schools 4/9/2018 12:36 PM

65 Development corridors, close to highway #2 and Okotoks/High River 4/9/2018 12:28 PM

66 On acreages larger than five acres 4/9/2018 12:20 PM

67 Where the parcel or home is large enough to handle one extra building or suite. 4/9/2018 12:08 PM

68 No 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

69 no 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

70 Under one roof...anywhere. Garage suites...with concern for neighbour proximity. Detachedhomes...on larger parcels (10+ acres).

4/7/2018 10:11 AM

71 Rural/farm and acreages above 5 acres allowing the space and privacy for other neighbors. Roomfor parking, water, septic, traffic, limit the density in smaller areas.

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

72 No 4/6/2018 9:15 PM

73 Rural farm/ranching and acreages have land and space to sustain. Especially greater than 5acres; especially appropriate to keep historical families in MD.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

74 Acreages, half and quarter sections and larger 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

75 City of Calgary 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

76 No secondary detached dwelling on parcels under 5 acres. 4/6/2018 11:48 AM

77 No 4/6/2018 9:51 AM

78 Perhaps. Things that come to mind are acreage communities e.g. Norris coulee etc. Are not thebest place for detached secondary dwellings.

4/5/2018 4:30 PM

79 NO !!! 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

80 The MD already approves what I would call a secondary suite where mobile homes are allowingfor temporary accommodation such as for farm help. But these are just temporary approvals. Anypermanent solutions should not be allowed

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

81 on all parcels >2 acres 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

82 No 4/5/2018 7:49 AM

83 no 4/5/2018 12:26 AM

84 Rural vs hamlets 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

85 no 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

86 No, I think they should be allowed where the need presents itself. 4/4/2018 2:52 PM

87 They are APPROPRIAE in the whole of MD of Foothills. 4/4/2018 12:10 PM

88 In small towns such as Turner Valley or Black Diamond 4/4/2018 11:36 AM

89 Everywhere is appropriate, people own their houses and pay high taxes, they have every right torent out their basement or suite, the rest of the world does this already. You cannot discriminateagainst any one in the MD and only allow this in certain areas. This should be a no brainer in thefirst place, as mentioned, this is the 21st century.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

90 No 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

91 no 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

92 no. 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

93 Not really ... lots of opportunity regardless of location (hilly vs flat terrain, isolated vs close totown/village/hamlet)

3/31/2018 10:34 AM

20 / 48

Secondary Suites

94 No. 3/30/2018 1:10 PM

95 Consideration of impact on neighbours should be given some consideration (Parking, noise, pets,etc.)

3/30/2018 1:08 PM

96 I’m not sure 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

97 Rural homes. Less impact on street parking. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

98 Larger acreages e.g. from 5 acres and above for separate dwelling unit. 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

99 More appropriate in larger parcels of land. 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

100 Fine in all areas 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

101 no 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

102 closer to the city, or denser areas. 3/26/2018 11:00 AM

103 no 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

104 All areas of the Municipalities should have the option for secondary suites. 3/26/2018 9:44 AM

105 No, I can see this being useful everywhere. 3/25/2018 10:31 PM

106 No. 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

107 Closer to the city and where ever necessary to facilitate elder care, or family support, or farmsupport

3/25/2018 9:46 PM

108 no 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

109 No 3/24/2018 4:34 AM

21 / 48

Secondary Suites

Q5 Are there certain areas of the Municipality where you would considerthis use inappropriate? Please explain.


# RESPONSES DATE

1 No. 4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 No. 4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 No 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 Properties that are too small 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 No 4/16/2018 6:25 AM

6 Only where impacts a close neighbour in a negative way 4/15/2018 11:32 PM

7 crowded areas 4/15/2018 10:27 PM

8 Secondary suites are not appropriate in communities that specifically prohibit their inclusion in acommunity of single-family dwellings. The community where we live Ravencrest Village owns andoperates their own community water supply Ravencrest Water Supply (RWS) and we do not havesufficient resources to provide the required 1,250 M3 as required by the water act.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

9 Residential areas especially areas already cramped with parking 4/14/2018 7:56 PM

10 Perhaps Green Zones 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

11 No 4/13/2018 8:50 PM

12 1 acre or less of land 4/13/2018 7:57 PM

13 All areas of MD inappropriate except large holdings and only for relatives, poor neighbor hoods willbe created and renters will not have pride of ownership

4/13/2018 4:47 PM

14 No. 4/13/2018 8:54 AM

15 Small subdivisions under 2 acres 4/13/2018 8:53 AM

16 High density housing. Ex. Heritage Pointe 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

17 High density neighbourhoods 4/13/2018 7:19 AM

18 personally, the entire MD, all the land use laws will need to be rewritten. Example, if you allow 3dogs in one residential house and that is turned into a secondary suite does that mean that oneproperty can now have 6 dogs? What about fire safety, septic, decline in water table?

4/13/2018 3:00 AM

19 No 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

20 No 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

21 I think we should try to preserve as much farm land as possible within the municipality 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

22 No 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

23 Not if there is consensus the use should be allowed 4/12/2018 4:05 PM

24 acreages immediately surrounding towns 4/12/2018 2:46 PM

25 See Number 1 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

26 Parcels under 40 Acres 4/12/2018 1:00 PM

27 No 4/12/2018 11:59 AM

28 No 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

29 not really but I don't see the need in towns like Okotoks and High River where there are plenty ofrentals or retirement homes available.

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

22 / 48

Secondary Suites

30 Yes- there needs to be areas that are restricted to types of secondary suites. I feel basementsuites aught to be allowed due to many aging parents.

4/12/2018 8:38 AM

31 No 4/12/2018 8:31 AM

32 None 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

33 No 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

34 No 4/11/2018 10:42 AM

35 In areas that are already high density they should be avoided. 4/11/2018 8:08 AM

36 no 4/10/2018 6:15 PM

37 No 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

38 No - should apply MD wide with same rules across the board BUT parking in Hamlet Residentialand stand-alone suites only where there is a water co-op and parcel of 1 to 3 acres where there isno livestock.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

39 No 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

40 No 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

41 Not away of any areas - possible in Towns or communities. 4/9/2018 8:44 PM

42 No 4/9/2018 8:36 PM

43 No 4/9/2018 8:32 PM

44 No 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

45 No 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

46 No 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

47 Rich areas with monster mansions. Would not probable appreciate any change close to their land. 4/9/2018 1:50 PM

48 Not really 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

49 No every area needs lower cost housing. 4/9/2018 1:38 PM

50 No 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

51 Towns 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

52 No. 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

53 Any higher density areas (Turner Valley, Priddis, Millarville, etc) 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

54 smaller parcels 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

55 No 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

56 areas where water supply is an issue 4/9/2018 12:48 PM

57 I think there needs to be regulations regarding number of people in a secondary dwelling. Oneperson has little impact - six could have significant impact on wells and septic.

4/9/2018 12:46 PM

58 No 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

59 no 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

60 In subdivisions of 1-2 acres 4/9/2018 12:36 PM

61 No, think there are valid reasons for these in all areas in the existing buildings. 4/9/2018 12:28 PM

62 Hamlets if the density creates parking problems 4/9/2018 12:20 PM

63 Where the area is already over crowded or sharing limited water resources. Small cul de sacsmight not be able to handle more traffic.

4/9/2018 12:08 PM

64 No 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

65 no 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

66 Same as question #4. Parcel size and neighbourhood density should be taken into consideration. 4/7/2018 10:11 AM

23 / 48

Secondary Suites

67 Hamlets, towns, acreages less than 4 acres. These areas increase the density in smaller areasincreasing the traffic, parking, water, etc in smaller areas.

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

68 Where there isn't decent water sources. Shipping water in from the city is costly to the land ownersand roads being used.

