Upload
mercedes-quinlan
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SEIS development and regular environment assessment since the Astana conference
Dr David StannersHead of International CooperationEuropean Environment Agency
European Environment Agency
Global assessments
Regional (EEA) assessments
Shared Environmental Information System
From national to regional to globalNational assessments
National data,
information,
analyses and
assessments
SEIS addresses the whole Policy Cycle
MDIAKKnowledge
Base
(1) Issue identification
(2) Issue framing
(3) Policy measure
identification(4) Policy measure
development / adoption
(6) Policy measure
effectiveness
(5) Policy measure
implementation
European Environment Agency
SEIS principles
Information should be:
● managed as close as possible to its source
● collected once, and shared with others for many purposes
● readily available and easy accessible
● accessible to enable users to make comparisons at the appropriate geographical scale
● fully available to the general public at national level in the relevant national language(s)
● supported through common, free open software standards.
European Environment Agency
• Data• Indicators• Assessments• …
• SDI -Spatial Development Infrastructure
• Standards• Web services• …
• Networks• Governance• Agreements• …
SEIS components
European Environment Agency
Extending SEIS and the regular assessment process to the pan-European
region
EEA in cooperation with stakeholders:
Developing the basis on which to implement the process: Outline of the process (Oct 2012)
Taking stock of progress:Review of progress (Oct 2013)
European Environment Agency
Where do we see progress? (1)
In countries:•Increased use of core indicators/data flows in national SOERs (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan…)•A more sustainable national SOER reporting process (Kyrgyzstan, Georgia…)•Modern tools for information sharing (Moldova…) •Increased cooperation between networks (env. & statistics..)•Reflected in recent EPRs -addressing SEIS and regular reporting (Albania, Croatia, Moldova, Morocco)
European Environment Agency
Where do we see progress? (2)
• In Policy and legal initiatives: clear reference to SEIS in 7EAP, Copernicus, Arctic policy…
• In SEIS-related projects: found across the region ENP/SEIS, FLERMONECA, AWARE, AoA+, Caspian Environment Information System…
• In organisations: promoting SEIS principles (UNECE, LRTAP, PRTR, RECs, UNEP,…)
• In global processes: SEIS-related initiatives in Rio+20 outcome, UNEP-Live…
However, progress is uneven and information is patchy
European Environment Agency
Why is progress uneven and information patchy?
No joint-responsibility to monitor overall progress in SEIS and regular reporting •Required actions: • Establish a partnership for regular information exchange
(Eionet-type);• Exchange data and information from MEAs & organisations
& strengthen interaction of existing networks• Share tool & methodologies• Agree on performance indicators for progress• Establish stable governance structure (with sustainable
funding) to track & assess progress and coordinate future pan-European reporting
European Environment Agency
Why is progress uneven and information
patchy?
No clear responsibility and ownership across the reporting chain• Required actions:
•Consolidate the national SOE reporting base; •Increase use/reuse of core indicators •Tailor/focus reporting demands on a clear/pre- defined need•Review, re-connect and integrate existing processes (pan-European forest, health, EfE; GEO…)
European Environment Agency
Learning from each other: SEIS ENPI - Cookbook
•A set of case studies collected from EEA Member and Cooperating countries and ENPI partner countries.
•A SEIS Checklist containing a set of questions to help assess the status of SEIS development and identify gaps and areas for further enhancement.
•Steps to be considered when planning SEIS implementation.
•Useful links.http://www.seiscookbook.net
European Environment Agency
How to bring this process forward
• Through some specific thematic discussions (e.g. PRTR)
• SEIS side-event in Aarhus MOP in June 2014• “Friends of SEIS” (inputs from the Convention?)• Monitoring & evaluation of progress (with clear
targets & performance indicators)• With Convention support (e.g. promoting the
development of regular national SOE reports as input to the 2016 pan-European environmental ministerial)