Upload
duonganh
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Media trip to Novy Urengoy & Yuzhno-Russkoe gas field28-31 March 2011
Secure gas supply for Europe –Nord Stream on track to supply Europe with cleaner energy >
Agenda >
2
Project Overview1
Construction Update2
Environmental Protection3
1. Project well on track >
3
Safe Energy Infrastructure for Europe >
Nord Stream
> Two parallel offshore pipelines of 1,224 km (transport capacity 55 bcm per year)
> A direct and fixed link between Russia’s vast proven gas reserves and the European Union
> An additional route complementing existing network and other planned pipelines
> Infrastructure project ‘of European interest’ within the framework of the EU’s TEN-E guidelines
Gas transported by Nord Stream can
> Provide 26 million European households with electricity and heating fuel
> Make a substantial contribution to EU climate protection goals
> Reach consumers already in late 2011
4
Nord Stream AG –a strong European-Russian consortium >
5
Shareholders Committee
Managing Director
Supervisory Level
Management Level
Technical Director
Project Director
Financial Director
51% 15.5% 9%
Communications Director
15.5% 9%
Meeting the growing need for natural gas imports in the EU >
6
Domestic production Existing imports Additional import requirements Nord Stream
Import gapΣ 198 bcm
630 bcm
2030
536 bcm
2008
Growing EU import needs
Decreasing European production
216
55
143
320
112
320
Source: IEA, World Energy Outlook, November 2010
The EU will need 159-198 bcm of additional gas imports by 2030
Natural gas – the key fuel for growth >
7Source: EWEA, 2010
> Emits 50% less CO2 than coal
> Is flexible in use and the first choice for new electricity production in Europe
> Is an abundant and secure energy source
> Makes a substantial contribution to achieving the European Union’s 20:20:20 climate goals
Natural gas enjoys growingpopularity as a fuel because it
Natural gas 49%Wind
39%
Waste 1%Other <1%
Biomass 1%Hydro 2%
New electricity generating capacity EU, 2000-2009
“Natural gas is the only necessary bridge technology towards the age of renewable energy“
- Greenpeace, position paper on natural gas, 25 August, 2010
Photovoltaic 8%
Additional pipeline transport capacities needed >
8
Skanled(suspended)
Nord Stream (55 bcm/a)
Turkey-Greece-Interconnector(11-12 bcm/a)
Nabucco(31 bcm/a)
Galsi(8 bcm/a)
Transmed(+ 7 bcm/a)
Medgaz(8 bcm/a)
South Stream(63 bcm/a)
Pipelines put in operation since 2008
Pipelines under construction
Planned pipelines
Source: European Commission, Priority Interconnection Plan 2007; Nord Stream
Trans Adriatic Pipeline(10 bcm/a)
White Stream(32 bcm/a)
ITGI / IGI Poseidon
(8-10 bcm/a)
Baltic Pipe(5 bcm/a)
Nord Stream’s onshore connections to the European network – OPAL & NEL >
9
Munich
Stuttgart
Duesseldorf
Nuremberg
Dresden
Hanover
Cologne
Amsterdam
Prague
Frankfurt/OderMagdeburg
SchwerinHamburg
Bremen
Berlin
Leipzig
OP
ALNEL
NO
RD
STR
EA
M
Lubmin beiGreifswald
Frankfurt/Main
BBL
INTER-CONNECTOR
Bunde
TRANSGAS
YAMAL
WAGHaiming
TEN
P
ErfurtSTEGAL
JAGAL
MIDAL
MID
AL
WEDAL
RHG
ER
M
Ludwigshafen
MEGALNorth
Passau
MEGALSouth
Aachen
Transit pipelines
Lippe
Rysum
Rehden
Rueckersdorf
Mallnow
Reckrod
Olbernhau
Pipelines under construction
Brussels
Zeebrugge
London
Bacton
Paris
Nancy
Project players – a true European endeavour >
10
5
6
43
2
1
2
1
4
Italy
France
UK
Denmark
Germany
Russia
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
Switzerland
Norway
1
2
6
5 4
3
1
24
36
5
7
2
Nord Stream & ShareholdersNord Stream AGOAO GazpromGDF SUEZ S.A.
