Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
29
5
Section Five
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—COMMUNICATION AGENCIES
5.1Agency Selection
5.1.1 SPS Agency Selection
In February 1995, five agencies, Groupe Everest, BCP, Compass, Palmer Jarvisand Vickers & Benson, were chosen on the second day of Heritage Canadaselection process. In an undated memo Mr. Guité indicated that these fiveagencies "will be included on the PWGSC/APORS qualified supplier listfor possible communication/advertising contracts on behalf of APORS."
In June 1995 Consortium Lafleur was selected. This consortium includedLafleur together with Compass, Natcom Publicité, Freeman Roger Battagliaand SKS Advertising.
In an April 1997 selection process ten agencies were chosen. The ten included:
• Communication Coffin with SOS Communications• Delta Media Inc.• Freeman Rodgers Battaglia Inc.• Goodman Communications Inc.• Gosselin• Groupaction• Manifest Communications Inc.• Publicité Martin Inc.• Scott Thornley & Company Inc.• Sparks Communications Inc.
In a May 2001 selection process, nine agencies were chosen to receive standingoffers including:
• Armada• Bristol Group• Coffin• Compass• Everest• Gosselin• Groupaction• Lafleur• TNC Multicom Inc.
Table 18 summarizes the percentage, by dollar value of contracts managedby the agencies chosen in the four agency selection competitions.
30 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit
TTaabbllee 1188:: SSuummmmaarryy ooff SSPPSS CCoonnttrraaccttss MMaannaaggeedd bbyy AAggeenncciieess
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31
Agencies Chosen in 1995, 1997 and 2001 Total
Contracts Percentage Groupe Everest 67.67 22.18% Lafleur 65.46 21.46% Groupaction 60.83 19.94% Groupaction/Gosselin 23.06 7.56% Gosselin 21.21 6.95% Vickers and Benson 15.36 5.03% Compass Communications 15.11 4.95% Communication Coffin 8.70 2.85% Groupe BCP 6.35 2.08% Armada 4.60 1.51% TNC Multicom 3.48 1.14% Palmer Jarvis Advertising 2.83 0.93% Publicité Martin 1.51 0.49% Bristol Group 0.55 0.18% Delta Media 0.24 0.08% Communications Consultants 0.18 0.06% SOS Communications 0.02 0.01% Sparks - 0.00% Goodman - 0.00% Manifest - 0.00% Scott Thornley - 0.00% Total for Agencies Chosen in 1995, 1997 and 2001 297.16 97.40% All Other Agencies 7.94 2.60% Total Agency Managed Contracts 305.10 100.00%
5.1.2 Advertising Agency Selection
Sections 8 to 16 provide the details of the departmental selection competitionsas they relate to each agency.
5.2Cash Flow to Agencies
Based on our analysis of the flow of funds for those agencies and sub-contractors described in Sections 8 to 16 of this report, we can provide thefollowing summary comments:
i) The entities received from 23% (Vickers & Benson) to 100%(Gosselin) of their revenues from GOC business.
ii) For the periods in which the firms received GOC related revenues,profits from all sources of business totaled $46.0 million1,2.
iii) For the periods in which the firms received GOC related revenues,salaries and bonuses paid to their owners totaled $51.2 million2.
iv) For the periods in which the firms received GOC related revenues,contributions were made to or on behalf of political parties, totaling,at a minimum, $801,627. If the amounts identified by Mr. Braultas payments for a political purpose are included, this amount risesto $2.5 million2.
v) Payments were made to Oro Communications totaling $525,923.In addition, Société Immobiliére Alexsim (controlled by Jean Brault)paid $25,000 to Mr. Guité, Mr. Brault purchased a car for $35,000from Mr. Guité and Mr. Coffin purchased a boat for $27,000 fromMr. Guité.
32 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit
1 Excludes net gains on sale of business by Groupe Everest and BCP.
2 Includes Groupe Polygone, Expour and PluriDesign.
Included in this section of our report are summary flow of funds charts forthose communications agencies and sub-contractors for which we have conducted financial analysis. These agencies and sub-contractor companiesinclude the following:
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 33
Table Communication Agency / Sub-contractors Year
Detailed Findings Section
19 Lafleur Communications 1993 to 2001 8
20 Gosselin Communications May 1997 to September 1998
9
21 Groupaction 1996 to 2001 10
22 Groupe Polygone and Expour 1997 to 2003 11
23 PluriDesign 1996 to 2004 12
23a Jacques Corriveau Designer Inc. 1996 to 2004 12
24 Groupe Everest 1995 to 2002 13
25 Communication Coffin 1996 to 2003 14
26 Vickers and Benson 1996 to 2003 15
27 BCP 1994 to 2003 16
34 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa
bbllee
1199::
LLaaff
lleeuurr
CCoomm
mmuunn
iiccaatt
iioonnss
-- FF
llooww
ooff FF
uunndd
ss ((11
999933
ttoo 22
000011))
$12.