4/6/2018 9:15 PM

69 Only place would be on commercial designated zones and areas in more urban zones which I feelis on overland on high population density zones. Taxing, water, sewer, and services.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

70 Higher density subdivisions and towns with poorly planned parking 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

71 Yes, any acreage 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

72 above 4/6/2018 11:48 AM

73 No, I'm sure the M.D. will decide that. 4/6/2018 9:51 AM

74 No. 4/5/2018 4:30 PM

75 NO 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

76 All existing communities 4/5/2018 11:51 AM

77 No 4/5/2018 7:49 AM

78 Detached secondary unit in hamlets 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

79 no 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

80 Commercial and Industrial land uses 4/4/2018 2:52 PM

81 NO 4/4/2018 12:10 PM

82 In hamlets and rural properties 4/4/2018 11:36 AM

83 No, appropriate everywhere. 4/3/2018 12:55 PM

84 No 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

85 no 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

86 no. 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

87 wetland areas where sewage treatment may pose a problem. 3/31/2018 10:34 AM

88 No. 3/30/2018 1:10 PM

89 On small lots where parking and noise could be a problem 3/30/2018 1:08 PM

90 I’m not sure 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

91 No. I think its a great idea. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

92 Lots in hamlets, villages and towns. 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

93 Perhaps in parcels of land smaller than 5 acres. 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

94 No areas 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

95 no 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

96 no 3/26/2018 11:00 AM

97 no 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

98 No. 3/26/2018 9:44 AM

99 No 3/25/2018 10:31 PM

100 No 3/25/2018 9:55 PM

101 No. 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

102 None 3/25/2018 9:46 PM

103 no 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

104 No 3/24/2018 4:34 AM

24 / 48

Secondary Suites

10.34% 12

28.45% 33

2.59% 3

2.59% 3

3.45% 4

0.00% 0

52.59% 61

Q6 Are there parcel sizes where you would consider this use would bemore appropriate?


TOTAL 116

# OTHER - PLEASE EXPLAIN DATE

1 There might need to be restrictions on size, placement, etc. with smaller parcels or in settlements. 4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 No limit to parcel sizes or location. 4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 All parcel sizes should be able to build 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 Parcel size really has not impact on whether or not there should be secondary suites. We live in athree acre development and our bylaws and covenants specifically states Single-Family CountryResidential.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

5 only in villages, or parcels over 40 acres 4/13/2018 4:47 PM

6 Should be up to the homeowner 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

Parcels over21 acres in...

Parcels 2 to21 acres in...

0.8 acres to1.99 acres i...

Less than 0.80acres in size

Within Hamletsof Cayley an...

WithinHeritage...

Other - pleaseexplain

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Parcels over 21 acres in size


0.8 acres to 1.99 acres in size


Within Hamlets of Cayley and Blackie (larger Hamlet lots)

Within Heritage Pointe, Greenhaven, Priddis Greens style development

Other - please explain

25 / 48

Secondary Suites

7 Doesn't matter. All are fine. 4/12/2018 4:17 PM

8 My opinion is that under 2 acres an in dwelling suite is more appropriate assuming sufficient safeparking is available- larger properties should be able to decide which type depending on anyarchitectural and neighbor controls/ feedback and services can support without impactingsurrounding properties

4/12/2018 4:05 PM

9 anything over 5 acres, anything less just seems more like developing an area instead of beingrural

4/12/2018 2:46 PM

10 No 4/12/2018 8:31 AM

11 Anywhere for most of them but separate detached suites should be on land that is a bit larger,maybe over 1 acre

4/12/2018 8:28 AM

12 I think if a land owner wants to add a suite, they should be able to regardless of size of parcel. 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

13 All areas are appropriate. otherwise you will be challenged with every application if you are to putrestrictions on where they are appropriate.

4/11/2018 10:42 AM

14 No 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

15 MD wide but special consideration for Hamlet Policy and stand-along only where a water co-opexist on parcels 1 - 3 acres in size.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

16 Fine for all sizes of property. Suites can be made quite small 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

17 Larger parcels with plenty of space between homes 4/10/2018 8:42 AM

18 As long as the site can properly accomodate the proposed suite. re setbacks, parking, water andsewer, than all sizes should be suitable.

4/9/2018 8:36 PM

19 Over 2 acres. Depends on parking. If they can prove they comply with existing standards, then yesthey should be allowed.

4/9/2018 8:30 PM

20 All should be classed the same 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

21 1 acre or more would be more appropriate 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

22 Should work in all areas 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

23 Over 2 acres - Heritage Point Style have no parking 4/9/2018 1:50 PM

24 High Density areas. Land size may dictate the secondary suite on is allowed to resurrect. ie. smallparcel may only have a suite in primary dwelling as setbacks disallow a second building.

4/9/2018 1:43 PM

25 Lets not have pockets that allow suites and pockets that don't (and are therefore considered moreupper class)

4/9/2018 1:38 PM

26 Parcels 2 - 21 acres and Hamlets. Hamlet areas could be consulted for their opinions. 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

27 Within hamlets and Heritage Pointe style developments. 4/9/2018 1:23 PM

28 Parcels over 2 acres 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

29 Each case makes sense.However, water and septic issues may need to be addressed in smallerparcels.

4/9/2018 1:14 PM

30 Parcels over 2 acres - more space, low density 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

31 all fine, depending on the type of secondary dwelling 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

32 no 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

33 no 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

34 Parcels 2 acres and larger or within Hamlets or Heritage Point style development 4/9/2018 12:36 PM

35 0.8 - over 21 acres. If a second building, there should be enough space to build. 4/9/2018 12:08 PM

36 Any is fine 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

37 no 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

38 See answers for #4 and #5 4/7/2018 10:11 AM

39 Parcels over 21 acres in size and parcels 2 to 21 acres in size 4/6/2018 9:15 PM

26 / 48

Secondary Suites

40 Land that can sustain more population due to size, wells, septic, and roads. Keep the landscapebetter eye appeal.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

41 Over 21 acres and 2 to 21 acres 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

42 MD over 80 acres 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

43 Detached secondary dwelling should be saved for larger parcels. Other than that, as long as youhave adequate space and parking, it should be fine.

4/6/2018 3:42 PM

44 Please see previous comments. 4/5/2018 4:30 PM

45 None 4/5/2018 11:51 AM

46 all parcels 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

47 Parcels 2 acres to 80 acres for separate dwellings 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

48 As noted previously. Over 21 acres 2 residences looking like houses would be appropriate. 4/4/2018 5:25 PM

49 Again, they should be allowed throughout the MD where the need presents itself. Agingpopulation, want for parents to age in place, caring for seniors and those with diabilities, and as asource of secondary income, all support the desire for secondary suites to be allowed for

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

50 The are appropriate on any size property. They can be as small a unit as 400 Sq. Ft. 4/4/2018 12:10 PM

51 No, appropriate on any size of parcel, why discriminate? 4/3/2018 12:55 PM

52 Calgary can do we should be able to also 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

53 no issues 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

54 no concerns 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

55 No 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

56 should be if rural on properties over 10 acres. 3/26/2018 7:47 PM

57 All of the above 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

58 all of the above 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

59 All areas. Increasing the population density is important everywhere. 3/25/2018 10:31 PM

60 More acceptable in larger lots but allowable in all locations if the rules are followed and if for family. 3/25/2018 9:46 PM

61 any of the above 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

27 / 48

Secondary Suites

0.88% 1

1.77% 2

10.62% 12

20.35% 23

0.88% 1

4.42% 5

61.06% 69

Q7 Are there parcel sizes where you would consider this use would beinappropriate?Answered: 113 Skipped: 11

TOTAL 113

# OTHER - PLEASE EXPLAIN DATE

1 No parcel sizes where this is inappropriate. If it can be done in cities, it certainly can be doneeverywhere in our MD

4/16/2018 12:42 PM

2 No 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

3 No , as long as regulations are met 4/15/2018 11:32 PM

4 Parcel size really has not impact on whether or not there should be secondary suites. We live in athree acre development and our bylaws and covenants specifically states Single-Family CountryResidential.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

5 No 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

6 see above 4/13/2018 4:47 PM

Parcels over21 acres in...

Parcels 2 to21 acres in...

0.8 acres to1.99 acres i...

Less than 0.80acres in size

Within Hamletsof Cayley an...

WithinHeritage...

