Upload
shruti-shah
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Seed maturity indicators in Myrica esculenta, Buch-Ham.Ex. D.Don.: a multipurpose tree species of subtropical-temperate Himalayan region
Shruti Shah • Ashish Tewari • Bhawna Tewari • R. P. Singh
Received: 16 June 2008 / Accepted: 29 October 2009 / Published online: 18 November 2009� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
Abstract Myrica esculenta, Buch-Ham. Ex. D.Don is a common under-canopy associate
of chir pine and banj oak forests in the Kumaun and Garhwal Himalayas. The species
commonly known as Kaiphal is a small moderate sized evergreen dioecious tree. The
species is well known for its edible fruit and other by products and has emerged as a
potential income generating species in the Kumaun and Garhwal region. The regeneration
of Myrica esculenta is poor in natural habitats mainly due to intense anthropogenic
pressure on it. To synchronize artificial regeneration of such species exact knowledge of
maturity time is essential to avoid the collection of immature and non-viable seeds. Fruits
of Myrica esculenta were collected from nine sites varying from lower, mid and high range
of species distribution (900–2,100 masl) for assessing seed maturation indicators. Across
all the sites the colour change from green to dark red/blackish red appears as one of the
indicator of maturity. In addition to the colour change seed maturity and maximum ger-
mination was found in seeds when the weight of 100 fruits was between 41 and 60 g, fruit
moisture content between 62 and 69% and seed moisture content between 30 and 32%.
Keywords Seed maturation � Seed moisture content � Mean germination �Germination capacity
Introduction
The Himalayan ranges (27.38� N latitude and 72.98� E longitude) support a variety of
forests, which vary in species composition from east to west and from low to high ele-
vations. These forests have traditionally played a key role in safeguarding the environment
and have provided long term ecological security to the subcontinent. The central Himalaya
is divisible into three major regimes, the sal (Shorea robusta) towards the lower elevation
(300–1,000 m) with warmer climate, and the oaks (Quercus species) towards the high
elevation (1,800–2,600 m) with the chir pine zone (Pinus roxburghii) in between. Chir
S. Shah (&) � A. Tewari � B. Tewari � R. P. SinghDepartment of Forestry, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand 263002, Indiae-mail: [email protected]
123
New Forests (2010) 40:9–18DOI 10.1007/s11056-009-9179-y
pine, however, climbs up-to 2,100 m and mixes with the banj oak (Quercus leucotricho-phora) forests and the banj oak commonly descends down to 1,600 m to mix with chir pine
because of aspect related climatic variations.
In the Kumaun and Garhwal Himalaya Myrica esculenta, Buch-Ham. Ex. D.Don is a
common under-canopy associate of chir pine and banj oak forests (Bhatt et al. 2000a, b).
The species usually prefers moist sites and often forms distinctive clusters of its own
within the communities. The species commonly known as Kaiphal is a small moderate
sized evergreen dioecious tree. The species is widely distributed in sub-tropical-temperate
region of the Himalaya from Ravi eastwards towards Assam and in Khasi, Jaintia, Naga
and Lushai hills between altitudes of 900 and 2,100 masl (Anonymous 1962; Hooker
1876). The species is well known for its edible fruit and other by products and has emerged
as a potential income generating species in the Kumaun and Garhwal regions. (Dhyani and
Dhar 1994; Bhatt et al. 2000a, b). The popularity of the species can be judged from the fact
that the local people of the Kumaun region can earn over Rs. 14.00 lakh/season from
selling the fruits of the species (Bhatt and Dhar 2004). The species is also known for its
unique medicinal and industrial uses (Gupta et al. 1989). The ecological importance of
genus Myrica is of being non-leguminous angiosperm, nodulated by Frankia species. This
species is even used as fodder in some parts of Uttaranchal and Himanchal Pradesh in
times of scarcity (Singh 1982).