2MSA
LAR
IES
AN
D B
ON
USE
S TO
OW
NER
S
GO
C (S
PS, A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
& C
row
n C
orpo
ratio
ns)
$66.
5M
Oth
er R
even
ues
$10.
9M
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$92.
3M1
NET
INC
OM
E
$300
,000
Publ
icité
Dez
ert
$6.4
M3
OPE
RAT
ING
EXP
ENSE
S
$79.
7M
$92.
0M
EXPE
NSE
S
Sala
ries
paid
to L
afle
urfa
mily
$12.
2M
Lafle
urfa
mily
GO
C a
nd O
ther
2
$14.
9M
Les
Editi
ons
Sate
llite
$2.8
M4
Xylo
Con
cept
Gra
phiq
ue$1
.4M
5
Plur
iDes
ign
via
La F
abriq
uede
St-A
dolp
he$1
31,1
72
Publ
icité
Dez
ert
Div
iden
ds$7
72,0
00
Sala
ry $
1M
$67,
000
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL R
ELAT
ED E
XPEN
SES
Libe
ral P
arty
of C
anad
a –
$8,0
00
Yuri
Kru
kC
omm
unic
atio
ns$1
.3M
6
1 G
esco
mpa
id n
et m
anag
emen
t fee
s of
$35
7,00
0 to
Laf
leur
. G
esco
mpa
id $
96,0
00 to
Wal
ding
Int’l
. La
fleur
Com
mun
icat
ion
paid
a fu
rthe
r $38
,000
to W
aldi
ngIn
t’l.
2 R
ecor
ds to
det
erm
ine
sour
ce a
re n
otav
aila
ble.
3 Pu
blic
itéD
ezer
tpai
d$5
26,7
35 to
Plu
riDes
ign.
4Sa
telli
te c
ontr
ibut
ed$8
,300
to th
eLi
bera
lPar
tyof
Can
ada.
5Xy
loC
once
pt p
aid
$940
,776
to P
luriD
esig
n.6
Yuri
Kru
kC
omm
unic
atio
n pa
id$2
43,0
00 to
Plu
riDes
ign.
$12.
2MSA
LAR
IES
AN
D B
ON
USE
S TO
OW
NER
S
GO
C (S
PS, A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
& C
row
n C
orpo
ratio
ns)
$66.
5M
Oth
er R
even
ues
$10.
9M
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$92.
3M1
NET
INC
OM
E
$300
,000
Publ
icité
Dez
ert
$6.4
M3
OPE
RAT
ING
EXP
ENSE
S
$79.
7MO
PER
ATIN
G E
XPEN
SES
$79.
7M
$92.
0M
EXPE
NSE
S
$92.
0M
EXPE
NSE
S
Sala
ries
paid
to L
afle
urfa
mily
$12.
2M
Lafle
urfa
mily
GO
C a
nd O
ther
2
$14.
9M
Les
Editi
ons
Sate
llite
$2.8
M4
Xylo
Con
cept
Gra
phiq
ue$1
.4M
5
Plur
iDes
ign
via
La F
abriq
uede
St-A
dolp
he$1
31,1
72
Publ
icité
Dez
ert
Div
iden
ds$7
72,0
00
Sala
ry $
1M
$67,
000
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL R
ELAT
ED E
XPEN
SES
Libe
ral P
arty
of C
anad
a –
$8,0
00
Yuri
Kru
kC
omm
unic
atio
ns$1
.3M
6
1 G
esco
mpa
id n
et m
anag
emen
t fee
s of
$35
7,00
0 to
Laf
leur
. G
esco
mpa
id $
96,0
00 to
Wal
ding
Int’l
. La
fleur
Com
mun
icat
ion
paid
a fu
rthe
r $38
,000
to W
aldi
ngIn
t’l.
2 R
ecor
ds to
det
erm
ine
sour
ce a
re n
otav
aila
ble.
3 Pu
blic
itéD
ezer
tpai
d$5
26,7
35 to
Plu
riDes
ign.
4Sa
telli
te c
ontr
ibut
ed$8
,300
to th
eLi
bera
lPar
tyof
Can
ada.