Other - pleaseexplain

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Parcels over 21 acres in size


0.8 acres to 1.99 acres in size


Within Hamlets of Cayley and Blackie (larger Hamlet lots)

Within Heritage Pointe, Greenhaven, Priddis Greens style development

Other - please explain

28 / 48

Secondary Suites

7 No 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

8 All fine, 4/12/2018 4:17 PM

9 no 4/12/2018 3:10 PM

10 last 4 options, especially if it is an entirely separate building 4/12/2018 2:46 PM

11 anything under 40 acres should not allow secondary suites 4/12/2018 1:00 PM

12 Anything larger then 2acres 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

13 No 4/12/2018 8:31 AM

14 No 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

15 No 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

16 as above - all areas are appropriate 4/11/2018 10:42 AM

17 No 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

18 no 4/10/2018 9:02 AM

19 no 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

20 1 to 5 acres in size 4/10/2018 8:42 AM

21 Over 2 acres in size 4/9/2018 8:44 PM

22 Rules regarding parking etc. would allow for appropriate size of suite. 4/9/2018 8:36 PM

23 All should be classed the same 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

24 no 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

25 no 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

26 Less than 2 acres. Saller areas may see an increase in traffic, however if there is only 1 tenantand 1 owner, I see no added risk or loss of enjoyment of property.

4/9/2018 1:50 PM

27 size may dictate the type of secondary suite but not disallow 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

28 Hopefully we don't have "not in my neighborhood" stands. eg. A good idea but not near me. 4/9/2018 1:38 PM

29 no 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

30 Parcels under 2 acres 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

31 No 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

32 under 2 acres in size - not enough space 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

33 Acreages less than 2 acres 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

34 no 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

35 less than 2 acres 4/9/2018 12:54 PM

36 Less then 2 acres - smaller acreages will become crowded, too many kids, pets, cars, noise, etc.Crime magnets

4/9/2018 12:48 PM

37 Parcels under 21 acres - overcrowding and enforcement issuers, by-law complaints. 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

38 no 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

39 no 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

40 under 2 acres in size 4/9/2018 12:36 PM

41 Conside the size of the existing home or garage to be developed on the size of the property if asecond home is to be built.

4/9/2018 12:08 PM

42 None of the above 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

43 no 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

44 See answers for #4 and #5 4/7/2018 10:11 AM

29 / 48

Secondary Suites

45 Less than 0.80 acres in size and within Heritage Pointe, Greenhaven, and Priddis Green styledevelopment

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

46 Less than 0.80 acres, within Hamlets, and within Heritage Pointe, Greenhaven, Priddis Greensstyle development.

4/6/2018 9:15 PM

47 0.8 -1.99 acres, less than 0.80 acres, within Heritage Point Greenhaven, Priddis Greens. Onlyconcern about hamlets is services are adequate for increase population potential. The rest is oversaturation of land for ability to sustain increased population. In smaller area vs large parcels ofland.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

48 All 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

49 I only think it would be inappropriate to have an actual second home on a small parcel of land.Having a basement suite or a suite above the garage is reasonable. Building two or more wholehomes is not.

4/6/2018 8:57 AM

50 Please see previous comments 4/5/2018 4:30 PM

51 ALL parcels except where they have a requirement for farm labour. 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

52 All 4/5/2018 11:51 AM

53 None 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

54 parking would be my only concern 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

55 All parcel sizes can accomodate some type of secondary suite. 4/4/2018 2:52 PM

56 NO 4/4/2018 12:10 PM

57 No 4/3/2018 12:55 PM

58 No restrictions within the md 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

59 no issues 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

60 no concerns 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

61 Not sure at this stage 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

62 Pending on the type of secondary dwelling unit. 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

63 The question should allow for more choices in which case I would choose 3 and 4 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

64 No all areas are appropriate 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

65 no 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

66 no 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

67 No. Option should be available across the MD. 3/26/2018 9:44 AM

68 None. 3/25/2018 10:31 PM

69 no 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

30 / 48

Secondary Suites

Q8 We have introduced a number of recognized benefits and challengesto secondary suites.Can you think of any other benefits or challenges with

allowing legal Secondary Suites in the Municipal District of Foothills?Please explain.Answered: 92 Skipped: 32

# RESPONSES DATE

1 Secondary suites are especially helpful for seniors. Whether they bring extra income or extrahands, suites allow seniors to stay in their homes, a significant advantage socially andeconomically.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 No 4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 A benifit would be people might be able to live with there families longer if they had secondary suitalso take care of them better if the were closer

4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 No 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 No 4/16/2018 6:25 AM

6 Children to reside with parents to help when parents get old Extra income for retired seniorsIncrease property values

4/15/2018 11:32 PM

7 second address for a property - currently new Canada post addresses for the new communityboxes are tied to one box. It would be important for privacy if the second family living in thesecondary dwelling / suite could have their ow n mail address. Also allow for contracts to be set upfor "renters" with damage deposit requests, monthly payments etc. rather than having seconddwelling "help with expenses"

4/15/2018 10:27 PM

8 Our community (Ravencrest Village) has bylaws and covenants specifically identifying thecommunity as Single-Family Country Residential. Purchasers are responsible to be aware of thebylaws and covenants and to comply with them to preserve our community of single familydwellings / country residential. We have a community water system that cannot accommodate therequired additional water. Our community utilizes separate septic systems that would probably nothave been sized to accommodate two families. There are a number of restrictions that secondarysuites are required to comply with : left in the MD staff’s (who have made it obvious they are aproponent of secondary suites) hands they would quickly be making exceptions to establishedrequirements to allow a secondary suite. i.e. - Direct access / exit to the outdoors - Access to1,250 M3 of potable water - Suitably sized septic system / mound. - the resident remains incompliance with structure requirements, number of structures and spacing of structures. Peaceand quiet – we purchased our land and built our single family residence because we did not wantto be living with a lot of neighbours and wanted the peace and quiet that residential / acreagedevelopments allow. The MD of Foothills #31 Council needs to ensure it is listening to theresidents. The manner in which the Secondary Suite concern is being raised is inappropriate – theMD continually refers to inlaw suites. Inlaw suites and secondary suites should be a separateissue. An inlaw suite is to take care of an immediate mother / father and NOT to generate “rentalincome”.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

9 Already mentioned 4/14/2018 7:56 PM

10 Our reasons and benefits are all about family and helping family members financially. We agreewith all the benefits that have been outlined.

4/14/2018 10:49 AM

11 No 4/13/2018 8:50 PM

12 absolutely no pride of ownership from renters. Even on Calgary they have massive problems withbylaw, fire and safety enforcement for suites. Council should take a long hard look at all thenegatives in trying to enforce.

4/13/2018 4:47 PM

31 / 48

Secondary Suites

13 We are approaching retirement in about 5-10 years. We have already given a lot of thought tobuilding a second residence for us and our son and his family living in the original one. This keepsus close to our kids and grandchildren. It also allows us to stay on the farm, which is what we wantmost of all.

4/13/2018 8:54 AM

14 Na 4/13/2018 8:53 AM

15 Family remaining close to other family. Employees close to work. 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

16 No not allow, all you will create is poor areas with declining property values, landlords who willNOT follow the rules. Bylaw officers who can NOT enforce the rules. More traffic, more schoolbuses, more MD staff, etc. Do we want low cost housing in our MD and all the problems associatedwith it? We urge the MD to proceed very cautiously with secondary suites as it is opening a verylarge pandoras box.

4/13/2018 3:00 AM

17 People can rent a room in your house, what's the difference with a separate secondary suite. 4/12/2018 8:35 PM

18 They should be allowed over 2 acres for family 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

19 none come to mind 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

20 This would be an excellent way for a farmer with a guest suite or guest house to perhaps have alittle bit of steady income to weather lean years. Do not listen to the NIMBYs and BANANA (BuildAbsolutely Nothing Near Anything) people that are going to come out of the woodwork, mostlyfrom mansionaires who have no actual business in the Foothills besides parking their Mercedeshere.

4/12/2018 6:09 PM

21 Lower property taxes 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

22 No 4/12/2018 4:17 PM

23 Sufficient services ie policing, emergency etc to be able to handle increasing density 4/12/2018 4:05 PM

24 none. 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

25 Create a new industry of more slum landlords!!! Destroying our property values, and beautiful MD, 4/12/2018 1:00 PM

26 The elderly being close to family will make it an easier transition to needing help as opposed toneeding to move to a long term care facility

4/12/2018 9:46 AM

27 Enabling families to look after their aging parents/grandparents and not be tasked with affordingthe hefty retirement home fees. Also allowing family units to stay together.

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

28 Taxes 4/12/2018 8:38 AM

29 Benefits: primarily aging in place. Also, transitioning kids into adulthood. Challenges: keeping thequality of suites to the level of the home.