The regeneration of most of the wild edible species is poor in their natural habitats
mainly due to intense biotic pressure on them (Sundriyal and Sundriyal 2001). In wild
edible plants availability of mature seeds is a problem as all accessible locations are
searched by the village dwellers for collection and selling them in the local markets. To
synchronize artificial regeneration of such species an exact knowledge of maturity time is
essential to avoid the collection of immature and non-viable seeds (Willan 1985) which can
cause nursery and plantation failure. Collection of forest fruits and seeds are greatly helped
by reliable guidelines of maturity that allow the earliest possible collection (Bonner 1988).
The general conclusion is that the more mature a seed the greater is its vigor and potential
to establish as a seedling. In many species seed maturation has been related to physical
attributes (Negi and Todaria 1995 and Pandit et al. 2002), but there is very scanty infor-
mation on the seed maturation of M. esculenta. In the present study M. esculenta fruits
were collected from nine different sites for 2 years to develop seed maturation indices for
better regeneration and multiplication of the species in the nursery for future plantations.
Materials and methods
Description of study site
The study sites, situated in the Kumaun Central Himalaya lie between 29�80–29�380 N
latitude and 79�210–79�450 E longitude. A total of 9 sites were selected; of these 3 sites
were located in the low range of the species (1,500–1,600 m), 3 in the mid range (1,700–
1,800 m) and 3 in the high range (2,000–2,100 m; Table 1). All 9 sites were on the south
and south eastern aspect.
The climate of the study area is subtropical monsoon type with higher temperature
towards the lower elevation and lower temperatures towards the high elevation. Rainfall is
governed by southwest monsoon and the average annual rainfall ranges from 2,000 to
2,200 mm.
10 New Forests (2010) 40:9–18
123
Tree characteristics
The trees selected had a clear bole, good crown, sufficient number of fruits and were
disease free. Five average sized, healthy trees were selected and marked at a distance of
about 100 m from each other at each site. The height and diameter at breast height were
measured for each marked tree in all the sites. The mean tree height ranged between
17.8 ± 0.90 and 19.7 ± 2.08 m. The mean tree diameter at breast height ranged between
79.6 ± 5.26 cm and 94.2 ± 6.47 cm (Table 2).
Seed collection and maturity parameters
Seeds collection of M. esculenta started from the last week of April up to the availability of
fruits towards the end of May from all the sites in two respective years, 2003 and 2004. For
maturity indices fruit collection was made at an interval of 1 week till the fruits were
available. The fruits were directly collected from the tree and de-pulped in the laboratory.
The fruit parameters taken were fruit colour, fruit surface area (mm2; length 9 width)
and weight of 100 fruits taking three replicates of 25 fruits (g). All these parameters were
taken for seeds also. Weight parameters were recorded with digital electronic balance and
the size was recorded with a hand held electronic digital vernier caliper (measuring range
between 1 and 150 mm).
The moisture content of fruits and seeds was expressed on fresh weight basis and
calculated for each collection date using three replicates of 25 fruits and seeds each, dried
at 103 ± 2�C for 16 ± 1 h (International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) 1993) and then
reweighed.
Table 1 Site characteristics of Myrica esculenta
S. no. Sites Altitude Aspect Forest type
Low altitude sites (1,500–1,600 m)
1 Patwadanger I (S1) 1,520 Southern Pine forest
2 Patwadanger II (S2) 1,580 South eastern Pine forest
3 Patwadanger III (S3) 1,520 Southern Pine forest
Mid altitude sites (1,700–1,800 m)
4 Bhowali I (S4) 1,740 South eastern Oak forest
5 Bhowali II (S5) 1,760 South eastern Oak forest
6 Bhowali III (S6) 1,720 Southern Oak forest
High altitude sites (2,000–2,200 m)
7 Maheshkhan I (S7) 2,150 Southern Oak-pine forest
8 Maheshkhan II (S8) 2,100 South eastern Oak-pine forest
9 Maheshkhan III (S9) 2,120 Southern Oak-pine forest
Table 2 Tree characteristics for different sites (±SE)
Sites Mean tree height (m) Mean tree diameter (cm)
Low altitudinal sites 18.6 ± 0.70 90.6 ± 4.72
Mid altitudinal sites 19.7 ± 2.08 94.2 ± 6.47
High altitudinal sites 17.8 ± 0.90 79.6 ± 5.26
New Forests (2010) 40:9–18 11
123
Moisture content was calculated as
MC% ¼ Fresh weight� dry weight
Fresh weight� 100
The seeds were surface sterilized with 0.1% HgCl2. For germination four replicates of
100 seeds each were used. Germination was carried out at 25 ± 1�C on top of the paper in
a seed germinator for each collection date. Germination was counted when the visible
radicle was about 1 mm. Water was added as required during the experiment.
