18
29 5 Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — COMMUNICATION AGENCIES 5.1 Agency Selection 5.1.1 SPS Agency Selection In February 1995, five agencies, Groupe Everest, BCP, Compass, Palmer Jarvis and Vickers & Benson, were chosen on the second day of Heritage Canada selection process. In an undated memo Mr. Guité indicated that these five agencies "will be included on the PWGSC/APORS qualified supplier list for possible communication/advertising contracts on behalf of APORS." In June 1995 Consortium Lafleur was selected. This consortium included Lafleur together with Compass, Natcom Publicité, Freeman Roger Battaglia and SKS Advertising.

Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

29

5

Section Five

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—COMMUNICATION AGENCIES

5.1Agency Selection

5.1.1 SPS Agency Selection

In February 1995, five agencies, Groupe Everest, BCP, Compass, Palmer Jarvisand Vickers & Benson, were chosen on the second day of Heritage Canadaselection process. In an undated memo Mr. Guité indicated that these fiveagencies "will be included on the PWGSC/APORS qualified supplier listfor possible communication/advertising contracts on behalf of APORS."

In June 1995 Consortium Lafleur was selected. This consortium includedLafleur together with Compass, Natcom Publicité, Freeman Roger Battagliaand SKS Advertising.

Page 2: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

In an April 1997 selection process ten agencies were chosen. The ten included:

• Communication Coffin with SOS Communications• Delta Media Inc.• Freeman Rodgers Battaglia Inc.• Goodman Communications Inc.• Gosselin• Groupaction• Manifest Communications Inc.• Publicité Martin Inc.• Scott Thornley & Company Inc.• Sparks Communications Inc.

In a May 2001 selection process, nine agencies were chosen to receive standingoffers including:

• Armada• Bristol Group• Coffin• Compass• Everest• Gosselin• Groupaction• Lafleur• TNC Multicom Inc.

Table 18 summarizes the percentage, by dollar value of contracts managedby the agencies chosen in the four agency selection competitions.

30 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit

Page 3: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

TTaabbllee 1188:: SSuummmmaarryy ooff SSPPSS CCoonnttrraaccttss MMaannaaggeedd bbyy AAggeenncciieess

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31

Agencies Chosen in 1995, 1997 and 2001 Total

Contracts Percentage Groupe Everest 67.67 22.18% Lafleur 65.46 21.46% Groupaction 60.83 19.94% Groupaction/Gosselin 23.06 7.56% Gosselin 21.21 6.95% Vickers and Benson 15.36 5.03% Compass Communications 15.11 4.95% Communication Coffin 8.70 2.85% Groupe BCP 6.35 2.08% Armada 4.60 1.51% TNC Multicom 3.48 1.14% Palmer Jarvis Advertising 2.83 0.93% Publicité Martin 1.51 0.49% Bristol Group 0.55 0.18% Delta Media 0.24 0.08% Communications Consultants 0.18 0.06% SOS Communications 0.02 0.01% Sparks - 0.00% Goodman - 0.00% Manifest - 0.00% Scott Thornley - 0.00% Total for Agencies Chosen in 1995, 1997 and 2001 297.16 97.40% All Other Agencies 7.94 2.60% Total Agency Managed Contracts 305.10 100.00%

Page 4: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

5.1.2 Advertising Agency Selection

Sections 8 to 16 provide the details of the departmental selection competitionsas they relate to each agency.

5.2Cash Flow to Agencies

Based on our analysis of the flow of funds for those agencies and sub-contractors described in Sections 8 to 16 of this report, we can provide thefollowing summary comments:

i) The entities received from 23% (Vickers & Benson) to 100%(Gosselin) of their revenues from GOC business.

ii) For the periods in which the firms received GOC related revenues,profits from all sources of business totaled $46.0 million1,2.

iii) For the periods in which the firms received GOC related revenues,salaries and bonuses paid to their owners totaled $51.2 million2.

iv) For the periods in which the firms received GOC related revenues,contributions were made to or on behalf of political parties, totaling,at a minimum, $801,627. If the amounts identified by Mr. Braultas payments for a political purpose are included, this amount risesto $2.5 million2.

v) Payments were made to Oro Communications totaling $525,923.In addition, Société Immobiliére Alexsim (controlled by Jean Brault)paid $25,000 to Mr. Guité, Mr. Brault purchased a car for $35,000from Mr. Guité and Mr. Coffin purchased a boat for $27,000 fromMr. Guité.

