Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Section 4
Introductions & Discussions 2
Introductions & Discussions Correct verb tense
Present simple
Present perfect
Past simple
Stating an accepted fact or current implications
Referring to past studies that are still relevant
Reporting an account of what you did/showed
Introduction Discussion
Introduction Discussion
Methods Results
“Graphene is a promising material for...” “Our findings have implications for…”
“Group therapy has been shown to increase...” “In this study, we have shown that…”
“We used NMR to investigate the structure of…” “Sorafenib prevented tumor growth in HCC patients...”
Introductions & Discussions
[New paragraph] “We previously took the Raman profiles of…”
Referring to previous studies in the Introduction
“We have previously studied/reported the Raman profiles of…”
[Next sentence] “A red shift in the G and 2D peak positions is observed…”
“A red shift in the G and 2D peak positions was observed…”
“We observed a red shift in the G and 2D peak positions …”
Correct verb tense – Case study
Introductions & Discussions
“This result suggested that these peaks are from…”
Referring to your implications in the Discussion
“This result suggests that these peaks originate from…” “This result suggests that these peaks originated from…”
“These Raman spectroscopy results confirmed that…”
“These Raman spectroscopy results confirm that…”
Signal words for implications of results: confirm, demonstrate, show, reveal, support, indicate, suggest, imply
Correct verb tense – Case study
Introductions & Discussions
“Many researchers proved that certain grasses were not affected by the fungus…”
Referring to others in the Introduction or Discussion
[New paragraph; general news] …have concluded/suggested that certain grasses are not affected…
[Not new paragraph; past specific finding] …reported/found/showed that certain grasses were not affected…
[Not new paragraph; past implication/generalization] …concluded/suggested that certain grasses are not affected…
Correct verb tense – Case study
Human report verbs: report, state, find, conclude, demonstrate, show, advise, recommend, suggest, comment, argue, claim, contend
Introductions & Discussions
Common mistakes in the Introduction
Ideas are not logically organized
Important topics in the Introduction are not mentioned again in the Results/Discussion
Important topics in the Results/Discussion are not mentioned in the Introduction
Cited studies are not up-to-date
Cited studies are geographically biased
Why study needs to be done?
Keep focused
Write last
<5 years
International
Introductions & Discussions
Common mistakes in the Discussion
Do not restate your results or introduce new data
We showed that tumor volumes in Groups A, B, and C were 34.6, 74.2, and 53.9 mm3, respectively, after a 4-month drug treatment, reflecting only a 8.6% decrease. However, after a 12-month drug treatment, the tumor volumes in Groups A, B, and C were 16.3, 18.7, and 16.9 mm3, respectively, which reflects a 45.2% decrease (p<0.05). The results demonstrate that 12 months of treatment is necessary for Drug X to effectively reduce tumor size among the three groups.
The results presented in this study demonstrate that Drug X more effectively reduces tumor size after 12 months of treatment (45.2% reduction) than it does after 4 months (8.6% reduction).
Introductions & Discussions
Common mistakes in the Discussion
Do not overgeneralize your findings
In this study, we demonstrated that Drug A effectively reduced tumor growth. Therefore, this drug should have therapeutic applications in breast cancer treatment.
In this study, we demonstrated that Drug A effectively reduced the growth of various breast cancer cell lines. Our findings suggest that this drug may have therapeutic applications in breast cancer treatment.
Result: Drug A reduced breast cancer cell growth in vitro
Introductions & Discussions
Makes readers think others’ words or ideas are your own
Copying published text (even with a citation)
Stating ideas of someone else without citing the source
Plagiarism
Introductions & Discussions
Copying text that you have written and published before into your manuscript
Self-plagiarism
May violate copyright
Makes readers think you are presenting something new
Introductions & Discussions
Expressing published ideas using different words
Paraphrasing
Tips on paraphrasing:
• Write the text first into another language, and then later translate back into English
• Verbally explain ideas to a colleague • Name a published method and cite it • Consider text location
– Introduction vs. Discussion
Introductions & Discussions Good paraphrasing
24. Li et al. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e68372.
“The magnitude of the change in carbon storage depends on how physical, chemical, or biological processes are altered over time under different land uses.”