Germination percent was calculated as the total number of germinated seeds out of 100
tested seeds within the test period. At the end of the germination test un-germinated seeds
were classified as firm seed and rotten seeds by floating test. The result was expressed as
germination capacity (GC), calculated following Paul (1972):
GC% ¼ Total germinated seedsþ total un-germinated sound seed
Total seeds tested� 100
The data was statistically analyzed for multiple analysis of variance (ANOVA; Snedecor
and Cochran 1967) to show the significant difference between sites, years and dates.
Results
Fruit colour
The colour of the fruits was green at first collection during the last week of April, which
gradually changed to dark red/blackish red at final collection, in the last week of May in
both the years (Table 3).
Fruit characteristics
The fruit surface area in Yr2 was marginally larger than Yr1 both at the time of initial
collection and final collection across all the three altitudinal sites. Across all the sites the
mean difference in size between initial collection and final collection was 26.6 mm2 in Yr1
and 19.75 mm2 in Yr2. During both initial and final collection fruit surface area was
smaller at low altitudinal sites and larger at high altitudinal sites.
Like fruit surface area, weight of 100 fruits was also higher in Yr2 both at initial and
final collection. Across all the sites the mean difference in weight of 100 fruit between
initial collection and final collection was 29.18 g in Yr1 and 27.75 g in Yr2 (Table 3).
The moisture content of fruit was higher across all collection dates in Yr1 in comparison
to Yr2. Across all sites and with each collection date the moisture content gradually
declined. The decline in moisture was 7.99% in Yr1 and 6.48% in Yr2 between first and
final collection (Fig. 1).
ANOVA showed that fruit surface area, weight of 100 fruits and the moisture content of
fruit varied significantly across sites, years and dates of collection (P \ 0.01). The inter-
action between year 9 date was significant for weight of 100 fruits (P \ 0.01). The
interaction between site 9 year 9 date was significant for weight of 100 fruits (P \ 0.01),
moisture content of fruit (P \ 0.05; Table 4).
12 New Forests (2010) 40:9–18
123
Table 3 Variations in physical parameters of fruit and seeds of M. esculenta over the collection periodfrom April end to May end in Yr-1 and Yr-2
Collection Fruit characteristics Seed characteristics
Fruit Colour Fruit surfacearea (mm2)
Weight of 100fruits (g)
Seed surfacearea (mm2)
Weight of 100seeds (g)
Low altitude sites (Yr 1)
27 April Green 60.94 ± 6.54 29.32 ± 1.62 39.55 ± 2.08 7.65 ± 0.40
4 May Reddish green 65.43 ± 3.47 35.69 ± 1.09 45.02 ± 2.10 9.67 ± 0.70
11 May Red 76.34 ± 5.28 40.51 ± 2.20 48.22 ± 2.60 10.73 ± 0.35
18 May Dark red 79.55 ± 2.38 48.63 ± 1.86 50.95 ± 2.05 12.05 ± 0.40