32 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit

1 Excludes net gains on sale of business by Groupe Everest and BCP.

2 Includes Groupe Polygone, Expour and PluriDesign.

Page 5: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

Included in this section of our report are summary flow of funds charts forthose communications agencies and sub-contractors for which we have conducted financial analysis. These agencies and sub-contractor companiesinclude the following:

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 33

Table Communication Agency / Sub-contractors Year

Detailed Findings Section

19 Lafleur Communications 1993 to 2001 8

20 Gosselin Communications May 1997 to September 1998

9

21 Groupaction 1996 to 2001 10

22 Groupe Polygone and Expour 1997 to 2003 11

23 PluriDesign 1996 to 2004 12

23a Jacques Corriveau Designer Inc. 1996 to 2004 12

24 Groupe Everest 1995 to 2002 13

25 Communication Coffin 1996 to 2003 14

26 Vickers and Benson 1996 to 2003 15

27 BCP 1994 to 2003 16

Page 6: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

34 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa

bbllee

1199::

LLaaff

lleeuurr

CCoomm

mmuunn

iiccaatt

iioonnss

-- FF

llooww

ooff FF

uunndd

ss ((11

999933

ttoo 22

000011))

$12.

2MSA

LAR

IES

AN

D B

ON

USE

S TO

OW

NER

S

GO

C (S

PS, A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

& C

row

n C

orpo

ratio

ns)

$66.

5M

Oth

er R

even

ues

$10.

9M

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$92.

3M1

NET

INC

OM

E

$300

,000

Publ

icité

Dez

ert

$6.4

M3

OPE

RAT

ING

EXP

ENSE

S

$79.

7M

$92.

0M

EXPE

NSE

S

Sala

ries

paid

to L

afle

urfa

mily

$12.

2M

Lafle

urfa

mily

GO

C a

nd O

ther

2

$14.

9M

Les

Editi

ons

Sate

llite

$2.8

M4

Xylo

Con

cept

Gra

phiq

ue$1

.4M

5

Plur

iDes

ign

via

La F

abriq

uede

St-A

dolp

he$1

31,1

72

Publ

icité

Dez

ert

Div

iden

ds$7

72,0

00

Sala

ry $

1M

$67,

000

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL R

ELAT

ED E

XPEN

SES

Libe

ral P

arty

of C

anad

a –

$8,0

00

Yuri

Kru

kC

omm

unic

atio

ns$1

.3M

6

1 G

esco

mpa

id n

et m

anag

emen

t fee

s of

$35

7,00

0 to

Laf

leur

. G

esco

mpa

id $

96,0

00 to

Wal

ding

Int’l

. La

fleur

Com

mun

icat

ion

paid

a fu

rthe

r $38

,000

to W

aldi

ngIn

t’l.

2 R

ecor

ds to

det

erm

ine

sour

ce a

re n

otav

aila

ble.

3 Pu

blic

itéD

ezer

tpai

d$5

26,7

35 to

Plu

riDes

ign.

4Sa

telli

te c

ontr

ibut

ed$8

,300

to th

eLi

bera

lPar

tyof

Can

ada.

5Xy

loC

once

pt p

aid

$940

,776

to P

luriD

esig

n.6

Yuri

Kru

kC

omm

unic

atio

n pa

id$2

43,0

00 to

Plu

riDes

ign.

$12.

2MSA

LAR

IES

AN

D B

ON

USE

S TO

OW

NER

S

GO

C (S

PS, A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

& C

row

n C

orpo

ratio

ns)

$66.

5M

Oth

er R

even

ues

$10.

9M

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$92.

3M1

NET

INC

OM

E

$300

,000

Publ

icité

Dez

ert

$6.4

M3

OPE

RAT

ING

EXP

ENSE

S

$79.

7MO

PER

ATIN

G E

XPEN

SES

$79.

7M

$92.

0M

EXPE

NSE

S

$92.

0M

EXPE

NSE

S

Sala

ries

paid

to L

afle

urfa

mily

$12.

2M

Lafle

urfa

mily

GO

C a

nd O

ther

2

$14.

9M

Les

Editi

ons

Sate

llite

$2.8

M4

Xylo

Con

cept

Gra

phiq

ue$1

.4M

5

Plur

iDes

ign

via

La F

abriq

uede

St-A

dolp

he$1

31,1

72

Publ

icité

Dez

ert

Div

iden

ds$7

72,0

00

Sala

ry $

1M

$67,

000

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL R

ELAT

ED E

XPEN

SES

Libe

ral P

arty

of C

anad

a –

$8,0

00

Yuri

Kru

kC

omm

unic

atio

ns$1

.3M

6

1 G

esco

mpa

id n

et m

anag

emen

t fee

s of

$35

7,00

0 to

Laf

leur

. G

esco

mpa

id $

96,0

00 to

Wal

ding

Int’l

. La

fleur

Com

mun

icat

ion

paid

a fu

rthe

r $38

,000

to W

aldi

ngIn

t’l.