5Xy
loC
once
pt p
aid
$940
,776
to P
luriD
esig
n.6
Yuri
Kru
kC
omm
unic
atio
n pa
id$2
43,0
00 to
Plu
riDes
ign.
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 35
TTaabb
llee 22
00:: GG
oossssee
lliinn CC
oommmm
uunniicc
aattiioo
nn --
FFllooww
ooff FF
uunndd
ss ((MM
aayy 11
999977
ttoo SS
eeppttee
mmbb
eerr 11
999988))
$14.
3M
GO
C S
PS a
nd A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
$14.
3M
$0.3
M$1
38,0
00
$14.
0M
EXPE
NSE
S$1
0.7M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
S
Oth
er s
alar
ies
$0.8
M
Paym
ents
to s
pons
oree
s$4
.4M
$3.3
M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ONU
SES
TO O
WN
ERS
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
Sala
ries
paid
to G
osse
linfa
mily
$3.3
M
CPP
C$0
.8M
SALE
OF
BU
SIN
ESS
$281
,500
NET
INC
OM
E
Gos
selin
fam
ilyC
PPC
Sala
ries
$129
,000
Div
iden
ds$7
9,00
0
Sale
of
busi
ness
$510
,000
Con
trib
utio
n to
Lib
eral
Par
ty$5
,000
Div
iden
ds p
aid
to
Gos
selin
fam
ily
$14.
3M
GO
C S
PS a
nd A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
$14.
3M
$0.3
M$1
38,0
00
$14.
0M
EXPE
NSE
S
$14.
0M
EXPE
NSE
S$1
0.7M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
S
$10.
7M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
S
Oth
er s
alar
ies
$0.8
M
Paym
ents
to s
pons
oree
s$4
.4M
$3.3
M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ONU
SES
TO O
WN
ERS
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
Sala
ries
paid
to G
osse
linfa
mily
$3.3
M
CPP
C$0
.8M
SALE
OF
BU
SIN
ESS
$281
,500
NET
INC
OM
E
Gos
selin
fam
ilyC
PPC
Sala
ries
$129
,000
Div
iden
ds$7
9,00
0
Sale
of
busi
ness
$510
,000
Con
trib
utio
n to
Lib
eral
Par
ty$5
,000
Div
iden
ds p
aid
to
Gos
selin
fam
ily
36 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa
bbllee
2211::
GGrroo
uuppaacc
ttiioonn
-- FFll
ooww oo
ff FFuunn
ddss
((119999
66 ttoo
220000
11))
$177
.6M
GO
C SP
S an
d Ad
verti
sing
Rev
enue
s
$46.
6M
Oth
er R
even
ues
$129
.1M
NET
INC
OM
E
$5.0
M$1
.8M
$172
.6M
EXPE
NSE
S
$167
.5M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
SPl
uriD
esig
n$4
30,3
70
Oro
Com
mun
icat
ion
$127
,731
Sala
ries
paid
to J
ean
Brau
lt$2
.8M
$3.1
M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S
Car p
urch
ased
fr
om J
.C. G
uité
2
$35,
000
Pers
onal
use
and
in
vest
men
ts
TOTA
L RE
VENU
ES
Sala
ries
paid
to
Joan
eA
rcha
mba
ult
$358
,960
$2.0
M
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$1
70,8
54
Oth
er p
aym
ents
pur
porte
dly
mad
e fo
r pol
itica
l pur
pose
s$1
.4M
Divi
dend
s pa
id
to s
hare
hold
ers
1 O
ther
com
pani
es re
late
d to
Gro
upac
tion
rece
ived
$16
3,75
0 fro
m G
roup
ePo
lygo
nean
d Ex
pour
, for
a to
tal a
mou
nt re
ceiv
ed o
f $2,
097,
800.
2 So
ciét
éIm
mob
lière
Ale
xism
, con
trolle
d by
Jea
n B
raul
t, al
so p
aid
$25,
000
to J
.C.
Gui
té.
Gro
upe
Poly
gone
and
Expo
urR
even
ues
$1.9
M1
$177
.6M
GO
C SP
S an
d Ad
verti
sing
Rev
enue
s
$46.