25 May Dark red 87.61 ± 5.24 58.36 ± 2.17 55.44 ± 3.13 16.54 ± 0.44
Mid altitude sites (Yr 1)
28 April Green 63.3 ± 4.11 29.58 ± 1.41 39.64 ± 3.28 7.36 ± 0.16
5 May Green 72.88 ± 2.04 33.76 ± 1.43 50.12 ± 2.95 10.12 ± 0.41
12 May Reddish green 77.06 ± 4.27 39.93 ± 1.53 51.27 ± 2.91 11.54 ± 0.38
19 May Red 79.65 ± 6.38 50.69 ± 2.73 52.6 ± 2.12 12.2 ± 0.52
26 May Dark red 88.06 ± 4.54 56.88 ± 3.52 56.49 ± 3.61 14.01 ± 0.24
High altitude sites (Yr 1)
28 April Green 64.4 ± 3.88 28.02 ± 1.39 37.7 ± 6.15 8.12 ± 0.18
5 May Green 70.57 ± 5.25 31.73 ± 1.07 43.05 ± 2.33 10.25 ± 0.17
12 May Reddish green 76.86 ± 2.17 38.75 ± 0.84 50.46 ± 1.95 10.91 ± 0.29
19 May Red 80.39 ± 6.51 51.46 ± 1.70 53.63 ± 2.49 11.59 ± 0.32
26 May Dark red 89.92 ± 4.45 59.24 ± 1.55 57.43 ± 2.96 12.99 ± 2.33
Low altitude sites (Yr 2)
27 April Green 80.51 ± 2.91 35.59 ± 1.20 53.41 ± 3.17 10.75 ± 0.20
4 May Reddish green 88.28 ± 2.02 43.80 ± 1.75 52.9 ± 2 14.11 ± 0.33
11 May Red 89.71 ± 4.39 52.03 ± 2.35 56.91 ± 1.25 14.44 ± 0.19
18 May Dark red 91.68 ± 2.63 58.03 ± 3.27 57.98 ± 0.93 15.24 ± 0.50
25 May Dark red 94.47 ± 4.89 62.82 ± 2.56 61.20 ± 2.62 16.98 ± 0.41
Mid altitude sites (Yr 2)
28 April Green 75.16 ± 3.34 34.40 ± 1.36 49.50 ± 1.56 12.34 ± 0.10
5 May Green 83.83 ± 3.20 42.71 ± 1.36 52.20 ± 2.23 12.83 ± 0.11
12 May Reddish green 85.89 ± 0.82 45.25 ± 1.54 54.35 ± 1.65 13.44 ± 0.27
19 May Red 88.56 ± 3.46 53.53 ± 2.67 58.02 ± 4.20 13.93 ± 0.30
26 May Dark red 93.37 ± 5.55 60.93 ± 3.29 61.79 ± 2.34 17.00 ± 0.76
High altitude sites (Yr 2)
28 April Green 74.21 ± 2.77 35.28 ± 1.12 47.88 ± 1.04 11.52 ± 0.31
5 May Green 81.16 ± 2.89 42.53 ± 1.56 51.2 ± 1.58 12.51 ± 0.69
12 May Reddish green 87.91 ± 2.29 51.39 ± 1.64 55.05 ± 1.44 13.21 ± 0.52
19 May Red 89.06 ± 5.94 59.89 ± 1.21 59.97 ± 3.06 14.79 ± 0.38
26 May Dark red 101.31 ± 5 64.77 ± 0.77 60.71 ± 2.67 16.4 ± 0.37
Source of variation Fruit surfacearea (mm2)
Weight of 100fruits (g)
Seed surfacearea (mm2)
Weight of 100seeds (g)
Site F test ** ** ** **
CD at 5% 3.99 1.82 2.60 0.83
** Significant at 1% (P \ 0.01)
New Forests (2010) 40:9–18 13
123
Seed characteristics
Seed surface area was also marginally larger in Yr2 than Yr1 across all the sites. During
the first collection the mean difference in seed surface area in Yr1 and Yr2 was 11.3 mm2.
Across all the sites the mean difference in seed surface area between initial collection and
final collection was 17.49 mm2 in Yr1 and 10.97 mm2 in Yr2. The difference in weight of
100 seeds, across all the sites between initial and final collection was 6.80 g in Yr1 and
5.25 g in Yr2 (Table 3). In both years the decline in moisture content between initial and
final collection was significant (P \ 0.01). The decline in moisture content was 12.29% in
Yr1 and 14.85% in Yr2 between initial and final collection (Fig. 2).