4/12/2018 8:31 AM

30 None 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

31 I only agree with a couple of the challenges. I think the benefits out weigh the challenges. 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

32 It makes common sense with the price of housing and rent. 4/11/2018 8:08 AM

33 none 4/10/2018 6:15 PM

34 Benefit is two generations on the same property. 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

35 Agricultural parcels - older accessory structure/barns could be re-purposed and may be poorlydone. It is important that this is not perceived as a "permitted" use in any district. Benefits- Manypeople want and need these for their family and aging parents and, if done properly this would bea societal benefit.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

36 Any and all the challenges are already covered without existing bylaws. 99.9 % of owners willmake good decisions.

4/10/2018 8:50 AM

37 I think the number and type should be based on parcel size 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

38 At the present time,I am aware of a number of secondary suites which are illegal and have had nosafety checks. The advantage is to enable family members to have independence and yet remainin the home. Involves care of the elderly and young.

4/9/2018 8:44 PM

39 Bringing families together, pooling resources, less wasted energy, more time with family 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

40 no 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

32 / 48

Secondary Suites

41 If there are helpers on a property or if the owner of the property is a single person, I see noproblem with having a few tenants.

4/9/2018 1:50 PM

42 Elder care, allows elders to remain with family longer. Expect more tax dollar for the MD Assistwith family care (children)

4/9/2018 1:43 PM

43 Help out with the huge number of seniors approaching who will need accommodation in order tostay in their communities. Better to have them cared for by family than draining the taxpayer'sdollars in some old-age setting. More reasonable places for people to live. Everyone deserves ahome.

4/9/2018 1:38 PM

44 Higher tax base, affordable housing, allowing individuals to live in rural areas who may nototherwise e able to. This will allow for more people to be exposed to rural life.

4/9/2018 1:27 PM

45 Home prices and rent in the city, town or village are very high. It is very difficult for young people tobuy houses or rent.

4/9/2018 1:23 PM

46 No 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

47 No 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

48 Benefit - more crime watch possibilities 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

49 It would be beneficial for people who are going to build to address issues such as septic, access,heating beforehand rather than having to retrofit things after. Properties appropriately taxed.

4/9/2018 1:03 PM

50 enforcement issues - how would this be enforced if the MD does not enforce existing regulations. 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

51 no 4/9/2018 12:41 PM

52 no 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

53 Benefits - increases affordability with additional income. Creates a more social lifestyle in Priddisas it can feel very isolated. Challenges - increased traffic, more demand on schools, infrastructure,daycare services.

4/9/2018 12:36 PM

54 Impact on neighbors impact on subdivision of land. Will people build secondary dwelling thenapply to subdivide it.

4/9/2018 12:28 PM

55 Agree with all you presented. We need to look at long range options as well as present conditionswhen we are making plans for our home and having plans by the MD in place would makerenovations easier and cheaper than retrofit later.

4/9/2018 12:08 PM

56 I think if build legally, keeping everything to code there should be no issues. 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

57 none 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

58 The cost of rural living in becoming to high for young family's to get into, allowing families to stay insecondary suites keeps the cost down for families to get to keep their family homestead and offsetthe cost of rural living.

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

59 Decreased strain on Alberta Health Services nursing homes; decreased need for group homes(thus Government funding) for individuals wanting more independence but have disabilities andrequire care. Keep families together or bring them back together! More income to individuals whomay lose their homes if they can bring in rental income.

4/6/2018 9:15 PM

60 Benefit is in world that is driven allows young families potential to live on land that is family owned.Keeps people in MD = $$spent and made benefiting MD of Foothills, allows long time home/landowners ability to off set rural living with potential rentals.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

61 Keeping grandparent and grandchildren closer together (Good for family life and community life) 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

62 No 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

63 I think it's a great idea. 4/6/2018 9:51 AM

64 Not at this time 4/5/2018 4:30 PM

65 Renters as a group are disrespectful of the rights of landowners 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

33 / 48

Secondary Suites

66 I would support secondary suites for family guests ie non rental and not permanent; or grannysuites for aging parents, again non rental and temporary. These type of suites would enhance thevalue of a property. The challenge I see in allowing these is enforcement to ensure they don'tbecome rental suites. As it is I see it difficult to ensure multiple related families don't occupy ahome zoned as a single family dwelling. The MD appears to not enforce the existing bylawsaround secondary suite or secondary homes on a property that is not zoned for them

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

67 Guidelines around site location, access, servicing, size, height, appearance, etc. are necessary tominimize any adverse effects... but given the large size of parcels in the MD, most parcels shouldbe able to accommodate them

4/5/2018 9:19 AM

68 I think they are beneficial especially for extended family members that might need care or familyclose to them. Also when parents get older if their kids took over the acreage the parents could livein the secondary suites to be cared for. It’s also handy if they have quests staying for longerperiods of time to have their own space.

4/5/2018 7:49 AM

69 No 4/4/2018 8:21 PM

70 no 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

71 Enforcement of those already existing suites to bring them into compliance with building andsafety codes would be a challenge. Benefit would be the ability for families to remain together, forparents to age in place and for children to transition to parent's properties.

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

72 Benefits 1. Security 2. Help aging people stay on their property 3. Help pay the escalating propertytaxes and insurance costs. 4. Help to introduce country life to youth and those with less money.(country living is becoming only available to the wealthy)

4/4/2018 12:10 PM

73 The effect on the usage of water, and septic systems. Would there be a larger RCMP presents 4/4/2018 11:36 AM

74 No more benefits than you have listed, plus may-be to generate economic activity of any kind inthis MD would be good. Your challenges are overblown fear mongering and don't make any senseto me.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

75 Residents really want this as an option - please consider allow us to use our valuable land the waywe want to within confines of reasonable laws for noise, safety and architecture controls

4/2/2018 4:30 PM

76 you have done a good job of covering 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

77 no 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

78 roads (sufficiently wide enough / surface maintenance) with increased usage. 3/31/2018 10:34 AM

79 Recognizing these living arrangements could allow for an additional tax on legal suites therebyproviding revenue for any necessary MD infrastructure improvements.

3/30/2018 1:10 PM

80 no 3/30/2018 1:08 PM

81 The sense of community is enhanced. It brings a new generation to the MD and realizes the dreamof people who chose this area to remain at home

3/28/2018 4:37 PM

82 I think its a great idea. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

83 No 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

84 would allow us old people to live in our homes longer --- having a person close to help with choresand summer stuff would be great. Plus would feel more secure.

3/26/2018 7:47 PM

85 Allowing our seniors to stay in there home with families to assist each other. As well as takingaway some of the financial hardships some face.

3/26/2018 3:41 PM

86 Foothills does not have enough space or places to accomdate the ageing population 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

87 Challenge - Monitoring potential grow ops or crime related activities. 3/26/2018 11:00 AM

88 benefits to farm families 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

89 Economic. The MD of Foothills is one of the only jurisdictions in the region that does not "allow"this type of development, which could impact attracting new residents to the MD. People maychoose instead to build in Rockyview that has a legal and accommodating system in place.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

90 More diversity of community. 3/25/2018 9:55 PM

34 / 48

Secondary Suites

91 In our current economy, it allows a rental opportunity. Also, with the aging population, it allows anopportunity for the elderly to have a place to live, and most importantly it allows family to take careof senior family members close to home.

3/25/2018 9:47 PM

92 no 3/25/2018 11:20 AM

35 / 48

Secondary Suites

40.16% 49

59.84% 73

Q9 Do you have any concerns with water and wastewater servicing forSecondary Suites?


TOTAL 122

# IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN DATE

1 Water and wastewater services should be standardized in regulating how suites are developed.Essential!

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 Landowners are the best managers of their own water and wastewater. If they have a weak well,they will not get more people on their land. If their septic system is smaller, it will have to bepumped more frequently.

