Upload
alan-gilbert
View
45
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Security Environment During Coalition Operations. Preview. Future Security Challenges. Security Concerns for Armed Forces. Regional Military Security Cooperation. Coalition Strategy to Counter Asymmetric Threats. Integration in Coalition Operations. Future Security Challenges. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Security Environment During Coalition Operations
PreviewFuture Security Challenges
Security Concerns for Armed Forces
Regional Military Security Cooperation
Coalition Strategy to Counter Asymmetric Threats
Integration in Coalition Operations
Future Security Challenges
Future Security Challenges
Globalisation
Technology Proliferation
Rising Importance of Non State Actors
Environmental Considerations
Population Growth
Globalisation
Broader interstate engagements
Permeability of national borders
Emergence of cultural homogeneity
Undermining sense of community
Security threats know no boundaries
Future Security Challenges
Non-state actors will shape global security
NGOs capable of influencing policy issues
Compete with governments in foreign policyformulation
Rising Importance of Non State Actors
Security planners will face the world in whichthe technological and military capabilities are not unique or limited
Technology Proliferation
Capabilities such as surveillance systems, nuclear powered submarines and long rangecruise missiles will proliferate
Future Security Challenges
Future Security ChallengesEnvironmental Considerations
Water, energy and land have traditionallybeen sources of conflict
Increased demand on supply of fresh water
Compliance with legislation and emission standards affects operational planning
Uneven distribution of worlds’ population
Population Growth
World population growth can influence intrastate conflict as well as produce large scale migration
Future Security Challenges
Security Concerns for Armed Forces
Terrorism and Proxy Wars Emerge as Strategic Challenges
Paradigm Shift in Nature of Conflicts
UnorthodoxApproach
Asymmetric Threats
Irregular Forces Negate Conventional Combat Power
Offsetting Conventional Capabilities
Jungle/ Urban Warfare New Focus
Increasing Emphasison Asymmetric Strategies
Security Concerns for Armed Forces
Information systems vulnerable to exploitation by adversary
Opponents’ methods have little relevance to Geneva Conventions or Just Wars
Intensification of media scrutiny
and influencing public opinion
Security Concerns for Armed Forces
Regional Military Security
Cooperation
Regional Military Security Cooperation
Most armies involved in fighting terrorism
Terrorist threat increasing everyday
Basic institutional assumptions, organised structures and policies need examination
Reorganisation of armies to operate in full spectrum of warfare required
Armies to be able to participate in coalition environment to counter terrorism, insurgency and proxy war
National governments will always approve such operations
Command and control structures contingent upon national sensitivities and policies
Terrorism to be defined under aegis of United Nations
No state or non state sponsor be allowed to justify terrorism
Imperatives for Regional Cooperation
Regional Military Security Cooperation
Military organisations and capabilities are based on perceived security threats
Asymmetric threats are the main focus of security policy and co-operation in the region
Most armies in the region have limited resources
Need to recognize threat and balanced organisation
Look for a security system that lowers risk of uncertainty
Balancing Capability Development
Regional Military Security Cooperation
The spectrum of the challenge is complex and multi-dimensional
The worst case scenario to be factored in
Militaries are conservative institutions with long lead times to change
Technological advances must be shaped to strengthen military cooperation
Challenge is how to co-operate and arrive at the appropriate degree of consensus in identifying response
Security Cooperation : Multidimensional
Regional Military Security Cooperation
Coalition Strategy to Counter Asymmetric Threats
Coalition Strategy to Counter Asymmetric Threats
Necessity to institutionalise direct and indirect measures to tackle terrorism
Action plan in the region to isolate the terrorists
First step is to identify the terrorists’ centres of gravity
Populace constitutes a centre of gravity for terrorists
Operations are required to aim at `control’ as against `destruction’
Difference from Conventional Operations
Temperament required to control the populace
No quick solutions for such warfare as armies involved willhave to be trained, physically and psychologically, for long hauls
Home Truths
People friendlyoperations as per laws of the land
Avoid inconvenience to population
Win hearts and minds of the population
Proactive actions invite reactionand collateral damage
Uphold human rightsImpeccable code of conduct
Coalition Strategy to Counter Asymmetric Threats
Integration in Coalition Operations
Integration in Coalition Operations
Problems of Coalition Participation
National and military command issues create difficulties
Coalition missions generally exceed span of control
Consensus creation amongst the participating nations takes time
Decision making is slow due to complexities of a coalition
Standards of force capability and levels of military training vary
Differences in language, tradition, and culture impact operations
Criteria for SuccessCriteria for Success
Force StructureTrained
PersonnelIntelligence
Capacity
Communications systems
Planningand
coordination
Assured consensusbefore commiting
military forces
Integration in Coalition Operations
Coalition Command Relationship
Ad hoc coalitions
are based on
temporary agreements
and less formal than
standing alliances
Psychological and sociological problems are generated by differences among coalition partners in culture, customs, religion and standards of living
Lack of confidence
in coalition leadership
as forces assigned
to the coalition operate
under a variety of
national employment
restrictions
Integration in Coalition Operations
Operational commanders must understand political objectives
Requirement to develop sound and effective coalition command relationships
Operational planning to be carried out by a combined staff which includes equitable representation from each coalition nation
Cooperation and coordination are keys to unity of effort
Coalition Command Relationship
Integration in Coalition Operations
Key aspects
Human Interaction
Civil military operations
Rules Of Engagement
Use of force
Training standards
Doctrine
Interoperability
Integration in Coalition Operations
War termination or end state to be decided
Combined exercises, language training forliaison officers are productive
Multi-lateral coordination and cooperationin training, seminars and exercises to enhance interoperability
Method of minimizing problems is to allocatediscrete geographical or functional areas of responsibility to national forces
Interoperability
Integration in Coalition Operations
The supreme excellence is to subdue
the armies of your enemies
without even having to fight them
Sun Tzu
Conclusion