The size of the carbon storage change depends on how physical, chemical, or biological processes are changed over time under different land uses.24
How differing land uses gradually affect biological, chemical, or physical processes changes how much carbon can be stored.24
• Nouns verbs • Prepositional phrases Adverbs • Passive Active voice
• Synonyms, word order
Introductions & Discussions Paraphrasing tips
Vary sentence structure to avoid patchwriting or listing
Change voice, rhythm, style
Separate/join sentences
Discourse markers Coincidentally; Also in agreement; Indeed
Join 2 sentences (semicolon, colon for a reason/list, or by subordination); alternate short/long sentences
Active to passive, or passive to active; negative to positive, or positive to negative;
invert word or sentence order
Sentence logic Either/or; neither/nor; not only, but also
Introductory phrase According to X’s method,…; In X’s study,…; X
showed/reported…; When X…
Change word class An altered direction -> A directional change
Activity 4
Please see Activity 4 in your workbook
Section 5
Checking your written work
Editing and proofreading
Don’t use numbers to start a sentence
50 participants were recruited.
We recruited 50 participants. / In this study, 50 participants were recruited.
Fifty participants were recruited.
Avoid mistakes 9
Editing and proofreading
Don’t use new words; use “that” for defining terms
Some of the data from the last 2 years, which we
inputted into the analysis, impacted on the overall calculation.
Some of the data from the past 2 years that we entered into the analysis affected the overall
calculation.
Avoid mistakes 10
Editing and proofreading
Avoid biased or offensive language
The doctor must treat his patient with care.
The doctor must treat the patient with care. The doctor must treat his or her patient with care.
Doctors must treat their patients with care. Doctors must treat patients with care.
Police officer, firefighter, person with epilepsy, person with diabetes, person with asthma
Avoid mistakes 11
Policeman, fireman, epileptic, diabetic, asthmatic
Editing and proofreading
Patient parameters …improved significantly; it is significant that… X was correlated with Y The risk* of developing X in this case-control study…
Patient variables …improved considerably/markedly; it is important that… X was associated with/related to/linked to Y The odds of developing X in this case-control study…
Don’t misuse statistical words
* OK in a retrospective study if disease is rare and causality is assumed; risk=x/total, odds=x/(total–x)
Avoid mistakes 12
Editing and proofreading
2 categorical endpoints
Paired (within sample)
Unpaired (between sample)
McNemar’s test
Fisher’s exact test 2 treatment groups
*for sample sizes > 60
Chi-square test* >2 treatment groups
du Prel et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107: 343–8.
Common complaints – Statistics
Editing and proofreading
Continuous endpoints
Parametric Nonparametric
Paired Unpaired Paired Unpaired
2 groups: Paired t test
>2 groups: Repeated-
measures ANOVA
2 groups: Unpaired t test
>2 groups: ANOVA (F test)
2 groups: Wilcoxon signed-
rank test
>2 groups: Friedman
one-way ANOVA
2 groups: Mann–Whitney U test (Wilcoxon
rank-sum test )
>2 groups: Kruskal–Wallis
test
Lang and Secic 1997; 71.