4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 Must have an approved waste water system 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

4 For us - would be no more people in the dwelling than when our kids were growing up. 4/15/2018 10:27 PM

5 Potable Water: The proposal notes a requirement for 1,250 M3 of potable water to be available foreach household at a residence. We live in a community with our own water system (four HighQuality Ground Water wells) and we do not have the capacity for the additional water. We arecurrently on Water Conservation measures and do not expect that to change i.e. our CommunityWater System cannot support additional families. Waste Water: In our community each residenceutilizes a septic field and it would likely not be sized for two residences. The system would nothave been designed to handle another 1,250 M3 of water – which is the allowance for eachhousehold – what comes in must go out.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

6 Our water issue is still the same uncorrected problem it has been for 15 years. 4/14/2018 7:56 PM

7 Just need to be regulated to ensure there are no illegal operations occurring. 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

8 As long as the added capacity is accounted for in the design and function of the system design. 4/13/2018 7:57 PM

9 over flow of wastewater fields on existing neighbors property , decline in existing water tables. 4/13/2018 4:47 PM

10 This should not be a problem if it’s done correctly. 4/13/2018 8:54 AM

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

No


Yes

No

36 / 48

Secondary Suites

11 If done correctly there should be no issues. 4/13/2018 8:52 AM

12 See comments 4/13/2018 3:00 AM

13 This should always be a concern. Secondary suites will put more stress on limited waterresources.

4/12/2018 6:49 PM

14 More people means more restrictions 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

15 Existing wells and/or sewage fields may not have capacity and increasing use may have potentialimpact on surrounding properties

4/12/2018 4:05 PM

16 That would be the landowners respons 4/12/2018 3:10 PM

17 as with any dwellings especially rural there are always water and wastewater issues especially intimes of drought or high water levels making sure the same precautions and that water will still beviable in bad years.

4/12/2018 2:46 PM

18 Reducing water to our home or perhaps contaminating our water well. 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

19 Existing septics were designed for a single family not multiple, overflow to other properties etc.Health hazard

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

20 If we are low already how can adding more be okay. It would be another tank to make sure it'senough hot water as well

4/12/2018 11:59 AM

21 If the homes are code inspected like new homes that are being built then water and sewage wouldbe up to code and the home owner would paying for any extra uses or lines to built - Nothing to dowith the MD except to allow, inspect or disallow it.

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

22 proof of water well and septic capacity for carriage house and within dwelling suites is important.Same standards should apply as it is equivalent to adding a new lot for a new family.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

23 Waste water is already covered by law water can be delevered if owner does not have enoughwater.

4/10/2018 8:50 AM

24 May be a strain on septic systems 4/10/2018 8:42 AM

25 They won't be able to build them if they don't have an adequate water and sewage source 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

26 These are concerns about the impact on septic tanks/fields and well water consumption But thesecan be overcome with appropriate maintenance.

4/9/2018 8:44 PM

27 Some concerns regarding availability of water. 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

28 Water should be adequate (cistern if needed). Septic systems should have alarms before full! 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

29 Existing rules should suffice based on services within each house. 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

30 Its all septic and well service. If the homeowner needs to increase or alter either's capacity, that isup to the landlord.

4/9/2018 1:50 PM

31 Needs to be built into the planning for sure 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

32 Bylaws would handle 4/9/2018 1:38 PM

33 Must be an adequate supply of potable water without depleting the groundwater table. Wastewatersystem must be able to handle additional volume without contaminating ground water.

4/9/2018 1:30 PM

34 Special attention should be given to water usage. This is more of an enforcement issue. 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

35 In higher density subdivision it may be a concern 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

36 Must be adequate 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

37 As long as regulations are followed 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

38 More people means more pressure on water and wastewater services. 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

39 Guidelines need to be very clear. 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

40 Assuming wells can handle it and appropriate wastewater treatments are installed. 4/9/2018 12:36 PM

41 Like the idea of showing impact on neighboring parcels if greater than 6 parcels per quarter. 4/9/2018 12:28 PM

42 Our family was larger when the kids were growing up than with addition of a suite would be. 4/9/2018 12:08 PM

37 / 48

Secondary Suites

43 A property should be able to accommodate the increase in water and wastewater needs. 4/7/2018 10:11 AM

44 For smaller acreages or higher density subdivisions 4/6/2018 9:31 PM

45 Cost - cash grab? Ability for property to accommodate 4/6/2018 9:15 PM

46 Because if secondary suites are an option they should be held to MD foothills standards of landbeing able to support suite.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

47 Posters explain 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

48 Obviously, septic fields need to be designed accordingly. 4/6/2018 3:42 PM

49 It all has to be sized for the total occupants and not impact the neighbours. 4/6/2018 11:48 AM

50 appropriate waste water treatment has to be a condition 4/6/2018 8:24 AM

51 I would expect secondary suites would need to be considered as part of the building requirementsof the primary dwelling. In that, wells and septic systems would need to handle the demand of bothdwellings on the land that is available. Same for building within hamlet and more dense populatedareas. If the demand can not be handled, the suite cannot be built until services can be provided.

4/5/2018 4:30 PM

52 The ALberta building code has requirement for water and for septic. I can guarantee you that nohouse meets the requirement for 2 houses.

4/5/2018 2:37 PM

53 Of course, the infrastructure wasn't designed for this, whether it be a home in a town on sharedservices or a home on an acreage

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

54 Safety codes regulations need to be followed. 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

55 The water supply should be adequate for number of residents and the septic system should beadequate as well.

4/4/2018 5:25 PM

56 1250 cubic meters per year per household is what is allowed under the Provincial Water Act, therewould need to be some assurance that the secondary suite in addition to the primary residencewould not impact this allowance. Also not sure how this would impact communal water usage asapproved by Alberta Environment. Would there be a need to alter approvals?

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

57 If you can't regulate how many people are living in a dwelling this could be a concern 4/4/2018 2:12 PM

58 1. waste water is very highly controlled now so no concern 2. Water question is of most concern tothe property owner so they will have to deal with that. Water is available for delivery anywhere inthe MD

4/4/2018 12:10 PM

59 We have a shortage of good drinking water with out the addition of secondary suites. I feel thatthere would be a huge drain on the environment in regard to wastewater.

4/4/2018 11:36 AM

60 None on water, the slight increase in well water use would not be an issue, this is a new suite nota new acreage. On wastewater, septic tanks and systems have to be rated for number of people,most systems now are great capacity that what is actually needed.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

61 Not as long as wells and sewers run by property owners meet acceptable requirements fordwelling

4/2/2018 4:30 PM

62 current bylaws control now 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

63 making the water requirement the same as the principle dwelling seems extreme because I don'twant to see two full families living on one parcel ... I'm envisioning a single person or coupleoccupying a secondary suite. Wastewater treatment sized per bedroom is good.

3/31/2018 10:34 AM

64 Acreages currently manage their own property water and sanitation needs. 3/30/2018 1:10 PM

65 Each and ever project would have to be evaluated individually. Maybe even find ways to correctthose concerns

3/28/2018 4:37 PM

66 Rural septic systems and water wells must be able to accomodate the additional people. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

67 As mentioned and discussed with the County staff during the public engagement at Priddis Hall 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

68 Just generally concerned over the use of water --.. people take it for granted -- should live in Africa. 3/26/2018 7:47 PM

69 No concerns as long as they meet the MD's guidelines. 3/26/2018 3:41 PM

70 Making sure water table is not strained. 3/26/2018 11:00 AM

38 / 48

Secondary Suites

71 As long as it is clear what the requirements are and these requirements take into consideration thesustainability of the watershed, then there should be no issues with the water and wastewaterservicing.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

39 / 48

Secondary Suites

60.87% 70

39.13% 45

Q10 Are there provisions that you would like to see the Municipality put inplace to make Secondary Suites a use that has minimal impact on

neighboring parcels?Answered: 115 Skipped: 9

TOTAL 115

# PLEASE EXPLAIN DATE

1 Placement on the property should respect privacy of neighbours. Safety and security should beaddressed. Water use and capacity of sewage systems should be monitored. There should bestandards for the suite building or portion of a home that are similar to building regulations forprivate homes, to protect tenants and owners.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 The MD is too concerned with managing impact on neighbours. If we were talking about industryor feedlot impact that should be managed, but not this impact. Landowners should be free to dowith this as they please.

4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 Restrictions on dwelling size, number of occupants, restrictions on rental use. 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

4 Reasonable boundaries between any future buildings to keep space between neighbours. 4/15/2018 10:27 PM

5 Secondary suites should be allowed for rental income. "In-Law and this means only in-law suitesare acceptable. Rental properties are not.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

6 Eliminate the 2 year temporary permits that are currently required for 'compassionate suites'. 4/14/2018 10:49 AM

7 Using design and style based on the current residence 4/13/2018 7:57 PM

8 Property fencing, not barbed wire, nice rural fencing. Many trees and berms. 4/13/2018 4:47 PM

9 The primary landowner should be residing on the property 4/13/2018 8:54 AM

10 Primary landowner should be required to live in one of the residences. I don’t want to see thisturned into a revenue generator for absentee landlords.