2 R

ecor

ds to

det

erm

ine

sour

ce a

re n

otav

aila

ble.

3 Pu

blic

itéD

ezer

tpai

d$5

26,7

35 to

Plu

riDes

ign.

4Sa

telli

te c

ontr

ibut

ed$8

,300

to th

eLi

bera

lPar

tyof

Can

ada.

5Xy

loC

once

pt p

aid

$940

,776

to P

luriD

esig

n.6

Yuri

Kru

kC

omm

unic

atio

n pa

id$2

43,0

00 to

Plu

riDes

ign.

Page 7: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 35

TTaabb

llee 22

00:: GG

oossssee

lliinn CC

oommmm

uunniicc

aattiioo

nn --

FFllooww

ooff FF

uunndd

ss ((MM

aayy 11

999977

ttoo SS

eeppttee

mmbb

eerr 11

999988))

$14.

3M

GO

C S

PS a

nd A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

$14.

3M

$0.3

M$1

38,0

00

$14.

0M

EXPE

NSE

S$1

0.7M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

S

Oth

er s

alar

ies

$0.8

M

Paym

ents

to s

pons

oree

s$4

.4M

$3.3

M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ONU

SES

TO O

WN

ERS

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

Sala

ries

paid

to G

osse

linfa

mily

$3.3

M

CPP

C$0

.8M

SALE

OF

BU

SIN

ESS

$281

,500

NET

INC

OM

E

Gos

selin

fam

ilyC

PPC

Sala

ries

$129

,000

Div

iden

ds$7

9,00

0

Sale

of

busi

ness

$510

,000

Con

trib

utio

n to

Lib

eral

Par

ty$5

,000

Div

iden

ds p

aid

to

Gos

selin

fam

ily

$14.

3M

GO

C S

PS a

nd A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

$14.

3M

$0.3

M$1

38,0

00

$14.

0M

EXPE

NSE

S

$14.

0M

EXPE

NSE

S$1

0.7M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

S

$10.

7M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

S

Oth

er s

alar

ies

$0.8

M

Paym

ents

to s

pons

oree

s$4

.4M

$3.3

M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ONU

SES

TO O

WN

ERS

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

Sala

ries

paid

to G

osse

linfa

mily

$3.3

M

CPP

C$0

.8M

SALE

OF

BU

SIN

ESS

$281

,500

NET

INC

OM

E

Gos

selin

fam

ilyC

PPC

Sala

ries

$129

,000

Div

iden

ds$7

9,00

0

Sale

of

busi

ness

$510

,000

Con

trib

utio

n to

Lib

eral

Par

ty$5

,000

Div

iden

ds p

aid

to

Gos

selin

fam

ily

Page 8: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

36 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa

bbllee

2211::

GGrroo

uuppaacc

ttiioonn

-- FFll

ooww oo

ff FFuunn

ddss

((119999

66 ttoo

220000

11))

$177

.6M

GO

C SP

S an

d Ad

verti

sing

Rev

enue

s

$46.

6M

Oth

er R

even

ues

$129

.1M

NET

INC

OM

E

$5.0

M$1

.8M

$172

.6M

EXPE

NSE

S

$167

.5M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

SPl

uriD

esig

n$4

30,3

70

Oro

Com

mun

icat

ion

$127

,731

Sala

ries

paid

to J

ean

Brau

lt$2

.8M

$3.1

M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S

Car p

urch

ased

fr

om J

.C. G

uité

2

$35,

000

Pers

onal

use

and

in

vest

men

ts

TOTA

L RE

VENU

ES

Sala

ries

paid

to

Joan

eA

rcha

mba

ult

$358

,960

$2.0

M

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$1

70,8

54

Oth

er p

aym

ents

pur

porte

dly

mad

e fo

r pol

itica

l pur

pose

s$1

.4M

Divi

dend

s pa

id

to s

hare

hold

ers

1 O

ther

com

pani

es re

late

d to

Gro

upac

tion

rece

ived

$16

3,75

0 fro

m G

roup

ePo

lygo

nean

d Ex

pour

, for

a to

tal a

mou

nt re

ceiv

ed o

f $2,

097,

800.

2 So

ciét

éIm

mob

lière

Ale

xism

, con

trolle

d by

Jea

n B

raul

t, al

so p

aid

$25,

000

to J

.C.

Gui

té.

Gro

upe

Poly

gone

and

Expo

urR

even

ues

$1.9

M1

$177

.6M

GO

C SP

S an

d Ad

verti

sing

Rev

enue

s

$46.

