13
SECURITY OF ASSIGNMENTS RIGHT TO SUE UNDER THE ASSIGNMENTS NAME REG NUM. MONISYA SRI NARAJU 01DKB12F2019 KANAGAMBIGAI MUNIASAMY NAIDU 01DKB12F2016 SANTHIRIGA RAMAN 01DKB12F2017 JAGATHISWARY MANUKARAN 01DKB12F2073 ELLIL VINOOTTENI GUNALAN 01DKB12F2020 SIVANANDA GANASAN 01DKB12F2014

Security of Assignments

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

banking law

Citation preview

Security of Assignments

Security of AssignmentsRIGHT TO SUE UNDER THE ASSIGNMENTSNAMEREG NUM.MONISYA SRI NARAJU01DKB12F2019KANAGAMBIGAI MUNIASAMY NAIDU01DKB12F2016SANTHIRIGA RAMAN01DKB12F2017JAGATHISWARY MANUKARAN01DKB12F2073ELLIL VINOOTTENI GUNALAN01DKB12F2020SIVANANDA GANASAN01DKB12F2014ASSIGNOR

ASSIGNEEPARTY THAT RECEIVES THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT, BUT WASNT AN ORIGINAL TO THE CONTRACT

CAN BE AN INDIVIDUAL, A GROUP OR A BUSINESS

RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF ASSIGNOR PASS TO THE ASSIGNEE.

STEPS INTO THE SHOES OF ASSIGNOR.

ASSIGNEE CAN GENERALLY SUE OTHER PARTY TO THE CONTRACT IF THAT PARTY DOESNT FULFILL THE CONTRACT.

OBLIGORObligor has same defences against assignee as those against assignorObligor is a party that is obligated to do something under the terms of a contract you might be familiar with the term obligor, because its often used to describe a borrower or debtor.

RIGHT TO SUE BY ASSIGNEE UNDER ASSIGNMENTASSIGNOR DEFAULTS IN HIS LOAN REPAYMENTFAIL TO MAKE PAYMENTASSIGNOR CAN DISPOSE THE PROPERTYTHE FRAUDULENT FROM THE ASSIGNORPROVIDING FALSE INFORMATIONINTENDED TO MAKE THE PROPERTY ASSIGN TO HIM

NO IMPAIRMENT & INVALID DOCUMENTINTERFERE WITH THE ASSIGNEES ENFORCEMENTS OF THE OBLIGATION

THE DOCUMENTS DELIVERED ARE NO GENUINE

CLAIM IS INVALID AND ENCUMBEREDASSIGNED CLAIM IS INVALID

IN TERMS OF DEFENSE

TORKINGTON V MAGEE (1902)Date:01-Jan-1902Judges:Lord Alverstone CJ, Darling and Channell JStatutes:Judicature Act 1873 25(6)References:[1902] 2 KB 427,

ASSIGNOR: RAYNERDEFENDENT: MAGEEPLAINTIFF(ASSIGNEE): TORKINGTON

CONTRACT FOR A SALE OF PROPERTY

CASE SUMMARY:

DEFENDANT HAD CONTRACT WITH MR.RAYNER TO SELL TO HIM THE DEFENDANTS REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN A SUM CHARGED ON CERTAIN STOCK AND FUNDS.

RAYNER ASSIGNED TO PLAINTIFF BY A DEED HIS INTEREST IN THIS CONTRACT. WRITTEN NOTICE IS GIVEN TO MAGEE.

AT DATE OF ASSIGNMENT THERE IS NO BREACH OF CONTRACT BUT AFTER SOME SUBSEQUENT NEGOTIATIONS , THE PLAINTIFF CONSIDER MAGEE HAD BROKEN THE CONTRACT

BUT JUDICATURE ACT DID NOT ENTITLE THE PLAINTIFF TO SUE IN HIS OWN NAME

THE PLAINTIFF APPEALED

COURT DECISIONCHANELL J

Debts and other choses in action

personal rights of property which can only be claimed or enforced by action, and not by taking physical possession

assignee can sue the developer/debtor directly without the concurrence of the assignor which means the assignor cannot sue the developer/debtor directly without the concurrence of the assignee unless it is an assignment by way of charge.

Thank you