ANOVA showed that seed surface area, weight of 100 seeds and the moisture content of
seed varied significantly across sites, years and dates of collection (P \ 0.01). The inter-
action between year 9 date was significant for seed surface area (P \ 0.05) and weight of
100 seeds (P \ 0.01). The interaction between site 9 year 9 date was significant for
weight of 100 seeds (P \ 0.01; Table 4).
Germination
In Yr1 seeds collected initially in the last week of April from low altitudinal sites and first
and second collection seeds of mid and high altitudinal sites failed to germinate. Germi-
nation increased thereafter with each collection and was maximum during the third col-
lection in low altitudinal sites (60 ± 4.86%) and in the mid and high altitude sites mean
germination was maximum during the fifth collection and was 54.44 ± 3.33 and
62.22 ± 3.33%, respectively (Fig. 3).
In Yr2 at low altitudinal sites germination started from first collection in the last week of
April whereas in the mid and high altitudinal sites it started from the second collection. The
germination increased with each collection and was maximum during the second collection
in low altitudinal sites (63.33 ± 7.08%). In the mid and high altitudinal sites mean ger-
mination was maximum during the fourth collection and was 64.42 ± 4.04% and
59.9 ± 9.55, respectively (Fig. 3).
ANOVA showed that the germination varied significantly across sites, years and dates
of collection (P \ 0.01). The interaction between year 9 date was significant for germi-
nation (P \ 0.01). The interaction between site 9 year 9 date was also significant for
germination (P \ 0.01; Table 4).
50
60
70
80
Low Altitude sites Mid altitude sites High altitude sites
Dates of collection
Yr1
Yr2
Fig. 1 Relation between dates of collections and moisture content of fruits in 2 years at low, mid and highaltitude sites
14 New Forests (2010) 40:9–18
123
Table 4 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for different fruit and seed parameters across different collectiondates, sites and years
Character Source of variation DF Mean square F-value
Fruit surface area Site 8 541.33 8.88**
Year 1 8,781.53 144.19**
Date 4 3,920.63 64.38**
Site 9 year 8 103.42 1.69 NS
Site 9 date 32 93.00 1.52*
Year 9 date 4 105.81 1.73 NS
Site 9 year 9 date 32 43.08 0.71 NS
Weight of 100 fruits Site 8 635.99 50.16**
Year 1 3,688.83 290.93**
Date 4 7,065.86 557.28**
Site 9 year 8 61.80 4.87**
Site 9 date 32 41.53 3.27**
Year 9 date 4 62.43 4.92**
Site 9 year 9 date 32 47.63 3.75**
Moisture content (Fruits) Site 8 41.06 6.97**
Year 1 1,681.70 285.83**
Date 4 417.14 70.90**
Site 9 year 8 24.66 4.19**
Site 9 date 32 13.48 2.29**
Year 9 date 4 4.78 0.81 NS
Site 9 year 9 date 32 11.20 1.90*
Seed surface area Site 8 297.09 11.50**
Year 1 2,720.82 105.38**
Date 4 1,565.96 60.65**
Site 9 year 8 91.11 3.52**
Site 9 date 32 48.82 1.89*
Year 9 date 4 100.24 3.88*
Site 9 year 9 date 32 29.23 1.13 NS
Weight of 100 seeds Site 8 38.77 67.83**
Year 1 575.09 1,005.99**
Date 4 266.18 465.62**
Site 9 year 8 6.79 11.87**
Site 9 date 32 2.35 4.12**
Year 9 date 4 4.74 8.30**
Site 9 year 9 date 32 4.78 8.37**
Moisture content (seeds) Site 8 257.57 28.49**
Year 1 1,639.34 81.37**
Date 4 1,437.83 159.08**
Site 9 year 8 43.68 4.83**
Site 9 date 32 13.22 1.46 NS
Year 9 date 4 20.46 2.26 NS
Site 9 year 9 date 32 12.62 1.39 NS
New Forests (2010) 40:9–18 15
123
Table 4 continued
Character Source of variation DF Mean square F-value
Germination Site 8 481.03 4.99**
Year 1 3,134.81 32.51**
Date 4 17,054.11 176.91**
Site 9 year 8 306.84 3.18**
Site 9 date 32 960.31 9.96**
Year 9 date 4 5,067.81 52.57**
Site 9 year 9 date 32 587.09 6.09**
NS non significant