6M

Oth

er R

even

ues

$129

.1M

NET

INC

OM

E

$5.0

M$1

.8M

$172

.6M

EXPE

NSE

S

$172

.6M

EXPE

NSE

S

$167

.5M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

SPl

uriD

esig

n$4

30,3

70

Oro

Com

mun

icat

ion

$127

,731

Sala

ries

paid

to J

ean

Brau

lt$2

.8M

$3.1

M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S

Car p

urch

ased

fr

om J

.C. G

uité

2

$35,

000

Pers

onal

use

and

in

vest

men

ts

TOTA

L RE

VENU

ES

Sala

ries

paid

to

Joan

eA

rcha

mba

ult

$358

,960

$2.0

M

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$1

70,8

54

Oth

er p

aym

ents

pur

porte

dly

mad

e fo

r pol

itica

l pur

pose

s$1

.4M

Divi

dend

s pa

id

to s

hare

hold

ers

1 O

ther

com

pani

es re

late

d to

Gro

upac

tion

rece

ived

$16

3,75

0 fro

m G

roup

ePo

lygo

nean

d Ex

pour

, for

a to

tal a

mou

nt re

ceiv

ed o

f $2,

097,

800.

2 So

ciét

éIm

mob

lière

Ale

xism

, con

trolle

d by

Jea

n B

raul

t, al

so p

aid

$25,

000

to J

.C.

Gui

té.

Gro

upe

Poly

gone

and

Expo

urR

even

ues

$1.9

M1

Page 9: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 37

TTaabb

llee 22

22:: GG

rroouupp

ee PP

oollyygg

oonnee

aanndd

EExxpp

oouurr

-- FFll

ooww oo

ff FFuunn

ddss

((119999

77 ttoo

220000

33))

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$117

.0M

NET

INC

OM

E

$14.

1M

Fund

s ad

vanc

edor

tran

sfer

red

into

in

vest

men

t com

pani

es

cont

rolle

d by

Luc

Lem

ay

$13.

5M

Rev

enue

s fr

om G

OC

Adv

ertis

ing

and

SPS

Con

trac

ts

$38.

6M

Rev

enue

s fr

om o

ther

sou

rces

$78.

4M

2.1M

$11.

5M

OTH

ER

EXPE

NSE

SIn

com

e ta

xes

$8.9

M

Loss

es o

n liq

uida

tion

of c

ompa

nies

$2.6

M

Gro

upe

Poly

gone

$14.

8M

Fund

s ad

vanc

edto

Exp

our

Expo

ur

$(0.

7M)

$1.7

M

$11.

8M

$91.

4M

Plur

iDes

ign

$5.8

M

J. B

raul

tCom

pani

esEX

PEN

SES

$2.1

M

$25.

6M

INC

OM

E B

EFO

RE

TAXE

S

$2.7

M

Inco

me

befo

re ta

xes

$25.

6M

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$117

.0M

NET

INC

OM

E

$14.

1M

Fund

s ad

vanc

edor

tran

sfer

red

into

in

vest

men

t com

pani

es

cont

rolle

d by

Luc

Lem

ay

$13.

5M

Rev

enue

s fr

om G

OC

Adv

ertis

ing

and

SPS

Con

trac

ts

$38.

6M

Rev

enue

s fr

om o

ther

sou

rces

$78.

4M

2.1M

$11.

5M

OTH

ER

EXPE

NSE

SIn

com

e ta

xes

$8.9

M

Loss

es o

n liq

uida

tion

of c

ompa

nies

$2.6

M

Gro

upe

Poly

gone

$14.

8M

Fund

s ad

vanc

edto

Exp

our

Expo

ur

$(0.

7M)

$1.7

M

$11.

8M

$91.

4M

Plur

iDes

ign

$5.8

M

J. B

raul

tCom

pani

esEX

PEN

SES

$2.1

M

$25.

6M

INC

OM

E B

EFO

RE

TAXE

S

$2.7

M

Inco

me

befo

re ta

xes

$25.

6M

Page 10: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

38 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa

bbllee

2233::

PPlluu

rriiDDeess

iiggnn

-- FFll

ooww oo

ff FFuunn

ddss

((119999

66 ttoo

220000

44))

Li

bera

l Par

ty

of C

anad

a

$1.2

M

Gro

upe

Poly

gone

and

Expo

ur

$5.8

M

Rev

enue

s as

soc.

w

ith J

ean

Lafle

ur

$1.8

M

Gro

upac

tion

$0.4

M

Oth

er S

ourc

es

$0.9

M

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$10.

1M

EXPE

NSE

S

$8.7

M$4

.4M

1$2

.2M

$2.1

M

Sala

ry a

nd b

onus

esto

Jac

ques

Cor

rivea

uPr

oduc

tion

Cos

tsO

ther

Exp

ense

s

$1.4

M

INC

OM

E B

EFO

RE

TAXE

S

$0.3

M

INC

OM

E TA

XES

$0.3

M

NET

INC

OM

E

$1.1

M

Div

iden

ds p

aid

to

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

uD

esig

ner I

nc.