4/13/2018 8:52 AM

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Yes

No

40 / 48

Secondary Suites

11 Defined property lines, limit amount of dogs, have bylaw inspect regularly so low cost housingareas of the MD do not develop over a short period of time. Lots of landscaping and berms toseperate is 55 feet setabacks adequate for side yards on 20 acre parcels? How many cars, oldtrucks, sheds will be on property to accomodate 2 families? All this should be limited to helpingexisting relatives, not turned into a commercial developments, where existing taxpayers will end upcarrying, the problems associated with secondary suites. Please use caution, and only allow onlarge parcels and or villages if the majority want do not expand it throughout the MD

4/13/2018 3:00 AM

12 Over 2 acres 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

13 Multi-family units should not have a negative impact on neighboring parcels 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

14 Yes, but having a neighbour who's upset should not veto any proposal. 4/12/2018 6:09 PM

15 Parking restriction 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

16 Permit required including water well and waste water review to ensure health and safety (iesewage field not encroaching on neighboring property use)

4/12/2018 4:05 PM

17 question seems skewed to a yes answer 4/12/2018 3:10 PM

18 making sure neighbors are aware, provide adequate noise / privacy blocks if required 4/12/2018 2:46 PM

19 Proper fencing for all dogs, and or proper landscaping with trees , berms, etc. None of this wouldbe needed if limited to 40 Acre or larger parcels.

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

20 Size of suite allowed to avoid crowding. Arcituctural controls. Appropriate septic use to keep theenvironment clean.

4/12/2018 8:31 AM

21 following current setbacks 4/11/2018 10:42 AM

22 They must be discretionary and subject to review and appeal so it is fair to neighbors. Goodplanning reasons need to be provided to shut them down - not emotional ones.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

23 parking on private property only 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

24 See #1 Should not go ahead without MD having restrictions in place for controlling tenants andholding owners responsible for infractions. I am concerned that this initiative will eventually openthe gates for much more potential negative activities. E.g. Increase in people on a parcel, increasein traffic & number of vehicles, number of parked RV’s and storage units, more noise, less visualprivacy for existing acreages in sight of each other etc. I therefore strongly feel that if this goesahead separate detached secondary suites be not allowed on smaller acreages (2 to 6 ish acresin size e.g.) for sure. Very strict parameters be set regarding the number of extra residents thatcan dwell in a secondary suite, limited parking on a property and of RV’s and storage containersetc. And secondary suite owners be made aware of all community standard bylaws in the approvalprocess. a Another concern is how the MD will monitor tenant compliance given there is not amplemanpower to even police current community standards. Strongly recommend if this goes aheadthat owners on properties where secondary suites are constructed be made aware that as part ofthe approval documentation that they are responsible to ensure tenants are made aware of MDproperty community standards by laws and that they abide by these bylaws with the ownersresponsible for infringements and they ensure tenants abide by them to minimize visual, noisebylaws. Consider people moving from a larger house or apartment to rent a secondary suite. Thereis a very good chance they will want to bring their belongings with them such as RV’s, extravehicles, furniture that may not fit in the smaller units and may request landowner to store instorage units on the property etc. We and the majority of acreage owners moved to the country toobtain privacy, quiet space and enjoyment of our surroundings. Allowing secondary suites willcertainly in many cases impinge on these situations going forward, especially detached units.Human nature is that renters to not treat their spaces or surroundings the same as owners!! Irealize progress is imminent but I don’t believe this change should be undertaken without placingstrict rules on the process to ensure neighbours are protected as much as possible and there isperiodic policing.

4/10/2018 8:42 AM

25 Possibly make them a certain amount footage away from property lines 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

26 I think clear legislation would address these issues. 4/9/2018 8:44 PM

27 Adhere to existing setbacks, cohesive exteriors, fully finished. 4/9/2018 8:36 PM

28 I assume they would follow (some of) the guidelines similar to a minor home occupancy permit. (ie.screened parking) and the usual noise bylaws, exterior lights, etc. already in place.

4/9/2018 8:30 PM

29 Limit the size of suites. 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

41 / 48

Secondary Suites

30 Whether it 's a secondary suite or the principal owner, people are people and they need toremember how to live in relation to each other. to many rules just create division, although peoplewill always need direction.

4/9/2018 8:21 PM

31 current setbacks, roadways, access roads already regulate all these concerns 4/9/2018 8:02 PM

32 appropriate suite for the land size and applicable setbacks 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

33 General appearance and parking availability 4/9/2018 1:38 PM

34 Enforce existing rues related to proximity to property lines 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

35 Only in high density subdivisions where water or waste infrastructure may be an issue. 4/9/2018 1:14 PM

36 No more than one secondary dwelling/property. Must abide by current setbacks from the propertylines. No more than two storeys high.

4/9/2018 1:09 PM

37 Should be consistent with color and design of main house if a separate dwelling. 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

38 visual impact on neighbours 4/9/2018 12:57 PM

39 parcels over 5 acres only 4/9/2018 12:54 PM

40 Specify how it will be enforced. 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

41 Have distance limits to neighboring houses. Require trees to be planted to increase privacy. 4/9/2018 12:36 PM

42 Should have neighbor consultation for addition of new structures. Not concerned about existingbuildings. Discretionary not permitted use for new structures.

4/9/2018 12:28 PM

43 If a detached secondary dwelling unit, that setbacks be appropriate to not affect neighboringparcels.

4/9/2018 12:20 PM

44 Not in our area. Might be a concern in more dense areas. 4/9/2018 12:08 PM

45 As per answers for #4 and #5, appropriate suites according to parcel size, water and wastewaterconcerns.

4/7/2018 10:11 AM

46 Limit the number of secondary suites to one per property. Prioritize basement suites due to lessimpact to the landscape.

4/6/2018 9:31 PM

47 More rural policing - more residents will bring more crime. *people in the country are easy targetsby criminals.

4/6/2018 9:15 PM

48 Limit on allowed secondary suites to one per parcel to minimize impact to land and services. I alsofeel that due to fact basement suites would have little to no impact and change to neighboringparcels, these should be first to be addressed.

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

49 Owner should be required to live on the property 4/6/2018 6:57 PM

50 Not do it 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

51 People still need to be able to feel like they are away from the city. Some common sense isneeded such as limiting vehicles or the number of people in a single dwelling

4/6/2018 3:42 PM

52 Total occupancy kept to reasonable levels. 4/6/2018 11:48 AM

53 The M.D. will have plenty of provisions already. 4/6/2018 9:51 AM

54 should not be used as a 'business office" - only as a residence 4/6/2018 8:24 AM

55 Please see comments above. 4/5/2018 4:30 PM

56 Ban them and have $1000 per month fines for illegal suites. 4/5/2018 2:37 PM

57 New developments only, built and zoned for this type of accommodation. However if you buildsuch homes make them duplexes or quadplexes and make them owner occupied only or areaswhich are rental only. Don't mix up owner occupied and rental.

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

58 Guidelines need to ensure suite is a secondary use on the property - smaller than the primarydwelling; accessed from the same driveway; close to existing buildings; similar design elements interms of colour, building materials, roof pitch, etc.

4/5/2018 9:19 AM

59 I think if allowed to be built they should match the house in look so that they don’t look ugly on theland so they are architecturaly pleasing. If being put in above a garage or assessory buildingthose buildings would likely match the house in some way

4/5/2018 7:49 AM

42 / 48

Secondary Suites

60 parking.. 4/5/2018 12:26 AM

61 A secondary suite where both the main house and the secondary suite are rental properties wouldin some situations be undesirable but if it is for the purpose of the secondary suite being for familyor for rental that would seem to be okay.

4/4/2018 5:25 PM

62 Secondary suites if above a garage should not impact the height restrictions. All suites should beadequately screened from neighboring parcels and should meet all architectural controls forplanned communities. All should adhere to some type of aesthetics to ensure that they arecomplementary to their surrounding structures, landscapes and neighbors.