6M
Oth
er R
even
ues
$129
.1M
NET
INC
OM
E
$5.0
M$1
.8M
$172
.6M
EXPE
NSE
S
$172
.6M
EXPE
NSE
S
$167
.5M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
SPl
uriD
esig
n$4
30,3
70
Oro
Com
mun
icat
ion
$127
,731
Sala
ries
paid
to J
ean
Brau
lt$2
.8M
$3.1
M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S
Car p
urch
ased
fr
om J
.C. G
uité
2
$35,
000
Pers
onal
use
and
in
vest
men
ts
TOTA
L RE
VENU
ES
Sala
ries
paid
to
Joan
eA
rcha
mba
ult
$358
,960
$2.0
M
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$1
70,8
54
Oth
er p
aym
ents
pur
porte
dly
mad
e fo
r pol
itica
l pur
pose
s$1
.4M
Divi
dend
s pa
id
to s
hare
hold
ers
1 O
ther
com
pani
es re
late
d to
Gro
upac
tion
rece
ived
$16
3,75
0 fro
m G
roup
ePo
lygo
nean
d Ex
pour
, for
a to
tal a
mou
nt re
ceiv
ed o
f $2,
097,
800.
2 So
ciét
éIm
mob
lière
Ale
xism
, con
trolle
d by
Jea
n B
raul
t, al
so p
aid
$25,
000
to J
.C.
Gui
té.
Gro
upe
Poly
gone
and
Expo
urR
even
ues
$1.9
M1
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 37
TTaabb
llee 22
22:: GG
rroouupp
ee PP
oollyygg
oonnee
aanndd
EExxpp
oouurr
-- FFll
ooww oo
ff FFuunn
ddss
((119999
77 ttoo
220000
33))
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$117
.0M
NET
INC
OM
E
$14.
1M
Fund
s ad
vanc
edor
tran
sfer
red
into
in
vest
men
t com
pani
es
cont
rolle
d by
Luc
Lem
ay
$13.
5M
Rev
enue
s fr
om G
OC
Adv
ertis
ing
and
SPS
Con
trac
ts
$38.
6M
Rev
enue
s fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
$78.
4M
2.1M
$11.
5M
OTH
ER
EXPE
NSE
SIn
com
e ta
xes
$8.9
M
Loss
es o
n liq
uida
tion
of c
ompa
nies
$2.6
M
Gro
upe
Poly
gone
$14.
8M
Fund
s ad
vanc
edto
Exp
our
Expo
ur
$(0.
7M)
$1.7
M
$11.
8M
$91.
4M
Plur
iDes
ign
$5.8
M
J. B
raul
tCom
pani
esEX
PEN
SES
$2.1
M
$25.
6M
INC
OM
E B
EFO
RE
TAXE
S
$2.7
M
Inco
me
befo
re ta
xes
$25.
6M
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$117
.0M
NET
INC
OM
E
$14.
1M
Fund
s ad
vanc
edor
tran
sfer
red
into
in
vest
men
t com
pani
es
cont
rolle
d by
Luc
Lem
ay
$13.
5M
Rev
enue
s fr
om G
OC
Adv
ertis
ing
and
SPS
Con
trac
ts
$38.
6M
Rev
enue
s fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
$78.
4M
2.1M
$11.
5M
OTH
ER
EXPE
NSE
SIn
com
e ta
xes
$8.9
M
Loss
es o
n liq
uida
tion
of c
ompa
nies
$2.6
M
Gro
upe
Poly
gone
$14.
8M
Fund
s ad
vanc
edto
Exp
our
Expo
ur
$(0.
7M)
$1.7
M
$11.
8M
$91.
4M
Plur
iDes
ign
$5.8
M
J. B
raul
tCom
pani
esEX
PEN
SES
$2.1
M
$25.
6M
INC
OM
E B
EFO
RE
TAXE
S
$2.7
M
Inco
me
befo
re ta
xes
$25.
6M
38 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa
bbllee
2233::
PPlluu
rriiDDeess
iiggnn
-- FFll
ooww oo
ff FFuunn
ddss
((119999
66 ttoo
220000
44))
Li
bera
l Par
ty
of C
anad
a
$1.2
M
Gro
upe
Poly
gone
and
Expo
ur
$5.8
M
Rev
enue
s as
soc.
w
ith J
ean
Lafle
ur
$1.8
M
Gro
upac
tion
$0.4
M
Oth
er S
ourc
es
$0.9
M
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$10.
1M
EXPE
NSE
S
$8.7
M$4
.4M
1$2
.2M
$2.1
M
Sala
ry a
nd b
onus
esto
Jac
ques
Cor
rivea
uPr
oduc
tion
Cos
tsO
ther
Exp
ense
s
$1.4
M
INC
OM
E B
EFO
RE
TAXE
S
$0.3
M
INC
OM
E TA
XES
$0.3
M
NET
INC
OM
E
$1.1
M
Div
iden
ds p
aid
to
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
uD
esig
ner I
nc.