$1.1

M

Inco

me

befo

re ta

xes

$1.4

M

Inco

me

taxe

s

1 C

onsi

sts

of $

0.5M

in g

ross

sal

arie

s, $

1.8M

in n

et b

onus

es ($

1.6M

re-d

epos

ited

into

Jac

ques

Cor

rivea

uD

esig

ner I

nc.)

and

$2.1

M in

taxe

s pa

id o

n th

e bo

nuse

s.2

Oth

er c

ontri

butio

ns in

clud

e: P

luriD

esig

n$4

,742

(199

3-19

95),

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

u$2

,541

(199

3-20

03),

Mad

elei

ne C

orriv

eau

$2,0

27 (1

993-

2003

) and

Ja

cque

s C

orriv

eau

Des

igne

r Inc

. $90

5 (1

993-

2003

), fo

r a to

tal o

f $53

,189

(199

3-2

003)

$42,

9742

Polit

ical

Con

trib

utio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)

Libe

ral P

arty

of

Can

ada

$1.2

M

Gro

upe

Poly

gone

and

Expo

ur

$5.8

M

Rev

enue

s as

soc.

w

ith J

ean

Lafle

ur

$1.8

M

Gro

upac

tion

$0.4

M

Oth

er S

ourc

es

$0.9

M

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$10.

1M

EXPE

NSE

S

$8.7

M

EXPE

NSE

S

$8.7

M$4

.4M

1$2

.2M

$2.1

M

Sala

ry a

nd b

onus

esto

Jac

ques

Cor

rivea

uPr

oduc

tion

Cos

tsO

ther

Exp

ense

s

$1.4

M

INC

OM

E B

EFO

RE

TAXE

S

$0.3

M

INC

OM

E TA

XES

$0.3

M

NET

INC

OM

E

$1.1

M

Div

iden

ds p

aid

to

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

uD

esig

ner I

nc.

$1.1

M

Inco

me

befo

re ta

xes

$1.4

M

Inco

me

taxe

s

1 C

onsi

sts

of $

0.5M

in g

ross

sal

arie

s, $

1.8M

in n

et b

onus

es ($

1.6M

re-d

epos

ited

into

Jac

ques

Cor

rivea

uD

esig

ner I

nc.)

and

$2.1

M in

taxe

s pa

id o

n th

e bo

nuse

s.2

Oth

er c

ontri

butio

ns in

clud

e: P

luriD

esig

n$4

,742

(199

3-19

95),

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

u$2

,541

(199

3-20

03),

Mad

elei

ne C

orriv

eau

$2,0

27 (1

993-

2003

) and

Ja

cque

s C

orriv

eau

Des

igne

r Inc

. $90

5 (1

993-

2003

), fo

r a to

tal o

f $53

,189

(199

3-2

003)

$42,

9742

Polit

ical

Con

trib

utio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)

Page 11: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 39

TTaabb

llee 22

33aa::

JJaaccqq

uueess

CCoorr

rriivveeaa

uu DD

eessiigg

nneerr

IInncc..

-- FF

llooww

ooff FF

uunndd

ss ((11

999966

ttoo 22

000044))

SOU

RC

EO

F FU

ND

S

$3.3

M

$3.3

M

1 Th

e di

vide

nds

paid

by

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

uD

esig

ner I

nc. t

o Ja

cque

s C

orriv

eau

wer

e re

-inve

sted

in th

e co

mpa

ny.

Div

iden

ds fr

omPl

uriD

esig

n

$1.1

M

Re-

inve

stm

ent o

f di

vide

nds

rece

ived

by

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

u

$0.4

M1

Oth

er a

dvan

ces

from

Ja

cque

s C

orriv

eau

$0.2

M

Div

iden

ds p

aid

toJa

cque

s C

orriv

eau

$0.4

M1

Paym

ents

of h

ouse

re

nova

tions

$0.4

M

Oth

er p

aym

ents

to

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

u

$0.1

M

APPL

ICAT

ION

O

F FU

ND

S

Re-

inve

stm

ent o

f afte

r ta

x bo

nuse

s re

ceiv

ed

by J

acqu

es C

orriv

eau

$1.6

M

Cas

h an

d m

arke

tabl

e se

curit

ies

left

in

inve

stm

ent c

ompa

ny

$2.4

M

SOU

RC

EO

F FU

ND

S

$3.3

M

$3.3

M

1 Th

e di

vide

nds

paid

by

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

uD

esig

ner I

nc. t

o Ja

cque

s C

orriv

eau

wer

e re

-inve

sted

in th

e co

mpa

ny.

Div

iden

ds fr

omPl

uriD

esig

n

$1.1

M

Re-

inve

stm

ent o

f di

vide

nds

rece

ived

by

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

u

$0.4

M1

Oth

er a

dvan

ces

from

Ja

cque

s C

orriv

eau

$0.2

M

Div

iden

ds p

aid

toJa

cque

s C

orriv

eau

$0.4

M1

Paym

ents

of h

ouse

re

nova

tions

$0.4

M

Oth

er p

aym

ents

to

Jacq

ues

Cor

rivea

u

$0.1

M

APPL

ICAT

ION

O

F FU

ND

S

Re-

inve

stm

ent o

f afte

r ta

x bo

nuse

s re

ceiv

ed

by J

acqu

es C

orriv

eau

$1.6

M

Re-

inve

stm

ent o

f afte

r ta

x bo

nuse

s re

ceiv

ed

by J

acqu

es C

orriv

eau

$1.6

M

Cas

h an

d m

arke

tabl

e se

curit

ies

left

in

inve

stm

ent c

ompa

ny

$2.4

M

Cas

h an

d m

arke

tabl

e se

curit

ies

left

in

inve

stm

ent c

ompa

ny

$2.4

M

Page 12: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

40 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa

bbllee

2244::

GGrroo

uuppee

EEvvee

rreesstt

-- FF

llooww

ooff FF

uunndd

ss ((11

999955

ttoo 22

000022))

$623

.7M

$476

.2M

$147

.4M

NET

INC

OM

E

$45.

1M$3

1.0M

$612

.0M

EXPE

NSE

S

$605

.0M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXP

ENSE

SO

roC

omm

unic

atio

n$5

,992

$6.9

M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S &

DIA

NE

DESL

AUR

IER

S

Polit

ical

con

tribu

tions

(L

iber

al P

arty

)Pe

rson

al u

se

& in

vest

men

ts

1B

ased

on

com

bine

d fin

anci

al s

tate

men

ts, i

nclu

ding

Med

ia I.

D.A

. Vi

sion

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

1

$2.4

M

$105

,139

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$1

05,1

39

GO

C S

PS a

nd

Adv

ertis

ing

Rev

enue

sO

roC

omm

unic

atio

nO

ther

Rev

enue

s

$60,

000

Cla

ude

Bou

lay

and

Dia

ne D

esla

urie

rsO

ther

Sha

reho

lder

s

$4.5

M

$33.

4MN

ET G

AIN

S O

N S

ALE

(net

of t

axes

)

Div

iden

ds p

aid

to s

hare

hold

ers

Polit

ical

con

trib

utio

ns

(Lib

eral

Par

ty)

Pers

onal

use

&

inve

stm

ents

$25.

5M$5

.5M

$14,

192

$8,6

87

$623

.7M

$476

.2M

$147

.4M

NET

INC

OM

E

$45.

1M$3

1.0M

$612

.0M

EXPE

NSE

S

$605

.0M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXP

ENSE

SO

roC

omm

unic

atio

n$5

,992

$6.9

M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S &

DIA

NE

DESL

AUR

IER

S

Polit

ical

con

tribu

tions

(L

iber

al P

arty

)Pe

rson

al u

se

& in

vest

men

ts

1B

ased

on

com

bine

d fin

anci

al s

tate

men

ts, i

nclu

ding

Med

ia I.

D.A

. Vi

sion

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

1

$2.4

M

$105

,139

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$1

05,1

39

GO

C S

PS a

nd

Adv

ertis

ing

Rev

enue

sO

roC

omm

unic

atio

nO

ther

Rev

enue

s

$60,

000

Cla

ude

Bou

lay

and

Dia

ne D

esla

urie

rsO

ther

Sha

reho

lder

s

$4.5

M

$33.

4MN

ET G

AIN

S O

N S

ALE

(net

of t

axes

)

Div

iden

ds p

aid

to s

hare

hold

ers

Polit

ical

con

trib

utio

ns

(Lib

eral

Par

ty)

Pers

onal

use

&

inve

stm

ents

$25.

5M$5

.5M

$14,

192

$8,6

87

Page 13: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 41

TTaabb

llee 22

55:: CC

ooffffiinn

-- FF

llooww

ooff FF

uunndd

ss ((11

999966

ttoo 22

000033))

OPE

RAT

ING

EXP

ENSE

S

$1,0

12,9

03

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ONU

SES

TO O

WN

ERS

GO

C S

PS a

nd A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

$4,9

08,4

01

Oth

er R

even

ues

$1,0

47,6

82

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$6,0

28,0

83

NET

INC

OM

E

$357

,573

Divi

dend

s pa

id

to C

offin

fam

ily

$223

,095

1

1 $1

30,5

95 p

aid

in 1

996

rela

ting

to p

re-1

996

earn

ings

.

Oro

Com

mun

icat

ion

$20,

600

$27,

000

Cof

fin fa

mily

boa

t (p

urch

ased

from

J.C

. G

uité

)

$4,6

27,9

07

$29,

700

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

S

$5,6

70,5

10

EXPE

NSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$2

9,30

0

Polit

ical

con

tribu

tions

(Con

serv

ativ

e Pa

rty)

$400

Sala

ries

paid

to C

offin

fam

ily$1

,012

,903

Cof

finfa

mily

OPE

RAT

ING

EXP

ENSE

S

$1,0

12,9

03

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ONU

SES

TO O

WN

ERS

GO

C S

PS a

nd A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

$4,9

08,4

01

Oth

er R

even

ues

$1,0

47,6

82

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$6,0

28,0

83

NET

INC

OM

E

$357

,573

Divi

dend

s pa

id

to C

offin

fam

ily

$223

,095

1

1 $1

30,5

95 p

aid

in 1

996

rela

ting

to p

re-1

996

earn

ings

.

Oro

Com

mun

icat

ion

$20,

600

$27,

000

Cof

fin fa

mily

boa

t (p

urch

ased

from

J.C

. G

uité

)

$4,6

27,9

07

$29,

700

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

S

$5,6

70,5

10

EXPE

NSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$2

9,30

0

Polit

ical

con

tribu

tions

(Con

serv

ativ

e Pa

rty)

$400

Sala

ries

paid

to C

offin

fam

ily$1

,012

,903

Cof

finfa

mily

Page 14: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

42 Who is Responsible? Forensic AuditTTaa

bbllee

2266::

VViicc

kkeerrss

aanndd

BBeenn

ssoonn

CCoomm

ppaann

iieess

LLttdd

.. ((VV

CCBB

LL)) --

FFlloo

ww oo

ff FFuunn

ddss

((119999

66 ttoo

220000

33))

$195

.2M

GO

C S

PS a

nd A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

$48.

7M

Oth

er R

even

ues

$146

.5M

NET

INC

OM

E

$3.0

M

$192

.2M

EXPE

NSE

S

$174

.8M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

SEm

ploy

eeco

mpe

nsat

ion

and

adm

inis

trat

ion

$169

.1M

PacC

anUs

Inc.

man

agem

ent f

ees

$3.0

M

John

Hay

ter

$8.7

M$1

7.3M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S

Libe

ral P

arty

of C

anad

a$1

41,4

04

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

Oth

er s

hare

hold

ers

$8.6

M

$117

,475

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$1

17,4

75

PacC

anU

sIn

c.$3

71,6

00

$20,

929

Oro

Com

mun

icat

ion

$3,0

00

VBC

L$1

17,4

75

$195

.2M

GO

C S

PS a

nd A

dver

tisin

g R

even

ues

$48.

7M

Oth

er R

even

ues

$146

.5M

NET

INC

OM

E

$3.0

M

$192

.2M

EXPE

NSE

S

$174

.8M

OPE

RAT

ING

EXPE

NSE

SEm

ploy

eeco

mpe

nsat

ion

and

adm

inis

trat

ion

$169

.1M

PacC

anUs

Inc.

man

agem

ent f

ees

$3.0

M

John

Hay

ter

$8.7

M$1

7.3M

SALA

RIE

S AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S

Libe

ral P

arty

of C

anad

a$1

41,4

04

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

Oth

er s

hare

hold

ers

$8.6

M

$117

,475

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontri

butio

ns(L

iber

al P

arty

)$1

17,4

75

PacC

anU

sIn

c.$3

71,6

00

$20,

929

Oro

Com

mun

icat

ion

$3,0

00

VBC

L$1

17,4

75

Page 15: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 43

TTaabb

llee 22

77:: BB

CCPP

LLttéé

ee ((BB

CCPP

)) --

FFllooww

ooff FF

uunndd

ss ((11

999966

ttoo 22

000033))

$90.

7M$3

7.8M

1$5

1.3M

NET

INC

OM

E

$22.

8M$2

0.3M

2

$80.

3M

EXPE

NSE

S

$73.

1MO

PER

ATIN

G E

XPEN

SES

$1.6

M

SALA

RIES

AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S

1Th

is a

mou

nt in

clud

es $

15.4

M o

f adv

ertis

ing

reve

nues

from

Cro

wn

Cor

pora

tions

.2

Of t

his

amou

nt, a

ppro

xim

atel

y $6

M re

late

s to

div

iden

ds p

aid

from

ope

ratio

ns d

urin

g th

e pe

riod

BC

P re

ceiv

ed G

OC

reve

nues

refe

rred

to a

bove

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$97,

720

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontr

ibut

ions

(Lib

eral

Par

ty)

$97,

720

GO

C S

PS a

nd

Adv

ertis

ing

Rev

enue

sD

ivid

ends

rece

ived

in 1

994

and

1995

Oth

er R

even

ues

$1.6

M

Divi

dend

s pa

id

to s

hare

hold

ers

$12.

4MG

AIN

S O

N S

ALE

GAI

NS

ON

SAL

E O

F IN

VEST

MEN

TS (1

996)

Sala

ries

paid

to Y

ves

Gou

goux

$1.6

M

$90.

7M$3

7.8M

1$5

1.3M

NET

INC

OM

E

$22.

8M$2

0.3M

2

$80.

3M

EXPE

NSE

S

$73.

1MO

PER

ATIN

G E

XPEN

SES

$1.6

M

SALA

RIES

AN

D B

ON

USE

STO

OW

NER

S

1Th

is a

mou

nt in

clud

es $

15.4

M o

f adv

ertis

ing

reve

nues

from

Cro

wn

Cor

pora

tions

.2

Of t

his

amou

nt, a

ppro

xim

atel

y $6

M re

late

s to

div

iden

ds p

aid

from

ope

ratio

ns d

urin

g th

e pe

riod

BC

P re

ceiv

ed G

OC

reve

nues

refe

rred

to a

bove

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

$97,

720

IDEN

TIFI

ED P

OLI

TIC

AL

REL

ATED

EXP

ENSE

SPo

litic

al c

ontr

ibut

ions

(Lib

eral

Par

ty)

$97,

720

GO

C S

PS a

nd

Adv

ertis

ing

Rev

enue

sD

ivid

ends

rece

ived

in 1

994

and

1995

Oth

er R

even

ues

$1.6

M

Divi

dend

s pa

id

to s

hare

hold

ers

$12.

4MG

AIN

S O

N S

ALE

GAI

NS

ON

SAL

E O

F IN

VEST

MEN

TS (1

996)

Sala

ries

paid

to Y

ves

Gou

goux

$1.6

M

Page 16: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

5.3Agency Payments to or on Behalf of Political Parties

We reviewed the available books and records of the agencies and relatedcompanies and individuals and the Elections Canada website to compile alist of payments made by these communication agencies, companies andindividuals to or on behalf of political parties. Table 28 lists politicalcontributions made purportedly, both directly to the parties or indirectly,on behalf of a political party.

TTaabbllee 2288:: AAggeennccyy PPaayymmeennttss ttoo oorr oonn bbeehhaallff ooff PPoolliittiiccaall PPaarrttiieess(($$ mmiilllliioonnss))

44 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit

Company and related parties Direct Indirect1 Total Lafleur 75,304 75,304 Gosselin 5,407 5,407 Groupaction 2 170,854 1,763,587 1,934,331 PluriDesign Canada Inc. 3 53,190 53,190 Expour/Groupe Polygone 23,361 23,361 Groupe Everest 4 194,832 194,832 Coffin 29,300 29,300 Vickers & Benson 4 151,659 151,659 BCP 97,720 97,720

Total $801,627 $ 1,763,587 $2,565,214

1 Per allegation by Mr. J. Brault, the actual amount paid to Liberal Party is unknown.

2 Includes Alleluia Design and Impact Splash.

3 Includes J. Corriveau and his family.

4 Includes related companies and individuals.

Page 17: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

5.4Contract Management by Agencies

As noted in Sections 8 through 16 of this report, we have reviewed availableagency records with respect to specific events. Our review disclosed certainpotential irregularities, improprieties and contracting issues in the managementof contracts both by the government departments and by the agencies. Asmore fully described in the individual sections we noted agencies which:

• Billed more hours for professional services to PWGSC than wererecorded in agency records for a specific event;

• Billed PWGSC for fees that were already paid by PWGSC via theAOR;

• Billed PWGSC based on approved estimated costs (a fixed fee) whilethe contract required billing based on approved hourly rates and actualhours incurred;

• Billed costs incurred to PWGSC before a contract was in place;

• Charged 17.65% commission on work sub-contracted to related parties;

• Passed on to PWGSC a substantial mark-up on promotional itemspurchased from a related supplier;

• Billed sub-contractor labour costs at full agency contract labour ratesinstead of the actual cost plus 17.65%;

• Did not obtain competitive quotes for sub-contracted work in excessof $25,000; and

• Charged a finder's fee or commission to a sponsoree while collectinga commission from PWGSC for being the communication agency.

Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 45

Page 18: Section Five SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......Table 18: Summary of SPS Contracts Managed by Agencies Section Five: Summary of Findings—Communication Agencies 31Agencies Chosen in 1995,

46 Who is Responsible? Forensic Audit