** Significant at 1% (P \ 0.01)
* Significant at 5% (P \ 0.05)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Low Altitude sites Mid altitude sites High altitudesites
Dates of collection
Yr1Yr2
Fig. 2 Relation between dates of collections and moisture content of seeds in 2 years at low, mid and highaltitude sites
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Low Altitude sites Mid altitude sites High altitude sites
Dates of collection
Yr1Yr2
Fig. 3 Relation between dates of collection and germination in two different years at low, mid and highaltitude sites
16 New Forests (2010) 40:9–18
123
Across all the sites germination percent increased with the decline of moisture content
of fruit and seed. The maximum germination was observed when the moisture content of
fruit was between 62.01 ± 2.34% (high altitudinal sites) and 69.61 ± 0.56% (low altitu-
dinal sites) and range of moisture content of seed was 30.38 ± 0.70% (low altitudinal
sites) to 32.22 ± 0.66% (low altitudinal sites) across both the years.
Discussion
Seed collectors have long been aware that most mature and immature fruits and seeds can
be distinguished in a number of ways e.g. by colour difference, increased firmness or
brittleness, decreased moisture content and specific gravity or by change in physical
dimensions (Edwards 1980). Willan (1985) has considered colour change in fruit and cone
to be reliable criteria for judging seed maturity. In M. esculenta colour change from green
to dark red was good maturity indicator. Colour change has also been recommended as a
ripeness indicator in the Himalayan wild cherry (Prunus cerasoides D.Don, Rox.; Tewari
2005) and in Bauhinia retusa Ham. (Upadhayay et al. 2006). In Ailanthus excelsa Roxb.
the physiological maturity was indicated by a direct colour change of the fruit from
yellowish brown to brown (Ramakrishnan et al.1990). Negi and Todaria (1995) also find
colour to be the best indicator of maturity for five species of the Garhwal Himalayas.
Moisture content has also been used as a reliable maturity indicator by numerous
researchers. Decline in moisture content percent from maturing seeds is closely related to
seed maturity (Adams and Rinni 1981). In M. esculenta decline in moisture content was a
good indicator of maturity. The seeds matured when the moisture content of seeds was
between 30.46 and 31.72%. According to Maideen et al. (1990) in Casuarina equisetifoliaseed maturity is attained when the cone moisture content is below 50%. This is also
observed in different pine species. In pine maturity is generally reached when moisture
content of cone is below 50% (Edwards 1980). In Pyracantha crenulata the moisture
content of fruit between 30 and 36% and the seed moisture content between 68 and 71%
have been adjudged indicators of seed maturation (Shah et al. 2006). Pandit et al. (2002)
also observed that in Populus ciliata, a broad leafed species the drop in moisture content of
capsule from 80 to 60% during maturation coincide with the maximum germination in seed.
In low altitudinal sites seeds matured in the first and second week of May, whereas in mid
and high altitude sites they matured in the third and fourth weeks of May. Maturity for
M. esculenta was earlier at low altitudinal sites in comparison to mid and high altitude sites.
Earlier maturation in lower sites was possibly due to higher temperature than the high sites.
Pandit (2002) also observed similar results in Pinus roxburghii and Cupressus torulosa.
Edwards (1980) reported a significant correlation between maturity and physical
parameters but there are also many unsuccessful attempts. From this study it becomes
evident that colour change from green to dark red, fruit moisture content ranging between
62 and 69% and seed moisture content varying from 30 to 32% are best indicators of
maturity in M. esculenta.