$1.1
M
Inco
me
befo
re ta
xes
$1.4
M
Inco
me
taxe
s
1 C
onsi
sts
of $
0.5M
in g
ross
sal
arie
s, $
1.8M
in n
et b
onus
es ($
1.6M
re-d
epos
ited
into
Jac
ques
Cor
rivea
uD
esig
ner I
nc.)
and
$2.1
M in
taxe
s pa
id o
n th
e bo
nuse
s.2
Oth
er c
ontri
butio
ns in
clud
e: P
luriD
esig
n$4
,742
(199
3-19
95),
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
u$2
,541
(199
3-20
03),
Mad
elei
ne C
orriv
eau
$2,0
27 (1
993-
2003
) and
Ja
cque
s C
orriv
eau
Des
igne
r Inc
. $90
5 (1
993-
2003
), fo
r a to
tal o
f $53
,189
(199
3-2
003)
$42,
9742
Polit
ical
Con
trib
utio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)
Libe
ral P
arty
of
Can
ada
$1.2
M
Gro
upe
Poly
gone
and
Expo
ur
$5.8
M
Rev
enue
s as
soc.
w
ith J
ean
Lafle
ur
$1.8
M
Gro
upac
tion
$0.4
M
Oth
er S
ourc
es
$0.9
M
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$10.
1M
EXPE
NSE
S
$8.7
M
EXPE
NSE
S
$8.7
M$4
.4M
1$2
.2M
$2.1
M
Sala
ry a
nd b
onus
esto
Jac
ques
Cor
rivea
uPr
oduc
tion
Cos
tsO
ther
Exp
ense
s
$1.4
M
INC
OM
E B
EFO
RE
TAXE
S
$0.3
M
INC
OM
E TA
XES
$0.3
M
NET
INC
OM
E
$1.1
M
Div
iden
ds p
aid
to
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
uD
esig
ner I
nc.
$1.1
M
Inco
me
befo
re ta
xes
$1.4
M
Inco
me
taxe
s
1 C
onsi
sts
of $
0.5M
in g
ross
sal
arie
s, $
1.8M
in n
et b
onus
es ($
1.6M
re-d
epos
ited
into
Jac
ques
Cor
rivea
uD
esig
ner I
nc.)
and
$2.1
M in
taxe
s pa
id o
n th
e bo
nuse
s.2
Oth
er c
ontri
butio
ns in
clud
e: P
luriD
esig
n$4
,742
(199
3-19
95),
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
u$2
,541
(199
3-20
03),
Mad
elei
ne C
orriv
eau
$2,0
27 (1
993-
2003
) and
Ja
cque
s C
orriv
eau
Des
igne
r Inc
. $90
5 (1
993-
2003
), fo
r a to
tal o
f $53
,189
(199
3-2
003)
$42,
9742
Polit
ical
Con
trib
utio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 39
TTaabb
llee 22
33aa::
JJaaccqq
uueess
CCoorr
rriivveeaa
uu DD
eessiigg
nneerr
IInncc..
-- FF
llooww
ooff FF
uunndd
ss ((11
999966
ttoo 22
000044))
SOU
RC
EO
F FU
ND
S
$3.3
M
$3.3
M
1 Th
e di
vide
nds
paid
by
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
uD
esig
ner I
nc. t
o Ja
cque
s C
orriv
eau
wer
e re
-inve
sted
in th
e co
mpa
ny.
Div
iden
ds fr
omPl
uriD
esig
n
$1.1
M
Re-
inve
stm
ent o
f di
vide
nds
rece
ived
by
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
u
$0.4
M1
Oth
er a
dvan
ces
from
Ja
cque
s C
orriv
eau
$0.2
M
Div
iden
ds p
aid
toJa
cque
s C
orriv
eau
$0.4
M1
Paym
ents
of h
ouse
re
nova
tions
$0.4
M
Oth
er p
aym
ents
to
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
u
$0.1
M
APPL
ICAT
ION
O
F FU
ND
S
Re-
inve
stm
ent o
f afte
r ta
x bo
nuse
s re
ceiv
ed
by J
acqu
es C
orriv
eau
$1.6
M
Cas
h an
d m
arke
tabl
e se
curit
ies
left
in
inve
stm
ent c
ompa
ny
$2.4
M
SOU
RC
EO
F FU
ND
S
$3.3
M
$3.3
M
1 Th
e di
vide
nds
paid
by
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
uD
esig
ner I
nc. t
o Ja
cque
s C
orriv
eau
wer
e re
-inve
sted
in th
e co
mpa
ny.