1
3
4
5
6
BASF SE/Wintershall Holding GmbHE.ON Ruhrgas AGN.V. Nederlandse Gasunie
EUPECPort of Sassnitz-MukranPort of Kotka
Logistics
3
1
2 54 Port of Hanko
Port of SlitePort of Karlskrona6
SaipemAllseasVan OordBoskalis-TidewayRohde Nielsen
5
67
Construction*
8
95
7
9
6
8
2
1
4
5
7
9
6
8
5
6
43
2
1
1
2
6
5 4
3
1
2
3
5 41
2
3
5 4
* Selection of contractors **Sumitomo is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan
Gazprom Marketing and Trading Ltd, UKDONG Energy A/S
Nord Stream Gas Purchasers31
2 54
GDF SUEZ S. A. WINGAS GmbH & Co. KGE.ON Ruhrgas AG
Pipes & Materials*EUROPIPEOMKSumitomo**PetrolValves
1
2
3
4
Operations*TechnipStatoilSiemensIMPaC
10
11
12
13
FOGASGS TÜV
Marin MätteknikRambøllDoF
1
23
PeterGazERMDNV
4
56
7
8
1210
13
11
SaipemAllseasVan OordBoskalis-TidewayRohde Nielsen
5
67
Construction*
8
9
Pipes & Materials*EUROPIPEOMKSumitomo**PetrolValves
1
2
3
4
2
Nord Stream & ShareholdersNord Stream AGOAO GazpromGDF SUEZ S.A.
1
3
4
5
6
BASF SE/Wintershall Holding GmbHE.ON Ruhrgas AGN.V. Nederlandse Gasunie
EUPECPort of Sassnitz-MukranPort of Kotka
Logistics
3
1
2 54 Port of Hanko
Port of SlitePort of Karlskrona6
Gazprom Marketing and Trading Ltd, UKDONG Energy A/S
Nord Stream Gas Purchasers31
2 54
GDF SUEZ S. A. WINGAS GmbH & Co. KGE.ON Ruhrgas AG
FOGASGS TÜV
PeterGazERMDNV
4
56
Environmental Studies, Quality Management & Safety*7
8
Italy
France
UK
Denmark
Germany
Russia
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
Switzerland
Norway
5
6
43
2
1
2
1
4
1
2
6
5 4
3
1
24
36
5
7
1
2
3
5 4
1210
13
11
Operations*TechnipStatoilSiemensIMPaC
10
11
12
13
11
Financing secured >
Phase I financing:successfully concluded in 2010
− Debt requirement of 3.9 billion euros− 26 banks participating− More than 60 percent oversubscribed
Nord Stream – a solid investment
Phase II financing:completed beginning 2011
− Debt requirement of 2.5 billion euros− 24 banks participating− More than 60 percent oversubscribed
Over 1,100 km of the first pipeline laid until date >
12
KP1195
KP675
KP297
KP7.5
KP350
2010 April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2011 Jan.
Feb.