References
Adams CA, Rinnie RW (1981) Seed maturation in Soyabean (Glycine max (L.)Merr.) is independent of seedmass and of the parent plant. Yet is necessary for production of viable seed. J Exp Bot 32:615–620
Anonymous (1962) A dictionary of Indian raw material and industrial products, vol VI L-M. CSIR Pub-lication, New Delhi, pp 471–472
New Forests (2010) 40:9–18 17
123
Bhatt ID, Dhar U (2004) Factors controlling micropropagation of Myrica esculenta buch.-Ham. Ex D.Don: ahigh value wild edible of Kumaun Himalaya. Afr J Biotechnol 3(10):534–540
Bhatt ID, Rawal RS, Dhar U (2000a) The availability, fruit yield and harvest of Myrica esculenta Buch-Hamex D.Don in Kumaun (West Himalaya). Indian Mt Res Dev 20(2):146–153
Bhatt ID, Rawal RS, Dhar U (2000b) Improvement in seed germination of Myrica esculenta Buch-Ham exD.Don—a high value tree species of Kumaun Himalaya. India Seed Sci Technol 28:597–605
Bonner FT (1988) Using leachate conductivity of bulked samples to estimate seed quality. In: Proceedingsof the 1988 southern forest nursery association, 1988, July 25, 218-Charleston, SC. Southern ForestNursery Association, Columbia Sc, pp 164–172
Dhyani PP, Dhar U (1994) Myrica esculenta box myrtle (Kaiphal). Himavikas Occasional Publ.3.GBPIHED, Almora
Edwards DGW (1980) Maturity and quality of tree seeds- a state of the art review. Seed Sci Technol 8:625–657Gupta PN, Chandra R, Govind S (1989) Bio-chemical studies on some Myrica genotype. Prog Hort 21(1–2):
168–170Hooker JD (1876) Flora of British India, vol V. Bishan Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, DehradunInternational Seed Testing Association (ISTA) (1993) International rules for seed testing (Supplement).
Zurich, SwitzerlandMaideen SK, Selvaraj JA, Vinayarai RS (1990) Cone attributes as indices of seed maturity and effect of
cone and seed grades on seed germination and vigour in Casuarina equisetifolia. J.R. & G. For SeedSci Technol 18:483–489
Negi AK, Todaria NP (1995) Effect of seed maturity and development on germination of five species fromGarhwal Himalaya, India. J Trop For Sci 8(2):255–258
Pandit A (2002) Development of technology for assessment of seed viability during storage of Pinusroxburghii and Cupressus torulosa in Kumaun Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital
Pandit A, Pant K, Ram J (2002) Effect of collection date on capsule moisture content and germination ofPopulus ciliata wall. Ex. Royle from central Himalaya. New For 23:121–130
Paul DK (1972) A hand book of nursery practice for Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis and other conifers inwest Malaysia Working paper no. 19, FO:SF/MAL 12, UNDP/FAO, Kualalumpur
Ramakrishnan HB, Jacqueline AS, Vinaya Rai RS (1990) Studies on ripeness index and pre-sowing seedtreatment in Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Seed Sci Tecnol 18:491–498
Shah S, Tewari B, Bisht S, Tewari A (2006) Seed maturation indicators in Pyracantha crenulata Rox. inKumaun Central Himalaya. New For 32:1–7
Singh RB (1982) Fodder trees of India. Oxford & IBH Publication, New Delhi, p 560Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, p 593Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC (2001) Seed germination and response of stem cuttings to hormonal treatment in
six priority wild edible fruit species of Sikkim Himalaya. Ind For 127(6):695–705Tewari B (2005) Regeneration and nursery techniques of Prunus cerasoides. Ph.D. thesis, Department of
Forestry, Kumaun University, NainitalUpadhayay L, Singh RP, Tewari A, Bisht S, Shah S (2006) Seed maturation indicators in Bauhinia retusa
Ham. in Kumaun Central Himalayas. Indian J For 29(4):367–371Willan RL (1985) A guide to forest seed handling with special reference to the tropics. FAO forestry paper
20/2 FAO, Rome
18 New Forests (2010) 40:9–18
123