Div
iden
ds fr
omPl
uriD
esig
n
$1.1
M
Re-
inve
stm
ent o
f di
vide
nds
rece
ived
by
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
u
$0.4
M1
Oth
er a
dvan
ces
from
Ja
cque
s C
orriv
eau
$0.2
M
Div
iden
ds p
aid
toJa
cque
s C
orriv
eau
$0.4
M1
Paym
ents
of h
ouse
re
nova
tions
$0.4
M
Oth
er p
aym
ents
to
Jacq
ues
Cor
rivea
u
$0.1
M
APPL
ICAT
ION
O
F FU
ND
S
Re-
inve
stm
ent o
f afte
r ta
x bo
nuse
s re
ceiv
ed
by J
acqu
es C
orriv
eau
$1.6
M
Re-
inve
stm
ent o
f afte
r ta
x bo
nuse
s re
ceiv
ed
by J
acqu
es C
orriv
eau
$1.6
M
Cas
h an
d m
arke
tabl
e se
curit
ies
left
in
inve
stm
ent c
ompa
ny
$2.4
M
Cas
h an
d m
arke
tabl
e se
curit
ies
left
in
inve
stm
ent c
ompa
ny
$2.4
M
40 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa
bbllee
2244::
GGrroo
uuppee
EEvvee
rreesstt
-- FF
llooww
ooff FF
uunndd
ss ((11
999955
ttoo 22
000022))
$623
.7M
$476
.2M
$147
.4M
NET
INC
OM
E
$45.
1M$3
1.0M
$612
.0M
EXPE
NSE
S
$605
.0M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXP
ENSE
SO
roC
omm
unic
atio
n$5
,992
$6.9
M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S &
DIA
NE
DESL
AUR
IER
S
Polit
ical
con
tribu
tions
(L
iber
al P
arty
)Pe
rson
al u
se
& in
vest
men
ts
1B
ased
on
com
bine
d fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts, i
nclu
ding
Med
ia I.
D.A
. Vi
sion
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
1
$2.4
M
$105
,139
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$1
05,1
39
GO
C S
PS a
nd
Adv
ertis
ing
Rev
enue
sO
roC
omm
unic
atio
nO
ther
Rev
enue
s
$60,
000
Cla
ude
Bou
lay
and
Dia
ne D
esla
urie
rsO
ther
Sha
reho
lder
s
$4.5
M
$33.
4MN
ET G
AIN
S O
N S
ALE
(net
of t
axes
)
Div
iden
ds p
aid
to s
hare
hold
ers
Polit
ical
con
trib
utio
ns
(Lib
eral
Par
ty)
Pers
onal
use
&
inve
stm
ents
$25.
5M$5
.5M
$14,
192
$8,6
87
$623
.7M
$476
.2M
$147
.4M
NET
INC
OM
E
$45.
1M$3
1.0M
$612
.0M
EXPE
NSE
S
$605
.0M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXP
ENSE
SO
roC
omm
unic
atio
n$5
,992
$6.9
M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S &
DIA
NE
DESL
AUR
IER
S
Polit
ical
con
tribu
tions
(L
iber
al P
arty
)Pe
rson
al u
se
& in
vest
men
ts
1B
ased
on
com
bine
d fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts, i
nclu
ding
Med
ia I.
D.A
. Vi
sion
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
1
$2.4
M
$105
,139
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$1
05,1
39
GO
C S
PS a
nd
Adv
ertis
ing
Rev
enue
sO
roC
omm
unic
atio
nO
ther
Rev
enue
s
$60,
000
Cla
ude
Bou
lay
and
Dia
ne D
esla
urie
rsO
ther
Sha
reho
lder
s
$4.5
M
$33.
4MN
ET G
AIN
S O
N S
ALE
(net
of t
axes
)
Div
iden
ds p
aid
to s
hare
hold
ers
Polit
ical
con
trib
utio
ns
(Lib
eral
Par
ty)
Pers
onal
use
&
inve
stm
ents
$25.
5M$5
.5M
$14,
192
$8,6
87
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 41
TTaabb
llee 22
55:: CC
ooffffiinn
-- FF
llooww
ooff FF
uunndd
ss ((11
999966
ttoo 22
000033))
OPE
RAT
ING
EXP
ENSE
S
$1,0
12,9
03
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ONU
SES
TO O
WN
ERS
GO
C S
PS a
nd A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
$4,9
08,4
01
Oth
er R
even
ues
$1,0
47,6
82
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$6,0
28,0
83
NET
INC
OM
E
$357
,573
Divi
dend
s pa
id
to C
offin
fam
ily
$223
,095
1
1 $1
30,5
95 p
aid
in 1
996
rela
ting
to p
re-1
996
earn
ings
.