Common complaints – Statistics
Editing and proofreading Qualitative studies
Rich data: sufficient, systematically collected,
high-quality Quantity (breadth/depth) depends on existing knowledge, size of knowledge gap, agree/disagree with current theory
Research question: appropriate and focused
Keep a “how” research question in mind when coding and when reporting how you contribute to theory
Grounding: relevant or closest literature
Introduction: show that there are knowledge gaps and a need for theory development; may include Literature Review section; check validity/reliability
Transparency: explain methods and show
systematic work
Give references of accepted methods; how did you identify/refine themes and identify outliers? Table of quotes (n>1) or in-depth theme boxes (n=1)
Reay. Fam Bus Rev. 2014;1–8, DOI: 10.1177/0894486514529209
Editing and proofreading Qualitative studies
Tell an intriguing empirical (not
theoretical) story Engaging and interesting, surprising and new; short version in Introduction and long version in Results; “tell” & “show”
Tell a convincing theoretical story
Discussion: clearly explain how your study connects to literature; refer to references from Introduction
Show clear contribution to target journal
Clearly explain how your analysis/model advances or changes theory, or where current theory doesn’t hold; keep to target journal aim/scope
Ethically conducted and reported/published
Informed consent, confidentiality, avoiding harm, research integrity (www.ethicsguidebook.ac.uk)
Reay. Fam Bus Rev. 2014;1–8, DOI: 10.1177/0894486514529209
Editing and proofreading
Check target journal about:
(1) format/style, (2) word counts, (3) referencing, (4) documents to be submitted, such as title page and declarations, (5) cover letter
Check relevant international guidelines in Equator Network
Check use of passive, or I/We or This author, This study, These results
Check logic and consistency
Check all data and display items; check reference to figures
Find a colleague for presubmission peer review advice
Check idiomatic language and parallel constructions; remove repetition
Clarify referents of pronouns such as It and This
Check subjects are close to verbs; check verb tense and agreement
Check spelling and grammar; ask a native English speaker to help
Before submission
Activity 5
Please see Activity 5 in your workbook
Section 6
Promoting your research after publication
Coverage and Staffing Plan
Publicize your work Three missions
Education/
Training
Research
Knowledge Exchange
Coverage and Staffing Plan
Publicize your work Match your audience
Pre- and post-publication impact
IMRaD research article
(journals,
posters, slides)
Hard news
(conclusion as “lede”)
(press
releases)
Hard news, delayed
lede
(implication at start)
Soft news/
Feature story
(news-letters)
Hard news, delayed lede + kicker
(implication at start &
end)
Only after journal publication!
Coverage and Staffing Plan
Publicize your work Match your audience
Writing for the public
Hard news
Heading
• Can say “new”; can use subheading • Name the source/people
Conclusion first (lede/top line) • Name the source/people; 6WHs give key
facts • Implications or importance as a quote
Results before Methods; use bullets Background last; end with a quote
Coverage and Staffing Plan
Publicize your work Match your audience
Tips
Hard news
Give only important details Include definitions, and synonyms, in
introductory or incidental phrases/clauses Check all data, details, and names Grab attention Write for the layperson; use analogies Avoid jargon and technical language Be concise! Short paragraphs Be interesting! What is different/new? End with Call to action, or a quotation
Coverage and Staffing Plan
Publicize your work Match your audience
Elements of a press release
Hard news
Use letterhead FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (or Embargo date) Short title; dateline, city name Quotations on insights from named experts;
no repetition! Include keywords Include full citation; name journal / evidence
level in the text End with END or ENDS or ### or -30- Contact info, institution info, explanations,
photo available, in “Notes to Editors”
S
Abstract Simulating the impact on health of internalising the cost of carbon in food prices combined with a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages Rising greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) have implications for health and up to 30% of emissions globally are thought to arise from agriculture.…In order to address this,…we model the effect on UK non-communicable disease mortality and GHGEs of internalising the social cost of carbon into the price of food alongside a 20% tax on sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs)….
Example: Publicizing your work
Press release A combined carbon and sugar tax could have environmental and health benefits A combination of a carbon tax on food and a tax on sugary drinks in the UK could lead to health benefits, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and raise up to GB£3.6 billion revenue, according to research published in the open access journal BMC Public Health. Lead researcher, Adam Briggs from the University of Oxford, said: “Agriculture is responsible for up to 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions”…
Based on: http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/press-centre/science-press-releases/3-feb-2016;
http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-016-2723-8;
Please see Activity 6 in your Workbook
Activity 6
S
Be an effective communicator
Your goal is not only to be published, but also to be widely read and cited
Planning well and developing advanced writing skills
Logically communicating your ideas in your manuscript
Checking your work carefully
Promoting your research findings to different
audiences
Thank you!
Any questions?
Follow us on Twitter
@EdanzEditing
Like us on Facebook
facebook.com/EdanzEditing
Download and further reading edanzediting.co.jp/ryukyu1603
Trevor Lane: [email protected] Julian Tang: [email protected]