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

63 Enforce the rules the MD puts in place. Actually listen to the neighbours when they oppose asecondary dwelling. If there is a majority ruling it should not go through!!!

4/4/2018 2:12 PM

64 1. Parking on the private property 2. Develop more of an attitude for neighbours to have to dealwith each other before the by-law enforcement get involved. Before it goes to the By-law, the 2neighbours have to sit down with a mediator with a fee paid 55-5- by each neighbour

4/4/2018 12:10 PM

65 To have a big RCMP more available for complaints, and to insure that there is not a over usage ofgood water, and that there is proper wastewater management.

4/4/2018 11:36 AM

66 Same rules on dogs, cats, animals, cars, junk, noise, etc.. that apply to acreages now. Suites mustmeet all codes for building, etc.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

67 possibly if parking and lower standards of landlords and tenants are issues in the neighbourhood. 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

68 keep animal limits on a per parcel basis, make sure land owner is responsible for all bylawinfractions (not secondary suite occupant).

3/31/2018 10:34 AM

69 Architectural controls and limitations on number of suites and personal use buildings (PUB) on oneparcel. Clear definition of suite and PUB.

3/30/2018 1:10 PM

70 In the beginning all these things would have to be considered 3/28/2018 4:37 PM

71 I am more interested with my acreage but what about those Sr type buildings that could be movedout when not needed.?

3/26/2018 7:47 PM

72 Should be architectually pleasing to neighbors (i.e. similar to existing structure on accessorybuildings). No more than two vehicles per suite.

3/26/2018 11:00 AM

73 proper planning provisions 3/26/2018 10:13 AM

74 Just provisions to provide for safe suites and be clear, particularly in hamlets and other denserdevelopments, of any parking requirements. Many of the issues raised by people concerned withsecondary suites (e.g. noise, neglect of property, etc.) are really neighbourhood disputes that havenothing to do with the type of dwelling the people live in. Community Standards bylaws aimed atgood behavior should cover these concerns, not a land use bylaw.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

75 Maintain all current standards with respect to setbacks and such 3/25/2018 9:55 PM

76 Required distances away from property lines. 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

77 off road parking is important for hamlets 3/25/2018 9:46 PM

78 Limiting occupancy 3/24/2018 4:34 AM

43 / 48

Secondary Suites

Q11 We acknowledge that there are some secondary suites alreadyexisting in the MD. Some may be in compliance with all the necessaryAlberta Building/Fire Code requirements. Others may not. SecondarySuites that do not meet safety codes, building code, and fire codes canbe a safety concern and a liability for property owners.What concerns

would you have with a requirement to bring existing Secondary Suites intocompliance? Please explain.


# RESPONSES DATE

1 Retrofitting is often expensive and sometimes impossible. A system like automobile emissionscontrol, with inspectors highlighting noncompliance but giving owners time to remediate, might beused. Grandfathering is another approach. It is more important that new secondary suites be safeand built to code (but codes might have to change somewhat). The details should be looked at byprofessionals.

4/17/2018 12:41 PM

2 The concern would be that they would not be reported. In order to avoid this, giving people areasonable period of time to come into compliance (ie 1 to 2 years) would help avoid this.

4/16/2018 12:42 PM

3 No concerns it would be great for families 4/16/2018 7:25 AM

4 Allow residents a defined time period e.g. (2yrs) to bring suites into compliance. 4/16/2018 6:38 AM

5 None 4/16/2018 6:25 AM

6 Compliance with regulations but be reasonable in regards to upgrades that are cost prohibitive 4/15/2018 11:32 PM

7 Permits to grandfather existing suites which are safe. 4/15/2018 10:27 PM

8 Secondary suites non-compliant or in compliance are in compliance with our community bylawsand covenants etc. Our community water system cannot handle the additional requirements forsecondary suites. Building alterations to accommodate secondary suites will likely result inchanges not acceptable to our Architectural covenants and the community as a whole.

4/15/2018 11:31 AM

9 Zero tolerance for those not complying 4/14/2018 7:56 PM

10 Phased approach to bring everyone up to code over perhaps a 5 year term...give them a'grandfather' period to give them a chance to get themselves legal.

4/14/2018 10:49 AM

11 If they were previously approved as long as they are safe should be grandfathered in 4/13/2018 8:50 PM

12 To be considered legal be compliant, legal suites will add to the value of the home, while an illegalsuite with detract

4/13/2018 7:57 PM

13 We have seen multiple persons live in a 1000sq ft. house designed for 2 people. On of ourneighbors has 3 tenants in a 1000 sq. foot house and there is no pride of ownership. They move in,move out in 3 to 5 months and create more and more conflict in the neighborhood. Bylaw has beencalled many times and a blind eye is turned to his rental of 3 suites in the less than 1000 sq ftproperty. Some people choose to profit, from people down on their luck and crime crosses into theneighborhood, with nothing done and no assistance from the MD. Council should focus on ruralcrime rather than secondary suites.

4/13/2018 4:47 PM

14 If they currently do not meet code, they should be brought up to code 4/13/2018 8:54 AM

15 Make them comply in order to be considered a legal suite 4/13/2018 8:53 AM

16 Secondary suites should be to code within reason. Many things that were built years ago were upto code at that time, and would currently not meet code. Any new construction would have to meetcurrent code.

4/13/2018 8:52 AM

44 / 48

Secondary Suites

17 All of the above especially the fire codes. sepic and water regulations. They should only be usedfor elder relatives and or family not for commerial gain

4/13/2018 3:00 AM

18 If a basement is done to code, with permits then it should be acceptable, there is no additionalrequirements if someone lives in your spare bedroom

4/12/2018 8:35 PM

19 None 4/12/2018 7:35 PM

20 None. I think it should be a requirement to bring existing secondary suites into compliance. 4/12/2018 6:49 PM

21 Rules should apply to all 4/12/2018 5:26 PM

22 Grandfather existing ones and move forward with new regs for new ones. 4/12/2018 4:17 PM

23 Cost to do so. Suite may have met code when first built but now codes have changed. Unless trulyunsafe an existing suite should be grand fathered and owner provided recommendations on whatcould be done to meet today’s codes.

4/12/2018 4:05 PM

24 none, i think that is appropriate 4/12/2018 2:46 PM

25 none 4/12/2018 1:52 PM

26 See previous comments. Very concerned and opposed and should be brought forth at nextelection.

4/12/2018 1:00 PM

27 None 4/12/2018 9:46 AM

28 Secondary suites need to follow builders code for safety and must use licenced contractors. Theyshould get inspected at the same building points as a house or commercial building.

4/12/2018 8:47 AM

29 Regulations will need to be placed- permit perhaps? Look to Calgary 4/12/2018 8:38 AM

30 None, as long as homeowners that come forward to be compliant aren’t penalized. 4/12/2018 8:31 AM

31 As long as they are brought up to code- no problem 4/12/2018 8:28 AM

32 No concerns, I agree that the codes are put in place for a reason. 4/11/2018 4:03 PM

33 None at all. All should be brought up to the current Fire and Safety Life Standards. 4/11/2018 8:08 AM

34 People would need to admit that they had done something illegal and not be penalized 4/10/2018 6:15 PM

35 None 4/10/2018 1:29 PM

36 None - There are several across the MD and for public safety they should be brought intocompliance.

4/10/2018 9:02 AM

37 None 4/10/2018 8:50 AM

38 Believe all secondary suites should be in compliance. Will be a major challenge to get all existingsuites into compliance.

4/10/2018 8:42 AM

39 No concern 4/9/2018 10:30 PM

40 None, all suites must reach the required safety requirements. 4/9/2018 8:44 PM

41 None. Once (if) secondary suites are allowed - then all need to be in compliance. 4/9/2018 8:36 PM

42 Within limits. Safety codes should be adhered too. Give a reasonable grace period for this to bedone.

4/9/2018 8:32 PM

43 Undue burden on owners with older homes, built prior to updated requirements. (ie. I don't thinkone or two seniors in a one bedroom suite should have the same demands as a 4 person family,not fair to subject them to the costly improvements that are required.

4/9/2018 8:30 PM

44 It needs to be done to be certain all safety codes are met. 4/9/2018 8:24 PM

45 Safety 4/9/2018 8:21 PM

46 None. I suggest a reasonable period where non conforming can apply and meet conditions forapproval. After that, shut the rest down.