Oro
Com
mun
icat
ion
$20,
600
$27,
000
Cof
fin fa
mily
boa
t (p
urch
ased
from
J.C
. G
uité
)
$4,6
27,9
07
$29,
700
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
S
$5,6
70,5
10
EXPE
NSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$2
9,30
0
Polit
ical
con
tribu
tions
(Con
serv
ativ
e Pa
rty)
$400
Sala
ries
paid
to C
offin
fam
ily$1
,012
,903
Cof
finfa
mily
OPE
RAT
ING
EXP
ENSE
S
$1,0
12,9
03
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ONU
SES
TO O
WN
ERS
GO
C S
PS a
nd A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
$4,9
08,4
01
Oth
er R
even
ues
$1,0
47,6
82
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$6,0
28,0
83
NET
INC
OM
E
$357
,573
Divi
dend
s pa
id
to C
offin
fam
ily
$223
,095
1
1 $1
30,5
95 p
aid
in 1
996
rela
ting
to p
re-1
996
earn
ings
.
Oro
Com
mun
icat
ion
$20,
600
$27,
000
Cof
fin fa
mily
boa
t (p
urch
ased
from
J.C
. G
uité
)
$4,6
27,9
07
$29,
700
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
S
$5,6
70,5
10
EXPE
NSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$2
9,30
0
Polit
ical
con
tribu
tions
(Con
serv
ativ
e Pa
rty)
$400
Sala
ries
paid
to C
offin
fam
ily$1
,012
,903
Cof
finfa
mily
42 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa
bbllee
2266::
VViicc
kkeerrss
aanndd
BBeenn
ssoonn
CCoomm
ppaann
iieess
LLttdd
.. ((VV
CCBB
LL)) --
FFlloo
ww oo
ff FFuunn
ddss
((119999
66 ttoo
220000
33))
$195
.2M
GO
C S
PS a
nd A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
$48.
7M
Oth
er R
even
ues
$146
.5M
NET
INC
OM
E
$3.0
M
$192
.2M
EXPE
NSE
S
$174
.8M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
SEm
ploy
eeco
mpe
nsat
ion
and
adm
inis
trat
ion
$169
.1M
PacC
anUs
Inc.
man
agem
ent f
ees
$3.0
M
John
Hay
ter
$8.7
M$1
7.3M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S
Libe
ral P
arty
of C
anad
a$1
41,4
04
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
Oth
er s
hare
hold
ers
$8.6
M
$117
,475
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$1
17,4
75
PacC
anU
sIn
c.$3
71,6
00
$20,
929
Oro
Com
mun
icat
ion
$3,0
00
VBC
L$1
17,4
75
$195
.2M
GO
C S
PS a
nd A
dver
tisin
g R
even
ues
$48.
7M
Oth
er R
even
ues
$146
.5M
NET
INC
OM
E
$3.0
M
$192
.2M
EXPE
NSE
S
$174
.8M
OPE
RAT
ING
EXPE
NSE
SEm
ploy
eeco
mpe
nsat
ion
and
adm
inis
trat
ion
$169
.1M
PacC
anUs
Inc.
man
agem
ent f
ees
$3.0
M
John
Hay
ter
$8.7
M$1
7.3M
SALA
RIE
S AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S
Libe
ral P
arty
of C
anad
a$1
41,4
04
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
Oth
er s
hare
hold
ers
$8.6
M
$117
,475
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontri
butio
ns(L
iber
al P
arty
)$1
17,4
75
PacC
anU
sIn
c.$3
71,6
00
$20,
929
Oro
Com
mun
icat
ion
$3,0
00
VBC
L$1
17,4
75
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 43
TTaabb
llee 22
77:: BB
CCPP
LLttéé
ee ((BB
CCPP
)) --
FFllooww
ooff FF
uunndd
ss ((11
999966
ttoo 22
000033))
$90.
7M$3
7.8M
1$5
1.3M
NET
INC
OM
E
$22.
8M$2
0.3M
2
$80.
3M
EXPE
NSE
S
$73.
1MO
PER
ATIN
G E
XPEN
SES
$1.6
M
SALA
RIES
AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S
1Th
is a
mou
nt in
clud
es $
15.4
M o
f adv
ertis
ing
reve
nues
from
Cro
wn
Cor
pora
tions
.2
Of t
his
amou
nt, a
ppro
xim
atel
y $6
M re
late
s to
div
iden
ds p
aid
from
ope
ratio
ns d
urin
g th
e pe
riod
BC
P re
ceiv
ed G
OC
reve
nues
refe
rred
to a
bove
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$97,
720
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontr
ibut
ions
(Lib
eral
Par
ty)
$97,
720
GO
C S
PS a
nd
Adv
ertis
ing
Rev
enue
sD
ivid
ends
rece
ived
in 1
994
and
1995
Oth
er R
even
ues
$1.6
M
Divi
dend
s pa
id
to s
hare
hold
ers
$12.