March
April
Castoro
Sei (C
6)
Solitaire
Castoro
Dieci(C
10)
* KP = Kilometre Point
KP451
Realisation of Nord Stream on schedule >
Nord Stream will soon be ready to contribute to the EU’s energy security and to meeting its climate change goals
>Nord Stream is key infrastructure which will help the EU’s energy security for at least 50 years
>Nord Stream is a safe and environmentally-friendly pipeline, constructed according to stringent international and national requirements
>Nord Stream is a long-term benchmark project for EU-Russia cooperation
>Nord Stream is on budget and on schedule to start transporting gas directly to the European Union in late 2011
13
2011-20122011 20122010-20111997-1999 20092006-20082005 - 2009
Feasibility Study
Pipeline design
Laying Line 1
CommissioningLine 1
Laying Line 2
Applications & PermittingEIA
Commissioning Line 2
2010
Financing Phase I & II
14
Nord Stream’s success factors >
Green logistics concept
Focus on safety & environment
Meticulous compliance &
permitting
Committed business partners
State-of-the-art technical solutions
Solid financial structure
Open dialogue & transparency
Dedicated company &
strong shareholders
Communication and transparency >
Intensive dialogue with authorities, NGOs, experts, media and public
>Some 35 public hearings
>Over 300 presentations, exhibitions and stakeholder information events and meetings
>Exchange with numerous environmental NGOs from the EU and Russia
Comprehensive project information
>Espoo Report, newsletters, brochures, website (10 languages)
> Mobile exhibition “Pipeline Information Tour”
> Systematic online response management system (2,400 inquiries handled in 2009)
15
Next steps – Highlights in 2011 >
16
Completion of construction line 1 (including hyperbaric tie-in)
Spring 2011
Start of pre-commissioning line 1 Spring 2011
First national annual Environmental Monitoring reports Spring 2011
Start of construction line 2 Spring 2011
Line 1 ready for first gas Autumn 2011
Last pipe segment delivered Autumn 2011
2. Construction Update >
17
At any time at least 30 ships are working in different parts of the Baltic Sea >
> Castoro Sei (C6)• Saipem S.p.A.
• Semi-submersible, anchor positioned vessel
• Lay rate: appr. 2.5 km/day
• Transit speed: 4 knots
• Installations: Offshore installation; construction of Russian landfall
18
> Castoro Dieci (C10)• Saipem S.p.A.
• Flat bottom, shallow draught
• Anchor positioned
• Installation of German landfall and near-shore section
> Solitaire• Allseas Group S.A.
• Dynamically positioned
• Lay rate: appr. 2.4 km/day
• Transit speed: 13 knots
• Offshore construction in the Gulf of Finland
Further specialised ships for pipe transport, surve ys, rock placement and landfall construction
Hyperbaric tie-ins complete the pipeline >
> Zone 1 and 2: will be connected in spring 2011 at a sea depth of approx. 80 metres
> Zone 2 and 3: will be connected in summer 2011 at a depth of approx. 110 metres
19
Zone 1 , Gulf of FinlandKP* 0 – KP 297, WT 34.6 mm, design pressure of 220 bar
Zone 2 , Central offshore sectionKP 297 – KP 675 , WT 30.9 mm, design pressure of 200 bar
Zone 3 , South-western sectionKP 675 – KP 1,224, WT 26.8 mm design pressure of 170 bar
* KP = Kilometre Point; WT = Wall thickness
Procedure of hyperbaric tie-ins >
> Will connect the three pipeline sections at KP 297 (Finland) and KP 675 (Sweden) – where design pressure and wall thickness changes
> Pipelines are connected in an underwaterwelding habitat in several steps:
− Cutting, and aligning of pipeline sections
− Placement of habitat over fit-up location and sealing over the pipeline end
− Pumping of water out of habitat and welding
− Testing of field joints
Example of an underwater welding habitat
Diving equipment on board >
3-Man Living Chamber
Diving Bell
Diving Bell Layout
Pre-Commissioning >
> After installation, the pipeline will undergo a series of activities which will prepare the pipeline for commercial operations
> The 5 main phases are:
• Cleaning: flooding the pipeline with treated sea water to remove any debris left during the construction
• Gauging: checking that the pipeline roundness is maintained along the route, by means of special measuring instruments (“gauging scraper”)
• Hydrotesting: ensuring the mechanical integrity of the pipeline by subjecting the pipeline to a test pressure higher than the design pressure. This test is usually performed with treated seawater
• Dewatering: removing the water used for hydrotesting
• Drying: flowing dry air into the pipeline to ensure that no water is left inside
23
Landfall Russia >
Shore pull completed in August 2011 >
24
Valves put in place in February 2011 >
23/11/2010
25
26
Landfall Germany >
Both pipeline strings pulled ashore in July 2010 >
27
Onshore connections in February 2011 >
28
29
3. Protection of the Baltic Environment >
Committed to preserving the environment >
Nord Stream
> Invested 100 mln euros into environmental studies, planning and route design
> Further 40 mln euros to be invested in a comprehensive environmental monitoring programme
> Surveyed 40,000 line kilometres of the Baltic Sea in comprehensive geophysical investigations over 4 years with state-of-the-art equipment
> Concluded comprehensive EIA and environmental studies
> Cleared over 100 munitions successfully for safe routing
> Preserved cultural heritage and identified 100 wrecks in the pipeline corridor
> Will share the findings with scientists and others working on preserving and improving the Baltic Sea
30
Environmental criteria
> Minimise pipeline length
> Avoid environmentally sensitive areas and Natura 2000 sites
Socio-economic criteria
> Minimise restrictions on marine users such as fishing and shipping
> Avoid munitions, cultural heritage sites and planned and existing infrastructure
Technical criteria> Control construction time
> Optimise free spans and curves
Safest route with least environmental impact based on stringent criteria >
31Proposed route Nord Stream final route
Various route alternatives presented Final route agreed with authorities
Munitions identified along the route >
> 3,000 objects of different nature detected
> 2,000 objects visually analysed
> Over 100 munitions successfully cleared:
– 49 in the Finnish EEZ
– 7 in the Swedish EEZ
– 49 in Russian waters
– 2 explosive items in German waters
> Five chemical munitions found, will be left on the seabed, pose no risk to the pipeline and the environment
> Analysis of 100 additional soil samples show no chemical contamination of the seabed
32
Safeguarding cultural heritage >
33
Identified cultural heritage sites >
34
> Pipeline passes close to several shipwreck sites and areas of submerged landscapes
> A historic rudder from the 17th or 18th century, foundnear the island of Bornholm, was salvaged
> Six wrecks or possible wrecks have been found within50 metres of the pipeline
> An additional 13 wrecks have been identified within theanchor corridor
> Twelve shipwrecks have been discovered in the anchorcorridor, most of them were commercial ships from the18th and 19th century
> It is possible that remains of settlements and seasonalhunting stations can be found near Gotland and Öland
> In the Bay of Greifswald, pipeline traverses thehistorical ship-wreck barrier of 20 sunken ships, oneof which has been salvaged
> Remnants of a smaller cargo vessel have beendocumented and relocated
> Another wreck from the late Middle Ages/earlymodern era carrying a cargo of 65 copper plateshas been identified
Identified cultural heritage sites >
35
> A total of 17 wrecks, some of which are made of wood and some of metal, have been identified in theanchor corridor
>Two admiralty anchors from the 18th to 19th centurieshave been salvaged
Continuous Environmental Monitoring Programme >
36
> Comprehensive environmental monitoring during construction and operations phase
> Monitoring will continue for one year after the completion of the pipelines
> Thereafter, the monitoring focus will be changed from the construction to the operation of the pipelines
> Regular reporting of results to authorities of all countries involved and other stakeholders
Objectives of Environmental Monitoring >
37
> To verify that the pipeline is installed and operated in accordance with permit conditions
> To verify that the pipeline construction does not cause impacts that were not anticipated or impacts that are greater than anticipated
> To verify the findings of the national EIAs
> To monitor the recovery of the environment after construction
> To control and monitor that significant environmental disturbances will not be caused
> To provide the basis for corrective action if necessary
Monitoring of 16 scientific criteria >
38
RU FI SE DK DE
Physical and chemical environment
Water quality + + + + +Seabed sediment + + + + +Hydrography and seabed topography
+ + + + +
Onshore soil +Landscape and topography + +Air quality +Noise + + +Biological environment
Fish + + + +Birds + +Marine mammals + +Benthic flora and fauna + + + + +Terrestial flora and fauna + +Socioeconomic environment
Fisheries + +Cultural heritage + + + + +Monitoring and clearance of munitions
Conventional munitions + + + +Chemical munitions +
> Nord Stream has prepared five tailored national environmental monitoring programmes
> Monitoring and analysis of potential impact of 16 scientific criteria
> About 1,000 fixed sampling stations
> Involving 22 renowned companies with an overall investment of 40 million euros