4/9/2018 8:02 PM

47 None, outside what provisions are listed on the Alberta website regarding secondary suites. 4/9/2018 1:50 PM

48 time to become compliant. No penalty to self identify. 4/9/2018 1:43 PM

45 / 48

Secondary Suites

49 Time frame should allow sufficient time to come into compliance. Where strict compliance isimpractical, consideration of methods providing equivalent results to compliance should be given.

4/9/2018 1:30 PM

50 The ability to identify them 4/9/2018 1:27 PM

51 None 4/9/2018 1:19 PM

52 None 4/9/2018 1:16 PM

53 I think a fair amount of flexibility should exist, where suites which are illegal have existed. Theissue of the MD approving them may create a liability t the MD, however they may have been inuse, without issue for some time.

4/9/2018 1:14 PM

54 No tenancies, must meet proper building codes. 4/9/2018 1:09 PM

55 Hopefully can be done in a way that give people a time frame they can work with. 4/9/2018 1:03 PM

56 We think the secondary suites should be required to meet safety codes and fire and buildingcodes.

4/9/2018 12:57 PM

57 No concerns 4/9/2018 12:54 PM

58 None, but who are illegal suites allowed? 4/9/2018 12:46 PM

59 For the most part, I would think that water and waste water would be grandfathered. If it has beenOK for this long, it should be OK for the future.

4/9/2018 12:41 PM

60 Ensuring there compliant and have followed the building codes. 4/9/2018 12:38 PM

61 I would require them to brought up to compliance on all fronts - if that is not possible, they theycould not comply.

4/9/2018 12:36 PM

62 Concern on temporary move on buildings becoming permanent features as a result of this. 4/9/2018 12:28 PM

63 Non. All secondary suites should be in compliance. 4/9/2018 12:20 PM

64 I think they should be built to regular building codes. New or existing. 4/9/2018 10:58 AM

65 none. fire and building code requirements are paramount 4/9/2018 9:20 AM

66 Bringing existing suites up to building and safety codes seems reasonable. 4/7/2018 10:11 AM

67 Cost Cash grab! 4/6/2018 9:15 PM

68 Ensuring that those that admit/bring existing suites into compliance feel and understand thejustification of going through this process and feeling the advantages to be compliant vs continuehaving illegal suites. Getting secondary suite owners to "buy in" to becoming compliant. Loss vsGain to Homeowner

4/6/2018 9:06 PM

69 None. Safety is an issue. Set standards and everyone will need to follow them- new and alreadyexisting.

4/6/2018 6:57 PM

70 Shut them down 4/6/2018 6:51 PM

71 Renovations are expensive. As long as the MD and safety codes officers are willing to work withthe home owners, it should be fine.

4/6/2018 3:42 PM

72 Clear guidelines. Penalty-free on site advice on compliance. Enforcement action when lives are atrisk.

4/6/2018 11:48 AM

73 I would like to know how many issues there actually were, if any. 4/6/2018 9:51 AM

74 All secondary suites should meet current safety codes that are in effect on the day it becomesapproved

4/6/2018 8:24 AM

75 No concern. Existing suites need to be compliant for safety reasons and to ensure that all is equalgoing forward. Time may be granted to address cost issues of upgrading, but where safety isconcerned, these requirements need to be met.

4/5/2018 4:30 PM

76 Water Sewer fire etc. There should be no existing suites that conforn. The building inspectorsshould have caught the second kitchens etc. If they do try to get approval they must rip up theconcrete to show plumbing just like new builds. In addition they must take off all their dry wall forplumbing, electrical and heating inspections.

4/5/2018 2:37 PM

46 / 48

Secondary Suites

77 The MD needs to enforce their existing bylaws which would require them ensure the existing nonbylaw compliant suites are vacated and stay vacated. What wasn't stated by the MD in this surveyas why anyone is even considering the need for secondary suites.

4/5/2018 11:51 AM

78 Be realistic in working with owners to bring existing suites into compliance. 4/5/2018 9:19 AM

79 None 4/5/2018 7:49 AM

80 If it is family living together and the secondary suites can be reasonably brought up to code itshould be required but to force aging parents to move out because the codes can't be met I wouldhave some concerns with. In a standard rental situation the suites should be brought up to code.

4/4/2018 5:25 PM

81 They should have 3 years to comply 4/4/2018 3:40 PM

82 As previously mentioned, non conforming secondary suites should be required to be brought intocompliance, to ensure the safety of those inhabiting these spaces. It may be useful to contact theinsurance companies to see what they would require in order that insurance may be obtained forthese dwellings.

4/4/2018 2:52 PM

83 Does the MD have to manpower to monitor this process?? 4/4/2018 2:12 PM

84 None 100% of the liability should be the responsibility of the property owner. Compliance with thesafety standard should be to help the owner maintain a safe environment, not to shift theresponsibility onto the MD or other government agency.

4/4/2018 12:10 PM

85 All codes should be meet.If they are not then the structure must not be used for secondary suites 4/4/2018 11:36 AM

86 Well, the MD created this mess in the first place by their stupid and archaic rules, so they need tobe part of the solution now. Regardless though, in the name of safety, all existing suites wouldhave to be inspected and shut down until they meet the codes for the safety of the tenants. This isfair to me as they have to be safe. But we should not forget the MD is part of the problem in thatthese were built without inspections etc. due to them being illegal in the first place. People aregoing to ignore stupid rules and bylaws that they know make no sense. So the MD needs to admitfault in making these bylaws and then go forward with solutions. Unfortunately, this will meanenforcement and possibly fines, etc. but better this way than the idiocy we have now.

4/3/2018 12:55 PM

87 Just ensuring fire safety codes mostly 4/2/2018 4:30 PM

88 no concerns 4/1/2018 4:04 PM

89 none. 3/31/2018 12:32 PM

90 1) current illegal suites may have been put in place to supplement household income for lower-income people who cannot afford to upgrade to code; 2) the time allowed to bring them to codewould need to be relatively long, 3) is it necessary to enforce all of the non-safety related coderequirements when upgrading (e.g. separate heating sources)?

3/31/2018 10:34 AM

91 How would the M.D. manage resources to accomplish inspections especially knowing where thesesuites exist? Taxpayers without suites should not be burdened with any costs to bring suites up tocode/compliance.

3/30/2018 1:10 PM

92 Provide a grace period for bringing them into compliance 3/30/2018 1:08 PM

93 A property would be recognized for the deficiencies, given time to work on the concerns. All in allCode requirements must be adhered to.

3/28/2018 4:37 PM

94 It must be safe and meet fire and safety codes. 3/27/2018 1:11 PM

95 No concern 3/27/2018 11:39 AM

96 How do you find them? 3/27/2018 10:06 AM

97 Should happen.. 3/26/2018 7:47 PM

98 All suites should meet building code and any existing should be disclosed for inspection withoutpenalties to the owners to ensure inspection and building codes have been met and are compliant.

3/26/2018 3:41 PM

99 none 3/26/2018 3:05 PM

100 None. Make them pay.....within reason of course. 3/26/2018 11:00 AM

101 if they can become compliant with building codes they would be legal through an applicationprocess.

3/26/2018 10:13 AM

47 / 48

Secondary Suites

102 No concerns with bringing existing suites into compliance if the main purpose is safety. However,the MD should look at each on a case by case basis to ensure homeowners can bring their homesup to standard without undue hardship.

3/26/2018 9:44 AM

103 I don't think this raises any different concerns than of regular homes that aren't up to compliancedue to age, neglect, or various other reasons.

3/26/2018 7:22 AM

104 Just to ensure that it’s safe and livable. That just makes it more important to allow them, so thatthere are boundaries in place for there creation.

3/25/2018 10:31 PM

105 I think safety is important and all residents should be protected by these standards. Adequate timeto make improvements to prevent tenant eviction is important.

3/25/2018 9:55 PM

106 Grandfather existing suites. 3/25/2018 9:47 PM

107 None 3/25/2018 9:46 PM

108 The time allowed to bring suite up to code 3/24/2018 4:34 AM

48 / 48

Secondary Suites

Documents

SECONDARY SUITES WHAT WE HEARD - mdfoothills.com Final Summary of... · page 3 of 15 secondary suites what we heard why are we exploring legalization of secondary suites?