4MG
AIN
S O
N S
ALE
GAI
NS
ON
SAL
E O
F IN
VEST
MEN
TS (1
996)
Sala
ries
paid
to Y
ves
Gou
goux
$1.6
M
$90.
7M$3
7.8M
1$5
1.3M
NET
INC
OM
E
$22.
8M$2
0.3M
2
$80.
3M
EXPE
NSE
S
$73.
1MO
PER
ATIN
G E
XPEN
SES
$1.6
M
SALA
RIES
AN
D B
ON
USE
STO
OW
NER
S
1Th
is a
mou
nt in
clud
es $
15.4
M o
f adv
ertis
ing
reve
nues
from
Cro
wn
Cor
pora
tions
.2
Of t
his
amou
nt, a
ppro
xim
atel
y $6
M re
late
s to
div
iden
ds p
aid
from
ope
ratio
ns d
urin
g th
e pe
riod
BC
P re
ceiv
ed G
OC
reve
nues
refe
rred
to a
bove
TOTA
L R
EVEN
UES
$97,
720
IDEN
TIFI
ED P
OLI
TIC
AL
REL
ATED
EXP
ENSE
SPo
litic
al c
ontr
ibut
ions
(Lib
eral
Par
ty)
$97,
720
GO
C S
PS a
nd
Adv
ertis
ing
Rev
enue
sD
ivid
ends
rece
ived
in 1
994
and
1995
Oth
er R
even
ues
$1.6
M
Divi
dend
s pa
id
to s
hare
hold
ers
$12.
4MG
AIN
S O
N S
ALE
GAI
NS
ON
SAL
E O
F IN
VEST
MEN
TS (1
996)
Sala
ries
paid
to Y
ves
Gou
goux
$1.6
M
5.3Agency Payments to or on Behalf of Political Parties
We reviewed the available books and records of the agencies and relatedcompanies and individuals and the Elections Canada website to compile alist of payments made by these communication agencies, companies andindividuals to or on behalf of political parties. Table 28 lists politicalcontributions made purportedly, both directly to the parties or indirectly,on behalf of a political party.
TTaabbllee 2288:: AAggeennccyy PPaayymmeennttss ttoo oorr oonn bbeehhaallff ooff PPoolliittiiccaall PPaarrttiieess(($$ mmiilllliioonnss))
44 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit
Company and related parties Direct Indirect1 Total Lafleur 75,304 75,304 Gosselin 5,407 5,407 Groupaction 2 170,854 1,763,587 1,934,331 PluriDesign Canada Inc. 3 53,190 53,190 Expour/Groupe Polygone 23,361 23,361 Groupe Everest 4 194,832 194,832 Coffin 29,300 29,300 Vickers & Benson 4 151,659 151,659 BCP 97,720 97,720
Total $801,627 $ 1,763,587 $2,565,214
1 Per allegation by Mr. J. Brault, the actual amount paid to Liberal Party is unknown.
2 Includes Alleluia Design and Impact Splash.
3 Includes J. Corriveau and his family.
4 Includes related companies and individuals.
5.4Contract Management by Agencies
As noted in Sections 8 through 16 of this report, we have reviewed availableagency records with respect to specific events. Our review disclosed certainpotential irregularities, improprieties and contracting issues in the managementof contracts both by the government departments and by the agencies. Asmore fully described in the individual sections we noted agencies which:
• Billed more hours for professional services to PWGSC than wererecorded in agency records for a specific event;
• Billed PWGSC for fees that were already paid by PWGSC via theAOR;
• Billed PWGSC based on approved estimated costs (a fixed fee) whilethe contract required billing based on approved hourly rates and actualhours incurred;
• Billed costs incurred to PWGSC before a contract was in place;
• Charged 17.65% commission on work sub-contracted to related parties;
• Passed on to PWGSC a substantial mark-up on promotional itemspurchased from a related supplier;
• Billed sub-contractor labour costs at full agency contract labour ratesinstead of the actual cost plus 17.65%;
• Did not obtain competitive quotes for sub-contracted work in excessof $25,000; and
• Charged a finder's fee or commission to a sponsoree while collectinga commission from PWGSC for being the communication agency.
Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 45
46 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit